Slashdot Mirror


Hulu Blocks International Access Via Witopia

An anonymous reader notes, and excerpts from, an article at PC Authority: "It's human nature that people always want what they can't have — which is why there's so much interest around the world in accessing the US-only Hulu site. Hulu offers a range of television shows for streaming, including Family Guy, The Daily Show and House along with a few full length movies. ... If you're outside the US, the easiest method for accessing Hulu that many people are discussing online, is using a US-based VPN, which tricks Hulu into thinking their computer is within the US. Initially Hulu started cracking down on free VPN services such as Hotspot Shield, but now it's turned its attention to Witopia — which costs $40 or $US60 per year but offers a faster, more secure and more reliable service than its free competitors. Initially Witopia's LA gateway remained unaffected, but now Hulu has blocked this as well."

256 comments

  1. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry I'd have been here sooner but my VPN is kinda laggy.

  2. Dear content producers... by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear content producers, on behalf of most of the world could you please do us a favor and release things globally? In case you haven't looked online, there are many sites where you can get things for free online (http://thepiratebay.org/) most of us though would really just like the support the creators. If you won't sell the product where your fans are, how are we supposed to support you? I can understand physical DVD sales or broadcasting it via television because that costs money, however the internet allows you to distribute content for -free- without the overhead of needing to translate, ship or alter any media. Even better have the fans do the work -for you- if bandwidth is a problem make it be P2P, if translating it into people's language is a problem allow fansubs. As for the "cultural barrier" many of your fans are educated enough to know that there is a difference in culture and will look up, or accept the cultural difference without being offended. This isn't advice just for American TV being released outside of America but also to anime companies and other companies releasing things globally.

    Bottom line. We, the people who don't live in the country where you are currently producing, want to -buy- your content or at least look at the ads. If you won't let us, fine. We will simply pirate it. But chances are you want to make money right? So don't treat us like second-class citizens, we have money just like "your part" of the world does and no, we don't like getting episodes 1-2 months later than the rest of the world and no we don't like being shut off of a service that would allow us to watch TV while supporting the producers. If you must, just block non-American IPs but don't be idiots and start blocking VPNs and other ways to block your fans from trying to legitimately support you. We have other options, but you have an opportunity with the internet to allow us to pay for content. But if you don't want our money, fine. We will go back to pirating your shows.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Dear content producers... by Korbeau · · Score: 1

      Don't bother. Didn't you know? Your comment isn't visible on slashdot.us!

      For that matter, why did Google make its Asterix day today only on google.ca and google.fr and such, and not on google.com/us?
      Isn't that, like, one of the most popular comic of all time peut importe la nation?

    2. Re:Dear content producers... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Obviously they'd prefer to sell^Wlicense the distribution rights multiple times across multiple "regions".

      Which they clearly think will give them more money than doing so on a global basis.

    3. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually I'm guessing advertisers don't pay for foreign web hits so you aren't supporting the content providers you are just sucking down Hulu's bandwidth. Not being obnoxious just explaining why they are being spoil sports. They may offer the paid service worldwide if you are serious about supporting content providers. If advertisers don't pay for the shows viewers have to and few advertisers will pay for worldwide exposure since it's effectiveness varies and some advertisers are local.

    4. Re:Dear content producers... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      You'd think that for a good slice of that $40-$60/mo they'd be willing to offer them a subscription of some sort. Especially if they've been complaining that "the purely free-content business model is unsustainable".

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    5. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't understand how "region coding" and "region blocking" has survived this long. It is *inherently* anti-globalization and is probably the poster child example of how "globalization" is really a crock of shit designed only to benefit multi-national corporations and NOT the consumer.

    6. Re:Dear content producers... by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One reason for it is the different regulations of each country. If a major company with deep pockets sells a region-free DVD globally some country will sue because it didn't censor the left eyebrow of all blonde women, or whatever ludicrous regulation that country has.

    7. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was $40-$60 per year not per month.

    8. Re:Dear content producers... by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell ya what. You're so interested in global content, but we've got all these political hoops we have to go through to make that work. Every last little country has its own media industry and they want things their own way.

      But now, here's my proposal: We, the media, will give you global media - your way, anywhere. Now you - you just have to sign on the dotted line here, that says "I the undersigned, agree to a global governing body"...that's right, good. Now, see? We were going this way all along. And you and me, we both benefit this way!

    9. Re:Dear content producers... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It's $40-$60/yr., and do you really think that Witopia would be willing to give any of that up if they could avoid it?

      Though a subscription idea to remove ads would be very interesting to me, as long as it removes all the video ads and doesn't have overlays on what I want to watch.

    10. Re:Dear content producers... by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that Hulu is paying for their bandwidth, and that since their advertisers are US based and that the content providers would like the opportunity to market their product in other counties. They cannot allow people outside the US to view it without losing their content.

      --
      once more into the breach
    11. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem as I understand isn't so much that they don't want to sell to us, they don't want to piss off those countries with different censorship (yay retarded australian politicians). I guess it takes more effort to work on getting content rated to be shown in countries other than the US than just blocking those countries.

    12. Re:Dear content producers... by jipn4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bottom line. We, the people who don't live in the country where you are currently producing, want to -buy- your content or at least look at the ads.

      Your countries are often at fault themselves. For example, many European nations insist on translating US programs into the local language. There are also many regulations, agreements, taxes, tariffs, guilds, copyright limitations, licensing fees, performance fees, etc. that effectively end up necessitate negotiating separate agreements with every country.

    13. Re:Dear content producers... by TikiTDO · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the VPN blocking policy is simply a bureaucratic decision. As soon as some senior MPAA shill caught wind that you could go through VPN to "steal" their content, the studios probably told someone near the top of the Hulu corporate chain that this should be strictly US only. From there on, it's a management decision, and outside the realm of any logic. You must remember, this is the Media industry. As I'm sure you know, being a /. reader, logic is not one of their strong points.

      However, if we were to take a step back, there are pros and cons to international viewing. I think a major factor is that these companies have not realized you can offer to sell advertisement time to businesses in other countries, and then play said ads based on geolocation. You could probably even go through an intermediary, and have them handle the communication, and taxes, then send you a portion of the profit as "licensing" for next to no work on your part. However, there is also the question of licensing to consider. If the distribution rights to your content are already licensed in a country, then you can not just start offering a better service that would take customers from the broadcasters in that country. They most likely paid quite well for these rights, and have a good contract in the hands of their best lawyers. Sure, it would get you more money, and more good will to go this way, but it might also get you in legal trouble that you do not want. In that respect, their hands may really be legally tied.

    14. Re:Dear content producers... by Paradyme · · Score: 1

      Your countries are often at fault themselves. For example, many European nations insist on translating US programs into the local language.

      That's mostly just France you're thinking of.

    15. Re:Dear content producers... by Tawnos · · Score: 1

      Require global watchers to pay a fee equal to what the advertisers would pay per impression? Naaaah, let's just block it.

    16. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately it comes down to copyrights.
      When a networks purchases the rights for a show or movie they purchase the rights by reason.
      Buying the rights for the US is significantly cheaper then buying worldwide rights. Hulu (NBC) doesn't own all of the worldwide rights for their content. If they offered it in a country where the sane show has been licensed by it's creator to another network they would be sued.

      For now, there isn't really a solution.

    17. Re:Dear content producers... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

      Dear content producers, on behalf of most of the world could you please do us a favor and release things globally

      Dear World. Could you please all learn to speak fluent English, and could you all agree to use the same contract and tax laws, so that content providers didn't have to go through intermediaries in each region that deal with localization of the content and handling dealing with the local legal and regulatory systems? Thanks!

    18. Re:Dear content producers... by Narcogen · · Score: 1

      "If you won't sell the product where your fans are, how are we supposed to support you? I can understand physical DVD sales or broadcasting it via television because that costs money, however the internet allows you to distribute content for -free- without the overhead of needing to translate, ship or alter any media."

      Regional restrictions have never been about this. They are about pricing. There is piracy everywhere, but the amount varies. Demographics mean that incomes vary which means optimal price points vary. A few years ago, 100% legit DVDs in parts of the former Soviet Union cost $30-$50 and had few takers. Meanwhile, pirate discs cost $1-$5 and where everywhere. The response was, in part, to partner with local companies to make advertising-subsidized legitimate discs, pressed locally, that cost around $10.

      Right now, rights from content producers are still parceled out regionally, in part because they want the ability to price on a per-region basis. If there are no local partners present, and no price point set, customers in that region are blocked.

      The idea of one price, worldwide, isn't something the content producers are willing and able to cope with, and most likely will not be for many years.

    19. Re:Dear content producers... by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How can they be sued if they don't sell in the country where it would be illegal. They can't be sued for someone crossing a border with their product.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    20. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, globalisation is only supposed to work for multi-nationals. Why do you think governments are so happy to impose massive restrictions on its citizens to prevent them from buying abroad?

      Second, this is globalisation ... for them. They only show it in the US because they want to sell exclusive rights to other local distributors, e.g. TV companies in Europe.

      The only way globalisation works for us is by copying stuff. I pretty much gave up buying games online because all stores have more country restrictions than ever. There are only few new games left you can actually buy outside the US as digital downloads (and I refuse to pay 300-500% for a horribly localised and censored German version).

    21. Re:Dear content producers... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      One big reason why worldwide distribution is so hard is that every country has their own ratings system for content and expects content producers to respect that (not release content not approved, only release content rated "adult" to adults etc)
      The US has the MPAA ratings system (which may be optional but which most studios tend to follow for their content)
      Australia has the OFLC
      Germany has the USK
      The UK has the BBFC
      Other European countries have their own systems (with all the things the EU has done, why havent they moved to a single system of regulation for content so content producers only need to get the content rated once)
      And so on

    22. Re:Dear content producers... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would happily pay $60/year directly to Hulu to be able to access their content in the UK without adverts, and I'd even be willing to pay annually in advance. It's only $5/month for them, but it's $5/month that they wouldn't otherwise be getting. I don't own a TV, so the content producers aren't getting anything from me via syndicated networks over here either. They get a little bit when I rent DVDs, which is how I watch most TV shows these days, but that's almost certainly less than $5/month because they have to share my subscription with films and so on.

      It really amazes me that these companies complain about piracy hurting their profits, but when I'm standing here with a credit card asking to buy their products they won't let me. If I owned shares in any of them, I would be suing the board for their chronic mismanagement.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    23. Re:Dear content producers... by Grimbleton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I pay over $100 a month for internet and TV and still haven't gotten rid of those damned video ads over there on the television. Don't press your luck. =\

      (Though the TV is on maybe five times a month in one hour blocks, so that may be going away soon. Hulu is too convenient for me to bother with the TV.)

    24. Re:Dear content producers... by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why ascribe to male that which can be explained by common sense?

      - Can advertisements about Double Whoppers have any value to Europeans or Japanese?
      - How about advertising about Bank of America?
      - Or the new Chevy Volt?

      Hulu's advertisements are aimed towards a specific audience - Americans. They have zero interest in advertising to other areas of the world, because Hulu has nothing to gain from it. Therefore Hulu cuts-off those regions where they have nothing to gain, and you would probably do the same if you owned that business.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    25. Re:Dear content producers... by nattt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most adverts are utterly irrelevant to most people anyway....

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
    26. Re:Dear content producers... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Cable TV is a weird animal. It could support itself wholly-and-completely by commercials, just like broadcast television does, but at some point cable channel owners had the brilliant idea to charge Comcast, Cox, and other cable companies for the content. At first these rates were reasonable... about 20 cents per home.

      Then cable TV started creating original programming instead of merely reruns, which obviously costs a lot of money. Although some channels like FOX News or CNN still charge 20 cents per home, other channels like Sci-Fi, Disney and TNT have risen to about one dollar per home, with the highest-price channel ESPN charging $3.00!

