They could make it flatter and wider so that they could build the keyboard into it. They probably wouldn't want a mouse dangling so they could add a touch pad below the keyboard. A foldable LCD would be nice, but they could settle for an LCD that is attached to the computer by a hinge, that would fold over the case like a clamshell type thing. Then they could add a battery and really have a winner!
It is always good to have access to more distros than just one. I assume you didn't also give her Lindows 4.0 since that wouldn't do her any good. So what was it, Redhat? Debian? Tell us what you gave her!
Me: If you don't like Microsoft, why buy their game system.
You: They lose money on all of their systems.
Me: Even if they lose money that doesn't mean that they sell them for below variable cost. You are just helping recover fixed cost.
You: I don't understand your fancy moon language!
Me: Why not get a Lindows computer?
You: The X-Box has better hardware!
Me: It has like 48 megs of ram.
You: It has a nice graphics card!
Me: Fine, it has a nice graphics card.
"However, the umpires association has filed a complaint about the system's unreliability and incapability to replace the human 3-D, real-time view." as, "It points out our mistakes!"
When Microsoft does not comply with standards I do not fly through my windshield! Plus we are talking about different types of standards. If your meaning of standard was the same as the articles meaning of standard then a sitcom would be like:
This article should be moderated -1 Flamebait. The idea of forcing MS into following standards is absurd, and if it wasn't for deep anti-MS sentiment in the community here, this would have never been posted!
You patent processes not source code. For instance I would patent: "The process of increasing a variable by one by adding one to that variable." I would not patent: i+=1; nor would I patent: inc ax.
Of course this assumes that Amazon does not yet have this patent.
Well, I think I phrased that wrong.
If you had only if... thens and a loop that would execute x times (not like a for loop where you can modify, but a loop that executes x times regardless of any action), then you would need GOTOs. I guess that type of loop would be a conditional loop, and I'm not sure if it actually exists in any form, but I was trying to consider it.
I know I've already commented, but I just realized he mentions that GOTO should be taught. If QBASIC has conditional loops (which I assume it does) there is no reason to teach GOTO!
Slashdot Mirror
Does Intel lack the ability to block external e-mail addresses? Geez, I'm buying AMD next time!
They could make it flatter and wider so that they could build the keyboard into it. They probably wouldn't want a mouse dangling so they could add a touch pad below the keyboard. A foldable LCD would be nice, but they could settle for an LCD that is attached to the computer by a hinge, that would fold over the case like a clamshell type thing. Then they could add a battery and really have a winner!
Add a bread slot and it will double as a toaster!
That is what I wanted to say, but could not properly phrase. That was the most worthless book review I have ever read.
What type of myth are we talking about here? A myth in the way that cellphone cancer is a myth, or a myth in the way the moon is a myth?
It is always good to have access to more distros than just one. I assume you didn't also give her Lindows 4.0 since that wouldn't do her any good. So what was it, Redhat? Debian? Tell us what you gave her!
Me: If you don't like Microsoft, why buy their game system.
You: They lose money on all of their systems.
Me: Even if they lose money that doesn't mean that they sell them for below variable cost. You are just helping recover fixed cost.
You: I don't understand your fancy moon language!
Me: Why not get a Lindows computer?
You: The X-Box has better hardware!
Me: It has like 48 megs of ram.
You: It has a nice graphics card!
Me: Fine, it has a nice graphics card.
...at least it is easier than actually listening to Phish.
The Mayan calendar is counting down to the release of Duke Nukem Forever!
So if it is +5 informative it is true?
Does anyone read:
"However, the umpires association has filed a complaint about the system's unreliability and incapability to replace the human 3-D, real-time view."
as, "It points out our mistakes!"
It will be modded (-1 redundant high-speed).
When Microsoft does not comply with standards I do not fly through my windshield! Plus we are talking about different types of standards. If your meaning of standard was the same as the articles meaning of standard then a sitcom would be like:
" :Character="daughter"
Action="enter set":Character="father"
Action="misunderstanding
Action="hilarity ensues":Character="all"
So that my television would be able to parse it without having to use a proprietary Hollywood studio to act it out.
This article should be moderated -1 Flamebait. The idea of forcing MS into following standards is absurd, and if it wasn't for deep anti-MS sentiment in the community here, this would have never been posted!
I looked at his username after I replied.
Yeah... good luck with that. I hope you find the help that you need.
You patent processes not source code.
For instance I would patent: "The process of increasing a variable by one by adding one to that variable."
I would not patent: i+=1; nor would I patent: inc ax.
Of course this assumes that Amazon does not yet have this patent.
The gray Hulk is called Mr. Fixit... you insensitive clods!
Well, I think I phrased that wrong.
If you had only if... thens and a loop that would execute x times (not like a for loop where you can modify, but a loop that executes x times regardless of any action), then you would need GOTOs. I guess that type of loop would be a conditional loop, and I'm not sure if it actually exists in any form, but I was trying to consider it.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but ELKS is not Linux. The top of the first page makes that very clear.
He is obviously running a 286 emulating a 386. That would be hell...
4 megs of RAM? 4 megs? Why, you whippersnapper, when I was your age core memory costed a dollar per byte, and we were happy to pay it.
I know I've already commented, but I just realized he mentions that GOTO should be taught. If QBASIC has conditional loops (which I assume it does) there is no reason to teach GOTO!
Chapter 1: That game where the snake eats the numbers.
Chapter 2: That game where the monkeys throw bananas at each other.
Chapter 3: That game..
"I'll be there in a minute! I'm downloading the Internet!"