Slashdot Mirror


U.S. World's Foremost Spam Nation In 2004

der Kopf writes "As reported by ZDNet, '42 percent of all spam sent this year came from the United States,' which makes the U.S. the unthreatened king of the 2004 spam hill. Number two on the list is South Korea (with 13.43%), while China can be found in third place (with 8.44%). The U.S. put out more spam this year than all the other countries in the top 12 combined." All depends who's counting, I guess.

274 comments

  1. Woohoo! by Primotech · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're good where it counts.

    1. Re:Woohoo! by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're good where it counts.

      Where's that? The enl@rjd p3njs?

    2. Re:Woohoo! by savagedome · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the spammers are mostly trying to sell penile enlargements, viagra, insurance and mortgage. Hmmmmmm ;)

    3. Re:Woohoo! by bsharitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This would be a good thing if it's accurate, that would mean that close to half of all spam would be under US jurisdiction, which means they can be sued and shut down in the US.

    4. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now that the elections are over, there is no more "Elect my guy cause teh man be teh him and he teh bettarrr!!!11!!" type emails. I'm sure China and S. Korea will start to pick up the pace again.

    5. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LIke I needed a fucking slashdot article to tell me that Lamericans are spam kings....

    6. Re:Woohoo! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We're good where it counts.

      Why aren't the spammers outsourcing it to other countries?

    7. Re:Woohoo! by canuck57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This would be a good thing if it's accurate, that would mean that close to half of all spam would be under US jurisdiction, which means they can be sued and shut down in the US./p?

      It is true. Americans generate the problem to sell products to solve the problem.

      The legal system in the US is not interested in enforcing SEC regulations, fraud laws or business licensing issues with regards to spam. You can't put 80% of the business in court for being spammers. The company you work for might be a spammer - they just quietly outsource it.

    8. Re:Woohoo! by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Given how unpopular spam is, this only really goes to provide evidence towards my contention- that the US political system is institutionally corrupt.

      i.e. the backhanders that senators and wotnot get from 'advertising' businesses mean that the laws have little or no teeth.

      I mean, in the US, it's pretty much legal to say just about anything in an advertisements. In the UK, you have to be actually not misleading.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    9. Re:Woohoo! by MobileC · · Score: 1

      I read this as "they can be sued and shut down the US."

      I don't see a downside, do you?

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    10. Re:Woohoo! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "I mean, in the US, it's pretty much legal to say just about anything in an advertisements. In the UK, you have to be actually not misleading."

      And in the US, you can't be sued for libel if you're telling the truth.

      There is a balance here, you know.

    11. Re:Woohoo! by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      And in the US, you can't be sued for libel if you're telling the truth.

      Nit-pick. In the US, truth is a defense against a libel suit. But in the US, anyone can sue anyone for just about anything. If what you wrote was true, you should be able to win the case, but that won't protect you from getting sued, and you will still have to defend yourself.

    12. Re:Woohoo! by Graabein · · Score: 1
      This would be a good thing if it's accurate, that would mean that close to half of all spam would be under US jurisdiction, which means they can be sued and shut down in the US.

      Sounds good in theory, but in reality the US anti-spam laws are pretty toothless. In fact, many other Western countries have much tougher laws.

      Not that those tough laws are any help, since most spam originates in the US and is relayed and hosted in China.

      --
      And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
    13. Re:Woohoo! by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Telling the truth and not being misleading are not the same thing at all, as your posting shows to some extent.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    14. Re:Woohoo! by camcloud1 · · Score: 0

      There is no doubt that spam is an American invention. It's kind of the online version of the "canned laughter" that you all love so well in your sitcoms. At first you don't really notice that it's there and then you can't go anywhere without running into it.

    15. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean my company making penis enlargers could be responsible for spam? I don't believe it. I'm sure we do just fine selling through retail.

  2. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, something to be proud of.

    1. Re:Yay! by sci50514 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally something that is not out-sourced. :)

    2. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Finally, something to be proud of.

      Yes, like fighting global terrorism and freeing people from tyranny really isn't something an American can take pride in.

      Oh well, at least this Christmas I'm proud to know that a few of my fellow citizens are risking their own lives for me so that I don't have to. Pity the self hating American crowd here.

  3. Headlines we'll see in 2005, 2006, .. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That one just isn't going to change. Never has, never will.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Headlines we'll see in 2005, 2006, .. by enosys · · Score: 1

      China will probably overtake the US farily soon. They have a much larger population and due to their current rate of progress many people will be getting computers. I'm sure they'll be able to get decent broadband as well.

    2. Re:Headlines we'll see in 2005, 2006, .. by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      [China] have a much larger population and due to their current rate of progress many people will be getting computers.

      I wonder what OS they will be running?

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    3. Re:Headlines we'll see in 2005, 2006, .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Rinux

    4. Re:Headlines we'll see in 2005, 2006, .. by enosys · · Score: 1
      I wonder what OS they [China] will be running?

      Pirated copies of Windows?

  4. Who's counting? by cperciva · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All depends who's counting, I guess.

    This study comes from the UK; given recent electoral history, I'm far more inclined to trust that they can count than I am to trust any study which comes out of the US.

    1. Re:Who's counting? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      From where I've been counting since about 1996, the US has always been the main source of spam, but I've never been surprised by this:

      It is a symptom of a society where any level of dishonesty is legally acceptable, and is socially acceptable if it pays (hence the number of spammers with intact limbs). It is also a symptom of the greed and gullibility of individuals who are so easily sucked in by offers of something too good to be true.

    2. Re:Who's counting? by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      All depends who's counting, I guess.

      What the fuck was that editorialil comment supposed to mean anyway?

      Every time spam comes up as a topic here we get dozens of xenophobic rednecks proudly explaining that since they've "blocked all APNIC" they "don't get any spam, and who cares about communicating with them anyway". Even in the face of data like this, I'm sure they'll continue to lecture the rest of the world on how thay have to shut down "their" spammers or be cut off.

      Personally, living in Hong Kong, about 1% of my spam is local, 2-5% Nigerian, the rest American.

    3. Re:Who's counting? by kaarlov · · Score: 1

      The problem is not that those people blocking all APNIC or whatever get a lot of spam marketing things from Asia, but the problem is that there are too many ISPs in China and Korea who are even worse than US ISPs in regards of reacting to spam complaints.

      And many of american spammers have noticed this and started to use APNIC-area ISPs services for spamming.

    4. Re:Who's counting? by mattdm · · Score: 1

      It is a symptom of a society where any level of dishonesty is legally acceptable, and is socially acceptable if it pays (hence the number of spammers with intact limbs).

      Err, yeah, sorry about that -- free speech is a terrible, terrible thing. But don't worry -- we're workin' really hard at turning ourselves into an authoritarian fundamentalist/multinational state, so if you check back in a few years, I'm sure you'll be happy to find that lying [*] is totally illegal and everything is happy.

      Not sure what we'll do about the lack of violent vigilante justice, but hey, I'm sure someone's working on it.

      * as defined by MobilMicroCitiGeneralWalDisney and the 700 club. They know what's best.

    5. Re:Who's counting? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      And many of american spammers have noticed this and started to use APNIC-area ISPs services for spamming.

      Actually, no. Most spam is, according to what I've read recently, sent from zombie PCs, in the US mostly. China does come up as a home for the websites processing sales to those idiots who respond to spam.

      And "APNIC" is an absurdly large area of the world -- including notably Asutralia and New Zealand. I wouldn't mind so much if people actually blacklisted the ISPs who do have something to do with spam, not just everyone on the same continent.

    6. Re:Who's counting? by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      I think I can shed some light on "what the fuck that editorial comment meant".

      I think the editor was referring to the fact that a new "study" on this topic seems comes out every two or three weeks, and every study isolates a different area of the world as the problem.

      It's impossible to know which one to believe!

    7. Re:Who's counting? by MeanSolutions · · Score: 1

      About 85%-90% of the spam I receive seems to be merkin - advertising pharmacy sh!te, penile enlargements, p0rn and mortgages, the rest seems to be fairly evenly spread over stuff in some east asian encodings and cyrillic.

      Seems that 'harvesting' e-mail addresses from web forums and mailing lists is a merkin habit. Some throw-away mail addys I have used recently for this, is only getting merkin spam.

      Got to hand it to you merkins though, you seem to have the filthiest women in the world, all them housewives that can't wait to get married just so they can cheat. (All according to the spam of course...)

      --
      Swedish, but resident in the UK since 1996.
    8. Re:Who's counting? by mauriceh · · Score: 1

      "The five person voting panel voted 57 to 3.14 in
      favour of getting rid of the Diebold machines."
      - 'Downside'

      --
      Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
    9. Re:Who's counting? by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      What the fuck was that editorialil comment supposed to mean anyway?

      It means it depends on how, when and what methods you use to gather your evidence. If I assumed all spam written and sent in English was originated from the U.S., then yeah the U.S. is the biggest spammer. But if you wanna get deep and complex you can look at when certain spam flows originate (last February I got a bunch of spam for the Chinese New Year and I doubt most U.S. spammers would know let alone target that). Or you look at where the original spam programs are first created (which seems to be India and China thanks to their huge populations and growing skills at computers.)

    10. Re:Who's counting? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      I understand your irony, and your point is valid; however, I'm not talking about the legal system, which is itself shaped by social mores, i.e. to regulate behaviour prevalent at the time.

      What I'm talking about is a more general societal attitude where it is perfectly acceptable to piss off thousands of people to make a (relatively) small profit for minimal effort, rather than doing anything worthwhile.

  5. And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...with owned, unpatched Windows machines sitting directly on cable or DSL connections.

    If Comcast and Verizon spent half as much on cracking down on their moron customers as they do on mailers begging me to use their Internet services, they'd have this problem under control in no time.

    1. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      You forget the people who actually sell and buy the stuff.

    2. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've said it before and I've said it again - the time has come for a virus that forcibly fixes security holes or just firebombs the computer off the net. There's *no* way that the collateral damage to the net could be as bad as what's being done by spammers who've 0wned the boxes already.

      Oh, it's also time for a spammer to be dragged into the street and beaten 99% to death in front of news cameras and/or their children. I've been gone from school for three days and have over 600 messages waiting for me - not one of them legit. A savage ass-raping is too good for the Richters, Ralskys, and other vermin. Beatings, that's what they need.

    3. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by fermion · · Score: 1
      having just spent hours reinstalling MS Windows, drivers, included programs, updates(4 different installs, four different restarts) and reconfiguring mail and browser, let me tell you something. People are making butloads of money off these idiots, and the people who are raking in the profits are the criminals, not the lusers.

      The ISP should supply every DSL or Cable subscriber with a NAT firewill. This should be preconfigured by the ISP. There should be no options. If the luser wants a control over the firewall, that costs more. People will bitch. Screw them. An ISP should not by default allow direct connections. Perhaps the ISPs need to be sued back to the dark ages until thye stop this dangerous pratice

      And no one tell me that they never had any significant problems with IE. I grew up in a pretty dangerous neighborhood and only got attacked once or twice, and our house was only broken into once. Does that mean the neighborhood did not have systemic problems. No. It just meant that I knew who to avoid the problems.

