Slashdot Mirror


Which Adware and Spyware are the Most Insidious?

the_dreadnought asks: "I was just asked today which adware and spyware are the most insidious by an acquaintance. He asked me if this stuff was really legal, or was it just not important enough for law enforcement to deal with? I know the porn stuff (not from experience,,,ok, from experience) that dials out to foreign countries is one of the more extreme examples, and Gator is well known, but if Slashdot readers could describe what adware and spyware they think is the sneakiest I would appreciate it. Also, any thoughts on whether some of this stuff is even legal, as it is almost certainly not ethical."

840 comments

  1. New.Net by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I do tech support, and one of the worst things I've seen is a piece of software called New.Net. While not technically spyware (though that's arguable), it actually overwrites parts of the user's TCP/IP stack so that any time they access the internet (not just their browser), it gets pushed through the (usually fairly buggy) New.Net DLLs.

    And the fun part is, if you (or the user) uncheck the New.Net software in MSCONFIG, it doesn't just stop New.Net from working... They simply stop being able to use the internet. At all. So then we have to pray that their version of New.Net has a working uninstaller, or we have to go through a huge manual uninstall that involves removing multiple registry keys. BTW, if anyone here gets this or other spyware that is difficult to remove, try using a program called HijackThis and "Fix" anything that looks out of the ordinary (use common sense... don't delete everything).

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS Proxy Does this and it work really well actually.

    2. Re:New.Net by Jouster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They used to offer a 5- to 10-cent "bounty" for each copy of New.Net you installed; that's why it was bundled with a lot of other programs.

      The bounty program was discontinued, however.

      Jouster

    3. Re:New.Net by shawnywany · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree, that HijackThis program did wonders for my parents' messed up computer. Not only did the search page mysteriously get changed after every reboot, we had the misfortune of answering questions from my little sister about the porn popups the BHO caused when she accessed Neopets. However, one or two clicks with HijackThis and all was right again. Adaware and S&D don't catch everything, looks like I had to add ANOTHER program to my arsenal.

    4. Re:New.Net by caseih · · Score: 5, Informative

      The easiest way to delete New.Net is to do the following:
      1. remove it using "Add/remove" programs
      2. if still not working, remove the WinSock and WinSock2 registry keys from CurrentControlSet
      3. Go to network settings on win98 or on 2000/XP, just go into the properties of your network connection and if possible, remove tcp/ip. On XP this is impossible, so ignore this step
      4. Add new service. If you're not on XP, just reinstall tcp/ip. On XP, select "have disk" and point it at C:\windows\inf. Then select tcp/ip and install it
      5. clean up any newdotnet files lying around.
      6. Join a class-action lawsuit against the company that makes this piece of crapware.

      Be aware that these steps can cause problems with programs like cyber-sitter or firewalling programs that modify the networking stack. Do this at your own risk.

      This is very prolific. I've cleaned it on on laptop twice! I have a supsicion the user is downloading crap all the time, but I do wonder in what form it come in.

      Michael

    5. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or you can just reset Windows XP's TCP/IP stack

      from command prompt:

      netsh [enter]
      int ip [enter]
      reset [enter]

      then reboot

    6. Re:New.Net by fiddlesticks · · Score: 1

      That sounds great, I was so tired of those pesky 'current Web site addresses ending in .com, .net, and other existing top-level domains' and was looking for 'domain names with(out..) greater relevance and meaning'

      but it's OK - they do a *nix version

      go to the 'enable your browser' link

      The Ts and Cs sound great

      Your sole remedy for dissatisfaction with the new.net software is to stop using the new.net software. you specifically agree that new.net shall not be liable for losses or liabilities arising in connection with your download, installation or use of the new.net software, including, but not limited to, loss or liability resulting or arising from or in connection with: (a) software conflicts related to the new.net software; (b) data non-delivery, data mis-delivery or unauthorized access to transmissions of data; (c) your infringement of a third party's right; (d) defects or viruses in, or distributed with, the new.net software; or (e) your own use or misuse of your personal computer or the software applications contained on your personal computer

    7. Re:New.Net by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Funny
      BTW, if anyone here gets this or other spyware that is difficult to remove, try using a program called HijackThis
      Yeah, that one's pretty good, but my favorite program for dealing with invasive spyware is still fdisk!
    8. Re:New.Net by deesbek · · Score: 1

      I cannot believe PWC put their name to the new.net site...?

    9. Re:New.Net by uncoveror · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you tried Pest Patrol. It has never failed me when I want to remove spyware crap for my father, or other non-techies who ask me for help. Tweaking The winsock registry keys might work for you or me, but not for them, and they are always asking for help.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    10. Re:New.Net by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      The new.net website actually has a special uninstaller you can get from a deeplink.. they usually furnish the link to it if you complain to them enough about not being able to uninstall it.. you can sometimes find the link to the uninstaller on forums... there is also a program called lspfix or something like that that will fix the stuff new.net messes up.

    11. Re:New.Net by halo8 · · Score: 1

      at compaq where i did techsupport

      the warrenty when you bought the computer stated we only supported the included software for 90days

      well.. we didnt include newdotnet
      and callcenter managment said it was a virus
      we didnt support virus
      well.. we did support them.. for $35

      yup.. lot of cash flow back in the days

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    12. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you tried Pest Patrol. It has never failed me when I want to remove spyware crap for my father, or other non-techies who ask me for help. Tweaking The winsock registry keys might work for you or me, but not for them, and they are always asking for help.

      how much to they pay you to push the product? can i get a job too?

    13. Re:New.Net by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      This is very prolific. I've cleaned it on on laptop twice! I have a supsicion the user is downloading crap all the time, but I do wonder in what form it come in.

      I think I've seen it get installed by Kazaa. Which is why you should use Kazaa Lite. I'm sure there are a number of other cutsey entertainment joke and games sites that will also push this junque on the user.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    14. Re:New.Net by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll drink to that.

      Want to have more fun with new.net? put up a firewall on your network. New.net has problems getting through firewalls, so the internet stops working after five minutes on anything that has it installed.

      I think it pissed off half the college students off in the first day the net was up. I got 100 calls the first day saying their internet wasn't working, then when I asked if they had (Insert piece of crap P2P app here), they would always say yes. Gee, I wonder why it doesn't work now.

      Maybe if people would quit downloading spyware laced crap and clicking yes on anything IE wants to install my small realm of hell would be a better place.

    15. Re:New.Net by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      You... don't work at the same place I work, do you? :^D Didn't want to mention it was for Compaq, but meh. And I'm not sure about whether Compaq included it or not, I've seen it on a LOT of pre-merger models...

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    16. Re:New.Net by TaoJones · · Score: 5, Funny
      The easiest way to delete New.Net is to do the following:
      1. remove it using "Add/remove" programs
      2. if still not working, remove the WinSock and WinSock2 registry keys from CurrentControlSet


      This is the "easiest" way? Slow down there Turbo... Now, over the phone, YOU try to talk my mother through this "easy" way. Believe me, I'll Make Money Fast selling you a couple of Valium when (and if) you ever get the job done ;)

      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
    17. Re:New.Net by liamcaden · · Score: 1

      a simpler fix for that, after you remove new.net or newnetdomains, (win9x) is to remove dialup networking (controlpanel/add remove programs/windows setup/communications) without restarting, then remove HKEY_Local_Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\Winsock2 after add dialup networking again and restart. I have found this to fix 99% of newdot net related issues. I found My search bar to be the worst, and not fun to remove, although it is found with many adware removal tools, it has a tendancy to come back again, and again...

      --
      "The same thing we do every night, try to take over the world" -The Brain (Pinky&the Brian)
    18. Re:New.Net by Chip7 · · Score: 1
      beentheredundat, my company also had a whole line of laptops brought down to a crawl because of new.net's IP stack (weirdly enough, only a single model was affected). Worst of all, it wasn't just slowing down net connections, the whole laptop was slow. The kind of slow that you click and there's action 2 mins afterwards.

      Fortunately it had a working uninstall script ... if you had the patience to run it! :-)

      --
      -- If you actually say LOL instead of laughing, maybe it's time to go outside! --
    19. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no its not... he/she's an idiot

    20. Re:New.Net by abolith · · Score: 1
      holy shit that made me laugh.

      --
      if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
    21. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      windows xp do this:
      delete winsock,winsock2
      restart
      go to any connectoid and choose install
      install from disk and then put in %systemroot%\inf
      then choose tcp/ip and then install
      then reboot and you should be fine

    22. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, FUCK YOU, I am SICK of people going around and accusing other people of shilling just because they're trying to help!

      You'd shill for Linux if it wasn't free you faggot.

    23. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How bored are you to keep spewing the same damn line everytime someone says "Hey, I like this product"? Get a life.

    24. Re:New.Net by nfsilkey · · Score: 1

      Isnt netsh a resource kit binary? Most users would have a dilly of a time since its not there by default (I believe, dont quote me ;)

    25. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe this is what you were referring to?

      http://www.newdotnet.com/

      Bottom of the page:

      http://www.new.net/support/uninstall5_48.exe

    26. Re:New.Net by silvwolf · · Score: 1

      I've tried it on several computers over the past few months. I doubt the owners have even heard of the resource kit..

    27. Re:New.Net by silvwolf · · Score: 1

      LSP-Fix is the easiest way I've found to fix the garbage that New.Net leaves behind. I've worked on computers that have had New.Net uninstalled but still couldn't use the net - I guess their uninstaller is really borked. LSP-Fix fixes their problem in a matter of seconds, doesn't even require a reboot, IIRC.

    28. Re:New.Net by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 2, Informative
      And new.net even works on *nix! Installation instructions (from http://www.new.net/download/instructions_unix.tp):
      Edit the following file: /etc/resolv.conf.

      In this file, look for the line that starts with "search," and add "new.net" to the end of the line. Thus if the resolv.conf file currently reads like this:

      search example.com
      nameserver 1.2.3.4

      You should change it, so that it now reads:

      search example.com new.net
      nameserver 1.2.3.4

      If there is no "search" line in the file, but there is a "domain" line, then replace "domain" with "search" and then add the new.net as above.

      Your Linux/Unix machine should now resolve and enable your web browser to see the new domains.

      Though I don't think that 1.2.3.4 is really a nameserver though.
    29. Re:New.Net by CrazyDuke · · Score: 3, Informative

      My vote goes to a program that is not quite as popular, but is similarly damaging called OSSproxy. Basically if you have the misfortune of deleting it, your system 's DNS resolution is hosed until you reinstall Windows. You can uncheck it in startup, but like New.Net, you can't DNS anything. Oh, did I mention it does not come with any (obvious) uninstall?

      I usually run across this when a customer complains that since they switched off dialup to broadband, they can't access the net. Apparently, there is some screw up within the program that keeps people that switch net connections from DNSing.

      You can bitch at the company and they'll send you a buggy ass uninstall program (which really helps if you already lost your net connectivity :P ...not). But, the only way I've been able to remove it is using the following. Oh, but you have to not have deleted any part of it yet in order for it to work.

      "%WinDir%\System\NScheck.exe" /uninstall

      Then just clean up any garbage left behind.

      P.S. Looking up on it, it looks like some people have found out how to can the sucker if it was already deleted. Still a pain in the ass though.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    30. Re:New.Net by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 4, Informative

      or run them all together as MSN tech support is trained to do... "netsh int ip reset resetlog.txt" That along with "regsvr32 softpub.dll" and "regsvr32 wintrust.dll" will fix 99% of MSN problems. That and Referring to OEM...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    31. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This (as well as your post) is redundant, so I'm posting anonomously.

      HijackThis is freeware.

    32. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So if I understand 'The Matrix Reloaded' correctly, the Matrix is basically a Microsoft operating system - it runs for a while and then crashes and reboots. By design, no less. Neo is just a memory leak that's too hard to fix, so they left him in... The users don't complain because they're packed in slush and kept sedated.

    33. Re:New.Net by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isnt netsh a resource kit binary?

      Apparently not - I've not installed the resource kit on this machine (which is running XP Pro), but I definitely have netsh available.

    34. Re:New.Net by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 1

      Apparently, according to reports from Operation Clambake, Scientologists are made to install software similar to this, it overwrites their tcp/ip stack and is used to filter a HUGE list of words and names. It will produce a whitespace in their place. Some sites are outright blocked. Oh, and here is where I read that.

    35. Re:New.Net by mikeswi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      New.Net is not spyware, although it is commonly believed that it is because it is targeted by antispyware software. The closest appropriate term would be "Unsolicited Commercial Software" or perhaps "Foistware" because it comes bundled with unrelated software. It does no tracking of the user and doesnt' even display advertisements.

      As for removing it, they took a lot of shit a couple of years ago because their uninstaller didn't work, so they fixed it. It works perfectly from add/remove and this has been verified by myself and by other members of our message board. If it doesn't for some reason, official and accurate manual instructions are located at http://www.newdotnet.com/#remove

      Please do not use HijackThis to remove any part of New.Net. It is a powerful tool, but it is not an antispyware program and not designed to uninstall software. It's purpose is to list anything that is not a default setting so that we can track down brand new spyware. If you don't know for an absolute fact that an entry absolutely should go, leave it and ask for advice first. You can hose Windows pretty good if you are not careful.

    36. Re:New.Net by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with most spyware is that if you simply remove it, the software that installed it will also stop working. When the user notices this they will reinstall the software.

      You need to find out what the user installed that contained spyware and make sure that software still works or replace it with a non-spyware equivalent. Then make sure the client is happy with the new software, understands why you changed it, and knows why they should NOT reinstall the original software.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    37. Re:New.Net by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a great tip! Thanks. You're going on my friends list, Mr. Anonymous Coward!

    38. Re:New.Net by miruku · · Score: 1

      it actually overwrites parts of the user's TCP/IP stack so that any time they access the internet (not just their browser), it gets pushed through the (usually fairly buggy) New.Net DLLs.

      doesn't aol do that (or at least they used to, iirc)?

      --
      MilkMiruku
    39. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need adaware or hijackthis in windows. Why? I use mozilla. Using explorer is like opening the door to your house, putting up a sign in your front lawn "please steal my stuff", and then going on an extended vacation.

    40. Re:New.Net by AlphaSys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you don't know how to configure windows. Not only do I browse with IE, my wife and son (9) do so on my workstation as well. My son definitely visits a place or two where adware is pushed and I never have an adware problem. I run AdAware and SpyBot and HijackThis occasionally to verify that things are clean. Every now and then they might turn up something minor (tracking cookies, etc.), but it's pretty rare.

      Note... I'm not bashing Moz, Opera etc. As far as I can tell, they're fine browsers. I especially like Moz because CSS2/XHTML behaves the way you expect it to in Moz, which is something I surely can't say for IE.

      But the point is, you *can* configure IE even without using third-party monitors and blockers in such a way that this crap doesn't get on your PC. Just because you haven't done it doesn't mean it can't be done..

      Also, don't think you're immune just because you don't browse with IE. More adware gets installed by piggybacking on cheap shareware/freeware than just about any other way. So just because you don't use IE doesn't mean you're clean. Riddle me this... If you've never run Adaware/SpyBot/HJT, how do you *know* you don't need some cleanup?. If you are clean, that's fantastic, but reasoning that you don't need it without checking it out is kinda PHB-like.

      --
      Can I bum a sig? I left mine at the office.
    41. Re:New.Net by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

      No, and it apparently is also on Win2K as well, or at least installed as one of the SP/Critical Updates. I just checked it, looks interesting..

    42. Re:New.Net by johndoesovich · · Score: 1

      Funny thing, I was going to remove an app I installed yesterday and saw new.net was loaded on my machine. Never even knew it was there. Sneaky little bastards. I even ran adaware yesterday and it did not pick it up.

      --
      alias dir='rm -rf /'
    43. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK that would be illegal under the Computer Misuse Act, if it renders the computer, or certain programs, inoperative, temporarily or permanently. IIRC these are the words used. There have been surprisingly few prosecutions, considering how many programs do intentional damage.

      The only defence under this law is ignorance, a defence which IMHO would be unlikely to be successful if the perpetrator was a programmer as opposed to a script kiddie. This would be a great law, if the authorities were to police it properly. If M$ trash your PC for some reason, they can in theory be prosecuted, and Bill would have to admit in court that he was ignorant.

      If an uninvited piece of code caused a leak of personal information on a computer which was otherwise secure and being operated within the law (i.e. registered under the Data Protection Act), then an offence would also occur under that act, and again a prison sentence is quite likely.

      It seems to me that much of the spamming, adware, spyware and other nuisance software either originates from, or is targetted to the US (not surprising in view of the large economy, over-complex legal system biased on favour of big business, and the number of internet users.) A good piece of legislation there would give us all worldwide some relief. Much of the rest seems to originate in China. Their "judicial" system seems to have the answer, they shoot the hacker and send his family the bill for the bullet.

      Seriously though, most of my trouble has been from Gator, but not so long ago some uninvited pest was bothering me. I don't ever use Lookout or Internet Exploder, yet it kept reappearing from an external source, despite the best efforts of Norton and Pest Patrol... I have forgotten which one it was, anyway I emailed the UK contact of the organisation concerned, threatened them with the Computer Misuse Act, and all of a sudden the problem stopped. If they know that a prison sentence is almost certain, it works wonders, but it will not do any good for something which is no longer under the control of its perpretators or acts automatically.

      Time for some tough laws worldwide, but first we need democratically elected representatives who actually have the slightest comprehension of what technology is all about, not lying scumbags like Blair or illegally unelected imbeciles like Bush. If they understood the cost of cleaning up all this junk nationally, they would presumably act.

    44. Re:New.Net by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Then you don't know how to configure windows.

      I do, and yo do, and probably most of the /. readers do, but that accounts for a negligable percentage of computer users.

      Joe 6 pack doesn't even know that you *can* configure Windows, let alone how to do it properly.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    45. Re:New.Net by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      What exactly does New.Net do?

    46. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New.Net bit me in the ass a long time ago. I didn't know about it until I restored a backup one day. After restoring the backup, my network connection would not work anymore and I was getting some error about newdotn~2.dll not found. The uninstall wouldn't work. The problem was that the link to newdotnet.dll was using the DOS filename, and after I restored the backup, it was named newdotn~1.dll instead of newdotn~2.dll, so it couldn't find it. I had to make a copy of the dll which had the newdotn~2.dll filename so that the uninstall would work.

      I would very much like to join a class-action lawsuit against this company.

    47. Re:New.Net by Starrdanzr · · Score: 1

      Here is the link to NewDotNet's uninstall instructions. They sure do look like they do a thorough job of CYA in their "you want to uninstall, don't listen to third parties and our program is not making your computer unstable" spiel. I'm curious to know if those who have said that the program won't uninstall have tried this uninstaller of NewDotNet's or just did the Add/Remove of MS? I'm curious to know whether these directions are pretty much useless. Also, they threw in that third party software that removes this program may do more damage. Is this the utter BS that I perceive it to be?

    48. Re:New.Net by lamabile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ".....it actually overwrites parts of the user's TCP/IP stack"

      Our software does NOT overwrite the TCP/IP stack; it adds itself to the TCP/IP stack.

      ".....so that any time they access the internet (not just their browser), it gets pushed through the (usually fairly buggy) New.Net DLLs."

      This information is false. Internet access is NOT pushed through our software. Our software recognizes when the user is trying to access a New.net domain name extension and ONLY then does it route the user through our software.

      "And the fun part is, if you (or the user) uncheck the New.Net software in MSCONFIG, it doesn't just stop New.Net from working...They simply stop being able to use the internet."

      I'm not sure where you thought that using MSCONFIG would stop our software from working. The RUN registry entry that you are referring to, does not affect the fucntionality of the software. That registry entry is used to update the software. Disabling this registry entry will NOT disable Internet access but it will prevent our software from updating.

      "So then we have to pray that their version of New.Net has a working uninstaller,"

      All of the versions of our software came with a working uninstaller. However, some uninstallers were rendered useless once a "tech support rep" started to use unconventional and unsupported methods of removing our software.

      "....or we have to go through a huge manual uninstall that involves removing multiple registry keys."

      There is no need to use any such manual removal procedures to remove our software. Proper removal instructions and accurate information about our software can be found at http://www.newdotnet.com.

      Leonard Amabile
      Director of Customer Support
      New.net, Inc.

    49. Re:New.Net by decepty · · Score: 1
      here's the stupid response from the stupid "Director of Customer Support" of New.net about the whole Ad-Aware labeling their "product" aas spyware thing. Funny thing is that he locked the forum so no one would have the chance to respond...and last time I checked, browser hijacking is spy/ad/malware.

      For all concerned, Lavasoft's Ad Aware has decided to target our software for removal based on information that they are unwilling to provide to the public. They used this same smear tactic 2 years ago and failed and they are failing again today. Two years ago, they were incapable of removing our software properly which resulted in hundreds, if not thousands, of users losing network access. Today, they are still incapable of removing our software properly and still continue to cause lost network access. Both today and 2 years ago, it was proven that our software was not spyware and that Lavasoft's Ad Aware was targeting our software unjustifiably. For anyone interested in an objective review of our software, please visit the following link: http://www.net-integration.net/cgi-bin/forums/ikon board.cgi?s=3e54fbb860c0ffff;act=ST;f=8;t=1634 As stated in Eagle1's synopsis, a full review will be published shortly. The discussion of our software being spyware ends now and I will not tolerate any member of Lavasoft or it's users posting on this message board with the intent to discredit New.net or its software. _________________ Leonard Amabile Director of Customer Support New.net, Inc.
      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    50. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But see, if you look at the link, there is an &affiliate= thingy, so this guy is getting paid, muhuhahahaha, i'm a genius

    51. Re:New.Net by CKW · · Score: 1

      It was an indirect affilliate link, it's a valid criticism. We can't tell if it's an honest recommendation or some a**h*le making money. Welcome to my enemies list boys and girls.

    52. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > my favorite program for dealing with invasive spyware is still fdisk!

      fdisk is OK, I suppose, but it doesn't really eliminate the spyware. It just makes it a bit harder to find and execute. I much prefer `shred /dev/hda`. DBAN is good, too.

    53. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I get it. Spyware/Adware is defined as whatever Ad Aware can properly remove.

    54. Re:New.Net by Mesaeus · · Score: 1

      Actually with one of the earlier Kazaa versions (1.6 ?) there was a whole bunch of spyware installed, but it only needed one Cydoor dll to be present to work. All the rest could be cleaned out, the cydoor dll was used to display ads inside the kazaa window so I could even understand why Kazaa refused to work without it. Adaware and Spybot S&D, the two cleaners I'd recommend, BOTH automatically keep a backup of every removed item so you can put it back if something stops working. You can experiment a bit and only put back the few things that are needed. Ofcourse spyware-free versions like Kazaa Lite are infinitely better, but you can still use the originals with a minnimal amount of hassle.

    55. Re:New.Net by plover · · Score: 1
      Actually, it can be (and has been) done. Wish I could remember the link... :-(

      There are many people running downlevel IEs that allow web sites to execute arbitrary code. While you may think you have turned off everything allowable, there may be Yet Another Security Hole of the Week in IE allowing scumware to slip onto your box.

      Granted, most of these holes are first exploited for worms, not spyware, but "unethical does as unethical is." If they're not being used for spyware yet, it's only because the spyware operators are slow on the uptake.

      I'm sure your box is much more protected than the average user's, and it's great that your system is so tight a 9-year-old hasn't clicked OK on the wrong thing. But don't rest solely on the configuration. Trust, but verify. Spybot S&D is still your friend.

      --
      John
    56. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the fact that 99% of his posts are just him pimping his site, I'd wager it's the latter.

    57. Re:New.Net by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      Oh, it may do more damage, especially if new.net decides to change their program in order to sabotage the 'unauthorized' uninstallers. It wouldn't be the first time adware/spyware/bundleware intentionally tried to break anti-adware software. I remember a story about one software package intentionally damaging Ad-Aware's reference file in order to prevent detection, and another where installation of one software package uninstalled Ad-aware (read: deleted it). In both cases, the authors believed they were completely in the right, since Ad-aware had the capability of 'modifying' their programs as they were distributed. The guy who deleted ad-aware as part of his install process eventually caved, and changed it so his software refuses to install if ad-aware is installed.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    58. Re:New.Net by BillX · · Score: 1

      That's the easiest way?

      Here are at least 2 easier ways :-)

      1) Run HijackThis (covered in a previous thread), find all the New.net references and choose 'Fix'.

      2) Run LSP-Fix from http://cexx.org/lspfix.htm (yes, I wrote it, and yes, this is shameless promotion). Click on "I know what I'm doing". Send all New.net entries to the Remove list, then press Finish.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    59. Re:New.Net by jblazed · · Score: 1

      thanks for the tip. you never realize whats there until you look!

      --
      pci-jabes jb negativetrend
    60. Re:New.Net by shlybluz · · Score: 1

      Aw h3ll, can't you cut a person some slack for making an honest recommendation even though its an affiliate link? So what if he mostly pimps his website, its some funny shiat.

      BTW, I put PestPatrol on every one of my relatives computers cause I was frickin sick and tired of cleaning up their messes. I've managed to get all but one of them trained to run it weekly and even update it. Grandma doesn't get it, but I cut her some slack cause she always has some sort of homemade treat for me to take home when I make a cleanup run to her place...nothing like homemade chocolate chip cookies :)

    61. Re:New.Net by CKW · · Score: 1

      - sigh - ... Yeah, I must have been in a bad mood or something.

      BTW: I've started using Firebird. Last week with IE I clicked on a torrent info link that lead to some other site (instead of an IMDB page) that launched an infinite popup stream. Had to do the three fingered salute to kill IE, then spend an hour cleaning auto-installed spyware off my PC.

      Only drawback with Firebird is it's not FCS yet, still beta, and is a resource hog. But I do love the user-control features such as "ask and disallow all future cookies" and "on demand inline-context-menu block images from site" and no popups and tabs.

      I'm actually happy that my brother has Windows XP and it auto-downloads updates a bit at a time when he connects to the internet over modem, and my cousin has AOL - otherwise I'd be doing a ton of free phone support for them.

    62. Re:New.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after having to reinstall my os not once, but twice after failed attempts to remove newdot, wait new.net, wait new new..lol. i realized that they did actually reconfigure my tcp/ip upon install. even tried using my windows cd to reconfigure the network, no luck. b/s adware should be banned. any sugestions on how to get rid of newdot again. as i said regedit didnt work the first two times, but im open to suggestions.

  2. IMHO the worst one was........ by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Xupiter! Or what used to be Xupiter. In it's time it really wreaked havoc. Although going to their home page says they are out of business, ths link on their site shows that they may be up to something else soon

    You can share some of the love for the Yomtobians here. These guys are right up there with Spamford Wallace and the Cantor/Siegel in the Internet Hall of Shame.

    1. Re:IMHO the worst one was........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They changed there plug in name to Orbit. Just so happens it tried to install it-self while reading these comments(yes i admit i was doing other stuff while reading /.). Tempo is a company of dirty bastards. At lest they asked this time.

  3. RealOne by JanusFury · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure there aren't many people who agree with me, but I personally consider RealOne to be spyware. It's intrusive and has lots of 'features' that are extremely difficult to turn off if you can turn them off at all, and it installs things without telling you. (For example, its 'message center' in the system tray that tells you to Buy RealNetworks Products(tm)(r)!0

    Other than that, I don't really run into spyware much, but I find gator and its kin to be the most intrusive and common on the web.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
    1. Re:RealOne by shird · · Score: 2, Interesting

      for the record, I agree with you. It completely overtakes your system, replacing home pages etc. Even the media has support for causing popups with its 'media browser' or whatever they call it.

      They used to also have a screen which allowed you to sign up for newsletters.The first checkboxes would all be clear, but scroll down a bit to the ones hidden and they would all be checked!... Its some of the scummiest software I have ever seen, and unfortuantly there is no other player which plays their media.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    2. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh no. RealOne is such a well-made program! It plays interesting, high-quality movies with a great sound quality without even installing random applications to slow down the CPU.

    3. Re:RealOne by galacticdruid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ya - no kidding. I hate realplayer. Every time I set my mpgs to load in windows media player, 10 seconds later some kind of dll that always runs sets my file associations back to realplayer. lame!

      --
      we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively - bill hicks
    4. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my sarcasm detector just broke.. too much man.. too much..

    5. Re:RealOne by nFriedly · · Score: 1

      i'd agree with you real player has pissed me off so many times that i wont come anywhere near it i stick with winamp

    6. Re:RealOne by questionlp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depending on which version of Real Player you are using, I'm using 8, you can go into the application's preferences and tell it to disable the Real icon in the systray and not to hijack the associations for other supported media types (in 8's preference dialog and under the Upgrade tab, click on "Auto Restore Settings" and uncheck anything that's checked).

      I did that during the setup and after it was running and haven't had that problem since. I haven't touched RealOne, so I don't know where they would hide that stuff. Else, go to the Registry and remove their systray app from running.

    7. Re:RealOne by desenz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You hit that one on the head. I don't get much other spyware, because its usually easy to avoid (as long as you know what not to download, and aren't using IE) I don't think its even worth usuing Real to begin with. Qualitys not that great, and if you've got the bandwidth quicktime is a far better choice in my eyes.

      That said, not everyone has the bandwidth or time to spend on it. And some just don't care.

    8. Re:RealOne by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Kill RealOne and download Real Alternative. It lets you play Real files through media player or whatever else you choose to use without having to deal with realplayer, one of the most horrible pieces of software ever.

    9. Re:RealOne by CaptBubba · · Score: 5, Informative
      "unfortuantly there is no other player which plays their media"

      There is Real Alternative. I'm not sure how legal it is, but it plays the files and I don't have to install the RealOne crap. Until I found it I simply didn't use any sites that relied upon realplayer files. I was so happy when Amazon.com added WMP samples.

    10. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... especially the word "interesting" in there... man, that just killed me :D

    11. Re:RealOne by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Mplayer plays Real, QT, WMV, and a whole crap load of other formats too. Of course, it's not REALLY easy to install, and it crashes sometimes, but generally, I like it better than any other.

      At least it's completely free, with no strings attached.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    12. Re:RealOne by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      The funny thing is that RealOne is only like this on Windows. Both the Linux version, which is crummy and crashes a lot (and, last I looked, was hard to download - you had to select a particular RedHat package type then ignore the results, clicking on an obscure link at the bottom of the page), and the Mac OS X version are just media players - no ads at all, no "home page", even within the media player.

      I'm not sure what this tells you, I guess either Real likes non-mainstream users and is trying to get their support, or they just hate Windows users ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    13. Re:RealOne by owlmon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Its some of the scummiest software I have ever
      > seen, and unfortuantly there is no other player
      > which plays their media.

      JetAudio plays Real Media. I like it, and I don't think that it is spyware. Would someone please post if I am wrong!

    14. Re:RealOne by chgros · · Score: 2, Interesting

      quicktime is a far better choice in my eyes
      Except that the quicktime player is not much better than Real Player IIRC (with popups telling you to go "pro" or somesuch).
      Anyway along with Real Alternative goes Quicktime Alternative, but I haven't had much luck with these (I haven't tried a lot though, since I mainly use GNU/Linux)

    15. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, the people at Real should be taken out and shot. That goes double for webmasters who insist on using Real for their streaming video.

      Friends don't let friends use Real.

    16. Re:RealOne by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      NEVER had Real One replace my home page....ever.

      --

      Gorkman

    17. Re:RealOne by OYAHHH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm,

      Not sure if StartupMonitor will stop Real in it's tracks, at least in terms of dropping things in your startup/system tray, but it is definitely worth a look.

      StartupMonitor just sits around and waits for a program to try to install itself into your system tray. If it detects such activity it pops up a message asking you if you want to allow it.

      I can proudly state that I only have four icons in my startup tray and each and every one of them I want to be there.

      Google for StartupMonitor and you shall receive...

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
    18. Re:RealOne by desenz · · Score: 2, Informative

      The real difference though, is that quicktime only tells you to 'go pro' when you use it. In windows, realplayer keeps a process going called realsched. Its only 128k so you don't really notice it, but its there to let you know about all your upgrade options.

    19. Re:RealOne by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      At least it's an attractive interface, as opposed to Real's jumble'o'buttons...

      Plus, Apple hasn't been caught raping customers up the ass like Real has.

    20. Re:RealOne by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Um...if you pay attention during install, it ALLOWS you to select whether Real One does this or not.

      I DO disagree with EVERY frickin app wanting to park itself in the tray. Although on every XP machine I am on I do seem to need enough of these tray programs running that I use the hide feature. Tray Icons for things like mail checkers, IM programs and weather programs are awefully useful, but why does Quicktime and RealOne need this?? It seems they say it makes it faster....by what? 2 Milliseconds??? I can't detect it...those get turned off right away.

      --

      Gorkman

    21. Re:RealOne by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Or you could just firewall realplayer after you install it. I have it permanently blocked by zonealarm and norton.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    22. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is the main reason I won't install it on my computer.

    23. Re:RealOne by Draveed · · Score: 1

      Have you tried using Real Alternative? You can download it from Kazaa Lite's website.

      --
      Oh, Edmund, can it be true? that I hold here, in my mortal hand, a nugget of purest green?
    24. Re:RealOne by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Some versions are even sneakier than that. If you scroll all the way to the bottom there's a page full that are checked by default, but if you scroll up one line, you'll see yet another line that's checked by default. If you scrolled straight to the end, you'd miss that one.

    25. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm proud to say that (on my windows box) I have no icons in the system tray. I hate them and disable any application that wants to run there (Quicktime, Messenger, et all). My computer runs 9.68 times faster at Start-Up.

    26. Re:RealOne by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 3, Informative

      unfortuantly there is no other player which plays their media

      mplayer!

    27. Re:RealOne by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, but that still doesn't take care of the fact that the software is crap. Back when I had Windows 2000 installed, the only time I got a blue screen was when I was using realplayer.

    28. Re:RealOne by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Funny, RP8 fucked with my KDE mime type asscociations.

      I used alien to convert it to a tarball, then copied files manualy, and now it leaves me alone.

    29. Re:RealOne by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      If you use Ad-Aware, the Pro version comes with Ad-Watch that will monitor for all kinds of Spyware installation as you use your Windows box.

      LavaSoft Ad-Aware

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    30. Re:RealOne by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That hide feature on the bar is so deceptive.

