Slashdot Mirror


User: jez9999

jez9999's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,978
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,978

  1. I was really excited about this on New Horizons Phones Home After Pluto Flyby -- Craft Healthy, Data Recorded · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd been waiting for this and following New Horizons so obviously it's great to see, but what slightly tainted the coverage for me was all the freaking USA flag-wavin'. Do you guys really always have to do that? Obama called it "American leadership". Look, I know it was launched and managed by NASA but it involved various non-US technology and experts, not to mention plenty of non-US interest (and non-interest from most US citizens who won't even have heard of New Horizons until yesterday).

    I do think your nationalism ruins things a bit. At one point a NASA guy said it was "all about America" in a room full of US flags. Funny, I thought it was all about Pluto. Can't it just be a victory for human ingenuity and curiosity?

  2. Re:Unlimited data? on Ask Slashdot: Measuring (and Constraining) Mobile Data Use? · · Score: 1

    Hehehe, 2GB plans. I'm amazed people put up with such rubbish, but maybe they don't have a choice ni their part of the US. I bet I use way more than that viewing Youtube videos alone. Lucky I have an all-you-can-eat data plan with Three in the UK.

  3. Re:launch cost mirrors vs. a teeny tinny PU RTG? on Is NASA Planning To "Terraform" Part of the Moon? Not Quite · · Score: 1

    there is something intrinsically lacking in our education system of the last 50 or so years where we can't even convince 1/2 the people that doing something to slow down global warming is a good idea.

    Oh we can, it just has to be wind or solar because they're too stupid to understand that nuclear could ever be safe.

  4. Re:Usually has to be earned on Ask Slashdot: How Do You Find Jobs That Offer Working From Home? · · Score: 1

    So now I'm having to go out of my way to make sure you stay on track.

    No; if you're a manager, you should be monitoring employee output in any case. Just assuming that because they're in the office they're being productive is silly.

    Why wouldn't I just hire the gal I interviewed before you who is willing to come into the office everyday?

    You would, unless she's less capable of doing the job.

    I don't need to have a daily Skype meeting if you're in the building just down the hall.

    No, but with agile software development, you're going to be having daily stand-ups anyway. It's trivial to set up a quick videoconference call for this.

    every staff meeting I have needs to be online so that you can listen in

    Pretty much, and at a place where I recently worked, we did just that. Wasn't a problem. People were usually sitting at their machines already and able to accept the call in seconds. Heck, it was probably quicker than setting up an in-person meeting!

    I don't get to read your body language during the meeting.

    You shouldn't need to. This isn't a date; if an employee can't express themselves clearly through text and speech, there's a problem. Although with videoconferencing, you even have a partial visual of them.

    I don't get to chat with you after the meeting about a project without asking you to stay on the line or calling you when I get back to my desk.

    So?

    You aren't going to participate in any of the local team building exercises that require face to face interaction.

    They're probably overrated, but work-from-home staff could come in specially for such things.

    I can't assign you to any projects where I need someone to sit down with the customer face to face.

    Again, work-from-home staff can come in specially for such things. Yeah, they wouldn't be suited for very regular customer meetings; that would be an obvious argument at interview stage against work-from-home, but I doubt it would apply to most developers.

    The rest of my team will have increased workload because they are dealing with the drive-by requests while you avoid them at home.

    What are drive-by requests? Are you working at McDonald's? If you mean "distractions by people coming up to you and asking you stuff needlessly", then good. Managers should let staff avoid them because they lower productivity.

    If I assign the best work to the people 30 feet away from me because they are easier for me to work with and get constant updates, you see that as favoritism.

    If you need "constant updates" - more constant than agile-style daily updates - you're an obsessive micromanager and I'm glad I don't work for you. You would be the biggest distraction of all.

    Remind me how I as a manager benefit from having you work at home?

    Some employees, myself included, are more productive working from home as we are quite sensitive to noise and even movement (if you have an open plan office and a lot of people walking around). So there's that, as well as the extra time that employee can put into working where they would otherwise be commuting. Both of these should benefit your business.

