I do not think you understand. Yes I mistyped breaking instead of braking. Still my statements stand. The flow of fuel into the cylinders is not shut off. Many reputable tuners will verify this. Also I'm not talking about starting the car. Let it coast in gear, switch the key off, then switch it to "on" not "start" and it will buck because the motor is putting fuel into the cylinders. You will get better mileage by putting the car into neutral rather than leaving it in gear because you are still using fuel but you are slowing down from the engine braking.
The added stress that the high vacuum situation engine braking creates can harm your motor. You are creating a situation where you are more prone to burning oil because you are sucking it into the combustion chamber with the extra vacuum. Boxer engines are more prone to this because the oil cannot drain by gravity as easily since they lay flat. This can lead to fouled plugs, low oil levels causing added wear etc. $40 for a set of brake pads or $2000+ for a new piston/sleeve/motor. I'll use my brakes.
This is not true. The injectors do not shut off and the drag from the wheels turning the engine causes you to lose (or not gain) momentum like you would if you took it out of gear. People that tune subarus for a living know this. You can verify it by putting your car in gear and turning it off then turn the key back to the on position. If there was no fuel flowing the motor would not kick but it does. The "seat of the pants" kick you are feeling is slop in the drivetrain. This misconception was started by novice tuners looking at the duty cycle of the injectors and not at the pulse width.
So take your car out of gear and get some more mileage. Your rings and rods will thank you for relieving the added stress from engine breaking. Also brake pads are cheap. Pistons, rings, rods and motors are not.
Even for good ideas I'm against them when they try to play the "it's for the children" emotional card. If the idea isn't good enough to stand on it's own then it's not worth it period.
From how I read the TOS (INAL and all that), it seems that they just own the rights to reproduce your stuff onto other people's screens not that they own the "stuff" indefinitely or even at all. They are just covering their butt so you can't say "I never gave you permission to display this to x person".
Actually those that "fear there may actually be a God" would argue that Neanderthals are actually just humans and that current science just mislabels them as different than us. At least those 6000 year folks.
Engraving things is a bit much. Quakecon does it well. You let them know the items you will bring or tell them at the door. They give you a list of your stuff with your name and an id (drivers license number etc) and you must have that paper to check out. Get detailed, enermax black and grey case, xxx mouse, xxx 17"lcd etc.
+1
A guy I know also with a concealed carry permit remembered to take his gun off but forgot about the extra magazine in his back pocket. Never got questioned or set off any alarm.
Data point 3
Christ died "once and for all" (1 Peter 3:18, Hebrews 9:27-28, Hebrews 10:10)
It's not about "original sin", it's about the effects of the fall or first sin by Adam. All of creation suffered the effects (Romans 8:20-22). Sure dogs, cats, bacteria do not have a soul and a spirit and would not have an after life so you could lump intelligent aliens in that group. But, IMHO self awareness and a conscience comes from having a soul which is partially what separates us from animals and gives us that desire to learn about our surroundings and figure out why things work which is something an intelligent being would need to possess.
Some Protestants may believe this way but there are others that do not.
Let's think about this a little.
If there are other created beings in outer space then they must have another way to salvation since they would not be descendants of Adam. Since we are of one blood (Acts 17:26) and Christ was of that one blood when He came to Earth His blood was shed for the descendants of Adam because it's not just blood that covered sins (Hebrews 10:4,11) but Christ's blood (Hebrews 10:10).
So I take exception because aliens could not be saved by Jesus' blood which is the only way (John 4:16).
well we have the stealth bomber as well now that can carry more than the stealth fighter. Then yeah the F-22 to fulfill the air to air missions that can also do the air to ground at the same time. It was also, as you said, the limitations of the F-117. It was basically the first real/successful attempt at stealth (that I remember offhand) so I wouldn't be suprised if it was more of a good concept that the government jumped at instead of saying 'that's good, now make it carry more'. Still very interesting and I agree that I can't wait to see the next iteration that we know nothing about yet.
Look at it this way.
Your original odds were 1/3. Monty has a 2/3 chance of having the right one. Monty's odds of having the right one is greater than your odds of having the right one so statistically you should switch.
Look at it by way of cards (in the article).
