Slashdot Mirror


Bluetooth Versus Wireless Mice

Meneguzzi writes "Having stuck with wired mice for years, I have recently been impressed by a couple of cordless mice I've used on other people's computers so much that I now want to buy one to use with my Mac Book Pro. However, while shopping around for the perfect cordless laptop mouse I was stuck with the question of whether to go for a bluetooth mouse or one of the many proprietary cordless mice with tiny USB receivers. To my surprise, there seems to be little literature systematically comparing these two options for attributes like precision, battery life (both for the mouse and the laptop), RF interference, and whatnot. As a Mac user, bluetooth has the advantage that it won't take up a USB port, and (in theory), would consume less battery than a USB port, but I wonder if this is actually true in practice. On top of that, I noticed that there are far fewer (and less fancy) options for Bluetooth mice than there are for proprietary cordless ones. Logitech, for instance, has a very basic Bluetooth Mouse, while its proprietary options are much fancier. So I was wondering what are the experiences from Slashdotters on this particular type of hardware, and any recommendations."

519 comments

  1. Wireless Mighty Mouse by MikeFM · · Score: 1, Funny

    You want what Apple suggests. Anything else sucks in comparison IMO.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having been a rabid Mac user and advocate since 1992, I have to say: Apple *sucks* at mice. My roommate has a wireless Mighty Mouse, and it never right-clicks properly for me.

      However, you may love it; my roommate swears by the thing, and never has any problems.

      So basically, my post is useless, except to say that whenever you can, try before you buy.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    2. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Haarg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately, I've found the Mighty Mouse completely unusable. They continued using a single button, and instead it senses where your finder is to determine if you are left or right clicking. If you rest your fingers on the mouse, it can't detect this properly and instead always registers a left click. I wasn't able to get used to this and instead just went back to using the trackpad.

    3. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by WCguru42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It takes some time getting used to the right click mechanism. I know I didn't become comfortable with it for a few weeks, but now I find myself slightly lifting my index finger off of standard two button mouses as if it were my mighty mouse.

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    4. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It takes getting used to but if you use it often it is an awesome mouse. I especially love that the middle button is a trackball. The only negatives IMO is that it costs $70 which I find a little excessive and you can't lift it when dragging so you need a big mouse pad if you have a 24" iMac.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by lxs · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been using one of those for six months now, and I have mixed feelings about it. Battery life is great, no dongles sticking out and taking up ports is nice too and it works, but it's not a very responsive mouse and I don't really like the feel of the no button design (you have to push fairly hard to click, sometimes it registers a right click as a left click and the scroll ball gets erratic two weeks before the batteries run out)

      It's ok for a laptop I guess, but far from ZOMG BEST MOUZ EVER! I would never use one on a desktop.

    6. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by DeadDecoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Meh, tell your friend to try out one of logitech's revolution mice. Those things are so damn nice to use: ergonomic, laser, wireless, with a scroll wheel that can continue spinning. Seriously, apple's (old) insistence on a one-button mouse and introduction of the 'puck', I just haven't bothered to look to apple for a mouse device.

    7. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Meh, tell your friend to try out one of logitech's revolution mice

      I want to own an Mx Revolution so badly... I could see myself becoming so dependent on that thumb scroll.

    8. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by anakha · · Score: 1

      I use a Logitech VX Nano mouse with my laptop. The precision is exceptional and the wireless range is ridiculously good (it uses 2.4Ghz). Battery life on 2 x AAA is decent also.

    9. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      His friend won't listen. Mac users that have paid 2x as much money for their machine will fanatically defend anything their brand manufactures, regardless of quality. mod flamebait? I think not.

    10. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I never got to like the Mighty Mouse. However, if anybody wants an actual positive recommendation (!), mine is for the Logitech Cordless Trackman Wheel. As far as I know, it only has 2 cons: it is a bit big to carry around with a laptop and it is probably useless to a left-hander. Oh, and the fact that Logitech have stopped marketing them, though they are still readily available.

      That aside, the device is a rugged thing. I've had mine for several years, and it shows absolutely no indication of wear. Since you don't need to pick the thing up and move it around, it needs very little desk space. It works perfectly on Linux with the standard USB interface or with a PS/2 adapter if you prefer. I used to get some pain in my wrist and arm after long sessions at the computer with ordinary mice, but that is a thing of the past now.

      Since the OP referred specifically to power usage, I have to say I don't know how much power the USB transmitter drains (since I use mine with a desktop machine it's a non-issue) but I think I have replaced the battery in the actual mouse only once or twice at most.

    11. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mice is the one thing where Microsoft is better than Apple.

    12. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Yetiszaf · · Score: 1

      Not really. I wanted to get myself one but realized that you can't just put it into a charger but have to swap out the battery.
      Also, if the scroll-ball on top gets dirty - and it will - it gets very unresponsive and you can't really take the mouse apart to clean up inside.

      I bought a Logitech MX Revolution instead and have not regretted that since.

    13. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by le_lotus_604 · · Score: 0

      mighty mouse is a the perfect example of Apple's design under ... ketamine
      ... stylish/design/lookThisPureLine/blabla totaly useless
      I had a logitech combo for my macs and pc for more than 4 years and until I got upset with the mouse not charging and destroy it against the wall,
      logitech was doing a good job and it was worth the $ (ok, the ctl panel on osx was (is ?) a piece of shit, they take months to fix compatibility issue, with growl for ex)
      I was checking M$ http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/productdetails.aspx?pid=084 and finally test 'the blue connection' on my MBP looks nice and affordable online

    14. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by tsa · · Score: 1

      Not true. I think the screen of my MacBook Pro is crap, considering I paid about 2500 euros for the machine. And more on topic, the Mighty Mouse I got with my iMac disappeared into the bux with unused hardware just a day after I got it. For an Apple mouse it's quite good, but for a vanilla mouse it's utter crap.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by trickyD1ck · · Score: 0

      I have been using Logitech VX revolution for over a year now and also tried this cordless mighty mouse on couple of occasions and for me logitech is far better in terms of build quality and ergonomics. You may also want to look an VX Nano if you are left-handed or want a smaller usb receiver. Another great thing about logitech is that when i managed to damage my usb receiver they sent me another one free of charge without asking any questions.

    16. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anenome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I've stuck with corded mice too. Every time I've used someone else's wireless I hear the stories. From the WoW tank who's mouse battery died while the guild had the last boss to 1% hp for the first time, to the intermittent rolling and clicking. It just all sucks. Plus, I don't want to be buying batteries all the time, or plugging my mouse in like its a Norelco razor. I am damn happy with my corded mouse. 100% reliability. Doesn't get much better.

      My dad has a cheap USB cordless laptop mouse, one of those super tiny ones with a single AAA battery. It works like a charm. But I would never use one for my desktop.

      --
      "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    17. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, they didn't. The Mighty Mouse has 3 buttons: standard "left-click", "right-click", and the pressing the ball is the 3rd button.

      Admittedly, the right-click takes some getting used to, and I still don't get it right once in a while, but the buttons are there.

    18. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      everyone hail to 1-button mouse!

    19. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they did. It's a touch-sensitive single button that if there's a finger on the left side, registers the click as left, otherwise it's right. This makes it impossible to do things that require both left and right at the same time, like WoW or some 3d modeling programs. Ok, it's a three button mouse: squeeze, top (depending on where your left finger is) and wheel. All awkward as hell to hit and maintain two buttons down consistently.

    20. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MX revolution is the BEST mouse i've ever used. Wireless and rechargable (two musts for any desktop mouse I will ever use). Bluetooth sucks because of the wakeup time (1-2 sec +). I've gone through 2 of them (WoW = mouse abuse). For my MBP though, I use a cheapo usb corded mouse.. I just wish there was a bluetooth version of the MX that matched the ultra low latency and wakeup times... the thing though is I think logitech uses some sort of always on USB transceiver so the receiver is always listening and the mouse can just transmit whenever, as opposed to bluetooth having to re-establish the connectin...

    21. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Meneguzzi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have tried a mighty mouse with my mac and can honestly say that I'm not even considering it now, the VX Mice from Logitech, though, are what are enthusing me now.

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
    22. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      Turn up the speed a little bit in System Preferences. I only have a 20" iMac at work and the default tracking speed is too slow for me! The other thing is the side buttons are pretty much useless as it is too easy to bump them, even with experience. I have, however, mastered the left/middle/right clicking, and I do like the 3D scrolling. Workmates call it a "bar of soap" though...

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    23. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft mice are rebranded logitech mice. Same with the keyboards.

    24. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      So basically, my post is useless, except to say that whenever you can, try before you buy.

      Or try after you buy, but make sure you have a good return policy.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    25. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      You can call it what you want, but you are still incorrect that there is only one button. Further, right-click works just fine for me if I do it right, regardless of whether there is one or two fingers on the mouse.

      Even if it is finger-sensitive as you say, IN EFFECT it is still two buttons; you have a left-click and a right-click. But wait... there's more! Pressing the ball acts as a 3rd button, and the squeeze buttons on the side make a 4th! So even if your assertion is correct, it is STILL not a one-button mouse.

    26. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have also a Bluetooth Mighty Mouse. When the mouse works, it is very good.

      You can use it with only one battery, so it does not weight too much. The right click is a bit sluggish on time, but the main problem is that the ball sensors are very sensitives to the dirt that gets inside, so with time downward scrolling stops working (this happen also with the wired mighty mouse). You can clean that with a toothbrush, but this single issue condemn this otherwise bright mouse.

      So I am looking now to buy a Logitech VT470 (grey). Logitech mice are very good and Bluetooth works very well for mouse.

    27. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eww. You've got to be kidding me. There is no mouse I'd rather use than my Mighty Mouse. Now if you were talking about one of those puck mice I might agree with you. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    28. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Batteries are always a pain. I wish they'd make one that could charge by induction and just have a special induction mouse pad. Still I haven't noticed it being worse than any other brand of wireless mouse I've used. I haven't really cared for the cradle concept for recharging because nobody ever bothers until the sucker just turns up dead and then you have to wait for it to charge.

      I've never had a problem with the scrollball although my keyboard usually turns black. I do wash my hands frequently so maybe that helps. (not sure why the keyboard turns black actually)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    29. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      A 1 button mouse that offers the normal three buttons, side buttons, and an extra scrollball.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    30. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Turning up the speed makes it more difficult to be precise in my experience. Important if you do much in the way of graphics. The jumbo sized mouse pad takes up a lot of desk space but otherwise is a easy/cheap fix. Heck, I wish the whole darn desk was a mousepad really.

      The side buttons can be frustrating sometimes. I wish they'd move them a little bit forward so that gripping the mouse didn't accidently trigger them. Something amusing I've noticed is if you have static electricity on you when touching the mouse it'll trigger the side buttons sometimes. Work up a good charge and then touch someone using the mouse and see. Or get a plasma ball and touch it while touching the mouser.

      Given the ugliness of the average PC and it's components and the lack of showering by most geeks I think I can live with a bar of soap mouse.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    31. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by pacergh · · Score: 1

      Using one of these right now on a Hackintoshed Dell Mini 9. I love it.
      The reason I prefer it over dongle-based wireless?
      Quick and easy. I don\t have to search for a dongle, plug it in, and go. Nor do I have to remember to unplug the dongle when it is storage time again.
      Just close the laptop, toss it in your bag, turn the mouse off, toss it in the bag.
      Quick and easy.
      Hell, that's what Bluetooth is supposed to be about. Why by a Macbook Pro, with all of its hidden wireless gadgets (no wireless card sticking out, no bluetooth dongle sticking out, no camera stuck on top to be put away) if you don't actually USE those features?
      Might as well buy a Dell then. (Which is not a bad thing.)
      If you pay for the luxuries, might as well use them.

    32. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember a time when Logitech had much more in the way of Bluetooth offerings, but it seems like they've trimmed their line of all but the bare minimum when it comes to Bluetooth.

      In fact, I've been looking at Bluetooth mice on and off for a while now and I've been somewhat disappointed - many of the mice I used to see are no longer offered, with no real replacement options.

    33. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Coopa · · Score: 1

      I already have a logitech mouse/keyboard combo which is around 3 years old now. The mouse has taken some abuse over the last few years (FPS games).

      Any idea if an MX Revolution would be compatible with my current logitech USB dongle?

    34. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i saw an article once where a guy bought around 50 of the plain black mouse pads in bulk somewhere, then carefully cut them all down so there where no round edges, and then glued em down to his desk. made one vast mouse pad.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    35. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by entrex · · Score: 0

      I agree. I've also found wireless mice to feel inaccurate at times. Every time I sit down at a computer with a wireless mouse I feel like I'm fighting it to go where I want.

      --
      To a nail, every person with a hammer looks like a problem.
    36. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

      The only issue I have with that is that you can't find a decent replacement for the Mighty Mouse that's got 4 buttons like the Mighty Mouse AND 360-degree trackball in it.

      Mighty Mouse's biggest problem is that it's glued shut. You can't easily open it up and clean it out (important for the trackball). Otherwise, it's a pretty decent mouse.

      The right-click thing is a matter of finger placement. Namely, if rest the left finger on the left button and press on the right as the same time, it will sometimes register as a left-click. The solutions are to move your second finger a few millimeters farther to the right before right-clicking, or to lift your left finger slightly while right clicking (or even pick up the left finger and use it to press the right button).

    37. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Chrono11901 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone, but if you look at posts above. You can see people taking flaws and spinning them.

      "Its not a flaw its a feature that takes several weeks to adjust to!"

    38. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I use a Logitech VX Nano mouse with my laptop. The precision is exceptional and the wireless range is ridiculously good (it uses 2.4Ghz). Battery life on 2 x AAA is decent also.

      I'll second that on the VX Nano. I love mine. The tiny USB connector is a plug-it-in-and-forget-about-it, it's so small. The old large adapters were always getting in the way, in danger of getting bent or broken, etc. I don't use the side-to-side scroller much, but it's very handy when you want it.

      As to the Mighty Mouse, I do like it when working with the Mac. The tracking seems perfect to me. It uses more batteries than the Nano, but it's not battery-hungry or anything, the Nano just runs forever. The problem with the Mighty Mouse is that after about a year and a half the little button in the middle quit working both ways (it'll scroll up but not down). I haven't had the Nano that long (have they even been out that long), but my other Logitech mice have never failed.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    39. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Adlopa · · Score: 1

      Untrue -- or at least it used to be. I toured both Logitech's Swiss and Microsoft's Seattle mice/keyboard facilities five years ago and can assure you that there is (or at least, was) no rebranding going on.

    40. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by a.deity · · Score: 1

      Not to pile on, but, actually, 4. Left click, Right click, pressing the trackball, and squeezing the sides.

      --
      Option-Shift-K.
    41. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Does Logitech offer a flat mouse? I can't stand mice that are too tall. The old Logitech Optical Mouse was somewhat acceptable but lately the only usable normal-sized mice I've encountered were the Mighty Mouse and the Razer Krait (which is what I use now as the Mighty is no good for gaming and cleaning the scroll ball gets old after a while).

      I'm starting to prefer the Krait for regular work, too - it's very sensitive so a slight twitch of the fingers moves the pointer halfway across the screen. That's very nice if you have a steady hand and good hand-eye coordination.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    42. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Yetiszaf · · Score: 1

      You might want to consider buying yourself a wacom pad.The mice for them run the same way as the pens, both inductive.

    43. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Paolo+DF · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course you can lift and drag!
      Read the instruction manual: you'll find that you just have to hold the mouse by those two lateral buttons (not squeezing them, just holding) and you'll be fine!

      --
      Pumbaa! I don't wonder; I know.
    44. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by joeyblades · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. I'm one of those Mac fanbois who routinely pays 10X as much money for my machines (hey, if we're going to play the exaggeration game, play to win). Yet, since about 1985 I've almost always used higher functionality mice than what shipped with my Mac. I say "almost" because I did enjoy a MightyMouse at first, but in the long run I find Logitech mice and trackballs much more capable and reliable.

    45. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      The Mighty Mouse is strictly hit-or-miss. You either love it or hate it. I think it works very well and the scroll ball is extremely nice; in fact I bought a Mighty for my Linux box before I ever owned a Mac. However, many people I know have no idea how anyone could ever get the thing to work properly.

      Some Apple products are great (I'm partial to their notebooks, which also tend to be more cost-compatitive than the desktops) and some are rather questionable (Apple TV). The Mighty Mouse is all over the scale, depending on person. Even among Mac users.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    46. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it is well documented that the Mighty Mouse is poorly engineered for the right mouse function (and this coming from a rabid mac user since 1988). Just because some people "don't have problems" with it doesn't mean it isn't poorly engineered. They do have problems--they choose to ignore them, or think they are insignificant (which is fine), but in the spirit of helping others on a discussion forum, it's best to be honest of real shortcomings.

    47. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ergonomic

      Only in the mouse world does "ergonomic" mean "forces you to use one specific hand and so increases the chance of RSI"

    48. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I've always found Microsoft't hardware division to deserve better than to be lumped together with their software division. Except for a fairly crappy router I've only encountered decent hardware from them.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    49. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by evanbd · · Score: 1

      I have one of the Logitech cordless (non-bluetooth) mice. It takes AA batteries (alkaline only, not NiMH or NiCd, unfortunately). It has a low battery indicator, so I don't worry about it dieing unexpectedly. Of course, in the four months (maybe five, I don't remember exactly) I've had it, that indicator has yet to come on, so I don't actually know how much time is left when it does.

      Interference is annoying. It took me a little while to realize that I can't plug the receiver into the back of the computer or the back of the monitor. I got a short USB extension cable and the receiver now sits on my desk behind the keyboard, and it works wonderfully. I'd hoped the range would be longer, but this isn't a problem. Overall, I'm fairly happy with it.

    50. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Uh, why don't you read the thread before flaming. Your flames might be a little more convincing if you actually read what people are writing. But since I see a lot of otherwise happy Mac users complaining about their crappy Mighty Mouses, your flame is an epic fail.

    51. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Actually, he's right. You can't "chord" with the Mighty Mouse--a feature in WoW where you push the left and right buttons at the same time to run forward. I personally can't get it to work with a mouse with 2 physical buttons anyway, so I stick to pressing the "W" key (imagine that). Of course, instead of griping about a feature that really isn't that important, why not just map the side buttons to run--it's easier to squeeze the sides than it is to hit two mouse buttons simultaneously.

    52. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can vouch for Logitech's mice. I've got an old MX1000 that I've had for years and still use to this day, it's easily the BEST mouse I have ever had. The battery in it is starting to lose its charge, but I've had it 5 years now and as long as you put it on a charge every day or two, it's got more than enough battery to last heavy use.
      When I first got it, the battery lasted days without a charge and I am definitely a heavy mouse user.

      Furthermore, I have to offer a warning: I heard a rumour that the latency on Logitech's NEW mice isn't the best. The mouse I have now has no perceivable latency, even in twitch FPSs like Quake and Counter Strike, but newer ones MIGHT not be as good. I'd advise doing some research on each model you're interested in.

      Still, a +1 for a decent logitech.

    53. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by brackishboy · · Score: 1

      I edited a short documentary using an iMac with a Mighty Mouse, and while I didn't care for the feel of the thing or the right-click method, I absolutely love the scroll ball. I've never found a better way of scrolling through complex video timelines quickly and accurately.

    54. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by brackishboy · · Score: 1

      Every Mac I've ever owned has shipped with the default pointer speed and acceleration settings set too low for me. It's a relief to hear others have the same problem :)

    55. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by brackishboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now, now. Everybody knows that all generalisations are bad!

    56. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by NoStrings · · Score: 1

      My mighty mouse did the same thing with the scroll button not working properly. It's probably just because some dirt got in behind the ball. Try holding the mouse upside down and spin the ball around like crazy for a bit. That should make any debris fall out and restore functionality.

    57. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by stewbacca · · Score: 1, Informative

      Everyone hail to an incorrect five year old myth!

    58. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Curien · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Turning up the speed makes it more difficult to be precise in my experience.

      That's why the Good Lord invented cursor acceleration. Amen.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    59. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've stuck with corded mice too. Every time I've used someone else's wireless I hear the stories. From the WoW tank who's mouse battery died while the guild had the last boss to 1% hp for the first time, to the intermittent rolling and clicking. It just all sucks.

      Honestly, I dislike corded mice because the cable is always a bit annoying.

      However having through the years tried a lot of cordless mice, I've always had a number of problems with them, from button 2 (click wheel) dying (ok, not cordless related) on my first MX 1000 some years ago to (more common problem with later mice) my latest attempt with a MS model going haywire with something apparently interfering on the frequency it was using.

      So I'm back to a corded Logitech G5 and the cord is a bit annoying. But at least it works consistently.
      And I was surprised to see that all the buttons worked in both Gnome and KDE without having to set up anything. In Windows it doesn't work as well (didn't install the Logitech drivers though, I just run a few games so I didn't see the point).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    60. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I'm exactly the same. I've been using my MX1000 for 5 years too, and I haven't found anything as good to replace it. I love it for gaming, too, because it has so many buttons. Left click, right click, wheel click, wheel left, wheel right, page up, page down, forward, back, and that button between forward and back. That's what, 10 buttons? Does anybody know of any other mouse with 10 buttons?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    61. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's next to impossible to find a full sized Bluetooth mouse now. They're all travel mice.

      Strangely enough, despite being travel mice which SHOULD have improved performance on "odd" surfaces, my Microsoft Bluetoooth Notebook Mouse 6000 (don't remember the exact name, it's basically MS's only BT offering) is the worst mouse I've ever used on carpet surfaces or couches. Even my first generation MS Intellimouse Explorer (the first optical mouse ever released to my knowledge) is superior on most surfaces.

      I've heard that Logitech's equivalent to the MS notebook mouse isn't any better, in fact on Newegg the MS unit got generally better reviews for "odd-surface" usability.

      Another annoyance is that you can't change the pointer speed of Bluetooth mice separately from other pointing devices in any Linux distro I've tried (Ubuntu and Gentoo). In both cases if the pointer speed is adjusted for good trackpad usability, the cursor moves at Mach 1 for the Bluetooth mouse.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    62. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I now carry a Logitech G5 in my laptop bag at all times (Yes, I bought a *second* G5 just for my laptop), like you I've basically given up on wireless mice (Bluetooth or proprietary). The only time I use a wireless mouse is with my HTPC in the living room.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    63. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I agree. Back in college a lot of friends of mine and I (who were almost all Linux fans) all felt that the only division of MS that made good products was their input devices division. Even the Linux Users Group would often reccommend MS mice to people looking for a good mouse.

      Their routers were OK too, not quite as high quality as the mice/keyboards/joysticks though.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    64. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I dislike corded mice because the cable is always a bit annoying.

      I dunno. I think that many fans of wireless mice would do just fine with a corded one if they just took some time to set the cord run nicely. There's not that much improvement from a wireless one that would overcome all the problems it brings along. And if one wants to go even further, there's some environmental stress related to making the batteries.

      Of course there is some situations where wireless makes sense, maybe some presentation space or sofa surfin'. xD

    65. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by corky842 · · Score: 1

      Heck, I wish the whole darn desk was a mousepad really.

      You mean like one of these? I use one, and it's great. It doesn't wuite take up the whole desk, but a keyboard (Model M non-space saver) and mouse fit on there with plenty of room.

    66. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by DaGoatSpanka · · Score: 1

      If you haven't yet, you should try uberOptions. It will really allow you to configure all those buttons on the MX revolution.

      http://www.mstarmetro.net/users/rlowens/

    67. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that right mouse buttons are new technology in Macland. Give them some time to work it out.

    68. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Arivia · · Score: 1

      If a tank on WoW wiped the raid at 1% with no mouse, then they need to learn to use asdf and not click their abilities: 6523434- repeat.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    69. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Arivia · · Score: 1

      In case anyone wonders why this is important, the best way to move in WoW is by chording and moving the mouse to turn, like an fps but with the chord replacing ws. Of course, ad are remapped to strafe, and the game has very poor click-to-move support. Edit: One downside to moving using another method besides chording is having to wrap your hands around / for walking and NumLock for autorun.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    70. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Actually no. Microsoft sucks at mice.

      they are good ar re branding Logitech mice to Microsoft and selling them.

      Microsoft mice have been Logitech mice for decades.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    71. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by mikeru22 · · Score: 1

      haha sometimes I have to turn on my Mighty Mouse to connect to my iMac to reconnect my Microsoft Bluetooth mouse when that fails to connect. The wireless Mighty Mouse is not comfortable in my hand at ALL. Mighty mouse LOOKS cool, but I'd much rather use the the Microsoft Notebook Mouse 5000 (even though the connectivity sometimes sucks). this seems like an argument for both sides, and it is. Mac needs to improve connectivity for other mice, or make their mice more comfortable and lightweight.

      --
      Go study.
    72. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by M-RES · · Score: 1

      Except yours. Damn, that means not ALL generalisations are... aaaagggghhhh brain fart!

    73. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MX610 has 12 buttons (Left click/right click/wheel left/wheel right/wheel click/volume up/volume down/email lamp & button/messenger lamp & button/thumb forward/thumb back). Available in right or left (difficult to find) handed. Now - can anyone help me? I'm looking for a large (larger than MX610) left-handed (or ambidextrous) wireless mouse with 10 or more buttons and a decent linux driver? They only seem to make mice for the tiny-handed individual nowadays..

    74. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by PIBM · · Score: 1

      You are not using a high enough resolution, or you are losing out on precision ;)

    75. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by jsnipy · · Score: 1

      Weeks to get used to a mouse sounds counter intuitive.

      --
      -- if you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
    76. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by beef+curtains · · Score: 1

      Yes - LOVE the VX Nano. It's a relatively simple little USB wireless laser mouse, but it works super smoothly & dependably.

      As Curunir_wolf mentioned, the USB "Nano receiver" is very small - when plugged in, it only sticks out about 1/4", and is designed to butt up against the side of your laptop very snugly, so you don't have to worry about it wiggling or snagging on anything. The only time I ever need to remove it is when I'm working from home & want to use it with my work laptop.

      Also as anakha said, the battery life is very good. I've had the thing for about a year, and have only had to change batteries twice. Luckily the little status light just below the scrollwheel starts blinking red when the juice is getting low.

      I actually went out of my way to find a wireless mouse that was NOT rechargeable...I prefer incurring the cost of two AAA batteries every four months than having to charge my mouse every other day, then having to deal with its charge running low, etc.

      Finally, some caveats:
      - The VX Nano is a smaller-than-average mouse. If you have large hands, or are only comfortable cupping your entire hand over the mouse, this might not be the mouse for you. This mouse is definitely designed for the claw technique.
      - The latest version of Logitech's OS X software (Logitech Control Center v2.7) is not compatible with World of Warcraft (if you play, that is). Everytime you try to use the scrollwheel in-game, the cursor will jump to one of the top corners of your screen. The solution is to download an older version of the LCC (2.1, I believe). There's a WoW forum thread that includes a (malware-free) link to the older LCC download, I've used it successfully in the past...I'd link it here, but I'm at work & WoW-related links are locked down.
      - Many people who hate the LCC software (for the reason outlined above, among other things) have successfully gotten all of the VX Nano's features to work using SteerMouse (and other freeware OS X mouse utilities). Personally, I don't really care either way...I use LCC v2.1 with now problems. I have the center "search" button configured to activate Exposé's all-windows mode, and have the two small buttons by the left mouse button configured for page back and page forward.

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    77. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by tixxit · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't give up on em so fat. I have a wireless Logitech Nano (or something like that) for my laptop. Works like a charm and the battery lasts extraordinarily long (several months). If you are Windows, then the software that comes with it has a warning indicator when your battery is getting low too. The USB receiver is very small, fits in the mouse (harder to lose). For me, the cords on corded mice always have a slight pull on the mouse one way or another, which gets annoying.

    78. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Hello Richard Gere! Welcome to Slashdot!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    79. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I had a Logitech MX Revolution, and I freaking LOVED it. For 3 months. Then the cheap rubber they put on the wheel started to stretch out, preventing the wheel from spinning easily. Logitech dicked me around until I finally gave up, chucked it in the trash, filed a BBB complaint, and bought a new mouse.

      I miss the cool clutch and flywheel thing that mouse had going on... VERY handy. The design was great, and felt good in my hand. For once, somebody made a mouse big enough for an adult hand. Now if they could just, I dunno, invest an extra quarter per mouse to make it hold up...

    80. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol! I've never understood this. My mouse of choice is a Logitech MX100 (bluetooth) and I use them on my Mac and PC laptops. It's so old they don't make it anymore but it has 8 buttons and a 4 way scroll wheel. Aside from the fact that the Mighty Mouse's trackball is uncleanable and will stop working with use, the mouse is lacking major functionality and waaaay behind the times. But it looks pretty!

    81. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Moleverine · · Score: 1

      I have the Mighty Mouse, and it is an ergonomic nightmare. It turns my hand into The Claw after about an hour or use. I've gotten used to the right-clicking thing (not that you really need to right-click all that often in OS X), but it's still far less efficient than a standard mouse.