      The lusers are getting computers for Christmas, and many of them will get MS crap because it is cheap. We can compliain that they are not able to go through the 100 step process to secure thier machines, or will we hold the proffesional accountable.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by MeanSolutions · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What gets me is that the spammers bother to send the spam outside Jesusland. The uptake on 'Low Cost Mortgages from USA' in Europe has to be 0.00%.

      --
      Swedish, but resident in the UK since 1996.
    5. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My company uses Verizon DSL and we've been having a lot of problems lately due to getting dynamically assigned IP addresses that have been previously used by customers with trojaned machines. The IP addresses have been made it onto some spamming blacklists, but Verizon doesn't bother to remove them from the pool, so I find emails to customers and business partners disappearing into the ether thanks to the blacklists (unless I keep unplugging the DSL modem until I get a decent IP address). Maybe if Verizon customers start to realize why their emails aren't getting through there will be some pressure on Verizon to get off its ass and police its network...

    6. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! You're as bad as the worm/virus writers if you can't see/understand this.

    7. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely.

      Even better - an undergound blackops assasan team targeting spammers, their customers and anyone willfully associated with them.
      - Save the beatings for those owning the zombifyied machines.

    8. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by idiotnot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a Verizon customer who attempts to send my mail server around 1k emails per hour. I complained to Verizon three and a half months ago. They shut the host down for about a week, then let him back...same thing. Normally, I get between 17 - 22k blocked connection attempts from ipfilter _from this one host_ per day.

      I complained again, and they didn't do anything. I really can't imagine the computer on the other end is at all usable, because it's so busy trying to send spam.

    9. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who should be held accountable are microsoft and their OEMS

      it should be the OEMS job to supply a PC in a reasonablly secure state.

    10. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and seeing how this is very very illeagal behavior on the spammers part, another law passed isn't going to do squat.

    11. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "An ISP should not by default allow direct connections. Perhaps the ISPs need to be sued back to the dark ages until thye stop this dangerous pratice"

      Actually, here's a simple solution that will keep everyone happy:

      When you signup for service with an ISP, you should be required to sign an agreement (provided that your ISP does not block ports 25/110) that says you will not use them as a transport for spam. The moment you're caught (blacklists, multiple reports, etc) breaking this because your box got owned, or because your intentions were to do so, your access to using ports 25/110 should simply be revoked (except to your ISP's local mail server).

      There is *NO* reason your incompetent grandmother needs access to any of that anyways.

    12. Re:And it's mostly coming from fucking idiots... by YCrCb · · Score: 1

      Keep hounding them, at least it worked for me with another ISP.

      I was receiving SPAM, blocked them, then finally found the ISP subnet and blocked it. Finally got tired of 12 thousand plus connections a DAY to my port 25 on my HOME DSL line with 2 users on the box. I sent a threatening a letter complaining of denial of service attack on my line, and threatened legal action, oh and CC my ISP. About a week later the connections have stopped.

      Good luck, maybe some of it will help.
      Michael

  6. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wonder if we will begin hearing tales of admins blocking US based IPs as we have heard of them blocking Chinese IPs outright.

    1. Re:Interesting... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Some people block parts of the US already. UUNET, Comcast ..

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do, pacbell, ameritech, comcast, bellsouth, rr, earthlink, I packet filter all their traffic to /dev/null

      Its because they dont give a fuck....

    3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I forgot to block savvis! There, that oughta fix th .. [NO CARRIER]

  7. Simple solution by ringer9cs · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am going to block USA, Korea and China on my firewall!

    1. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea, and as a bonus, you'll stop receiving obnoxious propaganda news from two of these countries at the same time.

    2. Re:Simple solution by Morlark · · Score: 1

      But which two? I think I know which two countries I'd rather not receive propaganda from.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    3. Re:Simple solution by northcat · · Score: 0, Troll

      Congratulations! You blocked the fucking Internet!

    4. Re:Simple solution by had3l · · Score: 0, Troll

      But in Communist China the firewall blocks you!

    5. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK and China.

    6. Re:Simple solution by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      No, seriously, this makes a lot of sense for a lot of people. Case in point, I support several web applications used only in UK based universities. These applications have their own e-mail addresses, which forward on to me. Blocking mail to these, from major USA based ISPs, would drastically cut down the spam that gets to me, with a minimal impact on genuine e-mail...

      Even for my personal e-mail, I could whitelist my USA-based friends, and add a high spam score to anything else coming from USA ISPs... very tempting, actually...

    7. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity it doesnt block all that shit coming from the USA and then, perhaps, we might have less spam.

  8. Good news in disguise? by Magus424 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If most of the spam comes from the US, that means that any anti-spam legislation passed here could have a huge effect.

    Of course, now we have to wait for Congress to actually do something about it. ;-)

    --
    -- Gone Crazy, Back Later
    1. Re:Good news in disguise? by DrNibbler · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the bulk of the SPAM is comming from zombified Windows machines. I don't think we can throw people in jail for getting 0wned, as much as I would like to see it.

      --
      Sean.OutaHere()
    2. Re:Good news in disguise? by killbill! · · Score: 1
      If most of the spam comes from the US, that means that any anti-spam legislation passed here could have a huge effect.

      Please explain how you expect people stealing other people's computers to send their spam to suddenly care about the law.
    3. Re:Good news in disguise? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Follow the money. If the spammers get their sales revenue seized from the credit card account, there will be a lot less motivation to spam.

    4. Re:Good news in disguise? by killbill! · · Score: 1

      You mean, like drug dealers, weapon importers or human traffickers?

      It'll only push spammers underground.

    5. Re:Good news in disguise? by andreMA · · Score: 1
      I don't think we can throw people in jail for getting 0wned, as much as I would like to see it.
      A better solution might be fines sufficient to pay for their prosecution and probation with the condition that they not live in a household with a networked computer until they (at their expense) complete a network security adult-education class offered by a local community college or some such. Assuming that their machine being compromised was something that was easilly preventable and they failed - through ignorance or apathy - to correct a problem.

      For a second offense, boiling oil.

    6. Re:Good news in disguise? by MeanSolutions · · Score: 1

      Considering the tendencies in Jesusland at the moment, I am surprised the 'enterprising spammers' has not been invited to sit in the Senate...

      Joke aside, just introduce a bill that ensures any spammers located in the USA have to do 24 months military service on the front line if they are caught. Should sort out them pesky 'enemy combatants' in no-time. Getting an extra 75,000 soldiers for free should make war a little easier...

      --
      Swedish, but resident in the UK since 1996.
    7. Re:Good news in disguise? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Congress isn't in charge of enforcing the laws. You're looking for the executive part of the government to make the crackdown. Of course, congress passes the budget, which has a line in there (or should have a line in there ...) for expenditures in enforcing spam laws.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    8. Re:Good news in disguise? by Jo+Owen · · Score: 1

      The important difference is that the above can deal in cash, its much harder for a spamming company to get you to send $20 to po box whatever than it is do get you to put your card details in the box.

  9. Total doesn't add up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you add up all the percentages listed, the total is about 80%. Where is the extra 20% coming from? Dark matter?

    1. Re:Total doesn't add up. by northcat · · Score: 1

      Little bits from other countries. And some of them could not be determined where they came from. Obviously. Use TFB (The Fucking Brain).

    2. Re:Total doesn't add up. by ESqVIP · · Score: 1
      As they say, those are just the top spammers, not all the spammers.

      The remaining 20% are distributed in other locations.

    3. Re:Total doesn't add up. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      No, dark fiber. Global Crossing wired up the city of Ryleh, the Mountains of Madness, and the Plains of Leng several years ago. Now they can't shut down the damned Cthisco routers!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. It's funny cuz by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    The US is supposed to have a legal tool against spam, and yet it's the worst offender in the world.

    I guess we CAN-SPAM and we're mighty proud of it...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:It's funny cuz by btbo · · Score: 1

      You're reversing it: it's the only country that really needs legislation against spam, we could live with the rest....

    2. Re:It's funny cuz by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Just proof that laws aren't the solution. The vast majority of spam is sent in violation of the law.

  11. Wonderful news... by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So we hold the majority on manhood enhancement, hot free teens, and low low mortgage rates.

    *sniff* I've never been so proud of my country.

    1. Re:Wonderful news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So we hold the majority on manhood enhancement, hot free teens, and low low mortgage rates.

      *sniff* I've never been so proud of my country.


      Actually, when you really interpret the above, the US holds the majority of men with small dicks, guys who can't get any, and people who have lousy mortgages.

    2. Re:Wonderful news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Mod parent up! It has to be the funniest post evar on the the intarwebs.

    3. Re:Wonderful news... by Hitmouse · · Score: 1

      ...and you're forgetting the majority of small penises. No wonder the cars are so big!

  12. That's all well and good, but... by Omicron32 · · Score: 1

    It's pretty obviously really.

    I mean, all the spammers living in the US have less distance to go to get Redmond to digitally sign their emails.

  13. Obviously by btbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you'd ask me, 90% or more comes from the US, through relays all over the world...

    1. Re:Obviously by adeydas · · Score: 1

      ... and you were blaming poor china.

  14. It should be 100%! by vikramrn · · Score: 2, Funny

    100% of Spam comes from the USA! SPAM is a registered trademark of Hormel Foods Corporation based in Austin, Minnesota!

    1. Re:It should be 100%! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "SPAM is a registered trademark"

      I always wondered what they made it from.

  15. A better question... by Mhrmnhrm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How did they come up with their numbers? I can easily see the US leading because of zombified Windows machines, but where are the ISP mail relays those zombies are using?

    --
    I suspect that one of these choices is incorrect. Correct.
    1. Re:A better question... by kaarlov · · Score: 1

      Umm, zombies nowadays typically don't use any further mail realys, they just send direct to receiving MX. Or if they do use realys, it is the isp's smtp-server the zombified machine uses for legitimate uses too.

    2. Re:A better question... by krray · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about!? If all the hacked Windows boxes were using mail relays the problem would REAL easy. They are not. Those hacked Windows boxes are trying to connect DIRECTLY to the mail servers -- they are the relay themselves.

    3. Re:A better question... by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 1

      Really they use both ways at the same time. Probably there are several types of spammer's viruses/worms and some of them use relays and some direct sending. Later is quite easy to cope with from ISP side. Just block all outgoing connections to port 25 besides ones originated from legitimate mail servers.

      But if you want to stop all the abuses of mail relays, you should monitor your mail server constantly. And it is not something ISP admins are paid for.

    4. Re:A better question... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      How did they come up with their numbers? I can easily see the US leading because of zombified Windows machines, but where are the ISP mail relays those zombies are using?

      You don't need to send mail through a relay. Just take your domain, look up the MX record, and send directly to the recipient's SMTP server. An extremely minimal SMTP implementation could probably be done in 20 lines of code or less, making it well within reach of worm/virus writers. Who cares about error checking if 95% of the messages get through.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    5. Re:A better question... by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      They don't need mail relays. The zombies can use their own SMTP engines just like the various Windoze viruses can.

