Hey dumbass, your application to be the guy that decides what all the words mean? Denied.
I know you're an idiot, you've been posting idiot shit on this site for years, but what the fuck makes you think you would get to make up a new meaning for a common term? I mean, did you fall out of bed and have a head injury this morning?
Get some fucking internet and look up what Open Source is!
Why must you be such an angry young man when your future looks quite bright to me?
Interesting article. Any US company that is so omnipresent in the lives of its customers and has an active corporate policy to crush or, at least, impede competition does indeed warrant a good look by the US Treasury Department. And I'm not a big government, anti-capitalist kind of guy by any stretch of the imagination.
Can you elaborate on this? I'm pretty familiar with bribery investigations, so I am curious about what you may know. Contact me privately if you need to.
I work with a company that can be best described as "Anti-Hipster" and we've make a pretty big infrastructure investment with GO. I personally love working with it as there's not a lot of second guessing when making design decisions.
Oops! I believe the GGP was talking about the theory of corporate law as opposed to any recent adjudications in the SCOTUS. In fact, I believe the GGP was going significantly further back into English common law and even further back into Roman law
Parties predated the Constitution, as they are an inevitable byproduct of electoral democracy. Some of the founders hoped to avoid them, but they split into the Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties as the Constitution was being written. Primaries are an internal party matter, each makes its own rules and there was no need for either to be mentioned in the Constitution. The term Gerrymandering didn't exist until 1812 and States draw congressional districts. Corporate personhood is a fundamentally necessary legal concept that predates the Colonies , which were themselves incorporated. As are municipalities, churches, NGOs, unions, non-profits, etc. Their personhood is established in common law, and supported by the Constitutional rights to free association and making contracts.
I'm not 'trolling'. I'm completely serious. Maybe you haven't used Rust yet but it's the next generation of programming. It offers unparalleled safety without sacrificing performance. That's the beauty of Rust's zero cost abstractions. Rust is what languages like C, C++, Java and C# should have been. It's still a young language but as more people learn about it we're seeing its usage skyrocket. Mozilla is already using Rust for parts of Firefox. I think we will see the same thing happen to most software projects. They will gradually use more and more Rust until all of the original C or C++ or Java or C# code is gone. If you're a programmer and you're not using Rust already, then you likely soon will be. Rust is taking the programming world by storm.
You will be glad to know that I've taken your words, pasted them into MS Word, prettied them up with a fancy font, printed them on a nice piece of paper, framed that paper and hanged it the wall of my office for the years to come. Thank you for this inspiration.
AI or machine learning is just computing. That's all it is. And with better and faster computing resources, we can do more with it which makes sense.
However, for "real" AI or machine learning to occur, there will need to be a biological substrate upon which such systems are to be built. I think this is the case because I believe that intelligent life is the universe's only way to "truly" conserve information.
There's nothing Trump can do about it. He may tweet about it, but there's nothing in his powers he can do.
You're right of course, but the President tweeting about this might be a good thing to do. It will give people some pause before making a purchase at Lowes.
You're not even close Rick. This whole Russia thing is just a theme to grab leftist headlines until the 2018 elections. There's just nothing there. No laws have been broken.
And I, for one, don't care how you vote. That's a private affair.
I wonder if the Senate overturned this regulation because they hate privacy or because of the fact these are "legislature level" rules being enacted by unelected bureaucrats in the last days of an administration that did everything it could to control its citizenry without the approval of Congress.
And this is to say nothing of the fact that Google and their ilk shouldn't be allowed to indulge in their raging data collection fetishes without letting the big telcoms and isp's wet their beaks. Right?
Everyone thinks they want to raise kiddos, until they actually have to. Then it's not quite all the fun and games those with kids attempt to make it out to be.
They're just trying to trick us into joining the twenty year misery train they have elected to ride. Hahahaa. No
Who are you, Malthus? You must really feel strongly about this topic as you've posted a boatload of anonymous, high negative energy posts.
Anyway, serious question: Do you wish your parents felt the same way as you and would have acted accordingly?
Here's the text of this particular FCC regulation put into effect by un-elected officials. I wonder if these regs were struck down by Congress because of the desire to do away with privacy or because of other more specific concerns with what is in this 200+ page document.
...that Hillary allowed into her SCIF room. Since she was an Original Classification Authority (OCA), she had every right to appoint others that could see classified materials including the FAXes she picked-up. Republicans are complaining about nothing again.
I think you already know this, but for the benefit of others that may be inclined to believe your statement, you could not be more incorrect in your reasoning both legally and morally.
Why must you be such an angry young man when your future looks quite bright to me?
Interesting article. Any US company that is so omnipresent in the lives of its customers and has an active corporate policy to crush or, at least, impede competition does indeed warrant a good look by the US Treasury Department. And I'm not a big government, anti-capitalist kind of guy by any stretch of the imagination.
