Slashdot Mirror


World's Smallest Desktop Pentium4?

Valour writes "The Jem Report has just published an in-depth review and installation guide for the new Iwill ZPC, a cool little Pentium4 ultra small formfactor PC. There have been similar designs in the past, but nothing with this kind of power."

242 comments

  1. Even better... by Prince_Ali · · Score: 1

    Add a bread slot and it will double as a toaster!

  2. Deflated specs! by dave_mcmillen · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you look carefully, you'll note that they use inches and millimeters that are specifically optimized for the Iwill, thus making it appear smaller and lighter than it really is. When will the manufacturers learn that this kind of "cheating" in mass and volume benchmarks isn't really fooling anyone.

    1. Re:Deflated specs! by Neophytus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Damn I've spent about ten optimised minutes thinking of a reply to this but it just isnt coming.

    2. Re:Deflated specs! by dave_mcmillen · · Score: 0

      inches and millimeters ... smaller and lighter ...

      Oops: "inches and pounds" or "millimeters and kilograms". Oh, well.

    3. Re:Deflated specs! by hamsterboy · · Score: 1

      No, that's completely different!

    4. Re:Deflated specs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please include context!

    5. Re:Deflated specs! by msheppard · · Score: 1

      These kinds of tricks fool tons of people. It's the minority that look carefully. Welcome to the wonderful world of marketing.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    6. Re:Deflated specs! by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Given the small indicated size and volume, it is entirely possible that they originally designed this on a government contract. They would, therefore, have used the US Aeronautic Metric/English conversion standard (WTF 91065) and thus the measurements are accurate enough for government work.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    7. Re:Deflated specs! by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      Damn I've spent about ten optimised minutes thinking of a reply to this but it just isnt coming.

      I'd hate to see how productive you are in your non-optimized time.

    8. Re:Deflated specs! by Puu · · Score: 1

      Not altogether fair, my man...

      Iwill's KK266 was one of the best of mobos for building a TurboPLL. While I appreciate the joke -- which made me laugh, out loud even -- I feel Iwill hasn't deserved

      Oh wait. Come to think of it. I don't know what they'we done nowadays. What decade are we on?

      [I don't mean this as a joke, I'm rather curious!]

    9. Re:Deflated specs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the WTF standard of measurement is perfect.

  3. Get me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A G5 this small and I'll take it in a heartbeat

    1. Re:Get me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, they need 4 square feet of silicon just to render the brushed metal on the dialogs.

  4. Nifty. by Kai_MH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The small form factor Pentium 4 is a great idea, but think about: Are the really able to fit all the goods into it? It may make a nice portable system, but when it comes down to it, an Mini-ITX board will be just as function(mostly), and be MUCH cheaper.
    Anyways, I'm an Athlon kind of guy.

    1. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyways, I'm an Athlon kind of guy.

      Good for you, though some of us would go with Intel for speed and stability.

    2. Re:Nifty. by Spokehedz · · Score: 1

      Yea... and watch that little box turn into a little molten-puddle of plastic and metal. ;)

      p.s. i'm 100% AMD-man, all the way. The A64 is going to kick everyone's buttocks, because much like there is no spoon, there is no FSB on the A64.

    3. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The A64 is going to kick everyone's buttocks, because much like there is no spoon, there is no FSB on the A64.

      AMD really didnt think that through. Intel tried a server chip about 5 years ago with an integrated memory controller, and they finally ditched it. Why? Because the upgrade path for memory technologies changed too damn much.

      So AMD is going to release the A64 with integrated DDR333 (maybe DDR400). So next year when we are looking at DDR533, etc, what are they going to do? Imagine the confusion after a few new A64 updates- there will be 3 or 4 different versions of each chip, and each one will support different memory. Thats going to be a marketing nightmare for them. And for what? Multi-processor systems still need to maintain cache coherency, so any performance gained by each chip having its own memory controller are pretty much wiped out while you are waiting for the chips to sync up.

      No thanks- I'll stick with a northbridge. Move to a high speed packetized serial FSB with QoS and a PCIExpress backbone. Thats the future. Lower pin count, lower power usage, higher performance.

      AMD is just repeating the mistakes that others made years ago, but they are too dumb to see it.

    4. Re:Nifty. by Shalda · · Score: 1

      Gee, and to think you can buy a similar system, the Latte, from Think Geek! Slow news day, I guess.

    5. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      biggest load of tripe ever.

    6. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, there is a Taiwan board maker (Commell?) that has come out with a P4 near the Mini-ITX form factor.

      The board has the dimensions of mini-itx. I say near because the height of the P4 with adequate heat sink/fan combo will likely be somewhat higher than an EPIA. (For those that don't know, the highest part of the EPIA M board are the 3 game/sound/midi ports on the left rear side.)

    7. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They also have small form factor AMD systems

    8. Re:Nifty. by mczak · · Score: 5, Informative
      Intel tried a server chip about 5 years ago with an integrated memory controller, and they finally ditched it. Why? Because the upgrade path for memory technologies changed too damn much.
      Maybe intel didn't succeed (though I don't know what project you're talking about), but the sun UltrasparcIII also has an on-chip memory controller. And as you should know those chips might not be the fastest, but they scale pretty damn well to a bazillion of cpus!
      And, you don't need that many versions of the same chip since memory _technologies_ don't change that often (EDO, sdram, rdram, ddr and ddr2 cover about 10 years). So one chip for DDR200-DDR400, one for DDRII. Though if higher speed memory of the same type is introduced, the chip might need revalidation and a new stepping might be needed - but new steppings are done anyway (the P4 Northwood already has 3 steppings). And guess what? DDRII533 won't magically work on your existing P4 board either. And how much people upgrade the board so they can use the fastest ram but don't upgrade the cpu?
      Move to a high speed packetized serial FSB
      You could call AMD's I/O links (hypertransport) exactly that, except that they are not used for ram access.
    9. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boy. Get ready for some mindless drivel from the AMD fanboys.....

    10. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the ICE-Cube looks spiffier, but that's probably just my homeless All-In-Wonder talking.

  5. tiny by dirvish · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Wow! How does it fit all of that? Especially three drive bays?
    Drive Bay(s)
    1 x Internal bay for 2.5 in hard disk drive (notebook type
    1 x Internal bay for slim-type optical drive (CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, DVD/CD-RW combo drive)
    DVD/CD-RW combo not included with barebone; available as an optional accessory
    1. Re:tiny by suckass · · Score: 1

      Ummm, re read that genius

      --
      blah, blah, blah
    2. Re:tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you get 3 drive bays out of that? One internal 2.5" bay, and 1 slim bay for an optical device.

    3. Re:tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must be doing that "new math", the one that allows for larger quantities of certain numbers, like 1 and 2.

    4. Re:tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all mounted to a plate that plugs into the motherboard...they're nice, we just got one in the computer store I work in today. The only problem with them is that there is a capacitor on the motherboard that won't let the plate connect to the board if a hard drive is installed. According to Iwill, a batch slipped out without being checked before they shipped.

  6. slashdotted in 3.2 seconds... by mess31173 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They were obviously using them as webservers too...

    1. Re:slashdotted in 3.2 seconds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:slashdotted in 3.2 seconds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdotted too.

    3. Re:slashdotted in 3.2 seconds... by Diclophis · · Score: 1
    4. Re:slashdotted in 3.2 seconds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Worlds smallest eh? by spinlocked · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that a desktop or a workstation?

    --
    # init 5
    Connection closed.


    Oh... ...bugger.
    1. Re:Worlds smallest eh? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      It's a building block for children's education. :P

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  8. Depressing by Davak · · Score: 4, Funny
    Man, is this depressing...

    Quake 3 Arena demo 1 FPS: 104.7

    The thing is the size of my hand and will do Quake3 twice as fast as my box that take up my whole desktop.

    Shheeettt... I must be getting old to have let my box go this long without an overhaul.

    Davak
    1. Re:Depressing by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Tom's Hardware has the latest and greatest Pentium 4 3.2GHz running Quake III at 450 FPS. So this computer is almost 5 times slower than the top of the line, at least as for as OpenGL/Quake/games go.