      I -like you, disable it from every machine I clean up.
      Kazaa continues to run for the user that installed it, and all the other things - realplayer, winamp etc are all common and not required. People wonder why their machines take so long booting with all the crap its loading.
      At least if they can *SEE* that something is running they can make a concious decision to close it.
      The Search bars from various places are becoming a pain in the rear at the moment. My final action is usually disabling 3rd Party browser enhancements.

      My personal pet-peeve is with so called Popup-stoppers. I have seen some which popup a message to tell you they have blocked a popup.
      Its totally insane!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    31. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a player that will play real player or real audio as well as quick time and just about every media file - it's called jet audio and is available at http://www.jetaudio.com

    32. Re:RealOne by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Don't forget Xine. It plays most of real media stuff (FAQ).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    33. Re:RealOne by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. However, of all the programs on my iBool, RealOne is the only one that keeps crashing randomally. The worst part is sometimes when it crashs for me, I have to log in via SSH and run kill to get rid of it. It's amazing how crappy commerialware can be :-P

      --
      This signature was left intentionally blank.
    34. Re:RealOne by Flying+high · · Score: 1

      I play rm files in Winamp with a plug in.

    35. Re:RealOne by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you on two counts...

      1. Last week I used RealOne's "check for updates" feature and it said there was a patch available so I told it to update. The update consisted of a full reinstallation, during which I had to give all of my details again and reset all of my settings and preferences to how they were before. Nice.

      2. On my WinXP system, RealOne changes the "start navigation" setting in my sound scheme. (This is the sound that is played when, for example, you open a folder in Explorer. It's usually a click.) Worse, it doesn't just change the current scheme, it changes the *saved* scheme. For some reason it just doesn't want me to have a "start navigation" sound. It wants silence and it does everything it can to get it!

      I use RealOne to listen to audio on the BBC's web site, mainly plays and comedy. Last week I contacted Real's customer support and asked (a) why it changes my sound scheme and (b) how can I stop it. Thankfully they wrote back and told me to simply... oh, hang on, no, they just ignored me.

      However, I'm going to go out on a moral limb here and say that I don't feel much anger towards Real. But I *do* feel anger towards the BBC because they only make their audio available in a proprietary format which, in practical terms for most users, can only be used with Real's own software. The way I see it, I pay my license fee and I should be able to use the BBC's services without installing a piece of software that I don't like and don't want, made by a company with questionable ethics and poor customer service. The BBC should not be pushing their listeners/viewers towards a company like that.

    36. Re:RealOne by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

      Easy answer here... use Real Alternative. Basically, it's a package with the Real codecs, which you can then use with your favourite media player.

      If you're going to click there, you might as well pick up QT Alternative on the same page. Same as above, but for QuickTime.

    37. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that Real One is spyware. I so much hate Real One. If I have to use real I just install real 8 from http://oldversion.com/

    38. Re:RealOne by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I dont know how to deal with Real Video files or files streamed with that propriatory streaming crap but if you have a real audio file on a local disk, there are ripper programs that can convert to MP3.

    39. Re:RealOne by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >At least it's an attractive interface, as opposed to Real's jumble'o'buttons...

      LOL!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    40. Re:RealOne by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The worst part is, people actually pay money to the scumbags at Real Networks for an 'enhanced' version of the software. These scumbags are, in my opinion, the inventors of spyware. They just didn't make it quite as annoying and virus like as Xupiter or Gator.

    41. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess either Real likes non-mainstream users and is trying to get their support, or they just hate Windows users ;-)

      Bad move for any company that actually wants to make money from their products.

      Why oh why would you want to alienate users of the OS with the greatest market share, and simultaneously the least amount of knowledgeable users.

      Oh well...I wouldn't be too downtrodden to find out that they've gone out of business and the CEO was last seen curled up in some newspapers in the park. (please lord, make this so)

      I'll save the curses and millenia of torture for those responsible for Gator, Xupiter and the like.

    42. Re:RealOne by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      As of the latest version of Quicktime (v6.4) it no longer has the annoying "Go Pro" dialog at startup. The UI is also a lot cleaner that it was back in version 4 (and to a lesser extent, 5).

      It also has, far and away, the best quality of any of the players out there. I do wish that Sorensen would licence the codec for use by one of the Linux media players though.

    43. Re:RealOne by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      There's RTSP rippers available for windows, and the RTSP spec is public, so it's possible to write one yourself.

      As far as mms is converned(Windows Media streams) you can get mmsclient.

      Both can be played directly with various versions of xine or mplayer.

    44. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny how i read this a mere 30 seconds after i installed RealOne just so that i could watch the tool vids i got from toolshed.down.net...

      *crapass, the crapwarenet wins again*

    45. Re:RealOne by doodaddy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, my mp3 player, a Panasonic SV-SD50 uses RealOne as a base for moving mp3 files! Panasonic does not warn of this, and even re-brands it the "Panasonic Media Manager."

      However, as soon as you install, Real One icons are literally everywhere, the desktop, the quick launch bar, the start menu, the program menu, a Real One folder, AND accessories/multimedia. Unbelievable!

      Oh and it take over all your media associations, such as .mp3 of course.

    46. Re:RealOne by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Just thought I'd double check. To get RealOne for Linux:
      • Visit the "Real for Unix" page
      • Under drop down "1", select "Linux 2.x (libc6 i386)", fill in the rest appropriately.
      • Hit submit, scroll to the bottom of the page, there's a "Download Now" button underneath the heading "RealOne Player for Unix - Preview Release"
      It's ugly and doesn't work very well IMNSHO, but, well, there you go.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    47. Re:RealOne by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      That's because the typical Apple customer's point-of-entry is already in use.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    48. Re:RealOne by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Because linux has far more diversity, with windows the vast majority of users use the default browser and desktop interface, and theres a single known place to install an app so it loads at startup. Contrast with linux, where there are a large number of commonly used interfaces, browsers, initscripts etc. You would need to target a larger number of apps, and then hope that those apps were actually installed in the places you expected them to be, for the relatively few people who use the unix realplayers, this is hardly worth doing.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    49. Re:RealOne by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      Duh.. that's QT 4.. hasn't been on a machine since '98 or so. It was quickly changed.

    50. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is Real Alternative. I'm not sure how legal it is, but it plays the files and I don't have to install the RealOne crap. Until I found it I simply didn't use any sites that relied upon realplayer files. I was so happy when Amazon.com added WMP samples.

      I kiss you!

    51. Re:RealOne by Lee+Cremeans · · Score: 1

      The page you linked describes QuickTime, all right, but it's also QuickTime Player 4.0, which is nearly 5 years old now.

      Apple fixed the most glaring problems shown here in QuickTime 5 and 6. The volume control is now a slider, the fast forward and rewind buttons are on the main pane of the window (and the "advanced settings" dropdown is gone), and they also killed the favorites tray.

      -lee

    52. Re:RealOne by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I use the "rm" command with "rm" files under any flavor of unix, rm really is the best way to deal with low quality realmedia files anyway.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    53. Re:RealOne by shepd · · Score: 0

      Okay. I'll give you those. However, the vast majority of the problems are still present.

      Listed problems still not fixed:

      - Video does not size to users screen
      - Grey on grey non-standard scheme decreases ability to use application by older users
      - All controls still appear unavailable
      - Lack of clarity as to what is a clickable item, and what isn't
      - Preferences menu still has multiple selections for the exact same dialog
      - Program help requires internet connection
      - Multiple about boxes

      New problems not fixed:

      - Popup "Purchase pro" box has no "NEVER" option
      - Fix to "drawer" problem means one cannot see at what point one is in the media while adjusting sound controls
      - Pointless and possibly confusing use of extra controls to adjust combo boxes (see movie information).
      - UI causes menus to switch from enabled to disabled look (but they are still functional) when mouse passes over them
      - Pointlessly adds system load during boot with auto-start taskbar "q", which must be disabled manually after installation
      - Opening new media requires opening a separate player instance, rather than opening it in the current player

      It wouldn't be such a magnet for complaints if they'd simply use the standard windows interface on windows, which had years of military research behind it (no, no joke there -- ever wonder why windows XP can still be used without a mouse?) and is familiar to all users using Quicktime for windows.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    54. Re:RealOne by Raunch · · Score: 3, Informative

      > there is no other player which plays their media

      Whatever you feel of their supposed code nazi attitudes; mplayer plays almost everything.

      Don't hate the player, hate the game.
      I don't have a sig.

      --
      George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
    55. Re:RealOne by bonch · · Score: 1

      Xine doesn't even have a simple "Open" button. I doubt it will ever gain mainstream popularity in its current state.

    56. Re:RealOne by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      Mike Lin, a very prolific young programmer, wrote this program.

      Here's the site: StartupMonitor

    57. Re:RealOne by windside · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, but I've found that the "tray agents" for Netscape and Opera browsers make for a significant increase in startup speed, putting them close to on-par with the lightning-fast but soul-stealing IE.

      Over the years, I've tried many times to ween myself from the IE teet and these "agents" have been the most significant factor in helping me stay clean.

      --
      ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
      Churchill
    58. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG you just made my day... rm encoded southparks here i come!

    59. Re:RealOne by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I DO disagree with EVERY frickin app wanting to park itself in the tray.

      I went to a bioinformatics conference a few months ago. These biologists would come up and plug their laptops into the projector so they could do their Powerpoint presentations. And it was amazing. ALL of them had tray icons spanning more than halfway across the screen! I completely stopped paying attention to one guy- it was more interesting to count how many spyware icons I could recognize in his tray. And they kept apologizing to the audience because their laptops were slow!

    60. Re:RealOne by chundo · · Score: 1

      That and every other MP3 player out there, unfortunately.

      Real sucks ass, but man, they must have a phoenomenal sales department. I can't imagine it's easy to convince a hardware manufacturer to rely completely on your software, especially when a little informed research would reveal that virtually any technologically savvy user views Real software as a plague.

      -j

    61. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you get the QuickTime Key Generator.

      Eek, I didn't say that. Please don't beat me, Ashcroft!

      Anyways, search Kazaa for "quicktime key generator". Someone's always got it online.

    62. Re:RealOne by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Its some of the scummiest software I have ever seen, and unfortuantly there is no other player which plays their media.

      How many sites use only Real, though? I haven't run across any lately...if they offer Shoutcast and/or Windows Media streaming, I'll go with one of those. I don't have any of Real's stuff installed on any of my computers, and I don't think I'm missing anything. (That Real is the most expensive way to stream stuff is no doubt part of the reason.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    63. Re:RealOne by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I second that. I must have wasted one week compiling/installing it and all its dependent packages, and it still doesn't work on my linux box.

    64. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree absolutely.

      In fact I don't use Real Media for this reason. There are often times when I want to view rm files but the deterrent of the adware and the fact that they install so much invasive crap on my system is sufficient for me to forgo the opportunity to view or listen to the media.

    65. Re:RealOne by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      I wanted to listen on the internet to a conference call for a stock that I own. According to the instructions, I had to install Real Player to listen to it; no other choices. I hated what it did to my system, so I uninstalled it as soon as the call was over. This was a few years ago, maybe they offer other streaming options now.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    66. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I second that. I must have wasted one week compiling/installing it and all its dependent packages, and it still doesn't work on my linux box.

      root@box:~ # emerge xine

      </OBGENTOO>

    67. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed one:

      Problems still not fixed: piece of shit.

    68. Re:RealOne by rabbit994 · · Score: 1

      Try EscapePod from AmbrosiaSW www.ambrosiasw.com It does wonders for those locked up apps.

    69. Re:RealOne by Seq · · Score: 1

      Try totem, or one of the other frontends that use the xine libraries. There are dozens.

      --
      -- Seq
    70. Re:RealOne by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      > unfortuantly there is no other player which
      > plays their media.

      If Realplayer8 or MPlayer wont play it... then I don't need it.

      Realplayer8 plays most of the Real content out there and I have had one movie in the last month that MPlayer had trouble with (and I got good video but no audio on that one).

      I'll continue to use Realplayer8 for as long as I can - hopefully Real will go back to a simpler player with more functionality and less garbage to interfere with the user experience.

      Well, there's my buck and a quarter...

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    71. Re:RealOne by LeoDV · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. The worst part is that whenever I use RealOne (as little as possible) it reinstalls all the stuff I deinstalled (launch program at startup, etc.) so I have to go back to msconfig, the registry, etc. to tidy up its mess each time I use it.

    72. Re:RealOne by Haarg · · Score: 1

      The best alternative I know of to RealOne is Media Player Classic. It needs Real's software installed to play the files, but you can remove most of Realplayer if you know how, and it will still work. It will also play quicktime files if you have quicktime installed. Another option is a RealMedia DirectShow Splitter. It will let you play Realmedia files in any Directshow player (Media player classic, Windows media player, and many others).

    73. Re:RealOne by Robmonster · · Score: 1

      They like non-0mainstream users SOOO much that they make a client that is 'crummy and crashes a lot' ?

      What would it be like if they wanted to put Linux users OFF using RealPlayer!!?!?

      --
      I have no sig yet I must scream.
    74. Re:RealOne by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's officially still a beta. Their pre-RealOne client, RealPlayer, isn't buggy/crashes a lot.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    75. Re:RealOne by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1
      Both the Linux version, which is crummy and crashes a lot

      I haven't had any problem with the Linux version. An earlier version used to take up 100% CPU though (some kind of busy loop).

    76. Re:RealOne by cicho · · Score: 1

      What good is Real Alternative (and all other players that purport to play Real content) if it requires you to install the original crud in the first place?

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    77. Re:RealOne by cicho · · Score: 3, Informative
      Correction. StartupMonitor doesn't look for systray apps. Rather, it intercepts any attempt by an application to add itself to autostart folder or a registry entry, so that the application will run automatically at startup.


      But you can't use it indiscriminately. Most setup programs for example will add a run-once entry to delete temp files or files that were in use and couldn't be replaced - this is something you want to allow. But the same setup program may also be installing fishy stuff, so you need to be able to tell the difference.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    78. Re:RealOne by Lovepump · · Score: 1

      The BBC's website uses Real extensively. For this reason, I never use it. I flat refuse to allow RealPlayer onto my machine.

    79. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apt-get install xine
      works for rpms as well; see freshrpms.net

    80. Re:RealOne by ViolentGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Speaking of spyware and weather programs, every weather program I have ever seen installs spyware. You might want to doublecheck yours.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    81. Re:RealOne by That's+Mister+Jesus · · Score: 1

      Here, here. I stopped using Real Player because of all the junk it installs. Pop up ads. Messages. Probably not spyware in the way the asker intended, but insidious nonetheless. Just another example of a company getting us hooked on their technology and then using it for evil.

      Myself, I plan on buying the rights for Oregon Trail and using it to pollute the minds of impressionable young people with subliminal messages from Snoop Dogg.

    82. Re:RealOne by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      No doubt. I sent a message to real tech support asking if their product was spyware, and how to turn off the popups, and how to ensure their software is only running when I am actually using it. I also told them I would never buy a commercial program from them if their free player represents the quality of their software. They didn't reply about the spyware part or how to ensure it is only running when in use, but did say you _can't_ turn off all the popups (deleted the email this morning or I would paste it in here). But I did go through the prefs and turn off all the popups I could, and didn't see any popups for two weeks. Then I wiped that machine, so I don't know if a popup would have eventually occured. Usually if I have to view a real audio file and am on Windows I install real player, view the file, and un-install it. A major pain.

    83. Re:RealOne by anagama · · Score: 1

      Right click in the Xine window space for the menu, select [open]. Alternatively, turn on the GUI (again, right click in window space for menu) and press the open button.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    84. Re:RealOne by anagama · · Score: 1

      ...GUI (again, right click in window space for menu) and press the GUI visibility button.

      Teach me to preview!

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    85. Re:RealOne by ChrisN79 · · Score: 1

      You could always do what I do... I have an old version of Real Player from around 1998 and it seems to play 90% of anything I try to listen to. That was before they loaded it up with crap. Try searching the web and you might be able to find install files for an old version.

    86. Re:RealOne by firebat162 · · Score: 1

      i thought i would add that for the past 4 years, i have refused computer help or service to anybody who installed real player.

      pretty funny, because it works! No one i know has real player installed because they're afraid of me not helping them with their computer problems.

      The most annoying thing about real player: The last time i saw it at a client's computer, real had literally taken over their download mechanism and everytime they downloaded something this practically full sreen X10 ad would pop up. Crazy, the nerve these people have.

    87. Re:RealOne by g0_p · · Score: 1

      Of course if you are on linux you always have mplayer from mplayerhq.hu. That plays real, windows media and almost anything else that you can think of.

    88. Re:RealOne by frankie · · Score: 1
      I *do* feel anger towards the BBC because they only make their audio available in a proprietary format

      Even worse is the frickin United Nations. They use Real for both their live webcasts and radio streams (they have one token mp3 stream, but everything else is .ram)

      I wrote to the UN webmaster, suggesting that perhaps an international organization like theirs might want to use internationally-recognized standards rather than proprietary protocols. I didn't even mention adware/spyware (didn't want to set off kook alarms). But as expected, no reply and no change.
    89. Re:RealOne by komisar · · Score: 1

      My vote is totally against it.

      RealPlayer just a marketing scheme with the player serving as the telemarketer. Do not call!

    90. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video does not size to users screen

      Full screen option is available.

      Grey on grey non-standard scheme decreases ability to use application by older users

      Completely unfounded assertion. Who knows more about user interface design? David Shepherd or Apple? I pick Apple.

      All controls still appear unavailable

      Incorrect.

      Lack of clarity as to what is a clickable item, and what isn't

      Incorrect. (Unless you're just dumb, I guess.)

      Preferences menu still has multiple selections for the exact same dialog

      Incorrect.

      Program help requires internet connection

      Incorrect.

      Multiple about boxes

      Incorrect.

      Popup "Purchase pro" box has no "NEVER" option

      Sure doesn't. This is not a bug.

      Fix to "drawer" problem means one cannot see at what point one is in the media while adjusting sound controls

      One can't hit option-eject with one hand, either. Point being?

      Pointless and possibly confusing use of extra controls to adjust combo boxes (see movie information).

      Incorrect.

      UI causes menus to switch from enabled to disabled look (but they are still functional) when mouse passes over them

      Incorrect.

      Pointlessly adds system load during boot with auto-start taskbar "q", which must be disabled manually after installation

      Incorrect. (It is not pointless, and it does not add "system load," whatever that is.)

      Opening new media requires opening a separate player instance, rather than opening it in the current player

      Sure does. This is not a bug.

      It wouldn't be such a magnet for complaints if they'd simply use the standard windows interface on windows, which had years of military research behind it

      That's fucking hilarious. Be honest, you're just trolling now, right?

    91. Re:RealOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Samurize skin that fetches the weather.
      I don't think it's got any spyware but the current version doesn't work all the time (it's a vbs script).

    92. Re:RealOne by nyseal · · Score: 1

      I don't want even that,,,,,I know what my upgrade options are.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    93. Re:RealOne by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Xine is actually best run from a file manager or command line to directly launch the file.

      I just double-click the file in Nautilus and it plays. Simple. =)

    94. Re:RealOne by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks guys, but I'm not going to bother. I tried lots of different things already. I don't remember what I tried, so I'm just going to give up for now.

    95. Re:RealOne by nitecruzr · · Score: 1

      Gator. Now calls itself Claria. Pfuuh. You can call it what you wish. Its still sh!t.

  4. Spytech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Syptech captures pretty much everything

  5. A more interesting question might be: by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Should the purveyors of operating systems be prosecuted for allowing software to run on their loyal customers computers, without their knowledge or permission. I have never read a Microsoft EULA in it's entirety, does it mention that this is part of the agreement?

    1. Re:A more interesting question might be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell should they be responsible for dirty tricks that third party developers wish to pull on users?

    2. Re:A more interesting question might be: by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Get real. Could you imagine the Violation-of-Privacy advocates going completely berko if any OS vendor actually had to detect and enforce this? *Especially* MS!

    3. Re:A more interesting question might be: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Read a Win2K SP3 or SP4 EULA. Yep, it lets MS fuck about with your box whenever they want (at least it says it in the part BEFORE you have to start scrolling down).

    4. Re:A more interesting question might be: by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      Well that's all right then. What's everyones problem?

    5. Re:A more interesting question might be: by TheSpoom · · Score: 1
      *sigh*

      Do you really think that Microsoft (or for that matter, the Linux community) should be responsible for badly programmed software that *other developers* run on their operating system? I mean, if the law went with your definition, the operating system vendor would also be responsible for viruses, popups, dialers, and any other things that the user did not expect before they were subjected to them.

      Let's be reasonable here, sue Gator for Gator, not Microsoft.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:A more interesting question might be: by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1
      From the MS EULA:
      11. LIMITED WARRANTY FOR PRODUCT ACQUIRED IN THE US AND CANADA.
      Microsoft warrants that the Product will perform substantially in accordance with the accompanying materials for a period of ninety days from the date of receipt. If an implied warranty or condition is created by your state/jurisdiction and federal or state/provincial law prohibits disclaimer of it, you also have an implied warranty or condition, BUT ONLY AS TO DEFECTS DISCOVERED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS LIMITED WARRANTY (NINETY DAYS).

      [...]

      12. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES.
      The Limited Warranty that appears above is the only express warranty made to you and is provided in lieu of any other express warranties (if any) created by any documentation, packaging, or other communications. Except for the Limited Warranty and to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Microsoft and its suppliers provide the Product and support services (if any) AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS, and hereby disclaim all other warranties and conditions, either express, implied or statutory, including, but not limited to, any (if any) implied warranties, duties or conditions of merchantability, of fitness for a particular purpose, of reliability or availability, of accuracy or completeness of responses, of results, of workmanlike effort, of lack of viruses, and of lack of negligence, all with regard to the Product, and the provision of or failure to provide support or other services, information, software, and related content through the Product or otherwise arising out of the use of the Product.
      So after 90 days, you're on your own.
    7. Re:A more interesting question might be: by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      "*sigh*"

      You should get that looked at by a professional.

      If people expect second rate, I suppose they will be given second rate. Those who question this philosophy are either considered trolls by some unfortunate individuals or unrealistic by the complacent.

    8. Re:A more interesting question might be: by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      I call troll -- Mod parent DOWNIZLE.

      Why should operating systems be held responsible for what the USER INSTALLS? Even if they didn't meen to, these idiots clicked "Yeah" to xupiter and New.Net and Gator and whatever else they infect themselves with.

      Damn. Next you're going to hold Bill himself responsible when you lose a game of Quake.

  6. i'd have to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    windows. yes...definetly windoze

  7. Windows = Spyware by Deltan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows likes to call home whenever it can. I'm sure it reports back to the mothership far more often than anyone would like to think about.

    *synches the strap on his tin foil hat a bit tighter*

    1. Re:Windows = Spyware by l810c · · Score: 1

      What version and exactly when does Windows phone home? I have several versions installed and it seems like I would be getting ZoneAlarm alerts if Windows was trying to phone home.

    2. Re:Windows = Spyware by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that it does so, but it's quite possible for Windows to call home at a lower level than ZoneAlarm (or any software firewall) can monitor. After all, a software firewall is running under the OS.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:Windows = Spyware by slyxter · · Score: 0

      if Windows used IE to phone home, ZoneAlarm wouldn't alert you.

    4. Re:Windows = Spyware by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      ZA trusts things that (for example) sygate will stop and ask about. As far as free software firewalls go, I was over pleased when I switched from ZA to sygate. Sometimes the kernel will send stuff to an MS server. I've seen about everything in windows send something to an MS server, even windows help.

    5. Re:Windows = Spyware by joel8x · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you run AdAware or Spybot on a new install of Windows 2000 it will come up with Alexa Related and WMP componenets as Spyware, so whoever modded the parent as a Flaimbait is actually incorrect in their modding.

      --
      Sound waves should be free!
    6. Re:Windows = Spyware by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I thought spybot was a trojan. Is there really a legit program AND a trojan named spybot?

      Didn't the AV companies think about that before naming spybot (the trojan)?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:Windows = Spyware by joel8x · · Score: 1

      Spybot is a good thing. Check out this site.

      --
      Sound waves should be free!
    8. Re:Windows = Spyware by L10N · · Score: 1

      Sygate Personal is a good free product IMHO. I do like that it alerts you of all unapproved traffic even those initiated by a windows service, for example.

      --
      "What we do in life echoes in eternity." Maximus Decimus Meridius
    9. Re:Windows = Spyware by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 1

      You may be confusing the program, Spybot Search and Destroy with the term, spybot. Spybots are the very malware that Spybot Search and Destroy removes.

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    10. Re:Windows = Spyware by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Oh, I had never heard a trojan called a "spybot" before. I guess people really shouldn't shorten the name of the spybot remover program, that's like making an antivirus program and calling it "A-Virus".

      "Hey Bob, have you got a Virus on your computer?"

      "Nah, Bill remember, I have A Virus!"

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:Windows = Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry.. I modded it unfair. Or at least the flaimbait mod I received...

  8. One word...GATOR by bluethundr · · Score: 5, Insightful



    Without any doubt in my mind, the most evil form of spyware I am personally aware of is the infamous insidious Gator. Booo, hisss!!!! I am sure there are others, but I'm sure of this: there is a special place in hell for these folks.

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    1. Re:One word...GATOR by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Troll
      Assuming that by referencing "Hell", you are believing the tenants of a religion that has such a concept - please point me to where in any of the basic religious texts of religions with the concept of hell, there is a statement concerning software which behaves badly. I do not believe such a provision exists.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    2. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree, Gator SUCKS. Not just your pursed-lips sucking, but a class-5 Tornado sucking. It doesn't even have the honesty to say how awful it truly is, it dresses up it's many evils as "features."

      BTW, hooray for Ad-Aware and Spybot Search and Destroy. They are the Anti-suck software leaders.

    3. Re:One word...GATOR by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Level 8- the Malebolge

      Those guilty of fraudulence and malice, the hypocrites, the barraters, the simonists,the magicians, diviners, fortune tellers, and panderers are all here, as are the thieves.

      I think crappy spy-ware fits in there somewhere.

    4. Re:One word...GATOR by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 0

      Gator is spyware, even though they say they aren't
      Gator is spyware, even though they deny it
      Gator is spyware, they sued someone for saying so
      Gator is spyware, gator is spyware
      Ask Google, Gator is spyware.
      Gator is spyware, once again for the record
      Gator is spyware, seventh time lucky for search-engine listing.

      Did I already mention Gator? As spyware?

    5. Re:One word...GATOR by RClayton · · Score: 1

      Is spying on you considered stealing your personal information? Because there is the whole "Thou shalt not steal" thing in the Bible. If we can stretch it that far, we might just be able to push those programmers into Hell. :-)

    6. Re:One word...GATOR by puppetman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Gator is only bad because it is ubiquitous.

      I figure just about anything I download that is a free-utility is spyware. Even the Google search bar will send anonymous databack (but they ask you openly, and it's easy to turn off).

      I had one once that took over my computer desktop and start-bar; the sad ending was a corrupted Windows OS that required a re-installation.

    7. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, it sucks more than Kathleen Fent at a frat party.

    8. Re:One word...GATOR by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google Toolbar doesn't count, because it is a VOLUNTARY move to enable the spying features (default is to disable them, they give you a nice short EULA that tells you they'll get some info from you if you enable PageRank). Gator and the more insiduous MemoryBlaster (or something like that - it's a taskbar icon that shows you percent free RAM, and takes up about 50% of RAM on a 128MB box with XP itself) count. Taking into account that someone could be blindly clicking links, one could VERY easily get the whole GAIN suite in a few seconds. (BTW, there are MUCH nicer alternatives to those - I've heard RoboForm isn't spyware, and can even import your Gator data if you did once use it, Date Manager? double click on the clock! (oh wait, roblimo can't figure that out) PrecisionTime? ArgoSoft Time Synchronizer is what I use - good ol' fashioned freeware)

    9. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you familiar with the ban on judging others as well?

    10. Re:One word...GATOR by H310iSe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I need help with Gator! One of my clients is hooked on it - it has, literally, hundreds of his passwords for god knows what websites, and he can't function without it. I know you can export and import the password file (as I had to do when I rebuilt his PC, god it pained me to install gator on a PC) but is there any way to extract the URL/Login/Password combinations? I spent a little time looking on Google but found nothing. Any help is welcome.

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    11. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might have missed GATOR. It's SPYWARE. :)

    12. Re:One word...GATOR by swordboy · · Score: 1

      I thought that gator was the worst until:

      1) WebShots started trickling other various spyware programs onto the host PC. If you install webshots, then you will get a number of other programs eventually. One of them involves a continuous stream of popups.

      2) I forget the name of this particular gem but it modified the HOSTS file to redirect websites to *other* sites. One of them was google.com. It redirected the PC to a similar looking site. The only reason that this one was discovered in the first place is that it became too successful and DoS'ed its own website. The user came in with the complaint that he couldn't get to google.com. If you get something like this, you'll need to go into the \windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts (or \winnt or whatever systemroot is) and delete the entries from the hosts file (use a text editor to open it). The problem here is that most Joe's don't know the difference.

      I'd literally like to shoot some of these software companies in the back of the head. This is criminal activity. It is probably microsoft's "trusted computing marketing department" at work. (sarcasm) Seriously, this will cause huge sales for Microsoft's trusted computing platform if open source doesn't address it on a free basis.

      And yes - I've tried all of the blockers out there. None of them are seamless and usuable by Joe User (i.e. - they do not maintain themselves quietly). What is required is a program that will go resident upon bootup and update it self continuously without user input. Anytime a spyware program is encountered, then it needs to block it. If the home page/search function is hijacked, then it needs to be reset without prompting the user. I had been installing spyware blockers on some of the PCs that I maintain but it resulted in too many calls from the users - itis easier to let this shit happen then fix it after it builds up for a while. Answering trivial questions every 5 minutes is not worth it.

      Microsoft's antivirus is going to kill the rest of the AV industry if it addresses the number of unethical bits of software floating around out there. I can't wait.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    13. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just uninstall it and tell him to go fuck himself on the passwords. After all, you're the admin, aren't you.

      Although if you're a contractor, ignore the advise I just gave you.

    14. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Assuming that by referencing "Hell", you are believing the tenants of a religion that has such a concept

      If he's atheist (like many here), you assume wrong. You'll need to use the dictionary definition:

      2 a : a place or state of misery, torment, or wickedness (source: Merriam Webster)

      Which seems to fit perfectly fine.

      Yes, IHBT. Oh well.

    15. Re:One word...GATOR by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 4, Informative
      Roboform is your friend. It can import Gator passwords and then export them to HTML for printing (or parsing with your favorite scripting language).

      It's recommended as Pricelessware by alt.comp.freeware, which means no nasty spyware or adware.

    16. Re:One word...GATOR by jesser · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can extract passwords from Gator (or any browser's password manager) one at a time with the "view passwords" bookmarklet. Be sure to tell your client that vanilla IE (new versions) and Mozilla Firebird have built-in password remembering, so he won't have to type his passwords each time after he gets rid of Gator.

      There are also some password managers that can import from Gator. Roboform is an example. I don't know if I trust any of them, though.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    17. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If he's not atheist (like an unknown percentage of people here - you have no statistics so shut the fuck up with your "like many here" bullshit), I assume correctly.

      And perhaps that seems to fit perfectly fine. I'd explain to you in a rational manner why I don't think it fits BUT you think I'm a troll, so I won't bother.

    18. Re:One word...GATOR by nukeade · · Score: 1

      What really irritates me is that even when you uninstall Gator ad-aware style, your browser can no longer visit the Gatored sites - google, altavista, all Gatored out. Does anyone know how to re-enable these sites? One of the computers on my network can't visit them anymore thanks to SPYWARE.

      ~Ben

    19. Re:One word...GATOR by boneshintai · · Score: 1

      Or, if you're using Windows 2000/XP, use the built-in NTP client.

      > net time /setsntp:your.ntp.server.here
      > net start w32time

      Or go into the Services manager and set it to start automatically.

    20. Re:One word...GATOR by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Without any doubt in my mind, the most evil form of spyware I am personally aware of is the infamous insidious Gator.

      Why? I would also like facts, not anecdotes that can't be reproduced or backed up. Gator is shitty software, but they fully disclose everything they do (hence, not spyware) and even provide working uninstall instructions. People just find it difficult to uninstall because they refuse to uninstall the bundled software.

      I just don't get why Slashdot has this hard-on about bitching about Gator.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    21. Re:One word...GATOR by angle_mark · · Score: 1

      Well not that I've used it but I've heard AI Roboform is a nice alternative to Gator that doesn't have any annoying spyware embedded. It can import Gator's password files.

    22. Re:One word...GATOR by silvwolf · · Score: 1

      I forget the name of this particular gem but it modified the HOSTS file to redirect websites to *other* sites.

      That sounds like Trojan.QHosts.

    23. Re:One word...GATOR by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wasn't that a creation of Dante's rather than being written in the Torah?

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    24. Re:One word...GATOR by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Gator has historically been a catalyst for other spyware. Maybe they've stopped doing it now (which I highly doubt) but in the past if you install gator, it will eventually download and install other spyware for you, for free! Maybe Gator itself isn't too bad.. (although any software that makes it very difficult to uninstall is really shady) but the other spyware that you'll get might not be.

      Every other workstation I sit at, at any company with internet access (most of them), IE has about 10 "search" bars, popups spring up every 5 seconds, and gator is in the task tray (or not... user might have tried to remove it, but it's still there.. you just can't see it.)

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    25. Re:One word...GATOR by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Every other workstation I sit at, at any company with internet access (most of them), IE has about 10 "search" bars, popups spring up every 5 seconds, and gator is in the task tray (or not... user might have tried to remove it, but it's still there.. you just can't see it.)

      First, how do you know that Gator installed those? If a user "accidentally" installed Gator, how can you blame Gator for all the other shit software on their system?

      The reason why I go up against the hordes on here is because I actually approve of the way Gator handles this. I think their software sucks, but it isn't about the software. It's about the ethics of a company. This company knew that they were going to piss of privacy zealots, so they went out of their way to disclose everything.

      I used to work for an advertising company, on the software side. I was acquaintances with a marketing guy who went into client services. I asked him about privacy, and his stance on the internet. He said the same thing I think, and I still agree with him 4 years later, "Nobody cares about you, we sell you and everybody else like you in a nice package because that's what advertisers want." People don't have privacy on the internet unless they go through painstaking efforts to get it. You can, with little effort, find out who I am and where I live (although I have a few things thrown in the mix to throw off the stupid people) but I'm just not important enough. If you can find out where Bill Gates, and countless others live, you don't give a shit about me.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    26. Re:One word...GATOR by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      What do you want me to say here? If you're looking for cold hard facts, slashdot is generally the wrong place for it. I don't keep a journal of my gator run-ins. I have not reverse-engineered the software.