      The problem is the ISPs who allow all their DSL/cable clients to do direct-to-MX mailing. A large secondary cause is all the ISPs who do spam filtering but who DO NOT assign a +100 SpamAssassin score to any mail that originates directly from a dynamic IP pool. Fix those two problems and zombie spam drops to nearly nil.

      p

    6. Re:A better question... by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      Spammers do realize this. Many of the mass-mailer worms do not have any mechanism for actually doing SMTP communication....they simply dump what would be a legit SMTP session to port 25 on the remote machine. Many simple web mailer scripts (these often are exploited, too) also do this. The Exim Manual has a good description of this under the smtp_enforce_sync option. Turning this on has stopped quite a bit of bulk e-mail on my host.

    7. Re:A better question... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Come on now. You've been here long enough to know what the /. reaction to any major ISPs blocking port 25 outbound is going to be.

      "But I *like* using my mail obscure server in China!"
      "Switch to $COMPETITION, $ISP wouldn't know technical literacy if it bit them on the ass!"
      "$ISP sucks, I paid for a real connection to the internet and got put in a sandbox with the kindergarteners"
      "Let's start a boycott!"
      "If I wanted to be treated like an idiot, I would have signed up with AOL!" ...and so on, and so forth, ad nauseum.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    8. Re:A better question... by hherb · · Score: 1

      Most important is that almost all spam we get is actually advertising for US companies; products and services sold or rendered in the US by US companies. Only a small minority of companies advertising by the spam we receive is located in Korea, China or Russia (at least what is caught in the spam filters of our 28 servers, according to our own analysis)

      I don't give a hoot about which country spam is sent from - it's the companies contracting spammers for their services in the first place that should feel the full grunt of anti-spam laws. Companies benefitting from spam should have all their assets confiscated - the proof of spamming would be in proving that they paid for spam.

    9. Re:A better question... by dodobh · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they use ISP relays?

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  16. It all depends on who's counting by fred911 · · Score: 1

    Absolutly! There are some places in the world that don't count p3n|s enlargment email as spam!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  17. Yes, but by Omicron32 · · Score: 1

    Are these emails digitally signed?

  18. Inspiration by CaptainZapp · · Score: 4, Funny
    The U.S. put out more spam this year than all the other countries in the top 12 combined.

    They must have gotten their inspiration from military spending.

    Fucking spammers!

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Inspiration by arose · · Score: 1
      Fucking spammers!
      Strange fetish...
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:Inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Military spending? Quite possibly. Military training? Not a chance: they haven't bought several metric buttloads of high-tech equipment only to have it operated by the educationally and morally sub-normal.
      And the spammers don't crap-flood each other.

  19. Re:Finally. A chance to whore some karma! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    This could explain South Korea's position near the top of the list, as it leads the world for broadband penetration.

    Gee, poor guys, if someone threatened me of broadband penetration, I guess I'd send out unsolicited email too...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  20. flawed data by +Addict-09+ · · Score: 3, Informative

    These reports use records at arin/apnic/ripe/lanic to determine country of origin. Just because an ip was issued by ripe (for instance) doesn't mean it's being used in Europe.

    1. Re:flawed data by kaarlov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Usually there is information about the country where the ip is assigned in the registries' whois-records. And there are compiled lists which quite accurately tells in which country ip-address is located. On of these is http://countries.nerd.dk/. Of course they aren't 100% accurate, but enough for purposes like this.

    2. Re:flawed data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that the greediest most corrupt sons-a-bitches on the face of the planet reside in the US pretty much justifies the call

  21. Re:Not surprised.. by northcat · · Score: 1

    And where the heck did you get those figures from? Its not in TFA. What's your problem with India?

  22. Here's the standard spam-solution form by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    In anticipation of yet another wave of proposed solutions, I have attached the standard spam-solution form for your convenience:

    ----------

    Your post advocates a

    ( ) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante

    approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work.
    Here is why it won't work:

    ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
    ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
    ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
    ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
    ( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
    ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
    ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
    ( ) The police will not put up with it
    ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
    ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
    ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
    ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

    Specifically, your plan fails to account for

    ( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it
    ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
    ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
    ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
    ( ) Asshats
    ( ) Jurisdictional problems
    ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
    ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
    ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
    ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
    ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
    ( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
    ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
    ( ) Extreme profitability of spam
    ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
    ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
    ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
    ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
    ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
    ( ) Outlook

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
    ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
    ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
    ( ) Blacklists suck
    ( ) Whitelists suck
    ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
    ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
    ( ) Sending email should be free
    ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
    ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
    ( ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
    ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
    ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

    1. Re:Here's the standard spam-solution form by 0x000000 · · Score: 0

      buutt it is not filled in, how am i supposed to copy and paste that?

      --
      cat /dev/null > .signature
  23. is this really a suprise? by suezz · · Score: 1

    in a land of counting your stocks and worrying about bottom line - this isn't surprising. we are nothing but a bunch lawyers and marketers - it's a joke - and I am embarrassed

    1. Re:is this really a suprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - trolling tard... you bet your bippy i'm counting my stocks, annuities, 401(k) and SEP-IRA funds, as well as my real-estate holdings...

      - i'll be retiring in luxury while fuckwits like you whine that Social Security isn't enough!

      - HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!

    2. Re:is this really a suprise? by suezz · · Score: 1

      gee your so intelligent - perfect example of where america is heading - hope you don't forget health care too when your retired.

  24. HA!!! by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    I AM NOW HOLDING MY BREATH!!! Pfhtt... ..... ..... ...ske... ...thud.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  25. Spamvertised web sites in China by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I report all my spam via Spamcop.net, and while I don't have any numbers, it seems like almost all of the spamvertised web sites reside in China.

    My understanding is that if you could close down the spamvertised sites, spam would largely be restricted to phishing attacks. If I didn't believe this, I probably wouldn't bother using spamcop!

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:Spamvertised web sites in China by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      it seems like almost all of the spamvertised web sites reside in China.

      Not for long I suspect, I do quite a bit of statistical analysis of spam and there are definitely changes in progress. Over the two years or so, there has a swing from using open relays and "bullet proof" hosted servers to actually send the spam to using compromised boxes on broadband connections. This is reflected in the report; a move from IPs in China to those in DSL pools countries with sizable adoption of broadband connectivity.

      The actual sites being spamvertised however have remained solidly in the traditional havens where ISPs with questionable anti-spam policies can be found. However, over the last few months in particular I have seen steadily growing numbers of spamvertised sites that are also being hosted in DSL pools, undoubtably on compromised boxes. From a spammer's perspective this is a no-brainer (no more hosting fees) so it's fairly obvious that this trend will continue I think.

      There are both good and bad points to this. The bad is that it makes traditional SpamCop style IP reporting almost unworkable - there are so many unpatched boxes that an ISP has no chance at dealing with them all. It was a game of Whack-a-Mole to start with, only now the number of holes that the moles can pop up from has gone up by a few orders of magnitude. The good however is that DNSBLs of the actual domains being used instead of the IPs, such as the SURBL lists, that can be generated from SpamCop submissions are *incredibly* good indicators of spam - so keep up that SpamCop reporting!

      More contentious though, is how ISPs might respond to this new spammer tactic. The simplest solution is probably going to be further restrictions on what an IP on a broadband connection can and cannot do. I expect to see more DSL services that are blocked prevented from running servers on certain ports, forced to send email through the ISP's gateway server, and possibly even outright firewalling of certain "remote access" ports like NetBIOS, RPC and so on.

      Frankly, given the rising tide of spam, ever increasing port scans bouncing off my firewall and almost total apathy of J.Sixpack in keeping his/her PC patched, I'm getting more fond of this idea every day. What I'd like to see is ISPs offering "standard" DSL packages with the kind of restrictions I mentioned above stated up front, alongside an unrestricted "premium" package - it could even cost a little extra. Alternatively, there is the middleground approach that my ISP uses: you can't run an email server by default, but send tech support and email and they'll unblock port 25 for free and periodically check that you are not running an open relay.

      One thing's for sure, if/when ISPs do respond to this latest spammer tactic, the spammers simply move the goalposts yet again. :(

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Spamvertised web sites in China by rasmajx · · Score: 1

      Whats phishing? Im hearing this term quite regulary i was just curious,..

    3. Re:Spamvertised web sites in China by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      There is a good article on it at Wikipedia

      Phishing is when a spammer sends out a very specificly targeted email to a whole bunch of people, hoping that the email will apply to certain people on the list. Those people may then take the "bait". Usually the scammer is looking for things like bank account information or a login name for a web site.

      For instance, you might one day receive an email from CitiBank saying, "Your account is expired due to a security threat! Please click here to log on and verify your information." Now for most people, the message is nonsense because they don't have a Citibank account, but for some small percentage, they may actually take the bait and click on the fake link.

      It's gotten so bad that it is best to never click on a link inside your email, no matter how legitimate it looks.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Spamvertised web sites in China by strikethree · · Score: 1

      "The simplest solution is probably going to be further restrictions on what an IP on a broadband connection can and cannot do. I expect to see more DSL services that are blocked prevented from running servers on certain ports, forced to send email through the ISP's gateway server, and possibly even outright firewalling of certain "remote access" ports like NetBIOS, RPC and so on"

      a restricted internet connection is not an internet connection. this solution is untenable to myself and many others. why can't the ISPs just cut off those who are causing problems? they should already be doing traffic analysis.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  26. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *claps*

  27. The undisputed kings of bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone had to say it, the sole and only reason for this is capitalism, which in the long run will prove to be the single worst economical system ever to have been used by men. Capitalism encourage bullshit, a lot, the single most common trait to any capitalist entity is to get more than it gives. That means that every single product has to be less than what was sold but in such a way that you can hardly complain, stretching the truth is common ground here. Capitalist entities also have the most rights, in fact no human has more rights than a capitalist entity, it all comes from the fact that corps have the same rights than humans but none of the responsibility, my take is, if your company has been found guilty of some crime, the corp should serve its time like any human; the product killed because it was faulty, that is involontary homicide, a couple of year, unable to profit or sell or actually do anything but support the product already out, any money making going to the public, I swear a lot more corps would actually do their homework and start being responsible, but just by your internal reaction I'm sensing here, some of you actually think that is unjust or stretching it, capitalism made its way in your mind, you're already done.

    The USA being the single most powerfull capitalist entity, by its policies and population and market it's no surprise at all they are the undisputed champs of spam, thats just the natural extension of their social and economical structure. What surprises me though is that Canada isn't on that list, I mean we are a very capitalist society, maybe not compared to the US but still compared to most other countries we are and our legislations are actually more spam friendly than in the US...

    1. Re:The undisputed kings of bullshit by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You've managed to put your finger on the biggest problem in the Western social and economic system, that corps have the same rights than humans but none of the responsibility .

      Though I don't think hitting the corporations financially as punishment really works. Large corporations will typically build in potential losses from economic punishments for misdeeds into their business model. A company may knowingly release a product they know to be unsafe, and simply put a portion of their profits aside for paying out of court settlements to victims.

      In essense, this is akin to saying that it's alright for me to go around killing people without fear of jail if I can afford to pay the victim's families a large portion of money.

      What I'd like to see is criminal charges brought on descision makers in corporations who knowingly use unsafe methods to produce a product that they know to be dangerous. In other words, a manager who makes the decision to save $0.02 on each product produced by using a less safe part won't be hedging those cost savings against the potential court costs from the families his company's product kills, he'll be hedging it against the very real possibility that he himself may face prison time for multiple murder charges.