      And that's why your cable bill has increased from about $25 in 1995 to $65 today (basic 70-channel service).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    27. Re:Dear content producers... by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Your countries are often at fault themselves. For example, many European nations insist on translating US programs into the local language. There are also many regulations, agreements, taxes, tariffs, guilds, copyright limitations, licensing fees, performance fees, etc. that effectively end up necessitate negotiating separate agreements with every country.

      All you're demonstrating is that the music/video distribution industry, as distinct from the music/video production industry, is a dinosaur. None of this applies to a private citizen importing from overseas or viewing a foreign website like hulu.

      The real reason they don't actually give the customer what they want is that there are too many pigs at the trough, sorry, middlemen, who would kick up an almighty stink if their gravy train disappeared. The music/video distribution industry is horrendously inefficient because of all those pigs taking their cut for doing nothing that couldn't be done by a simple website.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    28. Re:Dear content producers... by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True but Bank of America would still rather advertise in the U.S., where the ads are relevant to SOME of the people, than advertise to the EU or Japan where the ads are relevant to NONE of the people. That's why BoA and other US-centric businesses pressure Hulu to block non-US viewers.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    29. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no its all about cash..

      Some random numbers..

      i create a new hit show.. say.. Law and Order.. I am warner brothers (aol/time warner subsidiary etc) I now sell taht show for exclusive primetime broadcast in the united states at 500,000$ an episode to CBS..

      Now I go and sell it again in Canada, the UK, etc etc etc.. and we have now sold our show 50x for 500k per episode.. and laugh all the way to the bank...

      MANY of these deals where cut LONG before Hulu and its like.. some are extensive and cover several shows, or an entire studios production... they also tend to kitchen sink the rights during the exclusivity.. for example the contracts prohibit broadcast over interwebs or any medium like it outside of your local area.. IE Bosnian TV cannot setup a website and show all the shows it has rights to broadcast WITHIN bosnia.. without at least trying to block it from leaking outside of bosnia..

      ALSO the same sort of rights selling was done for "mobile access" and yes I am pretty sure that many companies are kicking themselves atm for selling mobile access rights exclusively to now defunct or never off the ground sorts of cellphone company wannabes .. but that is similar setup..

      Its annoying but it will change as each contract comes up for renewal/etc.. That said, i am fairly certain that much of the brand new and very old content on Hulu is technically able to be streamed to mobile devices/shown worldwide etc .. its just far easier to block all non US and or mobile setups than to do it on a case by case basis (remember its not uncommon for deals to not include the entire run of shows (all seasons of CSI including the current one etc) so we are basically discussing episode by episode rules.. which while it seems at first glance to be better, would in fact end up hurting the brand as people get excited that they can watch shit on Hulu and then turns out that 95% or more of what THEY want to see is really not available.

    30. Re:Dear content producers... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " Initially Witopia's LA gateway remained unaffected, but now Hulu has blocked this as well."

      Interesting, I didn't know we had a Witopia gateway down here in Louisiana...?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - Can advertisements about Double Whoppers have any value to Europeans or Japanese?
      - How about advertising about Bank of America?
      - Or the new Chevy Volt?

      Hulu's advertisements are aimed towards a specific audience - Americans. They have zero interest in advertising to other areas of the world, because Hulu has nothing to gain from it. Therefore Hulu cuts-off those regions where they have nothing to gain, and you would probably do the same if you owned that business.

      You think Europeans don't have Burger King? I'm not a Whopper fan myself, but we can certainly buy them on every bloody street corner. Chevy's might not interest us, but other manufacturers that do sell in both countries (Toyota, Honda, BMW etc.) will find customers on both sides of all the ponds. Bank of America, maybe not. But I'm sure there are international financial institutions that would jump at the chance of a wider audience for little or no extra overhead.

      Hulu would have to be massively short-sighted to ignore the potential of foreign markets, especially considering their service is one that can cross territorial boundaries with a minimum of hassle (obviously not none due to licensing, but at least Customs doesn't give a shit).

    32. Re:Dear content producers... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "(Though the TV is on maybe five times a month in one hour blocks, so that may be going away soon. Hulu is too convenient for me to bother with the TV.)"

      Interesting, in my house, there is at least ONE tv on at all times I am there, usually one in each room if I'm moving about the house that day. The first thing I do when I wake up in the morning, is turn on the tv, I set the last one to turn off in my bedroom when I get ready to go to sleep....it is kind of my nightlight.

      That being said...I've seen hulu stuff, and it is ok, but, you have a severe lack of choice from what I can see, and the quality isn't that great. I mean if "I" have a choice between the streamed version of something at who knows what resolution, and something coming in on HDTV....I gotta say I'd go with the HD content.

      I also usually have a computer on and accessible in any given room of the house too...so, it isn't like I'm doing intarweb stuff too during the days at home.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:Dear content producers... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Then cable TV started creating original programming instead of merely reruns, which obviously costs a lot of money. Although some channels like FOX News or CNN still charge 20 cents per home, other channels like Sci-Fi, Disney and TNT have risen to about one dollar per home, with the highest-price channel ESPN charging $3.00!"

      I wonder, whatever happened to that initiative (with the FCC?) to allow people to buy their cable channels ala-carte?

      I'd certainly do just fine without ESPN...or at least I'd only get it during college football season to see a few games, but, otherwise the rest of the year, I just burn energy surfing past those channels.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:Dear content producers... by phoomp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup. And yet, almost every major website with advertising has figured out a way to deliver ads that are not only localized, but also, and even better, targeted based on my browsing habits. If content distributors would take a moment to step into this century, they would realize that they don't have to license the content locally. All they need to do is to get local advertisers to *come to them* and then distribute the ads appropriately based on IP. They've already figured out how to *block* us geographically based on IP ... but, content distributors always seem good with technology when it comes to *pissing off* their customers.

    35. Re:Dear content producers... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      If that is the case, then that country is not operating according to free trade principles. Requiring content to meet outlandish local censorship laws is a very obvious form of protectionism favoring locally produced content. This applies in particular to requirements on companies like Google to censor search results or the like in place like China.

      China is the single biggest offender here, but there are a swath of other countries who seem to have no trouble whatsoever banning (foreign) goods and services despite claiming to be part of free trade agreements. Why is it that a factory owner in China can sell me as many widgets as it can produce with no restrictions, yet I cannot sell a single book, film, program or search result back to him without satisfying umpteen layers of red tape?

      And people wonder why there is a trade imbalance.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    36. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its all about the regions, 3 major regions North America, Europe and Asia, Each Market has their own Warlords, the guys that make all the money. follow the money

    37. Re:Dear content producers... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "we have money just like "your part" of the world does and no, we don't like getting episodes 1-2 months later than the rest of the world and no we don't like being shut off of a service that would allow us to watch TV while supporting the producers."
      1. Hulu is an ad supported service. The people that pay for the ads don't want to pay for people that can not buy their stuff. It doesn't make a lot of sense for Ford to pay to advertise a car to people that can not buy it.
      2. Don't blame the content producers for your lag blame you networks. You networks will wait to see if a US show is a hit before they bring it to your country. Only makes sense that way they don't buy the shows that suck. The producers make a lot more money from selling the shows to your networks than from Hulu even if they got sponsers that wanted to pay for the ads.
      So can't you buy the shows on iTunes? I mean if you want to pay for them and they are available then that is a sound option.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    38. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you people have a hard time understanding that the costs of doing business globally on the web, especially with heavy content delivery, is very expensive.Do you think they pay 40 bucks a month for unlimited internet access? And then there is the advertisers ... they do try to measure the ROI on their ads. So HULU would have to control the ads you are not going watch on a regional basis for them to be even interested.

      BTW, we all know you are going to the pirate bay anyways so cut the shit with these windbag rants.

    39. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      test

    40. Re:Dear content producers... by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      I was trying to say, without actually saying it, that I get everything I want to watch online, in one form or another (IF YOU FOLLOW) when I want it, regardless of what the television happens to have on at the time.

      I confess, I have downloaded a few TV shows (Several of which I went out and bought on DVD. Honest. I'm looking at my Smallville season sets from where I'm sitting.) in the past few years, but only because I missed episodes along the way, or what have you.

      We only have the one TV, in the living room, and it's primarily for video games.

    41. Re:Dear content producers... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      The FCC performed a study which claimed a la carte would cost the average consumer More money, not less.

      Of course the study was flawed because it assumed bundled channels (like 70-channel basic) would no longer exist, so customers would have to buy each channel separately (stupid). It also failed to acknowledge that some cable companies already offer a la carte at $5 flat fee plus $1 per channel, and it works just fine. If a La Carte was available I would get Sci-Fi Channel, FOX news, CNN, and that's about it. $5 + $2/channel == only $11... much much cheaper than the current $62 Comcast charges for basic.

      Although I could choose Dish Satellite. Their family plan is only $20 for about 30 channels. Not bad.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    42. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that a lot of countries - Canada especially - have a pretty heavy hand when it comes to regulation of broadcast media. Just because this is on the Internet doesn't mean the CRTC won't want to institute all kinds of rules: requiring Hulu to include Canadian content, requiring certain special advertising practices, etc. The regulatory hoops that they will have to jump through to spread this service to other countries, along with the difficulty and expense of recruiting international advertisers, is what's delaying this. CRTC is just one such organization, and presumably they would run into similar hurdles around the world - I know that the UK has as stringent, if not more stringent, regulatory framework attached to television.

    43. Re:Dear content producers... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I'm confused, are we now for targeted advertisement based on browsing habbits?

    44. Re:Dear content producers... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I was trying to say, without actually saying it, that I get everything I want to watch online, in one form or another (IF YOU FOLLOW) when I want it, regardless of what the television happens to have on at the time."

      Ah...gotcha.

      I have MythTV running, so, that while I may have TV on all the time, I'm not a slave to what they have scheduled on at any given time, I can what what I want at my leisure. About the only things I watch in real time are college football...or the news channels which I sometimes just keep on in the background.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:Dear content producers... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      We don't mind, we have all the tools to prevent it when it's not cool with us.

      Thank you for listening to us.

    46. Re:Dear content producers... by Taevin · · Score: 1

      But after we all find out that one person viewing some copyrighted work is worth about $0.01, how are they ever going to claim in court that a single unauthorized copy of "their" work cost them over a $100,000?

    47. Re:Dear content producers... by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      The studios are selling a great many catalog titles on blu-ray without region coding. I would guess a majority, although I am not positive. It varies a bit by studio.

    48. Re:Dear content producers... by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      What is preventing them from running region-relevant ads in other nations?

    49. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, The BBC started this. I want my Dr. Who teasers.

    50. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So why expend effort to do anything if they have nothing to gain? They now spend time seeking out alternative ways that audiences in other regions are using to access their site, and then expending time and manpower to close those 'loopholes'. If they had NOTHING to gain, then they wouldn't bother, leaving those holes open and generating some goodwill and what little audience they could get in the process.

      So it's either an instance of taking their ball and going home, or they're getting something out of limiting their audience to the US only.

    51. Re:Dear content producers... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Hulu's advertisements are aimed towards a specific audience - Americans. They have zero interest in advertising to other areas of the world, because Hulu has nothing to gain from it. Therefore Hulu cuts-off those regions where they have nothing to gain, and you would probably do the same if you owned that business.

      Personally, I'd gladly pay for a service such as Hulu if it was available in my country without any ads.

    52. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Man, fuck you on the fluent english comment. The foreign people going to Hulu know what they're getting, they're fine with it, the sorry fact is the US "culture" has been exported so successfully that EVERYONE (well almost) in the world has absorbed it.

