If so, I would want these for skiing, running, biking & so on. Otherwise, I would just pull out the phone to look at it. BTW, I am not a 24/7 phone junkie at all. But for example when skiing with family & friends, texting and calling is a big pain, but a heads-up display would be perfect.
I just skimmed TFA, but I didn't see any details of the electrochemistry. So this is only a guess, but I think the Al gets turned over to Al2O3, which provides the current to run the motor. If that is true, than you can't just recycle the spent mass, you have to convert it back to a metal, then you can recycle it. Doable, but not cheap.
You don't know the watch market. High end mechanical watches can easily fetch more that $10K. If Apple could get a high end digital design into play, and market it to the right people, they could do really well.
Seriously, the worst are idiots talking into neck-cradled mobile and pissing into the urinal. I feel sorry for the person on the other end of the conversation.
We are skiers, and have driven mountain roads in states where we don't live. Once you've gotten lost in the snow, you will never drive off with only a map again! Also, why would anyone but an idiot assume that a phone based nav system would have cell coverage in a rural area they obviously were not familiar with?
Tim Lundström, a physicist at a Swedish nuclear safety and training organization called KSU, told FoxNews.com that the radioactive orchestra is a good way to represent nuclear energy because it correlates so accurately to what we know about radioactive material. Lower energy beams produce colors like blue or green whereas higher level radioactive materials produce red tones.
Shouldn't red be lower energy etc? (I think this is cool stuff, just nit-picking with the physicist...)
mold it from HMW PLGA, I'm going to guess a good mole ratio for this project will be 80:20. It will be pretty stable as long as you keep it dry, then throw it away after a couple of years. It will biodegrade into glycolic and lactic acid.
'gonna help you all out here. Patent trolls buys up patents, and then lay in wait for unsuspecting companies to violate them, then goes after them for cash. They are not inventors, nor do not use the patents to protect their own products. So, is that Apple?
There is simply no way this would be effective for major research topics. They can't be experts across all fields, e.g., they would not have regulatory clearance to do medical studies. They would not have equipment or experience to do esoteric materials or particle physics etc. So yeah, call me extremely skeptical.
Or their attempts to appeal to a broader, less hip demographic is annoying the traditional recipients of their cheesy appeals, who didn't mind it as long as it was stroking their different thinking egos.
You mean our "think different" egos. Why can't you haters get your shit together!? (This was sarcasm, BTW)
Ah.... but "Think Different" reads perfectly fine if you take it as meaning that it is implying the existence of an unstated noun, and "different" is not intending to describe how the thinking is done, but rather describing whatever it is that is being thought about.
Exactly. it's not suggesting the "how" but the "what." . Plus it had that "made you think about it" quality.
The tech angle is pretty obvious. It's in the 3rd-to- last sentence.
Cops can't find our lost or stolen smartphones, even when said phone is broadcasting its location, so clearly that's a deficiency in the design.
... or is it just that the cops can't/won't take the final step? The location map was pretty accurate when I used it to see where I'd left my phone. There should be no mistake which house/building etc. That's all the system can really do for you.
Slashdot Mirror
I wanted to add a question - does anyone know how well these work for people with presbyopia?
If so, I would want these for skiing, running, biking & so on. Otherwise, I would just pull out the phone to look at it. BTW, I am not a 24/7 phone junkie at all. But for example when skiing with family & friends, texting and calling is a big pain, but a heads-up display would be perfect.
I just skimmed TFA, but I didn't see any details of the electrochemistry. So this is only a guess, but I think the Al gets turned over to Al2O3, which provides the current to run the motor. If that is true, than you can't just recycle the spent mass, you have to convert it back to a metal, then you can recycle it. Doable, but not cheap.
... Main thing for me was to not make a big deal about it, but to do it. Just keep doing something small everyday and it'll add up.
Also, don't listen to the naysayers: "it's not true cardio...walking is useless...etc" - every little bit helps. Emotionally and physically.
You don't know the watch market. High end mechanical watches can easily fetch more that $10K. If Apple could get a high end digital design into play, and market it to the right people, they could do really well.
Good lord, man...
use
breaks
Seriously, the worst are idiots talking into neck-cradled mobile and pissing into the urinal. I feel sorry for the person on the other end of the conversation.
you had to bring up JarJar... , thanks for that.
... How do you think the Patriots get so much production out of fringe players.
Bill Belichik
You want to stop this? Leave the guns, just charge $1000 a bullet. No way anyone can afford the 50 grand it would take to do this type of killing.
Problem solved.
Always important to ask locals.
We are skiers, and have driven mountain roads in states where we don't live. Once you've gotten lost in the snow, you will never drive off with only a map again! Also, why would anyone but an idiot assume that a phone based nav system would have cell coverage in a rural area they obviously were not familiar with?
This is "insightful" or "funny" - wish I had mod points today.
It's just too expensive; only clueless, rich snobs with more money than brains can afford it!
Sincerely,
Apple User
He lives in a town called "Middlefart"? Now I truly feel sorry for the man.
From TFA link:
Tim Lundström, a physicist at a Swedish nuclear safety and training organization called KSU, told FoxNews.com that the radioactive orchestra is a good way to represent nuclear energy because it correlates so accurately to what we know about radioactive material. Lower energy beams produce colors like blue or green whereas higher level radioactive materials produce red tones.
Shouldn't red be lower energy etc? (I think this is cool stuff, just nit-picking with the physicist...)
mold it from HMW PLGA, I'm going to guess a good mole ratio for this project will be 80:20. It will be pretty stable as long as you keep it dry, then throw it away after a couple of years. It will biodegrade into glycolic and lactic acid.
Howdy Y'all!
'gonna help you all out here. Patent trolls buys up patents, and then lay in wait for unsuspecting companies to violate them, then goes after them for cash. They are not inventors, nor do not use the patents to protect their own products. So, is that Apple?
Out of curiosity, what do you believe the iPhone can do that a similarly matched Android phone cannot?
Run iOS.
Arg, posting to delete a mod screw-up. sorry bout that.
There is simply no way this would be effective for major research topics. They can't be experts across all fields, e.g., they would not have regulatory clearance to do medical studies. They would not have equipment or experience to do esoteric materials or particle physics etc. So yeah, call me extremely skeptical.
Or their attempts to appeal to a broader, less hip demographic is annoying the traditional recipients of their cheesy appeals, who didn't mind it as long as it was stroking their different thinking egos.
You mean our "think different" egos. Why can't you haters get your shit together!? (This was sarcasm, BTW)
Ah.... but "Think Different" reads perfectly fine if you take it as meaning that it is implying the existence of an unstated noun, and "different" is not intending to describe how the thinking is done, but rather describing whatever it is that is being thought about.
Exactly. it's not suggesting the "how" but the "what." . Plus it had that "made you think about it" quality.
What's wrong with being sexy? Mine goes up to number 11! :0)
Ian : "...Sex - IST..."
David: "have you seen the cover of Derek Small's new album?"
later...
Nigel: "Ah, there's such a fine line between stupid and clever."
The tech angle is pretty obvious. It's in the 3rd-to- last sentence.
Cops can't find our lost or stolen smartphones, even when said phone is broadcasting its location, so clearly that's a deficiency in the design.