Stop being a crybaby. Boomers didn't do shit to your lazy ass. It's the wealthy - they've been screwing over everyone since the beginning of time. Boomers were also screwed over by them.
Who can afford to travel the nation just to 'protest'?
A lot of people, especially local people. A lot more people apparently can afford to travel to DC to protest than can afford to travel to attend Trump's inauguration.
People on political payrolls... appearing to coordinate the violent ones.
Many have been filmed at protest after protest, around the nation. Like gromit deadheads.
Been happening for years, but Obama's justice department had no interest, so they got overconfident. As I said in another post, conspiracy laws are a bitch, the crime spreads like herpes.
Yes, many have been filmed protesting. But no one has been filmed getting paid. That is just a right-wing nutjob conspiracy.
Bold assertion. Where do those chanting morons get their pot money? Many individuals have been filmed in many cities, there is clearly a roaming cluster fuck of fuckwits.
Now that the cops have all these phones, we'll see how far down the rabbit hole actually goes. Good news...
It is MUCH more bold to claim you have to pay people to protest Trump than to claim you don't have to pay them. Still waiting for my paycheck.
The secretary of state issued the memo after a Hawaii judge blocked the Trump administration's revised travel ban on citizens from six predominantly Muslim countries.
The ban is for six predominately islamic extremist countries. Are you bigoted against Muslims or something?
WTF? The countries are not "predominantly islamic extremist." That would require more than 50% of the population to be extremists.
I was once asked to list every address I had ever lived at. That's just about impossible unless you stayed in the house into which you were born for your whole life.
Um, no. I've lived at 11 addresses and I can recall all except two that were temporary relocations (and I can partially recall them). Granted, it is a ridiculous request. Perhaps all the addresses you've lived at for the last seven years?
So your assumption is that Facebook et al demand birth certificates, picture id, fingerprints and DNA prior to opening an account in any particular name. There is real insanity in using something like social media at borders where the validity of any social media account ie what is you name, John Smith, provide social media account details and passwords, I have none, liar John Smith is all over the place, prepare to be strip searched and anal probed and be held in custody until you provide details for all social media accounts tied to John Smith or variants of John Smith. So basically guilty for the entirety of social media until you can prove which accounts are not your account.
Well they could look at all the pictures of John Smith and see if any are obviously you, or if any of them posted about just visiting the country you're coming from. Of course this assumes you're dumb enough to have privacy settings that allow unknowns to peruse your profile.
I guess they figured that at $50, it would be a total flop and they'd just look stupid. At $30, they actually have something there, now that ticket prices are so f@cking high that I go only once every couple of years. I likely won't use it, but there are probably those that will.
I believe it would be more apt to say that Trump wanted to attack an openly corrupt media establishment. A whole lot of people agree with him, and of course the owners of that powerful block of corruption are doing all they can to maintain power and control.
That is just laughably incorrect. Trump is the most corrupt person around. Haven't you been paying attention? His campaign (not funded by him, as he said it would be), used Trump properties exclusively, effectively funneling contributions directly to his pockets; he routinely stiffs contractors who work on his projects; he tells so many easily verifiably false statements, that nothing he says can be believed. How the fuck is the media corrupt? You might not like what they report or how they report it but they are not corrupt. Get a dictionary.
Translation: No, Clinton operatives did not leak the information, but I need to sex up what actually happened to perpetrate the "evil Clinton Crime Empre" conspiracy I hold so near and dear.
And for fuck's sake, the WP has been delivered leaked information for a long goddamned time now. Do you feel Nixon got a raw deal because Deep Throat picked Bob Woodward? At the end of the day, leaks suck, but if the leaks actually point to misconduct and malfeasance, ought not your primary concern be those doing bad things, rather than those who blow the whistle?
Apparently that is not his concern when the whistle is being blown against his team.
Slashdot Mirror
Stop being a crybaby. Boomers didn't do shit to your lazy ass. It's the wealthy - they've been screwing over everyone since the beginning of time. Boomers were also screwed over by them.
Masturbating on company time is just over the top.
I disagree; it's another bodily function that can be handled in private. However, telling someone you're doing it IS over the line.
...lets remember that the Taliban were once supported by the USA. During that time, some called them terrorists.
Yup, the USA called them "Freedom Fighters" back then.
He's not the healthiest 70yo I know, but he's clearly doing much better than the average.
I believe the "doctor's note" he presented during the campaign said otherwise.
"I'm ready for u big boy." Are we sure there was even another woman? Only time have seen messages like that is reading my spam messages .
Well if you had a girlfriend other than your right hand, maybe you'd have seen a text like that.
Those who object loudest believe the most lies - and they don't want you taking them away.
Those who object the loudest believe the most lies.
Google needs to quit pretending and just limit it's search results to NPR, the New York Times, and the Washington Post.