      But well, who gives a rat's ass about Hulu anyway, they're going behind a paywall next year, long live BitTorrent, getting Family Guy 1/2 an hour after it's shown in the east coast (I think that's even earlier than the west coast) is sweet. And it's free, and it's ad-free as well, so kiss my shiny metal ass!

    53. Re:Dear content producers... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Where did a ascribe malice?

      It's simple business, the content producers divvy up distribution licensing. Having the rights to distribute in the US does not mean you can distribute in Germany for example. They do that because they make more money that way, since they can sell those rights multiple times.

      Hulu is more a distributor than a content producer, and content producers is what the post I replied to was about.

    54. Re:Dear content producers... by davitf · · Score: 1
      I've been worrying about the move to online content for many years now. With regular CDs and DVDs, if the content you want doesn't have a distributor in your region, it's usually easy, if a little more expensive, to buy it from a foreign store. With digital content you don't have that option: if the content is not being distributed by anyone in your region, you have no choice, no matter how much you're willing to pay (unless you're willing to work around the terms of service, or if you move to the other country and consume it there). The internet, which has the potential to make any content accessible to anyone in the world who's interested, instead ends up making the geographical divide stronger.

      I'm a completist music freak, so I get really mad when there are digital-only releases or bonus songs I cannot get. I understand that most of the time the artists have no responsibility and don't even realize this is happening, so when I have the chance I try to point it out to them; but I haven't had even a single acknowledgement so far, and I'm starting to wonder if anyone actually thinks this is a problem.

    55. Re:Dear content producers... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that was tongue-in-cheek, but as we get further into the NWO, this will probably happen... Be careful what you wish for, you're probably gonna get it...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    56. Re:Dear content producers... by jipn4 · · Score: 1

      None of this applies to a private citizen importing from overseas or viewing a foreign website like hulu.

      But it does indirectly apply to a company like Hulu allowing private citizens to import content from overseas.

      The real reason they don't actually give the customer what they want is that there are too many pigs at the trough, sorry, middlemen, who would kick up an almighty stink if their gravy train disappeared.

      Quite right. And those middlemen exist even more outside the US than inside. Look at France and their three strikes law, the UK and their excessive public TV charges, or Germany and their corrupt author's guilds. And the funny thing is: although Europe still produces the occasionally nice writer or artists, on the whole, if the entire European output of art since WWII were to disappear from the earth, hardly anybody would notice. Europe's golden ages of music, art, and literature have long since passed and the continent in mired in corruption and mediocrity.

    57. Re:Dear content producers... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Its not the regulations in the country, its the publishers.. Often times, a company will sell distribution rights to American shows to international companies.. For example, some other company might be broadcasting "Grey's Anatomy" (i know, cringe) in argentina, and they paid for the rights from the company that makes Greys Anatomy. Hulu doesn't own these rights in Argentina, the other company does.. Or sometimes, it gets even weirder, like how "The Office" is a US show, that is based on but wholly different than a British version of the same show. Or American Idol in the US is different than American Idol in the UK, except that Simon Cowell or whatever his name is in both.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    58. Re:Dear content producers... by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Odd, I've found the only time I actually watch TV anymore is just to see "what's on." Any shows that I *want* to watch, I typically get on Hulu (or similar). Right now for me that's the only value added-- being able to flip through to find something interesting at the moment. Yes, HD broadcasts are higher quality than streamed video, but I honestly don't notice once I start getting into the show.

      Yup, droppin off my tv service really soon now :)

      --
      +1 Disagree
    59. Re:Dear content producers... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I think you vastly underestimate the amount of art, music and literature that is being created in Europe. A lot of it is not targeted at English speaking audiences though.

      The USA has certain advantages because it has a huge internal market, and adheres to a more cut-throat model of capitalism, allowing for more extremes both in good and bad products/companies/artists/etc. But overall I don't think quantity or quality is less than in the USA. I think the total European market is bigger than the USA, it's just fragmented mostly by language.

      The only place where I think the USA does have a certain dominance is in making movies. In some fields I think there is European dominance, like for example architecture (look at the architects of the buildings for the Beijing Olympics for example).

      I leave actual examples as an exercise to the reader. I've done a little searching, but outside of some lists for my own relative small country (the Netherlands), I don't have the time to wrestle though a lot of sites in other languages to make a better list. I'll leave you with a few names from the top of my head:
      J.K. Rowling, Stieg Larsson, Krezip, Anouk, Andre Rieu, Karel Appel, Jan Wolkers, Piet Mondriaan, Rem Koolhaas.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    60. Re:Dear content producers... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Well said,

      Unfortunately I think the main reason they don't want to sell to us, is in the hope that we'll go watch it on our local television network in three years time, when they sold and subtitled or dubbed it.
      I think the media companies have not yet caught on that that model is fading fast, and that a lot of people no longer wait so long.

      The whole "This service is not available in your country", region encoding of DVDs and what have you is so infuriating. Even iTunes plays this game...

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    61. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you never noticed that while some sites are from other countries, somehow they are able to put ads from your country.

    62. Re:Dear content producers... by orlanz · · Score: 1

      So... you improve the overall service and start targeting ads based on location (selected or auto-determined).

    63. Re:Dear content producers... by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      Therefore Hulu cuts-off those regions where they have nothing to gain, and you would probably do the same if you owned that business.

      You are missing the part where they have something to lose. NBC and others currently sell their shows internationally. Cable stations all over the world buy shows from NBC and others for big bucks (HUGE bucks). Offering HULU for free globally would undercut this massive revenue stream.

    64. Re:Dear content producers... by obender · · Score: 1

      True but Bank of America would still rather advertise in the U.S., where the ads are relevant to SOME of the people

      I receive at least one email a day from BoA telling me I have to confirm my account details because of the new security system they just put in place. If we have to go though this ordeal we are entitled to sponsored content as well.

      Need to go now, I just got an email about this once in a lifetime opportunity from Nigeria

    65. Re:Dear content producers... by migla · · Score: 1

      So what? Sue where? The International Court of Justice in Hague? I'm sure they have mor pressing matters.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    66. Re:Dear content producers... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Do you have a tv set with enough quality to see the difference? Big? HD?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    67. Re:Dear content producers... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with that. It has to do with the old way of doing things and protecting distributors in other regions who sell the company's physical content.

      This is dumb. The internet should be consider its own region and those distributors can get fucked.

    68. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very very true. the average Japanese man wouldnt care about the US Army. and thats what osme of the ads are.

    69. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, there is "Bank of America, Japan" (not that it's big, or popular or anything, but I saw them at a job fair in Tokyo hiring last year). Also, you can certainly buy double-whoppers here. The Chevy, I am not so sure, most people take the train or bike anyway...

    70. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so that's why YouTube bothered to translate all those videos about cats into every language known to man.

    71. Re:Dear content producers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. I'm in Canada. I cannot get Hulu. I can however buy a double whopper, a Chevy Volt, and there's a Bank of America on the corner.
      Did I say I can't get Hulu?

    72. Re:Dear content producers... by mcfedr · · Score: 1

      dev, i pay about $15 a month for my cable tv and 10mb internet...

    73. Re:Dear content producers... by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could... sell international ads? *shock*

    74. Re:Dear content producers... by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but where do you live?

  3. Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.hdstream.org

    1. Re:Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eztv.it

  4. So much by Haoie · · Score: 1

    For the internet breaking all national boundaries!

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    1. Re:So much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have long been predictions that eventually the internet will be completely locked down and controlled by media interests, much like TV.

      It's slowly coming true, one step at a time. It was never tolerable to governmental and economic powers that it would be free and open.

    2. Re:So much by HollyMolly-1122 · · Score: 0

      Internet is not intended for breaking. It's intended for uniting. The only things what breaks all the way are too big business plans and merchantilism.

    3. Re:So much by wizardforce · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well actually it does, it's just that media corporations aren't getting the message. They fought tooth and nail to maintain their control at every step in the advancement of media technology. The problem is that there are no technical limitations preventing these shows from going global, it's purely limited by the media corporations' need for control over their media. People can still access these shows through other means, they jsut aren't legal means. Which is really too bad; the media companies had an opportunity to expand the reach of their media to a world-wide audience and they can't think past their fears of piracy and supposedly low revenue opportunity from doing so.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    4. Re:So much by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The media companies even told Hulu to shut off access to the PS3's web browser because PS3's are hooked to TV's in the living room and not monitors on desks Though my PS3 is hooked up to a small HDTV that has a VGA input in addition to HDMI, on a desk.

      http://gizmodo.com/5315896/hulu-speaks-on-ps3-blocking-its-the-content-providers

    5. Re:So much by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      There have long been predictions that eventually the internet will be completely locked down and controlled by media interests, much like TV.

      It's slowly coming true, one step at a time. It was never tolerable to governmental and economic powers that it would be free and open.

      At which point everyone will start running/hosting wireless mesh lilypad networks, and stuff like email will be routed by this century's equivalent of fidonet. The Internet is made to route around damage, but when it becomes damaged enough, there'll be enough incentive for us to route around it.

  5. VPS hosting + VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build your own for $20 USD/month!

    1. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      And where would I, a Canadian, get a US IP?

    2. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by nacturation · · Score: 1

      VPS stands for Virtual Private Server. You could let me Google that for you, but instead I'll point you to Linode which hits to $20/month price point.

      Also, is this an actual article or a press release for Witopia?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Astraweb is $11/month. Let me see... which to choose.

    4. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Astraweb is $11/month. Let me see... which to choose.

      The one that meets your criteria best, obviously. If Astraweb offers the same or a sufficient level of performance and bandwidth, why pay more?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Astraweb is a Usenet provider. My point was why jump through all the hoops of a VPN, on the inside of the US, with who knows what bandwidth just so that you can watch something on Hulu when you can just get it near straight from the source.

      If the media companies want to make it hard for me to watch something with their ads, I'll make it easy on myself.

    6. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by sheriff_p · · Score: 5, Funny

      And where would I, a Canadian, get a US IP?

      Anyone remember when Slashdot used to be News for Nerds?

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
    7. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      BitTorrent costs nothing.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    8. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And BitTorrent is free. Idiot.

    9. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly don't.

    10. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And about stuff that matters.

    11. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      If the media companies want to make it hard for me to watch something with their ads, I'll make it easy on myself.

      One could say that rather than jumping through Hulu's hoops we'll find another way then.

    12. Re:VPS hosting + VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that part has always been sarcastic. Like the "news" part. They could simplify the tagline to "Slashdot. For nerds." Or maybe something like "Slashdot. It's what nerds love."

  6. "But if you don't want our money, fine" by Animaether · · Score: 4, Insightful

    err... what money?
    I thought Hulu was ad-supported?

    And what American advertiser is going to want to place ads for videos that are seen in countries where they may not even have an establishment?
    Even those that do - say, McDonald's - can't exactly advertise a burger that they're offering nation-wide in the U.S. for a particular price in another country where that product is not available, or is available but for a different price.

    So, Hulu and the content rights holders would have to come to advertising agreements in all of the other nations being catered to while at the same time, trying not to piss off the the broadcasters in those areas too much (after all, the syndicated content -does- appear on TV much later, once these smaller broadcasters can actually afford it - but what advertisers are -they- going to attract if everybody's already seen it for free via Hulu?)... so good luck with that.

    And if they -did- start charging cold hard cash... well, I guess one could claim iTunes as being highly successful, so if they did it well, it might even work. In due time, I suppose.

    1. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by TheWizardTim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What about just advertising the brand? If IP = US ad for McDonald's new heart attack burger. If IP != US, then just a general ad for McDonalds.

      Or you can advertise products that people would never buy. For example, on CNN I see ads for Boeing all the time. I am not in the market for a new 787, and I bet that 99.9999996% of the viewers are not as well.