    82. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I find 1680x840 to be adequate. And the twitch I was referring to is a fairly large one - I can still position the pointer precisely with smaller movements. However, I don't need to move my hand to reach any part of the screen, which is nice.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    83. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd call it "poorly engineered." Differently engineered, certainly - most mice don't require you to lift your finger off the left side of the mouse to register a right-click. It's an elegant solution to the problem of balancing the power users' desire to have two mouse buttons with the simplicity of a one-button design for new users.

      It's certainly not the mouse for everybody - especially anybody who plays first-person shooters. However, I've never used the right button for gaming, and I sometimes use only the keyboard.

    84. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      A 1 button mouse that offers the normal three buttons, side buttons, and an extra scrollball.

      ... that reminds me of the old and beloved Street Fighter combos for special attacks

      --
      -- dnl
    85. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Seconded. If you're using a desktop, get a nice wired mouse with a low-friction cable and feed it intelligently. For my laptop though, I LOVE my bluetooth mouse, especially when I travel. So much nicer to just turn the mouse on instead of trying to feed a cord somewhere, and I can turn it off and stuff it in my pocket if I need to move to another conference room or something.

    86. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Cr4wford · · Score: 1

      I have a MBP with a wireless mighty mouse. The scroll ball is pretty awesome, until it gets dirty and stops working. Sometimes you can clean it and it will be back to normal, but one time I tried cleaning it with rubbing alcohol, and though it fixed the scroll ball, the middle button click was then broken. At least the Apple Store was really cool about it. They tried to clean it, still couldn't get it to work, and then just handed me a new one off the shelf.

      The right click is fine for most uses, EXCEPT gaming. I tried playing Starcraft with it, and it was horrendous.

      All in all I think it's a pretty good mouse for traveling, but for my home office I think I'll get a wired logitech. I'll miss the 360 scroll ball, but extra mouse buttons and no batteries will be nice.

      --
      Freelance Web Designer - Portfolio
    87. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Haarg · · Score: 1

      To be completely correct about it, there are three physical buttons. The side buttons are the simplest as it is just squeezing. The left and right click functions are implemented using the same button by sensing where your finger is located. This fails if you rest your fingers on the mouse or want to use both buttons at the same time. Last is the wheel, which actually doesn't get clicked itself. Instead, when the wheel is pressed, the main button functions as a middle mouse button. All together, this means you can only have two of the four "buttons" pressed at any time.

      I omitted the details for the sake of simplicity, as it is mainly the left vs right function that is problematic.

    88. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Haarg · · Score: 1

      It is definitely finger sensitive, a fact that is even promoted as a feature in the product information. Even if you get used to the need to not rest multiple fingers on the mouse, it still presents a problem for if you want to press more than one of the top three "buttons". That isn't something you can do right or wrong, it simply doesn't work.

    89. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I say it's poorly engineered only because it doesn't do very well (right click) what thousands of other devices just like it to without hassle. By "simplifying" the mouse, they added an unnecessary level of complexity. Short version: if it doesn't click when you click it, it's poorly engineered (unless it's poorly manufactured, which it isn't).

    90. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      It is a nice mouse, but it is too fragile for non-desk use. I say this after repairing mine, cannibalizing regular Mighty Mouse parts for it, and having it break again.

      I got a v470 to replace it, and I like it.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    91. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Another annoyance is that you can't change the pointer speed of Bluetooth mice separately from other pointing devices in any Linux distro I've tried

      Think it's the same in XP, and it's bloody stupid. Touchpad, trackball or mouse, you have the same settings for all.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    92. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I think that many fans of wireless mice would do just fine with a corded one if they just took some time to set the cord run nicely. There's not that much improvement from a wireless one that would overcome all the problems it brings along.

      Find me a mouse with a 15ft cord to use with my TV-sized iMac, and I might consider it. I probably won't though.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    93. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I can feel the cord dragging, they drive me mad. And if someone moves the cord after I've laid it out for minimum drag I can feel it even more.

      It's not that I'm weak, but I do have the sensitivity set high so I don't have to move it so much.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    94. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I, too have experienced severe range problems, in my case with a Kensington wireless trackball. It often has communication problems even at a mere three or four feet from the receiver (line-of-sight). By contrast, my MacBook can see my iPhone via Bluetooth from almost 28 feet line-of-sight. There's just no comparison. Maybe some of the newer non-Bluetooth wireless devices are less awful, but based on what I've seen with this one, it's Bluetooth or bust for me.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    95. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      As it turns out, this is correct. It is just that I had never had reason to "chord" (use both "buttons" simultaneously). Other than that, however, it does act as two separate "buttons". But the GP claimed that there is only one, which is incorrect in its own right... there is also the ball button, and the squeeze buttons.

    96. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is a no-button mouse. They don't use buttons. They use touch sensitive pads and a actuator lever switch. The actuator works very differently from real buttons, incompletely encoding the state of the touch pads. This is a big deal for occasions when you need to use the right pad at the same time as the left pad, and you find you can't.

      If you read Apple's Mighty Mouse page carefully, they don't mention that the scroll ball acts as a button, a fact confirmed by my experience with a Bluetooth Mighty Mouse.

    97. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's in-house game development is pretty good. Apple's is...n't.

    98. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Actually, it doesn't appear to be so much a range problem as a line of sight one. Behind the monitor is bad, but a couple inches away and not behind the metal monitor casing is fine. I have no need for 28-ft range on my mouse, so I think I'd prefer the additional battery life (allegedly 1-year, but I haven't tested that yet).

    99. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I have a 20" mouse pad I bought. but the regular ones could be great for tiling the kid's playroom.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    100. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by elbobo · · Score: 1

      I can tell you with absolute certainty that I have never had problems with the right button on my Mighty Mouse.

      I had problems with the side buttons (they were completely useless due to poor positioning), and with the scroll ball (gets dirty and stops working), but never the right button.

      I do love the scroll ball though, when it works. Pure bliss.

    101. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that you are lying (even though that's what I wrote, I didn't mean that), but just because it works for a few people, but doesn't work for the majority of people, doesn't make it ok.

    102. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by godglike · · Score: 1

      You might be behind the times:

      The mighty mouse has 4 buttons and 2(-ish) scrollwheels.

    103. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Divebus · · Score: 1

      The side buttons can be frustrating sometimes.

      So, turn them off in the control panel.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    104. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anenome · · Score: 1

      Ignorant. Speaking as a former tank myself, there are often things that can only be done with a mouse, notably moving. Movement \ turning is a very important part of tanking. And you simply cannot keyboard turn\move and expect to excel. Similarly communication is very important, and tanks are often called upon to coordinate and communicate. I was a tank and a raid leader also, and my PTT button was on my mouse, so that would be even worse. Depending on the phase of a boss you could be hitting abilities, sure, but 1% could come around during a phase change where you're virtually guaranteed to have to move around and avoid stuff. The days of standing there and beating on a boss until he's dead ended a long time ago. Wow is about group coordination (which is also WoW destined itself to smaller and smaller raids). They're down to what, 5-man raids now? What's next, two-man raids? Maybe a few more expansions we'll have the one-man raid finally and be completely full-circle :P

      But, I quit WoW a few years back. My character still has something like 43,000g on him _;;; I was pretty rich, and yet I never farmed, hehe. Thank you, Kunzite (No I didn't buy gold, do a G-search for 'Kunzite').

      --
      "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    105. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      My roommate has a wireless Mighty Mouse, and it never right-clicks properly for me.

      Take your finger off the left side. It's touch sensitive: if you click with a finger on the left, it's a left click; if on the right, it's a right click. If both, it treats it as a left click (to prevent confusion for users who don't know the difference).

      Click with just one finger on the mouse, and I bet it'll work just fine.

    106. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Range is more interesting for a multibutton trackball because you can use it as a controller to do complex tasks like starting and stopping recording/playback in a DAW from across the room... if it worked. I eventually gave up and bought a TranzPort....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    107. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by MrSparkle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly, and that is one of my biggest complaints about Apple. On one hand you have people claiming how simple and intuitive they are.

      On the other hand how are the following the least bit intuitive?
      -Right click on older Mac Book Pros requires you to place to fingers on the track pad and then click the giant mouse button that easily could have been split in half.
      -Scroll wheel on iPods, who knows what you're doing half the time.
      -Pressing "Enter" in Finder on OS X does a "rename". Huh? What's the single press button to open the damn file?
      -"Home" and "End" in Mac OS X. I may as well rip these keys off the keyboard because by default they're useless compared to there behavior on a PC.
      -iPhoto: Try to delete something, I dare you. Hint: don't try the obvious stuff like the "delete" key or pressing "right click" (I'm assuming you already know you're Mac hardware's obscure Konami code-esque right click combination)

      For all Apple's UI preachy-ness you'd think they'd have figured out the value of a right click context menu by now.

    108. Re:Wireless Mighty Mouse by owndao · · Score: 1

      I have used a Kensington Bluetooth and full size keyboard (the older sturdier model) with my iMac for 3 years without problems. I initially tried a Logitech wireless mouse but its broadcast range was unreliable past 1 foot from its USB dongle. I cannot sit at a desk and am typically 3-4 feet from the iMac and the Logitech could not make the distance while the Apple keyboard and Kensington (two button + scroll wheel with left-right tilt button action) work at least to 20 feet. I have never tested to the full Bluetooth range. Also, I have never noticed any lag time with either device except when the mouse disconnects after about 10 minutes of no use.

      --
      Be as you would have the world become.
  2. Bluetooth by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    I've always gone for bluetooth since, well, everything has bluetooth inbuilt now and you don't need to plug in proprietary usb receivers into laptops, netbooks, etc.

    I can't comment on how they compare to the propeiety wireless usb receiver types since I have never used on.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Bluetooth by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Same experience here. I've never used a standard wireless mouse, but my bluetooth mouse works quite well, and the battery (a single rechargeable AA) regularly lasts two weeks through lengthy gaming sessions. The mouse came with a USB bluetooth dongle which I've used once or twice on desktops, but I normally use the bluetooth receiver built in to my laptop.

    2. Re:Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a wireless keyboard and mouse bundle, and I have never have any problems with batte

    3. Re:Bluetooth by cakefragment · · Score: 1

      I'll add that it's a good idea to get low self-discharge batteries for a wireless mouse. I get a good three months between battery changes, and a spare set of standard NiMH battery could be dead by then.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_self-discharge_NiMH_battery

    4. Re:Bluetooth by Antidamage · · Score: 0

      Haha, your battery ra

    5. Re:Bluetooth by EvanED · · Score: 1

      the battery (a single rechargeable AA) regularly lasts two weeks through lengthy gaming sessions

      No offense, but I'd say that's pretty crappy. I've got this beauty; the mouse takes 2 AA. I use non-rechargables, but I think I've changed the mouse batteries probably about 4 or 5 times in 16 or so months. Even if there were 8 changes, that's still getting twice the life per battery that you are.

      That's my primary mouse, so gets used for 8-10 hours/day, 5 days/week.

      (OTOH, I have another Logitech mouse that has a built in battery that only ever lasted 2 or 3 weeks probably, and is down to a few days.)

    6. Re:Bluetooth by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Informative

      everything has bluetooth inbuilt now

      When buying my new laptop (~1 month ago), one of the things I wanted was bluetooth. It turns out that most people didn't use the bluetooth in their laptops, so manufacturers started pulling it from just about every model you can find. Going to the local shops, only about 10% of the laptops had it. For god's sake, there were almost as many with blueray drives as bluetooth!

    7. Re:Bluetooth by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same here. On a laptop a thingy in a USB port is very unhandy because if you use the computer on the couch or in bed there is a chance that it will be forced to bend due to folds in the upholstery or the sheets. This can cost you your motherboard. I don't want to risk that.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    8. Re:Bluetooth by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      My Logitech V450 Nano Laser Mouse works very well. http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/mice/devices/4335&cl=US,EN I've been using it for going on 3 months now, and haven't had to change the batteries yet. It runs on 2 AA. Battery meter in their optional software says it's still at 85%. I play several hours of WoW every day when I get off work, plus use it for several hours playing Call of Duty 4 each week. It responds really well, better than my previous usb wired mouse I had.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    9. Re:Bluetooth by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      We have a few bluetooth mice in the office and they are a real pain. They are forever pairing with the wrong computer. So you change the batteries and it pops up the pairing dialog on a computer 2 offices away while you sit there with a mouse that doesn't work.

      Of course to compound matters they are wireless Mighty mice which have to be the worst mouse i've used. They are too heavy, don't slide well across the mouse mat and the left click / right click has very dodgy detection. The only good thing about them is the mouse ball instead of a wheel with tilt that most use for vertical and horizontal screen. But even that gets gummed up quickly and stops rolling freely.

    10. Re:Bluetooth by Enry · · Score: 1

      Heh. I once had my BT adapter handling audio, a EVDO connection to the Internet, and a connection to my GPS all working at once.

    11. Re:Bluetooth by Enry · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are tiny USB BT dongles that aren't much bigger than the USB port itself. Check dealextreme.

    12. Re:Bluetooth by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I bought the keyboard and mouse separately, but I have the same setup.

      I'm not much of a hardcore gamer, computer usage tends to be limited to 2-3 hours at a time, but I can't actually remember the last time I had to swap out the batteries. It's been months.

    13. Re:Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You like Mac? Buy what ever is cheeky and most expensive. Blue Tooth will kill you laptops battery life, but you wont have an extra dongle... so it is more fashionable.

    14. Re:Bluetooth by Adlopa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cordd kyboards ar the most rliabl kind and thr's vry littl than can go wrong with thm. I'v bn using this old Chrry modl for yars and it's still as good as nw.

    15. Re:Bluetooth by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Rechargeable AA's, which almost certainly means NiMH these days, have somewhere between 1/2 and 2/3s the capacity of alkaline primary cells of the equivalent size(and deliver a slightly lower voltage). Given that, a device running on a single rechargable AA has somewhere between 1/4 and 1/3 the energy available to it that a device running on two primary AA's. Rechargable AA's also have a rather higher self-discharge rate than primary AA's do.

      Given that, it looks to me like the two mice are using fairly similar amounts of power.

    16. Re:Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After having used wireless keyboard/mice and the bluetooth alternative for a few years, I can comment on two things, battery life and performance. The battery life alone makes bluetooth worth it, the wireless/infrared units that we purchased ate batteries quickly, bluetooth consumes much less power. Also, the wireless/infrared is limited by distance, and sometimes by obstructions of the wireless reciever.

    17. Re:Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know if i tried a bad bluetooth mouse/keyboard, but i experienced noticeable lag, which i have never experienced with wireless. This was some rather expensive logitech keyboard/mouse set as well.

    18. Re:Bluetooth by SLi · · Score: 1

      Just get a USB bluetooth dongle, they cost at most $20 and are so small that you won't notice them (in mine the USB plug is about two thirds of its length).

    19. Re:Bluetooth by cwrinn · · Score: 1

      *gives Adlopa an E key for his keyboard*

      --
      Here's a cookie... *psst* it's MAGIC
    20. Re:Bluetooth by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had three of those from dealextreme. None of them worked.

    21. Re:Bluetooth by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      When buying my new laptop (~1 month ago), one of the things I wanted was bluetooth. It turns out that most people didn't use the bluetooth in their laptops, so manufacturers started pulling it from just about every model you can find. Going to the local shops, only about 10% of the laptops had it. For god's sake, there were almost as many with blueray drives as bluetooth!

      My laptop is bluetoothless because Acer would only include bluetooth if I bought the extra high capacity (read: extra heavy) battery with the laptop. It isn't as if the normal battery was too underpowered to drive a poxy little bluetooth radio or anything (although it is now because after a little over a year the battery was as good as useless and Acer don't seem to give a crap. I know that batteries are consumables, but I don't expect to have to replace it on a yearly basis).

    22. Re:Bluetooth by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      They have nano receivers any more that you don't have to worry about. They're all but flush with the case. What I hate is losing the USB port. If I have bluetooth built in, why would I use a wireless mouse with a dongle that eats up a USB port and more battery power?

    23. Re:Bluetooth by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think mice with two AA batteries are a little bit too heavy for gaming, for my tastes anyway. I switch back and forth between a wired, lightweight logitech mouse and a wireless Mighty Mouse with dual batteries. A lighter, shorter lifetime, single battery mouse might be a good compromise for gamers.

    24. Re:Bluetooth by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That's great, but the poster was talking about how BT is better because it's built in.

      When there's an equally tiny USB dongle for a proprietary wireless mouse, I may take a look at them. But I haven't seen them yet, so I stick with crappy Bluetooth mice.

      Oh, the mouse has to work in Linux, too, which is sometimes an issue for the proprietary wireless ones.

    25. Re:Bluetooth by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      [this is from Wikipedia, not the parent]
      NiMH cells are not expensive, and the voltage and performance is [sic] similar to primary alkaline cells in those sizes; they can be substituted for most purposes. The ability to recharge hundreds of times can save money and resources.

      [snip]

      NiMH cells are particularly advantageous for high current drain applications, due in large part to their low internal resistance. Alkaline batteries, which might have approximately 3000 mAÂh capacity at low current demand (200 mA), will have about 700 mAÂh capacity with a 1000 mA load.[20] Digital cameras with LCDs and flashlights can draw over 1000 mA, quickly depleting alkaline batteries. NiMH can handle these current levels and maintain their full capacity. [emphasis added]

      What are you smoking? (Permalink)

      --
      $ make available
    26. Re:Bluetooth by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      By the way, that weird  symbol should be a U+00B7 "middle dot" or equivalent which I can't persuade Slashdot to let me (X)HTML escape. It's essentially a multiplication sign.

      --
      $ make available
    27. Re:Bluetooth by adolf · · Score: 1

      You bought a laptop in a store?

      Gads.

      The ubiquitous shiny LCDs are enough to keep me far, far away from all retail (and otherwise pre-packaged) laptops.

      I tend to like Dell machines, but there's plenty of other companies which will install a Bluetooth module in a custom-built laptop. The built-in Bluetooth on my Inspiron 6000i was, IIRC, only $15 or $20, was worth every cent, and its inclusion was not tied to any other features or functions.

    28. Re:Bluetooth by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Have a look at something like this:

      http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/mice/devices/5484&cl=au,en

      The USB dongle extends from the USB port approximately 3mm, so in my experience it is not noticeable.

      Oh and no special drivers are required for it either.

    29. Re:Bluetooth by Sancho · · Score: 1

      That's fantastic! Thanks for the pointer!

    30. Re:Bluetooth by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's crappy, I don't know... I'm not a battery guru. However, I may have underestimated the battery life; I don't really devote brain cells to remembering how often I recharge it, I just plop it on the charger when the light starts blinking red. I remember that it's "not very often", which my brain translated to "two weeks [or so]" when I needed to write it down... this would be so much easier if the internet were telepathic :D

      For those interested, the mouse uses a single AA Nickel Metal Hydride rechargable battery which claims to have 2100 mAh. I don't know how much power the mouse draws; it's a Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 8000 if you really want to look it up.

    31. Re:Bluetooth by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did search online, but believe it or not (I almost didn't), the retail store had the best deal.

    32. Re:Bluetooth by DavidB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I love my wireless mouse with nano receiver. I can leave the receiver plugged into the laptop even when I put the laptop in its carrying case.

  3. VX Nano by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Honestly, I have recommended it to everyone I know. It's quite honestly the best mouse I've ever used.

    It's only flaw is that it doesn't have Bluetooth, but at the same time its battery life is about 4 times as long as my desktop's (also a Logitech) Bluetooth mouse.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:VX Nano by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have the v550 nano mouse. Other than being a little small, I love it. The frictionless scroll-wheel is insanely nice for scrolling through websites and my music player (thousands of songs).

      I was a little dissapointed that it was RF, but the dongle it uses is TINY and can be just left in the laptop (even when in a bag).

    2. Re:VX Nano by Eideteker · · Score: 1

      Only flaw? Does it come in a left-handed version? Ambidextrous?

      --
      sic
    3. Re:VX Nano by Spatial · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was going to get one, but according to reviews it has no middle button. Instead there's a gimmick to switch wheel modes. Instant fail; now how can I open all those porn tabs quickly? Ctrl-click can bite my ass, I've only got one hand free!

      Instead I got a MS Wireless 5000 BT mouse and I have to say it's pretty great. No lag, well weighted, comfortable and with good tracking and resolution. Four buttons too. It's easily good enough to play fast-paced FPS games with. I'm using it with my NC10 netbook right now.

    4. Re:VX Nano by XMyth · · Score: 1

      I've got a VX Nano for work and a v550 for home. I prefer the nano because of the back/forward buttons...other than that, these mice are practically identical (which is to say AWESOME).

      I'll never buy another mouse without a MicroGear scroll wheel again.

    5. Re:VX Nano by XMyth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It has a middle button. It's behind the scroll wheel. Clicking the scroll wheel changes the gear behavior so they couldn't make that the middle button like normal. But there is a functioning middle button on this mouse.

      You just have to tell the logitech software to use it as such is all.

      The mouse is awesome.

    6. Re:VX Nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VX Nano is just the best. Having tried at least 10 other (mostly from Logitech), I believe you cannot go wrong with this mouse. I bought four of them, one for dad, one for my sister, one for a friend, and one for me. Is the best of the best.

    7. Re:VX Nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has a middle button, and a back and forward button.

      Plus with the scroll wheel you can skip through all the boring talking much more quickly than normal mice.

    8. Re:VX Nano by TheDeuce · · Score: 1

      easy as side clicking the scroll wheel.

    9. Re:VX Nano by hplus · · Score: 2, Funny

      It has a frictionless scroll wheel? Quick, call NASA!

    10. Re:VX Nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unrelated but I still like my mx1000, I honestly hope it never breaks... lithium ion rechargable battery only take an hour or two to charge and works all week :) not really suited for a laptop though...

    11. Re:VX Nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The middle button on this mouse is just below the scroll wheel. The free spinning, high inertia wheel is a great innovation. It's a great product.

    12. Re:VX Nano by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      Dunno 'bout you, but I've been using computers for so long that even DESKS were to right-handed people. Never got why there was a part of the table on the right lowered (especially before the mouse), but people always used that as a mousepad placeholder.

      So even being left-handed, I use mouse w/right hand..

    13. Re:VX Nano by Axess+Denyd · · Score: 1

      Even better, it can be stored INSIDE the mouse if you disconnect it for some reason.

      I have the VX450 nano (I can't stand scroll wheels without detents) and am constantly surprised at how good it is.

      --
      ---- Watch out for snakes!
    14. Re:VX Nano by fathomDragon · · Score: 0

      I love my VX Nano. If you're going to be dual-booting anything, go with RF. I found having to re-associate bluetooth every time I boot into the other operating system (and back again) to be VERY annoying.

    15. Re:VX Nano by LeonN · · Score: 1

      Too much information!!! why mention the NC10 netbook? thats just too much.

      --
      http://freelinuxguides.wikidot.com
    16. Re:VX Nano by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 1

      I agree. I need small wireless mouse that would work with both my MacBook and my little AcerAspire netbook and the VX Nano fit the bill perfectly. I absolutely love this little mouse.

    17. Re:VX Nano by sabre3999 · · Score: 1

      I've got one, and it's ALMOST ambidextrous. The side forward/back buttons are actually to the left of the mouse, beside what would traditionally be the left-click. If you don't mind using your middle finger for those, it should fit a lefty fairly well.

      Barring that, I'll vouch for the Nano as well. I'm an enthusiast gamer, and have used tons of mice. BT/RF/Corded, trackball/ball/IR/laser... The Nano bests them all for everything I've thrown at it. That includes daily use at work, as I've found I just can't live without it!

    18. Re:VX Nano by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      It has a middle button. It's behind the scroll wheel. Clicking the scroll wheel changes the gear behavior so they couldn't make that the middle button like normal. But there is a functioning middle button on this mouse.

      You just have to tell the logitech software to use it as such is all.

      The mouse is awesome.

      How's that work for Linux users, is there software available for that in Linux?

      Being the jerk that I am I decided to call Logitech to ask if their VX Nano mouse works with Ubuntu Linux, as the webpage says only Windows Vista:
      http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/mice/devices/3271&cl=US,EN

      The rep told me that the mouse might work, but there are no drivers. I ask him if "might work" means that I should buy the mouse or not, and he said don't buy it. I asked if Logitech has any mice that work with Ubuntu Linux, and said "unfortunately not".

      So, as nice as the Logitech VX Nano is, I'll be buying a Microsoft Notebook Presenter 800 (The Microsoft rep was very helpful on the phone).

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    19. Re:VX Nano by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      I use it under Linux just fine, all buttons working, etc. There's no fancy configuration software, but that's more Xorg's fault than Logitech's.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    20. Re:VX Nano by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      The v550 has a really cool scroll-wheel feature. It has detents, but if you click the scroll-wheel down, it detaches the gears, the re-attaches them if you do it again. It's like a detents toggle button!

  4. You ask us a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...And we'll fight about every little detail, go off-topic, crack jokes about welcoming you to the year 2000, debate form over function, laser over inferred, brand versus brand versus model, and in the end you'll still have to decide for yourself.

    Have you at least read the reviews on Amazon? Are we only deciding blue-tooth versus wireless, or do we have to pick the exact model for you? Is your 'perfect mouse' going to be someone elses 'perfect mouse' and vice-verse?

    Not actively trying to troll here, but wanting to bring your attention to the fact that it ends up being a very heavy personal decision based on your preferences, hand-size, availability, etc...

    1. Re:You ask us a question... by bobmarleypeople · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've tried bluetooth mice, and there's a bit too much lag on it for me. Also, bluetooth drains batteries a hell of a lot more than RF wireless. I have an iMac and I was fine with the generic wired mouse for a while, but 4 buttons wasn't enough for me. So I got the Logitech "Wireless Desktop for Mac". Keyboard has lasted me 6 months with the same batteries, while mouse (with 8 buttons) lasts about 2 months at a time with 2 AA batteries. I got it for £50 on Amazon (same price as JUST the Wireless Mighty Mouse).

    2. Re:You ask us a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      , bluetooth drains batteries a hell of a lot more than RF wireless

      Bluetooth is also wireless RF(radio frequency)using the frequencies between 2.4 and 2.4835 GHz

    3. Re:You ask us a question... by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Yes, but for some reason (protocols, etc), it does tend to drain batteries quite a bit faster than a standard RF mouse. If anyone knows the actual reason why, I would love to hear it.

    4. Re:You ask us a question... by Another,+completely · · Score: 5, Informative

      Typically, it's because it's not used properly. The protocol itself has plenty of features for reducing power draw, and has been getting better, but a surprising number of products use the manufacturer default settings for their Bluetooth chip.

      For example, the clocks at the two ends need to stay synchronized to despread the signal. The more closely synchronized they are, the smaller your listening window needs to be to catch the beginning of a frame, but the more frequently you need to synchronize (depending on the accuracy of the clock you use, which also has an effect on power consumption). There are a lot of parameters that could be adjusted, and several performance measurements that you need to balance; the manufacturer defaults work well enough, so many product teams just use them.

      Those that take the time to do it right get better performance, but it's not usually noticed, as people assume that all Bluetooth devices will perform similarly (which closes the cycle of not being able to justify the effort to optimize your settings).

    5. Re:You ask us a question... by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Thank you, had I not posted as parent, I would mod you +1 informative.

    6. Re:You ask us a question... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've tried bluetooth mice, and there's a bit too much lag on it for me. Also, bluetooth drains batteries a hell of a lot more than RF wireless.

      I assume you mean "more than [other] RF wireless". I've got the Dell-badged Logitech mouse/keyboard combo (from a wootoff). Both the keyboard and mouse are powered by 2 AAs, and I get about 2 months battery life from both. If I use rechargeable batteries, I only get a few weeks, since they self-discharge faster than the hardware drains them . . . I've never found mouse lag to be a problem, except when the mouse is sleeping and has to wake up again -- if I'm using it constantly I don't notice a problem. I don't play games, though, so I can't address lag in that context.

      It comes pre-paired with its own dongle, you'd have to do some research to use it with another adapter. The upside to that is that it looks just like a USB keyboard/mouse to your OS in stock configuration.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    7. Re:You ask us a question... by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      one of the few relevant posts of the whole thread. thank you.

    8. Re:You ask us a question... by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      The most delicate question on the topic is, IMO, that the best BT is better than the worst wireless, and the best wireless is better than the worst BT.

      What I'm trying to say is that the specific model does make a huge difference on the decision. This question came right on time as I've been trying to decide it for myself. I am more inclined towards wireless on the idea that you get more options on the market and thus I should be easier to find one that fit my needs (size, feel, battery life, looks, form factor, etc)

      --
      -- dnl
    9. Re:You ask us a question... by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Wow, 2 months? I bought my Logitech wireless mouse for my new laptop last year in July (one of these: http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/mice/devices/5484&cl=au,en), I had to change the battery just two weeks ago! And that is for my primary laptop that I use 2-8 hours every day!

