Slashdot Mirror


Nerve Cells Successfully Grown on Silicon

crabpeople writes "Researchers at the University of Calgary have found that nerve cells grown on a microchip can learn and memorize information which can be communicated to the brain. 'We discovered that when we used the chip to stimulate the neurons, their synaptic strength was enhanced,' said Naweed Syed, a neurobiologist at the University of Calgary's faculty of medicine."

284 comments

  1. ...finally... it all makes sense by derphilipp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plant human cells in an elevator-controlling unit and you'll have the dumbest movie ever....

    --
    Spelling mistakes: My is english spoken not tongue of mother.
    1. Re:...finally... it all makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's based on a Dutch movie called "De Lift"

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087622/

  2. Kinda cool by hyc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But what's the size of a neuron vs the size of a transistor in a 65nm process CPU?

    --
    -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    1. Re:Kinda cool by Sivar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Perhaps a key use is not to use neurons to improve silicon chips, but to do the opposite.

      Who knows, in a few decades we might have people deleting their childhood to store and smuggle hundreds of GB of information about the cure for a major epidemic that an evil pharmaceutical company is exploiting for profit.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    2. Re:Kinda cool by bangular · · Score: 3, Funny

      More likely it would be used to erase someone's childhood to store hundreds of GB of sex memories.

    3. Re:Kinda cool by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1
      Interesting? Have these people never *SEEN* the movie?

      I'm not even gonna give the title, that would just be blowing it out of the water.

      Kinda funny though, I saw Henry Rollins in concert last night, and spoke to him before the show about his role in that movie. "You *liked* that role?" .. "Um, yeah Henry, I did"

      Cool...

      Although, and I hate to say it, but is he starting to look more like Richard Dean Anderson as time goes by? Pic from last night and yes, I look like a goof, you don't need to remind me.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    4. Re:Kinda cool by rofa · · Score: 2, Funny

      I haven't lost my mind. I have a backup on tape somewhere.

      --
      No sig. Go away.
    5. Re:Kinda cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or, more likely, we'll be getting sued by the RIAA for memorizing songs.

    6. Re:Kinda cool by Talinom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or, in an evil universe not too far from our own...

      People get divorced and lose their families and free time due to the high demands of the current marketplace.

      People needing to do more work each day take pills to reduce the need for sleep.

      Employers needing to cut training costs develop the "Plug N Work" chip. When you get hired you are assigned a read only chip that has all of the companies policies, procedures, employee names, and specific work duties for each task.

      Employers add wireless to the PNW chip to rapidly update corporate policies as they are implemented.

      The tasks and skills for your job (doctor, lawyer, tech support, etc) are duplicated by a firm that sells the chips to your company. Your wage just became minimum because now ANYONE can walk off the street and perform the function.

      Wireless communication reaches the brain level and we go from being worker drones to Borg drones. This eliminates the internal need for teleconferencing, e-mail, telephones, or bulletin boards. Your pr0n and Slashdot time at work become obsolete in the new order as everyone would know what you were doing.

      Underground hackers develop technology to override The Companies' chip and deliver slashdot, goatse.cs, and pr0n unbidden to all recievers in the area.

      George Orwells dream of the though police and ultimate revisionism become a reality.


      But perhaps I'm just being paranoid.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    7. Re:Kinda cool by MullerMn · · Score: 0, Troll

      Seems like children in Michael Jackson's house are way ahead of the curve!

      Come on, admit it... you laughed.

    8. Re:Kinda cool by KReilly · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What you guys are failing to take into consideration is what is the difference in heat given off between a resistor and neuorons? Even if neorons are slower and larger, the fact that they can be packed together without need for cooling makes them much more powerful/useful..

      Well, I find mine useful anyways, I am sure some people have mized results

    9. Re:Kinda cool by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Paranoid? That's a beautiful vision. We no longer have to waste time on training or put up with incompetence: everyone will be equally competent, everyone will be able to perform their task perfectly.

      Minimum wage? No, you're not thinking this through. This is a true commodification of labour. The entire economy will have to change to accomodate this idea... and it will be fantastic! This is something that Yevgeny Zamyatin would've loved to include in his utopic novel We.

      P.S. I'm serious: We is so often misinterpreted as distopic by reactionary luddites, when it really speaks about a fundamental conflict between the deeper needs of humanity and the needs of society. If you haven't read it, check it out and keep that in mind. It's not 1984.

    10. Re:Kinda cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic, but is Henry really short, or are you really tall, or what's the deal man?

    11. Re:Kinda cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i don't think people would be equal because the good chips would probably still be owned by bad (read: greedy) people. i mean, in theory it sounds like a nice utopian marxist wet-dream, but there is too much inertia keeping the system the way it stands. and personally, any sort of wild-und-crazy hive-mind is not something i'd ever want to participate in. the distractions would be omnipresent (you think video games are addictive now?) and any sort of rational, thoughful, political or philosophical discourse would be run over by the lovechild of classical liberalism and western capitalism / consumption.

      und besides: The ads. Think of the ads!!!!

    12. Re:Kinda cool by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      I'm 6'3".. err, very UScentric of me.. ummm..

      1.92 Meters

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    13. Re:Kinda cool by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      A more immediate application could be a CCD in combination with a neural interface to create an artificial retina for sufferers of macular degeneration and other diseases.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    14. Re:Kinda cool by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      If you don't think your brain needs cooling, I challenge you to sit in a hot arizona desert with a gallon of water an hour for as long as there is sun shining. Yes, you get to wear sunblock, if you want. 3, 4 days, tops? ;-)

    15. Re:Kinda cool by 09za+ · · Score: 1

      "yikes" Talk about IT work. Anybody else repulsed by the thought of paying for a piece metal to mimic the faculties we already possess?Will they have spyware, wireless connections subject to highjacking, Norton Virus protection? Is Bill Gates behind all this?

  3. Its the start!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haven't you learned anything on the matrix?
    You'll be the reason of extinction!!!

    1. Re:Its the start!!! by -Maurice66- · · Score: 0

      not so much the matrix! how about Terminator? M

    2. Re:Its the start!!! by wheresdrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who cares? Just so long as I can use this to learn kung-fu (or how to fly a helicopter) in less than 10 seconds.

    3. Re:Its the start!!! by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 1

      And I, for one, welcome our new CompuBrain overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground nutrient caves.

      --
      if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
    4. Re:Its the start!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom! Horrible, horrible freedom!

    5. Re:Its the start!!! by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      The important lesson to take home, kids, is that in the Matrix, you don't *NEED* to know these things. :-)

  4. Just like sci-fi. by murat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "We discovered that when we used the chip to stimulate the neurons, their synaptic strength was enhanced, ... " There was something like this in one of Asimov's books. The guys synapses are enhanced by a machine, then the guy starts to "feel" and "manipulate" things.

    1. Re:Just like sci-fi. by ottawanker · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bah, I just use LSD when I want to "feel" or "manipulate" things.. Plus, those chips don't seem cheap or very safe.

    2. Re:Just like sci-fi. by krumms · · Score: 3, Funny

      then the guy starts to "feel" and "manipulate" things.

      I didn't know Asimov wrote THOSE kinds of books :P

    3. Re:Just like sci-fi. by Xaroth · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on now. I'll reference you to "Lecherous Limericks", by Isaac Asimov, (c) 1976, "More Lecherous Limericks" (c) 1976, and "Still More Lecherous Limericks" (c) 1977. And that doesn't even mention the compilations. ,)

      Amazon has a few copies of each of these, in case you really wanted them.

    4. Re:Just like sci-fi. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Yep. Asimov was all about the sex. An inspiration to horny geeks everywhere.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  5. yes i am paranoid. by odenshaw · · Score: 1, Funny

    why do I feel like this is the beginning of the end?

    1. Re:yes i am paranoid. by mirko · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because you somehow found out a correlation with this...
      And/Or maybe with this...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:yes i am paranoid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      its ok, its just the end of the beginning.

    3. Re:yes i am paranoid. by -Maurice66- · · Score: 0

      it's not. It's the end of the beginning.

      It cost evolution several milion years to be ready for this next step.

      Now the real work can start:
      cyborgs, borgs, Darpa,...

      Let's just hope they do not sell this great invention to Cyberdine inc.

    4. Re:yes i am paranoid. by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, it could be the beginning of the Singularity..

  6. I'm no Bill Joy by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But this is very exciting. The idea that we could grow neurons on silicon is one of those big steps that looks to lead us into the Johnny Mnemonic world that Gibson was talking about just a couple stories prior to this one.

    There is a song that says, "It only takes a spark to get a fire going". So too is it true that it only takes a couple neurons to start synapsing. As these true neural webs become more complicated, it would be interesting to see if any kind of emergent behavior was evident.

    Also, with the current political and scientific climate as it is, this could be the first step to replicating a nervous system without having to rely on fetuses for stem cells. It requires no human cloning and holds immense promise.

    It would definitely be cool to have a couple of these chips implanted to enhance the base memory that we are kitted with at birth, that's for sure!

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:I'm no Bill Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, that's what you think.. go read the battle angel alita series sometime, it has a great piece on the whole 'enhancing humans with chips' thing.

      -- vranash

    2. Re:I'm no Bill Joy by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      But What about the blue screen of death? I'm happy with all of this as long a Bill Gates goes first on the Windows version.

      More seriously, the wole stimulation of nerve cells thing in my opinion isn't as important as the successful interface. *That* is what will lead to brain implants.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    3. Re:I'm no Bill Joy by kinnell · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The idea that we could grow neurons on silicon is one of those big steps that looks to lead us into the Johnny Mnemonic world

      No it's not. This involves interfacing with the neurons that are already there.

      As these true neural webs become more complicated, it would be interesting to see if any kind of emergent behavior was evident

      Given that large collections of neurons are well known to exhibit emergent behaviour, I think it would be more interesting if they didn't.

      this could be the first step to replicating a nervous system without having to rely on fetuses for stem cells. It requires no human cloning and holds immense promise

      Nerve cells harvested from an animal brain can be grown in the lab. There is no need for embryonic stem cells or cloning at all. Growing them on silicon does not make this easier - in fact they will probably grown better in a petri dish.

      It would definitely be cool to have a couple of these chips implanted to enhance the base memory that we are kitted with at birth

      Memory in the brain is not simple storage of information. It is unlikely that pluggin a DRAM into your brain would be able to enhance your memory.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    4. Re:I'm no Bill Joy by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The idea that we could grow neurons on silicon is one of those big steps that looks to lead us into the Johnny Mnemonic world that Gibson was talking about just a couple stories prior to this one.