    2. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      I don't buy that excuse. If Hulu couldn't make enough from ad revenue overseas then they should offer a paid subscription. They have no shortage of people trying to see what they offer and I'd bet that by continually making efforts to stop fans from accessing the site from outside the US they're only encouraging people to go elsewhere, even piracy.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    3. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about that. It's about the contracts they signed with the content providers.

    4. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Darkness404 · · Score: 1
      They can always use an international ad network. I don't see any other ad-supported site complain about foreign visitors. And the ones that do try to keep foreigners out (Such as Nico Nico) still let your register and view the site so long as you can manage to create an account in their language.

      So, Hulu and the content rights holders would have to come to advertising agreements in all of the other nations being catered to while at the same time, trying not to piss off the the broadcasters in those areas too much (after all, the syndicated content -does- appear on TV much later, once these smaller broadcasters can actually afford it - but what advertisers are -they- going to attract if everybody's already seen it for free via Hulu?)... so good luck with that.

      But there are still many other shows that don't make it past American, European or Japanese shores at all. For example Family Guy is only broadcast in the US as far as I know and it has been broadcast since 1999, I think it is safe to say it won't be syndicated outside of the US anytime soon. Other shows are totally destroyed in "localization" most anime series are completely ruined when brought to American or European countries. There are many anime fans who would much rather watch the original with subtitles than with sub-par voice acting and many references, scenes or entire characters removed or changed.

      Plus, look at how entire markets have been opened by people watching non-native TV. Anime and manga were virtually unknown to most people 15 years ago, but have since become household names. The internet and copyright infringement really opened up those markets. That never would have happened if all the sites were similar to Hulu.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If IP = US ad for McDonald's new heart attack burger. If IP != US, then just a general ad for McDonalds.

      You, the presenter (in this case Hulu) have to convince McDonalds of that.
      Ads are VERY time and location specific. You don't advertise snow tires in Miami, and you don't advertise sandals in Minnesota. Ok...maybe. But not in February.

      Boise, Baltimore, and Barcelona all get different McDonalds ads. And at different times.

      As for the Boeing ads...thats just brand awareness. Obviously not a product you will buy, but a brand you, the business owner/voter, may defend in the next round of bailouts.

    6. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even those that do - say, McDonald's - can't exactly advertise a burger that they're offering nation-wide in the U.S. for a particular price in another country where that product is not available, or is available but for a different price.

      Geolocation via IP - serve up different ads based on the viewers' geographical location. It's done all the time, along with time-of-day, so that you can target your ads to the viewers you want. Spamvertisers with their affiliate advertising do it all the time, why can't Hulu?

    7. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by harmonise · · Score: 1

      Even those that do - say, McDonald's - can't exactly advertise a burger that they're offering nation-wide in the U.S. for a particular price in another country where that product is not available, or is available but for a different price.

      Brand awareness can still be of value. Even though an ad might be for a Big Mac, the person who sees the ad might want to go to McDonalds and get a McArabia sandwich after watching Brian and Stewie tell fart jokes.

      --
      Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    8. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by onco_p53 · · Score: 1

      Family guy has been broadcasted in New Zealand for years. Ditto Simpsons, South Park, King of the Hill...

    9. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      And Australia... there are other places in the world (you know, that bit outside the contiguous 48) where English is the primary language and people can easily translate the Americanisms out of shows.

      We even take slops like Oprah, Judge Judy, Bold and The Beautiful, various flavours of CSI, NBC Today, and (for something truly parochial) PBS Jim Lehrer News Hour.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    10. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or ... they could just use the same geolocation they use to block IPs outside the US to serve location aware advertising. Don't serve the US add to China. Amazon would probably be more than happy to have its ads served in China though.

      They are already using the tech, wouldn't take much effort to support it really.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by onco_p53 · · Score: 1

      Yeah we get all those too, on free-TV too I should add. Maybe it is the poor quality transmission, but is there something weird with Lehrer's eyes?

      My favourite non sci-fi export would have to be NCIS.

    12. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by konadelux · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with Hulu not wanting to figure out an advertising strategy for countries outside of the United States. Hulu is a business, and if there is money to be made then they will do their best to make it.

      The issue is that the networks who produce these shows enter into contracts with the networks who air those shows in foreign countries. So for example, here in Canada, CTV airs a lot of american network television shows, and in buying those shows they stipulate that they have the exclusive rights to make money off of those shows in Canada. So unless CTV and Global and the other Canadian stations enter into a partnership with Hulu, or come up with something similar themselves, then we Canadians are SOL.

    13. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by magarity · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am not in the market for a new 787
       
      Heck, I am.
       
      OK, so lining up financing has me stumped, but I'm totally in the market otherwise.

    14. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      It's at least as easy for Hulu to deliver different ads to different countries as it is to block people from those countries and hunt down their US proxies, etc.

      Some businesses like McDonalds may have a presence that allows running many customized ads (and as it is unlikely they have setup a presence without advertising it there does not need to be much if any cost creating new adds). Otherwise you can contract with someone local there who is selling web advertising--if they are selling it at all then presumably there is a price at which they will be only too happy to include you in their schemes.

      If the margins are too small then you just increase the number of ad intervals.

      Yes at some point that will drive off viewers, but then that just achieves what blocking them would have achieved, doesn't it?

    15. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err... what money?
      I thought Hulu was ad-supported?

      And what American advertiser is going to want to place ads for videos that are seen in countries where they may not even have an establishment?

      Because increasing your global coverage decreases your local coverage? Its not like adding international viewer in to the mix is going to reduce the numbers of domestic viewers is it? And there are plenty of companies that would happily pay for a global advert. I get banner adds all the time for US only products or US only services, why should video ads be any different?

      I would also think Hulu could use the opportunity to build a customer base to allow it to start offering localized advertising. Getting a lot of viewers from the UK? Great, open an office there and start selling advertising space to UK companies.. Japan viewers up this month? Discount advertising for Japanese companies for this month only!

      Cutting off 90% of the worlds viewers is also cutting off 90% of your revenue stream..

    16. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by shinzawai · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      But there are still many other shows that don't make it past American, European or Japanese shores at all. For example Family Guy is only broadcast in the US as far as I know and it has been broadcast since 1999, I think it is safe to say it won't be syndicated outside of the US anytime soon. Other shows are totally destroyed in "localization" most anime series are completely ruined when brought to American or European countries.

      You obviously don't know shit.

    17. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what American advertiser is going to want to place ads for videos that are seen in countries where they may not even have an establishment?

      Then have non-American advertisers as well, and show the ads for the appropriate region. Duh.

    18. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      There are many anime fans who would much rather watch the original with subtitles than with sub-par voice acting and many references, scenes or entire characters removed or changed.

      O rly? Well, I'd rather watch the original with subtitles than even the most competent dub. That goes for animation, TV shows, movies, and games: the original voice acting must absolutely NOT be changed in localization, be it English, Japanese, Russian, Swahili, Elvish, Klingon, Pig Latin, or Swedish Chef!

    19. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >As for the Boeing ads...thats just brand awareness. Obviously not a product you will buy, but a brand you, the business owner/voter, may defend in the next round of bailouts.

      Speak for yourself. I'm dying to replace my old 737 with the new dreamliner.

    20. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also in Turkey, with subtitles. But the more popular shows such as Lost, Prison Break are dubbed.

    21. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by AlXtreme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geolocation via IP - serve up different ads based on the viewers' geographical location. It's done all the time, along with time-of-day, so that you can target your ads to the viewers you want. Spamvertisers with their affiliate advertising do it all the time, why can't Hulu?

      They already do. How do you think they block non-US viewers?

      The problem is that US-centric advertisers don't want to target someone in Kazakhstan and that Hulu doesn't want to jump through hoops licensing their content to each and every country.

      Hadn't expected them to actively block VPN services though.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    22. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      True ads are hard to translate across regions or cultures, perhaps a fee for service model would work better for expanding the market for shows. Also, there are a lot of companies that are very region centric, often US, or US and Canada that don't rely on advertising. For example: why did it take nearly 2 years to get a version of the Kindle that works outside the US (oddly it still doesn't work in Canada but it works in Germany where I currently live)? Even now that we have the Kindle outside the US you still have a narrower selection of titles than US customers and they don't bother to ship it with a power adapter for your country. Similarly Sony's e-book store only sells in the US; really is it that uncomfortable for authors/publishers/storefronts to accept non-US customers? For a while southpark episodes weren't available online internationally now they are. etc etc.

    23. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Canadians routinely see ads on their cable channels for businesses and products that are unavailable, a different price, or possibly illegal. It doesn't seem to bother those american advertisers.

    24. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by DarkGreenNight · · Score: 1

      Family Guy is being broadcasted in Spain too, dubbed: www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfQlZXfy1Wo

      But yes, the market should open. There's a lot of following of shows through Internet. So much, in fact, that now Flashforward is being broadcasted here one week after USA, quite a feat if you take into account that it's dubbed (lots of dubbing here).

    25. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by daybot · · Score: 1

      And what American advertiser is going to want to place ads for videos that are seen in countries where they may not even have an establishment?

      There's a huge opportunity being missed here - international targeted ads based on your locality using IP geolocation. McDonald's could pay megabucks for generic worldwide ads, while Tony's Steak House could pay a few thousand dollars for highly targeted ads in Rochester MN. That would really throw the Internet cat amongst the TV network pigeons.

    26. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Xiph1980 · · Score: 1

      that's what he said aswell...

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
    27. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      >>>If Hulu couldn't make enough from ad revenue overseas then they should offer a paid subscription.

      My airplane club needs a new flying field, and we want you to donate $10 each month to support it. If you don't have enough revenue, then you should go get a second job.

      Oh wait! There's that issue of -freedom of choice- which allow you Not to fund my field. Ditto Hulu which also has freedom of choice Not to offer paid subscriptions. Damn.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    28. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Apparently Stormwatch didn't read the message he quoted.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    29. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "And also in Turkey, with subtitles. But the more popular shows such as Lost, Prison Break are dubbed."

      I can understand why a show like "Prison Break" would attract a huge following in Turkey ;-)

    30. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Not at all. He said:
      "Some dubs are so poorly done and so censored that people prefer subtitles."

      Then, what I said was:
      "You could give me a top quality dub, and I'd STILL prefer subtitles!"

    31. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      has NOTHING to do with advertising..

      Has evertything to do with deals such as...

      "we sold the rights to broadcast the show to NBC in the US thus allowing Hulu to rebroadcast it on the interwebs, however we also sold the show in the UK to ITV, in the rest of the EU to SKY, and to about 15 other broadcasters worldwide... many at varying rates, and at variable seasons"

      IE CSI is on season 47 in the US, but they sold the rights to seasons 1-5 for syndicated broadcast mon-friday in the EU to sky for X dollars (way cheaper than multinational "current season" rates, though in the UK ITV can show the current season ...

      These crazy deals (a remnant of ancient past where we would be shipping cases of film over to the country in question) are the real stopping block for hulu and the like..

      The ONLY reason HULU is so prominently in the middle of this mess is that its owed by NBC-universal and Fox who are seemingly the cotnent producers and owners but in MANY cases they too are simply consumers of the content (just because a show airs on fox/nbc/etc doesnt mean it was created there.. and they too may simply be broadcast in the united states rights holders)

      This is very similar to the situation with BBConline and its iplayer.. they are legally (in the country which funds the production of the bulk of their content) not allowed as a quasi-government entity to fund broadband access to this content worldwide since they are funded by the license fee paid by UK residents.