  5. Re:Generally? You don't. on Ask Slashdot: How Do You Find Jobs That Offer Working From Home? · · Score: 1

    I also find that random discussions are much harder to have remotely. I need these to relax my brain.

    Just goes to show how different people are - I'm the opposite. If my brain suddenly gets distracted for 15 minutes after 45 minutes of concentration, I'm totally thrown off what I was doing and it will make me a lot less productive.

  6. Re:Generally? You don't. on Ask Slashdot: How Do You Find Jobs That Offer Working From Home? · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a lot easier to tell someone at work to go away because you are busy, and there is a clear escalation path if they don't.

    It is not, however, easier to tell someone at work to shut up because their noise is distracting you, and there is frequently no escalation path on that. Open-plan office and "talk out loud whenevr you like" are by design. Headphones often don't fully shut out the noise and are just a distraction in themselves.

  7. Re:Usually has to be earned on Ask Slashdot: How Do You Find Jobs That Offer Working From Home? · · Score: 2

    For a start, there's no guarantee you wouldn't just goof around for the 6 months or so it would take for them to realise you're a lazy freeloader and then go through the process of firing you

    Of course there is - daily Skype meetings. Have an agile board of work on TFS or something and check what people are doing on a daily basis. I've seen this work in practice. People goofing off will be noticed *very* quickly.

    sacking people in the UK and the rest of Europe is a long-drawn out process: employees have rights

    I can't speak for the rest of Europe, but programming jobs in the UK typically have a 3-9 month probation period. During that period you can typically be sacked with 24 hours' (or maybe 1 week's) notice, for any or no reason. There is no problem firing people at all. Even after the probation period, an employee cannot sue for unfair dismissal until they have worked for the employer for 2 years.

    Second, they'd have to install a load of kit in your house

    It's called a laptop.

    you'd also have little or no "induction" into the company, your boss, the goals and culture.

    Obviously one would expect an induction period of a few weeks or months before home working really kicked off.

    Finally, home working has many, many disadvantages. Apart from being isolated, you become an invisible part of the team - and therefore disposable

    Again, I have seen in practice that this just isn't the case, especially with regular videoconferencing meetings.

    You never interact with your work-mates and never get to hear "grapevine" stuff, like where the promotion opportunities are.

    This is a feature, not a bug. "Interacting" with workmates is frequently much closer to the "goofing off" you described earlier, and prevents concentration on development work or learning new stuff. In fact, the distraction of other workmates "interacting" with each other (whether talking about work-related topics or not) during work hours can drag your productivity down enormously, especially in the now-popular openplan office. Being able to consult with workmates only when you actually need to via videoconferencing can be a much better way of doing things.

  8. Re:oldbar on Firefox 39 Released, Bringing Security Improvements and Social Sharing · · Score: 1

    There's actually another extension that restores the search bar, more customizable interface, status bar, tabs-on-bottom, and a bunch of other stuff. I think it was called "Firefox 3" or something...

  9. Re:Moan moan moan on Firefox 39 Released, Bringing Security Improvements and Social Sharing · · Score: 1

    You missed out SeaMonkey and Pale Moon. Both of them are better.

  10. Honest question on Aussie ISP Bakes In Geo-dodging For Netflix, Hulu · · Score: 1

    Will we ever get decent copyright law reform? Like, ever, anything sane? 10 years maximum and no shitty regional monopolies? Or are we just fucked with this Disney regime for evermore?

  11. Re:It's that time... on Volkswagen Factory Worker Killed By a Robot · · Score: 1

    That woman has absolutely zero sense of humour.

    "Guys. I don't know what skynet is. And I wouldn't follow me - I tweet really boring stuff about unit wage costs and the like."

    "Ugh, this is a bit uncomfortable. A person has actually died."

  12. Re:Nevermind the bollocks, here's David Cameron on Cameron Asserts UK Gov't Will Leave No "Safe Space" For Private Communications · · Score: 1

    Bollocks.

