There is nothing in the US PATRIOT act that allows what you mention to happens.
What you described mainly came into play during the 1990s and even then you have to ignore alot to get it to fit your situation.
Your average modern MMORPG runs above that number.
WoW was in the $22 Mil range, and once they installed the number of servers they actually needed was alot more. EQ2 was close to $30 Mil.
A lie is a false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood. Unless you can prove that they knew before hand that they did not have WMD then it is not a lie.
Ahh, but what about the military commanders that were responsible for supervising their subordinates? Please cite one commissioned officer who has been courtmartialed the way the enlistees have been convicted.
where there any commanders that were performing the actions or knew about it and did not report it? If so why should they sent to jail for actions they did not perform? If you are going to say that the US military solider is the same as sadams jailors then you are going to get the responce that the worst actions, and illegal at that, happening under the US military was not even close.
While the trail did take place after all the newspaper articles the investiagation took place before.
In January of 2004 the miliary started investigations, in late April/May 2004 the newspaper and TV shows came out. Some of them even used and quoted from the military report which had been finished eariler then that.
It does beg the question on how the news companies got the pictues since the only people who had them are the people who took the picutes and the military and the military was not even was not distributing them with the report.
Is it sliming when I say the U.S. president lied about WMD
When did he lie about WMD? Unless you are one of thoses that believe that they knew that WMD did not exist at all; unlike the rest of the world. responsible for all the civilians being slaughtered there
So Bush is responsible for loading people up with explosive and having them walking into restaurants and then blowing themselves up?
Or that Americans are no better than the Sunnis that ran Abu Graib?
well except for the US arrested thoses that did anything of that nature, and even what they did was not close to standard practive when the sadam ran the place.
One little problem what is happening is that what happened is that FCC said that VOIP must comply with the Communications Assistance for Law
Enforcement Act (CALEA). CALEA was passed and signed into law in 1994, figure out who was president then.
IDC's report, "Worldwide RDBMS 2004 Vendor Shares: Preliminary Results for the Top 5 Vendors Show a Solid Boost (March 2005, IDC #32969)," estimates that Oracle(r) Database grew 14.5 percent year over year and increased its market share lead to 41.3 percent. Overall, the worldwide market for relational database management systems grew by 11.6 percent in 2004. In 2003, Oracle Database posted 8.6 percent growth year over year and was the market share leader with 39.8 percent.
MS-SQL server and/or Oracle are one of the first applications I install on a new computer. However I am a DBA and database developer.
As for what this will do for Oracle probably not that much. You could already could get a free licensed copies for development purposes, this allows distribution which is nice. This will be nice for the few times when you need to include a server based database with your application, but unless it is major application with multiple users give me a file based system and let me ignore the overhead.
So what are the direct experiments or conclusions drawn form other experiments to back up evolution?
I was at the Messel fossil pits and the talk from the scientist was filled with "believed", "we think" and other similiar terms.
The current administration wanted to skip the encryption part because they were pushing for only storing the picture of the person, none of the personnal information data, so encryption was not really needed.
However with the change, to be compliant with Europe, they did switch to adding the encryption.
MS-SQL Server 2000 any version allows you to have a blank sa password, you just have to check a box that where you enter the password that says you want a blank password.
Back with SP3 they did add the abaility to disallow blank passwords but that has to be activated.
Allow me to express my fears on the subscription model with respect to OSS.
The host based subscription model is not something you will see alot of, what you see and will see more of is a situation where a business purchases a enough subscriptions to cover all thier machines and because of prices and that you purchase the numbers is groups of 100 or 1000 a company will have spares sitting around for an needed use.
At that point you have spare licenses for whatever type of server software you needed. Need a web server you already have a licenses available for the product used everywhere else, why go and search around for another product.
The next part is that the subscriptions are for usally for a period of time, say 2-5 years, during which you get all updates, major and minor. Now depending on the company the subscription comes from you still can use the software after your subscription runs out however with some companies(and what others want to switch to) want is that as soon as your subscription is over you loose all rights to use the software. If you have any large numbers of computers with that software installed are you going to try to install the new software on them or are you just going to pay the subscription fee again and not pay the migration costs?
the whole subscription model just locks users and companies into a single company where looking at OSS has no justification.