      We cannot give large corporations exemption from responsibility on a human level. We see corporations as faceless entities, but there are always human beings behind the scenes making decisions on how that corporation acts. If we start making those humans accountable for the actions of the company for whom they make decisions, I think we'd start seeing quite a bit more safety, envrionmental and social responsibility in the corporate world.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:The undisputed kings of bullshit by moexu · · Score: 1
      What I'd like to see is criminal charges brought on descision makers in corporations who knowingly use unsafe methods to produce a product that they know to be dangerous. In other words, a manager who makes the decision to save $0.02 on each product produced by using a less safe part won't be hedging those cost savings against the potential court costs from the families his company's product kills, he'll be hedging it against the very real possibility that he himself may face prison time for multiple murder charges.
      I think this is a really great idea, but I see two problems :
      • Proving intent
      • Administrative focus on white collar crime
      Being able to prove in a court of law that a CEO knowingly chose to market an unsafe product would be incredibly difficult. It's sort of like proving a bait and switch scam. You know they're doing it, the cops know they're doing it, but proving that there is an intent to commit fraud is still a difficult thing to do.
      Also , it seems to me that few government officials are interested in cracking down on white collar crime. Corporations donate extensively to political campaigns for just this very reason. Look at Enron. There's plenty of criminal wrongdoing there to go around, but how many of those guys got away with it or got a pitifully short sentence? Tougher laws regulating corporate behavior would be a great start, but until there is a commitment on the part of law enforcement to crack down on corporate crime nothing will happen.
      --
      "Seek first to understand." - Socrates
    3. Re:The undisputed kings of bullshit by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 1

      Right!

      Now, read the Book of Revelation again to understand what the corporations really are.

      Then, read the history of the (U.S.) 14th amendment to see how the citizens were tricked into becoming corporations. Neat trick, huh?

      Or not.

    4. Re:The undisputed kings of bullshit by waveclaw · · Score: 1
      You've managed to put your finger on the biggest problem in the Western social and economic system, that corps have the same rights than humans but none of the responsibility .

      Though I don't think hitting the corporations financially as punishment really works.


      "Corporations create nothing; they're consensual hallucinations and exist at our pleasure. I don't know about you, but I'm not much pleased any more."

      -- Michael Fraase, When Elephants Dance.

      Note that this has nothing to do with capitalism, but everything to do with a messed up legal equivalence between real living people and fictious collections of paper.

      In the US if a *real* person kills someone we put them in jail for life or kill them. If a company kills someone we take some of their money, pat them on the back and send them on their way. It is the pervese opossite of the idea of making the punishment fit the crime. However, since companies already get all the benefits and rights of *real* people, it is simple to put a company on the same level of responability as *real* people

      When a company kills someone, force the company to disband. When a company breaks a law that would put someone in jail, suspend that company's operations for the same amount of time.

      The problem is that you would complaign about individuals in that company not getting paid during the suspension or after disbanding the company. I counter that within such a harsh environment, the only companies left and the resulting corporate culture of responsibility would self-police. Since most companes in the US are very small (95% have under 50 people according to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics) this would mainly be helping force small business owners to wake up to the negative impact of their (far too often) stupid choice. This scales all the way up to a national mega-corporation. If his job and those of many people who know his home address were at stake for every stupidity he did, CEO's wouldn't be green-lighting projects like SPAM. As it is, golden parachuts, very lightweight white-collar crime punishments and corporate greed make SPAM and standover tactics an everyday part of US life.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    5. Re:The undisputed kings of bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, fines should be based on a good percentage of income and/or including compensation to victims. If a company makes $10 billion annually, a 10% fine will send shocks to shareholders really quick.

    6. Re:The undisputed kings of bullshit by dsmark · · Score: 1

      I agree that percentage based fines are best, however some care should be taken to avoid abuse. What happens when the government targets primarily big companies, because that's where the money is. Incentive to grow become stifled. Also if we took it to apply to traffic laws, having those who got speeding tickets had to pay a certain percentage of their income, we would end up with mostly luxury cars getting pulled because thatswhere the money is.

    7. Re:The undisputed kings of bullshit by perp · · Score: 1
      You've managed to put your finger on the biggest problem in the Western social and economic system, that corps have the same rights than humans but none of the responsibility.

      I am starting to think that what we have created is institutionalized sociopathy; we now have entities with rights, with free will, with a desire for self-preservation, but with no conscience or empathy, only an awareness of penalties. They are proud of the fact that their only obligation is to the bottom line, they consider compassion to be inappropriate, they consider their fellow corporations to be food. We have set up an ultimate "ends justifies the means" scenario where we reward sociopathic behavior.

      A human being with the ethics of your average corporation would be institutionalized. I hope.

      --
      There are two kinds of sysadmins: paranoids and losers. I'm both kinds.
  28. Thank you... by liangzai · · Score: 1

    I would like to thank America. Not only for saving us during the great war, giving us democracy, human rights and capitalism, but also by making me instantly rich. I would like to thank America for enlarging my pathetically small tool, so now it almost matches my beloved's pink toy in size and magnificence. And I would like to thank America for giving me access to all those nude Britney pics. When I sit in front of my American made Windows Computer my beloved helps me use my enhanced tool getting off to the images of this wonderful and healthy country bumpkin. Thank you! Thanks to you, my fellow Americans, my life has so much improved.

  29. Re:Has to be said by had3l · · Score: 1

    That won't stop them from destroying our main cities with their nigerian scam tractor beam.

  30. Educate the users by space_man51 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Zombie computers -- PCs that have been compromised by hackers or virus writers -- are sending out over 40 percent of the world's spam, and many users who fall victim are unaware."

    So the real solution is to educate users about security... nothing new here. Now if only people actually cared about things like security, maybe the ISPs could educate their users rather than just blocking ports (much good that does).

    A more realistic solution would be to require licenses for internet access. Yes, I know all the privacy advocates are going to attack me for saying this, but there are way too many irresponsible people out there. A simple written test about security should be enough to make the average Joe aware of some of the issues out there. Then we can hold them at least partially responsible when someone hacks their computer and uses it to send spam, and getting them to use an alternate OS would be easier.

    I know such a plan would carry risks, but if the licenses are distributed by a non-profit organization (in the form of a digital certificate / PGP key) and enforced by the ISPs, then it may just work. It's not like the ISPs can't track you already, so there isn't much of a privacy concern there. Besides the ISPs would be required to sign a privacy agreement. What I mean, is that the license would only be used for loging into the ISP, and would not be transmitted any further (but read more below).

    Optionally these keys could also be used for online authentication. I for one would find it more convenient than standard passwords. Combined with a fingerprint reader, this technology can be useful (all based on open standards of course).

    Oh, and back on the topic of spam: if these licenses become a standard (and I think ISPs would love the idea if it means less problem with spam, viruses, and other uneducated user problems), then the next step would be making digital signatures in e-mails a requirement. If making it a requirement it too much, then at least spam filters could mark unsigned messages as junk as long as signing becomes more common.

    This is probably not the most sound plan, but it's a thought. Comments are welcome

    --
    Anton Markov
    *** Linux - May the source be with you! ***
  31. Blame it on microsoft ! by sunsrin · · Score: 1

    Its all because Microsoft ! Your email address ends up getting collected everytime a new email worm makes its presence because of a Windows vulnerability.

    1. Re:Blame it on microsoft ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ignorance of emailing systems is showing. The problem is not due, in large, to MS security problems, but rather to the protocols most email systems use.

    2. Re:Blame it on microsoft ! by sunsrin · · Score: 1

      I was just trying to find a reason to blame microsoft - I am a Linux Zealot - ;-). I know how email works. Thanks

  32. Re:Boo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God damn fucking American bastards. Think they own everything. Screw the United States. Damn conservative bastards.

  33. Dumb Question by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 1

    I have a dumb question: Who are these people that reply to spam, making the practice profitable? If we could just identify these people, we could route around the spammers and tap into a fabulously rich energy source!

  34. And people say America produces nothing. by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

    China controls manufacturing and India IT. But America will always remain #1 in penis enlargement.

    1. Re:And people say America produces nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because men in America have the smallest penises in the world.

  35. Sure it will by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as the center of the world's economy moves away from the US (which is is). Americans have way too high a Standard of Living. Worse, we've got a high SoL for most anybody here. The rich bastards of the world are busy ballancing the books and it looks like India and China (with their hugh, easily abusable populations) will come out ahead. Just give it time and the spammers won't have nearly enough Americans with more money than sense anymore, but they'll be plenty elsewhere.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Sure it will by DanielJosphXhan · · Score: 1

      And who knows: by the time that China and India do become world superpowers, maybe they'll be running an operating system that won't be so easily turned into a zombie for the Axis of Spam Evil. Like, oh say, Linux?

      --
      [ think ]
    2. Re:Sure it will by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      How can you say that a standard of living can be too high? That seems like one of the most horrible things someone could possibly say. Just because it's higher than yours you call it "too high" and want to take it away. I bet you'd call it "immoral" too.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    3. Re:Sure it will by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Even if Florida sinks back into the primordial ooze from which it spawned, I think the US will have the lead on spamming for quite some time.

      "That is not dead which can eternal lie,
      And with strange aeons even death may die."
      Unless it buys NEW HGH as advertised on television!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Sure it will by MeanSolutions · · Score: 1

      Easy..

      Average out the SoL across the world, if your SoL is above the average, it is to high.. *sheesh* *duuh*

      --
      Swedish, but resident in the UK since 1996.
    5. Re:Sure it will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking socialists...

    6. Re:Sure it will by MeanSolutions · · Score: 1

      Socialism was what brought decent SoL to the masses in the first place... But I am sure you knew that already...

      --
      Swedish, but resident in the UK since 1996.
    7. Re:Sure it will by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Its not like the 'large, easily abused' populations are getting paid an incredible surplus that makes them more likely to be targetted for spam. The whole idea is that you don't pay a Chinese or Indian worker anywhere near what you pay someone in America.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    8. Re:Sure it will by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      It's too high for the upper class' liking. The lesser people are starting to get downright uppity, expecting such unheard of luxuries as a steady food supply, 40 hour work weeks, and maybe even (gasp) health care. Seriously though, the problem is, there's a limit on what society can produce, but no limit on the number of greedy, conscienceless bastards who will do horrible things to get absolutely everything they want. These people want society to bend and break to their will, giving them anything they want no matter the consequences. Simply put, this is a class of people that's growing, and as they grow, you (if you're in America) suffer. You have to. They can't have it all, and leave you anything.

      There are other factors involved, like overpopulation (it's not that we can't feed them, it's that we won't), poor education, the debilitating effects of religion on a society (gotta love a system that encourages child birth during famines). It's a complex issue. For 2000 years, human society has been about giving everything it could to %1 percent of the people and leaving the crumbs to the rest. The world wars cut the labor force and hid this fact for a bit (like the plague did earlier), but it only takes one healthy Generation to undo all that progess.