      In my own experience, installing JUST gator, will net you lots of other spyware in a few weeks time. I've done it on some machines as a test. Now, I did it awhile back, but the machine generally just did nothing, with gator installed. Maybe they've cleaned up their act a little bit, but the history of the product will forever keep it in the "spyware" category for me and anyone else that scans for spyware.

      You can't ignore the fact that you can't uninstall gator gracefully. They say you can, but you can't. Gator remains, and will re-appear soon enough. Unless you delete dozens of registry keys and remove DLL's, or run a program like ad-aware, you can't remove it.

      You approve of this? They get you to install this software under the premise that you'll "sometimes get an add on your screen." They don't mention that you can't remove it and it's going to download other adware for you.

      Not sure where you're going with the the whole privacy issue. They call this stuff spyware, I think, because it spies on what you do and it shows you ads according to what it thinks you like. None of it (yet.. I think..) is sending your keystorkes out to a remote server, or letting people view your desktop.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    27. Re:One word...GATOR by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      In my own experience, installing JUST gator, will net you lots of other spyware in a few weeks time. I've done it on some machines as a test. Now, I did it awhile back, but the machine generally just did nothing, with gator installed. Maybe they've cleaned up their act a little bit, but the history of the product will forever keep it in the "spyware" category for me and anyone else that scans for spyware.

      I think it really depends upon what you call Spyware. I would call it Malware or Idiotware, but Spyware is a complete misnomer.

      You approve of this? They get you to install this software under the premise that you'll "sometimes get an add on your screen." They don't mention that you can't remove it and it's going to download other adware for you.


      Yes, they do tell you exactly how to uninstall. They also pay a lot of software developers to make great free software to use. The problem with Gator is that they got bundled in with some evil broad brush of other software providors because a) they write shitty software and b) they make money.

      They call this stuff spyware, I think, because it spies on what you do and it shows you ads according to what it thinks you like. None of it (yet.. I think..) is sending your keystorkes out to a remote server, or letting people view your desktop.

      It what they do constitutes spying, I expect the CIA to have neon sides on top of their covert agents from now on.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    28. Re:One word...GATOR by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      "I would call it Malware or Idiotware, but Spyware is a complete misnomer."

      I'm not a trend setter. I call it what everyone else calls it. Hey, I already try to use "GNU/Linux" where I can, and that's enough for me.

      "Yes, they do tell you exactly how to uninstall."

      But... it doesn't *get* uninstalled. Go for it, install it on your machine. Then un-install it the add/remove programs way they tell you. See what happens in a few days.

      "They also pay a lot of software developers to make great free software to use."

      What great free software? If you mean masking "malware" under the guise of a password saving utility, that doesn't sound so great to me.

      "It what they do constitutes spying, I expect the CIA to have neon sides on top of their covert agents from now on."

      Why you gotta be a dick? I was simply suggesting a possible reason for why people call it that. You're the one that went on a tangent about internet privacy. Personally, I don't give a shit who knows where I live or what color boxers I'm wearing - just don't fuck with my PC by sticking all these advertisements on it using crappy code that is known to cause major headaches for the desktop support folks. (and major money. Gator and pals must cost the industry millions in support calls. I've been called on site to fix these crappy problems at least once a week, and we're just a very, very small company.)

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    29. Re:One word...GATOR by NecroBones · · Score: 1

      I lump Gator in with any spyware/adware that is installed behind your back. Personally, as far as I'm concerned, they're all criminal if they install software on your system without your consent or knowledge. It's no better than a common virus or trojan horse.

      --
      I have not lost my mind... it's backed up on disk somewhere!
    30. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you make any assumptions about me? Is your life so devoid of interaction with others that it actually matters to you what I believe? If so, that is quite sad. For the record: I was using a figure of speach. Though I have to say, I've been very entertained by this thread and I have you to thank for kicking it off. So, thank you!

    31. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wassamatter, this user too gooood for post-it notes on the side of his monitor? This guy too high and mighty to tape a piece of paper to the bottom of his keyboard like the rest of us?

      You need to just whack this guy and when his head stops spinning explain these nifty password 'tools' to him.

    32. Re:One word...GATOR by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you - my mom installed Weatherbug, which bundled Gator, and was fooled by the marketspeak where Gator claimed to be a tool to enhance her browsing experience. I later cleaned her system of Adware and Spyware and there were several dozen pieces of spyware and adware on the machine that were not Gator (she had removed Gator on her own). This was the only program she claims to have installed from the internet, so there is no other place these programs could have come from.

      Another user I deloused had three-THOUSAND files and registry entries with adware and spyware according to Ad-aware. He was an avid Kazaa and other stuff user (ok, in a nutshell, pR0n), and Gator wasn't the only culprit. After I booted in safe mode, ran a virus checker and removed several viruses his 2 year old unupdated virus checker didn't catch, I reinstalled the OS (98SE) to replace several damaged OS files and rebooted. I started MS-update and was bombarded with probably a dozen pop-ups and pop-unders. I then cleaned up the crap and spent several hours fixing registry entries. The machine actually boots in under 5 minutes again :)

    33. Re:One word...GATOR by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I'm not a trend setter. I call it what everyone else calls it. Hey, I already try to use "GNU/Linux" where I can, and that's enough for me.

      Funny, that is the same excuse people said about racism and lots of others. "If everybody jumped off a cliff..."

      But... it doesn't *get* uninstalled. Go for it, install it on your machine. Then un-install it the add/remove programs way they tell you. See what happens in a few days.

      It gets uninstalled. I have done this, several times. It's not a big deal, you follow the uninstall instructions and it goes away. You just aren't following the instructions for whatever piece of software you got.

      What great free software? If you mean masking "malware" under the guise of a password saving utility, that doesn't sound so great to me.

      DivX, Kazaa, and lots others. You are missing the point, Gator the company has a lot of applications. There is the advertising piece which is what gets installed, which is bundled with the Gator password thing. There is also a bunch of other apps that Gator makes. GAIN is the advertising piece.

      Why you gotta be a dick?

      My mother told me I could grow up to be anything I wanted to be, so I became an asshole.

      Personally, I don't give a shit who knows where I live or what color boxers I'm wearing - just don't fuck with my PC by sticking all these advertisements on it using crappy code that is known to cause major headaches for the desktop support folks.

      Then don't install the application. How hard is it to not click "Yes" on a dialog box that has a big green aligator on it. Blaming the company for the users ignorance isn't right. They are being clearly prompted for the Gator install, and they chose Yes.

      (and major money. Gator and pals must cost the industry millions in support calls. I've been called on site to fix these crappy problems at least once a week, and we're just a very, very small company.)

      So, you complain because you have a job and get paid because of Gator... and Gator is forcing all of these people to install it. I know I get a visit by a big alligator with a gun everytime I use Windows. It scares me.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    34. Re:One word...GATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you download a utility that is spyware? Even google toolbar. Bad practice.

    35. Re:One word...GATOR by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

      Err, don't you know that Gator isn't spyware. They said it, so it must be true. We aren't allowed to say that Gator is spyware at all, even if we all know and think that it is spyware, we just can't say that it is spyware. I mean if Gator was spyware, they'd have admitted it was spyware wouldn't they ?

    36. Re:One word...GATOR by jontsok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      your signature is badly misquoted from douglas adams

      --
      ook ook
  9. Windows Spyware Removal by Davak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are the removal programs...
    Spybot
    Adware

    However, this begs the more interesting questions....

    Is there *nix spyware?
    Why not?

    Davak

    1. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by pilot1 · · Score: 0, Funny

      You're going to need something to remove Windows, if you're intent on getting rid of ALL your spyware.

      format.exe is the perfect program to do that. ;)

    2. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by MikeXpop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not?

      Because *nix isn't nearly as widely used as a desktop OS as Windows is, and the ones using it are generally more computer-savvy.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    3. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by zapp · · Score: 1

      Is there *nix spyware?
      Why not?


      I am not aware of any. That doesn't mean there isn't though.

      Why? 2 part.
      1) a more secure use model. Not many apps allow plugins or scripts to run arbitrarilly. However, if they wanted to, I'm sure people could find a way to write to the user's ~/.profile or .bashrc, etc files. Or atleast hijack Mozilla/etc.

      2) Popularity. It's all in the numbers for the people who design spyware. Windows has a significant chunk of the market, and so that is who advertisers target. It's also why I think you don't see many commercials on TV specifically for gay people. 2% of the population isn't a suitable target.

      Not saying Linux users are gay, just that both groups are similarly small :)

      --
      no comment
    4. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Spleener12 · · Score: 1
      Is there *nix spyware? Why not?

      Same reason why there are very few *nix viruses. The vast majority of computer users don't use them, and those that do are smart enough to avoid them.

    5. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by pheared · · Score: 1

      Sure. This one is cross-platform: http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/5a05/

    6. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by jqh1 · · Score: 1

      I've used ad-aware to good effect

      --
      who's moderating the meta-moderators?
    7. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Not trying to troll or shit talk but I thought the gay population was believed to be 10%

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    8. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by cshark · · Score: 1

      And we still don't have anything close to an accurate picture of how many linux users there are out there.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    9. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      $80 for a fscking keylogger. Yeah right. BTW, keyloggers are the tools of skr1p7 k1dd13z. If you're trying to steal passwords, use better forms of espionage (for example, looking over the user's shoulder (and I can tell you, I've been 10WPM faster than the fastest attempt at that could go - they got about half the password), tricking them into letting it slip, looking for post-its on the monitor, etc.) than this, where someone just has to unplug their kb to stop the logging. If you're trying to log someone, these are too small capacity - I'd rather use a logging proxy or maybe a listen-only VNC client that was modded to read keystrokes. It's definitely spyware, but less useful than I'd think.

    10. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by itsari · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there *nix spyware?
      Why not?


      Just give me a minute...

      Just kidding. But I haven't seen any spyware for Mac OS and such, either. There's no unix spyware probably because computer savvy induviduals who get freakishly pissed-off by spyware isn't the target demographic these companies are looking for. That and *nix users make up, what, 0.5% of the internet community.

    11. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 1
      Is there *nix spyware? Why not?

      Because spyware/adware is most usefull (to its creators) when it is installed on as many computers as possible. Only a very small precentage of computers run *nix . OF those a significant number (much higher than with windows) are run by people who know enough about computers to avoid spyware/adware and/or find and remove it.

      For spyware/adware to wortk (from the perspective of the people making and distribting it) it needs a large userbase consisting of computer-illiterate people who either don't know it is there or think gaving it is a good thing.. The number of *nix users in this category is tiny compared to the number of windows users

    12. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by pheared · · Score: 1

      And things like VNC imply access to the machine. If all you have is physical access, this is decent, albeit expensive.

    13. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to jump through hoops to install and configure even usefull software you want to use. Nobody has time to edit 20 config files to make Gator for Linux work properly. Do you know if there is FAQ or user support group anywhere? ;)

    14. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

      Is there *nix spyware?
      Why not?

      Simple. Unless the user is stupid enough to give the spyware his/her root password or run it as root, it would be a sinch to kill. Permanently.

      --
      #include "sig.h"
    15. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by mwilliamson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There won't be much *NIX spyware simply because *NIX users are typically smarter, won't tolerate spy/ad/mal/scum/gator-ware, and are a lot more security conscious than the typical win-drones.

    16. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by glenstar · · Score: 1
      Do you know if there is FAQ or user support group anywhere? ;)

      Jesus christ... just read the fucking manual, would you? It's in info format.

    17. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled 'RealPlayer'.

      Opera is not spyware

    18. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good points except gays are not just 2% of the population; most studies put the number between 10-20% of the population, uniformly, across all cultures. Obviously many are not out. Yes, think of five to ten of your college buddies: at least one is likely gay.

      If you wondering, I'm not gay... "Not that there's anything wrong with that..." (Seinfeld episode) but one of my five college buddies finally came out a few years ago so from my own experience the statistics have been confirmed.

    19. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There won't be much *NIX spyware simply because *NIX users are typically smarter, won't tolerate spy/ad/mal/scum/gator-ware, and are a lot more security conscious than the typical win-drones.

      But remember, MacOS is *nix. I'm not so sure that the average Mac user is a computer guru like the average Solaris, *BSD or Linux user, but I am sure that it has a larger marketshare on the desktop than those first two *nixes, and most likely the third as well.

    20. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Or atleast hijack Mozilla/etc.

      Yeah. Like IE, Mozilla's practically designed for such a thing. Just look at all the crazy stuff on the "Firebird Extensions" page that installs in 2 clicks.

      Were there a substantial userbase on Mozilla, it would be pretty easy to use social engineering and get folks to install something malicious.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    21. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by MeanE · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Is there *nix spyware?
      Why not?"

      Because *nix users are already subscribed to porn sites.

    22. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these statements is not true:

      * Unix users are smarter than Windows users.
      * Unix is a viable replacement for Windows.

    23. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by veritron · · Score: 0

      All three statements aren't true.

    24. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by mcpkaaos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Simple. There is no adware for Linux as companies know that we don't have any money. Isn't that why we use it?

      (Easy there mods, don't let the sarcasm fool ya.)

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    25. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However, this begs the more interesting questions....

      Is there *nix spyware?
      Why not?



      Please steal a logic book and keep reading until you find out what "begs the question" really means. Clue: you sure as hell don't know right now.

    26. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Is there *nix spyware?
      Why not?


      What would be the point? Do you think there is any money to be made by knowing what thousands of geeks who know better than to click on popup ads are doing on the net?

    27. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Seq · · Score: 1

      I lost my mod points about 2.5 hours ago, but you would have been +funny for sure :)

      --
      -- Seq
    28. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      But I haven't seen any spyware for Mac OS and such, either.

      and who exactly would find it? That girl who's paper "like disappeared" on windows?

    29. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Mryll · · Score: 1
      Is there *nix spyware?

      Yeah, it's called Verisign DNS... ;)

    30. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you hosers who say that linux doesn't have adware because its not as widespread as windows are missing the big advantage the linux community has: the big advantage of linux software is that its mostly open source. and while the average user may not use the source, SOMEONE is bound to. if its actually a useful program someone will fork the project and make a version without spyware. and even if i'm wrong and the main reason adware isn't on linux is becuase linux isn't as common, you still gotta like the open source advantage.

    31. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by martyros · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is there *nix spyware?
      Why not?
      A bunch of reasons already mentioned, but also diversity of platforms. As long as most Unix users are super-choice people (use Mozilla, Galleon, Firebird, Konqueror, whatever), and as long as distributions and configurations abound (RedHat, Gentoo, Debian, Mandrake) it's going to be pretty tough to get spyware that hijacks enough applications to be worth any money to the spies.

      OTOH, if one distribution or configuration takes over, and becomes popular, you can bet there will be programs there... someone suggested the possibility of adding things to .bashrc or .profile, those are pretty standard tools...

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    32. Re:Windows Spyware Removal by Syrrh · · Score: 1

      Spyware writers who distribute their material as source code are to be commended for honesty, but that's gotta be the stupidest method of distribution possible.

      The whole point of spyware is to fool users into installing it, not give full disclosure and explain exactly what they intend to hijack on the system.

  10. Weatherbug by grumm3t · · Score: 2, Informative

    That darn weatherbug thing that everyone I know has. You try to uninstall it but it manages to find a way back in :-/

    1. Re:Weatherbug by jkeyes · · Score: 1

      Even though weatherbug might install itself through unkind methods (faking windows update things and such) the program itself is NOT spyware.

    2. Re:Weatherbug by bivaughn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Weatherbug generates massive amounts of fragmented TCP traffic, frustrating Intrusion Detection Sensor administrators everywhere.

  11. Lop! by Bugpowda · · Score: 0

    Lop lop lop lop lop lop lop . . .

    1. Re:Lop! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      " Lop lop lop lop lop lop lop . . ."

      This would be the c2.lop spyware from C2Media. It took my a while but I finally removed the bugger from my mom's laptop. The thing sets itself up such that certain parts of it just can't be deleted as they're always resident and running, so even if you remove the rest of the spyware, it keeps re-adding itself. You have to get down to safe mode or whatnot and clean it manually.

    2. Re:Lop! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1
  12. I would not know by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I runSecure OSs like OS X and Linux

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your asking to be labeled a troll with that comment, but I have to agree...

      Had OSX for 6 months and I have not seen one pop-up on it. To make matters worse, I now cringe when I even open up IE on just about any Windows machine. I honestly don't know why people put up with it.

      It is really nice that I get prompted for a password when installing something that touches system files even though I am logged in. And that Safari be default doesn't let everyone and their sister easily script some toolbar for it.

    2. Re:I would not know by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      if you even knew how those OSs worked, you would now you could never write spyware/adware like you do on windows.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:I would not know by immel · · Score: 1

      So do I, but there is always a possibility that someone has written spyware for it. Just because Linux and MacOS have a low market share doesn't mean nobody's interested in knowing what mac and linux users are doing and sell stuff to them.

      --

      10 Bits= $.25
      100 Bits= $.50
      110 Bits= $.75
      1000 Bits= 1 byte
    4. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worm writers would have to have a rather sophisticated delivery and propogation system because NOBODY USES YOUR SHITTY ASS OSX AND LINUX, because if they did, they would write more spyware for it.

      You only have security through obscurity (and a cocksure, uninformed attitude to boot). Would you target 3% of the market? And hope that it would infect that and find another 3% computer? The odds for just one hop is (0.03*0.03). Multiply by 0.03 each time. Not too appealing compared to ~0.95^n, is it?

      Besides, it would be harder to propogate on OSX since Apple keeps changing their APIs and disabling booting/erasing data on a lot of their OS updates.

    5. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      again...if you knew ANYTHING AT ALL about how Linux and OS X execute code from the internet, you would not be saying such things...so shut up you ignorent fucking retard. you should be band from using a computer becasue you seem to be so fucking stupid that you might use it is a hammer and hit yourself with it!!!

      NO OTHER OS WORKS THE WAY WINDOWS DOES. windows executes code with out telling the user or asking for Authorization from the user. that is how you get programs installed in your fucking system with out knowing it you dumbfuck.

      in Linux, any program that is droped onto the box must be authorized by the administrator before it can be run. SAME THING FOR OS X.

      the reason windows has so many fucking spywares and adwares and worms for it is becasue even a retard like yourself could write a script that can get into the machine and wreak havoc!!

      you fucking computer neophite.

    6. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TAHT IS TEH POWER OF LUNIX REDHATE!!!!!!!!!!!!112

      # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
      # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
      # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
      # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
      # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    7. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of spelling errors for you to consider...

      ignorant not ignorent
      banned not band
      because not becasue
      dropped not droped

      This service announcement was brought to you by the 'Construct Your Argument Properly Instead of Swearing Your Fucking Head Off Society'(CYAPISYFHOS). Thank you for your time.

    8. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you dick head

    9. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your mum is proud of you?

    10. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, yeah.

    11. Re:I would not know by cm5oom · · Score: 0

      you do know that the first internet worm was for bsd ( and maybe vms ) systems in 1987

    12. Re:I would not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing spyware for Linux is probably as easy as for windows, its just a matter of making a binary installer that has to be run as root. Then you're free to modify X-windows, the kernel or whatever you like. I think Linux is secure in this issue in the same way it is secure when it comes to viruses/worms: the fact that the user base is so much smaller and so much more technically advanced keeps these things away from us. For now, at least =)

  13. Weird Comparison by serutan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If somebody leaves a paper bag full of shit on your porch, rings the doorbell and runs away, does it really make any difference whether it's dog shit or cat shit?

    1. Re: Weird Comparison by Ranger · · Score: 1

      If somebody leaves a paper bag full of shit on your porch, rings the doorbell and runs away, ...

      You forgot to set it on fire. How can you forget that? By the way, what's you address?

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    2. Re:Weird Comparison by nFriedly · · Score: 1

      thats hillarious - and a good point

    3. Re:Weird Comparison by samhalliday · · Score: 1

      is that a european, or an african cat?

    4. Re:Weird Comparison by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Informative

      cat shit has a wierd sharp afterodor that dogshit doesn't. I've found its realitively easy to get rid of dogshit odor quickly it pretty much localizes. cat shit odor on the other hand travels and adheres to stuff. You have to Febreve the fuck out of everything to get rid of it, and it never truly does completely leave...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    5. Re:Weird Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 informative

    6. Re:Weird Comparison by Zack · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that. I've got 5 cats and two dogs, and the most foul smelling excrement definately comes from the dogs. Of course, the cats use the litter box, which is filled with Arm and Hammer litter which does a good job of controlling oder (but come on, five cats!) Even outside when one of the dog lays down a pile it's rank... even from 25 feet away (they length of the leash)

      And when they're bad enough to go inside.. uggghhhh.

      of course when the cats are mad they pee on things.. and for some reason when they're mad it smells MUCH worse.

      But no doubt about it. Dog Poop is the worst.

      (this has got to be the most OT I've ever been..)

    7. Re:Weird Comparison by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      of course when the cats are mad they pee on things.. and for some reason when they're mad it smells MUCH worse.

      Neutering helps.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    8. Re:Weird Comparison by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Except spyware/adware is equivalent to the pizza dude sprinkling cat|dog shit on your pizza just to make you eat it. Something you normally wouldn't do.

    9. Re:Weird Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      44!

    10. Re:Weird Comparison by sckeener · · Score: 1

      If somebody leaves a paper bag full of shit on your porch, rings the doorbell and runs away, does it really make any difference whether it's dog shit or cat shit?

      I guess it depends on what you are allergic to...

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    11. Re:Weird Comparison by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      No, but it does matter if it's dog shit or elephant shit.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  14. Windows Media Player... by penguinrenegade · · Score: 4, Interesting

    gets my vote. Not only does it report your media files, but also any other apps you're running!

    /me adjusts tinfoil hat...

    1. Re:Windows Media Player... by klui · · Score: 1

      Can you give more details about this? I turn off WMP's ability to contact MS and don't save the most recently opened files.

    2. Re:Windows Media Player... by Tenareth · · Score: 1

      Run a firewall that reports traffic... You might be shocked how much it chats with MS.

      Then, run Ethereal on the network and you'll find out what it's reporting to MS.

      --
      This sig is the express property of someone.
    3. Re:Windows Media Player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moron have you ever heard of a switch i guess not u r 2 busy using ur ethernet hub isntead like a little dumass. hey buddy do u also use a slide rule and a pocket protector?

      hint hint mr loser ethereal doesnt work if you have a real network

    4. Re:Windows Media Player... by nervous_twitch · · Score: 1

      hint hint ethereal can also be run on the same computer.

      --
      Trees everywhere, and not a forest in sight.
    5. Re:Windows Media Player... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      I do and it doesn't. It's never tried to contact MS except for when I start it up. Then it tried about once a month to find new codecs. Other than that, it makes no communication attempts.

    6. Re:Windows Media Player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, apparently you know NOTHING of how to exploit switches to enable the use of packet sniffers...why don't you read up on network security before you go and insult someone

    7. Re:Windows Media Player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of all the God forsaken spyware out there, you think WMP is the worst? :) I'd take it over Gator, New.Net, and Xupiter any day. At least I don't have to use it. I also think RealOne is a far worse annoyance.

    8. Re:Windows Media Player... by afroborg · · Score: 0

      How recent is your media player? I believe the later versions are worse. I run 7.1 which doesn't seem to try to contact MS so much as 9 does (I used to use 9, and Zonealarm complained about it all the time...)

      --
      my sig could kick your sig's arse...
    9. Re:Windows Media Player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moron have you ever heard of a switch i guess not u r 2 busy using ur ethernet hub isntead like a little dumass. hey buddy do u also use a slide rule and a pocket protector?

      hint hint mr loser ethereal doesnt work if you have a real network


      hey hey leet rulaz! I be layin tha smack down on yo bitch ass netwokin ho muthafucka know what im sayin yo?

      word up g-dog. we be big pimpiiiiin in da club 2nite yall!!!!!!1!!!

    10. Re:Windows Media Player... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      I have 9. Never run it, I like MPC. However, it has nothing to say, and isn't resident in memory, unless I run it. When I do run it, it makes no attempt at communication other than what I stated (or if it is opening something on the network). I don't espically trust it so it is required to ask permission each time (on the firewall).

    11. Re:Windows Media Player... by Tinfoil · · Score: 1

      /me adjusts tinfoil hat...

      You will be hearing from my lawyers unless you license said tinfoil hat technology.

    12. Re:Windows Media Player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I tried really hard to come up with a response to your stupidity, but after five minutes I still can't think of anything.

      That was jaw-droppingly stupid, dude.

  15. Lop.com by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lop is by far the worse one ever... recently I convinced my cousin to switch over to Mozilla Firebird, but this article (http://www.spywareinfo.com/articles/lop/) suggested that Mozilla isn't 100% safe, but is much easier to cure than hacking the registry (apparently it's just one line in the user_prefs). One sources said that it changes 47 registry keys... I also found that it randomly mutates into new filenames (actually it downloads newer versions), making it much harder for programs like Adaware to hunt it down.

    Also, Lop disguises itself as a mp3 search toolbar. It also comes with newer versions of MSN Plus.

    One more thing, some people are willing to profit from lop uninstaller, such as this one - http://www.onlinepcfix.com/spyware/Lop.htm - it contains some more information related to lop.

    --
    Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    1. Re:Lop.com by Bugpowda · · Score: 1

      YES! By far the worst... lop lop lop lop lop lop lop

    2. Re:Lop.com by HansF · · Score: 1

      I've come across a lop infected computer. I took a look on their site and found a question in their Faq that discusses the uninstall. They have a uninstall tool, I ran that tool and the pc 'seemed' clean.
      I agree, it's Crapware with capital C, but the cleaning went smooth.

      --
      --> Insert Funny Sig Here
    3. Re:Lop.com by MMaestro · · Score: 1

      No one ever said Mozilla was 100% safe. Its only safer than Microsoft Internet Explorer, which we all know doesn't mean much.

    4. Re:Lop.com by kr0n1c · · Score: 1

      I must agree - Lop is by far one of the worst spyware/addware apps i have ever come accross!!! I remember back a few years ago (before i had a firewall) i removed Lop several times from my computer, but everytime i rebooted it would just download a new copy! Surely this cant be right!! How is it that its a criminal offence for a hacker to upload BackOrifice on someones computer, when, on the other hand you have so called 'legitimate' companies using the same (or worse) techniques to install spyware on my computer without my knowledge. In both cases the *same* basic principle are broken - unauthorised access to a computer that does not belong to you - This MUST the data protection act! So, how do these companies get away with it? Answer, ask microsoft!! ActiveX allows the same 'hack' to be done legally IMHO. Im sure that it you look carefully at the activeX docs, you will find some clause that say something like "when you install ActiveX you are aregeeing to authorise/allow activeX developers to replace, and make changed to software stored on the PC" Regards, |r0|\|1c

      --
      "Always know what you say, but don't always say what you know"
    5. Re:Lop.com by johnjay · · Score: 1

      I got hit by lop.com once: the network admins recommended installing MSN Messenger Plus! on our work computers. Version 1 was fine, but when I upgraded to Version 2--well, I guess the developer ran out of $ and sold his soul to lop.com.

      Anyways, I managed to clean up IE by:
      1. Right-click on the the IE toolbars, it will list the toolbars that are showing, including the lop toolbar (named something like: "qfasdag" or "ghghlmt", or some other garbage).
      2. Run spybot. (I don't know how effective that is, but you might as well do it once you know you have spyware). Run hijackthis (sp?) and get rid of the bad stuff (use your judgement and read the advice from other users). A lot of the bad stuff will be pointing to a certain website (I forget the website's url, but it will be obvious), write down that url.
      3. Search the registry for the name of the toolbar you found in step 1. Delete those keys.
      4. Search the registry for the url you found in step 2. For these keys, you might want to change them to a different url, rather than delete them entirely.
      6. If I recall correctly, a lot of bookmarks get added to IE that go to the same url described in steps 2 and 5. Go through your bookmarks and delete any new bookmarks that you didn't add yourself (they will have names like: "Mortgages", "Gambling", "Computers", there will be tons of them, more than 40, so don't be surprised if you don't notice them all the first time you do this).
      7. Switch to Mozilla. It may not be 100% safe, but I've had a much better user experience with it than with recent versions of IE.

  16. Hijackers by zapp · · Score: 1

    Unfortunatelly I can't remember the names of them right now, but I've encountered a few spyware things out there that hijack your browser. In other words, they set your homepage to their page (and reset it if you change it), add their links to your favorites, your desktop, and add a flash object to you Active Desktop.

    Of course, they aren't applications you can easily remove through control panel.

    If anyone knows the names of some of these, please tack a reply onto this :)

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Hijackers by zapp · · Score: 1

      Lop.com is one of them. I just read someone else mention it here

      --
      no comment
    2. Re:Hijackers by Denyer · · Score: 1

      CoolWebSearch? Insidious M$ exploit irritant, it is.

      Link to removal tool: http://www.spychecker.com/program/cwshredder.html

      There's a Windows patch for the exploit, and CWShredder will detect if it's installed and refer you to it if not. =)

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  17. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When I got my computer there was some kind of software that someone had snuck onto the computer while it was at the store called "Micro Soft Window". Have you ever heard of this? And they tried to get me to agree to some long legal thing just when i turn the computer on. I don't know why they think people would fall for that. It was easy to uninstall though, which is good, most spyware is not so easy to uninstall.

    1. Re:Well by yerricde · · Score: 1

      The problem with this "Micro Soft Window" spyware is that without it, the driver CDs included with many devices will not run.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
  18. hotbar by a.koepke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One program that really annoys me is hotbar. The main reason so, it adjusts your MS Outlook settings all the time turning off using Word as your HTML editor. It also requires about 2 hours to remove the stupid program.

    You remove it using AdAware and it will remove it for that user profile. Then login as another user it will actually install itself again. I logged on as each user to remove it and finally managed to get rid of it, so I thought. It has now appeared back and I know it wasnt the (l)users installing it again since I gave them a lecture about adware and installing crap on machines that I am in charge of.

    If a program comes with a valid uninstall feature then I can tolerate it. When its a program thats a biatch to get rid of and keeps coming back I get really ticked off.

    --


    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    1. Re:hotbar by Dunark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The company I work for has officially designated Hotbar as a "security risk", and has put a Hotbar remover utiity on their desktop support website.

    2. Re:hotbar by Espectr0 · · Score: 1, Troll
      One program that really annoys me is hotbar. The main reason so, it adjusts your MS Outlook settings all the time turning off using Word as your HTML editor.


      No one on his/her senses uses word as their mail editor. Any one that uses word gets sent to /dev/null in my box.

      Plain text is the standard. Use it or lose it. You don't seem to know what horrid html word uses to send mail.
    3. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also requires about 2 hours to remove the stupid program.

      No way, Windows reinstalls in about half that!

    4. Re:hotbar by silverbolt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This may be OT, but your opinion is one of minority. Plain text is NOT the standard. Most people don't give a sh*t about what editor they are using, they use the default that Outlook / OE shows them. And yes, OE/Outlook is the most popular mail client out there, like it or not.

    5. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know it wasnt the (l)users installing it again since I gave them a lecture about adware and installing crap on machines that I am in charge of.

      Ooooh, a LECTURE! I'll bet they even listened without glazed-over eyes too, right?

      Software 'magically' reinstalled itself? One of two possibilities:
      1. You don't know what you're doing, and didn't uninstall it properly.
      2. A user reinstalled it (intentionally or not) and you just don't know it.
    6. Re:hotbar by a.koepke · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when you work in a corporate environment and management want users to be able create emails with tables in them. This is for internal company usage.

      --


      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    7. Re:hotbar by a.koepke · · Score: 1

      Its obvious that you have never dealt with this program and are just making stupid generalisations.

      When I logged back into the machine as another user the hotbar was there and had the message "Hotbar is now finishing its install" and then it was back even though I had deleted it from the machine and run adaware over it a few times.

      Next I will be checking to see if its downloading the files again, if so then I will be firewalling off the IP's it downloads things from.

      --


      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    8. Re:hotbar by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Then why not attach the word/html/pdf/etc file?

      There are tons of ways to solve that problem. Spam/worms/etc are getting so bad that even outlook 2003 comes with a feature built in to disable all html mail and convert it to plain text.

      My point wasn't much against html mail, but more against using a program to send mail that uses a propietary html code

    9. Re:hotbar by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Remember this is slashdot? Mostly what we think is the thought of a minority. Windows is used almost by 95% of the world, like it or not. We are supposed to be smarter, to have choices, to do what's "right" or to do better.

      There's a reason plain text is the standard, it's because ANYONE can read it, even on dumb terminals.

      HTML in mail is just plain stupid. I am tired of people sending mails in html that take 80k or something when the same can be had with around 4k of plain text. Google some for more info on this subject. Also you should look up on ESR "how to ask questions the smart way" for some more bad things that are common with net use in general

    10. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its obvious that you have never dealt with this program and are just making stupid generalisations.

      I have dealt with more than my fair share of viral programs, and I know how to delete them. You apparently don't, but seem to want to blame it on omnipotent magic code rather than your own incompetence.

    11. Re:hotbar by Raunch · · Score: 1

      Anything that turns off word for anything, much less *html editing* can't be that bad.

      --
      George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
    12. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Plain text is the standard. Use it or lose it. You don't seem to know what horrid html word uses to send mail.

      Not only that, who likes to wait 10 seconds every time they compose a new e-mail for Word to load when Outlook does a fine job of rendering its own HTML/Rich Text itself with its built-in editor.

    13. Re:hotbar by cuban321 · · Score: 1

      There is a removal utility? I'd like to publish this via group policy in AD. Can you provide a link?

    14. Re:hotbar by donely · · Score: 1

      I work for a large corporation where we have 2000 PCs and our users are of the "heavy/thick" kind :) Now we all of a sudden started having problems with people installing hotbar (it's recommended in the emails they send). We don't know how this is possible as we have limited the installing of programs on the users computers (policies). BUT luckily it can easily be removed, but there's a catch. Their homepage has an uninstaller, but the CATCH is that to access the page where it's at, you have to have hotbar installed...tsk tsk... But after running the uninstaller, it's effectively removed. and YES, I have kept the uninstaller I downloaded when I had hotbar installed, and use it regulary on users computers :(

      --
      I will blog about your incompetence @ http://www.barelyadraft.com
    15. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boy, reading all these negative experiences makes me happy that I own a Mac :-)

    16. Re:hotbar by Gnascher · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, reading all these negative experiences makes me happy that I own a Mac :-) So ... it took this article to make you happy about your Mac?? Interesting. -G

      --
      It's not my fault! It was this way when I got here.
    17. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Open word
      2) Type in e-mail
      3) Send from within Word

      But FOR GOD'S SAKE never use Word as default mail editor in outlook.

