Slashdot Mirror


New Frozen World Found Beyond Pluto

theBrownfury writes "BBC, Sydney Herald, and the Indian Express are reporting a new object, which is one-tenth the diameter of the Earth, and lies well beyond Pluto in an area of the Solar System known as the Kuiper Belt. The new world, which has been dubbed Quaoar, is about 1,280 kilometres (800 miles) across. Quaoar orbits the sun ever 288 years and is 1250 Km wide, about the size of all the asteroids combined. This discovery is being hailed as the most important solar system discovery in the past 72 years."

756 comments

  1. Ah crap... you've found my home planet. by Ted_Green · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now you all must die!

    1. Re:Ah crap... you've found my home planet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your base ar belong to us!

    2. Re:Ah crap... you've found my home planet. by huge · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, All your (Quaoar) base are belong to us.

      --
      -- Reality checks don't bounce.
    3. Re:Ah crap... you've found my home planet. by anshil · · Score: 2

      All your planet are belong to us!

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    4. Re:Ah crap... you've found my home planet. by tigertigr · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't drop us into volcanoes using DC-8s and then release H-bombs on us like Xenu did!

  2. Most Important Solar System Discovery by von+Prufer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This discovery is being hailed as the most important solar system discovery in the past 72 years."

    Not by me.

    1. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by m4ik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is this a flamebait? I'd really like to know how this is more important than, say, the dicovery of the belts of Jupiter and Uranus.
      Oops now I can't even mod it up again.

      --
      Quod in aeternum cubet mortuum non est,
      Et saeculis miris actis etiam Mors perierit
    2. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not anonymous, like us cowards who are overjoyed by this useless new rock.

    3. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by joeykiller · · Score: 1, Troll
      "This discovery is being hailed as the most important solar system discovery in the past 72 years."

      Not by me.


      What's wrong with today's moderators?

      I can't believe a statement like that can be modded up to "Insightful". Had the poster at least written a few reasonable words stating why, I'd maybe understand it. But this...
    4. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the term used in the BBC article is "biggest", as in "largest".

    5. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by sniggly · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Agreed, water on the moon, water on mars, possibly tokens of life on mars (on micrometeorites), the beautiful and geologically complex moons of Jupiter & saturn.

      Compared to a block of rock 1/2 the size of pluto?, even colder & further out? It shows large objects exists in the kuijper belt but thats nice to know, not at all in the same league as some other recent discoveries .

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    6. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by esobofh · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's not even a rock.. it's a damn dirty chunk of ice.. now.. if that was in my drink i might have something to say about it..

      --

      ----------------------------
      Esobofh - Currently drinking fresh mango juice.
    7. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      The real question is if this "planet" fits into the Titus-Bode sequence of planetary orbits. And, if it does, how many planets are supposed to be between it and Pluto?

      PS: Yes, I know the Titus-Bode sequence is inexact but its general accuracy is seemingly non-random so perhaps some time should be put into bringing it up to snuff with modern mathematics.

    8. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      And, having investigated, it doesnt. Not even close. The next planet after Pluto (or the second of the next two, if Neptune's irregularity is repeated) should have been at 77.2AU but Quaoar is only at approximately 43AU. So theres another point in opposition of calling it a planet, albeit a weak one.

    9. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by William+R.+Dickson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like, "How the hell am I supposed to lift this glass with a freakin' planetoid in it?"

    10. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think you should say "rings", rather than "belts".
      At first I thought you meant the atmospheric belts,
      which in Jupiter's case at least have been known
      for much longer than 72 years.


      Sorry to quibble :)

    11. Re:Most Important Solar System Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried using the vacuum that obviously exists between your ears?

  3. Is that the name? by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

    Quaoar? I think you mean Planet X!

    1. Re:Is that the name? by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      *MOD PARENT UP*

      I, as well, remember a 10th planet from 3rd-4th grade called Planet X

    2. Re:Is that the name? by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1
      No, the entire "Planet X" debacle was about some inter-dimensional hoopla that hits the Earth every 2 million years or something (psuedo science). Now that a credible discovery in Astronomy that followed the scientific model has been made, the Planet X goons will cry out that they discovered it first using their Atlantiean power crystals and dimensional warps fields.

      You can't have the credibility and wording of science when it's convenient to you - you have to go all the way - this is no doubt published in a journal with a horde of credible and tangible evidence that can be verified and observed. "Planet X" was not.

    3. Re:Is that the name? by alienmole · · Score: 1
      No, the entire "Planet X" debacle was about some inter-dimensional hoopla that hits the Earth every 2 million years or something (psuedo science).

      Yeah, that's exactly what the evil denizens of Planet X would have you believe... OMG, you must be...! AAAAAAH!

    4. Re:Is that the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planet X is theorized to be much larger than the ball of ice described here. Something more like Jupiter that orbits every 2000-3000 years.

    5. Re:Is that the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have anything else to add, besides that I've heard the same thing. Planet X.

    6. Re:Is that the name? by Anselor · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is from the University of Arizona: http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/nineplanet s/hypo.html#planetx

      Planet X was theorized as a possible cause for large deviations in Uranus's orbit. The discovery of Pluto was directly related to this Planet X theory.

    7. Re:Is that the name? by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those of you who don't stay up til 5am listening to Art Bell, here's a good primer on all the "Planet X" garbage assembled by Phil Plait. http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index .html

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    8. Re:Is that the name? by Fuzion · · Score: 1

      Wasn't planet x, the name used for Charon, pluto's moon because they originally mistakenly thought it was a planet or something?

      --
      "Knowledge makes us accountable." - Che Guevara
    9. Re:Is that the name? by jhirbour · · Score: 1

      ah 10 planets! all the more reason the US should use the metric system!

    10. Re:Is that the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the planet x art bell is referring to isn't really related to what most of us here are discussing. planet x was theorized due to the odd orbit of uranus. check out anselor's post one or two posts before yours. art bell was simply talking about how some doomsdayer's had seized on this. the actual theory of planet x had nothing to do with it spreading havoc accross the globe next time its orbit brought it close to earth. discussions on planet x go back to the late 19th century.

    11. Re:Is that the name? by Snarph · · Score: 1

      ah 10 planets! all the more reason the US should use the metric system!

      ...Shouldn't that be 25.4 planets?

    12. Re:Is that the name? by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      oh, ok, i thought the original poster was saying that all the loonies were going to pick up on this new planety thing and say "see! planet x! we told you!!!" which, well, considering they're all talking about something that doesn't exist anyway, they can just cram anything they want into their argument, which i have a feeling is precisely what they're going to do :)

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    13. Re:Is that the name? by ethanms · · Score: 1

      10th Planet "X" Info:

      http://dosxx.colorado.edu/Pluto/PlanetX.Anderson .h tml

    14. Re:Is that the name? by ethanms · · Score: 1

      fixed link...

      Planet X Info

    15. Re:Is that the name? by mgblst · · Score: 2

      I believe the correct name is "Quagaar", and we will find "perfectly-preserved remains of a Quagaar warrior" on this planet. I hail this as the greatest discovery ever.

    16. Re:Is that the name? by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 2
      This is from the University of Arizona: http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/nineplanet s/hypo.html#planetx

      Article starts with: "In 1841, John Couch Adams began investigating the by then quite large residuals in the motion of Uranus. In 1845, Urbain Le Verrier started to investigate them, too."

      i hate to be juvenile, but then this is slashdot

    17. Re:Is that the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed the deviations in uranus' orbit when you stopped spending the night, big boy. [wink]

    18. Re:Is that the name? by jp78 · · Score: 1

      Don't those Quagaar warriors look amazingly like turkeys?

    19. Re:Is that the name? by Ded+Bob · · Score: 2

      The first thing I thought of when I read your post: "Duck Dodgers in the 24 1/2 Century!" :)

      Two important links:
      1) Reference.
      2) New show.

    20. Re:Is that the name? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Didn't they have anything better to do than stare at Uranus?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    21. Re:Is that the name? by kaiidth · · Score: 1
      it's not a planet...

      ... it's a garbage pod!

      It's a smegging garbage pod!

  4. Our solar system ... by mustangdavis · · Score: 1

    is made up of nine planets .... er ...

    Our solar system is made up of ten planets ...

    1. Re:Our solar system ... by Derkec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, this is further evidence that our solar system is made up of 8 planets and there are also a stack of Kuiper belt objects of various sizes. Pluto, just being a rather large and well known one.

    2. Re:Our solar system ... by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      is made up of nine planets .... er ... Our solar system is made up of ten planets ...

      It is sometimes said by astronomers that our solar system is made up of the Sun, Jupiter, and bunch of other little clutter. The mass of the rocky planets, and even the smaller gas giants is dismal compared to Jupiter.

      The borderline between planet and asteroid is blurry. We might as well stop counting at Pluto out of tradition. However, if something bigger than Pluto is found out there, then the debate will heat up again.

      Hmmmmm. I wonder if the Sun is even the brightest star out at the distance of Qu...... whatchmacallit. I would guess that it still is. Although Sun is not a big star, Q is still far closer to it than others.

    3. Re:Our solar system ... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      It's a full 4 light years to the next nearest star (proxima centuari IIRC) whereas 8 light minutes from the sun to earth. Although it's a fair distance past pluto, I'm guessing it's no more that a light hour, compared to 4 light years.

    4. Re:Our solar system ... by back_pages · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty certain that it's about 12 light hours to Jupiter, but my reference is my foggy memory of some dusty Arthur C. Clarke books. It's not like it would be tough to figure it out. The article mentioned 6x10^9 kilometers, so at a rate of 3x10^5 m/s (light speed, no?) it would be 55.56 light hours from the sun, a little over two Earth days.

    5. Re:Our solar system ... by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      Pluto is about 5900 x 10^6 km from the sun. Put in other words it's 39.4 AU(1) away. This comes out to 333 light minutes or 5.55 light hours.
      Apparently the sun (sol) would be no brighter than Sirius appears in our night sky.
      The nearest star is 6,634 sun-to-pluto lengths away.

      1 - an AU is an Astronomical Unit, the average distance the earth is from the sun

    6. Re:Our solar system ... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Hmmmmm. I wonder if the Sun is even the brightest star out at the distance of Qu...... whatchmacallit. I would guess that it still is. Although Sun is not a big star, Q is still far closer to it than others.

      Our next closest star, Proxima Centauri, is 4.8 light years away. Quaoar circles the sun in a nearly circular orbit taking 288 years to revolve once. Too lazy to calculate its mean distance from the Sun based on this, but I can certainly say that it is more proximate (pun intended) to the Sun than any other star.

    7. Re:Our solar system ... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      If The Big Ten can include 11 teams, why can't the 9 planets of the solar system have 10 planets?

    8. Re:Our solar system ... by mexicanfood.org · · Score: 1

      We won't see more than 9 official planets. That number will drop before it increases. Early 20th century data showed inexplicable deviations in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Some scientist tried to find a planet that could explain these deviations. In 1930, Tombaugh was able to find it using some crude star imaging. At first it was estimated to be about a tenth the size of Earth. This size and the need to explain data irregularities make originally labeling Pluto a planet reasonable. Today we know Pluto's mass to be about .22% of the earths...not nearly enough to account for deviations now known to be flaws in data, not actual deviations in orbit. Having a great deal in common with other trans-Neptunian Kuiper Belt objects, few astronomers consider Pluto to be a planet at all. Its official status is completely dependant upon tradition. The International Astronomer Union won't defend its title forever, though. Tradition is not likely to hold up a decade or two from now. True astronomers will never consider this new object in the same league as the closer 8. Comparisons to Kuiper Belt objects are too convenient. Some who just want money for the field (or themselves) might throw the word planet around, but that's only to gather attention.

    9. Re:Our solar system ... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Having a great deal in common with other trans-Neptunian Kuiper Belt objects, few astronomers consider Pluto to be a planet at all.

      Well, we should probably wait until we know more about those things way out there. The Pluto/Kuiper probe scheduled to reach the area in 20 or so years will hopefully shed more light on the question.

      Thus, please leave Pluto alone until we look at some of them closer up.

      Perhaps toss the word "planet" entirely. We have big balls of stuff, small balls of stuff, and lots of stuff in-between. Only stars are clear-cut (so far) because you either atomically convert hydrogen or you don't. There is not much in-between.

      I suppose "gas giant" is clear-cut in our solar system, but maybe not in others.

      I hope fights don't break out in astronomy class like the kind evolution/creation debates trigger.

    10. Re:Our solar system ... by ManitobaMoose · · Score: 0

      not to be smartassing, but proxima centauri is actually 4.27 ly away. in roughly 9000 years barnard's star (now 5.9 ly away) will be 3.8 ly from the sun.

    11. Re:Our solar system ... by barawn · · Score: 2

      Actually, there ARE very clear cut in-between stages.

      First, you can start converting hydrogen, without fully completing the pp cycle (and blowing up into a star). These are brown dwarves, though they are currently loosely defined via mass. You generate SOME heat this way, but not enough to start a full blown thermonuclear burn.

      There's a division between "star" and "planet" - we've got a name for it already, thankfully ("brown dwarf"). There's a clear division between "planet" and "other crap" as well - gravity. Below a certain mass, gravity can't pull an object into a sphere for rocky objects. Thus, asteroids are asteroids because they're aspherical. Note that this makes Ceres a planet, I believe - no big deal.

      So:

      "star": an object which completes the pp cycle or a later thermonuclear burn.
      "brown dwarf": an object which can begin, but not complete, the pp cycle.
      "gas giant planet": an object containing a planet with most of its volume made up of gaseous material. (Gas giant planets have solid cores... we think).
      "planet": a spherical or semispherical rigid body which orbits a point located inside of a star, and NOT a point located inside another non-stellar object.
      "trojan planets": any set of spherical or semispherical bodies which orbit a point located inside a star, and a point in empty space.
      "moon": any sizable body which orbits a point located inside a planet.

      That's a good set of working definitions.

    12. Re:Our solar system ... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      There's a clear division between "planet" and "other crap" as well - gravity. Below a certain mass, gravity can't pull an object into a sphere for rocky objects. Thus, asteroids are asteroids because they're aspherical. Note that this makes Ceres a planet, I believe - no big deal.

      Okay, I don't know enough about nuclear fusion/fission to question your brown-dwarf distinctions. However, "spherical" is a very continuous metric. No planet is perfectly spherical. I am sure some sort of cut-off could be devised for it, but it would be an arbitrary constant.

      IOW, the asteroid/planet distinction is *still* not solved.

    13. Re:Our solar system ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well actually, because they found this planet, it is believed that it is just ice debris from an asteriod belt in our solar system. also, this makes some believe that pluto is also NOT a planet yet a big chunk of this ice debris

    14. Re:Our solar system ... by barawn · · Score: 2

      Not really - saying "arbitrary" is a little much. The question is not its sphericity, but its mass in comparison to its composition. What you're curious about is whether or not the planet is held together by intermolecular forces, or gravitational forces. It's pretty clear cut, to be honest - either a planet is semispherical or it isn't semispherical. While it's true there will be planets "near" the boundary between the two, there will be brown dwarves close to stellar mass ("occasionally" completing the pp cycle), gas giants close to brown dwarf mass ("occasionally" running a few bits of fusion), etc.

      There are ALWAYS "arbitrary" cutoffs when you supply a definition, even if the definition appears clear-cut. However, using "of enough mass to pull itself into a sphere" solves the problem of not having a distinction between planets and asteroids. Right now it's "big" and "little", completely arbitrary as to which one. If you use sphericity, yes, there will be an "arbitrary" cutoff, but there will be a motivation behind it - the point at which self-gravitational forces dominate over intermolecular.

    15. Re:Our solar system ... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      However, using "of enough mass to pull itself into a sphere" solves the problem of not having a distinction between planets and asteroids.

      No it does not.

      Just about *anything* will pull itself together into a sphere if it is soft enough and other forces are not interfering. There is a far wider gray area here than brown dwarfs on the border of PP.

      I agree that no definition will be perfect, but the one you suggest for asteroid/planet distinction is *wide open* to a lot of factors. Gravity is just one force among many acting on a body. Whether it is the dominating force depends on other factors that vary widely over materials, time, etc.

      If the Earth is smacked by a large enough body, then gravity will *not* hold it together either.

      Brown dwarfs on the border may vary by a few percent from each other, but your def seems like it can vary by roughly an order of magnitude (10).

      I suggest you ponder your defintion suggestion a bit more.

    16. Re:Our solar system ... by barawn · · Score: 2

      Objects will only pull themselves into a sphere if gravity overcomes the intermolecular forces binding the object together. If it doesn't, they pull themselves into an aggregate sphere - that is, a loose collection of small particles, which is easy enough to distinguish: the density of the object will be less than the density of its composite materials. This is a kind of "inverse Roche limit" for an object. Gaseous objects will easily pull themselves into a sphere, but I didn't say gaseous - I said solid, and in fact, you could simply say "metallo-silicate" and be done. Solar system objects aren't made of "just about anything" - they're made of rock (silicon/iron), gas (hydrogen, etc.), and ice (comets). and even the gas giants have solid cores (most likely). Comets don't have a chance of pulling themselves into a sphere, as the intermolecular forces on ice are quite damned strong.

      As per Earth smacked by a large enough body: Earth was smacked by a Mars sized body, and still stayed (mostly) together. If the Earth is smacked by a body much larger, or with much force, and it doesn't stay together, then it wouldn't be a planet anymore, would it? It'd be a big ring of debris orbiting the Sun for a few million years, and then a planet again when it coalesced.

      The only rocky objects in the solar system that have pulled themselves into a sphere are the planets, several moons, and Ceres. On every other object in the solar system, intermolecular forces dominate over gravity.

  5. Again? by nogoodmonkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Haven't they discovered and disputed this "planet" for years? I believe I have seen this on space.com before in the past.

  6. How sure are they? by program21 · · Score: 1

    There's been a lot of controversy over other 'discoveries' of a 10th planet over the years, I'm just curious as to how sure these guys are, and what evidence they have that will convince their colleagues.

    --
    This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    1. Re:How sure are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, this newly found celestial body is not a planet at all, much less a "10th planet" ... It's just a Kuiper belt object, which happens to be rather large. Quaoar further strengthens the theory that Pluto is not a conventional planet but rather a Kuiper Belt object. "Quaoar definitely hurts the case for Pluto being a planet," said planetary scientist Mike Brown, co-discover of the new object. "If Pluto were discovered today, no one would even consider calling it a planet because it's clearly a Kuiper Belt object." While traditionally classified as a planet, Pluto is more likely is a Kuiper Belt object that was pushed into an erratic, Neptune-crossing orbit billions of years ago, according to astronomers and people with even remedial common sense. You can read up on Pluto here

    2. Re:How sure are they? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      Actually, this newly found celestial body is not a planet at all, much less a "10th planet" ... It's just a Kuiper belt object, which happens to be rather large. Quaoar further strengthens the theory that Pluto is not a conventional planet but rather a Kuiper Belt object.

      Ten planets? Eight? In either case, it won't matter for at lest 20 more years, when the schools finally getting around to updating their textbooks.

      You know, this makes me think. People get all bent out of shape about trying to detect asteroids hell-bent on destroying the earth, and we are just now finding an entire freaking planet(oid). If God decides to whack us with a rock, I really don't think there is a whole lot we can do to stop it.

    3. Re:How sure are they? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Didn't you see Armageddon?

      Besides, if God decides to whack us with a rock, he'll have decided several billion years ago. There doesn't seem to be a lot that changes unexpectedly up there (save the occasional asteroid collision.)

      Oh, and we'll be able to sell lots of commemorative t-shirts, magazines, and specially colored ribbons for the occasion. Go America!

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    4. Re:How sure are they? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      Didn't you see Armageddon?

      I caught the parts with Liv Tyler in them, yes. ;-)

      Besides, if God decides to whack us with a rock, he'll have decided several billion years ago. There doesn't seem to be a lot that changes unexpectedly up there (save the occasional asteroid collision.)

      Fair enough, I suppose. The Revelation already tells us He decided to whack us with a rock (two of them, actually).

      Oh, and we'll be able to sell lots of commemorative t-shirts, magazines, and specially colored ribbons for the occasion. Go America!

      "It is times like these that make us realize it is not whether you are a Republican or a Democrate, but an Amer....hey, waitaminute, we're all gonna die, right? Screw this, yeah, I am sleeping with my intern. What are you going to do, not re-elect me?"

    5. Re:How sure are they? by Mr.Nifty · · Score: 1

      The controversy over other discoveries has not been about what was discovered, it has been about what the definition of a planet is. Although the concept of a planet is used to teach children about the solar-system, in reality there is a gradation of objects from the large gas giants down to the smallest asteroids, and Pluto is much more similar to many smaller objects than it is to Jupiter.
      The definition of planet that media reports on has nothing to do with actual astronomical concepts, only on the things people learned in school because 4th-graders don't get an overview of the fine-points of astro-physics.
      This new object only serves to demonstrate how there is no hard and fast line delineating planets from non-planets, the debate in progress is only for the general public, astronomically the name is meaningless.

    6. Re:How sure are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I saw something like a moutain on fire fall into the sea... Yep, Revelations sounds like it describes the death of humanity by asteroid to me. Perhaps all sentient species get premonitions about the end of their civilizations.

    7. Re:How sure are they? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      And I saw something like a moutain on fire fall into the sea... Yep, Revelations sounds like it describes the death of humanity by asteroid to me. Perhaps all sentient species get premonitions about the end of their civilizations.

      Actually, that only kills off one third of the population.

    8. Re:How sure are they? by LordKariya · · Score: 1

      I recognize that sig.... from forums.warcraftiii.net ??

      --
      I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
    9. Re:How sure are they? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Somebody must have been impressed by it. I don't play video games and have been using it since long before Warcraft III came out. :-)

      I'm flattered.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    10. Re:How sure are they? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      If god(s) decide(s) to whack us with a rock he/they have munitions helluva lot closer than an entire freaking planetoid somewhere very far away.

      It's about 400000 kilometers from us and twice the size of this newly-found baby... you might've actually heard of it once or twice, it's called "The Moon" by most people.

  7. Aw shucks by entrippy · · Score: 5, Funny

    They called it "Quaoar"? You can't even pronounce it! Here I was hoping they'd have the decencey to name the planet out past Pluto as it should be named.

    Goofy.

    1. Re:Aw shucks by earthpig · · Score: 1

      i always thought the planet after pluto would be micky mouse.
      you see pluto is his dog, and . . . ah . . . never mind.

    2. Re:Aw shucks by JohnA · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't you mean "Disney(R) Presents Goofy"?

    3. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was supposed to be Mickey, then Goofy!

      Anyone else out there remember, "Mother Very Easily Made a Jam Sandwich Using No Peanuts, Mayonaise or Glue?"

    4. Re:Aw shucks by PD · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's pronounced Qwa O Wahr. Three syllables.

    5. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, the other names they considered were "ogg", "gentoo", "vorbis", and "cinelerra", but those were already taken.

    6. Re:Aw shucks by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      My first thought was, "I wonder if Stallman named it".

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    7. Re:Aw shucks by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 1

      What are the "mayonnaise" and "glue"? I find it easier to remeebr it thus: "Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto" :-P

    8. Re:Aw shucks by liloldme · · Score: 1

      quack of war? wtf?!

    9. Re:Aw shucks by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      Mine was:

      Men Very Early Made Jars Stand Up Nearly Perpendicular

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    10. Re:Aw shucks by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? It's not called GNU/Quaoar.

    11. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought "Hypatia" would be a good name for a planet, but I suppose the fundies would be up in arms if we tried to do that.

    12. Re:Aw shucks by Cranston+Snord · · Score: 1

      No, that would make it GNU/Quaoar. The GNU project provides the underlying construct for which said planet, Quaoar, exists. Quaoar is merely a planet.

      --
      And now for something completely different...a man with three buttocks.
    13. Re:Aw shucks by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      They will surely toss you in the Geek Bin if you go around saying,

      "I'm listening to an Ogg Vorbis tune about planet Quaoar."

    14. Re:Aw shucks by earthpig · · Score: 1

      not actually.

      i remeber " my very educated mother, just served us nine pizzapies, . . . 'more grits?'"

