Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: :CueCat, Exercise, Wormage

Slashback tonight brings you updates on the current doings (and name) of J. Jovan Philyaw, the man behind the :CueCat, the alleged worldwide infestation of file-trading computers with an RIAA-sponsored worm (not true, they say), the privacy implications of GeoURL markup, and more. Read on for the details.

When pranksters float your trial balloons for you. ninenet writes "A follow-up on the story posted earlier on Slashdot ... The RIAA has now officially stated that the claims of an elaborate P2P worm are 'a complete hoax.' A story on eWeek quotes an RIAA spokesman as saying, "Someone forwarded the message to us and that was the first we heard or read about it.""

<Location>,<location>,<location > A few days ago, we mentioned the interesting geographic lookup / markup system of GeoURL. Joshua Schachter, the fellow who runs GeoURL (and editor of memepool, to boot), writes with "some responses of mine to comments posted:

Q: "Why not use the WHOIS database for address information?"

A: GeoURL is geographic content markup. Nobody cares where your server is - where are YOU? That said, I'm waiting for someone to hook their GPS into their web page and keep GeoURL updated.

This way different URLs can have different coordinates, as well.

Q: "Blah blah blah blah privacy."

A: If you want privacy, don't put your location on your web page.

Q: "You're evil and you're going to steal this information and go private, just like CDDB did."

A: The content is marked up on the pages and not entered into my database. Anyone could easily write a similar service (and I hope they do.)

I plan to create a page containing lessons learned and useful code snippets for other people who would like to implement similar stuff."

Most importantly, I hope this helps the development of distributed speed-trap logging and mapping!

Making this up would be too easy. An anonymous reader writes "Egomaniacal former Dot.Bomb 'entrepreneur' J. Jovan Philyaw has escaped the asylum and is back with even bigger delusions of grandeur. When last we saw him, J.J. was trying to shove the misbegotten :CueCat/:CRQ combination on unsuspecting users. Now, he's apparently writing a couple of books, selling his 'power crystals' that adorned the offices of Digital:Convergence, and changing his name: his sites refer to him now as J. Hutton Pulitzer. Apparently the utter and complete failure of Digital:Convergence (loss of at least $185M) hasn't dented his ego one bit. In his bio, he actually compares himself to Thomas Edison. A hilarious must-read for those who followed the :CueCat debacle (and for those of us who worked there)."

I hope all these things can be adapted for recumbents. Jamie Briant writes: "Saw your update to the slashdot story on games for exercise bikes. I'm a developer for exertris.com that makes a bike with LCD screen built in, which we sell primarily to gyms, but you can buy in the UK at Harrods. We write and tune the games specifically to motivate you to exercise."

320 comments

  1. CUECAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh, it couldve been awesome if it wasnt meant to track what people bought :(

    refilling/ordering/getting mountain dew every week couldve been so much easier!

    1. Re:CUECAT by cioxx · · Score: 5, Funny

      I got my :CueCat back in 98 I think; came with the issue of Wired Mag. There were some driver issues and it didn't install, so I just threw it in the closet where it still is.

      In fact, here's a picture to prove I was part of the moron revolution.

    2. Re:CUECAT by Salubri · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can remember when the CueCats were distributed by radio shack. When you got it, it was in a plastic bag with a sealed paper envelope saying not to install the software if you did not agree to the terms, which included not reverse engineering. However if you didn't accept the license agreement, with the way it was packaged, you could still use the device as a standard barcode reader. At least this is what a couple friends did.

      --
      ----- I want my LART.
    3. Re:CUECAT by pato+perez · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually it was pretty useful--free barcode reader. I cataloged my entire library with it. I scanned each book and used some software I downloaded that looked up each book's barcode on Amazon, Library of Congress, (or other sites) and added it to a database.

    4. Re:CUECAT by Dan+Crash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I actually think the CueCat would've been a pretty cool idea if they'd sold the thing for $19.95 with some decent software for cataloguing your CDs and other home items. You'd have a permanent list, perfect for insurance companies, finding out product information, etc. Another natural partnership might have been with Webvan or one of the other grocery-delivery companies -- scan a package when you run out and have it added automatically to your next grocery list.

      The idea wasn't stupid, just their marketing and business plan.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    5. Re:CUECAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      /* In fact, here's a picture [66.186.8.206] to prove I was part of the moron revolution. */

      660KB picture, I'll say you're a moron!!

    6. Re:CUECAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


      660KB picture, I'll say you're a moron!!

      Moron doesn't even cover it. He's posting it from a businiess' web server (Pacific Auto Leasing, whatever that is).

    7. Re:CUECAT by mino · · Score: 1
      Another natural partnership might have been with Webvan or one of the other grocery-delivery companies -- scan a package when you run out and have it added automatically to your next grocery list.

      Oddly enough, an Australian current affairs show ran a story on this very topic last night... shopfast.com.au, an Australian online grocery store, is trialling this very thing. It works more or less exactly as you state above. No idea how effective it would be, as long as the interface was useful and easy to correct (no, I want the 1kg package this week, not the 500g), then it's quite a good idea.

      They talk about how easy it is to scan as you throw away the empty packet; however, you probably want to order new toilet paper just BEFORE you use the very last roll up, so you'd need to scan some things before you run out, and then make sure someone else in the house doesn't do the same.

      Still, beats spending forever in a supermarket (which, incidentally, is precisely what would have been happening in my personal circle of hell, had Dante written about me, which thankfully he didn't).

    8. Re:CUECAT by delta407 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I cataloged my entire library with it. I scanned each book and used some software I downloaded that looked up each book's barcode on Amazon, Library of Congress, (or other sites) and added it to a database.
      Coincidentally, I am currently writing software for a private high school, and the current project is to do exactly that -- make a library system that fetches information from a variety of sources and allows access in a flexible way. (Amazon is used for most info, LoC for LCCN, amazon.co.uk for book cover art -- that's already coded.) Further requirements include complex indexing capabilities (allowing 'sounds like' searching) and lots of other things, most of which are at least partially implemented.

      Oh, and guess what? The school made several stops to various Radio Shacks a few years ago and currently has nine CueCats that they plan to use on the library terminals. Nine. They read Code 128 for free, what more could you want?
    9. Re:CUECAT by dvoosten · · Score: 1

      I am actually still using for things like that.
      When I was on holiday in the USA I picked up a couple for some friends and all of us are still happily using them.

      --
      -- Please put this in your sig if you think /. should stop posting NYTimes articles.
    10. Re:CUECAT by lavaboy · · Score: 1

      I'm looking for sw to do this. What did you use?

      --
      Steve -- If you have to call it a system, you don't know what it is.
    11. Re:CUECAT by zurmikopa · · Score: 4, Funny

      I teamed up with a friend of mine and did (very dim) rave-esque lighting with a bunch of them.

      I have pictures... somewhere...

      Ahhh, college years...

    12. Re:CUECAT by xlation · · Score: 1

      I collected a bunch of them from Radio Shack. I never used them as a bar code reader. Instead, I gutted them, installed batteries, and added a switch for a tail and they make a cool red-led flashlight.

      It's not much, but at least I found a use for the things.

    13. Re:CUECAT by Jimbo+God+of+Unix · · Score: 1

      Really, what does everyone really want out of their cuecat? A funtioning, unencrypted barcode wand. Check out http://members.aol.com/cuecatguy/ for instructions on how to make your cuecat into a normal barcode scanner, no drivers needed.

      It's pretty sweet. I'm gong to try it this weekend I think.

      James

    14. Re:CUECAT by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Hell i've run into a few test books (college level) that had those slated :CueCat barcode that say to scan here for more info...i'll bet the publisher is sorry now that the whole :CueCat thing is dead and they have tons of text-books that don't work as planed. :)

  2. haiku by bobtheprophet · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, no more lawsuits
    but instead there will be worms
    From bad to evil.

    --
    Don't give me none of this "nature theme" business.
    1. Re:haiku by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I dunno, worms are pretty natural... oh wait, you meant computer worms, not tapeworms...

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:haiku by itsyourunclebill · · Score: 1

      Talk about 9 lives. The web site is back up at http://www.dcnv.com/. Doesn't do crap, but hey, look what it did before. Things are indeed looking up for re-incarnation. Worms - yeah, some of THEM follow your ass around too.

    3. Re:haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Everywhere I go
      Some lowlife pains my senses
      By writing haikus

      When will these people
      realize that syllables
      aren't interesting

      In a language based
      around small units of words;
      perhaps then, rarely

      But English Haikus
      suck my sweaty purple balls
      Please help stop them now

    4. Re:haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe anyone fell for the "worms" post. DUH. At the very bottom of the post, it talks about how it's a joke. Anyone who thought it was serious for ONE SECOND is a fucking idiotic moron and should put the keyboard down and step away RIGHT NOW.

    5. Re:haiku by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2

      "So, no more lawsuits [slashdot.org]
      but instead there will be worms
      From bad to evil."

      So no more worms
      for those who write them
      go to prison

    6. Re:haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haiku is 5-7-5, not 4-5-3.

    7. Re:haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My GOD! What a fiendishly subtle troll!

    8. Re:haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, thankyou for the friendly encouragement.

  3. Now we're screwed.... by reaper20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Someone forwarded the message to us and that was the first we heard or read about it."

    "Thanks for the idea though!"

    1. Re:Now we're screwed.... by chimpo13 · · Score: 4, Interesting


      So, the RIAA is finding out about stuff p2p? I hope their lawyers sue them.

      Heaven forbid, I check out a band I haven't heard before I buy their CD.

    2. Re:Now we're screwed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to use that excuse. Then I realized I haven't bought a CD in 4 years. So now I just say, oh well, I'm an a-hole, screw em.

  4. Actually, comparing himself to Thomas Edison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Might be apt if you're not a fan of his (and many of us aren't). He did have a way of stealing ideas and claiming them as his own. He was just a really good marketer.

    1. Re:Actually, comparing himself to Thomas Edison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just a fan of Tesla.

    2. Re:Actually, comparing himself to Thomas Edison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. What's up with the name change? by rgarcia · · Score: 5, Funny

    "J. Jovan Philyaw ... his sites refer to him now as J. Hutton Pulitzer.

    Might as well have changed it to Max Power ;)

    --

    I couldn't fail to disagree with you less.

    1. Re:What's up with the name change? by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If he could push the idea of the CueCat as far as it got, blow $185 mil and not lose any sleep over it... maybe he's thinking of becoming a lawyer for the RIAA!

      "Kids, as of this moment, Lionel Hutz no longer exists. Say hello to Miguel Sanchez!"

      Seriously, though. I've got a few of those CueCats. A father of a friend runs a soup kitchen, and I helped hack together a barcoded ID card system to keep track of who visited and how often. Cuecats were perfect because they were free and really easy to write software for!

      Still in service, as far as I know. :)
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:What's up with the name change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use mine to keep my library straight. Scan the barcode and bingo, title, author, year published, and MSRP :)

    3. Re:What's up with the name change? by Otter · · Score: 1
      Might as well have changed it to Max Power ;)

      Awwww, I've been frantically googling for the list of names that Homer requested before the judge gave him the only one he spelled correctly. It's episode AABF09 ("Homer to the Max") but none of the databases have the names.

      Anyone from alt.nerd.obsessive willing to step up to the challenge? I know one was Handsome J. Wonderful, or something like that.

      Speaking of which, I better get out of here if I'm going to watch the 7:30 Simpsons tonight...

    4. Re:What's up with the name change? by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 5, Funny


      Judge: Hmm. "Hercules Rockefeller". "Rembrandt Q. Einstein".
      "Handsome B. Wonderful". Huh, I'm going to give you the only
      name you spelt correctly. From this day forward, your name
      shall be ...
      [cut to a shot of Lisa, reading from a sheet of paper on the
      Simpsons' couch]
      Lisa: "Max Power"?

      Source: http://www.snpp.com/episodes/AABF09. Hope that helped.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    5. Re:What's up with the name change? by mino · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I've been frantically googling for the list of names that Homer requested before the judge gave him the only one he spelled correctly. It's episode AABF09 ("Homer to the Max") but none of the databases have the names.

      snpp.com does...

      Judge: What name would you prefer?
      Homer: Any of these will be fine.
      Judge: Hmm. "Hercules Rockefeller". "Rembrandt Q. Einstein". "Handsome B. Wonderful". Huh, I'm going to give you the only name you spelt correctly. From this day forward, your name shall be ...
      [cut to a shot of Lisa, reading from a sheet of paper on the Simpsons' couch]
      Lisa: "Max Power"?

    6. Re:What's up with the name change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Notice the deliberate conflation of his (new, fake) last name with the quote on the bottom left by Joseph Pulitzer, of Pulitzer Prize fame. I also notice that the cover of his "book" (and I use that term veeeery lightly) has his (new, fake) last name featured in very large type on the cover.

      This guy is beyond pathetic.

    7. Re:What's up with the name change? by sessamoid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Might as well have changed it to Max Power ;)

      Doesn't beat the guy I met yesterday who changed his name to "Big Daddy." No lie.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    8. Re:What's up with the name change? by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

      i would have changed it to tucker max

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    9. Re:What's up with the name change? by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Funny
      A father of a friend runs a soup kitchen, and I helped hack together a barcoded ID card system to keep track of who visited and how often.

      Cool--it's like a library card for food!

      Actually, the first time I read the post, I missed the phrase "barcoded ID card"--I wondered whether you had to have someone hold the homeless folks down while you tattooed them with a barcode, or if you just slipped a tranquilizer into their soup.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    10. Re:What's up with the name change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He sounds more like a Hooty McBoob. :-)

    11. Re: What's up with the name change? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1, Funny


      > Cool--it's like a library card for food!

      Except that they don't want you to bring stuff back when you're through eating it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    12. Re:What's up with the name change? by Theaetetus · · Score: 5, Funny
      Doesn't beat the guy I met yesterday who changed his name to "Big Daddy." No lie.

      But nothing beats this guy.
      Love-22 is a street performer in Key West, who legally changed his name, and prints up his own 22-dollar bills, which have been used (mostly at backwoods convenience stores and gas stations) for currency more than 500 times in the past 22 years.

      I met this guy once... Looooooooooopy!

      -T

    13. Re:What's up with the name change? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      when someone commented 'hey, great/cool name'. homers response was 'thanks. i got it from a hairdryer.'

      that had me on the floor when i first saw it.

    14. Re:What's up with the name change? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

      I had a substitute teacher in 8th grade whose name was "Everlasting Omnipotent Peace" E.O. Peace. The drugs in the 70s must have been damn good...

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    15. Re:What's up with the name change? by Grab · · Score: 2

      Tell you what, if I changed my name, I'd pick a first name I wanted to use! ;-) You can imagine the scene:-

      Bridgekeeper: "What is your name?"

      JHP: "Er, Jerkoff Hutton Pulitzer. No! wait! "

      Grab.

      (PS. Apologies to non-Monty Python fans.

    16. Re:What's up with the name change? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok... Big Daddy... big whoop...

      My own story: I work retail. So, one day this guy comes in and buys a few things. Pulls out his credit card to pay. I have him sign the slip, and when I look at the signature, it looks for all the world like a smiling mushroom. I do a double-take and ask for his ID. He shows me his driver's license, with the name "mushroom [last name redacted]" on it, and again, the smiling mushroom for the signature. I had no reason to do otherwise at that point, so I accepted it. Turned out it was legit... never came back bad, and he came in a couple more times in the following months. I was truly amazed.