That would fix it.
You're right - that's an equivalent filter.
Just as they love their lapdog MSM, the lib-left hate/fear "alternate media". http://www.breitbart.com/big-j... [breitbart.com]
...because "alternate media" present "alternate facts", aka lies. Brietbart is the PRIME example.
There is a pretty high correlation to trump supporters and people who argue against fact-checking. Just saying.
Sell them to terrorists.
Who can afford to travel the nation just to 'protest'?
A lot of people, especially local people. A lot more people apparently can afford to travel to DC to protest than can afford to travel to attend Trump's inauguration.
People on political payrolls ... appearing to coordinate the violent ones.
Bullshit. Link to non-RW media video or STFU.
Many have been filmed at protest after protest, around the nation. Like gromit deadheads.
Been happening for years, but Obama's justice department had no interest, so they got overconfident. As I said in another post, conspiracy laws are a bitch, the crime spreads like herpes.
Yes, many have been filmed protesting. But no one has been filmed getting paid. That is just a right-wing nutjob conspiracy.
Bold assertion. Where do those chanting morons get their pot money? Many individuals have been filmed in many cities, there is clearly a roaming cluster fuck of fuckwits.
Now that the cops have all these phones, we'll see how far down the rabbit hole actually goes. Good news...
It is MUCH more bold to claim you have to pay people to protest Trump than to claim you don't have to pay them. Still waiting for my paycheck.
That would require more than 50% of the population to be extremists.
Read it and weep.
If you are claiming that the majority of Muslims are extremists, then the word extreme loses it's meaning.
No, that's a horsey!
I'm good with this leading where it goes. We'll see who laughs last.
I'll bet you're wrong about who was paying the rioters bills. These were the usual black block suspects.
You might be surprised to learn that you don't have to pay people to protest Trump.
The list was made in 2012 by the Obama administration and has not been amended.
If you had a problem with the list, you should have spoken up when the democrats made it.
Stop pushing that lie. It was created by a Republican Congress and put into a bill that Obama signed
The secretary of state issued the memo after a Hawaii judge blocked the Trump administration's revised travel ban on citizens from six predominantly Muslim countries.
The ban is for six predominately islamic extremist countries. Are you bigoted against Muslims or something?
WTF? The countries are not "predominantly islamic extremist." That would require more than 50% of the population to be extremists.
I was once asked to list every address I had ever lived at. That's just about impossible unless you stayed in the house into which you were born for your whole life.
Um, no. I've lived at 11 addresses and I can recall all except two that were temporary relocations (and I can partially recall them). Granted, it is a ridiculous request. Perhaps all the addresses you've lived at for the last seven years?
So your assumption is that Facebook et al demand birth certificates, picture id, fingerprints and DNA prior to opening an account in any particular name. There is real insanity in using something like social media at borders where the validity of any social media account ie what is you name, John Smith, provide social media account details and passwords, I have none, liar John Smith is all over the place, prepare to be strip searched and anal probed and be held in custody until you provide details for all social media accounts tied to John Smith or variants of John Smith. So basically guilty for the entirety of social media until you can prove which accounts are not your account.
Well they could look at all the pictures of John Smith and see if any are obviously you, or if any of them posted about just visiting the country you're coming from. Of course this assumes you're dumb enough to have privacy settings that allow unknowns to peruse your profile.
"Save $100 on a new TV during our Spring Sale!"
The more you spend, the more you save!
I guess they figured that at $50, it would be a total flop and they'd just look stupid. At $30, they actually have something there, now that ticket prices are so f@cking high that I go only once every couple of years. I likely won't use it, but there are probably those that will.
I believe it would be more apt to say that Trump wanted to attack an openly corrupt media establishment. A whole lot of people agree with him, and of course the owners of that powerful block of corruption are doing all they can to maintain power and control.
That is just laughably incorrect. Trump is the most corrupt person around. Haven't you been paying attention? His campaign (not funded by him, as he said it would be), used Trump properties exclusively, effectively funneling contributions directly to his pockets; he routinely stiffs contractors who work on his projects; he tells so many easily verifiably false statements, that nothing he says can be believed. How the fuck is the media corrupt? You might not like what they report or how they report it but they are not corrupt. Get a dictionary.
Translation: No, Clinton operatives did not leak the information, but I need to sex up what actually happened to perpetrate the "evil Clinton Crime Empre" conspiracy I hold so near and dear.
And for fuck's sake, the WP has been delivered leaked information for a long goddamned time now. Do you feel Nixon got a raw deal because Deep Throat picked Bob Woodward? At the end of the day, leaks suck, but if the leaks actually point to misconduct and malfeasance, ought not your primary concern be those doing bad things, rather than those who blow the whistle?
Apparently that is not his concern when the whistle is being blown against his team.