Slashdot Mirror


Dell Releases First Consumer Product with Mandriva

WindozeSux writes "Dell Laptops(Latitude 110L) are now shipping with Mandriva Linux pre-installed. Mandriva says this represents a milestone to make Linux more available to consumers. From the article:"This product shows the world that Mandriva is today ready for the consumer market. We've been developing products for the corporate and enthusiast markets for years. Addressing the needs of the consumer market is a different challenge, because it is all the more difficult, as you don't have a system admin or professional technician at home", said François Bancilhon, Mandriva CEO"

312 comments

  1. AMD next? by kc32 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe if they start selling computers with Athlon 64's, I might consider buying one. Maybe. I'll probably just build another one though.

    1. Re:AMD next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if they start selling computers with Athlon 64's, I might consider buying one.

      No - you'll just find something else to bitch about.

    2. Re:AMD next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alienware does.

  2. Uh oh by Psychor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It seems that cunning Linux zealots embedded a subliminal message in that article as the submitter's name. I don't expect such shoddy journalism from Slashdot, which is normally a high quality news source.

  3. Tomorow's News: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First consumer angrily sends back 'discount' Dell computer for not having Windows.

    1. Re:Tomorow's News: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fucking written on bold on dell's france page that IT COMES WITH LINUX.

    2. Re:Tomorow's News: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I thought this Linux was supposed to be much better than Windows, but now I can't even open my Word documents on it - I want a refund!"

    3. Re:Tomorow's News: by hungrygrue · · Score: 0

      And why, prey tell, would anyone have that particular problem? I have had no problem opening any .doc file in OO. I would strongly suspect that the user being incapable of double clicking on a file's icon in order to open it would not be an acceptable reason for return.

    4. Re:Tomorow's News: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, the files open up just fine but the formatting is fucked up even in the most simple two column files with figures and math.

      That is why we can't use OO at our university. Collaborating with MS Office users is impossible.

    5. Re:Tomorow's News: by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

      Collaborating with MS Office users is impossible.

      That's exactly why I don't use MS Office.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    6. Re:Tomorow's News: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And why, prey tell,"

      Actually, that's "pray tell"

    7. Re:Tomorow's News: by mhearne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can open and edit any MS Office document with OpenOffice, which comes with the distribution. You can also save any OpenOffice document as a MS Office document - we've been doing this for years, I surprised that so few Windows users were aware of it.

      We can also listen to Windows media with MPlayer or Kaffiene and create .pdf files without Acrobat. This isn't new.

      Adobe, Real, and Macromedia all produce plugins for Mozilla, Firefox and Konqueror.

      Basically, the only thing that Windows can do that Linux can't is get viruses and crash.

      Michael

    8. Re:Tomorow's News: by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Try Crossover Office, works via Wine.

    9. Re:Tomorow's News: by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Basically, the only thing that Windows can do that Linux can't is get viruses and crash.

      And run decent software and hardware, of course. Not that I've got anything against Linux or Open Office, everything needs a discount alternative. Just as there are busses for people who can't afford cars, there is Open Office for people who can't afford Microsoft.

      I for one use Linux and boot into Windows when I need Office.

    10. Re:Tomorow's News: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      > And run decent software and hardware, of course.

      Well, on the new pc of a friend of mine word of warcraft and maya 7 run fine on linux. And they are pretty new aren't they?

      > Just as there are busses for people who can't afford cars, there is Open Office for people who can't afford Microsoft.

      Additionally he does not have to share his system with others or gets less compfort and quality from it, as he would have if he would take a bus.

      Neither would i take OOo because i *can't afford* ms-office, but rather because 1. there's no way i gonna support a criminal company and 2. i don't like to waste money if i can use it for so much better stuff that's really *worth* it 3. OOo is (nearly) the best alternative. (to me a open smartsuite UI with all OOo functions would be what i call perfect)

      So your way of seeing you as someone better because you can afford ms-office and let M$ vamp yourself - my poor friend - is clearly an illusion.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    11. Re:Tomorow's News: by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Basically, the only thing that Windows can do that Linux can't is get
      > viruses and crash.

      Oh, Linux can crash. It can crash pretty impressively. Especially if your IDE controller goes bad. That can be all kinds of fun.

      Oh, you meant crash for no particular reason on perfectly good hardware? In that case, only the GUI crashes (i.e., the X Window System, though it takes all your graphical apps with it). I haven't seen a Linux *kernel* go south, except in cases of bad hardware, since the vmm was changed to handle out-of-swap-space conditions by killing off the memory-hog app. I don't remember exactly what version that was changed in, probably between 2.2 and 2.4, or it could have been between 2.0 and 2.2, I don't recall.

      Of course, for most desktop users, a crashed GUI is vanishingly close to just as bad as a crashed kernel. I do hope, now that X.Org seems to have gotten X11 development moving faster again, that stability becomes a priority. No matter what an app does, the X server shouldn't crash, EVER. In this regard, the stability of a typical Linux desktop is about the same as a (protected, firewalled) Windows XP system. (I still prefer the Linux/X11 system, because it's rather more configurable, but that's a separate issue from stability.)

      I'd also like to see the ability to disconnect from an X app (or session even) but leave it running and reconnect later, possibly from a different location -- like what Gnu screen does for the tty, but on the desktop. Done right, this should mean that even if the X server does crash, it doesn't take the apps with it and can be restarted and you go on as if nothing happened. That would be worth a lot more than transparent windows. (Not that I don't want transparent windows; I do. But stability is more important.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  4. Step 2: by MagicTom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fly a plane over Sun with the banner "YEAH, WELL WE HAVE MANDRIVA!"

    1. Re:Step 2: by kc32 · · Score: 1

      Step 3: Profit!

    2. Re:Step 2: by Maxhrk · · Score: 0

      you forgot the dell logo and an additional ad words 'TAKES THAT SUN!'

    3. Re:Step 2: by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

      Aren't you skipping a step?

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    4. Re:Step 2: by Deltaspectre · · Score: 0

      Surely you mean a space probe? ;)

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    5. Re:Step 2: by infonography · · Score: 1

      That step is

      2) Return product and sue for damages.

      As a Sun user I should mention I am really kidding, good luck on that to Mandriva. More *nux is good in the long run.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    6. Re:Step 2: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Aren't you skipping a step?

      What do you mean????????????

    7. Re:Step 2: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't fucking rescind a contract and then sue upon it you fucking dipshit. It just doesn't work like that.

  5. I'm a little bit excited! by Crixus · · Score: 1

    I am!

        But we'll see how long it lasts.

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
    1. Re:I'm a little bit excited! by lixee · · Score: 1

      Way to go! I won't have to struggle with suspend issues on my own now.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    2. Re:I'm a little bit excited! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we'll see how long it lasts.

      It'll last just long enough for Dell to lock-in a low cost contract on Windows Vista licenses from Microsoft. Then expect to see Dell shutter the program and announce, with Microsoft's backing, lack of interest.

  6. I Wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    "...it is all the more difficult, as you don't have a system admin or professional technician at home"

    Somebody want to tell my parents this and, while you're at it, tell them I'm not available on loan.

    1. Re:I Wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't you just yell upstairs?

    2. Re:I Wish by evilspoons · · Score: 1

      ZING!

  7. Eh? by Moth7 · · Score: 1

    Changing a source's name in a citation unless explicitly stated is very shoddy journalism and is generally reserved for those who would come under threat from the quote in question.

    If someone wants to go by a daft name then fair enough, it's not the editors' job to protect submitters from chosen embarassment.

    1. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? Was WindozeSux not the submitter of this article or something? Please elaborate on your theories...

    2. Re:Eh? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
      If someone wants to go by a daft name then fair enough, it's not the editors' job to protect submitters from chosen embarassment.
      But in all fairness, someone should have done that with Mandrake. I mean, Mandriva ... it just sounds SO gay ...
      Q. Hey Buddy, nice laptop. What you running?
      A. Mandriva.
      Q. You're a man-driver? Well, nice meeting you - gotta go wash my hands ...
      I mean, even Lesbian Linux sounds cooler.
    3. Re:Eh? by aklix · · Score: 1

      Well when a user submits it, the name becomes a link. The name is indeed NOT a link.

    4. Re:Eh? by sveskemus · · Score: 1

      Wow that Lesbian Linux really needs to stop trying to make money off the Debian logo (which is trademarked IIRC).

    5. Re:Eh? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Only if you have a url entered under your account does your username link on a story. It's not the same as when you post. If you submit a story and you don't have a url, it won't link to anything. If you post a comment, your username is a link to your slashdot page and your url shows up under your username.
      If you want some proof, check out this story I submitted:

      ahref=http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/22/ 1416258rel=url2html-4315http://slashdot.org/articl e.pl?sid=05/02/22/1416258>

      I don't have a url.
      Furthermore, check the past few stories, every username that links, links to that user's url.

    6. Re:Eh? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      The debian people probably see it along the lines of generating goodwill, interest, and free publicity for debian linux in general.

      It works. After all, didn't YOU (and who knows how many others, me included) click on it?

    7. Re:Eh? by empaler · · Score: 1

      Have you ever even looked at the 'Submit Story' page?
      When you submit a story, you can choose whether or not your name/handle should link anywhere, and if so; where.

  8. This is a Good Thing by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Desktop Linux needs support from the big computer makers more than anything to succeed. Its interesting that Dell is pushing Mandriva with its laptops and HP recently began doing the same thing with its laptops and Ubuntu. I know from experiance that Linux on laptops can be tough, but mostly thats because the hardware won't work. If I can buy an Dell or an HP laptop with some distro of Linux on it that works with wireless and suspend hardware that works with Linux, then it really doesn't matter which one is on it when its shipped to me. I can put whatever I choose....avoiding the biggest problems with laptops and Linux!

    I say bring them on Dell, HP. You might have found a way to make me (and many other geeks) customers again.

    1. Re:This is a Good Thing by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I know from experiance that Linux on laptops can be tough

      I previously ran Mandrake 10 on my HP nx9010 laptop. Hardware support was not the best. Power and sound did not work correctly.

      I recently installed Ubuntu and hardware support is now much better. This makes me wonder if HP have been directly helping the debian/ubuntu people with ther drivers.

    2. Re:This is a Good Thing by ettlz · · Score: 1
      If I can buy an Dell or an HP laptop with some distro of Linux on it that works with wireless and suspend hardware that works with Linux, then it really doesn't matter which one is on it when its shipped to me.

      I use Fedora Core 4 very successfully on a rebranded Mitac 8011 notebook. This includes wireless (Intel Pro 2200) and I eventually got suspend to work. The latter seems to be a real issue under Linux, though, and it's a kludge getting it to work properly (i.e., having to "experiment" to find the correct combination of modules and services to unload), and then the i915 DRI doesn't work on resume. Hopefully, Fedora will release a kernel update that fixes this and doesn't break anything else in the process.

      A lot of these ACPI issues seem to be blamed on buggy DSDTs in the notebook BIOSes. Apparently, this can be fixed by patching the data as the kernel boots --- but this is inconvenient. And BIOS providers are sometimes reluctant to fix things because they work as intended under Windows (as Windows XP's implementation of the ACPI specification is apparently lax at best, broken at worst). But it gets me that these features work under Windows, but not under Linux; maybe it's time for Linux to bite the bullet and [allow an option to] interpret ACPI tables the way Microsoft does? Or would that take a rather aribitrary degree of reverse-engineering, and we should instead keep shouting at BIOS providers to use the Intel AML compiler instead?

    3. Re:This is a Good Thing by mjg59 · · Score: 1

      This makes me wonder if HP have been directly helping the debian/ubuntu people with ther drivers. Yes, though the vast majority of this is code that's now integrated into upstream projects.

    4. Re:This is a Good Thing by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      From personal experience, I can say that Linux works very well on Apple iBooks (everything supported, except if you have the AirPort card with the cursed Broadcom chipset) and IBM (now Lenovo) Thinkpads (everything supported, including wireless). These are also really high quality hardware, and, depending on what features you're looking for, inexpensive. E.g. an iBook costs under $ 1000 and provides 5 to 6 hours of battery life - try finding a cheaper machine that does that.

      Also, laptops with Linspire are being sold for around $ 500. I can't comment on their quality, but you can assume Linux works like a charm on these.

      As for the rest of the crowd, I think it mostly depends on whether the laptop's ACPI implementation is broken (many of them are, which causes sleeping not to work right) and the presence of unsupported hardware (winmodems and certain wireless network cards). It looks like both issues are improving, and ndiswrapper should get even otherwise unsupported network cards to work.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    5. Re:This is a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using a d-link wireless card on my TiBook. Third party drivers (orangeware.) Know what kind of hoops I'd have to go through to get Debian working on this?

    6. Re:This is a Good Thing by GeekTek · · Score: 0, Troll

      I agree - this is a Good Thing. However, isn't there a potential backlash when new users bring their shiny new Ubuntu laptops home and figure out that there's no easy way to install a printer?

      I'm all for Linux on the desktop, but confusing new users by having no GUI for Printer configuration (among other omissions and inconsistancies) can't help the cause.

    7. Re:This is a Good Thing by JAFSlashdotter · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't a clue, but this guy or this guy might.

      --
      We apologize for the preceding message. All those responsible have been sacked.
    8. Re:This is a Good Thing by pyros · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm all for Linux on the desktop, but confusing new users by having no GUI for Printer configuration (among other omissions and inconsistancies) can't help the cause.

      I haven't had to touch the command line to install my HP Deskjet 932c printer under Linux (multiple versions of ubuntu, fedora, centos, and suse) for several years. Honestly, what crappy distro (or crappy printer) are you using that the printer installation gui can't autodetect it?

    9. Re:This is a Good Thing by ReinoutS · · Score: 2, Informative
      However, isn't there a potential backlash when new users bring their shiny new Ubuntu laptops home and figure out that there's no easy way to install a printer?
      You'll be relieved to know that Mandriva has provided a graphical printer installation wizard for years. Those people buying Dell/Mandriva laptops shouldn't have any problems with that.
    10. Re:This is a Good Thing by GeekTek · · Score: 1

      HP 4LP with Ubuntu Warty (Hedgehog? whichever is newer). I should have been more specific though - Configuring a printer share was the problem - not the printer driver.