    18. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some crapware on my machine that just keeps re-installing OrbitExplorer even after I remove it with ad-aware...anyone know what this is or how to get rid of it?

    19. Re:hotbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're free to send non-plaintext mails as many as you want, but I'm keeping a pet filter that routes everything with the character sequence "

    20. Re:hotbar by feross101 · · Score: 1

      The company I work for has also done the same thing. Like the original post says, it takes a heck of a long time to get rid of.. I didn't even want to go to the website because I was scared that it would install some other junk along the way. The way I got rid of it was... - Disconnect the computer from the network. (No Internet) - Boot into SAFE mode.. otherwise a DLL that hotbar uses cannot be deleted. It reinstalls hotbar back whenever you access the internet. - Delete all of the users Temporary Internet files.. - Search for Hotbar files and delete. - Search Registry for hotbar and delete. - run adaware to catch anything else that you might have left behind. Reboot and pray...

  19. Xupiter is evil? Agreed 100% by redgopher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    DEAR GOD! My stomach turns every time that name is mentioned. I worked as a CSR at a local ISP for a year or so, and every time Xupiter was mentioned, nearly all of the employees within earshot would mutter, "Aw, jeez" or something else to that effect.

    On another note, I think that Gamespot's download manager, Kontiki, is kind of sneaky.. at least sneaky in the fact that I thought it was just another humble download manager. Then again, why would anyone want you to have their download manager unless they were spying on you?

    Stupid me. Oh well... thank god for Ad-aware.

    --
    Insert clever one liner here.
    1. Re:Xupiter is evil? Agreed 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gamespot is shitty anyway.

  20. Anti-spyware software by invisik · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    A client of mine recently asked what anti-spyware program they should run alongside their anti-virus. They have lots of "less-experienced" users so thend end up with all kinds of stuff being installed on machines.

    I use SpyBot Search and Destry and it does a good job. But they need something real-time, like a antivirus scanner. I mainly use Symantec Corporate Edition antivirus, but Symantec doesn't seem to have a anti-spyware program yet (maybe it's somewhere in one of their bundles, but that doesn't help me out network-wide)... Need something that automagically updates itself from the server, too, just like Symantec Corporate Edition.....

    Spyware is definately an annoyance!!!

    Thanks for any info....

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
    1. Re:Anti-spyware software by jkeyes · · Score: 1

      Norton Antivirus 2004 has Spyware protection. ...............

    2. Re:Anti-spyware software by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      I know of a good one, it's called Linux.

      Or alternatively, you could use an alternative browser, like Firebird, Mozilla, or Opera. This generally helps keep the spyware and adware down, as these browsers have much better security IMHO than IE.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    3. Re:Anti-spyware software by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      I use spybot too. In new versions you can schedule autoscans which if it isn't as good as real-time. will catch most stuff before they wreak havoc if you have it scan once a week or so. TinyFirewall (which used to be free, damn them and there profit making ways) is nice too in that it'll catch stuff trying to install itself and alert you. The setup curve on it is horrible though. You'll spend a week authorizing prgrams before its gets to a point where it won't bug you every 15 seconds.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:Anti-spyware software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Spyware Blaster
      - Spyware Guard

    5. Re:Anti-spyware software by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      There's something called pestpatrol, but i've never used it, as I don't run windows.

    6. Re:Anti-spyware software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out spyware blaster and spyware guard, Ive been using them for a while now with good results.

      http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.h tm l

    7. Re:Anti-spyware software by darf · · Score: 1

      If you pay for Ad-aware, you get a complementary app called Ad-watch. Ad-watch is a real time component to Ad-aware. That may be what you are looking for.

    8. Re:Anti-spyware software by Syrrh · · Score: 1

      Ugh... My number-one recommendation would be to NEVER trust an Anonymous Coward's advice, though these two seem to be ok. There are a lot of utilities out there which act like spyware protection but will happily infect your machine with all the crap you're trying to prevent.

      Ad-Aware, Spybot S&D, HijackThis, etc are all good, and most have free and non-free versions depending on your company's policies.

      Also, disabling the autoinstall ability and third-party browser extensions in IE help a good amount of userland damage. Just run Windowsupdate once first, so that it can get the ActiveX install done before it's disabled.

  21. a musical analogy by Savatte · · Score: 5, Funny

    which Creed album is the worst?

    1. Re:a musical analogy by shawnywany · · Score: 1

      Definetely that one(s) with Scott Stapp singing the vocals.

    2. Re:a musical analogy by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      said creed to his moderators:
      Mod me offtopic

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    3. Re:a musical analogy by mmdurrant · · Score: 2, Funny

      The worst Creed album is definitely the first one, the one with that "Jeremy" song.

      --
      I see my shadow changing, stretching up and over me...
    4. Re:a musical analogy by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      You mean Eddie Vedder?

      Actually, no offense to Pearl Jam. They're pretty good.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    5. Re:a musical analogy by tedDancin · · Score: 1
      Mod me offtopic
      Don't you mean: "Mod meeeeeeeee offff-top-ic-ahhhhh!"

      Hmm.. hope I didn't lose anything in the translation. (:
      --

      Ladies, form queue here -->
    6. Re:a musical analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And fret for your TOOL.

    7. Re:a musical analogy by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      which Creed album is the worst?
      That's like asking which kid on the short bus is the stupidest.
  22. Spyware that you can't uninstall... by LamerX · · Score: 1

    The best spyware is the stuff that you can't un-install. I can't remember the names of this crap. But I remember one toolbar for IE that I was paid to remove. There was no way to get rid of it. Also, HotBar has to be the worst because everyone installs it without knowing just how bad it is. I've seen it cause more problems with the computer than anything else. Since it integrates into Explorer, OE, Outlook, etc, It causes major headaches. Its so poorly written, and pops up advertising all the time I can't stand it. Also, there are those damn, "Free GAMES" that people always install. Those make administration a nightmare.

    But the worst software that gets onto a computer has to be any Win32 application. Windows seems to make people lazy, and they seem to forget about things like permissions. Everything you install in Windows requires "Administrator" access, which is what allows all this bullshit software to get installed.

  23. AOL client of any flavor by T5 · · Score: 1

    I can't count how many times I've had to clean up certain versions of the AOL software. One could strongly consider the new AOL 9, since it turns off Windows Messenger, malware. IMHO, it's not a bad idea to kill it, but to do so and not notify the user is insidious.

  24. Pre-Installed Dell Software by Jouster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about Dell's SupportLink, which (and I have the TCPdumps to prove this) broadcasts your system's S/N, your MS Windows S/N, and several other tantalyzing bits of data back to Dell every 30 minutes or so?

    Mind you, I love my Dell, but this pissed me off.

    Jouster

    1. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by g0hare · · Score: 1

      roger, we have confirmation. I mean, yeah, it was 469.00 with XP Pro AND Office XP pro, so a compromise was inevitable but still..........

      --
      Vote Quimby!
    2. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by linkjunkie · · Score: 1

      offtopic - but...

      I just had an experience with Dell tech support that I can only sum up as discouraging!

      The BIOS couldn't find the HD or the CDROM, after one hour of humoring them, I was told to reinstall the OS!!!

      I still can't figure out how I should do that without access to the HD.

      Dell was known for support and computers that didn't need extra crap to run (like Compaqs paq shit,) what's happening to them??

    3. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's OS used to do the same thing, it would contact "littlebuddy.apple.com" every couple of hours and upload a ton of info and shit from your system.

    4. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Call back on another shift. I know it's a pain, but occasionally you'll get someone crappy. Call back 8 hours later when they're likely to be gone.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    5. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Call back at night when the guys in Bangalore are running the tech support line. The day shift in Round Rock missed the cluetrain, big time. I know it's fashionable to dis Indian techies but Dell seems to have found real geeks there. They were able to talk a friend through a hardware upgrade where the Round Rock boys would have left him playing driver whack-a-mole.

    6. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here is a link

      There is some english for you towards the bottom.

    7. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by 1010011010 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.macopinion.com/columns/macskeptic/00/11 /21/

      MacOS 9 made a call to Gilligan's Island and tried to send some information to its little buddy at littlebuddy.apple.com. This was supposed to be a one time event at the end of the install process - but of course, Apple, forgetting that not everyone on the planet has 24/7 high-speed internet to their homes, created a situation where if it fails (ie: God forbid, you're not connected to the internet while installing MacOS 9), it repeatedly tries to get through. This first surfaced because someone noticed that their Mac was trying to make a net connection when nothing was supposed to be doing that.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    8. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's fashionable to dis Indian techies but Dell seems to have found real geeks there.

      That hasn't been my experience. I told one guy about a problem I had with my laptop, and could duplicate on 2 other identical laptops. He found a laptop of the same model, and was also able to duplicate the problem.

      First he told me it was "by design". When I disagreed, he tried to convince me to re-install Windows. Later, he wanted me to ship the computer back to Dell. I couldn't get him to escalate the call either - after a few more failed phone calls, I just gave up.

      Maybe they should always send your phone calls to an area of the world where it's the middle of the night. Real geeks wouldn't be working 9-5 ;)

    9. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by DontHaveAClue · · Score: 1

      I would like to know where they are all hiding when I call. Working for a company that sells Dell computers with its software I have had to make enough calls there to get a good variety of them. I spend a week with one customer and six different Dell techs trying to get her computer fixed. Being hung up on (and no calls logs so they insisted on troubleshooting again), telling her to go the device manager in NT 4, saying the CDs were bad, sending out he wrong Cds then telling me that I called too many times and needed to speek with the persistent problems department (or whatever they called it) after a few more hours ended up having the computer shipped to me to be completed. Don't get me wrong, a few khow their stuff but most if it isn't in their FAQ you are SOL. I dread calling them more than going to the dentist

    10. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by bogie · · Score: 1

      Dell support got a well deserved rep for being decent 5 years ago. Today they are just coating along on that rep. If your not talking about servers with them or from a business with a shedload of PC's, they can be a real pain in the ass.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    11. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for bringing this up. Am I right that you can disable this "feature" by simply deleting the registry key in the folder HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/Microsoft/Windows/Curr entVersion/Run? Or will this have nasty side-effects? (I hate it when they bundle spyware and software)

    12. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by idsofmarch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit! Now I have to wait 14 seconds before I can hit submit. Eat me! 'Slow down cowboy,' JFC!

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    13. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by chrispl · · Score: 2

      What is the exact process name? I looked up everything thats running (and in the run part of the registry) and didnt find "support link" or anything else overly suspicious.

      Then again I bought my dell laptop in germany and we have "personal data protection" laws that would probably make what you are describing illegal.

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    14. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you, I love my Dell...

      You need professional help.

    15. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you made up my mind. I'm looking for a new laptop. Have used Dell before and liked the stability, even if they are a bit expensive. Phoned up Dell and asked if it was possible to get some other OS than WinXP, or even a blank HD instead. Nope, ney, nix, totally impossible, never. We have a deal with Microsoft. Buy a computer from us, get Windows, that's the only way.

      The day after that I saw an ad on Swedish TV: "No hassle! Get your PC exactly the way you want it!" Too bad I didn't see it before, then I could rub their faces in it. "So I can get a cheaper computer by stripping the hardware, getting a less generous services guarantee, but I can't get a new OS. Why not? I want a new OS, that is the only modification I want. And you said I could get my computer EXACTLY the way I wanted it?"

      I was still considering them. I could just reformat the HD and install the OSes I want. It would give Microsoft a +1 to boast about on their false XP sales statistics, but what the heck.

      But now spyware also... no. I will not support a company that screws it customers like that, even if it won't affect me. From now one it's anyone but Dell. Does anyone know if any of the major laptop makers are more alternative-OS friendly? HP boast in ads that they are the Linux alternative, but does that apply to end user computers too, or only company servers?

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    16. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by mjprobst · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one here that feels the first thing one should do with a major-brand laptop or desktop is wipe it clean and reinstall an operating system from scratch, without all the silly support bells and whistles they try to include as a "feature"?

      More often than not these "tools" are buggy or fail to provide any actual benefit over calling the manufacturer or a local service center, and serve the additional purpose of making tech support outside the manufacturer difficult because things aren't where one would expect on a stock install.

    17. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point. I wish I'd reached a decent standard of computer skill when I got my dell. Planning to migrate to Debian, so there's hope for me yet :)

    18. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by tereshchenko · · Score: 1

      The first things I did with my Dell: 1. got latest drivers from Internet 2. configured BIOS 3. formatted hard-drive and installed my own OS (XP, but not customized Dell one) No more bundled shit ;-)

      --
      Slashdot - free anti-Microsoft propaganda 24/7
    19. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by sakshale · · Score: 1
      [...]the first thing one should do with a major-brand laptop or desktop is wipe it clean and reinstall an operating system from scratch.
      Unfortunately, the standard windows distribution CDs are often missing the needed drivers for your laptop. If you want to do this, first got to the vendor support site and download all of the drivers, placed them on a CD and then reformat your hard disk.
      --
      For every problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong.
    20. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      That is so untrue... My experience has been this: load the first time with the OEM version. Write down system config (graphics card, sound card, network card). (especially with a laptop, with a normal computer just go hunting on the motherboard for what is written on the chips)

      Reinstall a good Windows (and the only two that apply are Win2000 and WinNT4, and the latter only on older machines). You may be in VGA mode with no sound, but you can still go to the sites where you can get the drivers. I usually prefer the drivers of the chipset manufacturers than the drivers of the OEM. Yes, I know you might not get some features, but I don't trust OEMs.

      (Note: I also can install Linux, but I prefer OpenBSD and by the way, my machines are clean, when I reinstall machines it is to help people so then I can only do windows...you know this Linux on the desktop thingy doesn't work when you get the kid that wants to play Rollercoaster Tycoon or whatever)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    21. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by pavera · · Score: 1

      Completely opposite experience for me,
      I fixed a guys computer the other day who had spoken with an Indian tech over at Dell. His computer was freezing up (windows xp). The tech had him disable all of the services on the computer, and then couldn't figure out why the computer wouldn't connect to the internet. They spent 2 hours on the phone, the tech kept telling him to download new drivers from the internet, and the guy kept telling the tech "I can't because I can't connect anymore" in the end the tech told him he'd just have to reinstall windows, that it was broken beyond repair. Anyway, I turned on the services, found the one that was misbehaving and disabled it (I forget which one it was but it wasn't necessary), fixed beautifully... about 5 minutes.

    22. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you know why I took delivery on my new Dell machine, verified everything worked ok with the installed copy of WinXP, then I wiped the drive, and reinstalled with a purchased upgrade copy of XP I had.. Yes, it made the machine cost ~$100 more, but I'm sure none of the mentioned bogus Dell crap is installed....

    23. Re:Pre-Installed Dell Software by Jouster · · Score: 1

      For version 1, it was DADApp.exe. Dunno what it's called in version 2, though.

      Jouster

  25. IANALs here we come by dhowells · · Score: 1
    Also, any thoughts on whether some of this stuff is even legal, as it is almost certainly not ethical.

    Christ, we get enough of the 'IANAL but....' crowd sounding off on here without needing to be invited. Sounds like we'll be in for a tirade.

    D.

    --
    use Blunt::Instrument;
  26. not just zealousy, they are all bad, Bad BAD! by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
    my most frequent complaint (And ubiquitous from my poor L-users) is "my (fill in browser, i install mozilla for them) is going slow, can you help it". every time. i get Lava Soft's AdAware and clean the systems. immediately, i hear a "oh, that wasn't happening that way before" and collect my tech support check (for beer).

    i ilke tech support = beer. but its a lotta shit for a L-user to put up with

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  27. pr0n dialers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when I worked at v!v!d V1deo, the boss loved the idea of the sneaky pr0n dialers the submitter talked about. (You click on a link that says "Free hot videos!" or whatever, and you get an active-x control which then downloads and installs a windows component and puts the icon on your desktop. Then when you doubleclick that, it actually hangs up your modem and dials out to a foreign country that has INSANE rates, several dollars a minute. Your phone bill can reach into the hundreds very quickly, and the phone company doesn't give a crap, you gotta pay if you want to keep using your phone!)

    Of course old steve's house is probably burning down today, as the simi valley fire has spread into the hills above chattsworth.

    Endorsing pr0n dialers will lead to your house burning down. QED.

    1. Re:pr0n dialers by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Someone should mod parent up. Pron dialers not only fsck up your computer, they steal money.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    2. Re:pr0n dialers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Endorsing pr0n dialers will lead to your house burning down. QED.

      LOL... QED... i remember that from proofs.

      Mod parent up

    3. Re:pr0n dialers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QED- A latin abbreviation for quod erat demonstrandum. It means "which was to be shown" in english. It is used at the end of a proof to show that the proof has been completed.

    4. Re:pr0n dialers by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Eh, I ran across one on a friends computer that set itself to run during start up and was occasionally dialing out when the computer was left idle. (Only) racked up $60 in charges before I came over to fix their computer (in other words, remove a shit ton of adware, spyware, malware, scumware, etc.) and caught it.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  28. Redsheriff is the one I find particularly annoying by kevinatilusa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not necessarily through the damage it does, but through the sheer number of times I have to get rid of it. Even though I use adaware and block cookies, it still manages to get itself in through a back door (I think it runs as a java applet, which then installs a cookie).

    It doesn't do anything particularly nasty (other then send tracking data out), but I find it hard to block and its used by quite a few sites that I visit often (BBC, for example).

  29. you mean 37 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    excluding your sig and punctuation marks that is

  30. It's not spyware, but adware counts as well by yerricde · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    the most evil form of spyware I am personally aware of is the infamous insidious Gator.

    Gator is adware, and it may be evil adware according to some users, but but it's not spyware.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:It's not spyware, but adware counts as well by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      ...except in the sense that it's software that examines your browsing history and sends this back to Gator Corp, who use the information, currently, to provide personalized advertising.

      People who hear that it isn't "spyware" might believe that this means it doesn't pass personal information back to the software's makers. It does.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  31. Watch what you say.... by anakin357 · · Score: 1

    Just don't call Gator Spyware. :)

    --
    http://www.fsckin.com/
    1. Re:Watch what you say.... by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Gator can lick my bumbaclot.

  32. fuddles' payper liesense BugWear(tm) blight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    starts logging onto msFUDge.hostage.extortion.controll from as soon as you turn it on, right through the multiple re-boot process, should you be able to actually attempt to run any applications.

    when it becomes evideNT that you are out of .compliance/liesenses not paid dupe, it gets worse right away.

  33. SaveNow by pavera · · Score: 4, Informative

    The worst program I've ever seen is savenow..
    It starts like 5 processes on boot (using between 50-75mb of ram and 20-25% cpu), sends all of your browsing habits somewhere else, and pops up porn, and other various ads randomly while using the computer. It is by far the worst spy/ad ware I've ever seen.

    1. Re:SaveNow by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      That explains it - one student at my school was experiencing SEVERE problems with porn popups, and I ended up telling him about Alt-F4 and telling the teachers that it's not his fault - it's the fault of the people who download KaZaA onto our shit-boxes (OLD-ass Dells). BTW, I'd have them cleaned with SbS&D, but the apps seem to know how to propagate the network, much like a worm.

    2. Re:SaveNow by HaggiZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      it pops up porn? Hhrrmm.... where do I download this thing from again?

    3. Re:SaveNow by JemyM · · Score: 1

      SaveNow is the only program of this kind that actually entered my machine, except for RealOne.

      It was distributed together with a movieplayer that at the time was a very good alternative (but now there are much better ones). Unfortunate I cannot remember its name anymore.

      SaveNow makes the machine run like crap, sucking up heaps of memory, cpu power and then there are thoose annoying messages. Whenever I feel my machine is running slow, I make sure that SaveNow.exe isnt running (you never know when it returns).

    4. Re:SaveNow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had "save now" somehow (damn president that requires admin privileges) end up on my main terminal server. It took my hours to get rid of completely, including registry hacking and numerous S&D scans. This one gets my vote as worst spy ware, because the effin thing just keeps coming back, and every time someone would log into the terminal server, it would tell them that someone removed it, and they should re-install it. Although the looks on the admin girls faces when the numerous porn pop-ups displayed themselves were priceless.

  34. Gator, Xupiter, and more! by ShadowKatmandu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Xupiter is a personal demon for me, but Gator is up there as well. Not to mention the uncountable number of little toolbars that install themselves without warning into IE. There was one some time back, I think it was called Bargains or Bargain.com or something like that which was terribly annoying. It was one of those that hijacks your browser and pops up ads whether the page you're on has ads or not.

    Personally, I consider spy/adware more annoying than most viruses...

    --
    --ShadowKatmandu
    "It only takes one true believer to make a thing real..."
    1. Re:Gator, Xupiter, and more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking of Bargain Buddy. No friend of mine...

  35. I had to help a user over the phone uninstall this by headbulb · · Score: 1

    I used to work for Customer service. A customer called in complaining about xupiter. I told them I didn't have a guide to uninstall it but that I would go the extra mile and find out how to get rid of it. I did a little googling. Found an unistall page. Got the bloody thing uninstalled while the woman on the other side of the phone is thanking me profussly (one of those customers That over reacts and it takes telling her twice to do something because, you are talking to her husband through her)

    I then told them how to setup IE so that it wouldn't automatically install things.

    I sent my survey out and I didn't get the greatest score from them.. But she was thanking me to the point of me wanting to tell her to shutup and listen.

    So xupiter and IE get my vote.
    Rant Oh and some users who can't learn what the second mouse button is.. I can see them not using it.. But when i say RIGHT mouse button hose much more discriptive can I get.. rant over

  36. I agree with you by sweatyboatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't use RealPlayer at all. If for some reason a website offers only RealPlayer videos I just do without. not a big deal for me. much more annoying, as you say, to remove the tentacles of Real after you've installed their "free" player.

    -sweatyb

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    1. Re:I agree with you by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm fed up with their sh*t. I do not play their media again, and my computer is just thanking me every day about it!

    2. Re:I agree with you by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      The only good thing about Realplayer is that you could use it to play Sci-Fi.coms Seeing Ear Theater, and that it supported esd as an output format.

      Because of the joy of Esound, you could then use esdmon to snag the stream as waveform data and then encode it to a more cromulent media format. Of course, then along came stuff like Vsound, now sadly discontinued.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    3. Re:I agree with you by LordSah · · Score: 1

      Real is the spawn of Satan, and should die of a sexually transmitted disease. If I was forced at gunpoint to run Real, I think I'd run it inside a virtual machine.

    4. Re:I agree with you by MrLizardo · · Score: 1

      Realplayer actually works fine under Linux, disturbingly enough. Embeds in the browser nicely, doesn't try to hijack file associations. I'm sure Real would give hijacking file associations a try if there weren't so many different ways for them to be handled under different versions of different Linux desktops.

      -LizardMan

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    5. Re:I agree with you by shogun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to play Real Player movies under windows without the crap, just install it, then associated the files with Media Player Classic a neat little player that looks just like ole Media Player 6.x. (It also handles quicktime movies in a similiar fashion)

    6. Re:I agree with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but there is a lot of good porn in the real player format for some reason

    7. Re:I agree with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use it either, through lack of interest in what it does. Unfortunately its installer seems to be everywhere, it soon reappears on any of my PCs. Sometimes it has come with a browser update, that is understandable but there should be an option to deselect it. I am fed up with having to uninstall it. I think (although proving it would be tedious) that it causes a lot of system problems, crashes, slowdowns etc. I seem to remember that it was also doing its utmost to gather personal information, illegal in certain countries, and I do know first hand that it used to dial out to my ISP whenever it felt like it, i.e. several times a day, to check for updates. All of this shows a large degree of stupidity on the part of its authors. If you want someone to use your product, and presumably update to the full, paid-for version, don't annoy them. I have over the years upgraded quite a few free programs to full versions, if they were useful, wanted, and well-behaved. Real Player marketing persons please note, your junk fulfils none of these conditions.

      In the UK we have a weed known as Bindweed (probably known as otehr names elsewhere), which has the annoying habit of returning in a few weeks even if killed by the strongest legal weedkiller, unless you get every last trace, right down to the roots. If the tiniest trace of it remains alive, it will be back. It reminds me of Real Player, I guess every file contains the rudiments of an installer, so unless you get rid of every last trace, it will be back. What a vile, stupid, and potentially buggy way to write an application. What is wrong with a clean install and uninstall? It must also be easier to do, simpler, and by implication have less potential to cause problems.

      As I now do all my browsing and email in Linux (Mozilla and Ximian Evolution are very good, Konqueror and Opera also get used on occasion), the problem seems to have gone away. If there is a version for Linux, as I suspect, it will need root priviledge to install itself, which it will not get. Simple.

    8. Re:I agree with you by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea in theory but doesnt help with RealOne. I always use MediaPlayerClassic but just having RealOne installed means you get frequent 'friendly reminders' from Real MessageCenter.

      That's why I agree RealOne IS SPYWARE, and I too avoid real media files at all costs now!

      PS. I believe the Message Center "feature" is forced on you even in the non-free version. :( Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.

  37. It keeps coming back?! by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    I found it and uninstalled it on three employee computers while doing an Office 2000 update. One of them stated flat-out that she didn't know how it got there. I'll check up on them and find out if this bit of malware has returned.

  38. Spyware that launches multiple processes by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know the name of the specific spyware, but one of my clients had spyware that would have two processes running at a time. If you terminated one of the processes, a new one would pop up, probably created by the other one. The process names were also random characters, meaning you couldn't just stop certain processes from startup. I did end up using WinPatrol, which is a lifesaver. It's able to look at services, processes, and startup items. It gives more information than just the names and is useful is stopping active processes and startup items.

    1. Re:Spyware that launches multiple processes by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something from the Jargon file (the one with Robin Hood). What is the name of the program again? :-)

  39. Magic Lantern by mjphil · · Score: 1

    The FBI's virus/spyware. What makes it win? The fact that virus detection folks have agreed not to search for it.

    But don't worry, I'm sure it will only be used for good.

    1. Re:Magic Lantern by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Someone with a virus detection program that uses a virus definition file who is computer savvy and being monitored by the FBI ought to publish a line that you can add manually to your virus checker's virus def file to obliterate this trojan.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    2. Re:Magic Lantern by ymgve · · Score: 1

      Does Magic Lantern even exist? The FBI claimed they'd begin using it, but I've never heard of it since then. If it were in real use, wouldn't there be documentation on this in the trial, like it was in the Scarfo case?

  40. Most Filesharing software like iMesh and KaZaAaAaA by dustwun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of the filesharing software people are so eager to defend often install a who's who of spyware/adware today. For an interesting little test, take a clean windows system (no jokes) and install your iMesh kazaa, grokster or any other filesharing program. Then run adaware or spybot against it. You'll see new.net, shop-at-home select agent, gator, and many other nasty little goodies. File-sharing programs running on windows claim to be fighting for user/'fair use' rights, when they are simply fighting for their bottom line as a company. The fun part is that for nearly all of them, if you remove the spyware/adware the programs cease to function. Just my $0.02

  41. Business plan by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Ask Slashdot what sort of spyware is the worst. 2. Make this sort of spyware. 3. Profit!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Business plan by bakreule · · Score: 1

      For Christ's Sake, I just ate lunch..... Is that webpage really needed??? Are you studying this???

      At least include a warning for us people who don't know what the word "Chunder" is....

      Ugg....

      I think I now might be able to contribute to your page.... let me get my digital and set it on timer.... Do you accept movies?

      --

      Buses stop at a bus station
      Trains stop at a train station
      On my desk there's a workstation....

  42. LOP.COM by Str8Dog · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget the evil that is LOP.com... this crap gets installed on peoples system when they are searching the internet for mp3 songs.

    You will come across a site called mp3search.com or something to that effect that installed lop. The last time my wife got infected with it, adaware and spybot could not get rid of it...

    Nasty bit of malware.

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  43. Worst Adware Revealed! by missing000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    With absolute certainty, the worst adware is the threadjack /. post

    Especially evil is the sig line advertisement.

    1. Re:Worst Adware Revealed! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I concur. Signature line advertisements are insidious. That is why I put the bulk of my Ad in the homepage link. ;-)

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  44. *n?x lacks residential mindshare by yerricde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    owever, this begs the more interesting questions....

    "Raises", not "begs".

    Anyway, there are a few reasons why there isn't any adware designed specifically to run on popular desktop *n?x systems. For one thing, there's no well-known ActiveX equivalent that lets a script on a visited web page download code and run it with the logged in user's full privileges. But the major difference is that no desktop *n?x system, not even Mac OS X, has nearly as much mindshare in residences as Microsoft Windows, so development efforts directed at Win32 have bigger results than development efforts directed at LSB or Carbon APIs. Businesses don't count because they can more strictly regulate what can be installed on a workstation, possibly through bigger budgets for licensing proprietary HTTP proxy software.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:*n?x lacks residential mindshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >But the major difference is that no desktop *n?x system, not even Mac OS X, has nearly as much mindshare in residences as Microsoft Windows, so development efforts directed at Win32 have bigger results than development efforts directed at LSB or Carbon APIs.

      He got "Begs the Question" wrong, which you pointed out. Conversely, you started a sentence with "But". :) If we shall stick to old rules, let's do it correctly!

    2. Re:*n?x lacks residential mindshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however, not owever.

  45. Spybot Search&Destroy to the rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Highly recommended software to disinfect/protect against spyware: Spybot Search&Destroy. Free (as in free). Another one you may care to look at is Spyware Blaster

    Note that you may technically (?) be breaking contracts by removing spyware/adware.

  46. Something I got a long time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called a 'TV'. It is absolutely the worst adware ever. No matter how hard I try, I cannot get rid of it. I think it has some sort physicological hold on me.

    1. Re:Something I got a long time ago by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those comercial things causes little gnomes to pop out the side and repaint my entire house as a giant set of billboards, replaced my dog with a tatooed monkey that bonks me in the head whenever I try to sleep, puts a 500 pound GPS blackbox transmitter on my left rear bumper, and makes it so my house will only accept electricity from some company out in the central Pacific that charges $5 a megawatt hour.

      Oh, and the new cameras in the bathroom are a nice touch.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  47. I'll never know the name. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't think that spyware existed on MacOS X, but... my girlfriend came home from school last winter with something really odd. Internet Explorer would, no matter your user preferences, always go to a certain internet shopping site as a homepage. And would give you a barrage of popups constantly. I forget what shopping site, and back then I only had inbound firewalling, so I had no logs to check.

    No toolbars installed. No plugins. I created a new user account for her, and that worked, so apparently it hadn't messed with the internals of the Internet Explorer.app (which seems like a vector they'll soon exploit). Crappy, though.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:I'll never know the name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your GF probably had a popup which used JAVA to reset the homepage. YOu just needed to change the homepage w/o creating a whole new user. Or you could have trashed the IE preferences which in turn would have trashed the default HP.

    2. Re:I'll never know the name. by immel · · Score: 1

      The other solution to all this is even simpler- just don't use internet explorer! There are several great browsers out there for MacOSX, and most of them are pretty good. If you can't get safari, get camino.

      --

      10 Bits= $.25
      100 Bits= $.50
      110 Bits= $.75
      1000 Bits= 1 byte
    3. Re:I'll never know the name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nice thing about having a decent *nix base is that anything attempting to mess with Internet Explorer.app would have to ask for the sudo password.

    4. Re:I'll never know the name. by foom · · Score: 1

      """The nice thing about having a decent *nix base is that anything attempting to mess with Internet Explorer.app would have to ask for the sudo password."""

      Or not...if you use the default setup, users who are Administrators (are in group 'admin') have write access to nearly everything in /Applications and /Library, and can thus screw up damn near everything (including Internet Explorer) without asking for a sudo password.

      Of course, if you use your computer as a non-administrator, then you're safe.

    5. Re:I'll never know the name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know if you checked this or not, but the problem may have been rather benign. The start page for Explorer, or most other web browsers, can be set in two places: in the application directly, or in the System Preferences. If the start page is set in the system preferences, and Explorer tries to use the system start page, changing the Explorer start page may have no effect. Explorer on OS X also had a problem not correctly updating some preference files under some circumstances, and settings changes sometimes didn't take effect. (Entourage also had this problem.)

      Either of these, or a combination, could have caused this problem.

    6. Re:I'll never know the name. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did both of those issues.

      (And yes, I make that kind of mistake all the time, so your point is totally welcome.)

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    7. Re:I'll never know the name. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dude -- anybody still using Internet Explorer (a program which NEVER worked all that well, hasn't been updated since 10.1 and which is now officially unsupported by MS) is asking for trouble. Especially when Firebird and Safari are so much better.

      Old programs are like old cars...without good support they slowly rust away. Using slow ass IE on a mac is like driving a gremlin when you've got a free maserati and free Yukon just sitting in your driveway...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    8. Re:I'll never know the name. by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I haven't used that piece of **** in so long.

    9. Re:I'll never know the name. by timdaniels · · Score: 1

      I've seen a similar problem that turned out to be caused by a proxy server. Basically, you could change the home page to anything, but the proxy directed you to the spyware home page anyway.

    10. Re:I'll never know the name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      my girlfriend came home from school last winter with something really odd.

      Two weeks of penicillan should clear that up.

    11. Re:I'll never know the name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Safari are so much better.

      Safari on the mac still can't even handle forms right. try tabbing to a drop down box and see what happens.

      A browser that can't handle basic form elements isn't better than one that can. then again I'm not a mac zealot/Microsoft hater. Just a programmer without an agenda.

    12. Re:I'll never know the name. by babbage · · Score: 2, Informative
      Safari on the mac still can't even handle forms right. try tabbing to a drop down box and see what happens.
      Actually, the "can't tab to all form elements" issue is a known one, and, according to David Hyatt, the primary developer of WebCore for Safari, a fix seems to be on the way:

      And in case you're curious, here's what we've already got working post 1.1 in WebCore that you can look forward to:

      (1) Support for the title attribute using tooltips

      (2) The ability to tab to all controls in a Web page and to manipulate them from the keyboard.

      (3) Support for table border collapsing.

      (4) Support for the CSS cursor property.

      ... and a whole lot more ...

      So all we need now seems to be the Safari 1.2 release. The only question is when that will be...