    2. Re:Depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on. Are you still quoting those old, worn-out bullshit numbers? The 450 FPS number has been THOROUGHLY debunked in various articles and whitepapers. Do a google.

    3. Re:Depressing by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Like this is going to help his self esteam.

      In all likelyhood all this will do is force him to reconsider the decision about bigger being better as noted in all the spam he is ignoring.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    4. Re:Depressing by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Your hands are 7"x10"x2"? Can you like palm a beachball or something?!!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Depressing by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In all likelyhood all this will do is force him to reconsider the decision about bigger being better as noted in all the spam he is ignoring

      I think I would rather have a larger penis than a smaller computer.
      Besides, if my penis were larger I think my computer would look smaller.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    6. Re:Depressing by Greedo · · Score: 3, Funny

      The mental image of you frequently whipping it out to compare it against your computer ...

      For your co-workers' sakes, I hope you have cubicles at your office.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  9. Heh heh. And heat. And power. by ToadMan8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First of all, heh heh, we broke the Access database web engine. Already

    Next order of business, since I can't see the damned article, since we broke it, how are they handling cooling? That's been the big limitation with full (read: AMD or INTEL) scale desktop platforms in a ultra small form factor. Also how will the power supply be rigged? Is this a no PCI low voltage your USB gear better have batteries type thing, or what?

    And does anybody know of a mirror ;)

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  10. Heating by jmaatta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how hot it gets. I didn't find any information about that.

    1. Re:Heating by vought · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I was wondering too, because Dell and Apple and all the other PC manufacturers have a bullet point on the spec sheet called "How hot it gets".

  11. Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Thinkit3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't get it with these PC makers. All this legacy baggage. At least no parallel port. I'm building a box with the abit-K7-MAX2, no serial/parallel and 6 USB on the back!

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serial and parallel aren't that useless.
      Try hooking up a printer from even a few years ago, parallel port it is.
      How about a slightly older Palm? Serial.

      The reason they're still on there is that there's still so many pieces of hardware out there that use them. You don't need to buy a new printer everytime you upgrade your computer, so why force the consumer to? (Granted that type of thinking never stopped manufacturers before, but at the same time there's still printers made that use parallel ports)

    2. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually both serial and paralell ports are easily available as USB adapters. I support a printer, and have supported a palm Vx with appropriate adapters.

      The price of the adapters, when compared to the added space on the motherboard that the interface would take up, may very well be worth it.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by toddestan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason they carry it on is that people want it and need it. Serial is hardly useless, it is needed for older (but not that old) devices like Palms and HP Calculators. Also, the best modems generally are external that use serial ports.

      Older printers (and some new ones) still use parallel ports.

      PS/2 is hardly dead either. PS/2 keyboards just work. They have ironed out most of the bugs with USB keyboards, but you still have minor issues with Linux, old dos stuff, etc. Besides, all the good keyboards are either PS/2 or even the old AT style plug. USB keyboards are crap. Bottom line is, I better be able to hook up my Model M's to any computer I buy.

    4. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, the SIO chip that handles the serial, parallel, floppy, keyboard, mouse, and game port costs a whopping $2.20. You are not going to get all of your stupid USB adapters for under $2.20, moron.

    5. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there are applications that need more than this offers.
      I'm always looking for an extremely small form factor PC with dual serial ports that I could bolt to the wall (or something) in a restaurant to act as a server for the POS system.

    6. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but I can put 8-10 usb-a ports in the space taken up by two db9 and a db25 that would be required for a legacy printer port and two legacy serial ports.

      The supporting chipset may theoretically cost more, but if it is included in the bios for the motherboard, I will never see the cost difference. A single usb-a port running at usb 1.1 spec speeds can easily support three printers, and four or more serial ports, even if they are through adapters of some sort. The initial cost may be more, but the functionality is significantly better to use USB ports in place of db9 serial, and db25 paralell interfaces. A usb-ps2 interface will even take care of providing you with a keyboard or mouse port if you are too cheap to get such from a supplier at $10 or less for the combo.

      --
      You never know...
    7. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chipsets today usually have 6 integrated USB ports. That means to get your 8-10 ports, they need to add a second USB chip to the motherboard, and those are more expensive than the $2 SIO chip.

      Come on- think a little here buddy.

    8. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And in small form factor, what would you like to loose to include physical interfaces for the legacy serial ports?

      I grant you that if I wanted to have more than six USB ports I would need to add another USB controller. And yes it would cost more than $2.20.

      I still contend that USB ports will provide me with the capability of supporting far more than physical serial and paralell interfaces in significantly less space.

      Since a single legacy serial interface with an integrated 16550afn UART has a maximum speed of 115kbps, (aprox) and a USB1.1 has a 12Mbps speed and I can fit two USB ports in the space of a single db9 serial, or even a single ps/2 port.

      Note I am not telling you to give up on physical serial interfaces if you choose to include them in your design. I am simply saying that if you are attempting to build an extreamly small platform, (which admittedly will probably cost more than a mini-ITX based system) you get more bang for your buck to use USB ports rather than legacy Serial and Paralell ports. If you only include six USB ports, you can sell Paralell and Serial adapters, at a significant mark-up, to those customers who find a need for those interfaces.

      Then again, that's just my opinion. You are welcome to hold your own.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    9. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by yerricde · · Score: 1

      But will the popular SNESPAD and PSXPAD legacy adapters, which require precise timing, work through a USB to parallel adapter?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    10. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get USB Controller adapters for them instead

    11. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Phishpin · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. PS/2 ain't broken. Don't fix it untill you need to use something PS/2 won't handle.

      Long live the Model M.

      --
      -phish
    12. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use an IBM model M on my Abit AT7 motherboard which has no ps2 or serial or parallel. I just use a ps2 to USB converter, with out issue.

      I used to have my Focus 8000 (AT connector) hooked up to it as well. That one went from the AT plug into an AT to PS2 converter which went into a ps2 to USB converter :) That set up wasn't exactly perfect though, every once in a while when the machine booted it would not detect the keyboard

      I really like my mechanical keyboards. There is just something wrong with a Keyboard that doesn't make clicky noises!

    13. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by sootman · · Score: 1

      Serial: the best modem you can get (many in this day and age are still broadband-less) is an external 56k. Works great on serial. A friend had a USB modem and every so often his computer would 'forget' it was there, *while* he was online downloading stuff. Unplug it, plug it back in, reconnect, all is fine. Screw that.

      And then there's the Macs we have at work. My favorite trick: KB plugged into comp, mouse plugged into KB. KB stops working. Mouse still works. wtf?!?!? unplug, replug, all is fine.

      USB is mostly good... but ADB and PS/2 are perfect. Given the choice, which would you pick? And, in all honesty, it's not like they could make the whole box smaller by taking off those ports. Look at the back of an ATX box--you can get 1 parallel, 2 serial, and 2 PS/2 in about 1"x1"x3" along the edge of the box. (Don't have one in front of me to measure exactly.)

      Oh, and I once had a USB-only PC. The BIOS would see the keyboard always--I could press DEL at POST and get into it--but then Windows would boot and not see it at all sometimes. Nothing had moved since the last shutdown. Again, wtf?!?!?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    14. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by yerricde · · Score: 1

      I know about the PS1 adapter; I currently use an EMS USB2 adapter. However, I also mentioned Super NES controllers. Can you provide a link to an adapter that turns a Super NES controller, or any of the dozen or so other models supported by DirectPad and NTPad, into a USB HID joypad?

      However, your USB to parallel solution may not work well for the MBV2 cable that connects a PC's parallel port to a GBA's link port. Does this cable have a USB equivalent?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    15. Re:Still, a serial port, and PS/2! by leinhos · · Score: 1

      Hot swapping?

  12. Re:My experiences with Linux by Kai_MH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Version 9.0 of what?

  13. eh? by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A cool Pentium 4?
    I really doubt that.

    --
    Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
  14. Chilling by Davak · · Score: 5, Funny

    The nice thing about a computer this size is that you can just place it in a small refrigator... and then overclock the heck of it.

    Plus, you have a nice place to keep your sodas/beer chilled as well.

    "Honey, can you take out those leftovers? They are making my computer smell like an italian restaurant!"

