Maybe the rich people at CPAC are happy, but the poor people losing their health care, medicare, and next their social security are not. Trumps overall approval rating is now below 37%.
So what exactly did the US Government do in that first month to create all those jobs? After all, if you can implement policy on day one and see that translate into an economic boost within a month, that is some good policy that governments would want to imitate all over the world.
It's actually quite simple - you have a leader who says he wants to put his country first and that makes investors and business people feel good enough to expand existing businesses and start new ones. That's why the stock market rallied after Trump's election - it's not based on an actual policy but a feeling.
Obama's "you didn't build that" bullshit cost more people more jobs that you can imagine.
You are full of shit. This was the 76th consecutive month of job growth. The stock market went up 50% over Obama's terms. Things are still just chugging along.
This has more to do with Republican-ism that Trump-ism. The people who own businesses are primarily Republican. Many of them had very bad attitudes when Obama-care was launched and they refused to hire full-time because they thought Obama was picking their pocket. Now that Obama is gone the mood of business has changed drastically. They feel like their is relief, whether real or imagined. In any case, business owners are in a better mood with Trump as president and are hiring again. I don't think this has anything directly to do with policy.
Total nonsense. This is the 76th consecutive month of job growth. It is totally in line with the February job growth of 2016 and 2015. This has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with the economy doing what it's been doing.
Me, too, but only recently. During the study period I was still married and probably had sex about 30-40 times a year. Now I'm happily divorced and my girlfriend wants it every night. Nice change. At my age, my orgasm IS optional and she usually gets a few each time. Role reversal from teenagehood.
When it was $25, I liked it. When it went to $35, I was peeved. When it went to $49, I thought, "What a bunch of assholes, just trying to get us to buy more Xmas shit!" Back down to $35 is the right direction. If they put it back at $25, I will buy a lot more from them.
No, fake news really exists, although it the term has been coopted to mean "stuff I don't agree with."
That's not correct - it's a looney left talking point. The two items that I referenced are *factually* incorrect. The MLK bust was never removed from the White House, this isn't someone's "opinion", it's a fact. Likewise, Trump became President on January 21, 2017. So if someone was detained at the airport in December of 2016, it had nothing to do with now President Trump. It had to do with President Obama. Again, not an "opinion", not "stuff I don't agree with", instead it is "fact".
Both items were passed off as "news" by seemingly legitimate news organizations. Both items are fake news - literally fake. There are plenty of other examples, but, newsflash: Media Matters isn't going to tell you about it.
You continue to fail at understanding "Fake News." The MLK bust story was MISTAKENLY incorrect, and it WAS CORRECTED. Fake news sites INTENTIONALLY LIE and DO NOT CORRECT.
While I agree Trump's ego is out of control. Look at where we are at when both sides are arguing "Who had more friends show up". This is like 4th grade all over. SOMETIMES YOUR PARTY LOSES. Lose with some fucking class.
You're missing the point. If Trump, Inc will openly lie, boldly about trivial things are so obviously false, he will most certainly lie about things that matter that are hard to tell are false. That will put American lives in danger.
As a side note, I don't recall the Republicans losing with any "fucking class" for the last 8 years while they accused Obama of being from another country, blocked anything he wanted solely because he wanted it (ACA was modeled after Republican RomneyCare), and blocked him for a year from appointing a Supreme Court Justice. And before you start saying they didn't protest, look up Tea Party.
Why is it fine to try and determine who the Boston bomber was, but not some rando anti-trump kid that sucker punched someone?
That makes you a hypocrite, and a piece of leftist shit in my book, I hope you enjoy letting blacks fuck your wife up the ass, after all they don't have your white privileges, and you owe them.
You're obviously a troll (with all that buck-fucking stuff, also homo-repressive, but that's not my forte), but I'll school you on the difference. If you want to "identify" a criminal, go ahead and provide any information you have to the responsible police authority. Doxing is for vigilante justice.
Joining Jeffery Eisenach on Trump's FCC transition team is Mark Jamison, an economist at the University of Florida. Like Eisenach, Jamison is affiliated with the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, an expert in telecommunications policy and a critic of the FCC's net-neutrality regs.
Ah, the AEI - the climate-change-denying conservative "think tank" which offered $10K bribes to criticize the IPCC. Seems legit.
Politicians have sold out across the board. This is not a republican problem, it is a problem for every politician that accepts campaign donations from corporations.