You need to pick the ace of hearts. Monty will then go through the deck and pick the ace of hearts or a random card. He will then show you the other 50 "goats" and ask if you want to trade. You have a 1/52 chance of picking it. Monty then has a 51/52 chance of picking it. Obviously, statistically speaking you should switch.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Doesn't really look like they had completely secular principles in mind when deciding to defect and form their own country to me.
9"(L)Six days you shall labor and do all your work,
10but the seventh day is a sabbath of the LORD your God; in it (M)you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter, your male or your female servant or your cattle or your sojourner who stays with you.
11"(N)For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day and made it holy.
Mark relates by tying God and creation from Jesus' own words. Not trying to connect days with this.
19"For those days will be a time of tribulation such as has not occurred (N)since the beginning of the creation which God created until now, and never will.
Sure I don't speak the original language but I do use what I believe the best literal translation NASB along with a Strong's concordance to see the words in other passages and how they were translated there. You still didn't show how it's not 6 literal days as it was Noah writing the words down by inspiration from God so Moses would have understood that God was talking about 6 literal days or amounts of time.
I think you need to re-read the Bible.
Genesis 1 clearly separates each of the events into literal days. "And there was evening, and there was morning--the first day.", "And there was evening, and there was morning--the second day.", on until the sixth day. How much clearer does it need to be?
But just in case it's not clear enough, Exodus 6:9-11 connects six working days with the six literal days God created everything. Again Exodus 31:15-17 connects six working days with the six literal days of creation.
Still if not clear enough, Matthew 19:4 Jesus reaffirms that God created man and woman. Mark 13:19 again affirms creation by Jesus' own words.
Genesis is literal history. You wouldn't take stories about old Greek myths and say their days were figurative and really represented a longer time. Specially when it's connected with evening and morning day x. Why is thing being done with the Bible?
Obviously we can disagree on whether the Bible is real/accurate/fiction etc. but it is definitely meant as literal days.
Slashdot Mirror
I do not think you understand. Yes I mistyped breaking instead of braking. Still my statements stand. The flow of fuel into the cylinders is not shut off. Many reputable tuners will verify this. Also I'm not talking about starting the car. Let it coast in gear, switch the key off, then switch it to "on" not "start" and it will buck because the motor is putting fuel into the cylinders. You will get better mileage by putting the car into neutral rather than leaving it in gear because you are still using fuel but you are slowing down from the engine braking.
The added stress that the high vacuum situation engine braking creates can harm your motor. You are creating a situation where you are more prone to burning oil because you are sucking it into the combustion chamber with the extra vacuum. Boxer engines are more prone to this because the oil cannot drain by gravity as easily since they lay flat. This can lead to fouled plugs, low oil levels causing added wear etc. $40 for a set of brake pads or $2000+ for a new piston/sleeve/motor. I'll use my brakes.
http://oksc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=61578#61578
This is not true. The injectors do not shut off and the drag from the wheels turning the engine causes you to lose (or not gain) momentum like you would if you took it out of gear. People that tune subarus for a living know this. You can verify it by putting your car in gear and turning it off then turn the key back to the on position. If there was no fuel flowing the motor would not kick but it does. The "seat of the pants" kick you are feeling is slop in the drivetrain. This misconception was started by novice tuners looking at the duty cycle of the injectors and not at the pulse width.
So take your car out of gear and get some more mileage. Your rings and rods will thank you for relieving the added stress from engine breaking. Also brake pads are cheap. Pistons, rings, rods and motors are not.
Even for good ideas I'm against them when they try to play the "it's for the children" emotional card. If the idea isn't good enough to stand on it's own then it's not worth it period.
From how I read the TOS (INAL and all that), it seems that they just own the rights to reproduce your stuff onto other people's screens not that they own the "stuff" indefinitely or even at all. They are just covering their butt so you can't say "I never gave you permission to display this to x person".
Actually those that "fear there may actually be a God" would argue that Neanderthals are actually just humans and that current science just mislabels them as different than us. At least those 6000 year folks.
http://www.theesa.com/about/members.asp
Engraving things is a bit much. Quakecon does it well. You let them know the items you will bring or tell them at the door. They give you a list of your stuff with your name and an id (drivers license number etc) and you must have that paper to check out. Get detailed, enermax black and grey case, xxx mouse, xxx 17"lcd etc.