      Still, sharing and SMB functionality are standard functions which most people I know use on a daily basis.

      The question remains, if the Linux distro doesn't live up to basic user expectations, will it lead to backlash? People tend to hate to hear "It'll be in the next version" when they know it works in Windows.

    11. Re:This is a Good Thing by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Still, sharing and SMB functionality are standard functions which most people I know use on a daily basis.

      Yep. Students (thats who this is aimed at) share their printer everyday, so all the people in the dorm can use up all their ink and paper.

      This is not aimed at a market for those that want advanced networking. This is aimed at those that want to pirate music off the internet without being infected by the spyware of the P2P program.

    12. Re:This is a Good Thing by wrecked · · Score: 1

      I use Ubuntu on a Dell D600. It detected my office's SMB network and the network HP laser printers with absolutely no intervention on my part.

      There is a "System" menu on the taskbar, which has various admin dialogs where you can probably configure your printer if you have to.

    13. Re:This is a Good Thing by alienw · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sure that if Microsoft's behavior was well-documented, the kernel would work the same way it did. The problem is, there are no good specifications on what windows does. The bios manufacturers don't obey the specs, they just tweak their bios until it works with Windows.

    14. Re:This is a Good Thing by SpectreBinary · · Score: 1

      The broadcom chipset is now usable with a workaround. Admittedly a large ugly one, but depending how desperate you are for internal wireless support (iBook owners especially) or just something to mess around with, it may be worth it. Essentially the iBook runs a MOL session with a minimal OS X inside, and tunnels networking over Apple's OS. Uses more resources than it should, but it works.

      Take a look on the gentoo forums where this has been tried by several people over the last month.

    15. Re:This is a Good Thing by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Huh. Sharing? Under Mandriva 10.0, my Epson C64 was autodetected, installed, printed a test page, dropped into a Samba share, and configured there with about six clicks of the mouse and no driver disk. Installing the same printer under Win XP Home took 15 minutes and required the use of a driver disk.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    16. Re:This is a Good Thing by bryantthesmith · · Score: 1

      I actually had the opposite experience. I had Mandriva 2005LE running fine on my hardware but decided to give Ubuntu a try because of all the hype surrounding it. It totally flopped. I couldn't get my wireless NIC working and without a network connection my machine is useless.

    17. Re:This is a Good Thing by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I'm assuming that the Broadcom chipset is an ordinary PCI Broadcom chip used in standard Mini-PCI wifi cards?

      ndiswrapper to get a Windows driver running, QEMU to get ndiswrapper running.

    18. Re:This is a Good Thing by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      If your system tools do not detect the printer, a GUI to do so is found at http://localhost631./ But first you need to open up a command line and type in lppasswd -a root and then type in the root password twice. Then all of your printer config is GUI.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    19. Re:This is a Good Thing by hairguitar · · Score: 1

      Umm.. That's too bad. I successfully installed Ubuntu Hoary on my ASUS V6V after Fedora Core 4 failed miserably. If I recall correctly, ASUS is a Taiwanese manufacturer with no connections to HP...

      --
      |,,/, ,\,,| (four-horned salute)
    20. Re:This is a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, TFA is about Mandriva.

      Mandriva has wizards for EVERYTHING...

    21. Re:This is a Good Thing by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      It would be absolutely wonderful if we could get them to simply use LinuxBIOS, but I'm afraid that compatibility with whatever cockamamie Windows management tools exist will preclude that on desktops for a while, But check out http://www.linuxbios.org/index.php/Main_Page for details. This stuff is very, very interesting for replacing the closed source, API violating, debris cluttered, bug-ridden, and debris cluttered cruft most BIOS's use.

    22. Re:This is a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had SuSE running on my laptop for a couple of years now without any issues. Except for a few rare cases, my hardware have been automatically detected and configured.
      It's great that Dell is promoting Mandriva, but they should include other distros just to let consumers know that unlike windows, linux is about options.

  9. Available in USA or just France? by baomike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can the machines be purchased in the USA?

    1. Re:Available in USA or just France? by mysqlrocks · · Score: 0, Informative

      At only 759 euros (~ $940), the combination of Mandriva Linux and the Dell Latitude 110L is currently one of the most affordable notebooks available in developed countries.

      It appears that it will only be available in europe. Or it could just be that Mandriva is from Europe.
    2. Re:Available in USA or just France? by rlauzon · · Score: 5, Informative

      It doesn't look that way. I just checked out Dell USA's web site and didn't see an available option for Mandriva. It was Windoze XP all the way. Oh, well... Emperor Linux still does a really good job with laptops and Linux.

    3. Re:Available in USA or just France? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windoze"? God-fucking-damn, I hate nerds like you. For your next trick, spell "Microsoft" with a dollar sign! Yeah! Fucking geek-ass loser.

      Yes, I use Linux too. But, goddamn, shut the fuck up.

    4. Re:Available in USA or just France? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      web says:

      Dell Latitude 110L is currently one of the most affordable notebooks available in developed countries.

      So USA is not included.

    5. Re:Available in USA or just France? by legirons · · Score: 1

      If you're seriously looking for a linux laptop, then somewhere like YellowDog might be a good place to start.

      They sell powerBooks, iBooks, etc. at the same price as Apple's store, with dual-boot Linux/Mac OS X.

    6. Re:Available in USA or just France? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Not only is it just France, it's just France for students.

      There was this state sponsored thing where students could buy a computer for 1 EUR / day last year (the sponsorship was in the free credit) for a total of roughly 800 EUR. Apparently Dell renewed the operation on that single model, which is only available to students. The general public can only get it w/ MS systems.

      When the 1 EUR thing was launched last year, a number of small companies also sold Linux laptops. But I don't think any major names did so at the time. Apple participated too (with iBooks).

      This might have been covered on /. at the time. Or not. Or several times (since this is /. after all).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  10. huh? by naelurec · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Dell Latitude line is geared toward business users. The Inspiron line is for home users. According to Dell's Linux page:

    Dell does not officially support running Linux on Dell laptops."

    So where can I order one of these things?

    1. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Dell france, on the homepage there's a "student" offer...

    2. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but the regular configure and buy (sorry, "Configurez et achetez") just has:

      Latitude 110L

      Système d'exploitation
      Microsoft® Windows® XP Professionnel (SP2) avec Media NTFS
      Microsoft® Windows® XP Professionnel (SP2) avec Media FAT32

    3. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www1.euro.dell.com/content/default.aspx?c=f r&l=fr&s=gen

      follow the link "Micro Portable Etudiant" and you should finally find the laptop...

    4. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a system of liberty, not "exploitation."

      Look for the option:

      Système d'liberté
      Mandriva Linux

    5. Re:huh? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1
      What the FUCK?

      Mettez à jour votre navigateur

      Pour pouvoir utiliser les nouvelles fonctions et éléments de personnalisation des pages Premier Dell, vous devez utiliser un navigateur Web tel que Netscape Navigator (version 4.08 ou supérieure) ou Microsoft Internet Explorer (version 4.0 ou supérieure). Ces navigateurs prennent en charge les plates-formes Microsoft Windows, Apple Macintosh et UNIX.

      Pour télécharger la dernière version de ces navigateurs, sélectionnez le lien approprié ci-dessous.

      Netscape Navigator ®
      Télécharger la dernière version

      Microsoft Internet Explorer ®
      Télécharger la dernière version
      I may not know French, but I know when I'm being sent to a "wrong browser" page for running Opera.

      Also, I see that the 110L isn't even AVAILABLE in the US, Windows or Linux. It looks like a Latitude version of the 2200, from the specs... something to take a potshot at the R50e's that Lenovo's been churning out (for cheaper than a 2200, for that matter)...
    6. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a good reason for them to go with their Latitude line: the hardware won't change as quickly as in the consumer oriented Inspirons, where they change to cheaper (or just different) hardware without changing the name/number of the notebook.

    7. Re:huh? by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Ze leenk she is 'ow u say sleshdotteed.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    8. Re:huh? by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      The UK site (dell.co.uk redirects to euro.dell.com) has the 110L. However, 'Configure and Buy' only offers Windows XP.

  11. Sadly... by Dankling · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sadly I don't think the availability of Linux systems that is holding the average consumer or business person from buying one. If the IT guy of a company wants the employees to have Linux, they get Linux - no matter how easy or hard it is made.

    then the average consumer... of course "line-ux?"

    --
    Slash-for-Thought
    1. Re:Sadly... by woah · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you pronounce it as "lee-nux" or "lih-nux"?

    2. Re:Sadly... by glens · · Score: 1

      There is no "one way" to pronounce it. Propriety keys on the local pronunciation of "Linus". Note the pattern in the two versions of the historic sound bites of Linus introducing himself and stating how he pronounces "Linux"

      "lee-nooks" would be appropriate wherever "lee-noose" is.

      "lin-nucks" would be appropriate wherever "lin-nus" is.

      Here in the U.S.A. (most parts anyway) "line-us" is the man's name, so "line-ucks" is correct.

    3. Re:Sadly... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I think it's the inability of the admin staff to support Linux on corporate desktops/laptops. So much of the training and infrastructure is dedicated to Windows, it just doesn't cost to switch.

      Also, it's not a cost issue either. Most corps will not `download and install' Linux. They'd get no support that way. But -buying- Linux (from RedHat, etc.) is generally more expensive than similar Windows offerings.

      Oh, and I use Linux both at home and at wr0k.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    4. Re:Sadly... by Dankling · · Score: 1

      lee-nukes - thats how linus says it. the largest arguement is whether or not to pay attention to his accent, which is the cause of the pronunciation.

      --
      Slash-for-Thought
    5. Re:Sadly... by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your characterization. I live in Tennessee where they pronounce Linus as "line-us", but Linux is always pronounced "lin-nucks" ("lin" rhymes with "chin"). I know it's the same in the Mid-west 'cuz that's where I'm from.

      Since the IBM commercials pronounce Linux the same way, I would expect that that's
      how they do it on the East Coast.

      The only people I've ever met who tried to pronounce Linux and Linus similarly were both from India. Draw whatever conclusions you feel comfortable with.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    6. Re:Sadly... by glens · · Score: 1

      Always pronounced ``"lin-nucks" ("lin" rhymes with "chin")''?

      Maybe always only very recently.

      I'd never heard it pronounced "lin-nucks" for the first 5 or 6 years I was using it. One evening after hearing Captain Picard say "privacy" with the first syllable sounding exactly like the first syllable in "privilege" I asked a Brit acquaintance how they pronounced the name "Linus". Result: "lin-nus". Coupling that with Linus himself in the two sound files I was perhaps a bit too vague in referencing earlier ( http://www.mx.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/SillySou nds/ ), and with experience with people who natively speak various European languages, the whole thing gets rigidly cemented into place.

      I may sound like a displaced Kentuckian here in Hoosierland when I say "line-ucks", but I'm consistent; as are arguably most other-language-speakers from around the globe, with saying Linux and Linus using the same vowel sounds.

      I'd say Linus as "lin-nus" just to be able to conform with the rest of you would-be Brits (when saying "Linux"), but I feel utterly stupid saying it that way. I'd bet you would/do too.

      In terms of vowel sounds, if you had a buddy named Linus, however you'd pronounce his name (wherever in the world you lived) would be the same way you should pronounce Linux.

      Here's a thought. Do an informal "man on the street" series of interviews right there in Tennessee. One where you show folks the written word "Linux" and ask them to pronounce it. And I'm not talking about your IT friends; just your run-of-the-mill folk on the street. See how many you'd have to "correct", step back, and re-evaluate your position for consistency.

    7. Re:Sadly... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The only people I've ever met who tried to pronounce Linux and Linus similarly were both from India. Draw whatever conclusions you feel comfortable with.

      Everyone I know here in Australia (including myself) whose introduction to Linux was via the written word rather than spoken, pronounces 'Linux' as you describe.

      I've always considered 'linnucks' to be an Americanised pronounciation, and it's never made sense to me, as it suggests the word is spelt 'Linnux' (ie: double 'n'). I can see how an accent can get to 'Leenucks' (ie: how Linus prnounces it) but I've never understood where 'linnucks' came from.

    8. Re:Sadly... by SirPavlova · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. If you see it written/typed for a few months before you ever hear it spoken, it'll be 'lie-nucks' forever. Obviously that's a rather broad generalisation, but I don't think I'll ever be able to change it in my mind...

      --
      Yar.
  12. This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 0, Troll

    It seems linux distos like Mandriva and Red Hat have totally and completely forgotten their roots. Isn't the goal of Linux to provide a QUALITY os to people for FREE and have it OPEN SOURCE so the Linux community can make their own modifications to the code? And yet to get a x86-64 version of Mandriva, its going to cost me $150, plus shipping. WTF is that. Winblows is cheaper than that. I mean yes, they need to make some profit to keep going and cover packaging costs, but holy shit....I mean seriously. They are turning into another money grubbing microshaft corporation. I've seen so many linux distos now that dont offer half their products as a free download anymore. but what do I know....

    --
    "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    1. Re:This is irritating by NETHED · · Score: 1

      "apparent cost" my friend. A PHB is going to look at Linux that is free and say "well, you get what you pay for" and think Linux is crap. If you say it costs about as much as "winders" and can do more then he can go to his higher up and say "well Bob, though I may have never heard of this 'line-ux' thing other than for big servers and nerdy guys with pocket protectors, it may seem like a good idea"

      So thats why it costs money

      --
      --sig fault--
    2. Re:This is irritating by phoxix · · Score: 4, Informative
      Erm

      Get to know Mandriva before flaming it ...