    17. Re:What's up with the name change? by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

      Or, for that matter, Hugh G. Rection...

    18. Re:What's up with the name change? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      A father of a friend runs a soup kitchen, and I helped hack together a barcoded ID card system to keep track of who visited and how often.

      How did you barcode the indigents?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    19. Re:What's up with the name change? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      OK. Mod the parent as redundant. Didn't see the other post.

      Seriously though, I've worked with programs that deal with the poor and getting most of them to keep track of an ID card is nigh on to impossible. There are those who are poor because of temporary circumstances, but they usually don't stay too long as they figure out a way to get back into the labor pool. They're the ones who can produce a card every time they show up. The folks who stay on the dole year after year seem to be the same ones who can't be bothered with keeping track of, or at least producing, an ID card. I know that there are many poor who are mentally ill, but I'm talking about the ones who just plain don't care.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    20. Re:What's up with the name change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundant? Blah. He was one minute later...

    21. Re:What's up with the name change? by jalex9 · · Score: 1

      I went to college with a guy who changed his name to Geoff FortyTwo. He decided on 42 partly because he wanted unusual but easy to spell, and that whole HHGttG thing. You should have seen his face when I said "sure F-O-U-R-T-Y T-W-O, thats easy" just to kid him.

  6. the bio by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Don't bother clicking, y'all. This bozo doesn't deserve the notoriety that a good Slashdotting would bring. Here's the funniest part, smart quotes endumbened but all typos left intact. Just look upon his works, ye mighty, and despair:
    Who Is J. Hutton Pulitzer?

    J. Hutton Pulitzer is one of the most prolific independent Inventors of modern times and of the new millennium. His obvious "Invention and Passion Gene" seems to date back to his Royal German Ancestry as early as 1492 in the development of what is now modern Germany. Known for being "ahead of his time" in vision, thought and product development. J. Hutton has created many "first". One notable being the first syndicated television program in the world to combine simultaneous broadcast via Television, Radio and the Internet. His highly rated, award winning and acclaimed program, Net Talk Live!, which broadcast a record 245 original episodes, created a network of over 700 TV stations (ABC, NBC, FOX, CBS, WB and many Independent stations) and 200 radio stations-- Coast To Coast! In a format that is now copied by all the major networks, J. Hutton's show was broadcast to over 1.5 million TV homes worldwide on cable and broadcast television. His creation paved the way to the integration of various broadcast mediums around one syndicated theme. A sought after public speaker and industry trade writer, J. Hutton Pulitzer has presented his teachings to audiences as large as 45,000 and he has been guest lecturer and featured speaker/panelist at such prestigious educational institutions as Harvard Business School, Stanford University, The Cato Institute, University of Michigan, University of Texas, The C.E.O.'s Roundtable and corporations such as American Airlines, Radio Shack, Microsoft, NBC, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns and many others.
    I weep for the Republic.
    --

    I write in my journal
    1. Re:the bio by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hey, if you're going to quote and tell people not to read, you've got to include:
      His inventions have won numerous industry awards and accolades, chiefly due to the fact that J. Hutton Pulitzer's inventions and ideas were adopted by the American consumer at a rate that outpaced the combined first year growth of cell phones, pagers, personal computers, hand held computers and total Internet users in just the first 90 days of its heralded release.

      And here I thought all the whackjobs were Tesla fans. (Tesla the inventor, I mean, not the Canadian hair metal band.)

    2. Re:the bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look upon his works, ye mighty, and despair

      I've been looking for the source of this quote for a good long time. Where is it from???

    3. Re:the bio by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I saw that, too. I'd like to know who considers giving the damn things away to everybody who subscribes to Wired and-- what was the other one? Fortune? Popular Science? Something or other.

      Shit, dude, if I give away my inventions, can I achieve "unprecedented market saturation" too?

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:the bio by psamuels · · Score: 2, Funny
      Here's the funniest part, smart quotes endumbened but all typos left intact.

      "Endumbened". I'll have to remember that one. The correct term, I believe, is "demoronised - but I like yours too.

      Just look upon his works, ye mighty, and despair:

      Heh. There's definitely something pompous about using a first initial and middle name. Particularly if the first initial is J. Odd.

      I wonder if J in this case is short for Jabba the.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    5. Re:the bio by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 3, Informative

      I met a traveler from an antique land
      Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
      Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
      Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
      And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
      Tell that its sculptor well those passions read,
      Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
      The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed,
      And on the pedestal these words appear:
      "My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
      Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
      Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
      Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
      The lone and level sands stretch far away.

      -- Ozymandias, Percy Bysshe Shelly

      --

      I write in my journal
    6. Re:the bio by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      Hehe.. University of Texas..

      - Proudest Member of the Fightin' Texas Aggies Class of 2006

    7. Re:the bio by erc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      J. who? Did you notice that nowhere on the site does it list *anything* he's done, just lists of "awards" and such. Awards for what? If I had invented the internet or any such thing, I'd be hollering about it to high heaven on my web site ... oh, wait a minute, Al Gore already beat me to it!

      Smells like BS to me...

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    8. Re:the bio by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Here's my favorite part:
      J. Hutton Pulitzer's inventions and ideas were adopted by the American consumer at a rate that outpaced the combined first year growth of cell phones, pagers, personal computers, hand held computers and total Internet users in just the first 90 days of its heralded release.

      I'm not even sure what it means.

    9. Re:the bio by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      It means that he gave out lots and lots of copies with magazines (such as Wired) for free to anyone whether they wanted them or not.

    10. Re:the bio by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting
      J. Hutton Pulitzer is one of the most prolific independent Inventors of modern times and of the new millennium. His obvious "Invention and Passion Gene" seems to date back to his Royal German Ancestry as early as 1492

      Hey, my ancestry goes back to 1942, on both sides of my family. So for that matter does anyone's the only difference is whether you know who it was or not. 1492 is not all that far back either, my ancestors fought at the battle of Hastings (both sides) in 1066 but there are folk whose pedigrees go back to whatever date you argue for the Yellow Emperor of China.

      Of course it is all bollocks since genealogy tends to follow the male line and in practice it is only the female line whose accuracy can be assured. Adultery is not a modern invention, no matter who you are between 5% and 10% of your ancestors were bastards. If the gap between generations is 25 years that makes 20 generations since 1492, meaning that Pulitzer's chance of being legitimately descended from the royal family at no better than 35% with 12% being a more likely value.

      speaker/panelist at such prestigious educational institutions as Harvard Business School, Stanford University, The Cato Institute, University of Michigan, University of Texas,

      You have got to be pretty desperate if you end up putting the Cato Institute down on your speaking resume. Bit insensitive to put crank tank financed by rich rightwing crackpots to promote partisan views ahead of Michigan and Texas Universities though.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    11. Re:the bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, my ancestry goes back to 1942

      Why are you talking about this?

      Bit insensitive to put crank tank financed by rich rightwing crackpots to promote partisan views ahead of Michigan and Texas Universities though.

      Oh, I see. Sorry. I didn't realize you were a fucking moron. Hope that clears up soon.

    12. Re:the bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means he's counting all the people who took home CueCats as dog toys - like my mom, who wanted me to paint it Aibo Pink and have my Aibo chase it

    13. Re:the bio by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 2

      That's one of my personal freakouts: I mod ANYBODY down who uses a leading-initial name. I also use the first initial in conversation. "Hi, J. How are you?" If you want to use the first name, use it. If you want to go by your middle name, fine (unless I can pin an apt nym on your hairy arse). Initial + middle name == pretentious horseshit.

      Also - whassup with middle initial users? I used to tweak a girlfriend by refering to brit actor Richard Grant without his middle name (E). I don't care what author Brett Ellis' middle name is. Piss off!

    14. Re: the bio by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > > speaker/panelist at such prestigious educational institutions as Harvard Business School, Stanford University, The Cato Institute, University of Michigan, University of Texas,

      > Bit insensitive to put crank tank financed by rich rightwing crackpots to promote partisan views ahead of Michigan and Texas Universities though.

      Oh -- for a moment I thought you were going to say "at the end of the list".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    15. Re:the bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have some unresolved issues, Jimmy Geek.

    16. Re:the bio by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2

      Respect for the Shelley reference :)

    17. Re:the bio by DancingSword · · Score: 1

      I use the first-initial, second-name pattern, not merely with one of my online-accounts, but with one of my bank-accounts, even, because I'm in the process of switching from being commonly-known-as my first-name to being commonly-known-as my second-name.

      Period.

      It takes time to get everything sorted-out, and everyone-one-deals-with adjusted, and fucking-up a name-change means sabotaging one's ID, for one thing ( possibly also property/business/will-ownership ), so I'm doing it as gradually as necessary.

      Actors have to have unique name-identifiers ( within their union ), because their primary 'buzz-inducing' strength is their name, so when Michael Fox ( the guy who's now hammered by parkinson's ) went to join the actors' union, he got told that 'Michael Fox' was taken, so he changed it to 'Michael J. Fox', even though he hasn't a middle-J-name to justify it ( IIRC ). His choice was: do that or non-work.

      Also, anyone who's had their name become part of an abuse-(self)identity ( Ohhh, look at molested/worthless/whatever-little-Chris... ), has to change the name-they're-known-by in order to get leverage in undoing shoved-in negation/worth-suppression from their unconscious mind, ... or they aren't going to get past the unconscious limitation-of-their-worth ( this I concretely know from experience ) to become a whole, operational, autonomous-worth person and full-human.

      --
      Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
    18. Re:the bio by beowulfcluster · · Score: 0

      The hair metal band are(were) from California.
      (This is obivously a massively important fact in the context of this thread and this glaring inaccuracy cannot be left uncorrected. Canada may have had Bryan Adams but their hair metal was inferior and they all seemed to want to be from L.A instead of Canada, exemplified by lyrics like "Have you heard the news today, the kids are all shakin' in the USA" by Helix. Surely a Candian band should be singing about kids shakin' in Ottawa? NOTE: I'm not from the USA or Canada)

    19. Re:the bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D. Sword? I can see how you could get bored of getting called Dancing. "Hey Dance!"

      A. Coward

  7. Why are we even giving cuecat joker publicity ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    No such thing as bad publicity right ?

    Crystals ? next we will be having weird sects on global TV claiming they have cloned babies....
    oh wait....nevermind

  8. on excercising games by lingqi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So... besides the tried and true DanceDanceRevolution (and all its spinoffs - the korean versions seems the hardest so far), there are many others nowadays. (and have been)

    For those who complains that there is insufficient stuff for your hands to do because "nobody dances like that", there is also ParaParaParadise or somesuch that focuses on the hands. If you follow *exactly* what the person do onscreen, it actually gets pretty fancy.

    Moreover, in Japan I have seen some boxing games where you would put on a pair of gloves and hit targets as they come up; at least one of them is themed after "Fist of the Northern Star." Also gives you quite a cardiovascular workout after a while.

    Then we have the horse-riding ones... While looking silly, those gets tiring!

    Another "all the rage" game is a drumming one. The Playstation version is not so tiring, but in the arcade with big drums and relatively heavy sticks, they can get interesting mighty quick (since for fast tracks you have to accelerate a fairly massy stick to the drum at high frequency).

    In ESPN-zone in downtown Chicago, there is also a rock-climbing thingy. Nobody can afford one on their own, but that's probably the most physically engaging "game" I have ever played.

    so... no reason to stick just to the bikes, y'all.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:on excercising games by mmol_6453 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I play DDR some (my brother has it), and I can say, it's not "tried and true." It requires way too much coordination for me to be much interested in it, and for people looking for something to get them started on an exercise program, well, the more overweight you are, the more uncomfortable "Have You Never Been Mello" becomes after your third round.

      I don't mind anaerobic exercise, which is what you get if you do something for an extended duration, like jog, or ride a bike.

      I like the concept of immersing a game into a bike. I'm thinking about putting rotary encoders on my bike's handlebars and pedals, and mounting it to a frame. I should be able to rig up some box that translates the signals into something the Linux kernel joystick drivers can use. Maybe I can set up Need For Speed III under Wine. :P As long as I'm not thinking about the exercise portion, I'd absolutely love it.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    2. Re:on excercising games by Dialithis · · Score: 1

      No, thats aerobic excercise. As is DDR, unless you're doing the equivalent of sprinting, which I have yet to see.

    3. Re:on excercising games by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just so you know what's in the US too, I recently went to our local Scandia (crappy arcade franchise).

      They've got some super-ultra-whatever DanceDanceRevolution. Dunno where it's from. I don't speak furrin.

      They've got ParaParaParadise

      They've got some boxing game (not Fist of the Northern Star. I wish.)

      No drumming.

      And like ten different (lame) alternative-input device games. I guess arcades realized that the only way to make someone pay $1 for a game was to make it something that you couldn't do on your PS2 - which has to be more than just a bigger CPU now... so *everything* is six feet wide, features a chair, and makes you look like a dumbass.

      There was some river rafting game where the whole point was to paddle as fast as possible to avoid some whirlpool... then steer to the next whirlpool. Fun to watch fat kids sweat.

      There was some motion-capture golf game. No stick. You swing your hands as if you were holding a golf club. Seems like that'd be impossible without tactile feedback.

      My favorite will always be the shooters. I try to get my exercise... uh... with my girlfriend.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:on excercising games by Stonent1 · · Score: 2

      Fun to watch fat kids sweat.

      tmi TMI!!!

    5. Re:on excercising games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fist of the Northern Star"
      A boxing game? If this game involved you shoving your fingers into people's heads and then watching them explode, then it was Fist of the North Star; anything else would be a mockery.

    6. Re:on excercising games by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      All I remember from HS gym was that with the aerobic exercise, we'd run for a five minutes, rest for four, run for three, rest for two. There'd be two groups, while one was running, the other was resting.

      I found the straight 15-minute run a lot less painful.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    7. Re:on excercising games by Cutriss · · Score: 4, Informative

      The boxing game you speak of is called Mo-Cap Boxing, and it's produced by Konami, the same company that brings us Dance Dance Revolution, Para Para Paradise, DrumMania and Percussion Freaks (the drumming game you mention), and a wide variety of other motion-sensor and music-based games. Their Bemani division produces all of these (except for Police 911 and Mo-Cap Boxing).

      The Korean knock-off is called Pump It Up, and it's produced by Andamiro. It is more difficult, but in my opinion it's not as fun as DDR. The song selection isn't very good. Another Korean knock-off, Techno Motion, basically builds off the Andamiro formula, which says "More arrows *must* mean more fun!" There's also Stepping Selection, by Jaleco, which is the system that is the basis for Britney's Dance Beat. That's a pretty loathsome game there.

      Para Para Paradise, for the uninformed, uses five vertically positioned infrared beams placed in a pentagon shape around you. Similarly to DDR, you follow the arrows on the screen and break the light beams at the appropriate time. You don't have to use your feet, unlike DDR - Any body part will do. The orientation of the arrows makes it so that you have to rotate and twist more often, frequently making upper-body motions more efficient and viable. It's named Para Para Paradise because the motions you perform in the game are similar to a type of Japanese karaoke bar dancing called "parapara".

      For a good combination of both DDR and Para Para Paradise, try DanceManiax/Dance Freaks. These games have sensors on the front of the machine which you can place your hands/arms/knees/whatever over or under, and foot panels on the bottom similar to DDR.

      Bemani makes a lot of other good stuff too (Like Beatmania!), but it's not exercise-oriented, and so I won't mention it here. For anyone interested in Bemani products, take a look at BemaniStyle.com and DDRFreak.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    8. Re:on excercising games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VR exercise bike is nothing new.... but low(er) cost ones would be good.

