It's not needed, because the zero-day defense software will be perfect - duh.
You're obviously right on point. This is only a good idea, if the software was perfect. But we wouldn't need this "perfect" software, if software was perfect....and around and around we go.
A valid point. However, from personal experience I can tell you that when [place name of any webmail service] users no long get the mail they expect, they don't blame said webmail service - they blame the company or person that *should* have sent the mail. Because we all know that mail *always* gets through and that Yahoo, Hotmail, Google et al *always* work as they should.
The problem is compounded by the fact that answering angry support mail from users demanding to get their newsletter might be impossible, because that too may be blocked.
So while I agree with you that this could be solved by getting the webmail user to shift over to a new provider, the user may never be aware that the mail provider is the problem.
I guess solving the spam problems is not an easy task:-)
This being slashdot.org, you mean stuffed animals, cardboard cutout of Leonard Nimoy and such...not actually a human...right?
It's not needed, because the zero-day defense software will be perfect - duh.
You're obviously right on point. This is only a good idea, if the software was perfect. But we wouldn't need this "perfect" software, if software was perfect....and around and around we go.
Great, so now I need Mr. Fusion or a blot of lightning to get my computer running. I wonder if the flux capacitor is an optional extra?
Also ink - people always forget about the ink. Used by terrorists for recruitment and plotting attacks. When will the madness end and ink be banned.
Min is : ' or 'a'='a
Sometimes I even get into site I'm not even signed up for. It's neat.
Oh well - the worst that could happen is that RIAA segfaults...Why not keep the bug in?
shentino gets sued by RIAA for slander in 5...4...3...2...
I say nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
PSDoom - very old school console edition.
1) You can put out a fire on a live server. However don't use water.
2) Post link to server on slashdot....server will now be in use.
3) Lock and Load....Hank must fail
4) Well, you might want to unmount any ram drives you might have and throw in a few 'sync' for good measure. Then get your holywater and wait.
Chuck Norris? Is that you?
Pftt, two hours to pop on your router? It must be puny. ;-)
But most importantly, did you wear a tie?
You calling him a liar?
An adware adblocker...There's an idea.
"Blocks ads and it's FREE...*".
* you only need to watch a few automatically generated messages from our sponsors
Yes it is. Computers never lie. We also know that your alias is "Coward, Anonymous".
Pfft, I already bought a rock that does that.
Sure it works. No terrorist attacks on planes in the U.S. since they started using it....so it must work!
This is the worlds smallest violin, playing the worlds smallest atom...just for you
A valid point. However, from personal experience I can tell you that when [place name of any webmail service] users no long get the mail they expect, they don't blame said webmail service - they blame the company or person that *should* have sent the mail. Because we all know that mail *always* gets through and that Yahoo, Hotmail, Google et al *always* work as they should.
The problem is compounded by the fact that answering angry support mail from users demanding to get their newsletter might be impossible, because that too may be blocked.
So while I agree with you that this could be solved by getting the webmail user to shift over to a new provider, the user may never be aware that the mail provider is the problem.
I guess solving the spam problems is not an easy task :-)
Homeshopping Network...'nuff said.
Is it cold in here or are you just glad to see me?
0) Put your own GPS sats, which you can control, into orbit.
Might be taking it too far, but what the hey.
When I want to encrypt something I always use rot13...twice!
In Soviet Russia, federal underpants gnomes, pound-YOU-in-the....wait...naaaa
...we only need 640k...
of register space per core.