      But the main thing to take away from all this: your happiness and well being are not compatible with the desires of the upper class. No matter how little you have, there's always someone willing to take it away so that he can have just a bit more. And if he can do it to enough people, well then, he's rich.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    9. Re:Sure it will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your signature is correct, your standard of living is too high by your own logic.

      Guess I should go live on the street here and eat from the garbage to bring down the average.

  36. Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in Austria (Europe) and all the spams I get at home and at work (over a hundred a day) are in English and address subjects relating to the US. All the mortgage spams refer to US mortgages, all the Viagra Spams refer to pharmacies that deliver to the USA, all prices are in dollars, and so on.

    Most European countries have tough anti-spam laws. I get practically no spams that come from Europe or specifically target Europeans. The last Spam I got in German was from some dumbass dot-com newbie who had bought a CD-ROM full of "guaranteed legal e-mail addresses" from some US scammer.

    The problem with spam is a problem with the USA.
    Fix it.
    Now.

    1. Re:Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We in the US created the internet. If you don't want spam from us, feel free to firewall us off. Have fun.

    2. Re:Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We in the US created the internet. If you don't want spam from us, feel free to firewall us off. Have fun.

      That may still happen.

      Furthermore, as the automobile, internal combustion engine, lightbulb, radio, television, and democracy (all European inventions) show, having invented or created something doesn't give a nation perpetual control over it.

    3. Re:Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, like I'm going to trust anything you say. You don't even know that Austria is a big island in the pacific! Psssh. Next you'll probably tell me that there's democracy outside of the USA. As if!

  37. Re:Not surprised.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    United States 485,740
    India 90,303
    Korea, Republic of 42,962
    Japan 38,341
    United Kingdom 38,103
    France 36,986
    Canada 34,996
    Germany 31,185
    China 22,161
    Spain 17,140

    and yup my mail server is in india..

  38. Re:Not surprised.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what I saw in the article United States: 42.11 percent South Korea: 13.43 percent China (including Hong Kong): 8.44 percent Canada: 5.71 percent Brazil: 3.34 percent Japan: 2.57 percent France: 1.37 percent Spain: 1.18 percent United Kingdom: 1.13 percent Germany: 1.03 percent Taiwan: 1.0 percent Mexico: 0.89 percent Where did you see India in that?

  39. Re:Not surprised.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    United States 485,740
    India 90,303
    Korea, Republic of 42,962
    Japan 38,341
    United Kingdom 38,103
    France 36,986
    Canada 34,996
    Germany 31,185
    China 22,161
    Spain 17,140

    and yup my mail server is in india..

  40. Correct me if I'm wrong here... by Gay+Nigger · · Score: 1

    But don't most major broadband ISPs like Comcast and Verizon already block outgoing connections to port 25? How do spammers acquires these armies of zombie machines and actually send mail via SMTP?

    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong here... by shadowsurfr1 · · Score: 1

      I believe there's a way around it. Just use port 2525 for example. DynDns has a service like that.

  41. Makes sense... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hormel is located in the United States.

  42. Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    The statistics in the original article is misleading. In total volume, the USA may be #1. Yet, if we weight the numbers based on GDP per capita, then China is #1, followed by South Korea.

    In other words, the USA has more computers than China. Once China reaches a higher level of prosperity, with the same number of computer desktops possessed by the USA, then China will easily exceed the spam level generated by the USA.

  43. Ahh the Irony of Slashdot by Khuffie · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When an article came out sometime last month about how a lot of spam is coming from China, people here were complaining about the damned Chinese, how they should just block the whole country and be done with it, that they do nothing at all and that China just blame sucks.

    Now an article with research backing it shows the US as the major culprit, and what does everyone do? Make excuses or jokes. What makes you think the Chinese don't have zombie machines? Or is it ok for the US to spam, but no one else?

    And the fact of the matter is, aside from a few random Russian/Chinese emails (1 in 100), most of the spam I receive is offering goods and services in English, directed at the North American market. 'Where' the spam comes from doesn't really matter, what the spam is selling and where that thing is should.

    1. Re:Ahh the Irony of Slashdot by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      Now an article with research backing it shows the US as the major culprit, and what does everyone do? Make excuses or jokes. What makes you think the Chinese don't have zombie machines? Or is it ok for the US to spam, but no one else?

      Having never received a legitimate message from china, if I blacklist all of china, I have roughly a 0% chance of blocking legitimate mail. Over 95% of my legitimate mail comes from the US, so I can hardly block everything that originates in the US.

      That doesn't make spam from the US acceptable, by any means. But it does mean that I can't deal with it in the same way.

      The US has always been the #1 problem as far as spam goes. The server may be in china, the spam may be sent from russia, but the vast majority of it is sent on behalf of some salesman (or con man) located in the US.

      That's why I think that a good US law against spam would be useful. It won't stop it, but it could help. Unfortunatly, the only law the US has passed is the CAN-SPAM act which was written on behalf of the DMA and other scum that want to ensure that they can continue to spam.

      If you think that Americans as a whole are in favor of spam, or that they think "spam is OK when it comes from the US", then you are deluding yourself.

  44. Re:Not surprised.. by northcat · · Score: 1

    Where the heck are the mods? Mod parent as troll. He's just posting cooked up info. And if you're not convinced read this thread. He posted the same post as a reply to all the replies.

  45. Let me guess... by JaxWeb · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you're American? ;)

    (Merry Christmas!)

    --
    - Jax
  46. Re:Not surprised.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Kharagpur is a city near Delhi.

    Wrong. Kharagpur is about 1,000 Km from Delhi and is in the state of West Bengal. IIT-Kharagpur (aka IIT-Kgp) was the first IIT established in India. The other IITs came about 5-10 years later.

    The video clip had found its way on the IIT-Kgp LAN from where the IIT-Kgp student picked it up and then sold it on bazee.com. Note that the Director of IIT-Kgp was not arrested for the clip floating on its LAN.

  47. Internets by myukew · · Score: 1

    It's unfair! The USA have the InternetS: Two Internets means twice the amount of spam...

  48. Where it comes from, isn't always who its from.... by Avatar889 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just because all of this spam is coming from America, doesn't mean Americans are the spammers. Most of the spam, I would be willing to bet that most of that mail is from stupid Windoze users getting pwned and having their "super-fast", "always on" connections that they don't even know how to use. But take a look at who writes these viruses and stuff, they whould be the ones held accountable for all of this traffic. Also, look at the spamhaus lists or such, how many of them are American? Not many. So before all of you foreigners go on your self-righteous, America bashing campaigns, take a look at the facts and not just some bullshit those dirty, dental hygienically challenged bastards from across the pond are spewing forth.

    --
    Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementia (There is no great genius without a mixture of madness) - Aristotle
  49. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 2, Informative

    I block all email based on IP. If the IP is registered in APNIC, LACNIC, or RIPE, it goes to the SPAM bin. SPAM from U.S. and Canadian IP addresses goes to a different folder, then reported to FTC and originating ISP via SpamCop.

    The ratio varies from 30/70 to 20/80, with the majority percentage coming from foreign (to the U.S.) IP addresses.

    In other words, anecdotal evidence indicates most SPAM comes from countries *other* than the U.S.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  50. Yes, but... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Location of spamvertised websites != location where spam emails are sent from. Or at least, it's not generally the case.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Yes, but... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      How exactly is "location where spam emails are sent from" determined? If a spammer in China uses a zombie in the US, does that count under US or China? What percentage of open proxies are located in the United States? What percentage of home computers are located in the United States? These numbers raise more questions than they answer.

    2. Re:Yes, but... by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      Location of spamvertised websites != location where spam emails are sent from. Or at least, it's not generally the case.

      Yeah, I agree - but that was sort of my point. It doesn't matter from where the spammer is sending the mails, it matters where the spammer gets his revenue from. Who cares if spam is coming from compromised zombies in the US? If you want to stop spam it is very Quixotic to go after the source; you need to go after the complicit server companies that are hosting the spammers' websites. At least in my email box, these seem to be concentrated heavily in China.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  51. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by jerryasher · · Score: 1

    Can you outline a brief tutorial on how you do that? Or provide a link or two?

    Thanks!

  52. phenomenal expense of medicines by midgley · · Score: 1

    If your medicines were not sold at such ridiculous mark-up then there would be less profit in one area of spamming.

  53. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    Two ways:

    At the server, using iMail filters (if HEADER CONTAINS [nnn.nnn. send to FOLDER)

    Locally, SpamBully does the same thing at the receiving computer plus Bayseian filters everything else (which is how I trap "domestic" SPAM).

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  54. Depends.. by bcore · · Score: 1

    ..on what you think is more important: Fighting spam, or providing the world with unrestricted access to information.

    Personally, I'd go with the second one.

    1. Re:Depends.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. I also think this is a good spot to bring up good ole Ben Franklin(or Richard Jackson, one of the two)
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

  55. Targets, too by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It isn't just the source of spam - 95% or so of the spam is very obviously targetted at americans, too.

    Ok, porn sites are international, but mortgage refinancing and what else the other crap is seems totally US-centric to me.

    I'm sure 95% of the idiots who buy from spammers can be found in the US, too.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  56. Who is the real badguy? by mahesh_gharat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, most of the spam is also US centric. It mainly contains either Via9ra or P3ni5 enlargement programs. Most of the people out side US receive these mails and some stupid amongst those who really want to purchase those products by reading the mails can not buy since most of these products even don't have distribution network outside US.

    One of my friends, who work for a US based company, which sells cigarretes online. All this guy has to do is get some working email ids and send the mail drafted by the US based company. He does this from location outside US though. This guy has written a UserAgent (Robot) which goes to Yahoo and grabs the email ids at random and mails them. Untill this it looks very bad but if you see inside they do get enough business through this channel for their survival at least. They do not have any other business channel other than this and they are doing fine.

    Even if this guy is generating the SPAM from the location outside US, he is doing it for his master sitting there in US.
    Now, who is the real badguy?

    1. Re:Who is the real badguy? by Neduz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd say your friend is the bad guy. Why doesn't he look for a decent job like most of do? "He is doing it for his master ..." isn't an excuse. We're all human being with our own mind, only brainwashed people, or people who were tortured could say "I was doing so because I was asked to". Other people using this as an argument are just too lousy to take their responsibilities.

      --
      This is one lame signature, please read the message above instead.
    2. Re:Who is the real badguy? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Who is the real bad guy?

      Your buddy.

      And you for still being friends with such a lowlife creep.

      If he has any morals at all, he'll tell his boss exactly how far up his own ass the boss's head is, and then he'll leave the company.

      Until he does, don't try and play the self-righteous "I just do this to pay the bills" bullshit here.

      p

    3. Re:Who is the real badguy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy is just a software engineer. He is hired to write code and program that have search&mail functionalties. That's not illegal, right? Why does he becomes the REAL bad guy?

    4. Re:Who is the real badguy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, most of the spam is also US centric. It mainly contains either Via9ra or P3ni5 enlargement programs.

      You mean to say that only Yanks have small dicks? Makes sense, considering the SUV craze...

    5. Re:Who is the real badguy? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Because he knows what his employer is doing with his work.

      If you're hired to find holes in software, and then you find out your employer is using those holes to write new viruses, or steal people's identities, and you keep on working because "it's a paycheck," you're just as much scum as your boss is.