      For a top of the line example see :

      http://www.sgn.com/invent/shelves/health/bike_00 1. html

      a mere snip at $28,000 USD.

    9. Re:on excercising games by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

      Konami UK also has a fitness division, to cater for the burgeoning home fitness market (or so they say. I'd link, but their site unfortunately seems to be down at the moment). Konami Sports in Japan operates three brand-name fitness clubs.

      I adore Konami's willingness to stretch the idea of the video game interface. Their kooky-arse custom cabinets make my arcade visits worthwhile. :D Even games like Police 24/7 (Keisatsukan) give you a hell of a workout because you're always moving and engaging with the game in an active way.

    10. Re:on excercising games by extra88 · · Score: 2

      They're both "aerobic exercise." The first might be called "aerobic training" because running all out (or biking) then resting a little, the running again is supposed to make you better at aerobic exercise, more so than running at a steady pace. Exercise equipment like treadmills, stairmasters, and stationary bikes all have a setting to do such a "peaks and valleys" workout.

    11. Re:on excercising games by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      Hm. My gym and biology teachers told me that constant-effort exercise was anaerobic, which meant my muscles changed the manner in which they generated and used energy. As a byproduct, I was told it produces an acid. (Been trying for a few days to remember what the name of it was, though.)

      I'll have to ask my uncle; he's a Doc. :)

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    12. Re:on excercising games by extra88 · · Score: 2
      I think you're mis-remembering. Check out this link which does a decent job of explaining the difference between aerobic and anaerobic exercise. Here's the most relevant part of the page:

      • Anaerobic endurance refers to short term endurance capacity which relies mainly on anaerobic energy pathways.

        • Simplistically, anaerobic endurance is of such a short duration that oxygen from the lungs does not have time to reach the muscles.

        • Anaerobic exercise is essential for strength building & muscle gain.

        • Normally, short, intensive activities lasting less than 60 seconds, might be though of as "anaerobic,"

        • Also, longer activities which are intermittent (i.e., boxing, football, etc.) are also thought of as "anaerobic," since they consist of repeated high-intensity bouts of activity.

      • Aerobic endurance, on the other hand, refers to longer-term activities which rely primarily on the oxidative energy pathway.

        • Simplistically, aerobic endurance is of long duration & relies mainly on oxygen from the lungs

        • Aerobic Exercise is essential for weight loss, cardio vascular fitness and body-shaping.

        • Longer, less intensive work is thought of as "aerobic."

    13. Re:on excercising games by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      The first might be called "aerobic training" because running all out (or biking) then resting a little, the running again is supposed to make you better at aerobic exercise, more so than running at a steady pace.

      Actually, that is known as High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and has been shown in several studies to increase metabolism for prolonged periods of time (longer than the period of exercise). You are correct about both being aerobic though.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    14. Re:on excercising games by extra88 · · Score: 2
      Actually, that is known as High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)

      Yeah, but that's too long to fit on a button ;-)

    15. Re:on excercising games by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Actually, the descriptions of the way the exercises are done here are inadequate. Short bursts of sprinting intermingled with short bursts of jogging would still be considered aerobic. An aerobic workout doesn't have to last as long as an anaerobic workout. Although an anaerobic workout may last longer, the individual exercises are usually shorter in duration.

      A simpler definition would be that aerobic exercises cause an accelerated heart rate for an extended period of time along with increased respiration. Anaerobic may elevate the heart rate somewhat but the accelerated breathing and pulse rate are nowhere near the aerobic levels.

      Basketball and soccer also consist of repeated high-intensity bouts of activity and are aerobic in nature. The difference between those sports and boxing or football is the nature of the activity, not its intensity. With the latter two you are adding a greater amount of upper body resistance in blocking, tackling, punching and resisting during clinches. Some of these things exist in other sports but to a lesser degree (except maybe with hockey....).

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    16. Re:on excercising games by ShadeEagle · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite is "Mocap Boxing".

      This is one where you put on two rubber "boxing gloves" and punch and dodge.

      That's right - DODGE. Machine reads the position of your head and shoulders. If you've seen Police 911 (Police 24/7) it's the same sensor overhead.

      Although nothing beats a workout like trying to pass MAX300 on Heavy. Crezzy man, crezzy.

  9. spoken like a true american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    only a wacko like him would be an American right ?
    i guess thats what happens when you have a nations children reared on drugs

    expect more to come

    1. Re:spoken like a true american by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're an idiot, Ritalin and Adderall are the SHIT. Like speed with none of the horrible back-aches. As for this fucker, I'd say he sounds horrifyingly like L. Ron.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:spoken like a true american by dickens · · Score: 1

      Dipshit. Adderal is just a timed-release mixture of three amphetamine salts. It *is* speed. But I must admit it helped my kid more than the Ritalin. I did have to be dragged kicking and screaming into agreeing with this, though.

    3. Re:spoken like a true american by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Elrond?

      Chris

  10. GEOUrl by zangdesign · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For all you paranoid types out there, this GEOUrl thing is remarkably easy to defeat

    1. don't participate - it ain't mandatory, so you have no reason to bitch.
    2. lie - hell, it could even help. make it look like you live someplace glamorous rather than in the basement of your parent's house in Poughkeepsie.

    I fail to see a problem here.

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    1. Re:GEOUrl by bahwi · · Score: 2

      Wow! CmdrTaco's been hanging out at the Playboy Mansion again!

    2. Re:GEOUrl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poughkeepsie isn't glamorous? You must be thinking of the one in PA and not NY

    3. Re:GEOUrl by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Po-town (as we affectionately call it) is a slum. Yeah it has the civic-center, IBM, the mall (the place for winter jobs for poor college students) and some other cool places but goddamn it if a good chunk of it is just a big getto. Don't get me wrong, I love poughkeepsie been in this area most of my life but its still shitty :). Now if you're comparing it to Newburgh then I could see it being called glamorous...

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    4. Re:GEOUrl by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      2. lie - hell, it could even help. make it look like you live someplace glamorous rather than in the basement of your parent's house in Poughkeepsie.

      What was the address of that spammer dude again?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  11. Gobbles by Lurgen · · Score: 1

    Gobbles does have a slight tendancy to exagerate... still, despite his poor grasp of the English language, he's managed to release some fairly amazing exploit code in the past. 95% is probably a tad high, but 5% wouldn't surprise me at all (and given the number of peer-to-peer hosts out there, 5% is a frighteningly large number of users).

    1. Re:Gobbles by meringuoid · · Score: 2

      Gobbles?

      He's the retarded turkey, right? Timmy!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Gobbles by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Gobbles is the N'Sync of the security world.

    3. Re:Gobbles by Korgan · · Score: 2, Informative
      He's the retarded turkey, right?

      Actually, Gobbles Security are one of the most active, and largest, exploit groups hanging around the "Security" field at the moment. They have a knack for Pissing off Theo DeRaadt.

      You can see the posting to bugtraq from them on the SecurityFocus website.

      http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/306476
    4. Re:Gobbles by Rubik+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      GOBBLES is a team of 17 (at the last count) people. Their advisory makes a very important point that foundstone and microsoft miss. There are already known buffer overflows in winamp, m$ media player, and other players, but the respective advisories talk of receiving a media file either from a web page or email attachment. Most users I suspect get more media files via p2p sharing than from web pages or email.

      This is an infection vector that security "experts" are not taking sufficiently seriously.

    5. Re:Gobbles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a knack for Pissing off Theo DeRaadt.

      Premature baldness pisses him off. Sunspots piss him off. I'm willing to bet the exact pattern of micrometeoroid impacts on Voyager 1 pisses him off, too.

    6. Re:Gobbles by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      actually i would have said gobbles is the marilyn manson of the security world. he is alot more imature than nsync.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  12. "impressive" by xeno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shame on you; how can you call him a bozo? Judging by his many "achievements," Mr. Pulitzer deserves the "respect" of the technical and "business" communities alike. His many "inventions" and "first" (such as the supraliminal barcode) have clearly been to the benefit of all humankind. And who could question the genius of a man who has leveraged his "obvious" "Invention and Passion Gene" to record 245 episodes of a show with an ! in the name.

    Royal German Ancestry meine Hinterteile.

    -J

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
    1. Re:"impressive" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't know that he also invented the center tag, and has the "passion" to use it.

  13. excercise by BinaryGrind · · Score: 3, Funny

    "We write and tune the games specifically to motivate you to exercise." what ever happend to the whip?

    --
    Life is like a jar of jalapeños, what you do today may burn your ass tomorrow.
  14. Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by glenebob · · Score: 2

    So how exactly do we know that Philyaw is Pulitzer? Nothing I saw jumped out at me as a firm connection. Same with the crystals; where is the connection? They could be for sale by GW for all we know.

    The Pulitzer site claims the company has been around since 1988. And the story was posted by an AC. Hmmm. I smell bullshit. Problem is I can't tell where the smell is coming from. Anyone else?

    1. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by XO · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure it is bullshit. I see no connection, except for some possible inference that someone drew from the "products being accepted at a rate within 90 days than within the first year of handheld pc's, cell phones, internet access", etc. Of course.. no one had handheld pc's cell phones or internet access when they first came out. duh.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    2. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      From the Digital:Convergence website:
      Prior to founding Digital:Convergence, Jovan was host and executive producer of " Net Talk Live!," an international radio and television show broadcast live over the Internet. Begun in 1995 under Jovan's guidance, the show now reaches an audience of millions around the world.
      From the J. Hutton website:
      J. Hutton has created many "first". One notable being the first syndicated television program in the world to combine simultaneous broadcast via Television, Radio and the Internet. His highly rated, award winning and acclaimed program, Net Talk Live!, which broadcast a record 245 original episodes, created a network of over 700 TV stations
    3. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a damn good question. Here's some evidence that I found:

      The J. Hutton Pulitzer site mentions that he is the creator of Net Talk Live!. At the digital convergence site describing J. Jovan Philyaw, http://www.digitalconvergence.com/about/jovan_phil yaw.html, it is also mentioned Philyaw is the creator of the show Net Talk Live!

      As for the crystals, take a look at the email address provided on the auction.

    4. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by cjunky · · Score: 1

      His picture. That is Jovan. He has this forehead that would blind the studio audience during filmings (and his computer people like me). The whole page reads the way he thinks of himself (after several years, I hope I would know that).

      -Former NTL/DC Network Admin

    5. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well his whois does list his email address as emailjovan@yahoo.com, so who knows.

      If it is, I wonder if he's still looking for a German coin from the 1500's.

    6. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by s20451 · · Score: 2

      Problem is I can't tell where the smell is coming from.

      Damn it Jim, that's my sphincter, not a jelly donut!!!

      Problem solved.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    7. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by endquote · · Score: 1
      Well I don't know how strong this is but if you look at the mailing address from the Crystal site you'll see that it's:

      Providence Towers
      5001 Spring Valley Road
      Suite 400 East
      US

      Which while an incomplete address does match the address given on http://vertuDC.com/ which shows Jovan Hutton Pulitzer as Chairman and CEO... and is the same address as given on http://www.jhuttonpulitzer.com/

      So at the very least there is some reason to believe they are connected... unless of course one is a fake.

    8. Re:Philyaw: wheres the evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of this does not surprise me one bit. That guy is a freak!

      - Old NTL/DC lacky ~Mrspunky

  15. Any more still out there? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got a few of those CueCats

    A few? I went into a Radio Shack recently and asked if they still had any cue cats left. I was working on a project idea. They came back with a box of about twenty of them with a requirement that if I want them, I have to take a box of about 30 special TV cables (another DC flop) with them or else it's no deal.

    So I loaded up the back seat with the stuff. Now after spaying a few for use on my home PCs, I still got the rest of them in my basement.

    hehe.... maybe I ought to hold on to them till they become popular on eBay :)

    1. Re:Any more still out there? by bergeron76 · · Score: 2

      Too late:

      http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?cgiurl= ht tp%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.com%2Fws%2F&krd=1&from=R8&MfcI SAPICommand=GetResult&ht=1&SortProperty=MetaEndSor t&query=cuecat

      I'm going to hold on to mine, just for the usability factor. I'm sure I'll find _something_ to do with it. Hell, now that Fritz Ganter has released: Batchelor, I'll probably just end up using it to replace my non-existent girlfriend.

      Now if only it could cook... :)

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:Any more still out there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be a few left somewhere but the last time I asked they were out back with hammers making sure that the little beasties didn't fall into the wrong hands. Sorta neat about the "you got questions we got blank stares" outfit. Got took in on the idea, built the things, distributed them, them spent money destroying a lot of them. This guy must have pictures of somebody helping a sheep over the fence.......Probably got more from the sound of things.

    3. Re:Any more still out there? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      How about this poor soul that appears to have bought an unmodified CueCat on eBay for $26.00

      Good marketing job on the part of the seller.

    4. Re:Any more still out there? by whimmel · · Score: 1

      I use mine as an under-desk flashlight. Since the mouse is USB, I plug it into the spare PS/2 port.

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    5. Re:Any more still out there? by BlueMonk · · Score: 1

      Does your project by any chance resemble this CueCat decoder?

    6. Re:Any more still out there? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      No. I just wanted to use the pass through adapter on the CueCat cable to build the Zaurus power supply hack on the link listed below. It works great on most iPaq handhelds, too.

  16. Sue 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the RIAA sues Gobbles for libel. I think they'd have a pretty strong case. They need to learn a lesson about damaging the reputations of others, especially since the post did not have any clearly obvious tipoffs that would make it very clear to the majority of readers that it was a joke. (Assuming the RIAA's reputation is capable of being damaged any further. LOL.)

  17. Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go read about your hero... assuming you can read. Edison was a brilliant marketeer, but a piss-poor pseudo-scientist who blundered into most of his "inventions" by sheer dumb luck when he didn't steal them outright. He lived by patents, and had a stable of lawyers file for patents everywhere patents were obtainable. Tesla had gas-discharge lighting in his labs years before Lamb invented incandescent electric lights (two years before Edison). Edison thought alternating current was an abomination (he had no clue how it worked) and tried to push DC generation... ooh, a generator on every city block, great idea. Lucky for all of us that he fired Tesla, and that Tesla hooked up with George Westinghouse. Had Edison been a scientist, he would have done something besides patent the "edison effect" and not left the invention of the vacuum tube to DeForest. And on and on... Edison was a jerk, a joke, and the original abuser of IP patents. What a guy.

    1. Re:Edison was a jerk by Dudio · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the electric hammer. Everybody knows Edison only got credit for that because Homer left it behind in the museum.

    2. Re:Edison was a jerk by rossifer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm sorry moderators, but the posting calling Edison a jerk is right on the money.

      He was on the wrong side of developing just about every technological idea that his name is attached to. He was one of the first to develop the phonograph, but insisted on tubes instead of disks, no matter what the market said. Edison did not invent the incandescent light bulb, he refined the gas and filament for longer life. Etc.

      Just because you haven't heard this before or it deflates one of your personal sacred cows doesn't make it flamebait. American history texts in high school are so far off on every other topic, I'm amazed that they spelled Edison's name right.

      Edison's real genius was in securing IP and marketing his IP so that others would license it. He was doing that years before that became a high tech business plan for us to discuss on /.

      Regards,
      Ross

    3. Re:Edison was a jerk by Trogre · · Score: 3

      I don't totally disbelieve what you are saying, but it would help many ill-informed people if you would please state your source for this information.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Edison was a jerk by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Informative
      Just because you haven't heard this before or it deflates one of your personal sacred cows doesn't make it flamebait. American history texts in high school are so far off on every other topic

      Edison did what every other inventor has done, made improvements on other ideas and combined ideas to create new inventions.

