Slashdot Mirror


12.8 Petabytes, You Say?

MadUndergrad writes "Dr. Jonathan Spanier from Drexel University has come up with a novel way to greatly increase data storage density: water. Specifically, they propose using hydroxyl ions to stabilize minute ferroelectric wires. These wires could be many times smaller than what is possible today, enabling data densities in the neighborhood of 12-13 PB per cubic centimeter. While there are still many problems to be resolved before drives using these can be manufactured this technology does seem promising. For one thing, it would be non-volatile, but could apparently be made to act as RAM. The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor."

205 comments

  1. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    To me this idea sounds a little wet.

    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I hear ya. I would hate to wake up one morning only to find out my harddrive sprung a leak or my data evaoprated mysteriously. But I worry about that already, I'm still using Microsoft Windows!

    2. Re:Bah by Pollardito · · Score: 4, Funny

      your objections don't hold water, stop trying to rain on their parade

    3. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of how hours of breasts would fit on that...

    4. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at the bottom of the article youll notice that this project is geting funded by some military org's among others. i wouldnt be surprised if (when)they figure this out that it suddenly dissapears from mention for a long time.

  2. Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny


    A physics professor and his assistant are working on liberating negatively charged hydroxyl ions, when all of a sudden, the assistant says, "Wait, Professor! What if the salicylic acids do not accept the hydroxyl ions?" And the professor responds, "That's no hydroxyl ion! That's my wife!"
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by ahem · · Score: 1

      First, nice .sig

      Second, it's funny because it's not funny.

      Mod the parent '-1 Culturally Illiterate'

      --
      Not A Sig
    2. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by Red_Foreman · · Score: 0, Troll
      It's funny because it's not funny? Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

      This sentence should be gut busting hysterical then:

      Tommy was a toaster that ran rubber marathons in search of an autonomous chicken breast marinated with intergalactic motor oil.

      I know what Dexter's Laboratory is, by the way. It still doesn't make Trip Master Karma-Whore's post funny.

    3. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it because women don't sleep with you for other reasons than having a headache.

    4. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by fernandoh26 · · Score: 0
      Tommy was a toaster that ran rubber marathons in search of an autonomous chicken breast marinated with intergalactic motor oil.
      AHHAHAHHA *busts guy laughing* OW! Oh great now see what you have done....
      --
      Chums up, let's do this!
    5. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm that's odd, according to this site being moderated funny does not increase Karma /. "Note that being moderated Funny doesn't help your karma. You have to be smart, not just a smart-ass.".

      So how exactly is he karma whoring?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    6. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by Jordanis · · Score: 1

      Aw man, that was the first thing I thought of when I saw 'hydroxyl ion'. Figures I wouldn't be the only one.

    7. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually you made that extremely funny. I read it thinking wtf as I read your comment. That made it hilarious.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    8. Re:Oblig. Dexter's Laboratory Joke: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record: toasters and rubbers aren't good bedfellowes.

  3. Temperature issues? by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I did not read the article, but I would imagine the usage would be limited by temperature ranges, for that matter, even simple exposure of the components.

    Imagine a device with this technology submitted to freezing temperatures?

    1. Re:Temperature issues? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good point, but they're dealing with water at the nanoscale level. In this scale, water molecules act like glue. Besides, after reading another article on water running thru nanotubes below the freezing temperature, I think it's not possible for so water to form ice at the nanoscale.

    2. Re:Temperature issues? by Amouth · · Score: 2, Informative

      All you need for ice is enough water molecules for them to form a crystalline structure. (hit - not many I think 4-6) but water does have a wonderful property.. it doesn't freeze if it is moving..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:Temperature issues? by Tylerious · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't form at the nano scale, how does it form on the larger scale?

    4. Re:Temperature issues? by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      There's a freezing point depression in capillaries and water in small spaces.

      Google: Measurement of freezing point depression of water in glass capillaries and the associated ice front shape

      Also for real fun, look up:

      Freezing of water in cement paste pores

      http://ciks.cbt.nist.gov/garbocz/paper63/node3.h tml

    5. Re:Temperature issues? by wardude · · Score: 1

      if exposed to too much heat it will sadly turn out to be vapor

    6. Re:Temperature issues? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      even simple exposure of the components.
      That would apply to much of current technology anyway. The time is pretty much over when you could use a hard drive while it was open. The last hard drives larger than 20 GB or so that I've opened have completely broke more or less by just opening the lid for a while and closing it again, because so much as a speck of dust on the platter will result in a head crash.

      Likewise, you can't really hope to expose the "components" of a microchip and expect it to work afterwards, now can you?

  4. Backup safety? by pryonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'd be pretty annoying if you came back from a run/heavy night's drinking (delete as suits you) and accidentally drank the backup of all your MP3s and pr0n to rehydrate you...

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    1. Re:Backup safety? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      On the other hand this way you can easily get rid of your warez\movies\music\etc in case of a *AA\FBI raid.

    2. Re:Backup safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What's with the backslashes? Fucking annoying to read. Your / broken?

    3. Re:Backup safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      True, one subconsciously checks for embedded escape sequences! Let's blame Microsoft..

    4. Re:Backup safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the storage water doesn't taste like p0rn and mp3s. Keith Richards and Ron Jeremy. Burp!!!

    5. Re:Backup safety? by conJunk · · Score: 1
      It'd be pretty annoying if you came back from a run/heavy night's drinking (delete as suits you) and accidentally drank the backup of all your MP3s and pr0n to rehydrate you...

      or, when the new guy has too much to drink at the office party, mistakes the file server for a urinal, lifts the cover...

    6. Re:Backup safety? by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1
      It's kind of unnerving to imagine that your hard drive could become just a little more like a fishbowl. Next thing we know, Microsoft will be releasing Windows Lamprey Edition.

      -----

      I'm sorry, sir, but my goldfish drank my term paper.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  5. DMHO is deadly! by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe they would be so irresponsible as to use dihydrogen monoxide for data storage. That stuff is deadly!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:DMHO is deadly! by Kaetemi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't believe they would be so irresponsible as to use electricity to power a computer. That stuff is deadly!

      --
      Kaetemi
    2. Re:DMHO is deadly! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It's no more deadly than hydric acid, which is the primary ingredient in many household cleaners.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:DMHO is deadly! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Doctors and scientists tell us that DHMO is so pervasive in our environment that it can be found in every factory, every business, even every house, in our food and in our bodies! Tests confirm that all softdrinks and bottled water contain large amounts of DHMO. You can even find it in baby formula!

      The average adult has something like 5x10^16 picograms of this stuff in his or her body, which is a much higher concetration than the EPA safe levels for lead, asbestos or most industrial solvents.

      Won't someone please think of the children?!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:DMHO is deadly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm having a hard time imagining which person has less insight - the poster, or the one who modded him as insightful.

