Constant leaking could lead to this... And as we see it in the universe this could be the normal case. But you're partially right: We can't know it, and there must be some momentum killer for this to happen. (Even if it's only the light-energy and supernova-material from the stars...)
> I wish there was a port of the Mechwarrior series to handhelds.
And how would you control the game?
I remembered using the joystick for the feet, the keyboard for the commands and modes AND the mouse for the torso. And i still could turn the head with a coolie hat on the joystick.
There's no way i could imagine *such* a handheld-controller!;)
> And run decent software and hardware, of course.
Well, on the new pc of a friend of mine word of warcraft and maya 7 run fine on linux. And they are pretty new aren't they?
> Just as there are busses for people who can't afford cars, there is Open Office for people who can't afford Microsoft.
Additionally he does not have to share his system with others or gets less compfort and quality from it, as he would have if he would take a bus.
Neither would i take OOo because i *can't afford* ms-office, but rather because 1. there's no way i gonna support a criminal company and 2. i don't like to waste money if i can use it for so much better stuff that's really *worth* it 3. OOo is (nearly) the best alternative. (to me a open smartsuite UI with all OOo functions would be what i call perfect)
So your way of seeing you as someone better because you can afford ms-office and let M$ vamp yourself - my poor friend - is clearly an illusion.
It's not the number of holes, but the time between detection and fixing! (Okay, two sentences: And if the holes got detected by someone caring for its security or someone caring for its insecurity.
Get a Datadesk Smartboard in black with an adapter that will work with your favourite kvm switch and you never will have to search for a replacement again until you got some $600 for your datahand;))
> and it does no good at ALL if you code it so that it works on Explorer
IE? Are you trying to tell me that there are slashdotters who use the IE except for the trolls?? OMFG, slashdot is really gowng down the hill.;) No really!;)
To clearify it: in matters of plain logic Aardpig is right in all his conclusions, but the dark matter thing. Here ifwm is right.
This also disturbes me very much: Dark matter and dark energy always look like cheating, because it's a kind of making up something you can't prove because your observations are wrong, and ignoring the fact that there is nothing that forces it to be the cause of the difference between your observations and your expectations. (sorry i'm not that good in english, it's my third language)
sure. it's only a theory. but i hardly believe that there ever will be proof for it. it's rather a waste of time to me.
i guess as soon as the relativity theory and the quantum theories are merged, this will solve itself. no matter what's the outcome.
To me this looks a bit like that suppressing kind of arguing where moral is irrelevant and profit is everything, that lets every human with some sense of indebtedness feel some pain inside.
It's that feeling of: "this just isn't right!" even if it's "correct and makes sense"
To me poeple who decide in that style even are near to criminal in cases of legitimity and fairness.
Yes, maybe I'm just a lone idealist in a dog-eat-dog society. But I'm proud of it an if I die poor (in cases of money) because of this, at least I die happy (in most other cases) and with a clear conscience.
(Did I mention that i would bet that i could bring up unbeatable arguments arguments to everyone, that business in it's base is one of the two main supports of pure evil in this world? [dumbness is the other one an ist mostly required as the culture medium for it])
... one more of those "oh my god, there is so much danger, you all have to fear and follow only ME" things of the bush-administration. but this is only the feeling i get from listening to american news nearly all day...;))
Do you know what some europeans are mostly wondering about? "Why do most americans build their house out of *wood* and *chipboard*??" anyone here to explain it? I mean: Wouldn't a fat wall out of concrete be the better solution?;)
> SUVs are not for carrying cargo, the S stands for 'Sport'.
And you absolutely *need* that because you're doing that much *sport* and it would be an *abuse* of your human-rights to tell you: go drive a *normal* car?
Sure... allright... yes... absolutely...;P
Did you know that ford has an 1.4 liter (~0.37 us gallons) fiesta in his drawers sincd 1996? they even had a ready-for-the-road prototype, as far as i'm informed. If you imagine adding heat- and break-energy recycling in that car, then it's a shame that nowadays anything above 3 liters (~0.8 us gallons) drives on the roards of a modern state where poeple could afford it...
