Obscenity limitations are currently limited to sexual content in nature. Violence is perfectly acceptable. As for the ratings and being "basically illegal", that system is voluntarily enforced (like the ESRB ratings), excepting pornographic material as noted prior.
To reduce freedom and general quality of life among the targetted peoples. Sadly, nobody seems to remember that reducing these willingly is also letting them "win."
We haven't lost the war on terror. We're actively endorsing it, by being deliberately overprotective. No beverages on flights? Trans-atlantic (or even cross-country) flights are damned long.
Unfortunately, this whole mess will simple bring back the generic "wartime" retention for incumbents, and that's honestly more terrifying than the police/interpol/whatever doing their job.
People don't pirate games for because the games suck. They pirate them because they're good.
A game worth buying is a game worth not pirating, so to speak. For those games with online services, such as any FPS, RTS, MMO, eieio, buying the game is often the "only real option" due to key-checks and whatnot, and frankly, the average consumer isn't intelligent (or tenacious) enough to attempt to crack the various portions repeatedly until something works. Offline games of course are a different animal, but that doesn't change the idea (that the average consumer is a moron), but rather, points out that the average joe buys good games and makes do without during times of terrible releases. It isn't safe to assume that if a person does not buy a game, they will pirate it.
And let's not get into the whole "Disc-protection ate my babies" preference to cracking/pirating. You know, when companies install or incorporate difficult-to-run anti-pirate protection measures that FUBAR the program enough that many people can't play without bypassing said counter-measure, even if they legally bought the damned thing.
Unless they plan on, you know, providing a service, additional content, and other such niceties that the MMO genre provides, they need to keep their goddamned hands out of my wallet. Games already cost too goddamned much, and there just honestly has not been a lot of reason to buy many new games (as they've mostly sucked ass lately).
Why are the newest games in the series so drastically different from the original? The answer is because gamers demand more from their hobby now, and there's just not a lot of meat on those old bones.
Those "old bones" have a tendency to still have similarly excellent gameplay as the newer generation (and are usually far more challenging to boot!). When will we realize that gameplay isn't all bells and whistles?
The original Playstation, for one. It launched in 1994 and still has sales pushing past 2005. However, I suspect you meant to ask how many consoles have games being very actively developed for them on a commercial basis.
I have one perched atop my entertainment center at home. I have to see the dreaded thing every day as a reminder to not repeat history. Please don't tempt others!
Have "singers" mumble out incoherant words during "performances" then charge fans for the lyrics, so that they can see if said lyrics are "deep." Either that, or they can sue the fuck out of people.
I suppose either is a "good" current business model for the RIAA. I wonder when they're simply going to try to make music people want to hear again?
How about because these types of games are just money-grabs. They're typically absolutely awful games other than the amazingly high-profile superstar gracing the cover.
Slashdot Mirror
You're making the assumption that this information has been verified by a non-(very)biased source.
do Firefox and the open source community welcome this kind of analysis?
Obviously, yes. Otherwise, open source would be closed-source.
Not so oddly, the article on Reuters did a pretty good job explaining the difficulties of the Dementia.
NO.
Sincerely,
That guy that fucking hates the startup noise.
They're hurting really bad. Which is why their subscriber numbers are still rising (they hit 7 million yet?).
"Won't someone think of the multi-millionaires?"
"I'm...so...damned...happy...(please kill me)"
I prefer the term "sanity."
This is Illinois we're talking about. No such delusion exists when it comes to our politicians.
Obscenity limitations are currently limited to sexual content in nature. Violence is perfectly acceptable. As for the ratings and being "basically illegal", that system is voluntarily enforced (like the ESRB ratings), excepting pornographic material as noted prior.
To reduce freedom and general quality of life among the targetted peoples. Sadly, nobody seems to remember that reducing these willingly is also letting them "win."
In that event, "Terror" has won.
We haven't lost the war on terror. We're actively endorsing it, by being deliberately overprotective. No beverages on flights? Trans-atlantic (or even cross-country) flights are damned long.
Unfortunately, this whole mess will simple bring back the generic "wartime" retention for incumbents, and that's honestly more terrifying than the police/interpol/whatever doing their job.
Insert explanation about election year, scapegoating, or the moral decline of society here.
People don't pirate games for because the games suck. They pirate them because they're good.
A game worth buying is a game worth not pirating, so to speak. For those games with online services, such as any FPS, RTS, MMO, eieio, buying the game is often the "only real option" due to key-checks and whatnot, and frankly, the average consumer isn't intelligent (or tenacious) enough to attempt to crack the various portions repeatedly until something works. Offline games of course are a different animal, but that doesn't change the idea (that the average consumer is a moron), but rather, points out that the average joe buys good games and makes do without during times of terrible releases. It isn't safe to assume that if a person does not buy a game, they will pirate it.
And let's not get into the whole "Disc-protection ate my babies" preference to cracking/pirating. You know, when companies install or incorporate difficult-to-run anti-pirate protection measures that FUBAR the program enough that many people can't play without bypassing said counter-measure, even if they legally bought the damned thing.
Unless they plan on, you know, providing a service, additional content, and other such niceties that the MMO genre provides, they need to keep their goddamned hands out of my wallet. Games already cost too goddamned much, and there just honestly has not been a lot of reason to buy many new games (as they've mostly sucked ass lately).
Make a good game, and people will buy it.
Ironically, "Final Fantasy"'s system changes almost every game. The only real similarity they have are a few cameo characters and the title.
Those "old bones" have a tendency to still have similarly excellent gameplay as the newer generation (and are usually far more challenging to boot!). When will we realize that gameplay isn't all bells and whistles?
The goal was to be funny, insofar as much as vandalizing something can be funny.
20 years? Less time is mandated for molesting a child. That's fucking scary.
The original Playstation, for one. It launched in 1994 and still has sales pushing past 2005. However, I suspect you meant to ask how many consoles have games being very actively developed for them on a commercial basis.
More information from Blizzard.
I have one perched atop my entertainment center at home. I have to see the dreaded thing every day as a reminder to not repeat history. Please don't tempt others!
Have "singers" mumble out incoherant words during "performances" then charge fans for the lyrics, so that they can see if said lyrics are "deep." Either that, or they can sue the fuck out of people.
I suppose either is a "good" current business model for the RIAA. I wonder when they're simply going to try to make music people want to hear again?
How about because these types of games are just money-grabs. They're typically absolutely awful games other than the amazingly high-profile superstar gracing the cover.