    5. Re:DMHO is deadly! by nixkuroi · · Score: 1

      It's hard to believe anyone would use mercury in a thermometer, but people were sticking those things in their mouths for years. I remember using one when I was a kid and breaking it to see what it would look like in my hand. (yes, it's a miracle I survived my childhood).

      For that matter, though there's lead in CRT's and mercury and cadmium in boards and switches. It wouldn't be a real surprise for someone to put something ELSE toxic in this stuff.

    6. Re:DMHO is deadly! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Luckily studies on Mars and Earth's moon have thus far turned up no DHMO. If we can manage to make travel to the moon and the planets cheap and effective, there is hope for humanity.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:DMHO is deadly! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true... I believe there's evidence of frozen DHMO at the poles of the Moon. I think maybe it Clementine that helped find that. WRT Mars, it might be buried underground, after all something made those riverbeds, and it was probably laced with lots of DHMO.

      Mercury, however, is almost certainly uncontaminated.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  6. non-volatile RAM by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 0

    So if you don't want to lose the contents of your RAM I guess you just stick it in the freezer?

    I hope he doesn't try using this system in Alaska.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:non-volatile RAM by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      It brings a whole new meaning to: "Awe-Man my computer froze again..."

    2. Re:non-volatile RAM by DanQuixote · · Score: 1


      If you happen to RTFA you'll find that...

      the editor took a lot of "artistic liberty" in calling it water. They are actually using hydroxyl (OH) ions. Freezing won't be an issue at all here. It wouldn't surprise me if it ends up working at whatever temperature range the read/write transistors can handle.

      Large arrays of nano wires seems very feasible. I'm crossing my fingers.

      --
      "We think people rightly feel that once they buy something, it stays bought," --Suw Charman, Open Rights Grp
    3. Re:non-volatile RAM by jeffbax · · Score: 1

      I think that the changing structure of water when its frozen (expanded) might fuctz your data ;)

  7. What's that smell? by isomeme · · Score: 4, Funny

    this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.

    Until the heat sink fails.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:What's that smell? by JamesP · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least it is Water Vapour...

      However, if they are really using DHMO, then I bet some Greenpeace freaks will jump to his neck.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    2. Re:What's that smell? by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1
      Until the heat sink fails.

      What are you talking about? This is great: storage and water cooling in one technology!
      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    3. Re:What's that smell? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Until the heat sink fails.
      What's the big deal? Just use your RAM to cool your CPU. Not keeping it cool enough? Add more RAM.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:What's that smell? by pinano · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I was gonna say that. Good work, isomeme.

  8. Misplaced Optimism by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor."

    Um... the fact that this is coming from a university suggests to ME that it might be highly impractical, but of some academic interest.

    I mean, "university" may rank above "wacky fly-by-night startup looking to fleece investors" on the ol' Trust-o-meter, but the fact that a few academics are studying something certainly doesn't mean it's even potentially viable as a commercial product.

    1. Re:Misplaced Optimism by pr0f3550r · · Score: 1

      Can you say Pons and Fleischmann

    2. Re:Misplaced Optimism by NetDanzr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Um... the fact that this is coming from a university suggests to ME that it might be highly impractical, but of some academic interest.

      I fully agree. Having spent the last two years working in a business incubator associated with a major research university, I found the following life cycle of new technologies to be true in 95% of cases:

      1. Invent something, file an invention disclosure with the university and ask for patenting the idea.
      2. File for all grants you can get.
      3. Once you run out of grants, declare your intention to commercialize the technology.
      4. Secure some start-up funding, primarily in the form of SBIR/STTR grants and angel funding.
      5. Once funding is received, declare that the technology is not yet ready and go back to the lab to write more papers on your technology.
      6. Repeat and rinse.

      I've seen some really ground-breaking technologies in action. One was proven to decrease the level of emissions by 95%. Another promised to replace current heat sinks with a new design that would eliminate computer fans. Yet another has been around since the 1950s; the lead researcher has invented when he was a grad student. Unfortunately, most researchers at the school I was working at were aware of the fact that in the long term having a technology to work on for another decade or more was more lucrative than starting a company and ending with a miniscule ownership share after venture financing.

    3. Re:Misplaced Optimism by Eivind · · Score: 1
      That's the way of things. 95% of all "inventions" turn out not to be such a big deal, or to have practical problems that prevent them from mattering.

      There's no alternative though, you gotta fund the 19 sucky inventions to find the one thats gonna work.

      I agree it sucks that frequently the publich funds the 20 investors, and shoulders the loss on the 19 non-working ones, only to see the remaining successful invention benefit some corporation that hires the prof (or that the prof starts) rather than those that paid for the ground-research (i.e. the public)

    4. Re:Misplaced Optimism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some would argue that 1% of a sizeable corporation is much more than professor's payment for 10 years...

    5. Re:Misplaced Optimism by PipeIsArt · · Score: 1

      Well, at least be glad we are not in Soviet Russia. In Soviet Russia, technologies research you!

      --
      I find that although many people are liberal in beliefs, they are conservative in actions.
    6. Re:Misplaced Optimism by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      That corporate paycheck won't buy you time on a supercollider. Most academic scientists would rather play with state of the art lab equipment than drive a Porsche.

    7. Re:Misplaced Optimism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Drexel.

      They'll screw up anything they touch.

      This project will get the DREXEL SHAFT! Just like their students!

    8. Re:Misplaced Optimism by plankrwf · · Score: 1

      Well, anything coming from a University MUST be good, musn't it?
      Anyone remembering cold-fusion? Researchers came from a Utah University...
      (Agreed, they were chemists working on a physics subject, but still... they came from "a university").

  9. Overspill by Rekolitus · · Score: 1

    What if I accidentially go over capacity -- I don't want it to overflow and fry my motherboard!

  10. Vapour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.""

    Are you saying universities can't produce vapour?

  11. electrolysis? by fishyfool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the water will have to be de-mineralized to eliminate conductivity.
      whats left is oxygen and hydrogen, with the electricity in the wires running through the wires be strong enough to create electrolysis?
    thats not what i'd call non-volatile.

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
    1. Re:electrolysis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I'm sure the university scientist, with his PhD and such, probably just missed the Junior High science class where electrolysis was covered. That's why he didn't think of this. You should probably get in touch with him directly and warn him, ASAP, before someone is seriously injured!

  12. Vaporware? by jmcharry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prof. Jonathan Spanier is in Materials Engineering, so I would bet this is a lab demonstration of an effect that might be developed into a technology, not something likely to appear on store shelves in a year or two. Still, it is an important first step in that direction.

  13. Obnoxious Cynicism by jsailor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry to be so cynical, but why do you put more merit behind something from a University? They're competing for research dollars and don't actually have to produce anything that works in the field or that they'll have to support for many years. In much the same way that corporations extend/enhance the truth to attract customers, Universities extend/enhance the truth to attract grants.