    15. Re:Aw shucks by entrippy · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was - but Goofey was funnier in context...

      To anyone wondering what the heck we're talking about - go check out Schrodingers Cat by Robert Anton Wilson.

      Go! Now!

    16. Re:Aw shucks by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny
      They called it "Quaoar"? You can't even pronounce it! Here I was hoping they'd have the decencey to name the planet out past Pluto as it should be named.

      Goofy.

      What, you don't think the name "Quaoar" is goofy enough already? :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    17. Re:Aw shucks by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What happened to sticking with The Guide and naming it Rupert :-)

    18. Re:Aw shucks by naChoZ · · Score: 1

      I think they meant quaHOG, didn't they? :)

      --
      "I can be self-referential if I want to," said Tom, swiftly.
    19. Re:Aw shucks by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      Couldn't get past the copyright for another 300 years.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    20. Re:Aw shucks by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should have called it "Planet X". (If X = 10 isn't trademarked by Apple.)

    21. Re:Aw shucks by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then, of course, there's the painful deviation from the traditional planet naming convention to consider: Minerva, Ulysses, and Orpheus are all better choices than "Q-mumble-mumble".

      I swear, it looks like the sort of name that was made specially for Ash to mispronounce, thereby summoning unspeakable evil to an S-Mart near you.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    22. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that it is ironic that the planets are named about Gods and other religous imagery. I thought scientists were above that.

    23. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually,

      Ogg/Quaoar.

    24. Re:Aw shucks by SunLad · · Score: 1

      "NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has measured the largest object in the solar system ever seen since the discovery of Pluto 72 years ago. Approximately half the size of Pluto, the icy world is called "Quaoar" (pronounced kwa-whar). Quaoar is about 4 billion miles away, more than a billion miles farther than Pluto. Like Pluto, Quaoar dwells in the Kuiper belt, an icy belt of comet-like bodies extending 7 billion miles beyond Neptune's orbit."

      http://hubblesite.org/news_.and._views/pr.cgi.2002 +17

    25. Re:Aw shucks by CableModemSniper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cry havoc and let slip the ducks of war?

      --
      Why not fork?
    26. Re:Aw shucks by CableModemSniper · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's trademarked by the Roman Empire. Apple is licensing the letter "X" as the number 10 on a long term basis.

      --
      Why not fork?
    27. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course you mean: DIS/Goofy

    28. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pronounced Qwa O Wahr. Three syllables.

      It means "big fucking rock" in Klingon.

    29. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, that's even dumber than the name itself.

    30. Re:Aw shucks by mbogosian · · Score: 2

      In keeping with the Roman god thing, how about:

      Bacchus (God of W[h]ine)
      - or -
      Vulcan (The Smith God) -- so what if Gene Roddenberry says they came from somewhere else?

    31. Re:Aw shucks by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      You can't pronounce it. You refer to it as "The Planet Formerly Known As Planet X"

    32. Re:Aw shucks by apg · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is what happens when scientists get a load of crappy letters in Scrabble.

      "Honey, I'm telling you... 'Quaoar' is so a word. It's the name of the planet we discovered yesterday. Yeah, that's it..."

    33. Re:Aw shucks by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "Disney(R) Presents Goofy"?

      Actually:
      Disney(R) Presents(R) Goofy(R). All rights reserved.

    34. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Mr. Mouse, in this state, insanity is not just grounds for divorce."
      "Your honor, I didn't say that my wife was insane, I said that she was fucking goofy! "

      (The joke works better when you can tell it with the Mickey Mouse voice. And by damn, that's the definition of fair use, so Michael Eisner can kiss my ass!)

    35. Re:Aw shucks by drik00 · · Score: 1

      Did you hear about Mickey and Minnie splitting up? Yeah, according to Mickey, she was fuckin' Goofy.

      J

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    36. Re:Aw shucks by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it'd be a perfect scapegoat for the next series of Budweiser commercials....

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    37. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C | N > K

      My KINGDOM for mod points.

    38. Re:Aw shucks by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      how about... ...Vulcan

      Err, Star Trek mythos aside, when I think "Smith God", I think fire, I think heat.

      You did read the part where they mention this is a dirty little iceball that's even colder than Pluto, right? :)

      Sure, I know there's not actually any liquid water on Neptune, and you could pick faults with the other planets' nicknames, but...

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    39. Re:Aw shucks by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Qwa O Wahr?
      Sounds like my cat when I stuck it in the microwave.

      --
      Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    40. Re:Aw shucks by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      Lawyer: Mr. Mouse, you cannot seek a divorce simply because you think your wife is crazy...

      Mouse: I didn't say she was crazy...I said she was Fucking Goofy!

    41. Re:Aw shucks by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      Oops, those are already taken by asteroids:

      (93) Minerva
      (5254) Ulysses
      (3361) Orpheus

      With all the known asteroids and moons, it's probably getting pretty tough to come up with new names.

      Iz

    42. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... What about "Bob"?

      Or at the very least, "George Foreman"

    43. Re:Aw shucks by TekPolitik · · Score: 2
      It's pronounced Qwa O Wahr. Three syllables.

      I guess that's what you get when you let Te'oc name it.

    44. Re:Aw shucks by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

      You can't pronounce it. You refer to it as "The Planet Formerly Known As Planet X"

      Shouldn't that be "The Planet Formerly Unknown To Us, But If It Were Known It Would Have Been Known As Planet X"?

    45. Re:Aw shucks by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Curses! Foiled again! Goddamn trans-Neptunian bodies. Why do they need names, anyway?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    46. Re:Aw shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quaoar: Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians, California

      I'm supposing that the 'q' in quaoar is a uvular stop.

    47. Re:Aw shucks by DMBoyd · · Score: 1

      Yea, tis easy to pronounce, just yawn.

    48. Re:Aw shucks by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      "Hmm... What about "Bob"? "

      There's a few Bobs:

      (5871) Bobbell
      (6708) Bobbievaile
      (5642) Bobbywilliams
      (10498) Bobgent
      (12014) Bobhawkes
      (2829) Bobhope
      (37859) Bobkoff
      (2507) Bobone
      (6641) Bobross
      (2637) Bobrovnikoff
      (5549) Bobstefanik
      (39890) Bobstephens
      (13423) Bobwoolley

      and some Georges:

      (3854) George
      (6400) Georgealexander
      (16225) Georgebaldo
      (9704) Georgebeekman
      (6202) Georgemiley
      (10733) Georgesand
      (11740) Georgesmith
      (359) Georgia
      (9119) Georgpeuerbach

      See http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/MPNames.html for the whole list.

    49. Re:Aw shucks by mmortal03 · · Score: 1

      i completely understand how to pronounce it correctly, but playing off the last few, we'll certainly be seeing insurance being advertised with it soon. "What is it again?" "Quaoa-rac!!!!!!!!!!"

    50. Re:Aw shucks by dokutake · · Score: 1

      If we're going to give it an unpronouncable name, at least make it Cthulhu!

      --
      - Peter
    51. Re:Aw shucks by dokutake · · Score: 1

      Of course, we all know Pluto = Hades. And we all know the phrase "Hot as Hades." Doesn't fit the planet much does it?

      --
      - Peter
    52. Re:Aw shucks by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Hey! A whole new world for Petoria to conquer. Cool.

    53. Re:Aw shucks by pdion · · Score: 1

      The name Vulcan has been used before to name an undiscovered planet that was supposed to be in orbit around the sun closer than Mercury. Astronomers thought that the planet existed because they had noticed irregularities in Mercury's orbit that could only be explained by another planet. (Much in the same way that irregularities in Uranus orbit led to the discovery of Neptune and Pluto). Later, the irregularities in Mercury's orbit were explained by the relativity theory and so we have Vulcan no more. Actually this was one of the most notable succesful test of Einstein's theories.

    54. Re:Aw shucks by tripper · · Score: 1

      Here is a good article that explains the naming of planets vs.KBO (Kuiper Belt Objects):

      http://msnbc.com/news/818195.asp?pne-msn

    55. Re:Aw shucks by evil_qwerty · · Score: 1

      It should be named Myanus. Im running out of Uranus jokes.

    56. Re:Aw shucks by armb · · Score: 2

      Though you aren't actually allowed names in Scrabble.

      --
      rant
  8. Is it really? by joyoflinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article at TheAge disputes whether this object is really a planet...

    1. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      planetlet

    2. Re:Is it really? by gabec · · Score: 3, Informative

      they also found this thing years ago.. well... known that it was out there for a while, just not exactly where. here's a page talking about it in Feb 2000, for example.

    3. Re:Is it really? by Pedrito · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, they're still trying to decided if Pluto is a planet. Really, though, it's a matter of semantics. Either way, it's a big rock that circles the sun. That can be said about a few of the other planets.

      It's still a cool discovery.

    4. Re:Is it really? by JoeRobe · · Score: 1

      Have you read the article?

      They discovered it in June, and then used other scopes to verify it, and then finally announced it.

      This is not Planet X. Supporters of Planet X believe it to be a very large planet, and much farther out than this one. This is even said so in the article to which you link. This planet appears to be very small (smaller than Pluto) and in the Kuiper belt (relatively close as compared to the place of origin of many comets - the Oort cloud).

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
    5. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "New Frozen World", "new object"... I don't see any hint that Slashdot is claiming this is a planet. Which quote are you disputing exactly?

    6. Re:Is it really? by Timmeh · · Score: 2

      As the Sydney Herald article points out (*reading* the articles! who does that anymore?), It is most likely a Kuiper-belt object, part of the very large belt of asteroids 30 AU to 50 AU from the Sun, containing many trans-Neptunian asteroid-like objects.

    7. Re:Is it really? by Atzanteol · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's because the term "Planet" is rather loosely defined. Nobody has ever really set a lower-limit on the size of a planet. Asteroids are 'small bodies' that orbit the sun. Planets are 'larger bodies' that orbit the sun. Pluto is smaller than our Moon, yet many still consider it a planet simply because it orbits the Sun.

      This new object will have difficulty becoming a 'Planet' by name.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    8. Re:Is it really? by SamSpectre · · Score: 1

      It's doubtful that the "new" ice-rock is a planet, since the only reason Pluto is classified as one is that it was too unpopular to reclassify it as an asteroid.

    9. Re:Is it really? by dstone · · Score: 2

      here's a page [raytheon.com] talking about it in Feb 2000, for example.

      No, I think that is a different object. In the article you provided (did you read it?!), it says the object's orbit is 3 trillion km from the Sun, while Quaoar's is apparently less than 10 billion km from the Sun. The object you mention's mass is estimated to be between 1 and 10 Jupiters. Quaoar is apparently a tenth the size of Earth. These sound like entirely different objects.

    10. Re:Is it really? by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

      my high school teachers mentioned an orbitting ice structure out past pluto... (doing math)... 8 years ago, and explained that it wasn't technically a planet way back then. is this old news or are there many of these ice planets?

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    11. Re:Is it really? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's still a cool discovery

      Actually, given the distance from the Sun, I'd say it's a very COLD discovery!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    12. Re:Is it really? by alienmole · · Score: 2
      Pluto would not be reclassified as an asteroid, regardless of popularity, since it's apparently constituted largely of ice, and if brought closer in towards the sun, would essentially turn into a comet. It might leave behind a few small asteroids in the process, though.

      Pluto would be classified as a Kuiper-Belt object, or as the article in The Age put it, an "ice dwarf".

      But the truth is, these labels are meaninglessly vague. They'd be better off just saying that Pluto is a Kuiper Belt object which for various reasons, also qualifies as a planet. But judging by the arguments about this, there's a subclass of rather vocal astronomers on both sides who are pretty anal and uncompromising - a bit like the scientific equivalent of birdwatchers: "That's a blue-crested browntit, I'm telling you!" "No, you idiot, anyone can see it's a brown-breasted hoople!"

    13. Re:Is it really? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's still a cool discovery.

      Apparently it's a completely frozen discovery.

      (Sorry, couldn't resist . . . I'll mod myself down now.)

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    14. Re:Is it really? by CoreyG · · Score: 2

      The 2 Skinnee Js have a nice song about this whole issue. The song is called "Pluto" off of "$uper Mercado." The lyrics are easily googled.

    15. Re:Is it really? by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      This article at TheAge disputes whether this object is really a planet.
      Uh, so do the articles. None of them claims that this is a planet. All three of them draw comparisons with Pluto, and discuss the nature of the Kuiper belt.
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    16. Re:Is it really? by Rhett · · Score: 1

      Either way, it's a big rock that circles the sun. That can be said about a few of the other planets.

      Like all the ones that circle other stars.

    17. Re:Is it really? by morridx · · Score: 1

      I once read that if the body collapses under its own gravity into a more-or-less spherical shape, then it's a planet.

    18. Re:Is it really? by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      But judging by the arguments about this, there's a subclass of rather vocal astronomers on both sides who are pretty anal and uncompromising - a bit like the scientific equivalent of birdwatchers

      Or slashdot readers?

      Anal Uncompromising /. Reader 1: Use Linux!!!
      Anal Uncompromising Astronomer 1: It's a Planet!!!

      Anal Uncompromising /. Reader 2: Use BSD!!!
      Anal Uncompromising Astronomer 2: It's a Kuiper-Belt Object!!!

      Anal Uncompromising /. Reader 1: So we both agree... We shouldn't use Windows...
      Anal Uncompromising Astronomer 1: So we both agree... it's not a star...

      Anal Uncompromising /. Reader 2: I don't agree to that solely on the basis that you believe it to be true... do you have any proof?
      Anal Uncompromising Astronomer 2: I don't agree to that solely on the basis that you believe it to be true... do you have any proof?

    19. Re:Is it really? by Swaffs · · Score: 2

      Neither this, nor Pluto, should be considered planets, because otherwise we'd have bring Holst back from the dead.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    20. Re:Is it really? by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2

      That's because the term "Planet" is rather loosely defined. Nobody has ever really set a lower-limit on the size of a planet. Asteroids are 'small bodies' that orbit the sun. Planets are 'larger bodies' that orbit the sun. Pluto is smaller than our Moon, yet many still consider it a planet simply because it orbits the Sun.

      Apparently, a planet must not only orbit the sun but must also be big enough for its gravity to shape it into some sort of recognizable sphere. In other words, it must be a globe. Pluto and Quaoar fit in this category. Most asteroids are potato-shaped rocks.

    21. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, a clear view of Quaoar is obstructed by the gaseous emission of Uranus.

    22. Re:Is it really? by surfimp · · Score: 1

      "When does an asteroid become a planet?" reminds me of another wonderful "imponderable":

      When does walking become hiking?

    23. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they're still trying to decided if Australia is a continent. Really, though, it's a matter of semantics. Either way, it's a big rock that circles the center of the Earth. That can be said about a few of the other continents.

      It's still a cool discovery.

    24. Re:Is it really? by richie2000 · · Score: 2

      Ohh, Nemesis. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    25. Re:Is it really? by nalfeshnee · · Score: 1

      For those interested, 'planet' comes from the Greek 'planetos', meaning 'wanderer'. They were named so since in comparison with the 'stars', they were perceived to 'wander' about the sky (the term is especially striking when one considers the retrograde motion of planets further out than Earth).

      Nalfy.

      --

      -- Despair is an operating system that ANY human being can run, sort of a psychological JAVA --

    26. Re:Is it really? by HedRat · · Score: 1

      Or this... If they didn't want King Kong to escape, why'd they make the doors so big?

    27. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I once read that if the body collapses under its own gravity into a more-or-less spherical shape, then it's a planet.

      In that case, I can't wait to hear them announce the discovery of Planet Oprah.

  9. who comes up with these names? by Lawmeister · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they just hammered on the computer to come up with this one.... random keys?

    1. Re:who comes up with these names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the BBC article:

      "Astronomers named the new object Quaoar, after the creation myth of the Tongva people who inhabited the Los Angeles area before the arrival of the Spanish and other European settlers."

      Read the article folks!

    2. Re:who comes up with these names? by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      Get real, these guys are scientists. They used "/dev/random".

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
  10. Will it stay named? by Astin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After all, they threatened to delist Pluto as a planet.

    --
    - In hell, treason is the work of angels.
    1. Re:Will it stay named? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes, but pluto managed to pull its stock up over $1, so it's still listed.

    2. Re:Will it stay named? by PD · · Score: 2

      Pluto will remain a planet because that's the convention that has been established. We call it a planet because we call it a planet. Circular reasoning, but all taxonomy is arbitrary at some level. As long as they send spacecraft to this new thing, I don't care what they call it.

    3. Re:Will it stay named? by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2

      Well sure. Some of the larger asteroids, e.g. Ceres, have names.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    4. Re:Will it stay named? by Derkec · · Score: 2

      They've named asteriods, so it might stay named even though it won't be a 10th planet.

    5. Re:Will it stay named? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As long as they send spacecraft to this new thing, I don't care what they call it.

      Why? It's just another big asteroid, and way further away (and therefore more expensive and difficult to explore) than the hundreds (thousands?) of near-earth 'roids. Just because this rock has a name, doesn't make it necessarily more interesting than other rocks.

      Let's spend our scarce space budget on things that are actually worth knowing about, not flavor-of-the-month "discoveries".

    6. Re:Will it stay named? by Dannon · · Score: 2

      I hope Pluto stays listed. Going along with this thread, I'd hate to have to say that My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Quiches.

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    7. Re:Will it stay named? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe pluto could give a few tips to sun micro.

    8. Re:Will it stay named? by Consul · · Score: 2

      They named an asteroid after Mike Oldfield. 5656 Oldfield, to be precise.

      We usually don't hear about asteroids getting names, but I managed to stumble across that one.

      --

      -----

      "You spilled my egg... I needed that egg."

    9. Re:Will it stay named? by PD · · Score: 1

      Let's spend our scarce space budget on things that are actually worth knowing about, not flavor-of-the-month "discoveries".

      This isn't a good argument. Technically, not much beyond our atmosphere is "worth knowing about" in any practical sense. Oceans on Europa, melting lead on Venus, water under the sands of Mars, I mean, who gives a shit, right?

      When the argument is made that these things are worth knowing about because it fulfils our curiosity, and that learning things is the complete justification for our attempts to learn things, then there's no distinction at all between a rock in the Kuiper Belt and something closer to home.

      So, I say, let the rockets fly! Hallelulah!

    10. Re:Will it stay named? by mumkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not just the larger asteroids that have names, and they're certainly not all from ancient mythology. Check out this list of minor planetary bodies. It's a long read, but there are some real gems. Lots of dead Greeks, of course, masters of dusty literature, music, science, etc. Seems like almost every city, state, and country has a minor planet named for it. Those who don't can be content to be represented by (6000) United Nations.

      Perhaps most apropos to note in this forum are asteroids (9965) GNU, (9885) Linux, (9793) Torvalds and (9882) Stallman (all spotted and named by the Kitt Peak Spacewatch crew).

      Childhood fairytales include (14014) Munchhausen, (17627) Humptydumpty, (1773) Rumpelstilz and (5405) Neverland. (2675) Tolkien and (2991) Bilbo are memorialized in minor planetary names as well.

      Luminaries of Science fiction are well-represented by planetary bodies such as (5020) Asimov, (9766) Bradbury, (21811) Burroughs, (4923) Clarke, (6371) Heinlein, (12284) Pohl, and (7758) Poulanderson.

      (4659) Roddenberry is accompanied by (9777) Enterprise, (26734) Terryfarrell and the dreaded (2913) Horta (2362).

      The (3325) TARDIS is floating out there somewhere too, as is (18610) Arthurdent.

      (13681) MontyPython and the circus are flying around -- (9617) Grahamchapman, (9618) Johncleese, (9619) Terrygilliam, (9620) Ericidle, (9621) Michaelpalin, and (9622) Terryjones.

      (291) Alice may (or may not) be the young friend of (6984) Lewiscarroll -- along with (6042) Cheshirecat, (6735) Madhatter, (17518) Redqueen, (17942) Whiterabbit, (9387) Tweedledee and (17681) Tweedledum.

      Beware the (7470) Jabberwock, my son (the jaws that bite, the claws that catch) beware the (9781) Jubjubbird and shun the frumious (9780) Bandersnatch!

      Both (4386) Lust and (3162) Nostalgia might be served by a visit to (12382) Niagara Falls. Don't tell (10515) Old Joe.

      Hollywood has a presence in space, with (25930) Spielberg and (7032) Hitchcock, (11548) Jerrylewis, (11419) Donjohnson, (20789) Hughgrant and (12050) Humecronyn. (13070) Seanconnery stars as (9007) James Bond.

      Too many cool ones to list all at once, but I have to mention (8147) Colemanhawkins, and (6318) Cronkite. There's the trio of (5048) Moriarty, (5049) Sherlock and (5050) Doctorwatson, followed by (5051) Ralph.

      Have some (29700) Salmon.

  11. not official name by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    "However, Quaoar is not an official name - at least not yet. In a few months, the International Astronomical Union, astronomy's governing body, will vote on it."

    I vote for CowboyNeal.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:not official name by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1

      another vote for CowboyNeal

      --
      ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    2. Re:not official name by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      Is this allowed?

      Wouldn't it break some U.S. law? DRM perhaps?

      Don't vote for anything unless you wish to risk jailtime ;-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    3. Re:not official name by morgajel · · Score: 1

      I gotta cast my vote for cowboyneil as well.

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    4. Re:not official name by BobRooney · · Score: 1

      Given that Every other planet is named after some Roman God/Goddess/Diety it seems a bit inconsitent to name this new "planet" anything that isnt consistent for, well, consistency's sake.

      I mean, I can understand how an Indian astronomer would want to name it Vishnu or something, but the way I see it: our telescope = we name the planet.

    5. Re:not official name by jpt.d · · Score: 2

      I think that if they found it they should name it. I think it is a good move naming it for something not of the 'old world'.

      --
      What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    6. Re:not official name by dswensen · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'm rather partial to "Yuggoth" myself.

    7. Re:not official name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually one planet is named after your anus.

    8. Re:not official name by dswensen · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Okay, whoever you are, I'm curious as to how on earth that's flamebait.

      I understand if you haven't read your Lovecraft, so I could understand maybe an "Offtopic," but how do you get flamebait? I'm being disrespectful to fictional Mythos creatures the world over?

      Unless of course someone has a mod-point vendetta out for me, which I wouldn't rule out. Seriously. I'm curious as to your motives.

    9. Re:not official name by _GrosLapin_ · · Score: 1

      What about GNU/Quaoar ?

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion
  12. Dimensions by red_dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... The new world, which has been dubbed Quaoar, is about 1,280 kilometres (800 miles) across. Quaoar orbits the sun ever 288 years and is 1250 Km wide, about the size of all the asteroids combined.

    So which one is it? 1280? 1250? Both? Neither? CowboyNeal?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    1. Re:Dimensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both. Width and 'across' refer to different
      measurements.

      More important question: How does this affect
      your life? I mean, let's suppose they were
      off by 30.. what the fuck do you care?

    2. Re:Dimensions by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      Probably another attempt by NASA to convert miles into kilometers.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    3. Re:Dimensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Note that he used a capital K (the computer science kilo = 1024).

      1250 Km = 1250*1.024 km = 1280 km. Everything works out.

    4. Re:Dimensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 1280x1024. Call it a new-288-year's resolution.

    5. Re:Dimensions by CableModemSniper · · Score: 4, Funny

      ::takes out calculator:: That is absoluetly terrifyi ng.

      --
      Why not fork?
    6. Re:Dimensions by glenstar · · Score: 1

      The answer is simple: We Americans don't get the metric system. The article was obviously written by an American who divided incorrectly the second time.

  13. Blarney by Shamanin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Quaoar orbits the sun ever 288 years"

    Do I perceive a-bit of the ol' Irish accent in ye? Or are ye a pirate be?

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
    1. Re:Blarney by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My guess is that it was named by a Farengi pirate.

    2. Re:Blarney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... and here I thought every planet orbits the sun in one year.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Quaoar? by Rupert · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Who thinks up these names? I would like to recite the names of the planets without it sounding like I had major dental surgery after Pluto.

    And didn't they realize that people get upset when you prematurely abandon a naming convention? Those of you who work in server rooms must know this. There must be dozens of Roman gods with no celestial body named after them yet.