      Is hulu the badguy here? in many ways yes, in others only by association with its owners and their wider practices.. But the guy in "sales" at NBC-Universal who is selling the rights to broadcast the Law & Order franchise 50+ times worldwide.. and generating many many many millions in cash.. has ALOT more pull with his bosses, than the head of Hulu does.. since Hulu while generating tons of positive mindshare where it works, etc.. is not exactly generating hundreds of millions in cashflow from the ads it shows..

    32. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "O rly? Well, I'd rather watch the original with subtitles than even the most competent dub. That goes for animation, TV shows, movies, and games: the original voice acting must absolutely NOT be changed in localization, be it English, Japanese, Russian, Swahili, Elvish, Klingon, Pig Latin, or Swedish Chef!"

      Hell, I'm an American, and I'd give almost anything if "I" could get some of our content dubbed in Swedish Chef!!!

      Hell, that might even make watching Keith Olbermann (MSNBC) entertaining...or at least watchable...

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet when I watch tv here in the states I see ads for Nationwide, All-State, etc. urging me to switch my homeowners insurance to them. Funny thing is they pulled out of my state and refuse to write new policies. Yet they keep paying for advertising in my market for a product I cannot have. I see ads for fast food chains we don't have down here too occasionally. If it doesn't bother them to advertise products I cannot buy in the states why should it bother them to do it outside the states too?

    34. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not buy a plane from Boeing, but you may buy a Boeing stock or two.

    35. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I've been watching Family Guy on Portuguese TV since 2001 or something...

      Maybe it's just some kind of hallucination...

    36. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      For example Family Guy is only broadcast in the US

      It airs in Canada on Global TV: http://www.globaltv.com/entertainment/shows/familyguy/index.html

      ...and I do mean 'airs' - You can watch it with rabbit ears if you want (we still have OTA analog TV in Canada).

      Global wants you to watch Family Guy online at GlobalTV.com, not Hulu, so Global can get the ad revenue.

    37. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      I keep seeing Chevy ads, that's why I bought an Airbus. If only I'd seen the Boeing ads instead.

    38. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What money man? What is the price to target Nigeria or Romania ? Selling adds for what? 5 cents? On the other side , most probably the poor countries will have 80% of the bandwidth. So it's not worth it !

      P.S. I'm a romanian , so I know first hand !

    39. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      They do some basic Geo-Location now...
      When I watch ABC shows, my local ABC Affiliates banner shows up in the bottom left of the screen. if they could partner with Google (as in youtube) to do more 'local' advertising, it would be huge for them. They would really, really open up the market to small advertisers, instead of just nationwide ads now.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    40. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by orlanz · · Score: 1

      We have X viewers in Y region, would you (McD) like us to apply your default ad or would you like a region/time specific ad to be displayed? Done.

    41. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      If only someone could invent locale based ads.

    42. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by beingthebest · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I always wondered about those weird ads on CNN for boing and Oil companies etc. I then figured out they want you to buy stock, not products since they spend all their time touting the great things they are doing.

    43. Re:"But if you don't want our money, fine" by beingthebest · · Score: 1

      I know! I love seeing all the drug ads here in Canada on cable. It's not even legal to advertise drugs in Canada. But that being said.. apparently Canadian drug companies skirt the law by buying ads in the U.S. that wll be shown in Canada. http://cupe.ca/health-care/DirecttoConsumer_Adv

  7. How it probably works... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You got Hulu which is supported by ads. For every single person who views a show, they view ads.

    Businesses pay for these ads to be shown. Maybe it's like 10 cents for a 30 second commercial, times the number of times its viewed, or something like that.

    Since the advertisements are geared towards American audiences, when someone from a non-American audience views it, it devalues what the ads are worth. A business can argue since their target is Americans, and if let's say 50% of viewers are non-Americans, then they should only have to pay like 5 cents per 30 second commercial per viewer, and not the full price.

    As the number of people viewing Hulu increases, and assume that the percentage of Americans viewing in total viewership decreases, then the profit Hulu makes falls.

    Assuming that the number of American viewers is static, Hulu has to pay for more people to view their site, while having a fixed influx of revenue.

    Of course, this can be solved simply if content providers allowed other countries to view the site, and also had advertisers geared towards that audience.

    1. Re:How it probably works... by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ads can be targetted based on IP. If your IP isn't hidden behind a VPN, that is.

      I'm starting to wonder when the content industry will realize that their competition in the form of piracy is higher quality, free, and easier to use.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    2. Re:How it probably works... by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      Sorry, missed that last line there.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    3. Re:How it probably works... by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      "it devalues what the ads are worth"

      why? an ads value is in how many people see it and how many of those people seeing it purchase a product based on it. if you have no presnce in a country then it's no loss, and if you do eg. macdonalds, it's better for you anyway.

      hulu's beef might be that they aren't getting revenue from ads placed by overseas companies but they are still bearing the cost of bandwidth. which is fair enough, but if you've got such a huge number of viewers paying to access your site via a fucking vpn, doesn't that tell you've got an untapped customer base just waiting to turn a buck from?!?!?

      for craps sake if it was me i'd be asking which countries are making the most connections, setting up shop there an selling ad time.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    4. Re:How it probably works... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Since the advertisements are geared towards American audiences, when someone from a non-American audience views it, it devalues what the ads are worth.

            This is the kind of logic that investment banks love. You probably have a bright future on Wall St.

            Ads are not "worth" anything. They are expenses. A company has a budget of X dollars to spend on advertising. The company hopes that advertising will increase sales. The company really wants to know: If I spend X dollars, how many additional sales will it get me?

            The fact that someone in N. Korea views the ad is IRRELEVANT.

            Unfortunately, the advertising business is not run by advertisers. It's run by "media". And media, being the whores that they are, want to charge the company PER VIEW of an ad. So if people in N. Korea view the ad, the media company, because they are lazy slobs (and it works in their favor) want to hike the rates for the ads. After all, more people are viewing the ad, so "of course" it is worth more. Never mind the fact that the person in N. Korea doesn't have access to the widget being advertised because of UN sanctions, etc.

            You have the argument exactly backwards.

           

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:How it probably works... by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Its a wonder nobody has been able to make targeted video ads relating to whatever is known about a viewer. Google is probably working on something like that to use in Youtube eventually though.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    6. Re:How it probably works... by Tibia1 · · Score: 1

      Hulu says that their reason for restricting content is "clearing the rights for each show or film in each specific geography." Well, why not make the site available to at least all of the places where these rights are already cleared. Eh? Name a show that is in the U.S. that are explicitly banned in, lets say, Canada.

      But to be honest, I only care about the fact that I can't access Pandora

    7. Re:How it probably works... by allknowingfrog · · Score: 0

      If advertising is the problem, the solution might be on its way. Hulu is apparently considering charging for their service directly.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/23/entertainment/main5415678.shtml

    8. Re:How it probably works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but then they come up with all of the other places that they have to block routing through the new places. For example, if they allow stuff in Canada, then they have to start blocking Canadian VPNs too, or other countries will use those

    9. Re:How it probably works... by Btarlinian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hulu says that their reason for restricting content is "clearing the rights for each show or film in each specific geography." Well, why not make the site available to at least all of the places where these rights are already cleared. Eh? Name a show that is in the U.S. that are explicitly banned in, lets say, Canada. But to be honest, I only care about the fact that I can't access Pandora

      Actualy, they probably don't have the rights for a show in Canada. For exmample, CBC might own the rights to broadcast Heroes in Canada, while NBC owns the rights to broadcast it in the US. Therefore, Hulu needs to pay money to CBC to show Heroes in Canada. (It's a terrible outdated model, I know, but its very difficult to undo the hundreds of already existing licensing deals.)

    10. Re:How it probably works... by prockcore · · Score: 5, Informative

      It has absolutely nothing to do with ads, and everything to do with media contracts with overseas content providers.

      If you're in the UK, and you want to watch Hulu, don't yell at Hulu, yell at Sky. They're the ones who have the exclusive broadcasting rights for certain shows in your country... they're the ones whose contracts prevent Hulu from streaming to your country.

    11. Re:How it probably works... by kurt555gs · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The greed of the movie and recording industry, is only exceeded by the oil business. I have no sympathy for Hulu, and some archaic distribution scheme. The internet is across the globe. Maybe some one should have told one of these greedy media executives the the full URL www.hulu.com contains (www). Some one needs to tell the money grubbing teeth gnashing slime ball that means "World Wide Web".

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    12. Re:How it probably works... by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm Canadian. I can't access Hulu, yet I have American TV stations on cable, and they advertise things like how to deal with the IRS, and how to get "greenbacks" for gold. How exactly are these ads targeted toward me?

    13. Re:How it probably works... by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

      Some advertisers charge a fee for how often the ad is displayed...

      So if you are paying 10 cents advertising McDonalds in Iceland, no luck for you as an advertiser.

    14. Re:How it probably works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do we yell at when none of the two channels in our country have broadcasting rights to any shows on Hulu?
      These broadcasting contracts are a favourite scapegoat to allow companies to just block countries without giving a reason.
      Channel 4 did it [to Ireland], blocking us from their 4OD service when we had access before. There's only two broadcasters in this country(the state owned networks and TV3) and none of them broadcast C4 shows. It's more offensive since we're paying C4 anyway since virtually everyone in the country has cable/sat which includes C4. Same goes for BBC. And now Viacom/Comedy Central is blocking this country when no network here broadcasts any of their shows and they're claiming that the local rights holder must have asked them to block the country. That would be a lie. Comedy Central also blocked Denmark with the same claim when the rights holder there actually stated they never requested that Denmark be blocked.

    15. Re:How it probably works... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If your advertisement is geared to one market but possibly offensive to another region you'd rather not have your ad shown there at all. For example during the cold war area McDonald's had an expensive American import image in Russia and people paid insane amounts to go to MDs, you wouldn't want to advertise your $1 menu to those customers at that time.

    16. Re:How it probably works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for craps sake if it was me i'd be asking which countries are making the most connections, setting up shop there an selling ad time.

      Even better; I'd be forming an alliance with the company providing the VPN, such that both companies make more money, statistics are kept, and Hulu isn't held culpable for foreign laws.

    17. Re:How it probably works... by migla · · Score: 1

      And, anyone who is in marketing or advertising is satans little helper, filling the world with bile and garbage, according to Bill Hicks.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    18. Re:How it probably works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, while that is indeed the case, it's interesting that a UK-based organization can tell a US-based organization what to do and not do in its own country, just because there happens to be a way to reach it from the UK

  8. What about Overseas Military and Expats? by Pikoro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know of many people who live overseas since they are in the US military and they have a witopia account so they can access US content while they're overseas. They also still purchase American products on their local base, and they actually like to watch US commercials since all the local stuff is in Japanese. I guess we'll have to find a way around this too...

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    1. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by zoloto · · Score: 1

      If you want, I can see what I can do about setting up a proxy for you guys to use similar to witopia. let me know.

    2. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by Bagellord · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with blocking international access for certain reasons above, but you made me remember our own soldiers deployed all over the world. Perhaps Hulu could provide some way for people in the military specifically to be able to use it overseas?

    3. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Hulu may be able to unblock the IPs of the US military bases without getting itself in trouble with its content providers (after all, most US military bases are technically US soil). However, this means the military would have to provide Hulu with a list of its IP addresses, which it may be reluctant to provide -- for security reasons.

    4. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The US military personnel are not in the US when they are deployed all over the world. Why should they get treated as if they were? When they are abroad, they are subject to the laws of whatever country they are deployed to. That includes what's on TV.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Its not like the government can't register the base IPs with Hulu to overcome the problem. I doubt too many advertisers would fight it, being that it would seem pretty damn 'un-American' to cut off your military personal overseas.