      The American high school textbook hagiographies of Edison are easily explained by the role of school boards in choosing text books. Better not have anything in there that might upset a board member, no matter how loony. So don't tell the kids that the war of 1812 was about invading Canada and that the US lost, oh no it was about Britain impressing alleged US citizens and ended in a draw. When it comes to the civil war pretend that the South was unjustly attacked by the North, forget about the fact that the war was started by the South and was all about extending slavery to Texas and the Californias.

      Just about every country has ludicrously biased school textbooks. The British ones are pretty hilarious, victory after victory against the French until the loss of Calais appears in a footnote. The German textbooks are reasonably accurate - they were written by the Allied powers.

      Edison did some amazing stuff. He also did some pretty nasty and spiteful stuff, like opposing AC current and trashing Tessla to promote his own scheme. Edison invented the electric chair as part of his marketting campaign for DC - the chair used AC.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    5. Re:Edison was a jerk by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Try the internet. Google around, it's dead easy to verify this stuff.

    6. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I'm sorry moderators, but the posting calling Edison a jerk is right on the money."

      Somewhere between what one side believes and what the other side believes lies the truth. You're both right and you're both wrong. I sincerely hope nobody's making decisions based on what you guys are saying today until they've gotten some more objective info.

    7. Re:Edison was a jerk by dcmeserve · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Edison invented the electric chair as part of his marketting campaign for DC - the chair used AC.

      And it really backfired -- the execution went so horribly, disgustingly wrong that people thought "well, if it's *that* hard to kill someone with AC on *purpose*, I guess it doesn't seem so dangerous to have it in my home."

      And so AC took off.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    8. Re:Edison was a jerk by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, I know this isn't much help but the History Channel had a nice biography on him. He was a real asshole. If you wanted to work for him you had to sign away all your rights to any patents you develop to him. How do you think he "invented" all that stuff? Hundreds of inventors came to work for him and he ended up patenting THEIR work. Sounds like what the RIAA does today for music artists. He also had a stranglehold on the early motion picture and music industries single handedly. He dictated what could and could not be recorded depending on his personal taste. Oh yea, let's not forget he was almost completely deaf at the time he was doing this. ;-) We see Edison through rose colored glasses as some great inventor the same way kids will see Bill Gates as a great innovator 100 years from now. "Wow, that's the guy who created the computer operating system and made everything friendly right?"

    9. Re:Edison was a jerk by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm sorry moderators, but the posting calling Edison a jerk is right on the money. He was on the wrong side of developing just about every technological idea that his name is attached to. He was one of the first to develop the phonograph, but insisted on tubes instead of disks, no matter what the market said.

      In Britain ordinary household lightbulbs have a bayonet attachment. You just shove it in and give it a little twist and it's in. American style bulbs where you have to fiddle with the proper placement to get the screw threads lined up just right, then back off, and try again are called "Edison Style." Yet another item he was on the wrong side of, it's just that in the UK they took the other path whereas we in America are still stuck with the stupid Edison idea.

    10. Re:Edison was a jerk by nexthec · · Score: 1

      Correction,(i belive) AC was so succesfull at killing people in a some what painfull and horrifying fashion that New York decided to use an AC electric Chair, so they built AC generators for that purpuse, and it kinda took off from there.

    11. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing that Edison did give: The word "Hello" for telephone greetings.

      Bell pushed 'Ahoy!'

      See, not such a bad guy at all!

      Ahoy!

    12. Re:Edison was a jerk by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 2

      > So don't tell the kids that the war of 1812 was about invading Canada and that the US lost, oh no it was about Britain impressing alleged US citizens and ended in a draw.

      Hehe i remember reading about that in school. I live in canada so they actauly called it a war that the US started to invade canada and lost:)

      I'm not surprised that in the US kids arn't told about it. Textbooks in highschool are a joke(at least in canada)

    13. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please note: Canada did not exist as a country until MANY decades later. It was a war against the British.

    14. Re:Edison was a jerk by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      Even the Simpsons have (indirectly) lampooned Edison's stealing of ideas. In this case, Edison was credited with a fancy leaning chair that Homer made.

      -Paul Komarek

    15. Re:Edison was a jerk by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This thread is totally on the money on Edison. There's an ironic twist to the Edison story that bears interestingly in this discussion.

      It seems that Edison owned several patents on the technology behind filmmaking, and exacted brutal licensing on virtually every aspect of the industry. The pressure was so unreasonable that the burgeoning movie industry of the early 20th century was forced out of what was then the center of filmmaking - the east coast. They needed a place to shoot their pirate criminal outlaw movies that was far away from Edison and his patent police. Also important was that they be close to the Mexican border so that they could take their copyright criminal tools out of the country should Edison's goons show up.

      The result? Hollywood, CA. A litle fact I like to remember when they hurl hypocrisy about IP criminals.

    16. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was the electric hammer. They went to the museum to break the chair so Homer could take credit, and they left the hammer there in the ensuing chaos.

    17. Re:Edison was a jerk by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 1

      I knew someone would come to my rescue and correct my weak Simpson's knowledge!

      -Paul Komarek

    18. Re:Edison was a jerk by ncc74656 · · Score: 3
      Try the internet. Google around, it's dead easy to verify this stuff.

      "But I read it on the Internet...it must be true!"

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    19. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you haven't heard this before or it deflates one of your personal sacred cows doesn't make it flamebait.

      Just because it's true, doesn't mean it's NOT flamebait.

    20. Re:Edison was a jerk by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      So don't tell the kids that the war of 1812 was about invading Canada and that the US lost, oh no it was about Britain impressing alleged US citizens and ended in a draw.

      1812, like most wars, was about a lot of things. Invading canada was no more the "main cause" of the war than outrage over impressed sailors. The real reason, as with most secular wars, was poliitcs and trade. And it was a "draw"--neither side really wanted the war, and the war didn't solve anything. (The US didn't lose land, the US didn't get forced into a treaty, and the US certainly didn't wake up one day and think "lets invade canada." So, they wound up just where they started, with a few less patriots and a few more heros.)

      When it comes to the civil war pretend that the South was unjustly attacked by the North, forget about the fact that the war was started by the South and was all about extending slavery to Texas and the Californias.

      Every textbook I ever read on the Civil War blames the south for starting the war. The closest I've ever come to seeing a defense of the South was the "states rights" and "economic ruin" arguments.

      (The Civil War wasn't about trade, but it was a civil war, and so wound up being fought for just about the same reason all other civl wars are fought: succession of power. The final straw that led to the Confederacy was Lincon getting elected without so much as a single Southern vote.)

      As for Edison and Tesla: light bulbs and record players are rather boring, and the specifics of their invention are far less interesting (and important) than the socal changes and alterations they bought about.

      'coures, I don't see much wrong in making childhood a safe haven as much as possible; "grown-up" books and news articles seem so hell-bent on making Earth seem like a haven of hypocrites and liars and cheats that some balance can't help but be a good thing.

    21. Re:Edison was a jerk by blincoln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      it would help many ill-informed people if you would please state your source for this information.

      One of the easiest ways to verify his status as a jerk is to read pretty much any biography of Tesla.

      Tesla invented a ton of technologies that we use everyday, like AC electricity and flourescent lighting. Because he wasn't the greatest businessperson, many of them were stolen by people like Edison (who he worked for briefly).

      Most people think of Edison as a great inventor. I think of him as a thief who was so bent on discrediting Tesla's AC electricity in favour of his own DC that he used it to electrocute a bunch of animals to death on film.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    22. Re:Edison was a jerk by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Really? Is that were the (Obligatory Simpsons Referenece) Burns telephone greeting comes from? "Ahoy hoy!"

      --
      Why not fork?
    23. Re:Edison was a jerk by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      That is the creepiest thing I have ever read.

      --
      Why not fork?
    24. Re:Edison was a jerk by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Invading canada was no more the "main cause" of the war than outrage over impressed sailors.

      And as we all know too well, sailors are really easy to impress.

      WTF are you talking about man? You've said impressed this or that once in each of your posts. Do you mean 'opressed' because there's a gigantic difference between the two.

    25. Re:Edison was a jerk by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hundreds of inventors came to work for him and he ended up patenting THEIR work.

      This is pretty much boilerplate for most tech companies. If you work for a company based entirely on innovation, then they need your ideas. You get a good stable salary, and support for development in return for your creativity.

      Edison did not have a monopoly on ideas though, which is the main difference between him and the RIAA. They could work for other people, or for themselves, or with private backing.

      The rest of your comment, I have no issue with - I totally agree that Edison was a git, and better at marketing than inventing.

    26. Re:Edison was a jerk by nehril · · Score: 5, Informative

      additional meaning of "impress" from dictionary.com:

      impress
      tr.v. impressed, impressing, impresses

      1. To compel (a person) to serve in a military force.

      2. To seize (property) by force or authority; confiscate.



      so "impressing US sailors" in this instance means "capturing US sailors and forcing them into the British Navy."

    27. Re:Edison was a jerk by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "If you wanted to work for him you had to sign away all your rights to any patents you develop to him."

      And that reminds you of whose employment contract exactly? Surely not everyone who reads slashdot?

    28. Re:Edison was a jerk by lahi · · Score: 1

      So (indirectly) Edison is responsible for "Hello, World"?

      -Lasse

    29. Re:Edison was a jerk by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The British ones are pretty hilarious, victory after victory against the French until the loss of Calais appears in a footnote.

      Completely off topic, but I really wish that was so. When I did History GCSE it was ALL about the flipping industrial revolution and the poor old farmers. International politics barely got a lookin, let alone wars with the French. It's far more politically correct to study the economics of the weaving industry, or medieval farming methods.

      If something interesting happened at some point in British history, you can be guaranteed it will not appear in a reasonably advanced history course.

      Edison invented the electric chair as part of his marketting campaign for DC - the chair used AC.

      He went around electrocuting elephants as well I think. Well, it just goes to show, in case of FUD vs market economics, the market usually wins.

    30. Re:Edison was a jerk by arivanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When you sod off the high school science and get to the university level one you start seeing how much of the stuff that is attributed to Edison is actually Tesla's.

      Otherwise:

      1. Cylinders instead of disks on the phonograph - dead on the money. Look at the old pictures from the first advertisements for the new gadget in the history books. See disks there? Nope. Not if Edisons name is mentioned anywhere close.

      2. AC vs DC. Dead on the money as well. Dunno about him not understanding it but there is more then enough info about Westighouse out there and Tesla as well to confirm this.

      3. Layers - dead on the money as well.

      4. Also, as far as I know he was the first to invent the cubicle sweatshop for engineering. There are more then enough historical references that show how work in his labs was organised. He was the first person to hire engineers and designers in quantities instead of going for quality with a small design team the way people like Brunel, Eifel, etc did.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    31. Re:Edison was a jerk by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      Whether Edison was a jerk or whether he was brilliant or not, he did succeed in starting a number of VERY successful businesses, sold products people actually wanted to buy, and invented an ore handling process that is still in use today.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    32. Re:Edison was a jerk by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2

      The final straw that led to the Confederacy was Lincon getting elected without so much as a single Southern vote.

      I believe, sir, you'll find the final straw in a Souterner's mind was Lincoln shipping troops and weapons to South Carolina.

    33. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's insightful? It's a fucking lightbulb. You act as though there is one type of lightbulb in the U.S. Stupid Limey.

    34. Re:Edison was a jerk by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      I believe you will find that the South Carolina Seccession Congress started meeting before Lincoln's inauguration. The troops and weapons were a direct response to that act. The firing on Fort Sumter was a reaction to an attempt by the US Government to station US Army troops in a US Army fort belonging to the US Government. Of course southerners had problems with it. They had already decided to secede.

      I want a Confederate Battle Flag tee-shirt that has the damn thing on fire with a few bullet holes through it. The legend would read as follows:

      You lost. Get over it.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    35. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Edison bought the patent for the light bulb from a Canadian. He (edison) didn't 'invent' it at all. I wish I could remember the Canadians name (McSomething, I think) but he has been doomed to obscurity.

    36. Re:Edison was a jerk by MamasGun · · Score: 1

      Turn of the 20th Century: Thomas Alva Edison
      Turn of the 21st Century: William Gates III

      Yeah, that's about right...

      --
      "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
      -- Jack Valenti
    37. Re:Edison was a jerk by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      On a completely different subject but related topic, American-made ammunition uses Boxer primers (developed by an Englishman), and British-made ammo uses Berdan primers (developed by an American). Go figure!

      For the curious: Boxer primers have a built-in anvil for the percussive mixture to get squished against, whereas Berdan primers rely on bumps made into the cartridge itself for the anvil. Boxer-primed ammo is generally much, much easier to reload than Berdan-primed.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    38. Re:Edison was a jerk by pogle · · Score: 2

      impress (from dictionary.com, defn 2)
      1. To compel (a person) to serve in a military force.
      2. To seize (property) by force or authority; confiscate.

      Check your dictionary next time ;) Sailors on US ships were impressed into service to Britain, meaning they were taken and forced to serve on British ships. Which irritated them, I'm sure.

      The second poster was being sarcastic utilizing the more well-known defn of impress, "To affect strongly, often favorably"

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    39. Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who win the war write the history books.

    40. Re:Edison was a jerk by kldavis4 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
      Geez, man, this is history, go to the library and read it for yourself. If that is not PROOF enough for you, perhaps you would like to dispute the holocaust or maybe the American Civil War? There is nothing extraordinary about the claims of these other posters in regards to Edison.

      Apparently there is a movie in production about Tesla which will hopefully educate those who aren't keen on learning their history. Click on the links to read more about Edison and Tesla.
    41. Re:Edison was a jerk by RichardX · · Score: 1

      In Britain ordinary household lightbulbs have a bayonet attachment. You just shove it in and give it a little twist and it's in

      Yep. And those make me nervous these days. Occasionally you'll come across a light socket that needs a more-than-reasonable amount of torque to get the bulb into the bayonet fitting.. I know someone who was doing that, and had the bulb shatter in his hand, lacerating it rather badly. Since then, I always hold the bulb in a doubled-up cloth while putting it in... or better still, use those energy saving lightbulbs which are much tougher (and last longer. .and use less energy :)

      Just a friendly bit of advice for all the other brits here :)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    42. Re:Edison was a jerk by balthan · · Score: 1

      In Britain ordinary household lightbulbs have a bayonet attachment

      Oh, they bitch about our gun laws, but you can plug knives in their lightbulbs?!

    43. Re:Edison was a jerk by Evilderek · · Score: 1

      This message actually made me mad enough to register so that I could reply... Of course Edison made employees sign away their rights to inventions that they created while working for him. It is called "work for hire", and every research organiztion in the US today has the same policy. Why would Edison (or 3M or Microsoft for that matter) pay someone a salary, and not expect to reap the rewards of the new inventions that the EMPLOYEES discovered? The hundreds of researchers worked in a skunkworks (much like you can see today at Boeing, Apple, Xerox, or any other company engaged in research) whose sole intent is to develop new technology for patent and subsequent sales. As far as Tesla is concerned, it seems that maybe he should have been more aggressive in the IP realm, especially after he was burned the first time or two. For such a smart fellow, he sure didn't learn that lesson very well. Welcome to the world of BUSINESS! It seems like a lot of the posters here need smaked up side the head with this clue stick... DAMN

    44. Re:Edison was a jerk by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      (The US didn't lose land, the US didn't get forced into a treaty, and the US certainly didn't wake up one day and think "lets invade canada." So, they wound up just where they started, with a few less patriots and a few more heros.)