    Ooh! I've got to see if the International Star Registry does planets. I know it's not official, but it'd be cool to have someone name a planet for you, even if it was only for your money.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
    1. Re:Quaoar? by algae · · Score: 1
      There must be dozens of Roman gods with no celestial body named after them yet.

      Roman Gods? Don't be silly. Everyone knows the next two planets after Pluto should be named Mickey and Goofy.

      --
      Causation can cause correlation
    2. Re:Quaoar? by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      The convention seems to be deities but not necessarily Roman ones.

      Quaoar seems to be a native american one. See here.

    3. Re:Quaoar? by MyHair · · Score: 1

      but it'd be cool to have someone name a planet for you, even if it was only for your money.

      You take that back!

      Here are a couple of examples why:

      Planet Gates
      Planet Trump
      Planet Perot (It is a little planet after all, and he'd be good at graphing its orbit)

    4. Re:Quaoar? by Golias · · Score: 2
      The convention seems to be deities but not necessarily Roman ones.

      Mercury: Roman
      Venus: Roman
      Mars: Roman
      Jupiter: Roman
      Saturn: Roman
      Neptune: Roman
      Uranus: Roman
      Pluto: Roman
      Quaoar: Some tiny Native American tribe from the LA area. So obscure, Google only has one hit for the Karma Whores to link to, and suggests that you must be asking about quasars.

      If you break a convention and wait long enough, you create a new one, so in that sense you are correct, or at least will be if the new name sticks long enough.

      Personally, I'm still irritated at US coins with people other than dead presidents on them, let alone selecting diverse pantheons for naming our planets, but then I'm just a stuffy old conservative.

      As Homer would say, "I like my planets roman, my beer American, and by queers fuh-laming!"

      Uh... that would be the cartoon Homer, obviously, not the one who wrote the Illiad and... oh fuck, what am I saying? This is slashdot. Most of the people here can recite seasons 1-5 of the Simpsons by rote, but have never read anything that wasn't published in English first, unless you count the stupid made-up slang of Gibson's "Neuromancer" as another language.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Quaoar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The page you linked says it was called "Tranya."

    6. Re:Quaoar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to your own source:

      Alien Foods: 1
      (A beverage, probably alcoholic, called "Tranya.")

      ;)

    7. Re:Quaoar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop ranting, damnit.

    8. Re:Quaoar? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Stop ranting, damnit.

      It's a fair cop. I'm guilty as charged, but society is to blame.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:Quaoar? by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      The convention is overwhelmingly for Roman deities. With the exception of Earth, all the planets are named after figures from the Greek/Roman pantheon, using the Roman names: Mercury, Venus, [Earth], Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto.

      My vote is for Minerva, if it's not already taken.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    10. Re:Quaoar? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      Planet Quake is more likely.

    11. Re:Quaoar? by mal3 · · Score: 1

      Actually the "only president" standard hadn't been around long. We used to have roman gods on our coins as well, not to mention we've had Ben Franklin on our money for quite some time(though not coins)

      --Mal3

      --
      Non gratis rodentus anus
    12. Re:Quaoar? by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      Uranus is Greek.

      I was including moons and asteroids as well, but what the hell.

    13. Re:Quaoar? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Good catch, although he is also a Roman god, under the name "Cronus".

      Why they used the Greek name instead of the Roman one, as they did with all the inner planets, probably has something to do with giving fits to TV newscasters reading about the Voyager missions. ("The NASA probe is expected to reach Uranus next week.") Even if you say it "urine us" instead of "your anus", the 12 year olds will still snicker at you.

      Quaoar, on the other hand, is completely unrelated to classical mythology.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    14. Re:Quaoar? by Golias · · Score: 1
      If by "not long" you mean "since the days of bufallo head pennies", you would be correct...

      Back then they probably didn't think there were enough noteworthy presidents to put on the coins. We no longer have that problem.

      What can I say, I miss the Ike dollar. It was huge, like a dollar coin should be. The Sacagawea coin looks like something from our allies to the north.

      I must admit, though, I do find those goofy $2 coins the Canadians use to be kind of spiffy. Whenever I buy a $6 breakfast in a Canadian diner, I can use one to pretend I'm a cheap bastard by leaving only one coin for the tip.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    15. Re:Quaoar? by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

      Before Kennedy was killed, Ben Franklin was on the 50-cent piece.

    16. Re:Quaoar? by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      I used to have a few Ike dollars. I spent them on Mountain Dew at an A&P. I was dissapointed. I avoided all the old cashiers and went for the teenager hoping for an argument, but she just took them. She even had a damn space for them in the register!
      The one thing I found out is that they wouldn't fit in the little change sub-pocket on my jeans.

    17. Re:Quaoar? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      Problem is, what with all the asteroids, satelites, and other assorted odds 'n ends in the great big junk drawer of space, most of Roman deities have been taken, even going down from the Olympian pantheon and into the lesser known demigod figures. They've already moved into other mythical figures for satelites (not only other deities, but also things like Shakespearean characters). The really obvious ones, like Minerva, have long since been claimed....

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    18. Re:Quaoar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, check out that cheap 60's looking Death Star!!

    19. Re:Quaoar? by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Indeed. I have recently refined my position.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    20. Re:Quaoar? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      "Earth" in the present form may be an exception, but even if most used, it's not the only name this planet is called with...

      Terra is roman goddess "Mother Earth", so she too fits into the convention.

  16. The most important solar system discovery... by guttentag · · Score: 2
    > This discovery is being hailed as the most important solar system discovery in the past 72 years."
    You mean a little frozen ball of dirt at the edge of the solar system is a more important discovery than the news that we have two... er, three... no two moons orbiting our own planet? or Neil Armstrong's discovery that the moon is, in fact, not made of green cheese? Wow.
    1. Re:The most important solar system discovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What I am wondering about is what that discovery was in 1930 that was so important... Was it; Venus taking more days to spin around its axis as it does around the sun??

      Hmm...

    2. Re:The most important solar system discovery... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Probably refrences the discovery of Pluto.

    3. Re:The most important solar system discovery... by MAJ+Rantage · · Score: 1

      I would have figured that the discovery of volcanoes on Jupiter's moon Io would have surpassed this...or perhaps one of a dozen things from the Voyager I or II missions.

  17. Vanna White, help! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quaoar

    Otherwise known as the Vowel Planet

    1. Re:Vanna White, help! by growlydog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now... If we started calling it the Vowel Planet, and it somehow went out of its natural orbit, would that be called a "Vowel Movement"?

      --
      my sig was dubm so i took it out.
    2. Re:Vanna White, help! by warpup · · Score: 2, Funny

      The perfect puzzle for Wheel of Fortune. Sure the r will be guessed pretty quick, but who ever guesses Q? Even then, once all the vowels have been bought, chances are the person still wont be able to pronounce it...

    3. Re:Vanna White, help! by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now... If we started calling it the Vowel Planet, and it somehow went out of its natural orbit, would that be called a "Vowel Movement"?

      He he. And I thought we exhausted all the space doodee jokes when the new moon of Uranus was posted a few weeks ago. Boy was I wrong.

    4. Re:Vanna White, help! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they find it has a moon, my toddler has found a name for it:

      Eieio

    5. Re:Vanna White, help! by jumex · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Quaoar

      This planet name was obviously created by zealous Scrabble fanatics in the quest to make another word to use up their "Q"s.

      --
      "Your 'Gin n'tonic Futon Brain' sure makes you smart!"
      "That's 'Positronic-photon Brain', you idiot!"
    6. Re:Vanna White, help! by Mercuria · · Score: 1

      Silly, you don't get to use proper names in scrabble!

    7. Re:Vanna White, help! by aiabx · · Score: 1

      I would believe it if it didn't have a "u".
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    8. Re:Vanna White, help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vowel Planet:

      The inhabitants have no teeth.

      I mean literally, not figuratively like the UN or anything.

    9. Re:Vanna White, help! by rweir · · Score: 1
      ObSimpsQuote:
      ...the only danger in space is if we land on the terrible Planet of the Apes... wait a minute. Statue of Liberty... THAT WAS OUR PLANET! YOU MANIACS! YOU BLEW IT UP! DAMN YOU! DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!
      --Homer Simpson
  18. MVEMJSUNP by Squarewav · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas Q???
    ahh damn now what are we supposed to use to remember the planet order

    1. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Pies...Quickly

    2. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Frodo2002 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My Very Energetic MOther Just Served Us Nine Pizzas Quickly/Quietly/Quantumly/Quaintly/....

      Um, well it doen't solve the problem of 10 planets, but on the other hand we could leave it as "Nine". Just imagine our grandchildren will tell their children that the "Nine" is an artifact of history when people thought there were only nine planets in the Solar System...

    3. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Q'uickly

    4. Re:MVEMJSUNP by trixillion · · Score: 1

      Quickly? Quietly? Poached Quails? Plain Quiches? Powerful Qualudes? Ah, never mind.

    5. Re:MVEMJSUNP by BabyDave · · Score: 1
      "... Quickly." After all, she is energetic.

      Mind you, that's assuming that it's classified as a major planet. Since Pluto is twice the diameter and was possibly going to be reclassified as a planetoid (does anyone know the status of this?), I doubt that will happen.

    6. Re:MVEMJSUNP by gklyber · · Score: 1
      My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas Quickly.

      She is energetic...and would naturally serve them quickly.

    7. Re:MVEMJSUNP by stand · · Score: 4, Funny
      but on the other hand we could leave it as "Nine"

      How about My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Numerous Pizzas Quickly. Then we no longer have the scalability problem.

      --
      Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    8. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Pickled Q-cumbers?

      Ahh.

    9. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most voters earn money just showing up near polls... Queer.

    10. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quickly (duh)

    11. Re:MVEMJSUNP by KalvinB · · Score: 1

      "My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas Quickly"

      But I don't know how much longer she can keep this up.

      Ben

    12. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      For our german readers:
      Mein Vater erklärt mir jeden Sonntag unsere neun Planeten, Quatsch!

    13. Re:MVEMJSUNP by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clearly, we should just call the thing "Ten of Nine", and leave it at that. After all, it's clear that Saturn is the sexiest planet.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    14. Re:MVEMJSUNP by ASeed · · Score: 1

      My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas and a Quarter...

      Many Very Educated Men Just Saw Uppermost New Planet: Quaoar.

      --

      --
      ACid
    15. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In portuguese it makes sense. We say:

      Meu Velho Tio Mandou Junior Saborear Umas Nove Pizzas, MVTMJSUNP. In English: My old uncle asked Junior to taste nine pizzas

      The planets are: Mercurio, Venus, Terra, Marte, Jupiter, Saturno, Urano, Netuno, Pluto. So, with Quaoar, it would be

      Meu Velho Tio Mandou Junior Saborear Umas Nove Pizzas Quentes (MVTMJSUNPQ)

      (My old uncle asked Junior to taste nine hot pizzas)

    16. Re:MVEMJSUNP by gurensan · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a LOTR thang... 'Well, sonny, I remember when the Nine rode around the sun..."

      --
      You are all fartheads.
    17. Re:MVEMJSUNP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, well it doen't solve the problem of 10 planets, but on the other hand we could leave it as "Nine".
      Or even use a sports analogy How many teams make up the Big Ten Conference? And people wonder why college graduates are so smart!

    18. Re:MVEMJSUNP by srmalloy · · Score: 1
      How about My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Numerous Pizzas Quickly. Then we no longer have the scalability problem.

      Or the one from Robert Heinlein's novel Have Spacesuit Will Travel, 'Mother Very Thoughtfully Made A Jelly Sandwich Under No Protest'. Append ', Quickly' and you've got it covered, as well as getting the asteroids in between Mars and Jupiter. It does refer to Earth as 'Terra', though, which may confuse people.
  19. Funny by enkidu55 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'd think with an object that is the size of all the other Kuiper belt asteroids combined, somebody would have noticed it floating around out there.

    In a related news quote from the LINEAR research team "Holy Shit, did you see the size of that rock floating out there!"

  20. Not the cat chasing the mouse, that's for sure... by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    ...the keys are spaced a bit too far apart for that. Then again, maybe the pretentious feline in question was stalking on stilts? ;)

    - Jynx

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
  21. Glad.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    I'm glad that I'm done with school now.. It would suck to be the kid these days having to learn about all these new planets found in our solar system. And why do all these new planets have such crazy names? Won't somebody think of the children?

  22. Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by ites · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dunno, but I've racked my brains for the last five minutes
    and I can't think of a single thing we could do with Quaoar (OSLT).
    Nope. Zilch. Not a single damn use for another planet.
    We still haven't figured out what we're going to do with the current lot.
    Perhaps I'm an ignorant barbarian, but how is finding one more planet 'important'?
    I mean... surely 'importance' has to have something to do with human aspirations?

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe the Republicans will want to drill for oil there, too.

    2. Re:Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Not a single damn use for another planet.

      It increases the employment of the people who make and sell those solar system mobiles that hang in millions of classrooms. Now they have a reason to sell the upgrade.

    3. Re:Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      i wouldnt get too concerned about it.

      i hear its going to be destroyed to make way for a new interstellar bypass thats being built thru this solar system ...

      what?

      you didnt hear about it?

      come on, the proposal has been up at the local galactic council for the last 50 years!!!

    4. Re:Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      ...actually, lets send a booster rocket over to it and knock it out of orbit so we can have a really cool, big, short period comet.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    5. Re:Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by soxos · · Score: 1

      Hmm... thinking back to a Mr. Show episode... America can and must blow up Quaoar.

    6. Re:Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. We're too busy aspiring to hack the RIAA website than worry about things like research and aspiration.

    7. Re:Can anyone think of a use for a new planet? by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Could get the UN to announce a competetion . . .

      Whichever religion takes posssion will by world wide consensus be adopted as the official religion of planet Earth.

      Should keep everybody occupied with something reasonably constructive for the next half century or so.

      Meanwhile the rest of us can get back to drinking, eating, changing the wallpaper, reproducing, paying taxes and getting off our heads.

      With luck we can then extend the rules to Barnards star so the kids have some reasonably harmless diversion to keep them occupied too.

      Alternately - if that doesnt appeal, why waste time with Iraq, lets nuke the chinese first before they get round to doing it to us.

      ?

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  23. Pluto Not A Planet? by Etriaph · · Score: 2

    How could Pluto not be considered a planetoid when it has a satellite (Charon)? Does this make any sense to anyone?

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
    1. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhh... It's since been discovered that there are most likely more than a few asteroids with satellites out there. We already know of several.

      The earliest discovered one being Ida's satellite, Dactyl, which the Galileo probe took some very nice pictures of on its way to Jupiter.

    2. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by Ektanoor · · Score: 4, Informative

      It may make sense. Some good years ago, Dr. Van Flandern published several weird ideas about our solar system. He mentioned that some weirdnesses seen on certain asteroids pointed to the fact that they could have satellites. He was demonished for this theory but Galileo probe did find such an asteroid in its way to Jupiter. Sincerly, Pluto is too big for an asteroid and too small for a true planet. But still no one real could classify the real edge between planets and small bodies... So I wouldn't be admired to see this new object also bouncing between both terms.

      For UFO manhunters/bashers: note that VF was once the director of the U.S. Naval Astronomy, and one of the guys who help find Charon. Since Richard Hoagland started to search for hyperpyramids in the closet, he suffered some bad publicity, but still, his researches are quite important because they are in the edge of Science and some have had positive results recently.

    3. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by PD · · Score: 2

      Some asteroids have moons. Do a google search on the name Dactyl and you'll find an example of one.

    4. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If I recal correctlly Charon is part of the reason pluto was potentiall being reclassified as a planitoid. The Gravatational effects of Charon where strong eough that Pluto and Charon had a combined orbit around the sun whihc the two fo them orbit. (basically the center of gravity for the combined gravatational effects of each object was not below the surface of pluto but was actually above it. so)

      Now it's been a while since I read this so it could be debunked or just disregarded by now.

    5. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Ida has Dactyl, which asteroid has Tera?

    6. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pluto is the threshold case. At the moment, it seems to be the conventional wisdom that anything found that's larger than Pluto will have to be considered for planet status, and anything smaller for planetoid/asteroid/comet status. Quaoar would thus not be a planet. But who knows? The important thing is that a solar system can have these kinds of objects:
      Stars (Sun)
      Brown dwarfs (none known in our system)
      Gas giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune)
      Terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars)
      Asteroids (Ceres, Vesta, Pallas, etc.)
      Kuiper-like objects (Pluto, Quoaoar, maybe Chiron)
      Comets (maybe Chiron, Halley, etc.)
      Terrestrial moons (the Moon, Io, Europa, Titan, Iapetus)
      Kuiper-like-object-like moons (Charon, maybe Triton)
      Asteroid-like moons (Phobos, Deimos, Amalthea)
      Dust lanes and planetary rings
      Protostars, protoplanets, protoplanetary disks
      etc.

      As you can see, the star/planet/asteroid/comet/moon classification isn't quite detailed enough for what we now know.

    7. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Having a satellite is not grounds for planet status. Tiny (relatively) chunks of space rock only a few miles across have been found with satellites.

    8. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by NeuroManson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Didn't the term for small planets used to be "planetoid"? Just above an asteroid, or just below a planet, seems to be the appropriate terminology...

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    9. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe..... Uranus is a gas giant!

    10. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The important thing is that a solar system can have these kinds of objects:....

      Hey, you left out a category for spent Apollo boosters. Call it like say "Spent Apollo Boosters"?

      Or just "Human-made junk".

    11. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by GHennessy · · Score: 1

      Van Flandern was *NOT* the director
      of the Naval Observatory, and he was
      *NOT* one of the guys who found Charon.
      Harrington and Christy found Charon.

      I am employed by the Naval Observatory.

    12. Re:Pluto Not A Planet? by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

      Sorry for forgetting that he directed the Branch of Celestial Mechanics at the Naval Observatory. Not the director of the Naval Observatory.

      But he did help those gus finding Charon. And BTW I didn't say he found Charon. I said he HELPED on the find. If you work at the Naval Observatory you mau know well that he did a lot of homework about minor planets, Neptune satellites and things around Pluto

  24. Quaouo'eoaurion by tps12 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Since when did we start giving new heavenly bodies names out of pulp sci-fi? What was wrong with the whole Roman god motif?

    Not to mention, shouldn't Quaroroaa be referred to as "beyond Neptune," since we pretty much just finished undiscovering Pluto? Maybe we should just call the new planet "Pluto" and forget about the old one.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:Quaouo'eoaurion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's named after a native american tribe.

  25. Most important discovery....???? by Lunkwill_Fook · · Score: 1

    Can we PLEASE get on with the business of trying to, I don't know, learn stuff and stop trying to damn every damn ball of ice out there with your own personal politically correct name referring to an oppressed peoples? Let's turn Hubble around and point it at something like Jennifer Love Hewitt or something....

    1. Re:Most important discovery....???? by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Let's turn Hubble around and point it at something like Jennifer Love Hewitt or something

      Finally, a space program that makes sense! In other news, I'll be refferring to everything past Neputune as "trans-Neputnian bodies".

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  26. I was taught the same thing in grade school... by acidfast7 · · Score: 2

    in 4th grade (1985-86) that a disputed planet, dubbed Planet X, had an orbit outside of Pluto yet revolved around our sun. I actually included it in our final class project. After all these years I thought it was a farce, but now someone else has heard of it.

    1. Re:I was taught the same thing in grade school... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      What, did you never see the episode where "Duck Dodgers In The 24 and 1/2th Century" went to Planet X?

      He went there to collect Aludium Fozdex for shaving cream, as Earth's supply had run out.

      Google has many links, but try this one on for size.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:I was taught the same thing in grade school... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah dude! I love that episode!

      "Duck Rogers in the 24 and 1/2 century!"

    3. Re:I was taught the same thing in grade school... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      "Duck Dodgers In The 23rd and 1/2th Century" no?

      "When are we going to Planet Ten?"
      "Real soon!"
      - Buckaroo Banzai

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:I was taught the same thing in grade school... by ethanms · · Score: 1

      I remember that story... I think "Planet X" turned out to be Pluto's only moon, Charon.

      So this would be a newer discovery, not the same one...

    5. Re:I was taught the same thing in grade school... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Actually the Buckaroo Banzai quote goes:-

      "Where are we going?"
      "Planet Ten!"
      "When are we going?"
      "Real Soon!"

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  27. Hah! Got it! by ites · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the SCRABBLE PLANET!
    Someone just wants to sneak this word into the dictionary so that he can beat his aged grandmother at Scrabble.
    This is the only possible reason for the name.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  28. Send it to Bosnia! by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Support the Vowels For Bosnia campaign!

  29. Planetary Names by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

    Interesting to note that if this object is in fact deemed a planet and they decide to keep the name 'Quaoar', it will be the first planet (not counting Earth) named for something other than a Roman deity.

    1. Re:Planetary Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uranus is a Greek deity.

    2. Re:Planetary Names by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      Nope. Uranus has it beat (being the Greek name for the Roman god Cronos). And, of course, all of the satelites and asteroids which have since moved onto to less slashed and burned mythological systems....

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    3. Re:Planetary Names by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      Uranus really sounds like a Roman name rather than Greek. Indeed a small google search told me that this is the Roman name of the god called Ouranos by the Greek.

      Cronos is the Greek name for Saturn.

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
  30. classic 1) 2) ??? 3) profit!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Discover frozen planet beyond PLUTO
    2) ?????
    3) PROFIT!!!!

    1. Re:classic 1) 2) ??? 3) profit!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please retire this joke. It is beyond tired.

    2. Re:classic 1) 2) ??? 3) profit!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      1)Retire Proft Joke
      2)????
      3)PROFIT!

  31. Great name! by Ravagin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Quoth BBC:


    Astronomers named the new object Quaoar, after the creation myth of the Tongva people who inhabited the Los Angeles area before the arrival of the Spanish and other European settlers.

    I happen to think that that is way groovy. It's about time some other ancient belief systems got in on the planet-naming! :)

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

    1. Re:Great name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time some other ancient belief systems got in on the planet-naming!

      Why? Just wait till 2 more planets are discovered and they all get renamed after the 12 apostles. I bet you'd be wishing for Roman deities then...

    2. Re:Great name! by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I had a boss one time who wanted all computers in the office named after biblical figures. The big servers were Matthew, Mark, and Luke, but the names got pretty obscure after that. One girl in the art department-- tattoos and piercings, never wore underwear, religious affiliations left as an exercise for the reader-- suggested we put an end to it by naming the boss's laptop Lucifer.

      Not wanting to get both fired and excommunicated, I instead talked him out of it by appealing to simple reason. Nobody can spell Zephaniah, I told him.

    3. Re:Great name! by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Personally, I'd prefer to wait for something truly impressive, before giving up the name of my supreme deity for taxonomical purposes.

      "The Tongva people? Didn't we name one of those half-assed trans-Neptunian bodies after one of their gods? Qu-something-or-other? Whatever. Anyway, want another latte?"

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    4. Re:Great name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't get much more anchient than the Greek and Roman gods...

    5. Re:Great name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have just told him you were going to name the windows nt server 'Jesus'. Anytime it wasn't doing what you wanted it to do, get out the hammer and nails.... rebooot.

    6. Re:Great name! by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      I happen to think that that is way groovy. It's about time some other ancient belief systems got in on the planet-naming!

      Why, what did they contribute to modern astronomy? A lot of our science is still based on discoveries and theories of the Greeks. The ancient Arabs and Chinese also had an understanding of astronomy as a science rather than a "creation myth". I've never heard of these Tongva, so it's safe to say that their contribution to scientific knowledge is negligible at best. This name is merely another example of European-descended-men-are-bad political correctness.

  32. Proposed name for planet... by dperkins · · Score: 1

    Qwerty would be as good a name as what they have come up with, and since those indigenous people from LA are no longer around, we could use a word that is more meaningful to the current inhabitants...

    Ok, my idea sucks just as bad as theirs.

    --
    My sig hates me. That's ok, I never cared for it much anyway.
    1. Re:Proposed name for planet... by dildatron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another vote for Qwerty. So easy to type, no wonder it's #1!

