I understand your sentiments, especially in this day and age. My father would always say it in a somewhat of a sarcastic way, but then there was a little bit of truth in there, you know, just to make me feel better about having some troubles in school. cheers
how do you know that? photography degree doesn't mean shit. almost none of the pro's i know studied photography in school, and the few people I do know who have a photo degree sucked ass when they got out, or were no better than the others who had been shooting for the same amount of time. not to say that the above comment has any bering on your photos though. cheers.
i presuppose that the artist already knows what he/she wants the photo to look like. I do not have to be taught how I want my photo to look, I just need to be taught how to make that happen. That is what the purpose of the books are.
I have not completely missed the point. The books are about the process and how to implement it. A digital camera would therefore be just another method to use in that process and if he was into including digital cameras in that process, Ansel would have thoroughly documented it as well. Also, you can't help but think that he enjoys testing things and knowing exactly how they will work when you read his books.
If you ever look into the three books that Ansel wrote, "The Camera", "The Negative", and "The Print", you can see how Ansel was a scientist. Just take a look in the backs of those books at all of the charts and graphs he has for different elements of the photographic process. He tested everything and knew more about how the film, camera, developer, and paper would react with each other, then almost anyone. Kodak would even give him new film to test out and report back on the characteristics of said film. He also came up with the zone system, which is a scientific way of going from what you want your photo to look like to actually making it look that way. I think Ansel would have loved to test out the digital cameras and make observations on how the digital camera matched up with film cameras in different situations.
Now, when I'm driving to work in the morning, a huge TV ad can distract me from driving, talking on my phone, reading the paper, shaving, eating, and putting my pants on. How am I supposed to get ready for work!?
"TIME: What about independent labels? Will they follow suit?
Jobs: Yes. They've already been calling us like crazy. We've had to put most of them off until after launch just because the big five have most of the music, and we only had so many hours in the day. But now we're really going to have time to focus on a lot of the independents and that will be really great. "
"A polarized filter passes only the light that does not match its orientation. Only the part of the light wave that is not aligned with the slots in the filter can pass through. Everything else is absorbed."
so there are many layers and each time some gets absorbed and changed into current. all the while lining up the waves as they pass through the layers.
im just making this up though maybe someone else can help me
Slashdot Mirror
It's called shill bidding and it is illegal.
throw craigslist down the crapper.
in memory of Bill Hicks
Money, is that all it is for you people!
This guy might have a point but comparing the Leica vs. panasonic...
I don't think so.
I understand your sentiments, especially in this day and age. My father would always say it in a somewhat of a sarcastic way, but then there was a little bit of truth in there, you know, just to make me feel better about having some troubles in school.
cheers
College is so you can show the employer that you can deal with a whole bunch of bullshit... stuff you didn't want to do and still did anyway.
They all are horrible, with some just a little less horrible than the rest.
no, no, no...
You have to use the 2 equals 1 approximation.
We use that one all the time over in our physics department.
why do I feel like this is the beginning of the end?
Send er down capin'.
how do you know that?
photography degree doesn't mean shit.
almost none of the pro's i know studied photography in school, and the few people I do know who have a photo degree sucked ass when they got out, or were no better than the others who had been shooting for the same amount of time. not to say that the above comment has any bering on your photos though.
cheers.
i presuppose that the artist already knows what he/she wants the photo to look like. I do not have to be taught how I want my photo to look, I just need to be taught how to make that happen. That is what the purpose of the books are.
I have not completely missed the point. The books are about the process and how to implement it. A digital camera would therefore be just another method to use in that process and if he was into including digital cameras in that process, Ansel would have thoroughly documented it as well. Also, you can't help but think that he enjoys testing things and knowing exactly how they will work when you read his books.
If you ever look into the three books that Ansel wrote, "The Camera", "The Negative", and "The Print", you can see how Ansel was a scientist. Just take a look in the backs of those books at all of the charts and graphs he has for different elements of the photographic process. He tested everything and knew more about how the film, camera, developer, and paper would react with each other, then almost anyone. Kodak would even give him new film to test out and report back on the characteristics of said film. He also came up with the zone system, which is a scientific way of going from what you want your photo to look like to actually making it look that way.
I think Ansel would have loved to test out the digital cameras and make observations on how the digital camera matched up with film cameras in different situations.
tons of them around.
tons of lens' for them around.
proven to last.
Photography is expensive.
reaffirms my disappointment of being a part of the human race.
Now, when I'm driving to work in the morning, a huge TV ad can distract me from driving, talking on my phone, reading the paper, shaving, eating, and putting my pants on.
How am I supposed to get ready for work!?
I bet the power used for this is negligible compared with driving your fucking SUV!
I always knew having nothing to contribute would come in handy sometime!
Can we really be talking about the G5 when the icon is a G4?
Frankly I'm a little worried.
did I seriously just sit and wait to watch that?
check this out from a time article
"TIME: What about independent labels? Will they follow suit?
Jobs: Yes. They've already been calling us like crazy. We've had to put most of them off until after launch just because the big five have most of the music, and we only had so many hours in the day. But now we're really going to have time to focus on a lot of the independents and that will be really great. "
here is the article.
THE ARTICLE
i played my version on an atari.
"A polarized filter passes only the light that does not match its orientation. Only the part of the light wave that is not aligned with the slots in the filter can pass through. Everything else is absorbed."
so there are many layers and each time some gets absorbed and changed into current. all the while lining up the waves as they pass through the layers.
im just making this up though
maybe someone else can help me
look at it.
it looks like someone took a crap on a ti-book then sold it.
no comparison.
i wish i could have this kind of publicity when selling my junk on ebay.