And by the way: As far as i know from reading about it: In a comparision between solar, hydrogen, other fuel cells and the above solution, nowadays the above solution is the *most energy efficient* and hydrogen fuel cells are the *worst energy efficient* solution. (just to open the eyes of everyone thinking that it's otherwise around) i also read that this is because oil/fat is the most efficient energy container that exists.
so we have to stay on some form of this as an energy source for mobile systems or we still really have to do a lot of research...
If you could see me now, you would see a huge smile all over the face.:D
Finally there's someone who is able to do to microsoft what they did to other companies for decades. And the fact that ballmer gets that angy about (because it really hutrs him inside) even makes it more enjoyable for me.:)
Hopefully he becomes that angry that he gets a heart attack... and bill too... so the dragon - without both of his heads - dies alltogether.;P
you have to have a strange *guru* appearing sometimes, who never ever wears stuff like shoes, socks, ties, dresses, stuff like that, has a huge beard, and looks loke he knows about every screw and wire in the whole center.
Then the other poeple can tell stories and anecdotes about him and throw in some mysterious stuff...
To repeat it for the 1001st time: An optical mouse does *not* use a *laser*!!! It's a simple led. Or else you would maybe see a proper and very thin line of light coming out of your mouse and a very small point on the mousepad. (Or you have to have some moving parts to make the laser actually scanning the whole surface below it.)
Well... as far as i can tell, snopes does not even explain *why* this is false. Simply arguing that of course nobody is as trained as he was in school - what's self-evident - does still not mean that the document is "false".
Slashdot Mirror
Constant leaking could lead to this... And as we see it in the universe this could be the normal case. But you're partially right: We can't know it, and there must be some momentum killer for this to happen. (Even if it's only the light-energy and supernova-material from the stars...)
> I wish there was a port of the Mechwarrior series to handhelds.
;)
And how would you control the game?
I remembered using the joystick for the feet, the keyboard for the commands and modes AND the mouse for the torso. And i still could turn the head with a coolie hat on the joystick.
There's no way i could imagine *such* a handheld-controller!
The GameBoy DS has two processors too. And two screens... Just to create a relation...
> And run decent software and hardware, of course.
Well, on the new pc of a friend of mine word of warcraft and maya 7 run fine on linux. And they are pretty new aren't they?
> Just as there are busses for people who can't afford cars, there is Open Office for people who can't afford Microsoft.
Additionally he does not have to share his system with others or gets less compfort and quality from it, as he would have if he would take a bus.
Neither would i take OOo because i *can't afford* ms-office, but rather because 1. there's no way i gonna support a criminal company and 2. i don't like to waste money if i can use it for so much better stuff that's really *worth* it 3. OOo is (nearly) the best alternative. (to me a open smartsuite UI with all OOo functions would be what i call perfect)
So your way of seeing you as someone better because you can afford ms-office and let M$ vamp yourself - my poor friend - is clearly an illusion.
The host galaxy is *inside* the black hole. It got "eaten" completely. To me this sounds pretty realistic if it's a huge black hole...
i don't think you can say "if it did not happen by now, it is safe...".d itorials/dumb/index.html
i can't remember where but it's somewhere in there: http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/e
It's not the number of holes, but the time between detection and fixing! (Okay, two sentences: And if the holes got detected by someone caring for its security or someone caring for its insecurity.
Poeple will never get it i guess...
No? Then look here:h tml
http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2005/09/16/443527.
Get a Datadesk Smartboard in black with an adapter that will work with your favourite kvm switch and you never will have to search for a replacement again until you got some $600 for your datahand ;))
Do you mean:
Marcy: "Say it! Say it!!!"
Jefferson: "J-J-J...Joooob"!
?
And now it's 43, and i will never see the answer again, you insensible clod!
> Don't forget to steal a Das Keyboard.
;P
Baaad german! It's: "die Tastatur".
Try downloading the sounds. (And possibly convert them...)
> and it does no good at ALL if you code it so that it works on Explorer
;) ;)
IE? Are you trying to tell me that there are slashdotters who use the IE except for the trolls??
OMFG, slashdot is really gowng down the hill.
No really!
> 1: "Only the Sith deal in absolutes."