Unfonatly that link in the OP is very lacking on specific and explaining some details. Here is a quick description and judges reasoning.
1) the FBI asked for the cell towers used so they would have a rough idea of the location the person was located.
2) In most cases this has been easy to get since the Supreme Court has declared that a person has no expectation of privacy with the numbers that are dialed so also as the FBI says the information is relavent the courts allow easy access. The FBI claims that the tower being used for "control codes" is at the same level of expected privacy as phone number, they also used some other laws such as the Stored Communication Act to prove they should have that level of access.
3) in the New York case the judges ruled that this was not the case and the tower being used is different. "When the government seeks to turn a mobile telephone into a means for contemporaneously tracking the movements of its user, the delicately balanced compromise that Congress has forged between effective law enforcement and individual privacy requires a showing of probable cause,"
So it looks like Congress will probaly need to give some more specifications on what they mean.
Well, without evolutionary biology we would all be blissfully unaware of the possiblity of avian flu mutating from a bird-to-human virus to a human-to-human virus.
Evolutionary biology did not get its start until the 1930-1940 time period and was not really taught until the 70s.
Transmittion of flu virus from birds to humans was known and modern reporting comes from the 1910-1920 time period(various sources have different times). You do have earlier recorded incidents and understanding on how it came about from the 1700s from various places in Asia, through observation and testing.
All evolutionary biology did was give a set of terms to explain it under its hypotheses .
Do you have some link for this?
this does not even sound true. The CIA has its own office that does that type of stuff, if it was in the US it would of been done with the FBI; the NSA does not have the type of assets to spy on people. Also could not find anything with links to this besides a few kook sites such as dailykos.
The main reason that comparing new orleans to florida, or to New York, New Hampshire, texas and most other disasters in the last 10 years is that they have all planned for theses events and then executed them as best available and they were not depending on FEMA to rescue them.
After new orleans you event had cities in california along the earthquake faults tring to get all the TV time they could in order to show how they were planning and what they had set up.
Besides expecting a mayor and governor to do thier jobs FEMA really did not do anything worse with new orleans then what they have done over its entire history. FEMA has always been credited for being slow and not providing enough money New Orleans was no different.
It was FEMA who turned away Wal-Mart trucks with water and supplies.
According to Sharon Weber of Wal-Mart FEMA worked with Wal-mart and diverted the trucks to "another location, which [FEMA] felt was in greater need than where they were headed." Hardly turning them away.
It was FEMA who told Amtrak they didn't want evacuation help.
"We offered the city the opportunity to take evacuees out of harm's way...The city declined," said Amtrak spokesman Cliff Black.
It was FEMA who did not use available Navy ships and sent away the Coast Guard with diesel fuel.
The claim about the available ships was that thier hospital bays stood empty, which was actually true because they had moved all medical opertions on-shore instead of flying the people 30 mins to boats.
Also the Cost Guard fuel was not sent away, it was also diverted to where it needed in the immediate rescue of lives.
It was FEMA who turned away volunteers with boats and hovercraft.
Sheriff Steve Simpson, of Loudon County, Virginia, sent 22 deputies with supplies and 14 vehicles, including four all-terrain vehicles. But he called them back when Louisiana state police officials waved him off. It took days after the leve broke for Gov. Blanco to remove thoses restricts, until that happened Louisiana state police just kept turning them away.
You do have federal laws that require that volunteers that FEMA sends have a certain level of training and certification, they can be removed by the governor but until then the head of FEMA has a legal responsibility. This was brought up after katerina when some Representative said that more money needs to be put into recruiting people and paying for this training.
Since all the stuff you pasted has been repeated countless times on various kook sites such as dailykos and democrateunderground I am going to take it for granted that you are just uninformed verses deliberatly spreading lies.
The stuff about the wal-mart and diseal fuel was a fabricaion by Aaron Broussard and he has been so discredited it is not funny, the speak he made was this big crying fest that has turn he made for purly political reason.
"property of the government" is the phrase used to indicate that the item/propety is under the ownership of the government.