      Au contraire, the US was forced into a treaty. The only reason why the US did not lose land was that George Canning, the British foreign secretary believed that while the US was in no position to prevent loss of territory it was in the best interests of the UK to forgo it.

      The fact was that the US was not particularly important at the time. Britain was far more interested in maintaining control of India and defeating the French. Far better to come to an agreement with the US that would stick than insist on reparations and end up in an ongoing irridentist struggle.

      The success of the 1812 treaty was the principal reason that the US and the UK went into Versailles with a much more concilliatory approach than the French who anexed parts of Germany and generally did everything they could to put Hitler in power.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    45. Re:Edison was a jerk by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Okay. I'm basically saying, there is a TON of information about this on the net, at libraries, and everywhere else. Most of what you can find in the library you can also find online. Use your own judgement as to what to believe.. if you want to think it's all a conspiracy, go right ahead.

      Or you can stay in denial... but those of us who did the research KNOW that this isn't conspiracy theory... Edison was not as important as the American history books make him out to be... not by a longshot.

    46. Re:Edison was a jerk by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Completely off topic, but I really wish that was so. When I did History GCSE it was ALL about the flipping industrial revolution and the poor old farmers. International politics barely got a lookin, let alone wars with the French.

      Don't worry, after the industrial revolution only war of significance we lost against the perfidious French was the American Revolution. After that things looked up. They lost the battle of the nile, Trafalgar, the peninsular campaign and of course Waterloo. After that they confined their imperial pretensions to the glorious conquest of the Sahara Desert where the locals found that the best tactics were generally to leave the blighters to their own devices until they mostly died of thirst.

      After that it was basically the French fought with us in the next couple of campaigns, Crimea and WWI. We will tactfully refrain from mentioning their performance in WWII.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    47. Re:Edison was a jerk by ciphertext · · Score: 1

      You might be right about Edison. I haven't studied much about Edison, nor do I remember what I did study.

      I do believe, however, that it is important to resist making generalizations (as was done with the American History books and high school remark) as they are never accurate, and always lessens the credibility of the post. To make generalizations, only serves to increase the inaccuracy about this topic as much as a poorly researched history book.


      --
      To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
  18. 100 patents? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to Mr. Philyaw's (Pulitzer? Maybe Einstein next?) bio he has 100 patents in his name. Not according to the USPTO. According to them he has 3 or 4.

    What a loser.

    1. Re:100 patents? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you combine all his aliases...

    2. Re:100 patents? Yeah right. by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Is the USofA the only country that awards patents?

    3. Re:100 patents? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but regardless of what country you work in, the USA is one of the first places you file patents. Unless you invented something that can't be used in the USA, like a yak harness or something.

    4. Re:100 patents? Yeah right. by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      But those few pattents were really big, so they count as a hundred.

      ...

      ... no, I've never worked for the RIAA. Why do you ask?

    5. Re:100 patents? Yeah right. by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Whaaaat? Dang. And I already sent the money to the patent attorney for my new yak harness design.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  19. J. Hutton Pulitzer by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1

    I guess next he can award his own book the Pulitzer Prize! (I wonder if he's made up his mind what the "J" stand for yet?)

    1. Re:J. Hutton Pulitzer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder if he's made up his mind what the "J" stand for yet?

      Jesus?

    2. Re:J. Hutton Pulitzer by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2

      Stands for "Jay". All you have to is move the bush in front of the mural;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  20. pretty tame ego ... by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    next to the guy. Oh my God, I think I Slashdotted the Devil!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  21. Yup, wins the Prize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming it's still the same guy, of course; I didn't wade through his self-aggrandizing web site long enough to verify one way or the other.

  22. RIAA's Teenybopper Fans by Baldrson · · Score: 2

    I can just imagine all those teenybopper crackers out there who won't get or won't believe the RIAA's denial, deciding they've been issued a challenge by authority and therefore the RIAA's affiliates are fair game. RIAA's denial should be stronger but then since the RIAA's been seeking go-ahead to crack into users' computers it makes it rather difficult for them to deny they've thrown down the gauntlet to the pubescents.

  23. How did he get that big an audience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    • Amway convention?
    • Standing on a lamp-post in Times Square yelling stuff on New Year's Eve?
    • Had a booth at Comdex and that's how many people attended?
    • That's how many people clicked on his web site?
  24. Vertu Development Corp by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    http://www.vertudc.com/

    That's "Jovan Hutton Pulitzer" to you...

  25. not so much exercise on a bull. by twitter · · Score: 2

    This does not look like much of a work out. Looks more like a nightmare where you fall off the bed.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  26. Re:pretty tame ego ... by 1984 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (Not sure how just how much abuse this'll generate, but let's see...)

    So we all hate Bill Gates. Apparently for being ruthlessly successful at exploiting the (fairly) free, capitalist system we all hold dear. We're constantly shocked at the audacity of Microsoft, and Bill is the epitome of the evil that company represents.

    This is a guy who (with his wife) is in the process of donating $24 Billion to good causes. Not frat house good causes, not pussyfooting PC good causes. He has set up a well-run foundation (you know, managment and accountability) to see that money put to use combatting aids in India, that sort of thing.

    $24 Billion is more than most developed countries in the world will put into that sort of work in our lifetimes.

    But we do enjoy banging on that "He tried to squash Netscape!", because that's a) more important and b) surely nothing to do with how we like to run things?

    The wrong place to point it out, maybe, but it's fun to sit back and reflect on the irony sometimes.

  27. Gobbles' previous security advisories by professortomoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The outlandish claims are part of a "security advisory" supposedly written by a group called Gobbles Security. However, the message bears little resemblance to the group's other advisories and also seems to make fun of Gobbles' habit of posting vulnerability information and exploits without notifying affected vendors in advance."
    Eh, I don't know what they're reading, but just about every previous Gobbles advisory looks like that. The trademark Theo bashing, poor grammar, and other things. Most likely false, but most likely them.

    --
    If I wasn't so lazy, I'd have a sig.
    1. Re:Gobbles' previous security advisories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Most likely false, but most likely them.


      so you're saying that Gobbles immitated himself?

  28. Is Jovan Anti-AC by Zapdos · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if Jovan would electrocute an elephant the way Thomas Edison did in order to show how superior DC is over AC.

  29. RIAA can kiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my rosy red ass.

    And they can send me a virus while they are at it!

    Hey when you are done slashdotting, come look at the hotties on Pajonet.com. If you don't the RIAA will get ya!

  30. fastest adoption?? by spazoid12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hutton Pulitzer's inventions and ideas were adopted by the American consumer at a rate that outpaced the combined first year growth of cell phones, pagers, personal computers, hand held computers and total Internet users in just the first 90 days of its heralded release.

    Wow, that sure is something. The free Cuecat alledgedly outpaced a bunch of things that cost alot of money.

    I doubt it's true anyhow.

  31. Re:pretty tame ego ... by twitter · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Hey, 1984 you are a funny guy. Now what were you saying about how Bill Gates likes to run things? Oh yeah, kinda limited and extreemly controling? But wait, you are 1984, you should like DRM and the one Big Operating SystemS (BOSS).

    I kind of like his page as it reflects his company. He sits serenely over big hoard of someone else's 5 watt ideas, most of which do not work. Ah the life, bribing India, buying companies to put them out of business, cutting off air supplies, knifing babies, and telling us all that sharing software is evil bad horrible. Such benevolence, that royal purple couch is perfect.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  32. Boong-Ga Boong-Ga (spank 'em) by cpeterso · · Score: 2


    Don't forget Boong-Ga Boong-Ga (spank 'em) , the Japanese spanking-themed video game.

  33. The CueDil^H^H^HCat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    The dream was to connect items in the physical world to the Internet,

    It's come true, it's come true!

    The CueCat wasn't great as a barcode reader, but my girlfriend finds it very pleasurable. Sometimes, we even plug it into the Internet (of course, using an AntiVirus program--you never know).

  34. This ties all the names together by cosmicpossum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Based on whois, Digital Convergence and museumcrystals.com share the same address. Museumcrystals is registered to JJ Philyaw.

    JJ Phylaw's email address is emailjovan@yahoo.com.

    The email for JH Pulitzer is also emailjovan@yahoo.com!

    Here are the whois records:

    Registrant:
    DIGITALCONVERGENCE, INC (DIGITALCONVERGENCE4-DOM)
    9101 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 600
    DALLAS, TX 75231-5926
    US

    Domain Name: DIGITALCONVERGENCE.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    Mathews, Dave (DM205) dmathews@HOTMAIL.COM
    DaveMathews.com
    213 Missing Way
    Dallas, TX 75222
    530-684-9988 (FAX) 530-579-7759
    Technical Contact:
    Network Operations (NO59-ORG) dmathews@HOTMAIL.COM
    DigitalConvergence
    9101 N Central EXPY STE 600
    Dallas, TX 75231
    USA
    530-684-9988
    Fax- 530-579-7759

    Domain Name.......... museumcrystals.com
    Creation Date........ 2002-02-07
    Registration Date.... 2002-02-07
    Expiry Date.......... 2003-02-07
    Organisation Name.... J. Jovan Philyaw
    Organisation Address. 9101 N. Central Expy 6th Floor
    Organisation Address.
    Organisation Address. Dallas
    Organisation Address. 75231
    Organisation Address. TX
    Organisation Address. UNITED STATES

    Admin Name........... J. Jovan Philyaw
    Admin Address........ 9101 N. Central Expy 6th Floor
    Admin Address........
    Admin Address........ Dallas
    Admin Address........ 75231
    Admin Address........ TX
    Admin Address........ UNITED STATES
    Admin Email.......... emailjovan@yahoo.com
    Admin Phone.......... 214-292-6000
    Admin Fax............

    Registrant:
    J. Hutton Pulitzer (JYDPHRZAUD)
    5001 Spring Valley Road, 400E
    Dallas, TX 75244-3910
    US

    Domain Name: JHUTTONPULITZER.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    J. Hutton Pulitzer (CWGSDZSMJO) emailjovan@yahoo.com
    J. Hutton Pulitzer
    5001 Spring Valley Road, 400E
    Dallas, TX 75244-3910
    US
    972.383.1344 fax: 123 123 1234

    --
    (This sig intentionally left blank)
  35. Re:pretty tame ego ... by 1984 · · Score: 2

    You don't understand much about free markets or free societies, do you?

    Are you surprised that there's a constant arms race between those seeking to regulate "fairly" and those seeking to preserve their advantage?

    If so, why are you surprised?

  36. makes you wonder by spazoid12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this is the book he's writing...kinda makes you wonder what he actually intended for that hand-held CueCat device...

  37. radio shack by radon28 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i specifically went to radio shack begging them to give me one after the 2600 article came out on how to disable the tracking "feature" by cutting one little contact on an ic. then, after all that work, i realized that the cuecat was a piece of hot garbage.

  38. What's a 'hair metal band'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me it sounds like something to hold a steel wool wig in place.

  39. ah, you are confused. by twitter · · Score: 2
    you say You don't understand much about free markets or free societies, do you?

    Are you surprised that there's a constant arms race between those seeking to regulate "fairly" and those seeking to preserve their advantage?

    No, I understand freedom. If it were not for bogus software patents and outrageous copyright abuse, fostered in part by Mr. Gates, M$ would be nothing today. There is no such thing as "fair" regulation, there can only be the prevention of criminal abuse if we are free.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:ah, you are confused. by 1984 · · Score: 2

      So what's "criminal abuse"?

      (I realise there's a flippant answer to that, which you can use if you like. But if you give an actual answer, be careful you don't end up appealing to God as the source of all moral truth, unless you intend to.)

    2. Re:ah, you are confused. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      If it were not for bogus software patents and outrageous copyright abuse, fostered in part by Mr. Gates, M$ would be nothing today.

      Let us be perfectly clear on this. Microsoft got where they are today by acting like a business, and doing so completely within the rules. It was only when they got to a place where they could push people around that they started... well, pushing people around.

      If you don't like a competitive market, that's just fine. You're a grown-up (presumably) who is entitled to his own opinions. But a competitive market is what we have, and companies like Microsoft and Wal-Mart bubble up to the top because they're really good at being competitive.

      Is it good that most computers use software by Microsoft, and that most retail sales go through Wal-Mart? No, not really. And yet we let the competitive market system stand. Why? Because it's better than every other type of system that's ever been tried.

      If you can think of a better way to run an economy, by all means say so. If you can't, then kindly shut the fuck up. Okay? Thanks so much.

      --

      I write in my journal
    3. Re:ah, you are confused. by dubl-u · · Score: 2

      If you don't like a competitive market, that's just fine. You're a grown-up (presumably) who is entitled to his own opinions. But a competitive market is what we have, and companies like Microsoft and Wal-Mart bubble up to the top because they're really good at being competitive.

      You're missing two important things here.

      One is that once a company has a monopoly, the standards for their behavior change. Things that were legal when they had 10% of the market are not legal when they have 95% of it.

      And the other? As you say, the reason that we have a market economy is that it works well. The reason it works well is that strenuous competition forces continuous improvement for the consumer and the society at large. But once a company becomes so large that they need not fear others, then they stop feeling the pressure of competition.

    4. Re:ah, you are confused. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      One is that once a company has a monopoly, the standards for their behavior change.

      Yes, but twitter argued that Microsoft got where it is through illegal or unethical behavior. I assert that this isn't true. Microsoft didn't start breaking the rules until they got so big that a different set of rules applied to them, and tactics that they used legally yesterday (metaphorically) became illegal for them today.

      But once a company becomes so large that they need not fear others, then they stop feeling the pressure of competition.

      All other things being equal, this is true. But a monopoly like Microsoft's is kind of like the Roman empire. It's big and it seems strong from the outside, but there are barbarians at the gate just waiting to get in. I think it's an inaccurate statement to say that Microsoft doesn't feel the pressure of competition. They're trying like hell to stay one step ahead of the competition.

      Ironically, Microsoft's biggest competitor is Microsoft. Windows XP has shown a very disappointing uptake rate for no other reason than that Windows 2000 is good enough for most users. In that case, Microsoft has to develop a product that is good enough to beat their own best product from two years ago. That's a competitive pressure of a different sort entirely.

      But whatever the situation, the fact remains that we (as a culture) have never come up with a good way to keep companies from getting too big, or to make them small again once they've gotten too big. It doesn't seem right to just say, "Okay, Messers Gates and Balmer and the rest of you Microsoft shareholder, you have enough money now. Dissolve the company and go do something else for a change."

      So my point still stands. Until we can come up with a better way to run the economy-- including better ways to enforce existing antitrust laws, should we still think they're good things to have on the books-- whining about Microsoft will get us nowhere.

      --

      I write in my journal
    5. Re:ah, you are confused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft acted like mafia, not a business. Businesses compete, which involves offering better value than your competitors--not altering the environment so they cannot exist.

      Any time you see high prices and poor performance (software, music publishing, labor unions), you can expect to find someone attacking the market by cutting out producers by means that don't relate to their efficiency.

    6. Re:ah, you are confused. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      because they're really good at being competitive

      I wouldnt describe ruthlessness (ms) and amorality (walfart sweatshops, unionbusting) as 'competitive'... people who disagree w/ their actions -- for MORAL reasons -- are suggesting the rest of you patronize someone else... as I do.