> 2: "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
> Hmm...
You forgot:
3: War!
4: Profit!!!
To clearify it: in matters of plain logic Aardpig is right in all his conclusions, but the dark matter thing.
Here ifwm is right.
This also disturbes me very much: Dark matter and dark energy always look like cheating, because it's a kind of making up something you can't prove because your observations are wrong, and ignoring the fact that there is nothing that forces it to be the cause of the difference between your observations and your expectations. (sorry i'm not that good in english, it's my third language)
sure. it's only a theory. but i hardly believe that there ever will be proof for it. it's rather a waste of time to me.
i guess as soon as the relativity theory and the quantum theories are merged, this will solve itself. no matter what's the outcome.
To me this looks a bit like that suppressing kind of arguing where moral is irrelevant and profit is everything, that lets every human with some sense of indebtedness feel some pain inside.
It's that feeling of: "this just isn't right!" even if it's "correct and makes sense"
To me poeple who decide in that style even are near to criminal in cases of legitimity and fairness.
Yes, maybe I'm just a lone idealist in a dog-eat-dog society. But I'm proud of it an if I die poor (in cases of money) because of this, at least I die happy (in most other cases) and with a clear conscience.
(Did I mention that i would bet that i could bring up unbeatable arguments arguments to everyone, that business in it's base is one of the two main supports of pure evil in this world? [dumbness is the other one an ist mostly required as the culture medium for it])
... one more of those "oh my god, there is so much danger, you all have to fear and follow only ME" things of the bush-administration. ;))
;)
but this is only the feeling i get from listening to american news nearly all day...
Do you know what some europeans are mostly wondering about?
"Why do most americans build their house out of *wood* and *chipboard*??"
anyone here to explain it?
I mean: Wouldn't a fat wall out of concrete be the better solution?
> SUVs are not for carrying cargo, the S stands for 'Sport'.
;P
And you absolutely *need* that because you're doing that much *sport* and it would be an *abuse* of your human-rights to tell you: go drive a *normal* car?
Sure... allright... yes... absolutely...
Did you know that ford has an 1.4 liter (~0.37 us gallons) fiesta in his drawers sincd 1996? they even had a ready-for-the-road prototype, as far as i'm informed. If you imagine adding heat- and break-energy recycling in that car, then it's a shame that nowadays anything above 3 liters (~0.8 us gallons) drives on the roards of a modern state where poeple could afford it...
And by the way: As far as i know from reading about it:
In a comparision between solar, hydrogen, other fuel cells and the above solution, nowadays the above solution is the *most energy efficient* and hydrogen fuel cells are the *worst energy efficient* solution. (just to open the eyes of everyone thinking that it's otherwise around)
i also read that this is because oil/fat is the most efficient energy container that exists.
so we have to stay on some form of this as an energy source for mobile systems or we still really have to do a lot of research...
If you could see me now, you would see a huge smile all over the face. :D
:)
;P
Finally there's someone who is able to do to microsoft what they did to other companies for decades.
And the fact that ballmer gets that angy about (because it really hutrs him inside) even makes it more enjoyable for me.
Hopefully he becomes that angry that he gets a heart attack... and bill too... so the dragon - without both of his heads - dies alltogether.
Rather against the RI** or even better: the *I**!
Even with +4, insightful, i still think parent should be modded up, because this are some very true words that many poeple possibly never heard of...
you have to have a strange *guru* appearing sometimes, who never ever wears stuff like shoes, socks, ties, dresses, stuff like that, has a huge beard, and looks loke he knows about every screw and wire in the whole center.
Then the other poeple can tell stories and anecdotes about him and throw in some mysterious stuff...
> It could power the frickin' laser beam!
To repeat it for the 1001st time: An optical mouse does *not* use a *laser*!!! It's a simple led. Or else you would maybe see a proper and very thin line of light coming out of your mouse and a very small point on the mousepad. (Or you have to have some moving parts to make the laser actually scanning the whole surface below it.)
Well... as far as i can tell, snopes does not even explain *why* this is false. Simply arguing that of course nobody is as trained as he was in school - what's self-evident - does still not mean that the document is "false".
;)
Or did i overlook something?