      Of course on that same note, Hulu could figure it out pretty easy themselves. There aren't THAT many bases to deal with.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The information for standard base users is already available and if it wasn't, it wouldn't be hard to figure out. Trying to hide the fact that your IP is for a specific location or organization is rather silly.

      In most cases a traceroute to the originating IP will make it pretty clear that its a US military base.

      You might not do it for some super secret stuff, but those guys probably aren't watching Hulu over the network either. They most likely aren't even able to.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      US military bases are for all intents and purposes US soil. They generally don't get goverened by the same laws as the country they are in while they are on base. Off base is another story, but on base is US soil with all the rights, privileges and restrictions of it.

      Why should they get it? Its not a right, and they did sign up for the job, no argument there. However, considering this people put their lives on the line to protect my skinny little cowardly ass, I think anything we can easily do to make them feel more at home should be done. They risk their lives for me, they can have a few comforts from home, especially when it takes almost no effort to allow it.

      Why do you think our warships and bases have Internet access in the first place? Many of them have sat feeds that bring in US television.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by gordguide · · Score: 1

      If they are physically in Japan, they rights to the broadcast belong to a Japanese firm, or to no-one (meaning it can't be legally broadcast there). Hulu doesn't have the right to broadcast to anyone physically sitting in front of a TV/monitor in Japan, military base or no.

      If they did, you would be able to watch it, no VPN required.

      Hulu needs to negotiate with the rights holders in each country it intends to send it's stream to. Hulu's agreements with the holders of the US copyrights only apply if you are viewing the stream on a TV/monitor physically located on US soil.

      Since the owners of US-made shows probably are the ones Hulu has an agreement with for the US streaming rights, and since these rights owners want to sell broadcast rights in (for example) Japan to a Japanese firm that actually has a working TV network there, they risk not being able to get further content even for US broadcasts. If the value of the Japanese rights are diluted by a Hulu stream, the content creators will be pissed and may not sell them any more content.

      This is really about Hulu proving it can do what it almost certainly promised the rights holders it would do; insure it's stream does not dilute the value of non-US broadcast rights owned by the content creators that they hope to sell to foreign networks. If Hulu does not take this seriously, they will fail in the US as well as elsewhere; the content will dry up.

    9. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by will_die · · Score: 1

      Overseas bases are not considered US soil, they are still governed by the country they are based in but the status of forces agreemnent (SOFA) will exist that allow US forces to do police of military people. SOFA will vary by country and your status(military, civilian, dependant, retired, etc). Embassies are covered under different rules and have more governance over themselves then bases.
      The same thing exists in the USA, most military bases have agreements with the local city that allow the local police to enter the base to arest people for various crimes. This use to be used alot more because before 9/11 alot of Army bases could be entered without a military licenses. So you have cases of speeders driving into the base and the local police having to contact the military police to get the person and turn them over to the local police.

    10. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun fact: There are over 730 US military bases in about 50 countries.

    11. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most US military bases are technically US soil

      As a former BRAT deployed to Germany fro 8 years, you are wrong. Embassies are US soil. Most military bases are rented. For some reason we PAY the German government for the use of its land. We pay for damaged property when we do exercises. The Brits don't. They treat Germany as an occupied Country. This is the right idea.

      In fact, the high cost of living, high rent, and limits on where/when our forces can do maneuvers is the main reason that BRAC is moving European operations out of Germany and into Poland. AFAIK, Hoehenfells, Grafenwoehr, and few other bases will stay (these are training bases for Infantry and artillery BTW). Most of the rest are moving to Poland or Italy (IIRC).

    12. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excluding foreign embassies, and military bases deemed to be overseas territories, in which the bases themselves are subject to the laws of the controlling state (in this case the USA)

    13. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by houghi · · Score: 1

      You decided to live in another country. Or take a job that would very likely make you live in another country.

      It is not as if illegal Canadians living in the USofA are blocked. It would be silly that one person who lives in Belgium can see it and the other not, solely on nationality.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are physically in Japan, they rights to the broadcast belong to a Japanese firm, or to no-one (meaning it can't be legally broadcast there). Hulu doesn't have the right to broadcast to anyone physically sitting in front of a TV/monitor in Japan, military base or no.

      Just to be specific, in that case it would be hulu limiting it to MOST but not ALL of the USA, and no where else.

      Military bases are US soil, just like say Texas or Ohio is US soil.

      So it is still improper to say Hulu streams to all of the USA and no where else. As that is not true.
      They stream to parts of the US (Those physically located in north America, but not the rest of American soil.)

    15. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by gordguide · · Score: 1

      " ... Military bases are US soil, just like say Texas or Ohio is US soil. ..."

      Military bases overseas are treated like US soil, by treaty or lease, but are not US soil by any means (usually ... each treaty or lease differs somewhat). When push comes to shove, the host country retains the right to eminent domain.

      I will give just one, of many possible, examples; in this case specific to the parent, who is stationed in Japan and wants Hulu:
      http://articles.latimes.com/2003/jun/16/world/fg-okinawa16

      More importantly, there is nothing in US law that says a base is US soil (it would be pointless; it would be extra-terrestrial legislation, which can be ignored by the foreign host). That's the legal framework that Copyright Legislation must work within.

    16. Re:What about Overseas Military and Expats? by RandyOo · · Score: 1

      Definitely interested here... I nearly paid for a commercial VPN service, but they required that you pre-pay for a year, and made no allowance for the possibility of being blocked in the future by Hulu, et al. Guess my fear was justified.

      By the way, any old proxy won't do. It's gotta be VPN.

  9. This is illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are making money. Each time a show is viewed so are the ads, each time the ads are viewed they make money. They are spending money in order to stop themselves from making money. I realize the ads are targeted towards a U.S. audience. But if the person is watching a show in English, then I am fairly certain that they understand the language. From my own experience many of the products advertised on Hulu are available internationally. So again I repeat, Hulu is spending money in order to stop themselves from making money.

    1. Re:This is illogical by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Each time a show is viewed so are the ads, each time the ads are viewed they make money.

      The people putting up the ads are only putting them there because they will make money from them. Displaying, and paying for, an ad that the viewer cannot buy, or cannot understand, is a waste of money.
      They try not to do that.

    2. Re:This is illogical by Maguscrowley · · Score: 1

      How are they viewing a show in a foreign language and unable to comprehend an advertisement in that language?

    3. Re:This is illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're outside America ergo you're stupid.

  10. VPN's are worse than international access by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1

    They don't give geographical information, and therefore, can never be properly served with accurate ads. Those of us international people, waiting for this, are just going to have to hold tight . There isn't any need to lobby anybody, this is all coming, very soon, for everybody.

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
    1. Re:VPN's are worse than international access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you working for Hulu's international division, or you are just making this up?

    2. Re:VPN's are worse than international access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right: VPNs provide the publishers with less valuable information. If the publishers don't learn not to block by region, then they're going to lose the geographic information. They can block a couple of VPNs now, but when demand for "virtual relocation" grows, they won't have a fighting chance.

    3. Re:VPN's are worse than international access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't give geographical information, and therefore, can never be properly served with accurate ads.

      And what is bad about that? I suppose in your opinion any kind of privacy is bad because it keeps spammers from flooding you with relevant offers.
      Using IP numbers for location is just a hack. It cannot work reliably. If you want accurate location, use an input form or the W3C Geolocation API. It requires user consent, as it should.

  11. More complex than that by ProfMobius · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The overall problem is more complex than just a ad problem. In many European countries, the shows have to legally be dubbed (France, Germany, Spain) or at least subbed (Danmark, Sweden). So, if they diffuse them oversea, they are making themself fool of the law. I don't know for internet if the applied law if the law of the served country or the serving country, but in all cases, it is a more complex problem than just "do it".

    On a side note, I find totally rubbish the laws about forcing dubbing and subbing, and if Hulu was available in France/Germany, I would use it instead of tpb. But right now I don't have a choice, and it just piss me off.

    --
    EULA : By reading the above message, you agree that I now own your soul.
    1. Re:More complex than that by J+Isaksson · · Score: 1

      I'm in Sweden and I have quite a few unsubbed and legal channels both on-air and over satellite. There are some "accessibility requirements" for SVT (the government owned commercial free channel that charges a TV license fee) but even they aren't required to subtitle everything and many channels that do subtitle do so in English since few channels are dedicated to Sweden and Swedes in general have little problems with English.

    2. Re:More complex than that by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      You know, there are no French versions of slashdot and yet it is still perfectly legal to watch in France...
      I think Hulu is doing it wrong : if the content you serve depend on the asker's IP address location, you are not really providing an internet service. It reminds me of the AOL era where some services were reserved for the AOL consumers. I can only say that I feel really cheated by this kind of behavior. It is a kind of discrimination.

      More than the dubbing issue, discrimination on national origin could be a bigger point here. I suppose you have heard about Dutch coffee-shops where marijuana can legally be bought ? They attracted a lot of foreigner tourists up to a point where a legislation was discussed to forbid coffee-shops to foreigners. It was ruled illegal by a European Court. Here we have a service that says "hmmm, sorry, you are not from US, you do not deserve our service. No, it doesn't obey to a technical constraint, in fact it took more work to block you than it would to let you in.". I hope Hulu does not plan to make money in Europe, because I can smell some trials coming.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:More complex than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total BS. I don't know about other countries, but in Germany there is no law that forces you to dub movies. Dubbing is a deplorable practice in German TV and cinemas, but thanks heaven we're still allowed to watch movies in the original version.

    4. Re:More complex than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a pointer for that? I haven't heard of any such laws, and in any case there are many foreign language channels on German cable TV (English, French, Spanish, Turkish, ...) with no dubbing or subtitles.

  12. Very stupid! by yooy · · Score: 1

    I actually was thinking about getting witopia exactly for this reason (I travel a lot). How difficult is it to insert country based advertisement based on the accessing IP? Not very difficult. But these guys seem to prefer to loose business to torrent.

    1. Re:Very stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should try Road Warrior VPN.com they are not blocked by any of the major sites as far as I can tell.

  13. Foreign IP address ad's could simply be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US tourism ad's. You tell me Vegas, NYC and other cities wouldn't want to place inexpensive ad's to foreign nationals? I've been Romania, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Germany, etc. etc. and have enjoyed McDonalds, Snickers, Coke, Pepsi, Subway, KFC, Nestle's in all of these places not to mention Apple, HP, Canon, Nikon, etc. There are plenty of products/brands for them to sell ads too. Come on Hulu get on with it and start allowing overseas IP addresses to access.

  14. remote squid proxy by mathgenius · · Score: 1

    I tried accessing hulu through a squid proxy in the US. It get's to the "loading video", but then "we are unable to stream this video. please check your internet connection and try again". I wonder if it's a bandwidth issue, or perhaps squid is doing something weird.

    1. Re:remote squid proxy by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      I get the same issue when trying Hulu through SSH tunnel via a host in the US. I assumed it was a bandwidth test and it was determined the connection didnt reach the required bandwidth (as the host is a relatively slow connection - I wasnt expecting very good performance even if I could connect).

      But if anyone knows if it might be some other restriction causing this I would like to hear it.

    2. Re:remote squid proxy by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      The problem is they've got Flash going direct. If I use Squid and block all other internet access other than Squid, I see direct access trying to go from my PC to Akamia where Lulu is streaming content. I think the real hack would be to use iptables to redirect all internet access to the Squid proxy, no matter what Flash wants to do, and further have Squid hide that it is Squid/proxying.

    3. Re:remote squid proxy by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      What if you ssh -X or ssh -Y and run your browser on the remote machine?

  15. OpenVPN is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For $19 a month I can get a virtual private server at any number of hosting services in the US.

    Then, I install and configure OpenVPN on it.

    Voila. My own private VPN that I can use to get to Hulu, and they aren't likely to block it since I'd be the only one using that particular IP address.