    7. Re:ah, you are confused. by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Yes, but twitter argued that Microsoft got where it is through illegal or unethical behavior. I assert that this isn't true.

      Assert away. But federal courts have repeatedly found otherwise. Given the amount of money Microsoft spent on lawyering, it's hard to say they didn't get a fair trial.

      big and it seems strong from the outside, but there are barbarians at the gate just waiting to get in

      And they will likely keep waiting. Most serious competition Microsoft has seen in their core businesses (OS and Office) have been seen off by use of monopoly power. The only notable exception, Linux, is free. That's not exactly encouraging the barbarians to get out the ladders and catapults for the big assault on Fortress Microsoft.

      Ironically, Microsoft's biggest competitor is Microsoft. [...] But whatever the situation, the fact remains that we (as a culture) have never come up with a good way to keep companies from getting too big, or to make them small again once they've gotten too big.

      Well, actually, we have. And you even suggested it again here. If Microsoft is too big for anybody else to compete with, then breaking them up is an obvious solution. If they, as they claim, aren't illegally using their monopoly powers, then this won't hurt much. And it might even help Gates's bank balance: the market value of conglomerates is often higher after breakup.

    8. Re:ah, you are confused. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Assert away. But federal courts have repeatedly found otherwise.

      Wrong. The courts have found that Microsoft illegally abused their monopoly power. These things happened after Microsoft had already achieved their monopolies. So to say that Microsoft "got where they are today" through illegal or unethical behavior is not supported by any finding of any court, anywhere.

      Most serious competition Microsoft has seen in their core businesses (OS and Office) have been seen off by use of monopoly power. The only notable exception, Linux, is free.

      Have you not been paying attention lately? Just last week, Apple announced a direct competitor to one of the Office products. Apple is becoming a very serious competitor to Microsoft. Not so much Linux, because of the fractured nature of the product, the really appalling user experience, and the business-hostile nature of the politics behind it.

      If Microsoft is too big for anybody else to compete with, then breaking them up is an obvious solution.

      Yeah, in the same sense that drowning a baby because it cries is an obvious solution. Breaking Microsoft up would be a very drastic move on the part of the government, and we'd better be able to justify it pretty damn well. If Microsoft were doing something very serious, like defrauding their shareholders or something, that would be one thing. But violations of the antitrust laws-- laws that admittedly apply to different companies in different ways, depending on their position in the market-- are a different thing altogether.

      --

      I write in my journal
    9. Re:ah, you are confused. by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Wrong. [...]Have you not been paying attention?[...] drowning a baby because it cries is an obvious solution

      Oops! Sorry! I mistook you for a reasonable person. Sorry to have wasted your time. If you want to actually want to discuss this stuff, you know where to find me.

    10. Re:ah, you are confused. by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Um, to be absolutely fair to both sides the reality is that Microsoft got to be a monopoly partially through unethical behavior (many examples: QDOS, various other dirty tricks with MS-DOS, etc.) but MOSTLY by legitimately beating their competition, who often dropped the ball (Macs being too expensive, IBM's piss-poor handling of OS/2, Commodore's incompetence, etc.) beyond the fact that many Microsoft products (like Windows95 and Word) were regarded by many as superior to the competition. Microsoft also competes quite fairly in many markets to this day, like in hardware products like mice and with the XBox.

      OTOH, once Microsoft aquired it's monopoly in desktop operating systems there is no doubt whatsoever that Microsoft engaged in illegal monopoly maintainance. Microsoft also engaged in "tying" to try to extend their monopoly into othe rmarkets (like they virtual monopoly in office suites). Through bribery, Microsoft recieved little more than a slap on the wrist for these trangressions.

      Bill Gates' charitable contributions do not excuse the behavior of his company. And even if they did, Bill Gates is not the ONLY responsible party over at Microsoft, he just gets a lot of press.

  40. people who worked for dot.bombs... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Funny
    A hilarious must-read for those who followed the :CueCat debacle (and for those of us who worked there)."

    The people--from the CEOs to the Unix sysadmins--who worked for dot-coms with phony business plans should ALL take responsibility for the current sorry state of the economy.

    1. Re:people who worked for dot.bombs... by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      > The people--from the CEOs to the Unix sysadmins--who worked for dot-coms with phony business plans should ALL take responsibility for the current sorry state of the economy.

      Ahh, they only started it. The real blows came from the mistrust sewn by the Enrons/Worldcoms/etc.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    2. Re:people who worked for dot.bombs... by zentigger · · Score: 1
      actually the dumb f**Ks that gave them m^Hbillions of dollars based on business plans like:

      1. pay 11 year old nephew to make web page.

      2. [???]

      3. make millions of dollars.

      should be the ones that take responsibility!


      The pathetic slobs that invested their life savings into a company for $347.82 a share when the company has a market capitalization of $.000000000000002, should be the ones that take responsibilty. In fact they are probably the ones that are hurting the most, so I guess it really serves them right, doesn't it.


      1. Play with fire.

      2. [???]

      3. Get burned.

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

    3. Re:people who worked for dot.bombs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We don't blame Cisco or Ikea because they sold equipment to a dot.bomb, why should we blame people who sold labor? The cost of due diligence and examining corporate financials should be borne by investors, who have a big stake in the survival of the company--not by contractors or employees, who are risking nothing but a dishonored payment or so.

      The market did its job; it diverted resources away from inefficient producers and their supporters. The economy is only "sorry" in comparison to the late 1990s, which were characterized by wealth that simply wasn't real--it didn't represent enormous resources or labor suddenly becoming available, but self-reinforcing measurements of fictional spending.

  41. i-Tee Case mentioned a few days ago.. by o0o · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This comment has nothing to do with the current Slashback articles, but it fits in this forum.. I didn't have a chance to submit it before school this morning.. I don't know if it was worthy enough to make it into Slashback anyway..

    I wrote to the I-Tee case manufacturer the other day after reading this article on Slashdot..

    A few of the article's commentors mentioned that they hadn't received a response from them after emailing them themselves for prices, distribution, etc.. I guess I got lucky..

    Here's there response:

    Dear Mr. J. Johansen (I'm not Mr. DeCSS),

    Thank you for your e-mail.
    At present we don't have distributor in USA.
    If you want to be our distributor in USA, we offer our
    best competitive price based on F.O.B. Yantian China
    as following:
    1. i-Tee W/250W ATX P'SU P4 with USB @USD50.00
    Delivery: 2 weeks after receiving your L/C
    Warranty: one year from shipment.
    The above price is based on 20'container / 430pcs.


    Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

    Best regards,

    Kenny Tsai


    Anyone have $25,150+ lying around?

    --
    Sing While You May!!
  42. The sky is falling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm still a bit amazed that anyone was taking the Gobbles claim seriously to begin with. It's an advisory for an mpg123 exploit... the bit about the RIAA in the intro is just Gobbles having some fun.

    Gobbles has always had a rather twisted sense of humour, their bugtraq advisories are always full of stuff like this.. they're probably having quite a laugh right now over the fact that paranoid bloggers everywhere took it at face value and started freaking out like this.

  43. RIAA, GOBBLES, etc... by tweakt · · Score: 2
    Ok, fair enough, I didn't buy it either, but has anyone tested the exploit posted to BUGTRAQ this morning for mpg123? Aren't there also known exploits for Winamp?

    The claims were certainly possible... but not quite plausible.

    1. Re:RIAA, GOBBLES, etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a patch to mpg123 - the diff didn't work for me but i just pasted the code into common.c and recompiled.

      I haven't found any malformed mp3s yet... Would one of you C gurus please write up a batch-scanner for malformed frame headers? I'd appreciate it. TIA! :)

      http://security-archive.merton.ox.ac.uk/bugtraq- 20 0301/0144.html

  44. An excerpt from the book comments page... by gpinzone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Author: Garth
    Date: 1/14/2003 6:42 pm CST

    Dear Mr. Pulitzer/Philyaw,
    Being interested in patents in general, I took notice in your bio the fact that you have 100 patents. I went and looked them up and found that according to the USPTO you have what looks like 3 or 4 (didn't bother looking through each one). You might want to point out this oversight to them. It's quite irresponsible of them to lose track of 96 patents.

    Or perhaps you filed for them somewhere else, maybe Turkey?

    Garth

  45. You fools! by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2

    Of course the RIAA would deny it!

    I'm off to put tinfoil hats on my mp3 collection.

    Seriously, though, if I'm the RIAA, I no comment this one - just for the sheer fun of it.

  46. I keep expecting... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

    I keep expecting this Philyaw/Pulitzer jerk to go off and start his own wacky cult religion that's simultaneously very stylish amongst Hollywood types and very expensive to participate in. 'Cause his grandiose inflated claims sound a lot like Elron's.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  47. Sprinting in DDR by yerricde · · Score: 1

    As is DDR, unless you're doing the equivalent of sprinting, which I have yet to see.

    Try playing DDR Max's "Max 300" by Omega on Maniac. You're doing a solid ten steps a second.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  48. Re:pretty tame ego ... by Dave_bsr · · Score: 2

    $24 billion...good tax break, eh?

    ...bsr...

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  49. Virtual exercise bike at Pro Club in Redmond by virtigex · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Pro Club in Redmond had a pretty good implementation of an exercise bike linked to one of several "virtual worlds". It was made by Cybex and had a first person (or overhead) display. The worlds were a tropical island, snow scape and an arena with a ball game. Resistance varied depending if you were going up or down hill (or underwater) and there were challenges in the form of races (against AI or linked units) as well as matches for the arena. The arena game had a ball that stuck to the front of your bike and could be fired off with a button into the goal.

    It was pretty absorbing and one could get quite a workout without realizing it. Playing against the AI was tough, since it never got fatigued.

    The games demoed on the Exertris are all 2d and (strangely) oriented left-to-right. Strange, since according to their web site Bill Gates was showcasing them at CES. Obviously he hadn't turned up at his local gym to do some research.

  50. Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the inventor and the hair metal band are not one and the same?

  51. Prolific Trolling Going on J. Hutton's Message Brd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen a hidden goatse for some time... Ahh, nostalgia...

    Subject: Greetings!
    Author: Random Troll
    Date: 1/14/2003 7:38 pm CST

    Greetings from slashdot!

  52. Now you tell me?! by tezzery · · Score: 2

    Oh great.. now you tell us.. after i deleted all my mp3's!

  53. Re:pretty tame ego ... by DAldredge · · Score: 2

    Please tell me where we have a free market (H1B, OSHA, IRS) or a free society (TIA, TIPS, USA PATRIOT).

  54. foreign patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Counting foreign patents as separate patents is, at best, misleading. I'd consider it downright deceptive.

  55. Neutered Cat and X Window System.... by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    I neutered my 'Cat, but it's usefullness is reduced by the way they work when neutered.

    If you scan a barcode that reads "123", what the neutered 'Cat sends is:

    Alt down, Numeric 0 down, Numeric 0 up, Numeric 3 down, Numeric 3 up, Numeric 1 down, Numeric 1 up, Alt up.

    Alt down, Numeric 0 down, Numeric 0 up, Numeric 3 down, Numeric 3 up, Numeric 2 down, Numeric 2 up, Alt up.

    And so forth. In other words, they compose the keystrokes by using the ALT+number pad trick. This makes a bit of sense - that way they can guarantee that you will get the correct ASCII codes, no matter whether your keyboard is in QWERTY or Dvorac.

    And this works quite well under a normal text mode console under Linux. Howerver, the X Windows System does not seem to honor the ALT+Numeric code approach, so the neutered 'Cat isn't as useful.

    So, in this mini-Ask Slashdot - does anybody know how to get X to do the ALT+code mode?

  56. Re:pretty tame ego ... by 1984 · · Score: 2

    Well now, there's half your problem. Freedom doesn't beget freedom. It needs to be regulated to be as free as possible. Alas the regulations come from within the same system you need to regulate, so they aren't always going to have best of intentions attached. Less cynically, it's also difficult to strike a good balance, and to forsee the outcome of any particular regulation.

  57. Re:pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that like saying the drug dealer that buys $100k worth of food for the homeless is a good guy?

  58. GeoURL for real: APRS by oaklybonn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ham Radio has something called APRS: Automatic Position Reporting System.

    This works by sending short bursts of location information over the radio at pre-defined frequencies, including your callsign. These are broadcast and picked up by repeater stations (and anyone can be a repeater.) Eventually, they're picked up and stuck in a database.

    You can then query this database to find out where you are - or where your friends are.

    It don't get geekier.

  59. Similar name by fo0bar · · Score: 2

    Why does the name J. Hutton Pulitzer make me think of L. Ron Hubbard?

    Actually, there are parallels... Their state of sanity, for one...

  60. It ain't HIS money, is it? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Convicted monopolist (spare me any whining about the company being convicted, not the man) is passing our money around and you applaud him?

    So next time a bank robber throws the money out in the street, or gives it to bums, we should applaud that too?

  61. Digital Convergence by transient · · Score: 1

    I was offered a job at Digital Convergence. They needed someone to make the CueCat work on Macs. I declined, telling the recruiter that if I were to take the job, I'd be out of a job after not too long.

    Needless to say, I'm very glad I didn't accept. The funny thing is, most of my knowledge of DC came from Slashdot. Whether that's good or bad, I'm not sure -- but I can honestly say that Slashdot kept me from being unemployed!

    --

    irb(main):001:0>
  62. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > Ah the life, bribing India, ...

    Yeah, the media made a big deal out of how much money he donated for AIDS while he was in India, but most neglected to mention that during the same trip his team spent about four times that much on trying to keep India loyal to the Microsoft brand name.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  63. Re:pretty tame ego ... by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You have to understand you're arguing with someone whose understanding of reality is essentially flawed. A post like this one is classic Slashdot - it doesn't get any better than Mr. Twitter here. I mean, right down to the lame sig, right down to the unfettered use of the sad, tired 'M$' acronym and the arguing over a simplistic out of context point when called on their bullshit.

    This could be a discussion about, oh, bio-engineered hamsters or the moons of Neptune, and you'd still get the pathetic Microsoft non-sequitur.

    Why? Because someone with mod points will probably think it's funny.

    BTW, welcome to Slashdot. Or something.

  64. Re:pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    score -1 ad hominem troll

  65. You forget the shipping by wnissen · · Score: 1

    A mere US$8 to ship, what a bargain!

    Walt

  66. Re:Philyaw: here's a little more by glenebob · · Score: 2
    OK I'm pretty convinced now. And here is a picture I found with no caption, but I think it's the same guy. For a guy who was on TV, he sure doesn't like to have pictures floating around, I wonder why?

    *shudder*

    What a sleeze bag.

  67. Pulitzer's building - yeah, right by Animats · · Score: 2
    Pulitzer's site makes a big point of his address - 5001 Spring Valley Road, Suite 400E, Dallas, TX. Big, impressive building. Now look up that address in Google and see what comes up. Quite a few companies seem to share that address. There's a Mac repair shop, a headhunter, an accountant, a consultant, and a "healthcare management" firm.

    Hmm.

  68. on beatmania by lingqi · · Score: 1

    I was going to mention it, but it does not fall into the "excercise" category. but wow you have not seen a person "play" until you go to japan and look at scraggy dressed guys play the 7-key version at ultra-insane difficulty level, on *double* (using both stations)...

    the act of catching every raindrop in your immediate vicinity using your hand would probably be easier -- but it's pretty neat to look at the guy go into a trance and their fingers mechanically responds to the coming "notes", all at some 200bpm.

    it makes me wonder if people actually are physically capable of responding that fast - each "note", from top of the screen to the bottom, lasts only some fraction of a second - i mean, the info has to travel between your eye to your brain and down to your fingers - not to mention that you have to time everything right; maybe it's all about the memorization. I don't know... I fudge up on the 5-key version on medium...

