Most of the CDs I own are put out by TVT, but I didn't see them on the list. Strange. I did see Nothing Records, which I would have thought to stay away, but I guess not. Strange as well.
I really like the concept of the site. Picking a license is a very difficult part of releasing the source to a project, and the reason some of my personal projects are still closed source.
I would REALLY like to see something like this site, but slightly more involved, with a few more questions (with the description popup tips you can click on) where the end result is either a funky name like "Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial License" or GPL or something like that if the answers you picked to the questions actually fit GPL. Having only the funky names for responses doesn't seem complete enough to me.
Two companies can share the same name if its used for different purposes. Look at me - I have a trademark on MORPHEUS for the purpose of image manipulation, while some other company has a trademark for MP3/Music purposes.
I read this, then scrolled down to the bottom, and my quote of the moment said:
"Just think, with VLSI we can have 100 ENIACS on a chip!" -- Alan Perlis
If the warning box PROPERLY EXPLAINED to the user that the question at hand is "Do you trust thissite.com ?" instead of "warning! lots of bad things will happen if you click yes!".
How does paying money to a corperation really mean you are automatically trustworthy anyways? I would argue all CA's should be done away with and people should trust who they want to trust based on how the site presents itself. Browsers should ask the user in plain english, the simple question, "Do you want to trust this site for providing secure content?" Think of SSH as far as retaining the key for future verification.
Geotrust are probably the cheapest there are. Very no-hassle to aquire (all automated).
I got a good deal with geotrust ssl + rackshack.net (the ssl cert was free for me:)
Did you know you have a blind spot in each eye, where your brain just magically fills in what it thinks should be there? The blind spot is big enough to drive a car through, which is why somebody with an eyepatch is not supposed to drive a car.
Thats what I was thinking. And how exactally do you enforce this banner-ad showing program for free wireless access? Wouldn't that mean downloading some sort of proprietary software that is required for the net connection?
Am I the only one who thinks the person who submitted this story hasn't got a clue about technology, and just wants to find some fast cash?
I bet this gets even more confusing when you look at LCD's where 4 "pixels" can be, say, represented by 2 red areas, 2 green areas, and 1 blue area.
On the other hand, this reminds me of a old ModeX resolution trick for VGA-only boards. You could actually set the screen to 320x600 to simulate 18-bit color at 320x200. It works very well, using every 3rd line as R, G, B with 6 bits per color (64 shades of each, leaving you with 64 unused palette entries)
the 1-year warrenty thing isnt completely new. CompUSA brand (maxtor) drives I have seen had stickers on the side of the box saying "1 year warrenty". The sticker was placed over the spot that had formerly said "3 year warrenty".
http://www.nypost.com - Reported as accessible in China http://www.google.com - Reported as inaccessible in China http://slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China http://www.bmezine.com - Reported as accessible in China http://www.halturnershow.com - Reported as accessible in China http://www.beliefnet.com - Reported as accessible in China http://145.94.54.56 - Reported as accessible in China http://www.insex.com - Reported as accessible in China http://www.bukkake.com - Reported as accessible in China http://scimail.uwaterloo.ca - Reported as accessible in China
Slashdot Mirror
Im serious, learn english and deal with an 8bit character set where only the lower 7bits are guarenteed. It works for me so it can work for you too.
Most of the CDs I own are put out by TVT, but I didn't see them on the list. Strange. I did see Nothing Records, which I would have thought to stay away, but I guess not. Strange as well.
int ignore(void)
{
collect_data();
}
I really like the concept of the site. Picking a license is a very difficult part of releasing the source to a project, and the reason some of my personal projects are still closed source.
I would REALLY like to see something like this site, but slightly more involved, with a few more questions (with the description popup tips you can click on) where the end result is either a funky name like "Attribution-NoDerivs-NonCommercial License" or GPL or something like that if the answers you picked to the questions actually fit GPL. Having only the funky names for responses doesn't seem complete enough to me.
No, I would have assumed *BSD all had SMP support too, after all, Linux and Windows support SMP... strange
Deaf people dont seem to have that problem. I know one personally, she drives an SUV too!
http://www.morpheussoftware.net
:)
Its not for Mac, but its only 19.95
of windows 2000.
Two companies can share the same name if its used for different purposes. Look at me - I have a trademark on MORPHEUS for the purpose of image manipulation, while some other company has a trademark for MP3/Music purposes.
Part of the reason to ask for Zip code is AVS systems to help prevent credit card fraud...
Funny..
I read this, then scrolled down to the bottom, and my quote of the moment said:
"Just think, with VLSI we can have 100 ENIACS on a chip!" -- Alan Perlis
Whats in that? zero protons with zero electrons orbiting? wouldnt that be NOTHING at all?
http://nocall.wisconsin.gov/
Not Effective until Jan 1
*MOD PARENT UP*
I, as well, remember a 10th planet from 3rd-4th grade called Planet X
If the warning box PROPERLY EXPLAINED to the user that the question at hand is "Do you trust thissite.com ?" instead of "warning! lots of bad things will happen if you click yes!". How does paying money to a corperation really mean you are automatically trustworthy anyways? I would argue all CA's should be done away with and people should trust who they want to trust based on how the site presents itself. Browsers should ask the user in plain english, the simple question, "Do you want to trust this site for providing secure content?" Think of SSH as far as retaining the key for future verification.
*MOD PARENT UP*
:)
Geotrust are probably the cheapest there are. Very no-hassle to aquire (all automated).
I got a good deal with geotrust ssl + rackshack.net (the ssl cert was free for me
Go to your profile directory and look again (C:\Documents and Settings\MYUSERNAME\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\default\RANDOM.slt\chrome)
There is a file there called userContent-example.css with a commented out example:
blink { text-decoration: none ! important; }
Just uncomment it out and rename the file to just userContent.css
Did you know you have a blind spot in each eye, where your brain just magically fills in what it thinks should be there? The blind spot is big enough to drive a car through, which is why somebody with an eyepatch is not supposed to drive a car.
Thats what I was thinking. And how exactally do you enforce this banner-ad showing program for free wireless access? Wouldn't that mean downloading some sort of proprietary software that is required for the net connection?
Am I the only one who thinks the person who submitted this story hasn't got a clue about technology, and just wants to find some fast cash?
#ifdef WIN32
#define snprintf _snprintf
#endif
I always heard Spelling In Context
I bet this gets even more confusing when you look at LCD's where 4 "pixels" can be, say, represented by 2 red areas, 2 green areas, and 1 blue area.
On the other hand, this reminds me of a old ModeX resolution trick for VGA-only boards. You could actually set the screen to 320x600 to simulate 18-bit color at 320x200. It works very well, using every 3rd line as R, G, B with 6 bits per color (64 shades of each, leaving you with 64 unused palette entries)
the 1-year warrenty thing isnt completely new. CompUSA brand (maxtor) drives I have seen had stickers on the side of the box saying "1 year warrenty". The sticker was placed over the spot that had formerly said "3 year warrenty".
Well according to everything2, its British Naval Connector, Bayonet Neill-Concelman, or Big Nobby Connector...
Take your pick
This is what I saw:
http://www.nypost.com - Reported as accessible in China
http://www.google.com - Reported as inaccessible in China
http://slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China
http://www.bmezine.com - Reported as accessible in China
http://www.halturnershow.com - Reported as accessible in China
http://www.beliefnet.com - Reported as accessible in China
http://145.94.54.56 - Reported as accessible in China
http://www.insex.com - Reported as accessible in China
http://www.bukkake.com - Reported as accessible in China
http://scimail.uwaterloo.ca - Reported as accessible in China
I guess porn is good, but google is bad somehow..