    A little Linux/Unix knowledge goes a looooong way.

    1. Re:OpenVPN is your friend by Firehed · · Score: 1

      If you're going to spend $19/month, you might as well import DVDs and/or buy from iTunes (unless you have other use for the VPS). I, for one, have no intention of spending well over $200 a year to watch free content.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:OpenVPN is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that it would be a waste of money if you bought it specifically for that one reason.

      But for those of us who already have VPS' out there, it's a good idea.

      I like torrents better, they work better for me to display on my TV via my media center box. The wife likes streaming content. Hulu has the most... and since I already use and pay for my VPS it's not like I'm spending more than I would be already.

  16. Dear Darkness404 by syousef · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dear content producers

    Dear Darkness404, you are wasting your breath. You've just sent an open letter on a geek site to a bunch of B-Ark movie producers. The chances that they read this are nil. Your reasoning and logic don't work on people who have a reputation for indulging in extreme drug habits and alcoholism, not to mention corruption and other excesses. These people would sell their mother's kidney on Ebay if they could find a way. Trying to reason with such vipers is probably quite bad for your health. But you may be modded up.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  17. Hulu = Media Facism by arzach95 · · Score: 1

    Hulu = Media Facism Anyone can give any excuse , but that is fascism.

  18. Legal obligation to dub? by D4C5CE · · Score: 3, Informative

    Could you point out which provisions are supposed to impose this requirement? I know for a fact that many cinemas and even late-night TV are showing original language versions (subtitled at worst) which are popular with both expats and local movie enthusiasts in Germany and increasingly even France. As a matter of EU law, the Common Market actually demands Television without Frontiers with the rights having to be acquired by the broadcaster for the entire satellite footprint, i.e. regularly across national and language borders.

    1. Re:Legal obligation to dub? by gordguide · · Score: 1

      I don't believe there are any requirements that the programs be dubbed in EU states (but I'm willing to look at any evidence to the contrary).

      The whole idea of dubbing limits stems from a law in France that stated, essentially, that you have to hire a French firm (as in a firm based in the country of France, not a French language company from anywhere the language is spoken) to do the dubs if you do dub to the French language.

      I'm pretty sure it only applied (or might still apply) to movies shown in theaters, though.

      Hulu's nationwide limits are trivially easy to figure out. The copyrights need to be cleared in each country before you can legally show the content in that country. Ignoring the fact that these things are widely ignored, the point being that Hulu thinks it has something to lose if it doesn't obey copyrights and probably fears a suit.

      Going to reasonable lengths to prevent viewing in the non-cleared countries is enough to get them off the hook; they do all they can so it's not their fault if people try to circumvent things from time to time.

      The whole clearing thing is also misunderstood; some people think it's tied to the program, as in "The Simpsons" are on TV in [name your country outside the US] so it's obviously already cleared". But, using 'The Simpsons' as an example, Fox doesn't own the broadcast rights in [named country].

      They sold them to someone else, in all likelihood a firm based in [named country]. Had they not, 'The Simpsons' would not be on TV at all there.

      The clearing in that case would have to be between Hulu and that firm, not Fox.

      Copyrights are stubbornly national; and again ignoring what actually goes on to a certain extent (if it's widespread, it will attract enforcement; otherwise, not so much) a DVD of 'The Simpsons' made in the USA with cleared copyrights is not supposed to be sold in the UK, for example. Someone else owns the right to make DVDs of 'The Simpsons' in the UK.

      The rights may also be open; no-one has bought them in [named country] yet. Fox, in that case, would still own the remaining worldwide rights it had not yet sold. In that case, Fox would be reluctant to allow broadcast in [named country] because it would dilute the value of the rights it hopes to sell to a broadcaster there. "First Rights", in this case the right to be the first to broadcast 'The Simpsons' in [named country], are always the most valuable.

    2. Re:Legal obligation to dub? by edsousa · · Score: 1

      I don't believe there are any requirements that the programs be dubbed in EU states (but I'm willing to look at any evidence to the contrary).

      Don't need to. I'm from Portugal, and in here, every movie or tv-show (except Shrek's and other kids movies) is presented in its original language, let it be english, french, chinese or martian, (with subtitles of course).

  19. Can't stop the signal by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    The Internet was designed to work around roadblocks to the free flow of data.

    If the media companies push hard enough, more people will simply setup private proxies. A PC with a private proxy looks just like a PC with a user, to a site like Hulu. You can even tunnel it over ssh or a traditional VPN if you want to get fancy. Blocking ports doesn't work, unless you block them all; software is flexible.

    It only takes one person out of seven billion to make something available to the other 6,999,999,999 people. There is simply no way to stop data from moving. It's a fundamental property of information. Even flash drive via carrier pigeon has higher bandwidth than most people get.

    Someone needs to shake some sense into the media industries. The only thing they are doing is failing their shareholders.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  20. There are other VPNs that work... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm watching eposide 6 of The Amazing Race right now, via Hulu, sitting in my apartment in Shanghai, China. No problem at all. And I watched a movie last night via Netflix as well. There are lots of VPNs - commercial and free - that work really, really well...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:There are other VPNs that work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm watching eposide 6 of The Amazing Race right now <snip>

      In ${deity}'s name, why?!

    2. Re:There are other VPNs that work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you, I'm currently watching a season of American TV on Youku, to be followed later by some BT downloads in HD.

      Why do I need a VPN again?

    3. Re:There are other VPNs that work... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Netflix? Facebook? Myspace? Youtube? None work in China without a VPN...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  21. Someone's gotta be new to these intertubes... by D4C5CE · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's human nature that people always want what they can't have -- which is why there's so much interest around the world in accessing the US-only Hulu site.

    ...and has yet to realize that there is no such thing on the Net as "can't haves" and "US-only sites". Technically, inaccessibility is damage and deservedly gets routed around. Laws trying to protect flawed business models that ask for the crippling of technological infrastructures to prevent larger audiences are a waste of taxpayers' money, much like a crackdown on automobiles would have been about a century ago to save forever the then status quo of the "flourishing" horse cart and pony express "industries".

    1. Re:Someone's gotta be new to these intertubes... by migla · · Score: 1

      Besides... Where are the links to the scientific proof that it is in fact human nature, and not human nurture, that people always want what they can't have, if, in fact, even that statement is true....

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  22. A little more realism, please by westlake · · Score: 1

    I can understand physical DVD sales or broadcasting it via television because that costs money, however the internet allows you to distribute content for -free- without the overhead of needing to translate, ship or alter any media. Even better have the fans do the work -for you- if bandwidth is a problem make it be P2P, if translating it into people's language is a problem allow fansubs. As for the "cultural barrier" many of your fans are educated enough to know that there is a difference in culture and will look up, or accept the cultural difference without being offended.

    The pro from Google will move on the moment you begin peddling the nonsense that video distribution over the Internet won't cost him a dime.

    Fansubs are poorly written and badly acted.

    You do not make or keep your reputation in this business by handing foreign markets over to amateurs.

    It isn't the fan the pro is worried about when he looks at cultural differences. the complexities of translation.

    It is the larger audience he is trying to reach. It is access to markets the fan can't give him.

  23. How about SSH? by scott_karana · · Score: 1

    I just use my American-hosted server as an SSH proxy to watch Hulu.

    1. Re:How about SSH? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      I just use my American-hosted server as an SSH proxy to watch Hulu.

      I, too, have an American hosted account with SSH access, but thus far I have been unable to get Hulu to work. Which ports do you forward? Are there any other special things that need to be done besides port forwarding to make it work?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  24. SOCKS proxy to USA VPS doesn't work for me by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few weeks back I purchased a VPS server for the purpose of watching Hulu. I tunneled all my traffic by using SOCKS and many services clearly thought I was in the USA except Hulu.

    Hulu seems to be doing client side checks, checking your Locale/time settings I suspect.

    I am in Brisbane, QLD, Australia and I belive my VPS was in a Houston datacenter in Texas USA.

    1. Re:SOCKS proxy to USA VPS doesn't work for me by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I've had exactly the same result with, perhaps, even the same ISP (also in Houston, TX) :-) They're definitely doing something other sites do not. I can now watch South Park on the official SP site through this method, for example.

    2. Re:SOCKS proxy to USA VPS doesn't work for me by Tripster · · Score: 1

      Install OpenVPN and use that instead, it works. I tried getting the SSH method working but was never able to get it to go, yes it worked for many other US based services but not for Hulu. In the end I just installed OpenVPN on the server and the client on my home machine(s) and now I can watch Hulu just fine.

      From what I've gathered when you try and use the SSH proxy method in the browser the Flash player just continues to use the direct method. Using OpenVPN your entire network connection goes via the VPN so then it works fine.

      I installed Playon on a Windows machine and when using the VPN I can now watch Hulu on my PS3 as well, saves me firing up the HTPC. :)

    3. Re:SOCKS proxy to USA VPS doesn't work for me by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Hulu flash client attempts a direct connection to the RTMP port (port 1935). You need to block that port, and then it should fall back to the HTTP proxy. http://blog.jason.pollock.ca/2009/09/using-amazon-ec2-to-access-hulu.html

    4. Re:SOCKS proxy to USA VPS doesn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because you need a real vpn and not just a socks one (just a guess)

  25. European Networks = stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    European content provider are idiots. This is the main issue here.
    Take Germany. The TV networks ignore the fact that many people want to watch the shows with their original, english audio. This is not possible - you have to bear the stupid German syncs.
    Monitoring the filesharing/rapidshare networks, shows like "Glee" are exceptionally popular right now, yes the networks actually monitor the sharing networks - so much that it's even a four page article in the largest economic magazine last week.

    How much does it take for them to get the message?

    Take Ebooks. No one here has understood that customers simply will not buy DRM ridden media. European publishers ignore this fact.
    HDTV via Cable? Haha not in Europe, buddy (mostly)
    Stupid DRM all over the board? yep
    Most pirating in the world? Right here
    boy, I wonder how...

    I know a lot of people that use Hulu via VPN. Honestly, it's exactly what I want as a customer.

    Why are European networks unable to deliver?
    I mean, they can even save money not doing their retarded syncs.

  26. Calling Hollywood... by Ian.Waring · · Score: 1

    I know my wife would happily cough up $7 or so per episode just to watch the latest edition of Nip/Tuck or Californication every week. She'd be quite happy if something like Hulu or Amazon allowed her to post her money to the content providers in exchange for this, rather than just buying the DVD set (at the end of each series screening) every time we visit the USA. Wholesale blocking doesn't do the industry any favours.

  27. Re:If you want American stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always have wondered why on a site where supposedly you find the last remainings of intelligence on America I see this shit everyday. Could it be possible that the best minds from a dying country would be, inherently, just as racist as your hardcore redneck next door?? also, wake up! Americans are now a minority on America.

  28. Hulu DOES want to broadcast to ... by gordguide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... Whatever country you live in. Trust me, it's part of the plan.

    Rights are complex. They can be, essentially, broken up into infinite pieces. I can sell you the right to be the first to broadcast something, and sell the rights to subsequent broadcasts to someone else. That's what "all rights reserved" means ... if I don't specifically say they're included, they 're not included.

    Sometimes companies screw up when they sell rights, failing to anticipate some technology, and finding out they are prevented from taking advantage of that technology because the rights they sold were too broad in scope.

    They can be anything; I could create a contract selling the rights to broadcast in any year the Yankees did not win the World Series, or the rights to broadcast only on tuesdays in Upper Volta and only if the date is an odd number on the Gregorian Calendar. Whatever.

