Not only is she a crafty chick, she's hawt!
After watching the video, I don't think she'd be offended that someone notices that she's both smart and beautiful.
There's not a woman on the planet that doesn't like to feel beautiful.
I suppose Apple needs the rabid fanbase as they are advertisers that pay the company for the privilege. Maybe Apple should even thank them every now and then for keeping the company afloat for so many years.
Unfortunately, Steve Jobs sees us as the group that finally "gets it".
Speaking in evolutionary terms, doesn't the survival rate of a species increase with rapid, frequent, and earlier reproduction?
In a massive die-off, it will be the offspring of the poor who are better suited for survival. They have a more diverse gene pool, and they have sheer volume on thier side.
That's the way it would work in the animal world, at least...I know humans can [somewhat] alter the dynamics of survival of the fittest, but in a true die-off scenerio, would wealth/power/access to healthcare be enough? The influenza epidemic of 1917 comes to mind.
It's what Steve Jobs would fantasize about if he still worked out of his garage
Reality time: Steve no longer works out of his garage. He runs a multi-billion dollar empire that creates products that customers want to buy, thereby maximizing shareholder value. Any relationship with OSS/Microsoft/RIAA/MPAA/etc. is irrelevent unless it maximizes shareholder value.
Actually, the editors had all the stories queued up for the day in Excel. They managed to sort the list incorrectly, which caused this story to be posted under Hardware by mistake.
Once, ``I'd say developers, developers, developers, developers, but not any more, baby; it's advertisers, advertisers, advertisers,'' Ballmer said at an Avenue A client meeting in March in Florida, while running around the stage and punching the air.
We are witnessing, first hand, the effects of government education. The lack of any meaningful civics classes in the last 35 years is one reason why our elected officials keep pulling this anti-American crap out of their arses.
They can't help it -- they are ignorant fools.
Radio Shack went downhill when they made Cellphone and Satellite TV service their primary sales vehicles. They ought to get back to their roots...providing components for tinkerers. I know there's not as much potential profit in this, but if they were to partner with the editors of Make Magazine, they could become the new hope for the home brew crowd.
Example: In this month's Make Magazine...there's an article on how to receive free (not illegal) satellite channels by using inexpensive materials. Radio Shack should be the source for this material for those who don't want to scrounge!
I know this has been a huge plug for Make Magazine...but for goodness sake, when I used to need some obscure part, I knew it could be had cheaply at the Shack...now you have to order a lot of parts.
Sticking one's head in the sand does not make the issue disappear.
It's a nice ideal to live and work in an apolitical world...unfortunately the reality gets in the way. Unchecked, it will ultimately threaten a person's ability to write and publish free code. (the recently proposed legislation outlawing free software in France, for example)
How about doing a review from the perspective of someone who has never used a computer before - then lets see which one is easier to use (hint: the answer will be Windows XP by a massive margin).
Why not throw Mac/OSX into the mix as well?
I think once you remove the fanboism from all sides, you'll find that there's no perfect solution -- each has room for improvement.
Why aren't car engines designed like modern train engines? I believe most trains are propelled by elecric motors which are in turn powered by diesel engines, which turn generators.
Why doesn't this idea scale down to automobiles? Is it the continued dependence on fossil fuels / generation of greenhouse gases, or is there some point where the size/weight/power ratio no longer makes sense?
Impossible to consistently implement on any level other than that of the individual.
For example, I have steadfastly decided not to:
1) Shop at Wal-Mart; 2) Buy any music CD; 3) Use any Microsoft product on my personal computer.
I'm not proclaiming this as a way of saying "Look at me!" I've just made a conscious decision that as a consumer, I have a choice where my money goes, and I'm making that choice.
If enough people feel the same way as me, they may choose to make similar choices and the market will respond. If not, I still feel that my choices are right for me.
While human activity on the planet is undoubtedly contributing to global warming, are there other forces at work here that may be larger than the sum of the individual parts?