    Davak

    1. Re:Chilling by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      You laugh but imagine putting it in a cooler with some dry ice for lan parties.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    2. Re:Chilling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what happens if the heating capacity of the machine exceeds the cooling capacity of the fridge?

    3. Re:Chilling by TheViffer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is marked as funny, but is it?

      Look at today, we air blast our cases for cooling. Some of the daring will use water, even others liquid nitrogen.

      But think about it, we are clearly in the stone ages when it comes to effective computer cooling. This not only is in how we cool the equipment, but in how that equipment is designed.

      Don't laugh when in five years, some company like "Coleman" is making the worlds most advanced "desktop and workstation" cases employing refrigeration and insulation.

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    4. Re:Chilling by rasjani · · Score: 1

      No, it was funny because of the .. refrigator =))

      --
      yush
    5. Re:Chilling by tandr · · Score: 1

      ... and then overclock the heck of it.

      I am sorry, me bad with English. Overclock what, "refrigator"? waayyy too cool (pun intended) for me...

    6. Re:Chilling by forinti · · Score: 1

      In Russia if we donÂt overclock, computer freezes...

    7. Re:Chilling by antimuon · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean like these Ice Station enclosures? They are nice if you have the money...

      -antim

    8. Re:Chilling by egghat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd rather say, taht we're in the stone age regarding effective energy consumption. There are Mobile CPUs that take less than a half of normal energy. From the technical point it's possible to build a very fast PC that uses less than half of what a normal computer needs. There are mobile CPU, high efficiency PSU, etc.

      Look at Silent PC Review to get an idea.

      Bye egghat

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  15. Useful? by blackmonday · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Set these up in cubicles outfitted with mouse, keyboard and displays. People can work at any desk at any time, even in a conference room. And take it home and keep working! An exec's dream come true. I would say it could use some type of built-in display, maybe one of those new foldable displays we heard about yesterday.

    1. Re:Useful? by jmaatta · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ever heard of a laptop? :)

    2. Re:Useful? by cristofer8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! We could attach a flat panel screen to them, perhaps in a folding or clamshell style. And maybe stick a keyboard to it so you don't lose it on the way home. And then, since we don't want to lose the mouse, we could add a touchpad or a trackpoint. And suddely, we have something amazing, which the world has never seen!! Oh.......wait.......

    3. Re:Useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think somebody beat you to it.

    4. Re:Useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been invented already - It's called a "laptop" :p

  16. ahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: How many times do we have to see this joke?

    A: Every time there's an article about a small product (pda, micro pc, pocket calulator, et cetera)

    1. Re:ahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, well, imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

  17. Slashdotted... by pnix · · Score: 1, Funny

    I really doubt those P4's are running cool right now since they can't hold up to being slashdotted...

    Sure makes me want to buy one!

  18. article text by umthie10 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Home Articles Software Hardware
    Reviews Community
    Forum Guides
    and Help Credits

    Manufacturer Iwill USA
    Model ZPC
    Chipset Intel 845GV
    Formfactor Mini ITX/proprietary
    Market Portable workstation/fashionable desktop. This machine is primarily marketed to system integrators who will use it to create systems for targeted niche markets like those mentioned above.
    CPU support 400mhz and 533mhz FSB Pentium4 processors up to 2.53ghz.
    RAM PC2700 is recommended, but PC2100 and PC1600 will also work. ECC memory is not supported. Maximum RAM capacity is 512MB using one 512MB module.
    Iwill ZPC

    Graphics capabilities Onboard Intel Extreme Graphics
    IDE ATA100 (through a conversion daughter board) supports one notebook 2.5" hard drive and one slimline notebook optical drive
    Firewire Yes (2) (VIA chipset)
    USB Hi-speed USB 2.0 (4)
    LAN Realtek 8100B 10/100
    Sound ALC650 stereo
    Power External 90W DC19V power supply
    Dimensions Height: 54mm (2.13 inches)
    Width: 184mm (7.24 inches)
    Depth: 263mm (10.35 inches)
    Weight 1.95kg (4.3 pounds) net weight
    3.75kg (8.27 pounds) with hard drive, RAM, CPU, optical drive and power supply
    9-pin serial One
    Available colors Silver (aluminum) and black
    Warranty One year through Iwill

    The Iwill ZPC is the world's smallest Pentium4 desktop computer supporting the 533FSB. The initial material that Iwill sent me months ago made it look really cool -- there were a variety of different colors and the design was quite attractive. Unfortunately Iwill scrapped all of the colors except black and silver, and those two represent two different models of the ZPC. The black model is designed for slot-loading optical drives and the silver model supports tray-loading optical drives, but other than that they are identical as far as technical specifications are concerned. For my testing I was given one of the silver models. Here's what the front looks like when fully assembled, and here is the rear of the unit.

    The ZPC can be purchased with or without the CDRW/DVD combo drive but considering the fact that you can't buy a comparable optical drive for the difference in price, I would suggest getting the full package including the combo drive unless you're running totally from the network or otherwise have no need for a CD drive. The only extra software that it comes with is Nero Express (version 5.5.10.13)

    Assembly was surprisingly easy -- almost too easy, and in fact I suspected it was a trap. I was expecting something at least as complex and delicate as a notebook computer but it was actually more like a mini-PC. I have compiled a complete installation guide (including photos!) which can be found here.

    The ZPC is rather expensive; unless you're buying in quantity or directly from the manufacturer you won't find one of these under $450 (no hard drive, CPU, or RAM included) but considering what you're getting, that's not all that bad. As far as price for performance is concerned there are a few things to consider. First of all the ZPC is not versatile; it can never be a good gaming machine and since there is no TV-out or DVI connector you're limited to a VGA display, so there's no video editing possibilities. That means that the ZPC is not a replacement (or even competition) for a mini-PC like the Iwill XP4-G or for VIA's ultra-cheap and somewhat expandable Epia C3 integrated CPU solutions. If you're looking for a portable gaming machine, a low-cost, low-performance low-profile desktop system or a TiVo device, the ZPC cannot meet your needs.

    So what is the ZPC good for? A lot of things: as an Internet device or appliance, as a stackable node for a cluster, as a small formfactor workstation for cramped or limited spaces (dorm rooms, RVs, yachts, or even cars and airplanes). Being as it does not have a screen with it, the ZPC is not exactly a laptop replacement although it is smaller, lighter, and more durable. If you need a portable machine to take on special jobs (engineers and technicians often need good

    1. Re:article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Karma Whore

      These are people who post things which can be totally fabricated, simply regurgitations of the information available, bashing individuals or companies unpopular among Slashdot readers, or any other form of redundant or pointless contribution for the purpose of collecting "karma." This is described in more detail below, but suffice it to say that those individuals who consider collecting karma to be a status symbol need to get out more, and make some friends in meatspace.

      -- Source

      AC
    2. Re:article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's what the front looks like when fully assembled, and here is the rear of CmdrTaco's unit.

      One in every crowd.

    3. Re:article text by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Who does this help? We all just want to see the pictures. Preferable next to a CD for scale.

      -Peter

    4. Re:article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't seen a picture yet, but wouldn't it be great if it looked like this?!

    5. Re:article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.thejemreport.com/walkthroughs/zpc.htm has pictures

  19. Slashdotted by melete · · Score: 1


    Does anyone have pics/specs?

    1. Re:Slashdotted by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      It may be, but this is typical. They're using Access when they should be using SQL.

  20. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never heard this joke before!

    Haven't heard it in every article about a small machine, either!

    Gets funnier every time, fellas!

  21. Wha? by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

    Formfactor Mini ITX/proprietary I thought that part of the Mini ITX specification was that it had a VIA processor. Did I miss something?

    1. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently.

    2. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, Mini-ITX just describes the form factor - the size & shape etc. VIA themselves are coming out with a P4 Mini-ITX board "soon". (I'm a dealer, they have been sending me their hype sheets)

    3. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, perhaps the word "proprietary" NEXT TO the words "Mini ITX"?

  22. Should I? by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2, Funny
    Intel:
    Imagine a BW cluster of these to make the Intraweb go faster.

    Slashdot: /snicker
    yeah, right.