You are in denial. Democratic administration says they violated net neutrality. Republican administration reverses that. How is THIS not a republican problem.
Actually no. The "media narrative" photo was taken later. There is even a clock tower in that photo that you can zoom into. That picture has a physical world time stamp.
The two most famous of these side-by-side pictures show times of 11:19am and 11:22am.
Exactly. Salary negotiation is a game and the first person to name a number loses. Asking someone their complete salary history is like saying to someone, "Let's play poker, only, i get to see all of your cards and you don't get to see any of mine." You wouldn't play poker with someone like that, would you? Similarly, don't go in to a job interview with someone like that. And furthermore, it's a red flag for how the company treats their employees. Run far, run fast.
Actually, many job listings include a salary range, so they've already shown you their cards.
"I believe one of our core priorities going forward should be to close that divide -- to do what's necessary to help the private sector build networks, send signals, and distribute information to American consumers, regardless of race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or anything else. We must work to bring the benefits of the digital age to all Americans."
And here I thought virtue signalling was a trademark of the regressive left. Pai certainly is slathering it rather heavy on both sides.
I do wonder how exactly he intends to follow through on this.
Will telcos now require that customers write their sexual preferences and religion on the registration form? How else can Pai be sure that no one is getting discriminated in throwing money at the local monopoly?
He threw all that shit in to make him look like some kind of nice equal-rights guy. Race, gender, religion, etc have nothing to do with broadband availability. The factors are solely affluence and population density.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe the rich people at CPAC are happy, but the poor people losing their health care, medicare, and next their social security are not. Trumps overall approval rating is now below 37%.
Solution: take out all the seats and make everybody stand.
So what exactly did the US Government do in that first month to create all those jobs? After all, if you can implement policy on day one and see that translate into an economic boost within a month, that is some good policy that governments would want to imitate all over the world.
It's actually quite simple - you have a leader who says he wants to put his country first and that makes investors and business people feel good enough to expand existing businesses and start new ones. That's why the stock market rallied after Trump's election - it's not based on an actual policy but a feeling.
Obama's "you didn't build that" bullshit cost more people more jobs that you can imagine.
You are full of shit. This was the 76th consecutive month of job growth. The stock market went up 50% over Obama's terms. Things are still just chugging along.
This has more to do with Republican-ism that Trump-ism. The people who own businesses are primarily Republican. Many of them had very bad attitudes when Obama-care was launched and they refused to hire full-time because they thought Obama was picking their pocket. Now that Obama is gone the mood of business has changed drastically. They feel like their is relief, whether real or imagined. In any case, business owners are in a better mood with Trump as president and are hiring again. I don't think this has anything directly to do with policy.
Total nonsense. This is the 76th consecutive month of job growth. It is totally in line with the February job growth of 2016 and 2015. This has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with the economy doing what it's been doing.
The rules at work got so complicated that I ADDED a personal rule: must contain at least one vulgar word.
At least iOS shows the last character you typed. That in itself helps a lot.
I think it'd be funny if they decided that they would rip out the American Flag and put theirs in it's place. What you going to do about it, bitch?
Me, too, but only recently. During the study period I was still married and probably had sex about 30-40 times a year. Now I'm happily divorced and my girlfriend wants it every night. Nice change. At my age, my orgasm IS optional and she usually gets a few each time. Role reversal from teenagehood.
If you're hiring him for VHDL and not circuit board design, he doesn't fail. The board designer did.
but if I hadn't, they'd have been welcome to pay what I owed.
I'm pretty sure the criminals filing false returns are also using false data so they can get a false refund.
When it was $25, I liked it. When it went to $35, I was peeved. When it went to $49, I thought, "What a bunch of assholes, just trying to get us to buy more Xmas shit!" Back down to $35 is the right direction. If they put it back at $25, I will buy a lot more from them.
No, fake news really exists, although it the term has been coopted to mean "stuff I don't agree with."
That's not correct - it's a looney left talking point. The two items that I referenced are *factually* incorrect. The MLK bust was never removed from the White House, this isn't someone's "opinion", it's a fact. Likewise, Trump became President on January 21, 2017. So if someone was detained at the airport in December of 2016, it had nothing to do with now President Trump. It had to do with President Obama. Again, not an "opinion", not "stuff I don't agree with", instead it is "fact".
Both items were passed off as "news" by seemingly legitimate news organizations. Both items are fake news - literally fake. There are plenty of other examples, but, newsflash: Media Matters isn't going to tell you about it.