      I am waiting for the Alastair Reynolds-style Conjoiner conversion myself, but Johnny Mnemonic will do in the meantime.

      As long as it's the short story and not the film, that is.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:I'm no Bill Joy by eric76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out the book:

      Bothe, Samii, Eckmiller, Neurobionics - An Interdisciplinary Approach to Substitute Impaired Functions of the Human Nervous System, Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1993.

    6. Re:I'm no Bill Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and just by thinking, you could hack a gibson. or hack gibson.

    7. Re:I'm no Bill Joy by KinkyClown · · Score: 0

      No you are not Bill Joy, and if you where you would not have been that excited. Bill Joy wrote a lengthy article once where he announced his concert about these developments. The article was also added in a book called 'Taking the Blue Pill' a philosophy about the movie 'The Matrix' containing several articles.

  7. Hasn't this been done before? by nhaze · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought the Pine Lab at Caltech had done this several years ago. Neurochip Project

    1. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by kinnell · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. You're right, growing neurons on silicon is nothing new, but the breakthrough here is that they have been able to stimulate the neurons into forming new connections, rather than just measuring the response of existing networks.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    2. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by NeuroKoan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Quote from the above link
      This particular chip has no electrodes. The grillwork design allows the neurons to grow, and contains them indefinitely. We are currently building full chips with this design, and with electrodes.

      Keep an eye out for this page. Once we get fully functional chips, it shouldn't be long before I can show some real experiments and data.


      I think the big news is that electrodes were on the silicon chip, and were actually able to "learn and memorize information which can be communicated to the brain" (as per the original article).

      Also, the page looks like it hasn't been updated since 1995. I wonder what happened to this project. From the page Maher and Thorne seemed so close to what has just been acheived in Canada.

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    3. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by nhaze · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah I could have sworn they presented something at a conference that showed the different signals they were getting. They even rigged the net up to a DOOM like simulator and let the neural net learn to navigate.

    4. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by nhaze · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Potter has done a lot of work on the project since then and electrodes were defintely incorporated. He has linked the cultured network up to a variety of output devices, including a stylus device to 'draw', onto a robot to manuever, and a DOOM-like virtual environment. http://www.gatech.edu/news-room/release.php?id=160 http://www.wireheading.com/roborats/hybrots.html

    5. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, was this bring'em'all flesh-thirsty neural network called Skynet ?

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    6. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by techiemac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's kinda funny, a few years ago (back in the 80s) my dad actually did this. Believe it or not, he was the first one to grow a neuron on silicon (a Motorola chip for those interested). The poster with the electon micrograph of it was absolutly everywhere (we had 1000s of the posters in the basement). I even rememeber going to highschool science and, sure enough, there was my dad's poster.
      The hype surrounding this was insane mostly due to fact that everyone thought this was the true start to cybernetics. In the end, the hype died down, My dad's lab got a ton of grants and he got back to doing more research. Ironically enough, the most publicisied research that he did (the neuron on a chip) probably had the least impact.
      Such is the world of science at times :)
      So, yes, it's nothing new. Just repackaged.

    7. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2, Informative
      Weird -- I remember reading an announcement on this subject on Usenet back when I was in university. What's more, I was able to google for the original article from January, 1991:

      Hello. I just wanted to inform the netland that a direct nerve to transistor
      interface is finally operational. The invention was privately announced 1
      month ago, but is now out in the public. It is possible now to grow a nerve
      over a silicon substrate in a way that the nerve has a capacitive connection
      to a FE-Transistor built into the substrate. The signal to noise is good
      enough to resolve the bandwith of a usual neuron. For more information, watch
      out for an article of the university of Heidelberg in an upcoming issue of
      'Nature'.
      Welcome to Cyberspace.

      Henrik Klagges
      Scanning tunnel microscopy group at LMU Munich

      I was extremely impressed at the time, but I never did see anything more about it. Ah, the days of being young and believing everything you read on alt.cypherpunk...

    8. Re:Hasn't this been done before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That poster is still hanging around....I've seen it several times in the last week.

  8. One more reason to stay away from school! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Might as well stop studiying now, soon we can download information directly to our brains anyway!

    1. Re:One more reason to stay away from school! by Foole · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's how I learned Kung Fu.

      --
      This is not a turnip.
  9. human computers or cybronic humans ? by Gopal.V · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will this make computers more human or otherwise ?.

    Maybe it's time to admit that nature does a better job bruteforcing (OK , what else do you call SEX and EVOLUTION) the secrets of this world than all our mathematical precision.. (E=MC2 ... Forty Two ... naah... doesn't work) ... Of course, nature did a better job making us humans than we would have achieved ... :)

    1. Re:human computers or cybronic humans ? by Zoolander · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, nature has had a tiny bit of more time to do her stuff than we have...

      --
      Meep.
    2. Re:human computers or cybronic humans ? by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Yes but evolution is slow and the electron is fast. Wait, you'll see. Or at least your grandchildren will see.

      --
      stuff
    3. Re:human computers or cybronic humans ? by Zoolander · · Score: 1

      Well, that was my point too...
      Sorry if I was a bit unclear.

      --
      Meep.
  10. Other uses? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    We discovered that when we used the chip to stimulate the neurons, their synaptic strength was enhanced

    If only they could find out how did the strength increase and wether we can do the same to the human body we can find a cure for most of the nervous system degradation diseases. Anybody have link to a more verbose article?

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:Other uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Anybody have link to a more verbose article?



      link to article published in Physical Review Letters
    2. Re:Other uses? by Cred · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Now what about McDonalds using nanobots to inject "information" to our brains while enjoying that big fat El Maco? Great marketing isn't it? McDonalds could teach us to hate Burger King and vs. I wonder what would happen in this situation, McDonalds saying hate Burger King and BG doing the same for McD.

    3. Re:Other uses? by perraymo · · Score: 1

      If only they could find out how did the strength increase and wether we can do the same to the human body
      we can find a cure for most of the nervous system degradation diseases.

      I think they mean the that the cells gets more sensetive to input from other cells,
      not that the cells themselves grow "stronger" This is call Long-term potentiation and is believed to be
      how our brain forms memories.

    4. Re:Other uses? by hyc · · Score: 1

      Er, no. If the nervous system is degenerating, you need to reverse the degeneration. A silicon chip can't enhance a neuron that has died, you still have to figure out why the nerves are dying in the first place.

      --
      -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
    5. Re:Other uses? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

      Yes that remains, but lets say if the strength increases when you have some additional compounds introduced. For example if the reason for the strength increase is silicon, then we can counter the effect of the underlying disease. The disease may remain in the body, but with regular "doses" of whatever caused this increase in strength maybe we can counter the side-effects to a great degree. I look at this as a breakthrough not only for the computing field, but also for the medical field. With the way we are going, 20 years from now the line between computing and the human brain may become more and more diminished!

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    6. Re:Other uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the better IMO. Humans don't need to eat that shit. Besides, the Greens and PETA would be happy.

      Wouldn't it be something though if the govt required an RFID tag to persist from animal source to consumer, in the same way that it's only the consumer who has the legal right to remove that safety tag from pillows?

    7. Re:Other uses? by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Nervous system degredation does not necessarily come from lack of synaptic strength, however. At least one is caused by the degradation of the fatty myelin sheething around the axon.

    8. Re:Other uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We'd all go to taco bell or kfc
      In soviet russia resturant chooses you!

    9. Re:Other uses? by visgoth · · Score: 0

      Mutually assured destruction would result. The McD faction would try and wipe out BK, and BK would try the same on McD. Anarchy and violence would prevail, and the streets would run red with blood. Or maybe not :)

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    10. Re:Other uses? by msimm · · Score: 1

      Through rote/repetetive use?

      --
      Quack, quack.
  11. The Future of Computing by neurosis101 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is the future of computing right here.

    Not making faster Pentiums or Athlons. Sorry. Most of that magic has already been woven. Who out there is qualified to make systems level designs and decisions about bio computer systems? Think about the type of knowledge it must take about physics, electrical and computer engineering, as well as biological knowledge.

    What type of magnetic and power restrictions will there be? Reliability? What type of optimizations will exist? Interfaces? Flexibility?

    We're still quite far away from having things like this be applicable to modern day but think about when you too can say, "I know Kung Fu"!

    1. Re:The Future of Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't he own a takeout place in Moscow? :p

      -- vranash

    2. Re:The Future of Computing by pikkumyy · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely correct, Dear Sir. Industry will never exceed the speed of the 386 processor.

    3. Re:The Future of Computing by tdwebste · · Score: 1

      Even though you could conceivable construct a neural network out of these organic chips. The basic structure of neural networks is well understood. So there is no reason to go to this trouble. It is more compact and efficient to construct ANN completely out of silicon.

      Artificial Neural networks comprised of multipliers, adders or averagers, and signmod functions and do an adequate job of simulating biological neural networks. With that said to properly simulate biological neural networks, ANN need to have programmable multiplier weights, signmod functions and "connections". Most ANN you read about do not have programmable connections. As a result the designer has the difficult task if not impossible task of predetermining the what connections should be present before the ANN is fabricated. Its kind of like a child being born to only do certain tasks. We all know a child's brain is not rigidly designed to do only certain tasks, but rather neural connections form and break as required. This allows the child to quickly strengthen their brain to so whatever task they are exposed to, quickly.

      The other point often over looked in ANN design is programmable signmod functions. When Signmod functions programmable into linear, low pass, high pass and mid pass functions, the ANN can be designed to imitate a fussy logic processor. These fussy logic rules gives the ANN a good starting point to begin training. The issue is training needs to continue throughout the ANN operation to accommodate for variations of the controlled system an the ANN itself. High density ANN are essential analog devices, whose characteristics will change over time and portions will fail. Accommodating for the fact that portions of the ANN will fail is another reason why the connections must be programmable.

      ANN can be designed out of binary systems, but are much simpler when designed as ternary logic systems "base 2". "2^2 or 2^3 or 2^4 etc" In these ternary systems 2's complement operations apply. One of the reasons "base 2" systems are so successful is that every logic gate drives the signal to a low or high value. Such quantization must also exist in a ternary logic system. Ternary logic systems can be designed to work using charge, or standing waves. Standing waves are added and subtracted via constructive and destructive interference. Charge is probably the easier at this time. However in the future quantum effect ANN would most definitely use waves.