    Despite what my tone may reflect, I'm very curious to your thought process.

    1. Re:Obnoxious Cynicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is it beats companies where a half dozen people go "Look! we can turn lead into gold! Give us VC!" then it turns out that the people lied, took the suckers money, and left the country.

      Sure, a university may or may not be exaggerating their claims for research dollars, but they're not going to disappear overnight, leaving a sign on the door reading "haha suckers!"

    2. Re:Obnoxious Cynicism by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      I've seen a number of fantastic stories posted here, and more often than not they are that crazy guy with a startup who's been largely discredited. Sure, the tech may be completely impractical, and they may be gunning for grant money, but if nothing else someone with a doctorate working at a major university is very likely a capable person. I'm not about to sell all my property to invest in this stuff, but considering the amount of new technology that has come out of university research settings, this guy seems more credible than most who would make this sort of claim.

    3. Re:Obnoxious Cynicism by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hm... how's this for a start. If you're a university researcher and you'd like a grant, you apply. Your application is reviewed, by experts in the field who are probably THEMSELVES competing with you for grants.

      If you're a guy in his garage (or some company's garage) or even a whole company and you'd like to get some funding for your project or create some hype in the market to get investors, you write a report/press release, which is reviewed by managers/venture capitalists/the public, the majority of whom have anywhere from zero to a little knowledge in the field.

    4. Re:Obnoxious Cynicism by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

      You may have a point when it comes to /., but now go to www.sciencedaily.com and read all the articles that come from universities in order to keep the funding going. I hear a lot more 'scientists at the University of .... say" junk coming from news media than "some startup is working on xyz."

  14. Not vaporware because it's from university? by greenmars · · Score: 1

    Not vaporware because it's from university?

    Right, because nobody exaggerates or gins up evidence to write a thesis ...

    1. Re:Not vaporware because it's from university? by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

      Come on, all university publications are completely ligit... especially that cold fusion one too.

  15. Isn't... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 0
    640KB supposed to be enough for everyone?

    What kind of world are we living in if the sacred words no longer deserved respect!

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  16. Reality disconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor."

    You haven't attended university on our planet, have you?

    1. Re:Reality disconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You haven't attended university on our planet, have you?
      Particularly not Drexel...

      Full disclosure: I am a Drexel student.

  17. Old stuff by LoonyMike · · Score: 0

    This technology is kinda rusty

  18. You'de still be thirsty... by ZSpade · · Score: 1

    After drinking out of 'a glass of water and wire three-billionths of a meter wide'

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
    1. Re:You'de still be thirsty... by pryonic · · Score: 4, Funny

      You underestimate just how much pr0n I have, my good Spade.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  19. Overheard at Drexel University Lab Party by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

    Best tasting mineral water I've ever had! Has a funny aftertaste though...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Overheard at Drexel University Lab Party by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a Monica Lewinsky quote.

    2. Re:Overheard at Drexel University Lab Party by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Hehe, that was a great party.

      But whats even scarier is that my old university was mentioned on /.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  20. University by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.


    Like Pons & Fleishman's cold fusion? Like the recent Korean cloning fiasco? Like the forestry research papers that were pulled because of political and corporate pressure? Like so many others that have been in the recent news?

    Problem is that scientists and researchers can be corrupted by fame, fortune or pressure just like other humans.

    I'm not saying that this technology is bogus - I know nothing about the technology or the people involved. But the fact that it comes from a university doesn't offer any special guarantees in my book.
    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:University by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Like Pons & Fleishman's cold fusion? Like the recent Korean cloning fiasco? Like the forestry research papers that were pulled because of political and corporate pressure? Like so many others that have been in the recent news?

      Yes, just like those. The statement by MadUndergrad was, 'this gives me hope', not 'this must be true'.

      You make a good point, that science is always evolving, and that we should not stop questioning.... but in a very antagonistic way... could it be...

      Problem is that scientists and researchers can be corrupted by fame, fortune or pressure just like other humans.

      Ahhhh! I get it, you're one of those! "I hear the jury's still out on this Science thing." Tell me, which is your particular axe: is it Darwinism, or climate change? And by all means, set me straight if I have this wrong somehow. We are interested in the truth here, after all.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    2. Re:University by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a Drexel alumnus, I can say with a fair bit of confidence... most of the faculty there have absolutely no moral fiber, and the university is run by a money grubbing asshole who is actually PROUD that he runs it like a business, and not an institute of higher learning.

      Get corrupted? Most people there are already corrupt. The little media contact at the bottom of the press release (Phil Teranova) is a manipulative bastard who would stab his mother in the back if it could make him a dime.

    3. Re:University by corblix · · Score: 1
      But the fact that it comes from a university doesn't offer any special guarantees in my book.

      Certainly not. But we should recognize that the pressures on academic vs. corporate researchers are very different. And I think the pressures in an academic environment are much less conducive to faking results. For one thing, "how much money will we make off this in the next six months" is not how academics think. So ripping off the customers for a quick buck is much less common. For another, it is generally understood that findings are subject to peer review, unlike the trade-secret mentality in the corporate world. Since faking will probably be discovered, people tend not to do it.

      Yes, you can mention high profile announcements from academia that turned out to be problematic. I can think of a couple of others you didn't mention. But that's all I can come up with: a handful. On the other hand, I see bogus, vaporware, and ridiculously biased announcements from the corporate world pretty much on a daily basis. Probably you do, too.

      In short, certainly, the academic research world is far, far from perfect. But in terms of integrity and reliability, it is head and shoulders above the corporate world.

    4. Re:University by Spectra72 · · Score: 1

      You certainly have not been keeping up on how much coroporate business interests are funding your "pure" academic researchers these days.

      Ripping off a customer for a quick buck? Maybe not. Exagerating claims to get next year's grant or to boost one's chances for tenure? Certainly.

    5. Re:University by sirinek · · Score: 1


      Ahhhh! I get it, you're one of those! "I hear the jury's still out on this Science thing." Tell me, which is your particular axe: is it Darwinism, or climate change? And by all means, set me straight if I have this wrong somehow. We are interested in the truth here, after all.


      I wish I had a mod point to give you!

    6. Re:University by helicologic · · Score: 1

      Did you notice from TFA that there are two little problems with this memory medium? They haven't figured out how to write to it, and they haven't figured out how to read from it. And this announcement isn't a bit premature???

    7. Re:University by Skagit · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see that you, too, have received the Drexel Shaft.

      No matter how many Drexel students and alumni I talk to, I have yet to meet one that had a positive overall experience there.

      --
      Why does my coffee mug smell like trout?
    8. Re:University by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to ask him to turn in all the products of science that he uses.

    9. Re:University by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      That is the nature of science article on slashdot. The article title always makes some great claim about how something amazing has happened, and then when we read the article, we find that nothing of note has happened, but someone has figured out how to do the easy part in the event that someone else ever actually gets around to figuring out the hard part.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:University by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1
      Ahhhh! I get it, you're one of those! "I hear the jury's still out on this Science thing."


