they will have to be veeeery careful. if they lower their prices too much, it could be considered monopolistic. actually, on second thought, i hope they do. i hope they keep screwing up until they get ruled against over and over in court. pretty soon MS will be nothing but a public joke.
nimda? i have two screens full of "Deny from" rules because i get tons of CodeRed hits every day. yes, people are stupid when it comes to watching their stuff. especially ms admins (and i use the word lightly)
we don't even need friggin dns anyways. you'd learn a lot more and have more fun if you just typed in random ip addresses. and it would be even more fun if everyone had a dynamic ip.
if they punish Network Associates for this, it will be a major step in setting a precedence again stupid shrinkwrap EULAs. and if it really happens, i hope they punish Real for doing something something even worse
falcon makes nethack suck. if i've eaten a floating eye corpse and then put on a blindfold, i wouldn't (in falcon) be able to see that a Quantum Mechanic had spawned on the other side of the dungeon. weak dude, real weak.
just because something is weak or stupidly implemented doesn't mean it's ok to take advantage of it. yes, i agree that the makers could have designed the system better, but that's not the point of the trial is it?
i actually read(well, skimmed) the summary judgement paper for the case. the device does circumvent an encryption based routine. the intent of the original manufacturers was to keep criminals from "sniffing" the transmissions, and therefore to keep them from breaking into your garage and stealing your pinto. it's a good thing. making a device that allows anyone to come up to YOUR garage and open it is bad. and although i am against the DMCA, this case will be pretty simple as far as the letter of the law is concerned.
this would be like having a key that doesn't need to fit your actual lock. i doubt anyone would HONESTLY want the general public to have this.
i feel so dirty for agreeing with the prosecutors...so so dirty.
Slashdot Mirror
are you joking? this is a troll you guys.
whoops, i forgot to include a url:
. shtml
http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/absinthe/absinthe
i'd like to see the art of making of absinthe return. someone care to brew me up a batch?
Purchase winter coats I imagine.
clearly it can.
i always wondered what was hiding behind Windows 2000...maybe now we'll know.
it's "lose" not "loose"
fucktard.
p.s. where were you when we needed you "Lose not Loose" ??? WHERE?!?!
well, i spotted "password" in it right away. is that it?
in soviet russia, insightful sentences see YOU!
pee
if you = fail.it then
killall me
end if
they will have to be veeeery careful. if they lower their prices too much, it could be considered monopolistic. actually, on second thought, i hope they do. i hope they keep screwing up until they get ruled against over and over in court. pretty soon MS will be nothing but a public joke.
i dunno, most script trolls identify themselves as such.
hey look guys! it's a case of re-posting an old comment verbatim. so that's how i get a +5 informative!!!
nimda? i have two screens full of "Deny from" rules because i get tons of CodeRed hits every day. yes, people are stupid when it comes to watching their stuff. especially ms admins (and i use the word lightly)
ermm...someone clue me in as to why goatse resolves to above address, but clicking on above address does not goto goatse...
we don't even need friggin dns anyways. you'd learn a lot more and have more fun if you just typed in random ip addresses. and it would be even more fun if everyone had a dynamic ip.
try incorporating http://198.247.175.96 into a limmerick or poem
she probably has them chained up in the basement so they don't become evil pirates.
when are they going to develop a "glory" hole display?
whoops, i hate it when i forget the ending tag
but this is the most compelling evidence for the presence of aliens i've ever come across.
has anyone tried this technique? lemme know.
if they punish Network Associates for this, it will be a major step in setting a precedence again stupid shrinkwrap EULAs. and if it really happens, i hope they punish Real for doing something something even worse
falcon makes nethack suck. if i've eaten a floating eye corpse and then put on a blindfold, i wouldn't (in falcon) be able to see that a Quantum Mechanic had spawned on the other side of the dungeon. weak dude, real weak.
just because something is weak or stupidly implemented doesn't mean it's ok to take advantage of it. yes, i agree that the makers could have designed the system better, but that's not the point of the trial is it?
i actually read(well, skimmed) the summary judgement paper for the case. the device does circumvent an encryption based routine. the intent of the original manufacturers was to keep criminals from "sniffing" the transmissions, and therefore to keep them from breaking into your garage and stealing your pinto. it's a good thing. making a device that allows anyone to come up to YOUR garage and open it is bad. and although i am against the DMCA, this case will be pretty simple as far as the letter of the law is concerned.
this would be like having a key that doesn't need to fit your actual lock. i doubt anyone would HONESTLY want the general public to have this.
i feel so dirty for agreeing with the prosecutors...so so dirty.
whew, i'd hate to see slack become underground.
p.s. no, i'm not being sarcastic