      I was actually very surprised the very first time I bought one of those Logitech (non-bluetooth) RF mice for my other pc (media centre box so only used on the TV), it occurred to me about 18 months after buying it that I had NEVER changed it's 2xAA batteries, so I did anyway just incase they decided to spring a little acid leak!

  5. MX 5500 by racer-x.net · · Score: 1

    Logictech does have some advanced bluetooth mice, but I only know of them selling them as a bundle with a keyboard. I have the MX 5500 and its pretty nice. ( http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/keyboards/keyboard_mice_combos/devices/3481&cl=gb,en )

  6. My experience... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...is that a dedicated wireless tech like Logitech's is better than Bluetooth.

    My Bluetooth mouse at work occasionally lags behind, or sometimes stops moving for short whiles (even when it's not fallen asleep). Generally it seems the Bluetooth layer adds the occasional issues encountered with wireless networking in general.

    I haven't ever seen this with Logitech's dedicated wireless devices.

    Then again, I could just be a victim of bad drivers. :)

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:My experience... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm guessing bad drivers. My Microsoft bluetooth mouse works very, very well; I only see it lag briefly when I've let it go inactive for 5+ minutes.

      Incidentally, I don't have bluetooth enabled in my Linux kernel (2.6.27), but my mouse works. That is, movement and the right and left buttons work, but the wheel and the third, fourth, and fifth buttons don't, so it's not full functionality, but I find it odd that the mouse works at all without bluetooth support in the kernel. Can anyone help me understand why? Is my bluetooth hardware emulating something?

    2. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're not alone. Bluetooth is not good for this task. After the overhead, you end up with an unacceptable amount of lag and/or periodic hangs due to caching. It's just not meant for low latency streams.

      The Logitech dedicated devices are far better.

    3. Re:My experience... by clam666 · · Score: 1

      I've had similiar issues. Although I like bluetooth so I'm not taking up USB space, I have to say I've noticed my bluetooth devices use up the battery far quicker than the proprietary USB style ones, as well as the "lag" as mentioned earlier. I also haven't been able to narrow down whether it is a driver issue or a bad job of collision mitigation with multiple bluetooth devices or whatever causes the stop and jump phenomena.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    4. Re:My experience... by prockcore · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My experience is similar.. although I'll go a little further.

      The problem with bluetooth is that once it's paired, it works fine.. but pairing can be a problem, especially in a busy office. The mouse and keyboard always wants to pair with the dozens of macs in the room, except for the one I want it to pair with.

    5. Re:My experience... by PKJedi · · Score: 1

      What kind of bluetooth hardware do you have? At least the dongles that come with the mouses often do some level of emulation. (And as a result might not work as well as a regular bluetooth interface...)

    6. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Broadcom BT identifies itself as four devices. It has normal BT interface, mouse and keyboard. So usual USB HID drivers are enough for a mouse and a keyboard.

      lsusb for BT device:
      Bus 002 Device 028: ID 0a5c:4503 Broadcom Corp.
      Bus 002 Device 027: ID 0a5c:4502 Broadcom Corp.
      Bus 002 Device 026: ID 413c:8126 Dell Computer Corp. Wireless 355 Bluetooth
      Bus 002 Device 025: ID 0a5c:4500 Broadcom Corp.

    7. Re:My experience... by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth runs in user space, as do most usb drivers. Its been ages since I configured and built a kernel, but bluez is the basic driver stack for bluetooth, as I recall.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    8. Re:My experience... by Kotten · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bluetooth in a crowded environment have a tendency to make the computer (windows xp only?) hang because everybody is running around with cell-phones with bluetooth on and it becomes a lot of negotiations and discoveries going. So I have disabled bluetooth at work.

      But bluetooth has one advantage in less crowded situtations, two bluetooth mices does not disturb each other! At home we had a problem that the wireless mouse and keyboards where disturning each other, when my wife was moving the mouse (trackball actually) then I could not use mine. It did not matter that it was different manufacturers and I tried several different combinations. Finally I changed into using bluetooth mouse and wired keyboard.

      My bluetooth mouse is a logitech V470 and it works flawlessly. I have not not noticed the lockups I had at work even when sitting in crowded places but it might be that I am using Linux in my laptop and that the problem is a Windows only problem.

      At work I am now using a Logitech V220 cordless. It also works perfekt and there is no disturbance from collegues. In a tight cubicle landscape it might be a problem like I have at home but we have our own offices.

      If you do not sit cramped together with others using wireless mice/keyboard then I recomend standard rf-wireless. If you get problems then switch to bluetooth.

      --
      Note to self: Make a sig
    9. Re:My experience... by prefect42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. The dongle will be in HID mode, so simply presents as a basic keyboard/mouse. Otherwise users of bluetooth keyboards would be up the creek with using the BIOS, or anything else that doesn't have a bluetooth stack.

      --

      jh

    10. Re:My experience... by Tacvek · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you are experiencing is a feature of some bluetooth chips (notably those manufactured by CSR, which includes Dell's chips) which is designed to support using a bluetooth keyboard in a bios. Bluetooth keyboards and mice use the Bluetooth HID profile, which is the USB HID protocol wrapped in a thin bluetooth layer. These chips support an HID proxy mode, where the chip identifies as a USB HID device, and then simply removes the wrapping from incoming HID commands and dumps them on the USB Bus (yuck, PIN Number syndrome, but the redundancy was necessary for clear expression here :( ), and does the reverse too, which is a bit trickier.

      The net result is that usb keyboards and mice probably automagically work with your computer. I've no real understanding of how this interacts with bluetooth device pairing, as I've never gotten this to work for me, but hopefully it requires you to first pair the keyboard or mouse in question with the bluetooth chip while running an OS with bluetooth enabled.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    11. Re:My experience... by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

      I've had the same experience, which is why I eventually dumped my bluetooth mouse for a Logitech Nano. It takes up a USB port, but the dongle is darned near invisible. I love it.

    12. Re:My experience... by bioglaze · · Score: 1

      > My Bluetooth mouse at work occasionally lags behind, or sometimes stops moving for short whiles (even when it's not fallen
      > asleep). I haven't ever seen this with Logitech's dedicated wireless devices.

      My Logitech wireless mouse using proprietary protocol does this too.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    13. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not surprising that proprietary mice have longer battery lifetimes. After all, they use 8-bit XOR encryption for "security", and one has to suspect that the rest of the protocol is just as advanced.

      My experience with bluetooth mice is rather mixed, the old Logitech MX-900 tend to ruin their batteries rather quickly (probably the charger's fault), the LX-200 appeared to be much more reliable and had significantly longer battery lifetime. A bunch of Fujitsu-Siemens bluetooth mice had the cool feature that you could charge them with a small cable plugged into the front, so they worked like a wired mouse, but also had a suspiciously large appetite for rechargeable batteries.

      Either the MX-900 or the FJS-Mice took a second or two to wake up when left unused for a few minutes.

    14. Re:My experience... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      your bluetooth chip could be emulating usb HID device, or you could be using userspace drivers :s

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    15. Re:My experience... by egjertse · · Score: 4, Informative

      I second the vote for Logitech's proprietary cordless mice. I got me a Logitech VX Revolution for my Asus netbook, and it has excellent battery life, great precision and an almost invisible receiver. The size of the receiver was what initially sold me on this mouse, since anything protruding from a netbook is bound to break sooner rather than later.

    16. Re:My experience... by egjertse · · Score: 1

      Uhm yeah make that the VX Nano. Damnit.

    17. Re:My experience... by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      Totally opposite experience here.

      Logitech mouse eats AA batteries in weeks, and the dongle sticks out 5cm.
      Microsoft bluetooth mouse is still going on its first pair of AAA batteries after months.

      Both solutions worked without lag or anything in windows XP and Ubuntu.

    18. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is... bluetooth modules do infact reside on your computer and you just didn't realize it, otherwise it wouldn't work.

      As for why the movement/left/right buttons work but not the rest.. you have to either configure emulate 3 button mouse or configure those in X

    19. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work as an IT analyst for a very large SC based company, and we've had a LOT of issues with wireless technology over the years. Our current corporate policy bans the use of wireless devices at user desks for this reason.

      There simply are not enough short range frequencies available for people to operate and pair devices consistantly. We've had people simply walking down halls disconnect each other's bluetooth headsets due to interference, mice that go haywire, devices that won't pair, presentation remotes that won't operate presentations, phone headsets that pick up interference or drop calls, and more.

      All our users with cell phones are issued bluetooth headsets for safe driving, but they're cautioned about using them indoors. Users at desks must use wired mice. We do issue wireless headsets to those who spend long hours on phones, but they're commercial devices with a less commonly used frequency and more available chanels than bluetooth offers.

      The only wireless network we have is a public, externally facing only, wireless network we allow auditors and some select visitors to use. IT has to manually configure them to connect to it, and only a few locations in the building support it.

      In general, we've found the wireless devices to be finicky, increase support call numbers, cost more (not to mention batteries), and in general for 95% of our users using a wired mouse and kbd is a non-issue.

      A few people in special cases do have some wireless stuff, and our conference rooms are fully wireless (networked projectors, wireless remotes, etc), but it's purpose specific.

    20. Re:My experience... by bemenaker · · Score: 1

      My bluetooth mouse on my XP laptop does that from time to time. I have to stop and restart the bluetooth stack on the laptop to fix it.

    21. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have bluetooth modules loaded.

      I use a V430 with Ubuntu and don't have any lag problems. What I believe you're experiencing is the powersave feature of the mouse (assuming Microsoft's does the same as Logitech). You have to move it a little bit to wake up the circuitry.

      My V430 runs for about 10-12 months using Eneloop batteries with daily use (about .5 - 1 hour per day on average).

    22. Re:My experience... by H0bb3z · · Score: 1

      Your buttons may not be working because of your X11 configuration for your pointer device. Try looking up the ZaxisMapping parameter and adding "4 5 6 7" to see if your non-functioning buttons can be mapped and used.

      I'm not sure I can explain the non-Bluetooth Bluetooth though...

      --
      "There *IS* no patch for stupidity" -www.sqlsecurity.com
    23. Re:My experience... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anyone care about security? Bluetooth periphs are encrypted and paired. Nobody can snoop what you're doing, and you don't have to worry about your neighbor getting a similar product and having his clicks and keystrokes showing up on your computer.

      Add that to the fact that the Bluetooth devices need no dongles for a lot (most?) new hardware, and you have a clear winner.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    24. Re:My experience... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I've no real understanding of how this interacts with bluetooth device pairing, as I've never gotten this to work for me, but hopefully it requires you to first pair the keyboard or mouse in question with the bluetooth chip while running an OS with bluetooth enabled.

      I've got a Dell Bluetooth keyboard/mouse combo that works like that: It appears to the OS as a USB mouse and keyboard. It came factory pre-paired with its own adapter. This is incredibly convenient, since you don't even need to have a Bluetooth-aware OS, it works right out of the box. It's also incredibly inconvenient for the same reasons, since you'd need to do some googling to figure out how to un-pair and re-pair.

      Also interesting, the Dell hardware appears to be re-packaged Logitech stuff. When using it with Linux, you can see the firmware ID string when the devices appears on the USB. Since I don't want to lose by geek cred: I bought the setup in a wootoff, not from Dell.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    25. Re:My experience... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Updating the Bluetooth software on my laptop fixed a bunch of issues I was having with my mouse (I didn't install any extra drivers, the stack was just flaky).

      After that, everything was great (not having an extra thing to deal with is nice) until the switches on the mouse started to fail (Logitech V270).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    26. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The short version of what Tacvek said:

      Avoid Bluetooth devices which involve USB HID emulation. "But how do I know which devices do that?" You don't -- so avoid them all.

      The OP should read this, conclude the same, and move on. Or hell, go with a wired mouse and save yourself all of this hassle.

    27. Re:My experience... by sjames · · Score: 1

      I have a nice Logitech wireless with the USB transceiver an find that it just works. I have no idea what model it is, it was just handed to me and it does the job. It has a slot on the bottom that the transceiver fits in for travel.

      A nice thing about the USB option is that a lot more machines have USB than Bluetooth. No fights over associating. The mouse is "associated" with the computer I plugged the tranceiver in to, very simple.

    28. Re:My experience... by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      I carry some unbranded chinese bluetooth mouse with me. It shows no lag. Takes about 2 seconds to connect the first time, and I never changed batteries. It's just three months anyway.

      Oh yes, I use it the whole day.

    29. Re:My experience... by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Nah. In the worst case that the HID emulation does not require pairing, fixing the issue is easy enough. Turn the feature off. There are a few ways to do this if the bios lacks the option.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    30. Re:My experience... by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm wondering if in that case what you have is not a blutooth dongle with HID emulation. (I.E. it lacks a blutooth mode, so could only be used for Blutooth HID devices).

      But I've always thought external bluetooth dongles were idiotic. In that case why not just use a regular wireless mouse with external dongle? I never used the dongle that came with my Logitech keyboard, but instead used the internal bluetooth of my laptop.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    31. Re:My experience... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Most Bluetooth devices are attached to the USB bus internally. Not 100% sure on how bluetooth stacks work, but there's no real reason they couldn't be all userspace.

    32. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should upgrade to an EFI system that works flawlessly with bluetooth devices out the box

      IOW, *cough* get a Mac *cough*

      I love how everything in PC land is claimed to be hunky-dory until details like this come out. A lot of "but, but, but, we can do that too, for cheaper!" then.. oh.. it lags because of our legacy BIOS requirements and USB pass through. Hilarious.

    33. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find if I put my Blackberry to close to any blue tooth keyboards or mice I love connectivity. It's the 8300.. Bluetooth works great once I figured out that gsm gives interference.

    34. Re:My experience... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Makes sense, thanks. I did have to make sure the mouse is paired in Windows once before it would work in Linux.

    35. Re:My experience... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I compiled my own kernel. I'm quite certain I don't have bluetooth anything, userspace or otherwise.

    36. Re:My experience... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I tried the ZAxisMapping setting once, a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. It didn't work. I haven't tried recently, but since I'm about to give this laptop to my wife once I buy my new desktop, I'm not particularly motivated to fiddle around with it anymore ;)

    37. Re:My experience... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Bad form to reply to myself, but I thought I'd add that using a standard USB wheel mouse with the same kernel results in a working wheel. It must be the bluetooth chipset not passing on events other than right and left click.

    38. Re:My experience... by CharlieKotan · · Score: 1

      I use a Logitech mouse and MS keyboard - both Bluetooth - on a docked ThinkPad. Like above poster, both hang up for a while several times a day, sometimes causing XP to make the disconnected chime. A couple of seconds later they reconnect.

      I've considered Communist Plots, Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, and Those Who Cannot Be Named. I have not eliminated Country Music or the Current Administration.

      For now, I tend to blame Windows, because after that happens my VPN often loses heartbeat and drops.

      The Net Knows.

    39. Re:My experience... by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I've had the issue you've described on my iMac; worse yet was that I discovered how to quickly and easily reproduce it, and was about to start trying to track down the issue to figure out how to stop it. Bad timing (IT emergency) and then a power failure meant that by the time I had a chance to sit down and figure it out, the batteries in my mouse died anyway.

      I'm hoping that one day I'll stumble across some reliable reproduction method again and be able to figure out what the problem is and stop it.

  7. First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also - wireless mice take moar power.

    Row row fight the POWAH

  8. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by ewhac · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ha, very ha.

    Mac OS X long ago learned to cope with mice sporting more than one button. OS X even does The Right Thing (context menus) with the secondary mouse button by default.

    And now, with the new touchpads in MacBooks (where the "button" area is also part of the touchpad), you can set it up to pretend it has one button, or two.

    Here's another news flash: OS X can handle standard PC keyboards, too! If it generates a standard USB HID code, OS X can deal with it.

    Schwab

  9. How much USB do you use? by WCguru42 · · Score: 1

    I don't think I'd ever use a usb-wireless mouse simply for the fact that it's eating up a usb port. When I can connect my mouse to my computer without occupying any of the ports I can't think of any reason not to. And bluetooth is a very good connection, at least in all of my experiences with it.

    --
    "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    1. Re:How much USB do you use? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Don't most computers have loads of free USB ports though? I know the computer i'm using currently has 4 on the back and 2 on the front and it is a basic Dell box. My system at home with a fairly standard motherboard has 6 on the back and 2 on the front.

      The benefit of a USB mouse for me is that the RF receiver that is plugged into the USB port is also a charging dock so I don't have to worry about batteries. I had considered that the battery life of the internal batteries might degrade over time but 4 years later it is still going strong. (Logitech MX 1000).

    2. Re:How much USB do you use? by WCguru42 · · Score: 1

      The OP said he is looking for something to go with his Mac Book Pro. I don't know how many ports they have, but considering it's a laptop it's probably not that many.

      Your post makes a good point. I might actually consider a usb wireless mouse if the usb receiver was also a charging dock. But if it was simply an rf transmitter/receiver then I wouldn't mess with it.

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    3. Re:How much USB do you use? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Don't get me started on the lack of USB ports on laptops. It surprises me that the MacBook Pro only has two USB ports. I suppose it is due to Apple's new found love of putting all of the ports on one side of the laptop. I would imagine that most laptops have more (a quick look tells me that most of Dell's laptops have two on each side). But for a laptop using built in bluetooth is probably still less hassle than having to carry extra dongles about for RF wireless.

      For a laptop then a mouse with replaceable batteries makes sense but for a desktop it is so much more convenient just to drop it on the charging dock when you aren't using it.

    4. Re:How much USB do you use? by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Don't get me started on the lack of USB ports on laptops. It surprises me that the MacBook Pro only has two USB ports.

      Really? Even my netbook has three of them.

    5. Re:How much USB do you use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except your netbook doesn't have a FireWire 800 port.

    6. Re:How much USB do you use? by Spatial · · Score: 1

      That's right... But the Macbook also has another more relevant feature: ten times the amount of unused space on the sides.

  10. Logitech fancy bluetooth mouses by Antity-H · · Score: 4, Informative

    I personnaly own a Logitech MX900 it does come with a usb pluggable pod/receiver but it is fully bluetooth compliant. I never pugged the pod's usb cable anywhere, just the power cord to recharge the mouse. And it has always worked flawlessly.

    http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-MX900-Bluetooth-Cordless-Optical/dp/B0000CEPDF

    1. Re:Logitech fancy bluetooth mouses by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

      I like that the mouse's dimensions are "100 Pounds".

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
  11. RF vs Bluetooth Mice by Nasser · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've used several bluetooth and RF wireless mice. One thing you should consider is that when the CPU is bogged down the bluetooth mouse will become jerky and unusuable.

    1. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by macraig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whether or not a Bluetooth mouse was given CPU cycle precedence would depend entirely upon how the Bluetooth protocol stack was developed, wouldn't it? It's my understanding there is more than just one monopolistic stack available, so it may be a matter of understanding the issue - you do now at least - and choosing to use the better one. This has been the case with Bluetooth on Windows Mobile devices: there was a Widcomm BT stack and a Microsoft one. Guess which one had fewer problems on that platform?

    2. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by Kotten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whether or not a Bluetooth mouse was given CPU cycle precedence would depend entirely upon how the Bluetooth protocol stack was developed, wouldn't it?

      Entirely correct. I can have 100% utilization on both cores on my computer and my bluetooth mouse is still perfectly responsive. I have seen no difference between rf and bluetooth wireless mices in this respect.

      Running: Dell D630/Core 2 Duo T7250/Logitech V470/4Gb ram/30Gb OCZ Vertex/Ubuntu 9.04

      --
      Note to self: Make a sig
    3. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would make bluetooth mice impossible to use with games. This isn't true. They're still not as good as wired mice, but they're not bad. The refresh rate is noticeable lower, which can be an issue, but only for the hardcore.

      --

      jh

    4. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by macraig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Conversely, I have just installed a Microsoft Wireless Desktop 6000 V3 tonight, and I have already encountered significant hiccuping and lagging with both the keyboard and the mouse. The keyboard is actually missing keystrokes entirely, lagging at times, and the mouse... the mouse is just horrid! This is apparently a 2.4GHz non-Bluetooth variety. The mouse in particular seems to be adversely affected when I have WCG (World Community Grid, BOINC) running in the background; WCG is running at lowest priority and is supposed to yield to virtually everything, even normal-priority processes, but the mouse still seems to be affected. The mouse also seems to be VERY sensitive to the surface it's on, even though I have two other optical MS mice here that have worked fine on it for years. My guess would be that the mouse emitter was deliberately under-powered versus its wired cousins to try to save battery juice, with predictable consequences in the variety of surfaces it can tolerate.

      The short story is that this RF-based product, at least, is awful. I've deliberately omitted mention of issues not pertinent to this, but there are more. Had I still been using my previous keyboard and mouse as I wrote this, it would have taken only one third the time it has required now from having to accommodate said hiccups.

      You'll have to excuse me now... there's an RMA I need to arrange.

    5. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the RF receiver can get interference from other devices. The best RF mice/keyboards for desktops are the ones that use the mouse charging station as the receiver as you can place it away from interfering electronics. I found when I had the charging station too close to my speakers (when they're on) or close to my old CRT it had problems with reception.

      If you are stuck using the USB dongle receiver, try using a port on the front of your box, or at least as far away from any wireless cards you may have installed. I believe BlueTooth would be susceptible to the same issues, depending on the manufacturing quality. Also, internally installed BT receivers may be positioned to avoid interference within your box.

      --
      try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
    6. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      I hardly even play games, and I can tell you I simply cannot use any wireless mouse, bluetooth or not, because of the lag. To me, lag is not only noticeable, but causes me to mis-click on things and drives me nuts.

      Furthermore, I found that when I started using OS X, the mouse is significantly slower and less precise than windows or ubuntu, again causing me to mis-click. I've tried several different wired mice, high-res mice, the USB-overdrive utility, but nothing seems to help. I read somewhere that OS X uses two different drivers for clicking and movement -- to me, that's insanity -- but don't really know if that's what is causing the lag or not. If ANYONE has any suggestions, I would love to try hear it...

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    7. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, I found that when I started using OS X, the mouse is significantly slower and less precise than windows or ubuntu, again causing me to mis-click. I've tried several different wired mice, high-res mice, the USB-overdrive utility, but nothing seems to help.

      I know what you're talking about. It's not precision, it's the way OS X does mouse acceleration. I think it uses a curve instead of accelerating linearly. I'm not sure if I just got used to it, or if my tracking speed is not at the default. Try turning it up a bit.

      I have noticed that I can whip out a really good looking signature on OS X, and I don't remember ever being able to write decent shorthand on Windows or Linux. OTOH, trying to reposition very, very quickly, as in a game, on OS X I always land short because the speed drops off so quickly near the end of the movement. Makes sense, using a curve would give better precision at low speeds, but the sharp drop makes quick movement harder. For desktop usage I don't even notice it any more. For that matter, I can play C&C3 just fine, but WC3 when I just bought my Mac felt very awkward.

      I read somewhere that OS X uses two different drivers for clicking and movement -- to me, that's insanity

      That does not make any sense at all. Trust me, what you're feeling is the different acceleration technique. You do get used to it, but at high speeds it does still have tradeoffs.

    8. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by BillTheKatt · · Score: 1

      You've probably got the mouse and keyboard too far from the transmitter. I bought a MS wireless keyboard/mouse combo and had the same problems. MS wireless devices seem to need to be extremely close to the transmitter, I'm talking 2-3 feet. Logitech products work from a far greater distance. Try moving the keyboard and mouse very close to the transmitter (couple of inches) and see if the problem goes away.

    9. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Is there any way to change the curve, via a 3rd party driver maybe? I definitely can't get used to it (it's been 1.5 years already), so I really would like to find a workaround... Tweaking the acceleration/speed settings doesn't help, just does the same thing slower or faster heh

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    10. Re:RF vs Bluetooth Mice by macraig · · Score: 1

      Nope, already had them located within three feet.

  12. Murhpy by mrbene · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your decision to move to a system that requires an independent power supply (batteries) is an invitation to Murphy to send his law to your house / place of work at the most inopportune moment.

    Oh, and radiation. I'm sure it'll kill you too. Bluetooth will force you to visit your dentist too.

    Plus what are you going to fight off the ninjas with if you don't have a mouse cord?

    Holy surrealism, bantha!

    1. Re:Murhpy by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Keyboard. Being wireless, it get easier to use it like a kata-board or key-bo

      --
      -- dnl
  13. Mobile = bluetooth by Mutio · · Score: 1

    I have used multiple mice, from high-end logitech gaming mice to the cheapest available bluetooth mouse. I prefer a wired mouse for desk use, but for a portable platform such as a macbook i would definitely recommend a bluetooth mouse. In my experience they have not been laggy or jumped. Also you dont realize how annoying the dongle is until you have to deal with it while on the road.

  14. Bluetooth by DeadPixels · · Score: 1

    Go with Bluetooth. While USB wireless mice can be good, if you're not looking for anything terribly fancy, a Bluetooth mouse will more than suit your needs. I also recommend getting rechargeable batteries - some mice go through batteries ridiculously quickly, so it's a great investment to get two pairs of rechargeable AAs or AAAs. Keep one pair charging until you need them, then swap - no downtime at all.

  15. Highly Uneven by ewhac · · Score: 4, Informative
    I did some rudimentary research on this question about a year ago, except I was looking for a Bluetooth mouse to use with my ThinkPad. All the reviews I could find for Bluetooth mice seemed to point to a common set of problems:
    • Battery life is poor,
    • There is always an annoying wake-up delay,
    • They average 50-100% more expensive than their non-Bluetooth counterparts.

    Based on these findings, and my own experience in the embedded arena, I would hazard a guess that all these Bluetooth mouse vendors are using the same embedded microcontroller, probably with the same embedded firmware. Hence, they all suffer from similar problems.

    The only mouse's reviews that didn't seem to mention these issues (at least, not as bad as the others) was Apple's wireless MightyMouse. Of course, the MightyMouse has its own set of issues, such as the pretend secondary button, but if you can work around it, it's kinda sorta not too bad.

    Again, this was about a year ago. I don't know if things have improved since then.

    Schwab

    1. Re:Highly Uneven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I would also like to add that if walk in a store, they are bloody hard to find. For every BT mouse theres at least dozen regular wireless mouses.

      But BT mouses are soo much better than regular. Good points include:

      - If you have integrated BT in your laptop, then you don't get that ugly dongle sticking out of your usb port.

      - BT mice have excellent response. They work well even as a gaming mice to my experience.

      But I can confirm that battery life isn't that good. So to save money and nerves, get rechargeable batteries also. In my logitech mouse they last little over a week of pretty 16h/day use.

      That doesn't bother me much 'cause I have a AV-amp remote that eats the same rechargeable batteries in two days.

    2. Re:Highly Uneven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MightyMouse must be living in Apple's reality distortion field. I had one for two years at my last job and it had wake-up delay, would often lag, and would even sometimes unpair itself from my laptop for no apparent reason.

      The battery life was good, though. I left it on my desk for months at a time and never did anything to try to conserve its power. Same with the keyboard.

      It was really annoying having to re-pair the damn thing several times a month (sometimes several times in a day!)

    3. Re:Highly Uneven by adolf · · Score: 1

      I bought a Logitech V330 Bluetooth mouse for my Inspiron 6000 laptop a few years ago. Here are my observations:

      Battery life is good. With regular use (several hours per day), the batteries last for months. With occasional use, they last for more than a year. And, interestingly, the mouse is perfectly happy to run from only one (1) battery, though it has space for two -- this has been helpful a few times.

      Range is insanely good. Something like 40 feet in an indoor, open space, in my experience. This has been helpful for presentations.

      The wake up delay is sometimes annoying. No, not always. And, in fact, I don't believe I've noticed it at all since putting Vista on the machine with its stock Bluetooth stack.

      It was slightly more expensive, but being dongle-free is worth that to me.

      Small, but shaped well enough that it's not a problem for my big hands. Fits nicely in a side pouch on my backpack.

      The downsides:

      Pairing. Not a big problem with just one OS, but was a continual issue when I was dual-booting Ubuntu on this machine. Every time I switched operating systems and wanted to use a mouse, I'd have to re-pair it.

      Feet. This isn't a Bluetooth problem, but: The feet wore out in less than a year. I ordered new ones from slicksurf.com and couldn't be happier with them.

      It's not in production anymore, and I won't ever be selling mine.

      Like I said, this mouse is a few years old. I don't know if things have gotten worse since then.

    4. Re:Highly Uneven by quenda · · Score: 1

      There is always an annoying wake-up delay

      I have a no-name chinese BT mouse, and once it sleeps I must click a button to wake it. But there is no noticeable delay beyond that, at least in Linux. Maybe its a Windows driver issue??

      The only reason for getting bluetooth was to avoid an extra dongle on my laptop.

      Some people may want BT for the increased range that you typically get.