      Absolutely, unequivocally not.

      I'm one of those people that understands that conforming to the principles of the scientific method is a very different thing than being called a scientist.

      And fortunately over time the scientific method works quite well. A hypothesis is formed, gets tested, revised, and is peer-reviewed. Predictions can be correctly based on the hypothesis. It becomes a theory, etc.

      People who claim to be or are tagged with the description "scientist" are still people. Some are brilliant. Most, I hope, are careful and honest. Ideally they are without ego. Unfortunately, the traits required to survive the scramble and pressure to get from student to grad-student to post-doc to.....tenure doesn't always mesh perfectly with the ideal traits of a scientist. In fact, some universities expect you to prove your hypothesis in order to get your advanced degree which imparts exactly the wrong sort of pressure and attitude. At others, if your hypothesis is approriate for doctoral research then they expect good work and a result. If the result is that the original hypotheses is false, that is OK and one of the possible expected outcomes of rigorous scientific investigation.

      I revere the scientific method and the advances it has brought to human civilization. If something proves true I don't care if it was discovered at a university, a corporation or by the local dog catcher. I admire the work of the many people required to test, retest, refine and prove the idea.

      However I don't think that the mere fact that the researcher, in this case, works at a university is any reason to raise my expectation level of technological success.
      --

      ~~~~~~~
      "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    11. Re:University by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I revere the scientific method and the advances it has brought to human civilization. If something proves true I don't care if it was discovered at a university, a corporation or by the local dog catcher. I admire the work of the many people required to test, retest, refine and prove the idea. However I don't think that the mere fact that the researcher, in this case, works at a university is any reason to raise my expectation level of technological success.

      Fair enough, thanks for the response. I don't quite understand what you are getting at with this angle, these are human foibles, but fair enough.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    12. Re:University by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

      Forestry research papers? I missed that one. Care to enlighten me?

    13. Re:University by RebelWebmaster · · Score: 1

      As a current Drexel student (in the Materials Engineering department no less), I've got to believe you weren't in the CoE. While I can't speak for the experience of others, my experience there has been nothing short of positive.

      But our department is also very good. We have great faculty and it's small enough so that you actually get to know pretty much everybody.

      BTW - Taki's not so bad, having actually talked to him in person.

    14. Re:University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one thing, "how much money will we make off this in the next six months" is not how academics think.

      Often correct. But this is EXACTLY how D.U. President Constantine Papadakis thinks, which of course earns him little or no love outside the college of business.

      Don't get me wrong, I appreciate that under his care, D.U. has prospered and grown into a large and diverse university. The picture from when he took over was far more bleak. But the man is after profit and profit alone, which serves the purpose of keeping the university open, but often causes faculty, staff and facilities personel to take shortcuts or to skimp on services that might better further the ACADEMIC aims of the university.

      Gone are the days when Drexel University could be considered an "exclusive" university. These days, all you really need to get in are a heart beat and a checkbook. And once the check is signed, the heartbeat is optional. :-)

      I like to tell the incoming freshmen, "Here at Drexel, we only make three things. Accountants, Engineers, and Failures. More of the latter than the previous two." :-)

    15. Re:University by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      as a member of DUST, I worked directly for taki on numerous occasions. He's scum of the earth. He represents all that is soulless and wrong.

  21. 100 Millenia of Data by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine an iPod playing music for 100 millennia without repeating a single song

    Thats great until during that 100 millenia you encounter the next Ice Age, it freezes stopping its data transfer to only playing one song, "I Got You Babe" by Sonny & Cher
      - for eternity.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:100 Millenia of Data by tepples · · Score: 1

      it freezes stopping its data transfer to only playing one song, "I Got You Babe" by Sonny & Cher - for eternity.

      Damn Congress.

    2. Re:100 Millenia of Data by operagost · · Score: 1

      Hollywood has already explored that scenario.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:100 Millenia of Data by MadTinfoilHatter · · Score: 1

      Now, that's what I'd call "hell frozen over". :-P

    4. Re:100 Millenia of Data by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      On Iced Earth, no one can hear you scream.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    5. Re:100 Millenia of Data by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1
      ...stopping its data transfer to only playing one song, "I Got You Babe" by Sonny & Cher - for eternity.

      Yeah, then you're stuck in Punxatawney, PA, and keep living the same day over again.

    6. Re:100 Millenia of Data by Manchot · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen Groundhog Day?

  22. Where to begin? by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Man...there's so much wrong with this article.

    The RAM/NVRAM thing for one... RAM is for speed; NVRAM (including disk drives with random-access method drivers) is for persistent storage. There's no reason to believe that the two won't be the same, but there's also no information given here showing that this stuff is as fast as any RAM.

    Thermodynamics for another.

    The scaling of density figures ignoring spacing elements.

    When did /. become Popular Science?

    1. Re:Where to begin? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      When did /. become Popular Science?

      They haven't. If they did, they'd have to hire editors and fact-checkers. Clearly, we have neither.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  23. Core memory LIVES! by jhines · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounds like the magnetic core memory of the old days.

  24. HAR HAR HAR by flamingdog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sweet Jesus, is this article's sole purpose to be fodder for bad vaporware jokes?

    Start cranking 'em out, folks.

    --

    ---------------------------
  25. Hey Clippy, I forgot what I by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 5, Funny

    called that spreadsheet!!



    User: Hey Clippy search for .xls files containing "2006 budget"

    Clippy: I see, you want me to spend the rest of eternity searching 13 petabytes for your stupid spreadsheet??! I quit!! User: This maybe the first effective way to get rid of that little twerp.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    1. Re:Hey Clippy, I forgot what I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, you'll get a message stating that it's searching, and 120548723093 minutes remaining...
      After forty years you return to find that "No Documents Were Found".
        (Windows XP search has been broken since it came out.)

  26. am I the only one old enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to read this, see the word "wire" and think, "OMG it's the return of core memory."

  27. Global Warming - so there's an upside? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, the Earth warms, the ice melts, coastlines recede, economies collapse. But WAIT! We get more free memory that you can possibly need. That's got to be good, right?

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  28. poster hasn't worked much with universities by blackcoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.

    <rant>i don't think the poster has worked with many universities. my experience with using them as subs on r & d projects has been highly mixed — occasionally, you'll find a group that just rocks. the problem is that the remaining 7-9 out of 10 times, you end up just replacing the components that the university was supposed to deliver because they either (a) failed to deliver anything at all (not uncommon) or (b) delivered code that was so horrendously broken that it was less effort to redo their pieces than to shepherd them through the process of fixing things.</rant>

    before i'm flamed to death: please note that i didn't say all universities suck (and in particularly, i didn't imply that your university sucks).

    1. Re:poster hasn't worked much with universities by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

      Ahh my friend, I see that you too have dealt with Duke University. Duke does indeed suck.

