There are trolls everywhere , but unfortunately there is quite a few which are earnest. Like the few which think 9/11 was thermite demolition/US government false flag, like the one which think we never landed on the moon, or the one which pretend gas chamber never existed : some are troll and do for the kicker, some are unfortunately earnest in their belief. I note belief, because for all those there are far too many independent verification possible so anybody refusing facts in the face of reality is having a religious belief rather than an opinion...
"Content relevant to your interrest" normally include stuff you agree or disagree with, but on a particular subject. I don't care about twitter but when I want stuff about a certain theme, I want the stuff for the stuff against, and a way to weight where the consensus is (e.g. flat earth, globular earth, and where the consensus is). On the other hand if I want a flateartH/globular earth discussion and i get served content on java programming I am getting pissed off.
You are mistakenly reading "content relevant to yourself" with "content you agree with". A common error but a fatal one in such type of discourse.
In the past 3 decades even long before "AI" and expert system there were such basic checks. I have been called 2 times to verify if it was me making the transaction (though I can't recall if it was the processor or the bank which called me).
The problem is being paid a commensurate salary compared to the time you spend. I am betting he is not offering far more than the average salary for the time he wants to claim from the live of his worker, in other word, his success was paved over the live and money of his worker.
While gendarmerie is tasked with some of the internal security, it is mostly motorized and rural part of france. For such a task force it would be the national police, far more probably the counter terrorism part of it (something similar to GIGN but for internet). The fact also top levels url were chosen looks to me far more probably an error than a malice (or heck is even the email mentioned somehow open and somebody was hacked and now the troll is having fun is far more probably than trying to censor the internet archive - i am not excluding it but on the probability scale it is doubtful).
Firstly it was corrected to not say "EU" but "French national Internet Referral Unit" for which I can find no reference beside that article. There IS an EU IRU, but no french national IRU I can find of. So baring a proper reporting I am viewing that as dubious.
Whether one is a democracy or an autocracy does not matter. That way my point. No matter what you have got to respect local law or get out. So when people get angry at "apple censoring" they are either idiot not realizing they have to respect local law, or they should vote with their wallet and not buy apple (which you know as well as me won't happen).
I am sure also apple music Germany is censoring selling pro nazi song sales. We may not like the law of *their* country, but apple has to respect local laws *where ever* it sells. It is pretty much so in every country that the law of the location of the buyer is the one which applies, not the law of the seller. If they don't want to respect the law of a country, the solution is simply : don't sell to anybody in that country. Many US outfit do that if you try to go to their site with an EU address they simply throw you out and say "GDPR we don't want you". Same principle.
Factually what you reflect is the media stupid vault face on everything or jumping on any press release not understanding what is written. The reality is that science in general, no matter what a few tells you about reproducibility or significance criticism, is very very reliable. But the media don't like what they don't understand so you are very likely to read article spreading distrust on expert, or media taking a random idiot and pretending that person is an expert. The end game is people like you distrusting the expert, when in reality without expert you have NOTHING. Same shitty situation as with brexit really, where expert are distrusted "project fear".
That quote from CNN encompass all that I think about the seemingly jubilitaiton of many people here " Barr reports that Mueller found insufficient evidence to charge a federal crime, but not necessarily that Mueller found no evidence whatsoever. ". That is it. Now all we can do is wait to see for ourselves those insufficient evidence. Since the prosecutor level was "beyond reasonable doubt" my guess is that it will be one of those report "OJ " like where the public can decide based on evidence provided , but the prosecution held to a higher standard cannot.
Whether a crime was commited may be black and white but the available evidence is always a shade of grey : there may not be enough to convict somebody in spite of a crime. You are conflating the two unduly. Furthermore if for the justice system the evidence were not enough , sometimes due to technicality, that does not mean the general public cannot make such a call. Oj simoson was a murder. He was just not a convicted one. So far from what i saw with cohen manafort and the russian meeting reported, it may not be a high bar enough to convict trump, but it is a high bar enough to condemn him publicly.
The keyword is optional, not safety feature. There is probably a huge catalogue of them, but from the sound of it this should never EVER has been made optional. This is an essential crashing-and-die feature and as such should not be OPTIONAL. And that does not even start on how it was presented to the airline : possibly as "do not matter much here is an optional feature" or was it "very important optional feature" my bet is on the first.
ultimately only Boeing can know if a feature is essential or not. By making it optional they made it non essential. Do you really think from the crash that assessment is correct ? IMO not therefore boeing has the full responsibility.
Boeing offered options to provide detailed insight to these sensors that the customer opt'd out of. Who's at fault here?