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    2. Re:Proposed name for planet... by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      Actually, asdf is easier to type because the letters are on the home row. Maybe the 11 planet could be named AOEU.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  33. Most important? Hmm... by DirtyJ · · Score: 0
    What about the discovery of ice on Mars? Or the sub-surface ocean on Europa? Those seem pretty important to me.

    No doubt there are lots and lots of big-a$$ objects in the Kuiper belt. More will be discovered in time.

  34. More information on Kuiper Belt by Sir+Tandeth · · Score: 1

    here and here

  35. tenth planet by Triv · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the sake of geekdom everywhere -- If there's a tenth planet out there, it's gotta be called Persephone (I don't think Rupert would go over too well).

    (We miss you, Douglas)

    Triv

    1. Re:tenth planet by Rupert · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahem. I may not be a roman god,or one of whatever Quaoar is, but I don't see any fundamental objection to naming a planet after me.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    2. Re:tenth planet by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Prof. Farnsworth: "Fry, you have discovered the smelliest object in the known universe!"
      Bender: "Name it after me!"

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:tenth planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me a flunky, but I don't get it

    4. Re:tenth planet by Triv · · Score: 2

      It's from the fifth book in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy trilogy, "Mostly Harmless," by Douglas Adams (who died suddenly of a massive coronary last May.) One of the plot points revolves around how the discovery of a tenth planet (offically called Persephone, though usually known as Rupert after one of the planet's discoverers parrot) would effect astrology and horoscopes.

      Hope that helps.

      Triv

    5. Re:tenth planet by fenix+down · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Persephone really is a better name. Generally, all the planets are named after gods that at least have something in common with the planet.

      Mercury: messenger god, it moves fast
      Venus: god of beauty, it's pretty
      Mars: god of war, it's red
      Jupiter: king of the gods, it's big
      Saturn: Jupiter's dad, also big, I guess, although there's probably something else I'm missing
      Uranus: god in exile, it's far away
      Neptune: sea god, it's blue
      Pluto: god of the underworld, it's cold and dark
      Quaoar: force that created animals and people???

      Persephone was Pluto's wife, who he tricked into marrying him, and is allowed to return to earth every year, causing the seasons via her mother, Demeter, who makes it cold while she's gone and warm when she's arround. Honestly, I think she works better for Pluto, since it comes closer than Neptune some of the time, but it's better than Quaoar for #10.

    6. Re:tenth planet by jheinen · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, differentiates a "massive" coronary from an ordinary coronary? Is there a scale someplace? You always hear about people having "massive" coronaries, however you never hear about someone having a "light" or "inconsequential" coronary. Seems to me, a coronary, by definition, is massive. At least it is if it's happening to me is.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    7. Re:tenth planet by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      How about "Phil"? He's the ruler of Heck.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re:tenth planet by Gendou · · Score: 2

      If you die, it was massive.

  36. All the astroids combined? by Lazarus_Bitmap · · Score: 1

    Who came up with that comparison? And 'all' is bit broad, how about just the ones in our galaxy (which I assume is what they mean)? And even then, how do you wrap your brain around what all of them clustered together would look like?

    It's like saying Mt. Kilimanjaro is about the size of all combined boulders. Huh?

    --
    -Laz .:change is inevitable -- growth is optional:.
    1. Re:All the astroids combined? by th77 · · Score: 1

      No, they mean all the known and numbered asteroids in our solar system. There's around 50,000 of them, and most of them are (relatively) tiny.

      I don't think they've found asteroids (or any other small objects) outside of our solar system -- they're just too small to detect. We can't even detect Earth-sized objects yet (but we'll see them soon, hopefully).

      --
      Your favorite sig sucks
    2. Re:All the astroids combined? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about the size of 1,000,000 Libraries Of Congress.

  37. Err.... it actually says "biggest find"... by Lawmeister · · Score: 2

    in the solar system, not "most important"... biggest as in the largest object found in _our_ solar system in 72 years.

    Lead in is a little misleading...

  38. just doesn't sound the same by rattler14 · · Score: 3, Funny

    my
    very
    eager
    mother
    just
    served
    us
    nine
    p izzas
    um... quickly?

    ah well, i'm sure someone else can come up with something more creative

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  39. K-Pax by rppp01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Prot was right! I knew it!

    Now I know he was really an alien!

    --
    They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
    1. Re:K-Pax by TJPile · · Score: 0

      Damn! You beat me to it. Wasn't the asteroid belt at one time a planet? I remember 5 grade science and there was an astronomer who mathematically predicted 10 planets before they were all discovered. Maybe he is still correct.

    2. Re:K-Pax by valjean78 · · Score: 1

      actually it's not Prot. It's prot.

  40. Hah. by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    To think we still name our planets after a set of decrepit Roman gods who no-one even believes in anymore (ah, wait, that's not entirely true, sorry about that CowboyNeal) is almost as ludicrous as wondering why the galaxies beyond our own have weird names like XR-0915. Scientists may be orderly, but they've got the poetic sense of a brick in a snowstorm. Me? I'd name the new planet Coca-cola after selling it to the same company.

    - Jynx

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
    1. Re:Hah. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Roman gods? No. Quaoar was the name of the one and only god in the mythology of one particular native american tribe, the name of which escapes me. For some reason, I remember this fact from freshman year anthropology.

      Besides, I hereby announce that I'm taking bets. The official name of this body-- if it ever gets one-- will be Persephone.

    2. Re:Hah. by bravehamster · · Score: 2

      Found this on google:

      Quaoar: Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians, California

      As for Persephone, isn't there already a celestial body with that name? One of the moons of Saturn or Uranus? Ahh, here it is...an Asteroid. My personal vote is for Kali.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    3. Re:Hah. by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

      Kali? Heh. I've got three words for her.

      "Can't touch this."

      - Jynx

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
  41. Lies! All lies and stretching truth! Pluto facts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lies! All lies and stretching truth! Pluto facts currently show that pluto is actually TWO bodies in close orbit around each other and that the old "discoverer" was wrong.

    And... here is the good part... THE DEFINITION OF "PLANET" is currentl purely based on mass size.

    This rules out both parts of fake-pluto for some astronomers!!... and TOTALLY rules out large asteroids like the one just mentioned in this article.

    This article should never have been posted. Its not science fact.

  42. A Little Perspective? by yndrd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most important solar system discovery in the last 72 years? More important than:
    • Liquid oceans on Europa
    • Ice on the moon
    • Possible signs of water erosion on Mars
    This seems only important to people counting rocks and not to people with any hope of visiting them or furthering our understanding of the one we're on.
    1. Re:A Little Perspective? by Lunkwill_Fook · · Score: 1

      How about finding organic material on space debris? That would also have to top Mr. Tenth Ice Ball.

    2. Re:A Little Perspective? by siskbc · · Score: 0

      This seems only important to people counting rocks and not to people with any hope of visiting them or furthering our understanding of the one we're on.

      People said this about the moon landing 40 years ago. Let's try to have some creativity.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:A Little Perspective? by yndrd · · Score: 1

      Counting rocks isn't creativity.

  43. Prot Was Right by The_Rippa · · Score: 0

    I knew he was really from K-Pax

  44. An object... by nenolod · · Score: 1

    And on this object, there is presently a bunch of ice. Ok, so why not call it Iceworld or something? Or, it is the tenth planet, so they should actually call it Planet X. This could also be tied into the recent plans to send a probe to europa to drill through the ice and look for life in the very cold water under the ice. Anyway, that's about all I have to say about it.

    1. Re:An object... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooeee Planet X sounds like it's getting caught up in the whole software/OS naming thing. Mayhaps if it had a moon, that could be called Planet X 10.2. Earths 2nd moon could be Moon '99. Unless MS got a bit annoyed at that in which case it could be iMoon, which could only be good marketing for Apple.

      And in other news, NASA has brought action against Michael Robertson of Lindows fame for announcing Moondows 1.0

      christ I need to lay off the coffee.

    2. Re:An object... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Iceland? Oh wait, that name's already taken.

  45. Quaoar is California Spelling of American Indian N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who can't use Google:

    Quaoar Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians, California

    http://www.angelfire.com/journal/cathbodua/Gods/Qg ods.html

  46. Is Quaoar an obscure god? by Prince_Ali · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why abandon a perfectly good naming convention? How about Vulcan?

    1. Re:Is Quaoar an obscure god? by PD · · Score: 2

      Vulcan is the name reserved for the mythical planet that was hypothesized to exist inside the orbit of Mercury. So, it's already "taken".

    2. Re:Is Quaoar an obscure god? by cocotoni · · Score: 1

      Quaoar Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians, California

    3. Re:Is Quaoar an obscure god? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Vulcan" is already taken by astrologers to refer to a planet (not yet discovered) closer to the Sun than Mercury.

    4. Re:Is Quaoar an obscure god? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Is Quaoar an obscure god?

      With a name like that, I can understand why.

      "Diety Bob, for you have violated the temperal directive. Therefore, I shall punish you by bestowing on you a name too hard for mortals to pronounce. This will render the mortals unable to pray to you."

      (Lightning crack)

    5. Re:Is Quaoar an obscure god? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diety Bob, for you have violated the temperal directive. Therefore, I shall punish you by bestowing on you a name too hard for mortals to pronounce

      Well, it does explain why there ain't no planets named "Bob"

    6. Re:Is Quaoar an obscure god? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "...after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind."

      Whose purpose of course is to turn order back into chaos...

  47. maybe this will explain the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quaoar - Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians, California

    http://www.angelfire.com/journal/cathbodua/Gods/ Qg ods.html

  48. Does the good Doctor know? by Zwack · · Score: 2

    Has anyone contacted the Banzai institute and asked for Buckaroo's opinion on the discovery of the location of Planet Ten?

    Will the Nova police cover this story up?

    Z.

    --
    -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    1. Re:Does the good Doctor know? by Kilmor · · Score: 1

      Maybe this new planet has been busy hanging out in the 8th dimension, thats why we havent seen it till now. Certainly helps explain the name....

    2. Re:Does the good Doctor know? by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Yes. He discovered the tenth planet in 1986.

    3. Re:Does the good Doctor know? by Zwack · · Score: 1

      Lol... I didn't mean That good Doctor, but Doctor Buckaroo Banzai. However Doctor Who (particularly the Tom Baker incarnation) is another very Good Doctor.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
  49. Frozen ball?!? by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    That's what YOU know. My informants have just let me in on the secret as to WHY Quaoar's so important. It's made of rich, perfectly preserved, creamy 50+ better-than-french Brie.

    - Jynx

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
    1. Re:Frozen ball?!? by alienmole · · Score: 1

      It's only better-than-french because it's fresher. Unbeknownst to anyone else, the French have long been launching secret mining missions to the Kuiper Belt in order to obtain their famous brie. Do you think Jules Verne just imagined all that stuff? And you believed that old story about brie somehow being made from cultured milk? I mean c'mon, how likely is that, really?

  50. More Naming Crap by spudwiser · · Score: 2

    Astronomers named the new object Quaoar, after the creation myth of the Tongva people who inhabited the Los Angeles area before the arrival of the Spanish and other European settlers.

    To the indigenous peoples, Quaoar was the great force of nature that summoned all other things into being.


    I guess they ran out of Roman gods already.

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
    1. Re:More Naming Crap by Ektanoor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, they are probably afraid of naming it Nemesis - the Death Star. There are some theories about the Sun having an older sister in the form of a brown dwarf. Some consider alternatively the existence of a planet somewhat bigger than Jupiter. They use these theories to explain the episodical extinctions on Earth, supposedly caused by swarms of Kuiper belt comets falling inside the Solar system. This hypothetical "star/planet" is supposed to be much far away than Quaoar. Some theories give its orbit the fantastic period of 3 million years, and some consider it the reason why we can't find it...

      Well, probably some academical SF. They, sometimes, are also good writers...

  51. it should be named after the douglas adams subject by havaloc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In 'Mostly Harmless', a tenth planet was discovered. In the story it was named Persephone, but it was more commonly known as Rupert, which was the name of the astronomer's (who discovered it) parrot. With this discovery, the science of astrology could be set back years. What happens if you were born while Rupert was in your tenth house of Mars, etc.

  52. Re:Lies! All lies and stretching truth! Pluto fact by Frodo2002 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And so, what is the earth and the moon if not two bodies in close orbit around each other? Ya think the earth isn't orbiting around the moon? Think again brother.

    Secondly, what alternative definition would you suggest for a planet other than that it has to be massive enough? (And probably be in orbit around the sun...which is kind of trivially obvious I guess.)

  53. Call me a pedant, but ... by DonalGraeme · · Score: 1

    ... that should be the Sydney MORNING Herald, not the "Sydney Herald".

  54. A bit late, dudes by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    This "discovery" was made LONG ago. They just never nailed down the exact trajectory it took around the Sun. They called it something else, so we'll see which name wins, the new or the old. And since it lies in the Kuiper Belt, it's probably just an asteroid anyways. In a few days/weeks we'll know more; and if this turns out to be more than an asteroid I'd be amazed. Plus an object that size doesn't explain Pluto's eccentric orbit. Not enough mass.

  55. One minor nitpick... by Cu · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it is a planet, it orbits the sun once per year. It just has longer years.

    --
    I'm Abram Bender. You're not.
    1. Re:One minor nitpick... by br0ken2o0o · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they are just breaking it down into how many Earth years it takes to revolve around the sun, for all the slow people....

      br0ken

      --
      This post was generated by a Team of Elite Monkeys for br0ken2o0o (569914).
    2. Re:One minor nitpick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are ignorant.

    3. Re:One minor nitpick... by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      That would be one of IT'S years, not one of OUR years, right? (while we're nitpicking, of course)

    4. Re:One minor nitpick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be one of IT'S years, not one of OUR years, right?

      Or it could be internet years.

  56. Questions on how... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Ok, they have some vital stats on this "planet"

    can someone here please tell me ot point ot links on how you can from observing something through a telescope tell how wide a dot of light is and oll those other statistics? I understand through cromatography you can see different things...

    How do they get these statistics?? Other than just pulling a number out their butt?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Questions on how... by sweet+reason · · Score: 2

      How do they get these statistics?

      at a guess, they calculated the size from the apparent brightness, the distance, and a guesstimated albedo (reflectivity). that last is the hard part! the estimated size of pluto varied substantially over the years with different albedo guesstimates. it all depends of what you figure the thing is made out of.

      --
      Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
    2. Re:Questions on how... by jmiles · · Score: 1
      If you were to take reasonably detailed measurements of the object's position over, say, 1 year (which plots a small fraction of its total orbital path, but would be sufficient to constrain the entire orbit), you can equate the force of gravity from the sun to the centripetal force required for it to follow that path, thus yielding the "semimajor axis" and eccentricity of the ellipse it follows. That is, this yields the distance. Knowledge of the sun's mass and the object's distance will yield its mass via Kepler's 3rd law.

      Additionally, if you were to observe over a full year (or even 6 months) a simple parallax measurement (where one takes note of the angle by which the object is shifted against the "static" stellar background due to the Earth's displacement about the sun) will yield it's distance from the Earth directly.

      --
      Anecdotal evidence! I'm sold!
    3. Re:Questions on how... by slartibartfastatp · · Score: 1

      Knowing the sun's mass, the distance of the planet from the sun, and the orbit period, you can get the planet's mass using Newton's laws: Fg=GMm/d^2 Fc=Mv^2/r Fg=Fc v=2*pi*r/To Fg is the gravitational force, Fc the centripetal force, M the sun's mass, m the planet's mass, r is the planet orbit radius, d the distance of the planet to the sun, pi is pi :) and To is the orbit period. As you know all this numbers but m, is just a matter of doing the maths :)

      --
      -- --
    4. Re:Questions on how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use trigonometry (and very precise direction measurements) to get the distance. Kepler's 3rd law gives you the mass from that.

      With very-long-baseline interferometry (i.e. even better direction measurements from multiple telescopes at the same time), you can even discern the object's size, if it's not too small. Otherwise, you have to guesstimate the size from the mass by dividing it by some assumed density.

      If you look at the same object long enough (or frequently over a long time), you may determine if it revolves around itself from variations of its brightness (unless it happens to be a perfect, uni-colored sphere).

  57. Quaoar? by Schnapple · · Score: 2

    Wasn't that the pink stuff Clint Howard had Kirk and Spock drink in The Corbomite Maneuver?

  58. Huh? by Junky191 · · Score: 1

    Aren't there hundreds of these objects of similar size flying around in the Kuiper belt and it has already been decided to not classify any of them as planets? How is this a significant discovery?

  59. Re:Hah! Got it! by Frodo2002 · · Score: 1

    The standard scrabble rules state in effect that you are not allowed to use proper nouns...

  60. Nemesis? by CommieLib · · Score: 2

    It seems to me that an object of this size could influence the Kuiper belt substantially. Could this be Nemesis?

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:Nemesis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Do you even know what nemesis is? Its a *star* not a rock. Nice try though.

    2. Re:Nemesis? by CommieLib · · Score: 2

      Hey really smart guy. Star at really far distance, or planet at closer distance.

      Crack a book.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  61. Funny Names... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    The new world, which has been dubbed Quaoar[...]

    All I have to say is: I don't want to hear any more complaints about what a crappy name "Ogg Vorbis" is ever again! :-)

  62. planets...roids...substellar objects by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2

    What boggles my mind is why these people are racking theres because they can't figure out whether to pigeon hole the floating rocks as planets or just asteriods. Kuniper belt object? Whats Earth, an inner belt object? We have lots of rocks in this part of the solar system, too. It seems like they have a cactus up the ass because Pluto and this thing aren't gas giants like the rest of the outer planets.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    1. Re:planets...roids...substellar objects by Lunkwill_Fook · · Score: 1

      Planet Envy. Fear it!

    2. Re:planets...roids...substellar objects by MikeyO · · Score: 2

      Whats Earth, an inner belt object?

      No, but uranus is an inner belt object, and therefore, i guess, so are 'roids.

      hahahaha

    3. Re:planets...roids...substellar objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We astronomers got tired of all those juvenile jokes, so in 2020, we renamed the planet "urectum".
      -- sage words from Prof Farnsworth in the second book of all wisdom

    4. Re:planets...roids...substellar objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man I got roids. Bad case of roids too and some of them are pretty damn big but you don't see people naming them!

    5. Re:planets...roids...substellar objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh! you just invented a new slang word, "roids." But I don't understand why we need a nick name for hemroids in this discussion? I really don't understand why an exceptionally big one would be called a planet.

  63. What makes a planet? by Fugly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What makes an object a planet? Size? The presence of its own sattelites? An atmosphere? What separates planets from large asteroids?

    It seems to me the astronomy community can't decide. How hard can it be? It's an arbitrary classification that doesn't actually mean anything. It's all just hunks of rock orbiting the sun. It's a classification that doesn't actually mean anything. Somebody just make a decision and let's all stick to it. It's annoying not knowing how many planets have been discovered in our own solar system.

    1. Re:What makes a planet? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 2

      Well what's wrong with 'planetoid'?

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    2. Re:What makes a planet? by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What makes an object a planet?

      That's a tough question.

      Size?

      Yes. Generally, a body should be large enough that gravity makes it roughly spherical, before it can be considered a planet. However, this is apparently a necessary-but-not-sufficient criterion.

      The presence of its own sattelites?
      No. See Mercury and Venus.

      An atmosphere?
      No. See Mercury.

      How hard can it be? It's an arbitrary classification that doesn't actually mean anything.

      You just answered your own question. It's hard to draw the line between planet and non-planet precisely because the line is arbitrary and has no real meaning.

      I think we should just call it a planet if it (1) orbits a star directly; (2) is massive enough to be roughly spherical; and (3) is not so massive that it is either a brown dwarf or a star. However, please note that this definition would include the asteroid Ceres, which is generally not considered a planet...maybe it should be.
      (Ceres is 900 km in diameter, compared to this new one's 1250-km diameter).

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:What makes a planet? by igaborf · · Score: 2
      What makes an object a planet? Size?

      Yes, despite what your GF told you, size does matter.

    4. Re:What makes a planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far the eccentricities of the known planets falls within some limit (defined currently by Pluto's since it has the largest), perhaps that is a criteria to exclude Ceres? Also, perhaps some limit on the inclination of the orbit (and I'm assuming it is a somewhat regular orbit) relative to hmm...others?

    5. Re:What makes a planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about adding to the criteria that its orbit isn't too eliptical? That would disclude Ceres.

    6. Re:What makes a planet? by solarrhino · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you think about landing on it: planet.

      If you worry about it landing on you: asteroid.

      --
      "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
    7. Re:What makes a planet? by u19925 · · Score: 1

      It needs to have enough mass, so that its shape is approximately spherical (Of course, on the higher side, it must not glow on its own). Because of large mass, any aspericity would generate strong pressure due to gravity, so that the base will melt and it will become spherical again. Look at Earth, its diameter is 12000 km, but the largest bulge is Mount Everest, which is 9 km. Note, that the bulges due to systematic rotation etc are not counted, only the random bulges are counted.

    8. Re:What makes a planet? by Lunkwill_Fook · · Score: 1

      Too elliptical? How do you define that? Besides, if they are orbiting the sun, chances are, they will all have similar ellipitical orbits with the sun at one of the foci. The only thing that can change that and make it "more elliptical" would be to add tremendous amounts of speed (ie. comets).

    9. Re:What makes a planet? by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      How about adding to the criteria that its orbit isn't too eliptical? That would disclude Ceres

      And Pluto.

      Tor

    10. Re:What makes a planet? by abar72419 · · Score: 1
      You could say, something's a planet if it's big and the gravitational force of the sun on it is stronger than the force due to any other body. That's more precise than "orbits a star directly".

      That 'correctly' categorizes all the moons and planets, except for Earth's moon! The sun pulls on the Moon slightly more strongly than Earth does, IIRC from an essay by Asimov. We could think of Luna and Earth as planets with similar orbits, so close that they perturb each other strongly..

    11. Re:What makes a planet? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      there really is no convenient yardstick for calling a planet a planet and/or planetoid/ planetesimal/ etc...

      we should lose all pretext of straight science on this question, and just admit it is all relative to the human eyeball.

      and therefore, we have a convenient yardstick: the earth's moon

      larger than the moon, planet, smaller than the moon, planetoid.

      so mercury is a planet and pluto is a planetoid.

      this seems like a good enough idea.

      but to get radical, i also think we should have a whole new designation for objects that orbit planets that are larger than our moon. no really! they are quite big, and should get that recognition they deserve. the moon systems orbitting saturn and jupiter are quite varied and exotic and interesting, rivalling the sun's planetary system in variation and form. let's give these large moons the recognition they deserve with their own designation other than "moon".

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    12. Re:What makes a planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple -- If we think we can destroy it, it's not a planet. Just look -- Before nuclear weapons, Pluto was definately a planet. Now, we're not so sure... :-)

    13. Re:What makes a planet? by barawn · · Score: 2

      The center-of-mass of the Earth-Moon system is inside the Earth. The only thing that the Earth orbits is itself, and the Sun. The Moon orbits a point inside the Earth, and the Sun.

      Your definition has problems with Trojan planets - if you have two planets that orbit each other, then they could pull on each other more than the star does. Clearly they should both be planets, but they wouldn't be, by that definition.

  64. "Vowel Movement Linked to Uranus" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Film at 11.

    1. Re:"Vowel Movement Linked to Uranus" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be a Kentucky Fried movie reference.

  65. Re:This is olod news... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    I believe it was TIME magazine that reported this a number of months, if not a year or so ago, they claimed it to be "Planet X".

    Don't forget, it's pronounced "Planet Ten," version 10.0.

  66. Re:Hah! Got it! by Fiver-rah · · Score: 2
    It's not that great a Scrabble word. It can't possibly compete with "demisemiquavers" which, with an extremely improbable board arrangement, could be placed on three triple word scores, netting over 1100 points. It's a Q word, sure, but it uses a U, so it's nowhere near as cool as "qat" or "faqir" or "qi". It uses no other cool letters.

    Of course, it can't be used in Scrabble because it's a proper name. Maybe they hope an element will get named after it for Scrabble purposes. But quaoarium just isn't that euphonius. :)

    --
    Read Bujold. Free (as in
  67. If like Pluto, not a planet by wytcld · · Score: 4, Interesting
    See this note from the American Museum of Natural History on the controversy and their suggested conclusion, along with National Geographic's account of the demotion.

