The Cleveland Public Library has been stocking software, including games, since the early 1990s.
Not completely new, not without difficulties too.
on
Wearable LCD Display
·
· Score: 1
I used to work for Telxon, until they moved the tech jobs out of Ohio to Texas, then merged with their rival Symbol.
Telxon had mini screens like this, designed for mobile shop workers (i.e: Warehouse workers or the like). Screens worked relatively well, but there was a major drawback. Continual use caused major straining of the eyes. Overuse caused eye injuries! Because of this, Telxon dropped making 'em.
Will be curious to see if the new company has worked out these issues with these new screens.
I've found eHarmony to be the best one out there.
on
Online Dating Advice?
·
· Score: 3, Informative
I'm an athiest myself, and got matched to someone quite agnostic.
I have been amazed at who I was matched with at eHarmony. I had the most compatible matches of any service I have ever tried. In fact, I'm now engaged to a match I made over eHarmony.
Forcing you to go through the personality tests and multiple choice questions before you actually get to meet the person really helps ensure the person you meet at the other side of the process will be of a similar way of thinking to yo.
an MMORPG with a built in welfare/unemployment system.:)
Couldn't find work (something to kill) this week, so get a free government (trainer) handout.
(And no, this was not meant as Flamebait, just as a joke, although someone will probably moderate it as such.)
In the console market, a company MUST consider the needs and focus of the game development companies.
Because a console can do nothing without games written for it, and you cannot use a console for really anything but the licensed games (unless you mod the box, possibly breaking ability to play regular games), launching a console line without a strong commitment from development houses is just asking for a financial flop!
Of course, Microsoft does have enough muscle to do it's own development, but not enough to pump out enough games to support a purchase decision to buy the console.
My school (#7) University of Akron, states the only supported configuration is using a Cisco card, but will let you attempt to use Centrino or whatever else you wish to try, but will not guarantee it to work.
On the Adobe page, click the FAQ link near the top of the page.
It states within there Adobe's decision not to continue Mac versions of Framemaker, (Sales stopping April 21, 2004) plus support ending next year.
I understand where you are coming from, although I still would of liked to see it released.
Old adventure games with puzzles tended to be quite hard at times, taking a fair amount of figuring to solve.
These days, most puzzles in games seem to be EXTREMELY easy. The answers are practically handed to you.
What ever happened to game puzzles that used to make you work for the solution. In my opinion, when you solved these games, you had much more of a feeling of accomplishment than you do in solving one of the "non-puzzles" of today. I'm almost convinced that game designers have decided that the general population is just too stupid these days to figure a difficult puzzle out, or too lazy to invest a few brain cells to figuring out a solution.
I think this just shows what a number of scientists have been saying about Bush from the beginning, that he just does not trust, nor believe in science, nor the scientific community in general.
It started with small manipulations of results, or skewing of reports by ommiting crucial sections, but it just seems to be getting more and more blatant.
I think the growing number of prominent scientists speaking out, risking their chances of getting appointed to advisory panels, or getting federal funding, etc, is making the point more clear every day.
What I have done at several jobs was look at the contract, then just strike out with a pen the portions I did not agree with, along with initialing the strike outs, then making sure to get a copy of this modified contract.
I've found that often, HR people are too busy/lazy to scrutizie their forms to see if you've modified it in any way, thus it can slip through.
You can almost always compare diversity vs. monoculture and find pros on both sides.
1) Pro diversity means that you are more resistant to attack, due to the differing functions and implementations of software functions, but a definate additional complexity to managing a network, where each node may behave slightly differently
2) Pro monoculture means that you will be much more certain of having the same effect on every node on your network, thus making changes and amangement much easier. But, this comes at the cost of being vulnerable to the same risks, as well as being constrained feature wise. If you use only one product, and that product doesn't have feature X, then, if you are unwilling to implement a compeditor to the product, you are stuck without feature X.