    13. Re:I'll never know the name. by Chacham · · Score: 1

      I don't remeber where it is (sorry) but i cleaned some's computer from a similar thing. There is a directory that IE uses on bootup to install some settings. One such file kept resetting the home page. So, the Home Page must be cleared, and the program erased. Check processes for runnning programs, and search for any unrecognizable names.

  48. Nastiest is CoolWebSearch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    CoolWebSearch is nasty - hard to detect, hard to remove.......and it keeps changing. Check the link below for complete info!

    The CoolWebSearch Chronicles
    The story of a thousand hijacks

    This is an article which details the variants of the browser hijacker known as CoolWebSearch (CWS). In the last few weeks, the people behind this name have succeeded in becoming (IMHO) an even bigger nuisance than the now infamous Lop.

    The difficulty of removing CWS from a user's system has grown from slightly tricky in the first variant to virtually impossible for the latest few. Some of the variants even used methods of hiding and running themselves that had never been used before in any other spyware strains.

    The chronological order in which the CWS variants appeared is detailed here, along with the approximate dates when they appeared online. However, even though the evil programmers of CWS have released over half a dozen versions of their hijacker on the advertising market in such a short time, it should be mentioned that it is very hard to catch a live installer...........

  49. how to disable the 'message center' by JAYOYAYOYAYO · · Score: 2, Informative

    search your hdd for 'realsched', dont delete it (else it will automagically be reinstalled), just change the name to realsched.old or something. viola, no more message center system tray popups!

    1. Re:how to disable the 'message center' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont delete it (else it will automagically be reinstalled), just change the name

      I'm calling bullshit. To realplayer, a renamed file would appear exactly the same as a deleted file - i.e: not there.

    2. Re:how to disable the 'message center' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it checks the registery to make sure it still exists.

    3. Re:how to disable the 'message center' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it checks the registery to make sure it still exists.

      Umm, what?

      Stop talking about things you don't understand. What does it check in the registry?

      If the program checks anything before determining whether to replace a file, it will check for the existence of that file. Neither deleting a file nor renaming it will have any impact on the registry, so how can you claim that renaming stops magical reinstallation, while deleting promotes it?

    4. Re:how to disable the 'message center' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try it yourself and find out then, sucka. and when realsched suddenly reappears, blame it on magic and not the registery. go ahead, magic fucks up everything, admit it. magic is why you are so stupid, its not because you are really stupid and just a bullshit reactionary. go back to clown college you magically disgusting jailbait raping DEMON.

    5. Re:how to disable the 'message center' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you automatically assume that it's realplayer that reinstalls it?
      They could install it as part of the OS, and the system file checker would automatically reinstall it.

      The only way that really works: keep your fingers off of anything that requires the player.
      There's plenty of porn in otherr file formats.

    6. Re:how to disable the 'message center' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could install it as part of the OS, and the system file checker would automatically reinstall it.

      Which it would also do if the file was renamed - thus my point. Renaming a file is no different to deleting it, from the point of view of something checking for that file.

    7. Re:how to disable the 'message center' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need to try it myself, because I can already disable the stupid tray icon. I asked you to show what it checks in the registry, and since you're an idiot (who can't even SPELL registry) you need to resort to incoherent abuse.

      Face it, you don't understand what you're doing, so it's no surprise you couldn't get rid of a tray icon successfully.

  50. xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if its insidious, but I stopped going to tucows.com (shareware), becuase of a persistent window that would appear in the lower corner. They had a script, triggered by closing the window, that would open a new one. The only way to get rid of it was to turn off javascript, then close the window. I haven't been back. Another pain in the *ss is a 'feature' employed by mail.com. Certain functions would interrupt your session with an ad that would remain in place for a few seconds. Forcing you to view before proceeding to your mailbox. Stopped using that one as well.

    1. Re:xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That =/= adware. That's just a misconfigured browser on your part.

  51. kazaa by ComputerizedYoga · · Score: 2, Informative

    kazaa and everything it bundles with it are my collective vote.

    I used to work tech support, where half the problems people had using our pages had to do with the numerous spyware programs installed with kazaa. It was a mess.

    I'm glad that in my department now my users don't have admin priveleges. If they get themselves spywared, it is easy to fix -- if all else fails, back up their roaming profiles and blow them away, recreate settings on next login! I don't know of anything that can survive a brand new shiny profile ;)

    1. Re:kazaa by cyt0plas · · Score: 1

      There was a "gator on steroids" running around one of our networks a year or so ago. I suspect it was one of their "partners", not gator themselves who made it. Not only would it survive a profile reload, somehow it managed to make it so it would install gator for every user on the system, even Administrator. Never did figure that one out, especially as on some of the machines, no administrator had ever logged in.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
  52. Built in... by Drakker · · Score: 1

    I think Windows XP activation and hardware modification monitoring is the worst.

    1. Re:Built in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is what prevented me from buying XP, and pushed me in to trying my first Linux distro (redhat-7.1) i made the switch from Win98 to Linux a couple of years ago and never looked back...

      gotta love it, no nags, no adds, no need to register, no product key to type in, no viruses, firewall built in...

    2. Re:Built in... by Drakker · · Score: 1

      Definitly the same here, but using debian and going to get one of those awesome iBook g4. :)

      I have the chance to work with Macs at work now, and I must say I love them.

  53. Coolweb hack by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    This coolweb hack resets your homepage everytime you restart thanks to a trojan that is loaded via a browser hole. It did not happen to a personal machine but to a shared machine that I login to occasionally. It is a PAIN to remove.

    --

    Gorkman

  54. The truth comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you professed Linux users really use WINDOWS!

  55. From Gators own .js app detection file :) by caferace · · Score: 2, Informative

    DateManager PrecisionTime Gator eWallet OfferCompanion Dope Wars Go!Zilla MThree_Decoder MThree_Encoder MThree_Ripper DivXNetwork DivXNetwork2 Audiogalaxy Satellite MailCleaner Grokster iMesh Swaptor Shankster MediaSeek Morpheus Screen Scapes Software Supreme Sunsets Supreme Sunsets Setup Weatherscope Blubster Weatherscope SearchScout Toolbar

    1. Re:From Gators own .js app detection file :) by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I've seen almost ALL of this on my school's boxes. DAMN IT, I TOLD them that the filesharing apps wouldn't work throught the proxy, and you'd get spyware!

  56. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  57. From Gators own .js app detection file :) by caferace · · Score: 1
    DateManager
    PrecisionTime
    Gator eWallet
    OfferCompanion
    Dope Wars
    Go!Zilla
    MThree_Decoder
    MThree_Encoder
    MThree_Ripper
    DivXNetwork
    DivXNetwork2
    Audiogalaxy Satellite
    MailCleaner
    Grokster
    iMesh
    Swaptor
    Shankster
    MediaSeek
    Morpheus
    Screen Scapes Software
    Supreme Sunsets
    Supreme Sunsets Setup
    Weatherscope
    Blubster
    Weatherscope
    SearchScout Toolbar

    One more time, with formatting...

  58. spyware kills. don't do it. by qcubed · · Score: 1

    i run an elementary school network of about 200 computers, all on winxp. because of the entire spyware thing, i've had to lock it down much more than i want--all activex controls are disabled if you're not an administrator. most scripting is also turned off. it sucks, too, because some of the education websites out there for the kids don't work anymore-- but it's better to have a few not work than to bring down the whole network with broadcast storms.

  59. CoolWebSearch by sysadmn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See The CoolWebSearch Chronicles The story of a thousand hijacks.
    Quote:
    The difficulty of removing CWS from a user's system has grown from slightly tricky in the first variant to virtually impossible for the latest few. Some of the variants even used methods of hiding and running themselves that had never been used before in any other spyware strains. End Quote.
    15 variants so far....

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    1. Re:CoolWebSearch by Idealius · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you can still remove the latest variants, it just takes much more effort. You have to use a program like Hijack This! which can scan all the registry keys that spyware like CWS normally resides and remove them manually. Just did it last week with a customer.

    2. Re:CoolWebSearch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've removed this. Twice: once on a friend's PC, once on my own. He assured me he hadn't OK'd any ActiveX installations, etc., so, having fixed, I checked his browser history for the time of infection (from timestamps on the malware files) and followed it at home. OK: it'd have been a good plan to patch first: looks like it exploited a vuln in MS's JVM to install itself. 0wned, just like magic. Stuff it did: tried automatically to call a premium rate number; installed a program to run at startup; fucked with HOSTS; fucked with favorites and home page; inserteed a default stylesheet to try to reinstall itself... need I go on? This one's a beauty. It has my vote.

  60. Novice Computer Repair Man by killmeplease · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have a degree in Computer Science and that makes me the computer repair man for everyone I know. The biggest problem is unsolicited adware programs.

    Gator - Slows the computer and uses insane amounts of hard disk space downloading ads.

    Weatherbug - SLows the computer down and is difficult to install.

    Bonzai Buddy - Similar to Gator.

    New.Net - Does nothing useful but slows the internet connection to unusable levels of slowness.

    These programs are almost always installed by kids using the family computer. Kazaa is the biggest problem because it automatically installs adware. I can't count the number of houses I have gone to where the computer is unusable. I remove the programs I have listed and the computer is usable again. Sometimes the kids have tried uninstalling the programs incorrectly and I have to reinstall windows, all 'cause the kids wanted to check out porn on kazaa. Little bastards.

    --
    - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
    1. Re:Novice Computer Repair Man by too_bad · · Score: 1

      > Weatherbug - SLows the computer down and is difficult to install.
      Isnt that a feature then ?? :)

      --
      DO NOT PANIC
    2. Re:Novice Computer Repair Man by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      New.net - they're a bunch of bastards that want to make TLDs that InterNIC hasn't made yet. Of course, their method of accessing New.net domains via *nix is actually tame - it's adding them as a third DNS server (it won't find, for example, site.xxx on either of the two DNS servers your ISP gives you access to, so it goes to the New.net one).

    3. Re:Novice Computer Repair Man by mdamaged · · Score: 1

      One of the scariest parts of New.net is what their website states at the bottom:

      174,661,619 New.net enabled Internet users worldwide*

      oh my...

      --
      Someone asked me the difference between ignorance and apathy, I told them I don't know and I don't care.
    4. Re:Novice Computer Repair Man by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Does that count the numbers behind proxies? I know of AT LEAST 10 behind there. Why, oh why, can't someone DDoS new.net (live for a reason - for the DDoS)?

    5. Re:Novice Computer Repair Man by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      HOLY FUCKING SHIT! Look at this image:

      New.net partners (not goatse - what's shocking is some of the partners)

      If you don't want to access the site, here goes:
      Tiscali
      Earthlink (WTF?)
      Prodigy (I thought SBC/Yahoo bought them out)
      NetZero (big surprise)
      Juno (ditto)
      Tutopia
      EasySpace
      BulkRegister

    6. Re:Novice Computer Repair Man by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Try out adaware on those computers with the incorrect uninstalls rather than formating the drive or send them to someone that knows what the hell they're doing. Jeeze.

  61. Obviously by lurker412 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most insidious are the ones we don't even know about.

    1. Re:Obviously by morgue-ann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most insidious are the ones we don't even know about.

      Mod parent up MORE!

      Ding ding ding!!!

      Why has AIDS killed more people than Ebola? Because it takes long enough to kill the host that many more hosts can be infected. You'd be lucky if you make it to the airport once you contract ebola, let alone fly to the States and bleed out on a Manhattan subway platform at rush hour.

      We keep hearing about how horrible Blaster/SoBig/CodeRed &c &c are, but wait until the worm that's been in the wild for a year, spreading slowly & carefully so as to not alarm intrusion detection wakes up on some very large portion of Windows boxes.

      Someone mentioned Magic Lantern, but even though it might not be conventionally detectable, at least the source is sort of known. It's the people clever enough not to brag, even to their spouse/sibling/friend, and to keep the conspiracy small that are more dangerous. (I just self-selected out of this group)

      How many times have you loosened up a firewall's rules because it was interfering with something you were trying to do, then not tightened back up when you were done? If a worm knocked at your door once a month instead of 100 times per second, do you think you'd notice?

      Yeah, I've been reading too much Brunner.

      We had a worm that exploited the RPC hole running around work. We have a good firewall, so no one's ever directly compromised one of the unsecured machines inside (e.g. CVS pserver running with cleartext user list and no passwords) and Lotus Notes, though mostly execreble hasn't brought a worm inside (thanks, I think, to server-side virus checkers). However, people check their personal email accounts with Outlook. That gets a worm inside that spreads around to unpatched win2k boxes (all of 'em).

      IT's response was to update virus checker definitions and run full scans more often. Kills the worm, but it's back an hour later. The only way to kill such a worm without patching the machines (which they finally did) is to turn off the switch and clean every machine.

    2. Re:Obviously by red_gnom · · Score: 1

      "The most insidious are the ones we don't even know about."

      Like what?

    3. Re:Obviously by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I encountered a nasty one a few years back that was just spyware without any ads as far as I could tell. When the site it contacted went down, it started retrying after every single pageload, causing IE to freeze for about 10 seconds each time. I found little about its origin. Its name was simply "Tracker". It didn't run at startup, but instead was an IE helper. I removed it and unchecked the "Enable third party browser extensions" option in Internet Explorer.

  62. At Least you can disable it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though it's a bitch;
    you can disable every feature in Real One you were describing.
    In addition it uses I.E.s security settings.
    So it is a good idea to put it in your restricted site list then disable everything.

  63. cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say the worst spyware is the spyware some cable broadband providers bundle with their service.

  64. Shocking disrepect for consumer choice by StefanJ · · Score: 5, Funny
    You should be ashamed, ashamed!

    All these companies want to do is let you know about exciting new products and services that could entertain you, improve your life, and lengthen you genitalia.

    Shutting out these innovators . . . well, it smacks of Communism, doesn't it? First TiVO, screening out the ads that broadcasters, our public servants, need to survive. Now this ungrateful attack on champions entreneurship and freedom of choice. Just a bunch of surly, consumer-choice hating Reds is what you all are.

    I'm going to tell John Ashcroft what you've been up to so these SpyBot removers can be banned!

    Stefan "scared to hell that someone out there might actually be thinking like this" Jones

    1. Re:Shocking disrepect for consumer choice by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      TiVo's don't screen ads, users do. You have to fast forward (or use 30 second skip, but that's not an official feature)

    2. Re:Shocking disrepect for consumer choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you being serious? I seriously cannot tell...

  65. How often does this happen??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted I know what I'm doing, but I've used Windows for a long time and NEVER had any of this crap on my computer (excluding Real and WMP, which is still v6.4 on my box). Even when something does slip through, it's always small and easily removed via viruscanner (which means it technically isn't adware or spyware since they didn't even pretend to ask you if you wanted it installed). I'm not running any strict proxy server or firewall either. Is this, in essence, just users (who shouldn't be users) clicking yes instead of no?

  66. Gator=Spyware by Naito · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd love to see the day when a "define Gator" on Google returns "bottom dwelling scum sucking spyware" yeah you heard me, GATOR IS SPYWARE!

    1. Re:Gator=Spyware by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      It seems to be working already.

  67. Biggest spyware by too_bad · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am not sure what this thing was, but its the biggest spyware I have seen. It came installed
    on my laptop, and even after I installed Linux, it continued to exists. Everytime I forget to press
    arrow key while bootup, it would boot into this spyware. Once I am there, I am given a illusion that
    this thing looks very similiar to my Linux system, but everything was slow. There was an ambulance
    (I think thats what they use for hijacking my laptop) which would keep yelling "Click here to update".

    Then it did have something that looked like konqueror and it did show some internet sites. But I couldnt
    open more than one tabs in it. Also, every 2.5 seconds it used to open up a colourful window offering
    me stuff I did not want.

    Then I got a message saying Cindy wants to talk to me. I didnt want to talk to Cindy, but it kept yelling
    at me for not saying Hi to Cindy. Cindy was barely wearing any clothes (shudders)

    I finally managed to get rid of this spyware, and everytime I think about it I shudder.

    --
    DO NOT PANIC
    1. Re:Biggest spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice

      I bought an entirely new computer to get rid of that same spyware!!!

    2. Re:Biggest spyware by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      dude, you got WINDOWNED

    3. Re:Biggest spyware by sircle_72 · · Score: 1

      Thank God I am not alone! I thought my coworkers and I were the only ones to have to suffer through this massive spyware.
      There seems to be more than one version of this program. Does yours say NT on it like ours does? The nearest any of us can tell is that the NT stands for "Nerd Trap". Being a nerd, I can say that I do indeed feel trapped; subject myself to 40 useage hours of this spyware a week, or find another way to feed 2 kids, a wife, a cat, and myself.
      Thankfully, at 5:15 PM, my misadventures with this spyware will end (for the next 48 hours, anyway).

      --
      Sure Bill Gates' hair is fugly, but give his barber some credit! At least he managed to cover the horns on his forehead.
  68. Not just adware and spyware by Ryan+Mallon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More and more applications are becoming intrusive, software such as Winamp, Windows Media Player and Kaaza all having annoying dialog boxes which popup each time you run them if they detect a newer version which you haven't yet downloaded. MSN actually refused to do anything until I upgraded it.

    A large number of applications now have an online registration feature, they dont force you to do the registration, but they will bug the hell out of you if you choose not to.

    Applications such as RealPlayer try and sign you up to email based newsletters(spam), why should I have to give my details (email address, home address and hobbies for example) to a company in exchange for using their software?

    There seems to be a gradual increase in the invasiveness of software, currently most of these 'features' are still optional, but I dont think it will be long before many software companies start making things like software updates, online registration and having a valid email address mandatory.

    1. Re:Not just adware and spyware by snilloc · · Score: 1

      AIM is annoying in this same way, even though I have repeatedly asked it not to check for upgrades. You can't pre-emptively ask it not to check for upgrades, but when it tells you that there is an upgrade and you decline it, there is a way to tell it not to ask again. Apparently AIM doesn't abide by this request.

    2. Re:Not just adware and spyware by timshea · · Score: 1

      Just because software wants to upgrade itself doesn't make it intrusive.

    3. Re:Not just adware and spyware by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      I found that setting the power switch to the 'off' position greatly reduces the amount of software greatly reduces the amount of "anoying dialog boxes that pop up at you.

      I mean, I literally can't click an icon on my desktop without some "application" deciding to launch itself.

    4. Re:Not just adware and spyware by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Applications such as RealPlayer try and sign you up to email based newsletters(spam), why should I have to give my details (email address, home address and hobbies for example) to a company in exchange for using their software?"

      Um.....because its free? I hate their crap as much as you do, but do realize that they are offering you software for free. I don't blame them for trying to make some money off of it. But I don't like how they do it, so I never give them my information. You can't always have your cake and eat it too.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Not just adware and spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just loaded XP for my neibor. So, I turn off Messanger Service, turn off DCOM, apply critical updates, and install a firewall.

      So, then I have to reconfigure every piece of software on the machine. I gave realplayer a garbage address.

  69. What the hell are you guys downloading!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that you don't get these things without going to shady places. PORN!!!!!! WAREZ!!!!!! CRACKS!!!!!!

    Don't lie, I know that is what you guys are doing. Everyone knows that half of these only come from clicking those "Free Movie" links.

    Honestly... the funniest thing is getting dialer.exe on my Mac desktop(haha).

  70. Oh, can't remember which this was from: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Click OK to not install this program."

  71. Legality of Spyware by SupeRobot+Ninja · · Score: 1
    Also, any thoughts on whether some of this stuff is even legal, as it is almost certainly not ethical."

    I think that if people make a conscious decision to install a piece of software which admits that it is spyware, even if only in the small print, there can't really be anything illegal about it.

    If it doesn't, the question necessarily becomes a bit trickier. IANAL, so obviously this is just my opinion.

    According to the Supreme Court (in Roe v. Wade, the abortion case), there exists an implicit "right to privacy" in the Bill of Rights. The Court used it to defend a woman's right to procure an abortion, essentially saying that the government couldn't create legislation that would violate a citizen's "right to privacy." The government being denied the ability to infringe on people's privacy (Patriot Act notwithstanding) is obviously different from corporations being denied the same--and, again, IANAL--but the fundamental legal principle seems applicable to me. That is, we as citizens should have the right not to have people snooping in on our lives and habits without our express consent.

  72. Safe: Gnucleus, WinMX, eMule by yerricde · · Score: 1

    install your iMesh kazaa, grokster or any other filesharing program. Then run adaware or spybot against it.

    WinMX contains no adware or spyware. Neither does Gnucleus or eMule.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Safe: Gnucleus, WinMX, eMule by jo42 · · Score: 1

      > WinMX contains no adware or spyware. Neither does Gnucleus or eMule.

      For how long? These days you can not trust anything...

    2. Re:Safe: Gnucleus, WinMX, eMule by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Why should I believe that?

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    3. Re:Safe: Gnucleus, WinMX, eMule by Mryll · · Score: 1

      I think eMule is open source.

  73. Re:Redsheriff is the one I find particularly annoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use this hosts file to block redsherrif. It works well for me.

  74. Netsetter Proxy by Ethan+Butterfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is about the nastiest one I've seen in my consulting work. On its most basic level, it inserts itself into the registry as the default proxy server for IE. Unless you get the registry entry, it'll just keep putting itself back. What gets really bad is that I've seen Netsetter break several computers' TCP/IP stacks entirely. With Netsetter ripped out you get PCs that can dial up, connect, and have complete connectivity except no DNS resolution. And you can't get DNS back without either an in-place reinstall (works for 95/98/ME/XP), or a complete format and reinstall from scratch (NT/2K).

    They're on my short list of People Who Need To Be Shot.

    1. Re:Netsetter Proxy by denverradiosucks · · Score: 1

      I received Netsetter two years ago when my at & t cable connection was installed. Was it software that came with the old "@Home" setup that they used? It eventually corrupted my whole win 98 system (shocking isn't it!?) and I eventually installed Win 2000 and I never got it again. Piece of crap program.

  75. BlackJack by Angram · · Score: 1

    A few days after I first updated to RealOne (when it first came out), I realized what crap it was. Since then, I've been using RealPlayer 8, which can handle all of the files, but with less hassle. Rather than go for illegal (?) alternatives, you can just go to their Legacy page (which they keep moving around - for a long time the only way to get there was to act like you couldn't get RealOne to work on your machine in the Help pages). For now, the "BlackJack" page is still there.

    --

    GL
  76. Mod Paren Up Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a very cool tip!

    Just checked out netsh. Never seen it before. It has all sorts of information in it.

    Thanks!

  77. Hijacking normal text in IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one I've been trying to help various people who come to me for computer help with. It seems that certain keywords in text of websites (only in IE, as far as I can gather), get turned into ad links. I've googled for this and can't find anything. Adaware et. al find nothing. It's not in Windows startup and not a seperate process. Ir's not even a register extension to IE in the registry. I'm stumped.

    1. Re:Hijacking normal text in IE by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Maybe its TopText. Check this site to see if it looks like what you're trying to get rid of.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    2. Re:Hijacking normal text in IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. That *could* be it, but I've never seen it myself, so I can't be sure. Thanks anyway.

    3. Re:Hijacking normal text in IE by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Most likely thats it. Microsoft was going to do the same thing, and abandonded it. Other now defunct programs were Flyswat, Third Voice, and zBubbles from Amazon.com

      If you can take a look at it, you may be able to tell if its TopText. If not, try a google for the other programs.

      Good Luck and good hunting :)

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    4. Re:Hijacking normal text in IE by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Flyswat, by any chance? Their site doesn't exist anymore. It's rather tame - shows up in A/RP, clean uninstall, disables MOST tracking, they're upfront about their tracking policy, installs are primarily voluntary downloads of the app itself, no hijacking. eZula TopText is the other app that does this, and it's a LOT more evil. Both cause all links generated by them to turn yellow upon a mouseover.

  78. Re:Most Filesharing software like iMesh and KaZaAa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's why god created Kazaa-lite and such.

  79. BDE Projector by dr_funk · · Score: 1

    This steaming pile makes your computer join a stealth p2p network used for computer simulations, serving ads, etc...

    --
    ------- Assumption is the mother of all f$#@ ups.
  80. Hotbar was nasty by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I'm about 90% sure it was hotbar. My mother-in-law (technophobic AOL user) had clicked on some banner ad about "Upgrade your browser for FREEEE!!!" and it installed its extra toolbars for IE. Kept getting their advertising whenever it was on. She doesn't use Outlook, so at least it only seems to have annoyed IE.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  81. Scratchcards by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    I'd have to go with scratchcards. It installs a little proggy that spawns popup ads every 30 seconds or so, even when the user is idle. Some computers at a lab got this parasite, and there were stacks and stacks of popup ads, even takes a few minutes to close all of them. So many popup ads that Internet Explorer would eventually crash every time the scumware opened a new popup ad.

  82. winpup.exe by scarolan · · Score: 1

    Not sure what the hell this is, or who makes it but it got installed on my browser while I was surfing the internet. I know for sure it didn't come from an email message since all the viruses are stripped out on the server level.

    I found it this morning when I noticed popup windows coming up at random times. Damn thing even tried to install Gator on my laptop.

    But if you're really 1337 you probably don't care because you're using Linux anyway.

    1. Re:winpup.exe by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Behold the power of Google (if you can because of fucked up spyware):

      http://www.experts-exchange.com/Miscellaneous/Ne w_ Net_Users/Q_20640277.html

      (if you can read it - ee tends to need an account)

  83. Which Adware and Spyware are the Most Insidious? by niko9 · · Score: 1



    The one's that spy on me and show me advertisments?

    --

  84. Re:Good grief by ddimas · · Score: 1
    I had heard that statistic also. The more accurate figure is 1% to 3% gay, depending on social acceptance.

    The 10% gay figure was based on major metropolitan areas, but turned out to be biased because small groups tend to congregate in cities due to the higer absolute numbers to be found. After all 1% of a million is far more people that 1% of a hundred.

    Please don't flame, I'm just passing on info.

  85. its all evil and bad! by ghost-hacked · · Score: 1

    First off, any software that changes system configuration w/ out letting you know, is bad software.(correlary, M$ is bad software too). About 3 months ago i was happily running winXP, and had been since its release, and had had next to no troubles with, and in the grandious scheme of things, i still dont, i am however now running linux, and have been for about 2 months. Basicly i got hit by why i can only describe as and adware/spyware BOMB. Unfortunatly i could never trace the source of the my problem, but in short, i spent about 2 weeks trying to elimate several add/spy ware programs from my computer, but to no avail, more just kept comming up. I finaly got so fed up w/ all these crap popus, i busted out my RH9 cd's and began the install, utterly destroying what was left on my hd. If you ask me,(and yes you did), i beleive it is illegal, in the sence that it is unauthorized access to a computer system, but good luck in court, and if it isnt illegal, it shure as hell should be. Long story short, run linux, no adware !!

    --
    --The Titanic was built by proffesionals. --The Ark was built by Amatures.
    1. Re:its all evil and bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll fit right in here at Slashdot, what with the spelling and all.

    2. Re:its all evil and bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should consider installing a spell checker.

  86. Some people simply need to be killed by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    Who, you ask? The people who make Gator, Xupiter, RealPlayer, and any other software that hi-jacks your computer or psychologically tricks people into installing things they don't actually want. They are actually worse than car thieves, because at least with a car thief you know what you're getting -- he doesn't knock at your door, claim to be an auto mechanic, and then drive off with your car, all the while claiming to be a legitimate business.

    People like this, quite simply, all deserve to suffer incredibly long, incredibly painful deaths. They need to be made to feel the full effect of the pain they have so selfishly inflicted on the world around them.

    I suggest sending them tons of spam telling them they've won a "free" vacation into space, then loading them all on board a one-way rocket destined for an agonizing, slow-deteriotion orbit into the sun. Oh, and fill their spacecraft with fellating pirhanas and skunks. That might grant them a very small taste -- approximately 0.0001% -- of the pain and agony they inflict upon millions of other people on a daily basis.

    I don't get how people like that can sleep at night. They must completely lack any form of conscience or ethics.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Some people simply need to be killed by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Lawsuits man, class action, multi-billion dollar lawsuits...

  87. TCP/IP, obviously by stienman · · Score: 1

    Come on, we can talk about the programs that use TCP/IP and complain about them, or we can go to the source - the enabler of all this spying and ading, and persecute TCP/IP itself, which is what we should have been doing all along.

    Take a page from the lawyers. Don't go after the file traders, go after the programs that enable file sharing. Don't go after the drug addicts, go after their dealers. Don't go after the women having abortions, get their docters. Don't go after the spammers, get their ISPs.

    This whole TCP/IP thing was fun in its heyday, but it's nothing but trouble now. Let's ditch this ride while we've still got momentum, and find the next big wave.

    -Adam

  88. I do tech support... by skank · · Score: 2, Informative

    and run into this cr*p all the time. New.net is always fun, as are Xupiter, Xzoomy, and the newer varients (like orbitexplorer). Theres another one called lop that has been pretty fun to try to get rid of. Here is a quote from doxdesk.com about lop I find amusing "lop/Toolbar installations normally put a round icon in the system tray, try right-clicking this, choosing 'Menu', then on the resulting window, clicking 'Help', then 'Uninstall'. With newer variants you will have to answer an annoying riddle before it will go away."

    I really hate dealing with this stuff over the phone with people who don't know what IE is or where the start button in any version of windows is located. It makes you wonder how they know they have a problem in the first place, did they make it to thier 3rd game of solitaire and not get any pr0n pop ups? Either way, if you don't know how to use a computer, why do you automatically click on "I agree/accept" any time it pops up on your screen? This was my short list of spy/ad/cr*pware that gets on my nerves on a daily basis. Have a nice day...

  89. all spyware is terrible by Enfurno · · Score: 1

    Gain / Gator seem too be the most abumdant, although not the most intrusive. Cydoor has been one i have had trouble with in the past. im glad too say i have been completely spyware free for over a year now.. learn to avoid it, learn too remove it. and worrying about it becomes nill.

    --
    Need cheap, customized, and quality bandwidth or hosting on any business scale? Visit www.ENetpresence.com
    1. Re:all spyware is terrible by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Cydoor? Hmm, my grandparents actually asked me to put that one BACK ON! (for eGames Collector's Edition to work) It actually came with the WildTangent Web Driver, which can be some good, but appears to be spyware. Also, I've heard Alexa fucks with your browser. Isn't it the spy data gathered from Alexa that builds the Web Archive?

    2. Re:all spyware is terrible by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      Cydoor? Hmm, my grandparents actually asked me to put that one BACK ON! (for eGames Collector's Edition to work)

      I had that problem a couple years back when I used KaZaA/Grokster. Delete the SpyWare, abnd the app wouldn't run 'cos of the missing CYDOOR.DLL file.
      It was possible to get around. Just get the cracked DLL that acted as a dummy. It'd fool the program that the 'Ware was there, but it didn't actually send anything out.

      Of course, being a bit more tech-savvy now, I'd certainly check to make sure that such a cracked DLL didn't have it's own ulterior motives.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    3. Re:all spyware is terrible by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I actually looked for info, and found that one was in development by cexx.org (could be somewhere else), but not at all ready.

  90. In gator's defense... by stile · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now, let me step up and argue the other side of this one for a moment. Sure, gator sucks if it shows up when you don't expect it to, like if some shareware program you download installs it without telling you. However, I recently wanted to encode a DIVX movie. Just one or two, mind you, not a ton of them. So, I went to the DIVX website and downloaded their encoder. They will let you use the decoder for free (or they used to...) but the encoder part costs money. Alternately you can install and use the encoder for free if you agree to let gator on your system.

    They're very up front and honest about it: they want money for their software, so either you fork it over or donate your eyeballs. Sounded fair, I didn't intend to have it on there for more than a month or so.

    The installer was also very open about the fact that it was installing Gator, and the fact that I'd be seeing ads occasionally. After I installed it, gator came up, and I found a nice little preferences pane. After some digging through "advanced settings" I found out I could make it display ads approximately 1-3 times a week at minimum. I did that, and it never bothered me again. I think I've seen it pop up maybe a few times. I can deinstall it any time.

    So what's the big deal?

    1. Re:In gator's defense... by witte · · Score: 1

      well... I'd be surprised if it gets uninstalled if you uninstall the codec / coder / whatever software it came with.
      I've had a lot of "free" programs not cleaning up the parasitic mess they installed on the side. Like the new divx codec i installed a week ago, it came with "gain", which is adware.
      I guess we can be glad that adaware and friends can clean up for us (in most cases) :-/
      In any case, you're right about one thing : there's no free lunch.

    2. Re:In gator's defense... by Hi_2k · · Score: 1

      While it is getting much nicer about its popups, that was never the problem with Gator. It has a tendency to use your CPU for their data anaysis on the information they collect on your browsing habits. It also has been known to make microcharges to your credit card ($.35-$2, but it is still annoying). I love E-Commerce, but I refuse to shop online on any computer with Gator because of this.

      --
      When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
      Sluggy Freelance.
    3. Re:In gator's defense... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      charges to your credit card? surely that could be classed as theft and/or fraud!!

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:In gator's defense... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      While it is getting much nicer about its popups, that was never the problem with Gator. It has a tendency to use your CPU for their data anaysis on the information they collect on your browsing habits. It also has been known to make microcharges to your credit card ($.35-$2, but it is still annoying). I love E-Commerce, but I refuse to shop online on any computer with Gator because of this.

      No, it hasn't. You are making this up. It has never done anything even remotely close to this. If the Gator programmers were good enough to make it detect the unused cycles and do distributed computation, the application wouldn't be such a piece of shit.

      You do realize that you are just a clown, right? There are no factual statements in your post.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    5. Re:In gator's defense... by Hi_2k · · Score: 1

      I never said it did distributed computing. I said it analyzed your data with your CPU cycles before sending it off to HQ.

      --
      When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
      Sluggy Freelance.
    6. Re:In gator's defense... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I never said it did distributed computing. I said it analyzed your data with your CPU cycles before sending it off to HQ.

      How else do you think it works? Would it ask you to do it for you? "Hi, we don't want to use your precious CPU cycles to strip out your personal information and only provide demographic data, could you do it for us?"