    So, if all we have with this new thingie is the second largest Kuiper Belt object after Pluto - so what? Isn't the news play just about trying to get more funding from the fine fellows who've identified it, which is more likely if the headlines scream "Tenth Planet!" What a cynical abuse of the press. Science should stop grubbing, and strive for purity of purpose, lest the results themselves be corrupted. Prostitution just isn't the same as free love.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:If like Pluto, not a planet by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Prostitution just isn't the same as free love.

      That's right. One has a place in society, the other is a rebellion against societal norms.

      "Science" doesn't give a rat's ass if this is a planet or a cumquot; it's a stellar body, and what we call it doesn't matter.

      This is a discussion of semantics & language, not "science." Finding a "catagory" to put it in matters only marginally more than deciding what name to call it.

  68. Most important astronomical discovery... by Apostata · · Score: 2

    ...and they give it a name only a Scrabble enthusiast could love.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  69. You know you've been playing too much Sacrifice... by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    Now THERE'S a game with arrogant, stuck-up stoopid gods...

    My point was, however, that we waste time calling jupiter jupiter at all anymore. I want to buy it and call it "The Place Laughing Gas Comes From".

    Jynx

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
  70. Origin of the name by Ramuh · · Score: 1

    so says this site:
    Quaoar: Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians, California

    --
    //radiotakeover.
    .for indep
  71. Astonishing discovery! by bluethundr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even more astonishing than the planet itself is the fact that the only thing on it is a little French boy with a rose...

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    1. Re:Astonishing discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you don't. The sheep has eaten the rose :-(

  72. At last the sequel we've been waiting for! by grendelkhan · · Score: 2

    They can use this as the launching vehicle for Ice Pirates II!

    --
    Wu-Tang Name: Half-Cut Skeleton Get your own Wu-Na
  73. Planet Xbox! a giant Microsoft Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, Microsoft marketing department is at it again.

    I think this new planet will be named Planet Xbox!

    "Microsoft Xbox, the only console with a planet behind it!"

  74. Re:Quaoar is California Spelling of American India by PD · · Score: 2

    That sounds like the description of a computer programmer!

  75. Gravitational Wobble by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I thought that Kepler thought there was another planet outside of Neptune's orbit based on gravitational wobble, and when Pluto was discovered in 1938, a lot of scientists went, "Nahh... that's too small. There's got to be another, much larger one to create that kind of wobble." And the debate continues.

    I had this theory that a much larger planet is further out, but is very dark in color, and thus it hasn't been seen by albedo, and no one was looking in the right place to see it eclipse out other stars.

    Of course, I haven't taken a course in astronomy since the 1980s, and I may be totally missing something obvious ("If that were true then the Hubble's Heisenburg Compensator would have found it, duh!"), but I have always thought if I wanted the *correct* answer to something I should post something obviously wrong on Slashdot.

    ____________________
    I had a Heisenberg-mobile, but every time I looked at the speedometer, I got lost.

    1. Re:Gravitational Wobble by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

      but I have always thought if I wanted the *correct* answer to something I should post something obviously wrong on Slashdot

      Now that's true enough! Sorry I can't help with your astronomy, but that last line got a chuckle.

      More on topic, however, I noticed that CNN isn't reporting this as a planet, just a big icy rock, half the size of Pluto. To me this further dulls the line between an asteroid and a planet. Given what's been said about this new object, the line is draw somewhere between pluto-sized and half-pluto-sized. Go figure.

      Also interesting to note... Google News has a /. link to this discussion.

      --
      My sig sucks.
    2. Re:Gravitational Wobble by Kimble · · Score: 1

      I'm too lazy to look it up (maybe it's at the Nine Planets website, which I'm also too lazy to look up), but I believe the old measurements of Neptune's orbit were just wrong. It's moving just like we'd expect.

      --
      ..!!in an intastella burst i am back to save the universe!!
    3. Re:Gravitational Wobble by smash · · Score: 1
      heh.

      Maybe its a mini black hole.

      :)

      smash

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  76. Re:Quaoar is California Spelling of American India by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quaoar is California Spelling of [an] American Indian [God]

    The God of Vowels, no doubt.

    (I know I know, I cannot kick this vowel thing.)

  77. Kuiper belt full of Awl! by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    Well, I think the thing that would make it an important discovery would be the implication that there are lots of large objects covered with water & volatile organics in the Kuiper belt. (added to : biggest object discovered since Pluto, & maybe Pluto not a planet). (Quaoar is thought to contain rock, water ice and frozen organic compounds such as methane..")
    http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/10 /07/ice.objec t/index.html

    Of course this will be of more practical importance in a few centuries (millenia?) when folks start colonizing the Kuiper belt...

    Unless we could get the Bushies all fired up about building an interplanetary tanker to go git us some of that 'Texas tea' covering Quaoar?

    Return of the Beverly (Quaoar) Hillbillies, Episode 6, anyone?

  78. Congradulations by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    You've just discovered the Rhode Island of the universe.

    Maybe we will make it a droid colony or something..

  79. What a silly name by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    I don't think the name will stick myself. If anything, I think most people, like me, will call it Planet X and that name will stick because of popular demand.

    Even if it is not deemed a planet, given they want to strip Pluto of that title, I think Planet X is as good a name as any. At the least 99% of people can pronounce it.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    1. Re:What a silly name by sweet+reason · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Planet X is as good a name as any. At the least 99% of people can pronounce it.

      99% of what people? half of all people only speak chinese.

      --
      Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
    2. Re:What a silly name by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      Christ, you people have to nitpick over everything don't you?

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  80. More bad news for quack scientists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father is a heavy believer in astrology. Stories like this just make me wonder how someone that believes in something so insane can continue to hold their beliefs after discoveries of new planets... Astrology as a quack science has been around for quite awhile. When I asked him how astrology can be reconciled with things like pluto only being discovered in the last century, his response was that astrologers ALWAYS KNEW there must be another planet, and where it was...

    Guess it's time for him to start having KNOWN there MUST be 10 planets in the solar system... _

    1. Re:More bad news for quack scientists. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      My father is a heavy believer in astrology. Stories like this just make me wonder how someone that believes in something so insane can continue to hold their beliefs after discoveries of new planets... Astrology as a quack science has been around for quite awhile. When I asked him how astrology can be reconciled with things like pluto only being discovered in the last century, his response was that astrologers ALWAYS KNEW there must be another planet, and where it was...

      IANA (Astrologist), but the (alleged) science hasn't really changed since 500CE or so. Astrology, (both Oriental and Western schools of thought), merely requires certain blinking lights in specific locations of the sky. It doesn't care if there are more lights (or indeed, if the lights are don't revolve around the earth, to account for the Copernican challenge to its pedagogy).

  81. no no no it goes like this: by gik · · Score: 1

    Check, yo:

    My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Potato Quiches

    take that!

    --
    ZERO
  82. My Vote by Rayonic · · Score: 2

    "I don't believe in planets, you insensitive clod!"

  83. Don't break the damn pattern by cryptochrome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it's a planet, give it a proper name from the list of the major Roman gods. When they named Pluto they suggested the following (from Appolonius.net). I vote for Baccus, god of wine and mysteries, or secondly Cronus.:

    The naming of Pluto is a story by itself. Early suggestions of the name of the new planet were: Atlas, Zymal, Artemis, Perseus, Vulcan, Tantalus, Idana, Cronus. The New York Times suggested Minerva, reporters suggested Osiris, Bacchus, Apollo, Erebus. Lowell's widow suggested Zeus, but later changed her mind to Constance. Many people suggested the planet be named Lowell. The staff of the Flagstaff observatory, where Pluto was discovered, suggested Cronus, Minerva, and Pluto. A few months later the planet was officially named Pluto. The name Pluto was originally suggested by Venetia Burney, an 11-year-old schoolgirl in Oxford, England.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I could have sworn that Cronus was the Greek name for Saturn.

    2. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by Embryo3 · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as how we're the new Imperialistic power of the world, why don't we name the new planet ourselves? Hell, it's an even better pattern - like Rome naming the planets after the Gods of a culture they butchered, we're naming it after the God of a culture we butchered! Sweet.

    3. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by saforrest · · Score: 1

      You're right, though I've usually seen it written as Cronos.

    4. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Kronos = Saturnus.
      Chronus = Khronos, which isn't necessarily the same thing as Kronos. See Timothy Gantz, Early Greek Gods. Another example: Helios sometimes is and sometimes is not the same god as (Greek) Apollo; but Sol is less often the same god as (Roman) Apollo.
      Anyway, Minerva seems best to me (though there's already a Pallas named after her, one of the four giant asteroids).

    5. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Bacchus, not Baccus.

    6. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by sirvalence · · Score: 1

      Cronus is the Greek name for Saturn, so that would be redundant.

      I agree that we need to stick with the Roman names: Minerva deserves a planet as much as any of the rest.

    7. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by apt142 · · Score: 1

      Isn't Vulcan the same god as Mars?

      Besides which, that would just be plain silly. Of course, the star trek fans might not think so...

    8. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by BlakeStone · · Score: 2, Informative

      The names were not chosen randomly, even from within the Roman list. Mercury(the messenger) was named for its speed(88-day orbit), Venus(goddess of love) for its beauty, Mars(war) for its blood red color. Jupiter(Zeus) was the ruler of the universe and the brightest of the nighttime planets. Cronus(Saturn) was Zeus' father & former master of the universe, until Zeus overthrew him. When Uranus was discovered in the 18th century, it was named for Cronus' father, the original lord of the universe(Jupiter is brighter than Saturn is brighter than Uranus). Neptune, in the 19th century, was named for the god of the ocean because of its deep blue color.

      Pluto was so named for two reasons. 1) To honor Percival Lowell, whose initials are the first two letters of the name. 2) Pluto(Hades) was god of the dead, and the astronomers knew that the new planet must have a very bleak, desolate, Hades-like environment. (Well, as Hades-like as anything 400 degrees below freezing can be ;-).

      So, IMHO, when they name it, planet or not, the name should be appropriate, i.e. not Artemis! ;-).

    9. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Actually, the star trek fans might be quite upset, since trek "canon" places Vulcan in orbit around Eridani?

      Also, somebody already tried naming a non-existant planet between mercury and the sun, vulcan. It would be confusing.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    10. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1

      Vulcan = Hephaestus (God of smiths, volcanoes)
      Mars = Ares (God of war)

      --

      "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

    11. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

      Personally, I think Minerva deserves more than some iceball way out yonder. Perhaps we'll find something good enough for her someday.

      For the record, since Apollo is so closely associated with the sun it wouldn't seem right to name it after him, despite his prominence in the Pantheon.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    12. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by juggleme · · Score: 1

      And besides, you'd piss off every astrologer in existence...

    13. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by pdion · · Score: 1

      I think you are wrong. Helios was never Apollo. Helios was the god that drove the Sun around the Earth. (Helios means sun in ancient and modern Greek). Apollo was the god of sun like he was the god of music etc. In a sort of way he was Helios' master, although Helios was an older god than Apollo.

      Kronos is Saturn. Chronos (which means Time in Greek) was the god of time but in many cases Kronos was also Chronos i.e. the god of time.

    14. Re:Don't break the damn pattern by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      I think you are wrong. Helios was never Apollo.

      In the fragments of Euripides' Phaethon, Helios is addressed by Klymene as Apollo (more precisely, as the one whose name means destruction, a common pun on Apollo and apollumi). I can provide the exact reference if necessary; there are texts in e.g. Diggle's OCT of selected fragments, and in Cropp's Fragmentary Plays I. This is the earliest case in which the two gods, who are usually distinct, are conflated. There is a huge amount of literature on the subject. So, no, I'm not wrong, but I can see why you would think that.

      As for the rest of your posting, I know very well that Khronos (also transliterated as Chronos) is Greek for time. I've had eight years of ancient Greek.

      As I suggested above, see Timothy Gantz's books on Early Greek Mythology.

  84. New planet name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call it Tux!!

  85. Screw Cowboy Neal by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    I say name the chunk of ice Treeluvinhippy!

    --
    >
  86. -1 Stupid by MyHair · · Score: 2, Funny

    Otherwise known as the Vowel Planet

    No, that's Uranus.

    Oh wait, I'm sorry, Uranus is the Bowel Planet.

    1. Re:-1 Stupid by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, I'm sorry, Uranus is the Bowel Planet.

      If 'Ur' CowBoyNeal... Uranus really is a planet...

  87. How is this possible!?! by idleprocess · · Score: 1

    How the hell did they discover this? The Earth and Beyond login servers have been down since early this morning!! I hold the Jenquai and Terran's responsible!

    --
    :wq!
  88. I wonder what will happen... by DrXym · · Score: 2
    ... to all the Planet X nuts.


    One would hope they'll go away but I reckon they'll be rationalizing like mad in the next few days, to emerge even crazier than before.

  89. Why the controversy over "planet"? by Kyont · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is there anyone in the astronomical community who can explain the apparent desire to "de-list" Pluto as a planet? It's not like a diving .com stock that NASDAQ can just yank. It seems to fit the accepted definition of "planet" (a non-luminous hunk of something that is larger than an asteroid and orbits the sun only somewhat eccentrically**) even if we later discover it is not even the largest object in the Kuiper Belt. If the line between "big asteroid" and "planet" is arbitrary, why the desire to shift the cutoff and exclude Pluto? It'll have no effect on the planet, just on textbooks and things. Will we have to start referring to it as "The Asteroid Formerly Known As Pluto"?

    **Obligatory Dom DeLuise joke here.

    --
    You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
    1. Re:Why the controversy over "planet"? by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

      I think the debate is going on for simply no better reason than as fuel for publications. "Publish or perish", as they say. One way to make a name for yourself is to stir things up--but it's a risk. If the vast majority disagrees with you, you're toast--unless there are enough people who are willing to keep the debate going so they can weigh in and publish on it as well. I know it sounds cynical, but I know some professors in academia, and you wouldn't believe the lengths to which they'll go to get their name on a paper--it's sickening sometimes.

    2. Re:Why the controversy over "planet"? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      Is there anyone in the astronomical community who can explain the apparent desire to "de-list" Pluto as a planet?

      IANAA (an astronomer), but based on observation, I find scientists in general to be very exacting in the words the use to describe things, even when the definition of the word is as vague as "big, um, thingie." It was originally decided that Pluto was, indeed, a big um thingie, but another camp soon arose that declared the first camp's interpretation of "big" and "thingie" wrong, though they both agree on the proper use of "um."

      Simmilar to the religious wars between EMACSers and VIers, both camps are willing to fight to the death over just how big a thingie must be to be considered "big enough." The "Pluto-is-a-Planet" camp declares that they like their planets light and fast, while the "Pluto-is-an-asteroid" proponents chide Pluto's lack of features and extensibility.

      Worse, new factions have developed, touting slogans such as "My Planet, My Choice," "Keep Your Definitions Off My Planet," and "Size Does Matter," the latter of which is often followed by "No matter what your girlfriend told you." These groups seem to be more concerned with personal political agendas than the advancement of science, but due to their vocal nature, have all but eclipsed the scientific community in the public eye.

      RIAA President Jack Valenti only complicated matters when he, apparently out of innocent ignorance, chimed in with "A nineth planet is to the astronomical community what the Boston Strangler is to a woman home alone." Fortunatly, the RIAA's web site is unable to stay live long enough for many people to read this comment.

      Finally, recently disovered correspondence from the Sonny Bono Library indicate that the late senator intended to present the "Sonny Bono Interstellar Copyright Act," which would have declared Pluto to be both a planet and the copyright of the Walt Disney Corp., requiering all textbooks to pay Walt Disney the "royalties any hard-working mega-conglomerate deserves for the use of its dead founder's intellectual property." This bill would have also retroactivly extended copyright by 20 plutonian years (4960 earth years).

      This is what keeps science alive, folks.

    3. Re:Why the controversy over "planet"? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure. IANAA, but the problem with Pluto isn't that astronomers have some personal grudge against Pluto, but that it's orbital details and composition don't fit the pattern set by the other planets. The orbit *is* way too elliptical, it's too eccentric (e.g. Pluto is closer to the sun than Neptune for a good part of its year) and it's on a weird angle with regard to the orbital plane set by the others. The rest of the solar system fits the pattern of small, rocky planets close in, big gassy planets farther out, with a bunch of tiny ice-balls way, way out.

      When you compare Pluto to the various trans-Neptunian objects in the Kuiper Belt, though, it fits right in. Composition, orbit, distance, everything. Even if you want to get picky about Charon, there have been examples of small rocky bodies in mutual orbit in the asteroid belt, so a small moonlet of a small planetoid isn't that big of a deal.

      I think astronomers are just tired of having to say, "... except for Pluto." when discussing the solar system's arrangment.

      IMHO, Pluto was identified first because it is among the largest, if not *the* largest, of the trans-Neptunian objects, discovered using 19th century optical technology. Now that the lenses, cameras and data analysis tools are so much improved, objects of comparable size are starting to be identifed. This isn't to take away any historical significance from Pluto for being the first of its class to be observed, but I don't really consider it a really small planet, more of a really big planetoid.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:Why the controversy over "planet"? by quark137 · · Score: 1

      Sure enough, I didn't used to know this. Until a C++ class in college!

      As my term project, I chose to do a solar system simulator. Implementated a very simplistic system of Newtonian physics. You could input the weight of each planet and it would calculate and animate it's theoretical orbit around the sun. I got the weights for all the planets and put them in. Imagine my surprise when Pluto was nowhere near where I expected it to be. I had to check and re-check my program to make sure it wasn't a bug. Turned the bug was in Pluto and not my program. How often does that happen?

    5. Re:Why the controversy over "planet"? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      ...simulator. Implementated a very simplistic system of Newtonian physics.....Pluto was nowhere near where I expected it to be....Turned the bug was in Pluto and not my program. How often does that happen?

      Evidence that Pluto was built by Microsoft?

  90. "Quaoar"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst. Name. Ever.

  91. In homage to Lovecraft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it should be named Yuggoth.

    1. Re:In homage to Lovecraft... by Hinkkanen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      H.P. Lovecraft writing about the discovery of Pluto in a letter dated April 1st 1930:

      One wonders what it is like, & what dim-litten fungi may sprout coldly on its frozen surface! I think I shall suggest its being named Yuggoth!

      Selected Letters III (p. 136)

  92. 10th planet discovered - again. by raehl · · Score: 2, Funny

    A team of astronomers utilizing the latest technology to scan the outerreaches of the solar system announced today that they had discoverred the solar system's 10th planet.

    "We're really pleased to have discoverred the solar system's 10th planet. Only though diligent research methods, including pointing telescopes at lots of different areas of the sky, were we able to make this discovery," said team leader George Randi.

    When asked what was most satisfying about the discovery, Randi said "Definitely making the '10th Planet of the Week' website. Almost all of our buddies have discoverred at least one 10th planet, so we were feeling a little left out."

    Astronomy buffs are also encouraged to rate the discovery at "scientificornot.com" and "wasteofmoneyornot.com". Said team member Alfred Inglebrot, "Our discovery of the 254,357th asteroid got all ones and a two. We're hoping that finding the new 10th planet will appropriately get us a few tens. At least until someone else discovers the new 10th planet next week."

    The discovery was not without controversy, however. A competing russian research team claims they found this week's 10th planet first at 3:04 AM on Sunday, preceding Randi's team's discovery at 9:27 AM bt over 6 hours. "We were robbed," said Alexander Dumivsk. "The Russians are always overlooked in favor of American glory."

    The Americans downplayed any controversy. "They can try again next week. Even if we were a little later, our 10th planet is obviously the biggest, and that's certainly more important that precise timing."

    1. Re:10th planet discovered - again. by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      It will be discovered a third time when Slashdot reposts this story in about 2 days.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  93. The actual article says biggest... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    as in, the biggest object we've found since Pluto. Not most important, not most earth-shaking, not most scientifically interesting, just the largest object.

  94. I think you'll find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That its "Rupert"

  95. Rupert by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

    It just has to be named this, after the Late Douglas Adams (Mostly Harmless) [RIP]

    Just as he predicted......

  96. OK, mod me down... by kubrick · · Score: 0, Redundant

    My first thought was, "I wonder if Stallman named it".

    No, then it would have been "GNU/Quaoar".

    (-1, Obvious Poor Joke :)

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
    1. Re:OK, mod me down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (-1, Obvious Poor Joke :)

      More likely - 1 redundant since you posted the same joke a full 3 minutes after the last guy posted it. You should always hit refresh becoming posting to make sure you aren't saying something that was just said. I typically use a new window to create my post and then just before I hit submit I hit refresh.

    2. Re:OK, mod me down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're an anal little twat and should be shot.

    3. Re:OK, mod me down... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      ... and browse at -1 just in case :) Ah well, luck of the draw...

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  97. Meaning of the name? by Winterblink · · Score: 3, Informative
    Did a little Googling, found the following definition of Quaoar. Don't know if it's real or not. *shrug*

    Quaoar: Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians, California

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  98. Planets Shmanet. by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Okay, here's the definition of a planet from dictionary.com:

    1. A nonluminous celestial body larger than an asteroid or comet, illuminated by light from a star, such as the sun, around which it revolves.

    So what is the definitiion of an ansteroid?

    Any of numerous small celestial bodies that revolve around the sun, with orbits lying chiefly between Mars and Jupiter and characteristic diameters between a few and several hundred kilometers.

    From this I would conclude that it probably is a planet given its dimensions. But really you are just drawing an arbitrary line between asteroid and planet. Personally, I think that if it is within a belt of asteroids, then it is probably an asteroid, and if it isn't, then it is probably a planet.

    It's just an arbitrary distinction given to an object orbiting the sun. Also, I believe it is thought that the asteroid belts are really just planets that didn't quite get it all together. Who knows.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Planets Shmanet. by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 1
      Okay, here's the definition of a planet from dictionary.com: 1. A nonluminous celestial body larger than an asteroid or comet, illuminated by light from a star, such as the sun, around which it revolves.

      Non-luminous celestial body? Could we be any *more* vague? Using the same dictionary.com (which I am not blaming, I am sure Oxford has something similar), the defintions for:

      Luminous: Emitting light, especially emitting self-generated light.
      Celestial:Of or relating to the sky or the heavens; Of or relating to heaven; divine; Supremely good; sublime: celestial happiness. Body: A mass of matter that is distinct from other masses [see Cowboy Neal]

      Okay... so, a planet is some form of matter in the sky that does not glow in the visible light spectrum. Hmmm... then, techincally, I could say a frisbee or other dog chew toy I threw up in the air was a planet.

      Okay, all kidding aside, that doesn't answer the asteroid/planet debate. Now, in MY universe (which may or may not allow tourists), a planet was defined as a very large, round blob of matter that revolved around the sun in a fairly regular eliptical orbit, and was created from the original star stuff(tm - (c) Carl Sagan) that made our solar system. Why does it have to be round? I don't know! I just needed standards and was pressed for time! Round to what tolerance? Shut up! I determine round by eye. Eros is shaped like a peanut, thus is an asteroid. Earth is round, thus a planet. Pluto and Charon are double planets. Black is white. Oh, forget it.

      Wake me up when we have a good definition for "moon" vs. "satellite."

      ____________________________
      I tried to join the sexual revolution, but I flunked the physical

  99. Farengi bar jokes, part I by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    New DS9 tongue twister:

    Quark, Queue me up a Quick Quart of Quaoar

    1. Re:Farengi bar jokes, part I by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      "Quaoar" is hard enough to pronounce by itself! You don't need to make it any harder!

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    2. Re:Farengi bar jokes, part I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So funny you almost put me into hibernation.

    3. Re:Farengi bar jokes, part I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So funny you almost put me into hibernation.

      Perfect timing for the tech slump

  100. lies, damn lies! by CodeMunch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Quaoar orbits the sun ever 288 years

    No, it orbits the sun once per year, just like everyone else. It just equates to 288 earth years :P

  101. The Greeks knew a long time ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Mercury: Messenger God.
    Venus: Hottie God
    Mars: War God
    Jupiter: King God
    Saturn: Fertility God
    Uranus: God of the Sky
    Neptune: God of the Sea
    Pluto: God of the Dead
    Quaoar: God of the Queer

    Of course, this information was suppressed by the Romans when they assimilated the Greek gods. The Romans just weren't into 'doing it greek'. Why they left that homo statue David standing is a mystery to me.