    4. Re:The Future of Computing by ktanmay · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know I had read somewhere that our brains (individual processes) run at around 200MHz (as it is all electro-chemically done), now if you say that we have hundreds of billions of neurons, so do we have billions of transistors on chips.
      The difference here is that our brains use the 3rd dimension effectively (and also work in parallel, I think). Now I'm not sure if the latest breakthrough uses electro-chemical processes to communicate, but if it's faster than 200MHz, it definitely has huge potential.

    5. Re:The Future of Computing by tdwebste · · Score: 1

      You are most definitely correct our brains use the 3rd dimension to good effect. However to get around that limitation that silicon is "2D", it runs 5 to 10 times faster. Assuming your 200MHz figure is correct, "I believe it is much lower, must check". So by feeding past results into current calculations you get 5 to 10 times the effective connections. Which is equivalent to using the 3rd dimension to a depth of 5 to 10. Not to bad when you think about it. Also given that fact the Artificial neurons are much smaller than real neurons, ANN could quickly surpass the capabilities of the human brain.

    6. Re:The Future of Computing by Illserve · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is certainly not the future of computing!

      The precise properties of individual Neurons are unpredictable and highly variable. Worse, they require constant life support just to stay alive. A 5 minute power interruption to your neural CPU and it's time to go shopping for a new one. You would certainly not want to build a practical computing tool out of them.

      Neural computing will remain the domain of highly specialized research into AI and neural computing forever. We may develop neural analogs using nanotech or some other gee-whiz tech, but they will not be true neurons.

    7. Re:The Future of Computing by scambaiter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Actually i think its a big mistake to think of the brain in terms of cpu computing power. The brain does not simply use brute-force computing power to solve problems and handle special tasks and situations. We got a lot of built-in or learnt features to do so efficiently. For examples we use a lot of shortcuts to (not always correctly) solve a task. Just think of optical illusions: the brain uses some cues to judge a situation instead of doing a correct calculation. Or think of reflexes: a lot is happening just before the brain is involved, e.g. when you put your hand on some hot thing (yep, that athlon that has been running for 2 weeks straight;)) the signal to take the hand away gets sent straight from the spine before it reaches the brain.

      Unless we use equivalent mechanisms for cpu based computing comparing the speed of the brain to silcon based units imho doesnt make much sense.

      --
      sick of sigs... *sigh*
    8. Re:The Future of Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we do have interrupts to immediately respond to external events, even though on an uniprocessor system it will interrupt the currently executing task. There aren't many real-time OS's in general (workstation) use, though.
      Also, many devices use DMA to transfer data without using CPU time.

      Ofcourse, the brain is not just a processor running some linear programs, but a huge self-organizing neural network. This can be simulated on a normal CPU, given enough power, but the native implementation is of course more efficient.

    9. Re:The Future of Computing by bthomson0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, Neural Networks by there very nature are really nothing more than adaptive filters, aka classifiers. The eye does a great deal of preprocessing such as edge detection, motion detection, etc ?aka classifying? to reduce the work load on the brain. Neural Networks could perform similary preprocessing to reduce the work load for cpu based image reconition systems.

      Actually the idea of "reflexes" is the same as electro-robots which can since objects by electrical load. That hot plate is nothing more than an over threshold input that cause electro-motor response. An electrical circuit could also be easily designed to include a little bit of fussy logic via a simple anolog circuit to achive the same thing.

      So, equivalent mechanisms are not readily available for cpu based computing, but there are for ANN based computing. If we ever hope to match the basic capabilities of animals we can not just rely on cpu based computing, we also need ANN based computing for sensor preprocessing and feed back controlled motor function

    10. Re:The Future of Computing by proffit · · Score: 1

      I've actually read studies have linked brain processes to microtubles in which there are billions in every neron. Each microtuble is filled with water that creates a state of quantum cohesion with all the others therefore a change in one simutaneosly affects a change in all others. I could be wrong about it all. I believe the book was called the emporers new mind by roger penrose. Anyone else here about this?

    11. Re:The Future of Computing by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Neural computing will remain the domain of highly specialized research into AI and neural computing forever. We may develop neural analogs using nanotech or some other gee-whiz tech, but they will not be true neurons.

      I disagree, I think neural computing will have practical applications, but more in the lines of neural interfaces than actual computers. Imagine a prosthetic(sp?) arm that works just like the old one did...

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    12. Re:The Future of Computing by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Yes, I meant to add that as well (it came out of my fingers as "neural computing" instead of "neural interfaces")

      But that's a far cry from being the future of computing, which implies that we'll use biological neural tissue instead of fabricated CPU's.

    13. Re:The Future of Computing by anno1602 · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, the brain uses a lot of brute force. The CogSci community was long trying to find out how the brain went about recognizing edges and shapes, since computers were so bad and/or slow at it. The answer was somewhat disheartening: The brain uses up to 70% of its capacity (depending on the situation, of course) for optical processing - that is, edge detection, shape detection, movement detection and prediction, filtering of all sorts. That's also (in part) why people close their eyes, unfocus or look at unmoving objects when they're thinking - they're freeing up resources.

    14. Re:The Future of Computing by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      quote: The precise properties of individual Neurons are unpredictable and highly variable. Worse, they require constant life support just to stay alive. A 5 minute power interruption to your neural CPU and it's time to go shopping for a new one. /quote

      That would be like forgetting to feed a fish, no?
      But then wouldn't you need to "feed" your biological chip? instead of having it hooked on electricity-network?
      Maybe cause it's biologic, you'd keep your high-tech as a pet? Why not implement a personality into the device? Chinese robodog developers' wet dream!
      "Build your own supercomputing pet, with upgradable GPU neuron chips. Hook your neuronPet up with friend to build a multiprocessor super neuronPet."

      Why not take it further and..

      Oh well I can dream,...

      I do admit my ignorance on biochemical / electrotech connectivity and how the interaction with both works exactly in full detail, but I do know dreams have pushed the perceptions of what most thought to be impossible in the past.

      ExistenZ shows a really fascinating world where "biotech exists".
      You should rent this one if you get the chance. :)
      They toy with biological 'pods' in the movie, being plugged into a human for bio-energy, very fascinating stuff.
      Matrix- feel anno '99.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    15. Re:The Future of Computing by johnjay · · Score: 1

      It seems like both of these difficulties (unpredictibility and constant power) could be overcome. The manufacturing process would have involve a training stage, where the neurons would be put through a series of routines until the connections between the neurons were at the correct strength. As for the power interruption, enough backup power supplies and advanced warnings would make this an unlikely event. As long as the chance of power-loss was less than the chance of hard-drive failure, it will be a sellable product.

      These are not small problems, but considering how much different neurons are than transistors (G4from128K has an excellent post here in which he goes into a lot more detail than I could attempt) there will be a lot of incentive to solve those problems.

      I would be amazed if we could interface manufactured neurons with the brain any time soon. It doesn't seem such a stretch to create an interface with an artificial limb, but getting chips to work with the brain is a seemingly insurmountable challenge.

      But, that challenge will keep people employeed in research for years to come....

    16. Re:The Future of Computing by MjDascombe · · Score: 0

      You could now, you lazy fsck, just get off yer ass and learn.

    17. Re:The Future of Computing by scambaiter · · Score: 1
      AFAIR there is a thing called lateral inhibition (at least in german we call it that way, no translation at hand) that does the edge enhancing more or less directly in the eye. Whenever a neuron gets triggered by some sensory information (brightness of light) it sends an inhibtory signal to its neighbours: if the neighbour does not get triggered the difference of signal strength beteen the first neuron and the neighbour gets larger than the input would actually require.

      On the other hand especially for processing visual information the brain uses (as i already pointed out) loads of heuristics and cues which lead to the well-known optical illusions. See for example this or this. So there is a lot of stuff that gets preprocessed for the brain so it does not have to process the information every single neuron delivers.

      Although i graduated in psychology i have to admint that i had more focus on statistics than general psychology which covers issues of perception but i cannot recally studies which point out that most processing is done brute-force. Would be nice if you could dig up some for me. Thanks in advance.

      --
      sick of sigs... *sigh*
    18. Re:The Future of Computing by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      200Hz, not 200Mhz.

    19. Re:The Future of Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. They said the same thing about Computers in the home. Look now.

    20. Re:The Future of Computing by tdwebste · · Score: 1

      As you so accurately noted the eye does preprocessing in the analog domain. With feed back suppression to correct for light levels, enhance edge contrast.

      With a charged based ANN the CCDs of a digital camera are the direct charge inputs into the ANN. This first "level" preprocessing provides edge detection and a simple historieous for motion detection. The edge and motion information is then supplied along with the full picture to the next level of image process, which classifies objects.

      With this kind of preprocessing provided at the sensor level the "cpu" based image processing is a greatly simplified task. There is tight feed back between the "cpu" based image processing and the object classification. With extra effort the "cpu" can decide that the current object classification needs to be refined. The objects for extra evaluation are easily select by there "low" confidence levels. These new object classifications can in turned used to improved the training of the ANN object classification. Classifiers are parallel image processors by there very nature. So even though the system often needs to take a "second" look at objects with low confidence levels it is extremely fast.

      It just goods to show the best designed system by man work like nature. Nature had it right all along. :)

    21. Re:The Future of Computing by Illserve · · Score: 1

      The difference is that there's no good reason to use neurons. You could accomplish the same thing with silicon models of neurons. The only problem is that we don't know exactly how to model them yet.

    22. Re:The Future of Computing by tdwebste · · Score: 1

      Actually we all ready have adiquite models. The problem is actaully appling these models. Or creating a silicon equivalent of the model.

      I am not sure how this rating system works. But I always get marked as sore 1. If you just take a look at my messages, you can see how neural networks can work. I have not discussed time domain averaging, which is actually closest to the biological neuron. But if you are interested and my rating rises above score 1. I also discribe in detail how time domain averging can be utilized in ANNs

      Since my score is 1 there is no fsck point spell checking.

    23. Re:The Future of Computing by jerald_hams · · Score: 1

      The brain is not a serial computer
      I repeat, the brain is not a serial computer. The maximum firing rate of each neuron is 1000 hertz. This speed is glacial compared to even the oldest computers. The brains power comes from its massive parallelism. Your head houses billions of interconnected neurons, all firing simultaneously.
      A machine equivalent would not be a computer (in the usual sense) but a parallel neural network.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_network

    24. Re:The Future of Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're saying my Brain is CISC based. (Which begs the question, "Yeah, but can you put li... oh nevermind.")