Not only is she a crafty chick, she's hawt! After watching the video, I don't think she'd be offended that someone notices that she's both smart and beautiful. There's not a woman on the planet that doesn't like to feel beautiful.
Unfortunately, Steve Jobs sees us as the group that finally "gets it".
It is completely unreasonable to expect compensation for second-hand radio.
Oh Yeah! Look at the hangers on that one!
1. Regulate
2. Tax
3. Sell licenses to our corporate masters.
Hammer and Sickle Linux (TM) -- Now with improved worker thread support and Cooperative multitasking.
Download it today, comrade!
Simply don't use Vista! I don't think it's necessarily in Microsoft's business model to ensure you have the functionality you need or desire.
Commodore 64 + external floppy drive + 300 baud modem = endless fun dialing into local BBSs until all hours of the night.
In a massive die-off, it will be the offspring of the poor who are better suited for survival. They have a more diverse gene pool, and they have sheer volume on thier side.
That's the way it would work in the animal world, at least...I know humans can [somewhat] alter the dynamics of survival of the fittest, but in a true die-off scenerio, would wealth/power/access to healthcare be enough? The influenza epidemic of 1917 comes to mind.
Then why the hell do I continue to pay the Federal Universal Service Charge on every goddamned phone bill I get?
Actually, the editors had all the stories queued up for the day in Excel. They managed to sort the list incorrectly, which caused this story to be posted under Hardware by mistake.
Once, ``I'd say developers, developers, developers, developers, but not any more, baby; it's advertisers, advertisers, advertisers,'' Ballmer said at an Avenue A client meeting in March in Florida, while running around the stage and punching the air.
We are witnessing, first hand, the effects of government education. The lack of any meaningful civics classes in the last 35 years is one reason why our elected officials keep pulling this anti-American crap out of their arses. They can't help it -- they are ignorant fools.
PLEASE!!
The politicians are in the pockets of the corporations.
How about asking me first?!?!
Example: In this month's Make Magazine...there's an article on how to receive free (not illegal) satellite channels by using inexpensive materials. Radio Shack should be the source for this material for those who don't want to scrounge!
I know this has been a huge plug for Make Magazine...but for goodness sake, when I used to need some obscure part, I knew it could be had cheaply at the Shack...now you have to order a lot of parts.
There is hope for /.ers after all.
Sticking one's head in the sand does not make the issue disappear.
It's a nice ideal to live and work in an apolitical world...unfortunately the reality gets in the way. Unchecked, it will ultimately threaten a person's ability to write and publish free code. (the recently proposed legislation outlawing free software in France, for example)
How about doing a review from the perspective of someone who has never used a computer before - then lets see which one is easier to use (hint: the answer will be Windows XP by a massive margin).
Why not throw Mac/OSX into the mix as well?
I think once you remove the fanboism from all sides, you'll find that there's no perfect solution -- each has room for improvement.
Why aren't car engines designed like modern train engines? I believe most trains are propelled by elecric motors which are in turn powered by diesel engines, which turn generators.
Why doesn't this idea scale down to automobiles? Is it the continued dependence on fossil fuels / generation of greenhouse gases, or is there some point where the size/weight/power ratio no longer makes sense?
Heck, the only growth I experience with cannabinoids is growth around my waistline!
Damn Ms. Smith, Ms. Fields, and that dastardly Betty Crocker.
Impossible to consistently implement on any level other than that of the individual.
For example, I have steadfastly decided not to:
1) Shop at Wal-Mart;
2) Buy any music CD;
3) Use any Microsoft product on my personal computer.
I'm not proclaiming this as a way of saying "Look at me!" I've just made a conscious decision that as a consumer, I have a choice where my money goes, and I'm making that choice.
If enough people feel the same way as me, they may choose to make similar choices and the market will respond. If not, I still feel that my choices are right for me.
Is there any relationship between this phenomenon and the Earth's magnetic fields weakening?
I read that the Earth is due for a reversal of its poles.
While human activity on the planet is undoubtedly contributing to global warming, are there other forces at work here that may be larger than the sum of the individual parts?
Oh, yes it is!