  102. How far from earth? by phorm · · Score: 2

    How far exactly does this planetoid come from earth? I suppose if they just noticed it them it's probably nearer to earth lately?

    Hopefully we'll be able to get a decent peek at it now via satellite/telescope. I wonder if they'll be able to get some satellites near enough to take a good look during my lifetime.

    All your old schoolbooks just became useless - phorm

    1. Re:How far from earth? by mikewas · · Score: 2

      There is a plan to send a mission to the outer planets and the Kupier belt. I'm sure a vist to the Kupier Belt's leading citizen will be added if at all possible.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  103. I don't think an 800mile diameter object should .. by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    hmm I think it's too small to be a planet.
    Has the solar orbit been monitored? Could this
    just be an object that got caught up into an orbit
    around the sun?

  104. obligatory simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comic book guy:
    Is there any word in Klingon for loneliness?
    (Grabs pocked Dictionary, makes fist)
    "Quaoar!"

  105. Quaoar? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
    I'm sure that someone will auction off the name to some company. Just think! Planet Microsoft (TM).

    Or would that be Microsoft Planet XP (TM)?

    --
    That is all.
  106. How Big Is It? by bobdinkel · · Score: 1
    Well, according to the article:
    A good idea of the size of the new world can be gained from the fact that if all the 50,000 numbered asteroids were combined, the resulting body would still be smaller than Quaoar.
    Um, ok. I don't know about you, but this doesn't tell me squat. It's an interesting tidbit, but the "to get a good idea" part just made me laugh.
    --
    A publicly traded company exists solely to make profits for shareholders.
  107. Re:Hah! Got it! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's the SCRABBLE PLANET! Someone just wants to sneak this word into the dictionary so that he can beat....

    Lesson learned: Never play scrabble with an active astronomer.

  108. Better names (using Roman gods) by IvyMike · · Score: 3, Informative

    Everybody knows that the planets are supposed to be named after the Roman gods. That's just the way it is. Here's a list of some of the more common Roman gods. I'm sure some of the Hercules and Xena fans out there can add to this list.

    Personally, I like:

    • Minerva, better known by her greek name as Athena. Just because it sounds cool. She sounds like she might be a hottie, too.
    • Somnus, the god of sleep. Because of course a planet that far away from the sun must be asleep.
    • Bacchus, the god of free beer. Just because I like free beer.
    1. Re:Better names (using Roman gods) by SQL+Error · · Score: 3, Informative

      Minerva and Bacchus have already been used for asteroids.

    2. Re:Better names (using Roman gods) by yoinkslap · · Score: 0

      sweet! i liked the sound of a god of sleep anywa..zzzz....

      --
      Dont ask me...Im just the bass player.
    3. Re:Better names (using Roman gods) by DemiKnute · · Score: 1

      Yeah, she is a hottie.

      --
      .
  109. The bigger issue by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    I'm not suprised that the articles all point back to the bigger debate of what classifies as a "planet."

    Compared to the possibility that out solar system could have a 10th planet, the idea that we should only consider 8 of them planets seems almost mroe important to the people involved.

    IMHO, if scientists considered Pluto a planet for as long as it's been considered, use it as the basis for a planet. Of course, then you have to consider Jupiter's largest moons (and our moon for that matter) planets in their own right.

    An alternative, use Mercury as the basis. There's been no debate that Mercury is a planet in it's own right, so that works as a mark. But, the people who discovered Pluto all those years ago would be without the prestige of finding a true "planet."

    Or better yet, let's just keep arguing about it. Which actually isn't a bad idea, it keeps the hunt for larger object heated, and it keeps those people thinking.

    1. Re:The bigger issue by JWW · · Score: 3, Informative

      By definition planets orbit the Sun, thus Jupiter's moons are not planets as they orbit Jupiter.

    2. Re:The bigger issue by Derkec · · Score: 2

      We could use Mercury as the basis and grand-father Pluto in. Pluto doesn't really seem to deserve it, from what I've read. However, it now has social merits to being a planet even if the scientific merit is questionable.

    3. Re:The bigger issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By definition planets orbit the Sun, thus Jupiter's moons are not planets as they orbit Jupiter.

      But the moons essentially do orbit the sun. So if a larger planet captures a smaller one it becomes a moon and no longer a planet?

    4. Re:The bigger issue by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 2, Funny

      We'll have none of that! You leave the facts out of this!

    5. Re:The bigger issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that would be correct. It has nothing to do with size, contrary to what women may tell you.

    6. Re:The bigger issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize of course, that the earth orbits the moon in addition to orbitting Sol?

    7. Re:The bigger issue by anshil · · Score: 2

      Isn't the Halley's Comet then also a planet? Or how about crommelin?

      Or how is it with Charon? Can you really say it's a moon of pluto? I mean the difference in masses is not that great, actually you could also say it are two planet orbiting around each other, while orbiting around sun.

      I think to recall there is also some comet orbiting the sun, somewhere between saturn and uran, or other two planets, currently considered to be an comet, but it's as large as pluto. etc.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    8. Re:The bigger issue by squidfood · · Score: 1
      However, it now has social merits to being a planet.

      You mean it gets invited to all the "Big 8" parties while The Moon has to sit outside and park cars?

    9. Re:The bigger issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do less intelligent people classify things?
      It's not like it will make them look smarter...

    10. Re:The bigger issue by scalis · · Score: 1

      Bah, i'll settle this with ease:

      Definition of a planet:
      An object that orbits the sun and that has a size at least the size of Mercury OR has the name of Pluto.
      All other object would either fall in the category of "frozen world", "moon" or "big piece of rock".

      --

      True ravers don't need drugs
    11. Re:The bigger issue by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 1

      for the same reason dumb people tend to stereotype - groupings are an easy way of thinking of things without. Oh wow - I just did it myself, too!!

      --

      -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

    12. Re:The bigger issue by garbs · · Score: 1

      >Or how is it with Charon? Can you really say it's a moon of pluto? I mean the difference in masses is not that great, actually you could also say it are two planet orbiting around each other, while orbiting around sun.

      Damn, then you must consider our own moon as a planet too, as both the earth and the moon orbit each other around a central point while orbiting the sun.

    13. Re:The bigger issue by anshil · · Score: 1

      Not quite true, first a planet is something that orbits any star, must not be our sun by definition, or?

      Second it may not be a star itself (binary star system), or brown dwarf or something like that.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  110. "New Frozen World Found Beyond Pluto" - no shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I'm not a scientist but I can bet my ass that this is not the last one.....

    /Toor

  111. Sawyer called it by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Funny
    [ Loosely paraphrased from Calculating God...]

    Alien: It's only natural that humans would use a base-10 number system. You have 10 of everything. 10 fingers, 10 toes, 10 planets in your solar system...

    Human: Uh, that's nine planets.

    Alien: Keep looking.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  112. Don't you know... by BoomerSooner · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're going to bring the wrath of Steve Jobs down on you. It's planet "ten" not "X". Trademark pending, patent pending, soul pending.

    1. Re:Don't you know... by drik00 · · Score: 1

      come on...this is funny, mod the shiznit up, yo

      btw (and off-topic): who's gonna win next week at the Cotton Bowl?

      J

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    2. Re:Don't you know... by ishamael69 · · Score: 1

      Easy...


      Oklahoma.

  113. Political Correctness by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know, troll -1.

    Don't you hate it when someone takes something completely unrelated, like ASTRONOMY, and uses it to make a political statement? I can see it coming now, there will be politically correct software coming where a really annoying popup will espouse some political view or another. Spare me. Save it for something we can opt out of, not a planet that will be named for all time.

    Time to start a "Name it Persephone" website?

    Yes, I'm a geek. Sue me.

  114. Slashdot Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is your favorite pronunciation of Quaoar?
    1) kyoo-ohr
    2) kway-ohr
    3) kwow-ahr
    5) kwak-kwak
    6) k-pax
    7) kow-boi-neel

    1. Re:Slashdot Poll by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      You forgot
      "6.5) I can't pronounce vowels, you insensitive clod!"

      Or wait. May be it should be... ahh, don't bother. Can't think of any consonant-replacements for "I".

    2. Re:Slashdot Poll by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      8) I'm mute, you insensitive clod. ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  115. I think they should name it Alderaan by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

    ... and then build a giant "Death Star" and blow it up.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    1. Re:I think they should name it Alderaan by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      And will this "Death Star" use a "laser" ?
      (lame Dr. Evil reference...I know....)

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  116. Time to update Celestia by JohnMunsch · · Score: 1

    http://www.shatters.net/celestia/

    It's a shame that it's so far away that we can't get a good texture map for it (or for Pluto for that matter).

    --
    Sigs are for people who started using the net _after_ '86.
    1. Re:Time to update Celestia by execom · · Score: 1

      http://skyandtelescope.com/

      --
      I need a Sino-Logic 16. Sogo-7 data-gloves, a GPL stealth module...
  117. What will they say about it in grade school? by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    If they teach it in k-3rd grade as a planet.. then it will be a planet for all eternity. *grin*

  118. Talkin' our Uranus! by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    Aren't the names of new planets supposed to be auctioned off by the Gub'ment. I'm wager on Planet Starbucks being the front runner.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:Talkin' our Uranus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no! Planet Starbuck! after his fighter gets shot down and he's forced to live on an alien planet with a Cylon. Later a mysterious woman appears and bears him a child. Stupid.

  119. Hey!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's no planet, that's a space station!

  120. NOT a planet by kstumpf · · Score: 2

    This is NOT a planet, its a Kuiper Belt object. Most likely, it will be referred to as a planetoid.

    Alot of people also argue that Pluto is actually part of the Kuiper Belt and not a true planet. If anything, this discovery hurts Pluto's bid for planet-dom. Also, Pluto has a crumby elliptical orbit that swings near Neptune.

    1. Re:NOT a planet by scharkalvin · · Score: 2

      Pluto is probably a Kuiper Belt object. But it does have one thing going for it as far as planet status goes, it has a moon. If any other kuiper belt objects also are found to have satelites then maybe Pluto should be demoted. But Pluto does seem to have its own orbit (weird as it is) and a moon, so for now its a planet.

    2. Re:NOT a planet by Skoshi · · Score: 1

      Not only does Pluto have a moon, but some scientists think that at some point Pluto and Neptune may have switched moons. Pluto would have to be large enough to maintain its own orbit while the switch occured (in other words it has to be big enough not to have gotten sucked in as just another moon of Neptune). This lends support to keeping Pluto listed as a planet and not relisting it as a planetiod.

      --
      "What are apples? Left, right, socialist...I don't know."
    3. Re:NOT a planet by Drbuzz · · Score: 1

      I agree with the guy above me. Pluto is truly a planet. Not only does Pluto have a moon (Charon), the moon is half the size of pluto. The ratio for the planet-moon combo is unlike anything else in our solar system. Pluto and Charon have even been considered dual planets revolving around each other. Current pictures show a round planet not an oblonged shaped asteroid.

  121. OMG, It's Niburu!!!! by TrekCycling · · Score: 1
    Wake up, Art Bell fans, Sitchin was right!!


    Google Search

    1. Re:OMG, It's Niburu!!!! by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      You want to name the new one "Two Beers"? (nihongo de "two beers" wa "ni biru")

      I suppose that's easier to pronounce than "Quaoar". Might make it more popular among students. ;)

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  122. Obligatory Simpsons Refernce by LittleGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Suggestion: Planet Kwyjibo.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  123. What is Earth named after? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does anyone know where the name "Earth" comes from?

    And don't anyone say "it was named after a worm"

    1. Re:What is Earth named after? by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

      Found this on Merriam-Webster.

      Main Entry: earth
      Pronunciation: '&rth
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Middle English erthe, from Old English eorthe; akin to Old High German erda earth, Greek era
      Date: before 12th century

      I'm not going to attempt to go past Old High German. I want to keep my brain intact :)

  124. Sure! by alienmole · · Score: 2
    I mean... surely 'importance' has to have something to do with human aspirations?

    Your aspirations are simply too puny! We need all the material we can get our hands in, in order to build a Dyson Sphere around the sun!

  125. How about... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    Why don't we just define a "planet" as "an object that maintains an atmosphere via its gravity well."?

    It'd sure clear up a lot.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about mercury? It has about as much atmosphere as the moon.

    2. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess Titan is a planet then.

    3. Re:How about... by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      That would rule out Mercury. And Titan would suddenly be a planet instead of a moon.

    4. Re:How about... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      Yup. But how important is it that we consider Mercury a planet and Titan a moon?

      In all the SF I remember reading, if it had an atmosphere, it was colonizable. If it didn't, it was minable. Seems like a logical distinction to me.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  126. How do you pronounce it? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    KWAY-OR?
    At least the BBC version didn't have a pronounciation guide.

  127. Re:Is it really? - no, it's Vorlon in origin... by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's obvious that this is a Vorlon Planet Killer come to destroy the Earth - Bush convinced them that Al Queda had links to the Shadows.

  128. The traditional name for Sol's 10th planet by devphil · · Score: 5, Interesting


    is Persephone. (per-SEF-oh-nee) This would be the chick from Greek mythology that ate the pomogranate seeds and thus had to stay in Hades for half the year (when the world grows cold), and gets to come out the other half (when the world warms up again).

    Most of the SF and speculative fiction/nonfiction articles over the last few decades have all referred to a tenth planet as Persephone, on the assumption that we would continue naming major astronomical objects for ancient mythological figures.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:The traditional name for Sol's 10th planet by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interestingly there are a few problems with the name Persephone. All of the major planets are named for Roman gods; Persephone is the Greek name for the goddess in Latin called Proserpina.

      Second, there is the suggestion that Clarke (or maybe Asimov) made before Charon was discovered: he suggested that Pluto's moon, if one were ever discovered, be named Persephone, and that the name Charon be given to any trans-Plutonian planet, with I think Cerberus being reserved for any moons of that planet. That way someone from outside the system would have to pass Charon and Cerberus (or maybe it was Styx) to get to Pluto and Persephone.

      See the Space Telescope Institute's Press Release for more information about Quaoar; on the name, this link may be of use; it looks like Quaoar is a name from mythology, albeit indigenous American mythology, which makes it consistent with the names of the minor planets and moons (which do not need to be named after Roman gods; the moons of Uranus are even named after characters from Shakespeare : e.g., Oberon and Titania from Much Ado About Nothing, and Ariel and Miranda from The Tempest).

    2. Re:The traditional name for Sol's 10th planet by Rand+Race · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's taken:

      399 Persephone

      This main belt asteroid is approx 52 km in diameter and was discoveredby M Wolf at Heidelberg in 1895. This first determination of the spin period was made from 6 nights ofobservations (by Col Bembrick) over a time span of 6 weeks, representing 58 rotations of the asteroid.The large amplitude of the light curve approx 0.4 magnitudes implies a considerable irregularity in theshape of this asteroid.


      Personally I would think Minerva would be a better fit being a Roman goddess, but that's an asteroid too.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    3. Re:The traditional name for Sol's 10th planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't oberon and titania from "midsummer nights dream"?

    4. Re:The traditional name for Sol's 10th planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      at the risk of repeating a lower modded comment, Oberon and Titania are from a Midsummers Night Dream, not Much Ado About Nothing.

    5. Re:The traditional name for Sol's 10th planet by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Could we name it Hercules? (Okay its already a constellation, but not a very prominent one).

      According to Greek legend his final labour for King Eurystheus was to travel to Hades, a cold, dark, miserable place, and bring back Cerberus, guardian of the Underworld.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  129. Obligatory Star Wars quote by tit4tat · · Score: 1

    "That's no moon..."

    1. Re:Obligatory Star Wars quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kill yourself.

    2. Re:Obligatory Star Wars quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine!

  130. Caltech site about Quaoar by Chuk · · Score: 1

    It's here:
    http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~chad/quaoar/

    Please don't slashdot the page. Take a number and just click the link when your number comes up. Single file, please. (Kind of a slow-loading page already, hence no link...)

    --
    chuk
  131. Funny, by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

    how everyone is using Google News these days to submit stories to /.

  132. My God! by Phalse+Impressions · · Score: 0, Troll

    Alf was right. He knew it 15 years ago and we are just now figuring it out!

    Listen to TV aliens. They know more then you think.

  133. Re:I'd laugh ... by howardjp · · Score: 1

    As a Silver Spring resident, I feel your pain.

  134. Re:You know you've been playing too much Sacrifice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    alluding of course to the high concentration of nitrous oxide in Jupiters composition?

  135. Discoverer's home page URL by cje · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a link to the Quaoar FAQ, maintained by Chad Truijillo, one of the planet's co-discoverers. There's a lot of cool stuff there, including the discovery images (animated so you can see it moving across the star field), the Hubble images, information about the orbit, etc.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  136. Dimensions by Drakonian · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So it's 1280 km "across" and 1250 Km "wide". How does that work out? This is on two successive sentences. Nice!

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  137. Top 5 speculations where 'Quaoar' came from... by Galaphine · · Score: 2, Funny

    5. An inept reporter who misspelled 'Quasar'...
    4. A new interplanetary CDMA relay station sponsored by Qualcomm...
    3. Some drunken Brooklynite...
    2. A homophobic astronomer with a southern drawl...
    1. Somebody tried to use a non-Roman god but couldn't remember the name of that winged Aztec creature...

    --
    Galaphine
    1. Re:Top 5 speculations where 'Quaoar' came from... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      1. Somebody tried to use a non-Roman god but couldn't remember the name of that winged Aztec creature...

      Obviously, you don't google before posting. A quaoar is different from a Quetzalcóatl.

  138. N Pizzas. by douglips · · Score: 1
    N. N Pizzas, that way we don't care how many.


    My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us N Pizzas.

    1. Re:N Pizzas. by stand · · Score: 1

      I like that one even better.

      --
      Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
  139. Alvin and Dave? by friendofish · · Score: 1

    Now we know that Brian Tanner shouldn't have got in trouble at school after Alf told him about the two planets beyond Pluto, named Alvin and Dave.

  140. Google by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    Right now, if you google for "Quaoar," you'll find one unrelated hit, one news item, and a suggestion that maybe you meant "Quasar."

  141. Which is it? by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The new world, which has been dubbed Quaoar, is about 1,280 kilometres (800 miles) across. Quaoar orbits the sun ever 288 years and is 1250 Km wide, about the size of all the asteroids combined.

    So, is it 1,280 or 1,250?

    Hint: The difference wouldn't be so significant if you didn't write them right next to each other like that.

  142. Wait a minute... by teslatug · · Score: 2

    That means Prot really was an alien

  143. changed letters.... by nebenfun · · Score: 0

    they're now known as the
    "Planet Q" nuts...
    nbfn

  144. Re:How old are you then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, you must be older than 248 Earth-years then (that's the time Pluto takes to revolve around the sun).

    Or wait... you a one-year old kid?

  145. Persephone, damnit! by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    It should be named Persephone (per-sef-an-nee), damnit! Larry Niven must be apeased!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  146. Need a new Mnemonic! by tommck · · Score: 2

    My Very Eager Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas Quickly!

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  147. I guess Prot really was an Alien by utahjazz · · Score: 1

    From the movie K-PAX.

    Jeff Bridges (Doctor) : Where I come from we have 9 planets.

    Kevin Spacey (Prot): Actually it's 10, but that's not important right now.

    1. Re:I guess Prot really was an Alien by killmenow · · Score: 1

      What about Planet X, that further object? I think now it's a debate along the lines of This is Spinal Tap...

      Astronomer: There are only ten planets.

      Nigel: But these go to eleven.

    2. Re:I guess Prot really was an Alien by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      David: You're missing the point! The problem is, we've got a new planet so small it's in danger of being trampled by midgets.

      Derek: What if we put a small fence around it?

      David: What for?

      Derek: So that the midgets can't trample it.

  148. Zetas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the Zetas, Nancy was right, they really do exist!
    http://www.zetatalk.com/

  149. Deciml is EVIL qjkx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only natural that stupid people would use a base ten numbering system.

  150. Primary Education Funding Test by ApharmdB · · Score: 1

    Here's something interesting to pay attention to:

    How long will it take the science textbooks in your local school to reflect this change? One of the first things they teach kids in science classes is the number of planets. How many 3rd grade styrofoam ball solar system projects have there been?

    Remember the year the planet was discovered (even if it winds up in the same argued category as Pluto) and you can use it as a argument when kids are using textbooks 10 years from now that still don't have the new planet in them.

  151. "biggest" != "most important" ... learn to read by Greedo · · Score: 1

    Sigh.

    In not one of the three original articles does it say the this is being hailed as the "most important discovery in the past 72 years". They all say that it is the biggest find in the Solar System since Pluto itself 72 years ago.

    And, if you read the articles in context, it's pretty obvious that they mean "size" big, not "important" big.

    I'm all for editorializing, but get your facts straight, Mr. theBrownfury.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  152. Re: distance to Jupiter by mfnickster · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...my reference is my foggy memory of some dusty Arthur C. Clarke books. It's not like it would be tough to figure it out.

    In other words, you're too lazy to look it up or do the math before you post! ;-)

    The speed of light in a vacuum is 300,000 km/s (not meters), or 18,000,000 km/min.

    So, here is the actual (approximately) factual information on Jupiter:

    • Distance to sun: 5.2 AU / 777,908,924 km / 43 light-minutes
    • Max. dist. from Earth: 6.2 AU / 927,506,794 km / 51.5 light-minutes
    • Min. dist. from Earth: 4.2 AU / 628,311,054 km / 35 light-minutes

    Of course, all of these vary at apogee, perigee, etc. - but not by much, so cut me some slack! At any rate, you're only off by an order of magnitude or so.

    So this new body, at a distance of 6 billion km from the sun, would be about 333 light-minutes or 5.5 light-hours away. Wow.

    - MFN

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  153. Yhink About The Astologers! by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Please! For the love of the neo-pagan movement we must suppress this! Ten planets will totally screw up all of the Astrologer's charts! What is to become of us when we find that all that we thought we knew bout our futures is wrong because we've been assigned the wrong planet?

    Now we find that Jupiter is not ascending, Qualcom, er, Qualuud, er, whateverthehellitscalled is really in the house of Bal Saggoth!

    GGRRRRR!!!! I'll never know my lucky lotto numbers!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Yhink About The Astologers! by PhxBlue · · Score: 3, Informative

      Feh. Astrology accounted for Chiron when it was discovered back in the seventies. For that matter, astrology accounted for Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto after their respective discoveries. Whether you believe in astrology or not, you can count on people writing papers and books to describe what effects Quaoam (or Qualcomm, or whatever. . . damn, what a forgettable name for a planet) will have on their personal lives.

      . . .or maybe astrology won't account for it. Most astrologers still don't account for precession of the earth's axis and the presence of Ophiucus in the Zodiac. . . so ya never know.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:Yhink About The Astologers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If astrologers don't account for precession, then why are astrological ages based on precession? E.G., the age of Pisces, the age of Aquarius? These are based on the precession of earth's axis. There's even an oldies song about the age of Aquarius, which has either just arrived or will arrive soon, depending on where you draw the line.

  154. it's called what??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone think whatever scientist named this planet also recently a won a certain MySQL mascot naming contest?

  155. Gonna have to change the mnemonic by Proc6 · · Score: 1
    My Very Earnest Mother Just Served Us Nine Pickles Qatar.

    Doesn't quite fit I guess.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  156. Re: distance to Jupiter by back_pages · · Score: 2

    Hehe, one man's order of magnitude is another man's rounding error. Thanks for the correction - I'm a computer scientist, not a physicist.

  157. Yes... planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right, it's a planet. Certainly not an alien death cruiser on a slave recruitment mission. Just a nice little planet, bristling with laser cannons... I mean, rocks...

  158. Oh, the (in)Humanity by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1

    Thanks to a momentary lapse of reason (the callous and thoughtless act of giving the 10th planet a ridiculous name), today's astronomers have doomed thousands of potential future astronomers to study business instead. This will be due to the fact that they failed their grade 4 science tests after having spelled the name of that damned planet incorrectly.