  16. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    The new touchpads were a bit of a surprise but now I like them a lot. When I use my Dell I get frustrated because the touchpad sucks.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  17. Same issue by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I was looking for a nice low cost Bluetooth keyboard/mouse combo. I remember seeing a number of them about 2 years ago. Now, that I want to switch to it, I am not seeing it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. Uh, Bluetooth is a kind of Wireless by corsec67 · · Score: 1

    Unless there is a wired kind of Bluetooth, should the title be "Bluetooth and non-Bluetooth wireless mice"?

    Or would I be wrong to say that I prefer USB mice over wired mice?

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  19. My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've used... 4? 5? different Bluetooth mice with my Powerbook and MacBook Pro over the past several years. The biggest issue I've had, with the lone exception of Apple's Wireless Mighty Mouse, is that Bluetooth mice take a significant amount of time (often a few seconds) to "wake up" once they've gone into power saving mode.

    I've observed this same issue with Microsoft's Bluetooth Mouse (Intellimouse Explorer, IIRC), a Bluetake mouse, a Dell mouse (not sure who makes it for them), and another mouse whose lineage escapes me. If the mice haven't been moved for several minutes, you have to wave them back and forth like a madman for several seconds before they'll start to respond again.

    It's certainly not an inescapable shortcoming of Bluetooth, because my Mighty Mouse doesn't have this issue - if you start to move the mouse, it responds immediately, even if it's been inactive for minutes or hours.

    The Mighty Mouse has another shortcoming, unfortunately. The scrollball design is really cool and intuitive... until it gets gummed up and stops working in one direction. This WILL happen to you, repeatedly.

    I love my Mighty Mouse... except when I hate it. Right now my scrollball is gummed up again, so I'm in the "hate it" camp at the moment.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I was wary of that problem before I tried a bluetooth mouse too - but as I wrote in my post below, with the Microsoft offering, in my experience (I've used it for over a year) it doesn't show that lag. I don't know about the one you tried, but after it's gone into sleep mode it takes less than a second to wake up again, which I imagine is similar to the mighty mouse.

    2. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft mouse I had was the first Bluetooth mouse I ever owned - and I think it was Microsoft's first shot at making a BT mouse. It's certainly possible their rev 2 and later products might be better in that regard.

      BTW have they figured out yet that an on/off switch is a good thing to have on a battery-powered device? Cuz that first mouse didn't have one...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

      "The scrollball design is really cool and intuitive... until it gets gummed up and stops working in one direction. This WILL happen to you, repeatedly."

      Agreed. I have a client with this problem. What is your solution to unsticking it?

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
    4. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      One more for the gummed up mouse crowd. I swear. I hate absolutly hate it when it gums up. Other times it's a dream. The virtual second button problem isn't a hassle when you've given up gaming too. It's an irritation. But not a show stopper. The squeeze for 4th mouse button is neat though. Beats all other 4th mouse button options I've used

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    5. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The scrollball design is really cool and intuitive... until it gets gummed up and stops working in one direction. This WILL happen to you, repeatedly."

      Agreed. I have a client with this problem. What is your solution to unsticking it?

      Put some alcohol on a lint-free cloth, lay it flat on a table, then roll the mouse around upside-down on it so that the scroll ball is being rolled around. The alcohol seems to free up a lot of the lint and dirt that gets in there.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disagree about the wake-up time issue. My wireless Mighty Mouse (synced to a MacBook Pro) takes at least 2 or 3 seconds to wake up once a button is pushed.

      I have also experienced the same scrollball issues that you mention. The ball often stops working in one direction (always up or down, but never both at the same time). It's highly annoying to the point where I will probably go with a different brand of mouse if/when the current one needs replacing.

    7. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This actually worked quite well for me, except that the alcohol seemed to dissolve some contact surface somewhere inside the mouse, after which the middle button stopped working.

    8. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Plunky · · Score: 1

      What is your solution to unsticking it?

      I found a guide to disassembling the mouse on the web (you need to prise off the outer ring the first time but the rest of it is fairly easy - I stuck it back on with a dab of silicone and its easy to remove now) and I open it up and clean out the ball compartment. I appreciate that I'm a dirty soap dodger but the amount of gunge needed to clog up the delicate moving parts is not great. The above posters suggestion of alcohol is probably better than Apples suggestion of using a damp cloth which I couldnt get to make any difference.

      Its a 10 minute job once you understand the mechanism.

    9. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Plunky · · Score: 1

      The squeeze for 4th mouse button is neat though. Beats all other 4th mouse button options I've used

      I've never configured that, as it seems that as you squeeze the mouse the pointer would move.. is it an issue in practice? (what do you have the squeeze configured to provide?)

    10. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the "Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000" has an on off switch.

    11. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      follow apple's advice :

      turn the mouse upside down, and vigorously stroke the trackball for a few seconds in the direction that wasn't working

      it should work again

    12. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutely HATE the squeeze - I use a wired MS mouse with two side buttons, the thumb is mapped for Exposé show all windows and the third finger mapped for Exposé show desktop. Ironic that an MS mouse works so much better with OSX than an Apple one...

    13. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      I thought the days of having to disassemble and clean mice were over when everyone moved to optical! Ah the days of picking fluff out of a ball mouse how I am glad you are over.

    14. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lysol seems to work well, although it leaves a very sanitary smell on your fingers.

      Be careful with rolling the mouse upside down -- it doesn't work well if you don't press down hard enough, but if you press too hard, you risk scratching the scroll ball. I did, and now it scrolls badly downward, even though it scrolls well in all other directions.

    15. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasnt having to clean mice with rubbing alcohol the whole reason to switch to the optical mouse in the first place? Seems like its time for the optical scroll wheel.

    16. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      Matching anecdotes for anecdotes:

      I have to say, I've had my Bluetooth Mighty Mouse since about six months after they were released. It lives in my canvas messenger bag--and so gets banged up a bit and dusty--when I'm not using it and carrying it from home to work to the coffeeshop to gaming night, etc.

      I've never had a problem with it. The scrollball has never stuck. Never. It just works.(tm)

      I also have less problem with the virtual right mouse button than the weird, tiny buttons that are littered all over "high-end" mice from Logitech and Microsoft.

      Not saying you're wrong, just that I've had a very different and positive experience.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    17. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved my mighty mouse also: great precision, nice looking, not too power consumming.

      But frankly:
      - ergonomy is crap. I get wrist ache, lifting the mouse is unpractical due to its shape and surface
      - scrollball is crap.

      I switched to the microsoft mouse, which is better for the ergonomy, but lacks precisions and has no horizontal scrolling.
      I might try the MX900, if it's available in europe though....

    18. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by evanbd · · Score: 1

      If you have an ultrasonic cleaner, pull the batteries and drop it in. Alcohol is preferred because it will dry faster than water (and work slightly better, but I doubt it matters). Either way, you should make sure it's thoroughly dry before replacing the batteries. This step may take a while if you used water.

      For keyboards, I've done that (requires a large ultrasonic cleaner -- I used one at work, since they're too expensive to buy one myself) and also just tossed it in the top rack of the dishwasher. Again, allow to dry very thoroughly (12-24 hours if you don't disassemble for drying) before applying power.

    19. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      The alcohol seems to free up a lot of the lint and dirt that gets in there.

      Yeah, I noticed that at the bar last weekend.

    20. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the same thing with a piece of paper

    21. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by slyborg · · Score: 1

      >>The scrollball design is really cool and intuitive... until it gets gummed up and stops working in one direction. This WILL happen to you, repeatedly.

      No. It does need to be cleaned, like any ball mouse. I roll mine upside down on one of those Lysol cleaning wipes and then a piece of plain paper every two weeks or so. I've had my wireless MM for close to a year now, and have had no trouble with the scrollball, and I use it constantly. If you have one in a n auto garage, well, probably an issue.

      I hope they come up with an optical solution, but the scrollball is far superior to the conventional scroll wheel, and I am annoyed when I have to use a mouse without one.

    22. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasnt having to clean mice with rubbing alcohol the whole reason to switch to the optical mouse in the first place? Seems like its time for the optical scroll wheel.

      That would be wonderful. You should probably see if you can apply for a patent for that.

      I keep a can of 3M dust remover on my desk now to blast my mighty mouse scroll ball. Works great, but the damned scroll ball seems to be a major dirt trap - once it gets dirty it seems to get dirty again much faster.

    23. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If cleaning doesn't help, you can always take it back to an Apple Retail Store. My experience is they will do a Point-of-sale swap with no questions asked (other than if you tried cleaning it).

      If replaced several mice this way once they "lose and axis".

    24. Re:My main complaint with Bluetooth mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Apple solution is basically that- take a clean piece of paper, turn the mouse upside down, and roll the "heck" out of it. YOu cold try some compressed air as well- a bit- not too much. Plus, wash your hands occasionally. Also- turn the mouse off first- then the cursor doesn't go crazy. I find it gets it working pretty well.

  20. Bluetooth is the way to go by penguinchris · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have the Microsoft "Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000" and it is pretty good. It definitely looked like the best reasonably priced bluetooth mouse I could find - it really is surprising that the selection is so poor. I think they haven't pushed them into the market as much as they could have, especially now that everyone knows what bluetooth is because of cell phone headsets (even though those make you look stupid ;) ). I'm a linux user, but you have to give Microsoft credit where it is due - they may make a terrible OS, but their mouse division is excellent. I prefer their mice over all the other brands.

    Anyway - it works great. In use it feels no different than the "Laser Mouse 6000" I use when at home (the bluetooth one also uses laser, which I've found is actually nicer to use than LED optical), other than being smaller, of course. So there is absolutely no loss of precision - I've used it to make minute photo edits without a problem. And I've never run into interference. I mean, you're probably going to use it right next to the computer, so you should have an excellent signal. I have, however, used it from 20-30 feet across the room with my laptop hooked up to a projector, and it still had the same precision and no interference.

    As you may have figured out from above, I don't use the bluetooth mouse when I'm at home at my desk. I have a USB hub with a few things plugged into it, including the Laser Mouse 6000, so I just plug that in when I get home with my laptop. That's because a full-size mouse is easier to use, not because the performance is any different, and it's also to save batteries. However, the battery life is actually excellent - with normal usage, the two AAA batteries the mouse uses last several months or more for me.

    Apparently some bluetooth mice go inactive after a while, and take a couple seconds to respond again. As you can imagine, this would be annoying. With this one, though, while it does go on standby after several minutes, it starts responding again in under a second. It's never annoyed me because of that.

    Pairing it with the computer works flawlessly as well; after the initial pairing all I have to do is switch it on and it starts working after just a second or two, with no intervention required. Of course, bluetooth is partially broken in KDE 4.2 and it takes some fiddling, but that has nothing to do with the mouse and I assume with OSX it works.

    Finally - I don't like the idea of having to plug in a little receiver. It wastes a USB port, which are often lacking on laptops, and it would surely be easy to lose. Besides those mice being cheaper, I simply don't understand why you'd want to add another thing when your computer already has bluetooth built in.

    1. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by phcrack · · Score: 1

      I'm using a Notebook Mouse 5000 right now with OS X. I also use it with Ubuntu on another partition. Works perfectly, and you can even set the thumb button (button 4) up just like any other mouse.

      I Windows Vista and 7 I have to delete the mouse and re-add it every time I restart the computer. For some reason it won't stay paired. Odd that an MS mouse doesn't work with Windows, but does with everything else.

    2. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur--the "Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000" is a fantastic bluetooth mouse with great performance.

      Unfortunately, MS doesn't seem to make an equivalent full-size mouse that works well with Mac (the bluetooth 8000 series gets mixed reviews), and I also revert to a USB wireless mouse when I get my MacBook Pro back to my desk.

    3. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I have owned the Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 8000 for nearly two years and I adore it.

      - The battery lasts for weeks at a time (often a month or more) and if you use a rechargeable battery it can be charged by leaving your mouse on the included base at night.

      - It has a convenient on/off switch on the bottom so you don't drain the batteries during transport.

      - It is full-sized, which is important to me. They have smaller options as the parent mentions.

      - It has two extra buttons and all buttons are fully programmable.

      - It is an ambidextrous design.

      The only con is that the button function of the scrollwheel, the press-to-click one, requires too much pressure to be useful. But the two customizable buttons on the sides are well-located and feel great.

      It pairs with my ThinkPad's built-in Bluetooth adapter and uses the MS Intellipoint software to program the buttons - which, by the way, can handle a different set of button function mappings for each application if you ask it to. And all I have to do when I pull it out of my bag is flick the switch on the bottom. About two seconds later I'm mousing happily away.

    4. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by kafeier · · Score: 1

      i think you are right

    5. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a Linux user too. I have a Microsoft bluetooth mouse (IntelliMouse Explorer.)

      And I want to choke the authors of Linux Bluez to death.

      The idiots decided that it's a good idea to require me to enter the PIN they suggest on the keypad of the bluetooth device, and outright refused to implement options for the user to provide their own PIN.

      The procedure required to get my mouse to work in Linux involves emailing kernel messages and debug data to them and waiting till their updates to the hardcoded database are included in the distribution updates. Yes, Linux is completely ready for Desktop.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    6. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with penguinchris- the Microsoft 5000 Notebook laser/bluetooth mouse is brilliant. I love the fact that it is laser and so doesn't require a mouse mat, the precision is great and the battery life is spectacular. Some people find the physical size of the thing too small, but I have large hands and still find it very comfortable. The only problem with bluetooth is that when I'm using bt to sync my phone, then the mouse is very jumpy, but that's a limitation of the bluetooth on my laptop, not the mouse.

    7. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by vrmlguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      especially now that everyone knows what bluetooth is because of cell phone headsets (even though those make you look stupid ;) ).

      You insensitive clod! Some of us think it looks stylish.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    8. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

      I too have a Microsoft Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000. I use it exclusively under Linux and it's a great little mouse.

      However, I recently bought a new Microsoft bluetooth mouse for when I'm on the go: the Mobile Memory Mouse 8000. This mouse this is unreal. It supports 2.4 GHz RF AND Bluetooth. You can use it with the included USB RF receiver, or the computer's built-in bluetooth by flipping a switch on the bottom of the mouse. I use it in Bluetooth mode with my laptop, but if I need to work on a PC or a server which has a grimy or poorly-functioning mouse, I pull out the USB receiver and use my own mouse.

      Batteries are an issue with all cordless mice unless you carry extras. Well, the Mobile Memory Mouse 8000 includes a thin magnet-tipped cord that attaches to the end of the USB receiver and the bottom of the mouse to charge the battery while you're using it! I've only ever had to use it once, but it was great to have that option.

      If all that wasn't enough, the included USB RF receiver? ... is also a 1 GB flash drive! This mouse has everything but a kitchen sink! The only downside might be that its shape is a little unconventional, but it doesn't bother me. It's pretty small too, but I like small laptop mice. The clicking and scrolling are nearly silent which is great for using it during quiet meetings/presentations. It feels weird raving about a Microsoft product but the Mobile Memory Mouse 8000 is the coolest mouse I've ever owned. It's even very reasonably priced!
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826105088

    9. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by devewm · · Score: 1

      I use a Microsoft Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000 as well and I'm really happy with it. Sometimes it does go to sleep when I've not used it in a few minutes, but it wakes up in just a few seconds so it's not a huge deal. And I think 1.5 - 2 month battery life is acceptable (I use it all day every day at work with my Macbook Pro).

      My rationale for getting this mouse in the first place was the same as penguinchris - I didn't want to waste a USB port and have to plug and unplug a receiver every time I moved. Bluetooth was a must. The selection of bluetooth mice does seem very limited, but I have recommended this mouse to everyone who has asked me.

    10. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by chill · · Score: 1

      Ditto, almost verbatim. I'm using an Asus EEE 901, I didn't have any issues setting up or using the mouse under KDE 4.2.2 (Kubunu 9.04). All four buttons set up correctly without my doing anything special other than pairing it.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    11. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Interesting... I've been using Ubuntu 8.04 on my office laptop, and I use a bluetooth mouse when I'm traveling (Microsoft BT Mouse 5000 or whatever it is). In KDE 3.5, I just hit the "connect" button on the mouse, hit search for devices on the computer, and it just worked. Bluez may be a piece of crap, but kbluetooth isn't.

    12. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Just to add my voice to the throng, I own this mouse and use it extensively with my MacBook Pro. For me, a USB dongle was simply not an option because there are times when I need those USB ports for something else, or when the port is physically blocked because I'm working under less-than-ideal conditions.

      The Microsoft Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000 solved most of my problems. It's a great basic mouse. The only caveat is that it only has a single extra mouse button (besides the right and left and the clickable scroll wheel), but that suits my needs just fine. Under OS X, I have the 4th mouse button bound to show/hide the dashboard, which is great because I have a dashboard widget that lets me do photo uploads and requires that I drag icons from the desktop and drop them onto the dashboard widget. (That's not a maneuver I'd want to attempt with just the keyboard and the trackpad!)

      Under World of Warcraft, that 4th mouse button will toggle autorun (and this works under both OS X and Vista). The mouse is great for gaming as well as "serious" work. Battery life is great. Waking up from sleep takes a few seconds, but I've only had that happen when I went AFK for a while.

      My fiancee has an HP laptop running Vista, and she uses the same mouse. We can both be using our mice paired with our respective laptops in the same room and not have problems with interference, which is a good sign. She plays WoW a lot more than I do, so she has invested in rechargeable batteries for the mouse.

    13. Re:Bluetooth is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pin codes can be put in the /var/lib/bluetooth//pincodes file

      I have Been using this for a couple of years, with serial interface bluetooth adaptors to dumb serial devices.

      The format is ascii with remote device BT_ID space pincode.

      Cheers

  21. Anonymus Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried a Logitech's bluetooth device and it stopped working after a while. I had to restart my bluetooth on a computer. I asked around and some of my colleagues have had the similar problem. Then now i have a logitech IR mouse and it works like a charm.

  22. All Logitech Bluetooths have a common problem by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've used 3 mice in their range.

    The problem is the mouse goes to sleep very quickly (only a few minutes) and then misses movements for quite a time (perhaps 1/4 second) when waking. It tries to compensate by getting the first movement it recognizes and multiplying it up, so your first movement when the mouse wakes is usually a huge jump in one direction.

    Also, they don't seem to use terribly good optical sensors in their Bluetooth mice, they have more trouble with surfaces than any other logitech made in the last two years.

    The only Bluetooth mice that don't have this problem are Apple's, but they don't have real buttons on them.

    I still use a Logitech Bluetooth mouse on my Mac Mini, but I keep wishing for something better.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:All Logitech Bluetooths have a common problem by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If you'd used apple's mouse, you'd find that there's nothing wrong with the buttons they don't have (left, right, middle all work fine, even if you've got a habit of resting your fingers on the buttons you don't use)

      The flaws with the mighty mouse are:

      1. No replaceable foot pads. The ring was a good idea, but for something that slides on a surface all day, it really needed to be made of harder plastic or have a replaceable gasket.
      2. Side buttons poorly placed. This isn't really apple's problem, though, since side buttons are *always* poorly placed, by virtue of being on the side. Forcing people to hold a mouse gingerly just to move it probably isn't ergonomically sound.
      3. Sensor is low resolution. Like way low resolution. So, You get the choice of either putting the sensitivity way up or having to move the mouse further than a hand-twitch to move anywhere useful.

      Fortunately, Logitech cordless wave desktop solves two of those issues. And is, in all other ways, so far a pretty effortless input combo. It's not bluetooth, but the main reason to get bluetooth (confidence that they might have used AES encryption*) only really applies to the keyboard.

      *Why isn't this a selling point? I'd think "Uses encryption approved by the NSA for up to Top Secret" would be something that every manufacture of wireless keyboards or any device that wants to be secure would like to put in bright flashy text on every box, even if they've done the implementation poorly.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:All Logitech Bluetooths have a common problem by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

      I've used Apple's mighty mouse. Don't act like you know me.

      You cannot right click on Apple's mouse without lifting your finger off the left side of the mouse. Try it. You may be used to this, I'm not, and don't see any reason I need to learn to be used to it when only one company is dumb enough to do it this way.

      Furthermore the scroll ball is tough to click without scrolling (yes, I need to click it at times) and gunks up.

      I want a Bluetooth mouse because I want a Bluetooth mouse. If I wanted a cordless wave desktop I'd get a cordless wave desktop.

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    3. Re:All Logitech Bluetooths have a common problem by zigfreed · · Score: 1

      You cannot right click on Apple's mouse without lifting your finger off the left side of the mouse.

      And don't forget about the 4th button going ballistic click-click-click-click "WHY DO MY WINDOWS KEEP MOVING AROUND!" It appears everyone here uses either the Logitech or Apple bluetooth mice. From experience, Bluetooth mice is one thing Dell has over both of these established companies.

    4. Re:All Logitech Bluetooths have a common problem by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I really think the problems I outlined far outweigh the finger placement issue. The buttons work fine, it's just that there is an ergonomic issue relating to rest state.

      But consider that if you don't have a mac, you wouldn't get a mighty mouse, and if you do have a mac, then you either don't actually need the right-button functionality, or the issues I mentioned would force you to get another mouse anyway. Don't even bother trying to use Blender with default mouse on a mac.

      The ring-wear and low resolution are critical issues contraindicating the use of a mighty-mouse anywhere where the mouse might actually get used a lot. And worse, they complement each other: the longer distances cause more wear in the ring, and as the ring wears, it becomes less smooth, increasing the work done with each twitch.

      Here's where I lost some respect for you:

      I want a Bluetooth mouse because I want a Bluetooth mouse. If I wanted a cordless wave desktop I'd get a cordless wave desktop.

      That's a very PHB thing to say, and mocks the whole purpose of this discussion: whether or not bluetooth is even worth it in wireless mice. You've already blocked off a whole avenue without even considering the drawbacks.

      The most important things for a cordless mouse are ease of use and security. Bluetooth mice tend to be actually stronger on the latter than the former, since bluetooth has encryption as part of its spec. (but not, afaict as a requirement, so you still have to do some annoying research).

      And, also importantly, encryption increases latency, so it might actually not be such a great feature depending on what you do with a mouse.

      But the point is that there's no reason why bluetooth should be the only tool capable of meeting whatever requirements you have, so why would you limit yourself to its rather small (at the moment) universe of devices?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  23. Low profile was key by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

    Since I used to schlep my MBP to work every day I went with the VX Nano over a year ago. When I bought my second MBP I was hooked and bought another (Circuit City close-out, red, without the glide wheel, @ $29).

    Battery life is about 4 months with the original, well over that with the newer model, as it take AA's vs. AAA's.

    They have surprising range as well, I can stretch out on the floor five feet away or more away from my home set up, and run VLC to play .mkv files just fine.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  24. Macin and windozin... by M0b1u5 · · Score: 2

    I am a Windoze and Mac OSX user. New PC. Older Mac...

    Alhtough I have not used BT mouse on the Mac, I have extensive experience with BT mouse/Keyboard on the PC.

    I won't get another BT setup. It's that simple.

    Because it works most of the time, and when it doesn't it is a cow. This has been with Logitech almost exclusively. So, the fault may be with Logitech itself> I have never ceased to be amazed at how complete and utter shit the Logitech drivers are, juxtaposed against the amazing hardware they make.

    For my money, the VX Nano mouse with the world's smallest USB receiver is the single best laptop mouse money can buy. It is superb. Especially on the Mac.

    My only complaint is that the VX nano uses the middle click to exclusively switch between free-wheel and notched scrolling mode. This is a dire and severe flaw, and it should be controlled by drivers, not the device! Retards.

    The VX Revolution wireless for the main PC is absolutely stunning, but once again the Logitech drivers will, from time to time drop all your settings, forget you exclude ALL applications from the control list - making your buttons go whack when you are in a long list of apps.

    Battery life is monumental - espcially for the VX Nano. It has a power button, but you don't need it. 2 x AAA rechargeables run the thing for weeks and weeks of solid use. And the low battery indicator probably shows for longer than most mice will run with a full set.

    The VX Revolution battery lasts at least 4 weeks between charges, and that's with full time use.

    So, I'd say for get the BT, and just go wireless. The range of mices is better, and you'll end up with more hair on your head.

    You're still gonna lose some hair because of the whack drivers - but hey. Nothing's perfect.

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
    1. Re:Macin and windozin... by SuperAndy · · Score: 1

      H have an MX Revolution, which is obviously bigger, but I love it. I have never had a problem with the Logitech software in either Windows or OS X, even in the Windows 7 beta or RC. It's not too bad with linux either. But I have it set up so when I scroll the mouse wheel at a sufficient speed it just goes to the freewheel mode, leaving the wheel click action for the standard middle click.

      Really is a fantastic mouse.

    2. Re:Macin and windozin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming the gear system the VX nano uses is similar to my MX Revolution mouse, then it is impossible for the drivers to control the changing between the free-spinning and ratched scroll modes. It's a mechanical gear linkage, and short of battery-draining, weight-adding, needless-complexity-inducing servos or other motorized linkages, it would be impossible for the drivers to say "Hey, you clicked a button, now I'm going to mechanically change the way the wheel scrolls." It's an entirely mechanical process involving switching between different gearing systems. I haven't ripped mine open so I'm sure there are real differences, but in general I expect its not entirely dissimilar to a car's transmission. Drivers can't do anything about that. Although a poster above said something about another button on the top that could be remapped to middle mouse button functions, I think? I don't have a VX nano though, so I can't vouch for that statement.

      I will agree with you about the other various quirks of the drivers though. I've been irked by Logitech's random driver oddities for a decade now, but I keep coming back because of their incredibly designed hardware.

    3. Re:Macin and windozin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a VX Revolution and use it with my MacBook Pro. Best mouse ever. I haven't experienced the driver/software problems of the above post. Then again, maybe it is the Windoze drivers. I have used Apple's BT mouse. The BT mighty mouse always felt sluggish, and of course, it would always gunk up, making scrolling a nightmare. The Revolution feels quick and precise as well as coming with rechargeable batteries and charger. I highly recommend it.

  25. don't lose a USB port by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

    Go for the bluetooth thingy. You won't lose a USB port, and you won't get annoyed by this stupid radio receiver which sits 5 cm away from your mouse. You might as well take a wired mouse, since the wired radio receiver will still clutter up your workspace and claim a USB port. Stupidest thing I ever bought.

  26. Don't use BT if you plan on doing anything else by bmajik · · Score: 1

    Mother in law has the apple wireless desktop, which includes a BT (afaik) mouse.

    I started transferring pictures off of a BT phone onto the mac. The mouse became unusable. It was like using windows 3.0 while formatting a floppy disk. You'd move the mouse all the way across the desk; it would move about 1" on the screen.

    If you ever do anything else with bluetooth, i'd avoid a BT mouse.

    I've got a MS wireless mouse and a logitech wireless mouse. The logitech doesn't work at long distances very well (its setup in my HTPC room and from the couch its performance is spotty). Every few months it will forget that it knows about the PC it's attached to and you have to re-sync it.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:Don't use BT if you plan on doing anything else by Duradin · · Score: 1

      I've had my wireless (proprietary logitech dongle) mouse become rather unusable when moving files around the network over WiFi.

      It basically boils down to: devices that rely on the use of radio frequencies will be affected by other things that emit radio signals. If you don't want this to happen, you should use a wired connection.

  27. What is wrong with wire? by DaleCooper82 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Seriously. After experimenting with multiple BT and IR wireless mice in the past I have returned to having one regular wired one for desktop and smaller one for the road.

    Problems with both BT and IR:

    • you must have spare batteries ready. Otherwise your mouse will behave erratically and/or go dead at the most unconvenient moment
    • because of batteries it is heavier than wired one. After a full day heavy use you feel the difference.

    IR mouse has further disadvantage that there must be visibility between the USB thingy and your mouse.

    Therefore if you are organized (i.e. never forget to take spare batteries and never put anything between mouse and USB thingy) athlete (doing arm training) go for wireless.

    If you are disorganized nerd like me, keep wired one.

    --
    :: There is no light at the end of a tunnel. There is a tunnel after a tunnel : Thom Y. ::
    1. Re:What is wrong with wire? by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For programming and sysadmin, where I'm constantly copy/pasting where quick precision is required (often small text in terminals), and when using multiple monitors and the screen desktop spans those monitors, a wired mouse is a piece of crap. If the wire was as thin and flexible as a strand of cotton (they *never* are), then it wouldn't be a problem. I've been using mice for,... dunno, 17 years? ...and I've yet to find a wired mouse which doesn't interfere with my movement (the wire keeps bumping into the monitor stand, or the keyboard, etc. I abhor the bloody things.

      An alcaline battery lasts a month or three, so this is rarely a problem.

    2. Re:What is wrong with wire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now this is so not true. I have a Logitech VX Nano and love it. I had my computer in the living room, and the mouse in the kitchen, when my gf was cleaning she moved the mouse and to my surprise it worked like a charm through two walls. And my MX610 works well on my desktop where the receiver is somewhere under the table and behind the computer.
      The only downside in the Nano is that, it doesn't have a clickable scrollbutton. It just changes the behaviour of the scroll. Oh, and it's a tiny bit too small. Could be a little bit bigger. But batterylife is amazing and if you leave it alone for long time, you can put the receiver in the mouse and it shuts down automatically. But I have left my receiver to the computer and the rechargeable batteries that I have run for almost 6 months, 2 months longer than my MX610.
      So i'd say go for the new logitechs with the nano-receiver, they are ftw.