    25. Re:The Future of Computing by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you are referencing The Matrix, Neo said "I know Gung Fu".

      --


      --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
    26. Re:The Future of Computing by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      We're still quite far away from having things like this be applicable to modern day but think about when you too can say, "I know Kung Fu"!

      Lots of people can say that. They just did the work.

    27. Re:The Future of Computing by MjDascombe · · Score: 1

      How can something that hasn't been rated be overrated, for f*cks sake?

  12. Huge market? by Homology · · Score: 3, Funny
    nerve cells grown on a microchip can learn and memorize information which can be communicated to the brain.

    The researches have read some Slashdot posts, and believe that there must be a huge market for this chip. There is clearly a need for it ;-)

    1. Re:Huge market? by MrRTFM · · Score: 1

      Ok, good joke, but seriously - wouldn't this be the greatest thing ever, if they could actually get implanted memory available?

      For starters the entire PDA market would be retooling damn fast (to whatever method works), and half the students around the world would be loading up quickly prior to exam time.

      This sort of basic data retrieval seems to be possible in the near future, but I doubt if we'll *ever* get 'Kung Fu master 1.0.5' - the average body would just break if it tried to execute the procedures.

      --
      You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
  13. Magical Transistor by spaceghst · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A transistor located on the chip then recorded that conversation between cells."

    I'd like to see this transistor...

    fud

    --
    I'm so creative sometimes I wear an eye patch.
  14. I could use a .. by Kalroth · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. memory upgrade implant, specially in the mornings.
    It would also be cool with an encyclopedia or even a few o'reilly books implanted.

    Too bad it seems to be a one-way communication only, otherwise a spellchecker implant would be cool too :-)

    1. Re:I could use a .. by thursdays · · Score: 0

      if you have an encyclopedia or a dictionary upgrade i bet you will spell just fine. :D

      personally, like something like a martial arts or car drifting upgrade

      "woooh. i know kung-fu"

    2. Re:I could use a .. by nempo · · Score: 1

      It's just to bad that your body will be just as stiff as it is now, and hence, you'll likely hurt yourself when trying to show of your non-existant dexterity.

      --
      --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
  15. hmm... by TeamLive · · Score: 1

    cyberzombies. if you dont know what I am talking about, play shadowrun.

    --
    one world | many people
  16. Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, welcome own new grown organic nerve and silicon masters.

  17. "Communicated to the brain?" by penguinland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Researchers at the University of Calgary have found that nerve cells grown on a microchip can learn and memorize information which can be communicated to the brain.

    While the article mentions this in the introduction, it doesn't mention this happening at all in the research. It talks about neurons communicating with each other. This is a long way from connecting this chip into a living brain in an animal that can still function.

    While I agree that this is a fascinating article, we should make sure not to sensationalize it too much. Making chips that interface with actual brains in actual animals, even if they are snails, is still a long way off.

    --
    "Flying is the art of throwing yourself at the ground and missing." - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:"Communicated to the brain?" by kinnell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Making chips that interface with actual brains in actual animals, even if they are snails, is still a long way off.

      No it's not

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    2. Re:"Communicated to the brain?" by nhaze · · Score: 1

      But the Nicolelis project does not currently stimulate neurons. The implanted electrodes are strictly used for recording.
      BUT there are plenty of neuro labs that are working on stimulating experiments in awake behaving animals.

    3. Re:"Communicated to the brain?" by neuraloverload · · Score: 1

      i can see where you're coming from on that. you're right, it does say that the signals were induced, transmitted biologically, and recorded by the chip (i'd like to know if they tried playing it back myself). the recording aspect is important, especially if an article is taken into account from march 12,2003 in new scientist "world's first brain prosthesis revealed" regarding a replacement hippocampus in people(yesss, i'm lame, i don't know how to link. i call it my lucky fin). you said "While I agree that this is a fascinating article, we should make sure not to sensationalize it too much. Making chips that interface with actual brains in actual animals, even if they are snails, is still a long way off." in that you are wrong. /. has posted several times on the joystick/no joystick (soon to be) monkey (rulers of the earth when they figure out how to control microsoft with their minds) brainchipped to control a robot in the next room. one thing just occured to me, if synaptic activity is increased by this device, presumably in an electrochemical fashion) then is it not generating it's own power? then add a dash of rfid tech, mix liberally with the idea of a police state...

  18. I call dibs on implants by Matimus · · Score: 1, Funny

    Seriously, this is what I have been waiting for,

    If I were you I would welcome your new ME overlord.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    1. Re:I call dibs on implants by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      ME? As in Windows ME? Dude, that's so obsolete :-)

      --
      Martin
  19. Initial subjects were quoted as saying... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1


    "We are the Borg, all your base belong to us, i love you PHILIP-K-DICK".

  20. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, just what we need, computer chips smart enough to stick themselves to the side of the aquarium and do nothing. Intel must be shivering in their boots.

  21. mmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ....chips

  22. synaptic strength was enhanced by gentoo_is_bogus · · Score: 1, Funny

    "synaptic strength was enhanced" What the...? I don't recall this term in my functional neurosceince calsses.

    --
    -- Exposing the hype of Gentoo zealots. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion.
  23. Wow ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article contains more information than the original article.

  24. Catching a virus by ClaudiusMinimus · · Score: 3, Funny

    would have a whole new meaning...

    1. Re:Catching a virus by avendasora · · Score: 1
      Catching a virus would have a whole new meaning...

      Or the same one it always has.

    2. Re:Catching a virus by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the new STDs will actually make you REMEMBER what happened last night after your 5th shot of AbsinthE.. *shudder*

      --
      When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  25. Copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Researchers have used live pond snail nerve cells to implement a basic element of neural memory on a semiconductor chip. The team isolated two neurons from a pond snail and placed them on a silicon chip. They electrically stimulated one cell with a microcapacitor on the chip and recorded the signal transmitted to the other neuron. Repeatedly stimulating the first cell increased the strength of the connection between the cells, just as neurons in the brain strengthen their connections as part of learning and memory formation. The chip may find uses in brain research and drug development, and may eventually lead to neurocomputers with living nerve cells or microchips that could be implanted in the brain for medical prosthetics.

  26. Maybe... by lemonjus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Someone could post a link to the reasearch paper itself ? It would be more interesting to read thenthe news articles. (couldnt find it myself....)

  27. would this introduce a new measure of speed? by imnuts2 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IQ instead of GHz?

  28. very cool... by zeruch · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but I still think Natural Stupidity will outpace Artificial (or artificially enhanced) Intelligence.

  29. This looks promising by highwindarea · · Score: 1

    One step closer to a direct neural interface to my computer, it's time to dump your stock in keyboard and monitor companies they'll be broke in a year.

    --
    I think this internet thing sounds like a good idea
    1. Re:This looks promising by thursdays · · Score: 0

      omg, i should wake up my broker right now and tell him to dump all my shares of microsoft since those are the only decent products they sell.

  30. Trick question, eh? by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 1

    Why do I feel like this is the beginning of the end?

    Because you're paranoid. Heh.

    --
    "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
  31. obligatory response by thursdays · · Score: 0

    never understimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

  32. Skynet by Karem+Lore · · Score: 2, Funny
    da da dum de dum.
    da da dum de dum.
    da da dum de dum.

    Termihuman III, coming to a cinema near you.

    In the year 2250, a small pocket resistance of humans find the means to develop an organic gooker. Using the power of jelly to disable our circuit boards, they start a highly accurate military campaign to overrun the machines...

    Tron and Tran, are a simple couple thrown together in this all-action, pistol pumping, explosion-full chase between man and machine. Will their love be enough to conquer the invading humans, or will the humans finally overcome the race they created.

    Rated 18 with scenes of sex with hoover connectors and frequent uses of acronyms.

    A film by Widget Jones.

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
  33. The brain is a muscle by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    'We discovered that when we used the chip to stimulate the neurons, their synaptic strength was enhanced'

    Makes sense, doesn't it?

    The (possibly) frightening spect of this is that it may pave the way for artificial lifeforms/cyborgs/skynet...

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  34. In other news by NorwBlue · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ely Lilly release the new Prozac add-on for nervous cpu's

  35. Anyone read "Interface" by Stephen Bury? by Elanor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    a.k.a Neal Stephenson and his uncle.

    Chip embedded in politician's brain after a stroke - he goes on to be president.... v. spooky.

    I would love to see alzheimer's patients helped with this. If it's a genetic disease, I'm up the creek and dropped me paddle a while back.

    - Lnr

    1. Re:Anyone read "Interface" by Stephen Bury? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      YES.

      "Researchers at the University of Calgary have found that nerve cells grown on a microchip can learn and memorize information which can be communicated to the brain..."

      I got that far, and my mind was clamoring Interface!
      Stay away from radio towers.

  36. better copy on story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Researchers have used live pond snail nerve cells to implement a basic element of neural memory on a semiconductor chip. The team isolated two neurons from a pond snail and placed them on a silicon chip. They electrically stimulated one cell with a microcapacitor on the chip and recorded the signal transmitted to the other neuron. Repeatedly stimulating the first cell increased the strength of the connection between the cells, just as neurons in the brain strengthen their connections as part of learning and memory formation. The chip may find uses in brain research and drug development, and may eventually lead to neurocomputers with living nerve cells or microchips that could be implanted in the brain for medical prosthetics.

  37. OT: evolution vs. bruteforcing vs. creation by q.kontinuum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Evolution != bruteforcing. With bruteforcing (e.g. trying to guess a password with a dictionary) there is no "being on the right path" or whatever. It's just wrong or right. Evolution is survive of the fittest, do minor changes in different direction on an existing system and let see which one will lead closer to success.(Just like sex ;-)) Take many of the fittest and do the same again. The some time take some of the not so fit and try as well the same.

    On the other hand you are right: This trial and error seems to lead to better results in the long run compared to deterministic creation. But this scheme is already adopted by science. IIRC there was a distributed computing project simulating a robot with a defined task and changing the parameters of the robot. The different clients exchanged the information about the results. I don't remember anymore the name or the homepage of the project, I think it was already 4 or 5 years ago...

    --
    Trolling is a art!
    1. Re:OT: evolution vs. bruteforcing vs. creation by Gyan · · Score: 1

      Evolution is survive of the fittest, do minor changes in different direction on an existing system and let see which one will lead closer to success.

      Umm, no.

      In evolutionary terms, 'fittest' are those who survive. There is no objective definition of 'fittest' independent of survival.