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
  159. Quickly (duh) by gosand · · Score: 2

    My Very Energetic Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas Quickly

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  160. It's a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that the only planet behind Pluto is Yuggoth.

    1. Re:It's a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Pluto IS Yuggoth (according to H.P. Lovecraft).

    2. Re:It's a scam. by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this planet is Shaggai.

    3. Re:It's a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, It's Yuggoth. As in "Fungi from Yuggoth".

      Great Cthulhu

    4. Re:It's a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yuggoth == Pluto
      Shaggai == Quaoan

  161. Re:Hah! Got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was funnier than piss, why'd you have to go ruin it?

  162. Just one question.. by radja · · Score: 2

    Mars - martians
    venus - venusians
    qwaoar - ??????

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  163. Quaoar by bluhatter · · Score: 1

    Quaoar (pronounced Kwah-o-ar) - which is still hard to pronounce.

    This discovery is being hailed as the most important solar system discovery in the past 72 years.

    I'll say, it's the first "planet" that's not been named after a greek god! This one gets its name from the creation force of the Tongva Indian tribe! How cool, huh? We waited 72 years for something to pop up and we wreck our big chance at coming up with a cool name and call it Quaoar?

    Clearly this speaks for humanity. ;)

    --


    bluHatter
  164. Quaoreg by hanmer · · Score: 1

    Same guy who named it named this thing. That's not German ... that's the model name. I swear.

  165. well no wonder the world didn't end by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Here we thought the world would end because 9 planets lined up in 2000. Turns out we needed to wait for 10 planents to get lined up.

    Ben

  166. Re:Most imporatant discovery in the last 72 years by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    I believe the discovery that Pamela Anderson has fake tits is more important. Significantly more important. We all have a better chance of grasping her breasts than some 800 km object out side of Pluto's orbit.

    "Not grasping" you mean, given your assertion that her tits are fake.

  167. For Gods sake choose another name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In Portuguese, Quaoar sound awfully close to something like an invitation to stick your ass in the air! (I kid you not!!!!)

    1. Re:For Gods sake choose another name! by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      And in Czech it sounds almost like "a coffee machine" :)

  168. Mondas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, every self respecting Doctor Who fan knows this. It's where the Cybermen are from.

    Pity it blew up a few years ago, but then the timeline in that show makes any Star Trek series look normal.

    1. Re:Mondas by sg7jimr · · Score: 1

      Only called that by the Cybermen, I believe. Just like I doubt Mars is called that by the Ice Warriors, except maybe when conversing with humans. They may have appeared to call it Mars in some episode, but as we all know most science fiction programs have a universal translator for the audience.

    2. Re:Mondas by AlistairMcMillan · · Score: 1

      So what did the humans call it?

      Been ages since I watched any.

  169. Better idea by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    We should start using Star Wars names for newly discovered planets. Tatooine! Alderaan! Dagobah! Naboo!

    Alternately, we can take a cue from Earth and Beyond, and start naming them after dead astronauts. Planet Grissom! Planet McAuliffe! And so on.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Better idea by certron · · Score: 1

      My mind is a little hazy on this, but I'm pretty sure Wing Commander had the McAuliffe system in it...

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
  170. Goes well with Uranus, the Bowel Planet. (eom) by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    Well, it seemed funny in my head...

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  171. This must be used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I voted for "fucktard".

    Think of it.

    "Gee, you must be from planet fucktard".

  172. So how long until Jack Brennan moves it? by rthille · · Score: 3, Funny


    And puts another Stonehenge in my backyard?

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    1. Re:So how long until Jack Brennan moves it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly. I am the one who _put_ it there. Where do you think I keep all my volatiles? Pockets??

      -Vandervecken

    2. Re:So how long until Jack Brennan moves it? by seanellis · · Score: 1

      He won't move it - he'll collapse it into an 8 foot neutronium sphere and use it to power his gravity generators with.

  173. Nitpicking by archen · · Score: 1

    Mercury was discovered to actually have an extremely thin atmosphere fairly recently. Although I can't recall if it's native to the planet or captured from the sun.

  174. Didn't they say this in K-PAX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember Prot in K-PAX saying something about a planet out there. I could be wrong.

  175. Re:omnipotence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> If God decides to whack us with a rock, I really don't think there is a whole lot we can do to stop it.

    If God decides to whack us with ANYTHING, I don't think we can do much to stop it!!

  176. Government Funded Semantic Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the US has a huge budget surplus now that the Bush administration has cut the budgets for most social programs.
    I'm going to calll my congressman tonight to see if we can't get say $1,000,000,000 for a bunch of language scholars to study the Planet vs. Kupier belt controversy.

    In fact, i'm going to make this a challenge to slashdot users from other countries to see what country will pledge the most to this very important cause.

  177. I can just see the book title now by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    CmdrTaco is from Cruithne, Cowboyneal is from Quaoar

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  178. Uh... no by mark-t · · Score: 2
    They're named after ancient Roman Dieties, actually... not Greek. Although it's true that in general there is a one-to-one accounting for every Greek God to a Roman equivalent (Mercury->Hermes, Jupiter->Zeus, Venus->Aphrodite, etc).

    There's something to be said for tradition, and personally, I think that if it's really a planet they really do need to name it after a character from ancient mythology.

  179. Quaoar follows a circular orbit by Rares+Marian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry folks, its just some bird crap on the telescope. No self-respect 21st century discovered planet would follow an orbit proposed in a dark old century where people who lived on a flat Earth in a geocentric solar^H^H^H^H^H geo system.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  180. Re:Pronunciation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Quaoar. It is pronounced 'Lie-nucks'.

    Silly troll. It is pronounced 'guh-NEW lie-nucks'.

  181. The name is an indian god by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

    This object (planet or not) is named after an local (california) indian tribes god.

    --
    ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  182. Quaoar Means.... by briglass · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Quaoar: Their only god who "came down from heaven; and, after reducing chaos to order, out the world on the back of seven giants. He then created the lower animals," and then mankind. Los Angeles County Indians , California

    --

    ----
    "Those who quote others are more likely to one day be quoted" -Tom Planter
  183. Re: not planets-- people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should know better. They were named by Greeks who thought the planets WERE gods!

  184. Why this won't be classed as a planet by vinn · · Score: 1

    I can think of several reasons why this won't
    be classed as a planet:

    • The chance of this thing having an atmosphere is doubtful. Even Pluto's freezes
      for most of it's orbit. (Though for the next 15 years it will likely have an atmosphere of nitrogen, methane, and carbon monozide.. then it'll freeze solid again. That's why we should be sending a probe there now.)
    • It's only 25% bigger than Varuna - another Kuiper Belt object, and probably about the same size as other ones. The unique thing is this one
      reflects more light and makes it easier to study.
    • The Kuiper Belt, although interesting, doesn't seem to hold any objects that are substantially different from one another. This is just another one, albeit a hell of a lot bigger.
    --
    ----- obSig
  185. A few short facts about Quaoar by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

    - Around half the size of Pluto (and there's been dispute if Pluto is a planet).

    - 5% of the sky was looked at before finding Quaoar, so there might very well be a dozen more Quaoar-sized "planets" in the Kupier belt. Even Pluto-sized planets might be out there.

    - Water, methane, methanol, and carbon dioxide ice seem to exist on Quaoar.

    - Quaoar's name isn't decided yet and its designation is 2002 LM60 until a name is officially decided upon in a few months.

    - Quaoar is pronounced "kwah-o-wahr" and is the name of a great force of creation among the Tongva people.

    - Quaoar is 42 AU from Earth, while Pluto and Neptune are both 30 AU from Earth. 1 Astronomical Unit = One "Sun to Earth" distance.

    - If standing on Quaoar, what one would see at the Sun (and the Earth) would be what happened 5 hours ago, since light takes 5 hours to travel to Quaoar.

    - A Space Shuttle would need 25 years to travel to Quaoar.

    - Google News about Quaoar.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:A few short facts about Quaoar by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1

      ...and all of its inhabitants are named "John." And the shuttle would take less than 25 years to get there if they'd just install an oscillation overthruster....

    2. Re:A few short facts about Quaoar by TrevorB · · Score: 2

      A Space Shuttle would need 25 years to travel to Quaoar.

      Is that how they're going to be decomissioned?

      Was that what Buck Rogers' mission was supposed to be?

    3. Re:A few short facts about Quaoar by goodmanj · · Score: 1
      - A Space Shuttle would need 25 years to travel to Quaoar.

      What? The Space Shuttle can't even leave Earth orbit. 25 years for a Hoffman-style rendezvous trajectory sounds reasonable, but the Shuttle can't carry enough fuel to do that.

    4. Re:A few short facts about Quaoar by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      That's just a figure I picked up while browsing through Quaoar sites.. :) I think it's meant to give us an idea of the distance, not to say that it's possible in practice.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  186. Alternate theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked out the orbital paths on Pluto and Quaoar

    http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~chad/quaoar/

    I have to propose a different theory. I think Pluto and Quaoar are co-orbiting planets. IOW, they are each-others moon and they together circle around the sun. This will explain Pluto's eccentric orbit. With more data, if pluto's average year equals quaoar's average year, it would confirm this theory. That being so....

    I vote we call this new planet Fifi(after Pluto's girlfriend).

    H R Hashim

  187. Why in the world? by kakos · · Score: 1

    Why did they name it Quaoar or whatever it is? It seems completely idiotic that they would deviate completely from the conventions of naming planets; all the other planets are named after Roman gods, so it seems reasonable that they should have named this one after a Roman god. In fact, it would have been completely appropriate to name it Erebus, the darkness of the underworld.

  188. Can anyone answer this? by unicron · · Score: 2

    It seems every year, I hear something about someone discovering "the planet after Pluto". How many times has the 10th planet been discovered now? Is this planet the same thing? Something new. I'm too friggin confused at this point.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  189. Home of the Red Lectroids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are we going?!?

    PLANET TEN!!!

    When?

    REAL SOON!!!

    1. Re:Home of the Red Lectroids? by qengho · · Score: 1


      "Laugh-a while you can-a, Monkey Boy!"

  190. Come on, Moon 2, Moon 2!!! by watanabe · · Score: 4, Funny
    I want this to be moved into orbit around earth, so that we can have two moons, like "Hook." Woo! That would be great. Who wants to fund the expedition? I'm sure we can profit from the new moon somehow. Like, countries could pay to keep it in or out of their orbit... How great would this be? Like "Grandpa, were you there when they added the second moon?" "Yes Deirdre, I was. In fact, I suggested it..."

    Moon2.com. If only it were 1999, this would already be funded!!

    1. Re:Come on, Moon 2, Moon 2!!! by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

      Nice idea reck the planets ecosystem by screwing up the gravitational balance between the earth and the one moon we have. You know the one that regulates the oceans tides.

      Just to have a cool view right out of a subpar movie, I wouldn't want to put up with 100 ft tidal waves for example.

      --
      >
    2. Re:Come on, Moon 2, Moon 2!!! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "Grandpa, were you there when they added the second moon?" "Yes Deirdre, I was. In fact, I suggested it..."

      Well, Al Gore already took credit for the *first* moon :-P

    3. Re:Come on, Moon 2, Moon 2!!! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      not to mention the effect on surfing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Come on, Moon 2, Moon 2!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but what if it somehow acts as a benefit?

  191. Let's call it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's call it X. I am sure we can find a few reasons.

  192. "Sol" by BTWR · · Score: 1

    Why do geeks feel that they can change the name of the Sun? I personally feel that it is incredibly ignorant to call the Moon Luna or the Sun Sol. The Moon and The Sun are it`s names. Period. It happens to also be the proper noun. (Yes, proper nouns can have "the" in it i.e. The Bronx - you don't say I'm from Bronx). It`s like people who insist on calling Israel Jewish-occupied-Palestine or something (NOT flamebait! Not getting into a I-P debate, just making an analogy!). Does anyone else feel this way, or am I the only one? I understand that "The Moon" and "The Sun" are very Earth-centric terms, and obviously most planets and every solar system has their own "Moon" and "Sun," but I still feel that we have not come to a point where this name change is necessary. Any comments?

    1. Re:"Sol" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sol and luna aren't recent name changes jacko.
      There are a variety of names for these objects.
      Continuing to call our sun "the sun" makes discussing other suns kinda cumbersome.

      English Sun Mercury Venus Earth Moon Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto
      Latin Sol Mercurius Venus Terra Luna Mars Jupiter Saturnus Uranus Neptunus Pluto
      Arabic Shams Otaared Zuhra Ard Quamar Merrikh Mushtarie Zuhal Uraanus Niptuun Plutoon

    2. Re:"Sol" by geoswan · · Score: 2

      The thing that grates on my ear is when people refer to "other Solar systems". I think it should be "other stellar systems".

    3. Re:"Sol" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do geeks feel that they can change the name of the Sun?

      I don't call the star Sol, but the Sun. You see, my native language is English, not Latin (though I do read Latin well enough to teach it).

      But Sol is the Roman name both for the Sun and the god of the Sun. So this is hardly a matter of neologism. The geeky Sol is only necessary if you're outside the system and want to distinguish between the local primary (the sun) and the homeworld's primary (the Sun, i.e., Sol). Since noone here has been outside the system yet, it would seem out of place, but it's a literary (or semi-literary) convention and not worth getting worked up over.

      It`s like people who insist on calling Israel Jewish-occupied-Palestine or something (NOT flamebait! Not getting into a I-P debate, just making an analogy!)

      The minute you have to add a "NOT flamebait!" disclaimer to your comment, you should know you're better off not posting the comment. This reads like it should be covered by a new corollary to Godwin's Law. Anyway, calling the Sun "Sol" is not a matter of political correctness (as any use of terminology other than the hard-to-problematize "Israel" and "Palestinian Territories" might be called), and so the analogy fails.

    4. Re:"Sol" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like "other planetary systems."

    5. Re:"Sol" by BTWR · · Score: 1
      Thank you for making my point.

      In english, it is precisely "Sun Mercury Venus Earth Moon Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto"

      My apologies if you were referring to Sol in another Latin language. I just don't agree with that name as the Sun re-named or simply re-imagined.

    6. Re:"Sol" by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the other hand, the sun has been called Sol for much longer than it has the sun, and as such is the reason why we name them solar eclipses, solar systems, solarized films, etc.

      Language is *flexible*.

      For the same reason that 'Photoshopping' is a verb, 'Sol' is the name of our sun. People use it, and the term sticks.

      In a similar vein:

      Sol
      Luna
      boxen
      unices
      Linux (over GNU/Linux)
      Doh
      phat
      slashdotted
      owned/0wnz3d

    7. Re:"Sol" by morie · · Score: 2

      I thought it was "de zon", "le soleil" or "die Sonne". Maybe "Sol" has something to do with a reference which surpasses local language?

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    8. Re:"Sol" by castlan · · Score: 2

      Nah, you screwed up the analagy.

      "Sol" is the name of our local star not because of the flexibility of a language, but because the choice of which language to use is flexible.

      Not to say that a language cannot be flexible, especially a "living" language. Be it jargon, regional dialect or slang, slashdotted, boxen, phat can become viable.

      The same isn't true for "Linux" over GNU/Linux. You don't call an apple an "orange" and say that it is correct because language is flexible, without some extreme application of poetic license. You also don't call a star "the Moon", a tree an "apple" or call a GNU OS "Linux".

      Now you might call a potato an "apple of the earth" or a lime a "lemon", but that would be anoter instance where the choice of language is flexible, not where the language itself should be corruptibly flexible.

      If you hate the term GNU/Linux, then just call it GNU. Nobody know's what you are talking about? then call it "GNU with Linux". If they don't know what GNU is, then they probably have no idea what a kernel is, so there is no point in talking about Linux anyway. Say "free Windows alternative".

      Now do you really say "zero-w'nz-three-d"? That isn't really flexibility in language, that is "clever" dissafection, like "womyn". Heavy handed and artificial mutations don't illustrate the flexibility of language, but the speaker's need for attention.

    9. Re:"Sol" by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Sol is the Latin word for "Sun". The Greek term, by the way, would be ho Helios, "the Sun." Likewise Luna and he Selene for the Moon.

  193. furthermore by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Some asteroids are now known to have satellites of their own...

    --

    "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  194. How about Quaalude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It starts with "Q" just like Quaoar, but is easier to pronounce -- and easy to swallow!

  195. Quaoar? That sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got it- that's the name of Yamcha's cat...

  196. Re:You know you've been playing too much Sacrifice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, that's Uranus.

    It's even fallen down laughing.

  197. Planet Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    named after our favourite web site...

    1. Re:Planet Goatse by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Planet Goatse

      Actually, the Saturnian moon "Mimas" best fits the title of the Goatse Planet, or Goatse Moon.

      http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap950924.html

  198. Ramming a political message down everyone's throat by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

    /sarcasm on, in case anyone is wondering

    IMHO someone's angry at the fate of Native Americans at the hands of the rest of us and wants to call attention to it. Choosing a name that's nigh unpronounceable in English only draws more attention and needles everyone else. After all, once couldn't choose a (gasp) Roman god, those Europeans are eeeevil.

    (sigh)

    /sarcasm off

    - My ancestors were still IN Europe until 1956, so DON'T FRELLING BLAME ME.

  199. Definition of a Planet? by kakos · · Score: 1

    So, I've been wondering for a while if there is a "definitive" definition of a planet. I've always used the definition that a planet was any object that was formed in the accretion disc of a star. Is this correct or not at all? Also, if you are to believe in the Bode-Titius Rule, the new planet should be 77 or so AU from the sun, which may be a reason to believe Quaoar isn't a planet.

  200. Elron Haubouard by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Oh Great! Silly space object names are only gonna give scient*logy more appearent credibility.

  201. "Disclude"??? That's unpossible! (N/T) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what part of "no text" don't you understand??

  202. Ashcroft to send FBI to Quaoar by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    AP news update: "At a press conference, US Attorney General John Ashcroft declared planet Quaoar as a possible terrorist hideout for Bin Laden, and said he is sending FBI agents there to search for Al Qaida. He commented: "Anything that starts with a 'Q' is suspect."

  203. Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are you sniffing Freon? WTF does this have to do with "geeks?" "Sol" and "Luna" have been in use for one hell of a lot longer than "the sun" or "the moon." Where do you think terms like "Solar System" and "Lunar Module" come from? This doesn't mean that it's incorrect to use generic terms like "the sun" or "the moon" .. it's just a local convenience (i.e., a person living in the suburbs of Chicago might talk about taking a trip into "the city", where "the city" implies Chicago because of its close proximity.)

    1. Re:Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

      Where I live, if anyone says "I'm going to the city" it'd mean they're going to San Francisco. Just because it's called "the city" far more often than "San Francisco" by no means makes it incorrect to call it by its real name. If, however, you say "Frisco", be prepared for some derisive laughter.

      Comparing the names "Sol" and "the sun" are no different.

  204. actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..actually planet x stuff mostly comes from zacharia stichin and his translations of ancient sumerian records. Stuff written down by real humans a long time ago. Beyond that I won't speculate, but there is something to it, the translations I have read are fairly detailed, but those are in dispute as well. No link handy, but worth a few minutes with google if you are interested. Hmm, sorta like the "myth" of the biblical flood, but then you find out there really was some sort of giant flood, many ancient cultures all have more or less the same stories and records.

    My rule of thumb is, the older I get the less I'm a know-it-all, and am more open to at least checking out stuff with an open mind, see maybe if there's a smidgen of reality in there. As in, who really knows? I remember as a teen age kid dreaming(real dream I still remember it was so vivid) of a thing that might have looked like a console, and I was communicating with people with sounds and video all over the planet instantly and had access to all this knowledge at my fingertips. I woke up and wanted one, but they didn't exist then, not really, not for joe average anyway. This was early 60's btw, now I own that stuff. I use "magic black windows" to provide my electricity now, silent, no fumes,no noise, work quite well. Internet "experts" keep telling me it doesn't work, even today. Their loss, same as people who don't own computers say they aren't useful enough to bother with them. Oh well.... And as to crystals, just read a story last week that they can store sounds and stuff in memory of a kind. Umm, no link again but it was some mainstream normal news place, I surf a lot.

    diggit, no one knows, it's all guesses, even the experts

  205. Mars needs women! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your bloody mitts off!
    Wales needs vowels!

  206. Re:Hah! Got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical geek ruining a perfectly good joke with inconvienent facts!

  207. Our God by superyooser · · Score: 1

    It's good that they're abandoning the naming convention based on Roman gods. However, instead of Quaoar, I think it's most appropriate that we name the planet after the predominant god of our age: Darwinius, the god of evolution.

  208. Cthulhu calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it has to be Yuggoth

  209. Re: Shakespeare by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    FYI: Oberon and Titania were from "A Midsummer Night's Dream", not "Much Ado About Nothing". They were the King and Queen of the fairies.

    Although, I have to admit that "Much Ado About Nothing" might have been more interesting with them included, particularly the Kenneth Branagh screen version...

  210. Stellar nomenclature and moral relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll get flamed for this, but as a religious conservative, the problem that I have with the name "Sol" is that it implies that the Sun is just a plain old ordinary ball of gas with a name. That there is nothing particularly special about it, or about its third planet and the inhabitants of that planet. We've got "Sol" and "Rigel" and "Sirius" and all of these ordinary stars, and none of them are any better or worse than the others, so therefore there is no need to treat our own sun with any sort of special respect or reverence, right?

    The problem with this attitude is that it devalues human life in a culture where the value of human life has already hit rock bottom. If you believe, as I and the vast majority of Americans do, that the Sun and the Earth were created specifically for us (by which I mean humans), it is misguided (and bordering on impudent) to try to "play down" the importance of the Sun by giving it a cold and morally-neutral name (i.e., "Sol.") It is our Sun, it was created for us, and so it is not "Sol" or "a sun", it is "the Sun." Lock, stock, and barrel.

    Of course, it should come as no surprise that "Sol" has become more and more popular in a country where a woman can walk into any corner drugstore and purchase RU-486 (an active abortificant), but that doesn't mean that we should just sit back and accept it without debate and discourse.

    1. Re:Stellar nomenclature and moral relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, "the Sun" is just a plain old ordinary ball of gas. Once you get to the realization that there is nothing more special about it than the fact that it's third planet sustains life, you can appreciate life for what it really is: a magnificent product of chance. This is no more devaluating to human life, and somewhat less ludicrous, than the idea that there is a man in the sky who made us on a whim.

    2. Re:Stellar nomenclature and moral relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you'll get flamed for it, because you're no mere "religious conservative," you're a fucking wacko.

      That's quite a hang-up, getting so worked up over what others call "our" sun. You should really try joining us here on Earth sometime.

      Or mabye I'll call it 'Terra' just to piss you off.

  211. Re:conservatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's okay... most conservatives I've encountered aren't actually interested in conserving traditions that are historically valued, they only want to conserve their comfortable childhoods.

    In other words, they want to keep everything as it was "in the good old days."

  212. What does this by Jru+Hym · · Score: 1

    do for the push for the Europa/Pluto probe? http://www.planetary.org/html/UPDATES/Pluto/pluto_ europa_action.html

    --
    This lobster was alive when it hit the frothy, boiling water.
  213. Ten Planets! by heptapod · · Score: 1

    Hooray, our solar system is finally metric!

  214. what a shitty name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quoaroarar??

    sounds fuckin retarted to me... i wanna punch the idiot who thought that one up

  215. None of the above... by Akardam · · Score: 2

    From their FAQ:

    "kwah-o-wahr"

  216. Letter Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Astronomers named the new object Quaoar, after the creation myth of the Tongva people who inhabited the Los Angeles area before the arrival of the Spanish and other European settlers."



    Also in the news, the Tongva and Eastern Europe have agreed to a letter exchange. The Tongva will export vowles and import consinents, making their language and many Eastern European languages pronouncable.

  217. Ixion (2001 KX76) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Ixion (original name 2001 KX76)? When this was discovered into 2001 they said the size was between 1200 and 1400 km. Seems like that would probably be larger than this new one.

