But you would expect goverment to protect your copyright? How is a law that requires reslease of source code with binaries fundamentaly different from a law that requires not to copy something that can be copied at no cost?
I have never heard of a program that is as universally criticized as having a bad interface, but the developers completly ignore the critiques.
ed?
Gimp is powerful, but it is needlessly hard to use.
You are welcome to try and make a better interface and shouting from rooftops that it should be exactly like PS does not cut it. Anyway how often do you see people criticizing programs they pay $600 for or have to use as part of their job unless they are truly unbearable? I never had problems after reading "Grokking the GIMP", but I don't expect complex programs used for specific tasks use the same interface as notepad.
I think the crop tool is sheduled to be improved in 2.4, but don't quote me on that. The toolbox staying (or not) on top is something you ask the WM to do.
Features are objective, what interfaces you like or don't like on the other hand seems to be very subjective. So how does Paint.NET compare to Gimp in terms of features (-10 points for beeing windows only;-).
From the GNU GPL: "Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does."
BitTorrent makes better use of the bandwidth available: no need for biger pipes to your servers or caching servers all around the world. Less resources wasted overall.
Don't forget to put the right spin on it: if BitTorrent wasn't available the developers of X-Plane would have to pay more for bandwidth, so having BitTorrent is good for commerce.
Slashdot Mirror
But you would expect goverment to protect your copyright? How is a law that requires reslease of source code with binaries fundamentaly different from a law that requires not to copy something that can be copied at no cost?
They don't need to rush Linux is here and very good. The Hurd developers can play around.
China refuses to pay Red Hat for sunlight.
Have you changed any hardware since then? :-P
He controls his movement in the 4th dimension?
Seems like a windows related problem.
Layer masks do nearly the same thing as layers? What are you smoking?
Get a DAT! :-P
You are saying that as if it's a good thing.
Santa Claus is not possible without FTL travel. :-D
Use this.
It's Layer/New Layer in Gimp, but of course Paint.NET has it much easier...
I think the crop tool is sheduled to be improved in 2.4, but don't quote me on that. The toolbox staying (or not) on top is something you ask the WM to do.
Features are objective, what interfaces you like or don't like on the other hand seems to be very subjective. So how does Paint.NET compare to Gimp in terms of features (-10 points for beeing windows only ;-).
EULAs have nothing to do with copyright.
My finger sliped.
From the GNU GPL: "Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does."
BitTorrent makes better use of the bandwidth available: no need for biger pipes to your servers or caching servers all around the world. Less resources wasted overall.
w00t, t3h zig i's ra11y !nsigful!
Don't forget to put the right spin on it: if BitTorrent wasn't available the developers of X-Plane would have to pay more for bandwidth, so having BitTorrent is good for commerce.