"property of the people" is the phrase used to indicate that the item/property is the owned by a private individual.
Just because some land is owned by the government does not give you the right as a citizen of the united states to do anything with that property. This leads to some wierd laws such as an old Spanish one which declared that trees could be the property of the people of spain but all fruit was the property of the government of Spain.
It is protected by its own set of laws so and with trademarks being out and works by the U. S. Government not eligible for U. S. copyright protection that is its protection.
The Seal of the President, Senate, Vice-President,etc are NOT the property of the people of the USA they are the property of the government of the USA and there is a major difference between thoses two.
As for the mis-use of it congress put it rather high, 6 months jail time.
Over all not that much of a big issue, someone complained, the customized form letter was sent out as required by federal law, and as you mention the onion will have to make some changes and will probably get a few funny articles out of it.
Please don't let your hatered get in the way of the facts.
It is generally agreed that the.xxx domain was pushed by ICM Registry.
Thoses mean, old "religious fundies" were actually against its creation for a varity of reason, all of them easy it find.
No one has ever disputed the statements in the memo accurately depicted Bush's military record.
The memo was a fake and everything in it was false, what is the use of disputing something that is so false?
If I write up an article saying that you are a pedofile and then in the same hand writing sign your name and that the above statement was correct would you spend time going around saying that the statement was false but you did write it or would you not just say this is a forged document explain why and move on?
It may not be the majority anymore, but it's still almost half of Americans (could that be the *conservative* half?), and considering that George W. Bush himself promoted the idea that Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks
Please show this; and you better not read your own second link. The only thing you can come close to saying this was misunderstandings and was quickly retracted by the white house. A very easy to find quote is "We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the Sept. 11 attacks." President Bush.
What gets really interesting with the harris poll is if you go read the full details, not the small amount they replease to the non-paying public, but for that you need a decent library. The vast majority of people who do believe that sadam played a major role in the 9/11 attacks classified themselves as democrates or independants. In addition the number of democrates that believed this increased as we got closer to the previous election.
Slashdot Mirror
There is nothing in the US PATRIOT act that allows what you mention to happens.
What you described mainly came into play during the 1990s and even then you have to ignore alot to get it to fit your situation.
Your average modern MMORPG runs above that number.
WoW was in the $22 Mil range, and once they installed the number of servers they actually needed was alot more. EQ2 was close to $30 Mil.
Or how about Warning, Will Robinson
A lie is a false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood. Unless you can prove that they knew before hand that they did not have WMD then it is not a lie.
Ahh, but what about the military commanders that were responsible for supervising their subordinates? Please cite one commissioned officer who has been courtmartialed the way the enlistees have been convicted.
where there any commanders that were performing the actions or knew about it and did not report it? If so why should they sent to jail for actions they did not perform? If you are going to say that the US military solider is the same as sadams jailors then you are going to get the responce that the worst actions, and illegal at that, happening under the US military was not even close.
While the trail did take place after all the newspaper articles the investiagation took place before.
In January of 2004 the miliary started investigations, in late April/May 2004 the newspaper and TV shows came out. Some of them even used and quoted from the military report which had been finished eariler then that.
It does beg the question on how the news companies got the pictues since the only people who had them are the people who took the picutes and the military and the military was not even was not distributing them with the report.
Is it sliming when I say the U.S. president lied about WMD
When did he lie about WMD? Unless you are one of thoses that believe that they knew that WMD did not exist at all; unlike the rest of the world.
responsible for all the civilians being slaughtered there
So Bush is responsible for loading people up with explosive and having them walking into restaurants and then blowing themselves up?
Or that Americans are no better than the Sunnis that ran Abu Graib?
well except for the US arrested thoses that did anything of that nature, and even what they did was not close to standard practive when the sadam ran the place.
One little problem what is happening is that what happened is that FCC said that VOIP must comply with the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). CALEA was passed and signed into law in 1994, figure out who was president then.