      First, Mandriva is TOTALLY open source. In fact, of the major commercial distributions Mandriva was the first to do so. Go read section 4-6 of Mandrakesoft's 8 Golden Rules

      Not only is it fully OSS, but they give you all the instructions and such to fork your own Mandriva based distro easily (look at the popular PCLinuxOS as an example) Google for "mandrivasoft wiki" and have ball forking your own.

      Secondly, if you've actually engaged with the Mandriva community, you'll notice that it is comprised of both employees and non-employees. The non-employees deal with real packages and stuff, and not bull-shit non-important packages.

      Sunny Dubey

    3. Re:This is irritating by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is how I would make a profit off of Linux, if I were of the mindset to do so.

      Linux of any sort is pretty much free (as in GPL'd), so it's hard if not impossible for me to sell you the uncompiled version. This is a given.

      But I can sell service instead. I could sell you the hard work I did to compile everything and make sure it works fine together. That saves a lot of people time, and in business time means money. To compile it for the 64bit systems, I could assert that it's twice as difficult, ergo twice as expensive.

      But then that pricing model is endangered the moment someone hand compiles their own version of the source code, puts it out in the wild, and has it polished by a million other contributors into a fork distribution that can be passed around via bittorrent for free.

      Countering that, I can imply my version is more stable than those "garage hack" distros, and the phb's and store managers might be dum^H^H^Hconvinced enough to believe me and purchase my boxed laminated product.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    4. Re:This is irritating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The extra cost is probably because they know their support staff is going to be working overtime fielding calls from people who wonder why they pop in an Earthlink/AOL CD into the drive and it doesn't fire up, installing software so they can connect to the internet? Why they double click on the "elf-bowling.exe" game their friend sends them in an e-mail, and nothing happens? Why they pop in the latest Myst game their friend lets them borrow and it doesn't work? Why they open an Excel spreadsheet, and while it displays nicely in OpenOffice Calc, the macro's the economics professor put in it don't appear to do anything? etc, etc, etc.

    5. Re:This is irritating by rm69990 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, no, there is no goal in Linux that says that all providers have to provide their products for free. Perhaps you should retake GPL 101. Actually, since you are cheap, just skip the course (doesn't really exist btw) and read the GPL.

      If this really was the goal of Linux, perhaps releasing it under a license that specifically allows you to charge money for the software wasn't such a good idea, no?

      Oh, and just to let you know, Red Hat and Mandriva do in-fact provide full source code for every open source component in their products, as they are required to by copyright law (they cannot distribute others code unless adhering to the attached license).

      It really disgusts me some people around here. Half of you that bitch about Red Hat are sitting there running kernels and other Open Source packages that contain code that Red Hat paid to have contributed to these projects so you could use them FOR FREE, yet you get in a huff when these companies try to make some money. Quit being so fucking selfish I say. Don't want to pay for something...great I say...Red Hat could care less. Let all of the companies and enterprises that do value Red Hat's value-add pay for their services. If I were you, I'd be happy Red Hat is doing this. It lets them continue to pay people to improve code you are using.

      Oh, and one last thing. You can download Mandriva x86_64 edition for free.

      PS I'm not saying you HAVE to pay for Linux....I am running a free distro myself, one that is based extremely heavily on Red Hat's products (CentOS). But to use their code and complain when they try to make money is really low.

    6. Re:This is irritating by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "apparent cost" my friend.

      I work for a large multinational company. I am currently studying source control systems for an eventual move away from cvs.

      Chances are it will come down to a choice between commercial and open source systems, and that the commercial system will win for exactly the reason you have stated.

      When you think about it this is a good thing. The open source project could sell a premium package (or something), and actually make some money for a change.

    7. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      never thought of it in that perspective, but yeah, both of you are right :D thanks for pointing that out, i get a bit disgruntled every time i see some linux distro id really like to try out, but theres a $150 price tag and no free downloadable edition.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    8. Re:This is irritating by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I mean yes, they need to make some profit to keep going and cover packaging costs, but holy shit....I mean seriously.

      What, you don't think there are development costs? It's not as though these distros aren't writing code of their own. Yes, I know, some distros do some great work with only volunteers, but development of these free distros are helped by the developers that are paid by others.

    9. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      ok, if its totally open source, why can't i download an x86-64 edition of it?

      Commercial Products: The Mandriva Linux Distributions that are not available for free download and which are sold in retail, e-commerce, and directly by Mandriva its partners and distributors. These include (but are not restricted to) Discovery, Powerpack, Powerpack+, Corporate Server, Move, Multi Network Firewall, Mandrivaclustering, Mandriva Linux for PPC,
      and Mandrivalinux for AMD64. and before you jump to any conclusions, im not bashing either you or mandriva, im just wondering here. is there still a way to get the x86-64 edition free? i used mandrake 10.0, the 64 bit edition of it for awhile, and i really liked it, but i didnt have time to figure out how to get all my games to work, and id really rather do all or nothing, not a dual boot. now i have time to do that, so im looking more into switching over. sorry for an uninformed post from a linux noob :D

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    10. Re:This is irritating by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Red Hat? You mean that company that provides you with glib? That company that maintains GCC? Or wait do you mean that money grabbing corporation that has devoted hordes of developers to everything from Apache and Gnome to integrating SELinux into the kernel. That price tag on cygwin is way too high for me. And Fedora or CentOS (which red hat engineers have helped work on), they are both above my budget. I hope Red Hat stops giving away their directory server or GFS too because noone would ever need those.

      The truth is, Red Hat open sources everything they do, if you want the source to their enterprise line, go and download it or go to CentOS which already did the work for you. Red Hat is at the core of OSS and without them, we'd all be much further back then where we are now. The only thing Red Hat charges for is enterprise support so please don't go around spreading FUD. They are the biggest single contributor to the kernel and pay for some of the best kernel hackers alive. We may all have this dream of everything OSS and being free... the truth is that at scales this large it'd all fall to hell without serious money behind it. This is why we need big companies with billions of dollars like Red Hat, IBM and Sun to aid in OSS. Out of those companies though, Red Hat is the most critical because even though they aren't the largest, they have the most motivation to make linux successful. If linux fails, Sun and IBM shift to other markets, no big deal, but Red Hat's whole business is linux so they have every reason to ensure its success.
      Regards,
      Steve

    11. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      dude, seriously, chill out.

      to the common user, the point of switching over to linux is

      A) (and most importantly) its FREE B) it actually works

      im not looking from a corporation mindset. im looking from a "me" mindset. which makes perfect sense considering its going to be "me" using the product.

      if you have a high paying job, then fine, money isn't an object for you. but for the rest of us "little" people out here, its nice to be able to cut corners and lower costs.

      i'm not saying they don't have a right to make money, yes, i think they should. i'm not complaining that they are making money, thats good.

      i was complaining, because as far as I can see, there isn't any way to obtain a free edition of the x86-64 bit edition.

      Commercial Products: The Mandriva Linux Distributions that are not available for free download and which are sold in retail, e-commerce, and directly by Mandriva its partners and distributors. These include (but are not restricted to) Discovery, Powerpack, Powerpack+, Corporate Server, Move, Multi Network Firewall, Mandrivaclustering, Mandriva Linux for PPC, and Mandrivalinux for AMD64. if there is a
      legal way to get it, i'd sure like to know about it.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    12. Re:This is irritating by Spectra72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because if you don't pay them..they don't have to give it to you. Nothing in any open source license _requires_ that anyone give you their work product for ZERO dollars. Do some do so for all or a subset of their products..yep. Are they required to do so? No.

    13. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      i guess i just have a bad understanding of how those companies work - id always thought that it was basically the open source community that worked on the kernel/distros.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    14. Re:This is irritating by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      I run SLAX livecd on an old Toshiba Laptop 4015CDS, and store the configuration on the hard drive, also partitioned to allow a nice swap area.
      Originally, the machine came with Win98. SLAX is free, but not free of problems, perhaps it is not suited to ordinary users. It does look good when it is booted up, I have Firefox and Opera, use kppp for the dial up. Rather complicated to get a "slaxconf.mo" with all that. No, the sound does not work on this box for SLAX. Unfortunately, one has to pay something for a good OS that mostly works. Too bad Windows is getting so bloated. I'm trying to cut my knoppix remaster down, while offering more of what I can use in daily work. (See screenshots) Can look at it like this: You get Windows for free, with the computer. It's everybody else that is getting on the charge-for-os bandwagon. I'm having to. My day job paycheck does not buy much anymore. I'm just trying to pay the bills doing something that I like to do.

    15. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      maybe i just don't understand the words open source very well, do they not mean exactly what they say or something? i thought the theory behind open source software was that it was open source.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    16. Re:This is irritating by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      RedHat doesn't maintain GCC

    17. Re:This is irritating by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Open Source != free of charge.

      Open Source, in terms of GPL, means that the source is available either by free of charge download of via CD/DVD at cost price. The seller can sell the binaries for as much as they like, but regardless of the price, the source will be available as mentioned previously.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    18. Re:This is irritating by Nutria · · Score: 1
      ok, if its totally open source, why can't i download an x86-64 edition of it?

      Commercial Products: The Mandriva Linux Distributions that are not available for free download and which are sold in retail, e-commerce, and directly by Mandriva its partners and distributors. These include (but are not restricted to) Discovery, Powerpack, Powerpack+, Corporate Server, Move, Multi Network Firewall, Mandrivaclustering, Mandriva Linux for PPC,
      and Mandrivalinux for AMD64. and before you jump to any conclusions, im not bashing either you or mandriva, im just wondering here. is there still a way to get the x86-64 edition free? i used mandrake 10.0, the 64 bit edition of it for awhile, and i really liked it, but i didnt have time to figure out how to get all my games to work, and id really rather do all or nothing, not a dual boot. now i have time to do that, so im looking more into switching over. sorry for an uninformed post from a linux noob :D


      You need to re-read the GPL.
      When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    19. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      you don't get windows for free at all. if you a buy a computer with windows preinstalled, its figured in with the price.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    20. Re:This is irritating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GPL says that if they distribute the binaries to you (ie.. you buy Mandriva), then they have to also make the source available to you.

    21. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      ok, sorry for being a complete idiot, but what it sounds like you are saying is this:

      so basically they are saying that if somebody buys a $150 package of their software, they have the complete freedom to distribute it to anyone they want at will? doesn't that completely kill their money-making opportunities? i'm not quite sure i'm understanding this - in fact, lol, i know im not getting this.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    22. Re:This is irritating by pyros · · Score: 1
      i get a bit disgruntled every time i see some linux distro id really like to try out, but theres a $150 price tag and no free downloadable edition.

      Assuming the distro is released under GPL, anybody who has paid for a particular release can then distribute it for free to everyone else.

    23. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      ok, got it now, thanks :D so how would i go about compiling the source for x86-64? where do i even GET the source - i was looking around on mandrivas site for a bit, but all i found were some pre-compiled binaries free for download.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    24. Re:This is irritating by pyros · · Score: 0, Troll
      so basically they are saying that if somebody buys a $150 package of their software, they have the complete freedom to distribute it to anyone they want at will?

      yes

      doesn't that completely kill their money-making opportunities?

      No, businesses (including both for coporate desktop rollout and OEM repackaging for sale preinstalled with a computer) will want to pay for copies so they get support.

    25. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      okay, i think i understand it now, but doesn't that kill their profit? also, is the Mandriva Limited Edition just the OS without all the commercial packages?

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    26. Re:This is irritating by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      This isn't "your" model: this is precisely what Red Hat (RIP) and SuSe have been doing for years for the desktop market.

    27. Re:This is irritating by pyros · · Score: 0, Troll

      Here is a link to buy a copy of it for $9. copies

    28. Re:This is irritating by Weird_Hock · · Score: 1

      I don't have a use for 64 bit yet, so I haven't tried this link; but have you tried here? http://www1.mandrivalinux.com/en/ftp.php3#iso2005

    29. Re:This is irritating by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      yeah, thats what I was looking at before. i ended up downloading the cd edition since i couldnt find a dvd edition anywhere

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    30. Re:This is irritating by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      if there is a legal way to get it, i'd sure like to know about it.
      Since apparently you have trouble finding one of the multitude of Mandriva ftp mirrors, I've provided this link for you.
    31. Re:This is irritating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not their code.

    32. Re:This is irritating by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I guess you could say that the "open source community" works on the various distros. By definition, working on open source projects makes you part of the "open source community". It'd be a problem, however, to allow this fact to lead you to believe that all the programmers working on these distributions are unpaid.

      Companies like Novell, Mandriva, and Redhat actually employ programmers who are paid to improve these distributions. And part of what I was saying was that, yes, the distros that do it all for free are still benefitting from the work put in by these paid programmers.

    33. Re:This is irritating by Nutria · · Score: 1

      so basically they are saying that if somebody buys a $150 package of their software, they have the complete freedom to distribute it to anyone they want at will? doesn't that completely kill their money-making opportunities?

      Exactly. That's why no OSS-related company will get Big.

      i'm not quite sure i'm understanding this - in fact, lol, i know im not getting this.

      Mandrake began as Desktop RedHat 6.? with better KDE support.

      The people at RH probably grumbled a tad, but they knew/know what the GPL means.

      If someone who has an unnatural love for Mandriva wants to make, for example, a server oriented branch, they are more than welcome.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    34. Re:This is irritating by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

      read this

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    35. Re:This is irritating by Hosiah · · Score: 0, Troll
      Incidentally, I downloaded Mandriva disks 1,2, &3 from LinusISO.org and burned 'em to disk and it's running on one of my computers like any other free distro.

      What irritates *me* about Mandriva is the complete lack of compiler/C library support. Don't even think of getting a source tarball and doing anything meaningful with it if you're running Mandriva. But the games rock, and it saved my butt today (by running the only Python version that'd be compatible with Blender's script tools), and it installed itself while I took a nap, so I love Mandriva anyway.

    36. Re:This is irritating by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative
      What irritates *me* about Mandriva is the complete lack of compiler/C library support. Don't even think of getting a source tarball and doing anything meaningful with it if you're running Mandriva.