      Yeah. You are still full of it, sparky. Go read up on GAIN and you will find out exactly what they do. It's amazingly simple to learn what Gator does, it's on the front freaking page.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    7. Re:In gator's defense... by Pr0xY · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there is no need to "detect" unused cycles, all the programmer has to do is set the process to low priority and it will only get run when there is no real work to do...it's that simple.

      as for whether or not they actually do this, I dunno, I'm just glad to not have it installed on my computer.

      proxy

    8. Re:In gator's defense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro charges?

      What a royal bunch of dumbasses they would be if they ever even THOUGHT about trying that. Dude, if you are just going to make shit up, at least make it somewhat plausable. Gator *LIVES* in court. They would have been ripped to pieces YEARS ago if they did that.

      You forgot to state the known fact that Gator leaves the toilet seat up too. I know that because it was on a website someplace.

      JEEZ

    9. Re:In gator's defense... by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Parent is a TROLL

      --
      Speak for yourself.
  91. Worst of them? LiveGirls.exe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Recently a client came in with a PC and said it was acting funny and suspected there was some kind of virus on it. A scan detected that there was several files that appeared to be infected with something called "Downloader-DZ" and, along with the links to porn sites (my favorite one being "Operation... SEX!") and the homepage being replaced with a porn page, there were SEVERAL dialers installed, and an attempt to just delete LiveGirls.exe did nothing... it later reapeared.

    To put it short, I spent two hours running spyware removal software and manually editing out bad registry keys. A pain.

    Oh... and PLEASE tell people they don't need that FUCKING SHIT like hotbar and weather bug either!! I'm sick of seeing that crap on people's PCs!

  92. spyblast by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the hell it does, other then the fact that it claims to remove spyware, but in fact is spyware as detected by spybot. So now not only are these bastards praying on security holes on machines and less-then-attentive users, they're also praying on people who are actualy trying to remove there crap.

    I sware to god these motherfuckers, spammers, Spyware authors, and low-lifes in general are responsible for an over-all decline of the internet into suckattude.

    Someone smarter then me needs to figure out a way to create an internet that offers both anonymity and relative accountability (like the slashdot mod system, except something that actually works).

    I've only been infected with Spyware once, something called "surfer bar" which replaced IE's display, and replaced my address bar with it's own. It put in three buttons. I don't remember one, but the other two were "gambling" and "porno". I swear to god it got installed by an IE hole or something, and I switched to mozilla right after that.

    Oh yeah, and ad aware didn't even detect it, I had to manually remove it by going through the registry (thankfully it was simple, just a standard COM based extension to IE, except it called itself "win32.dll" and had no references whatsoever to "surferbar" in any text anywhere in any of it's files or registry keys...)

    One girl's machine I tried to fix had some process that would reinstall Spyware after it was removed by add/remove programs. I ran spybot on her system and it found 30 different types. But there was still some weirdness when we rebooted : (

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:spyblast by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Of course, you've got the safest browsing habits (seeing as you own a major porn hub)... I don't think it's so much the spyware authors that have fucked the inet, it's the browser authors who leave goatse-sized holes in MSIE. Besides, Opera (just an example) has popup blocking, tabbed browsing, a workable e-mail client (download Thunderbird if you like living... without spam) that can't get the lookOut VoTW, great speed, some of the best MSIE compatibility there is, etc. Mozilla comes damn close (speed, UI, and minor rendering issues are my problems with it), so does Firebird (speed isn't an issue there - however, Opera IS a touch faster).

  93. Ad-ware, sorta: Flash? by ScorpiusFan · · Score: 1

    I recently uninstalled the Macromedia Flash plug-in from my IE browser because a few sites I would hit would run ads in Flash.

    As a result, if I had several browsers open I noticed some would be taking up CPU time, and those were the ones running the Flash ads.

    I'm sorry, but I'm going to let a company run a Flash-based ad on my computer using my CPU time.

    Now I have to deal with the annoying "Do you want to install Flash" pop-ups from those sites, but I'm quick at clicking the "No" button.

    It would be nice if IE had the ability to ignore some certificates and not take any action. Perhaps it does? Or perhaps some other browser can do that.

    1. Re:Ad-ware, sorta: Flash? by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      Proxomitron will turn Flash (et al.) into links, so you can choose what you want to actually run.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    2. Re:Ad-ware, sorta: Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could add macromedia's domain to your /etc/hosts file and point it at 0.0.0.0 . It will no longer bug you

    3. Re:Ad-ware, sorta: Flash? by ScorpiusFan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the suggestions. I will implement them.

  94. Real Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real Player is by far the most intrusive spyware program out there. Having it foisted upon me in order to listen to .ram files is beyond annoying.

  95. Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by billstewart · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Most of this software, while some of it is Ethically Challenged, doesn't have legal problems, at least in the US. The stuff claims to be free or cheap, and usually tells you that you'll get advertising, and even though it doesn't always tell you how much data it's collecting, it's usually not breaking any laws by doing it. Even the annoying features like popups or making your machine dog-slow aren't illegal, they're just misfeatures. Often you even have to press a "Pretended to read the fine print of the license" button for it to install.

    Some of it's not even broken ethically - if all they're doing with it is deciding which ads to show you, rather than tracking your every move online, especially if they didn't collect personal information about you, and if they didn't lie to you about what they were doing, and if they have a privacy policy that actually reflects what they're doing, that's ok. Not necessarily something you want to run, but ok. Some particular examples are the adware versions of Eudora and Opera.

    European data collection laws may have terms that popular spyware violates, but usually the spyware companies aren't based in Europe so there's no legal jurisdiction. The data collection laws themselves are often effectively spyware - in return for "protecting" you, they're also subjecting you to possible audits of your machines because you *might* have personal information about other people on your computer or your PDA or your cell phone. (Sure, they mostly pretend they wouldn't do that to regular citizens, only businesses, but it's pretty much a selective enforcement thing. And you are registering all your computers with the data protection bureau, aren't you?) But at least it doesn't slow your machine down when they're not auditing you.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've NEVER noticed Eudora target ads. Opera used to only target ads if you told it your info, but now you can OPT IN to ads related to the page you're on (it's Google AdWords).

    2. Re:Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by billstewart · · Score: 1

      Eudora has one version that's adware. It's not the one I'm using, so I don't know how targeted it is.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    3. Re:Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Sure, they mostly pretend they wouldn't do that to regular citizens, only businesses, but it's pretty much a selective enforcement thing.

      No, it's a law thing. Individuals are exempt from notification if the only data processed
      are for personal, domestic and household affairs (including recreational
      purposes).

      Sounds like some libertarian yanks have been filling you with FUD. Data protection laws regulate business and public data, not private, personal data. If regular householders had to register their christmas card lists, address books, etc, the entire system would collapse. DPR is there to protect citizens from businesses who'd say "i'm private property so you can't do anything about my lies on file against you! it's my freedom of speech! freedom to FUCK YOU OVER yeah baby!"

    4. Re:Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's not targeted at all. In about 5 ads, one's for eStamps, one's for GoToMyPC, one's for an online backup service, and the other two are for Eudora.

    5. Re:Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever buddy.

      you might think you have a valid point, but given enough time and enough pissed off people, your argument goes down the toilet.

      (are you associated with a company pulling these kinds of tricks?)

      anyway, there's a little thing that comes up quite often in law...you often hear about a "reasonable person"

      what would a reasonable person do in situation A?

      would a reasonable person realize that they are about to ass shaft their own computer?

      would a reasonable person know that clicking on xyz is going to monopolize their internet connection?

      i tell you buddy...the ground that all these fucking assholes that are spreading this tripe...is very shaky indeed.

      don't be surprised when some of these companies are sued into the ground.

    6. Re:Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by starcraftsicko · · Score: 1
      No, it's a law thing. Individuals are exempt from notification if the only data processed are for personal, domestic and household affairs (including recreational purposes).


      The operational term in the above "legal" citation is IF. IF you meet the criteria, then and only then are you exempt. But meeting the criteria requires not only that you be a "private citizen", but also that you not be using your PC for particular purposes.

      Maybe I, (and the parent poster) am just a libertarian crackpot, but how do YOU figure they are going to determine what you are using your computer for?

      Sounds like some leftist franks (that's surrendermonkeys for all you "yanks" in the crowd) have been filling you with trust_the_government euphoria. Nothing wrong with that of course, but selective blindness is at least as dangerous as FUD.

    7. Re:Mostly Ethics, Seldom Legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had to remove crapware/spyware many times.
      It seems to be installed because it confuses the heck out of my daughter(s).
      I'm sorry, but the design of the CONSENT section in most crapware/spyware is purposely designed to CONFUSE.
      It is especially confusing to my 9 year old, who does not have the legal ability to give consent.
      Where does it ask for the age?? answer - NOWHERE.
      May the producers of spyware ROT in {insert your own appropriately uncomfortable place here}!!!

  96. AOL auto log on activated? by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 0

    Call 0800-AOLHELPME.... :-)

    No realy that sounds nasty. Have you done an fdisk? or format of the c-drive? Maybe there is a hidden partion that speaks Win & Linux?

    NSG

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  97. For more info ... by fygment · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... maybe this site would help:

    http://www.spywareinfo.com/downloads.php

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  98. SPYWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every Needs to Check there HOSTS FILE.. After you remove spyware most of the time the HOSTS file was modified to point to some other IP.. like search.msn.com gets changed and search.netscape.com gets changed and a few others.. IT is why your homepages dont work.. it does work but is using the hosts file to do the work of DNS lookup (Nice feature aye)..

  99. hahah by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Damn I just posted so I can't mod you up. Oh well, made me laugh :)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:hahah by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Funny

      Autopr0n, your sig is an especially insipid sort of inline advert, because your website is so terrible.

      I would never think of advertising my ventures in a slashdot post.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  100. EarthLink users: think about SpyWare Blocker by valmont · · Score: 2, Informative

    i've been an earthlink user for quite a few years now and i usually tend to stay away from ISP-supplied software, but they have been putting out some pretty cool shit this year thru various 3rd-party software partnerships/cobrandizing, the latest of which being SpyWare Blocker powered by WebRoot. it is actually quite cool: it'll look for advertising companies cookies and disable'em for you, as well as offer you to remove 3rd-party spyware and trojans, i think it can do some other shit but i haven't entirely explored it yet. it maintains a constantly updated database of existing spyware. i wonder if it would catch the New.net shit. hrmzerz. and it's free for all earthlink customers.

    1. Re:EarthLink users: think about SpyWare Blocker by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I doubt that it would even TRY to look for New.net - not because it's a mediocre anti-spyware app, but because Earthlink is a New.net partner.

    2. Re:EarthLink users: think about SpyWare Blocker by cyt0plas · · Score: 1

      Just get mozilla. Plop in a nice usercontent.css, and most ads go away automagically, without needing any 3rd party kludges, like proxies (transparent or otherwise). Plus, it's unwanted popup blocker is far better than any external one - popups are a browser function, and blocking them should be too. As an added bonus, most spyware is totally incompatible with mozilla, and it won't automatically install plugins when you load a page (or try to get you to).

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
  101. wow, idealab by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Interesting, new.net is an idealab company, which is sort of the archetypal silicon valley pipe dream. Oh, we can't change the world and become billionaires, let's just fuck over millions of peoples computers so we can keep making payments on the cars we thought we had paid for by stock options. Pathetic.

    The T&C section is pretty standard fare, try to find some license that doesn't try to get the author off the hook. The GPL certainly tries, weather you pay for it or not (like buy disks from redhat)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:wow, idealab by rgmoore · · Score: 2, Informative
      Interesting, new.net is an idealab company, which is sort of the archetypal silicon valley pipe dream.

      That's interesting, but Idealab is not a Silicon Valley company. It's based in Pasadena, which means that it missed Silicon Valley by about 350 miles.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    2. Re:wow, idealab by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      Well, the GPL only applies if you redistribute the software, and you don't have to agree to it if you're just a user, so normal liability laws would apply. Unless you're intentionally adding viruses or completely disregarding the 1,000 complaints in your e-mail that your software fried someone's monitor, I don't think it's much of an issue.

      The GPL would protect you if someone took your code, modified it (added a virus), and redistributed it though, but it won't protect you if you introduced the virus.

  102. This stuff is worse than virii. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do tech support for *nix users and run OSX at home. I'm completely amazed I haven't heard how big this problem is. I just don't know anyone that uses Widows and seem to have missed out. I'm not a zealot just a computer guy but seriously folks this situation is *appalling* given it will only get worse in the next few years. I feel so sorry for average users that get literally traumatized by this stuff happening to them. Anyone in tech support will know what I mean. And it's so unfair they think it's their fault when it'\s really the OS.

    Sorry, time to trim my beard.

  103. The kind that nobody else has heard of... by snilloc · · Score: 1
    My uncle's computer is a virus and trojan-ridden piece of shit Win95 box that apparently visits a lot of shady pr0n sites. Until recently, a simple AVG update and scan got rid of everything. After once or twice finding re-infections I set AVG to auto-update and auto-scan. This worked for a while. Then I came across this nasty backdoor piece of shit that ran a process called "shellexp", which only has about 55 hits on Google right now, but only had about 15 when I first discovered it. Another wonderful feature of this backdoor exploit was a spoofed "explorer.exe" that refused to load the normal UI (start button, taskbar, desktop icons, etc.).

    I finally got fed up and told him to use Firebird rather than IE. That should solve the vast majority of his problems.

    What the hell is somebody supposed to do when the internet writ large has not heard of a problem?

  104. Xupiter... by meme_police · · Score: 1

    ...but they all suck. Our helpdesk spends considerable time cleaning them out.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

  105. Yeah, and by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Okay, it makes the program faster, but the computer slower to boot. And even then, why do they need an icon It's entirely possible to startup without having a tray icon.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Yeah, and by Ickster · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd prefer that every progam that starts an 'agent' of some sort to load an icon in SysTray. I'd rather see it there right away than find it in a monthly sweep of the registry. (Of course, I'd also like every app in the systray to include a 'disable' option on the context menu [and while I'm dreaming, I'd like a pony and a red wagon as well].)

      --
      --- Usually, those that believe in absolutes are ignorant, fools, or both.
    2. Re:Yeah, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's running in the background, I prefer to know about it and kill it.

      Real is also evil because they run background programs with obscured process names, even with no systray icon.

  106. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just slow. I go for slow.

  107. Re:And Serious /.ers are thinking: by HansF · · Score: 1

    Get your solder and pliers and build that laptop from a empty cerialbox.

    --
    --> Insert Funny Sig Here
  108. Real + ISDN + autoconnect = $$$ by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    I remember back in '95 or so when I had an ISDN router with autodial + autodisconnect and made the mistake of installing Real. I managed to find and turn off all but one of their annoying behind-the-back spyware features. Unfortunately that one I missed caused my ISDN router to establish a connection and then timeout and disconnect about every 5 minutes for a month, and I ended up with an extra $60 on my ISDN bill. Thanks Real!

    1. Re:Real + ISDN + autoconnect = $$$ by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      So a "feature" of their software which you were not notified about nor given an option to disable, directly resulted in financial loss to you.. Sue them!

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  109. Lavasoft AdAware Pro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the website:

    * Lock down sensitive areas in your memory and registry to keep them from being compromised!
    * Real-time blocking of browser hijack attempts and drive by downloads!
    * Real-time blocking of forced installations and activeX!

    It has a pretty slick interface to boot. Worth a look.

  110. get spybot by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Spybot works a lot better then ad-aware. Or hell, get 'em both.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  111. Bonzai Buddy by four2five · · Score: 1

    That little purple swinging fruitcake will not leave computers. I swear, he's like the freaking plague, your mother-in-law and an itch in the middle of your back where you can't scratch it all rolled into one. That's all I've got, just a rant. But an honest one at that.

    --
    -or so you'd think
    1. Re:Bonzai Buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Obviously... you need to upgrade to the BonziBuddy Gold Membership. Yes! You can actually pay money to get a better BonziBuddy ! It's only $49. I can't believe everybody doesn't buy this stuff.

    2. Re:Bonzai Buddy by evilzippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes! Nasty little purple bastard. I informed one of our directors that it was a pest when I saw it on his home computer and he just said to leave it on there because "his kid likes it"... scary social engineering...

  112. Windows by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft Windows and that dastardly Messenger service. (enabled by default) that would be the most insidious adware out there.

    oh and i guess XP qualifies for spyware with that nasty activation "feature" (though not quite)

    --
    Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    1. Re:Windows by freeweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft Windows and that dastardly Messenger service. (enabled by default) that would be the most insidious adware out there.

      Much as I hate the Messaging service, calling it adware is like calling your email client adware.

      I think we're missing the point when we can just call any application that receives data and presents it to the user adware. Adware is better applied to things *intended* to serve up ads.

      Believe it or not, the Messaging service was originally planned to do other things, and in fact, generally is. Just not for 99% of Windows users :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  113. Nasty Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a machine that i really don't use much running a virtualy clean install of XP. I'm also tech enough to know what programs to install and not. Inspite of this somehow some Alexia software managed to sneak on my computer even with the latest OS updates and such.

    When a program can seak on the computer of a geek then the company has really done it's homework.

  114. Xupiter by Dan+Connor · · Score: 1

    Xupiter by far is the worst that I have seen.

  115. Re:Most Filesharing software like iMesh and KaZaAa by dustwun · · Score: 1

    kazaa-lite still contains spyware/adware according to adaware and spybot. It's better, but it's not totally safe either.

  116. Alyon Technologies and the auto-dialer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Say what you want about annoying spyware and adware, but how many of them cost you $100? My computer had an auto-dialer installed on it somehow. We received a bill for $100 from a collections agency. It took us a week to even figure out who was trying to collect money from us. It turns out to be Alyon Technologies. You can read all about their shady dealings here.

    I thought that I had it bad, but some people received bills for $500. They have gone to court, and somehow they have not been shut down (though anyone that disputes their bill gets the FTC as a third party arbiter). I encourage everyone to educate themselves about Alyon Technologies. Go read through that site, you will learn about some of the worst people in the world, and how they will take advantage of you and then tell you YOU are at fault.

    I don't know if there is a Hell, but if there is, these people would be in the center of it.

    1. Re:Alyon Technologies and the auto-dialer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alyon has been taken to court by 13 state governments. And it still continues to operate as if it is just another business. Sheesh!

    2. Re:Alyon Technologies and the auto-dialer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but they say that they have been vindicated and that true justice has been found with them not having to shut down. Burn in Hell, Alyon.

  117. How to stop it on XP and above by friday2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Windows XP there is a feature called Software Restriction Policies (SRP, see here). This feature allows you to deny software to run based on Certificates (and Path, and Hash, and Zone for MSI). Since all the Spyware installers use signed Active-X "drive-by" installers this is an effective way to kill them. This, however, is an arms race. You need to collect the certs you want to invalidate first (upon first encounter of a spyware safe their cert into a file and disallow it). You can find the feature in Control Panel->Administrative Tools->Local Security Policy. Have fun!

    1. Re:How to stop it on XP and above by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. I thought the whole point of Certificates is that you use them as a trust basis. So, you'd know in advance who you can trust, and THEN install their software.

      Now we have to know and tell our computers in advance who NOT to trust?

      Man, who comes up with these things?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:How to stop it on XP and above by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      Does anyone keep a list of certs to deny?

    3. Re:How to stop it on XP and above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works both ways (and more). Given a cert, you could say "automatically trust", "ask me", or "automatically distrust and get that crap outta my system".

      There is not, as you assume, a built-in policy to automatically trust every cert not explicitly distrusted. You choose.

    4. Re:How to stop it on XP and above by friday2k · · Score: 1

      Well, you actually can do the same thing with SRP, but it is harder to maintain. You can set your default rule to disallow all and make exceptions (like trusting a certain number of certs). Follow the link that I posted in my previous post and read through it. It is pretty neat technology and for managed environments extremely powerful. But it is a lot of work to maintain a "disallow all" environment for machines that change a lot like a home machine.

  118. Bonzai Buddy by SB5 · · Score: 1

    Hasn't anyone heard of Bonzai Buddy? I think it is not only the most intrusive but the most annoying... It is Microsoft's Clippy taken to a higher and more perverse level!

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  119. the most insidious adware by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 0

    How about slashdot goatse trolls?

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  120. weird google override by HermesHuang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On my laptop the dns for google seems to have been overwritten. Don't know what did it, but it always redirects me to this other search engine (forgot what its name is already). I've tried resetting the DNS tables with no luck. Now, whnever I want to use google, I have to just type in the IP address. I haven't been able to fix the problem - if anyone else has come across this, I'd really appreciate it if you could post how to fix the problem.

    1. Re:weird google override by Phil+John · · Score: 1

      Have you made sure that some piece of software hasn't put a line in your hosts file that looks something like...

      google.com someother.search.engine.ipaddress

      if so just delete the line.

      If you don't know where your hosts file is do a search from your start menu (it's normally in [windowsdir]\system32\drivers\etc\hosts)

      --
      I am NaN
    2. Re:weird google override by aderusha · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's probably this. likely your hosts file has been hijacked, and quite possibly moved to a different folder (try c:\windows\help\hosts). the link has a removal tool.

    3. Re:weird google override by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its probably the mediasearch trojan, i had the same problem. all search sites seemed to stop working (cept for msn search). if you get AVG, itll remove it.

  121. Oops, forgot some info by HermesHuang · · Score: 1

    I forgot to mention that the laptop is running windows XP pro. [I have to, to interface with the computers at work :(]

    1. Re:Oops, forgot some info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts

      has been hijacked to point to spyware hijack sites. Tcp/ip in windows reads hosts first, before querying dns. If you are slick, you can change this default behavior in the registry!

      HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Serv ic es\TCPIP\Service Provider

      You will see: HostsPriority , DNSPriority, NBTPriority, the lowest values are checked first!

    2. Re:Oops, forgot some info by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Why not 2000 pro? More reliable, faster, a couple less security holes, works in 99% of the situations that XP pro works in.

    3. Re:Oops, forgot some info by HermesHuang · · Score: 1

      Laptop came with XP, and I'm not about to pay money to buy yet another version of windows.

    4. Re:Oops, forgot some info by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the power of KaZaA (if you don't use KaZaA Lite, I'll have to shoot you!)...

    5. Re:Oops, forgot some info by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      BTW, before I get modbombed, let me add this:

      I meant instead of KaZaA - Klite is the only fasttrack for windows that's worth using.

    6. Re:Oops, forgot some info by HermesHuang · · Score: 1

      Using pirated software in a commercial setting is a good way to lose lots of money. You go right ahead.

  122. bah, can't remember the name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But there was one on a comp I worked on this summer that basically ran anything that wasn't a .com url through it's search engine. Made it really hard to test the stuff I was writing that was hosted on a local machine (http://localmachine/ was a search term for it, as was the ip). That probably is a lawsuit if people cared. I just ran adaware and got rid of the 60+ pieces of crap that the clueless "support staff" had installed. Given that at least one of them had full administrative access to the entire network, I'm quite glad that was just a summer job

  123. SpyWare is more damaging than a virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been a few cases of spyware I've had to clean from student computers recently that really bothered me. One system had as much spyware as I had ever seen at once, all because it visited a site with unsafe ActiveX controls (and of course, they clicked "whatever") that installed a "searchbar" along with every other spyware I've ever encountered. Getting rid of the extra stuff was one thing, but even AdAware diddn't get rid of the searchbar, which was crashing the browser and constantly changing the home page. Only manually deleting 30-something registry entries killed it off. I also had an incident where SaveNow was eating 100% of the CPU, locking up as soon as it started, and causing all kinds of hell. Not a fan of SaveNow, either. What really bothers me about SpyWare is not its existence, but rather that so few people are aware of it and how to get rid of it. When I tell someone they're infected with SpyWare, they almost always ask "What's that?" and seem horrified when I explain it. Then they give me the usual "Can you fix it?" instead of relying on their own faculties, because they've been trained that we know how and they never will...

  124. Thank god for open source by freeweed · · Score: 1

    I dont think it will be long before many software companies start making things like software updates, online registration and having a valid email address mandatory.

    Preaching to the converted, I realize, but this is precisely why I'm moving everything I do to OSS applications.

    As "free" software becomes more and more nag/spy/ad-ridden, and worse, as software you PAY for gets like this, I'm giving up and ditching it all. I stopped using IM entirely a while back for similar reasons.

    Thanks to OfficeXP and WindowsXP, Microsoft has permanently lost me as a customer. Once 2000 is no longer practical, bye bye Windows at home.

    The funny part is that I'm finding the new stuff I'm using to generally be better. CDEX, Firebird, you name it, it's better. Now that mIRC is officially nagware (well, much worse than it's ever been, and not upgrading to 6.12 is suicide what with the latest exploit) there's not a hell of a lot tying me to Windows.

    I never thought so many zealots could actually be right :) Now if only we could convince Management...

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  125. What no Comet Cursor!? by rueger · · Score: 1

    Just spent way too much time clearing dreck of my B-in-law's laptop (...it used to be faster... ). The highlight was running Ad-Aware and finding some 48 different bits of Comet Cursor that it removed.

    Ack.

    Barry

  126. Re:And Serious /.ers are thinking: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "pantywaist" you "dickwad".

  127. Spywareblaster is another good one by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    Spybot S&D is the best, as long as you keep it updated and "immunize."

    Another good one is Spywareblaster. I don't know if it does any more in the way of ad/spyware removal than Spybot S&D does, but it's "Flash killer" is very cool to get rid of those increasingly obnoxious Flash ads. It will prevent the repeated download request (annoying!), or alternatively, it will prevent Flash animations from running once Flash is already installed (an easy click to re-enable if desired).

    Although not billed as an ad/spyware removal tool, Peer Guardian blocks all known DoubleClick, Cydoor, and TRIBAL FUSION domains, as well as other ad networks known for tracking. The ads don't even load. Added benefit: Stealth Sufing Mode to RIAA, et al.

    Full list of blocked IP addresses.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  128. Re:And Serious /.ers are thinking: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn proper grammar, you shit-faced cockmaster!

  129. Preventing Spyware? by kaptainsunshine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a end user admin on a small (300 machines ) network where both IE5 and Netscape4 are available ( and nothing else ) on WinNT4. I'm constantly fighting against end users that install spy/adware. I'm losing the battle and re-imaging machines on a daily basis... I'm looking for tips on reducing downtime due to this junk being installed. Any tips would be appreciated.

    1. Re:Preventing Spyware? by cyt0plas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Deep Freeze. Once it's installed on a machine, unless they use a boot disk, all changes are transitory. You could even reformat the HD, and it would look like you really did, but after you restart, all changes are gone. You can even define "safe" folders where this doesn't happen, like a shared documents folder.

      It's a pain for end users, but if you are already re-imaging daily, it's the same effect without the work.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    2. Re:Preventing Spyware? by buss_error · · Score: 1
      I'd suggest something other than DeepFreeze. (And yes, I've used it, and on larger networks that the OP. Yech.)

      Here is a free solution: set up an OS partition, a data partition, and a image partition. Use something like PartImage to re-image. When they get spyware, nuke the OS partition.

      With a bit of work, you can make it all automatic over the wire, or ship a diskette that will do it. I used to use a slackware boot disk and keep an image server in the office. That way I didn't need a image partition on the desk top. The down side is you have to be very careful to get the correct image for the hardware you wish to reimage.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    3. Re:Preventing Spyware? by Bernie+Fsckinner · · Score: 0

      Spybot Search & Destroy at http://security.kolla.de

    4. Re:Preventing Spyware? by Bunyip+Redgum · · Score: 1

      If all they need is a browser, replace the windoze crap with a secure operating system such as OpenBSD or Debian and Mozilla Firebird or Netscape if they insist.

    5. Re:Preventing Spyware? by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm constantly fighting against end users that install spy/adware. I'm losing the battle and re-imaging machines on a daily basis... I'm looking for tips on reducing downtime due to this junk being installed. Any tips would be appreciated.

      Courtesy of the Master of Suspense, Alfred Hitchcock:

      Every time they download spy/adware, they lose a finger.

      Watch compliance go up drastically.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    6. Re:Preventing Spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use PC-Sentinel cards in our machines. It has an automatic restore after a reboot feature and is hardware based so even using boot disks doesn't change the default configuration. We force a reboot of all our windows machines daily so all the non approved changes are removed daily. This has been very successful for us, it lets 2 people manage ~200 PCs. Check it out www.tandex.com

    7. Re:Preventing Spyware? by joe170 · · Score: 1

      Do what we do: Cut off their internet access as soon as you detect downloads (grep for .exe |/.zip , for example)in the proxy logs. Then take your sweet time getting around to refreshing their Ghost image. Worked wonders around here after the second or third "example".

  130. Re:Windows Messenger 6.0 ad-ware by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 1

    If the ads in Windows Messenger 6.0 for WindowsXP bother you, then just go ahead and disable them. The modifications prevent those annoying ads from showing in the "MSN MESSENGER" panel.

    You'll need a hex-editor to make the changes yourself, at this site:
    http://www.windows-help.net/microsoft/messe nger6-r emove-ad.html

    I have only tested this modification with v. 6.0.0602 of MSN Messenger so I'm not sure if it works with later builds.

    I found the directions easy and I never see any ads now. As for additional spware that it may contain... who knows?

    --
    uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
  131. CommonName hijacked my Add-Remove Programs Panel! by soren100 · · Score: 1

    I thought I had seen it all until I got the CommonName parasite. I got it from installing a game, then noticed I had strange programs tring to access the internet.

    When I went to the add/remove programs section in Windows 2000, I was sent to a web page insisting that CommonName was NOT spyware and asking that I validate myself as a human so that scripts could not automatically remove the software. After that, the program removed itself from the add/remove panel but left itself in place, until I killed it with spybot. (A great program!!)

    It was very irritating to have a program essentially thumbing it's nose at me and taking over my system like that.

  132. MSN Messenger by The+Herbaliser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has all the same problems as RealOne, plus the way it gets on your computer is really insidious... it's on there before you even open the box.

    1. Re:MSN Messenger by hatchet · · Score: 1

      That's windows messenger, not MSN messenger... The functionality is basically the same.. only that you do not need .NET passport to use windows messenger.

    2. Re:MSN Messenger by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes WindowsMessanger has become one of my pet-hates! Unfortunatly now that I have moved overseas I have to go back to using an IM (I used ICQ years ago but realised it is the devil incarnate) so since too many of my friends use Messanger I chose it, also since this is not my computer, and it was already here.

      What I hate, is I have NO CONTROL over it! I hate Messanger (or ICQ or whatever) telling the world whenever I am online, I rather it off at all times except for the 30 odd minutes of every week I go on to see who's around. But no Messanger fights to be online always, ever since I was stupid enough to click that 'remember password' box now whenever outlook is open it will be there! Even when set to 'not login messanger' in outlook, if say my modem re-connects i will find messanger online waiting before I know it! Argh?!$!"!%^$

      I used to have a great simple solution to fix Messanger, just delete the msmsgs.exe program and suprisingly nothing complains! Outlook works fine and you never have to see it popup again! (With no regsrv or regedit needed!)

  133. SearchSquire by vanillaspice · · Score: 1

    Normally I don't have much of a problem with spyware. I scan at least once a day and it keeps the problems down to a minimum. But SearchSquire broke my registry and installed itself without my knowledge or consent. Of course, I was the dummy who broke my backup registry. Check out this link for official lies posted by an alleged employee of SearchSquire who says it's an ActiveX script -- which should have prompted whether or not I wanted something installed.

    1. Re:SearchSquire by vanillaspice · · Score: 1

      http://www.computerelated.com/forum/viewthread.php ?tid=23 I was also the dummy that said, "see this link" and forgot to paste it in.

  134. Re:Spybot Search & Destroy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've never had trouble removing New.net or any otherspyware with Spybot Search & Destroy. Sometimes one or two reboots is necessary, but other than that it seems to do the trick.

    It even says, when cleaning with it, something like "Applying networking fix".

  135. Re: Hijack This by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    how much are they paying you to push the product?

    It's freeware.

    spywareinfo.com has a number of good resources, along with a semi-reasonable message board. Which is where I found out about HiJack This

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  136. byte me -Re:Shocking disrepect for consumer choice by swschrad · · Score: 1

    bullshit, it's MY machine.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  137. It's so hard to pick just one as the worst... by QuietYou · · Score: 1

    I don't know if "dialers" are considered spyware or adware, but some dialers are pretty nasty. A friend of mine had a dialer installed on his system that would dial an offshore ISP using a 1-900 number at some absurd rate ($99.99 an hour or something like that). The dialer only activated when the computer was idle, such as when the computer was left on over night. It wasn't detected until after it had racked up over $1000 in calls.

    Most spyware/adware is just a nuisance, but dialers take it to a whole new level.

  138. Re:And Serious /.ers are thinking: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Originally, yeah, but doesn't 'panty waste' conjur up much more obscene images in your head? I think I prefer his terminology.

  139. It Phones Home by Mastagunna · · Score: 1

    which is not much better in most peoples minds.

  140. Ummm, gee, this is a tough one. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Considering that I haven't used Windows in over a year and a half now I just couldn't be sure anymore.

    It seems that I haven't had the joy of this type experience since June '02..

    1. Re:Ummm, gee, this is a tough one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who gives a fuck

    2. Re:Ummm, gee, this is a tough one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me

  141. Re:Something to keep in mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether it is less than 1% or more than 10% of the population that is gay, depends entirely on the political agenda of the person or organization reporting the statistic.

  142. stfu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kiss my ass mofo cock sucker. Jerks like you wreck this world. Not everyone is fuking dilbert like you.

    Go give yerself a wank, cause obviously it's been a while. prolly voted for king bush

  143. Re:Redsheriff is the one I find particularly annoy by jesser · · Score: 1

    That's a cookie. This article is about spyware.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  144. Microsoft should fix windows by jonwil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Basicly, any time a program wants to do something like put something in startup or modify winsock settings or stick files in windows system folder or modify the hosts file or dns settings or things like that, windows should come up with a nicely worded warning about why clicking "yes" is a bad idea.
    Also, it should log all these actions so that for example, you can see which programs installed what settings (so you know what to remove)
    And it should have something that allows sysadmins to turn off these things completly (just like how its possible to turn off control panel and other system things)

    That way, when some idiot wants to install kazza, the system detects that kazza wants to install "privacyviolatingspyware.exe" to c:\windows\system\importantmsfile.exe" and add it to startup and denies the request.

    What should be done when the request is deined (either because its completly switched off or because the user clicked "no") is that it should return for file i/o calls "cant open file" and for registry calls whatever the appropriate error is.

    Or better yet, pretend to write to the registry or the file but dont actually do it.

    1. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by hetta · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a nice little program called "InCtrl5". It was freeware, from PCMag, but they now want money for their "free downloads" ... should be easy to do, though.