    3. Re:What is wrong with wire? by Cixelsiduous · · Score: 1

      I dunno man... you have to be a special kind of weak for the batteries in your mouse to be causing you muscle strain.

    4. Re:What is wrong with wire? by fmaresca · · Score: 1

      Besides, batteries are strong contaminants. Please, use the least batteries you can, and dispose those properly.

    5. Re:What is wrong with wire? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      You get warning of battery death many days in advance, no need to carry some around.
      Proprietary wireless generally don't need LOS.
      And you take an extra few grams of weight in exchange for no cord.

    6. Re:What is wrong with wire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lithium batters last quite a bit longer and quite a bit lighter.

    7. Re:What is wrong with wire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cable resistance

    8. Re:What is wrong with wire? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Really? I got a bluetooth mouse specifically for traveling. The batteries last for months typically, and it's not that big of a deal to keep spares. I just tape a couple AA's together and keep them in the mouse pocket.

      BTW, I got the product sheets from Microsoft. The Microsoft bluetooth 5000 mouse: 3.10 ounces (with batteries) vs. the Wheel Mouse Optical at 4.42 ounces. Weight is not a significant enough difference to make your choice, unless you have really, REALLY weak wrists. It's more of a problem dicking with the wired cords around all the random crap that ends up on conference tables, at least in my experience. I just turn my mouse on and go.

    9. Re:What is wrong with wire? by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      1. RF (Radio-Frequency) mice. Not Infrared. They operate very well.

      2. A single battery usually lasts me months. Too long for me to remember the last time I changed the battery. Additionally, a decent RF mouse has a battery gauge right on there.

      3. In a portable setting, wiring is a pain in the ass.

      4. Wires still interfere with movement. I've never used a wired mouse that had a cord that didn't give feedback. This is especially bad in portable settings.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    10. Re:What is wrong with wire? by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      I agree here. If you're sitting on your desk all day then get a mouse with a wire. There's no need to worry about flat batteries if you go that route. The wired mouse/keyboard are more secure; no snooping on potentially insecure over the air protocols.

      To top it all off, Linux support for bluetooth keyboards (in my experience) is ratshit. My Bluetooth keyboard takes about 6 attempts to pair with the damn thing (the pairing dialog times out faster than I can type in the 4 digit PIN each time). When I finally get it paired it mostly works though apart from interference on occasion.

      Wires remove all those problems and really aren't that inconvenient, really.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
  28. Related Question: Interference in a Lab? by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

    I have a related question someone might have experience with.

    If a lab of computers (maybe a dozen in close proximity) is equipped with wireless mice, will there be interference or are modern wireless mice smarter than that?

    Would using BlueTooth be better than wireless? Or should we just stick to wired?

    --
    -David
  29. I have both, use bluetooth for subjective reasons by egork · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth (BT V470) mouse seems to be heavier and less responsive. It obviously draws more power, so uses two AA batteries. The proprietary (RF Laser MX or smth.) mouse - two AAA. The wheel of the BT mouse can not be set to free rotation, but there are handy FF and REW events generated by tilting the wheel. Also BT seems to have higher latency to wake up after put to rest for a while.

    I would say RF mouse should be superior to BT in almost all regards. Except that I still ended up using the BT. May be because I find it somehow cool to use BT with Linux :-)

  30. Bluetooth is perfect! by skeffstone · · Score: 1

    I have a Razer Pro|Click bluetooth mouse and to me it's working pretty well. The battery life seems excellent, I can probably go two months without changing batteries. It uses 2 AA batteries. An improvement possibility there, with li-ion rechargeable, but then you'd add some cost. Bluetooth though, is simply brilliant. I never think about the connection. My laptop has always-on bluetooth, together with the wifi, so I just flip on the mouse itself and 3 seconds later I can move it around. The accuracy for office work is adequate, but I have one annoyance with it: Every once in a while, it freezes. Either it unfreezes by itself after 10 seconds, or I have to switch the mouse off and on. It's one reason, that while doing CAD design, I prefer a wired mouse which never fails.

  31. Bluetooth the clear winner by leamanc · · Score: 1

    You've basically answered your own question, by pointing out that Blueooth saves a USB port, uses less battery, and doesn't require a proprietary dongle. I like Logitech's wireless USB mice a lot, but I'm on my third USB dongle lost already. For my Mac laptops I've switched to...gasp...Dell's Bluetooth mice. I just like the feel of the mouse, and the precision is pretty darn good. With a black MacBook, Dell's Bluetooth "travel mouse" coordinates pretty well.

    I really can't stand Apple's Bluetooth Mighty Mouse. I don't like the feel of the mouse, or the tiny little scroll wheel, or how there are no real physical buttons. Too often it issues a standard click instead of a right-click, even though I'm pushing to the right of the scroll wheel. Guess I'm not pushing it far enough to the right of the scroll wheel...and that's just asinine.

    --
    :q!
    1. Re:Bluetooth the clear winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. I bought an expensive MS Bluetooth mouse (can't remember which) few years ago and, while the mouse itself was good, the interaction with the computer was horrible. Sometimes the mouse simply wouldn't work after resuming from hibernation, sometimes it would take looong time for it to start working, sometimes it would require pairing with the laptop again. The biggest problem was that it was not responsive enough: the pointer would always lag behind the actual mouse movement by a fraction of a second. Short enough to be still usable, too long for any quick or precise movements (the pointer is on the button and you stop moving your hand, but the pointer continues for few pixels more). Recently I got a Logitech VX Nano and it works great. It's taking 50% of USB ports on my MBP, but I see that as failure of Apple HW desing (these days everything is USB and I got only 2 ports on my $3000 machine?!?!)

    2. Re:Bluetooth the clear winner by gauauu · · Score: 1

      Too often it issues a standard click instead of a right-click, even though I'm pushing to the right of the scroll wheel. Guess I'm not pushing it far enough to the right of the scroll wheel...and that's just asinine.

      No, but the truth is even worse. I had the same problems as you and so did a little research to figure out why my mighty mouse wouldn't right-click properly. The truth is that it doesn't matter where you push it -- instead, it has a touch sensor where your left finger should go, and if your left finger is touching the mouse, then clicks count as left clicks. If your left finger isn't touching it, they count as right-clicks. So if you're like me, and tend to rest your left finger on the mouse while you right-click, then you're not going to have much luck with the mighty mouse.

      To make it even worse, it's a known problem that when your batteries are running low in them, the touch sensor gets less accurate, so it starts registering clicks improperly. (right vs left).

      I'm generally not a regular mac user, so this stupid mouse really makes me wonder about Apple, and how everyone says they have such well-designed products. If this thing is typical of the wonderful Apple design, then I just don't get it.

    3. Re:Bluetooth the clear winner by leamanc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. That explains a lot of my frustration with that mouse. As far as Apple's reputation for great design...even the hardcore Mac-heads will acknowledge that Apple sucks at mice. And other than a handful of good models, they suck at keyboards too.

      --
      :q!
  32. VX Revolution by venkateshkumar99 · · Score: 1

    May I suggest a mouse that I have been using for the past 1.5 years? The Logitech VX Revolution. It is one of the best (if not the best) notebook mice around right now. http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/mice/devices/165&cl=US,EN

    1. Re:VX Revolution by toutankh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a mac laptop user, I am satisfied with this mouse (Logitech VX Revolution). The driver, however, is a total disaster, as always with Logitech. Your choices are the following:

      - Use the official Logitech driver+software (which takes in this case ~50mB I think), and waste some precious CPU and RAM with them. Also, it randomly resets your scrolling speed, with "randomly" being usually equal to "after a few minutes".
      - Do not install any driver, just use the mac os mouse driver, which does not handle those fancy extra mouse buttons that you just paid 50$ or more (it just handles 3 buttons + 2 scrolling directions)
      - Use a 3rd party driver. That's what I do with steermouse (easily found on google). It's lightweight and does exactly what the logitech driver should do. Only problem: it's not free (20$).

      It's still incredible that Logitech is so great at producing hardware and so awful at writing appropriate drivers, we're not in 1996 anymore ffs.

    2. Re:VX Revolution by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Or use Linux, which handles multiple buttons quite well ;) There's NO excuse for any OS to not handle multiple buttons with recent mice... they're all just standard HID devices. Just sending out higher numbered button events for more buttons.

  33. What I know, I suffered to learn... by SpzToid · · Score: 2, Informative

    FYI, I now own nearly identical spec. Logitech mice. A bluetooth and another with a little USB thing to go with it.

    As an Ubuntu user, I first found www.hidpoint.com that promised to provide drivers to get my proprietary mouse to function. To date, they've never delivered a driver I can use, say in 64bit.

    However to my shock and amazement, sometime a few months ago, the proprietary unit Just Worked! Seemingly it was some Ubuntu patch. I had to try on several boxes and it worked consistently. I think those hidpoint folks might redirect support accordingly perhaps, just to save everyone's time?

    BUT, before this happened, because I really needed a wireless mouse, I bought a bluetooth since I used Ubuntu which Logitech CLEARLY does NOT support. Battery life sucks thick canal water!!! Like daily recharge? WTF!?

    meanwhile months after the fact, I am still using the free El Cheapo batteries that came with my proprietary Logitech USB mouse, while the bluetooth mouse that costs about 175% of the proprietary model sits idle for this reason.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    1. Re:What I know, I suffered to learn... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Weird. I never changed anything from my default installs and my bluetooth mouse just works. I use KDE 3.5 with it though, so that may be why it works nicely (not going past Ubuntu 8.04 until the next LTS).

      I do agree with the rechargeable battery issues, though. I only get mice that use AA/AAA's. I have a Microsoft bluetooth laser 5000 mouse that I use with my work laptop, haven't replaced batteries in it yet and it's been at least 2-3 months. But I typically use it when traveling or at home and not at the office since I have a USB hub.

  34. Logitech Nano by argee · · Score: 1

    I tried several mouses; the Logitech Nano was the easiest to set up. Works with Linux out of the box. The resolution is good, and has no "go to sleep if not used for a while" quirks. It uses a pair of AA batteries that run it for about 3 - 6 months. There are several variants, some have the tiny receiver and some a larger one. Some have just the two buttons and the clickable scroll wheel, some have more buttons. I found all the extra buttons, specially the side by side button on the wheel to be excruciatingly aggravating, and not so easy to deactivate. I've been using the Nano V450 which is plain. The quirkiest under Linux was a Microsoft Intellimouse that liked to have the pointer move randomly on the screen. But it worked ok in Windows with its proprietary driver. I gave it away to some dumb guy that uses Windows and he is happy with it.

  35. Wireless Mighty Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Performance wise, I play World of Warcraft with it. It has no lag issues or other performance issues. And, since I am on a small MacBook Pro screen, I don't need a higher DPS mouse.

    Battery wise? I leave one mouse on all the time. I've gone through three sets of batteries this year. Not bad.

    Sleep/wake performance? As poster above, excellent. I just move it an it goes. When I put it to sleep, I just slide the infrared cover back and click the button. In moments it reconnects.

    Button/scroll functionality. This can vary as it is subjective. Some love the Mighty Mouse, some do not. It did take me a while to get used to.

    First, make sure you turn on two-button clicking after connecting it. I had another two-button mouse hooked up previously, but I still had to go into my Mighty Mouse settings and tell Mac OS X that, yes, this is a two-button mouse. You may also want to mess with the scroll wheel or side buttons here. (My side buttons pull up Expose -- all-windows. I love it!)

    Second, the scroll wheel can take getting used to. It is sensitive -- more so than most. You can also spin it to where it keeps spinning beyond where you want it to go. (Just have to put your finger on it, but different than the less sensitive wired-mouse scroll wheels I had previously.)

    It also gums up. My 1-year old mouse began doing this after about 6 or so months. This likely depends on how clean your desk area is. Mine is not clean.

    To fix it, turn your mouse over and place the wheel on a clean sheet of paper. Then, proceed to roll the mouse (upside down, via the scroll wheel) along the paper in many different ways. This clears out the gunk and gets it working again.

    You can find Youtube videos on this. Some also provide other methods of cleaning it.

    I love my Mighty Mouse. It just makes sense if you own a Mac. I also love having my USB slots.

    Sincerely,
    The one Too Lazy to Log In

  36. Microsoft mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using bluetooth mouse made by Microsoft myself with my macbook pro. It works surprisingly well, all five buttons of it. The only annoying thing compared to cheap rf-mouses is that when it goes to sleep, which happens fairly quickly after inactivity, it takes few seconds for it to reconnect. Reconnecting is done by just moving the mouse, but during the connecting time, cursor does not move.

  37. Having stuck with wired mice for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having stuck with wired mice for years

    To untangle a snarl, loosen all jams or knots and open a hole through the mass at the point where the longest end leaves the snarl. Then proceed to roll or wind the end out through the center exactly as a stocking is rolled. Keep the snarl open and loose at all times and do not pull on the end; permit it to unfold itself. As the process is continued the end gradually emerges. No snarl is too complicated to be solved by this method; only patience is required.

    http://www.geocities.com/roo_two/tangle.html

    I don't know if this helps, since you aren't stuck anymore.

  38. RF Receiver Bluetooth by JYD · · Score: 1

    I have been sticking with my RF Receiver mice (Logitech VX Rev / VX Nano / G7), even though I have most branded Bluetooth mice available, including Apple Wireless Mighty Mouse, Razer Bluetooth Notebook Mouse, and the Logitech V450 bluetooth (I might have got the model number on this one here).

    Anyways, after using the wireless mouse with just simple RF Receivers dedicated for that purpose, I never went back to BT Mouses, just because the tracking is usually shitty. The pairing is a pain in the ass (and no, you don't pair it only once, if you lose the connection the computer failed to pair on boot, you will have to pair it again). The latency with the bluetooth connection is unbearable (there is a definite, but minimal lag from mouse to pointer when compared to RF mouses). And no, I am not even judging bluetooth mouses to gaming standards here.

    With good branded RF Mouses, connection is like wired mices, plug in the receiver and go. Lose a connection? Unplug receiver, plug receiver, continue productivity. Tracking is generally better than its bluetooth counterparts, and any mouse movement generally gives immediate feedback.

    And ok, Bluetooth mouses look better overall and does not take up an USB port. But usability and ease of use suffers in turn.

  39. MX1000 by armitage787 · · Score: 1

    My roommate had a bluetooth Logitech mx1000 and i have a rf mx1000. The difference in performance and battery life is huge. The RF mouse was sooo much better. If you are only planning on web browsing though i would imagine that it is pretty inconsequential, but if you are gaming or doing anything mouse intensive you will regret bluetooth.

  40. Bluetooth Battles Wifi Woes by MarkTBSc · · Score: 1

    I've been using a Logitech wireless trackball for a while and it's just fine for me, but I'd probably still recommend Bluetooth. We had an incident at work recently where a new WiFi network took up a huge proportion of the available 2.4ghz spectrum and killed the mouse we used for seminars stone dead. Bluetooth has more advanced signal processing and we've replaced the old mouse with one of those.

    --
    "There are three schools of magic..."
  41. Wrong problem? by Korbeau · · Score: 1

    You got a Mac, why not deal with the core problem? :)

    1. Re:Wrong problem? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      what problem? there's no problem!

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  42. Belkin sucks by dargaud · · Score: 1

    At the least the belkin mouse I had. There was always a delay when moving the mouse, which makes any kind of graphic work impossible.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  43. How many ports... by crossmr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Does your sense of righteousness and superiority take up?

    As a Mac user, bluetooth has the advantage that it won't take up a USB port

    this is absolutely going to blow your mind but my 2.5 year old Dell laptop running XP has an integrated bluetooth module.

    1. Re:How many ports... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of it as a subtle way to mention his platform (so compatibility can be assured) while mentioning the availability of bluetooth for mouse connectivity.

    2. Re:How many ports... by Danious · · Score: 1

      You mistake his point entirely, he isn't bragging he has bluetooth, he's bewailing that Macbooks only have 2 USB ports and having a dongle wastes one of them. Your Dell I bet has 4 so it's not such an issue.

    3. Re:How many ports... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      you're right, it was crazy of me to think a mac user would ever brag about their platform...

  44. My take - haven't read the other replies. by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Get Bluetooth if you have it built in. Even if you don't have it built in (which having a Mac you do) get Bluetooth. It beats having a dongle for every damned device you want to plug in (keyboard, game control, mouse, headset) the Bluetooth one can do all of it.

    DO NOT get a fucking Apple Mighty Mouse. I've had a couple, great idea in theory, but not a good mouse in practice. Right click sucks. It works at first and stops working over time. If you completely remove your index finger from the mouse and click with your middle finger you can usually get a right click, or if you take out the batteries and put them back it works again. It's not worth it. The ball always gets fucked up over time, you can fix it and it will work again for a while, then fix it again, and again, and eventually, not anymore.

    Get this Logitech, reviewed it, you can find my review in that link, and I did chastise Logitech a bit, but when compared the other Bluetooth mice I've used that's the best.

    The USB wireless mice do have one advantage. They work immediately on boot up no problem on every OS. With Bluetooth I've found that to be the case with Linux. On Mac I have to either hit the connect button while booting with the Logitech (the Mighty Mouse actually did better at this - go figure) or fidget with the buttons and hope the Mac pics up on it after a while. With Windows, well, very mixed experience there, especially when it forgets the mouse should exist.

    On my Macbook Pro I always carried a mini bluetooth keyboard and a mouse in my bag, and I left a bluetooth keyboard and mouse on my work desk, used Synergy at home. I had at least 3 each keyboards and mice paired with it, they all worked great every time. I even paired a bluetooth headset with it, but that seemed to be problematic. Audio quality would degrade with time, and the applications were stupid, if the headset wasn't present it wouldn't automatically switch back to the built in or external mic/speakers. Not to mention I paired a Motorola Q, a Blackberry and an iPhone. The Q was awesome with it, surprising since it sucked all around otherwise. The Blackberry was functional, but not that great. There was no point with the iPhone. I don't even see why it's pairable.

    Linux on the other hand, I've paired everything above and a PS3 Sixaxxis, the Mac I could only get that to work via USB.

    I like Bluetooth, I'm pushing Logitech to support it a bit better, and I can't wait for the day the dongle dies. The electronic dongle, not my dongle.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by swg101 · · Score: 1

      I'll second the Logitech V470. It's smooth and accurate and has great battery life. It does have a small lag if you have not moved it for a while, but a small movement is enough to get going again.

      --
      Like pi? Try 10,000 digits.
    2. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      Matching anecdotes for anecdotes:

      I have to say, I've had my Bluetooth Mighty Mouse since about six months after they were released. It lives in my canvas messenger bag--and so gets banged up a bit and dusty--when I'm not using it and carrying it from home to work to the coffeeshop to gaming night, etc.

      I've never had a problem with it. The scrollball has never stuck. Never. It just works.(tm)

      I also have less problem with the virtual right mouse button than the weird, tiny buttons that are littered all over "high-end" mice from Logitech and Microsoft. Also, it is the best feeling mouse under my hand--i.e. has the best ergonomics--that I've ever used.

      Not saying you're wrong, just that I've had a very different and positive experience.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    3. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ball always gets fucked up over time, you can fix it and it will work again for a while, then fix it again, and again, and eventually, not anymore.

      Never realised it, but it seems Apple properly implemented the clit mouse ;)

    4. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      The logitech dongles stick out of your laptop like 2mm. So it has become less of an issue, you just leave it plugged in all the time.

    5. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

      I have to agree that the Mighty Mouse right click is terrible.

      But, I have noticed that when I right click in Windows XP under VMWare Fusion, it behaves much better. It would seem that the Mac OS is doing a bad job of handling the Mighty Mouse's right clicks.

      The scroll ball sucks. Someday they'll change it to an optical sensor combined with a touch sensor so it only detects movement when you're actually touching it.

      Meanwhile, I wish I could replace my Apple keyboard with a Model M and retain all of the fancy function key controls.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    6. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by koick · · Score: 1
      I have a C2D Macbook Pro. I love my old wired Microsoft IntelliMouse Optical 5-button mouse.
      I tried using a Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 8000 (in bluetooth mode). I had two show-stopping problems:
      • If it stopped moving for more than about a second or two, when I moved it again, the cursor would hang and hesitate to move for a frustrating fraction of a second (I suppose that was the laptop and mouse reestablishing contact with each other).
      • This was the only time I found my notebook *hot* in my packpack because it had been awakened somehow (maybe a mouse click), looking for that mouse, and didn't go back to sleep.

      I'd at least avoid that model mouse, but very possible you will have similar probs with any bluetooth mouse on your MBP.

    7. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Just a word in, I did keep my in a small polyester draw string bag as well.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    8. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In your review, you are wrong. Logitech produces many other bluetooth mice besides the V740. The MX1000 does bluetooth, I have one at work I use with the Macbook Pro. MX Revolution is bluetooth also.

    9. Re:My take - haven't read the other replies. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      I looked up the MX1000. It was NOT listed in the mice section of the Logitech website, on the website it comes up bundled with the diNovo keyboard that cost $200.

      I may be wrong, but I can't find a stand alone MX1000 that's Bluetooth. This board discussions claims it only comes with the keyboard in Bluetooth.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  45. Bluetooth ruins 802.11 networks by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

    Run a speed test before and during using a bluetooth mouse.

    With the bluetooth mouse performance sucks. There is interference.

  46. forget about the USB dongle by Tom · · Score: 1

    I own a wireless mouse with USB dongle, and a MacBook Pro, so I'm exactly where you want to be.

    While I like the specific mouse I have a lot, if I had a choice of this mouse as bluetooth or USB, I would go with bluetooth in an instant.

    When you actually travel with your notebook (and why else have one), over the years you will accumulate a good number of instances where you simply left the USB dongle at home. In your average home setup, with keyboard, mouse, iPhone, printer, etc. you have a USB hub involved, and that's usually where you'll plug in the mouse dongle. And more often than you think, that's where it'll still be when you're 300 km away, digging out our mouse and realizing it's useless.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  47. Bluetooth for me also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Microsoft's wireless laser mouse 8000 for the best part of year with both my work and home computers as well as my laptop and I have to say Iâ(TM)m extremely happy with it. Admittedly you have to pair it when moving between systems but that is where the pain ends.

    The mouse is incredibly responsive and the only lag Iâ(TM)ve experienced is when initially booting you can have up to 5 second where the mouse is unresponsive which is not really noticeable considering you wait much more than that for windows to finish loading (and even a mac os).

    Battery life is also excellent and I've left it off its charger for many weeks without the thing dying on me. But saying that the charger is not unattractive and happily sits at my desk where I can plonk the mouse on it when going off for lunch etc.

    As a web designer I'm often fiddling around with images and the option of programming one of the buttons to increase the precision is a godsend allowing detailed editing and manipulation (also great when gaming).

  48. fyi: logitech cordless desktop pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not know if the Logitech Cordless Desktop Pro works on the mac as the OP uses but I am after 5 years still satisfied with mine.

    Big dongle and uses 2 USB ports. Comfortable keyboard with Logitech layout. Comfortable mouse with too few button (2+1+wheel). 2 AAA batteries for the mouse and 2 AA batteries for the keyboard. I use normal alkaline batteries because during the last five years I have changed batteries 4 times (2 times kbd and 2 times mouse) so there is no need of rechargable ones.
    Proprietary wireless protocol. Doesn't go more than a meter or so, it has to lie on the desktop. Sometimes (4times a year) it behaves erratically (reacts slowly) but a few minutes later it is working alright again. Low batteries make the setup behave erratically in the same way.

    FWIW

  49. Some things to look out for with wireless mice... by distantbody · · Score: 1
    Look for a mouse with:

    a) a power switch
    b) a short wake-up time
    not to light or heavy, with a centred mass

    Some mice go to sleep in as little as ten seconds and then take a second or two to wake up and start transmitting again, almost unusable because mouse use is intermittent.

  50. Logitech proprietary ftw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole reason they developed the proprietary transceivers is because, quite frankly, Bluetooth sucks for the task of mousing. Go proprietary. The new transceivers are tiny, they barely even stick out of the USB port, and the power usage is lower than a typical USB transceiver.

  51. Good proprietary RF is much better than Bluetooth by _vSyncBomb · · Score: 1

    I have experience with lots and lots of mice, because for several years I went on a tear of buying a new mounse every couple months looking for one that didn't suck.

    I finally settled down on two:

    1.) Logitec MX Revolution "desktop mouse" (by which they mean non-changeable battery that needs charging cradle).

    2.) Logitec VX Nano laptop mouse.

    Note that on the Mac, these mice come with software that is not only the very worst mouse driver ever produced by humans, but is some of the worst software ever made, period. It will crash your whole Mac (kernel panics), and break OS upgrades in a grey-screen-of-infinity (google "logitech unsanity").

    That made me really try my hardest not to buy them, but in the end I think the MX Revolution is the best mouse HARDWARE yet made. You need a third party shareware driver; I use Steermouse.

    Pros of proprietary:
    1) Instantaneous connection; no pairing and weird unpairing.
    2) Available mice are better.
    3) Better battery life (in my unscientific testing with a few mice of each type).
    4) The fucking mouse doesn't stop working from time to time for no reason.
    5) The newest smallest dongles are so small you can still slide your notebook into a sleeve case.
    6) No jiggle-jiggle-wait dance while your mouse rouses itself from its battery-saving slumber, as with Bluetooth.

    Cons:
    A) Lose the itty-bitty dongle and your mouse is useless.
    B) Takes a USB port.
    C) It's proprietary.

    Apple, of course, has a funny history with mice: after basically introducing the mouse the the general computer user, they then proceeded to stick with the retard-oriented one-button mouse for years and years, and also designed some of the very worst mouse hardware in human history (perfectly round hockey puck iMac mouse).

    Their latest offerings still suck horrifically in my opinion; I have many wired and wireless "Mighty Mouse" turds, but wouldn't every really use one.

    I don't like making myself a Logitech customer, mainly because their software is so fucking bad that somebody should have to do a few weekends in jail for it, but the combo of their best mice with somebody else's driver is the best thing going on the Mac, I think.

    Two things that I am still looking for:

    a) Fucking charge the fucking mouse with a standard fucking USB cable please (mini-USB is fine).

    b) Fucking put a vaginal USB port on the ass-end of the penile one, making it a little one port USB hub that is every bit as tiny as the current smallest dongles, so that we don't need to give up a USB port.

    c) The Mighty Mouse does do a good job of scrolling in all directions, not just up and down. The Logitechs can do that too, but they have a tilt-wheel kinda awkward going left and right.

    Bonus Note: The Logitech MX Revolution has a cool feature whereby if you flick the scroll-wheel hard, it disengages the resistance and really flies, scrolling through many many pages (it scrolls for like 7 seconds or so). Move it normally, and it operates normally. Press it and it is button 3 like a normal mouse.

    This is really cool, and you will use it all the time once used to it; flick hard, scroll scroll scroll, and then tap the wheel gently to stop it. Really reduces how many times you have to bend your finger, and feels cool to boot.

    However, I think the default turd Logitech drivers set this up differently, where you push the scroll wheel to toggle scroll modes, instead of having it auto-sense by the force of your scroll. That is stupid, since it breaks the button-3 functionality and feels clumsy, too. The cool way I have it set up might be a feature of my driver, Steermouse. I can't be positive since I would never install the Logitech driver to find out.

  52. For God's sake no! by theolein · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am Mac sysadmin. I admin about 50 Macs in a design agency. The Apple Mac Mighty Mouse is usually the first thing that the designers throw out (bad form factor, cramps in the hands, poor right click functionality, the scroll ball gums up far too often and is difficult to clean, the cord is far too short etc) and the wireless mouse compounds all of that with terribly poor battery life and bad response times. The only way it'll be useful is if you use rechargeable batteries.

    Do yourself a favour: get a Logitech RF wireless, whichever one suites your tastes. They have fantastic battery life (8 months on my Logitech LX7 ) and Logitech almost certainly has one that will fit in your hands. Personally, I love the hard rubber grip on the sides of their mice.

    The downside is that you need a USB receiver for them.

    1. Re:For God's sake no! by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 3, Informative

      One more caveat on Apple mice worth mentioning explicitly; they only have one clicker for the multiple mouse buttons (as others have mentioned) which means it's impossible to a L+R simultaneous click. Since some apps do use this combination explicitly (i.e., Blender), this can be very frustrating.

      (Blender does have offer an alternative way to trigger/emulate this mouse combo, but that requires holding down a key on the keyboard, and thus is considerably less elegant/easy to trigger.)

    2. Re:For God's sake no! by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      Matching anecdotes for anecdotes:

      I have to say, I've had my Bluetooth Mighty Mouse since about six months after they were released. It lives in my canvas messenger bag--and so gets banged up a bit and dusty--when I'm not using it and carrying it from home to work to the coffeeshop to gaming night, etc.

