A complicated neural net is not always the problem. Very often, the neural net is too simple for our understanding of the problem. Adding "complications" to the network (that is, discrete serialized steps, repeated instructions, or other non-neurally algos) would actually make it easier to understand.
Those tend to be old documentaries. During initial release, most people pay. Like most products, they try to eke out as much profit as possible during the paid run. Then they license it to ad-based services like You Tube to receive a second stream of revenue.
Which can is that? Ending wars? Stopping economic collapse? Recovering the stock market? Saving the big three? Improving Middle East relations? Putting Israel on notice for engaging in apartheid?
If an employer wants me to give them social media accounts, then I would ask for a second salary from the marketing department. I'm not going to spend my social capital selling my employer's product for free. Show me the money.
Facebook seems to think their product has more value to me than I have value to Facebook. That's incorrect. People like me who abandon social platforms early are the ones that start chipping away at the network effects that give Facebook their entire value.
Facebook will have to remove ads and pay me to stay in order to maintain their network value.
Facebook's on its way to becoming MySpace or Google+.
You're extrapolating from an extremely small window of data. The newly arrived market volatility suggests we may have just seen an accumulation and burst of pent-up sell pressure, which could easily send the markets down far enough to wipe out the Trump boom.
Sanders is a wild card. Certainly with a supportive Congress, the economy would be radically different under Sanders. Shifted. Perhaps better, perhaps worse. Clinton would have continued existing policies and been able to provide a sense of stability. The glacially slow Obama recovery would have continued. We would have likely seen the stock market grow more sensibly. Once we see the full effect of the impending Trump correction, we'll know if the Trump boom was just a precursor to a Trump bust, or if it was the beginning of solid growth.
That's largely a correction from the boom years that Clinton accidentally stumbled into due to the dot-com boom. Sometimes, the market doesn't give a shit who's president. The systemic forces of the 90s markets were laid out in earlier years, and had nothing to do with Clinton. The subsequent market collapse was expected and had little to do with Bush (except the expensive wars; it wasn't economic policy).
You're statement is probably accurate for pretty much all alt coins. But not BTC. The BTC network's entire value prop is an immutable ledger. They don't need to pander to people who lose money like all the altcoins do.
If you just want sign-on, FB's API is OAuth based and mostly standard. I wouldn't worry about it unless you're actually using it to scrape the user graph or somehow impersonate the user's actions on FB (like leaving a comment in their name).
Using renewable energy does not negatively impact your carbon footprint unless you replace non-renewable energy. This would have no effect on Google's footprint.
If you are working at a restaurant or loading a truck, sure you can be effective whenever. If you think for a living, you are wasting your time and your employer's time if you don't quickly figure out what daily schedule (or lack of schedule) works best for stimulating your mind. This is demonstrated in study after study.
I work about six hours a day (after you take out lunch) because my scedule is flexible. If I had to come in at 9, I'd probably end up working 8 hours and get less done. Who is benefiting by me coming in at 9 besides jealous snowflakes?
I am almost 40 years old, with a six figure salary. I don't do anything special. I'm not some Stallion spitting out features. I refuse to take shortcuts or get caught up in shiny new Software features, and that make me a long term value to my employer.
In return for this long term value I provide, I am afforded respect and the ability to do what I want when I want.
In truth I always thought nine-to-fivers were the kids without real jobs. Men who produce things of value don't have to be in at 9.
ISO C has a standard lib for threads..NET has standard lib for threads. Visual C++ has standard lib for threads. Who exactly is writing Windows apps in an environment with no standard library support for threads and what are they writing in?
No, availability of threading libs does not explain any disparity in application utilization of threading.
I don't know about Mac, but on Linux, the Unix philosophy of small programs that get tied together means many apps are multi-process, with IPC mechanisms in place to make that work. Most apps on Linux - in my experience - rely on multi-process apps, and not multi-threading.
This author really think San Franciscans are going to move to Pittsburgh for a cheap home, when they can move to literally any city in the nation other than NYC for a "cheap" home? I think San Franciscans are far more likely to end up in San Diego or some other CA city than Pittsburgh.
"In 2010, for instance, a judge threw out two plaintiffs' claims that they could copyright their mathematical model for electron dynamics."
Most notably, the jury isn't even needed in cases like this. Case law is so one-sided against the idea of copyrighting a formula, the judge can make that determination on their own.
When you develop an API call, the interface is a fact of how one invoke's the call. It is not a form of creative expression. Tell ten experienced Java engineers how a function is implemented and what it's arguments are and what the coding standards are and they will NOT come up with ten different expressions of that API call.
Because the (lower) courts have demonstrated repeatedly their inability to understand even the fundamentals of cases like this. An API is like a mathematical formula. It is not subject to copyright. End of story. Patent is different, of course, but this case is a copyright case.
Slashdot Mirror
But some people are retarded.
A complicated neural net is not always the problem. Very often, the neural net is too simple for our understanding of the problem. Adding "complications" to the network (that is, discrete serialized steps, repeated instructions, or other non-neurally algos) would actually make it easier to understand.