      What are you talking about? Granted I'm running Mandrake 10 and not the absolute latest Mandriva, but I find it hard to believe that they spontaneously dropped support for something they've had since the earliest version I used, 7.something.

      Nope, just checked, they haven't. It looks like 2006 beta 1 will use gcc4.

    37. Re:This is irritating by CyanDisaster · · Score: 1

      ...What irritates *me* about Mandriva is the complete lack of compiler/C library support. Don't even think of getting a source tarball and doing anything meaningful with it if you're running Mandriva...

      I've had no problems compiling QEMU, though I may have explicitly told Mandriva to install the proper packages. It's like anything else though, when you think about it. How can the OS support something (C libraries, devices) if the appropriate software isn't installed?

      Hope be with ye,
      Cyan

    38. Re:This is irritating by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      Since going to www.mandrivalinux.com and clicking download is apparently too difficult, I'll provide a link :)

      http://www1.mandrivalinux.com/en/ftp.php3

      http://gulus.usherbrooke.ca/pub/distro/Mandrakelin ux/official/iso/10.2/x86_64/

      Simply use urpmi to download any packages missing since it is only one CD. You are actually using less bandwidth that way, since you are only downloading the packages you need.

    39. Re:This is irritating by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "The GPL says that if they distribute the binaries to you (ie.. you buy Mandriva), then they have to also make the source available to you."

      And in fact, if they distribute just binaries, they have to make the source available to any third parties.

    40. Re:This is irritating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is this not true, it's even less true that they have to do it for free.

      I have mod points, but there is no "-1, Wrong", so I reply instead.

    41. Re:This is irritating by legirons · · Score: 1

      "First, Mandriva is TOTALLY open source."

      So why do you have to agree to an End User License Agreement before being allowed to install it?

    42. Re:This is irritating by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the business model that redhat and SuSE (now novell) use. The bit you're wrong about is that fork distributions end up killing the original shrinkwrap.

      Yes, your time in putting together the good distro has value to people who don't want to spend that time - and so does support. As the original vendor, you're in a much better position to offer patches, upgrades and aftersales support. Take Redhat enterprise linux for example; there are a couple of rebranded versions like centOS, but people still buy RHEL because they like the idea of guaranteed support and patches. Hell, redhat even provide their own community-supported desktop OS, fedora.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    43. Re:This is irritating by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      What are you talking about?

      What I'm talking about is unzip/untar tarball, cd directory, read README & INSTALL, type ./configure, make, make install, get errors due to failed dependencies: library missing, header file not found, thisfunction.so MIA. I've gotten this reaction from Mandrivites before. Don't google-eye at me in shock and act like you've never heard of a failed compile before.

      "Download the proper packages" and I grow weary of repeating over and over: not EVERY computer in the world is online. Some of us have multiple machines in the household. Have you ever tried running a machine with an apt-get-type system that's not online? It's such a hassle that for all intents and purposes it's impossible. If you've never done this, take somebody's word for it. There's a reason I burn three disks...I try to get as much operating system on there as I can.

      Anyway, I'm not knocking Mandriva at all. It has other things that it does very well. It just saved my butt yesterday, by being the only system in the house with an old enough Python install that Blender's Python console would play nice with it, which I'm trying to use to cross-port meshes between Blender and POVray. Mandriva comes with an awesome game package, which the kids love.

      There is no Linux distro in the world, without both flaws and perfections.

    44. Re:This is irritating by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      What I'm talking about is unzip/untar tarball, cd directory, read README & INSTALL, type ./configure, make, make install, get errors due to failed dependencies: library missing, header file not found, thisfunction.so MIA.

      That happens with every single distro in the world. You're never going to include every library used by every program. Singling out this particularly obvious "point" as some sort of Mandrake flaw is ridiculous and dishonest.

      I've gotten this reaction from Mandrivites before. Don't google-eye at me in shock and act like you've never heard of a failed compile before.

      Well then don't disenguously refer to some encounter you had with missing libraries as "complete lack of compiler/C library support", that's simply an outright lie. Mandrake includes a several compilers and a wide variety of libraries "out of the box" on the CD/DVDs if you would simply choose to install them.

      Anyway, I'm not knocking Mandriva at all.

      Of course not, making inflammatory untrue statements isn't a "knock" at all. And of course you followed it up with a backhanded at best "compliment" about the Python install being "old enough". There is no Linux distro in the world, without both flaws and perfections.

      Indeed not, Captain Obvious, but picking a flaw that every distro has and naming it as a singular fault of one in particular just looks like you have an ax to grind.

  13. or... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 2, Funny

    as you don't have a system admin or professional technician at home.
    Or you do have one at home, but he gets grumpy if you ask him questions without rtfm.

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
  14. proper market segment by magarity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    you don't have a system admin or professional technician
     
    This, and the article says it's being sold direct to students. I went back to school for another degree last year and the specs for the required notebook said Windows XP Pro or 2000 ONLY. The networking people won't let you connect to the school LAN with anything else. I suspect other schools have similar policies. Linux preinstalled systems should be the high end models for hard core technical users, not the nearly bare bones Celeron student models, IMNSHO.

    1. Re:proper market segment by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 1

      I won't tell them if you won't tell them...

      --
      .sig
    2. Re:proper market segment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be a really crappy school, with very crappy networking people. Every computer in my school dual-boots Windows and Linux (and certainly everyone getting a technical degree will be taught the basics of it), and any OS is welcome on the wireless LAN.

    3. Re:proper market segment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows XP Pro or 2000 ONLY. The (school)networking people won't let you connect to the school LAN with anything else.

      Certainly not every school is like that. Linux is embraced at my school. All of the school computers run Linux, and you can connect to the LAN with whatever OS you want. Then again, I go to MIT, so I may not be having a representative experience.

    4. Re:proper market segment by cgenman · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with Celerons?

      In case you haven't noticed, the "hard core technical users" are usually the ones with a room full of scavenged parts, running e-mail servers from dual-proc P2 machines and file servers on sidewalk special sparc stations. I don't know a single "hard core technical user" that would bemoan a Celeron, though they're currenly more likely to own an AMD, or some tiny half-sized notebook from Japan running a transmeta.

      Unless they're requiring some form of system-side authentication application, which is a bad idea in general, you shouldn't have any problem with linux on your school's network. My college refused to provide support for Linux, basically because they didn't know anything about it (Linux was extremely new then), but they didn't ban it and there was no technical reason why it wouldn't work on the network... Except, of course, the difficulty in getting an ethernet card to run under Linux in the early days.

      Be a rebel. Stick it to the man and use Linux on your campus network, you wild child.

    5. Re:proper market segment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caltech has its share of bad IT people. Some can be annoying about choice of operating system
      But in the end there are competent
      people handing out accounts and in security are competent and use unix themselves. In fact, they give you a longer security lecture if you run windows.

    6. Re:proper market segment by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      Windows XP Pro or 2000 ONLY

      There it is again: Linux needs a cloak mode. It already has a Windows emulator. Now to go with it, a set of patches to drop down a binary "Windows disguise" to the outside world so it can tell the buttinsky server, "Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm Windows, now show me the page!"

      Highly called for in these days of OS discrimination. And it'd be just like smart-aleck Linux developers to pull that off!

    7. Re:proper market segment by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and the IT guys at my school say the same thing. But the truth is that both they and I use Linux and nobody has any problems at all with it- they just won't *support* it if you have trouble like they will support OSX and 2K/XP.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    8. Re:proper market segment by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Actually at my school they won't provide support for Linux, but they admit that they'd rather see Linux installed because of the severe problems with Win boxes getting owned. They've even made Symantec Corp. AV required for every win box that connects (paid for out of the connect fee.) Our routers shutdown when outgoing spam hits a certain level, and they can't just toggle it 'cause the infected boxes are still spamming. They have to clean the infected boxes first. Never had a problem with a linux box, ever.

  15. So we know how it all works then .... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Insightful
    One of the big pains with a laptop is getting everything to work, ie include power management& stuff. Dell would have made sure that this all works, so pretty soon $YourFavouriteDistro will support everything on these Dell machines.

    Whatever you think of Dell, this is good for Linux.

    1. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by MagicTom · · Score: 1

      Is it really, though? I agree, one of the bigger problems with Linux is that the advertisement just isn't there. All most people know is Windows, so when they buy a computer with Linux thinking that it will be "better" and "more stable" as will undoubtedly be advertised, what you'll end up having is someone who tells all his friends how horrible Linux is because it's just so hard to use -- because yet again, we've found another consumer who thinks everything new he buys should just work without reading the manual or learning anything. Only if this machine is only marketed toward corporate IT managers who might be interested in buying computers with Linux pre-installed will you avoid that, and then in that case, Linux still gets no advertisement to the home user.

    2. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, FreeBSD 6.0 runs perfectly fine on my Dell Inspirion (3800, not a very recent machine, true) including power management, suspend, wireless (with wpa etc), I'd expect a modern Linux to not have much trouble with that either.

    3. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by nsushkin · · Score: 1

      Right,

      It's very hard to get full ACPI support. I bet under Linux, the battery life is still shorter than under Windows.

    4. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, damn Microsoft for making software that just works without forcing the user to read the manual or learn anything.

      The fact is that half the population has a sub-100 IQ. Those people will never grasp Linux in its current form. The solution is certainly not telling them to go and learn something -- they went through years of schooling without managing that. The solution is making software that an idiot can use and making software that an idiot can't break. Microsoft has done the first of these. Linux fails at both.

    5. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      I currently run Gentoo on a Dell C610. I haven't played around with suspend yet, but everying else (including wireless networking, ASPI, CPU throttling, etc.) works fine. I've found the C610 to be a good machine for Linux.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    6. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Ummm... if Dell is producing the laptop, they have to provide Windows drivers for that stuff in their Windows laptops. I see no reason why Dell would sell their Linux laptops without sufficient drivers. As a sidenote, I own an Inspiron 6000D that I dual-boot XP/Gentoo. The CPU frequency and fan adjust automatically as expected, although I have yet to get sleep-mode working and hibernating working completely. Those last two are things that I am sure Dell has covered in the laptops mentioned in the article.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    7. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by MagicTom · · Score: 1

      So when you were born, how long did it take you to send an E-mail?

      Seriously. Everything has a learning curve. Even you needed to learn to use Windows. Using linux is no harder in it's current form. Automatic hardware detection which in many cases is better than windows and a software system much more superior, packages like Ubuntu and Mandriva are light years about Windows as far as ease of use. It just takes that learning period that everyone needs no matter what they learn to use.

    8. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by Kristoffer+Lunden · · Score: 1

      Maybe Dell have commonly supported parts already, too. I installed Hoary from a printed CD on a Dell laptop, think it was a D600 although I don't have it here. As far as I could tell everything just worked out of the box, including the wireless network at school, printers and other things.

      Admittedly, I didn't test everything on purpose, I just installed, got on the network and started working. What I can say is that since I didn't react to anything not working, most things probably did.

    9. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      When I first learned how to use a computer -- a C128 -- I read the User's Manual. From that I learned BASIC and the command LOAD "*" 8,1.

      A while later, I learned DOS. There wasn't much to that. The commands dir, copy, and typing the filename were all it took. From the manuals of a couple of games, I learned about freeing memory. After that I picked up Windows 95 as a teenager. Everything was simple and obvious and I never had to look up anything.

      In college I tried Linux for the first time. Even the simplest tasks took loads of man page reading and net surfing to learn about. It was hell. Even now, having worked for a while as a Unix Administrator, the hell is still there, always lurking over my shoulder.

      Saying "packages like Ubuntu and Mandriva are light years about Windows as far as ease of use" just communicates to me that you are an insane person who has somehow snuck past the orderlies who normally guard your rubber room, and is cladestinely posting to Slashdot, gibbering madly and drooling on the keyboard all the while.

    10. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      $ cp *.txt *.bak
      Whoever thought that putting wildcard expansion in the shell, rather than in a shared library should never, ever, be allowed near user interface design, ever again.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:So we know how it all works then .... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Have you tried getting details on the 110N from Dell's UK site? I'm getting a number of "product unavailable", "your order requires further processing", etc messages that make it look as if Real World (TM) Dell (TM) are slightly confused.
      I'll have another try after work.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  16. A most timely announcement by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    Last year, notebooks for the first time out-sold desktops. So this is a very timely announcement. The momentum of notebook sales could carry over to desktop Linux.

    1. Re:A most timely announcement by zenneth · · Score: 2

      That statement might be a bit of misinformation. You can say that notebooks out-sold desktops, yes... but how many people upgraded their notebooks last year? Now tell me how many people upgraded their desktops. The desktop isn't going anywhere, least of all is it giving ground to the cumbersome beasts we call "portable". People being more and more comfortable with upgrades is one of the bigger reasons why not as many new systems are sold outright.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
  17. Now if they just went AMD... by rf0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and did some nice AMD stuff with Linux preloaded on the server line I would be a happy bunny

    Rus

    1. Re:Now if they just went AMD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? He gets modded Insightful and my post at the VERY BEGINNING gets modded Off-topic.

  18. Re:And so it begins.... by zxnos · · Score: 1

    everyone was a n00b once, even you. more os choices out there means a better product.

    --
    always mosh clockwise
  19. You just don't understand opensource. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    It is about software being free, not cheap. You pay them for the work of getting all the different projects together into a working OS. You don't have to pay them, all the software is avialable for free.

    As long as the code remains free the ideal remains. They can charge whatever they want for the binary package, you always got the freedom of the LFS distro if you don't want to pay them for their hardwork.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  20. Sysadmin? by l2718 · · Score: 1
    Consumer Linux is more difficult "... as you don't have a system admin or professional technician at home"

    Is this to say that MS-Windows requires no system administration? I think the real difference is that Microsoft (and Dell) both offer customer support services for people who don't have WinXP administration skills, while Mandriva (and Dell) will not offer customer support for Linux.