      I've never had a problem with it. The scrollball has never stuck. Never. It just works.(tm)

      I also have less problem with the virtual right mouse button than the weird, tiny buttons that are littered all over "high-end" mice from Logitech and Microsoft. I really like the ergonomics and how I can just use my fingertips to use the thing instead of having to death grip my mouse, unlike most Logitech mice I've tried.

      I get a year out of a pair of Energizer Lithium.

      Not saying you're wrong, just that I've had a very different and positive experience with the Might Mouse.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    3. Re:For God's sake no! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      the cord is far too short

      Apple mice have short cords because they're designed to be plugged into the keyboard, not directly into the computer.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:For God's sake no! by atamido · · Score: 1

      We've purchased a number of wireless keyboard/mice at our work, and we've had no problem with the Logitech LX7. Although we prefer the Logitech Desktop MX 3200 as a cheap and extremely reliable set (never had one die yet).

  53. Bluetooth and 802.11 both use 2.4GHz by phizi0n · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth and 802.11 (wifi) both use 2.4 GHz spectrum and interfere with one another. Some routers have "bluetooth coexistence mode" to weave 802.11 transmissions into time slots that it doesn't expect nearby bluetooth devices to use but it's better to just avoid bluetooth for a mouse imo. The FCC filing for my Logitech MX700 shows that it uses 27 MHz https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/tcb/GetTcb731Report.do?applicationId=463065&fcc_id='JNZ211596'

  54. Bluetooth lag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found that at least my bluetooth mouse can lag badly if further than three feet from the computer's BT antennae or has any (even small) obstacle. I've tried this on about 4 computers and it seems to be the same with each.

    Otherwise, it works really well.

  55. Bluetooth key sharing between OSs on same machine? by Elrond,+Duke+of+URL · · Score: 1

    Does anybody who dual-boots have a solution for the shared Bluetooth adapter MAC address pairing problem?

    That is, currently I have a nice set of BT stereo headphones and soon (hopefully) a BT mouse. When I pair in Linux, it generates a key which is unique to the MACs of the adapter and the device and stores the key on both PC and BT device.

    Now, what happens when I reboot into Vista? It doesn't know it has been paired, but the BT headphones *do* think they are still paired to the BT adapter that is present. These particular headphones are capable of remembering five hosts, but in this case the adapter (host) hasn't changed, only the OS.

    I guess the solution is to manually force Vista/Linux to use a previously known key file. In this case, I know where Linux stores its BT pairing keys, but try as I might I cannot find where Vista stores this information. Google hasn't been able to help me here, either. I assume it's buried somewhere deep within the darkness of the registry, but where?

    Without this fix, I have to re-pair my BT headphones every time I want to use them in a different OS on the same machine, and then re-pair yet again when I boot back into Linux. I'll probably have to do the same dance for a BT mouse, which will dramatically reduce its usefulness... :(

    So... surely I'm not the only one to run into this. Anybody else with ideas/solutions?

    --
    Elrond, Duke of URL
    "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my enemies!"-Sam&Max
  56. Range is a factor. by MrKneebone · · Score: 1

    I tried a few standard cordless mice, and had to go to bluetooth to get further than about 1.8 metres or 6'. The garden variety ones wouldn't reach from my home theatre PC to the coffee table. If you want to use it for presentations or at least from a distance, make sure to check the range - although most boxes won't state any distance/range.

  57. I prefer non-bluetooth by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Mainly as it doesn't involve messing about with drivers.
    Put teensy dongle into your PC and as far as it's aware there's a physically wired mouse and keyboard plugged in.
    Doesn't matter what OS, whether it's POSTing, whether your BT module has decided to wake up etc etc. You have a working mouse and keyboard. Maybe Bluetooth has improved since I last tried - put I really can't see the advantage (and seemingly neither can the marketplace).

  58. God almighty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a bloody mouse. Pick one! You sound like the kind of fool who will just loose the dongle anyway, so go for the bluetooth.

  59. Re:Related Question: Interference in a Lab? by taucross · · Score: 2, Informative

    I set up a training workshop with a number of cheap Microsoft mice, and yes, they did interfere with each other. These were standard RF, not Bluetooth. I would venture to say Bluetooth mice uniquely pair with your PC and would not have the same problem, though someone else may correct me.

    The upside however was that the range was fairly small so I was able to separate them enough to minimise interference. I would still probably recommend wired mice if you're going to have a lot of them, though.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
  60. seee by kafeier · · Score: 1

    very good people .i like it

  61. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    The only problem with keyboards, at least for en-GB locale ones is that some of the keys are in different places. For example @ and " are swapped round, and a few other symbol keys have been rearranged. I had to find an en-GB Mac keyboard layout for the copy of Windows XP I run in Parallels.

  62. Just go for it. by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 1

    I concur with the fellows who say that it is your decision, and this is a frivolous question. Surely you have not wasted my time; I have read this thread for ten minutes and don't feel disappointed. I've had one incident where Windows was unable to detect a bluetooth mouse. Maybe the mouse died, I don't know, I just replaced the mouse with a Logitech wireless. I don't see why bluetooth would be any slower than another radio frequency mouse. I think performance will be the same, BT or RF.

  63. BT brings one thing to the table -- encryption by mlts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Realistically, this is a very low risk to most people. However, session hijacking and packet sniffing via TCP was considered a low risk as well in the past.

    One reason I go for BT mice over generic USB radio is the fact that BT traffic is encrypted once the devices are paired. Someone sniffing traffic would not be able to figure out your mouse patterns, or even worse take control of your mouse and start clicking on stuff.

    Similar with a BT keyboard versus a wireless keyboard and either intercepting keystrokes or injecting them.

    1. Re:BT brings one thing to the table -- encryption by Plunky · · Score: 1

      One reason I go for BT mice over generic USB radio is the fact that BT traffic is encrypted once the devices are paired.

      Don't assume that is always so.

      The traffic is encrypted if one device requests it and both support it. In the HID spec, keyboards are mandated to support encryption but mice are not. You can generally enforce encryption for all connections but thats not always useful as you must then always pair (allowing remote device authenticated access to your machine :)

      Also, for a long time (I think its fixed now, not sure of exact versions), the BlueZ/Linux stack only supported requesting such options on _incoming_ connections so if your computer made the initial connection and the remote device did not request it, the link would not have been encrypted.

    2. Re:BT brings one thing to the table -- encryption by MarsianMan · · Score: 1

      That's not really true. They have discovered a way to intercept keystrokes (95% accuracy) just by the change in electrical current/interference/magic. I know they posted about it on slashdot earlier. This worked even with wired and laptop keyboards.

  64. Logitech's Fancy BT Mouse by Peeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Logitech DOES have a fancy modern Bluetooth Mouse, it's the MX Revolution. Unfortunately, the bluetooth version of the mouse seems to only be available by buying the keyboard and mouse set. Otherwise, you can only get the MX Revolution mouse on it's own in proprietary RF style.

    I've been using it as a desktop mouse in both windows xp and linux and despite a few small quirks, I love it. I've very much gotten used to the auto shifting scroll wheel and am quickly approaching "how did I ever live without it". It does take a second to start up after idle but never more than 1 second. It has a lot of buttons and a very responsive laser sensor.

    Personally I would use a Mighty Mouse Pro or whatever it is in your situation just because it goes with the mac, is a more compact design (for stowage) and has replaceable AA batteries (I think it will even run on only 1 battery). The MX Revolution has a charging cradle (which they finally improved and fixed from the old fiddle-with-it-for-an-hour pain in the ass cradle that would never make proper charging contact) and non-replaceable batteries.

    One other advantage (I think it is an advantage) is that bluetooth is better about dealing with interference from other bluetooth devices and from other devices in the same bandwidth area as bluetooth. Thus, if you're working in a public place around other bluetoothers or RF mousers, I think it is naturally more likely that you can mouse in peace with a BT mouse than with an RF one, but this is a partially untested hypothesis. I've seen 2 RF mice fight with eachother at work whereas I've used two BT mice at home without problems. There aren't many good choices for BT mice out there for whatever reason, but keep asking about it and maybe manufacturers will pick up on the trend again and we'll see more and better designed bluetooth mice.

  65. on the road again? by CheshireFerk-o · · Score: 1, Insightful

    i havent a clue why anyone would use a wireless anything on their desktop system, as if the monitor cable dosent exist. between the lag and battery sucking it just dosent make any sense to me. from your post it sounds as if you dont have any BT devices as of now, so i would go with usb mini dongle instead of opening your system up to bluetooth. i could definatly see problems with all kinds of BT phones earpieces and whatnot around, but if your stationary get a wire.

  66. Re:Bluetooth key sharing between OSs on same machi by Plunky · · Score: 1

    Does anybody who dual-boots have a solution for the shared Bluetooth adapter MAC address pairing problem?

    Some bluetooth controllers will support storing a set of link keys directly in NVRAM on the device, so you could pair with Vista (ie configure vista to know about the device) and then pair with Linux (configure linux to know about the device) then write the linux key to NVRAM and whenever a connection is made, The OS won't be asked for the key as the device will provide it directly.

    I think the hciconfig(8) command can do this if you are using BlueZ/Linux. (For NetBSD/OpenBSD/DragonflyBSD use btkey(1), for FreeBSD use hccontrol(8) - I know nothing about Windows or Mac)

    I've used several (CSR, 3com) devices that support this, but the BCM2045B in my current laptop does not

  67. RF mice have the same trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recently went back to a wired mouse. Frankly, the wireless freedom (from the advertisements) is hardly noticeable in practice. The battery life still sucks, and gets worse as the batteries get older, and also, quaintly enough, as the mouse gets older. Wake up responsiveness is better now than it used to be, but still annoying. And the mechanism tends to fail in old mice, making them either die before they're really worn out, or drain the batteries with a vengeance. Range is limited, especially if you have large metal objects in the vicinity. If you sit at a metal desk... Well, to cut a long story short, I went back to a simple (but ergonomic) wired Logitech and I'm happier with it than I've ever been with a mouse, so wireless is far from the holy grail.

    1. Re:RF mice have the same trouble by keytoe · · Score: 1

      I'll second this. I keep trying to figure out what all these people are doing with their mice that the cord could possibly hinder. I just don't see the justification in trading off the performance and simplicity of a good corded mice for input lag, configuration issues and battery swapping - all so I can flail my mouse hand around a little harder. My mouse hand only moves a couple of inches tops. Including while gaming.

      For $40 I can buy a really nice multi button corded Logitech. For the same price, I get a bargain basement wireless that comes with a pile of hassle. The only real value I can see to the wireless mice is that you can sell them to people by saying "but it has no wires -- oooooooh!"

  68. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by ceka · · Score: 2, Informative

    @ being swapped with " is the difference between en_US and en_GB

  69. Re:Related Question: Interference in a Lab? by MrMr · · Score: 1

    I have switched back about 5 RF wireless workstations a couple of years ago to wired for that very reason. We had interference from the same labspace and from our neighbours on both sides (all in all about 10 devices fighting over three RF channels).
    I'm now completely wirelessless again, and a lot less irritable.

  70. I would like to reinforce by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what so many others have said:

    The Apple "Mighty Mouse" is the best mouse to use with the Macbook Pro. There are several reasons for this. Let me take care of the negatives first:

    (1) Right-clicking can be a pain. You have to move your finger way over to the right-hand edge of the mouse, and maybe even lift your other finger. This is the one thing I can say that they really screwed up. On the other hand, considering that their original mouse had only one button, it's still an improvement.

    (2) The bearing surface is a smooth (teflon?) ring, all the way around the mouse. As a result, there is a bit more drag than there is on other mice, and the ring tends to pick up a bit more dirt than other mice do.

    Now for the positives:

    (A) At least there is a right-click. And in fact there are actually 3 buttons: press the ball on the top for the 3rd button, much like you press the wheel on other mice.

    (B)I got that wrong. I forgot about the side-buttons, which work as a pair. Squeeze them together, and they behave as a 4th button.

    (C) The Mighty Mouse works seamlessly with the Macbook over bluetooth. In fact, my regular work setup is a Macbook Pro with a Mighty Mouse and their bluetooth keyboard. There is NO noticeable lag, glitching, or delay like there are with some wireless mice. It is rock-solid.

    (D) The battery life is great even if you just walk away at the end of the day, and if you want even more life, there is an off-switch on the bottom. I have had this mouse for over a year, I am a professional developer, and I often do not bother to turn it off at the end of the day. I think it was just last week I inserted my 4th pair of AA batteries.

    (E) The ball on the top is a full trackball, far superior to wheels, even the wheels that tilt for side-to-side. You get full 360-degree control, and very smooth. Nothing else on the market has a full 360-degree secondary control like this. Scrolling horizontally is as easy and instinctive as scrolling vertically.

    (F) This is the only control device (mouse or trackball) I have EVER owned for more than a year without having to at least partially disassemble it for cleaning.

    I am not sure what else I can say. The right-click could use some improvement. Big deal. And the ring on the bottom should probably be 3 or 4 teflon pads instead; also "big deal".

    And you are getting this from a long-time Windows person. There are some Apple practices or design decisions that I am still not convinced about. But as for the Mighty Mouse: the pluses so far outweigh the minuses that this is a no-brainer.

    1. Re:I would like to reinforce by moonbender · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could fix the ring thing by sticking 3 or 4 pieces of teflon tape under the mouse. It's sold for exactly that purpose. I still won't get a mouse where the right-click functionality could "use some improvement", but then again I'm not using OS X.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:I would like to reinforce by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      It's really not so bad if you just get into the habit of lifting the other finger when you right-click. Then it is very reliable. But it's a difficult habit for this old Windows hand to remember to do.

    3. Re:I would like to reinforce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every Mighty Mouse I have encountered with the middle trackball eventually has that trackball get gunked up and rendered inoperable in one direction (usually scrolling down or up). Even people who try to clean it out with alcohol and other means tend to not be able to get it operable in all four directions.

      I'd like to see Apple design a little bit more tolerance with the trackball so it can deal with the gunk that a normal mouse deals with.

    4. Re:I would like to reinforce by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      Now for the positives:
      (A) At least there is a right-click.

      Only a Mac fan could point out a right mouse button as a feature (no offence!)

    5. Re:I would like to reinforce by Woy · · Score: 1

      From your description, that is a horrible, horrible mouse.

      A - Seriously, lift left finger to right click?
      B - Seriously, squeeze 2 buttons to work as one?
      C - Apple mouse works with Apple computer. Wow.
      D - Off button!
      E - I guess some people might prefer a trackball rather than a tilting wheel.
      F - I have never needed to clean a light-mouse. Is this a ball mouse?

      Wow.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    6. Re:I would like to reinforce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a massive idiot (no offence!).

    7. Re:I would like to reinforce by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I like that you recommend the very worst wireless mouse because it's the one you've used. The right click problem makes it unuseable for anyone used to full mouse functionality, and the poor precision and lag are very noticeable for someone sensitive to such things. I'd suggest a Logitech G7 if there is an interest in getting a mouse that tracks quickly and accurately. In my experience, it's slightly slower than a wired mouse, but faster than other options from Logitech, Apple, and tied with the best MS options.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    8. Re:I would like to reinforce by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      If you want to read it that way, fine. But really, here is what I was saying:

      A - There IS a "right-click". Some people here have been saying that there wasn't.
      B - The squeeze is a very natural movement. And it makes for 4 buttons. Not bad.
      C - No, it doesn't just work with the Apple computer. It works GREAT with the Apple computer. Better than Microsoft, or Logitech, or ...
      D - Some wireless mice, believe it or not, do NOT have an off switch. But my point here (as should have been quite clear) is that you can extend the already excellent battery life by actually USING the off switch.
      E - The trackball is FAR superior to the wheels. There is no contest.
      F - Prior to this, I generally used optical trackballs (which did need cleaning occasionally), and before that, mechanical mice. So your point here is taken. But yes, it is an optical mouse.

      In any case, you can read my previous post in as negative or sarcastic way as you want; the Mighty Mouse still adds up to the best mouse to use with a Macbook.

    9. Re:I would like to reinforce by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I have used -- or at least tried -- MANY mice. What makes you think I haven't?

      I had a wireless Logitech keyboard + mouse. They were very good. But not AS good.

      I used Microsoft wireless keyboards and mice. I did not like them as well as the Logitech. Neither brand of mouse was as good as the Apple.

      I have used Logitech and Kensington trackballs. I rather liked the trackballs with Windows. I was partial to the Kensington Orbit, even though it was not as smooth as the Marble products.

      So what you are saying here is just nonsense. I am not recommending a poor product just because that is the one I happen to use. The truth is the opposite: I use it because it is the best I have found.

      There is NO perceptible lag, jerkiness, or delay with my Mighty Mouse on my Macbook. None. If you experienced any, then something was not set up correctly. The precision is excellent (and yes, I mean in comparison to those other products). If your Logitech G7 is a bit slow, then it can't be as good as my Mighty Mouse, because my Mighty Mouse is NOT slow. It has no delays whatever. And it is the most precise mouse I have ever used.

  71. This is not a problem since 1.2 plus ... by testman123 · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth is already Wifi friendly since version 1.2 ( See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Bluetooth_1.2 ) = no interference.

    But as it is still using the same spectrum (ISM band = about 2.4GHZ), this means that if using the same chanel, they can be situation where it suck some of the bandwidth. But be sure Bluetooth is not as sprectrum greedy as 802.11n ey ;-)

    Actually, you are right there is interference with wifi ... but with the proprietary wireless mouse using 2.4GHz (today's high end wireless mouse use this band). And there you have no standard that ensure your mouse is not fully jamming the spectrum & killing your wifi bandwith.

    So between Bluetooth and proprietary ... choose Bluetooth but at least 2.0 (1.2 is fine, but 2.0 has added more speed).

    The only problem I see is that manucaturer prefers to build proprietary stuffs, because it is usually less costy to produce : compatibility test, interference, etc. So, at this time, you will get less choice out for a bluetooth mouse.

    FYI, My graal Bluetooth mouse shoud get :
      - minimum 2.0 EDR
      - cool wheel
      - nice design
      - AAA batery/accu friendly
      - miniUSB plug to charge
      - full functional thu cable using a miniUSB cable
      - instant on
      - laser motion detection
      - cool look & rock solid

    Any suggestion ?

  72. Likely depends. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Absolutely NOT the cheap wireless.
    I had some and the experience was outright horrible. The battery fails fast, the range is like 40cm from the receiver, and random interferences make the mouse to fail.
    I don't know about "top of the line" wireless, but I got a decent bluetooth mouse recently and I don't want to look back.
    One significant minus is start-up time. The bluetooth service loads quite late and takes a few seconds to connect, which means it takes some 10s of staring at the loaded desktop screen before it starts working. It also took some work to hook up. But when it's working, it's working. I never noticed any delays, any loss of precision or reaction speed, it works just fine several meters from the receiver, and the battery life beats the old ones.

    I still have the receiver of the old 'proprietary wireless' mouse plugged in. It has a charger built in, and I have two sets of accumulators for the bluetooth mouse - one in the mouse, one in the charger.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  73. Bluetooth, of course! by Adarsh+R · · Score: 1

    I have a Targus wireless Bluetooth mouse which I use extensively. The biggest reason for me to go for this is that my laptop has just 2 USB ports and I didn't want to sacrifice one just for the sake of a mouse. The mouse comes with AAA rechargeable batteries that can be charged using a USB cable that the manufacturer has provided. Fair enough for me!

  74. MS-Mag-Tech vs XP vs Win7 by pg--az · · Score: 1

    Having aging vision, I can no longer live without the proprietary(?) "Magnifier" technology which I get with the itty-5th-button on my Microsoft "Wireless Intellimouse Explorer 2.0". On Windows-XP it is instant GLASSY-SMOOTH magnification even as you continue to move the cursor. Evidently there are problems with the fancy compositing technology because it just doesn't work as smoothly under Vista or Windows-7.
    Actually I am not sure this excellent technology is totally proprietary, as long as I get it for free with my mouse I need not research further - but I would of course be interested in any insight on this.

    1. Re:MS-Mag-Tech vs XP vs Win7 by Meneguzzi · · Score: 1

      You can get something very similar (in purpose) in the Mac OS, if you hold the control button and scroll, it will zoom in and out of the area under the cursor, no need for fancy mice here.

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
  75. Consider your surroundings by Xanlexian · · Score: 1

    For the longest time, I've searched for a decent left-handed ergonomic mouse. Well, I settled on the Logitech MX-610. It has a little proprietary 2.4GHz dongle. I found the mouse to be horribly jerky in movement, the pointer jumps, button clicks sometimes just don't respond. I found to solve this I had to use an USB extension cord and keep the receiver TAPED to the side of the mouse (losing the 'ergonomics' of the mouse itself). I called Logitech and they said I had a faulty dongle.

    They shipped me an entirely new package -- mouse, dongle, manual, the whole retail package (FANTASTIC customer support!!) however, I had the same problem. I found it was my wireless router in the other room. I've got four computers that are wireless and a Playstation 3 using WiFi. When there is NO network traffic, the mouse works perfectly!

    So, keep that in mind. If you're using all 5GHz stuff, you should be fine. In my case, I have a couple of PDAs that I use that are 802.11b only. But be mindful of your router!!

    --
    "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
  76. cordless mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russians just use a corded mouse

  77. Questions about wireless mice by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a wireless mouse because using the pad on the eeePC is annoying (just like for all laptops and netbooks). Whilst I decided on a USB wireless mouse based on it's looks and how it feels in the hand, one bit of information I looked for was VERY difficult to find online. There is no discussion on the security of using a wireless mouse as opposed to a wired one.

    I would never use a wireless keyboard in case your keypresses could be intercepted, but there is so little information on the security of wireless devices like mice or keyboards. Range is not mentioned, transmission power is not mentioned, is it really a good idea to bathe yourself with more radio waves all day?

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  78. went back to cords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The apple mouse is crap, I've had two. The MS basic optical cordless of a few years ago was great and batteries lasted forever. but I wanted a smooth, heavy, industrial mouse so I went back to a corded G9 logitech mouse. I have a wireless bluetooth keyboard, which is nice to use, but you have to remember to turn it off.

  79. Trackball makes the wire "just there", a !problem by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Before going out and buying anything, ask yourself why you want wireless.

    I've been using a Marble Mouse---don't let the name fool you, it's a wired trackball---for some years now. In normal use, my wire just lies still on my table.

    If getting rid of wires is a Good Thing with mice, I assume it's because when you move the mouse you also move the wire, and the movement (not the mere presence) of the wire is what's really annoying. That's how I remember my personal experience too, but don't trust my memory too much :)

    So, if you want to get rid of moving wires, trackballs are also worthy of consideration.

    And really, isn't that all you want from a wireless mouse: not having the wire move? Or do you want to point and click while lying in your couch? I can recommend a wiimote for that, use some candles or other infrared sources as a sensor bar :)

  80. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

    The other really annoying thing with Mac Keyboards is that there isn't a # key. Makes it a pain to write code when you have to press alt-3 every time.

  81. my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have two mice that I've been switching between -- a microsoft laser mouse 5000 and since I just got a razer mamba I've been using that. Both use proprietary connection protocols.

    The microsoft laser mouse pairs instantly, but, it takes a lot of effort to actually press the mouse button. The razer has much smoother tracking.

  82. Re:Trackball makes the wire "just there", a !probl by Meneguzzi · · Score: 1

    Actually, I don't mind the wire that much when I'm working from home, I have a very good gaming mouse from Logitech there. My problem is that this mouse (and it's wire) are very bulky when I am traveling, and not only the weight and volume of a full wired mouse impacts me, but the whole process of packing up to leave a place I park myself to work is more annoying with the having to wrap wires. Although the weight factor might not seem a lot, it's by saving in every small detail when packing that you get a lot less weight in your travel package.

    --
    www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
  83. bluetooth keyboard/trackpad under linux... by pointbeing · · Score: 1

    I use this one on my htpc -

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823111040

    Funny, I wrote a review of this product but the product now shows zero reviews ;-)

    Anyway, this keyboard is tiny and has some compromises, like a shift key only on the left side of the keyboard. There is no configuration utility for the trackpad which irritates me - and Synaptics or Alps utilities just don't work.

    But - I love this little keyboard. I wouldn't write a novel on a keyboard that's about the same size as a netbook and sometimes it takes two or three tries to connect, but battery life on the keyboard has been good and if I had it do do over again I might buy something a little bigger, but this one works pretty well.

    I did my research and bought a Bluetooth dongle I knew worked under Linux and the whole thing was pretty much plug and play.

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
    1. Re:bluetooth keyboard/trackpad under linux... by tuffy · · Score: 1

      Lenovo makes a similar trackpoint/trackpad USB keyboard that's compact, but still quite usable and with built-in mouse capabilities.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  84. For laptops, get a MoGo mouse by SoapBox17 · · Score: 1

    I use a MoGo mouse with my laptop. Its a tiny rechargeable mouse that first in the PC Card/x54 slot in the side and recharges there. So it's storage is *inside* the computer which is pretty cool. It uses bluetooth for connection, and I've never had any issues with it.

    I don't know how the battery life is though, all I know is it outlasts my laptop and I put it back in its slot and they both charge at the same time.

    I love that little thing.

    1. Re:For laptops, get a MoGo mouse by tyldis · · Score: 1

      Mine was utter crap. Not very precise, intermittent dropouts, need to re-pair often... That was almost 2 years ago, it might work better now.

    2. Re:For laptops, get a MoGo mouse by Jason69 · · Score: 1

      I highly recommend the Mogo as well. I've been using mine for about a year and it's fantastic. It also has a presenter mode that lets me easily run slide shows and includes a red LED pointer. It's always with my laptop and always ready to use.

  85. Bluetooth Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used a bluetooth mouse with a iMac and Macbook you years with no problem pairing, Make sure you turn off wake on bluetooth or macbook will restart from sleep when mouse turns off. I have found battey life to be poor with bluetooth I use recharables now,Using Kensington mouse.

  86. You go, thinkpad bt laser mouse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a ThinkPad Bluetooth Laser Mouse and used it for some months, and it's the best mouse I've ever user. Strangely nice rubberlike cover material, and overkill build quality ("built like a tank" as the review puts it).

    Review that I think is fair:
    http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4407

    Lenovo's shop's page:
    http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/controller/e/web/LenovoPortal/en_US/catalog.workflow:item.detail?GroupID=38&Code=41U5008&current-category-id=E9ADAEB6787146E29B78400A33E7FE8A

  87. Laser Bluetooth from Logitech by jprupp · · Score: 0

    I have a Logitech laser bluetooth mouse. I can't overstate how good it is. First it's Bluetooth, so I never worry about plugging dongles in my laptop, second, it's laser, so a couple of batteries last for over SIX months, I use it for a couple of hours a day in average. I never turn it off. I don't even have to think that it's there, just reach for it while I'm using the computer. This kind of invisible almost magic technology is what everything should be.

  88. My experiences by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    I use a Mac and went with a Bluetooth mouse after using a USB one with a Mac and PC.

    I tried the Mighty Mouse but did not like it, mainly because I prefer the multiple button design common on PC mice.

    I use a MS Bluetooth Mouse 5000 - which I like because it is small and hence easy to carry around. I really don't miss any of the more advanced features some mice have since I mostly use it for browsing (page forward / back) and Office tasks which don't need a lot of buttons in general use.

    Why bluetooth? No need for dongles - I use the mouse and my Targus pointer concurrently to run presentations and don't have two dongles to connect. Plus, there no dongle to lose if I forget to remove it from the PC (sometimes I use someone else's PC to run a presentation); although you will have to pair the mouse and need a PC with Bluetooth to be able to use it on someone else's PC.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  89. USB wireless mouse, wifi mouse. by kholburn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have wanted something simple for a while now. I don't understand why it isn't obvious. I want a wireless and USB mouse. A wireless mouse that you can plug into USB (it has a normal USB socket on it where a mouse cable might be. The USB cable charges it when it's plugged in and you can still use it while it's charging.

    How hard would this be?

    Oh and I used to use a thing called synergy to allow a mouse and keyboard from one desktop to be used on another. What about a wifi mouse eh?

  90. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    The other difference is that there is one extra key on en-GB and all other European keyboards vs en-US.

    Shift 3 gets you a # symbol on en-US keyboards. On en-GB it gets you a £ symbol. The # is on the extra key next to the Enter key.

    Alt-Gr 4 gets you a € symbol on en-GB keyboards. I don't think it does anything on en-US keyboards.

  91. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by Lord+of+the+Wazz · · Score: 1

    On UK Apple keyboards, @ is Shift+2 (i.e. same as US). On every other UK keyboard, the same key combination gives you "

  92. Bluetooth every time... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    I am Mac sysadmin. I admin about 50 Macs in a design agency. The Apple Mac Mighty Mouse is usually the first thing that the designers throw out (bad form factor, cramps in the hands, poor right click functionality, the scroll ball gums up far too often and is difficult to clean, the cord is far too short etc) and the wireless mouse compounds all of that with terribly poor battery life and bad response times. The only way it'll be useful is if you use rechargeable batteries.