Boing is at fault. They should have made it mandatory and presented it as a major system which could lead to major lethal problem in case of misunderstanding or failure or mishandling. Instead they made it an option, a "don't worry not too important" case. They are the one knowing the consequence, so they are the ones which should have insisted. But by the sound of it, it was passed off as a minor problem or no accent was really put on it.
But while I may want to do some sacrifice, e.g. I am already trying to use only public transport and biking, low electricity footprint, I am rioting in the street if you try to touch to my meat consumption. It is one thing to not have bitten at the forbidden fruit. But now I have eaten it and it is very tasty, I am not giving it up until I am dead. Eating tasty stuff is one of the only few guilty pleasure I truly have. I am doing it until I am dead or unable to.
"These officials say the company's knowledge of and access to undersea cables could allow China to attach devices that divert or monitor data traffic -- or, in a conflict, to sever links to entire nations" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... you know in the past 2 years it has been... funny(?) to see the US accuse Huawei and china to prepare to do, or do, what they themselves did in the past.
They are not really "patch" they are complete re-download of the files, because apparently either out of lazyness or out of problem with console, they can't simply change a small part of the file with a diff path.
I don't care about the film (I don't like any movie super heroes AT ALL, only deadpool and mostly only for the 4th wall humour - without the 4th wall humour I would not bother watching). But one thing I remark is that the first openning is not that important for any film. What is important is 1) is this sustainable after word of mouth (e.g. 155M 1st week end and 3M next is bad) and 2) how does it compare with the long tail (e.g. some film do much better on the dvd market than in cinema). I am just saying that they should wait a bit before jubilating with their chicken counting. As for the controversy.... I am not even sure there was that much. One was about rotten tomatoe "i want to watch i don't want to watch" prediction, another thing was by the blonde actress can't remember her name, but compared to say ghostbuster 2016 ? It was tame.
And read my posting history. I am well aware that both side of the political spectrum don't vaccinate. But to my knowledge there are only 3 reasons you can refuse : medical exemption, religious exemption and philosophical exemption. To my knowledge all state enacted the first one (medical), the crushing majority the second (religious) and for the few state I know of which enacted the third one it was enacted under republican legislature. But does it matter anyway in the end ? When it comes under public health and putting other at risk, there are only 2 philosophy :
* allowing all kind of freedom even if it hurts other indirectly
* limiting some freedom if they are bound to hurt other
Many state seem to hang on the first type , I think it should be a matter of state to use its power to enable the second when it comes to vaccination. The dumb fucks which endanger other which cannot vaccinate due to medical reason, should be forced to vaccinate their kids.
You (mostly) can't be rationalized out of a position you came to with belief or emotional way. If you could easily be rationalized out of such a position, there would not be many theist left in the world, and the US would massively agree that global warming is of anthropogenic origins, and "evolution by selection" is indeed a thing. You can't even get that in the US, with roughly 20% of the US population disbelieving the theory of evolution by natural selection, and what was the stats about the world being 6000 year old ? I don't want to get depressed AGAIN so I won't bother checking. And you think education will have any effect on vaccination uptake ? Ha ! People get the "don't vaccinate" by their inner circle, people they trust and get the pro vaccinate education by mostly people they don't know or trust or at least not part of their inner circle. Good luck with that one. I don't care of people have weird belief and think a god exists, but as soon as they become dangerous for us all, and yes indeed not vaccinating against lethal disease is one way this happens, then I am all for actively going what they see as their right to refuse vaccination. Simplest solution : tell republican to go fuck themselves, and remove the freedom to refuse vaccination for philosophy reason : make vaccination mandatory for anybody not having an independently verifiable disease making vaccination dangerous.
"How you're stupid if you question any vaccine on any level" that is not left wing , there are people on either side of the political spectrum which don't vaccinate their kids for variety of stupid idiotic imbecilic reason and many of them left wing - "you should vaccinate your kid" is enither left nor right wing, it is "it is science dumb fuck learn from history on people dying from it dumb fuck" wing. And that was your first one, the one which should be the strongest in an enumeration... There is no need to continue reading.
The same plan as when their game division say "they will start again supporting pc gaming". Lip service, but in reality do nothing of worth. With the calculator it is so comical as to give me tears of laugh. There are so many OS project which do better with more functionality, and heck there isn't anything in windows calculator a 1st year student could not slap in a week in java.
Or even the OP linked video ? The first post in the addiction video is from kurzgesagt saying they will remove the video , and delete it (hey you can even google it https://www.reddit.com/r/video...). In the second the one I linked, they themselves say those 2 video did not match standard they set themselves, cited only one source etc.... Well whatever.
Basically the video does not live up to their standard, takes only one source, is disputed etc...etc... Frankly "addiction as a sole psychological explanation" is kookery of the highest grade, and match scientology stuff.
