The plasm engine is old stuff with the propulsion power of 1 feather !
Copied from Corporation for Space Transportation Website :
This propulsion technology supplements its nuclear power by using renewable free electrons from space for continued 24 x 7 electron propulsion.
The Space Shuttle using an Advanced Electric Propulsion Linear Electron Beam Particle Accelerator (LINAC) for light speed electron particle propulsion using the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect and Birkeland currents is a unique concept. The shuttle would have the capability of paying all of its expenses for the first time !
Dr. Steve Schaefer, Ph.D. Princeton University (Physics), "Calculates if X = 4.3 light-years, then T = 3.6 years. Dozens of stars could be reached in five to six years. In fact, a traveler could even go the Andromeda galaxy (2,000,000 light years) in under 29 years (Ship Time in Years) if a constant acceleration could be maintained." Also see Dr. Carlos I. Calle, PhD, NASA senior research scientist, below on page.
Dr. Schaefer calculates, "If the total distance is X, then the total travel time T is given by expression
X / 2 = (c 2 / g) [cosh (0.5 g T / c) - 1] : T = (2 c / g) cosh -1(1 + 0.5 g X / c 2) "
The NLS propulsion technology has been peer reviewed by several physicists as being valid technology following Newton's and Einstein's laws using invariant mass propulsion.
Present Day Solid Rocket Exhaust is 1,000 to 4,000 m/s with 10^3 N to 10^7 N thrust and a firing duration of minutes.
The Proposed NLS Propulsion uses 300,000,000 metres per second electrons with 1 N to 1x10^6 N thrust and a firing duration of years - decades and capable of developing > 50,000 hp.
The cost per pound for current Chemical Rocket technology is $ 2,000 to $ 27,000 dollars per launch. This generally runs into hundreds of millions of dollars per launch as verified by the industry.
A future spacecraft, using technologies that we haven't even dreamed of, may use an engine that could sustain a constant acceleration of 1 g until the ship reaches relativistic speeds. With such an engine, a trip even to Andromeda may be possible within a human lifetime. "Einstein For Dummies", By Dr. Carlos I. Calle, PhD, NASA senior research scientist Pub. Date: June 2005, ISBN: 978-0-7645-8348-3, Pages: 384 Pages.
Several possible trips on a ship constantly accelerating at 1 g. The figure for "Distance in Light-Years" is also the time that would pass on Earth while the ship traveled to its destination.
IBM of late has made a move into spintronic atomic storage with IBM's Parkins new approach, referred to as "racetrack memory". Its interesting to note that pancake motors, electric field generators, etc. all use the concept of creating strong EMF fields by subatomic particles moving through serial wires. Not only will there be increased EMF, heat and energy needs of the device but when the wire develops an open in any wire there goes the memory device. High stray EMF magnetic fields could also pose a health problem to users as well as other electronics in the circuit. How does IBM propose handling the EMF crosstalk between wires possibly effecting neighboring wires data ? These and many other question need to be answered before this technology can be said to be reliable holding a customers data.
My theory entanglement of atoms over fiber eventually without fibers was for the first time verified. UM concept and my own published many years ago applies directly to my patents.
They published information even after several requests not to.
The inventor of phonton induced electric field poling Michael E. Thomas has " 2 patents " and requested Wikipedia remove the commonality of their prose stating EVERYONE knows how to do this and further NOT giving credit for his 20 years of ground breaking work on the technology.
After 8 years of website publication and research from 1985 in which no other country, company, or scientist ever doing research in the area was characterized by Wikipedia as banal research.
Wikipedia thinks they are the Patent Office and God of Gods.
Ferroelectric phase change densities of.2 to.5 Petabits = 200 to 500 Terabits sq. in. / 40 Petabits = 40,000 to 100 Petabits = 100,000 Terabits cu.cm. or 200,000 to 500,000 Gigabits sq.in. / 40,000,000 to 100,000,000 Gigabits cu.cm. with symmetrical read / write times of 160 picoseconds for 100 year non-volatile storage having infinite rewrites.
Normally the 1.3 to 5 nanometer molecule can switch at 160 picoseconds while maintaining non-destructive readout of ferroelectric bistable properties at a 5 nanometer cell size.
This is not the end by any means as Tohoku University says their target is 4 Petabits a sq. in or 375,000 Terabits cu. cm. using a.4 nanometer cell size. Ferromagnetic - Magnetic disk drive have the next highest density at 50 Terabits sq. cm., The Super Paramagnetic Limit. This density is a particle size prediction ( 10 nm ) where the real operational density is more around 1 Terabits sq. cm. as 50 nanoparticles are needed per 1 data bit cell ( ~ 500 nm ). Perpendicular orientation recording will only delay this dead end a few years at most.