Yeah, I'll see your microbubbles and raise you tinybubbles
Can you elaborate on this? I'm pretty familiar with bribery investigations, so I am curious about what you may know. Contact me privately if you need to.
Just lost a lot of respect for Y Combinator. I'll still keep reading Hacker News as that seems to be their most successful and enduring effort.
I swear to God, I think people are becoming so open-minded, their brains are falling out of their collectiv(e|ist) heads!
I work with a company that can be best described as "Anti-Hipster" and we've make a pretty big infrastructure investment with GO. I personally love working with it as there's not a lot of second guessing when making design decisions.
Oops! I believe the GGP was talking about the theory of corporate law as opposed to any recent adjudications in the SCOTUS. In fact, I believe the GGP was going significantly further back into English common law and even further back into Roman law
Parties predated the Constitution, as they are an inevitable byproduct of electoral democracy. Some of the founders hoped to avoid them, but they split into the Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties as the Constitution was being written. Primaries are an internal party matter, each makes its own rules and there was no need for either to be mentioned in the Constitution. The term Gerrymandering didn't exist until 1812 and States draw congressional districts. Corporate personhood is a fundamentally necessary legal concept that predates the Colonies , which were themselves incorporated. As are municipalities, churches, NGOs, unions, non-profits, etc. Their personhood is established in common law, and supported by the Constitutional rights to free association and making contracts.
That is simply not true...
I'm not 'trolling'. I'm completely serious. Maybe you haven't used Rust yet but it's the next generation of programming. It offers unparalleled safety without sacrificing performance. That's the beauty of Rust's zero cost abstractions. Rust is what languages like C, C++, Java and C# should have been. It's still a young language but as more people learn about it we're seeing its usage skyrocket. Mozilla is already using Rust for parts of Firefox. I think we will see the same thing happen to most software projects. They will gradually use more and more Rust until all of the original C or C++ or Java or C# code is gone. If you're a programmer and you're not using Rust already, then you likely soon will be. Rust is taking the programming world by storm.
You will be glad to know that I've taken your words, pasted them into MS Word, prettied them up with a fancy font, printed them on a nice piece of paper, framed that paper and hanged it the wall of my office for the years to come. Thank you for this inspiration.
Your Friend in Rust,
FootNipple
AI or machine learning is just computing. That's all it is. And with better and faster computing resources, we can do more with it which makes sense. However, for "real" AI or machine learning to occur, there will need to be a biological substrate upon which such systems are to be built. I think this is the case because I believe that intelligent life is the universe's only way to "truly" conserve information.
Yesterday I wasn't feeling that great, so I set up some blockchain and now I feel much better!
Then Linux and Windows together is like a mullet; business in the front and party in the back.
There's nothing Trump can do about it. He may tweet about it, but there's nothing in his powers he can do.
You're right of course, but the President tweeting about this might be a good thing to do. It will give people some pause before making a purchase at Lowes.
Good post! Should've signed in.
You're not even close Rick. This whole Russia thing is just a theme to grab leftist headlines until the 2018 elections. There's just nothing there. No laws have been broken.
And I, for one, don't care how you vote. That's a private affair.
Very good! The Hammer 2.0 Slashdot post might be one for the ages. Wish I had some modders to hand out...
For the kneejerks, I humbly offer the original document this Senate resolution references:
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/...
I wonder if the Senate overturned this regulation because they hate privacy or because of the fact these are "legislature level" rules being enacted by unelected bureaucrats in the last days of an administration that did everything it could to control its citizenry without the approval of Congress.
And this is to say nothing of the fact that Google and their ilk shouldn't be allowed to indulge in their raging data collection fetishes without letting the big telcoms and isp's wet their beaks. Right?
We see through your lies !
Everyone thinks they want to raise kiddos, until they actually have to. Then it's not quite all the fun and games those with kids attempt to make it out to be. They're just trying to trick us into joining the twenty year misery train they have elected to ride. Hahahaa. No
Who are you, Malthus? You must really feel strongly about this topic as you've posted a boatload of anonymous, high negative energy posts.
Anyway, serious question: Do you wish your parents felt the same way as you and would have acted accordingly?
The Romans had the 3.5mm audio jack?!?
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-148A1_Rcd.pdf
Here's the text of this particular FCC regulation put into effect by un-elected officials. I wonder if these regs were struck down by Congress because of the desire to do away with privacy or because of other more specific concerns with what is in this 200+ page document.
Keep the those knees jerking though!!
...intelligence documents? Just asking.
So was I! The 90's, 00's, 10's...three decades ;-)
Oh God, please don't...
I think you already know this, but for the benefit of others that may be inclined to believe your statement, you could not be more incorrect in your reasoning both legally and morally.
And I'm done Putin up with the likes of you!