    The SNP don't even pretend to give a shit about anyone outside Scotland. I'm aware that there were a few English people who wanted to vote SNP. I consider them idiots. I think the SNP's vote share outside Scotland would be in the low single digits at best. It would be like Jews voting for the Nazis.

  13. Re:Nevermind the bollocks, here's David Cameron on Cameron Asserts UK Gov't Will Leave No "Safe Space" For Private Communications · · Score: 1

    Care to elaborate on why UKIP are "a bunch of wankers"? Do you happen to be Russell Brand?

  14. Re:Fools getting the government they deserve on Trolls No Longer Welcome In New Zealand · · Score: 1

    If you are stupid enough to try and convince someone to suicide and they do (as an example), you are an idiot and will get the book thrown at you.

    Sorry, but you're the fucking idiot who thinks that censoring some speech isn't inevitably going to lead to censoring of other speech, or for that matter, that your WORDS should get you into criminal trouble because it hurts somebody else's feels. You guys wanna do away with free speech? Then you're idiots, and I'll fight it where I live for as long as I live and breathe.

    Oh, and you can't so me for calling you a fucking idiot, because I don't live in New Zealand.

  15. Re:Religion is a choice! on Trolls No Longer Welcome In New Zealand · · Score: 1

    Stop letting your biases cause you to ignore evidence because it disagrees with your ideology. ...is what you need to be telling religious people.

  16. Re:Mod parent down on Google Apologises For Photos App's Racist Blunder · · Score: 1

    It's a black day for the English language.

  17. Re:Nuclear? on The Presidential Candidate With a Plan To Run the US On 100% Clean Energy · · Score: 1

    Nuclear isn't clean by any stretch

    *sigh*

    Actually modern nuclear IS relatively clean and can process existing nuclear waste, thereby making the world *less* irradiated.

  18. Re:Movie? on Color Movie Made of Pluto-Charon System · · Score: 1

    Why does Pluto look brownish? Is this false colour, or would it really look that way to the human eye? Wikipedia says the surface is 98% nitrogen ice, which seems to be basically white, so wouldn't one expect it to look white?

  19. Re:Umm, bullshit. on DuckDuckGo Sees Massive Growth In Post-Snowden World · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, DuckDuckGo is a private company and so not vulnerable to a hostile takeover. If they were, it would kind of defeat their purpose. The second they got bought out by the likes of Apple, privacy would go down the shitter.

  20. Re: "(being hung by their tails)" on Triggering a Mouse's Happy Memories With Lasers Gives It the Will To Struggle On · · Score: 1

    IKR? Looks like you can do any fucked up test you want on mice. We wouldn't allow this with cats or monkeys or the precious homo sapiens.

  21. Re:TRIM -- command of mass destruction on TRIM and Linux: Tread Cautiously, and Keep Backups Handy · · Score: 1

    Isn't TRIM support disabled by default in Linux? They must have set the "discard" mount option.

  22. Re:win32 really? on Microsoft's Skype Drops Modern App In Favour of Old-Fashioned Win32 App · · Score: 1

    I can believe you, the way Skype does things.

    It's my biggest criticism of Skype - you have the "All" list which pretty much shows everyone you've ever talked with on there and grows massive. And then you hav the groups. What you DON'T have is an "Ungrouped" category, which is desperately needed. What am I meant to do, go through "All" and remember who I haven't grouped??

  23. Re:Oh mozilla on Mozilla Responds To Firefox User Backlash Over Pocket Integration · · Score: 1

    That's news to me. They host their binaries in various locations, and their source code on Github.

  24. Re:Waste? on Cool Tool: The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Cost Calculator · · Score: 1

    Why store "waste" when you can process it in a fast breeder reactor? It's totally the wrong strategy.

  25. Re:Let me put my skepticism hat on... on Cool Tool: The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Cost Calculator · · Score: 1

    So let's build IFRs then. Wasn't their research cancelled by the Clinton administration to "send a signal"? An anti-science one, presumably.