So accomodating ? You can do a very nice job, finishing all of your runs of wires with mural plaques, in dual boxes along with a phone line, so that beside the fact that there's more than a phone line output no one would notice it.
Direct du proprio / By the owner (http://bytheowner.com/) has been doing this for homes & apartments for a while, at a very small flat rate rather than a fixed percentage of the home value for quite a few years, so much that it started replacing real estate agents:)
you get rid of 4 servers, putting it on that new one. 2KW -> 300W = 1.7KW saved.
Recently removed 9 servers around here, replacing it with 2 for redundancy, 1 working the other duplicating, using 3.9KW/h less than the previous setup measured at the UPS entry point.
Well, you need to take into account the full cost of ownership. Are those servers using 500W of power to run, doing 1/4th of the work of a new server requiring only 300W ? At 10c/kWh, it cost you 1500$ / year to keep them running not including the climatisation, beside the wasted space (4 times more than the newer servers), and you will not be able to sell them at a meaningfull value after too long.
Small personnal UPS usually gets 2 12V battery at 8AH to 12AH. In a server environment using the google way (cheap quad core), the computers are probably using under 200W (no video card) and probably around 100W avg. (no hard drives everything by lan?). a 12V 8AH battery can provide 96W for an hour, less the convertion rate, so it`s more than is required to put the generators online.
The wiring resistance is constant per meter (for a given cost) and increasing the voltage will reduce the amperage, while the power loss in the wiring is the multiplication of the amp times resistance, so, by increasing the voltage, the reduce the amp which in turn reduce the power loss in the transmission.
There's a failing video card in a imac sitting right here, and the fans are getting noisy as hell. They'd like to have the mac for about 1 month to fix it, but I can't afford to let it go for so long, and I am certainly not paying for a faster service. I guess I'll send it in at the last day of warranty:\
If you had RTFA, you`d have noticed that they are giving ways of having flash uploaded on the server while it`s actually checking for other file types, so it`s not as simple as blocking flash file uploads.
Keep it for when it will be worth it. When the USA/Canada will be the last two place on earth with fuel, we will pull back all the money we spent for buying it for all those years in no time, selling the last few drops!
Well, the problem probably resulted from a much higher drag on a single side of the trawler. They usually work in groups, (at least, the small ones), and if most of the jellyfish are on a specific side, the drag can getting close to an horizontal pull, easily capsizing the boat.
There's not much chance that if we'd lock down the bottom of the net in something underneath the boat, that 1 the net would be strong enough so that infinite strenght winch would bring the boat underneath the water rather than break the net, and 2, a real winch would not be strong enough to bring the boat underwater for an infinite strenght net:)
So, it's either a human error, or the jellyfish decided that swimming in a direction perpendicular to the boat would be the best thing they could do:)
To be fair, the 3times price is compared against a 4 pack of normal light bulbs which are not sold in single packaging here. Also, we've had subsidies from the electrical company handing back up to 10$, as to make them more affordable and used. So no, it wasn`t the case of the 'cheapest available solution' and after the first failures I went with other big names with the same results.
For CR website, looking at it gives a very bad first impression, as they look like many scam site, not offering much on the first look beside ways to hand out your credit card. I had to look it up on google to make sure it was the real site and not just a phishing page.
We have something equivalent to CR, who makes money from their paper edition which includes everything they recently reviewed in a nice to read version, and they also have support coming from television relations, and they don't look like a scam site, or a site to sell something 'as seen on TV!'
It`s totally possible that CR just have a really bad design, and that the content they show is just too much built for selling the content. Anyway:)
I didn't had a single CFL last more than 3 months in my apartment. The vibrations from people walking upstairs seems to have been killing them much faster than a normal lightbulb, and at 3 times the cost, dangerous content and all, I wasn't so happy.
There are a ton of factor, and a lot of people who had a bad experience with them. You are lucky to have had them for as long!
Then, about consumer reports, they are a company built for profit (well, they charge to check their reports!) and it's a bit hard to put all our trusts in those kind of things.
Most museum rules are built in the intent to stop people from taking pictures with their flash, because the light emanating from the flashes can tarnish the art. I've seen many museum where they simply ask no flash, but it's harder to control.
Copyrights have a limited time span. What if that painting is 300 years old. Who are you stealing from ? What are they enitled to ?
Lets say that we can build something which extract an image which are you thinking of from your head and convert it to a binary images. You are standing in front of that painting, remembering it, then you convert it and get it printed. What you just build is your interpretation of that painting, and it's now your piece of art. Who would own the copyrights ?
Anyway, you based too much of your argumentation on the possibility of the museum of setting up rules prohibiting taking pictures..
They could also have used songs which are mostly in the low frequency range, and the algorithm to build it back from 48kbps might improve (read amplify) the bass channel, thus giving a perception of a stronger reproduction, which a lot of people seems to like these days.
I found that their linear desktop was a very bad idea. Playing around on my 30 inch I tend to have a 3 columns, usually being 2 - 2 - 3 rows of windows opened, and I place my other windows with a few pixel showing so that I can pop them up when needed. IE, I have all the information I want ready to be seen, which is not the case with their idea, and that's a big step backward.
Actually, you used the cumulative chance of hitting the heart over the existence of the asteroid, rather than the impact probability for 2036, as stated (at least !) in the summary. Actually, they got it wrong too, since it's 4.3e-06, they took it at 4 chance in a million, while it's around 2.326 in a million.
That the jpg weight in at 666kb ?!!!?
So accomodating ? You can do a very nice job, finishing all of your runs of wires with mural plaques, in dual boxes along with a phone line, so that beside the fact that there's more than a phone line output no one would notice it.