One item that I like to think of when considering this issue is the consolidation of network protocols:
Originally you had SNA, DECNET, TCPIP, etc, etc, all seperate, distinct, and relatively equal. This meant that it was pretty hard for any single virus/worm to spread between the different networks.
Eventually, TCP/IP has dominated the networking space, thus on the plus side allowing for easy interconnection between us all, but at the price that an attack is now easily spread by all who are connected to the network, as almost all are implementing the same standards.
I believe you are on the mark here. With HP's rollout of their "execuspeak" version of this, their main change in the way the charge for machine CPUs, whereby you only pay for the number of CPUs you actually use, and you can allocate them dynamically.
If the payments are made, then of course the labels profits will fall.
So, what will they say next quarter to make their shareholders happy?
"It's all because of those damn internet pirates. We need more legislation against them, or our profits will continue to fall."
God I hated that membrane keyboard!
I had a computer class back in 79/80 or so on these machines. Nearly broke my fingers trying to just punch in the code.
Forking is definately not limited to Open Source.
I've seen it happen many a time to comerical software.
For instance:
=Microsoft's Windows95 tree vs. Windows NT tree.
=Rational's PreVue vs. Performance Studio vs. Performix
are just a couple I can think of off the top of my head.
What tends to be more annoying when forking happens in a comercial setting is often, they will fork to a new direction, support both for a short while, then cut off all support for the old code, even if the new code cannot fulfill some functions. The nice part about open source is even if a codebase is completely abandoned, a company that wishes to use the code badly enough can take on further development efforts themself.
Of course, this is not an option for closed source.
Slashdot Mirror
I found this review at http://forums.evercrest.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi ?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=063745 to be pretty decent. Gives a pretty good sense of what the game is like.
The Cleveland Public Library has been stocking software, including games, since the early 1990s.
I used to work for Telxon, until they moved the tech jobs out of Ohio to Texas, then merged with their rival Symbol.
Telxon had mini screens like this, designed for mobile shop workers (i.e: Warehouse workers or the like). Screens worked relatively well, but there was a major drawback. Continual use caused major straining of the eyes. Overuse caused eye injuries! Because of this, Telxon dropped making 'em.
Will be curious to see if the new company has worked out these issues with these new screens.
I'm an athiest myself, and got matched to someone quite agnostic.
I have been amazed at who I was matched with at eHarmony. I had the most compatible matches of any service I have ever tried. In fact, I'm now engaged to a match I made over eHarmony.
Forcing you to go through the personality tests and multiple choice questions before you actually get to meet the person really helps ensure the person you meet at the other side of the process will be of a similar way of thinking to yo.
I read it back when I was in 6th grade. Loved it.
Alltel, for instance, has incomming SMS free. They have email addresses attached of number@message.alltel.com.
an MMORPG with a built in welfare/unemployment system. :)
Couldn't find work (something to kill) this week, so get a free government (trainer) handout.
(And no, this was not meant as Flamebait, just as a joke, although someone will probably moderate it as such.)
In the console market, a company MUST consider the needs and focus of the game development companies.
Because a console can do nothing without games written for it, and you cannot use a console for really anything but the licensed games (unless you mod the box, possibly breaking ability to play regular games), launching a console line without a strong commitment from development houses is just asking for a financial flop!
Of course, Microsoft does have enough muscle to do it's own development, but not enough to pump out enough games to support a purchase decision to buy the console.
I wonder what these "co-axial tables" are in those tunnels. (Typo I assume, but still funny.)
My school (#7) University of Akron, states the only supported configuration is using a Cisco card, but will let you attempt to use Centrino or whatever else you wish to try, but will not guarantee it to work.
http://www.evercrest.com
You are in a room with many exits. You see a rocket launcher.
:)
>Pick up Rocket Launcher
Rocket launcher picked up.
>Look.
You are in a room with many exits. You see player X leaving via exit number 1.
> Go to exit number 1.
You are in a room with many exits. You see player X.
> Fire Rocket Launcher at Player X.
Player X gibbed.
To me the article is nothing more than reporters trying to "create news" when they have little to report on.
....continue ad nauseum....
