You don't think that mounting the camera on a point that's going to be constantly moving (I.E., someone's head) for 2 hours doesn't count as making the recording so degraded in some way?
I know, crazy, right? It's not like the FBI is responsible for investigating copyright infringement or anything. Oh, wait. It is. While the situation was completely ridiculous, it did get to the correct party.
We were out of school (middle GA) because the temperatures had gone low enough for the diesel in school buses to gel up. I remember watching it on my couch with a stupid sort of "hey, I don't think it usually does that?" when it blew up.
There's an awful lot of theoretically smart people here who can't seem to figure out that any scheme that requires you to know just about anything at all is not going to be appropriate for the posited memory loss scenario.
I wouldn't expect Customs to apply rules for agricultural products overbroadly to electronic devices. The one situation does not inform the other in this case.
No, rules apply (theoretically, of course!) to everyone in that particular jurisdiction, be they citizens, residents, or just passin' through. Diplomats are a noted official exception.
No, they think they can get less. But giving someone a sticker shock heart attack and then settling for a lower amount is simply negotiation technique.
The problem with The Walking Dead, at least the TV show (never read the comic) is that the writers are lazy and almost everything driving the show is a result of the near-parody level of stupidity typically shown by ALL the survivors. Building fires in the open? Camping out in tents? Not locking, or at least chaining cells of the people who could die from your mentioned virus at any minute and start eating you? Not going around armed at all times? At the end of the day, you simply have to accept that a zombie movie by definition isn't going to exhibit high levels of logic and reality. Hopefully they aren't egregiously bad such that it pulls you out of the story, but that's the risk you run.
It's fairly obvious that those are the percentages of people who said those items were problems. It does not say that they, individually, were the worst problem.
If "they" break down your door, it only proves they don't care that you know. It doesn't mean at all they can't get in your house without breaking down the door.
Slashdot Mirror
Because of Jupiter turning into a sun?
...deserve's got nothin' to do with it.
How do you know the sand on your doorstep is from the Sahara and not some closer sandy area?
You don't think that mounting the camera on a point that's going to be constantly moving (I.E., someone's head) for 2 hours doesn't count as making the recording so degraded in some way?
I know, crazy, right? It's not like the FBI is responsible for investigating copyright infringement or anything. Oh, wait. It is. While the situation was completely ridiculous, it did get to the correct party.
We were out of school (middle GA) because the temperatures had gone low enough for the diesel in school buses to gel up. I remember watching it on my couch with a stupid sort of "hey, I don't think it usually does that?" when it blew up.
There's an awful lot of theoretically smart people here who can't seem to figure out that any scheme that requires you to know just about anything at all is not going to be appropriate for the posited memory loss scenario.
I think he meant THE husband / wife, I.E., dad and mom. You could just ask her when she brings down your sandwich.
I wouldn't expect Customs to apply rules for agricultural products overbroadly to electronic devices. The one situation does not inform the other in this case.
That doesn't appear much to be part of their job, either.
No, rules apply (theoretically, of course!) to everyone in that particular jurisdiction, be they citizens, residents, or just passin' through. Diplomats are a noted official exception.
No, they think they can get less. But giving someone a sticker shock heart attack and then settling for a lower amount is simply negotiation technique.
Look out!
The problem with The Walking Dead, at least the TV show (never read the comic) is that the writers are lazy and almost everything driving the show is a result of the near-parody level of stupidity typically shown by ALL the survivors. Building fires in the open? Camping out in tents? Not locking, or at least chaining cells of the people who could die from your mentioned virus at any minute and start eating you? Not going around armed at all times? At the end of the day, you simply have to accept that a zombie movie by definition isn't going to exhibit high levels of logic and reality. Hopefully they aren't egregiously bad such that it pulls you out of the story, but that's the risk you run.
Hey now!
Water resistant, maybe. If it was waterproof you wouldn't have had to worry about trying to dry it out for almost a week.
It's fairly obvious that those are the percentages of people who said those items were problems. It does not say that they, individually, were the worst problem.
Stormtroopers aren't accurate, they're precise. ;)
No no no, their main weapon is surprise, and fear. You must be new here.
Airmen are different from pilots, and planes are expensive.
That doesn't make any sense, given that:
Currently unarmed, they were primary targets of this attack, and
Typically, people don't like to attack known-armed targets, on account of it's more dangerous. People go after weaker targets.
If "they" break down your door, it only proves they don't care that you know. It doesn't mean at all they can't get in your house without breaking down the door.
So, if you don't like their views, they don't count? Sure does make it easier to "win" an argument I suppose, but it's pretty poor logic.
I'm confused - are you suggesting he looks like Shatner or Montalban?
You need to be a US citizen to have a phone working in the US? Not a non-citizen resident, not a tourist, not a businessman?
Majority US citizens, yes...ONLY? Not even close.