Slashdot Mirror


Wearable LCD Display

fenimor writes "PhysOrg reports, that Mitsubishi is going to introduce next year a headset with a small liquid-crystal display screen which is positioned in front, slightly below eye level so as not to obstruct normal vision. Designed for users who need to perform multiple tasks simultaneously, this tiny wearable heads-up display is expected to cost only US $400."

186 comments

  1. Spectacles by Big+Mark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I already wear glasses, will this work with me?

    1. Re:Spectacles by Jacer · · Score: 1

      Are you near or farsighted?

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    2. Re:Spectacles by Big+Mark · · Score: 4, Funny

      Depends on how ugly she is and how drunk I am... Normally farsighted though. What difference does it make?

    3. Re:Spectacles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It should not be a problem.
      In the picture, the display is around four inches from the face. There is enough room to wear glasses as well.

      Optics in camera viewfinders etc are still useable with glasses, so this should be too.

    4. Re:Spectacles by Big+Mark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The optics in... well anything assume that the glasses I wear cover the viewfinder/eyepiece/whatever - which is a reasonable assumption, as if I am looking through a camcorder or telescope eyepiece then I will be looking directly at it, so the glasses will lie between the eyepiece and my pupil.

      Of course "tall" aviator-style glasses cover the entire field of view with corrective lenses and so they'll work, but as lots of (most?) people wear "short" fashion specs the part of the field of view that is occupied by the LCD display may not intersect that part of the display occupied by the lens.

      Will glasses still work then?

    5. Re:Spectacles by nwbvt · · Score: 2
      I would think that it would be adjustible. If it is too low, you could probably raise it higher, though then it would be more likely to obstruct your vision. I would thus suspect these would work best for people with perfect vision or who wear contact lenses.

      I can tell you right now there is no way I would be able to use this thing. I'm farsighted and in order for me to comfortably read something it has to be at least a foot away from my eyes, even when wearing glasses. Now that I think about it, don't optometrists generally recommend that you don't read things at that close of a range anyways?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    6. Re:Spectacles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I am more concerned with eye health.

      We were always told not to read or watch TV too closely. How healthy is it to put a light source inches from your eyes for significant amount of time?

    7. Re:Spectacles by g3head · · Score: 1

      If its like most existing displays (and it looks like it is), it shouldn't be a problem. I've got a pair of goggle type displays and while I usually wear contacts when using them I can use my glasses with them just as well.

    8. Re:Spectacles by Ziak · · Score: 2, Informative

      that was always a myth here take a look http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20021230.html

      --
      Loading Please Wait....
    9. Re:Spectacles by aj50 · · Score: 1

      I would assume that the display can be adjusted for farsigted people, after all, you can't normally focus on something that close to your eye anyway so adjusting it for people with vision problems shouldn't be too dificult.

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    10. Re:Spectacles by tabrnaker · · Score: 0

      However, it will strain your eyes and possibly lead to myopia. Then again, as long as you don't listen to eye doctors you can 'cure' your myopia. Look up the bates method. I can see again after 20 years!!

  2. Wow. by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never thought we'd get to the point where people had to attach televisions to themselves. I can already hear the bickering over usage rights while driving. I'm beginning to think that John Titor wasn't so wrong.

    1. Re:Wow. by Pingular · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm beginning to think that John Titor wasn't so wrong.
      For those that don't know: John Titor.

      --

      When anger rises, think of the consequences.
      Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    2. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is this flamebait? besides, how does this have anything to do with John Titor?

    3. Re:Wow. by mikael · · Score: 1

      It would be good for road driving if you could have a map of where you were going displayed below your view of the windscreen.
      Especially if it could tell you which lane you should be in, and which direction you should go, in order to make the correct intersection change on the freeway. Or maybe it could be used for driving in foggy/rainy conditions.

      How many accidents have been caused by someone trying to read a map, while trying to drive at the same time?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Wow. by bob65 · · Score: 1

      Why would you need a headset for that? Wouldn't it make more sense to have the map on screen slightly below (or even transparent on a corner of) the windshield?

    5. Re:Wow. by mikael · · Score: 1

      It would make more sense, but a projection system for a windscreen is far more expensive than a headset mounted LCD display. For a windscreen, you need a bright light source, reflective mirror and a large projector, all in order to generate a image large enough to cover the visual field, which can just as easily be generated by a small LCD display close to the eye.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Wow. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I can already hear the bickering over usage rights while driving."

      I wouldn't mind having a HUD for my car.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Wow. by metlin · · Score: 1

      I already have a professor who has been doing that for a while now.

  3. How do I use it with glasses? by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do I use it with glasses? I'm an old man, and can't see anything closer than three feet away WITH glasses. How the heck am I going to read that tiny screen?

    1. Re:How do I use it with glasses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tri-focals of course ;-)

    2. Re:How do I use it with glasses? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't use a glass, use a tippy cup. Otherwise you'll spill your vodka all down your shirt.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    3. Re:How do I use it with glasses? by vena · · Score: 1

      bifocals, grandpa!

    4. Re:How do I use it with glasses? by Skadet · · Score: 1

      You'll read it because it appears to be 10" from your eyes. if you can read something at 10", you'll likely be able to use this.

    5. Re:How do I use it with glasses? by st3v · · Score: 0

      How the heck am I going to read that tiny screen?

      You can't.

    6. Re:How do I use it with glasses? by FrenZon · · Score: 3, Informative
      How do I use it with glasses?

      When headset manufacturers say things like 'equivalent to a 90" screen at 7 feet!!', it's not just fancy marketing talk - the distance is usually the focal distance of the display. I found out this out with my i-glasses, which were specced as a massive screen at 8' or so - I worked out the ratio and said "that's like a 19" screen at 3', cool." unfortunately, while I can easily read a 19" screen at 3', I can't read the equivalently large screen at 8' due to short sightedness. Wearing normal glasses or contacts underneath helps, if you can get them to fit.