Slashdot Mirror
There are trolls everywhere , but unfortunately there is quite a few which are earnest. Like the few which think 9/11 was thermite demolition/US government false flag, like the one which think we never landed on the moon, or the one which pretend gas chamber never existed : some are troll and do for the kicker, some are unfortunately earnest in their belief. I note belief, because for all those there are far too many independent verification possible so anybody refusing facts in the face of reality is having a religious belief rather than an opinion...
"Content relevant to your interrest" normally include stuff you agree or disagree with, but on a particular subject. I don't care about twitter but when I want stuff about a certain theme, I want the stuff for the stuff against, and a way to weight where the consensus is (e.g. flat earth, globular earth, and where the consensus is). On the other hand if I want a flateartH/globular earth discussion and i get served content on java programming I am getting pissed off.
You are mistakenly reading "content relevant to yourself" with "content you agree with". A common error but a fatal one in such type of discourse.
Attempting hacking the nsa or us gov is still a crime.
In the past 3 decades even long before "AI" and expert system there were such basic checks. I have been called 2 times to verify if it was me making the transaction (though I can't recall if it was the processor or the bank which called me).
The problem is being paid a commensurate salary compared to the time you spend. I am betting he is not offering far more than the average salary for the time he wants to claim from the live of his worker, in other word, his success was paved over the live and money of his worker.
While gendarmerie is tasked with some of the internal security, it is mostly motorized and rural part of france. For such a task force it would be the national police, far more probably the counter terrorism part of it (something similar to GIGN but for internet). The fact also top levels url were chosen looks to me far more probably an error than a malice (or heck is even the email mentioned somehow open and somebody was hacked and now the troll is having fun is far more probably than trying to censor the internet archive - i am not excluding it but on the probability scale it is doubtful).
Firstly it was corrected to not say "EU" but "French national Internet Referral Unit" for which I can find no reference beside that article. There IS an EU IRU, but no french national IRU I can find of. So baring a proper reporting I am viewing that as dubious.
Whether one is a democracy or an autocracy does not matter. That way my point. No matter what you have got to respect local law or get out. So when people get angry at "apple censoring" they are either idiot not realizing they have to respect local law, or they should vote with their wallet and not buy apple (which you know as well as me won't happen).
I am sure also apple music Germany is censoring selling pro nazi song sales. We may not like the law of *their* country, but apple has to respect local laws *where ever* it sells. It is pretty much so in every country that the law of the location of the buyer is the one which applies, not the law of the seller. If they don't want to respect the law of a country, the solution is simply : don't sell to anybody in that country. Many US outfit do that if you try to go to their site with an EU address they simply throw you out and say "GDPR we don't want you". Same principle.
Factually what you reflect is the media stupid vault face on everything or jumping on any press release not understanding what is written. The reality is that science in general, no matter what a few tells you about reproducibility or significance criticism, is very very reliable. But the media don't like what they don't understand so you are very likely to read article spreading distrust on expert, or media taking a random idiot and pretending that person is an expert. The end game is people like you distrusting the expert, when in reality without expert you have NOTHING. Same shitty situation as with brexit really, where expert are distrusted "project fear".
That quote from CNN encompass all that I think about the seemingly jubilitaiton of many people here " Barr reports that Mueller found insufficient evidence to charge a federal crime, but not necessarily that Mueller found no evidence whatsoever. ". That is it. Now all we can do is wait to see for ourselves those insufficient evidence. Since the prosecutor level was "beyond reasonable doubt" my guess is that it will be one of those report "OJ " like where the public can decide based on evidence provided , but the prosecution held to a higher standard cannot.
Whether a crime was commited may be black and white but the available evidence is always a shade of grey : there may not be enough to convict somebody in spite of a crime. You are conflating the two unduly. Furthermore if for the justice system the evidence were not enough , sometimes due to technicality, that does not mean the general public cannot make such a call. Oj simoson was a murder. He was just not a convicted one. So far from what i saw with cohen manafort and the russian meeting reported, it may not be a high bar enough to convict trump, but it is a high bar enough to condemn him publicly.
The keyword is optional, not safety feature. There is probably a huge catalogue of them, but from the sound of it this should never EVER has been made optional. This is an essential crashing-and-die feature and as such should not be OPTIONAL. And that does not even start on how it was presented to the airline : possibly as "do not matter much here is an optional feature" or was it "very important optional feature" my bet is on the first.
ultimately only Boeing can know if a feature is essential or not. By making it optional they made it non essential. Do you really think from the crash that assessment is correct ? IMO not therefore boeing has the full responsibility.
Boing is at fault. They should have made it mandatory and presented it as a major system which could lead to major lethal problem in case of misunderstanding or failure or mishandling. Instead they made it an option, a "don't worry not too important" case. They are the one knowing the consequence, so they are the ones which should have insisted. But by the sound of it, it was passed off as a minor problem or no accent was really put on it.