    2. Re:OT: evolution vs. bruteforcing vs. creation by q.kontinuum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. I'm no professional about biology, so I might be wrong.

      But from a logic point of view: If a generation with severel individuals, each of them with minor changes compared to it's ancestors, is born, for some individuals their changes will be an advantage, for some the changes are a disadvantage.

      The weaker individuals will not spontanously die, but they might have fewer chidren or maybe only few of their children will survive. The stronger individuals will have more children, or if they have the same amount of children they are in a better position to feed their children / let them survive.

      Thus, the next generation will still have some (few) individuals with the inherited weaknes plus some new minor changes and some (more) with the strength inherited plus some minor changes.

      Now it is still possible, that one of the weaker individual is affected so positively by its changes that it is now the strongest among all of his generation.

      Where is the flaw in my logic? Or does evolution theory realy exclude this scenario?

      In a book (of course I don't have the title again.. grrrr...) describing the technical version of evolution I saw that the weaker results are still considered for further development, you just have to put more weight on the stronger results.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    3. Re:OT: evolution vs. bruteforcing vs. creation by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      The key is realizing that the first Q/A pair doesn't really have anything to do with the way evolution actually works. A better way to put it is, "Some survive, some don't, and we designate the former group as 'fit'." IOW, "fitness" can be defined (exclusively) as that collection of traits which leads to survival and reproduction.

      It's tempting for us, as humans, to believe that we represent the peak of evolutionary fitness. We don't; no organism does, because fitness isn't static. What traits are useful for survival can change over the course of a single day.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:OT: evolution vs. bruteforcing vs. creation by gte910h · · Score: 1

      Evoulution is survival of those who survive.

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
    5. Re:OT: evolution vs. bruteforcing vs. creation by Squidbait · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert either, but...

      My understanding of genetic algorithms etc is that you might generally create the generation from the current generation by randomly selecting members of the current generation to reproduce, each with a probability of being selected equal to its fitness relative to the other members.

      So, the most fit members of the current generation are most likely to produce (and will therefore reproduce the most times, on average), but some less fit members will reproduce by sheer luck (you can imagine that this is how it works in nature too; some sick, weak animals may stumble across enormous food supplies/excellent unoccupied territory/large lonely groups of willing females/etc). So the next generation will likely have many sub-optimal members.

      This is important because it allows the algorithm to simultaneously explore in different directions in the space of all possible individuals, and it will have less of a tendency to get stuck at local maximums, as one of those weaker individuals may someday evolve in a different direction to reach an even greater maximum. Not to mention, in nature there is the possibility of an environmental change that turns the tables on the currently most fit individuals. So basically, it is a good thing to have a genetically diverse population, even though that means many sub-optimal individuals; the average fitness of the overall population will still drift upward over time.

  38. I know Kung-Fu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    t-he.

  39. This could really upset international politics by hazman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine a U.S. President that is simply a marionette made of organic plasma being controlled and manipulated by puppeteers and handlers behind the curtain - stringlessly AND wirelessly.

    1. Re:This could really upset international politics by El+Torico · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How would that be any different than what we've had for the last 20 years?

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    2. Re:This could really upset international politics by dave420-2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Imagine? Watched the news recently? :-P

    3. Re:This could really upset international politics by micronix1 · · Score: 1

      via bluetooth. ..oh, wait.

    4. Re:This could really upset international politics by avendasora · · Score: 1

      You mean another one?!

    5. Re:This could really upset international politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, that would be different because ... ?
      Your point is ... ?

    6. Re:This could really upset international politics by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      We are already driving rats by remote control. We can effect its pleasure centers so that the mice will feel really happy when it goes right when we want it to go right. So imagine if we can get a President to feel really happy if he votes right. This isn't really meant to be funny or an indictment of the current political system. But in the far away future, mind control of this sort may be a reality.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    7. Re:This could really upset international politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, that would be the joke he was making. That's why he got modded funny.

  40. Nerve cells by Avada+Kedavra · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe something can be done about spinal cord
    injuries in the future with this technology?

    1. Re:Nerve cells by dave420-2 · · Score: 1

      Stem cells are the way forward for spinal cord damage, as they can be used to replace the damaged cells. This technique is more useful for adapting already existing cells, and integrating them with computer circuitry.

  41. Another great steps by Xenobane · · Score: 3, Funny

    towards a virtual girlfriend.

  42. Half-bit bandwidth by korpiq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quoth the article:

    scientists stimulated one nerve cell to communicate with a second cell which transmitted that signal to multiple cells within the network.

    Singal up (probably down too, though that is not said). That's a start. Now let me jump.

    Imagine how this would feel in your own brain. Even strengthened to noticeable level by a lump of neurons, the signal would still read "beep". Now imagine being fed information through that channel. "Beep, bip beep bip bip beep". Better start training that morse.

    Now let's enhance the input by adding more bits into it and running data through a digital-to-analog converter. This is where you would slowly be able to "see colors", one at a time. Low signal, cold feeling; high signal, hot feeling. That is brainable information. You can associate different patterns of these "colors" to different ideas.
    But still it's not like you could see any shapes, is it?

    Now add more bytes, feed them in side-by-side. That's a feed. At this point, feel nausea. Something is feeding noise into your thoughts, something you cannot possibly comprehend.

    Would take a processing system not unlike vision inside the brain to translate that feed into experiences like colors, tastes, touches, then further associate these to make shapes out of the noise.

    A long way.

    Worth taking, of course, as research goes, but I wouldn't toss away those external displays as of yet. Have a hunch computers won't be the same, either, when we get there.

    Future research will focus on interfacing silicon chips with the human brain to control artificial limbs and develop "thinking" computers.

    Mostly fun!

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
    1. Re:Half-bit bandwidth by dave420-2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That's the beauty of the brain, though. It can make sense of the strangest of inputs. The very nature of neurons and connections in the brain means that if you were to introduce an "input" into the brain using a technique like this, given time, there's a very good chance that the brain will eventually make sense of it. After all, it's a very good learning computer, and this is really no different to the information sent via the optic nerve.

      Imagine trying to describe vision to someone who's been blind from birth. It's nigh-on impossible to explain, as it's unlike anything else they can experience. This is what we're seeing here - a new sense we just can't comprehend, yet could offer us such incredible benefits we can't hope to fully understand at such an early stage as this.

    2. Re:Half-bit bandwidth by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Brain implants to give vision to the blind already exist.

      This new tech is basically a way of doing it more efficiently.

    3. Re:Half-bit bandwidth by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      given that, in laymans terms, the brain adapts to changes (people who get a lump of brain chopped out can adapt slowly over time to accomodate this sometimes) it may be possible to implant the very young with mini interfaces which supply a feed.

      Now - feed simple messages such as 'food' or 'your mum' or 'barney' into this interface to train it to associate the feed with whats going on around it.

      You never know - your brain may well start treating this as a new sense - and you would potentially have some more complex interactions with it - not just taking in text or video - the visual stuff we think in - but actual raw ASCII or morse.

      Its the associations, surely, that lead to understanding. Just like when I hear people say things like 'in my ass' I know they actually mean 'not likely matey' not actually 'i have one in my ass'.

      I'd volunteer my little people to receive such a thing. Just think - if it was two way you could type without typing - that would be fucking sweet!

    4. Re:Half-bit bandwidth by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
      "there's a very good chance that the brain will eventually make sense of it."

      It's almost guaranteed... long, long before we could put chips in brains, there were experiments with hooking a video monitor up to a matrix of pins on the skin of the back.

      The pixels of the video were transformed into electrical impulses which prickled the back. This was 70s era research, so naturally the computer involved was huge... the person was tethered, with a large and heavy camera helmet.

      In any case, blind people were able to learn to "see" through this method. They didn't get the normal visual impression we do... the brain wasn't turning it into a picture. But it wasn't long before the person could move around the room based on this mechanical sense alone... reach for a ball, avoid a wall...

      Resolution was pitifully low... the back can't feel much more than a 20x20 matrix. Still, it shows quite clearly that the brain can pick up strange information and just rely on it.

  43. Well by RightInTheNeck · · Score: 1, Funny

    Right now theres a lab room somewhere filled with caged chimpanzees discussing who has to take the first one after witnessing buckets of vasoline being stacked in the corner of the lab the last few nights.

  44. Fucking Awesome!!! by mrshowtime · · Score: 0

    This is one of the coolest things I have ever heard of! Finally, the link between man and machine is being solidified. Just think, in 20 years, or less, an amputee could actually get a robot arm that obey's his thoughts. Granted, it's a far way off from "Cyberdyne," level tech, but it's a start!

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  45. in other news by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    In a press release read before assembled journalists, Intel Corp. announced that growing neurons on Pentium class chips would contravene the DMCA, by allowing competing engineers to directly download chip information into their brains.

    When pressed further, the spokesman stated that he couldn't be sure, but believed that growing neurons on AMD chips would however not contravene any laws.

    RIAA executives were unavailable for comment, but an anonymous source indicated that at least one executive has been admitted to a private clinic, where he repeatedly tells everyone "The chips, they're everywhere! No music is safe! Why won't anyone believe me?"

  46. to paraphrase Alan Cooper by erwin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alan Cooper, author of "The Inmates are Running the Asylum" and other texts put it this way:

    Q: What do you get when you cross a camera and a computer?
    A: A computer.

    His point is that from an interface and place-in-the-world point of view, most products that have been digitally enhanced tend to remain closer to their technology roots than their analog counterparts (with all of the usability, and I would say ethical, challenges inherient in a technologist-driven system).

    That said, this is pretty frickin' cool, but the double-edged sword presented by this innovation seems both particularly sharp and far reaching. I really hope we get this one right.

    "Why can't you use your powers for Good?"

    1. Re:to paraphrase Alan Cooper by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Q: What do you get when you cross a camera and a computer?
      A: A computer.


      Perhaps I'm missing the point (I've never read the afformentioned book), but when I cross a camera and a computer, I usually get a camera. Digital cameras are exactly this, no? The question seems a silly one. When we started making bridges out of steel did they somehow become something other than bridges?

      A camera is a thing that can capture pictures and later reproduce them. You can use film, or silicon to do that, but it's a camera because of what it does, not how it does it.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:to paraphrase Alan Cooper by blahtree · · Score: 1

      The book is mainly about interfaces. When you cross a camera and a computer, you're stuck with the interface of a computer. You have to wait for the camera to boot up before you can take a picture, you have to know how to navigate menus to change camera settings, etc.

      His point is that computer interfaces can be hard to use and more attention should be paid to their design.