      It takes a snapshot of your system before and after you install something, and shows you the difference. Configurable - "don't include this directory" or "include this directory" - but really, the default settings (check windows directories, registry, autoexec.bat, config.sys) are sufficient.

      'course, haven't used it in quite a while, now that I use SuSE ... but it was useful, way back when.

    2. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by warkda+rrior · · Score: 1

      If I were the developer of a piece of software that is packaged with spyware, I would make sure the functionality of my software is dependant on the spyware, so that you cannot remove. If you block the installation of the spyware associated with Kazaa, you won't be able to run Kazaa.

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
    3. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by cuban321 · · Score: 1

      This is the AIM of Cisco's CSA. Check it out, it does everything you've asked and more.

    4. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by jonwil · · Score: 1

      True.
      But:
      A.sometimes the program will work without the spyware
      B.this will work for software that isnt tied to a program (for example, gator, dialers, other stuff that is run manually and also things that run via security holes and so on such as viruses, trojan horses and worms)
      and C.this will enable administrators to block the installation of software that does these things (for example, admins can block the installation of file-sharing software that runs at startup and adds stuff to windows/system. Or they can block people who are trying to replace windows sockets components (e.g. to get around filtering software like net nanny that replaces them)

    5. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ofcourse, the problem is dialog saturation. Windows users see so much yes/no dialogs that their brains are adapted to automatically clicking yes. This won't stop spyware installation, it'll just make the users who end up with it seem even more stupid.

      The solution is not in negative action to stop spyware at the gates (like your suggestion to click no), but positive action needed to install any piece of software. In other words, make it impossible to install software from IE, so users have to manually locate the installation binary on disk. If they don't know how to do that last bit, they shouldn't be installing things.

    6. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by swb · · Score: 1

      And not running or installing an application because you couldn't install some spyware is a perfectly valid and desirable outcome, since it pushes the whole free-app-with-spyware "model" into the light of day.

    7. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This tool alerts and allows you to deny programs trying to become self-starting.

      http://www.mlin.net/StartupMonitor.shtml

    8. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A program called eSafe actually does monitoring close to that. It watches the registry, as well as several other important bits (like your default homepage) and will alert you anytime something tries to change things, and give you the option to allow the change or to deny it.

      If you deny the change, programs still seem to think that the write was successful, so things like DivX w/Gator still think everything's installed fine, but Gator never starts since the registry was never actually changed.

      Too bad eSafe isn't free anymore...

    9. Re:Microsoft should fix windows by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Basicly, any time a program wants to do something like put something in startup or modify winsock settings or stick files in windows system folder or modify the hosts file or dns settings or things like that, windows should come up with a nicely worded warning about why clicking "yes" is a bad idea.

      Windows already does block attempts to fiddle with it... unless you're running as Administrator, of course. Surprising how many "geeks" wouldn't dream of running as root constantly on Unix will just add themselves to the administrators group on Windows because it's convenient. And there's no need for it either, now that Windows has "Run As" functionality.

  145. 00hq.com: MSupdater.exe, winshow.dll by jcomeau_ictx · · Score: 1

    This is the worst I've personally come across, after pr0nsurfing willy-nilly one night. It somehow installed itself without my (knowingly) permitting it, and without Cygwin I would probably have never figured out where the crap was ('find' is your friend); I've probed 00hq.com's ssh port and found they're still running OpenSSH_3.5p1 but (oops) then again, so am I... better fix that right away...

  146. Is there a blacklist? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Anyone know of an IP blacklist so that admins can block these sites/installers at the firewall? No luck finding anything that's targeted at only spyware host IPs.

    1. Re:Is there a blacklist? by Mryll · · Score: 1

      Google for "Sponge" and spyware - he (at least used to) keeps a pretty comprehensive blacklist, might even have it as a rule set for Kerio.

  147. Steam by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

    To install Steam and play on any Steam-validated Half-Life servers (Including Counter-strike servers), one must agree to Valve's privacy statement. Here's a little snippet:

    "Storage and Security of Information
    Personally identifiable information will be processed and stored by Valve in databases hosted in the United States. Valve has taken reasonable steps to protect the information users share with us, including, but not limited to, setup of processes, equipment and software to avoid unauthorized access or disclosure of this information."

    Reasonable steps, eh? Like the same steps they used to protect the Half-Life 2 source code?

  148. Slashdot attempts to download "MediaPlex" by ~packetfire~ · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's homepage itself appears to try to install MediaPlex according to Spybot Search and Destroy , in its "resident" mode, so I'd say that the WORST spyware is the spyware that is installed when you are reading about how bad spyware is on sites like THIS ONE! :)


    --
    Science is the art of infallibility, perpetrated upon non-scientists
    1. Re:Slashdot attempts to download "MediaPlex" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I'm getting the same thing from S&D ... you have been warned.

  149. Newton Knows by sargatanas · · Score: 1

    One reason why I have switched to full-time Linux programming is because frankly, I was getting afraid of all the crapware that was being installed on my Windows 2000 PC. One day, this crap called "Newton Knows" installed itself as a toolbar in the Explorer bar and I had no idea where it came from. It had ads and random popups that I could not control whatsoever. Then I used Adaware to remove 287 objects from my PC, and I've been using Linux ever since.

  150. A very good fix by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    Go get a preset hosts file and put it in where your old hosts file is at on your windows and that will take care of nearly 75% of all your problems.. http://www.2fords.net/rchapin/hosts.zip Do a search for hosts and simply overwrite your old ole with the new one.. It's small, but it does take care of the top spy/mal/adware..

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  151. Re:spyware kills. don't do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you should consider Deep Freeze. A simple reboot, and EVERY change to the machine is wiped. Even a hard disk format. Every boot is like having a freshly installed OS. Sounds too good to be true I know, but try the demo out. It doesn't require any special hardware either.

    It keeps the labs at my school spyware free and virus free.

  152. http://searchdot.net/ by sennomo · · Score: 1

    Searchdot doesn't seem to be harmful, but it's damn annoying.

    --
    Mi klopodas varbi por Esperanto.
  153. We use it at work by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Some of our servers send out messenger messages when they require attention. The idea being that, unlike e-mail, it will get the attention of someone immediatly.

    1. Re:We use it at work by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, our University uses it to send a message to workstations when print jobs complete. Pretty damn handy when you see how long the print queues for the free dot-matrix printers can get. Not having to run into another room every few minutes is a lifesaver.

      Of course, it took them at least 2 months to finally clue in to firewalling off netbios ports to the internet, but once that was solved all was well again. Thankfully, the service is still running so we can "zwrite" in Windows, without installing an IM client :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  154. Personally... by serial+frame · · Score: 1

    I'm far more concerned with aspects of computing that are outside of my control, like my ISP, or the various DNS servers throughout the world, or perhaps even Google. So, my own paranoia is my vote as most annoying adware, and if I am correct, I will have also confirmed my vote for the most insidious spyware.

    --

    -
    And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
  155. Problem isn't the support people by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Dell isn't the problem, their suppport people are very intelligent.

    The real problem is that you can't speak hindi, and the support people are not at their best in the middle of the night (their time).

    To be quite serious however, if you get a Dell you need to track down third party parts and third party support. Unfortuately their cost cutting has set a new low standard which many other companies are also conforming too - since if Dell can get away with it, they can too.

  156. The list is too long by GuruHal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a service tech I see New.Net, Xupiter, Gator, and Savenow all the time, but I didn't see Marketscore in there anywhere. It proxies your connection through one of Marketscore's own servers - I'm sure its for better service not actually spying on your content ... Whatever. Sometimes MArketscore adds 2 minutes (yes minutes) to a boot time and all your info is router through through their insecure proxy server. Total garbage. It wreaks havok on our customers since our email servers will not allow email to be sent from outside our domain, so any customers that have it on their home systems and try to send email get errors. The customers I talk to have no idea how it got there or why its running. Worst part is they don't understand how software doesn't show up in their add/remove programs section while running as a background process. It requires a command line uninstall process which is a bit elusive and makes many customers squirm.

    Recently TVT Media has made it onto my $#!T list - go through the uninstall process and it reports that it is gone but a reboot proves otherwise. In fact, if you remove the keys and then run the uninstaller and go back into the registry all the keys are regenerated. We'll see how much more press that kind of crap will get.

    Memory Blaster seems to be another growing problem on the horizon too, but its still pretty fresh to say how bad that one will be.

    In all truth new.net and Xuptier are probably the worst since they have a tendancy to destroy the winsock portion of the TCP/IP stack and take people offline when DNS queries are returned unresolved. Nice products: NOT.

    --
    "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green
    1. Re:The list is too long by denverradiosucks · · Score: 1

      Didn't that become Netsetter? Or did netsetter become Marketscore? Correct me if I'm wrong. That may be why you don't see it anymore. I had it on my system. Pure crap.

  157. Better solution. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll
    deny software to run based on Certificates (and Path, and Hash, and Zone for MSI)

    Great, so my printer and modem drivers which are not signed won't run? Wonder if I can run a Linux Loader? Pththth-fit! What junk.

    How about a better answer, like removing that steaming pile of excriment known as XP from your computer and using something without a designed to be rooted and sold architecture?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Better solution. by friday2k · · Score: 1

      No, this is not true. What you do is you explicitly distrust a certificate for example from Gator. You do not distrust the Root Certificate (for example from Verisign). So this only affects software that was signed with the gator Cert. I sure don't hope that you install device drivers from Gator ...

  158. Website blacklists?? by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    Now, someone please step up and let me know if this exists already but, seeing as the source of some spyware is from active x scripts that run when you visit websites why are there not blacklists for sites (just like dns blacklists for spam) that Gator and others pay to infect our machines? Just like spammers, it can all be traced back to someone paying the spammers to spam. Spyware/adware that gets installed when you visit a site to view information/photos is akin a virus infections IMO. The companies like Gator, etc pay sites to host their viruses to be put on our computers and cause us grief. Why do we visit such sites? I think that if a blacklist were set up and people used it that we would less and less instances of Gator,etc. Many sites may disappear due to lack of revenue to sustain themselves but that's fine with me. We're better off without them spewing spyware on everyone. Lepers of the internet. This does not of course account for spyware programs that people download/purchase and install on their machines. Something has really got to be done because I find it completely unacceptible and I would say illegal that companies can put their filty paws into your "PC" (personal!! computer) and handle your information. If individuals do this, it is called a 'cyber-crime'. Why is it ok for companies to do it?? Come on! Enough is enough!!! -blankoboy /me swings mace

    1. Re:Website blacklists?? by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

      Use a browser other than internet explorer. I don't think mozilla has a problem with automatically running executables when you click on a website.

      The only reasons you really need to run IE is for crap like bank websites and such. Just use IE for that and use mozilla for all your pr0n and slashdot needs.

  159. where have you been, Chuck? by twitter · · Score: 1
    Chuck proposes a plan, sure to be hated:

    1. Ask Slashdot what sort of spyware is the worst. 2. Make this sort of spyware. 3. Profit!

    How about this instead:

    1. Learn software that's secure by design.
    2. Collect war storries from people suffering under monopoly garbage software.
    3. Tell people about software that works.
    4. Profit as people ask you to install and administer said software.
      1. A business plan can and should do good things for your customers.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:where have you been, Chuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carriage returns are, by default, insecure, as the parent post pointed out. Overuse of commas is also an insecure practice as I have proven here.

  160. GOOGLE by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

    http://www.google-watch.org/

    Considering we use it more than any other site...

  161. You know what you are? by Raunch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A playa hater.

    --
    George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
  162. The people you trust.... by docbob · · Score: 1

    What I find funny is that when I clicked on the link to read this page, my Spybot Search and Destroy (Yes I run Windows) poped up and said that the site was trying to download Avenue A to my machine, upon sigining it to comment, I was hit with popup boxes that said that the site was trying to load mediaplex on my machine.... Perhaps the ones that are the worst are the ones from the sites that you do not think that you would get them from... The Doc.

  163. Re:I had to help a user over the phone uninstall t by exhilaration · · Score: 1
    I then told them how to setup IE so that it wouldn't automatically install things.

    Would you share that little trick?

  164. Re: hmm.... adaware? by grolschie · · Score: 1

    I no longer use Ad-aware. After my wife previously installed a heap of spyware with a nice little Donald Duck screensaver, Ad-ware removed the Spyware, but left my TCP/IP stack screwed. Following all the HOWTOs in the world wouldn't fix it completely. Finally I am able to use every internet app on my machine except "ping.exe". For some reason, not matter which address I ping, it resolves the DNS correctly, but pings another IP - the same bogus IP address no matter which url I ping.

    After doing a little googling, I found that simply nuking spyware (which is what Adaware does) is no good in some cases, as sometimes Spyware needs to be de-tangled propertly from your system (e.g. newdot.net). SpyBot Search & Destroy claims to do such. My TCP/IP stack isn't 100% ok yet, but that can wait until my next clean install of Windows.

  165. Timekeeper by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    is another one I remember. It's just as bad.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  166. Re:What no Comet Cursor!? by docbob · · Score: 1

    Ran spy bot on neighbors machine when fixing it for them, 148 different spyware programs(including about 5 comets also). Incuding 3 adult dialers, which happened to be down loaded when son had friends over one Saturday night while parents were out. Can you say grounded? The Doc

  167. Re:Windows Messenger 6.0 ad-ware by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

    i said the messenger serivce not MSN Messenger

    similar names, functions from opposite ends of the spectrum.

    --
    Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  168. Hmmm by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    Don't hate the playa...hate the game.

    Don't know what is worse -- the spyware/adware -- or the browser and OS that make it possible.

    I have seen a machine/browser infected with a few of these buggers....and if there was ever a plug or commercial for Linux .....then this was it. Nasty Nasty Nasty stuff boys and girls. I think if uncle Bill were to sit down at a workstation that was infected with these bad boys (to check on his stocks) that even he would switch to Linux.

    Yes it is that bad.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  169. Re: hmm.... adaware? (TCP/IP stack) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what she was using, but did you try this?

  170. Website blacklists?? by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    Now, someone please step up and let me know if this exists already but, seeing as the source of some spyware is from active x scripts that run when you visit websites why are there not blacklists for sites (just like dns blacklists for spam) that Gator and others pay to infect our machines? Just like spammers, it can all be traced back to someone paying the spammers to spam. Spyware/adware that gets installed when you visit a site to view information/photos is akin a virus infections IMO. The companies like Gator, etc pay sites to host their viruses to be put on our computers and cause us grief. Why do we visit such sites? I think that if a blacklist were set up and people used it that we would less and less instances of Gator,etc. Many sites may disappear due to lack of revenue to sustain themselves but that's fine with me. We're better off without them spewing spyware on everyone. Lepers of the internet. This does not of course account for spyware programs that people download/purchase and install on their machines. Something has really got to be done because I find it completely unacceptible and I would say illegal that companies can put their filty paws into your "PC" (personal!! computer) and handle your information. If individuals do this, it is called a 'cyber-crime'. Why is it ok for companies to do it?? Come on! Enough is enough!!!

    -blankoboy
    /me swings mace

  171. Ummmmm, no by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are three ways spyware gets on to someone's computer:

    1) You visit a website and it installs as an ActiveX control. However you must grant permission for this to happen. By default, it will ask you on a per control basis. You may change this to always deny or always permit if you wish, but it is up to the user to make the call. MS has done nothing wrong here, they allow you to choose how you want your system security set and what you wish to permit.

    2) You install an application that, as part of its install process, installs the spyware. It may or may not inform you of this. This is again, not an issue for MS. If you choose to execute software on your computer there is nothing they could or should do to stop you. It is your computer, after all, and executing software is its purpose. IF a company sneaks in spyware, it is their fault.

    3) You voulantarily download and install spyware. YOu'd be amazed how much users think what some of it does is coll and wants to have it. Again, MS is not at fault.

    Get off the trendy "Let's blame everything on MS" stick. It isn't there responsbility if others write malicious software and it isn't their responsbility if users install stupid shit on their computers. Linux has no protection against this either. If I send you an app that allows me to control your system, and you install it, Linux will do nothing to stop you. It's not like OSes have a built in evil dector or anything.

    1. Re:Ummmmm, no by Avihson · · Score: 1

      So send me some spyware!

      Linux WILL stop you (or me) because I do not log in with root permissions as a default. However I can install software without root permission. So for you to "control" my system, you would have to send me some software that I install as an unprivileged user that will install a root kit on my box.

      That would be a major task for you to convince me to install said software.

      However, all I would have to do is miss a close click on a IE popup and malware could be installed. This happens daily at the college with locked down Win2k. No unzip programs, No rights to install anything. Can not even add a shortcut to the desktop on the machines, but spyware keeps popping up.
      Thank RMS that they have one lab that has Linux and some BSD installed.

      Now tell me I'm wrong. Tell me I don't watch the gang of MCSEs running around updating and "de-spyboting" the Win2K and XP boxes while I surf the same sites using Konqueror. Tell me this and I will know you are not just a MS Fanboy, but a fool and a liar.

      It is the responsibility of the software developers to create secure software, just as it is the responsibility of any tool manufacturer to create safe tools, or of Ford to make safe SUVs. Ford and Firestone created unsafe conditions, and look what happened. Microsoft creates unsafe conditions, and you pay them more to pretend to fix them.... Only in America!

    2. Re:Ummmmm, no by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      So who makes you run a Windows system as administrator? I've got plenty of users at work that run as normal users. Can't install anything unless I come and do it. You are free to do the same thing at home. Have a user account that you normally use, only log in as admin when you need to do something that needs admin rights.

      Guess what? Most users don't want to do that. They don't care (or know) about the security implications. If they ran Linux, they'd be root all the time since since they wouldn't want to be hassled with entering the root password to do simple tasks. Or they'd run a distro, like Lindows, that always runs as root anyhow. Come to think of it, most clueless Linux people I know, run Lindows.

      So you're a power user that is smart. Great, they aren't and they are the target. You think the kind of person that open e-mail attachments after being told not to is going to be safe with Linux? You're kidding yourself.

      Look, it's easy to design an OS, or even modify Windows, such as to be locked down as all get out. Problem is people aren't going to live with that. They want it to be simple, they don't want to be hassled with entering a privledged password all the time. So they just run in privledged mode all the time. Even if they didn't, they'd give these programs permission to run. You think all the sorority chicks who got all their spyware from Kazaa checked? No, they just installed, and let it do as it pleased. They wanted their Kazaa and it wouldn't have mattered if they'd needed to su to install it.

      When dealing with the mass market, you must make your product easy enough for them to want to use it, or they'll go to a competitor.

      Auto makers are a GREAT example. They do a shit job on safety really. There are so many things they could do to make our cars much safer. Biggest would be a safety harness. Put in a 4 or 6 point racing harness, with accomidating seat and your safety just went up a ton. You could probably survive a 70mph head on collision with that. Add to that a helmet and a roll cage and you can probably flip end over end at that speed and emerge with nothing other than some brusing. Then make a body that self destructs like a race car and you can even survive collisions at the speeds they go (as is demonstrated often). Oh but wait, these things are expensive, really inconvienent or both. I mean the biggest safety improvement is from a harness. They aren't that much, probably $500. No big deal in the cost of a modren car. They are a pain in the ass though. Not comfortable to ride in and a pain to get in and out of. They are also obtrusive if you don't put them on.

      So, do you think the public, many of which refuse to wear the simple restraints in cars now, would put up with this? Not at all, hence they aren't put in normal cars. GM has actually been working on a modified 4-point harness that they think they might actually get people to use. No luck so far.

      If a company wants to exist in the mass market, security and safety cannot be the overriding concerns. You have to give people a product they are willing and able to use. If you make it too difficult, onerous, uncomfortable, confusing, expensive, etc they'll just go with someone else.

    3. Re:Ummmmm, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who stops the malware from running as administrator?
      That is the point!
      On any windows box, malware gains admin rights. That does not happen on Unix or Linux.

      That, my friend is shit programming, been that way since Win95, and it is still that way. Remote admin access is the hole that is sinking the MS ship. Face reality!

      None of my users run as root, they are reformed MS users, they came over from the insecure side, and they know better. They know what "su" is, they have a sudo list. and since rh 8 at least, you can not log in remotly as root, you have to remote in as a user and then su to root. How many Microsoft "pros" would stand for such a restriction?

      I rest my case!

  172. Would you like to upgrade to QuickTime Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, don't forget QuickTime Alternative, assuming you're unfortunate enough to have to play QuickTime files.

  173. The most insidious ones I have run across: by Mostly+PO'd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    lop.com and keenvalue aka wildmedia.
    They had morphed since being written about even 2 weeks before(of course I googled), and combined took me 4 hours to eliminate off of a client's Win98 PC. They used every dirty trick in the book to hide and re-install themselves: hidden startup files that rename randomly at each reboot, multiple startup locations, redundancy by installing themselves disguised as several different innocuous sounding programs, including maxmem, maxspeed, ie driver, ie update, People On Page, and more. I finally had to resort to verifying the legitimacy of every single program that was installed, and then manually scan the registry for references to all of the bad stuff. Oh, and by the way, this was after running adaware with the latest updates! (Which I still of course highly recommend, it was just behind on this one.) This stuff used every underhanded trick in the book to keep from being uninstalled. Combined these were far "stickier" than even the worst viruses I have dealt with.

    While this software may have been legal, it's methods IMHO should definitely NOT be. I would jump at the chance to join the butt kicking posse going after the sleaze/parasite/spy-ware vermin!

    "It's scum like this in my industry that lead to my handle"

  174. Re: hmm.... adaware? (TCP/IP stack) by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tip. However, the machine is still using 98SE. Handy tip though for the XP machines!

  175. Re:Redsheriff is the one I find particularly annoy by whitelines · · Score: 1

    Redsherrif is annoying, it wastes memory and slows the machine down as it starts up a Java process. I've found that you can stop it simply by blocking outgoing comms' to redsherrif on your firewall. Luckily they only have a few hostnames the data is sent to. This stops the tracking and the launch of the redsherrif applet.

    --
    /* TBD */
  176. Spyware blocker??? by Mhumble · · Score: 0

    Is there any sort of spyware blocker? Like Norton or whatever for blcoking virus's? Lots of clients have adaware installed but getting them to run it once a week is a nightmare, updating it is even worse. I can have it run each start- up but they don't like that either. Having a piece of software that blocks spyware before it gets installed would make my life a lot easier. Thanks in advance

    1. Re:Spyware blocker??? by denverradiosucks · · Score: 1

      Use a different Browser. Mozilla, Opera, and the dozens of Linux variants. Active X controls cause the problems. I have never had a problem when using other browsers. Question, does the free version of Opera install spyware? I does have banner ads. Just curious.

  177. Spyware/malware infests more than just P2P by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 2, Informative
    While most P2P apps are riddled with the stuff (kudos to Shareaza and MLDonkey for steering clear of it), malware can crop up in some surprising places. I once downloaded a Windows Theme from DebbiesThemes. It came packaged in an .exe file - when running this it offered to install TopText, then silently (and without asking) tried to install the following:Using an application firewall like System Safety Monitor can help limit these (it intercepts calls between applications and allows you to permit or deny them) but this does require an experienced user.
  178. KaZZa by netnerd.caffinated · · Score: 1

    All of KaZZa is one big spyware application. If you run adaware over Kazza & nuke the spyware, when its re-started, it complains about "missing modules" & promptly downloads & installs it all again..
    then off course there is KaZZA lite, which doesn't have ANY spyware & is a lot better then KaZZa itself, but then by using that, your breaking the law .. DMCA & all that crud...

    --


    You tried your best, & you failed miserably,
    The lesson is:
    Never Try
  179. They were HACKED by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    If you'd bothered to read the posts made by Valve (somewheres on planethalflife.com) you'd find out that they were *hacked.* Trojans, keyboard loggers, and several other malicious programs were found.

    So you're saying it's their fault someone broke the law stealing their stuff?

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:They were HACKED by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      Blame who you want for what happened to Valve, but it's just common sense to know that shit happens and data gets compromised. It's rediculous to expect *anybody* to be able to hold your personal info without unwanted visitors taking a peak. Whether or not their marketing affiliates with legal access or hackers without doesn't matter. Valve has no good reason to be storing information that can be traced to me in their system without my *EXPLICIT* permission first.

      Steam will not install unless users agree to the privacy policy. Half-Life players who wish to play on Steam-validated servers, which you can expect to become the vast majority with more servers upgrading from the old version each day, must install Steam. So it's either give up your info or buy a new game to play on-line.

      It's a tactic worthy of Microsoft.

    2. Re:They were HACKED by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

      They were using unpatched versions of Outlook and using the preview pane. Gabe said that is how Valve thinks they got in. I'm sorry, but if you use the preview pane in outlook, you are just asking to be h4>

      Are they using unpatched versions of IIS on the steam servers to store your cd key, e-mail address, name, etc.?

    3. Re:They were HACKED by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Yes, so long as reasonable steps are taken to provide the appropriate level of security.

      In Valve's case, reasonable steps wern't taken.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  180. Re:Something to keep in mind... by ddimas · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Whether it is less than 1% or more than 10% of the population that is gay, depends entirely on the political agenda of the person or organization reporting the statistic.


    Not quite, the number reported depends on the political agenda of the reporter. The actual percentage depends on biological, and social factors, and the precise meaning of gay.


    Case in point, while the ancient Spartans took male lovers, were they gay? Careful how you answer that, Leonidas is standing next to you with a (sharp) spear. They certainly would have killed someone who is effete. Useless in war you know.

  181. Bulla and Rapid Blaster by furasato · · Score: 1

    http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/Bulla.html tells the tale of Bulla. If you've come across a PC running RB32.exe, you would know it. I've seen plenty of ad/spywares installed, working on car dealerships networks, where slimy car salesmen whack off to porn any time business is slow. To me, there really isn't any ad/spyware that is worse than the others. They are all equally worthless POS softwares that need to have thier creators shot, execution style.

  182. Re:I had to help a user over the phone uninstall t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use a different browser:)

  183. Crapware targets IE, so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do phone support for our online courses and these crapware programs (gator sued for calling them spyware, better change your tune:) are causing hours and hours of trouble. People can't log in, can't take quizzes, can't do crap. Turns out their P2P software installed application X, toolbar Y, pop-up blocker Z....

    What are the common threads with these apps? Windows, Internet Explorer, default settings. I usually send people to
    http://doxdesk.com/parasite/ to help prove to them that they've got problem software on their system.

    I'd love to blame Microsoft, Windows, IE, et al., but many people I've helped seem to know what they're doing. Maybe there's just a case of "click OK" going around.

    My saving grace? Thank you Mozilla.

  184. This might be off topic, but you be the judge by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    While everyone is ranting about the annoyances of windows spyware, why isn't microsoft addressing this? They're in desperate need of something to sell their upcomming longhorn in a couple of years. I'm sure I'm not the first person to bring this up, but why don't they just focus on say a firewall/antivirus/antispyware tool in windows? It would make a lot of sense and it would allow them to really make the system more secure. They could adertise it as Windows Longhorn Internet Condom Edition. Alright, that was a joke, but this is meant to be serious. I just see it as really fucking obvious for microsoft to actively take a role in windows security and not rely on smaller companies like norton or adaware to fix the problems. I think a lot of people would buy windows if it had that feature. Otherwise, they're going to lose too much market share to linux that in general doesn't have to worry about this crap

  185. Spyware? AOL! by StormShadw · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the old versions of AOL, Prodigy and CompuServe that would reveal local file systems and such when they called home? They invented spy ware!

  186. Get adaware by JoeGuitar · · Score: 1

    I use adaware to get rid of adware/spyware. One time i had this nasty program that ran in the background that would make pop-up ad's in internet explorer about 5 times a minute. It got really annoying, so i got adaware, and it fixed my problem. If you are looking for adaware, go to download.com and search for it.

    1. Re:Get adaware by grolschie · · Score: 1

      AdAware doesn't safely remove some spyware - it can leave your system crippled. I'd recommend Spybot Search and destroy instead.

    2. Re:Get adaware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember now. I did have adaware screw up my system. But i just restored using the backups it had quarantined and it worked fine. Since its a free/shareware program i guess it still has some bugs. Ill check out spybot. Thanks

  187. Spyware should be clasified as "viruses" by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    It might be more of a Trojan then a virus, but either way, software like Symmantec Antivirus should start picking this crap up like it was a virus.

    I've been working desktop support for the last few months... yes, I hate it. A lot. But in this market, you take what you can get...

    Anyways, out of the maybe 100 pc's I've sat down at over the last few months, I can't think of one user that actually intended to install any of the spyware that's crashing thier machines, showing popups every 2 minutes, and redirecting searches. None of them wanted 6 "searchbars" in IE. And I've only met one dude that wanted Gator (and I argued with him for about 20 minutes about it.)

    This software uses misleading ways to get you to install it, and once you get one spyware, it opens the door for all the others. On a corporate network where you must allow internet access and allow people to have admin rights to their own machines, this presents a serious security hole in your network. It doesn't take a stretch for one of these spyware packages to start sending out your network passwords and other information.

    Come on Symmantec, help us out!

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:Spyware should be clasified as "viruses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, some AVs are picking it up and more is being added almost every update.

      The problem is they have no naming conventions and some mild crap gets tarred with the same brush as some serious shit and ends up scaring the bejeebers out of everyone.

      The other annoying thing with AVs (it seems to happen with both the adware and viral crap) is they all popup something saying blahlblah.exe is infected with a particular "nasty" and it can't be "fixed"...when said file actually is the friggin' "nasty" and should be immedialtely killed.

    2. Re:Spyware should be clasified as "viruses" by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would be nice if the virus scanners said "This file is a virus. It is being removed." when the whole file is the virus, not just some normal file with the virus attached.

      Glad to hear that some AV's are picking this crap up. Hope it really starts catching on. I really don't think most companies would shell out the extra cash for a spyware-blocker program like the commercial version of adaware, for software that they don't even realize does a lot more harm to your system then most viruses.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  188. Re:Legal Issues of Working on Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then, BitTorrent rained down from the heaven...

  189. Waiting for a new version by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    Sadly I went to download Gator and found out that the Mac version is "in the Works". Of course we all know what that means, we'll not see a Mac version for years. It's probably vaporware. Now I have to seek out a new way to store my passwords and bookmarks.

    You've really missed the mark Gator.

  190. National Privacy Principals by guru_Stew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Australia has National Privacy Principals which among other things forces companies that gross 3mil plus PA to inform users that data is being colledted and stored and for what purpose. it also must allow a person access to any data that is stored about them.
    There is also a bill in parliment that will do more and will have hefty penalties.

    I dont know exactly what XP sends to microsoft, other than SN details but the average user trusts MS and for the moeny they pay for a license they should be able to.

  191. Re:In gator's defense...actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can pay $30 and shut off the GAIN ads

    I went here:

    http://papps.gator.com/papps_intro.php?app=weath er

    paid the $30 for weatherscope and haven't gotten a GAIN ad since. Even though I also have the Gator password thingy installed too.

  192. Don't run as admin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't running as a low level user (i.e., not an admin or power user) prevent the pc from getting infected in the first place?

  193. SaveNow... or McAfee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Savenow sucks- it unleashes a flurry of junk programs, not to mention the dozens of popups. On the other hand, the newest version of McAfee seems to shut down ports 80, 110... so its just as bad in my book...

  194. +5 tongue in cheek by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

    Crap, I just ran out of mod points this morning. Is there no justice?!?

    --
    Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    1. Re:+5 tongue in cheek by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for a +5, ironic. After all, this is America, and irony's the only humor we got.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  195. Those Suckers who use Windows Messaging!!!! by SPYDER+Web · · Score: 1

    They send you windows messages that tells you that this is a fault in windows and the only way to fix is to get their software to turn it off. So for the mainstream they have no choice but to comply since they dont know how to turn it off otherwise they keep on sending them windows messages that ruin any experience you could have using the internet. But I think when Gator declared, that their shit dont stink...that catapulted their asses to #1...Wouldnt it be funny if someone gave all these Jokers virus ::cough:: I mean Spyware.

    --
    Trix are for kids!
  196. Badware by Mushkode · · Score: 1

    Another good one is Keen Value, which ties into your IE and keeps track of everywhere online you go, how long you stay there, and how many sub-pages of the site you load. Nicely, half the time, it crashes IE with an internal error when you go to load it.

    I work tech support, and this is a nightmare for our customers.

    --
    "If there is a cliff, I must jump. Just in case I should chance to fly."
  197. Re:I had to help a user over the phone uninstall t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you share that little trick?

    Don't be a dumbcock. Seems to have worked for me all these years; IE has never installed anything without me asking it to. From personal experience and things I've heard, all these "ghost installs" seem like pilot error to me.

  198. NO! by theolein · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as registering your computers with some data protection bureau.

    1.You really have some strange fantasies about life and the law in Europe, some of which seem to belong more in Hollywood than in real life. Come on over and visit for a while. You'll be amazed considering the drivel you've just posted.

    2.The word you used, "bureau" reminded me more of what your government is doing with it's patriot act.

  199. Re:Good grief by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    I had heard that statistic also. The more accurate figure is 1% to 3% gay, depending on social acceptance.

    Not that I'm suggesting anything here but isnt that awfully similar to the number of Mac users...? (3.5%)

  200. Re: hmm.... adaware? by DZign · · Score: 1

    weird - I had the opposite problem !
    I used the immunize option of adaware and had problems with my tcp/ip stack. ISP cable company helpdesk couldn't quite help.. line was ok, problem was in the software. Ping did work, but mail or surfing didn't :-(
    (I was also using win98se)
    The solution - I bought a larger harddisk (was planning to upgrade anyway) and installed that one..

  201. VX2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also: Blackstone Data Transponder, and a million other names.

    Because no matter how annoying a talking purple gorilla gets, at least it isn't harvesting your credit card numbers.

  202. Question: how big is this problem on Mac? by Chrysophrase · · Score: 1

    Is anyone aware of the extent of this problem on the Mac platform? I know that with marketshare of the Mac platform & all, the Mac isn't as interesting as the PC platform, but I can't believe that there is NO Mac ad- or spyware out there.

    I've already done a few searches on the subject but can't seem to find anything. Is the problem non-existant or is nobody aware of the problem? Is this a case of safety through obscurity?

    What are your experiences & opinions?

    --
    "It usualy starts with some screaming. Afterwards there is much running around."
  203. Browser Helper Objects by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1
    One day, I was investigating a machine that was suspected of having a trojan horse installed on it.

    There were portions of the program, a .DLL file in particular that had been installed as Browser Helper Objects within the registry.