    The thing is the size of my hand {snip}


    Take care you don't burn your...uhhhh....nevermind.
    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Should I? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. You are on to something! by Prince_Ali · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could make it flatter and wider so that they could build the keyboard into it. They probably wouldn't want a mouse dangling so they could add a touch pad below the keyboard. A foldable LCD would be nice, but they could settle for an LCD that is attached to the computer by a hinge, that would fold over the case like a clamshell type thing. Then they could add a battery and really have a winner!

    1. Re:You are on to something! by Surak · · Score: 1

      And they could make it out of Aluminum or Titanium! And then they could put a PPC 970 processor in it! Hey, then it could run....OS X! And ... and ...

      Oh, never mind. I hear Apple just beat me too it. :(

    2. Re:You are on to something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear Apple just beat me too it. :(

      TO it, motherfucker.

    3. Re:You are on to something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, according to Apple's VP of Hardware Product Marketing, Greg Joswiak, there will not be any G5 notebooks anytime soon due to amount of heat the G5 produces (Those metals transfer the heat really well... roasted balls anyone?).

    4. Re:You are on to something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post - almost perfect. You should have been a bit more subtle with the last line and said "Then they could build in a Uninteruptable Power Supply ..."

    5. Re:You are on to something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they call that a laptop...

  24. This is an old trick by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2, Funny

    People have done this for years. You get a real smart midget (like Michael J. Fox) to sit inside the empty box. He's the one actually doing the "computing".

    1. Re:This is an old trick by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Yep, really old trick. The first reference I can find is from 1769.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
  25. Slashdotted by pmz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One possible reason why Microsoft has a bad reputation (from the IWILL website):

    "The Microsoft Jet database engine stopped the process because you and another user are attempting to change the same data at the same time."

    I'm glad Jet is at least honest about why it isn't a real database.

  26. Re:Joke reused in 1.9 hours flat .... by Surak · · Score: 1

    You should at least wait til the story scrolls off the front page before copy and pasteing a joke from it.

  27. Specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Processor
    Supports single Intel® Pentium® 4 processor up to 2.53 GHz
    Supports single Intel® Celeronâ processor up to 2.4 GHz ZPC

    Chipset
    Intel® 845GV chipset
    â 82845GV Graphics and Memory Controller Hub (GMCH)
    â 82801DB I/O Controller Hub 4 (ICH4)

    Bus Frequency
    533/400 MHz system bus

    System Memory
    1 x DIMM slot
    Supports up to 1GB DDR266/200 (PC2100/PC1600) memory

    IDE
    ATA/100 IDE
    Supports one (1) 2.5 in hard disk drive (notebook type)
    Supports one (1) "slim-type" optical drive

    Audio
    Realtek® ALC650
    AC'97 Audio CODEC

    VGA
    Intel® Extreme Graphics
    Integrated in Intel® 845GE, 845GV, 845G and 845GL chipsets

    LAN
    Realtek® RTL8100B 10/100M Fast Ethernet Controller
    10/100 Mbps operations

    IEEE 1394
    VIA® Fire II VT6306 IEEE 1394 Link-Layer/PHY Chipset
    2 x IEEE1394 ports (front panel)
    400/200/100 Mbps data transfer rate
    Supports up to 63 devices
    Supports hot-swapping and Plug & Play

    Drive Bay(s)
    1 x Internal bay for 2.5 in hard disk drive (notebook type
    1 x Internal bay for slim-type optical drive (CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, DVD/CD-RW combo drive)
    â DVD/CD-RW combo not included with barebone; availabl

  28. tradition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like "in soviet russia" and "1:xxx,2:???,3: profit!", it's a tired joke, man.

    1. Re:tradition? by cre8tor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Go out and get some fresh air - you need it.

    2. Re:tradition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick! Insult me too! You're very good at it!

  29. why a P4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you're going to make a small PC, wouldn't using a low-power chip instead of the 845gv chipset (note a lack of details about heat dissipation) make more sense? I realize its not a laptop, so there's no worry, but inefficient power-drain == hot-plate for a small device.

    Why not a Centrino or TransMeta? It would be making the smallest desktop using intelligent engineering decisions. How about a cycles/in^2 or sufmin'.

  30. More Photos by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here are some more photos if you can't get to the iwillusa site.

    --


    --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
    1. Re:More Photos by snofla · · Score: 1

      So it does fit in my free 5 1/4 drive bay!

      --
      i don't like style guides
  31. Sorry to be negative, but ... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... I really do not understand what the niche for this might be. Notebook class performance, notebook level pricing, less portable than a notebook (when you consider the need for a monitor also) and no more configurable.

    I own a Shuttle. It is more expensive than the cheapest desktops and less portable than a notebook, but it has real desktop performance in a reasonably portable form factor. That makes sense to me.

    1. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by brkello · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A friend of mine has something like this. It is a great thing to take to a LAN since it is so portable and can hold a ton of data. He has a 240 GB drive in it and he shares games, movies, etc. But you are probably right, this won't take over the market...though it may be time for desktops to get smaller.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    2. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      He has a 240 GB drive in it

      In something like the Shuttle, sure ... but the Iwill ZPC only takes notebook type harddrives. I may be a little out of date, but I think the largest are about 60GB.

    3. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by PhilipMatarese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At my last job, this computer would have been perfect - not for workstations, but for a project we worked on.

      We wrote content management/distrobution software for advertising companies, and got pulled into doing work with the hardware as well. A 1U rack mount computer was hooked to the back of a plasma screen, and plugged into a modem or a network, then we could update on the fly and run any kind of media that the computer could display. We added touch screen overlays to make them interactive. It was a cool project to work on.

      The project failed because of the poor quality computer we used -- we were locked into using the 1 brand of computer that was custom designed to mount on the back of a plasma screen.

      This would have been an ideal computer for us. :(

    4. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by brkello · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was the Iwill, I said it was something like it...but I can understand why you would be skeptical about that. His is a lot taller than an Iwill and able to hold standard hard drives. I was just trying to say the Iwill could be used in a similar way. I apologize for my lack of clarity.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    5. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by heli0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ". I really do not understand what the niche for this might be."

      How about people who regard aesthetics in as high a regard as engineering specs?

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    6. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by runcible · · Score: 1

      *Duh*....because it's *shiny*.

      --
      remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
    7. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One of the saving graces of these newer "teeny" PC's is the fact that they use 1/5th the power a regular clone uses. If you take last years' PC and 21 inch monitor... you are gobbling up arounf 650 to 700 watts of power ... today, a 17 inch flat panel, and a small- low power consumption pc will use a maximum of 100-120 watts. a MAJOR savings in power.

      now this may mean nothing to you and your $100.00+ a month electrical bill, but to people trying to live off grid on solar and wind power or simply trying to be as efficient as possible... these things are a godsend.

      and I think a middle ground is needed. we need decent speed, low power computers that will take a Geforce 4ti in it for decent gaming.... the shuttle boxes give me that and if you do it right, you can get in under 290 watts with one.

      It's interesting what happens when using another 900 watts in your entire household can cost you an extra $6000.00 in storage, inverter and solar elements... you watch very closely what kind of power consumption versus useability your electronics have.

      I just wisk shuttle would make a low-power version... that uses the Pentium4M processor or an AMD that doesnt double as the toaster-oven heating element.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by Daz3d · · Score: 0

      ... I really do not understand what the niche for this might be. Notebook class performance, notebook level pricing, less portable than a notebook (when you consider the need for a monitor also) and no more configurable.

      It would be good as an in-car PC.

    9. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      Yes, I can well understand the concern about power consumption if reliant on wind power or something. But, in that case, maybe a notebook computer is the way to go.

      For my Shuttle, I elected to go with an ATI Radeon 9000 Pro. It is definitely not a gamer's choice, but it draws relatively little power and needs no active cooling. When not using the DVD drive, I draw less than 200 watts (including LCD monitor).

    10. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by ForsakenRegex · · Score: 1

      I love my Shuttle SS51G. I don't feel any desire to go smaller. My monitor is always the real pain when going to lan parties. I really don't care for LCDs. Until they come up with an affordable, perfect looking, compact screen with zero trailing and latency, getting a smaller box isn't going to help me all that much. I'm sure they'll get there someday, but for right now I'm sticking with my mini and my CRT.