+1
A guy I know also with a concealed carry permit remembered to take his gun off but forgot about the extra magazine in his back pocket. Never got questioned or set off any alarm.
Data point 3
My sweater was destroyed when I walked away.
but the cake is a lie!
When a chimp figures out how plants grow and can farm them get back to me.
There's a difference in "Hey what's this? Let me pee on it" and "How does this work? How does it grow? How did it get here?"
Christ died "once and for all" (1 Peter 3:18, Hebrews 9:27-28, Hebrews 10:10)
It's not about "original sin", it's about the effects of the fall or first sin by Adam. All of creation suffered the effects (Romans 8:20-22). Sure dogs, cats, bacteria do not have a soul and a spirit and would not have an after life so you could lump intelligent aliens in that group. But, IMHO self awareness and a conscience comes from having a soul which is partially what separates us from animals and gives us that desire to learn about our surroundings and figure out why things work which is something an intelligent being would need to possess.
Some Protestants may believe this way but there are others that do not.
Let's think about this a little.
If there are other created beings in outer space then they must have another way to salvation since they would not be descendants of Adam. Since we are of one blood (Acts 17:26) and Christ was of that one blood when He came to Earth His blood was shed for the descendants of Adam because it's not just blood that covered sins (Hebrews 10:4,11) but Christ's blood (Hebrews 10:10).
So I take exception because aliens could not be saved by Jesus' blood which is the only way (John 4:16).
Man it's going to suck to be thrown in the slammer just for owning the System of a Down song.
well we have the stealth bomber as well now that can carry more than the stealth fighter. Then yeah the F-22 to fulfill the air to air missions that can also do the air to ground at the same time. It was also, as you said, the limitations of the F-117. It was basically the first real/successful attempt at stealth (that I remember offhand) so I wouldn't be suprised if it was more of a good concept that the government jumped at instead of saying 'that's good, now make it carry more'.
Still very interesting and I agree that I can't wait to see the next iteration that we know nothing about yet.
Look at it this way.
Your original odds were 1/3. Monty has a 2/3 chance of having the right one. Monty's odds of having the right one is greater than your odds of having the right one so statistically you should switch.
Look at it by way of cards (in the article).
You need to pick the ace of hearts. Monty will then go through the deck and pick the ace of hearts or a random card. He will then show you the other 50 "goats" and ask if you want to trade. You have a 1/52 chance of picking it. Monty then has a 51/52 chance of picking it. Obviously, statistically speaking you should switch.
I vote we tag this awesome article "AWESOMEBAR"
With Firefox 2.0.0.13 I've been doing just find rendering the render image properly!
http://acid3.acidtests.org/reference.html
no really, the carbon nanotubes just assimilated by themselves! :)
I got a 100/100 on the reference image.
Doesn't really look like they had completely secular principles in mind when deciding to defect and form their own country to me.
The first.
The second expounds upon the days mentioned in the first. Notice there is no division between night and day like the first.
Mark relates by tying God and creation from Jesus' own words. Not trying to connect days with this.
Sure I don't speak the original language but I do use what I believe the best literal translation NASB along with a Strong's concordance to see the words in other passages and how they were translated there. You still didn't show how it's not 6 literal days as it was Noah writing the words down by inspiration from God so Moses would have understood that God was talking about 6 literal days or amounts of time.
I think you need to re-read the Bible.
Genesis 1 clearly separates each of the events into literal days. "And there was evening, and there was morning--the first day.", "And there was evening, and there was morning--the second day.", on until the sixth day. How much clearer does it need to be?
But just in case it's not clear enough, Exodus 6:9-11 connects six working days with the six literal days God created everything. Again Exodus 31:15-17 connects six working days with the six literal days of creation.
Still if not clear enough, Matthew 19:4 Jesus reaffirms that God created man and woman. Mark 13:19 again affirms creation by Jesus' own words.
Genesis is literal history. You wouldn't take stories about old Greek myths and say their days were figurative and really represented a longer time. Specially when it's connected with evening and morning day x. Why is thing being done with the Bible?
Obviously we can disagree on whether the Bible is real/accurate/fiction etc. but it is definitely meant as literal days.