    Indeed, at-home Linux will be an "enthusiast-only" market until some form of commercial customer support becomes available. This can be from the OEM or from the makers of the distribution (perhaps the costs included in the price of the machine), or from the local computer store, but it has to exist. [clearly there is a chicken-and-egg problem here]

    1. Re:Sysadmin? by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

      Heu? I got support with my suse93-distro. I needed it too, because of my weird hardware combination, and since i didn't understand anything of computers i needed the support badly. But they helped me through.

      Maybe it's just me, but i could never get used to windows. For me, Linux turned out a much easier system to adapt. The imago of Linux is "experienced user only". But actually, windows requires more experience.

      I think the message should be: Linux is very suitable for beginners, it is easy to learn. It's much more logical than windows. Get just one set of cd-rom's and you're ready to do all you want. Installing new software is always the same, it goes with a click. If you think a program is too difficult, you just use another one which does the same. If you can't get used to the whole desktop, just put the cd-rom back in the machine and install another one. Now THAT'S what you need when you don't like nerding around with your computer.

      --
      Trust me, I work for the government.
  21. My list of Linux desktop companies by cyber_rigger · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:My list of Linux desktop companies by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      I got a server from IbexPC.com a couple years back, and it's worked pretty well. It gets wonky if you eject a CD before shutting down the software reading it, but I rarely deal with CDs so it's not much of an issue for me. And the RPMs are a bit borked in Synaptic's eyes, but this is probably the fault of some early hack work on my part.

    2. Re:My list of Linux desktop companies by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Uh, hello!? Canonical Ltd??

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

  22. How is this news? by keosak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see, why should it be called "a milestone". In my country (Czech Republic) almost all PC vendors let user choose whick OS he/she wants. Besides Windows and Linux they also provide FreeDOS. I think there is a law forbidding selling computer set without operating system, so this is a way to go for people who want to install they own system and dont't want to pay for Windows. I don't know what is usual in USA but I would expect the same. Can someone explain it to me, please?

    1. Re:How is this news? by RGTAsheron · · Score: 0

      The large manufacturers over here generally just install windows. You don't even have the option to not have it installed.

    2. Re:How is this news? by ComputerSherpa · · Score: 1

      Yep. I've never heard of a laptop manufacturer (other than Apple, of course) sell a machine with anything other than Windows on it. Once it's in your hands you can install whatever you want, of course, but you've already paid for Windows. The only real choice you get is what version you want--XP Home or Professional.

      --
      Information wants to be anthropomorphized!
    3. Re:How is this news? by Zerathdune · · Score: 1

      In the US, it's pretty rare to find a desktop/Laptop preloaded with linux. I've actually never seen one. all of my linux systems I've installed myself. It's a milestone partly because of that, but also partly because Dell is the largest computer distributor in the US, and their laptops are nutroius for not playing nice with linux. My Inspirion 3200's cd drive, wireless card, and sound card still don't work. with HP that's even true with desktops, though not to the same extent.

      --
      No single raindrop believes that it is responsible for the storm.
    4. Re:How is this news? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      "I think there is a law forbidding selling computer set without operating system, so this is a way to go for people who want to install they own system and dont't want to pay for Windows."

      There is no law forbidding you from selling a computer without an operating system.

      As I understand it, this is a condition of selling Windows. Microsoft will not give you OEM pricing unless you promise not to sell a machine without an operating system.

    5. Re:How is this news? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, this is a condition of selling Windows. Microsoft will not give you OEM pricing unless you promise not to sell a machine without an operating system

      Are you sure that's what you meant? Surely it's the other way around...

      Quick browse at komplett shows this: http://komplett.co.uk/k/ki.asp?sku=303203&cks=SPK
      "You must order at least ONE piece of hardware per OS item. ie. ordering 4 operating systems would require you to order 4 pieces of hardware."

      All windows software I've bought has been OEM... since I have an almost insatiable need for hardware, the OEM conditions have never been a problem.

    6. Re:How is this news? by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      Can someone explain it to me, please?

      I'm sure others have, but I'll add: you see that funny picture of Bill Gates dressed up as a "Borg" that accompanies most Windows stories? That's from "Star Trek, the Next Generation". It's not a joke. In the US, you can damn near get arrested for admitting you use Linux in public. Kind of like being gay, nothing wrong with it, but fat white rich monotheist guys don't like it, so PERSECUTE!

    7. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, this is slashdot.

      You could've just said, In Czech Republic, the OS chooses you!

    8. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for if you read this discussion you know that's in the US.

  23. Re:Mandriver? by PyroX_Pro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes

  24. Must be Vista OEM pricing time. by PAPPP · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having seen dell in action "considering" AMD in hopes of squeezing more discounts out of Intel, and seeing as Microsoft has a new version of Windows coming along, my guess is that this is just posturing to squeeze better discounts out of Microsoft on Vista OEM pricing.
    It's a nice thought, but probably just a ploy.

    1. Re:Must be Vista OEM pricing time. by heffel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've said it before, It doesn't really matter if Dell is doing this to get a discount from Microsoft.

      If this is really the reason they are doing this, it is because it is an effective strategy to get those discounts. The fact that it is an effective strategy is reason enough to celebrate.

    2. Re:Must be Vista OEM pricing time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they just wanted discounts from Microsoft, they could just have offered a free (as in beer) linux distribution with their desktops. Offering linux for notebooks is quite a bit more difficult if everything including suspend to disk and ram is to work properly.

  25. News.... yeah.. I guess. by fshalor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But not that big. Sure, you could get Dell's with dedhat before.

    I may get one actually, since I need a good laptop with linux running on it. I've had a lot of luck buying a winblows machine and then rolling my linux install, but sometimes vendors play too shifty with components.

    Which is why I'd stillbe concerned about this one. The vendor I've had the most issues with *shifty* components lately is dell.

    And I like AMD/s.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    1. Re:News.... yeah.. I guess. by rm69990 · · Score: 0, Troll

      dedhat and winblows....how very mature indeed. How old are you exactly...12?

    2. Re:News.... yeah.. I guess. by fshalor · · Score: 1

      I'm a realist who always had to wipe redhat from the dells we got and install debian to get it to actually work.

      I'm also a realist who has had enough issues with windows and doesn't trust it as a stable, viable OS, without severe tweaking.

      I'm also a system manager with about 40 machines in my hands. All of which run pretty well. Behind a rather hardened firewall, which works to keep wierdness out.

      "dedhat" was actually an accidental typo. "winblows" wasn't. ;)

      Want link you to my mature and tasteful howto on getting debian running on some Dell Precision 650n's which came preinstalled with a completely disfunctional (read: dead) version of redhat enterprise?

      I do use CentOS for my personal dedicated server. And I miss my Dell Latitude cpia 300XT laptop. The new low end dells I've touched have been crap in comparison. (We've stopped buying them after sending 4/6 back every few months.)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  26. Why is my insurance so high? by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because I'm a Mandriva.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  27. Re:And so it begins.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU SUCK!

    And you have a n00b UID.

    What a loser.

  28. Comment and Question by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ``Addressing the needs of the consumer market is a different challenge, because it is all the more difficult, as you don't have a system admin or professional technician at home''

    With a good Linux distro, there's less of a need to. Less computer expertise is needed to keep the system free of malware, and if it works now, it will still work years down the road (barring hardware failures). Also, desktop distros can and do include lots of drivers for various pieces of hardware, so that you can just plug in your device and start using it. YMMV, but I've had more success with this on Linux than what I see in the Windows world.

    Now for the question: how good is Mandriva Linux these days? My experience with Mandrake wasn't particularly good, and I'd hate to see Linux get more bad rap because Dell chose to ship with an inferior distro. I assume polish won't be a problem, but what about package management? Does dependency resolution work? Do all packages work? Is the collection of available packages large enough? What about the software that comes pre-installed? Does it cover most users' needs, or would most people have to install extra software first thing when they get the machine? To what extent are Linux skills transferable to and from other distros (proprietary configuration tools, heavily customized desktops, etc)?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Comment and Question by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      My experience with Mandrake wasn't particularly good, and I'd hate to see Linux get more bad rap because Dell chose to ship with an inferior distro.

      I didn't like it much either, but the package management certainly worked well. It was just a lot of little things which put me off. The real reasons are hard to pin down. I think I just like the techiness of debian or fedora. I don;t think it is really a bad distro. Just different.

      But these factors may make it a more attractive distro for general users. So for Dell this could be a good choice.

    2. Re:Comment and Question by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 2, Informative

      typing this on Mandriva LE 2005... It's far superior to Red Hat Workstation or FC-anything IMHO. SuSE is supposed to be very good, but in my experience has more of the non-standardisms that you refer to.

      Mandrake's GUI configuration tools are decent enough, though I tend to use the config files myself. They don't commit the Linuxconf sin, they're open source, they work.

      The package management is where things get far superior. I've used urpmi for several years and it's always worked better for me than apt4rpm or red-carpet or yum or up2date. Too bad that so many other distros put Not Invented Here over using a mature open-source platform that someone else wrote...

      As far as package choice, it comes preconfigured to make some fairly solid choices, though they're not perfect for my needs. Still, I think it's a good solution (or at least, no worse than any other Linux distro) for the non-technical user. I have my doubts about giving Linux to non-technical home users at all, but that's another discussion...

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    3. Re:Comment and Question by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      No-one likes what they're not used to...I'm a Gentoo user, and the other day when my friend put Ubuntu on his computer, I found it to be a bitch to use....perhaps apt isn't for me? ;)

  29. Re:And so it begins.... by Jekler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fallacious logic. If new people are never allowed to use things which they are new to, then no one is ever allowed to use anything that they're not currently using. You could never have a new Linux user, which means Linux could do nothing but die out as the population of Linux users eventually succumbs to mortality.

    By your own logic, you should never go anywhere you don't currently go. Don't switch grocery stores, don't switch clubs... don't even switch TV channels because you'll just be a newbie to it, a realm in which you don't belong.

    Maybe you should start your own business, and from the day you open hang a sign on the door that reads: "If you're not an existing customer, go away."

  30. Been there, done that. by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    Mandriva says this represents a milestone to make Linux more available to consumers.

    Ummm, I seem to recall that Redhat used to be available pre-loaded on Dell laptops. Lets see how long it lasts this time.

  31. Dude, You're Getting Linux by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Normal people are always asking their geek friends and relatives which computer to buy. Geeks never want to tell them to get Linux, even if it will be better and easier, because even that lower "Total Cost of Ownership" will then partly be paid by the geek who recommended it. Unless they recommend Dell, HP or some other vendor with a helpline, which will field (at least much first-level) support requests. Of course, the normals will buy a Dell or HP anyway, with Windows, no matter what the geek recommends, and then ask the geek for Windows support. Which the geek will be even less interested in giving.

    Now that we can recommend Dell or HP with Linux, we'll do it much more often. When they get the Windows machine and ask us for support, we'll be able to say "send it back and get the right one this time". That kind of "word of mouth" is the best advertising Dell and HP could ask for. Way more valuable than a primetime season of "Dudes".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Dude, You're Getting Linux by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Now, I know you're kidding. The amount of time my friends waste with dumb Windows help requests would more than cover the time they'd spend with dumb Linux requests. Dell has offered RedHat before, on servers especially. And there are smaller computer shops all around the country that offer RedHat on custom machines. I wonder what got Dell to use Mandrive? And whether they will offer it on laptops, which has always been the hardest to integrate Linux onto?

    2. Re:Dude, You're Getting Linux by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't get your post. Your points all support my relief that Dell will now field people's dumb Linux requests, which will usually be preceeded by their asking geek friends, who can now tell them "ask Dell". But which redirects will be less frequent because it's Linux, not Windows. And small computer shops hardly have 24/7 helpdesks, even if Dell's do largely suck. But the situation has much improved. Don't you agree?

      Linux installation on notebooks has been hardest because each model is different from the other, while towers have much more standard hardware. So notebooks installs require more HW ID routines, more different drivers, even in systems essential to the install process, like HD/CD-ROM controllers, video, network. But Dell has all those drivers, all those specs. They don't install a generic kernel, then work the keyboard to specify features. They generate an install image for a specific model, tuned for its specs, then preinstall it on HDs at the factory before installing them into machines. In fact, I won't be surprised to hear about Dell selling "Linux cartridges", HD upgrades with Linux preinstalled that get swapped in for reboot. They control the platform, they can do that. It's one reason why preinstalled Linux from a major manufacturer/retailer is such a big jump for Linux adoption.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  32. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes Rly

  33. Just wondering.... by rm69990 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is this obsession of the Slashdot community towards calling everything a degrading name. Examples: Deadhat Winblows M$ LinSux etc. Can't you people get out of your mom's basement and grow up? Try getting a job in IT and then explaining to your CIO why you shouldn't use deadhat or winblows and see how long it takes for them to laugh in your face. Sorry, just a small gripe of mine.

    1. Re:Just wondering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And so it came to pass that rm69990 (885744) was forever know on slashdot as rimjob69.

    2. Re:Just wondering.... by Angelox · · Score: 0

      You mean Microshit's Winblows?

    3. Re:Just wondering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, this is slashsquat. I don't think they know how to type the word Windows and their skanky spellcheckers in openoffice or whatever crap they are running probably thinks windoze is correct.

      Pick your battles, these folks won't learn to spell correctly anyway...

    4. Re:Just wondering.... by Mishra100 · · Score: 1

      You are talking about nerds here... Nerds have a tendency to try to use that kind of wit. Just like they can't say "newbie" and instead have to say "newb"... I suppose it is just accepted throughout the internet now. Just like ebonics is sadly accepted (although you should have rocks thrown at you when using it). :)

    5. Re:Just wondering.... by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      But we want to fit in with the herd...

      You don't understand...I want to be stereotyped; I want to be classified!

    6. Re:Just wondering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I don't, but at times I am tempted. I do like the "Borg" picture though, it reminds me of who the enemy is.

      I have over 25 years in IT and an additional 10 years in electronics. When you are a consultant you really need to reccommend the best solution for the cusomer so you must have all the facts. In fact (surprise!) you may have to reccommend Microsoft solutions (personnaly anoying). I always highlight "standards" and "ownership" and CEO's better understand or risk their jobs.