      --
      "A man talking sense to himself is no madder than a man talking nonsense not to himself."
    11. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by dereklam · · Score: 1
      How about people who regard aesthetics in as high a regard as engineering specs?

      Those people buy Macs.

    12. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by Eric+Savage · · Score: 1

      People with large pockets?

      --

      This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
    13. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by quahog · · Score: 1

      650-700 Watts??? Just because you have a 450W power supply in your computer doesn't mean it uses that much. My Athlon 900 with a 380W PS only uses 92-112W (gf4, 2 HD's, ...), and my 21" monitor uses 120W at most (high res with all white screen). So I'm using at most 232W but average more around 200W. I got these wattage numbers from measuring the current of the 120V AC using a Fluke multimeter. So, if I use my computer for an average of 16 hours a day, that works out to 96kWh/month. At roughly $0.10/kWh (I took my last hydro bill and divided by the total kWh, ~$0.104kWh) that would be $10/month. Plus, for an extra $3/month I'll keep my 21" thank you very much (base on 40W average for 17" LCD).

    14. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by gvonk · · Score: 1

      How about people who regard aesthetics in as high a regard as engineering specs? ...They've all been sorely disappointed with Apple's processing power for the last decade?

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    15. Re:Sorry to be negative, but ... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out - the difference in annual power consumption between a 17" LCD and a 17" monitor is between 50KWH/yr and 100KWH/yr (rougly US$5 to US$10) if you're using your PC during normal businesss hours (2000 hours per year). Which means that for a corporation deciding between CRT vs LCD - that choice won't be made based on power consumption savings (a US$100 difference in cost would require something like 8-12 years to recoup). It's the same issue with why the public isn't willing to pay for higher efficiency cars. For someone that drives 18,000 miles/year a car that gets 18mpg costs $1500/year (if fuel is around $1.50/gal). At 26mpg, costs drop to $1038/year, which is a cost savings of $2300 over five years. However, if the cost difference between high/low efficiency vehicles is a $4000 markup for the 26mpg model - the consumer is better off buying to 18mpg model (environmental concerns aside). In short, a ~$400/year cost savings isn't enough of an incentive for a person making $40k/yr to make the switch. Would I like higher fuel/energy efficiency? Sure. But I'm not willing to pay more then I'd save over the expected life of the unit.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  32. No SCSI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not interested then. It's fucking hot as hell outside. Holy shit.

  33. Pics by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 4, Informative


    For those who just want to see it, check out this pic among many others at the actual review, instead of the IWILL site. Also check out the installation guide

    --
    True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    1. Re:Pics by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      Hey, they fit that think in an old Hayes 9600 baud modem case. Nice.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
  34. Regular CPU and Hard Disk by some1somewhere · · Score: 1

    With all these new "mini" cases requiring notebook hard disks, I wonder what the small case is that supports a regular size hard disk?

    A lot of expense goes into the hard disk, and since notebook hard disks are relatively slower and much more expensive, a "mini" case supporting a regular hard disk would be a boon!

    Any URLs or anything?

    --
    **FREE** Track and view your phone's via CellID and/or WIFI and/or GPS :- http://tinyurl.com/la6fhd
    1. Re:Regular CPU and Hard Disk by Surak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many Mini-ITX boxes, like those from Shuttle, will support a regular-sized hard drive.

      google for 'mini itx' :)

    2. Re:Regular CPU and Hard Disk by makapuf · · Score: 1

      of course, you realize that Shuttle makes P4/Athlons CPU boxen, not mini-ITX (flex-ATX ?), wihch are (until now, would be cool to see some with anotoher CPU) only C3 -the low power, but quite less performing CPUs -, and almost all are made from VIA ?

      Besides, many ppl here and from the preceding mini itx article here are quite funnily talking about how many GHZ those boxes are : this is all the more wrong that a 800 MHz C3 CPU performs like a PII 350 MHz (which is quite good given the other advantages of a mini itx : price, integration, ...)

    3. Re:Regular CPU and Hard Disk by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Shuttle is a Flex ATX case/board combo. Mini ITX IS compatible with Flex ATX, but is smaller. BTW, I take it you haven't been to mini-itx.com lately, have you?

      This page lists a few Mini ITX boards (the P4BGA isn't, though), all socketed, unlike the VIA boards. All except for one take P3/P4/Celeron chips.

  35. Re:Heh heh. And heat. And power. by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading from the review, (which hasnt yet been slashdotted) they did the same thing I did when I made a briefcase computer. That is, make a hole right above the CPU fan and have it blow out. The powersupply looks incredibly wimpy so it is doubtful that it would generate that much heat. Also, from the looks of it, the AC to DC conversion doesnt take place on the actual powersupply. There's probably a separated power brick for it. Thus, the only heat-producing component in there of any relevance would be the CPU.

  36. Alternate Links by sparkhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    1 2 3

  37. Reason for being slashdotted by zapp · · Score: 1, Interesting

    /ProductDetail.asp?vID=179

    1. ASP
    2. Hammering a database

    My guess is there's no caching or anything enabled either.

    You know what would be nice, is if /. automatically tracked hits to articles.

    It could do this easily by automatically inserting something like:
    http://www.slashdot.org/countHits.pl?
    befo re everything linked in a submission.
    Not highly useful, I know... but don't you wonder sometimes just how many hits it takes before it stops responding all together?

    --
    no comment
  38. Power comsumption? by toddestan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed that it only comes with a 90W power supply. I don't think that is going to work very well, with a P4 consuming upwards of 70W or more of power. How will there be anything left to run the disk drives, video, etc.?

  39. price? by sootman · · Score: 4, Informative

    this thing is super-sweet. in case of slashdotting, here are the two coolest pics. anyone know what these things cost? I didn't see it mentioned in the review and iwillusa.com is also down.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:price? by sootman · · Score: 1

      OK, one more cool pic--one of the inside to answer all the "how do they fit all that $#!+ in there?" posts. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    2. Re:price? by sootman · · Score: 1

      top 3 google matches for 'iwill zpc'--japanese, sweedish, and russian pages. then I saw that google has a 'would you prefer to search for english results only?" they never cease to amaze me. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:price? by Stigmata669 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well you can put one together for yourself.

      The Case is a mini itx case with a fan blow hole drilled and a low profile (probably U1) heatsink for the chip.

      A motherboard that supports P4s in the mini-itx form can be found here, however I don't know any resellers... google it.

      The rest is just laptop parts, but I really don't trust a 55W powersuply on a P4 so you might want to replace it with one here. My guess is that it will end up being $600-700 in parts so think about $1000 retail.

      --
      Yawn.
  40. What about the ASUS Pundit? by Zendar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It may be a little larger, but the Pundit case from ASUS is a heck of a lot more stylish and is still smaller than most of the other small form factor cases.

    1. Re:What about the ASUS Pundit? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      That woiuld make a very good "media center" system. It looks more like a CD player than it does a computer. Nice looking piece of kit.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:What about the ASUS Pundit? by Zendar · · Score: 1

      That's where I found out about the case. It seems to be popular with MythTC users.

      In any case, it certianly *looks* better than the iWill case.

    3. Re:What about the ASUS Pundit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't a cdrom get all screwed up sitting sideways like that though? Seems like that's happened to me before...

  41. you know when you buy a car... by ferrocene · · Score: 1

    And they have the optional leather seats? They don't stuck them in the trunk ya know. Or on top of the original seats. I'll leave this puzzle up to you to figure out.

    --
    Most folk'll never lose a toe, and then again some folk'll...
  42. Your wife let her box go for quite some time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But get me a Toro and a power washer and I'll have that thang back in tip-top shape, TOOT SWEET.

    *rimshot*

  43. Hey, it's like a cave in here....here....here... by Asprin · · Score: 4, Funny


    You know, you could probably fit a whole Beowulf cluster of these inside my now-seemingly-cavernous Shuttle SN41G2 XPC case!

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  44. Windows 2000/XP by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the article: if you must use Windows I would recommend Windows 2000 over XP as it has a slightly thinner GUI and tends to manage resources a bit better.