      This is no different. Knowingly working for scum makes you scum too.

      p

    6. Re:Who is the real badguy? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1

      Your friend is a bad guy. He is ruining email. The company he works for is bad. And you are count slimeballs amoung your friends. My friends are honest, or they wouldn't be my friends. Yours are conmen.

  57. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lame reply to my own comment, but forgot something.

    The majority of U.S.-sourced SPAM I receive comes from the following ISPs:

    Comcast
    Road Runner
    EarthLink
    Pacbell
    Ameritech

    In that order.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  58. Re:Do not blame the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha I think that this is the reason that the rest of the world percievs americans as stupid.

    Not only are they trying to shift the blame, but they mod it as "Insightful".

  59. Re:I hate to say it... by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    Okay, where is the -5, uber-off-topic, "Just blame everything on Bush" moderation?

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  60. Not surprising. by Renaud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All depends who's counting, I guess.

    Yeah, right...
    If I were counting, that would be more like 99% than 42%, sadly.

    More precisely, I'd say that 42% of the spam being relayed from computers in the US sounds about right. But when it comes to the target audience, or the companies/individuals behind the spamvertised goods/services/scams, it suddenly looks like a 99% american problem in my (and most people's) view.

    I had already commented on this

    Sad, but certainly not Slashdot headline-worthy.

  61. Re:Not surprised.. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    From *his* mail server?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  62. ban mail by IAR80 · · Score: 1

    I am considering to ban all mail coming from US.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
  63. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by bananasfalklands · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From my observations I find that Americans hire the Koreans and Chinese and send there junk from there ip space.

    Korean/'insert country name here' send spam - yes ... but funded by an american(s)

    Now in the case of Robert Solaway (as seen on spamhaus) I find he uses borked windoze boxes worldwide to send his junk (he also hosts in China - well thats what the dns reports)

    Murky stuff this.

    --
    Send Peter Clifford Francis Macrae comdoms to 23 Bedford St, St.Neots, PE19 1AX, England
  64. Blocking port 25 by budgenator · · Score: 1

    If blocking unauthorized port 25 connections stopped spam by 50%, that means the total received would go down 20%; What's wrong with that. I sure that there are a few that would object but not many. Most clueless windows owners would be mortified that their computers were being used to defraud others.
    A little out-reach education on how to avoid and detect being owned wouldn't be a bad idea either.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  65. Re:way to go yanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The telephone
    The computer
    The Internet
    The transistor
    The integrated circuit
    The cure for smallpox
    The rocket
    The airplane

    Oh, never mind. You believe in human-caused global warming (the biggest load of malarchy in history), you believe that having an Arab democracy in the Middle East won't be a good 'foil' to Israel ... or, you're smoking something.

    Wait 20 years. The world will be more at peace, more people will enjoy a higher standard of living, be more free, and have local control over their destinies. Why? Because we have vision and purpose beyond the week after tomorrow, and you don't.

    Oh, and yeah: in 20 years, America will STILL have the world's longest list of applicants for immigration and the largest backlog of applicant for citizenship of any country in the world.

  66. Re:way to go yanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I haven't check them all, but at least airplanes and the internet seem to be right, but the first one is wrong at least Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone, was from Scotland, UK.

    (That is a lot of commas)

    Anyway, this is very off topic, and I've moderated, so I'll post it AC.

  67. U.S. head start on 2005 begins today by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just after Christmas last year I noticed quite an uptick in spam attempts on my mailserver from U.S. residential broadband IPs. Clearly this was from new computers received as Christmas gifts getting quickly zombied.

    All the people who came downstairs this year to find a shiny new Dell or Gateway under the tree should be getting their machines owned by spammers right about..... now. So prepare for another post-Christmas onslaught as the spammers play with all their newly-acquired toys.

    ~Philly

  68. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

    I'm in the process of researching issues like this for a new business. Would it be possible for you to email me the numbers you have based this post off of?

  69. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

    I believed this for a long time as well, but it seems that the research is starting to show its coming from within... With the amount of people that just don't care about spyware and such, its really not surprising that, in some cases, their ignorance/stupidity is causing their biggest complaint.

  70. Re:way to go yanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are aware that most of those things were invented outside the US, right?

  71. the telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was invented in Boston, Mass., USA

    the telegraph: Morris Plains, NJ, USA

    the electric light: Edison, NJ, USA

    the motion picture was first demonstrated in Manhattan, NY, USA

    television, FM radio, the electron tube, aerobic sanitary wastewater treatment, reverse osmosis, Teflon, high-strength oxygen-processed steel, hydroelectric generation, the assembly line, interchangeable parts, the muffler, electrostatic particulate reduction, aluminum reclamation, oncologic reagents, the laser, the Marshall Plan, the Panama Canal, nuclear power, superconductors, the coronary pacemaker, lithotripsy

    oh, brother

    can't someone give us a break? we're tired of working ourselves into a frenzy, making things better for everyone else!

    1. Re:the telephone by andr0meda · · Score: 1


      you forgot one:

      The self-centric zoo.

      --
      With great power comes great electricity bills.
  72. Listen, asshole... by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because you're a mentally challenged, nazi-voting, mouth-breathing American doesn't give you the right to condescend to other countries. Apart from that, most of the spam I get advertises American websites, American fake Rolex watches and American drugs - in fact, I can use that as a pretty good spamfilter, since I'm a German living in Germany; I need only check for American English as the language and can dump it in my spam folder.

    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.
    1. Re:Listen, asshole... by zaq121 · · Score: 1

      First, because I am white and male, I can't have an opinion (after all, I responsible for the what any white male has ever done).

      Now, because a handfull of scum sucking spammers are American, 260 million Americans are responsible for their actions.

      Fill in the blanks on what else I am accountable for

      I live in Virginia
      I own 2 vehicles
      I took a day off to be with my mom last week
      My hair is brown
      I get my water from a well
      I work 40+ hours a week
      I am married
      My parents are divorced

    2. Re:Listen, asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering your country exterminated 6 million people and sparked 2 World Wars, that's f.ucking hillarious.

    3. Re:Listen, asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering you have voted for Bush, that is really hillarious. I thought you had time to learn from mistakes in the past, but wait you also have an austrian in your country now... let's wait until you make him president.

    4. Re:Listen, asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Considering your country exterminated 6 million people and sparked 2 World Wars, that's f.ucking hillarious.

      Considering that native americans were supplied with great friendship and african slaves were greeted with a warm welcome in the US, what a great history of fair play! Btw it seams germans do not need penis enlargment so deperatly, are not on war for oil and do not torture prisoners of war right now.

  73. Treat Spam like other pollution by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Spam is a form of pollution that results from an inappropriate pricing of a common resource. In this case the resource is the attention span of millions of literate intelligent internet users throughout the world.
    In other forms of pollution, a common resource is used for private gain because it is not correctly priced. For example, air pollution comes from a factory being able to dump its waste into the atmosphere for no cost.
    The solution to pollution is first decrease it and then ending it by making alternatives less costly than using what used to be a free resource. The commonly accepted way to reduce air pollution now is to sell the right to dump exact amounts of contaminants into the atmosphere. These pollution permits are traded on the free market. Companies are market encouraged to develop alternative ways to deal with factory waste other than dumping it into the air. Then they can sell their 'rights to pollute' to the highest bidder.
    While this seems backward and counterproductive, it does reduce the amount of air pollution in the real world.

    The same approach to spam would be to sell the right to send a precise number of unsolicited commercial e-mail messages to internet users. The right to send X number of Spam e-mails could be bought and sold on the international market. Then over time, the absolute number of spam e-mails would be reduced. This would reduce spam by forcing the spammers to start doing market research and focusing their advertisments to specific audiences. This will make the internet advertising medium cost the same as other advertising mediums.
    Spam exists because the net is free for spammers. It is an inappropriately priced resource.

  74. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

    Of course... Because spammers generally prefer open proxies and open relays outside of US to hide identity.
    Just think about it: you usually get spam in english trying to sell something to english-speaking audience. It's not someone like random guy in China. It's US-based "marketers".

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
  75. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can believe Comcast is still #1. That's my ISP and the number of spams I get (not to mention the number of worm propagation attempts) from Comcast addresses is remarkable. Of course, they do have a lot of IPs. I do know that, in my area at least, they've implemented a policy whereby if you send more than some {undefined} number of emails within some {undefined} interval, SMTP access is suspended automatically. I know because I had accidentally set my mail server to bounce unknown messages back to the sender. Since I receive over a thousand spams a day that made me a spammer, so far as Comcast was concerned. Okay, my bad ... but Comcast couldn't be bothered to let me know what was going on. Their assumption was that I was deliberately spamming: the fact that I might have been zombied didn't seem to occur to them. All I knew was that my SMTP access had been blocked, for no apparent reason, and their tech support had no idea what was going on. I finally found a person who had a clue, and he said it would take a couple of days for my access to return automatically.

    I hear all kinds of noise about how to deal with spam from the standpoint of broadband users running as unwitting spam relays. Everything from "make it the ISPs responsibility" to "require users to get training and get a license in order to get online". What is the real solution? I don't know, but anything that requires passing a Federal law will probably cause more harm than good. Doesn't mean they won't try to pass one, though.

    Personally, I liken people that run unprotected, unpatched machines as being "bad neighbors". You know the kind: the one that lets his dog run free and crap all over your yard. Yes, I realize that most of these zombied systems are in that situation because of the ignorance of their owners. But if that neighbor started building a garage extension on your side of the property line, you wouldn't let him off the hook because he couldn't read a survey.

    People don't really think of security as being a social issue as well as a personal one. I believe that most people want to be good neighbors, and would take steps if you reported their dog taking a dump on your property. But there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of zombies out there whose owners have no idea that their systems are crapping in everyone's back yard. Somehow, we need to close the loop on these people so they a. know that they've been taken over and b. give them easy, effective steps to take care of the problem. Tall order, I know. Comcast is heading in the right direction with their policy, but they need to let people know when they've been disabled, and why. Maybe they are now, I don't know.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  76. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 1
    China, Japan, Korea, Singapore - ok, most SE Asian countries don't have enough public IP addresses allocated to them to hadn out to consumers. So consumers get a NAT'd IP address, and no inbound connections possible. This would certainly protect their systems a lot more than having all of the default Windows ports exposed to the world.

    So I think the States - which has the largest pool of public IP addresses - will always come out ahead in this one.

  77. The Frozen North by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    As a Canadian, I am appalled, disappointed and throwing up by this biased and US-centric study that failed to consider our spamming abilities. Shame on them for failing to include us.

  78. Re:Where it comes from, isn't always who its from. by Wastl · · Score: 1
    Also, look at the spamhaus lists or such, how many of them are American? Not many.

    I had a quick look at Spamhaus. You have a pretty screwed notion of "many" if you say that 77.5% (141 out of 182 entries in the ROKSO list) is "not many".

    Sebastian

  79. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    Done. Check your IN box.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  80. Well here's the thing by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It's not really discrimination against countries, but against ISPs. It is your duty if you are an ISP to police your network. Not like you have to monitor every single thing that goes on, but if someone complains of spam, you need to investigate and respond to that complaint.