I see it along the same lines as:
1) PC Gaming is dead
2) Apple is dead
3) UNIX is dead
On the Adobe page, click the FAQ link near the top of the page. It states within there Adobe's decision not to continue Mac versions of Framemaker, (Sales stopping April 21, 2004) plus support ending next year.
I understand where you are coming from, although I still would of liked to see it released.
Old adventure games with puzzles tended to be quite hard at times, taking a fair amount of figuring to solve.
These days, most puzzles in games seem to be EXTREMELY easy. The answers are practically handed to you.
What ever happened to game puzzles that used to make you work for the solution. In my opinion, when you solved these games, you had much more of a feeling of accomplishment than you do in solving one of the "non-puzzles" of today. I'm almost convinced that game designers have decided that the general population is just too stupid these days to figure a difficult puzzle out, or too lazy to invest a few brain cells to figuring out a solution.
Of course, this is all IMHO.
I think this just shows what a number of scientists have been saying about Bush from the beginning, that he just does not trust, nor believe in science, nor the scientific community in general.
It started with small manipulations of results, or skewing of reports by ommiting crucial sections, but it just seems to be getting more and more blatant.
I think the growing number of prominent scientists speaking out, risking their chances of getting appointed to advisory panels, or getting federal funding, etc, is making the point more clear every day.
When I first tried this, it was after speaking to a law student (was not a lawyer yet, so they couldn't give me a full opinion).
They believed that the cross-out with initialing would be enough to indicate my refusal to agree to a provision.
What I have done at several jobs was look at the contract, then just strike out with a pen the portions I did not agree with, along with initialing the strike outs, then making sure to get a copy of this modified contract.
I've found that often, HR people are too busy/lazy to scrutizie their forms to see if you've modified it in any way, thus it can slip through.
You can almost always compare diversity vs. monoculture and find pros on both sides. 1) Pro diversity means that you are more resistant to attack, due to the differing functions and implementations of software functions, but a definate additional complexity to managing a network, where each node may behave slightly differently 2) Pro monoculture means that you will be much more certain of having the same effect on every node on your network, thus making changes and amangement much easier. But, this comes at the cost of being vulnerable to the same risks, as well as being constrained feature wise. If you use only one product, and that product doesn't have feature X, then, if you are unwilling to implement a compeditor to the product, you are stuck without feature X. One item that I like to think of when considering this issue is the consolidation of network protocols: Originally you had SNA, DECNET, TCPIP, etc, etc, all seperate, distinct, and relatively equal. This meant that it was pretty hard for any single virus/worm to spread between the different networks. Eventually, TCP/IP has dominated the networking space, thus on the plus side allowing for easy interconnection between us all, but at the price that an attack is now easily spread by all who are connected to the network, as almost all are implementing the same standards.
I believe you are on the mark here. With HP's rollout of their "execuspeak" version of this, their main change in the way the charge for machine CPUs, whereby you only pay for the number of CPUs you actually use, and you can allocate them dynamically.
If the payments are made, then of course the labels profits will fall. So, what will they say next quarter to make their shareholders happy? "It's all because of those damn internet pirates. We need more legislation against them, or our profits will continue to fall."
God I hated that membrane keyboard! I had a computer class back in 79/80 or so on these machines. Nearly broke my fingers trying to just punch in the code.
when thinking about this game..... Diakatana. :)
Forking is definately not limited to Open Source. I've seen it happen many a time to comerical software. For instance: =Microsoft's Windows95 tree vs. Windows NT tree. =Rational's PreVue vs. Performance Studio vs. Performix are just a couple I can think of off the top of my head. What tends to be more annoying when forking happens in a comercial setting is often, they will fork to a new direction, support both for a short while, then cut off all support for the old code, even if the new code cannot fulfill some functions. The nice part about open source is even if a codebase is completely abandoned, a company that wishes to use the code badly enough can take on further development efforts themself. Of course, this is not an option for closed source.
...I thought Apple was out trying to patent the concept of Shareware.