      There was an old addage "You never got fired for buying IBM" now put Microsoft in place of IBM and you can see the past 15 years but that is now changing and IBM is back with a vengence and they are not offering Microsoft solutions.

      --
      There are no such things as closed standards only closed formats. All standards are by nature "open".

    7. Re:Just wondering.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      We do it because it conveys meaning. I actually have a serious dislike for M$, so they get that $ sign in there because it expresses my dislike. I am not neutral in my feelings, so why should I speak as if I were? In face-to-face talk I would convey the meaning using tone of voice, in text form these modifications are the replacement.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:Just wondering.... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Personall, I think that sort of name-calling is petty and immature, and only serves to make the entire community look stupid.

      Like it or not people, you are judged by what you say and how you say it. If people come here, to "the open source community website", and see people acting like immature teenagers, then that's the impression they'll get of the community as a whole. People don't want to be associated with that sort of attitude. In the corporate world, appearance is as important as actual results (more so sometimes), and given the choice people will go with an inferior, but more professionally-presented product every time.

      Bottom line Linux fanboys - if you want Linux to continue to gain acceptance in the corporate world, cut out the name calling. Similarly to the Microsoft fanboys, unless you want your platform of choice becoming a has-been, keep it professional.

    9. Re:Just wondering.... by freewaybear · · Score: 1

      I wanna be a clone! I wanna suburban home!

      --
      Registered Linux User #404114 [url=http://www.punkoiska.com][img]http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/4379/posbannercf5.g
    10. Re:Just wondering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, blinglish sounds better!

  34. Not targetted for the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are only intended for French students, apparently.

    I suppose Dell could call them "Freedom Laptops" in the U.S.. Considering that they were running Linux, it would seem appropriate. :)

  35. Yes... by SheeEttin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, but does it run Li--Oh, wait...

  36. Re:Mandriver? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    No, but if you say it backwards, you get Avirdnam, which sounds like "A weird name". Which is what Mandriva is. (I actually created an IRC channel called #a_weird_name because of that)

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  37. Not all schools, not all high end models. by icefaerie · · Score: 2, Informative

    MIT is heavy on the Linux usage, I hear. And here at Cornell, they've got no problems with non-Windows OSes like Linux or Mac. We even have a lab full of Linux computers.

    I've got two of my own Linux machines on the network right now. In fact, one of them IS running Linux on a Celeron, the other on a Sempron.

    I'm sure there are plenty of schools who are Linux- as well as Mac-friendly.

    1. Re:Not all schools, not all high end models. by EngMedic · · Score: 1

      many universities have their own distros, even. BU, for example, has BU Linux. (it's crap, but at least it's actively supported) dunno what shite school you go to that has such asinie network policies.

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  38. Light on details by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I RTFA, but still have questions...

    Many posters assume that Dell has done some optimization / tuning / development. But the article says bubkis about that. Did Dell do any work so that things are guaranteed to run smoothly? E.g., is the WiFi support 802.11g, or is it just some old out-of-date 802.11b chipset? Does the power management, in particular sleep / standby mode, consistently work even with X11?

    Seriously, if any of you know the answers (and aren't just presupposing one way or the other) let us know!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  39. What's the problem? by FishandChips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds excellent news. Yes it might be a ploy to give Dell more traction with Microsoft, but there again it might be sincere. It also goes to show that you don't have to be SuSE or Red Hat to score well, either. Mandriva has very firm markets in France and Brazil and in fact could make a very good living if it never went all that far outside them. This too shows that you don't have to take on the world to succeed in Linux, just do what you know as well as you can. By trying to span the world and appeal to everyone, SuSE and Red Hat might end up by appealing to no one.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  40. Free as in FREEDOM by Aomighty · · Score: 1

    The GPL is about free of proprietary components, it has nothing to do with cost... why can't you people understand this? You try making money off of software that costs $0 and then tell Red Hat they're evil.

    --
    Insert Clever Sig Here.
    1. Re:Free as in FREEDOM by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      yeah, but doesn't most of their income come from corporate liscences and people who buy the packaged versions of their distro?

      i mean they can still make tons of money with an "along-side" free distro, and im not saying they shouldn't - i cant imagine its easy upkeeping and distributing a "free" OS.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    2. Re:Free as in FREEDOM by Aomighty · · Score: 2, Informative

      But you can get Mandriva free, though. I used it for quite a while and it's still quite good that way. They do have an along-side free distro.

      --
      Insert Clever Sig Here.
    3. Re:Free as in FREEDOM by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

      yah, i decided to look around their site a bit more, and found the x86_64 edition. it wasn't on DVD, which i would prefer but thats ok too. the Limited Edition is just mandrivia commercial without all the commercial packages, right?

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    4. Re:Free as in FREEDOM by Aomighty · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's full Mandriva, the difference being 1. Very slightly less up-to-date packages I think, 2. You're not in the Mandriva club (gasp!), 3. You have to install Acrobat and flashplayer and such yourself, which is easy enough.

      --
      Insert Clever Sig Here.
    5. Re:Free as in FREEDOM by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The GPL is about free of proprietary components, it has nothing to do with cost

      Sort of. The GPL is about the freedom to do with the code as you please. Specifically that means that you can modify it and/or redistribute it to your heart's content, with certain restrictions:

      1) If you distribute the binaries you must make the source available
      2) You cannot place any restrictions on those you distribute to
      3) You cannot change the licence - the code and any derivatives must be GPLed

      The intention is to prevent you from denying those you distribute the stuff to having the freedoms that you enjoyed. The upshot is that the cost of GPLed software tends to be driven right down to the cost of reproduction, as even if I do sell it, I can't stop you from buying it from me and undercutting me.

      The GPL may not be specifically about cost, but I do not believe that the side effect of tending to drive down cost was unitended. That's just my opinion, of course.

  41. "Free" never was about money by ringe82 · · Score: 1

    Did you bother to read the GNU papers? Not Free as in "Free Beer" but Free as in "Freedom".

    There's nothing wrong about charging for access to de readymade software as long as you can do what you want - read: access source code without restriction.

  42. yeah, but where? by yagu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, I took the bait. Nasty hook marks in my mouth now.

    If they're serious about this, how come when doing a search for linux in their "search all dell" option on their home page, I get no results around this new offering? If they were really proud of this and really intended to sell it it'd be nice if they made a bit more noise about it. This feels like PR.

  43. Soon to change... by biendamon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using the OpenOffice.org 2.0 beta for a while, and it's gotten a lot better at opening MS Office files. If you install the MS fonts, it's hard to even see a difference in most files. I regularly use it on MS Office files people send me, and it hasn't failed yet. The beta is just about perfect. But there are some problems still, admittedly.

    Converting .odt documents to .rtf usually works, but there are some distinct formatting problems that have given me grief. I regularly generate files in manuscript format (in other words, double spaced, 1-inch margins, Courier-style monospace font, with headers in a "Author / Title / Page" format). If the document includes a single-spaced introduction at the top of the first page, then converting it to .rtf seems to drop all other text.

    That's a serious bug. Of course, converting to MS .doc format works fine.

    1. Re:Soon to change... by gordgekko · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've been using the OpenOffice.org 2.0 beta for a while, and it's gotten a lot better at opening MS Office files. If you install the MS fonts, it's hard to even see a difference in most files. I regularly use it on MS Office files people send me, and it hasn't failed yet. The beta is just about perfect. But there are some problems still, admittedly.

      That's a little like saying having sex with someone who has herpes is usually safe. It's true...it usually is...until it isn't. Don't get me wrong, I like OO but it does have some problems opening Office files, problems that will truly screw over some people who need those files opened properly. You and me may be able to deal with it but Joe, Jane and Aunt Millie won't dig it.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    2. Re:Soon to change... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but the problem with Office, is that it doesn't even open it's own files correctly. If you have Office 2000, you can't open Office XP files. With OpenOffice, I have filters to open up most office formats, and it works as well as opening between different versions of Office. When office 12 comes out, OpenOffice will not be able to read the new format, but neither will Office 2000. Which of those do you expect to have an update available to read office 12 files.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Soon to change... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Jane and Aunt Tillie typically don't open complex Word documents, and, believe me, they wouldn't ever notice that the document looks a tad different in OO than in Word. They just don't, even if it's totally obvious to an experienced user. So yeah I think the compatibility of OO with Word is easily good enough for a personal computing environment. Business, I'm not so sure, it's probably good enough if you have at least one back-up system with Word installed on it.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:Soon to change... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The problem with openoffice, is that when opening word files it seems to behave like word 2000, so it has some issues opening up files from 2003.. For instance, tables of contents get screwed and line numbering often gets messed up (as happens in word 2000 aswell)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:Soon to change... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      However, msoffice often has the same problems, in some cases they are worse than openoffice at opening their own documents... Especially if you have a mix of different versions..
      Also, if you ever tried to use ms publisher to import/export word files, it makes a much bigger mess of it than openoffice does, microsoft's own app, written by people who have full access to sourcecode and file format specs!
      If you use microsoft's proprietary format, you will have problems opening files whatever program you use, this problem will always occur with a format so poorly designed.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  44. Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't mean this to troll, but why does Linux have to dethrone desktop Windows to be considered successful as an operating system? Why can't it just live happily as a rock-solid server OS with a desktop component that some advanced users use?

    1. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't mean this to troll, but why does Linux have to dethrone desktop Windows to be considered successful as an operating system?

      I never said that. I said "Desktop Linux" needs such support. Getting Dell on the side of Desktop Linux is needed if it is ever to be as popular as "Server Linux" and "Embeded Linux." I don't really care about crushing MS, I just want my desktop OS to work with more pieces of hardware and I want my family to use Linux even though they won't buy from anyone but Dell.

      Why can't it just live happily as a rock-solid server OS with a desktop component that some advanced users use?

      Because:

      1. That is boring.

      2. I want more linux drivers for things like wireless devices, that won't come till the marketshare does.

      3. Why can't Linux be good at both. Why hold Linux back at all?

    2. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by kesuki · · Score: 1

      right now the 'goal' of desktop linux is to Keep it simple. just have a nice, easy secure desktop does what your average user needs. easy to connect to the internet, easy to read mail on, etc.. windows is trying to 'draw' users in with it's glitz, while also supporting nearly every piece of hardware on the planet (no matter how crappy the support for the hardware is)

      Linux desktop projects aren't meant to be 'windows killers' per say, but rather a nice sane easy to use desktop. something you can set grandma up with and not worry about anything. they're also meant to enable the extremely poor to afford reliable computers, hardware that's very basic & relatively slow, something where the 'free' price tag of linux makes perfect sense.

      So linux desktop isn't going in the 'direction' of a windows killer, but rather, as the os of the poor masses who want a $50 PC that just has basic web access and e-mail capabilities, some 'free' games are a bonus.

    3. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by Hosiah · · Score: 0, Troll
      I don't mean this to troll, but why does Linux have to dethrone desktop Windows to be considered successful as an operating system? Why can't it just live happily as a rock-solid server OS with a desktop component that some advanced users use?

      GOD, finally! Somebody else said it, too!

      Yeah, some of us geeks are happier being "advanced users" with our advanced system that we don't have to dumb down ^-99999.111 IQ points so that Joe Sixpack likes it. Joe Sixpack isn't gonna do anything but surf the web and play games anyway, I was never in a hurry to convert him to begin with.

    4. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Linux only needs to get big enough to have better driver support. I do not care if only one percent of users use Linux as I use it and that is all I care about. But driver support requires a little more than that. It's not about winning vs. Microsoft, it's about having a very good OS.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    5. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by sean23007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the way Microsoft is fighting the battle, they're trying to lock you out of being able to install Linux at all on new hardware. They're trying to prevent you from being able to watch your legally purchased media. If desktop Linux doesn't make a push into the mainstream, the advanced users might not even be able to use it any more. That's why it's vitally important.

      We don't need to crush Microsoft, we just need Linux to become enough of a player that companies are forced to support it.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    6. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by bedroll · · Score: 1
      We don't need to crush Microsoft, we just need Linux to become enough of a player that companies are forced to support it.

      Almost.. More than supporting Linux we just need to make people realize the value of open standards. If you support open standards then the choice of OS, office suite, IM, etc becomes a personal one. Right now it's, "I have to use Windows to use MS Office because otherwise I can't make PPT files." I know there's work-arounds, but your average user doesn't. The more people use Linux, Mac, and OO.o the more awareness that MS isn't the only player there is and normal people start to appreciate standards, even if just a little.

    7. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is all about simplifying training. You want to provide the majority of people with an operating system/desktop that they can start to learn in kindergarten and then continue add to that knowledge as they progress through school. After they have left school you want them to be readily able to deploy that knowledge in the work place. It would also be nice if they can use the knowledge at home as well.

      You do not want to have to keep paying for that opportunity for the rest of your digital life on an annual basis. Microsoft has proven time and time again that it can not be trusted with that responsibility (they actually really do lie, cheat and steal) profit and ego are their only motivations.

      Anything like this needs to be based upon some kind of community based open standards free of licence fee for the mutual benefit of all. Let alone burying it with coporate crap just to achieve a lock in.

      Penguinistas are actually going way out of their way to try and achieve this because they know and understand the benefit that this will bring to the greater community (and yes, we also knew the kind of marketing driven vilification we would end up receiving from a particular corporation M$=B$, you know what it stands for, not because of what we have done but but because what they have done).

      We actually do want users to be happy little campers, we really do care. Believe it or not folks Linux is all about people not computers.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by Deathanatos · · Score: 1

      Because, with a little knowledge on the users part, Linux can be a rock solid desktop OS.

      People are scared of learning a new way of working, and that intimidating thing called a command line. I have GNU bash on my Windows side (blasphemous, I know) because I love the ease and power of shell scripting. (Although it's a wee quirky in Windows) (And because I can redirect stderr to stdout. That feature is a godsend.)