    This is true enough, but running an old OS just so you can have a shoe box-sized PC seems like a rather arse-about-face logic to me.

    By the way, I'd love one of the PCs :-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Windows 2000/XP by objekt404 · · Score: 1

      You say that like *some* of us do not prefer 2k of XP!

      I'll never run XP (or it's decendants, as long as I can) thank you very much! 2k:SP3 suits me just fine (& yes, I know SP4 is out!!!)

      --
      "Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun."
  45. Great Something else to lose... by mustangsal66 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok for the past 10 years, things have been getting smaller and smaller.

    I've lost my cell phone, my PDA, my laptop, and god knows what else.

    Now I have to worry about losing my desktop???

    --
    Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
    Sig changed for readability by G.W.
    1. Re:Great Something else to lose... by ConsoleDeamon · · Score: 1

      I dont even whant to now where you lost them :P

    2. Re:Great Something else to lose... by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      Now I have to worry about losing my desktop???

      no need to worry! as long as it's securely attached to the desk bottom...

  46. Re:Heh heh. And heat. And power. by bluesangria · · Score: 1

    I'm more concerned with the fact that they have a PDF RMA request form - right beneath two tech support options.

    Hmmm, are they expecting a high volume of "This is crap! Give me my money back!" responses which would necessitate an easily downloadable RMA???

    blue

    "Remember, you get what you pay for."

  47. Ew... Ugly! by jmh_az · · Score: 1
    What an ugly little box! It reminds me of a Muntz 8-track tape player. (yeah, yeah, I'm really that old--so what?)

    But, wait... Maybe it IS an 8-track tape player! Someone finally figured out what to do with all those left over cases after the Muntz company folded sometime last century. Yeah, that's it. Recycling!

  48. Valour = The Jem Report = Not-so-stealthy by HardcoreGamer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Valour writes "The Jem Report has just published an in-depth review....

    Valour/Jem, I don't understand why you are hiding the fact that YOU ARE Valour, and YOU ARE the OWNER and writer of TheJemReport.

    It doesn't take a genius to figure out that valour@herotale.com is the same person as valour@thejemreport.com - it's on the front page of your site.

    If it's karma-whoring, go ahead, because that's not uncommon on Slashdot, but why pretend that you aren't submitting your own review by writing the submission in the third person?

    Now let's re-write that first line:

    Valour [THAT'S ME!!!!!!] writes "The Jem Report [THAT'S MY SITE!!!!!!] has just published an in-depth review and installation guide for the new Iwill ZPC, a cool little Pentium4 ultra small formfactor PC. There have been similar designs in the past, but nothing with this kind of power."

    :)

    1. Re:Valour = The Jem Report = Not-so-stealthy by caffeinex36 · · Score: 1

      Does it make a difference? And actually, I don't see him saying it's NOT him. The Jem Report and Valour are two different things. Valour runs the site or whatever...and His SITE just published.....blahblahblah

      big deal...
      It's /.ed anywho...

      -Rob

    2. Re:Valour = The Jem Report = Not-so-stealthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a nut. he slashdotted himself.

    3. Re:Valour = The Jem Report = Not-so-stealthy by hawkstone · · Score: 1

      I assume you're facetiously pretending to be a conspiracy theorist (thus the smiley), but you somehow got modded +5 Informative anyway. I personally would have preferred +5 Funny, but no explaining mods sometimes.

      But just to point out what someone who has not submitted articles before may not know (whether or not that is you): the submitter has no control over the "Valour writes" part. That part is up to the editor who posts the story, and the default is "[nick] writes...".

      Thus, the best he could have done was:

      Valour writes "I've written an in-depth review for my site, the Jem Report....."

      But so fsking what? It's not like what he said was wrong, and if it seemed misleading it was only to reduce the amount of credit he got, not to take credit for someone else's work. If he really were making any attempt to cover it up, all he had to do was put in another nickname in the submission form, or submit it as an AC. Sheesh!

  49. Re:Heh heh. And heat. And power. by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 2, Informative

    The system comes with a power brick, just like most printers and laptops. Thus, most of the heat will be generated outside of the case. All they have to cool is the CPU, and in something that small, all that requires in a nice grill overtop of the CPU to vent the hot air directly to the outside world.

  50. How Loud is it? by -tji · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With a P4 in that little case, they have to push a lot of air, so this thing will be loud. What they need is:

    - Add a second ethernet port, so this can be used as a home gateway/firewall/proxy/etc.

    - Use a cooler CPU, such as a Pentium-M (used in the Centrino chipset), VIA C3, Transmeta. Depending on the CPU, it could potentially be fanless.

    1. Re:How Loud is it? by mustangsal66 · · Score: 3, Funny

      A little deflection of moving air and the first hover computer..

      --
      Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
      Sig changed for readability by G.W.
    2. Re:How Loud is it? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      With a P4 in that little case, they have to push a lot of air, so this thing will be loud. What they need is:

      Not if all the CPU heat is dissapated directly out of the case....like if they drilled a hole right above the CPU. Which they did.

      - Add a second ethernet port, so this can be used as a home gateway/firewall/proxy/etc.

      Why the hell do you need a P4 as a proxy/firewall? You trying to run MS Proxy server or something? Try Linux with IPChanins if you must run a software firewall. Or Smoothwall. Runs just fine on a 486.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:How Loud is it? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Okay, but a 486 isn't this size. Perhaps you missed the significance of this article...

    4. Re:How Loud is it? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      Okay, but a 486 isn't this size. Perhaps you missed the significance of this article...

      Hmmm... how about a 486 laptop with 2 PCMCIA ethernet cards?

      Assuming that's possible, of course. My old 486 laptop/webserver only has 1 pcmcia slot (with 1 ethernet card in it), and I admit that I've never seen a 486 laptop with 2. A pentium laptop, on the other hand...

    5. Re:How Loud is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to be gross about it you can get by with only 1 NIC using IP aliasing. It's not pretty, but will work in some situations.

    6. Re:How Loud is it? by -tji · · Score: 1

      Why the hell do you need a P4 as a proxy/firewall? You trying to run MS Proxy server or something? Try Linux with IPChanins if you must run a software firewall. Or Smoothwall. Runs just fine on a 486.

      Who runs a dedicated proxy/firewall? I want it to be my gateway, and my mail/spam-assasin/web/PHP/MySQL/FTP/samba/NFS/VPN/ firewall/ server, as well as being a general host I can always SSH into, for a Linux command prompt.

      So, a 486 is fine for packet forwarding. But, to be my "Linux Home DSL Gateway", I would like a bit more horsepower.

    7. Re:How Loud is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an IBM Thinkpad 755CD with two PCMCIA slots. Though mine's a Pentium 75MHz, the 755CD (or a slightly different model) was available with a 486.

    8. Re:How Loud is it? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Okay, but a 486 isn't this size. Perhaps you missed the significance of this article..

      Sin you've obviousl suffered some loss of higher brain function, I'm not going to take the time to find the links. It will be a good exercise for you to google forthem yourself. But there haver been both 486 and Pentium/Celeron, and probably PII and III class machines of this size. No, nt by the same company, no, not looking exactly the same. But nearly the same size, and some even smaller.

      No, I did not miss the significance of the article.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    9. Re:How Loud is it? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Who runs a dedicated proxy/firewall?

      Perhaps people who are interested in more than a passing glance at a secure network setup.

      But what would I know. I only engineer network solutions for companies with global presences, with literally hunderds of network egresses, all of which need to be secured.

      But that's for businesses....I mean...hackers only go after THOSE IP addresses...not your cable modem IPs, so why bother with the same level of security, even if it can be accomplished with some old boat anchor 486 that's hardly useful for anything else.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    10. Re:How Loud is it? by cookd · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention it, but I spent the last few evenings undoing that mistake.

      Split your requirements into two computers. One should be a devoted gateway. It should do any routing, NATing (if you do that sort of thing), firewalling, traffic shaping, DNS, DHCP, etc., everything associated with "getting the Internet into my residence". Maybe email fits in as well. If you want, you can even put Squid on it. I got a box that is perfect for this for about $105 (after shipping). Just add a second NIC (everything else is included). Maybe a bit of overkill (400 MHz, 128 MB RAM, 6 GB HDD), but hey, it was cheap. Not as small as the IWill, but since I tend to not mess with my router much, it doesn't really need to be any smaller than it is.