      This _is_ fark.com right? No?

      /me runs away

    2. Re:poster hasn't worked much with universities by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      So wait, your anecdotal evidence dealing with a few universities (I assume comp sci departments) producing commercial code has exactly what to do with materials engineering of a possible approach that can be sold off to the highest bidder?

    3. Re:poster hasn't worked much with universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Let me guess, you paid them peanuts, right? If you had the proper funding, you would have hired your own researchers. But you decided to cheap out and exploit grad student slave labor, and you got what you paid for.

    4. Re:poster hasn't worked much with universities by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      not duke per se, but certainly other high prestige universities who really should know better.

    5. Re:poster hasn't worked much with universities by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      He got what he deserved too. Speaking as an exploited grad student, it's one thing to be exploited producing work that might be of value to humanity. It's quite another to be exploited for the sole benefit of some corporation.

    6. Re:poster hasn't worked much with universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you think taking on a university as a sub is cheap, then I'll guess that you have never had to deal with the money side of these things. It isn't like picking up a student to work for the summer. Also it is not unusual to get 80% solutions--this isn't a damn research project, it is good enough, just finish the last 20% because I'm on a schedule!

      There are numerous reasons to take on a university as a sub, but "cheap" labor is not one of them.

  29. Couple of questions by gone.fishing · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this mean that the operating temp range will be 32F - 212F (0C-100C)?

    I would have said, If this is vaporware I'd be steamed...

    I suppose this will give a whole new meaning to the term "The computer froze up"!

    Will we litterally need a bit bucket for overflow?

    I better stop now.

    1. Re:Couple of questions by conJunk · · Score: 1

      if the box freezes up, the admin will likely be boiling...

  30. Worse yet by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    "She Bangs" as sung by William Hung. I suppose better that than say, the greatest hit's of ABBA.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Worse yet by bohemian72 · · Score: 1

      If you have that on your iPod, you don't deserve to live for millenia.

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
  31. Bad physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Without commenting on the competence of the researcher, whoever wrote the press release doesn't have the first idea what they're talking about.

    "Ferroelectric materials possess spontaneous and reversible electric dipole moments. These dipole moments are times when the material gains a charge, in this case an electric one. For example, the Earth's magnetic field generates a dipole moment that causes compasses to face north"

    First sentence is correct. Second sentence is baloney. A dipole moment is not anything to do with time, and an electric dipole moment does not mean a material gains a net charge, although it might correspond to a charge developing on a certain surface. Third sentence: the dipole moments associated with the earth's magnetization are nothing to do with the dipole moments in a ferroelectric material. The former are the result of intrinsic magnetic moments in atoms, the latter the result of differing charge distributions in materials. Similar names, completely different things.

    1. Re:Bad physics by Manchot · · Score: 1

      At my university, press releases aren't written by the researchers. Rather, they're written by people whose job it is to dumb them down for the general populace and insert buzzwords for corporations. The result is often that the press releases are misleading, a fact which the researchers recognize, but cannot rectify. For example, one electrical engineering professor was just telling me about how one such release talked about the quantum computing applications of a novel device, even though the professor had mentioned none and the device had no such applications.

  32. The usual route from academia to the market place by Jerry · · Score: 0, Troll

    will be followed by this technology, no doubt.

    With University and Government funding the researchers will solve the technical problems but not publish the pivital ones. Then they will resign/retire from the University and start their own corporation, using the give-away program Congress has established whereby information that was discovered/learned/developed using public tax monies, and should remain in the public domain, is given to corporations for next to nothing, and some "campaign contributions".

    Then, the principal researcher, formerly an academic but now a businessman, will file patents on the key technologies that he discovered while being funded by tax monies. With ethics and morals like that it's no wonder that American corporations are pocketing BILLIONS in excess oil profits during times of scarcity, while defunding retirement accounts and abandoning health insurance programs.

    The public, as usual, begins getting billed continually for technology that they payed for in the beginning. Because of this scam we're now paying 10 times or more what we should be paying for medical diagnostics or treatment. Even as I write the cable weather companies are working feverishly behind your backs, bribing politicians and spreading disinformation, in order to gain SOLE control of your taxpayer funded data streaming from weather satellites and NexRad radar data. When you go to a gas/convenience store and pay for gas at the pump using your bank debit card, the store takes 4 or 5 times the value of the gas you pumped and keeps it, interest free, for 3 or 4 days before returning the difference back to your account. For one midwest chain that has 952 outlets I computed that the owners are pocketing over 4 MILLION/year in unearned interest on our money. Meanwhile, those living on a tight budget and unaware that their checking account is being ripped off, pay the bank $35-50 per bounced check, written on money that SHOULD HAVE BEEN in their account.

    Evil scams.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  33. Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by technoextreme · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://miru.deviantart.com/journal/
    Here is the exact text:
    A physics professor and his assistant are working on liberating negatively charged hydroxyl ions, when all of a sudden, the assistant says, "Wait, Professor! What if the salicylic acids do not accept the hydroxyl ions?" And the professor responds, "That's no hydroxyl ion! That's my wife!"
    -Joke from Dexter's Laboratory

    I've always wanted to understand this joke, from many years ago. @___@;;;
    I was reminded of this joke today when we talked about hydroxyls in biology and chemistry. :XD:

    To liberate is to set free. The point of this joke is that it's saying that a negatively charged hydroxyl ion is equivalent to a professor's wife. Hydroxyls, which contain at least one hydroxide (-OH), are alcohols. Does the joke mean the wife is drunk?
    I then researched salicyclic acids and I found out that salicyclic acid is a plant hormone used as a medicine for acne. More importantly, it is a carboxylic acid. We learned in biology today that an ester linkage is formed between a carboxyl and a hydroxyl, and in this case, salicylic acid and hydroxyl ions create aspirin, the pain reliever.
    Now isn't that cool? :D
    Lastly, the hydroxyl ion is NEGATIVELY charged, so the wife has had an excess of alcohol.
    Basically, therefore, the professor was only trying to give some aspirin to his wife, who has a hangover.
    ROTFLMAO.

    Btw... I find it creepy that googling this returned six results.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by HumanisticJones · · Score: 1

      My dear god, I've heard the phrase learn something new every day... but this is on a new level. What's scarier is someone actually figured out all of this before in order to construct that joke.

    2. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're reading too much into this.

      "That's not <X>, that's my wife!" is a classic punchline. The joke is probably nothing more than a callback to that punchline in an unexpected context.

    3. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      bzzt. Hydroxyl ions are OH-

      Thats basic chemistry. }}}ouch{{{

      Alcohols, which contain hydroxyl groups, OH (note lack of charge) are not the same animal.

      Alcohols, glycols, etc which contain hydroxyl groups do not release hydroxyl ions - if anything they will act as weaks acids and release H+.