IDC's report, "Worldwide RDBMS 2004 Vendor Shares: Preliminary Results for the Top 5 Vendors Show a Solid Boost (March 2005, IDC #32969)," estimates that Oracle(r) Database grew 14.5 percent year over year and increased its market share lead to 41.3 percent. Overall, the worldwide market for relational database management systems grew by 11.6 percent in 2004. In 2003, Oracle Database posted 8.6 percent growth year over year and was the market share leader with 39.8 percent.
Oracle is very open in its pricing. check out http://oraclestore.oracle.com/ and you can customize what you want.
MS-SQL server and/or Oracle are one of the first applications I install on a new computer. However I am a DBA and database developer.
As for what this will do for Oracle probably not that much. You could already could get a free licensed copies for development purposes, this allows distribution which is nice. This will be nice for the few times when you need to include a server based database with your application, but unless it is major application with multiple users give me a file based system and let me ignore the overhead.
So what are the direct experiments or conclusions drawn form other experiments to back up evolution?
I was at the Messel fossil pits and the talk from the scientist was filled with "believed", "we think" and other similiar terms.
The current administration wanted to skip the encryption part because they were pushing for only storing the picture of the person, none of the personnal information data, so encryption was not really needed.
However with the change, to be compliant with Europe, they did switch to adding the encryption.
MS-SQL Server 2000 any version allows you to have a blank sa password, you just have to check a box that where you enter the password that says you want a blank password.
Back with SP3 they did add the abaility to disallow blank passwords but that has to be activated.
Allow me to express my fears on the subscription model with respect to OSS.
The host based subscription model is not something you will see alot of, what you see and will see more of is a situation where a business purchases a enough subscriptions to cover all thier machines and because of prices and that you purchase the numbers is groups of 100 or 1000 a company will have spares sitting around for an needed use.
At that point you have spare licenses for whatever type of server software you needed. Need a web server you already have a licenses available for the product used everywhere else, why go and search around for another product.
The next part is that the subscriptions are for usally for a period of time, say 2-5 years, during which you get all updates, major and minor. Now depending on the company the subscription comes from you still can use the software after your subscription runs out however with some companies(and what others want to switch to) want is that as soon as your subscription is over you loose all rights to use the software. If you have any large numbers of computers with that software installed are you going to try to install the new software on them or are you just going to pay the subscription fee again and not pay the migration costs?
the whole subscription model just locks users and companies into a single company where looking at OSS has no justification.
Here is the New York decisions.
Unfonatly that link in the OP is very lacking on specific and explaining some details. Here is a quick description and judges reasoning.
1) the FBI asked for the cell towers used so they would have a rough idea of the location the person was located.
2) In most cases this has been easy to get since the Supreme Court has declared that a person has no expectation of privacy with the numbers that are dialed so also as the FBI says the information is relavent the courts allow easy access. The FBI claims that the tower being used for "control codes" is at the same level of expected privacy as phone number, they also used some other laws such as the Stored Communication Act to prove they should have that level of access.
3) in the New York case the judges ruled that this was not the case and the tower being used is different. "When the government seeks to turn a mobile telephone into a means for contemporaneously tracking the movements of its user, the delicately balanced compromise that Congress has forged between effective law enforcement and individual privacy requires a showing of probable cause,"
So it looks like Congress will probaly need to give some more specifications on what they mean.
Well, without evolutionary biology we would all be blissfully unaware of the possiblity of avian flu mutating from a bird-to-human virus to a human-to-human virus.
Evolutionary biology did not get its start until the 1930-1940 time period and was not really taught until the 70s.
Transmittion of flu virus from birds to humans was known and modern reporting comes from the 1910-1920 time period(various sources have different times). You do have earlier recorded incidents and understanding on how it came about from the 1700s from various places in Asia, through observation and testing.
All evolutionary biology did was give a set of terms to explain it under its hypotheses .
Do you have some link for this?
this does not even sound true. The CIA has its own office that does that type of stuff, if it was in the US it would of been done with the FBI; the NSA does not have the type of assets to spy on people. Also could not find anything with links to this besides a few kook sites such as dailykos.
The main reason that comparing new orleans to florida, or to New York, New Hampshire, texas and most other disasters in the last 10 years is that they have all planned for theses events and then executed them as best available and they were not depending on FEMA to rescue them.