      Then have second machine -- perhaps the one referenced in this article -- for everything else. Forward port 80 to it so your web sites appear to come from the main system. Forward port 2222 to 22 so that you can SSH into it from the outside world. Put samba, MySQL, XFree, etc. on it.

      The point of this is, put the stuff that you simply set up and forget on one machine. Make it dedicated to its purpose of handling the network needs for your residence. Then for everything else, use one or more other machines. Then, if you crash or screw up or whatever the one machine, you haven't taken down your whole local network. You don't have to worry about accidentally messing up your firewall config, since it is on a box that you never touch. You still get a web (and any other) server that appears to be directly exposed, but you can mess with the web server configuration without risking messing with your whole network. Finally, you can disconnect and take off with your secondary server without messing anything up. Before I split the job over two computers, I wanted to take my computer somewhere else for a few days. But I couldn't -- taking it would take the network down. And to make my routing computer work properly in the new environment, I would have to reconfigure it. And then I would have to configure it again to get it back up and running once I put it back to work as a router. Now, I can just unplug the secondary computer. It is already set up to use DHCP, and it doesn't expect to act as a router, so no reconfiguration. And the network at home stays up -- the web server is gone, but that is all.

      Anyway, my suggestion is to give permanent services a permanent, stable home. Give the dynamic services and the stuff you will play with a separate box. Kind of like the kernel-space, userland separation that makes an OS stable...

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    11. Re:How Loud is it? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      1. I did realize that, but it's too late once you hit submit.
      2. If you're going to insult brain function, do some proofreading.

  51. Is that the worlds smallest desktop pentium 4 by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    in your pocket, or are you just trying to Slashdot me?

  52. Pentium M? by bedizened · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm surprised at what appears to be a complete lack of small/quiet desktop systems using the new Pentium M, or even the entire Centrino chipset.

    It seems like the Pentium M, even on a laptop motherboard, would be the ideal way to make an extremely small, fanless (at least for the 7W version of the chip) pc.

    Has anyone seen something like this? Would it be difficult to make one?

    1. Re:Pentium M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the athlon XP-M?

      Those can be drop in replacements for desktop cpus (i. e. they fit in socket A's) and run significantly cooler than standard xp's (and P4's).

  53. Only one Enet port :-(( by jpetts · · Score: 1

    Why is this? As more and more people are putting in home networks, having at least the option to put in a second Ethernet port become more important.

    I want to put in a small form factor, quiet machine running OpenBSD as a firewall, but I can't find what I'm looking for. Anybody got any suggestions?

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    1. Re:Only one Enet port :-(( by dr+bacardi · · Score: 2, Informative

      how about a usb -> ethernet dongle?

    2. Re:Only one Enet port :-(( by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      I have an old Dell laptop (p1-166 w/ 48mb ram), broken monitor (but the vid out works) doing dsl gateway duty... previous, I had a 486sx33 laptop with 12mb ram in charge of sharing a modem connection. That was a bit wimpy though. The 166 seems to do great. You can probably get something similar on ebay for under $100.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  54. Ouch! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    "Somewhere in the environmental controls of the Lying Bastard, there was a point the temperature of a star."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  55. It's not the money... by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    It's just that I don't want old baggage! It's like a closet full of old crap you don't want. If it's old enough to use parallel, I don't even want to use it.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:It's not the money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's just that I don't want old baggage! It's like a closet full of old crap you don't want. If it's old enough to use parallel, I don't even want to use it.
      because new is better
  56. A novel idea... by aechols · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80004005'

    [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] The Microsoft Jet database engine stopped the process because you and another user are attempting to change the same data at the same time.

    /include/left.inc, line 139


    Who'da thunk it, more than one user getting to the same data at the same time? Amazing how quickly computer technology changes.

    --
    Are you pondering what I'm pondering?
  57. What happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Somebody set us up the slashdot cliche!

    Penisbird turn on!

  58. Similar in concept: CappuccinoPC Mocha P4 by KMSelf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dimensions are about the same -- the Mocha's slightly taller, but shorter in depth and width, 2.4 lb. Max RAM is 1GB, and current CPUs run to 2.4 GHz. It's loud unless placed behind other HW. Tons of ports (serial, parallel, 4x USB, firewire, audio in & out, S/video, 2xPS2, PCMCIA).

    And it runs Debian GNU/Linux. Well.

    Why, you ask? Portable desktop, fewer parts to break than a laptop. Fits in my book bag. $1300 as configured (1.7GHz, 512MB, 20 GB).

    --

    What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?

  59. Re:JESUS, TACO, SLOW DOWN on the POSTING! by scottcha+4 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Quality? You're new here aren't you?

    --
    Sanity is overrated...Being CRAZY is much more fun!!!
  60. No video editing possibilities? (wrong!) by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 3, Informative
    First of all the ZPC is not versatile; it can never be a good gaming machine and since there is no TV-out or DVI connector you're limited to a VGA display, so there's no video editing possibilities.

    Obviously this guy doesn't know much about video editing. The firewire on this makes it very video-editing capable. Disk space is more likely to hamper serious video work, but an external firewire drive could be used to gain space.

  61. Re:You're lack of clarity proves you are an IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your lack of the ability to use the word 'you're' correctly in a sentence proves that you are an even bigger idiot. Good job.

  62. A possible solution to the Slashdot Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldnt Slashdot implement a google-like function that would automagically cache all the text of a linked site/article?

    Sign your petition here :P

    1. Re:A possible solution to the Slashdot Effect by ducster · · Score: 1

      And who is going to pay for all of this lovely content to be cached? Unless you have a couple of spare servers and huge 'net connections you are offering.....

  63. Re:What about the ASUS Pundit? Whoaaa by Azathoth!EDC · · Score: 1

    It looks like they took an old desktop pc and stood it up, tower-like.

    Is it a tower!?

    Is it a desktop!?

    WHAT A REAL MIND FSCK!

  64. Intel's already doing this... by aksansai · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since the Pentium 4's ratio is locked, Intel has to support three different CPUs for different FSB speeds (400MHz, 533MHz, and 800MHz). This is not uncommon nor does it appear to be drastically hurting sales (in fact, it really is not that much of a nightmare at all). I imagine Intel will be adding more frequencies as technologies allow.

    AMD is just following suit, but eliminating one more path the CPU must take to access the memory. If it works for Intel, it'll work for AMD.

    --
    Ayup
  65. Re:Hey, it's like a cave in here....here....here.. by Ananee · · Score: 1
    Personally, I don't like how small this thing is. I prefer room inside for my hands, that makes it easier to tinker with and fix if one of the components break.
    Also, I'm going to assume that because of the size, some replacement pieces are going to be hard to find, and more expensive than they really ought to be.

    Maybe I'm missing the point...

  66. Motorola MW800 - Smaller Tougher. by liquidzero4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have any of you seen the Motorola MW800. It's smaller. http://ruggedpower.motorola.com Not only that but it's completly ruggedized. It's completly water proof, has a thick aluminum case. I drove my sisters Jeep over an eval I had. The mother boards only about 4inches by 6inches, with an integraded power. They told me it was the worlds smallest P4 motherboard. It has a 3D shock mounted HD with a heater to heat the HD during extreme cold. P4 1.7Ghz, 2.4 coming. Includes the following integraded. 1 gig ram 40 gig HD Video caputre w digital VCR Firewire USB Bluetooth PCMCIA WLAN Wideare network support, GPRS, iDEN, CPDP Etc GPS 10/00 Built in power supply with sorts of portection. The back of the unit also has an AUX port for GPIO and will provid 5 and 12V regulated power to external devices. Supports dual digital/analog display

    1. Re:Motorola MW800 - Smaller Tougher. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been working with their PT800, a few kinks in the initial production but otherwise very nice. I wouldn't even compare these products though. Ruggedized computers are really for commercial applications and the Mot units are easily 4 times the price of this little home unit.
      (I'd like to see some drive a truck over that toaster-of-a-PC :P )

  67. I hope they don't get cheap with their hardware... by fumanchu32 · · Score: 1
    I hope hardware isn't as "cheap" and inefficient like they did with their db.