  218. X11R6 was first! by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    And OS X is the only commercial unix I've seen that doesn't include it.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  219. God doesn't speak latin? by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    > Of course, it should come as no surprise that "Sol" has become more and more popular in a country where a woman can walk into any corner drugstore and purchase RU-486

    Uhh, "Sol" is latin for "Sun"? So what does it have to do with your bugbear (moral relativism)?

    Is calling "God" "Deus" also "moral relativism" in your book?

    Or are you saying that your God created the world in English, so obviously the proper, root, term for "Sol" is "the Sun"?

    Of is your crusade just against anything you heard people saying outside of church?

    1. Re:God doesn't speak latin? by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

      Yech. I was born and raised in the U.S.A., but I swear the ignorance (or arrogance, take your pick) of some of my countrymen sickens me sometimes. Maybe that's because my parents were European immigrants and I have a larger perspective (of course, I went to a Jesuit university, and they're so broad they skate on the edge of excommunication sometimes :) )

      In my high school, taking two years of a foreign language was MANDATORY (Estudié Español--and yes I had to use Character Map to add those symbols). Perhaps an easier course in "Modern Latin" would bring our less fortunate brethren up to speed:

      http://www.langmaker.com/lm.htm

      (and yes, Latin does help your English as well)

    2. Re:God doesn't speak latin? by octalc0de · · Score: 1

      (Estudié Español--and yes I had to use Character Map to add those symbols)

      P'haps you didn't know about dead keys? It took forever to get my accents in French done... but with dead keys, it goes by a lot quicker.

      Examples:
      ctrl-apostrophe + e = é
      ctrl-'the key under the tilde, (backwards apostrophe?)' + e = è
      ctrl-^ + e = ê

      likewise, áàâ and with the other vowels.

      for the curly n(ene? it's been a long time since I read a spanish textbook), it's ctrl+tilde + n = ñ

  220. Re:Hah! Got it! by zbuffered · · Score: 2

    Excellent work!
    I'll bet you didn't expect anyone to pick up on that, but euphonious was the Word of the day for Sept 5th, 2002.

    Sometimes I cry myself to sleep.

    --
    Synergy is your friend
  221. likelihood of Pluto-sized planets. by David+Jao · · Score: 2
    there might very well be a dozen more Quaoar-sized "planets" in the Kupier belt. Even Pluto-sized planets might be out there.

    I think the chance of finding additional Pluto-sized planets is much lower than you suggest.

    Clyde Tombaugh found Pluto in 1930. He continued searching the sky for planets at Lowell Observatory until 1943. In his own words,

    my plates recorded stars five times fainter than Pluto and I covered two-thirds of the sky, and nothing more showed up at all.
    (source: Tombaugh, C.W., The Trans-Neptunian Planet Search. In "Planets and Satellites", Kuiper & Middlehurst (ed.s), University of Chicago Press, 1961.)
    1. Re:likelihood of Pluto-sized planets. by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      I think the chance of finding additional Pluto-sized planets is much lower than you suggest.
      What did I suggest? :-)

      I'm saying Pluto-sized planets might be out there. Which is suggesting that there might be zero, or perhaps two or five. I wouldn't be surprised if a Pluto-sized body was found, simply because it's said that with today's technology, only 5% of the sky has been searched and they've already come up with Quaoar - a body half the size of Pluto. What's saying that a Pluto-sized body can't be out there, which Clyde couldn't find with 1940 technology?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  222. Rediscover what the Sumerians Discovered by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    So is this another planet that the Sumerians knew about 5000 years ago? Yeah, those ancient peoples who created the first civilizations, written language, mathematics, and astronomy.

  223. Roman Gods by Mzilikazi · · Score: 1
    Oh, there's a few more to go around, like my personal favorite, Jeff the God of Biscuits.



    Cheers,

    Mzilikazi

    --
    Random Musings at Rum Smuggler
    1. Re:Roman Gods by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 1

      Let's call it Hercules!

      ... the Greek demi-god?

  224. I swear... by jiv3turk3y · · Score: 1

    Why do they even bother trying to find planets around other stars when they're still finding them around this one?

  225. That is an amazing discovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for me to poop on!

  226. Planet X or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know if soemone finally gave name to Planet X or is this something else? Do we really have 11 planets or did Planet X disappear? HELLO WORD WE STILL HAVE PLANET X!

  227. Coincidence or Useless Fact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know the old board game IQ 2000? The tenth planet there was called "Quizzar." Funny how they gave it a name it that sounds like "Quizzar."

  228. The REAL story behind this... by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    is of course, that the planet Rupert has finally been discovered.

    Let the monitoring begin.

    -JT
    (and for those that are completely missing the reference, pick up the Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide and get a little cultured)

  229. Re:The b00gger issue by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 1

    Well, hell, then I guess the booger I picked this morning is a planet too.

    --

    -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

  230. Correction to the article by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 3, Funny
    The original poster wrote:
    Quaoar orbits the sun ever 288 years
    Actually, Quaoar fully orbits the sun once every year. 288 Earth years = 1 Quaoar year. Don't be so planetocentric. :)
    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  231. could this be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the very elusive underkohling? It's only a matter of time before they find the gates.

  232. It's already got a name! by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

    Everyone knows the 10th planet is already called Mondas... and if you want to change it, you're gonna have to go wave some gold at a bunch of Cybermen.

  233. sort of a setback by sacrilicious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm, ten planets. This renders useless all those messages we've sent for aliens to find... the ones where a sun is shown with nine planets orbiting it, and a humanoid figure shown near the third one.

    Zok: Hey, this looks like the place from the message, check it out: humanoids, single sun...

    Glork: Oh wait though, there are ten planets. Let's keep looking.

    Klork: Drat! I was so looking forward to bestowing the technological gift of perfectly realistic virtual porn on yet another race.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  234. Re:Hah! Got it! by Fiver-rah · · Score: 2

    Actually I just like the word "euphonious". It's one of my favorite words. Along with snollygoster. And cachet.

    --
    Read Bujold. Free (as in
  235. The Moon orbits the Sun, not the Earth by mystrale · · Score: 1

    It gets even trickier. If we call 'larger bodies' orbiting the sun 'planets' then the Moon qualifies just as well as Pluto.

    The Moon's orbit remains concave toward the Sun at all points. At no point does the Earth pull the Moon away from the Sun and toward itself. The force of gravity between Sun and Moon always exceeds that between the Earth and Moon.

    We would probably do better to consider Terra-Luna a double planet, with the orbit of the less massive component, Luna, strongly perturbed by the more massive component, Terra. (Terra's orbit gets perturbed by the Moon, too, but less noticeably.)

    From our point of view, the Moon's orbit appears tightly wrapped around the Earth. From a point of view high above the ecliptic, we would see the Earth and the Moon orbit the sun at about 150 million km. The Moon would seem to wobble in and out, by a measly 0.4 million km, as it first trailed the Earth, then passed it on the outside, then crossed in front, then dropped back on the inside. That wobble proceeds so slowly and gently, however, taking fully 1/13th of an orbit, that you'd never see the Moon's path kink into a loop. It would remain a smooth curve around the Sun. Ergo, the Moon doesn't orbit the Earth, but the Sun.

    If a little math doesn't scare you, check out this more detailed explanation.

    I didn't work this out myself, by the way. Asimov wrote about it, a good twenty-odd years ago. I forget where I read his essay.

    1. Re:The Moon orbits the Sun, not the Earth by barawn · · Score: 2

      Earth-Moon is definitely not a double planet - you can EASILY define a double-planet system as a system of "larger bodies" where the center-of-mass of the system is in empty space. The Moon orbits the Earth. The Earth does not orbit the Moon - it orbits itself (the center-of-mass of the system is inside the Earth.)

      Does the Moon orbit the Sun? No. It orbits the Earth. The Moon's "path" around the Sun is a very perturbed ellipse. The Earth's path, however, is a perfect ellipse - if you consider the little patch of "Earth" that is the center-of-mass of the Earth-Moon system.

      The problem that you're describing - that from a Sun-stationary point of view, the Moon doesn't look like it's orbiting the Earth - isn't a good argument for the fact that the Moon doesn't orbit the Earth. This fact is true for any object thats orbital period is a significant fraction of the solar year. There are several satellites that would have this same problem!

      The easiest way to ask "what is the Moon orbiting?" is to try to describe its motion as an ellipse about something. That "something" is what it's orbiting - and it would be the center-of-mass of the Earth-Moon system, slightly perturbed by the Sun. The center-of-mass of the Earth-Moon system is inside the Earth. Hence the Moon orbits the Earth.

      You cannot describe the Moon's orbit as an ellipse about the Sun.

  236. Let Microsoft name it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we let MS name it, it would be Planet2002!

    Or would that be PlanetXP... Maybe just XP for 10th Planet...

  237. TV knows all by F1_Fan · · Score: 1

    Did someone name this "planet" after watching the episode of Red Dwarf where Rimmer thinks he's discovered a pod from Quagaar? (sp?)

  238. le sigh by The+Kow · · Score: 1

    You'd think they could name it something pronounceable, like 'Bob'...

    --
    Moo
  239. wrong question by solferino · · Score: 2


    we are asking the wrong question when we query
    "how many planets in the solar system?"

    simply we should ask

    Q : "how many inner planets are there?"
    A : 4 - mercury, venus, earth, mars

    and
    Q : "how many gas giants are there?"
    A : 4 - jupiter, saturn, uranus, neptune

    these two questions are more meaningful
    and the answers 100% accurate

  240. Mondas by AlistairMcMillan · · Score: 1

    I thougt "The Tenth Planet" was called Mondas.

  241. Two words: "Borg Sphere" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resistance, though futile, is encouraged nevertheless.

  242. The dolphin and now this?? White liberals again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another trendy name by guilt-ridden, liberal Whites that no one will be able to correctly pronounce. I guess this confirms they are open-minded, progressive and not euro-centric, right? Couldn't these enlightened White liberals just adopted a black baby instead of causing an eternity of confusion on how to pronounce this tongue twisting eye sore?

    I think i'll just call this new planet GALILEO. Why name it after a tribe, who did ABSOLUTELY nothing to advance celestial knowledge because some people have developed a guilt complex?

  243. Re:Ramming a political message down everyone's thr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chineses have their own names for all the planets. So do just about ever other group of people in the world but they all tend to use their English versions of the Roman names when publishing about them in English.

  244. Re:MVEMJSUNP [ob Tolkein] by mattsucks · · Score: 1
    Just imagine our grandchildren will tell their children that the "Nine" is an artifact of history when people thought there were only nine planets in the Solar System...
    "... Nine for the Mortal Men doomed to die, ..."

    Oops, make that Ten. Imagine our granchildren telling their children about the time in history when the Nine became Ten.

    (oof, no sleep and something something make matt unfunny. unfunnier. whatever.)
  245. Q U what ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the problem with these scientist types ? Why can't they name them after their girlfriends or bitch of an ex wife.

    Oh - they don't have any :-(

    Well why not their cat, or dog, or goldfish ?

    Oh, they died from neglect.

    Well, its a bloddy big tombstone and to far away to visit !!

    I pity the poor school kids who have to spell this baby out (they should have just called it 'Fred').

  246. ELITE, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This name sounds a lot like those generated pseudorandomly in the classic Elite game.

    1. Re:ELITE, anyone? by ManitobaMoose · · Score: 0

      indeed. maybe Zaonce, Leesti or Tionisla would be good naming choices as well. or maybe Lave.

  247. Quaoar not the only "large" Kupier body by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

    - Varuna was discovered in 2000 and measures 1,000 kilometers in diameter.
    - Ixion was discovered in 2001 and is thought to be of similar size as Quaoar and Varuna.
    - .. and Quaoar itself has actually been imaged in 1982 - 2001 but not detected as a planet until now. How embarassing. :-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Quaoar not the only "large" Kupier body by helix400 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's a link to a nice graphic comparing the sizes of Pluto-Charon to numerous Kuiper objects. (BTW, the graphic doesn't yet show Ixion, but the prior poster already mentioned that it's roughly the size of Varuna.)

      http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/varuna.ht ml

      Its amazing to see that at least 8 good sized Kuiper objects have been found since 1995, with three big ones (Varuna, Ixion, and Quaoar) being discovered in the last three years. It makes you wonder how many more objects we'll find in the next few years.

    2. Re:Quaoar not the only "large" Kupier body by seanellis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what's most depressing about this? If you Google for Varuna and Ixion, the top link is this one:

      http://astrologershq.com/asteroids.html

      The top link on the world's best web search engine is to a bunch of retarded charlatans who think that this is another piece of bait to separate the gullible from their cash.

      Here's a sample of the tripe from this site:

      'Enter the new theory of Hyperdimensional Space, or Hyperspace. In this theory, "attraction" replaces "gravity". In the Hyperspace theory, velocity is a very important factor. So, the high speed which the outer bodies of our Solar System are traveling become very significant even - influencing the placement of the "Barycenter."'

      These things don't travel at high speed. They travel at low speed. If they have a profound effect, why was it professional astronomers who discovered them, and not astrologers?

      It makes me so angry.

  248. Pluto gets a name change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From now on, Pluto will be known as...
    "The Planet Formerly Known As Pluto",
    or TPFKAP for short.
    If anyone can think up a suitably ridiculous symbol, post it.

  249. Pluto a planet, Quaoar still in the air? by Wombat · · Score: 1

    One of the things that clinches Pluto's status as a planet for me (besides the fact that I saw Clyde Tombaugh, discoverer of pluto speak when I was little) is that it's tough to categorize as a Kuiper belt object for one simple reason: it appears to be made out of different stuff. The albedo of Pluto suggests a different composition than all the wacky little things flying around past its orbit. I'm curious to see a report on what they think Quaoar is made of before a definitive declaration is made....

    -Wombat

  250. more bad pirate humor by Tablizer · · Score: 1


    It is how pirates call each other "queer" in Pirate High School.

    "Arrr, thar bloke ain't nuttin' butta fucken quaoar"

  251. Spelled it wrong? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else immediately think of the Quagaars? Red Dwarf Season 4: Wating for God

  252. Where are we going? Planet Ten! by spun · · Score: 2

    When are we going? REAL SOON!
    All praise John Wharfin!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  253. Poll Options by F34RL3SS+L34D3R · · Score: 0

    DAMNIT! Wheres the Cowboy Neal option?

    Who do you have confidence in? Man, or that imaginery person in the sky?

    1. Re:Poll Options by fireklar · · Score: 0

      7) kow-boi-neel

  254. offtopic pirate joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know what the latest pirate movie was rated?

    It was rated "Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"

  255. Planet X by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

    This is why Apple Computer is not allowed to name planets... :-)

    --
    Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
  256. Great! by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we send that Nsync kid up there tomorrow?

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  257. oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 10th planet...Planet Mondas!
    The cybermen are coming. Quick, everybody get your gold dust and arm your glitter guns!

  258. Great, another season of Sailor Moon... by DavidBrown · · Score: 2

    For love and justice, I am the pretty sailor suited warrior, Sailor Quaoar! I will right wrongs and triumph over evil, and that means you!

    And because Quaoar is named after a Native American God from a tribe near Los Angeles, Sailor Quaoar's attack could be none other then...

    "Quaoar Sticky Tar Pit!"

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  259. Weird name. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2

    But I think we should call it Yuggoth. And then stay the hell away from it lest we find a lake where puf't shoggoths play

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  260. It was somewhere over New Jersey... by billstewart · · Score: 1

    We're going there REAL SOON

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  261. Did you mean:quasar ? by kindbud · · Score: 2
    It's not like astronomy isn't already confusing enough to the public, but I wonder if these geniuses ever thought that maybe there's some other Qu-ending-with-ar name for some other object completely unrelated to the Kuiper belt, like... (oh, I don't know, maybe you never heard of it...) QUASAR?!?! I mean, come on. This name of theirs differs by only one letter from another term that is mentioned in probably - just a guess - every other paper that has been published since they were discovered, what? - almost 40 years ago. I guess that's fairly recent on a astronomical timescale, so maybe they have an excuse for not having been informed of the new research.

    Did you mean to search for:quasar


    No, Google, I didn't mean to search for "quasar".
    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  262. Hmmm... I never knew a planet could be 2 sizes!!! by Drbuzz · · Score: 1

    Haha, I wonder if anyone failed to notice that this planet has two apparent sizes.. One is 1,280 (800 miles) and the other is 1250. I am curious of how this came about in the same article that is only a paragraph long.. HAHA.

  263. Quaoar, a new scrabble word by drwho · · Score: 2

    yes, this is all a hoax so someone can cheat at scrabble.

  264. Correction... by Drbuzz · · Score: 1

    Pluto's orbit reaches 39.5 AU from the Sun. Sorry.... HEHE. I like your article... What would Quaoar look like? I have a scale model hanging from my ceiling.

  265. Astrologers Rejoice by malloci · · Score: 1

    "Today The International Astrologers Cul, er Organization made a statement saying that Quaoar was indeed the reason why all of those predictions that they had continuously bungled were off. In the meantime, they stated that your horoscope today would be plagued with trying to figure out where in the hell the name Quaoar originates from, or more precisely, who pulled it out of their arse."

  266. Heres a picture of Quaoar!!! by Drbuzz · · Score: 1

    This picture is an artists interpretation...

    1. Re:Heres a picture of Quaoar!!! by Drbuzz · · Score: 1

      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/05/im ages/021007_quaoar.jpg I guess it helps to have the link...

  267. Well, it could have been worse... by achurch · · Score: 2

    They could have named it "Ogg Quaoar".

  268. Quaoar's moon discovered: Zyoaieuax! by Rat's_ass_donor · · Score: 1

    In the future, if we have an excess of vowels that needs to be dealt with, could we export them to Croatia or some other vowel-starved nation instead of inflicting them upon a harmless planet?

  269. "Biggest", not "Most Important" by diethelm · · Score: 1

    The articles state clearly: "... and is the biggest find in the Solar System since Pluto itself 72 years ago...". I'm sure this refers to the object's size, not to the relative importance of the discovery.

  270. Clarification by Nygard · · Score: 2

    According to the IAU, as of 1999, the issue was settled. Pluto is both a planet and a member of the group tentatively called "Trans-Neptunian Objects" -- essentially close Kuiper belt objects.

    "No further debate is planned on this issue."

    --
    "Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped." --Elbert Hubbard (1856-1915)
  271. Re:Two words: "Borg Sphere" (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resistance is useful.

    It's capacitance that's futile!

  272. HP Lovecraft's choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't he want it to be called Yuggoth?

  273. Roman Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's call it Hercules!

  274. I heard it might be a part of another solar system by ModernGeek · · Score: 0

    I heard somewhere (I dont remember where) that Planet X could have been a part of another solar system. Even though this doesn't make sence since we would probably notice a such nearby star. Is there a type of solar system that can just orbit around somthing else?

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  275. A new definition of a planet? by noah2k · · Score: 1

    Could this be a turning point in our definition of a planet? What type of criteria will we look for in future explorations of planets? How many more are there? Why is the mass of this planet, in relationship to our Sun so "non-Capernican? or relational as to make it special?" -Noah

  276. Roman Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the major planets are named for Roman gods

    Except Earth, which is named after dirt.

  277. Re: not planets-- people! by Boronx · · Score: 1

    If they were named by Greeks then how come the names are Latin? I'm curious why thy want to name this puny ice ball after a god that sounds bigger than Saturn or Jupiter.

  278. Re: distance to Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, the same thing happened in "Office Space." This is how Computer Scientists get a bad name.

  279. Re:This is olod news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's a tool for the olod invasion of earth! Damn Olodians!

  280. 10th planet in ancient times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Can't find the referances off hand, but IIRC, the ancient Sumerian's and possibly others had traditions of there being 10 planets in our solar system. Although the evidence may be open to interpretation, it is still an interesting claim. A quick go at google got me http://seekers.100megs6.com/ufoman4.htm, which has a bit of information on it. Anyone got a more reliable url ?

  281. Re:Heres a picture of Quaoar!!! [minor correction] by Tune · · Score: 1

    'gues that would be http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/05/im ages/021007_quaoar.jpg (without the space in /im ages/)

    --
    Discover your own (solar) system!

  282. Titus-Bullsht [was Re:Most Important Solar...] by flamingnight · · Score: 1
    And, having investigated, it doesnt. Not even close. The next planet after Pluto (or the second of the next two, if Neptune's irregularity is repeated) should have been at 77.2AU but Quaoar is only at approximately 43AU. So theres another point in opposition of calling it a planet, albeit a weak one.
    It is not the planet after Pluto that should be 77.2AU according to T-B. Pluto (using d=.4+(.3*N), where n=0,1,2,4 doubling for every planet, including 8 for the asteroid belt/planetary gap) is 77.2. Quaoar should be, then (using d=.4+(.3*512)) 154. It's not. Actually, at 4 billion miles, it's 43.0107, approximately. Wayyyyy off.

    As you say, a weak point. Really, there is no point at all (in even looking at T-B). T-B is just some strange series which happened to work out closely enough for the first few planets. You mention yourself "Neptune's irregularity." It's more like "Neptune's confirming the fact that T-B is a load of BS".

    Then again, those who believe in T-B probably also believe that Newton's law of Gravitation holds for *everything*. sigh.
  283. Re:Does the good Doctor know? (fixed URL) by Shimbo · · Score: 1

    Lol... I didn't mean That good Doctor

    Yeah, I know. Let me get the URL right this time.

  284. Re: distance to Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's senior high physics and math, if not even lower level... You don't need to be a physicist to do that.

    Not that there was anything wrong with calculation, but base information ... and that should be even easier for you to check than it would be for the physicist, just dig it up from the 'net.

  285. Re: distance to Jupiter by back_pages · · Score: 2
    What's it take to recognize lame humor these days? A BA in English? Giving computer scientists a bad name? Pointing out that I don't need to be a physicist to do multiplication?

    Holy cow, you have opened my eyes. Thanks for clearing that up. Things which were unknown to me are now known. You have expanded my horizons with insight into things which could not be more obvious if they were on set on fire in a gun powder factory.

  286. Wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that the only thing "verified" that lies beyond pluto that could possibly be a planet was actually plutos moon, or was Pluto its moon?

  287. Re: not planets-- people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> If they were named by Greeks then how come the names are Latin?

    Uhhh... because the Romans took their gods from the Greek pantheon and renamed them. You didn't know this?

  288. Re: even A/UX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's an interesting observation! Even Apple's previous commercial Unix, "A/UX," included an X server called "MacX."

    And to be fair, if you count NeXTSTEP as a commercial Unix separate from OS X, it also didn't include X11.

  289. "Planetary Systems" by Marticus · · Score: 1

    Except many stars may not have planets around them.

  290. Poor little Pluto about to be demoted :-( :::: by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

    Poor, cold little pluto, their all so mean to you, :-( ::: , there, there, don't cry little (planet, ummm thingy) we still love you.

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  291. 10th Planet idea raised by astrology by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
    I've never really believed in Astrology, but something bothered me. My sister used to cast horoscopes and do other things with it, and several years ago, mentioned to me that based on the charts and other information, that there should be 10 planets, not just 9.

    I don't know what to make of this, except to point out two things. There can be some forms of analysis that may have some valid elements even if not all of it is valid. (Then again, I don't know if astrology has any validity yet, but something like this bothers me.) And that we shouldn't always immediately dismiss someone's ideas every time even if we think they are a crackpot.

    I think one of the really crackpot ideas that professional physicians were dismissing was the idea that diseases were passed around by tiny organisms we could not see, and that it was a good idea for a physician doing an autopsy to wash his hands before tending to other sick patients so as not to transfer the disease carrying organisms from the dead to the sick, or even to the well. Semelweiss was routinely criticized as being a crackpot who didn't know what he was talking about. We now know that he was.

    Now, of course, the converse, of humongous numbers of really crackpot ideas being exactly that can't be ignored either. But occasionally, they aren't.

    Paul Robinson < postmaster@paul.washington.dc.us>

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  292. what is the orbit of the "tenth planet" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what is the orbit of the socalled tenth planet? is it in proportion to the other planets orbits? or does it have a "special" orbit, like a comet.

  293. Other Kuiper belt objects by geoswan · · Score: 2

    Here is a link to 2001 KX76 last year's big Kuiper belt object. And here is some more background infor on the Kuiper belt in general.