      Thats what you get when a Physics professor starts playing with chemistry.

    4. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      No. Someone merely constructed that afterwards in order to make the joke actually make sense. Of course, it was funny already, because it used the "that's no X, that's my wife!" line in a context that made no sense. With this new explanation, it now DOES make sense and is no longer funny.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, dude you seriously need to put the keyboard down and back away.

    6. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chemistry students have a LOT of time on their hands in between titrations.

    7. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by conJunk · · Score: 1

      damn, technoextreme for the win; nicely done. two gold stars for your nerd card.

    8. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

      i thought it was a pun on salicylic (salacious)..

    9. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by iced_773 · · Score: 1


      Close, but nobody here has mentioned that the ions are called hydrox ide .

      Also, alcohols do not release protons, they merely come near a water molecule whose negative dipole from the oxygen pulls the hydrogen away through hydrogen bonding, forming (in ethanol's case) an acetate ion and a hydronium ion.

      Such a mess-up with releasing vs. reacting on your part is completely unacceptable. Please visit the restrooms (down the hall, third door on your right) and flush your geek license down one of the urinals before you leave today.

      Signed,
      The Chemistry Nazi

    10. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by zullnero · · Score: 1

      Replace hydroxyl ions with x, and salicylic acids with y, and you'll be laughing along with all us scientists, Mr. Mathmatician.

    11. Re:Mod parent up +5 It does make sense!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got something to put between a nice pair of titrations...

  34. About those CC's by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    12-13 PB per cubic centimeter.

    And what's the density of current storage? While it has a lot of square centimeters, current coatings are rather thin. What would a cubic centimeter of current magnetic disc storage store?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:About those CC's by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the storage world it matters little how densely you can STORE things. It matters how densely you can READ things.

      If you stacked the platters you'd get a lot of density but you can't read it because the arm won't fit between two touching plates.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:About those CC's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly the other articles I've seen about this have said 100 PB per cubic centimeter. Which is correct? I'm confused.

  35. Animes Galore !!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Yay for Anime fans !

    It has become too difficult to cope with all these hoards of anime - no hard disks ever big enough, no cd writer fast enough -

    Cavalry on the way it seems. We can speed up 'acquisition' of anime eh ?

    1. Re:Animes Galore !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak of the devil....yes you're correct. I was wondering why my HDD was magically full again. Ahh my broken DVD writer has caused a bit of a blockage. So walked over to other machine plugged in and copied across many large files....all happened to be Anime. The burning of dvd's on this old machine was painfully slow. I have to decide what I want to take with me at any given time. I'd love all my anime/movies/music on 'tap', so to speak..

    2. Re:Animes Galore !!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Yea, on-demand getting of anime is very important. If you need to shuffle among hoards of cds to get 2-3 episodes for watching, it becomes pain.

      Maybe it would be logical to employ an old unused computer in the network as an anime server at home. With an upgraded hd of course. And same machine would help greatly in 'acquisitions'.

  36. Don't you know what they have done?!? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    They have returned core dump to its original meaning! Now THAT is what I call good science!

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  37. 1.21 Jiggawatts?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got nuthin.

  38. Oh c'mon by avasol · · Score: 1

    The problem has never been the transfer rate between two nodes. The problem has always been with increasing the capacity of whatever filter (lexical, physical, virtual, layered or parsed) that interprets the information.

    Much like brains. We certainly get all the info, but that doesn't make everyone smart. The capacity to process information is what counts, the rest is irrelevant.

  39. The usual rant about academia to the market place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "will be followed by this technology, no doubt."

    *rant* *rant* *take a breath* *rant* *rant* Why is it the low UID's that lose it? The thing your rant is forgetting is that not ALL university research is government funded. The other thing your rant forgets is that a lot of the research that comes out, while technically correct isn't usable in the marketplace. Someone has to put up the money and do the practical research to make that happen. Can you say risk?

  40. An Excellent Point by TheThirdRider · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that is a very valid point, i work in a nanotech lab. we are working on a project invoving CNTs carbon nanotubes) electrified in water. because of nanotube unique properties, any electrical field is greatly amplified. the small surface area of the nanotubes creates areas of extremely high voltage that can easily cause electrolysis.

    --
    A robot's ability to speak of Nazis grows by a factor of 2 every 18 months. -roman_mir
  41. I tried to make one of these myself... by Pichu0102 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...But for some reason when I plugged it in my computer started shooting sparks out of the USB port.
    What did I do wrong?

  42. Take it easy on academic research by JackL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.

    I was going to write just how incorrect this statement is, but after reading previoius comments, I feel I need to defend academic research instead of bash it.

    The reason why academic research is not likely to pump out an actual product is because it is not the goal of academic research to create a commercially viable project. The goal is usually to explore the basic underpinnings of something of interest, in this case the possibility of hydroxyl ions to stabilize minute ferroelectric wires. Corporations come along later and add engineering to those principles and produce the products we use.

    Those who are saying that academic researchers are con men in search of funding are overstating their case. There are examples of cheating and overstating cases in academic research but they are rare. There are also examples of corporations doing basic research, but they are becoming more rare, too. Bell Labs has all but disappeared, IBM hasn't won my Nobels lately.

    Academic research does what it does very very well and quite cheaply (see how much a grad student makes compared to well, anything, really). Corporatations do their research well, too. Just don't confuse the two.

    Jack

    1. Re:Take it easy on academic research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goal of academic research is to intellectually masturbate along with friends (colleagues). Grant money just makes that possible.

      The fierce competition over grant money is just that the economy just won't support jobs to masturbate in versus the ammount of people who want those jobs.

      Maybe we will get something useful from the researcher's work and maybe we won't. If we do get something useful, my gut feeling is that is completely by chance.

    2. Re:Take it easy on academic research by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The goal is usually to explore the basic underpinnings of something of interest,

      I think you misspelled "bring in grant money" and "write publishable papers."

      If the grants happen to go to, or the papers happen to be written by, somebody who's interested in the subject, that's a bonus. It's not required.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Take it easy on academic research by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Considering how little professors (not to mention grad students) are paid, I expect most have an interest in the subject otherwise they'd have gotten regular jobs rather than spend their early twenties getting paid nothing, mid and late twenties getting paid a couple of percent more than a McDonalds front line worker and the rest of their lives getting paid less to somewhat more than that teenager's manager.

  43. Faster by BoxSocial · · Score: 0

    My P.C is faster than that.

    --
    Give me good ratings or I will close down the internet.
  44. Vaporware? by overshoot · · Score: 1
    The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.
    If you calculate the power density required to read/write that data, "vapor" is quite likely exactly what you're likely to get. If it happened to me, I'd be steamed; if it happened to $SIGNIFICANT_OTHER I'd be in really hot water.
    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  45. obligatory futurama by santaliqueur · · Score: 0

    Leela: "So after I specifically asked you not to touch anything, you drank a bottle of strange blue liquid? It could've been poisonous acid!"