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  69. That's nothing by Savatte · · Score: 1

    I filed papers last week to change my name to Baron Von Hugecock.

    1. Re:That's nothing by Nexx · · Score: 1

      wouldn't that be false advertisement? *ducks and runs for cover*

    2. Re:That's nothing by Savatte · · Score: 1

      oh man, i got zinged!

  70. Re:pretty tame ego ... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

    I feel it necessary to preemptivly envoke Godwin's Law to end this thread before it gets too far.

    Here goes -- -- Hitler liked dogs and children too. Bill Gates is just like Hitler. You don't like Hitler do you?

    Of course now someone can invoke the Muntz Corollary and respond, "What did Hitler ever do to you?"

    I, of course, will not dignify that with a response.

  71. What all in one exercise units? by WatertonMan · · Score: 2
    Rather than sell bikes with computers they ought to just sell one of those spinners you place your bike on and give it a USB interface. (You know, the front wheel goes on a roller and the back is locked in place) Then sell software. That way you don't get stuck with crappy games or crappy video cards. (The typical bane of these sorts of things)

    That would also cut down on the cost of the thing and would let you use your own bike. Hell, I'd get one in a sec.

    Of course what I'd really like is a stair climber version of joust. But that's just dreaming.

  72. the cuecat by funkmastermike · · Score: 1

    .. it always seemed so sad to me.. just look at the logo. :{
    maybe because it was never used. at least it was fun "modding it" to uh.. "crack" the encryption scheme to output only numbers

    1. Re:the cuecat by watchful.babbler · · Score: 2
      .. it always seemed so sad to me.. just look at the logo. :{

      :)

      There's kind of an amusing story behind that logo, and the bizarre use of colons in the Cue:Cat name. The designer was originally asked to create a logo for a product named "Concerto," which was later renamed the "Convergence Cable." The 'C' in the logo was a stylized bass clef, hence the use of ':' as a design element.

      The designer had some, er, personality conflicts with Jovan, and left not long afterwards. Evidently there were trademark issues with "Concerto," and the product line had to be renamed. Jovan didn't want to discard the logo, so he created that godawful "Cue:Cat" name, and promptly earned himself a slot in the "worst dot-com names ever" list.

      --
      "Freedom is kind of a hobby with me, and I have disposable income that I'll spend to find out how to get people more."
  73. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post or retract, asshole. You said, "his team spent about four times that much on trying to keep India loyal to the Microsoft brand name." Post some kind of URL that confirms this accusation or retract your statement. I'm sick and tired of Slashdotters spewing falsehoods whenever they feel an urge to make a point.

    Post, or retract.

  74. License? by Linuxathome · · Score: 2

    It would be helpful if you mentioned the type of license your software is under within the first page or the download page. Not all open-source software are equal.

    1. Re:License? by delta407 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The download page has been updated.

      And yes, I am aware that not all OSS licenses are equal, but few school administrators care. ;-)

  75. Re:pretty tame ego ... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

    You rock, Bungi. If I hadn't already posted in this thread, I'd mod you up.

    --

    I write in my journal
  76. Re:pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have it on good authority that Hitler didn't like dogs very much. He was more of a cat person. Which I think says more about Hitler than it does about cats. No wonder he wanted to take over all of Europe. He never got any affection from his pets.

  77. Dallas Observer article about Philyaw/Pulitzer guy by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wish I had remembered this earlier; I would have posted it then. About a year and a half ago, the Dallas Observer (one of those "let's all pretend we're not owned by a giant soulless corporation" alternative weeklys) posted a positively high-larious article about Digital Convergence, the Belo Corporation, and our friend Mr. Philyaw... er, Mr. Pulitzer. Mr. Whatever Person.

    It's short, funny, and worth a read. And it mentions uses a Simpsons reference to advance the story, so it's got to be cool.

    Because this article will be off the front page soon, meaning nobody is going to see it, I'll post this little tidbit in my journal as well. That way the Teeming Horde (i.e., my fans) will get a chance to read and laugh and live and love!

    --

    I write in my journal
  78. You must provide proof for us to UNlearn history by Linuxathome · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but I don't see why the moderators modded up the two previous posts. Look, we learned what we learned in high school from those textbooks because most historians and educators agreed upon those facts. If these facts are wrong, the only way for us to unlearn them (i.e. to learn the actual truth) then the onus is upon you, the poster, to provide references to back up your claims. By providing references, it allows us, the readers, to formulate our own points of view. Let's move beyond pure conjecture and provide some references people! Even URLs would be helpful. Yes, history is subject to interpretation, but so is science. Put the facts out there and let us decide. And if you make a claim of fact, provide at least one reference for us to determine our own interpretation.

  79. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > Post or retract, asshole. You said, "his team spent about four times that much on trying to keep India loyal to the Microsoft brand name." Post some kind of URL that confirms this accusation or retract your statement. I'm sick and tired of Slashdotters spewing falsehoods whenever they feel an urge to make a point.

    > Post, or retract.

    I stand corrected. While looking for the relevant news in a search engine (you should learn to do that too) I discovered that my claimed 4:1 ratio was off by more a factor of three. It should actually be 14:1 , since the funding ratio is $421 MM over 3 years vs. $100 MM over 10 years.

    I should learn to research my posts a little better.

    ps - What exactly do you do at Microsoft?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  80. Re:on excercising games- Not Mo-Cap Boxing by dypstick · · Score: 1

    The boxing game you speak of is called Mo-Cap Boxing.

    Actually, the original poster spoke of a game where you physically hit targets as they popped up. That game is Fighting Mania. In Mo-Cap Boxing, there is no contact (at least, there's not supposed to be, and I'll kick you out of the arcade if you hit the screen too many times).

    Incidently, the horse racing game he mentions is called Final Furlong, and the paddling game mentioned by someone else is called Rapid River.

  81. How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much you want for 3 of them?

    --
    In Soviet Russia Cat Cue's YOU!

  82. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ps - What exactly do you do at Microsoft?

    I fuck your baby sister's bloody ass all day long. What exactly do you do under RMS's desk all day?

    The Gates Foundation has given out over $5.5 billion since 1994, and over $3 billion of that went to world health. Microsoft's $400 million investment is a fucking pimple compared to those kinds of numbers. When you give five billion dollars in charitable grants, Crack Faggot, you can criticize. Until the, wipe RMS's commie jizz off of your chin and get back to work.

  83. Re:Virtual exercise bike - Wiki Site by virtigex · · Score: 1

    Here is a picture of the Virtual Exercise bike. Apparently, it was produced by Tectrix and called the VR bike. It was purchased by Cybex and then squashed. It's a crying shame, since this was a fun machine to work out on.

  84. Re:Virtual exercise bike - Wiki Site by virtigex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry - here is the Wiki site for the VR exercise bike. Unfortunately, it was produced bt Tectrix, bought by Cybex and then canned. Oh it also had a fan that would blow in your face as you started going faster.

  85. hate to bring it up but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That bit about the American civil war was as misguided as any of those other references of yours. Go and count how many abolishionists were active in the north in 1862? not many huh?
    And the bit where the 1863 emancipation proclamation only applied in Confederate controlled terrirtories? The very ones in which it couldnt be reinforced?? The fact that the war was fought on the more general issue of states rights????

    Read a few good books, then make judgements.

    (I suggest none died in vain - Robert Leckie, If only i wasnt at work and could get to my bookshelf !)

  86. Re: "GOBBLES" & the RIAA by pingofbadkarma · · Score: 1

    "Garbles", uh, I mean "Gobbles security" are really cheesy and annoying. They've got chops, and it's understandable that the Register had to run with the story, but C'mon...

    From their bugtraq post:

    "Things to keep in mind:
    1) If you participate in illegal file-sharing networks, your
    computer now belongs to the RIAA.
    2) Your BlackIce Defender(tm) firewall will not help you.
    3) Snort, RealSecure, Dragon, NFR, and all that other crap
    cannot detect this attack, or this type of attack.
    4) Don't f*ck with the RIAA again, scriptkids.
    5) We have our own private version of this hydra actively
    infecting p2p users, and building one giant ddosnet."

    Hmmm. If this is true, and I sometimes play "borrowed" MP3's and MPEG's on Winamp, then why do my versions of Xolox and KaZaA Lite checksum exactly the same as the binaries from the net distros...?

    Wait! I'll bet these guys are so l33t that they hacked my version of Cygwin sum, too, just to be sure.

    Or no, wait, wait, they're prob'ly so good that they hacked the net distros, or...

    I've got it. These guys are such geniuses, they computed their hack to checksum exactly the same as the unhacked binary! Wow! No wonder my firewall, which checksums every executable I run, is useless against their l33tness!

    Fsckin' punks.

  87. How did Gobbles prove it was RIAA? by tobs · · Score: 1

    The slightly paranoid side of me says - what if both sides are saying the truth. What if someone posing as an employee of the RIAA contacts Gobbles, gets them to do this and then takes the data for their own nefarious uses. I can think of a number of borderline "legal" groups of people who would be willing to pay someone to produce this type of data for them.

    I would love to know from Gobbles how they *know* they were dealing with the RIAA and whether the whole discussion of their deal was done online or not.

  88. Reading /. on a gym bike by billstewart · · Score: 2
    A year or two ago, when I joined a gym, the place had about four exercise bikes with touchscreen computer screens on them, fed by some sort of DSL system. You could either use them to access the Internet, or to play music, and they tracked how long you'd been pedaling and gave you points which you could accumulate for fabulous prizes or something if you wanted to give up your privacy.

    Unfortunately, you had to keep pedaling at a steady rate or it would interrupt whatever fun stuff you were doing on the computer to nag you about getting your butt in gear and pedaling faster, which meant you couldn't do much typing (typing being a relatively inaccurate and clumsy process when you're bouncing around on a bike.) So this meant that most of what you could do with the computer was try to get it fired up into some news site before it nagged you and then do a lot of pagedowns. Well, there was an obvious site to read while biking, which was Slashdot. It was a bit tedious, since the screen was only 640x480, but it was halfway manageable or at least, as long as you didn't want to write long, insightful, informative articles like this one, anyway....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  89. D'Oh, forgot to finish by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Oh, right. So who were they? Doesn't matter, because they were a dot-bomb, and they're dead now..... Ran out of cash and valuable prizes, unplugged the DSL, and eventually the gym rolled them out of there.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  90. Re:pretty tame ego ... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    You have to understand you're arguing with someone whose understanding of reality is essentially flawed. A post like this one is classic Slashdot - it doesn't get any better than Mr. Twitter here.

    Twitter accused me of trolling because I pointed out that I didn't fancy the idea of running with an ipod for two hours (I run Marathons) because I didn't like the idea of shaking a hard drive all that time.

    Go figure.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  91. :CueCat!isdumb;;@ by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Putting ':' in front of a name makes me think that its pretentious and stupid. This called bad marketing. Companies please just use normal words, its not cleaver, original, fun, thought provoking or arty to put random punctuation into titles or stick every single title together to make one word. Cue Cat not CueCat. We live in a world were people can handle 2 words and no-body cares if C cant take spaces in variable names. Its not the end of the world if you do it, it just pisses me off. And probably other people too.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  92. It means they were pressed into service by davidmb · · Score: 1, Informative

    Against their will. You might have heard of the press gangs that used to roam British ports, kidnapping men and forcing them into the navy? They were impressed sailors, although I doubt they were too impressed by what happened.

  93. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > > ps - What exactly do you do at Microsoft?

    > I fuck your baby sister's bloody ass all day long. What exactly do you do under RMS's desk all day?

    You make such an eloquent argument that I'm tempted to apply for a job at Micorsoft too!

    > The Gates Foundation has given out over $5.5 billion since 1994, and over $3 billion of that went to world health. Microsoft's $400 million investment is a fucking pimple compared to those kinds of numbers. When you give five billion dollars in charitable grants, Crack Faggot, you can criticize.

    As a percentage of his net worth, that's like someone making $100K/year giving a few hundred dollars per year to charity.

    > Until the, wipe RMS's commie jizz off of your chin and get back to work.

    I'm unemployed. Microsoft destroyed my company.


    ps - My 14:1 ratio of money spent in India still stands. Shouldn't Gates also be lauded for all that money he donated toward the preservation of monopolies?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  94. Re:pretty tame ego ... by dipipanone · · Score: 1

    You don't understand much about free markets or free societies, do you?

    I certainly don't. Do you suppose you could point me at one, so I can be better informed?

    Oh, wait? You weren't thinking of the USA were you?

    Bwahahahahahahah!

  95. Re:pretty tame ego ... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

    "So we all hate Bill Gates."

    I think it would be more accurate to say that we dislike microsoft shareholders, and large companies in general. We like bill gates, even if his programs are only toys.

  96. Re:pretty tame ego ... by clickety6 · · Score: 2

    This is a guy who (with his wife) is in the process of donating $24 Billion to good causes.

    It would be interesting to kow what percentage of that money came from illegally exploiting his company's power as a monopoly i.e. how much of his generous donation was effectively stolen from you and me and others over the year?

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  97. Re:pretty tame ego ... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    for every dollar bill gates has its $1 that a worker (who wrote the software, did the accounting, drove the truck, washed the bathroom etc) doesnt have.

    no person can possibly create the billions of dollars Gates has... his 'weatlh' is a result of a distorted and corrupt system.

    dont applaud him because he has managed to suck money from so many...

    the richer you are, the less moral and honourable you are -- if it was not so, you wouldnt actually *be* rich... meaning, a "good" person would SHARE and not HORDE.

  98. It is "impress" by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Go fig, had mod points yesterday, nothing worth moderating, now I don't have them.

    Impress is the correct word. In this case, it means that the British took US sailors off of their ships and forced them to serve the British Navy.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:It is "impress" by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Ah, now I see. Enlightenment comes at the cost of karma.

    2. Re:It is "impress" by belroth · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying that the Navy didn't 'press some US sailors but there were also a lot of navy deserters who found a home in US ships and the Navy were almost always short-handed. So when they stopped neutral shipping to check for contraband being shipped to France they took the opportunity to look for deserters - and sometimes a few others.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  99. Re:pretty tame ego ... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    wrt M$ - i like it, it is the same kind of advertising/marketing for the ANTI-ms camp as "where do you want to go today" is for M$ themselves - it makes a point, its quick and effective...

    who decided you would be allowed to frame the debate and outlaw nit-picking (as "M$" I concede is...) - really, the communication straight *from* M$ is equally shallow and empty... whats good-for-the-goose...

  100. Re:pretty tame ego ... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
    So we all hate Bill Gates. Apparently for being ruthlessly successful at exploiting the (fairly) free, capitalist system we all hold dear.

    Hey cool! You mean, like Robin Hood? Yeah man, I can see that. He like robbed from the rich to give to the poor!

    Robin Hood was an outlaw as well, found guilty by the Evil Sherrif of committing terrible crimes and stealing for poor defenceless rich people.

    Despite some evidence that suggests he had a taste for violence, and in fact helped rich people as well, of course everybody loves Robin, don't they.

    Anyway, back to the point, Bill made a lot of money out of the markets precisely by so effectively removing that freedom. He should be punished like anybody else who attempts to play the markets, but he hasn't been. Giving away lots of money to charity doesn't make it OK by the way, if that were the case all drug dealers would have to do to get off the books would be to give away some of their personal fortune to good causes.