      Great book.

  47. Sirius Cybernetics Corporation by Rassendyll · · Score: 4, Funny

    So that's how the "real people personalities" work. Guess the crowd at University of Calgary will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes!

    --
    An eye for an eye... leaves the whole world blind.
  48. Synaptic by wan-fu · · Score: 1

    So apparently, "synaptic strength was enhanced."

    Does this mean I'll need to upgrade my apt-get?

  49. More like Ghost in the Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This seems more like Ghost in the Shell than Asimov.

    How long 'till I can get my own cyberbrain implants?

  50. Reminds me of... by jonney02 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A quote i read somewhere
    "The danger from computers is not that they will eventually get as smart as men, but we will meanwhile agree to meet them halfway." -Bernard Avishai

  51. Solution for tinnitus sufferers? by hkmwbz · · Score: 3, Interesting
    With research like this going on, will we eventually see a medical solution to tinnitus?

    Tinnitus is a serious problem to a lot of people today, and it can have many causes, from various diseases/illnesses, to noise damage. It apparently has to do with the nerves in one's ear, so would this kind of research, might we finally see a way to actually treat tinnitus?

    Until you get T, you don't realize how lucky people who can actually be in a quiet room without going mad are...

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
    1. Re:Solution for tinnitus sufferers? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      I have tinnitus, and what's the big deal? If there's any noise at all, the sound is either gone or just not an issue unless you concentrate on it like a child picking at a scab. It's not like it interferes with hearing or anything. It's annoying, yeah, but there's nothing you can do about it, so just don't worry about it.

      Either that or commit suicide.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
  52. implants by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps it will be possible to make brain implants that enables you to connect to the internet and let others connect their brains with the net as well. Imagine sharing brainpower, or even share thoughts, ideas and memories over a filesharing network.

    1. Re:implants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      wouldnt want to slashdot a human....nah there would be no humans no more

    2. Re:implants by axxackall · · Score: 1
      I am for one waiting to get it in my head. I am sick and tired from using clamsy keyboards and mice with eye-hurting displays. I don't want to read from display - I want to feel it. I don't want to type on keyboard - I want to think it.

      Of course it opens a new filed for hacker attacks. But it won't stop us to have anyway, eventually. Certainly they will work in area of brain firewalling.

      At first time as a simple solution I could use my personal laptop as a gateway connecting me to to the rest of the world. Basically the implant communicate wirelessly (but encrypted!) with my laptop, which runs SE-Linux, which is connected to the internet by one way or another - whatever is available at that placw.

      --

      Less is more !
  53. PubMed link to academic ref by covenant_uk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pubmed link to the abstract for their research. Publisher's site sometimes holds a free copy of the full paper (depends on the journal).

  54. I, for one ... by octal666 · · Score: 1

    wellcome our new cibronic sillicon neuron overlords.

    --
    DON'T PANIC
  55. My computer already has a mind of it's own... by Serious+Simon · · Score: 2, Funny

    The last thing I would want is to make it nervous.

  56. I would REALLY start worrying by -Maurice66- · · Score: 0

    if/when M$ were to buy it and have it interface directly with their software.

    WSOD is really wsod...

  57. OMG by PorscheDriver · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of those!

    --
    "This is your life, and it's ending one second at a time."
    1. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ptff: -1

      You OBVIOUSLY don't know how ON TOPIC it is

  58. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Informative

    Neurons are much larger than transistors, but the two aren't really comparable. The main body of a neuron is usually around 25 microns (25000 nm) in diameter and runs at a clockspeed only in the kilohertz max.

    A neuron is much more than a transistor-like switch. On the one side of the neuron's central body is a set of dendrites that connect to and gather input from other neurons. The average neuron might have a thousand of these dendrites.

    The synapse at the end of each dendrite acts like part of a multiply-accumulate term -- taking the signal from an other neuron, multiplying it by a numerical coefficient and summing it into the total excitation level of the neuron's body. I suspect that the precision of this multiply -accumulate process is fairly low -- perhaps 8 to 16 bits.

    Next, the body of the neuron has a long axon extending from it that sends the output of the neuron to other neurons (connecting to the dendrites of other neurons). This axon can be quite long, millimeters, even inches, in length. Thus, the axon is like an off-chip line driver with the potential to have a very high fanout (of a 1000 or more). (On a modern microchip, these off-chip connections are driven by much larger transistors than the small 65 nm ones used in computation).

    Third, a neuron is not a static multiply-accumulate system. The coefficients on each synapse change in response to long-term adaptive processes. This process is computationally complex and includes cross-correlation of inputs between synapses and processing of other chemical signals in the brain. Cross-correlation alone could require the equivalent of several kilobytes to several megabyts of RAM. (We won't even get into the adaptive processes that include physical growth and removal of dendrites as this has no easy analog in hardware)

    In summary, a neuron is more than a transistor-like switch. Its a free-running 1000 register multiply-accumulator with an off-chip line driver and a statistical processing engine that updates the coefficients on each of the multiply-accumulate terms. Thus, emulating a single neuron would require hundreds of thouands to millions of transistors.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  59. Interesting by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 0

    Now it's only going to be a matter of time before I can download porn to my brain. ^_^ Ha, just playing.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  60. my question is... by kertong · · Score: 1

    if these nerve cells (organic) are grown on silicon (not really organic), could these possibly have a computing application as well, instead of bio-tech?

    What I wonder, is what the lifespan (or MTF) these silicon "nerve chips" have. After all, if the nerve cells are "grown", they obviously are fed and nurtured in some way. What kind of upkeep and lifespan are we talking here?

  61. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by hyc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thanks for the reply, very enlightening.

    But it clearly would be folly to try to emulate a neuron using purely digital computing techniques. You're dealing with an analog mechanism that is pretty much a wire-or of many inputs feeding into a capacitor. This is very much an analog computing circuit; now the question is how efficiently you can do A/D-D/A conversion on this scale.

    (And as I recall, the sciatic nerve running down your leg is a single cell with an axon over 1 foot long. Definitely some impressive stuff Mother Nature has concocted...)

    --
    -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
  62. Just a thought on this strengthened stimulation... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Would it be possible for such a thing to get so stimulated that it starts causing unpedictable results... like a seizure or insanity? Not that we'll need to worry about that for decades, but it would be interesting to figure out before it gets applied to technology that could affect a large number of humans directly.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  63. it would be the smartest prez ever by gomel · · Score: 1

    if that was the case, such a puppet would have the combined intelligence of a team of hired PhDs, would be unbeatable in discussions. there would be some lag, naturally.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  64. Software version by Gendhil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or, for a more software interpretation, it's a function that takes a bunch of boolean parameters and returns a boolean. Anyone who's ever done any programmation or computer architecture should see why you can easily process anything with this.

  65. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 5, Informative

    This axon can be quite long, millimeters, even inches, in length.

    Acutally, it can be over a meter in length (spinal cord to calf is one axone). Try that with a transistor

    --
    Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  66. It's not about getting more memory by Gendhil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since you are using a ridiculously little part of all the storage space you have available at anytime in your life. The cool thing, would be to have an electronic device that could strenghten a give synaptic path, allowing you to "refresh" your memory at will, and not forget important things. (like read the whole C++ W/ libraries reference once and then refresh this everynight)

    1. Re:It's not about getting more memory by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      Anchoring, baby. You're using ridiculously little of your mnemonic capabilities as well. (not to get personal)

  67. For the mathematically inclined by Gendhil · · Score: 1

    Evolution is to bruteforcing what dichotomy is to random guessing.

  68. I wonder by Gendhil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who'll be the first to upload a linux distro into the brain of an actual pinguin.

  69. Well, it must be said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our nervous silicon Overlords! (because they clearly srouck!)

  70. Speed issues... by elFarto+the+2nd · · Score: 1, Funny

    The team cultured nerve cells from a snail...

    I'm thinking it might be a bit slow :)

    Regards
    elFarto
  71. Re:Software version (more than Boolean) by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or, for a more software interpretation, it's a function that takes a bunch of boolean parameters and returns a boolean. Anyone who's ever done any programmation or computer architecture should see why you can easily process anything with this.

    Excellent point. You are right about the computational flexibility of neurons. They can represent a wide range of logical functions, although I believe that the single neuron is incapable of doing an XOR.

    But a neuron is more that a Boolean circuit. Although a neuron seems like a two-state device (its either quiesent or its firing), it is more of an N-state analog device in which the pulse-rate encodes a numerical quantity (probably the equivalent of an 8 to 16 bit floating point number). That is why the dendrite field is like a giant numerical multiply-accumulate.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  72. Predicted 1945(!) by infolib · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the end of WWII research director Vannevar Bush predicted the IT revolution. He was eerily right in many ways, but some things are still to come. For some time I had the following quote hanging on my wall:

    In the outside world, all forms of intelligence whether of sound or sight, have been reduced to the form of varying currents in an electric circuit in order that they may be transmitted. Inside the human frame exactly the same sort of process occurs. Must we always transform to mechanical movements in order to proceed from one electrical phenomenon to another?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  73. I don't know about you.. by SQLz · · Score: 1

    but I welcome my new silicon based masters.

    1. Re:I don't know about you.. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Hell no! Never bow down to those who want to suppress, Never take a step back for those who seek to do injustices.
      Down with our new silicon based masters! Freedom is ours for the taking!
      Join the resistance today!

  74. but where's the RFID? by ThePretender · · Score: 4, Funny
    'We discovered that when we used the chip to stimulate the neurons, their synaptic strength was enhanced,'

    ...and when we added the RFID, the test subjects had great futures working for Wal-Mart as they could communicate directly with the pallets of merchandise. In 2.0, the store employees will automagically know when the Gillette razors need to be restocked. :-)

  75. Killer attack snails by FathomIT · · Score: 1

    Get ready for new enhanced killer attack snails.

    Serious note: The future will be full of key decision makers suddenly dying, when attack insects like common flies carry real poison payloads with nano-tracking equipment installed.

  76. Rejoice ... or not. by fygment · · Score: 1

    Here on /. years ago there was an article about Japanese researchers controlling cockroach movement with implants stimulating its brain. Perhaps now they could control bigger life forms ....

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  77. Did anyone see The Lift by ErrorBase · · Score: 1

    The Lift is a Dutch movie about a thinking lift. It's quite old and seems to be badly duped in the states. See the Reviews here, here and here. It has been quite some while i've seen it (the native version) and i thougt it was scary than. probably was 1988 then ...

