Especially since the more logical answer is that the containers were used for different things at different times. That they were all in the container at the same time is not proven by the evidence.
Of course, none of the solutions offered here are in the least bit compliant with the myriad of regulations that are going to need to be addressed in a enterprise this large. Sorbanes-Oxley is just one of your problems.
Sorry, but if you need to ask this question on/., you need to outsource this project to a company that specializes in projects this size and will guarantee compliance.
Nothing has fallen into the public domain for almost a half century before I was born.
How do you figure that? Something published in 1922 passed into public domain in 1997. You were born in 2047? Nothing has passed into public domain since 1998, but that's 7 years ago not 50.
The articles do not contradict each other, both say the problem is slowly fixing itself but it will take decades. The CNN article doesn't even mention the hole over the Antartic that the BBC article is talking about.
The side boosters are the same as the shuttles', just with one more section added. Since they are safely reused now, they certainly should be able to be reused in the future.
IBM stills spends more (last time I looked, 12x more) on Windows development than it does on Linux. They may not be happy about it, but IBM is big on Windows.
I doubt that these are still under copyright, the problem is no one wants to research if each one is. A newspaper published in 1923 had a 28 year copyright, which would have expired in 1951, It could have been renewed in 1951 for another 28 (later expanded to 47, then 67 years) years, but do you think newspapers renewed the copyrights on each days paper? I find that hard to believe... may be they did, but I doubt it.
Now, I can see a problem with newspapers published after 1964 (when the renewals became automatic).
Forgetting for a moment that this is terribly off topic, there is no way you can have the same number on two different carriers and switch back and forth. If you think about it for a minute, you'll realize what a huge task this would be for the carriers, with relatively little benefit.
Just before IBM pulled the plug on OS/2, I saw a demo of their thin client for OS/2. Ran unbelievably well on old junk machines. They were running 10 386 PC's off a single Pentium server. Unfortunately, it only ran Win 3.1 apps so it was already obsolete.
True, but the effects of a jumbo jet going down, while tragic, are temporary and confined to a small area. The effects of a major nuclear accident will be permanent (or close to it) over a wide area.
That it will die is inevitable. Seriously, there is only 1 reason to buy an ipod... it's cute. But that fads based on style only last a short time. A single use device like the ipod, especially when that 1 use can easily be incoroporated into other devices, cannot last.
The terms of use that tried to restrict (illegally) a consumer's right to appeal, were removed after ebay bought them. Last time I looked at their appeal process, it looked like it complied with Federal Reserve Regulation E, which the old terms of use definately did not.
Slashdot Mirror
Wonderful. You know have an encrypted string that you can't decrypt. What have you accomplished?
Not when one of your basic products is given away free. Novell isn't like IBM where the goal is moving hardware.
Especially since the more logical answer is that the containers were used for different things at different times. That they were all in the container at the same time is not proven by the evidence.
Of course, none of the solutions offered here are in the least bit compliant with the myriad of regulations that are going to need to be addressed in a enterprise this large. Sorbanes-Oxley is just one of your problems.
/., you need to outsource this project to a company that specializes in projects this size and will guarantee compliance.
Sorry, but if you need to ask this question on
Let me rephrase this:
No copyrighted work has passed into public domain by expiration of it's copyright since 1998.
Nothing has fallen into the public domain for almost a half century before I was born.
How do you figure that? Something published in 1922 passed into public domain in 1997. You were born in 2047? Nothing has passed into public domain since 1998, but that's 7 years ago not 50.
The articles do not contradict each other, both say the problem is slowly fixing itself but it will take decades. The CNN article doesn't even mention the hole over the Antartic that the BBC article is talking about.
"It was not his responsibility to call the police, nor was it Gateway's"
WRONG! If you see a crime being comitted and do not report it, you can be charged with a crime. It was his responsibility as a a citizen to report it.
Does anyone do backups anymore? Only the smart ones. Drives die.
were crap...
The side boosters are the same as the shuttles', just with one more section added. Since they are safely reused now, they certainly should be able to be reused in the future.
And you would be. It's called a paycheck.
RTFA You'd have to buy a daughterboard.
IBM stills spends more (last time I looked, 12x more) on Windows development than it does on Linux. They may not be happy about it, but IBM is big on Windows.
I doubt that these are still under copyright, the problem is no one wants to research if each one is. A newspaper published in 1923 had a 28 year copyright, which would have expired in 1951, It could have been renewed in 1951 for another 28 (later expanded to 47, then 67 years) years, but do you think newspapers renewed the copyrights on each days paper? I find that hard to believe... may be they did, but I doubt it. Now, I can see a problem with newspapers published after 1964 (when the renewals became automatic).
And after we pledge, do we start chanting "Sieg Heil" too?
Look again... I found 2 models of Dimension, 3 models of Optiplex, and 2 models of Precision available with Linux.
Because too much of the underlying code is owned by Microsoft.
Forgetting for a moment that this is terribly off topic, there is no way you can have the same number on two different carriers and switch back and forth. If you think about it for a minute, you'll realize what a huge task this would be for the carriers, with relatively little benefit.
Just before IBM pulled the plug on OS/2, I saw a demo of their thin client for OS/2. Ran unbelievably well on old junk machines. They were running 10 386 PC's off a single Pentium server. Unfortunately, it only ran Win 3.1 apps so it was already obsolete.
True, but the effects of a jumbo jet going down, while tragic, are temporary and confined to a small area. The effects of a major nuclear accident will be permanent (or close to it) over a wide area.
If the PC's at our company failed this much, I'd be out of a job.
There are programs that have allowed you to do this for a long time, Total Recorder pro for one...
That it will die is inevitable. Seriously, there is only 1 reason to buy an ipod... it's cute. But that fads based on style only last a short time. A single use device like the ipod, especially when that 1 use can easily be incoroporated into other devices, cannot last.
The terms of use that tried to restrict (illegally) a consumer's right to appeal, were removed after ebay bought them. Last time I looked at their appeal process, it looked like it complied with Federal Reserve Regulation E, which the old terms of use definately did not.