You continue to fail at understanding "Fake News." The MLK bust story was MISTAKENLY incorrect, and it WAS CORRECTED. Fake news sites INTENTIONALLY LIE and DO NOT CORRECT.
Are these polls from the same media that showed Hiilldog as winning in a landslide? Can you even trust them? Or at least cite your sources?
You fail to understand polls. You can poll all you want, but if people don't show up to vote, they will be wrong.
So, Rev 51.2.3.1 of the MS Driver, dated July 20, 1969, should have a higher priority than Rev 34.5 of an nVidea driver? Really?
Yes, because the time stamp of 1969 has obviously been altered and thus the version number should be used. Thanks for proving my point.
I would love to see this happen.
Just wait for the entitled Americans to cry to their government reps about how they are being treated like garbage.
Again, this applies only to NON-US citizens. Did you even read TFA?!
Did you read TFPPHWRT (parent post he was responding to)?
Perhaps using a higher revision number before a newer time stamp would be the way to solve this stupidity.
Trusting wikipedia on anything is dodgy these days. Trusting it on anything political or contentious is downright fucking naive.
Trusting a source with five citations is less dodgy and naive than trusting a random Internet dude with no citations (not including speeding tickets).
While I agree Trump's ego is out of control. Look at where we are at when both sides are arguing "Who had more friends show up". This is like 4th grade all over. SOMETIMES YOUR PARTY LOSES. Lose with some fucking class.
You're missing the point. If Trump, Inc will openly lie, boldly about trivial things are so obviously false, he will most certainly lie about things that matter that are hard to tell are false. That will put American lives in danger.
As a side note, I don't recall the Republicans losing with any "fucking class" for the last 8 years while they accused Obama of being from another country, blocked anything he wanted solely because he wanted it (ACA was modeled after Republican RomneyCare), and blocked him for a year from appointing a Supreme Court Justice. And before you start saying they didn't protest, look up Tea Party.
Why is it fine to try and determine who the Boston bomber was, but not some rando anti-trump kid that sucker punched someone?
That makes you a hypocrite, and a piece of leftist shit in my book, I hope you enjoy letting blacks fuck your wife up the ass, after all they don't have your white privileges, and you owe them.
You're obviously a troll (with all that buck-fucking stuff, also homo-repressive, but that's not my forte), but I'll school you on the difference. If you want to "identify" a criminal, go ahead and provide any information you have to the responsible police authority. Doxing is for vigilante justice.
Joining Jeffery Eisenach on Trump's FCC transition team is Mark Jamison, an economist at the University of Florida. Like Eisenach, Jamison is affiliated with the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, an expert in telecommunications policy and a critic of the FCC's net-neutrality regs.
Ah, the AEI - the climate-change-denying conservative "think tank" which offered $10K bribes to criticize the IPCC. Seems legit.
Politicians have sold out across the board. This is not a republican problem, it is a problem for every politician that accepts campaign donations from corporations.
You are in denial. Democratic administration says they violated net neutrality. Republican administration reverses that. How is THIS not a republican problem.
To paraphrase Harlan Ellison, "I have no anus, and I must shit."
The two most famous of these side-by-side pictures show times of 11:19am and 11:22am.
Stop using facts. It isn't fair.
Exactly. Salary negotiation is a game and the first person to name a number loses. Asking someone their complete salary history is like saying to someone, "Let's play poker, only, i get to see all of your cards and you don't get to see any of mine." You wouldn't play poker with someone like that, would you? Similarly, don't go in to a job interview with someone like that. And furthermore, it's a red flag for how the company treats their employees. Run far, run fast.
Actually, many job listings include a salary range, so they've already shown you their cards.
"I believe one of our core priorities going forward should be to close that divide -- to do what's necessary to help the private sector build networks, send signals, and distribute information to American consumers, regardless of race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or anything else. We must work to bring the benefits of the digital age to all Americans."
And here I thought virtue signalling was a trademark of the regressive left. Pai certainly is slathering it rather heavy on both sides.
I do wonder how exactly he intends to follow through on this. Will telcos now require that customers write their sexual preferences and religion on the registration form? How else can Pai be sure that no one is getting discriminated in throwing money at the local monopoly?
He threw all that shit in to make him look like some kind of nice equal-rights guy. Race, gender, religion, etc have nothing to do with broadband availability. The factors are solely affluence and population density.