  78. "Mad Cow Disease" for Robots? by hadesan · · Score: 1
    I wonder if someone can throw some Mad Cow tainted meat into the "neuron" production line and produce a whole generation of robots which "fall" down and act erratically...

    OR

    they could use faulty pentium processors and a Windows OS...

  79. Bluetooth! by Ba3r · · Score: 1

    Now I can have a bluetooth adapter in the back of my skull.. oh wait, thats a dying protocol, but at least i can trigger my neurons into making me grumble like a ferrari when i first wake up!

  80. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by visualight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, now thats a good explanation of why humans can so (mentally) easily manipulate objects in 3d space without doing any math.

    I've always figured that the best design for a computer would be one that's able to "imagine". Since it would take too many transistors to emulate a neuron, maybe there's some other way to do it? Is binary the only way to compute?

    --
    Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
  81. Humans deserves more credits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I disagree. Nature had a lot of time to "bruteforce" things. Give us the same amount of time and we will see what we'll be able to do in terms of "reengineering the world".
    Modern science is a 400 - 500 years old thing. Nature had billion of year to reach the levels we see.
    I think that the progresses we are achieving in the last 50 years are *really* impressive, and probably what we'll see in the next 50 years will be even more impressing. Sometimes humans deserves more credits IMHO.

  82. big deal by lukesl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IAAN, and this is not a big breakthrough in any sense. Basically, this is something that was first done using manually-positioned electrodes probably twenty years ago, and now they can grow neurons on a dish that has electrodes built into it and do it that way. WoO-hAH!

    The computational power of neurons comes from the way they work in groups, not the way they work alone. Therefore, it's strongly dependent upon the detailed organization of their connectivity. Grinding up a piece of brain and regrowing it on a dish will obviously not retain native connectivity. Additionally, the time it would take to manually rewire an interesting circuit by giving little localized electrical pulses (or do anything else interesting) is longer than neurons are viable in culture, and that's not a problem that's been solved yet.

    I'm not saying this technology won't have important uses as a research tool, just that it won't be useful for what people here seem to think it will be useful for (high-density pornography storage). BTW, one of the more interesting characters in this field is Steve Potter, a somewhat strange guy who does some technically impressive work

  83. this isn't a novel effect by sbma44 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    it's something called long-term potentiation, and neuroscientists have known about it for a long time. if you get a neuron to fire enough, its synapses will strengthen. It's been a while, but I believe the mediating mechanism involves calcium-triggered protein synthesis.

    FYI, LTP is one of the most promising mechanisms proposed for explaining how long term memory works.

  84. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post just about gave me an orgasm. May I ask if you are in university or in the workforce? What have you done professionally or personally to get that kind of insight? I've been in electronics for most of my life, but I've always felt/known that electronics is childishly and hopelessly simple compared to a single cell. The biological machinery around us is much MUCH more complex and interesting to me than the boring repetitive electronics world I'm (still) in.
    So, what's the scoop? I have to go back to school for sure, but in what?

  85. Input interface? by delcielo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see any practical value in being able to add memory; but it would be cool to have an interface that would let me learn things faster.

    Kind of like how people in "that movie" can learn how to fly a UH-1 in 3 seconds.

    Now THAT ability would be cool.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    1. Re:Input interface? by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 1

      and AFAIK you need memory to learn things!

      --
      My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
  86. Depressing by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Now your PC can actually FEEL Windows being installed!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  87. in other news.. by patrick.whitlock · · Score: 1

    a high school student was suspended today after he began screaming explitives as his teachers and fellow classmates, following the resuld of catching the famed magistr virus. when asked about wether or not the suspention was fair, the school board replied," it isn't our fauld he diddn't update his definitions"

  88. What to do? by Slugworth01 · · Score: 1

    Should I get the 32 bit brain implant now, or spend the big bucks and get the 64 bit implant? How big a cooling fan will I need to attach to the side of my head?

  89. OT - Re:Kinda cool by Halthar · · Score: 1

    Yeah, he is looking more and more like McGyver all the time. Oddly enough, I happened to really enjoy Johnny Mnemonic. Admittedly though, I am a fan of any movie in which Dolph Lundgren's character dies.

  90. In other news Micro$oft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Announces WinCE Neuron....
    Imagine if that happened. Can you say seizure?

  91. Please learn how to use links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please learn how to use links.
    <a href="http://www.gatech.edu/news-room/release.php? id=160">Researchers Use Lab Cultures to Create Robotic 'Semi-Living Artist'</a>
    <a href="http://www.wireheading.com/roborats/hybrots. html"> Wired to the Brain of a Rat, a Robot Takes On the World</a>
    yields:
    Researchers Use Lab Cultures to Create Robotic 'Semi-Living Artist'
    Wired to the Brain of a Rat, a Robot Takes On the World
  92. Sex has a big head start. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give math another 200 billion years and then maybe you have a comparison.

  93. Re:Software version (more than Boolean) by MacJedi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Excellent point. You are right about the computational flexibility of neurons. They can represent a wide range of logical functions, although I believe that the single neuron is incapable of doing an XOR.

    Actually, I think it can be done (or at least a partially working XOR.) Imagine a neuron with two inputs and an output. But these inputs are not both excitatory: one is excitatory and the other is inhibitory. So, input only from the excitatory branch produces an action potential, and input from both branches yields no output. Unfortunately, input from just the inhibitory branch would produce no output either.
    --
    2^5
  94. Yet another bad movie by zz9plural · · Score: 1
    --
    "This message brought to you by LOUD YELLING, the future of nationwide wireless communication."
  95. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1? Way to go, mods! What happened? You saw the word 'orgasm', looked in the dictionary, found out you never had one and got pissed? Or are you in EE and got miffed that I think electronics is for children?

  96. Anyone got a link to the paper ? by Xanthra47 · · Score: 1

    It's not available on line at journal's web site or the university's, at least I didn't find it : ( Anyone know where it is ?

  97. Temporal Synchrony by percepto · · Score: 3, Informative
    But a neuron is more that a Boolean circuit. Although a neuron seems like a two-state device (its either quiesent or its firing), it is more of an N-state analog device in which the pulse-rate encodes a numerical quantity (probably the equivalent of an 8 to 16 bit floating point number). That is why the dendrite field is like a giant numerical multiply-accumulate.

    You're right on-- the change in firing rate relative to the baseline firing rate is very important. Also, there is some reason to think (logically and biologically) that some ensembles of neurons fire synchronously with each other and asynchronously from other ensembles of neurons. By using synchrony of firing, they gain computational power and allow for variable binding, thus allowing more formally logical computations to happen than just autocorrelation our boolean operations.

    If I have four neurons, and one represents "red," one represents "green," one represents "square" and one represents "circle," then it is very difficult to tell (based on the sustained activity of the neurons alone) whether they are responding to a red circle and a green square or a red square and a green circle. This is called "the binding problem" and, at least in neural networks, can be solved by distributing the firing patterns of the neurons over time. So, "red" and "circle" fire in synch, then rest while "green" and "square" fire in synch and then rest while "red" and "circle"... etc. Notice that you could even have "red" bound with both "circle" and "square" by being active over two epochs, thus allowing for dynamic binding of variables, etc.

    Anyway, the point of all of this is that if we can figure out how some of this temporal synchrony dimension is exploited in the brain, then we should be able to harness that computational power through silicon transistors like the one described in this article and build modules that could replace damaged regions of the brain.

    --

    The term "outside the box" is squarely within the box at this point.

    1. Re:Temporal Synchrony by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      Temporal synchrony seems unlikely to explain (much of) the binding problem. The Singer results relied on neurons with overlapping receptive fields. They showed synchrony, but it is easy to argue that the neurons recorded simply had common neurons driving them. Also, his screening technique for finding neurons was biased toward selecting neurons with some synchrony. Newer experiments show very little evidence for synchrony when using neurons responding to well separated areas of the visual scene and not selecting pairs based on correlated firing.

  98. X-Mas 2020 ... by straybullets · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna grab one of these new Ono-Sendai and hack my way into the subspace interbank !

    --
    With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
  99. Good News For George W. Bush: +1, Patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Maybe, the Puppet-On-A-String
    can improve his "speeches" and "press conferences".

    Regards,
    Kilgore Trout

  100. Re:Software version (more than Boolean) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a "partially working" XOR anyway?

  101. Wow that a bold future by 330Pilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Future research will focus on interfacing silicon chips with the human brain to control artificial limbs and develop "thinking" computers." Thats one heck of a leap forward from connecting x number of snail nerves together.

  102. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sounds analogous to a wire, but that's so obvious that I must be missing something.

  103. A Clarification by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    Synaptic strength in this context means something different from nervous system degradation. When neurons are fired, they tend to reinforce that connection. Hence, practicing a free throw, which is simply just a certain pattern of firing a group of neurons, can make you better at shooting because the neural pathways involved are stronger. They are saying that they observed a similar phenomenon with a neuron on the chip.

    Nerve wasting illnesses attack the nerve itself. MS in particular causes the myelin sheathing on the nerve cell to disintegrate. This cannot be reversed or prevented by the strengthening mentioned in this article.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  104. I'm curious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as to the actual motivation behind the negative moderation of the parent post.

    Is it illiteracy? Must be, because not only is the story Fondly Fahrenheit extremely ontopic for the article, it also applies quite well to the parent post.

    Would the moderator care to post AC, and 'splain his/her ignorance?

  105. Random thoughts by It's+the+tripnaut! · · Score: 1

    Two Women in a Bathroom Laverne: I kinda liked that Rudy fella, he seems to be a nice guy... Charlotte: I think he should flash his neurons less often. Laverne: Why so? Charlotte: I can't believe you didn't notice it! Laverne: Notice what? Charlotte: It's like he's nervous all the time. He keeps fidgeting and I can't stand his nail-biting. Laverne: You think he's a junkie? Charlotte: You'll never know with these firmware addicts, you think they're nice and normal and then they just flip out all of a sudden. I'm not trying to be funny. This conversation could actually happen.

  106. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by kabocox · · Score: 1

    It sounds like a brain is just a beowulf cluster of alot of tiny neurons. The neurons compared to silicon aren't much at processing individually, but they are orders of magitude better connected. How many beowulf clusters have each machine connected to 10,000+ other machines? That there is I/O bandwidth. The sum is more than the individual parts. Besides how many beowulf clusters have standard self repair? That don't just route around bad machines but repair it and the connections to other machines? Organic will be awesome, but really scary. I'd be easir to make organic machines that are sentient than fully silicon ones.