But while I may want to do some sacrifice, e.g. I am already trying to use only public transport and biking, low electricity footprint, I am rioting in the street if you try to touch to my meat consumption. It is one thing to not have bitten at the forbidden fruit. But now I have eaten it and it is very tasty, I am not giving it up until I am dead. Eating tasty stuff is one of the only few guilty pleasure I truly have. I am doing it until I am dead or unable to.
"These officials say the company's knowledge of and access to undersea cables could allow China to attach devices that divert or monitor data traffic -- or, in a conflict, to sever links to entire nations" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... you know in the past 2 years it has been ... funny(?) to see the US accuse Huawei and china to prepare to do, or do, what they themselves did in the past.
They are not really "patch" they are complete re-download of the files, because apparently either out of lazyness or out of problem with console, they can't simply change a small part of the file with a diff path.
I don't care about the film (I don't like any movie super heroes AT ALL, only deadpool and mostly only for the 4th wall humour - without the 4th wall humour I would not bother watching). But one thing I remark is that the first openning is not that important for any film. What is important is 1) is this sustainable after word of mouth (e.g. 155M 1st week end and 3M next is bad) and 2) how does it compare with the long tail (e.g. some film do much better on the dvd market than in cinema). I am just saying that they should wait a bit before jubilating with their chicken counting. As for the controversy.... I am not even sure there was that much. One was about rotten tomatoe "i want to watch i don't want to watch" prediction, another thing was by the blonde actress can't remember her name, but compared to say ghostbuster 2016 ? It was tame.
And read my posting history. I am well aware that both side of the political spectrum don't vaccinate. But to my knowledge there are only 3 reasons you can refuse : medical exemption, religious exemption and philosophical exemption. To my knowledge all state enacted the first one (medical), the crushing majority the second (religious) and for the few state I know of which enacted the third one it was enacted under republican legislature. But does it matter anyway in the end ? When it comes under public health and putting other at risk, there are only 2 philosophy :
* allowing all kind of freedom even if it hurts other indirectly
* limiting some freedom if they are bound to hurt other
Many state seem to hang on the first type , I think it should be a matter of state to use its power to enable the second when it comes to vaccination. The dumb fucks which endanger other which cannot vaccinate due to medical reason, should be forced to vaccinate their kids.
You (mostly) can't be rationalized out of a position you came to with belief or emotional way. If you could easily be rationalized out of such a position, there would not be many theist left in the world, and the US would massively agree that global warming is of anthropogenic origins, and "evolution by selection" is indeed a thing. You can't even get that in the US, with roughly 20% of the US population disbelieving the theory of evolution by natural selection, and what was the stats about the world being 6000 year old ? I don't want to get depressed AGAIN so I won't bother checking. And you think education will have any effect on vaccination uptake ? Ha ! People get the "don't vaccinate" by their inner circle, people they trust and get the pro vaccinate education by mostly people they don't know or trust or at least not part of their inner circle. Good luck with that one. I don't care of people have weird belief and think a god exists, but as soon as they become dangerous for us all, and yes indeed not vaccinating against lethal disease is one way this happens, then I am all for actively going what they see as their right to refuse vaccination. Simplest solution : tell republican to go fuck themselves, and remove the freedom to refuse vaccination for philosophy reason : make vaccination mandatory for anybody not having an independently verifiable disease making vaccination dangerous.
and "dying by it" i meant measle in case it was not understandable from the context. I should have previewed my bad.
"How you're stupid if you question any vaccine on any level" that is not left wing , there are people on either side of the political spectrum which don't vaccinate their kids for variety of stupid idiotic imbecilic reason and many of them left wing - "you should vaccinate your kid" is enither left nor right wing, it is "it is science dumb fuck learn from history on people dying from it dumb fuck" wing. And that was your first one, the one which should be the strongest in an enumeration... There is no need to continue reading.
The same plan as when their game division say "they will start again supporting pc gaming". Lip service, but in reality do nothing of worth. With the calculator it is so comical as to give me tears of laugh. There are so many OS project which do better with more functionality, and heck there isn't anything in windows calculator a 1st year student could not slap in a week in java.
Or even the OP linked video ? The first post in the addiction video is from kurzgesagt saying they will remove the video , and delete it (hey you can even google it https://www.reddit.com/r/video...). In the second the one I linked, they themselves say those 2 video did not match standard they set themselves, cited only one source etc.... Well whatever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Basically the video does not live up to their standard, takes only one source, is disputed etc...etc... Frankly "addiction as a sole psychological explanation" is kookery of the highest grade, and match scientology stuff.