Ferroelectrics will not use complex wiring schemes that have impedance, heat, and reliability problems but instead will exceed any storage devices proposed and would enable a storage density of more than 100,000 terabits per cubic centimeter. A ferroelectric storage drive device the size of an iPod nano or 3.5 inch drive could hold enough MP3 music to play for 300,000 years without repeating a song or enough DVD quality video to play movies for 10,000 years without repetition.
This flash albeit published years ago by another inventor shows how the concept will work using ferroelectrics, silicon,etc. using phosphor as a visual data agent.
that is going to be designed obsolete by its engineers in 5 to 10 years.
It seems alot of trouble to use this drive just to have to re-replace it again in such a short period of time. Is there any quick backup or archiving thoughts on how you would protect your data.
8 years ago Michael Thomas patented a read write head for 40,000 Terabits cu.cm. using ferroelectrics on a 2d / 3d 3.5 optical disk drive. UV Photon induced electric field poling of a ferroelectric molecule called an optical / molecular / atomic switch.
Slashdot Mirror
Forgot to mention there are no gas stations out in space and the Ion Engine just like an automobile needs
refilling.
Poor concept that I think will hurt man's exploration into space.
The plasm engine is old stuff with the propulsion power of 1 feather !
Copied from Corporation for Space Transportation Website :
This propulsion technology supplements its nuclear power by using renewable free electrons from space for continued 24 x 7 electron propulsion.
The Space Shuttle using an Advanced Electric Propulsion Linear Electron Beam Particle Accelerator (LINAC) for light speed electron particle propulsion using the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect and Birkeland currents is a unique concept. The shuttle would have the capability of paying all of its expenses for the first time !
Dr. Steve Schaefer, Ph.D. Princeton University (Physics), "Calculates if X = 4.3 light-years, then T = 3.6 years. Dozens of stars could be reached in five to six years. In fact, a traveler could even go the Andromeda galaxy (2,000,000 light years) in under 29 years (Ship Time in Years) if a constant acceleration could be maintained." Also see Dr. Carlos I. Calle, PhD, NASA senior research scientist, below on page.
Dr. Schaefer calculates, "If the total distance is X, then the total travel time T is given by expression
X / 2 = (c 2 / g) [cosh (0.5 g T / c) - 1] : T = (2 c / g) cosh -1(1 + 0.5 g X / c 2) "
The NLS propulsion technology has been peer reviewed by several physicists as being valid technology following Newton's and Einstein's laws using invariant mass propulsion.
Present Day Solid Rocket Exhaust is 1,000 to 4,000 m/s with 10^3 N to 10^7 N thrust and a firing duration of minutes.
The Proposed NLS Propulsion uses 300,000,000 metres per second electrons with 1 N to 1x10^6 N thrust and a firing duration of years - decades and capable of developing > 50,000 hp.
The cost per pound for current Chemical Rocket technology is $ 2,000 to $ 27,000 dollars per launch. This generally runs into hundreds of millions of dollars per launch as verified by the industry.
A future spacecraft, using technologies that we haven't even dreamed of, may use an engine that could sustain a constant acceleration of 1 g until the ship reaches relativistic speeds. With such an engine, a trip even to Andromeda may be possible within a human lifetime. "Einstein For Dummies", By Dr. Carlos I. Calle, PhD, NASA senior research scientist Pub. Date: June 2005, ISBN: 978-0-7645-8348-3, Pages: 384 Pages.
Several possible trips on a ship constantly accelerating at 1 g. The figure for "Distance in Light-Years" is also the time that would pass on Earth while the ship traveled to its destination.
Also has a webpage discussing Mars colony.
http://nlspropulsion.net/
Since my patents predate all, by licnesing my patents, Cheaply, her patent threat goes away.
Regards,
MThomas
http://colossalstorage.net/
These so-called future seers should hook up with palm readers, card reader, etc. maybe
they can tell us the next president of the United States also.
The article and reference source are total garbage.
http://www.dailytech.com/Worlds+Data+to+Reach+18+Zettabytes+by+2011/article11055.htm
If we continue to use the present technology we will need a nuclear power plant in every
city around the world.
Nanotechnology is the way to go, but the feather heads citing the article and writing the
reference article are obviouly not men of science.
You decide.
http://www.colossalstorage.net/home_atomic_switch_display.htm
http://colossalstorage.net/home_OLED_tv.htm
http://colossalstorage.net/home_spintronics.htm
Will cost a small percentage of the Iraq war.
http://nlspropulsion.net/
Sir, I invented the concept back in 1983. No one back then would believe it would work. I talked
to all the companies in storage at that time.
http://www.colossalstorage.net/colossal4a.htm
My nanotechnology will blow this technology out of the water ! With >>>>Petabytes !
The will still have the same s/r problems at the densities and won't prevent super paramagnetic limit.