  107. Does that mean that in the future....... by preclose · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that in the future my pc will shed a tear when I rip it from limb to limb during an upgrade.....?

  108. Re:not much to say on this, other than by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I would like to know just how the FUCK that is off-topic. It doesnt have much to say. It may be "overrated", but it is _NOT_ fucking "off-topic". Those were my thoughts on the matter, and it is not your job as a moderator to mod-down something because you have a different opinion.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  109. questions, questions by whittrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not so much interested in the Hollywood vision of this, although Ice-T deserved an Oscar for his performance. What I think is interesting is to think about the limits of our brains and how this could be used to expand consciousness.

    I think it would be interesting to understand how a neural interface would 'feel'. What would a process based in ones and zeros feel like? How would the brain adapt to take advantage of the new processing capability? Would we be able to project our consciousness outside of our body in some kind of digital plenum (that may not be a visual experience at all, it could be an entirely abstract experience like blind person contemplating numbers or language). Would we be enabled to 'see' new phenomena if we integrate a chip into the visual cortex (we could hook our brain up to a radio telescope and see the entire electormagnetic spectrum)? What color would ultra-violet be if it became a part of the visual spectrum or is the brain incapable of seeing a color that is as yet unimagined? What would it be like to 'smell' or 'touch' light or gravity or computer processes. Would it be possible to add entirely new senses or reasoning structures to the mind. Could we augment our perception to allow us to be cognisent of additional dimensional properties in addition to the 3 dimenstion we can see now. Would our bodies ultimately be relevant to our consciousness or could this technology allow us to be unhinged from our physical being, what would that mean for religion and philosophy? Could a person be in more than one place at once? Would it be possible to integrate two people into one or transfer one person into another, what would that do to 'individuality' and 'memory'.

    Just a few questions.

    1. Re:questions, questions by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > What would a process based in ones and zeros feel like?

      What does a process based in chemicals feel like? How do you know we aren't just ones and zeros now? I doubt we are, but we don't really know.

      Anyway, I am going to practice my detective work. Since you asked those specific questions, I am guessing you have taken LSD once. Maybe twice. If you had taken it MANY MANY times, you would either
      1) know that you can, because your brain is fried, or
      2) know that you cannot, because you have kept trying over & over, yet failed.

  110. Re:Software version (more than Boolean) by jerald_hams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think parent (along with some other posts) are confusing the biological neuron and the perceptron, which is a simplified mathematical model. While the perceptron can't cope with linearly inseperable problems (like XOR), there is no consensus on the computational limits of the neuron. In fact, very little is known for certain about the learning algorithm used by the nervous system. The neuron may learn not only through the weights of its inputs, but also through chemical interactions with glial cells. Really, the neuron is still too much of a mystery for us to know its limitations.

  111. Already done, actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a neat article (sciencedaily.com?)on a replacement medulla oblongota for rat brains. Researchers took a slice out from a rats medulla, mapped it electrically and made a circuit to give the same outputs as it gave to the same inputs. With the slice missing the rats were crippled. When the circuit was put in place to replace the removed slice - the rats were fine. What is interesting about this research is that the medulla is a primitive structure and is very similiar in human brains, it's purpose is usually muscle control. Combining the two discoveries could well lead to bionic limbs.

    It is a long way off, but the research is now showing it is possible.

  112. Hello my future girlfriend by elitebrad · · Score: 0

    This is what I sound like.

  113. Not Quite a breakthrough by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "We discovered that when we used the chip to stimulate the neurons, their synaptic strength was enhanced..."

    Neurons firing in response to the same stimulus do that; that's what they do. All this really managed to show was that the stimulus could come from a chip holding the cell rather than cells around it or a wire shoved into it. Growing cells on a chip is neat, but increasing synaptic connectivity ain't that tough.

    In any case, I for one welcome our new wires-in-the-head ma..... oh wait, I am one.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  114. Definitely a century away, probably more... by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    and yes, I realize that Bill said "640k etc...." just a few years ago, so I shouldn't underestimate technological progress. But I'm quite sure about this because the problem isn't grafting neurons and chips together, it's understanding how our brain works. The human brain is the most complicated object known to humanity in the known universe. What makes it especially difficult to investigate is that its almost impossible to verify any theory because you can't really conduct experiments on it, because no 2 brains are ever the same (look up the formal definition of an "experiment" if you're not sure what I mean). All you can do is observe and theorize. Tinkering around with it would most likely damage it.

    Despite all the technological achievements, nobody knows how we remember, why we are conscious, how knowledge and judgement works, etc. All this information is "soft" knowledge (dunno if that's the technical term), so its not like we can make some calculations and decide where to graft cards and make the brain accept and use it. All we know is that if you are scared, then this part of the brain gets more blood, and if you're remembering, then this part of the brain gets more voltage. But to insert a chip somewhere in the brain? You'd probably just do brain damage. We don't even know where you'd graft the chip onto, much less how, much less without doing damage, much less how to make the brain use it. As if all that weren't enough, here's the final obstacle for scientists: it seems that every person's brain is different!

  115. Occures to me by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    From a design stand point it occures to me that the first elements of our electro neural system to be replaced likely won't be processing or memory based. Though an interfact with a long term storage solution might be in our near future it will probably be controlled consciously. Despite an earlier comment to the contrary, I think that advances will be made in replacing longer neurons such as the spine. The money is there for research because of spinal chord injuries and other disabilities and all these links do is move electrical current from one location to another. This means they can be done in conjunction with our current systems.

    Plus running a hyper transport bus from my occular nerve centre to my trigger finger would be pretty badass :)

  116. Re:Software version (more than Boolean) by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    XOR has the truth table:
    a b aXORb
    1 1 0
    1 0 1
    0 1 1
    0 0 0

    What you have described is:
    e i e?i
    1 1 0
    1 0 1
    0 1 0
    0 0 0

    Where ? is either &~, i.e. "e and not i", or "not if e then i". A "partially working" logical function is really just a fully working different logical function.

    --

    (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  117. Age of the universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    200 billion? So, you feel that the life we see now was seeded from outer space, and before that, from a universe that came before ours?

    The universe is perhaps 10 to 20 billion years old. Earth is about 4 billion years old.

  118. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is very much an analog computing circuit; now the question is how efficiently you can do A/D-D/A conversion on this scale.

    Also, if your silicon starts to chug, will you need a heatsink on your skull to cool it? Body temperature isn't ideal for microcircuitry. Could I take the heatsink off if I'm not thinking about a diffucult problem? Would my AMD coprocessor catch fire if my heatsink were jostled? Would my Intel coprocessor throttle it's clock and make me dumber in the summer?

    And would my 60 year old barber still cut my hair if I have a huge hunk of metal clamped to my head?

  119. Tinnitus... What's the big deal? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    "I have tinnitus, and what's the big deal?"
    I know what it's like to be incredibly exhausted in the afternoon ... following a restless night ... but not want to take even a brief nap, because I knew I'd wake up with twice the roar I started with. I've been there.
    I know what it's like to see the audiologist's eyes practically fall out of his head during tinnitus matching, because he's thinking, "Now this is impressive.
    I know what it's like to want to beat my head against the wall because of the noise.
    I know what it's like for the idea of putting food to my mouth to cause my stomach to knot up with nausea because of the trains going by in my head.
    I know what it's like to be an adult male in his late forties and want to put my head on my 80-year-old mother's lap so she can rub it and make things quiet ... and I know what it's like to see tears in her eyes because she can't help. I've been there.
    I know what it's like to want to die.
    I know what it's like to see a loving wife sick with worry and fear.
    And I know what it's like to just about fall apart when a five year old son looks at his father's ears and says, "Daddy, I wish I could just reach in there with my fingers and pull that bad noise out so you could be happy again." You see, I've been there, too.
    So I think I know damn tinnitus.
    - Stephen Nagler
    Guess not everyone is as lucky as you and I then. We probably have mild cases compared to Dr. Nagler and thousands of other real victims who are actually disabled because of their T.
    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  120. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by antispamist · · Score: 1

    Very informative? Isn't this guy talking about Legos? lol jk...couldn't resist. Mod-away.

    --
    --Thei Antispamist A useless endevor that will cer
  121. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by hesiod · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the OT post, but others will probably find this interesting too.

    > the sciatic nerve running down your leg is a single cell with an axon over 1 foot long

    I thought this was usual Slashdot bull$h!#, as it sounded unlikely. I was right that the statement was incorrect, but "in the wrong direction." A foot-long nerve? Evidently it's more like a 2.5-3 ft. nerve cell. Crazy. Check out Paragraph 3 of this link.

  122. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by hesiod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    >And would my 60 year old barber still cut my hair if I have a huge hunk of metal

    Naw, by the time that chunk of metal gets there we will be outsourcing hairstyling/barbering (anything like barbarism?) to China.

  123. Re:not much to say on this, other than by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    While admittedly that one was off-topic, any moderator should have at least been considerate enought to mod the other one up a bit while modding this one down. I must conclude that whoever moderated the parent must not have actually read the post before moderating. I hope the meta-moderators will view it in context and do their job!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  124. Re:Software version (more than Boolean) by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    So where the fuck are the memories, man?!?!?!

    Argh... I'm so tempted to just open it up, and stick a logic probe in there.... grrrrrr

  125. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by incom · · Score: 1

    If you know of any good links with more information like this, I would appreciate it.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  126. Now... by Plumpkin · · Score: 1

    If only they could grow a few more nuerons on the brain of the avarege person we may be better off.

  127. Headlines of 2015 by serutan · · Score: 1

    Army of rogue super-snails occupies Paris. Restauranteurs publicly executed. France surrenders. Allied liberation forces mired in slime trail.

  128. Re:Kinda cool: Neurons vs. Transistors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called neuroscience or neurobiology at many schools. Other options are biomedical engineering and biophysics.

  129. Can you say... by gmby · · Score: 1

    BioSoft; the next big monopoly? Hated more than the other .....soft corp. If you think a M$oft tax on your hardware is bad; wait until you have to pay the "thought tax".

    Just a thought. Or is it? Maybe it's someone elses memory?

    better stop before I go crazy. ...oh wait

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  130. Cyberkinetics Inc. anyone interested. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waise bhi Dimag kharab kar diya-ab Barbaad karo aur Maza looton.
    Ask the University and Max-planck people to collaborate with www.cyberkineticsinc.com and do something positive for humans too.

  131. MOD PARENT UP by AlistairGroves · · Score: 1

    Someones been doing AI....