    I was curious to find out what exactly a BHO object was, so I searched MS Support site - and here's the link to what I found because I KNOW that if I typed it here, you'd think I just made it up.

    From the Microsoft Website:

    What Are Browser Helper Objects?
    From [the operating system's] point of view, Internet Explorer is just like any other Win32-based program with its own memory space to preserve. With Browser Helper Objects you can write components-specifically, in-process Component Object Model (COM) components-that Internet Explorer will load each time it starts up. Such objects run in the same memory context as the browser and can perform any action on the available windows and modules. For example, a BHO could detect the browser's typical events, such as GoBack, GoForward, and DocumentComplete; access the browser's menu and toolbar and make changes; create windows to display additional information on the currently viewed page; and install hooks to monitor messages and actions. In short, a BHO works as a spy we send to infiltrate the browser's land.

    Jeeemany Christmas!!! And people wonder why MS products are so insecure?! This is the ripe playground that MS has created specifically to support the ilks of the spyware.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  204. Obligatory Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lack of spyware availability is FURTHER proof that FreeBSD is dead... :)

  205. Get an alternative ! by imtheguru · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I agree with you too on each count. However, you dont need to do without REAL content.

    Check out Real Alternative , which plays all Real media files, without the crud. While you are on that website, also check out QuickTime Alternative

    Cheers,

    --
    Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
    A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
    1. Re:Get an alternative ! by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      Ooh. Does WinAmp (Classic) pick them up? 'Cos next 2K reinstall, I'm thinking of breaking from WMP.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    2. Re:Get an alternative ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are there any Real alternatives for linux?

    3. Re:Get an alternative ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares?

  206. Re:I had to help a user over the phone uninstall t by michib01 · · Score: 0

    Tools --> Internet Options --> Advanced --> Browsing
    then uncheck "Enable Install On Demand" check-boxes.

    See
    This for further information

    --
    - "Having a clean conscience is sign of bad memory"
  207. spyware in commercial games! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not the stuff thats free, that looks around
    your system abit and occasionally "phones"
    home that's sneeky ... NO! it's the spyware
    in all the GAMES like UT2003 or HalfLife
    that phones home.

    the sneakiest spyware you will find in commercial
    software (you bought it!) MOSTLY IN GAMES!

    biggest capitalists (even bigger then micrososoft)
    are game companies!

    "pay up kids and don't mind if the game phones
    home occasionally (every 5 min)" ...

  208. Re:Something to keep in mind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    indeed, there are homosexual acts, but no homosexual people.

  209. The real problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ and its software(Internet Explorer) which allows all this to happen.

  210. Slashdot promotes adware and spyware! Mediaplex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you open up slashdot with search and destroy turned on it will register "mediaplex" as being in the page. This is ... very ... very ... very .. rude, considering the story.

  211. CmdLineExt02.dll by UnConeD · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what this file is? It's located in my Win2K user profile's Local Settings > Temp directory. It cannot be deleted (file in use), and a hexexit shows nothing except 'File packaged with Petite' (which is sort of suspicious).

  212. Worst Spyware/Adware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company recently insidiously allied itself with the diamond web awards site which we were using with some of my website customers from a company called 180solutions.com they install an activeX (supposedly) without any notification or chance to accept or deny its installation and then any time you start browsing pop up come out of everywhere at you from all directions for all kind of services and things that if you wanted them already you would have had them (remember X10 cameras LOL) and in contacting both Diamond Web Awards and 180solutions ONLY 180solutions responded to my request for uninstallation instructions and I was greeted with directions to an enhanced installer ONLY no uninstallation directions NOR an uninstall program. So I had to strip my registry and the program manually and take screen shots and make directions for my customers to have accessable to pass out to thier customers affected by this "raping" of thier personal PC and personal PC security and stability.

  213. Why isnt your Mom using a Mac? by Selecter · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And dont tell me your mom has some weird prog that macs dont have. That may be a valid excuse for you, but not your mother. She will have a lot less trouble with adware, malware, spyware and the like if you PITCH that PC and get her a nice G4 Imac. She'll love ya. Go ahead, mod this a troll. It's the truth, and you know it.

    1. Re:Why isnt your Mom using a Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the answer is linux

    2. Re:Why isnt your Mom using a Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the question was -- "What product has the most unlikable and inexplicably egotisitical followers in the known universe?"

    3. Re:Why isnt your Mom using a Mac? by welthqa · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I'm sick of helping my family with their comptuers. I never had to do that when they had a mac. everything was always zap the pram or whatever. I'm poor though... donations?

      --


      100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
    4. Re:Why isnt your Mom using a Mac? by decepty · · Score: 1

      the answer is an abacus, a chisel and a stone tablet.

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    5. Re:Why isnt your Mom using a Mac? by hesiod · · Score: 0, Troll

      > Why isnt your Mom using a Mac?

      Because she doesn't want to throw down five grand on a computer just to check EMail & browse the Web, maybe? The $500 PC does more than what she needs, prolly. Unless Gramma's doing 3D rendering, of course...

    6. Re:Why isnt your Mom using a Mac? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know who the mac-loving fanboy piece of shit is who moderated this a troll. I have no problem with Macs, and I said nothing resembling a troll. The Macs ARE a lot more expensive than PCs, and better in many ways, but the expense is not worth it if you're just Surfing the 'net & sending EMail. A Mac would be overkill. Would you buy a $20,000 Sun Server to be a workstation? Probably not.

      Fag.

  214. Gator vs Wil Wheaton.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    I want to know if Gator ever sent Wil Wheaton that nastygram..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  215. Most widespread spyware: Windows XP by edxwelch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows media player (which is part of WinXP) collects data about what you are listening to and sends it to a MS server. And we don't know what other things are going on under the hood.

  216. How about the Coolweb Search browser hijack by suepahfly · · Score: 1

    Maybe not te worse in symptoms, (annoying toolbal, keeps setting yourhome page and gives some popups)

    But the way it install it self, is rather sneaky.
    Some versions drop a file called `msspi.dll` in the system23 folder, this file has some key URL's that are monitored.

    How ever you connot just remove it.
    msspi.dll hooks it self to the Winsock LSP chain.

    If you delete the file, you're left with an crippled internet connection

  217. I found the perfect answer.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    I recieved an email saying "Get rid of annoying pop-ups forever!" - so I sent $19 in used notes to a Post box in Nigeria, and presto! problem sorted! How ever my computer seems to be running a bit slow, and logs on to a porn site by default, I wonder why.. ;-)

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  218. webHance agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caught one called webHance (came with gamespy I think) a few years back on my windows 98 SE machine. I was on dial-up at the time, and every half hour or so it would use up 100% of my upstream bandwidth to do it's auditing of internet structure for a few minutes. The packets were largely empty, didn't look like personal information. Looked like the authors of it were selling data about the throughput of various parts of the internet.
    Was a bitch to get rid off, same as that newdotnet thing, completely reinstall the tcp/ip stack.

  219. 2nd thought by cemaco · · Score: 1

    One of our home systems had this annoying crap that kept dumping those god awful pop up's on the desktop. It also kept asking us to download some browser plug-in. I think it was called 2nd thought. Tried deleting all references to it from the system, including registry but it would not die. Adaware found it and removed it. What really pissed me off is that I am sure it got onto our system when my wife was browsing a teachers resource site.

  220. just an fyi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    steve gibson is a raving crackpot. go find a real security site.

  221. Searchv Hijack by MauMan · · Score: 1

    Although I guess it's technically a hijacker this is a bitch to uninstall. It took me about an hour on the phone to help a buddy get it off his machine. I does a nice job of disgusing itself with file names that blend in well with system system filenames like msupdate.exe, winshow.dll and win.reg.

    --
    ------- Code to try when you're bored: qsort( 0, UINT_MAX, sizeof( int* ), IntCompare );
  222. Re: Hijack This by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

    You may want to read the newsgroups at www.grc.com. These are all security related and contain information on all the latest software and hardware related thereto.

    --
    Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  223. Read the license ? Its not SpyWare... by Quazion · · Score: 1

    It for starters says it sends information from your computer to real and even better you agreed to the fact that real can install software on your computer with telling you.

    After reading the first few lines of the End User License Agreement I pressed cancel and figured i could live without the real player.

    People start reading those damn licenses! its full fo crap you dont want to accept, but if you do dont whine afterwards, oke? :)

  224. C2Lop !!! by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    Is the worst I have ever seen. Neither Spybot S&D nor Adaware were able to remove it completely from a box I worked on that had it.

  225. gator, bonzai, etc. by 1eyedhive · · Score: 1

    i'm an indy computer tech guru guy, and run across my share of id10t users every now and then, one of my earliest was a lady with a shiny new 9x gateway box, Comcast @home and AOL (no firewall), she clicked on every single popup that AOL and/or IE gave her, had 10 tons of spyware (gator, bonzai and a dozen others), i managed to get rid of most of em, but she was too damned attached to gator (i just couldn't get through to her)... anyways, a pal of mine, with an unprotected windows 2000 machine on a cable connection got an shitload of spyware, adware and something hidden that spewed pr0n, not to mention messenger spam (nuked messenger service), adaware didn't do squat (didn't know about S&D at the time). Solution: save all files on C to D (alt. HD), WDclear (HD diag/write zeros), reinstall 2000, install adaware and the like, teach little sister a lesson (gave her her own user acct with LIMITED access), no problems since. my personal policy: 1. find offensive adware/spyware/etc 2. run knoppix 3. copy files to linux file server 4. from 2 other win boxes, beat the hell out of said files with adaware, NAV, kaspersky, etc to make files clean 5. wdclear offending box 6. install windows 7. download adaware, antivirus, etc 8. copy files frm server 9. install programs 10. make damn sure no spyware gets on box. i have all my p2p apps on a PII 350 box, and watch the processes like a hawk, run adawaware and S&D regularly and have been adware free for quite some time, that and my linux firewall blocks everything inbound and adding outbound catches takes 5 seconds.

    --
    Logistical Chaos Officer http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL,USA
  226. Gator == Lieware by chaoticset · · Score: 1

    Gator's not spyware, it's lieware. As in the people who make it lie and say it's not spyware. :)

    --

    -----------------------
    You are what you think.
  227. Slashdot Legal Panel ? by Goody · · Score: 1

    Also, any thoughts on whether some of this stuff is even legal, as it is almost certainly not ethical.

    Once again, Slashdot's vast panel of legal experts are called upon to provide counsel on key legal issues of our day.

    Tune in next week when we get an update on Slashdot's cancer and AIDS research. Key findings from Slashdotters c0red4mp and IRQ5 revealed.

    --
    Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
  228. Source code by yerricde · · Score: 1

    For how long?

    Should WinMX add adware or spyware, I'll stop recommending it.

    It's a bit harder to hide adware or spyware in a program published as free software. Gnucleus and eMule are published as free software.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  229. OK, how about this? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Then how is *n?x "a viable replacement for Windows" on the x86 hardware platform that entry-level desktop computer users can afford? Trust me, I'm trying to get rid of this "Micro Soft Window" spyware, but I'd rather not have to buy a new computer to do so.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  230. Spyware Schmyware... by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    I don't like spyware anymore than the next guy but it has been around far longer than computers in one guize or a another.

    Telemarketing surveys - they call you and ask you questions, you don't need to answer but somehow feel either privliged or obliged to do so.

    New product registrations that ask you all sorts of questions.

    Targeted coupons - those coupons that you get in the grocery store that are printed out at the same time as you purchase.

    The quick customer survery that gives you a coupon if you complete it when you check out.

    All of these things are like brick-and-mortar versions of spyware yet we really do not complain about them but they can all track us.

    What makes computer/internet based spyware worse is it's insidiousness and how inexpensive it is. As a society, we must find a way to make it too unprofitable be a functional method of advertising.

    Here are some suggestions:
    1. Start a movement where publishers of software are boycotted unless their products sport a "spyware free" label.

    2. Collect a small sum from tens of thousands of people and hire lawyers to lobby against spyware and sue companies that violate any laws anywhere.

    3. Hyper-flood the spyware servers from bots that will effectivly kill their service.

  231. Spyware removal for the enterprise? by AntiMatter · · Score: 1

    Of all the itmes I take care of on a 1500 node network, one thing that I haven't seen a solution for is centralized spy-adware removal. Does anyone know if such an animal exists?

    If not, that would be a great project to start on. No install on clients and remote scanning and removal from the backend.

    That would be puuuurfect.

  232. Gator/Kaaza by Lipongo · · Score: 0

    I agree that spyware is annoying, and in some cases damaging. But this is the case with all things when taken to the extreme or abused. Spyware does have its uses when used properly and without extememity(forgive my spelling). Spyware/adware provide people who offer free software with a method of paying the bills but not having the client pay through cash but rather through popups, or simple research infomation as opposed to charging the client out right. Granted Gator'd popups are annoying, in my opinion they are relativly harmless. If its that annoying to you, have one machine offline that you install all software that requires adware/spyware so that it cannot connect to its advetisements. And stop visiting those questionable porn sites, now thats harder said than done.

    --
    -Certified TechnoWeinie
  233. The best of both worlds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Email-Stealer-MAPI32 is the most insidious i've seen so far.

    It is classified as a trojan and it pops up a dialog box about every 2-3 minutes telling you that you are having a mapi32 exception. It then asks you to please fill in boxes with you username, password, pop, and smtp information to send to "support" to fix the problem. Whereever this info goes would then give that person a nice spam account or worse. If this is a company user, the person who received the info would have a valid user account on someone elses mail server to relay spam.

    Quite a nasty one! Removed with spybot...

  234. Re: hmm.... adaware? by PunWork · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're running Win98SE - you can always refresh your installation by running

    "setup /p f"

    That goes through the installation procedure, refreshing all the corrupted/replaced files. Gives you options to keep the more recent ones, too. That's solved many a problem for me...

  235. TopText by poizoness · · Score: 1

    In my never been humble opinion TopText is the worst. This place changes words (that happen to be keywords) on a webpage into links for its paid advertisers. For instance, abc company owns a website and they sell abc gum, yet xyz company wants to hijack visitors to abc's website. What they do is they pay toptext for the word gum...and then on every computer with toptext whenever the word gum appears there it is made into a link to xyz's website (this includes but is not limited to instances of gum on abc's website). For more info check out ScumWare.Com

    --
    The way things were....thats the way i'm glad things aren't.
  236. Gator, n-Case, My Search by Lester67 · · Score: 1

    N-Case and My Search appear to be linked somehow. N-Case managed to install on my system without me saying "Yes" to any installers. I haven't quite figured out how that happened yet.

    Even after using their "remove" feature, Ad-Aware found it running in the background.

    That smacks of trojan, if you ask me.

    1. Re:Gator, n-Case, My Search by Lipongo · · Score: 0

      Had a similar problem with N-case was eventually able to remove it by repeating the un-install proccess several times then restarting and repeating it one last time. Hope this helps. Also never noticed it being installed either till I was freeing up some hard drive space and saw it in add/remove programs.

      --
      -Certified TechnoWeinie
    2. Re:Gator, n-Case, My Search by Lester67 · · Score: 1

      Run Ad-Aware, it is most likely still there.

      I removed it using Add/Remove twice, the second time it actually removed it from the list, but the program was still there, with registry entries tied in.

    3. Re:Gator, n-Case, My Search by Lipongo · · Score: 0

      Just ran ad-aware, the long lost program that saves us all the headache. Got rid of several spy/adware programs that were installed on my Work machine which I inherited from the managers(computer morons) and my lord there were roughly 177 spy/ad related entries.

      Yet again I am reminded that power does not mean intellegence.

      --
      -Certified TechnoWeinie
  237. Re:LOOK LOOK LOOK LOOK ! UNINSTALL INSTRUCTIONS by lcsjk · · Score: 1

    Go to to get specific instructions and information about new.net and a removal procedure.

  238. Very few people use *NIX ... by 0xF1D0 · · Score: 1

    ...for personal use, anyways.

    Same reason many companies develop software only for the Windows platform. Here, have some data:

    Operating Systems Used to Access Google, Sept 2003:

    Windows XP 38%
    Windows 98 29%
    Windows 2000 20%
    Windows NT 3%
    Mac 3%
    Windows 95 1%
    Linux 1%
    Other 5%

    Source:
    http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.h tml

  239. Broderbund / BBSTORE by cjmnews · · Score: 1

    This software was included in several kid's games (Fisher Price Pet Shop, Pokemon Art Studio, etc). The early versions installed without warning you. The later versions asked you if it was OK to install, and if you said no, it would install anyway. It "apparently" collects web browsing information, encrypts it with PGP and sends it to the seller of the game (Mattel?). Removing it requires Registry edit, reboot, then deleting the BBSTORE directory from your windows directory.

    Encrypting the information makes it insidious.

    --
    You can lose something that is loose, so tighten the loose item so you don't lose it.
  240. Comet Cursor by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    Comet Cursor is perhaps the most insidious I have come across. Every female in our office thinks it's 'cute' and thus installs it and, like a virus, every other female that sees their computer installs it as well. This then installs adware, spyware and hijackware all over their system.

    Yesterday, I was on a conference call helping to set up someone terminal so that they could access a secure site. The person was told over and over again to go to the URL but nothing happened... so I said I'd be on over and check out their computer (guessing they had installed comet cursor or something and it was hijacking their browser).

    Sure enough, I get to their computer and just looking at their damn cursor, I knew it was installed on their system. I then removed comet cursor and ran ad-aware and sure enough... they were then able to access the secure server.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  241. Hmm...worst spyware... by thebagel · · Score: 0

    Gator is the WORST spyware EVER!

    Ha. Said it.

  242. This is Easy -- AOL by blizzardsoup · · Score: 2, Informative

    AOL is by far the worst piece of spyware ever devised by man.

  243. Just a stupid damn good idea ... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    What would happend to all this ad/spy shit if someone puts a man in the middle and reverse enginer their 'clients', and if someone then takes that data and writes an app that can send user specified data to their database ... and what would happend if millions of people installs that app and start sending wrong, stupid data to their databases ... ????
    Since this doesn't seem ilegal to me (at least the 'companys' that develope that kind of shit won't complain), we can even open a project in slashdot. We have GNU replacement clients for MSN, ICQ, Kazaa, e-donkey, etc, etc, etc ... i want a GNUator Corporation Client (gcc?) too ... : )

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  244. How to kill Windows Messenger by aws910 · · Score: 1

    I HATE how windows messenger is pre-installed on WinXP, especially that outlook starts it indiscriminately...
    SO...

    Here's how to get rid of it:
    from a command prompt, enter
    RunDll32 advpack.dll,LaunchINFSection %windir%\inf\msmsgs.inf,BLC.Remove

    Although I haven't tried this part, this is supposed to fix an issue if you use outlook express:
    In the registry key of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express add a new DWord value, name it "Hide Messenger" and give it a value of 2.

    Personally, I think the whole Windows Messenger thing is a ploy to relive history when they integrated IE into their OS in order to beat out competition. They want to kill everyone else in the IM world, but I think their product sucks compared to AIM. Even if M$ cleaned up the program, it's too late. Everyone I know uses AIM, ICQ, or Yahoo.

  245. Comma preceds quotation marks w/o exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Raises," But you were close.

  246. ApprovedLinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing is annoying as all get out. My wife somehow managed to get this installed on her PC and it is a total pain. It resets your home page to all the time, it stops you from using Google.com, and it pops up ads about every 45-60 seconds or so, making our dialup connection almost worthless.

    The people that write this stuff should be publicly gutted.

  247. in total agreement by sbma44 · · Score: 1
    I had this piece of malware afflict me when I was working overseas for an extended period. With highspeed internet an hour tram/bus/metro ride away. And GPRS, charged-per-kilobyte access for everything else. Not that it would have mattered, since it prevented me from ANY network access of any kind. And of course I had no retail access to english-language software.

    So okay, this is pretty much a worst-case scenario, and I suppose I could have had the office express ship me an OS CDROM. But still -- it was a bad situation. Malware that requires you to reinstall your OS is bad, bad stuff.

  248. (OT) ESR claims they don't always "preced" by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Where the comma goes in relationship to the closing quotation mark is a mechanics issue about which Eric Raymond seems to think differently. Punctuation goes outside of quotes in hackish style unless the punctuation is part of what is being quoted. Please study the example of the vi command in Raymond's explanation.

    printf("Without exception? I can think of at least %d," n_exceptions);
    /* Like that one. Putting the comma
    before the closing quote mark breaks the code. */

    On a larger scale, the responses to my comment raise another question: why did they all have everything to do with my incidental correction of usage (not mechanics) and nothing to do with the paragraph of actual content that followed? I tend to consider the idea most important, then usage, then mechanics, which is why I spent a whole paragraph on idea and as few as three words on usage.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  249. Re:you mean 37 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a row?

  250. OT: your sig by pebs · · Score: 1

    alias dir='rm -rf /'

    batch file called ls.cmd in path containing:
    echo y | format c:

    Not quite as elegant, but just as effective :)

    --
    #!/
    1. Re:OT: your sig by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > alias dir='rm -rf /'
      > echo y | format c:
      > Not quite as elegant, but just as effective :)

      I don't think it's "just as effective"... On Linux it's worthless, and on DOS/Windows it's infinitely better.

    2. Re:OT: your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's "just as effective"... On Linux it's worthless, and on DOS/Windows it's infinitely better.

      worthless like your comment.

  251. Kazaa by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

    Why didn't I see Kazaa mentioned anywhere? I've cleaned out so many "additional" programs that "came with" Kazaa on my family & friend's machines that I can't even count them on all of our fingers and toes combined.

  252. Re: Hijack This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  253. Great Windows tool to use pre-install of anything by BigBong · · Score: 1

    There is a great piece of freeware called InCtrl for Windows systems that will show you just about anything you want to know about what an installer program does to your system when it runs. Clean, kinda customizable, and easy to use.

  254. MS's Paladium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS's Paladium would probably illiminate most, if not all, spyware.

  255. my top list by garwain · · Score: 1

    Kazza Gator Bonzi Buddy Weather Bug Save Now (easy to uninstall, but seems to return in no time)

  256. Huntbar by MuParadigm · · Score: 1


    Anyone else having a lot of issues with Huntbar in the past 2 days?

    It looks like they've gone out of control, somehow. I mean it's showing up everywhere, in particular, sites that don't typically have spyware -- I've run into it at Google and NY Times.

    It seems to be coming up repeatedly, telling people it's already installed, then asking if they want to run it. If they say no, it's asks again "Are you sure?"

  257. Re: Hijack This by Striver · · Score: 1

    interesting link. Did you happen to notice this statement on the page...

    Important Message :
    We value your help and like it when you refer other poeple to this site, but please do not link to this site and brand Mr. Gibson as a scam, he is not (per se). This site questions the motives of Mr. Gibson, criticizes him and his works by trying to demystifying what he is doing. What you are going to find on this site are Researched Facts and Opinions, Opinions however are refered to as what they are : opinions not facts.

    --
    this is loaner...my sig is in the shop
  258. Re:I had to help a user over the phone uninstall t by GlassUser · · Score: 2, Informative

    For IE 5/6, do tools, internet options, security, internet, custom level. Set everything in activex controls to disabled, except automatically run, which you can set to run. This will only allow already-installed controls to run, but won't download new ones or give you that damned annoying message about how it's not running them because of your settings (that's the only reason you tell it to run - if you can deal with it nagging you for every refresh, set that to disabled too). You can block specific things like flash by adding the GUID and a descriptor to a certain part of the registry.

  259. Gator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gator is on my company's official builds, my laptops all come with it already installed!

    New.net has been bad for me personally, I had it back when and a Tribes2 patch choked on its winsock code. It took me days to figure out what was wrong.

  260. Winamp? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Winamp asks for certain info the first time you run it after install, but I've not had it bug me afterwards (unless perhaps the weblet is on). Maybe you have some odd plugins installed?

  261. My Search??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone explain wtf MySearch is? It mysteriously appeared on my MSIE a few days ago and I do not know how it got there. I don't see any way to get rid of it, and Adaware seems to not see it (maybe I need to update Adaware).

  262. Isn't it obvious? by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

    Windows is the answer you are looking for. It being the most insidious piece of crap software I am aware of.

    --



    I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
  263. Downwind by siskbc · · Score: 1
    Even outside when one of the dog lays down a pile it's rank... even from 25 feet away (they length of the leash)

    See, that's why ya gotta guage windspeed and direction before letting your dog lay cable. You get downwind of a St. Bernard you fed chili to last night...you're begging for a slow miserable death there.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  264. Truth == Flamebait, apparently. by autechre · · Score: 1

    Yes, Mac IE used to be better than Windows IE; it was even the most standards-compliant browser for a time. But that was a long while ago in software time.

    You really should not use software:

    1. That is no longer supported
    2. written by Microsoft
    3. to access the Internet.

    IE on the Mac (and on Windows, for the moment) is behind on standards compliance and features, and by standing still, it's only going to get worse.

    Perhaps the parent poster could have phrased things a bit differently, but I'm amazed that more people didn't post replies like this.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  265. I-lookup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I-lookup is so far the worst I have come accross by a long shot. Convenient for me this discussion just came up here. I managed to pick up an infestation of it this past weekend. It reset my homepage to one of their sites, added several toolbars, and filled my favorites list with about 25 porn sites. After reseting everything I went into control panel and removed half a dozen programs. Problem solved? Not by a long shot. I opened another IE window...kablam, right back to the shopping site, popups, etc. Which promptly reinstalled the programs I had just removed. I ran adaware which found maybe ten items. Then ran spybot and found about 50 more. After checking the adaware forums for some information on it I found that I had a much larger updated version of it than had previously been discussed. I then had to clean out about 30 registry entries and reset all of my security settings in IE. Two hours into the cleanup I had everything fixed except for one nagging issue that I am totaly lost on. Now whenever any vaguely sexually related word comes up in IE comes up with a green underline and is hyperlinked back to one of the I-lookup sites! So entirely frustrating. Unless anyone here has any insights on how to remove this I will probaly be reformating that machine shortly.

    1. Re:I-lookup by brain159 · · Score: 1

      Just the other day (literally!) I finally managed to get I-Lookup off of my friend's machine. The uninstaller available on i-lookup's FAQ page didn't work at all for me (it set the homepage to yahoo and unloaded the toolbar, but next run of IE the bar was back and the homepage reset to them).

      Here's how I beat it:
      Spybot S+D. Online-Update that, do a full scan and such. Then look in the Tools section (the left hand part of the Spybot window in advanced mode is an outlook-type menu thingy) for the BHO tool.

      Close all IE windows, toggle all the BHOs to OFF. Start IE, reset homepage to blank. Back to Spybot, turn on a couple of the BHOs (google toolbar if you've got it installed, etc). Back to IE to see if the bar's back. Trial+Improvement to work out which one is I-Lookup, leave that one turned off to stop it loading straight away.

      After that, fire up regedit and look for the full title that the toolbar uses to describe itself in IE (I think it's "I-Lookup.Com Bar" IIRC, YMMV). In the middle of the class IDs there will be a match - delete that whole class ID key (save it out to a .reg first just in case you're wrong) then restart IE. Should no longer be running and no longer seletable from IE. Examine that registry entry more closely for the file name of the DLL it's loading the com object from and murder that by hand if you like.

  266. Re:byte me -Re:Shocking disrepect for consumer cho by spronk · · Score: 1

    Humor impared are we?

  267. Worst Spyware ever by MacGod · · Score: 1
    Worst Spyware ever: Windows.

    Fortunately, there's a cure available.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  268. IE is the root cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call me a GUI novice, but if you can put a checkbox that says "always trust content from gator inc." when the goddamn on-demand installer pops up for GATOR et al, why can't MS put another checkbox in there that says "never trust content from gator inc." and be done with it?

  269. Re: hmm.... adaware? by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that. So setup /p f is different to a normal re-install over itself? Or is it more selective? Thanks for this tip, much appreciated.

  270. SearchV.com by mumwahead · · Score: 0

    I find that the searchv.com hijack has been the worst i've encountered. It continually reset my homepage from /. to some searchv.com crap. I decided to do a little research and found via internic that it was registered to some asshole from gaza. Removal was a huge hastle, had to manually uninstall dll's and remove 20+ registry values.Infuriated, frustrated, and feeling vulnerable I wonder what can be done to stop this. I equate it to someone coming into my house, repainting my walls and putting decals on my windows and mirrors. How can this be legal? It most certainly isn't ethical. I payed for my computer, what gives anyone else the right to abuse it?

    1. Re:SearchV.com by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      The excuse that gator has is that they were "invited in". It doesnt matter that they were invited in because they were "dressed like girl scouts offering cookies" and instead came in, painted cookies on your wall, and put ads for their location on your windows...

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
  271. trojan.qHost by christodd · · Score: 1

    I haven't heard anyone mention it, but the trojan.qHost "virus" (not a virus at all) is pretty nasty, and seems to be changing all the time. It only effects IE right now. It changed your DNS settings, and creates a hijacking "hosts" file so that all search engines (google, yahoo, hotbot, excite) end up at another webserver. It took me about a week to figure out what was going on, and from the look of things other people are stuck on it. It's being called a virus, but really it's hijack-ware. And once you've caught it, it's really hard to do a search to find out what's going on. There's a small discussion on GoogleGuys site (seems to be shrinking ?), and a trojan.qHost information/removal page at BiteSize.

  272. Remember OS? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 0

    OS was my favorite spyware ever (of course I mean OS, i.e. the Output Spy -- not Operating System, abbreviated as O/S) and not because it was itself so great, but because of the unbelievably stupid countermeasures, completely missing the whole point. I always had a copy of unpatched JEDGAR but most of people was foolish enough to use the "patched" (read: backdoored/trojaned) one. Imagine if today one of the anti-spyware software like chkrootkit, ad-aware or tiger would say "Don't like being spied on? Here's a tool which will tell you you are safe, after doing abslutely nothing at all. Enjoy!" Such morons would be out of business in seconds today, not to mention being sued into oblivion. Unfortunately back in the ITS era most of people didn't understand computers and technology in general. But I must admit that it was somewhat funny to see people using patched JEDGAR against your OS. Those were the days.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  273. Porn dialers by natefanaro · · Score: 1

    I think porn dialers are the worst (and best.) Worst because it causes a lot of damage to your phone bill when you get an international call. The best because I work for a dialup ISP and it's funny when you hear agents go "Maybe it was your husband?" Brings a smile to my face every time.

    (It's also funny because if I "accidently" run across one it tries to dial out when I have no modem installed, just a NIC.)

  274. +5 tongue in... yeah, that's the spot. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? Autopr0n rules!

  275. RealAlt won't play www.bbcworld.com live feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will play in RealOne but not in Media Player Classic:
    http://europe.real.com/smil/bbc_world_ne ws.smil

  276. Re: Hijack This by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

    I am aware of these guys from comments on the aforementioned newsgroups. My general impression is that there is a certain element of jealousy at work. Folks do tend to put Steve Gibson on a pedestal, but only because he writes incredibly efficient programs in machine language that have very small footprints and work quite well. And a lot of the work he does is available for free (but not open-sourced) so there's an element of frustration among the folks who sell what he gives away.

    In any event, I find the GRC groups useful especially because they keep me abreast of new security-related software that I, as a private user with no deep understanding of security or programming in general, can take to the bank, so to speak. Whatever Gibson's personal flaws (he is human), he is doing more good than harm, and that's all I can practically expect from someone who holds himself out as an expert. Trolls can always find some genuine reason to complain if they dig deeply enough, but that doesn't make them any less trolls.

    --
    Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  277. Use a firewall ! by LadOuvE · · Score: 1

    With a free, really nice and easy to use firewall like Zone Alarm, you get almost absolute control on your software connections, and therefore detect and contain (ad||spy)ware.

    A simple popup appears when a soft connects to or is being connected to through your LAN or the Internet. All you have to do is click "Yes" or "No" and you even get a checkbox to tell ZoneAlarm you want this to become a rule.
    You then have the possibility to browse through the rule list whenever you want or nedd to.

    Real Player is one of a connecter, but WMP is one too.

    While it can be usefull when the soft automaticly downloads necessary codecs, it is spyware when it sends your playlist, usage stats, etc.

    And for the MIME part of the problem, I must agree that RealOne is one of the most annoying to configure, but a lot of programs are (I hate QuickTime for that).

  278. Re:Microsoft Windows! by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    I'm probably going to get moderated down for saying this ( ;-) ), but the moderators are clearly on crack.

    The question was "Which Adware and Spyware are the Mode Insidious?", and my answer was "Microsoft Windows!"

  279. CoolWebSearch not detectable by AdAware by kwench · · Score: 1

    Today I cleaned a friend's computer from something which I haven't seen before (btw, it is already mentioned in four other comments here).

    His IE always showed "here4search.com" as starting page which always reappeared after manually resetting it. Having seen similiar things before I tried AdWare and checked for some unsual things in Autostart. But after rebooting... it was there again!

    This here4search.com-thing is part of the CoolWebSearch trojan and can be detected by Hijack This! and (which is even better) can be removed easely with CWShredder.
    Nasty thing, but it was gone afterwards.

    I surely do not need to mention that you should install some tools like a decent spyware killer (like AdAware), a decent virus killer, a small personal firewall and some other browser/mailclient than the duo infernale IE/Outlook, if you insist on running Windows.

  280. Gator and Hotbar... by sircle_72 · · Score: 1

    ...really chap my ass.
    What makes them so damn insidious is that with the former, all you need to do is stumble upon a popup that has the code embedded within its source to fall victim, and with the latter, one need only to receive an email from someone who really felt they needed to "express yourself with 4,000 FREE Smileys!". (I say this with complete confidence because I've got just such a nugget of joy from some random idiot coworker, eating up space in my Inbox and quietly trying to install itself as we speak).
    Fortunately, neither has presented such a problem for me that Ad-Aware [Lavasoftusa.com] hasn't been able to catch them and delete them, but it doesn't stop it from being downright fucking annoying.
    There have been several occasions where I just took the minor and yet perverse pleasure in finding every file, folder and errant, cleverly named and hidden piece of these programs, and destroying them one-by-one, Z-Deleting them from my hard drive forever [Zdelete.com]. But who the fuck has time for that every day?
    Pricks.

    --
    Sure Bill Gates' hair is fugly, but give his barber some credit! At least he managed to cover the horns on his forehead.
  281. Third Party Client by The+Herbaliser · · Score: 1

    Most of the open source and otherwise IM clients are far less of a pain in the ass than the ones provided by Microsoft, AIM, and ICQ, which seem to have had their interfaces designed by teenagers on uppers.