Just another bandaid to prevent the death of magnetics.
http://nlspropulsion.net/
IBM of late has made a move into spintronic atomic storage with IBM's Parkins new approach, referred to as "racetrack memory". Its interesting to note that pancake motors, electric field generators, etc. all use the concept of creating strong EMF fields by subatomic particles moving through serial wires. Not only will there be increased EMF, heat and energy needs of the device but when the wire develops an open in any wire there goes the memory device. High stray EMF magnetic fields could also pose a health problem to users as well as other electronics in the circuit. How does IBM propose handling the EMF crosstalk between wires possibly effecting neighboring wires data ? These and many other question need to be answered before this technology can be said to be reliable holding a customers data.
http://colossalstorage.net/spintronics.htm
Sirs,
My theory entanglement of atoms over fiber eventually without fibers was for the first time
verified. UM concept and my own published many years ago applies directly to my patents.
http://colossalstorage.net/home_entangled.htm
We are in secret test bed proof on many of my nanotechnology concepts.
Regards,
Michael
Everyone is in the Race, but we will use the same old technology. I think we need to look a new stuff.
http://nlspropulsion.net/default.aspx
Interplanetary and Interstellar Propulsion Technology will be hot !!!
http://nlspropulsion.net/
So they should be allowed to break it.
Talking about light speed what if we could travel at Near Light Speed ?
These folks say it possible.
http://nlspropulsion.net/default.aspx
They published information even after several requests not to.
The inventor of phonton induced electric field poling Michael E. Thomas has " 2 patents " and requested Wikipedia remove the commonality of their prose stating EVERYONE knows how to do this and further NOT giving credit for his 20 years of ground breaking work on the technology.
After 8 years of website publication and research from 1985 in which no other country, company, or scientist ever doing research in the area was characterized by Wikipedia as banal research.
Wikipedia thinks they are the Patent Office and God of Gods.
I hope Zoellor shuts Wikipedia down ! go Fuzzy !
Ferroelectric phase change densities of .2 to .5 Petabits = 200 to 500 Terabits sq. in. / 40 Petabits = 40,000 to 100 Petabits = 100,000 Terabits cu.cm. or 200,000 to 500,000 Gigabits sq.in. / 40,000,000 to 100,000,000 Gigabits cu.cm. with symmetrical read / write times of 160 picoseconds for 100 year non-volatile storage having infinite rewrites.
.4 nanometer cell size.
Normally the 1.3 to 5 nanometer molecule can switch at 160 picoseconds while maintaining non-destructive readout of ferroelectric bistable properties at a 5 nanometer cell size.
This is not the end by any means as Tohoku University says their target is 4 Petabits a sq. in or 375,000 Terabits cu. cm. using a
Ferromagnetic - Magnetic disk drive have the next highest density at 50 Terabits sq. cm., The Super Paramagnetic Limit. This density is a particle size prediction ( 10 nm ) where the real operational density is more around 1 Terabits sq. cm. as 50 nanoparticles are needed per 1 data bit cell ( ~ 500 nm ). Perpendicular orientation recording will only delay this dead end a few years at most.
Ferroelectrics will not use complex wiring schemes that have impedance, heat, and reliability problems but instead will exceed any storage devices proposed and would enable a storage density of more than 100,000 terabits per cubic centimeter. A ferroelectric storage drive device the size of an iPod nano or 3.5 inch drive could hold enough MP3 music to play for 300,000 years without repeating a song or enough DVD quality video to play movies for 10,000 years without repetition.
This flash albeit published years ago by another inventor shows how the concept will work using ferroelectrics, silicon,etc. using phosphor as a visual data agent.
d isplay.htm
http://colossalstorage.net/display/atomic_switch_
http://colossalstorage.net/home_spintronics.htm
http://colossalstorage.net/home_diskdrive.htm
http://www.colossalstorage.net/
Just as gasoline prices increase,,,,,, so does the need for world wide storage.
http://press.xtvworld.com/article13092.html I am sure the storage landscape will change even further over the next few years so keep your hopes up for something better.
that is going to be designed obsolete by its engineers in 5 to 10 years.
It seems alot of trouble to use this drive just to have to re-replace it again in
such a short period of time. Is there any quick backup or archiving thoughts
on how you would protect your data.
Must rewrite the data after reading it every time. sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow !
Unless extremely high capacity storage devices with much higher bandwidth transfers aren't developed the prediction will come true.
Today's disk drive, Blu-Ray, HD-DVD, and Inphase Holographic Storage are
too small in data capacity and stagnant in their data transfers.
We new some new evolutionary or revolutionary storage technology.
http://colossalstorage.net/
8 years ago Michael Thomas patented a read write head for 40,000 Terabits cu.cm. using ferroelectrics on a 2d / 3d 3.5 optical disk drive. UV Photon induced electric field poling of a ferroelectric molecule called an optical / molecular / atomic switch.
http://www.colossalstorage.net/
http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/06/02/17/005 1234.shtml
I'll wait a few years insted of investing every 6 months in something
that last as long as a pet rock.
like the Japanese and now your talking.
Intelligent people don't kill innocent people in the name of some unseen spirit or ghost.
If the Islamics invented calculus then why aren't they able to use it ?