    If you e-mail our abuse line, we take it seriously. We see who has the IP, and check to see if the system is sending spam. If it is, it gets removed from the network until it has been cleaned. Even if not, we'll still give you an e-mail acknowledging that we looked in to it.

    Ok, well China has only one ISP, the state run one. They just don't care. spam, hacking, whatever, if it isnb't polticial propaganda, they just don't give a fuck. If you send them an e-mail about it, you get a form response that claims they don't control the IP, despite the fact that APNIC records clearly show they do.

    So I support the same treatment of them as of any other ISP: If they won't learn how to deal with their spam problem, they get banned as a whole ISP. The same thing applies to any US ISP. If they think spam isn't a problem and won't respond to abuse e-mails, I see no problem with blacklisting them as a group.

  81. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    I work phone support for a DSL ISP. People get pissed when you tell them they've been suspended because of it. It's never their fault (or so they fanatically believe). Sometimes it's my fault, other times it's the ISP.

    Slashdot is always raving about how SP2 does or doesn't protect against this or that... irrelevant. The number of people who call up wanting help configuring 98 and ME for DSL is astounding. None have ever heard of linux, mozilla, adaware. The exceptions tend to loathe the mentioning of such software ("You want me to use netscape, isn't that like 10 years old?". And yes, I'm aware of the irony in such a statement from someone wanting to get 98 working right).

    They're all used to computers continually screwing up, and they've got everyone else to blame for their lack of taste in software, their lack of skill in configuring a safe machine, and the wasteland that the public internet becomes because of those shortcomings.

  82. which definition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this survey consider spam?

    The preferred FTC definition or UBE?

  83. Re:Where it comes from, isn't always who its from. by hughk · · Score: 1
    Many of the companies whose products are advertised this way turn out to be US based, it doesn't matter whether it is V1agra, C1alis, Mortgages, loans or whatever. Forget the advertsing channel, it is the company being advertised that initiates spam-based marketing campaigns.

    If the US government outlawed the users of spam campaigns then a large part of the volume would be eliminated.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  84. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The statistics in the original article is misleading. In total volume, the USA may be #1. Yet, if we weight the numbers based on GDP per capita, then China is #1, followed by South Korea."

    Why not divide by the number of chinese speakers in each nation, while you're correcting the statistics...

  85. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, anecdotal evidence indicates most SPAM comes from countries *other* than the U.S.

    The US can still be the biggest spammer. "countries other than the U.S" is not normally counted as one entity. Oh wait ...

  86. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, okay.

    Notice that there's always a lot of
    "U!S!A! NUM!BER! ONE!"
    until it comes to this kind of statistic?

  87. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

    I feel your pain. No one cares about anything until it happens to them. Then, like you say, they claim ignorance and blame anyone but themselves. Yea, I did 5 years of TS work...

    I burned out about 3 years into it. My fourth year, I got a 'promotion' into E-Support (email support). Each email, from then on, started with "I'm sorry" then I read their message - honest to god truth. Oddly enough, I was the admin of the email box (Kana) and management wouldn't let me put that into the startup response...

    I wish I could offer some advice, but I can't other than move up the ladder to get out of the shit.

    Part of the problem is the company you're working for. There are ways to block what the users machines are doing, but the company just doesn't want to implement them - don't want to step on the toes of their users to create a little peace of mind...

  88. So now we know the Ultimate Question... by Nemesis242 · · Score: 1

    So now we know the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything...
    "Witch percentage of SPAM came from US in the year 2004?"
    Because SPAM takes time off our Lives, seems to be a Universal problem and tries to sell us Everything!

  89. Re:way to go yanks... by Sethus · · Score: 0

    I fail to see what spam has anything to do with Iraq and Kyoto. I mean I understand Iraq and Kyoto, but those are things related to our government, while spam is something done by sleezy money-making entrepreuers, and heavily effects everyone in the USA and worldwide. It's not just something that's "annoying" it's also a major problem economically. Think what it costs in time to actually send all those spam emails, lost time in productivity when people just delete spam, it really adds up. I'm sorry but I don't undersand the relationship at all.

    --
    Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
  90. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    As a power user though, I don't want them going nazi, deciding what OS's can be used with it, what ports are fair game. Too far away for DSL myself, I have to get cable, which *does* do that.

    Personally, I don't get it. What happened with cars? I don't remember ever reading stories about the 1920s, with 9 out of 10 drivers being wreckless speeding maniacs, who didn't bother to tighten lugnuts, who flew down the road wearing blindfolds. Why do they do this with computers?

  91. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

    Well, I can see your point. Security has its issues but some things help.

    As for your car analogy, the government stepped in, which is what the 'net community doesn't want. Technically speaking, the government kicked in after saftey became an issue. Heck, the first automobile accident was in 1771, 2 years after it had been created.

    Now, until people start getting killed by their computers for stupidity (short of chat room issues0, I don't see things getting much better.

  92. two more cents... by Glider+Girl · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. I get: 1700 spams a week Of these: 1500 are from "Texas Holdem Poker" sites that exploit a glitch in a blog's comment system... since apparently there's no "Disable emailing comments to the owner of the blog" option, I'm about to wade into the sourcecode and play mad scientist. These are, obviously, American in origin. 50 are Spanish. No idea where they come from, but possibly Peru, since this seems to have started after I logged into my mail service from a cafe' there. (The actual addresses are yahoo.com and such, but at least we know they aren't targetting the typical American.) Sometimes I get one or two in Esperanto, but they're not advertisements for anything. They're more "announcements of what's going on in the Esperanto global community" Several of those Nigerian-type things... And the rest are typical, junky American spam. For the curious... I live in America... but I am Dutch.

    --
    o o ooo zero to root in two seconds
  93. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, anecdotal evidence indicates most SPAM comes from countries *other* than the U.S.

    "Comes from" in what sense? When you get spam in English, asking for US dollars, do you really think that foreigners are behind it?

    The majority of spam I see is sent by Americans, and they get their money from American punters. The fact that a server happens to be located in China or wherever is just an implementation issue - sometimes handy for blocking, but largely irrelevent to the big picture.

  94. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    Do the terms "APNIC, LACNIC, and RIPE" mean anything to you?

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  95. Ironic That ZDNet Would Report This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever signed up for eWeek?

    It's ZDNet's weekly "Tech" magazine, free to computer professionals. They fund it by legitimate advertising, then sell your email address to spammers. Though you can unsubscribe from THEIR list, they make no effort to remove you from the lists they have disclosed the address to.

    Try it with a throw away email address, then throw the email address away after you see the disaster the inbox becomes.

  96. US made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, they weren't, try Google and see

  97. self-centric zoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's a French invention.

    Question: "How many Frenchmen does it take to defend Paris?"

    Answer: "Unknown, it's never been tried. We usually get the Americans to do it."

    The US seems self-centered because it is.

    Why?

    It's because the US has a sufficiently large mass of people who have enough disposable income / per-capita income to constitute a purely domestic market capable of sustaining a single-country, multibillion dollar enterprise. US firms can target a solely-doemstic market for goods and services and still address a market that is larger than Europe, and which has a single common language, currency, system of mesurements and standards, transportation infrastructure, body of regulations, etc.

    We, literally, don't need the rest of the world. Most of it could blow up tomorrow and we wouldn't miss a thing. (Sorry, it's the truth.)

    THAT is why we have our attitude!

    1. Re:self-centric zoo? by andr0meda · · Score: 1



      It's because the US has a sufficiently large mass of people who have enough disposable income / per-capita income to constitute a purely domestic market capable of sustaining a single-country, multibillion dollar enterprise. US firms can target a solely-doemstic market for goods and services and still address a market that is larger than Europe, and which has a single common language, currency, system of mesurements and standards, transportation infrastructure, body of regulations, etc.

      We, literally, don't need the rest of the world. Most of it could blow up tomorrow and we wouldn't miss a thing. (Sorry, it's the truth.)


      All I see and hear is boring uniformity, braindead conformism, senseless mass psychotery, and culture devoid marketting lingo. The economics of law, money and ownership. I should not be surprised because they are the exponents of that old 'American Dream' illusion that you all were indoctrinated with from preschool onwards..

      What the US exports into the world, besides all that material crap (and crap it is), is bad habbits and wrong ideology. And your last statement illustrates nicely.

      Merry Christmass.

      --
      With great power comes great electricity bills.
  98. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHY, in the name of Gods green Earth, are you bouncing e-mails to begin with? They should have left you without SMTP forever. Please, do us all a favor and learn how to setup your mail servers.

  99. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Your reply doesn't address his point at all. Yes, you are filtering out non American IPs. But the point is that the "foreign" IPs that are sending SPAM are mostly sending SPAM from Americans to Americans, even though they are hiring foreign service providers.

  100. Where spam originates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would go so far as to say that 99% of all spam ORIGINATES from the US. Location of zombie machines or spamvertised website is a side issue. Spam starts in the US, targeting US users.

    So instead of you Americans blaming everyone else (which you are very good at), try looking in your own backyard. The stench is pretty awful.

  101. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by operagost · · Score: 1

    1771? The first auto appeared in 1886. The steam engine hadn't even been invented in 1771.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  102. Re:Where it comes from, isn't always who its from. by bbc · · Score: 1

    So, does cleaning the toilets at the Rochester Institute of Technology pay well these days?

  103. Traceroute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Nuff said.

  104. Re:Where it comes from, isn't always who its from. by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
    Just because all of this spam is coming from America, doesn't mean Americans are the spammers.

    Anyone that pays any attention knows that regardless of where the spam is sent from, and regardless of the hosting of the website being spamvertised, the vast majority is sent on behalf of Americans, and is advertising to Americans.

    Also, look at the spamhaus lists or such, how many of them are American? Not many.

    Only if by "not many" you mean "the vast majority".

    The Spamhaus ROKSO list has 183 entries right now, the vast majority based in the US.

  105. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have to agree. I also include SIPE (France). I'd say that 80% of all messages are blocked this way, with almost no false positives. I rarely correspond with folks outside the U.S. other than through newsgroups or such, so blocking 8-bit IP networks managed wholly by other than ARIN is quite efficient. Perhaps 50%, probably more, of the remaining messages are spam from other networks, some of which are non-U.S. managed but which are not part of those managed by other than ARIN. Of these, quite a few are in character sets I would never use, and which are unlikely to be used for U.S. audiences. Of course that does not mean that they are not sent using U.S. systems, but I doubt that the sender is of U.S. origin. Not that I could know; can't read the messages anyway.

    If anyone is interested in a regular expression that works pretty well (all on one line):

    [^\d](43|5[89]|6[012]|8[0-8]|19[345]|20[0-3]|21[ 0- 37-9]|22[012])(\.[\d]{1,3}){3}

    The list of non-ARIN networks is available at:
    http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space

    This changes from time to time, so the above regex will need to be updated once in a while.

    All the networks listed as "various registries" will contain a mix of ARIN and/or others; I found it not worth the while to try to use the data therein, but ymmv.