    Considering he basically did steal that money and even got found guilty of it, I don't see why his charitable preferences should override mine. He gave $10 billion to India to fight aids yes? He also gave a lot more than that to fight Linux in the very same country, not a good cause I'd have chosen to donate to (and I do donate to charity by the way).

    $24 Billion is more than most developed countries in the world will put into that sort of work in our lifetimes.

    Since when? Governments give huge amounts of money away as part of aid initiatives and so on. Britain still pays out large sums of money to help prop up parts of Africa, as well as supporting many charities through grants. Other governments do similar things. Often it has strings attached of course - Bill can give away all his money and see it disappear down the drains through long term corruption and mismanagement but governments who represent the people need to be a bit more careful, which is why such organisations often require governmental reforms to go along with aid.

    Oh and finally, don't forget that if him or his company had paid income tax, then a portion of that money would have gone towards such aid, and (at least in theory) the people would have chosen where the aid went or at least had some influence over it.

  101. ::Cue::Cat WOO! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    This gives me another chance to say " FLYING BUTT MONKEYS on slashdot and still be ontopic!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  102. Rip Off Artist by dowski · · Score: 1

    The "concept cover" for Pulitzer's magazine looks strangely similar to the cover of Wired's December issue

  103. Bill Gates and future history by McFly777 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The unfortunate thing is that people (and I mean usually smart people too) already think that Bill Gates is "the guy who brought us the computer." I was having this exact conversation with one who posed the question "Who was the most influencial person of the last century?" He answered his own question with "Bill Gates, he was the one who connected the world!"

    I protested, and thought about the question over Christmas dinner. Afterwords, I gave him my answer. "If you want to talk about 'connecting the world' Bill Gates isn't your man. You should be talking about Jon Postal, who authored most of the specifications for the internet." The response... "Bill Gates is the one who brought it to the masses." (The Christmas gathering ended shortly thereafter -- a bit earlier than usual.)

    Thinking about it a bit more, a better answer might have been Tim Berners Lee for WWW or, to counter "...the one who brought it to the masses...," I could have responded with Marc Andresen, main author of Mosaic and Netscape, which is what really fueled the internet explosion.

    So, It seems that the history of the future has already been rewritten, and Bill Gates invented it all.

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
    1. Re:Bill Gates and future history by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

      Unless you happen to be Al Gore...in which case, YOU are the one responsible!

  104. ObCrapSlashJoke by Cally · · Score: 2

    Someone forwarded the message to us...
    ...to have your advice? For great justice? Enquiring minds want to know!

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  105. Re:pretty tame ego ... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

    That line of reasoning only applies if you are a communist.

    Earning a great deal of wealth is moral neutral. It all depends in how you got it. Not sharing is also not something that makes someone less moral.

    Personal accountability is something people like you seem to not be very big on. If you stopped worrying about how much money Mr. Gates makes and more about how much you make you might be doing well enough to not worry about the MS CEO anymore.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  106. Re:pretty tame ego ... by gosand · · Score: 2
    This is a guy who (with his wife) is in the process of donating $24 Billion to good causes.

    1. Yes, it is a good thing that he is doing with his money.

    2. It is a pittance, compared to what he is worth.

    3. Are you suggesting we forgive him his transgressions simply because he donates a tiny portion of it to charity?

    4. He is, and from what I have read has always been, an unethical businessman. The fact that he has succeeded doesn't make that any less true. Why should his charity be run any more ethically? I am not accusing him of anything, just that he is who he is, and that person is 0-1 in running ethical businesses.

    5. I could give a rat's ass how much money he has, money hasn't made him any less of a dufus. There are other people out there who effectively have the same amount of money (more than they could ever spend) yet people don't quote how much they give to charity.

    6. It is EASY for him to give away money. Just because he gives away more than I'll ever see in my life doesn't mean I should be impressed. Money means nothing to him. Although the sheer amount of money is impressive, his "charity" is not.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  107. Captain Monterrey Jack -- Re:Edison was a jerk by bsd-mon · · Score: 1

    Edison may have invented the lightbulb, but he was a bastard to his wife and kids!

    --
    To read makes our speaking English good. - X. Harris
    1. Re:Captain Monterrey Jack -- Re:Edison was a jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bbbrring! Bbbrring! Hello, cheese? No! Cheese can't dial a phone!

  108. Re:pretty tame ego ... by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 2

    Of which irony do you speak? I fail to see any.

    Believe it or not, it's possible for a single human being to do both good things and bad things. It's generally considered acceptable to complain about the bad things someone does while still appreciating the good things.

    Second, the "we" you're talking about refers to a thousands of people, each with slightly differing ideas and opinions. If you collect all of those opinions and try to stick it into a single opinion labelled "Slashdot's opinion", you're going to get some confused, conflicting ideas.

    Microsoft, while under the control of Bill Gates, repeatedly and intentionally used their market dominance to limit potential competitors access to the market. Netscape just happened to be the straw that broke the camels back. The complaint isn't "He tried to squash Netscape." Every competitor tries to outdo their opponents. The complaint is "Microsoft used its position of market dominance to threaten a wide variety of companies into behaving as Microsoft wanted."

    Bill Gates is using his fortune for a great deal of good work. But Bill Gates also lead his company as it tried to stop the free market forces that created it. There is no irony here, just the complexity of humanity.

  109. CUECAT for libraries by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    No need to reinvent the wheel. You're focusing on school administrative software. You can use existing open software for libraries. Koha or others.

    Barcode interfaces are a minor addition to the user interface. Too bad X11 doesn't provide cleaner alternative input interfaces (there were some removed before a recent release...).

  110. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a percentage of his net worth, that's like someone making $100K/year giving a few hundred dollars per year to charity.

    You are an idiot. Bill Gates's net worth is estimated to be $35 billion. His foundation has given away $5.5 billion to various charitable causes. That's more than 1/6th of his entire net worth. In other words, it's like someone making $100,000 a year giving nearly $20,000 per year to charity.

    So shut. The fuck. Up. Now. Bitch.

    I'm unemployed. Microsoft destroyed my company.

    Can't you read? Post or retract, bitch! Which company did you work for? Post the fucking name! Let's see if you're telling the truth, or if you're lying because you've got a bug up your ass about Microsoft.

    ps - My 14:1 ratio of money spent in India still stands.

    No, it doesn't, you idiot. Read the post. $5.5 billion to charity. Yes, most of it was in grants of less than $1 million, but so what? The fact is that Gates has spent $5.5 billion on charity, and $400 million on promoting Microsoft software in India. Coincidentally, that's a ratio of about 14:1 as well. Suck on it, bitch.

  111. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > You are an idiot. Bill Gates's net worth is estimated to be $35 billion.

    IIRC it was over $100 billion for much of the period you invoked. The drop in his net worth came with the general tech-stock crash of the past couple of years.

    Do correct me if I'm wrong on that point.

    > Can't you read? Post or retract, bitch!

    I elected to post. Don't blame me if you don't like the results!

    > No, it doesn't, you idiot. Read the post. $5.5 billion to charity. Yes, most of it was in grants of less than $1 million, but so what? The fact is that Gates has spent $5.5 billion on charity, and $400 million on promoting Microsoft software in India. Coincidentally, that's a ratio of about 14:1 as well.

    Ah, but you're comparing his total donations over his entire life vs. his recent MS promotion in India alone.

    Don't get me wrong: I'm glad that he's spending a big percentage of his tax-break PR-break money on AIDS research, since AIDS seems to be one of the world's worst problems these days. But don't mistake those outlays as anything other than an integral part of the cost of being an ultra-rich businessman. If you investigate a bit you'll find that they all do the same thing. In fact, one of the previous times this came up on Slashdot someone marshalled the evidence to show that Gates' donations are actually lower than the going rate for this class of individual.

    Face it, they are gestures that reveal no more about his character than when a politician serves the first bowl of gruel at a soup kitchen on Thanksgiving. If you want to promote him to sainthood, he needs to give until it's inconvenient. I'm happy about where some of his money goes; I just don't buy it as evidence that he isn't a world-class jerk.

    ps - How does it feel to realize that you have bought in to a propaganda ploy hook, line, and sinker?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  112. Re:You must provide proof for us to UNlearn histor by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    > Look, we learned what we learned in high school
    > from those textbooks because most historians and
    > educators agreed upon those facts.

    No, you learned that because that was the toned-down drivel that the textbook publisher could sell to the largest number of school boards. And as Mark Twain said, "First God made idiots. That was for practice. Then he created school boards."

    Chris Mattern

  113. Cool by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    Forget calling my uncle; this is good news. :)

    Anything that makes it easier for me to lose weight. (252 lbs at 5'10")

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Cool by extra88 · · Score: 2

      I hear you (~250lbs at 5'8"). I'm going to the "Y" pretty regularly now. However I'm more concerned with my volume than my weight :-) and it has improved a bit (1 belt notch, skinnier legs). I rarely weigh myself but when I have, my weight hasn't changed. I guess I'm trading fat for muscle. I haven't really changed my diet (which is not terrible but not good) and that's probably necessary to do serious damage to this gut. I don't have any specific goals, right now I'm just trying to make exercise a regular part of my life. I think that's the most important thing, finding stuff to do that you can stick with.

  114. ParaParaParadise gives you the gay by collapser · · Score: 1

    in dancing games that focus on the hands and waist you move like a lady the totally serious-looking feller I saw in the arcades the other night, playing PPP, had no idea of the huge crowd clustered behind him, trying incredibly hard not to laugh. of course, there is an alternative to doing all these silly gimmicks in the pursuit of health.. calisthenesia psychosis.

    --
    <B>note to self:</B> <I>post as html</I>
  115. Re:pretty tame ego ... by The+Bungi · · Score: 2
    wrt SOVIET RUSSIA - i like it, it is the same kind of advertising/marketing for the ANTI-troll camp as "natalie portman hot grits" is for trolls themselves - it makes a point, its quick and effective...

    who decided you would be allowed to frame the debate and outlaw nit-picking (as "SOVIET RUSSIA" I concede is...) - really, the communication straight *from* trolls is equally shallow and empty... whats good-for-the-goose...

    ------------
    Get it now?

  116. OT some more... by No-op · · Score: 1

    Speaking of lackluster performances...

    The french have no word for victory, so we all expect it from them. I still believe a stronger US isolationist policy that kept us out of WWII and no FDR might have made the world a more interesting place.

    if you can say any one good thing about americans, which is difficult to do, it's that we will finish what we start (and more than likely provoked to begin with...)

    --
    EOM
    1. Re:OT some more... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      The french have no word for victory, so we all expect it from them. I still believe a stronger US isolationist policy that kept us out of WWII and no FDR might have made the world a more interesting place.

      Hardly, all it would have meant is that the USSR would have occupied the whole of Germany and Austria in addition to the other parts of Eastern Europe. The Germans were defeated by the Russian war machine before the D-Day landings took place.

      But the US did not have a choice, Japan and German both declared was on the US. It is like the ridiculous Republican speculation over 9/11, as if any US president would not have invaded Afghanistan in response. There was simply no choice but to go to war, the war was started by the other side.

      The difference between Churchill/FDR and the appeasers/isolationists is that Churchill and FDR recognized the situation for what it was in advance of the attack. The appeasers would still have entered the war after - and did, Chamberlin declared war after Germany invaded Poland.

      Churchill was also a briliant military tactician. Had the battle of Gallipoli gone the other way WWI would have been won several years earlier. It would have gone the other way but for Kamal Attaturk rallying the Turkish troops, and that despite the incompetent allied officers.

      The failure in the Whitehouse on the other hand avoided going to Vietnam by getting daddy to pull strings, went AWOL and has lied about it ever since. And he dares compare himself to Churchill.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  117. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I elected to post. Don't blame me if you don't like the results!

    I knew it. You're a fucking liar. "Oh, waa, Microsoft put my company out of business, waa." "Gee, Black Parrot, what company was that, exactly?" "Uh... waa! Waa!"

    Whatever, asshole. You're a fucking liar, and now everybody on Slashdot knows it.

    ps - How does it feel to realize that you have bought in to a propaganda ploy hook, line, and sinker?

    ps - How does it feel to realize that you are a fucking sheep who couldn't think for himself if his life depended on it? "Micro$oft is EVIL! Bill Gates is El Diablo! Everything they do sucks! The people on Slashdot say it, so it must be true!"

    The only even remotely independent thought you've exhibited during this entire thread was that bald-faced lie you posted about being run out of business by Microsoft.

  118. Re:pretty tame ego ... by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


    And the Mafia don gives money to the Catholic Church, but he ain't a saint for that.

    Note, I am not saying that MS=Mafia here, just that donating to charity
    means nothing if you are a motherfucking bastard the rest of the time.

    Oh, and I am convinced that if the donations were sincere and not PR we wouldn't hear about them so much.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  119. Geeks should not repeat this stupid lie about Gore by geoswan · · Score: 1
    Unless you happen to be Al Gore...in which case, YOU are the one responsible!

    This is one of the two memes about the internet that really bugs me. If you are going to criticize someone, criticize them for what they actually said, not for what their critics say they said, for crying out loud.

    Gore never claimed to have "invented" the internet. During a CNN interview he said "During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

    So, who did create the internet? Well Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn were the guys who lead the development of TCP/IP, so their opinion should carry some weight.

    And this is what they had to say about it.

    I imagine that if Gore had been writing, rather than speaking off the cuff, he may have prefaced the word "initiative", and said, "legislative initiative" or "political initiative". And if Cerf and Kahn are to be believed, this would be a very fair assessment of his role.

    I didn't know of his efforts, prior to reading this article. Reading it earned him my respect.

    Particularly when you consider what George W. Bush was doing during this time. When was dubya a drunk and a coke-head?

    The other meme that bugs me is that "the internet was designed to survive a nuclear war." You don't believe that one too, do you crawdaddy?

    I am going to go off-topic in this last paragraph, and suggest slashdot readers take a look at the portion of Douglas Jones's homage to the punch card devoted to analyzing the questionable voting machines used in Florida./a?

  120. Googlewhacking "Hutton Pulitzer" by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Given that he has an entire website, I find it very odd that Googling on "J. Hutton Pulitzer" returns NO hits, while Googling on "Jovan Hutton Pulitzer" or just "Hutton Pulitzer" returns only one.

    Presumably he has a robots.txt file set up, but why wouldn't he want Google to find his site easily?

    Googlewhackers: just remember "Hutton Pulitzer"...

  121. Re:Geeks should not repeat this stupid lie about G by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the clarification. The article simply adds to the respect I already have for Gore. I voted for him in 2000 and would vote for him if he had decided to run in 2004. Bush and most of his administration is the cause of way too many problems plaguing the US at the moment. But who said you didn't have to admire/respect someone to poke fun at them?

    And of course I believe the internet can survive a nuclear war. Afterall, it IS just a bunch of people dialing into ISPs linked up with sattelites, right? See? Joking again...I know that all the backbones of the internet aren't in space, but instead are housed in underground armored bunkers in secret locations around the world.

  122. Re: pretty tame ego ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whassa matter, "Black Parrot?" I called you a liar and dared you to prove me wrong, and yet you remain completely silent on the issue. Afraid of being caught in the lie, liar?

    Shit-for-brains cock gobbler.

  123. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    gorgo: *lol*
    joey: what's so funny? :)
    shh, joey is losing all sanity from lack of sleep
    'yes joey, very funny'
    Humor him :>
    -- Seen on #Debian

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...