Those tend to be old documentaries. During initial release, most people pay. Like most products, they try to eke out as much profit as possible during the paid run. Then they license it to ad-based services like You Tube to receive a second stream of revenue.
Which can is that? Ending wars? Stopping economic collapse? Recovering the stock market? Saving the big three? Improving Middle East relations? Putting Israel on notice for engaging in apartheid?
Did you miss Article I or are you just a dipshit?
If an employer wants me to give them social media accounts, then I would ask for a second salary from the marketing department. I'm not going to spend my social capital selling my employer's product for free. Show me the money.
Facebook seems to think their product has more value to me than I have value to Facebook. That's incorrect. People like me who abandon social platforms early are the ones that start chipping away at the network effects that give Facebook their entire value.
Facebook will have to remove ads and pay me to stay in order to maintain their network value.
Facebook's on its way to becoming MySpace or Google+.
Good fucking riddance.
Canada is economist.
You're extrapolating from an extremely small window of data. The newly arrived market volatility suggests we may have just seen an accumulation and burst of pent-up sell pressure, which could easily send the markets down far enough to wipe out the Trump boom.
Sanders is a wild card. Certainly with a supportive Congress, the economy would be radically different under Sanders. Shifted. Perhaps better, perhaps worse. Clinton would have continued existing policies and been able to provide a sense of stability. The glacially slow Obama recovery would have continued. We would have likely seen the stock market grow more sensibly. Once we see the full effect of the impending Trump correction, we'll know if the Trump boom was just a precursor to a Trump bust, or if it was the beginning of solid growth.
That's largely a correction from the boom years that Clinton accidentally stumbled into due to the dot-com boom. Sometimes, the market doesn't give a shit who's president. The systemic forces of the 90s markets were laid out in earlier years, and had nothing to do with Clinton. The subsequent market collapse was expected and had little to do with Bush (except the expensive wars; it wasn't economic policy).
You should simply look them in the face, then speak pointedly in Japanese, with laughter intermingled. That type of shit drives racists crazy.
How is a modular keyboard better than a bluetooth one: https://www.adafruit.com/produ...
You're statement is probably accurate for pretty much all alt coins. But not BTC. The BTC network's entire value prop is an immutable ledger. They don't need to pander to people who lose money like all the altcoins do.
Credit is just a measure of trust to pay debts. It's still all faith.
If you just want sign-on, FB's API is OAuth based and mostly standard. I wouldn't worry about it unless you're actually using it to scrape the user graph or somehow impersonate the user's actions on FB (like leaving a comment in their name).
Maybe Tinder shouldn't base their entire business model on the good graces of Facebook.
Using renewable energy does not negatively impact your carbon footprint unless you replace non-renewable energy. This would have no effect on Google's footprint.
If you are working at a restaurant or loading a truck, sure you can be effective whenever. If you think for a living, you are wasting your time and your employer's time if you don't quickly figure out what daily schedule (or lack of schedule) works best for stimulating your mind. This is demonstrated in study after study.
I work about six hours a day (after you take out lunch) because my scedule is flexible. If I had to come in at 9, I'd probably end up working 8 hours and get less done. Who is benefiting by me coming in at 9 besides jealous snowflakes?
I am the GP.
I am almost 40 years old, with a six figure salary. I don't do anything special. I'm not some Stallion spitting out features. I refuse to take shortcuts or get caught up in shiny new Software features, and that make me a long term value to my employer.
In return for this long term value I provide, I am afforded respect and the ability to do what I want when I want.
In truth I always thought nine-to-fivers were the kids without real jobs. Men who produce things of value don't have to be in at 9.
ISO C has a standard lib for threads. .NET has standard lib for threads. Visual C++ has standard lib for threads. Who exactly is writing Windows apps in an environment with no standard library support for threads and what are they writing in?
No, availability of threading libs does not explain any disparity in application utilization of threading.
I don't know about Mac, but on Linux, the Unix philosophy of small programs that get tied together means many apps are multi-process, with IPC mechanisms in place to make that work. Most apps on Linux - in my experience - rely on multi-process apps, and not multi-threading.
By 2020, Apple will have already deprecated all those technologies, and they'll all be replaced by some new quasi-proprietary bus replacement.
This author really think San Franciscans are going to move to Pittsburgh for a cheap home, when they can move to literally any city in the nation other than NYC for a "cheap" home? I think San Franciscans are far more likely to end up in San Diego or some other CA city than Pittsburgh.
"In 2010, for instance, a judge threw out two plaintiffs' claims that they could copyright their mathematical model for electron dynamics."
Most notably, the jury isn't even needed in cases like this. Case law is so one-sided against the idea of copyrighting a formula, the judge can make that determination on their own.
When you develop an API call, the interface is a fact of how one invoke's the call. It is not a form of creative expression. Tell ten experienced Java engineers how a function is implemented and what it's arguments are and what the coding standards are and they will NOT come up with ten different expressions of that API call.
Because the (lower) courts have demonstrated repeatedly their inability to understand even the fundamentals of cases like this. An API is like a mathematical formula. It is not subject to copyright. End of story. Patent is different, of course, but this case is a copyright case.