After new orleans you event had cities in california along the earthquake faults tring to get all the TV time they could in order to show how they were planning and what they had set up.
Besides expecting a mayor and governor to do thier jobs FEMA really did not do anything worse with new orleans then what they have done over its entire history. FEMA has always been credited for being slow and not providing enough money New Orleans was no different.
It was FEMA who turned away Wal-Mart trucks with water and supplies.
According to Sharon Weber of Wal-Mart FEMA worked with Wal-mart and diverted the trucks to "another location, which [FEMA] felt was in greater need than where they were headed." Hardly turning them away.
It was FEMA who told Amtrak they didn't want evacuation help.
"We offered the city the opportunity to take evacuees out of harm's way...The city declined," said Amtrak spokesman Cliff Black.
It was FEMA who did not use available Navy ships and sent away the Coast Guard with diesel fuel.
The claim about the available ships was that thier hospital bays stood empty, which was actually true because they had moved all medical opertions on-shore instead of flying the people 30 mins to boats.
Also the Cost Guard fuel was not sent away, it was also diverted to where it needed in the immediate rescue of lives.
It was FEMA who turned away volunteers with boats and hovercraft.
Sheriff Steve Simpson, of Loudon County, Virginia, sent 22 deputies with supplies and 14 vehicles, including four all-terrain vehicles. But he called them back when Louisiana state police officials waved him off. It took days after the leve broke for Gov. Blanco to remove thoses restricts, until that happened Louisiana state police just kept turning them away.
You do have federal laws that require that volunteers that FEMA sends have a certain level of training and certification, they can be removed by the governor but until then the head of FEMA has a legal responsibility. This was brought up after katerina when some Representative said that more money needs to be put into recruiting people and paying for this training.
Since all the stuff you pasted has been repeated countless times on various kook sites such as dailykos and democrateunderground I am going to take it for granted that you are just uninformed verses deliberatly spreading lies.
The stuff about the wal-mart and diseal fuel was a fabricaion by Aaron Broussard and he has been so discredited it is not funny, the speak he made was this big crying fest that has turn he made for purly political reason.
"property of the government" is the phrase used to indicate that the item/propety is under the ownership of the government.
"property of the people" is the phrase used to indicate that the item/property is the owned by a private individual.
Just because some land is owned by the government does not give you the right as a citizen of the united states to do anything with that property. This leads to some wierd laws such as an old Spanish one which declared that trees could be the property of the people of spain but all fruit was the property of the government of Spain.
It is protected by its own set of laws so and with trademarks being out and works by the U. S. Government not eligible for U. S. copyright protection that is its protection.
The Seal of the President, Senate, Vice-President,etc are NOT the property of the people of the USA they are the property of the government of the USA and there is a major difference between thoses two.
As for the mis-use of it congress put it rather high, 6 months jail time.
Over all not that much of a big issue, someone complained, the customized form letter was sent out as required by federal law, and as you mention the onion will have to make some changes and will probably get a few funny articles out of it.
Please don't let your hatered get in the way of the facts. .xxx domain was pushed by ICM Registry.
It is generally agreed that the
Thoses mean, old "religious fundies" were actually against its creation for a varity of reason, all of them easy it find.
No one has ever disputed the statements in the memo accurately depicted Bush's military record.
The memo was a fake and everything in it was false, what is the use of disputing something that is so false?
If I write up an article saying that you are a pedofile and then in the same hand writing sign your name and that the above statement was correct would you spend time going around saying that the statement was false but you did write it or would you not just say this is a forged document explain why and move on?
It may not be the majority anymore, but it's still almost half of Americans (could that be the *conservative* half?), and considering that George W. Bush himself promoted the idea that Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks
Please show this; and you better not read your own second link. The only thing you can come close to saying this was misunderstandings and was quickly retracted by the white house. A very easy to find quote is "We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the Sept. 11 attacks." President Bush.
What gets really interesting with the harris poll is if you go read the full details, not the small amount they replease to the non-paying public, but for that you need a decent library. The vast majority of people who do believe that sadam played a major role in the 9/11 attacks classified themselves as democrates or independants. In addition the number of democrates that believed this increased as we got closer to the previous election.