    Fry: "It could've been, but chances were equally good it was a petabyte."

    --
    I do not accept czechs.
  46. no more data corruption! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great. Instead of data corruption, we merely have to worry about data evaporation.

  47. Enough Isn't Enough anymore by galindox · · Score: 1

    19 years ago I was using 320kb floppy disks with no hardrive, now my computer have A 300 GB HD, that's 983,000 times that capacity so, I'm ready for embrace my liquid petabytes in a couple of years, don't you folks? PD I need a drink

  48. Re:The usual route from academia to the market pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When you go to a gas/convenience store and pay for gas at the pump using your bank debit card, the store takes 4 or 5 times the value of the gas you pumped and keeps it, interest free, for 3 or 4 days before returning the difference back to your account. For one midwest chain that has 952 outlets I computed that the owners are pocketing over 4 MILLION/year in unearned interest on our money. Meanwhile, those living on a tight budget and unaware that their checking account is being ripped off, pay the bank $35-50 per bounced check, written on money that SHOULD HAVE BEEN in their account."

    What! Are you some kind of crack smoker? Are you trying to say my $50 tank of gas is actually a loan of $200-$250 and then I get will eventually get a credit for $150-$200? I know you are not saying that, cuz that would be crazy. For some reason, however, that is what it looks like you wrote. If this little "scam" was true, a lot of people would not even be able to pump the gas, because a lot of people do not have $200 sitting in their checking accounts. Please do not spread this crap.

  49. what a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most things that are a result of Drexel U., this article is such a joke.

  50. re: Now we only need by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    Now we only need a task that requires such capacity!

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  51. Re:The usual route from academia to the market pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When you go to a gas/convenience store and pay for gas at the pump using your bank debit card, the store takes 4 or 5 times the value of the gas you pumped and keeps it, interest free, for 3 or 4 days before returning the difference back to your account."

    Bullshit. The process you describe is illegal. It has also never once happened to me. I watch every single debit card transaction on my accounts and I check them daily.

    Go back to your tinfoil hats and conspiracy theories and leave the rest of us in peace.

  52. Re: Now we only need by davonshire · · Score: 1

    Task in hand I sugguest a Life Recorder.

    If such a storage device could be made, It could be possible
    to store video, audio and even life signs etc in high quality
    for the life of a person.

    Imagine a personal blackbox for security people etc.

    Just a thought.

  53. PETABytes, indeed by llamadillo · · Score: 0

    At least we know no animals will be harmed in the construction of such a device.

  54. Re:The usual route from academia to the market pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, what I see happen usually is they levy a $1.00 token [placeholder] charge of $1.00 to the account and then in about a day or so the actual charge finally appears.


    Original poster is full of "you know what" - damn anti-corporatists!

  55. I don't know about you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But for me this idea doesn't hold water.

  56. Cap'n Crunch by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 3, Funny

    So if you don't want to lose the contents of your RAM I guess you just stick it in the freezer?

    Do I see on the horizon a new implementation of PERL's freeze() and thaw() ??

    Meh - maybe in PERL 6...

    1. Re:Cap'n Crunch by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Are these real operators? I'm looking through perldoc.perl.org for them (I try to learn a new Perl tidbit every day, and this sounds kind of interesting) but I can't find them. Methods/subroutines in a standard package?

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:Cap'n Crunch by zhobson · · Score: 1

      The GP post is probably referring to functionality in the Storable module.

      http://perldoc.perl.org/Storable.html

      It's not uncommon for someone to refer to module functions as though they were builtin. We perl geeks pretty much take CPAN for granted these days. It's one of the best thing about perl!

  57. The Real Question? by umask077 · · Score: 1

    Can I hack one into my Tivo? I hate it when i miss The Simpsons.

    --
    --- Always remember. 99.36% of all statistics are inaccurate.
  58. Aww Dang by Heembo · · Score: 1

    When I saw 12.8 Petabytes I was hoping those were the stats of some new under 99$ SATA Hard Drive. Ah well, I can dare to dream!

    --
    Horns are really just a broken halo.
  59. Just make sure you cool it well by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    or this is the first product that becomes vaporware after its implementation.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  60. Vaporware by bioglaze · · Score: 1

    Suddenly, all my data are being vaporized awaaay. This, if something, is vaporware :-)

    --
    Who is John Galt?
  61. IT'S A JOKE, PEOPLE! by spun · · Score: 3, Informative

    Second serious reply to my post, so I guess I have to say it: Dihydrogen Monoxide is WATER. The joke is that if you make something sound scary enough, in vague enough terms, people will believe it's a threat. I thought everyone here would get the joke, but apparently not.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:IT'S A JOKE, PEOPLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the punchline was lost in the dyslexic acronym.

    2. Re:IT'S A JOKE, PEOPLE! by fritzk3 · · Score: 1
      Actually, it looks like the people replying DID get the joke, and were adding onto what you posted.

      So, your pedantic follow-up post really wasn't necessary.

      --
      All your sig are belong to us.
    3. Re:IT'S A JOKE, PEOPLE! by OuroborosCobra · · Score: 1

      Actually, part of the problem is that Dihydrogen Monoxide is would notbe the proper chemical name for water. It would be Hydrogen Hydroxide.

      I know the joke is with Dihydrogen Monoxide, and I get it when I see it. Just always annoys me, that's all.

  62. Re: Now we only need by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Porn?

  63. That's the secret, see? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Cubic Centimeters are the real secret to high density storage!

    They just give you lots of little boxes to pour your data into. When you fill up about 10 of 'em, you just slap some duck tape on them, scribble a half-ass lable with a tiny magic marker, pack it into your Tonka truck with about 10 others, and push it to the other side of the data center. I call this last part the Tonka Transport Layer (TTL), and it offers the highest transfer rates in the history of networking!

    The RFC requires that you make 'VROOM! VROOM!' noises and smash it into at least one cow-orker's foot along the way. My 5 year old has already mastered this technology.

  64. per *CUBIC* centimeter---that's volume by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Disk surfaces are measured in area, not volume...so if you were to plate that out in a thin layer...how much area/petabyte?

    This doesn't address the problem of access, but mere layout. How many cc's of whatever the storage material is does a current high capacity disk contain? I'd wager not many. The desire is generally for as thin a layer as possible to reduce the size of the magnetic domains. Disks used to be metal, but now they're glass (lagely) because of this.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    1. Re:per *CUBIC* centimeter---that's volume by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I'm going to imagine that this might not be applied in the current spinning platter method, but I CBA to RTFA. Let's be realistic, though, nobody needs to back up the entire internet *twice* on their hard drive. I know this'll bite me in the ass five years from now, but 12.8PB is enough for anyone.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  65. What About Oxidation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm a long way from being a specialist on this stuff. However, it looks to me like there's a basic materials compatibility problem here.