    Do yourself a favour: get a Logitech RF wireless, whichever one suites your tastes. They have fantastic battery life (8 months on my Logitech LX7 ) and Logitech almost certainly has one that will fit in your hands. Personally, I love the hard rubber grip on the sides of their mice.

    The downside is reciever that you need a USB receiver for them.

    I won't argue with your comment regarding the form factor of the Mighty Mouse but I still like it because it doesn't take up much space. Also the MM still runs if you only put only one battery in it, none of my Logitech wireless mice did that. The MM can be flaky, my first MM had flaky right button functionality, the replacement worked fine. I like compact Notebooks and ancillary equipment and when it comes to compactness you can either have your cake or eat it, not both.

    Regarding whether one should get a USB wireless mouse or a Bluetooth mouse I would without hesitation recommend to Meneguzzi that he get a Bluetooth mouse. I have had two of the Logitech wireless notebook mice with USB receivers that I have used with Macs. When the USB receiver was removed both of them regularly caused kernel panics in OS X and Flaky behavior when used with Windows. The connection reliability of Bluetooth vs. USB-wireless is in my experience about the same. Also it is way to easy to lose the USB key (thus, AFAIK, bricking the mouse) which is a problem you don't have with Bluetooth.

    Recommending wireless mice often gets you critical comments from gamers. My answer is simple, if you want to to play a lot of games, especially 1st person shooters get a corded mouse or a game pad. My personal choice when ever rarely I play 1st person shooters is an old corded Logitech "gaming" mouse. Wireless mice are hopeless for anything other than strategy games like Civilization, WOW and I have also heard somewhat unfavorable comments from people who require a high degree of mouse precision in things like CAD and Photo processing apps. If you do use a wireless mouse for "gaming" then do keep an eye on the battery level, you might find your self out of juice at a critical moment and there is nothing more fantastic than the incandescent fury of WOW fanatic who misses an important moment due to equipment failure.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Bluetooth every time... by LiquidFire_HK · · Score: 1

      I hear the gaming argument all the time, but I don't understand it. I have a Logitech RF mouse and it seems just as instantly responsive as any corded mouse. I also play FPSes and I don't see a difference there. Granted, I'm not the type that scores a headshot the moment 1 pixel of the opponent is visible on the opposite side of the map, but I really don't see what corded mice have over wireless ones for gaming, they seem identical to me.

      As for the battery thing - I can see how that could be an issue, though my Logitech LX5 uses 2 AAs which last for at least 4 months, and it has a warning light that lights up about a week before the mouse actually starts showing symptoms of low batteries so you have plenty of time to replace them.

    2. Re:Bluetooth every time... by bemenaker · · Score: 1

      Gaming at home on a wireless mouse is ok, I do notice a slight lag on it compared to wired. But if you ever go to a big gaming tournament or gathering were there are lots of wireless mice in the room, they become useless. I switched back to wired on my gaming rig for those two reasons.

    3. Re:Bluetooth every time... by LiquidFire_HK · · Score: 1

      Oh I see, didn't think of places with lots if wireless mice before. Thanks for the explanation.

    4. Re:Bluetooth every time... by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      I guess the lag is related to distance. If the mouse is close to the reciever, things go well because you don't get too much "lost packets"

      I saw it happening today during one presentation I gave. The mouse was really far from the reciever and it was hard to use it to point at large thing on the slide

      --
      -- dnl
  93. Re:Good proprietary RF is much better than Bluetoo by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    However, I think the default turd Logitech drivers set this up differently, where you push the scroll wheel to toggle scroll modes, instead of having it auto-sense by the force of your scroll. [...] The cool way I have it set up might be a feature of my driver, Steermouse.

    On Windows, it's a standard feature of Logitech's drivers. You can also set different scroll modes for different applications.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  94. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

    And the whole £ vs # issue. And the placement of the \ key is a whole lot more sensible. And the return key is double height, which is VERY useful!

  95. Three by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Mac OS X long ago learned to cope with mice sporting more than one button. OS X even does The Right Thing (context menus) with the secondary mouse button by default.

    Actually it recognises three: if you are in the terminal you can select some text and past it at the prompt with the middle mouse button.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  96. Microsoft Bluetooth Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently bought a Microsoft Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000, and I must say I'm amazed. The only downside is the wake up time, which is only half a second. It's a great mouse, comfortable even for me (I have a big hand), trackball has a great feeling and it's so easy to install and use. Not having a dongle is a big plus too. Too new to judge battery life though. And the price, 35 bucks. Not too expensive...

  97. Rocketfish and Logitech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For my laptop, I use the white Rocketfish BT mouse. This gives me good response, good battery life, and short wakeup time (next to none).

    Given that I am constantly on the go, I do not want to mess with a dongle hanging out the side of my laptop when I have to plop the laptop out on a job site.

    For my desktop, I use my tried and true Logitech wireless MX Rechargeable.

  98. Multitouch trackapad ftw by jurv!s · · Score: 1

    If you've got a newer MBP with a multitouch trackpad, I can't understand why you'd ever want a mouse. From two-finger scrolling and two-finger clicking to three-finger gestures and beyond, I've never wanted to go back to a mouse. I feel the multitouch trackpad is the best input device improvement since the original mouse.

    --
    sigs are for fools and trolls. no signature is *always* appropriate. you should turn them off in your preferences.
  99. No-Lag Performance Is Why We Buy Faster Computers by randyjparker · · Score: 1
    Most of us spend money to get computers that don't "get in the way" of our work with irritating lag. We spend hundreds of dollars for faster CPUs and more memory to avoid breaking the flow.

    Wireless mice and keyboards add annoying delays several times per hour. My anecdotal experience is that Bluetooth is significantly worse than proprietary RF. Is it the protocol, or the drivers? The original poster is right - there is no good survey of this problem, and no explanation from the vendors. I'd expect them to compete on reducing this problem, because it far exceeds the "break the flow" delays I suffer from any other part of my system (except for Comcast!)

    I have a Microsoft 8000 Bluetooth keyboard / mouse on my Macbook Pro, and I'm pretty sure I'd be better off with a corded keyboard and Logitech proprietary wireless mouse.

    My interest in wireless keys & mouse is eliminating some wire-plugging every time I move my laptop between home & office. Now I think a USB hub is a better solution.

  100. Why I stay wired at work by houghi · · Score: 1

    At home I use a wireless trackball. At work I use a wired trackball. The reason is that at one point or another, the batteries go flat and you can't work anymore. Obviously at just that moment you will need to finish a report and there are no other batteries available.

    At home I just stop doing what I was doing on the computer and do something else while the batteries recharge.

    So whatever you decide, keep that in mind as well.

    Concerning the use of an extra USB port you should look how often it happens that you don't have enough or use them all. Also look at how your ports are positioned and how large the USB dongle is. I have three ports on my portable, but often can only use 2, because the USB keys overlap the middle one.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  101. Bluetooth. You have no other choice. by Tomsk70 · · Score: 0

    If you're intending to use the mouse in a living room environment, where the mouse may be some metres away from the receiver, it's a no-brainer.

    I went through every wireless k/b+mouse setup available when they first became available, and found that if I wanted to use the mouse on a heavy oak table (or similar), the signal would be blocked.

    Then the next-gen of k/b+mouse setups came out - and as they'd nearly all reduced their range (the assumption being that you'd be sitting at the desk anyway), they were even worse.

    Then I got Logitech's first Bluetooth offering, and have never looked back. I don't have to worry about what my device is sitting on or behind - I can turn the volume up or down *from the toilet* (=2 rooms away), in a 130yr old house with THICK walls - never mind being in the same room.

    The same goes for the M$ version - once you're onto bluetooth, those previous worries disappear.

    One thing to watch - security. All the BT offerings will work out-of-the-box, but unless you install the s/w and 'pair' the device, you're open to having your typing monitored...

  102. I have used the Logitech Bluetooth with a MacBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used the Logitech LZ548AP Bluetooth mouse daily with a MacBook Pro for 2.5 years... I first got the Apple wireless optical and it was too lame to suck another mouse's ball, virtually everything was wrong with it, so I opted for the Logitech. At the time they only came in a darker grey, some time later they started making an identical model in a silver that matches the MacBookPro's aluminum color scheme, if you care about such things. Oh, and while my Logitech mouse was en-route, Apple made a big splashy announcement about the Mighty Mouse - which I must admit is not as lame as it's predecessor, it can at least suck its own ball.

    So, both the Mighty Mouse and the Logitech suffer from what I refer to as Mac Bluetooth Lag - this is something I experience daily on boot-up, where the bluetooth devices (I also have an Apple BT keyboard), just don't start working until 10, 20, sometimes 60 seconds after bootup. Clicking on the buttons seems to wake them faster, so that makes it an interactive problem you'll notice every time you boot up, if you just ignore it, they save some delay until you've interacted with them, then they make you wait just a little longer just so you know they're not working when you want them to. I'd attribute this to my noisy RF environment at work, but it's actually something about the MacBook Pro - it also happens at home.

    Bluetooth radio range with the 2006 MBP varies from poor to shockingly short. Range seems to decrease as the batteries age, so when you have to place the mouse in contact with the notebook for it to function, you know it's time for a fresh set of batteries (NiMHs seem to last about 4-6 weeks per charge, which says more about the batteries and my usage patterns than the mouse, but that's what I'm living with.) Even with a fresh set of batteries, I max out at about 4 feet at work and maybe 10 feet range at homes, I suppose due to the heavy RF environment at work, though my new Vaio gets 10' or more at work with the same mouse - go figure. Either way, 4' is plenty of mouse range for my desk, so that doesn't bother me.

    Response time on the Logitech Bluetooth is adequate for normal office work and graphic design type stuff (like defining an outline path in photo-editing), but not so great for games - if you are serious about games, stay wired - a $20 wired laser-mouse will out-perform anything wireless.

    An earlier poster mentions that the multitouch trackpad is so good that you don't need a mouse, and that's sort of true for me, I leave the mouse (and keyboard) at work and just use the built-ins at home. But, for me, the ergonomics of having a mouse in the right hand and having the right hand wherever I want it (and if I have to say "on the desk", dear reader, it is you who has the sick mind) is worth the hassle of changing batteries once a month or so.

    The major reason I stick with the Bluetooth accessory items is the "cool factor" of not having a dongle to mess with / lose, etc. In my opinion, that's a biggie. For the PS3, I got a long-range wireless keyboard/mouse with a dongle that easily covers the living room and all adjacent rooms too - but that's a different application, the PS3 hasn't moved from its shelf since we got it - it bugs me a little that the dongle could get detatched and lost or dunked, thus hosing the keyboard and mouse in one fell stroke (5 and 7 year olds, and their friends, have done stranger things) but that hasn't happened yet. My notebook is another thing altogether, it travels every day and is setup for use probably 500 times a year between home and work, so I really don't want the dongle thingy to worry about in the notebook's world.

  103. Re:Good proprietary RF is much better than Bluetoo by NightLamp · · Score: 1

    I have been using a Radtech BT600 (http://www.radtech.us/Products/BT600.aspx) for a couple of weeks now and I am very impressed, it nicely addresses your USB charging issue and, in a pinch you can use it as a USB mouse also.

    The build quality is very good, a solid mouse though it is a little on the small side it doesn't weigh very much and even though I have a lot of bluetooth devices it can pair with it consistently chooses the right one.

    Installation was perhaps the smoothest I have ever experienced (Vista x64) - I paired it with the computer and everything just started working within 5 seconds.

    It has a convenient recessed off switch on the top, time between on/off switching is about 1 second. Tracking is on par with my favorite wired Intellimouse. The buttons are nice, not too sensitive the left/right are a bit loud, the side buttons are a bit stiff but not bad and the wheel is quiet with a good feel.

    I don't know much about the battery life but one review claimed 2 weeks with it switched on all the time.

    All in all I am very happy with this mouse.

  104. bluetooth mice can lag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my biggest issue with bluetooth mice is they are a bit laggy compared to say a logitech with the proprietary dongle. Bluetooth seems to drop out a bit more.

    suffisive to say, i would never trust a bluetooth mouse for quake or photoshop...maybe just every day things like the internet

    For keyboards its another story, bluetooth works great

  105. Apple Wireless Keyboard / Mouse Combo by LSU_ADT_Geek · · Score: 1

    I have used my Apple-branded wireless keyboard / mouse combo (Bluetooth) for a year now and can tell you how it has measured up:

    1. Difficulty repairing Bluetooth connection upon changing batteries

    I don't know what the deal with this is, but I end up having to reboot because it doesn't pair up with my iMac upon changing the battery.

    2. Right click on mouse is a little eh.

    If you train yourself to hit the far right of the mouse, then it works fine 98% of the time.

    3. Side squeeze takes some effort and not really worth it

    I have remapped my mouse such that Expose uses the middle click whereas Spaces takes the squeeze. I hardly ever use it.

    4. Some people have problems with the keyboard due to size and key spacing.

    I haven't had any issues with it but I know my cubemate complains about it all the time due to his sausage fingers.

    5. Lacks home / end / page up / page down / delete keys.

    I really had to learn some strange ways of replicating these keys with the Apple wireless keyboard. If these are a must for you, then do go with Apple wireless keyboard.

    6. Lightweight

    This thing is really light and if you want something stylish, then it is a double win.

  106. Re:Some things to look out for with wireless mice. by Spatial · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's 'Wireless Notebook Mouse 5000' is the one I recommend, after getting it on recommendation from others. It only takes a moment to wake up from long periods of inactivity, has a power switch and is just a plain good mouse regardless of wireless considerations.

  107. jmo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say it depends on what you are using it for--if you use the mouse pretty much continuously for large stretches then a bluetooth would be fine. If you use it only occasionally and use the keyboard more, go for the standard RF and suck up the USB port. It also depends on how many ports you have available. If you are already using most of your ports, that kind of changes things. I would definitely say go with Logitech, regardless of which you choose--they have a wide variety of mice and they are all quality.

  108. RF and signal noise by griffinme · · Score: 1

    I loved the Logitek wireless keyboard and mouse so much I got another for my wife. She kept having issues with the mouse and keyboard going crazy. Finally replaced them on her computer. Only later did I realize that the real problem was a baby monitor.

    --
    Is he strong? Listen bud, He's got radioactive blood.
  109. Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by Velska1 · · Score: 1

    I am not familiar with Mighty Mouse (other than the ancient cartoon), wireless or not, but an optical mouse doesn't need a mouse pad.

    Now, I do know that some iMacs come with a classic mouse with a rubbery surface-tracking ball that is picky about the surfaces you use it on, in addition to being insanely sensitive to a little dust. The only surface an optical mouse usually doesn't work on is a high-polish extremely smooth reflective one. My matte-formica-like tabletop is ideal.

    So no mouse pad needed.

    --
    Every problem has a solution that is simple, easy and wrong. Selling our Liberty for a little Security is a much too de
    1. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by mmarlett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, no, iMacs come with optical mice. Apple doesn't sell any other type and hasn't for a few years.

      I had a boss who insisted on outfitting me with an all (clear) glass desk and a wireless mouse and keyboard. The glass desk made the optical mouse about worthless -- I had to get a mouse pad. But even worse was that I was working sometimes 18 hours a day, and the wireless mouse and keyboard were constantly running out of power. I had to get a bunch of rechargeable batteries and a station, but eventually I just replaced them with a wired set because it was just a pain in the ass and I didn't care about how it looked. It took my boss eight months to use up the batteries in his wireless mouse, though. That probably says something ...

      I still use a mouse pad no matter what the surface is, though, because I find that any uneven or slightly reflective surface makes the pointer jump. The semi-gloss desk at my new job is just terrible for the optical mouse -- and my wife gave me this neat-looking mouse pad that is glossy and has the same problem.

    2. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by Chruisan · · Score: 1

      Use a mouse pad because spouses tend to leave pretzel crumbs and and spill ice cream on the desk. This really tends to gum up the feet on an optical mouse.

    3. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by Creepy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd say your assertion depends on the surface and mouse - my LED optical mouse fails to read either on my glass covered kitchen table or my black computer desk. My newer laser optical mouse fails to read on the glass table but handles the black desk just fine.

      From my experience, Bluetooth tends to eat more power than proprietary standards, but proprietary is less compatible than other standards. Bluetooth did come up with a low power spec recently, but I doubt there are any devices out that use it. I get about a week of use on my proprietary Bluetooth Logitech mouse (but incidentally, I have the same non-bluetooth mouse on another computer and it gets about the same). My proprietary and newer Logitech laser mouse gets about 5-6 months on two AAA batteries (the package said it could last a year).

    4. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      mia culpa - I have the older version of that mouse that takes AAA batteries (the newer version is AA).

    5. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Tell your boss the wireless mouse you have is a problem and have him get you a wireless mouse/keyboard that dock.

      If your boss is spending that kind of cash just for looks (all glass tables aren't cheap, and I'd wager he got tempered glass for the table top since plate glass scratches easilly), he'll probably go for it, because docked wireless mice/keyboard combos tend to look pretty slick.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    6. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by mmarlett · · Score: 1

      Oh, he was a well-meaning idiot. Water under the bridge.

    7. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      It took my boss eight months to use up the batteries in his wireless mouse, though. That probably says something ...

      He knows how to use keyboard shortcuts and doesn't use the mouse for absolutely everything? I rarely touch the mouse if I can help it. I hate taking my hand off the keyboard.

    8. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by mmarlett · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, he only used his with his laptop, which has an easy-to-use keypad. I, on the other hand, was doing things such as story editing, php code marathons, page layout in InDesign and image manipulation in Photoshop -- some of which can involve very fine-tuned mouse control. Actually, when I story edit, I highlight the paragraph I'm reading with a triple-click, so that uses some clicks, too.

      I'm so tuned into my keyboard shortcuts I sometimes can't talk other people through simple tasks because I don't have any idea where it is on the menu and really don't "know" what the keyboard shortcut is except by muscle memory. I once was extremely tired and said something very stupid to a coworker. I immediately gestured in the air with a thumb-down-middle-finger-flick-forward -- an air-Command-Z undo. Thankfully I was talking to a fellow designer who just burst into complete laughter because she knew exactly what I was doing.

    9. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you've tried any of the new laser mice, but they should work more reliably on glossy, glassy, patterned, or uneven surfaces. They use the laser speckle effect, which occurs on almost any reflective surface, to provide positioning information. A typical optical mouse calculates position by simply taking high-speed photos of the surface it's sitting on, so it can have problems with clear, very featureless, or some patterned surfaces.

      --
      Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    10. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by argiedot · · Score: 1

      I got a shiny mouse pad too. Solution: I flipped mine over. The other side was black.

    11. Re:Why on Earth a Mouse Pad? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a wireless keyboard that had good keys or a good layout. Probably because Sun and IBM haven't made one yet.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  110. All wireless mice can lag. by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

    IMHO virtually every (on topic) issue here is about implementation details. Sure any wireless mouse can lag if you develop it to be highly CPU dependent (currently running Fah with 100% CPU use and no noticeable difference in mouse tracking).

    It's probably better to talk about specific models rather than talk about generic things like BT vs. prop wireless.

    For example I use a Microsoft Wireless Notebook Presenter 8000. It seems to work flawlessly as a mouse - it's not really a great presentation tool though - although it is fun to have a laser pointer built in.

    I bought it mostly because it is small and doesn't use a dongle (although it comes with one if you don't have BT).

    It also seems resilient to ambient wireless noise. There is a bank of Macs in the hallway behind my office and I can see them all when I try to pair it (as well 802.11abg is running in the area).

  111. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Mac OS 7.5 long ago (1994) learned to cope with mice sporting more than one button.

    Fixed that for ya.

  112. Logitech MX5000 Bluetooth Desktop by DJGrahamJ · · Score: 1

    I picked this up a couple of years ago and the mouse works really well. The keyboard isn't compatible with OSX and has Logitech's lame ins/del/home/end/pgup/down layout which as a programmer I simply can't use so I sold it off. I'm still very much enjoying the mouse though.

  113. Less RF interference with Bluetooth by W2IRT · · Score: 1

    One huge advantage of Bluetooth over conventional wireless mice for me is their lack of susceptibility to RF interference in the HF spectrum.

    Conventional wireless keyboards and mice operate at about 27 MHz (very close to CB frequencies, just between CB and the 10m amateur band). As an amateur radio operator using high-power HF, if I use my wireless mouse while I'm transmitting anywhere from 18 to 28 MHz, the mouse (or keyboard) loses communication with the base receiver immediately on key-down and takes a while to come back after I un-key. Using bluetooth (which, IIRC, is in the 5.8 GHz range) this isn't an issue.

    --
    Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
  114. Yea, wireless mice did suck about 5 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously -- this is the argument that I hear from people over and over again, but you really have NO idea what you're talking about...

    When's the last time you used a this-gen wireless mouse?

    I have a VX Nano (first gen) from Logitech, and it it great. I can find no difference between it and a wired mouse. The batteries last like 6 months, and you can go for like a week after the low battery indicator comes up.

    Also, the Nano has a "search" button on top right behind the scroll wheel, and mapping that button to "middle-click" is stupidly easy, so I've had a middle mouse button from day one.

    Also, do they even make IR cordless mice anymore? The Nano has a receiver so small that I've never taken it off of my laptop, and it's RF. I've plugged my laptop into my LCD TV and used the mouse from like 15 feet away on the couch...

    Lastly, organized and "wire" don't go in the same sentence. My receiver, when I do remove it to go to another computer, stores INSIDE my mouse. No chance of loosing it, and my cat won't eat the cord.

    WIRELESS MICE 4 EVER!!11!!!

  115. Oh it gets worse. by Benanov · · Score: 1

    My ancient ThinkPad A22m has only one.

    Then again it doesn't have BT either, but at least the BT dongle can talk to more than one device at a time.

    1. Re:Oh it gets worse. by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Well technically a USB port can serve a number of devices if you use a hub but it all gets a bit clumsy.

      The Macbook air only has one, which is a completely baffling design choice.

  116. Proprietary wireless by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    I own two wireless mice, one by Logitech (part of a a combo set containing a wireless keyboard) and the other by (gasp!) Microsoft. Both of these things worked with my Debian laptop right out of the box. I hadn't bothered with getting a Bluetooth interface when I bought my laptop.

    I just bought a laptop for my synagogue and got the "XP downgrade". While choosing components and accessories, I noticed two things: that the Bluetooth software needed on the laptop depended on whether I was getting XP or Vista, and that the same Microsoft mouse I own was going to cost half what the Bluetooth mouse was going to cost. I chose the proprietary mouse.

    My wife has a Bluetooth mouse she bought at my suggestion for her XP laptop, and she has never reported any problem with it; however, I don't think she uses it much, as I found it behind the couch the other day.

    It seems to me that these proprietary wireless things must do more of their processing in hardware than on the CPU, and I continue to by mystified as to why the proprietary devices continue to be significantly cheaper than the open standard ones.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  117. I've used both on the Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem I have had with Bluetooth though is the "bus" or bandwidth boggs down when I have my cell tethered. Mousing becomes almost impossible do to it's erratic behavior. Pairing via Bluetooth is more of a hassle but only by a step or two. Pairing via RF doesn't involve the OS/CPU and for me has always been simple. Press the button on the mouse and the receiver and they find each other without software.

    Cheers
    Link33

  118. Having worked at Logitech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...I had tons of Mice to play with (though I wasn't in their mouce/keyboard) department.

    Anyhow, Here is what I can tell based on experience and currently owning and using both Bluetooth and Wireless mouse from Logitech. On Mac and PC.

    - Logitech Wireless technology is very mature, almost flawless, offers more bandwidth to mouse than Bluetooth, helps in gaming.
    - Bluetooth mice have a very slight lag at start of mouse movement, u become accustomed to it in a day or so. Almost as if they were in sleep mode and had to wakeup.
    - If you game, stick with wireless, lag will drive you in sane.
    - Battery life is effected more by Laser or Optical vs Bluetooth or Wireless. I can't notice much of a difference.
    - I don't charge either of the mouse for weeks (they are both laser). Use them for few hours every day. they charge in under an house when the battery is down.
    - I repeat, if gaming, stay away from Bluetooth
    - On my PC (though never on Mac), the damn Bluetooth mouse sometimes hangs. Possible Bluetooth drivers, but I can't say.
    - Oh Pairing, thats a bitch. Consider a keyboard and a bluetooth mouse, its not paired to your mac, so you either use shortcuts to get it to pair with your mac, or use another temporary mouse. Problem is compounded if keyboard is also bluetooth. You basically have no way to tell your MAc what to do, unless you hook up another keyboard/mouse.
    - On Linux, stick with wireless, it is detected as any good old USB mouse.

    If you can spare a USB, go with Wireless.
    If that slight lag at start is a non-issue, once paired to a Mac, the BT mouse works great, without issues.

  119. I'm about to use "the" bad word... by singingjim1 · · Score: 0
    Microsoft. Once you're over the shock of seeing that word on \., maybe you'll take my advice and just get one of their wireless meeces. I've been using them for years and they have never let me down and the battery life of the latest one I got is phenomenal. Just ignore the "low battery" warnings for, oh, say, 6 months and you'll be fine. The only flaw that I can see is that they must have some sort of deal with battery manufacturers to prematurely warn you that the battery is low. I just wait until the pointer stops moving - which it never does if the batteries are good - and then I replace the batteries. IT'S JUST THAT EASY!!

    My Wireless Intellimouse Explorer 2.0 has worked flawlessly since the day I got it and I'm a graphic designer. (That'll be 50 bucks, Bill)

  120. ot: sad but amusing cordless mouse story by pointbeing · · Score: 1

    As I said in another thread I work for Your Federal Government. Part of my job is to approve hardware and software procurements for this 3,500 user federal agency.

    Sometime ago I get a requisition for a cordless mouse with an ergonomic assessment attached. An ergonomic assessment is filled out by a healthcare professional and exaplins why you might need a trackball, an ergonomic keyboard, a huge monitor and so on - and if you need ergonomic accomodations I think you should have them.

    Anyway, I get a requisition for a cordless mouse with an ergonomic assessment signed by the head nurse. I call the head nurse and explain that this is ridiculous since mice move in a single plane and that this request (not her assessment) is bullshit.

    Unfortunately I used the word "bullshit" in the conversation and HR got involved. In the end I had to apologize to the nurse, the user got the cordless mouse and the nurse told me that although mice do move in a single plane the cordless mouse keeps the user from acquiring or aggravating a repetitive stress because he doesn't have to untangle the mouse cord.

    I kid you not.

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
  121. My $0.02 (CDN) by FlyingOrca · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've used a LOT of mice over the years, and I went wireless way back. Currently I use a Logitech MX Revolution on my main home machine and another on my work notebook when it's docked. For travel, I use a Logitech V470. I'm no hardcore gamer, but the Revolution has always performed very well in every application up to and including casual gaming. The V470 is my second Bluetooth mouse (on my second Bluetooth notebook) and also performs very well.

    I use my notebook all day every day at work, so I only get about a week of battery life out of the office Revolution, but it charges fairly quickly and I always have the Bluetooth mouse for backup if the Revolution runs low while I'm working. No manual switching necessary, it just works. The V470 runs on AAs, and I have yet to need a battery change, but I've only had it for a few months.

    The one thing that will drive you crazy with some Logitech wireless mice, the MX Revolution among them, is their crappy charger design. I love the mouse, but you have to keep the charging contacts very clean (especially on the mouse, where a small pencil eraser helps) and fiddle with placement in the charging cradle waaaaay more than you should, especially with an older one. It's enough of a problem that I've seriously considered "acquiring" some electrolytic paste (like they use on ECG contacts) to make charging easier. That being said, it's still worth it.

    To zero in on your original question - I would avoid USB dongles unless they are tiny enough that you can leave them plugged in all the time. I killed my first notebook (the one before the one before this one) by plugging a USB dongle into it one or more times a day - eventually the USB port separated from the motherboard, and everything went to hell after that. This, incidentally, is why I use a dock at work... and why both of my subsequent notebooks have had Bluetooth and a Bluetooth mouse.

    So... I'd say go Bluetooth, and the V470 is a good choice if you're after a compact ambidextrous mouse with good battery life and a power switch (you want a power switch). Good luck!

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  122. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry to double post, but I have to correct the rest of your post now. Since Macs went to USB only for keyboard input, they've always been able to use standard USB PC keyboards. This is not a news flash, and isn't even really that impressive of a technical feat. USB--U, as in Universal...

    Also, it is a bit disingenuous to say the secondary mouse button context menus are on by default. You have to turn right click functionality on, because it is off by default, thus you can't see a menu that is invoked by a right click, even if contextual menus are on by default. Some of the smarter Apple Stores turn their floor models' right click on, but I've seen plenty of baffled potential customers trying to figure out how to right click on a Mac (thus perpetuating the 10+ year old myth that Macs only have one button).