    Good luck,
    Chuck (anonymous coward, too lazy to register)

  106. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

    How in the name of even the most warped US-is-No 1 whacko math, if pigs could fly bullshit, is this crap marked Informative? Look pal, the US lags a good number of nations, globally, in a lot of areas, like infant Mortality, universal access to health care, etc. We're number one in areas, all right. Like bombing other countries, supporting right-wing terrorist paramilitary groups (who've killed far more people on our behalf than Osama could possibly imagine). Being a huge polluter of the world environment. Wake up. Where are the europeans, i can't believe this jingoistic crap can even get on here. Americans BUY more SPAM-adverted products than the rest of the World, so of course the ads originate here. That's just moronic yanks fulfilling their end of what is basically good old yankee capitalist free market economics, a need, a filling of that need, the marketing, etc.

  107. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

    You're not googling hard enough...

    The History of the Automobile - Steam Cars

  108. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    learn how to setup your mail servers

    "set up" ("setup" is a noun).

  109. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    send there junk from there ip space

    "their", "their".

  110. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not true. I remember reading somewhere that Jesus rode into Jerusulem on an Ass-tin Martin.

  111. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    "Your reply doesn't address his point at all."

    Of course it does. His question: "When you get spam in English, asking for US dollars, do you really think that foreigners are behind it?"

    Whether it is in English or whether "foreigners" are behind it is irrelevant. The fact that it comes from a foreign ISP makes the probability 99.9 percent that it is spam, ergo, I block all foreign IPs.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  112. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    That's what's relevant to you blocking it. But there's a bigger world of relevance that this article and everyone else posting comments is talking about. It's about the people not the IP addresses. Try and turn down the geek control from 11 to something more normal for a moment.

  113. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    You are making no sense at all. What does "the people" have to do with anything? I am not communicating with any "people," and the only "people" (I use the term loosely) trying to communicate with me are spammers. Are you saying I have no compassion for spammers? If so--damn straight! Obviously, something in all has touched one of your nerves, but darned if I can figure out what or why.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  114. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
    LOL! People. You must have heard of people. They're carbon based life forms that don't have an IP address.

    Of course I'm not saying you should have compassion for spammers. They are scum. But they are human scum, and therefore don't have an IP address.

    OK I'll lay this out as simply as I can. Computers don't write spam. Computers don't have business models based on spam. Spammers are people. So just because the IP address that you are getting the spam from is outside of America doesn't mean that the spammer who wrote that spam and is promoting his business with that spam isn't American or living in America. That's all the poster that you tried to patronize was saying. Your answer to him was ignorant and missed the point.

  115. This means by SI285 · · Score: 0

    We are spamming ourselves...

  116. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So just because the IP address that you are getting the spam from is outside of America doesn't mean that the spammer who wrote that spam and is promoting his business with that spam isn't American or living in America. That's all the poster that you tried to patronize was saying. Your answer to him was ignorant and missed the point.

    Thanks. Just got back to this thread, and you hit the nail on the head perfectly.

  117. Not so fast... by pr0cess · · Score: 1
    What the Sophos study reveals is that the US is the king of the spam bulk, but not necessarily the most intense at producing it.

    If you take the percentage of spam received by the honeypots and weigh it against the number of internet users per country, the top 12 looks something like this:

    1. South Korea (4.4 mess/user)
    2. Canada (2.8 mess/user)
    3. US (2.1 mess/user)
    4. Brazil (1.7 mess/user)
    5. China (0.92 mess/user)
    6. Mexico (0.89 mess/user)
    7. Taiwan (0.86 mess/user)
    8. Spain (0.82 mess/user)
    9. France (0.59 mess/user)
    10. Japan (0.39 mess/user)
    11. UK (0.32 mess/user)
    12. Germany (0.22 mess/user)

    South Korea doubles the average spam production of the US, and Mexico is far from being as well behaved at Sophos puts it.

    One should study the spam control measures in place in Japan, the UK and Germany, since they seem to be working pretty well to limit production.

    Stat calculations are based on a hypothetical 1e6 messages received by honeypots, and internet users by country were taken from internetworldstats.com

  118. Re:Where it comes from, isn't always who its from. by Avatar889 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't know, but being in charge of their Windows technical support staff does.

    --
    Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementia (There is no great genius without a mixture of madness) - Aristotle
  119. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by Graabein · · Score: 1
    In other words, anecdotal evidence indicates most SPAM comes from countries *other* than the U.S.

    Sure, other countries are *relaying* spam to you, but where does it originate? I.e., who is it that's trying to sell you something?

    Follow the money, then try telling me that most Spam comes from countries other than the US.

    --
    And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
  120. Follow the money! by Graabein · · Score: 1
    All depends who's counting, I guess.

    Not really. Forget IPs, follow the money! Who is it that's trying to sell you something?

    I get the odd Spam in cyrillic and chinese characters too, we all do, but the majority of all Spam I receive is from some scumbag US spammer or other.

    "Only available in the continental US" my ass, why are they spamming a .no email address then? And what would I want a mortgage in a US bank for? Would I even qualify? Is that a Norwegian outfit spamming me about the US green card lottery? Not bloody likely.

    No, Spam was invented in the US and remains a primarily American "industry". The only thing CAN-SPAM has done is outsource the actual hosting to China. Yay, another outsourcing success story!

    --
    And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
  121. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    "So just because the IP address that you are getting the spam from is outside of America doesn't mean that the spammer who wrote that spam and is promoting his business with that spam isn't American or living in America."

    Funny, at no point did I write anything about the country in which the spammer(s) live, just that the SOURCE IP of the spam was outside the U.S.

    To further restate my point, for the purposes of blocking spam, where a spammer is located is irrelevant. Where spam comes from IS relevant.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  122. Listen, Kraut... by the_partisan · · Score: 1

    You people are the ones who voted the Nazis into power and invented industrialized genocide (another fine example of "German engineering" that was).

    Oh, but you aren't referring to the National Socialist German Workers' Party as Nazis, you're referring to the Republican Party as Nazis.

    In that case, you should be committed to a psychiatric institution for your delusional statement. Maybe some shock therapy will clear your mind.

    1. Re:Listen, Kraut... by Wastl · · Score: 1
      You people are the ones who voted the Nazis into power and invented industrialized genocide (another fine example of "German engineering" that was).

      So, where does the Germany of 2004 torture prisoners, discriminate people based on their origin or colour, disrespect human rights, invade and bomb foreign countries and consistently drop out of international institutions?

      At least we have learned from history, but you apparently haven't.

      you're referring to the Republican Party as Nazis.

      And indeed, while calling Rebulicans Nazis is IMO not (yet) acceptable, the similarities between both parties are disturbing.

      Sebastian

  123. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
    To further restate my point, for the purposes of blocking spam, where a spammer is located is irrelevant. Where spam comes from IS relevant.

    Irrelevant TO YOU. Not to the rest of us. YOU may not talk to the rest of the world, but many of us do. You might not be interested in tackling the source of spam but plenty of other people are. The other poster asked a perfectly valid question, you answered him ignorantly. End of subject.

  124. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    Again, nowhere did I write that this involved anyone but me and my personal solution to spam. Gawd, you guys are touchy on this subject. What's up with that?

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  125. Re:Wrong: China is Still # by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Because I upgraded the server software and it changed a default setting. So shoot me.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  126. What difference does it make where spam comes from by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1

    All the attention focused on who sends the spam and how, and from where it comes, leads nowhere.

    Filtering, if you get really good at it, keeps your inbox fairly clean but does nothing about the huge volumes of spam flying around the Internet.

    The only tactics that have hurt spammers are those that have increased the costs of the sponsoring Websites. The Lycos screen saver was delicious but failed because it depended on a central server and because a bunch of complete nitwits clucked and wrung their hands over the appropriateness or lack of same in hammering spamvertized Websites. Meanwhile spam continues and those same whiners do nothing meaningful about it.

    The one controlling fact that seems to have escaped most of the discussion about spamfighting tactics is that almost all spam contains explicit invitations to visit sponsors' URLs. It's really that simple. If a sponsoring Website hires a spammer to send out millions of emails advertising the Website, the sponsor can't complain if millions of people accept the invitations and visit. Visitors to a Website have no obligation to buy anything.

    Active spamfighting was first articulated in 2003 by Paul Graham in Filters That Fight Back. Graham is the person who popularized Bayesian filtering in 2002, about a year before he suggested that filters might actively punish the spamvertized sites they identify. To date no good tools have emerged for independent, distributed spamfighting of this type although many individuals have built scripts for using curl or wget to download files from spamvertized sites.

    Until an open source, personal spamfighter is developed and released, the best way to fight back against spam is to use one of the Web-based "vampire" pages, either as maintained by someone else or customized to hit the sponsors of the spam you receive. They are called "vampires" because the suck bandwidth from the spamsites, thus increasing the costs of running spamvertized businesses.

    Any of the SpamVampire-type pages may be saved locally and modified. Once you have one of them running in your browser just right click and Save As to your desktop or other convenient place, then edit the list of sites/files at the end of the HTML page. The pages run just as well from your own hard drive as they do from servers.

    Of course it's a pain in the butt to keep such an HTML page current, so there's something to be said for running someone else's updated page if it targets spamvertized sites of interest to you. LadVampire, for instance, targets fake bank sites that scam people out of millions. The Spam Research Tool is updated to target spamvertized sites and redirectors manually identified from spam received at its several hosted domains.

    One of these days someone will build a bridge between the excellent URL de-obfuscation and identification contained in many of the filtering tools on the one hand and local spamsite downloaders like the SpamVampire genre. Then we'll be able to quickly and easily verify our own spamsite targets and pass the information to our own spammerhammers.

    --
    Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
  127. Thankfully, I'm not BIG ISP by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 1
    I serve just about hundred users in the big appartment building.

    So, I can deal with those effects. Just give your users some options

    1. Pay for static IP, and you can even run your own MX for your own domain. You can be responsible for yourself, if it is your choice.
    2. You just want to connect several external mailservers? OK. Here is web form, you type name of mail servers here and we would let you out. I doubt that some mail worm would be sufficiently clever to find out were this form is located and what password user have to enter. Of course some slashdot user can try to write special worm to hack just my users. I'd give away address of the web server where this form is located: 192.168.216.1. One have to click just few links to find this from from start page.
    3. You want just browser the internet and don't want to bother with securing your machine? OK, we'll do our best to save world from you.
  128. Nationalism sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Internet was originally built on X.25, a British invention. The US relies on technology from around the world, and always has.

    The island mentality I see on the rise in the US is a real threat to your own future. Grow up.

  129. Greek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementia (There is no great genius without a mixture of madness) - Aristotle

    Aristotle made that statement in Greek, his own language. So I never could understand why Burton quoted him in Latin, nor why English speakers keep using Burton's Latin translation when quoting Aristotle.

  130. that's what I was going to say... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Do it based on percentages, or maybe 5 years worth of profits. But along with this would necessarily come more inspectors for oversight...because if the threat of severe punishment were enough, we wouldn't have any drug users in the United States, especially New York state. However, the fines would probably pay for the inspectors, and then some.

    This would also help reduce the number of lawsuits. Right now a lawsuit and a good attorney are your only weapons as an employee/consumer, but advocates of "tort reform" want to limit lawsuits so much that they are meaningless to any defendant who has enough money.