      I've used Linux for all sorts of home projects - for instance, gphoto can interface with my camera, and I can automate phototaking with it. (With a little work, I could probably turn it into a webcam.)

      The nice thing about command line utilities is that they can easily be made to do what you want, as well as automated to do that.

      And why not give the user a choice? I think that's a logical thing to do from a corporate point of view. If there is a demand for Linux, then why not offer it? The customer is always right, and if they'll buy a computer that has some *nix on it, then might as well offer it. (Heck, it's free as well...)

    9. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by diogenes57 · · Score: 1

      Because we need to crush Microsoft. I mean, really, are you content to use a superior OS on your own desktop but wherever you go, whenever you need to work on someone else's computer you must use Windows? How about when you have to give a presentation and the virus infested OS does porn pop-ups over your slideshow? What if you want to do some secure online banking when you travel? Do you really want your ATM to use Windows? And when your mom, aunt, coworker, or neighbor says "Help me get my email from off that intarweb thingy" do you want to deal with their Windows ME viruses and spyware?
      I can't understand why someone who appreciates Linux would want to limit its success in any way. Unless its out of a gloating sense of superiority that says: "Haha, look at all the peons buying their Windows PCs and paying the Microsoft tax. I'm glad I'm such a 1337 h4X0r."

    10. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      1.Because, I'm interested in Diversity (not just Linux, but BSD, BeOs, etcetera) which will give me a choice and also hopefully lead to developers making their applicitions more platform agnostic by using Cross Platform tools.

      2. I'm interested in the long term viability of Linux/GNU and Free software. I believe MS is a threat to that and small business in general in many ways, not just in marketshare but in that their push for software patents/etcetera.

      3. I'm love to see a total reduction in malware/spyware. MS is the culprit again. First by providing homogenous environment with their popularity and second in making that environment unsafe by default.

      4. I believe MS is too big for its own good. If you read any Bill Gate's interview, 1 thing strikes me. Well, besides the overuse of the word 'innovation.' It's that they want to get into any and every fad business that happens to make money at the moment is considered "the new hotness." They pull in all these directions, for better or worse (usually worse and losing money). Yet their two core businesses still have mediocre or (worse than mediocre) products (inside, the glitz and glamor is grade A) and to subsidize all these directions, these two products are either involuntary (Windows) or overpriced (office). They do have some decent products (Visual Studio).

      6. In keeping for the last one, I want to stop paying the MS tax (paying for a Windows License on a new computer.)

      7. Device Drivers. Manufactures will be forced to release specs or drivers if MS has less than majority markey share. Until that day comes, to this end, when I buy something, I also purchase products that tend to support Linux.

      (I could purchase stuff not supporting Linux but which the community has their own driver out by now, but then that's sending the wrong message to the companies that took the time out and made a good effort.)

    11. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Because as long as windows is a dominant desktop os, microsoft will be able to make it difficult for those few running anything else in an attempt to force them over....
      Working alongside would be all well and good, if we had truly open standards in the industry.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      You're right. Open standards are more important than Linux itself. It doesn't matter if Linux succeeds, necessarily (it could very well be supplanted by a better open OS), but no alternative OS can succeed without open standards. And that's why we have to fight for Linux at the moment.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    13. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Yet their two core businesses still have mediocre or (worse than mediocre) products (inside, the glitz and glamor is grade A) and to subsidize all these directions, these two products are either involuntary (Windows) or overpriced (office).

      Were this really true, then neither product would be as popular as it is. Simple fact is the only other OS as polished and easy as Windows is OS X, and it comes saddled with a requirement for buying typically expensive and/or underpowered hardware.

      Office got where it is by being the best option, as hard as that may be for some to understand.

      In keeping for the last one, I want to stop paying the MS tax (paying for a Windows License on a new computer.)

      So don't buy PCs that come with Windows. Duh. Despite the rantings and ravings of people on Slashdot, it has /always/ been possible to purchase PCs without Windows.

      Device Drivers. Manufactures will be forced to release specs or drivers if MS has less than majority markey share.

      Bollocks. They'd just be producing closed, proprietry drivers for other OSes. You'd be in precisely the same situation, just with a different company to aim your displeasure at.

      Linux would be a lot more attractive to hardware manufacturers if they didn't have to worry about - and deal with - every minor kernel revision breaking their drivers. Every remotely mainstream OS conquered this problem over a decade ago, but Linux still requires either the entire driver, or some kludgy wrapper layer, to be recompiled with every kernel update.

      The driver situation is merely another sympton of the general developmental instability and inconsistency rife throughout the entire Linux platform, that everyone except Linux zealots understand is one of the major issues holding it back in the commercial world. Vendors like Red Hat and Suse make valiant efforts at attempting to improve this situation, but typically earn little more than contempt and abuse from the Linux community for doing so.

    14. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Because the way Microsoft is fighting the battle, they're trying to lock you out of being able to install Linux at all on new hardware.

      Evidence ?

      They're trying to prevent you from being able to watch your legally purchased media.

      That seems like a rather counter-productive business plan.

      Or is it possible you're referring to something else through the haze of paranoia ?

    15. Re:Maybe desktop Linux will just always be niche by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be completely ignoring the implications of Microsoft's push for Trusted Computing. Once it's all implemented, if the computer even allows you to install an "unsigned" operating system (such as Linux), it will not allow you to play DRMed media content.

      Reacting to news about Microsoft's push for these draconian "security" measures does not make one paranoid.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  45. First Consumer Product With Man... by vandoravp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Saw this in my live bookmarks with the "driva" of mandriva cut off. First thought was they were taking a new (and expensive!) approach to tech support. Needless to say I was sorely disappointed.

  46. What about US customers by beforewisdom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I will be impressed when gnu/linux comes preinstalled on computers in the US.

    1. Re:What about US customers by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
      I will be impressed when gnu/linux comes preinstalled on computers in the US.

      Because then you will know what PC company has some balls (since doing that would be the way to loose OEM Windows pricing)?

    2. Re:What about US customers by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      Because I would know that there is a significant market for desktop linux among ordinary users.

      Corporations have no balls. If any PC maker started selling gnu/linux preinstalled it would be because they are convinced there is a market for it.

    3. Re:What about US customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone posted a list already that you might find interesting:
      http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162550&c id=13586893 ...

    4. Re:What about US customers by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      I saw that list.

      I will be impressed when gnu/linux comes preinstalled from the MAJOR, WELL KNOWN PC companies in the U.S.

  47. huge progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a milestone in the history of Dell. Up until now if you wanted to buy a Dell computer (not a computer & MS Windows) you had to redial at least five times in order to get through to the right person and even then Dell still charged you the price for computer & Windows and you got a merchandise credit or had to wait for a so-called Windows refund check by snail mail.

    I am glad to see that Dell realizes the huge market of people who would buy Dell computers if they didn't get charged for software they don't want.

  48. Good idea in general - great idea on laptops by mattma · · Score: 1

    Linux has traditionally been difficult on laptops - especially the power management aspects. If a vendor such as Dell or HP makes an effort, they can most certainly overcome the difficulties in heat and power management, sleep and hiberate. 2.6 kernels all have that ability now, but hardware compatibility and lack of available drivers are always result in a sub-optimal laptop. Linux laptops make a lot of sense from a security standpoint. Every Windows laptop in at a starbucks is essentially vulnerable to worms, spyware and hackers. I use a web-based database called Lightspoke - http://www.lightspoke.com/ and while part of the benefits of a web-based database is accessibility anywhere, I find myself paranoid about security when I use it at a coffee shop.

    1. Re:Good idea in general - great idea on laptops by ashton_us · · Score: 1

      Fedora supports a lot of laptops pretty well now. But I do agree with you on the sleep and power management functionality.

  49. Step3 : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Profi... oh, shucks, nevermind!

  50. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what, so you could sit there for days at a time while people dropped into it by mistake before continuing their search for a woman on IRC?

  51. computers as the new hotrods by zogger · · Score: 2

    I would agree. Upgrading desktops is now mainstream, blue collar. I see it roughly analogous to earlier hotrodding by young dudes. You go in whitebox shops, mobos and drives, etc on the shelves. Empty fancy cases for sale, etc. It has become quite commonplace for people to be doing this in joe and josephine bubba land, and that's because it has gotten loads easier to do. Blue collar guys have no problems with tools in their hands, none whatsoever. There's little reason to drop several hundred on a new machine when one hundred fifty worth of mobo and chip and some new RAM does the trick more than adequately.

  52. Acer or Lenovo by aleator · · Score: 1

    dell makes nice TFT screens but horribly low quality notebooks what i want to see is the Acer Ferrari 4005 with preinstalled linux (or at least without windows with it) - THIS would be really cool!

  53. I say "lin-ucks", you say "line-ucks" by controlguy · · Score: 1

    let's call the whole thing off

  54. Network Admin Give up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ping of deaths on a my Windows 2000 machine configure by the network admin leaving as a dead machine. Network Admin ask where was the source of the ping of deaths coming from. O my anti windows system on my home network. Each switch has a warning notice don't connect anything version of Windows under Windows XP Pro with SP2 with firewall enabled to this network it will toast you machine.

    Next comment Ok what is the ping of death machine a Windows XP Pro with SP2.

    Yes you may run linux.

    I got sick of people pluging in laptops and the like into my Adsl most people now ask in case I have added something else.

    Windows XP Pro and 2000 ONLY networks are Active Directory networks.(Microsoft bad information of course) Linux Samba can join the network. The problem is that the Active Directory cannot browser or over ride the registry of the Linux machine(what registry). No admin snooping. Warning RDP can be actived threw Active Directory I feel much happier on a Linux box in a Active Directory domain.

    Developers working on top secert projects really should not interface with the network with windows as there OS to much risk if snooping from a bad admin.

  55. Are they hidden by LIQID · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone have a link to a page that actually displays this product. I don't know but ususally they announce things like this then hide them like its a treasure hunt. It took me a while to find the servers with linux pre-installed.

  56. 8O by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    The world came to an end! Why didn't somebody wake me? And send Satan a snow-shovel!

  57. MOD PARENT UP- DELL LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks man

  58. I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0

    and I abandoned it because it was plain and simple crap. Two years I used it and it was every bit as god awful as winders. I finally abandoned it for Suse and I've had no regrets. Just for grins, I loaded up Mandrake 10.1 on a spare machine to see if having a few more years experience would help make it run any better. Nope. Still crap. Lax security, MOST stuff doesn't work without heavy tweaking.
    CUPS is screwed up, and forget getting a winmodem working.. Macromedia flash doesn't work and is hell to get working, Java doesn't work worth a damn, most mozilla plugins don't work.

    It's a terrible distro. I would never recommend it to anyone. You want a distro that works straight out of the box? Suse.

    1. Re:I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm not exactly going to cheerlead for Mandriva (wake me when you stomp on Slackware's turf!), but it *did* practically install itself on my desktop PC while I took a nap, and recognized every stick of hardware without my having to tweak a *single* *line* of text file *anywhere* (Mandriva 10.1, we're talking). Given, this wasn't a particularly challenging box.

      I think much of the problem with Mandriva stems from complete lack of programming support; don't even think of asking Mandriva to do something productive with a source tarball! C libraries, what are those? Programming languages? We grow our binaries on trees!

      I've said this about distros like Mandriva and Ubuntu since forever: I refer to them collectively not as Linux, but as "I-Can't-Believe-It's-Not-Windows!(TM)" So here we are, we broke our necks to be more like Windows than Windows is in order to draw market share from Windows, and now what? We have a couple of sub-standard distros on our hands, Windows users can look at the shoddiest of our work and turn their nose up at it and go back to Windows, and we give it away for free, so we would have gained little even if we'd won.

      Experience has taught me that this will decrease the mob frenzy not a tad.

    2. Re:I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2

      By George, you've called it spot on.

      I've always been alarmed and disturbed at the mad rush to make Linux into a Windows look-a-like system.

      I'm sorry but I didn't leave Windows to switch over to Windows. I left Windows because I despise it deeply and want nothing at all to do with it.

      I could give a damn about drawing the Windows people over. I don't want the Windows problems that are sure to follow when Linux becomes so much like Windows that you can't tell one from the other.
      And when all the deviant, malicious little script kiddies decide to jump on the band wagon, oh boy.

      I really, really enjoy the isolation and separation from the M$ world and the M$ problems. Why people are so gung-ho to do so is beyond me.

      Run Windows or run Linux. But FFS, leave Linux alone to be Linux.

    3. Re:I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think much of the problem with Mandriva stems from complete lack of programming support; don't even think of asking Mandriva to do something productive with a source tarball! C libraries, what are those? Programming languages? We grow our binaries on trees!

      I'm sorry, but that's just plain misinformation. Did you bother to install the development tools? I did, and I haven't had a problem compiling things like Sylpheed, Quake III, and Mame.

    4. Re:I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think much of the problem with Mandriva stems from complete lack of programming support; don't even think of asking Mandriva to do something productive with a source tarball! C libraries, what are those? Programming languages? We grow our binaries on trees!


      Strange that you, a Slackware user who should be used to delving around and working out such stuff, couldn't compile a tarball on Mandrake 10.1, because I can do so without much effort. I don't know why people keep on spreading this kind of FUD about Mandrake, unless it's because they didn't really take the time to do some simple research.

    5. Re:I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      The Mandriva machine is not online. apt-get-type systems are set up to be online. Without being online, apt-get-type package install systems are a huge pain.

      My Slackware box (my personal workstation) is not online either, but it comes out of the box with support for *everything*, from X-library C++ and SDL libraries to Tcl/tk Wish, Clisp, full Python and Perl, etc. Slackware is aimed more at the hacker/developer. Mandriva is aimed more at the casual user, I think is the way to put it.

      All I said was it's an "irritation", not a full-blown flaw. There's a difference between that and condemning an OS as worthless.

    6. Re:I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by chawly · · Score: 1

      Yep ! I'm with you. Spot on. Linux is Linux and Windows is Windows. Run what you want and be happy - but leave the other guy in peace.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
    7. Re:I cut my Linux teeth on Mandrake by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu has worked out of the box for me, but getting WINE to work is being a major pain in the ass...