  123. bluetooth seems to go further by amigabill · · Score: 1

    I have a multimedia computer in my living room, which is not right next to where I sit. Bluetooth seems to be better for across-the-room distance than RF. The RF keyboards/mice I tried could go a few feet, but were unreliable beyond that, and while fresh batteries made it seem OK, it wasn't long before they were no longer quite new enough to do it anymore. Bluetooth parts seem much better for that.

  124. Re: Blender by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    Never a truer word spoken. there are some apps, blender is mine in which the mighty mouse DOES NOT allow proper and smooth operation. I feel so stupid buying that wireless BT mighty mouse. what a waste for me. I use the Evoluent3 usb wireless. Love it. A lot of people don't know that if your USB mouse is in the Ghz frequency, you'll likely get just as much distance (20-30 ft) as BT. some mice you can get a really small USB dongle so they are nearly invisible with a rounded corner. It can stay plugged into a laptop and slip into a bag without hurting it. The evoluent doesn't have this good a dongle, but it works well anyway.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  125. Dell BT combo by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

    My Dell Bluetooth Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Bundle will occasionally "drop out" for no apparent reason. Each device dies separately and takes about 5 second to reconnect. The keyboard will occasionally get stuck with whatever key I was hitting in the "down" state, often Backspace, which erases everything I was typing. This leads to loud "aw aw aw!" outbursts, which confuse and annoy my co-workers. For the record, I did not pay $90 for the damn thing either. Dell gave us several as promotional gift a when they came out because we ordered several dozen desktops and laptops.

  126. Sorry bro by coryking · · Score: 1

    Us lefties are pretty much left in the dust with these new-fangled ergonomic mice deals. The last time I had the ability to use either hand for a mouse was about 5 years ago. These days, everybody has those thumb-buttons that are your back/forward button. Dunno how they'd make that work for both hands.

    I do miss the ability to swap the left/right mouse buttons when I went into left-hand mode. Anybody that tried using my computer would get very confused until they realized I was a lefty.

  127. Call me a skeptic by coryking · · Score: 1

    But to this day, getting a keyboard working in USB mode is still a hit and miss thing. What makes me think "they" can pull off a bluetooth keyboard that works the second I boot? Not bloody likely, I say.

    Something tells me PS2 will be around for a hell of a lot longer. Until they invent wireless PS2. Maybe.

    1. Re:Call me a skeptic by greed · · Score: 1

      Join us in OpenFirmware and EFI land, you'll like it.... USB keyboards work beautifully.

    2. Re:Call me a skeptic by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      The second you boot may be problematic indeed, which would mean you would have trouble entering the BIOS setup utility using the bluetooth keyboard, but once you are in, it should work.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    3. Re:Call me a skeptic by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      he was talking about bluetooth emulating usb, wasn't he?

  128. Logitech Trackman: Please make bluetooth version by alohatiger · · Score: 1

    The Trackman is the greatest pointer device ever made. And there's no bluetooth version. They have a dongle wireless version, which completely misses the point.

    If anybody hacked together a bluetooth trackman, I would pay $200 for it.

    --
    Bigtime Consulting - "We're the best because we cost the most"
  129. best whatnot? by Destoo · · Score: 1

    Your mouse should work perfectly on most whatnots.
    I especially recommend this one with ample room for all your accessories.

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  130. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

    How is a double-height return/enter key useful?

    (personally, I hate it because I hit it every time I mean to hit \ or |)

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
  131. MX Revolution BT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logitech sells a BT Keyboard/Mouse combo, and the mouse is a BT version of the MX *Revolution*, the fancy full-size mouse with the free-spinning wheel that will spin pretty much forever.

    The only downside is that you can only get this mouse in the bundle with the keyboard, so you'll end up spending way more than you probably want for just a mouse.

  132. Logitech V470 by rosshmusic · · Score: 1

    Never liked RF dongles... I have a V470 and love it. I rarely turn off the power switch and my battery lasts a couple months. I've been very happy with it. I also use a Apple Bluetooth mouse on my Mac Mini. Which seams to go through battery noticeably faster.

  133. For God's sake yes! by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

    Yes, the cord on my wireless Mighty Mouse is definitely short...

    Disagree on battery life - still on my first set of batteries after 15 months.

    Disagree on response times - seems as responsive as a wired mouse.

    My scroll ball hasn't gummed up, and the form factor is as good as any I've used. Right-clicking does take getting used to, but is fine once you learn it.

    --
    No sig? Sigh...
  134. Works great but sometimes doesn't connect at first by mikeru22 · · Score: 1

    I am using the Microsoft Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000 with my iMac. I find it's very sensitive, and after a 20 second or so "reconnect" phase after I come back to wake up my computer with the mouse, it works quite nicely. HOWEVER, sometimes I come back to my computer, and having switched off to save battery power, the mouse refuses to reconnect to the iMac. This forces me to manually reboot the machine and reconnect. This angered me so much. BUT IF YOU ARE USING A MAC LAPTOP, then you could simply use the trackpad to go to your Bluetooth preference pane and reconnect the damn thing. Sadly, my keyboard and mouse are both Bluetooth, so if this fails I feel like a person with no arms and legs...

    --
    Go study.
  135. Laser wireless - so far so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've a Logitech optical wireless mouse (MX-Laser 20X). It's been great except for a small issue with the usb driver. I fixed that by attaching a PS/2 adaptor and using the regular mouse port.

    Other than that it's been great. The charge lasts for days (10 days or more) before I have to set it in the cradle. And even then I've only to leave it there for a few minutes to get a usable charge. Plus the range is great. I like to watch TV shows on the internet so I just lay in bed and use the mattress as a mouse pad. It has a few extra buttons that I don't even use (not even in games) -- mainly because I'm not use to the buttons plus I've never learned to configure them in Linux (lazy).

    All and all it's been a very reliable mouse.

  136. Apple Wireless Mighty Mouse by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    No wake-up delay. It does occasionally fail to recognize right clicks, which can be solved by turning the mouse off and then on again. The scroll ball tends to trap dust and stop working, so you have to clean it every month or so. Battery life is 2-3 weeks on rechargeable batteries. My memory is that the battery life is longer on disposable alkalines, and extremely long on the included lithium batteries. If you boot into Windows using Boot Camp, you'll have to click and move the mouse around to get it to resync with the machine.

    I had a Logitech LX7 on my old PC before I upgraded to a Mac--it was a very nice, very ergonomic wireless mouse.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  137. BT mouse with a thumb 'back' button by chargen · · Score: 1

    I've had lots of problems finding decent BT mice. One thing I like in a mouse is a button that I can assign as a 'back' button for web browsing. Most BT mice are lacking in features (extra buttons and whatnot).

    The only possible reason I've been able to think of for BT mouse models being less popular is that perhaps additional licensing fees need to be paid by the manufacturer. Maybe there is enough demand that manufacturer's can't ignore the BT models, but not enough demand that they will make BT versions of the fancy wireless models.

    If I have built-in BT on my laptop I sure as heck don't want to dedicate a USB port to a stupid wireless dongle, no matter how small it is!

    -Pete

  138. Microsoft Notebook Wireless Bluetooth Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you get over the fact it's sold by Microsoft, it's a great little mouse. The extra button is very useful for Expose. I bought one for my MBP, and will probably get another for the desktop.

  139. Re:ot: sad but amusing cordless mouse story by maxume · · Score: 1

    So the sad part is that 4 people spent time dealing with an issue that might have saved $20 if you had successfully managed to maintain control of your fiefdom?

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  140. Don't waste money on a wireless mouse by hikerhat · · Score: 1

    I've used both types and a wired mouse is far superior and much cheaper. A bluetooth mouse does take too long to wake up, costs too much, and the batteries will die when you need them most. With a wireless mouse with a USB dongle you will lose the USB dongle. But before that happens your batteries will die when you need them the most. And it costs too much. Cheap wired mice weigh less, cost so little you don't worry about losing it, are durable, and always work perfectly.

  141. YES! by charlezhunt · · Score: 1

    Been using a Bluetooth mouse on my Macbook and love it. Doesn't use the USB and no problems moving the cursor where I want it to. Definately would recommend for a laptop.

    --
    ~~~ Charles Hunt ~~~ http://www.charleshunt.me ~~~
  142. Go with wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They almost always work like a regular usb mouse, and nothing is more frustrating that when your bluetooth won't pair right for one reason or another...

  143. That's fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the good side of it is that you can fuck around with somebody else's computer with pure random clicks (of course, provided you are able to pair it on the other computer - while he is away).

  144. Careful with Bluetooth Drivers by wistlo · · Score: 1

    I use a proprietary Microsoft mouse, but have friends who are happy with Bluetooths.

    One cautionary note: My Nokia phone syncs via Bluetooth, but for a long time I had problems with authentication failures. I downloaded updated vendor (Anycom) drivers for my device, and the problem disappeared.

    If you add a Bluetooth dongle, be sure to use the vendor's drivers rather than the default Microsoft stack.

  145. short range by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    A lot of us use bluetooth mice at work with laptops, and my daughter owns one for her laptop at home. They work fine but have very short range.

    An old Logitech wireless trackball had a much longer range -- it was our "remote" for the media PC before we invested in Windows Media Center. But it's hard to find drivers for it now.

    I'd like to find a modern ambidextrous trackball with a range of about 20 feet, for gaming on the media center. But the manufacturers usually don't advertise the range.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  146. Go out find a mouse you like and buy it. by mathmoi · · Score: 1

    I think you overthink it. Most wireless mouses are precise enough and can work > 1 month on a set of regulars AA bateries.

    --
    Mathieu Pagé
  147. Re:Can you get Bluetooth mice with only 1 button? by danieltdp · · Score: 1

    No one is saying (on this thread) that the OS sucks. Its just those damn one button mouses. I can't comment on that because I never used one, but I get a feeling that I prefer multi button instead of multi-interaction with the same button

    --
    -- dnl
  148. Logitech MX5000 by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

    I bought the Logitech MX5000 about a year and a half ago from *sniff* Circuit City. Moves reliably, I could even play FPS with it, but a wired gaming mouse is just that much faster and more accurate. But for non-gaming it was perfect. It advertised 60 ft range, and didn't seem to have any trouble doing that. Mouse still has a pretty long battery life, and the charging cradle is nice. I did have some bluetooth connection dropping, but ONLY whtn playing games. Of course, that was when it was the most annoying =D. I have since setup another computer for gaming, and the bluetooth is setup on my HTPC in the living room, and the mouse and keyboard are matched perfectly there. The bluetooth range has beat everything else I've seen in a proprietary wireless solution, and thats one of the main reasons I bought it. PC on the TV without a pair of cords between me and the computer. Gaming capable, but not recommended. The MX5500 looks good, but haven't touched that one.

  149. waste of time... by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    I honestly don't know why people waste time asking this question. It's a freakin' mouse. 2 buttons and a wheel. Most people don't use more and some don't even use that much. Get Bluetooth it takes up one less port. Analysis complete.

  150. Don't install Logitech software by theolein · · Score: 1

    All those points in my original post are not only my own observations. I've had to replace no less than 38 of the 50 Mac Mice we've had in our company. Most of the users simply find them poor and uncomfortable.

    As for the 1 battery, my Logitech LX7 works fine on one battery.

    I've never had kernal panics in OSX or BSODs in Windows pulling the USB dongel out, but I don't install Logitech's software, ever. If there is one thing about Logitech that it really bad, it is their software. Use the generic Apple and Microsoft Mouse drivers and you'll be fine unless you have a mouse with lots of buttons.

  151. Kensington optical hybrid (cord rolls up) by Ginsu2000 · · Score: 1

    47 MHz transmitter plugs into usb port for wireless use - otherwise it stores itself in the bottom of the mouse and you can unroll the cord so you will never not be able to use it due to battery life. Its slim line, has a scroll wheel, and what more I got it for CAD14.95ish on special at future shop. Lots of battery life - wakes itself up with a click... unbeatable!!! Since new I have used it wirelessly on the same batter for the past three months and no sign of the battery giving out any time soon...

  152. Get a tablet! by Lord+of+Hyphens · · Score: 1

    Get a Wacom graphics tablet. I use my little Bamboo Fun for general pointing with no hassles at all, and less RSI. It surprises anyone who watches me work on my laptop.

    --
    "I've spent my whole life figuring out crazy ways to do things. It'll work." -- Montgomery Scott, "Relics"
  153. Should read Kensington optical wireless hybrid (co by Ginsu2000 · · Score: 1

    It is wireless, but you can optionally use a hidden cord...

  154. It seems ironic... by zigfreed · · Score: 1

    I would say Dell Bluetooth mice have this market cornered. Pretty much has the same number of buttons as the nicer logitech (5 + tilt wheel) at a slightly cheaper price.

  155. Re:Bluetooth in the new Ubuntu by zigfreed · · Score: 1

    And I want to choke the authors of Linux Bluez to death.

    I believe the correct answer is Qualcomm. However Ubuntu 9.04's bluetooth fixes the problem you're stating.

  156. Apparently, I have an older BT mouse. by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 1

    I've noticed a lot of comments about the Logitech V470 Bluetooth mouse, but I have an (apparently) older version, the V270. My comments echo some of the other comments I've read:

    -Does not require a dongle if you have BT already built in,
    -Good accuracy,
    -Good battery life: I change the (2) AA batteries in my V270 about every 2-3 months, and I use it 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, minimum. It has a battery light that blinks when the batteries start to get low, and you can continue using it for another 16 hours or so before the mouse response becomes flaky.

    It does go into a standby mode after about 60 seconds of non-use, but will re-engage in under one full second of movement. Leaving it on overnight will put it into a sleep mode, and you do have to wait about 2-3 seconds after moving it for it to come out of sleep mode. It always automagically pairs up after rebooting within 3 seconds. The buttons work well, and the trackwheel works well. This particular model does not side-scroll, the wheel just moves up, down, and in. It is an ambidextrous mouse, and it's smaller than a desktop mouse but not so small you feel uncomfortable trying to use it. I got it specifically because I travel quite frequently, and I put my laptop in a briefcase and take it to a jobsite, so I can't risk having a dongle always protruding.

    The only problem I have has more to do with the "radio" switch functionality of my Dell D820: the switch will turn on and off all wireless, including the internal BT adapter. That part is kinda frustrating at times, but I've learned to turn the wireless off at the adapter via software, rather than the hardware switch. That's certainly not the mouse's problem.

    Unfortunately it seems Logitech no longer makes this V270. I think that's too bad - I can't imagine a better BT mouse than this.

  157. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't say that I've done much research on BT versus wireless. Back when I was doing my research to buy a mouse I found that finding a BT mouse was easy, but finding a BT mouse with the features I wanted was nearly impossible. Usb port usage is a non-issue as I always have free ports, USB hubs are daisy chainable, and I actually use the ports that my keyboard provide. USB vs BT vs WiFi should be a more of a question asked when buying a printer, scanner, external HDD, or other long term peripheral device. If you have USB devices that you use regularly, but don't have enough ports (especially with a laptop), you might look into turning an old PC into a server (XP, Ubuntu, Fedora) to keep track of these devices for you via LAN.

    I ended up buying the Logitec MX and VX Revolution mice. Both are very nice.

    The MX has is lacking a way to change the battery, but is a very functional and comfortable mouse. The charging station means that I don't have to worry about batteries and it holds a charge through about a week of heavy daily use. I use this on my desktop and have tested it on Fedora, Ubuntu, XP, and Vista. It works well on all. Some will have middle click issues, but this should go away after looking at the documentation (hard middle click vs soft). The mouse has enough buttons on it that this matters little.

    The VX is an excellent little mouse. It can run off a single AA battery for several months (Long enough that I can never remember when I changed the battery last). It is much smaller then it's MX counterpart, but it's meant to be that way. The VX has a place to insert the USB dongle in it for safe storage. The VX turns off to conserve power and turns off further when the USB dongle is placed in it.

  158. Just my vote ... by gordguide · · Score: 1

    I'd go with Bluetooth as my recommendation. It's got the qualities I need ... low power versus who-knows-what power from a myriad of USB wireless providers who, almost naturally, will have varying emphasis on security versus usability. I like almost no power via bluetooth, designed from the start to be a limited range protocol.

    Batteries might be an issue, but frankly regardless of what you choose if they are an issue whatsoever, you are suffering needlessly. Get 4 rechargeable NiMH or Lithium AA's (or whatever it uses) and have 2 charged units at the ready all the time. End of issue, regardless of battery life.

    I eat AA's like candy with my Bluetooth mouse (not so much, but every few weeks) and my GPS needed for work (burns through 2 a day, every day). I'm still using the 8 AA's I bought a couple of years ago, and I probably won't need to buy new ones for another year, from the power I'm still getting. They don't last forever, but a few hundred recharges is plenty enough for the cost (if you get grinded, you might pay $20 for 4, but the same reseller probably has 4 with the charger for a dollar more; if you pay attention, you can find them for less). I haven't bought an alkaline in years.

    I use the Apple Bluetooth mouse with my MacBook, but it wasn't a smooth adoption due to it's design. The left and right clicks are a bit ambiguous, so I changed mine in the mouse preferences so that it's all left click, with right-click being the middle scroll ball. Scroll up/down and left/right is enabled, and the side buttons are disabled. Works for me, but I wouldn't be against a nice 3-button plus scroll Bluetooth mouse from someone else.

  159. Bluetooth is OK... by liquidsgi · · Score: 1

    In general, I have been less than impressed with the whole bluetooth standard. As far as gadgets, like a phone connecting to a computer, I have found bluetooth to be very quirky (disconnecting alot etc). I have also found bluetooth remotes (Apple remote for example) to be crap because of interference. The one bluetooth accessory that I have been happy with is the bluetooth keyboard from Apple. It works perfectly.

  160. Go proprietary! by hazydave · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm not a big fan of the whole idea of proprietary wireless (well, unless it's from MY company), and the extra dongle needed is a pain. But Bluetooth is just involving too much overhead to make a decent mouse.

    First of all, there's going to be a relatively huge software stack running on an ARM7TDMI out on that Bluetooth mouse. The end result is that, relative to a proprietary mouse, it's going to suffer from noticable latency and it's going to suck power.

    You may or may not be bothered by Bluetooth latency, but it can be significant... 20-40ms, maybe worse depending on their power management. I used amplified Bluetooth for robot and R/C car control years ago, but could not eliminate the latency... faster vehicles were undriveable, compared to even entry-level analog radio. I eventually went to one of the proprietary RF chips (Cypress's "Wireless USB", which has been used by some of the wireless mice), and wound up delivering the lowest latency R/C controller on the market.

    The real test is drawing and other types of graphical manipulation. If the latency is noticable, I'll proabably find the mouse bashed against a wall somewhere within a few hours. The Logitechs are indistinguishable from a wired mouse, even for things like Electronics CAD and Photoshop work.

    The power sucking used to be a big issue with proprietary mice, too, but going to lower power radio chips, ultra low power 8 or 16-bit microcontrollers, and low-power IR lasers, models like the current Logitech units (I use a VX Nano with my laptop) run acceptably long (months and months). The dongles are now largely contained within the USB plug, so you only get

    Interference-wise, it's hard to compete against Bluetooth... 1600 hops per second across the whole 2.4-2.5GHz band is going to deliver a pretty robust link. With that said, the Cypress chips at least a very robust, using 32 or 64 chip-per-bit DSSS on 1MHz channels (my company also implemented a frequency hopping protocol on these, though only 100 hops per second... I rather doubt the mice makers went to this trouble, but you could). They pretty much work even with other 2.4GHz interference sources (Wifi, microwave oven, Nomadio R/C controllers, etc).

    --
    -Dave Haynie
  161. LX8 Laser and V450 Nano by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 1

    I've had Logitech mice for ages -- going right the way back to my Acorn RiscPC (technically an "Acorn" mouse, but actually made by Logitech)...

    My two latest acquisitions were a V450 Nano (with the nano-IR receiver) that I bought to use with my two laptops (I can't stand the Trackpad on my Eee 1000H or the Trackpoint joystick on my Thinkpad) and an LX8 Laser. Seriously, these two track on damn near anything, including the awful glossy desks at university and my varnished pine computer desk at home.

    I absolutely love the V450, but I'm very, *very* tempted to get a screwdriver and some superglue and permanently disable the two side buttons on the LX8. Single most annoying mouse feature *ever*. At least you can turn them off in the Setpoint control panel, it's just a shame that said control panel is a 60MB chunk of bloatware...

    But eight months on a set of Duracells is still pretty decent. I'd rather that than having to deal with replacing some custom Li-ion pack two or three years down the line (cue: "I'm sorry sir, that product is no longer manufactured and spare parts are no longer available.")

  162. Mac Bluetooth yes, PC Bluetooth no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every Bluetooth device I've used on my Macs has worked well every time. Occasionally the initial device authentication hiccups, but once paired, it's been smooth sailing.

    On the other hand, I've tried several Bluetooth devices on our Windows conference room computers (nice for passing the kybd/mouse around to different people when doing group presentations) and have never had a good experience. I don't know what the problem is, but BT just seems to stink on Windoze. I finally ditched all the BT devices and got a proprietary wireless Logitech kybd/mouse pack for the PCs. Works fine now.

    I have not tried BT in Linux. I suspect the experience would be somewhere between MacOS and Windoze.

    Devices:

    Apple BT Mighty Mouse - awesome mouse. The little trackball scroller works fine and does not gum up if you keep a clean workspace (admittedly I have the cleanest desk at work, so I might not be representative of the average bloke).

    Apple BT Keybord - it just works. Flawless... But it never worked properly with the Windoze PCs.

    Kensington PilotMouse Mini BT. Works great. If you don't like the Apple BT Mighty Mouse, this might be the one for you... traditional 3-button/scroll wheel, good feel.

    Final comment: I've never had any wireless input device (BT or otherwise) that did not have some response delay. I guess that's just the nature of the beast.

  163. Bluetooth = more battery consumption, Lags by LordBite · · Score: 1

    After talking to several colleagues (we use laptops every day), my conclusion is: - Bluetooth mice use more power - Bluetooth mice sometimes lag or "pause" for a few seconds - USB Wireless has that thinggy that can break when you forget it and toss the laptop into your bag. Since I'm used to having my mouse ALWAYS NEAR my laptop, I've bought a CORD mouse from Microsoft, and it works pretty well and its much cheaper.

  164. Logitech MX 5500 Revolution Bluetooth Desktop by ecloud · · Score: 1

    I have a regular wireless Revolution mouse, and really love the clickless free-spinning weighted scrollwheel. If the Bluetooth version is really the same thing with a different radio, I suspect I would love that too; it just bothers me that I cannot buy it without the keyboard.

    I don't get it, why really cool BT mice are so hard to find.

  165. Re:ot: sad but amusing cordless mouse story by pointbeing · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but that's not correct - we do have some lovely parting gifts for you, though.

    First, there's a configuration management issue.

    Second, if the user calls the helpdesk *once* because his mouse battery's dead you've doubled the cost of your mouse.

    Last, I'll buy anything for anybody if there's a business need and I won't if there isn't.

    Welcome to corporate IT ;-)

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
  166. Apple Laptops and Non-Apple Mice by Vastad · · Score: 1

    My dad has been a long time fan of Apple and is a proud owner of a Macbook Pro (brand new, March last year). Before that he had a PowerBook G4.
    The G4 and the bluetooth Apple mouse he got with it died about the same time. He never really liked the Apple mouse. It felt cheap and clackety and didn't fit his hand right. He does like having that second mouse button.

    It was around that time I wanted to buy a present for my dad and looked into getting a mouse that was bluetooth and kinda fit the Mac theme and didn't take up a USB slot. So I got my dad a white V470 bluetooth mouse. It was even advertised in the store as being Mac friendly.
    That mouse was horrible. It never gave the correct amount of battery charge and you pretty much couldn't tell if it was turned on or not. I kept swapping out batteries on it and it greatly annoyed my dad who just wanted to get on with his work. I never figured out if it was a fault with the mouse or the Macbook but it never remembered it's pairing. Everytime the Macbook was booted up, the mouse had to be manually paired again as if it was a new mouse. I recommend that no one here ever look twice at a V470. My dad ended up using a cheap little Taiwanese corded mouse with flashy LEDs I got for free from some store offer.

    A couple of months later my dad's original Apple Bluetooth Keyboard also died. So we decided to look into getting a wireless combo deal. This time, we didn't try for bluetooth. We looked at RF. We went for the Microsoft Wireless Laser Keyboard 6000 V2.0. It was on a heavily discounted offer price and initially we were just focused on the big chunky mouse.
    Turns out to be a really nice product. It's a big full-size keyboard, nice rubbery wrist rest and came with some extra function keys that are perfect for my dad. There's zoom-in and zoom-out buttons on the side that work globally and are especially useful for websites with small writing. No more hunting for the options in Firefox or Safari. The OS also recognized the big pair of volume controls above the function keys making it much easier to change volume.
    The chunky mouse is perfect for my dad. My only gripe is that for some reason, the polling or DPI isn't handled correctly and so the mouse pointer moves half the speed it usually does for a given setting. So right now, the pointer speed is maxed out in the system preferences and it's just a tad too slow....but my dad has gotten used to it now. Again, I have no idea if this a fault in the mouse or the Macbook.

  167. Targus Bluetooth Mouse for Mac by SinistrArtr · · Score: 1

    I'm currently using this mouse. http://www.targus.com/US/product_details.asp?sku=AMB08US It's got separate buttons, 2d _optical_ scrolling, middle button, and two side buttons. It's quite a nice mouse, about the same size and weight as the Apple Mighty Mouse, and has the advantage of being 5 buttons. The config software it comes with is rubbish and doesn't give you alot of options, I'm using the mouse with Steermouse drivers instead. There's that lag when it wakes up that everybody mentions, but that's about it. I personally don't mind. All in all, it's great, has the horizontal scrolling and I love having lots of buttons.

  168. Left-handed by heatherset · · Score: 1

    I write with my right hand, so it made sense to learn to use the mouse in my left hand. (Just watch someone making notes off a screen - repeatedly putting their pen down to use the mouse then pick up the pen again. Not productive.) Works well with standard mice, but newer mice are designed for the right hand. Any recommendations on left-handed mice?

  169. A purely personal solution, my experience by Punknubbins · · Score: 1

    I have used both in the past with little discernible difference in performance for general computing tasks. But here is what my experience has taught me, neither is practical for _my_ needs . In my case I travel with my laptop a lot. When I first decided to go wireless I went with a cheaper proprietary RF mouse, even though my laptop supports bluetooth, because I am a cheap bastard. But after my second snapped dongle, one my fault as I had forgotten it was there when I threw my machine in my bag, and one because someone decided to squeeze by me in a coffee shop and snapped off the usb connector, I decided to go bluetooth. While my logitech bluetooth mouse did have a hefty price premium it has outlasted three laptops and doesn't require a proprietary dongle. My biggest complaint with both solutions was power consumption. In my experience power consumption was a function of implimentation. While my logitech unit is great sitting on a desk going into sleep mode almost before I let go of the mouse, it had no off switch. So if I didn't take the batteries out before throwing it into my bag it was dead in a matter of hours. While one of my RF mice did have an off switch, the sleep mode had a very long delay before kicking in and limited it's overall battery life to about a week. On a semi related tangent. when I worked for a large company management decided to standardize on on vendor/model for wireless keyboards and mice. But the RF model they chose had a limited "key" set so once an office reached critical mass we where inundated with call that started "Help! Someone is taking over my computer. I think we are being hacked." Only to find out that there wireless dongle was just associated with another keyboard and mouse set utilizing the same key. Because of the pairing requirements this should never happen with a bluetooth unit. I solved these problems with two approaches. For my bluetooth mouse I installed an off switch in line with the the positives battery lead. Now my batteries last me a couple of weeks even when traveling and I can still move the mouse to any machine that includes bluetooth. For the RF mouse, the one with the lost usb connector, I cracked the case to one of my old laptops and soldered the dongle to a set of unused usb pins on the mainboard. Now that laptop, currently used by my son, has a dedicated wireless mouse with no risk for dongle damage. In the end it all comes down to personal preference. What are you going to be using it for? How much are you interested in spending? And, what environmental factors would limit your options.

  170. Windows has no bluetooth support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't find that many direct comparisons -- and they might not apply to the Mac anyway. Windows (XP at least) has absolutely no bluetooth support whatsoever, and relies entirely on 3rd-party drivers to provide it. So

    a) Most PC users probably use the non-bluetooth variety whether they have to or not.

    b) Any "Oh it's crap" might be crap drivers, while the hardware is just peachy.

  171. Re:MS Intellipoint-Mag Fixed in Win7-RC by pg--az · · Score: 1

    "Wireless Intellimouse Explorer 2.0" ... just doesn't work as smoothly under Vista or Windows-7

    I'm so pleased - with the build 7100 the Intellipoint-Magnifier now seems perfect, perhaps even better than with XP.