    Water facilitates oxidation of iron (colloquially, rust). The conductor is iron, or at least contains significant quantities of iron. Hydroxyl is one of the main ions of water (the HO in H2O).


    So isn't this proposal going to rust out the circuit in about an hour? And, correct me if I'm wrong, but iron oxide is not a suitable conductor itself, being so mechanically weak?


    Am I missing something? Am I missing everything?

  66. having trouble with this.... by nblender · · Score: 1

    Any of you Petaphiles have a picture of how this is supposed to work?

  67. I'm not holding my breath by pestilence669 · · Score: 1

    ..."The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor"...

    Drexel isn't exactly a technological powerhouse. This is like the next breakthrough coming out of Riverside State University. I won't hold my breath. This "water" stuff their talking about is probably vapor.

  68. Today is tomorrow. It happened! by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Have you ever seen Groundhog Day?

    Yes, and it is a grand spectacle of human superstition well worth driving all the way up to Punxsutawney, PA.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  69. Vapor Ware? by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

    Wires running through water. Electricity runs through wires. Wires get hot. Wires heat water. Water turns to steam. This is definately vapor ware. ;-)

  70. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it... The article says that it could replace harddrives / ram. They say theyve managed to stablize the creation of really fine wires by adding water. They then state that "All that remains" is to figure out how to pack them together, and essentially how to even store data with them?

    I've figured out how to make all current means of transportation obsolete, i've managed to build circular platforms. All that remains is to figure out how to encode your body and transport it send somewhere else.

  71. Check The Source by TrueWest175 · · Score: 1

    Bear in mind that Drexel is a very market-driven, finance-oriented university with a president who has stated "Make no mistake, higher education is a business."

    Perhaps they are looking for some PR, eh?

    --


    laugh hard, it's a long way to the bank
  72. Gives a whole new meaning. . . . by AnElder · · Score: 1

    to the term "memory leak."

  73. Obligatory Rollerball reference by rkowen · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised that no one has made the obvious reference to the 1975 movie with James Caan named "Rollerball", where he, as the main character Jonathan E., goes to the library to find the history of his, then, current world dominated by corporations. The contents of the entire library and the sum of all human knowledge has been "saved" into this watery mass storage unit, prominently shown bubbling in the background. However, as with other WORN (write-once-read-never) archival data systems we've all come across at one point or another it has some problems ...

    Jonathan E.: So the computer misplaced some information?
    Librarian: The entire of the 13th century.

    (This is cut and paste directly from the imdb.com, so I'm not responsible for the grammer of the quote.)

    --
    I hate sigs (especially yours which is a waste of my bandwidth)
  74. vapor paper by SlashSquatch · · Score: 1
    The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.

    The fact that this is coming out of a university makes me think that this won't be vapor, but in fact, toilet paper. Looks great on a publication list though.

    --
    Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
  75. Didnt I see this in... by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

    AEON FLUX last night?

  76. thirsty people by jaimz22 · · Score: 1

    so durring a drought would people flock to data stoage centers?

  77. This means you can by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Start defraging this disk when your child is born and it will be ready when they go to college!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  78. vapor? by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
    hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor.

    Hope they keep the temp under 212F - or it'll all be vapor

  79. Re: Now we only need by Jakeypants · · Score: 1

    640 mL of water ought to be enough for anybody.

    Note: I know the Bill Gates quote is fake.

  80. Army research only ? by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    Support for the research at Drexel is from the Army Research Office and at Harvard and at Penn from the National Science Foundation, the Packard Foundation, the Dreyfus Foundation, the Office of Naval Research, and the Center for Piezoelectric Design.

    I guess if it really does give 12 petabytes, it will be restricted to classified army usage *only*...

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  81. good idea by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    Vaporware and Petabyte would be nice names for a diner that serves a lot of beans.

  82. Re:The usual route from academia to the market pla by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

    With ethics and morals like that it's no wonder that American corporations are pocketing BILLIONS in excess oil profits during times of scarcity, while defunding retirement accounts and abandoning health insurance programs

    The goverment takes a nice chunk off of the top of gas prices too, why can't they seem to save the money instead of spend it.

    Why is it that the people and corporations smart enough to make more than they spend are evil and greedy, and that nobody seems to complain when corporations and goverments spend more then they make?

    I do not mean to imply that corporations can't be too greedy for their own good, but that in capitalism you are supposed to act in your own self interest and aquiring more money then you spend is in your own self interest.

  83. Chemistry Nazi Mk. II by iced_773 · · Score: 1


    Wrong. Water is not an ionic compound, so it not be called "hydrogen hydroxide" or "hydrogen oxide" or "hydroxic acid". Molecular compounds (i.e. nonmetals) are named using the numerical prefix system, so dihydrogen monoxide is correct, just as ammonia would be nitrogen trihydride, and methane would be carbon tetrahydride.

  84. 100 petabyte and Beyond by fedrive · · Score: 1

    8 years ago Michael Thomas patented a read write head for 40,000 Terabits cu.cm. using ferroelectrics on a 2d / 3d 3.5 optical disk drive. UV Photon induced electric field poling of a ferroelectric molecule called an optical / molecular / atomic switch.

    http://www.colossalstorage.net/

  85. I hope it turns out useful, too by vought · · Score: 1

    The fact that this is coming out of a university gives me hope that this technology won't turn out to be just so much vapor."

    Yeah, if this effort ended up in failure, I'd be steamed too.

  86. A disruptive innovation by Macka · · Score: 1

    Even if it were possible to turn this technology into a commercial venture, I don't think it would be allowed to see the light of day. The article tempts the reader to imagine the following products:
    Imagine having computer memory so dense that a cubic centimeter contains 12.8 million gigabytes (GB) of information.

    Imagine an iPod playing music for 100 millennia without repeating a single song or a USB thumb-drive with room for 32.6 million full-length DVD movies.
    In reality, if someone brought a product like this to market in the next 10 years, it would turn the computing industry on its head, and not in a good way. The big players (IBM, HP, etc) would see billions slashed from their revenue and entire divisions would die out. Companies like EMC would collapse within a year. Millions would face unemployment as the storage market we know today evaporated and people in related industries took the hit.

    Never mind the money lost, the social consequences to products like this would be devastating to a lot of people.

  87. Great News! by trongey · · Score: 1

    Now we'll have a place to put our Petafiles!

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  88. Hot water scalds by deVoid99 · · Score: 1

    Turn up the power, and you'd have REAL vapourware! ---- Everything must change, nothing stays the same.

  89. Hmmmm by M45T3RS4D0W8 · · Score: 0

    Just imagine the calls to tec support?

    "Hello? I cannot use my computer, the screen is black."

    "Are you in a tropical place sir?"

    "Yes I am."

    "I am sorry, everything on your HD went up in a little spoof of air..."

    --
    Security is but an illusion of the mind
    ~M45T3R S4D0W8~