  59. Poor Printer Support by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

    Mandrake 10 on my computers refused to work with their HP printer-scanner. There was a driver, it just didn't work.

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    1. Re:Poor Printer Support by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Funny... Mandrake/Mandriva *ANY VERSION* in the last several years has worked *PERFECTLY* with *EVERY* HP printer/scanner I have tried. Running 10.2 right now, and, as usual, it autodetected the HP2210 and setup scanning, printing, and even photo card interface all automagically (just like it did in 10.1, 10.0, 9.2, 9.1, 9.0....)

      Seems like experience will vary, yes?

    2. Re:Poor Printer Support by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I too have used Mandrake *a lot* and while it has a lot of irritating quirks, all of its autodetection stuff usually works flawlessly. IMO the grandparent has forgotten to install a few RPMs.

      I haven't used SuSE or any of the new "friendly" distros (I stick with Gentoo/Mandrake/Debian) but I expect that since all of that stuff is GPLed they all use similar (or the same) techniques.

      But Mandrake certainly led the way in that regard. Which is why I've been using it regularly for office desktops wherever I've had to setup that category of system (that and urpmi which has always been quite convenient). Their desktop interfaces were also always pre-setup in a satisfactorly way.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  60. Amazing! by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    Dell ships laptops with Linux
    Dell stops shipping laptops with Linux
    Dell starts shipping with Linux again... and it's a "milestone"

    1. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Profit!

  61. Just what Linux needs on the PC side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I'll know the darn hardware freaking works out of the box. I've had too many bad hardware experiences with Linux to even bother trying it on my new PC. I thought of trying Linux a couple different times, but hardware that doesn't work in Linux kept me from giving it a serious try. If I'd had more experience before running into hardware problems, maybe I would've fixed it, but running into it when I'm first learning a new OS is frustrating (I was still typing DOS commands in the DOS box, and know you guys call it something else).

  62. *cough* by msimm · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a long time Mandrake user *and* a fulltime sys admin I'd say for users-space Mandrake's offering is one of the best. But I'd also suggest that thats no-where near where it needs to be if they are planning Windows/Mac area market penetration.

    Its hardware detection has been some of the best for some time now, driver support, clean interface, all good things. Their configuration utilities knock Yast and FC.X off the butts, but they are a LONG way from providing either complete or reliable management solutions. Their package management solution is RPM based, but it excels well beyond YUM and its probably fair to say its on par with Debian's apt-get system, but you also have rpmdrake which wraps a comfy clear, easy-to-use GUI around it.

    As far as commercial distros its the bee's-knees (although I haven't installed that free Linspire disk yet) and has the added bonus of being one of the few commercial companies going after the user desktop that still shows a commitment to the GPL.

    That said, development hasn't shown any remarkable leaps in usability. Its a Linux distro and for the most part its about as good as any other favorite might be. It requires a hobbiest or enthusiast to use still, unless they've got something big they've been keeping under wraps, but 2005 (aka Mandriva) isn't remarkably better or worse then previous releases and they, along with most every other distro seem to be sticking pretty closely to the status quo, which isn't as innovative as I expect would be required to penetrate that particular consumer space, but I'm a sys admin, what do I know. :)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  63. Why not call it mangina & get it over with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've got to come out of the closet at some point.

  64. Won't let you or won't help you? by msimm · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing you're using Active Directory shares, which you *could* support using under Linux, but I haven't seen any distro make it reasonable for a regular person (Novell/Suse ENT make some strides in that direction but more from the server stand-point...still interesting stuff).

    My guess is you're Linux laptop would simple be a support night-mare for them, so why would they "allow" it. :)

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Won't let you or won't help you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're Linux laptop

      So are you telling the parent poster that they are a linux laptop? I've heard of square-eyes but that is something else!!

  65. OT - Slashdot\Digg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else find it kinda weird that DIGG linked to this /. post instead of the Mandriva article? I'm going to try posting matching articles on both sites referencing each other.

  66. I know_just_ what you mean..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we should grep each others tarballs

  67. only half true. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Dell would have made sure that this all works, so pretty soon $YourFavouriteDistro will support everything on these Dell machines.

    This will only be true if they free the drivers via gpl, etc. They can, if they are silly, release binary junk and then you are half way back to the windoze world where you need floppies and CDs that only work on one computer with a one particular distribution. Without source code, other distributions can't roll it into their kernels.

    In the end, it does not matter. Six months or a year down the road the free community will have drivers that are better than what a single company can provide now.

    It would be great if Dell decided that free software was the future and started requiring free drivers from their sub contractors. This would save everyone a lot of time and take a lot of the guesswork out of buying a new computer. As things stand, the safest way to buy a new computer is to try out Knoppix or Mepis on it. Binary drivers can help fill in the time between when you buy the computer and when you can really install your choice of distribution. That's second best and I don't recommend it.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:only half true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical sycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or Mepis or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. This is an article about email disclaimers. The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx, because "is teh free".

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      Here's that drive-by advocacy and FUD in motion: twitter goes on about some topic and then drops the usual "oh and M$ is teh evil" because "WMP phones home" or some such. Called on his FUD, he then claims that WMP stores every song and movie you've ever played in a file, somewhere. Pressed further, he just sort of slithers out of sight, his FUD-spreading complete. This is not about some Microsoft technology that nobody likes anyway; it's about lying for the sake of lying. Way too many of his posts are exactly like this one.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one. Or this one.

      Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

      M

    2. Re:only half true. by twatter · · Score: 0

      willy!

    3. Re:only half true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Six months or a year down the road the free community will have drivers that are better than what a single company can provide now

      You said the same thing two years ago. With the same unflinching bullshit swagger, I might add.

    4. Re:only half true. by twitter · · Score: 1
      --Six months or a year down the road the free
      -- community will have drivers that are
      -- better than what a single company can
      -- provide now

      - You said the same thing two years ago. With
      - the same unflinching bullshit swagger, I
      -might add.

      It was true then and it's true now. Amazing how that works, isn't it?

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    5. Re:only half true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amazing how that works, isn't it?

      Ahhh... no, not really.

  68. Laptops + Live CDs = great alternative. by dougllio · · Score: 0

    I've successfully run Knoppix 3.9 Live CDs on my corporate issued Thinkpad T40 and loved it. I was able to do everything I needed to do except write to the ntfs partition. I can play streaming audio and mp3s with XMMS, VNC to other computers, connect to my SMB shares, and open Word Docs. I ran it on my desktop and was even able to watch TV. I've also had varying degrees of success with SuSe, Feather Linux, FreeBSD, and Ubuntu Live CDs. The software is there and it works with laptops.

    --
    Take it easy. But take it. And if you can get it easy - take it twice.
  69. Here's the Dell page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can see the tech specs for the Latitude 110L.
    It has two choices of OS:

    Genuine Windows® XP Professional
    Genuine Windows® XP Home Edition

  70. What the...? by NMZNMZNMZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article reports on a godsend to the Slashd^H^H^H^H^H^HLinux community and only ~230 comments? Even the static-man article that had more holes than swiss cheese got more than that.

    Are all of the Linux fanatics off buying these laptops, or what?

  71. in laptops, Apple still rules by aleax · · Score: 1

    Whenever asked to recommend a laptop, I recommend an Apple iBook (or Powerbook if they want something costly and big-screen) -- whether they accept the suggestion or not, my future support load is MUCH lower than if I recommended either Windows or Linux. And I can back it up... e.g. by pointing out that the geeks at Google mostly use Apple _laptops_, even though their desktops are mostly Linux and their servers invariably so (actually, I hear Rob Pike prefers a Mac even as his desktop... but, for desktops, I still prefer to recommend Linux, personally).

    Alex

    --
    Alex
    1. Re:in laptops, Apple still rules by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see a team of people porting Apple innovations to Ubuntu, the distro I run on my Dell i8K notebook. I used to work for Apple, and that little old machine is the kind of integrated dream they had when Powerbooks were just a gleam in people's eyes. Dell/Linux and Apple/Intel offer lots of cross-pollination opportunities.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  72. Doh! by jbellows_20 · · Score: 1

    My coworker and I debate between the different distros. He loves and swears by Mandriva and I prefer a couple others (Fedora, Ubuntu, SuSE). Now I'm gonna have to go to work Monday and hear how Mandriva must be better since Dell is using it!

    1. Re:Doh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell the guys at work that HP is using Ubuntu.

  73. Mandriva? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that anything like a mandingo?

  74. Excellent! by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Right, I'll have an Athlon64 3500+ Mandriva box, thanks. ...

    uh, heh heh sorry I thought I'd heard you say you didn't do AMD. ...

    (walks to door, crosses road)

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  75. Dual Boot by totierne · · Score: 1

    If I had one pc I would require a dual boot, XP and linux, so what I would be happy with from a vendor is linux/ubuntu compatible hardware, or even install, AND a Windows install on a different partition.

    My father is getting a laptop for Christmas, so having a spare partition and linux friendly hardware is high on my wish list for his machine, just incase I inherit it or he wants to dabble in linux (and/or) the viruses get too much for him.

    Any recomendations of UK linux compatible laptop vendors? (I live in the south of Ireland and a minor dongle is required for the telephone between UK plug and south of Ireland plug).

    1. Re:Dual Boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP are doing laptops with some kind of OEM CD of Ubuntu. I bought one before finding out about this, and I've found the build quality pretty good, and hardware support excellent out-of-the-box.



      Then again, I've been using linux for 5 years, and only on laptops...I don't see what the fuss is, it's not that difficult people!



      My word was "illicit"

  76. Windows for grownups by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    "How about when you have to give a presentation and the virus infested OS does porn pop-ups over your slideshow? "

    The organisation that employs me uses Windows for almost all of its desktop machines. They are all connected to the internet. I would say on an average day I see or use at least 5 different PCs. Never, in 7 years, have I seen a porn pop-up. Never.

    1. Re:Windows for grownups by diogenes57 · · Score: 1

      This is a university an a teacher was giving a class lecture when it happened to him. I have seen countless Windows machines produce pop-ups without even opening IE first. And when you do open IE you get them from Google, Amazon, or whatever site you visit.

  77. Development by antikristian · · Score: 1

    Developers do not use servers to program on, linux might mainly be developed for servers, but not on servers. Also, new users do not try Linux on servers the first time around.

    And why would you not want to replace windows and os-x with Linux? I Like it on my desktop. Linux and more users equals more developers equals better OS for me.

    --
    A computer is a tool, but I am not. I use Linux
  78. Re:Been there, done that. - NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your recollection is wrong. Dell never sold a laptop with Linux. Microsoft, likely through an anticompetitive marketing contract, has prevented them from advertising Linux to consumers.

    Note that in Europe, this behavior is not tolerated and is easier to prevent through court enforcement.

    This represents the beginning of a sea change.

  79. Yep just a fucking Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You can't fucking rescind a contract and then sue upon it you fucking dipshit. It just doesn't work like that."

    I actually know who you are crap for brains. Just as you know who is posting this. What saddens me is that medical science has kept vermin like you from dying young. Considering where you live and your lifestyle choices. I won't follow you around posting little bits of vile like you choose to, your real slashdot ID won't be bothered by snide little comemnts by a petty prick. Because the only one of us that is is you.

  80. Joe User won't remember to "install a few RPMs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    IMO the grandparent has forgotten to install a few RPMs.

    If the user ever has to remember or deal with RPMs directly, there will be pain and suffering! The whole RPM arcana has to be covered by a nice front end that offers tools, applications and servers. Not RPM packages.

    RPMs and .debs are empowering to the savvy user who is already empowered. But they are not direct answers to the naive user's needs and desires. Hence, you need some abstraction layer on top of them, like "Install new software".

    By default "Install new software" should just tell how much data must be downloaded and how much diskspace will be used when a program/tool/service is selected. As far as I know, some of the distros come close to this.

    I repeat, Joe User won't remember to "install a few RPMs"! Those files have long, arcane names, and scary things called "dependancies". That stuff belong in command-line land, where the geeks and power users are. Tuck it away behind the "Advanced" button in the GUI, lest Joe User be confused.

    1. Re:Joe User won't remember to "install a few RPMs" by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      I repeat, Joe User won't remember to "install a few RPMs"! Those files have long, arcane names, and scary things called "dependancies". That stuff belong in command-line land, where the geeks and power users are. Tuck it away behind the "Advanced" button in the GUI, lest Joe User be confused.


      I fully agree, which is why Joe user should get his machine preinstalled.

      When that same Joe User reinstalls Windows, the result is often quite messy as well (with a number of risky services enabled by default, useful tools forgotten, etc.)
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  81. Editors: put in a filter against this bot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Every time twitter posts a longish post, this AC posts the same long tirade, like a bot. Maybe he is a bot?

    It's getting tiresome.

  82. Re:Been there, done that. - NOT by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    Actually I'm correct. I remembered this way back then and I Googled it and found this article from Geek.com:

    http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2000nov/gee20001 201003115.htm

    Here's a snippett from the 2000 article:

    Dell has been offering Red Hat Linux preinstalled on some of its computers for a while, including the PowerEdge and PowerApp servers, Precision, OptiPlex, and Dimension desktops, and Latitude and Inspiron notebooks.

  83. Ferrari and Solaris X86 and Linux by seawall · · Score: 1
    At USENIX '05 a Sun engineer was asked about Sun's then newfound (again) support for Solaris on x86 (especially AMD 64-bit) and how do we know the enthusiasm is real?


    One part of his multipart answer was pulling out his Ferrari laptop running Solaris 10 and saying 80% (? - this is from memory) of the Solaris kernel engineers have Ferrari-model 64-bit laptops, running Solaris 10 of course.


    The idea being: if it's your workday laptop, you support it.


    I know the connection with Linux here is somewhat tenuous but having another good Unix on these laptops, especially an opensourced Unix, bodes well for future Linux laptop support.