    A commercial site on access, nice.

    http://www.iwillusa.com/home/home.asp

    "[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] The Microsoft Jet database engine stopped the process because you and another user are attempting to change the same data at the same time."
  68. Back to the future by silkySlim · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the big deal is about all this size stuff. My high-end state of the art desktop was smaller than the keyboard. It even has the keyboard built-in!

    Well, OK. Fine. It was high-end for the 80's (128KB and CP/M Bee-otch!).

  69. Re:Hey, it's like a cave in here....here....here.. by Zekat · · Score: 1

    Careful... if it gets dark you could get eaten by a grue.

    --
    Mmm, donuts.
  70. Re:I hope they don't get cheap with their hardware by fumanchu32 · · Score: 1

    Make that "I hope hardware isn't as "cheap" and inefficient like their db." It is sad when you have to edit your unread comment.

  71. I don't think so by Artifex · · Score: 1
    The nice thing about a computer this size is that you can just place it in a small refrigator... and then overclock the heck of it.


    Condensation becomes a real issue if you try that.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just purge it with dry air, nitrogen or co2

    2. Re:I don't think so by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Most refrigerators are practically dehumidifiers. Condensation will only happen when you open the door ane let humid air in. Besides, you could also just exchange the air in the fridge with some dry CO2 you can get really really cheap.

  72. Cappuccino PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for $350 off ebay, I bought a Cappuccino mini-pc :

    1.0 ghz P3
    256mb ram
    20 gig hdd
    slim dvd drive

    it is in my truck, for mp3, dvd/divx/(s)vcd/GPS/naviagation/games

    Its MUCH more powerful than any of the EPIA mini-itx systems (like, by a lot) and it was cheaper to boot (the cost for the dvd/ram/hdd alone is more than what I paid)

  73. Wow I didn't think of that. by Gldm · · Score: 1

    Yeah that'd really be a pain. It'd be like having the same speed chip released in versions with different multiplier settings so you could run it at different FSB speeds. I mean the confusion would make it completely unprofitable. Good thing nobody ever does anything like that. It's much easier and cheaper to upgrade my $100-150 motherboard to support new ram speeds every year or two than buy a new $100-150 CPU AND a new motherboard every time I buy ram. I mean why would you wanna replace a perfectly good 800mhz cpu just because you got DDR400 and a better motherboard? I mean what would I do if I had to replace the CPU too, build a completely new machine and have two? Ludicrious!

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  74. ZZZ...(at 54 db) by joaodk · · Score: 1
    and What about the noise?

    ItÂs no use to be small if it sounds like a dustbuster anyway.

    It will blend in nicely on your living room so that people will arrive in your place like:

    "You got a really cool place dude! but... whereÂs this awfull noise coming from?" IÂd like to see a AMD-XP in a SFF running with passive cooling. that would be cool! and probably a lot cheaper, too.

  75. I'll stick with my Micro ATX thank you very much by onelin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sick of these small yet proprietary mini ITX boxes. Yes, they're small, but you can't put much in them. Read the review, he couldn't even put in a corsair 512MB DIMM because the heat spreader made contact with the chassis?space? That's CRAMPED.

    My box is 5.5" by 11.5" by 11.5", houses a 300W power supply INSIDE IT (not externally, ala ZPC), can handle any standard micro atx formfactor motherboard, as much RAM as I want, a full size AGP videocard, etc. It will hold whatever hard drive and CDROM I want...Oh, and it weighs less than the ZPC since it's aluminum. I have expandability and as much power as I want. Did I mention the geargrip for small PCs works beautifully with this?

  76. Solarism makes a cheap fast-response LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a Solarism LM1530, it's a pretty nice 15" LCD monitor and has a fast response LCD (16 ms instead of a more typical 30 ms) for under $300. You can get a 17" version as well, for under $400. It works well with my Shuttle SN41G2. I have the black Shuttle case, and it looks great with the black Solarism monitor.

    The reason I mention it to you is that I read some article where someone was speculating about how it might be good for LAN parties, since the monitor stand basically folds up and you can carry it flat. I can't say I've brought my monitor to a LAN party, but it is quite easy to carry around when folded flat.

    Check out the review on GamePC for more info. I haven't seen any others yet, since this monitor is fairly new (on the market about a month, I think...). Anyway, I thought it was a great deal, since it runs about $150 less than the Hitachi CML174, and about $250 less than the Planar PX171M, which are also 16 ms response time LCD monitors. The only down side for me is that the Solarism doesn't have DVI, but the picture is still awesome for analog.

  77. Hardly worlds smallest by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    We have a bunch of these in our labs. We've had these for almost a year now... Notice its a few inches smaller as well... The PIII and PII versions are much smaller as well, as we have those in our labs too. Cool little buggers...

  78. Plastic just like the Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've seen it up-close and personal in a store (yes the actually had a sample, those cheap bastards) and it drew me over like a nice Cooler Master case usually does. But lo, it was plastic and it felt cheap.

    Of all cases nothing can beat a nice cooler master.

  79. Re: heater by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
    a heater to heat the HD during extreme cold. P4 1.7Ghz, 2.4 coming.

    Makes sense to me. ;-)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  80. Power by jmu1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I want to know why it is these super-small units can operate on 90W PSUs.

    Intel and AMD swear up and down that I MUST use some 350-400W PSUs that generate heat like they were mini fission plants and sound like a 747 sitting under my desk. Bah.

  81. Dell has some pretty small cases too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell has their SX270 although twice the volume still pretty neat. The power supply is external but 150W

    Dell SX270

  82. 55W is enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try the VIA Nehemiah M10000, you can use the 55W PSU instead of 90W PSU used in this article.

  83. Waste of [insert favourite asset] by arth1 · · Score: 1

    If you want a truly small P4 computer, buy a small laptop, toss away the keyboard, display and battery, and put the rest in a custom made box.

    These case fads come and go (isn't that the definition of a fad?). Two years ago it was aluminum cases, then there was cases with windows, then there was cold cathode lights, then there was watercooling for the masses, and now tiny boxes and old-fashioned horizontal boxes seem to be in.
    Next year I predict you'll see leather-skinned computers, followed by wall-mounted computers.

    Regards,
    --
    *Art

  84. wow by ducster · · Score: 1

    Great, something else to lose own the back of the couch.

  85. nothing with this kind of power? by Scott · · Score: 1

    I'd say the submitter hasn't checked out the latest from Shuttle, the SB61G2, which by comparison will blow this Iwill machine to pieces. The Iwill box uses the dated 845 chipset while the new Shuttle not only has more expansion options it also uses the 865 chipset. Check out some reviews and you'll see it can keep up with even the most powerful full size desktops.

  86. Nothing new about the performance either by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

    "There have been similar designs in the past, but nothing with this kind of power."

    Sorry, but smaller, equally powerful machines have been quite available for a while now. Notable examples include the SaintSong Latte P4 (specs here) and the Jadetec Micropc4 just to name Pentium4-capable solutions. In cases where a slower CPU will do, even smaller options are available, such as the SaintSong Cappuccino or Espresso systems (specs here and here).

    The main unifying factor of all these systems is that all claim to be the world's smallest. Currently, the title of "World's Smallest Desktop Pentium4" claimed in the article title actually belongs to the Latte (above), which has a volume of about 1951 cm^3 (although the Micropc4 comes close at 1976 cm^3). The iWill ZPC in the article is comparatively huge, at over 2613 cm^3, although Shuttle's XPC systems are over 11000 cm^3, so the iWill is certainly a small system. However, while the iWill looks to have other interesting innovations as far as minimizing temperature and noise, it fails to beat the competition in both size and performance.

    There is no sig.

  87. PS/2 not perfect... by fendel · · Score: 1

    Every box I've had, it's been painfully easy to accidentally knock the keyboard plug out of the PS/2 port... and when that happens, it's hard-reboot time, because the computer goes into a stupor.

    At least USB is hot-pluggable.