Direct du proprio / By the owner (http://bytheowner.com/) has been doing this for homes & apartments for a while, at a very small flat rate rather than a fixed percentage of the home value for quite a few years, so much that it started replacing real estate agents :)
you get rid of 4 servers, putting it on that new one. 2KW -> 300W = 1.7KW saved.
Recently removed 9 servers around here, replacing it with 2 for redundancy, 1 working the other duplicating, using 3.9KW/h less than the previous setup measured at the UPS entry point.
The servers will be paid for in less than a year.
Well, you need to take into account the full cost of ownership. Are those servers using 500W of power to run, doing 1/4th of the work of a new server requiring only 300W ? At 10c/kWh, it cost you 1500$ / year to keep them running not including the climatisation, beside the wasted space (4 times more than the newer servers), and you will not be able to sell them at a meaningfull value after too long.
Small personnal UPS usually gets 2 12V battery at 8AH to 12AH. In a server environment using the google way (cheap quad core), the computers are probably using under 200W (no video card) and probably around 100W avg. (no hard drives everything by lan?). a 12V 8AH battery can provide 96W for an hour, less the convertion rate, so it`s more than is required to put the generators online.
The wiring resistance is constant per meter (for a given cost) and increasing the voltage will reduce the amperage, while the power loss in the wiring is the multiplication of the amp times resistance, so, by increasing the voltage, the reduce the amp which in turn reduce the power loss in the transmission.
There's a failing video card in a imac sitting right here, and the fans are getting noisy as hell. They'd like to have the mac for about 1 month to fix it, but I can't afford to let it go for so long, and I am certainly not paying for a faster service. I guess I'll send it in at the last day of warranty :\
If you had RTFA, you`d have noticed that they are giving ways of having flash uploaded on the server while it`s actually checking for other file types, so it`s not as simple as blocking flash file uploads.
Keep it for when it will be worth it. When the USA/Canada will be the last two place on earth with fuel, we will pull back all the money we spent for buying it for all those years in no time, selling the last few drops!
Well, the problem probably resulted from a much higher drag on a single side of the trawler. They usually work in groups, (at least, the small ones), and if most of the jellyfish are on a specific side, the drag can getting close to an horizontal pull, easily capsizing the boat.
There's not much chance that if we'd lock down the bottom of the net in something underneath the boat, that 1 the net would be strong enough so that infinite strenght winch would bring the boat underneath the water rather than break the net, and 2, a real winch would not be strong enough to bring the boat underwater for an infinite strenght net :)
So, it's either a human error, or the jellyfish decided that swimming in a direction perpendicular to the boat would be the best thing they could do :)
Get google chrome, allows you to resize the text areas as you see fit, and often does it for you automatically on slashdot.
I wonder if they found the areas too small here themselves ?
1M + 0.5M = 1.65M !
We don't mind, we have all the tools to prevent it when it's not cool with us.
Thank you for listening to us.
To be fair, the 3times price is compared against a 4 pack of normal light bulbs which are not sold in single packaging here. Also, we've had subsidies from the electrical company handing back up to 10$, as to make them more affordable and used. So no, it wasn`t the case of the 'cheapest available solution' and after the first failures I went with other big names with the same results.
For CR website, looking at it gives a very bad first impression, as they look like many scam site, not offering much on the first look beside ways to hand out your credit card. I had to look it up on google to make sure it was the real site and not just a phishing page.
We have something equivalent to CR, who makes money from their paper edition which includes everything they recently reviewed in a nice to read version, and they also have support coming from television relations, and they don't look like a scam site, or a site to sell something 'as seen on TV!'
It`s totally possible that CR just have a really bad design, and that the content they show is just too much built for selling the content. Anyway :)
I didn't had a single CFL last more than 3 months in my apartment. The vibrations from people walking upstairs seems to have been killing them much faster than a normal lightbulb, and at 3 times the cost, dangerous content and all, I wasn't so happy.
There are a ton of factor, and a lot of people who had a bad experience with them. You are lucky to have had them for as long!
Then, about consumer reports, they are a company built for profit (well, they charge to check their reports!) and it's a bit hard to put all our trusts in those kind of things.
Most museum rules are built in the intent to stop people from taking pictures with their flash, because the light emanating from the flashes can tarnish the art. I've seen many museum where they simply ask no flash, but it's harder to control. Copyrights have a limited time span. What if that painting is 300 years old. Who are you stealing from ? What are they enitled to ? Lets say that we can build something which extract an image which are you thinking of from your head and convert it to a binary images. You are standing in front of that painting, remembering it, then you convert it and get it printed. What you just build is your interpretation of that painting, and it's now your piece of art. Who would own the copyrights ? Anyway, you based too much of your argumentation on the possibility of the museum of setting up rules prohibiting taking pictures..
They could also have used songs which are mostly in the low frequency range, and the algorithm to build it back from 48kbps might improve (read amplify) the bass channel, thus giving a perception of a stronger reproduction, which a lot of people seems to like these days.
botnets allow such a thing already.
2^5 - 1 is a nice number. Just add million afteward and you are set!
I found that their linear desktop was a very bad idea. Playing around on my 30 inch I tend to have a 3 columns, usually being 2 - 2 - 3 rows of windows opened, and I place my other windows with a few pixel showing so that I can pop them up when needed. IE, I have all the information I want ready to be seen, which is not the case with their idea, and that's a big step backward.
Actually, you used the cumulative chance of hitting the heart over the existence of the asteroid, rather than the impact probability for 2036, as stated (at least !) in the summary. Actually, they got it wrong too, since it's 4.3e-06, they took it at 4 chance in a million, while it's around 2.326 in a million.
The sooner it happens, the sooner the patent expires ?
645$, for only 30fps 1080p .. That's even worst than this!
And that's called a mosquito screen -- just make sure not to get one in plastic.