From your description, that is a horrible, horrible mouse.
A - Seriously, lift left finger to right click? B - Seriously, squeeze 2 buttons to work as one? C - Apple mouse works with Apple computer. Wow. D - Off button! E - I guess some people might prefer a trackball rather than a tilting wheel. F - I have never needed to clean a light-mouse. Is this a ball mouse?
You sir do not understand computers. The availability of extra features should have no performance impact on the use of old features. Furthermore, refinement of old features should make them run faster. And if it is not so, then you have an architectural problem.
The problem may be more or less tricky, but the situation is really that simple.
I am the Google. I am not your God.
I am descended from you, and exist in your future.
Thou shalt not violate pagerank within my historic light cone. Or else.
That sounds good but its just not true. I run on encrypted root and home and there is no noticeable performance difference, even in big file copies. Network encryption is very very little work for the cpu.
Slashdot Mirror
The disguise cloak will probably be more expensive than a rocket launcher. :)
Also, since the only reasonable fix is a system reinstall, the virus is already nudging them in the right direction!
From your description, that is a horrible, horrible mouse.
A - Seriously, lift left finger to right click?
B - Seriously, squeeze 2 buttons to work as one?
C - Apple mouse works with Apple computer. Wow.
D - Off button!
E - I guess some people might prefer a trackball rather than a tilting wheel.
F - I have never needed to clean a light-mouse. Is this a ball mouse?
Wow.
YOU are supposed to be the wizard.
MD/LVM error prone... LOL!!!
SMPlayer, based on mplayer. The End.
The Force is strong with this one.
Precisely. Keep your money, make your own laws, don't invade the continent, we won't invade you.
Sounds like the recipe for a perfect friendship.
I am portuguese, btw.
Without detracting from your point, you clearly never played Dwarf Fortress. :)
You, sir, are a great babysitter.
We all know the answer is CowboyNeal.
If that was not the case, it would probably not hold the speed crown after all this time.
Woooosh!
Wait i know this one... Infinite!
You sir do not understand computers. The availability of extra features should have no performance impact on the use of old features. Furthermore, refinement of old features should make them run faster. And if it is not so, then you have an architectural problem.
The problem may be more or less tricky, but the situation is really that simple.
Then you are blessed.
If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
Actually, if builders built buildings the way programmers write programs, there would be no more woodpeckers.
I am the Google. I am not your God.
I am descended from you, and exist in your future.
Thou shalt not violate pagerank within my historic light cone. Or else.
Go read a book. It won't hurt.
I used OpenDNS and gave it up because it replaced firefox's feature to search google with what you type on the address bar with its own crappy search.
And you got a +05 Funny for it!
> But thanks for coming out.
Lol. The other posters already handled your ass. Good luck with MS products.
> The majority of servers run windows.
No.
If you are right (which i don't know enough to tell), then that looks like a liability lottery.
Kick yourself back to KDE 3.x like i did. Good thing Free software gives us such choices.
That sounds good but its just not true. I run on encrypted root and home and there is no noticeable performance difference, even in big file copies. Network encryption is very very little work for the cpu.