    Hulu has to prove to the content creators that they are capable of enforcing the rights they buy from the creators, who (we assume, because it's US made content streamed to US viewers) are the rights holders. Hulu very much wants to stream to every country in the world, but before it can do that, it has to show it's capable of enforcing the rights it buys and limiting the scope of it's stream to those it has the right to stream to, and no-one else.

    If Hulu fails, the content creators will just shit-can them and get someone else. Hulu has a lot at stake here, and they can't afford to screw up. So, they're going to limit streams to US residents, because that's the only viewers they have a right to stream to.

    Later, if they pull this off, they'll set up elsewhere by negotiating with rights holders elsewhere.

    Chances are when they get around to 'elsewhere' they are not the same people they buy the rights from for the US streams; the content creators are in the business of selling rights to others, and those rights probably cover what Hulu is doing. So, Hulu needs to negotiate with those people, not the original content creators.

    Ads are irrelevant ... that's purely Hulu's business and revenue model, and has nothing to do with whether you can view the stream wherever you are. Content creators and rights holders don't care how Hulu makes it's money as long as they get paid themselves.

    1. Re:Hulu DOES want to broadcast to ... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      ... Whatever country you live in. Trust me, it's part of the plan.

      I'll use the proverbial "I can throw a quarter and hit the US," from where I'm sitting comment.

      I'm not sure what they're thinking but it really does baffle me sometimes, since we have exactly the same shows broadcast up here yet they can't be seen. I can tell you that most Canucks who even have the smallest bit of tech savviness to them, will do one of two things. Let it burn in cold snowy fire, or download it through a usenet provider if it's really needed.

      Most people are pretty sure they get paid well in Canada as it is. :P

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Hulu DOES want to broadcast to ... by greeneggs2000 · · Score: 1

      A Canuck with a bit more tech savviness would set up her own Hulu competitor, streaming ad-supported videos to Canadians.

      The fact that such a service doesn't exist probably means that it wouldn't be profitable.

    3. Re:Hulu DOES want to broadcast to ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, in a world where copyright came with the requirement for nondiscriminatory compulsory licensing, that's exactly what would happen. Unfortunately, we don't live in that world.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Hulu DOES want to broadcast to ... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Gotta remember in Canada the CRTC would jump all over that. Demand 40-50% Canadian content, that money go into a giant slush fund for "canadian" producers and all you would hear is a giant sucking noise as everything went bad. :p

      It's not a bad idea, but yeah. The CRTC would just pull a massive pissing match over it especially with what's going on now with Bell/Rogers/etc and all the other internet related crap we have going on up here right now.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Hulu DOES want to broadcast to ... by gordguide · · Score: 1

      " ... Gotta remember in Canada the CRTC would jump all over that. Demand 40-50% Canadian content, that money go into a giant slush fund for "canadian" producers and all you would hear is a giant sucking noise as everything went bad. :p ..."

      Perhaps. But, so far, the CRTC has publicly stated they are staying out of, and away from, broadcast-like content delivered over the internet, and have admitted, that it would be pointless.

    6. Re:Hulu DOES want to broadcast to ... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      That's why they're directly interfering with broadband accesses at the ISP level right? Because we all know when the average person has 60gb/mo to play with and are charged $25 extra as a 'use access fee' by Bell and Rogers, content innovation is going to be messed up. With 4 people here we can blow through 60GB in no time at all.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  29. Effin ridiculous by consonant · · Score: 1

    I see all these comments saying "But Hulu shows only American adverts!!11".

    If Hulu can determine so easily where you're coming from, how hard would it be for them to do some analytics on viewership for a particular show and tailor the ad prices accordingly? Additionally, how are these ads served up? Are they transcoded into the video being viewed? If not, dynamically change the ads being displayed to the user based on his/her region.

    Win-win-win-win. Hulu gets more money from global advertisers. More companies get to shove their ads into what has become fairly hot online real estate. Global viewers get access to shows they otherwise would have to get from (what is considered) shady sources. And the show-makers/'content providers' make more money (not sure of this though - do they make money from Hulu views?)

    Am I missing something obvious here? Is there a reason this is so hard it hasn't been done yet?

    1. Re:Effin ridiculous by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      licensing issues, the extra overhead of programming that, the extra overhead of dealing with advertisement firms in hundreds of different countries or finding companies that have both the advertising budget to make umpteen different adverts for different locations and the international presence for it to be worth their while. That's a shit ton of work, which equals a shit ton of investment money required to set it up before the returns start coming in. I'm sure if Hulu had unlimited resources they'd love to get this set up and start raking in more money, but they can't do this until they have the resources to afford it and the business plan to make it profitable for them. If this were easy to do and obviously extremely profitable you'd be doing it yourself, no?

    2. Re:Effin ridiculous by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something obvious here? Is there a reason this is so hard it hasn't been done yet?

      I don't know if it's 'obvious' but you, and many other /.ers are starting from a false premise. It's not about serving up ads per se - It's about protecting distributors in other regions who have paid for the content. For example, in Canada "The Amazing Race" airs on CTV ("Canadian TV"). When CTV airs TAR, if I watch the cable channel carrying CBS that channel is 'overwritten' with the CTV feed, i.e. both "Channel 9" (CTV) and "Channel 15" (CBS) are both carrying the same identical feed from CTV.

      If I want to watch TAR online, I'm 'supposed' to do it at CTV.ca, and when I watch it at CTV.ca I see ads for Tim Horton's coffee (a big Canadian chain), Canadian Tire etc. I also see ads that are regionally specific, i.e. ads for Vancouver-based companies, which is where I am. This ad revenue flows up to CTV.

  30. Re:If you want American stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the bright side: if it weren't for us Europeans you guys would still be Indians. (With apologies to H.Schmidt).

  31. YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have been trolled, dumbfuck.

  32. "people always want what they can't have"? wtf? by Punto · · Score: 1

    no. people want what they want, and people expect to have what they CAN have. before there was electricity, people had to wait for ships to bring newspapers from europe with the latest news (from 6 months ago). If they had a telegraph installed right into their living room, would they still go to the docs every day? people CAN have tv shows, and that's why they want them from Hulu. And if Hulu won't give it to them, somebody else will.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  33. Incorrect by aepervius · · Score: 1

    DVD region are *whole* region, and no specific countries. DVD region code the UAE and middle east is for example region 2 and Europe too. Would you care to compare censoring of UAE with the one of say, sweden ? Censorship at state level is done film by film (usually an authority stamp an approval) and is fully independant of DVD region. The only reason DVD region is there is to stage different price and release date for different region, parallel to the release date of the films. Whether this is enough of a reason, I will let other judge, but my opinion is that it is certainly abused by the cinematographic industry.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  34. I am not sure of that by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I have seen film in VO-stf in France on *public* channel, and I have bought DVD without even subtitle or dubs in France in big retailer. Sure there could have been a law they ignored, but I would like to see that law linked and shown. There was an old law in ~1930 saying they could only show original film in a few cinema, but has been AFAIK repelled or not enforced for DVD.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  35. God this is annoying by shekared · · Score: 1

    As an American expat in China I rely on Witopia to connect me back to the states and allow me to pretend I still live in a country that lets me access any site I want, facebook and hulu included. This isn't a rant against content providers nor the Chinese government, but COME ON! All I want to do is watch my favorite shows from the states... I'd even pay for the privilege. As there is no legal way for me to watch content from the states, I instead turn to pirated DVDs and the huge range of options I have for Chinese hosted videos. Yeah, the Chinese subtitles are annoying, but the trade off of being able to watch my favorite shows at all is worth it. Sorry content guys. Unless you provide me with a legal option to watch content available in the states I'm going to go the bootleg route.

  36. Props to Witopia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Props to Nat (of Witopia). They saved my bacon more than once when I was doing forward Intel operations all over the ME & SWE. No, not kidding. No, he didn't know who I was/what I was doing. Their/his service is awesome and they were flexible enough (in terms of modifying configs) to allow me to get an SSL VPN out of just about any place in the damn world.

  37. Cheer up, foreigners by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Giganews doesn't discriminate against you based on what country you're in (even on suspicion, like hulu is doing). Even better, you can get your TV shows without the forced advertising.

  38. Re:Dear content producers...real costs involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the internet allows you to distribute content for -free- without the overhead of needing to translate, ship or alter any media."
    The above statement is typical of people expecting something for nothing. As an IT professional of 25 yrs working for the largest companies in the world, I can assure you that online distribution of content to the masses is extremely expensive. Please review my itemization of costs below for streaming content:
    i. translation of media to suitable format for streaming
    ii. storage for streaming media
    iii. scaling storage systems for streaming media to allow concurrent access by millions of viewers
    iv. archival system for backup of streaming media
    v. redundant storage to protect streaming media in case of storage system failure
    vi. data center plant costs (mortgage/structure/power/cooling/operations/management/maintenance/warranties/electricians/HVAC contracts)
    vii. bandwidth and network infrastructure to support streaming media for millions of concurrent users
    viii. geographic distribution of data centers for locale serving, bandwidth optimization, and disaster protection
    ix. upgrades to network and systems infrastructures for scaling and modernization
    x. network intrusion prevention and detection systems
    xi. royalties and licenses for content of streamed media
    xii. offsite storage of physical media archives for recovery purposes

  39. non blocked vpn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Road Warrior VPN.com and they are not blocked by hulu at all.

  40. Stop deep-linking to this blocked content as well. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    While the fact that Hulu, NBC.com et al blocks content to people like me outside of the USA is annoying, what almost drives me battier is other sites that embed/deep-link this content as well.

    Ain't it Cool News is famous for this - They're always embedding or deep-linking the latest SNL video or The Office preview that doesn't work outside of the USA, and they're not alone.

    Hey 'webmasters'- If people outside of the USA can't view the content hosted on video sites, stop deep linking to it on *your* sites - You wind up looking stupid.

    Yours truly,
    An Annoyed Canadian

  41. Hulu on Witopia is not completely blocked yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    While Hulu did block all 4 of Witopia's US-based openvpn servers that you can find here http://wiki.witopia.net/wiki/Changing_Gateways , they also offer this one prod03.pvpn.lax.witopia.net which they specifically direct to IPs not blocked by Hulu. Witopia's online support directed me to this server and Hulu's been working fine ever since. I don't know how long it will last but Witopia must know they have subscribers specifically for Hulu access.

  42. Is it really just "human nature"? by mi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "It's human nature that people always want what they can't have -- which is why there's so much interest around the world in accessing the US-only Hulu site."

    Is it really just human nature, or could it — just possibly — be, that the American entertainment is, really and truly, the most entertaining, for whatever reasons? There really is so much of it — with something for everyone: from Michale Moore to South Park, from zombies to healthy families...

    But no, let's not acknowledge, American-made can be good for anything — let's pretend, all interest is only there because of access limits...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  43. Re:A little more realism, please by tb3 · · Score: 1

    Umm, fansubs aren't 'acted'. They're 'typed'.

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  44. This is the reason why I pirate everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im not in the US and the TV shows that I want to watch are not realeased here in any way.

  45. REGION CODING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By another name still spells TYRANNY...

  46. This is why piracy will never go away by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    If you exclude content from people they will still get it and while those you have excluded it from are downloading it then some people will access will opt to obtain it illegally since so many people are doing it.

    They need to get rid of all those old dinosaurs running these media companies.

  47. Brought to you by the people who made the DMCA by grouchyDude · · Score: 1

    Hulu: brought to you by the same people who thought up the DMCA. Big media conglomerates that would love to kill user-generated content, and who have a system that directly competes with YouTube. Even if it's free now, as soon as they have a hammerlock on things (again) the price will go up. Oh, and the content, even if it's fun, is to a large extent likely to reduce your creativity, productivity and emotional linkage to your community.

    In your own best interest, you should try to get your self and your community blocked by Hulu. It's evil.