      Some headsets include adjustable focal length, which I think is a necessity.

    7. Re:How do I use it with glasses? by igzat · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they have like a bi-focal version of it for the seeing impared. Now that I think of it, I'll probably need one myself. Getting old here. It's my b-day!

  4. not to be pedantic, but... by CracktownHts · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    ...this is Slashdot. so:

    LCD stands for Liquid Crystal Display.

    Now that that's over with, you may resume posting without R'ing the FA.

    1. Re:not to be pedantic, but... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      I guess if they installed LCD displays on ATM machines for entering your PIN number, it would drive you nuts!

  5. Death by EMI by Lindar+The+Bard · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Have they effectively eliminated EMI or are they just going to let people die of eye cancer?
    -------------

    --
    I play guitar.
    1. Re:Death by EMI by p4ul13 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I thought LCDs don't produce EMI because they don't use an electron gun like a CRT does.

      Yes / No ? I really am not sure here...

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    2. Re:Death by EMI by workman161 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, LCD doesn't emit EMI radiation. But this makes me think of another question... Are there any long term effects from using it? Like eye strain, or headaches, or nausea?

    3. Re:Death by EMI by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

      Since this isn't even out yet, I doubt it has been around long enough for studies to have been done on that yet.

      --
      All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
    4. Re:Death by EMI by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      EMI? No, it'll make you mutate and give you super-powers, but only if you're pure of heart.

      Or if you have a name like "Doktor Devious."

      Seriously, though, is this one of those religious things? I've heard this before, but didn't really believe that people would follow it then. Mysterious rays that you can't see cause cancer because everything does?
      EMI from a device like this is in the form of visible light, radio, and microwaves. Same for cell-phones, microwaves, TVs, etc. The worst you can get is burned. Like when hot things burn you.

      Feeling burned? No?
      Then everything is fine.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:Death by EMI by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Have they effectively eliminated EMI"

      They kind of had to in order to avoid lawsuits over neck injuries.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Death by EMI by metlin · · Score: 1

      Not that I know of.

      I know several people in my school who work with wearable computing, and wear this stuff 24/7.

      If anything, it seems quite useful and consequently, addictive.

  6. YES!!!! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I plan to be the first person to cause a fender-bender from a chatroom.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:YES!!!! by Rob_Warwick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Honestly officer, I thought my hand was on the gearshift! Yes, of course it was a map.

    2. Re:YES!!!! by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I plan to be the first person to cause a fender-bender from a chatroom.

      Just to let you know you misspelled "porn".

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    3. Re:YES!!!! by Saeger · · Score: 0, Troll
      "Great Googly Moogly Goatse!"

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  7. so? by Yonkeltron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this is pretty neat. now i will be able to watch babylon 5 reruns and code at the same time. but then again, what kind of a device will this display hook up to?

    --
    Keep the faith, share the code
    1. Re:so? by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      If you were using Mac OS X, you could do this anyway, courtesy of Aqua's every-pixel-is-double-buffered-and-alpha-channeled thing.

      If programming in a Unix shell, go to Terminal > Window Settings > Color, and slide the Transparency slider to reveal the DVD Player behind...

      If in another app, install WindowShade and you can make any app's window semi-transparent, eg, surf the web with Firefox while watching DVDs behind the window.

      I actually do this from time to time, working and being entertained in the same visual space. (I don't think it's good for productivity though!)

    2. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question is, which one will be on the big screen and which one will be on that little LCD? I think I can guess.

  8. Could be a big thing by jridley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they perfect these things, I'd use one as my normal monitor. I have no particular love of having a big ass thing on my desk (even an LCD). If it covers the same apparent field of view, I'd go for it.

    Combined with a folding keyboard, this could help portable computers get a lot smaller too.

    Odds are it draws a lot less power than a full size LCD panel; should help portable PC power consumption as well; I think the LCD is one of the major power hogs.

    1. Re:Could be a big thing by TheRealStaunch · · Score: 0

      The only reason I wouldn't use one of these is if they couldn't get the resolution very high, anyone find specs anywhere on what these are capable of?

      --

      -- Get
    2. Re:Could be a big thing by Saeger · · Score: 4, Informative
      Even better than a LCD HUD is a Retinal Scanning Display (RSD), but the tech isn't as mature yet. RSD's have a long list of advantages over LCDs and CRTs.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:Could be a big thing by eikonos · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if you had one of these instead of a monitor at work, you could browse pr0n without having to alt-tab quickly when someone comes up to your desk!

    4. Re:Could be a big thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont care how safe they say the laser is, i dont want lasers being pointed into my remaining eye.

    5. Re:Could be a big thing by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      No hard information is available, not even expected resolution. There have been headsets available for a long time, I don't remember them ever hitting VGA in better than monochrome. It hasn't caught on yet, and Mitsubishi is not saying why this one will beat the odds.

      The power savings doesn't seem to be that significant except for maybe battery life.

      A 17" panel takes around 30-40W, which is in line with the fact that backlights are basically special flourescent bulbs with some sort of light distribution material, sometimes fresnel type.

    6. Re:Could be a big thing by g3head · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Full color 680x480 isn't a problem, thats what NTSC runs at IIRC, and personal video has (so far) been the only real market for wearable displays.

      Get above that and the cost rises in leaps and bounds

      Some commercial displays

    7. Re:Could be a big thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microvision has this as a product called the nomad http://microvision.com/nomadexpert/index.html
      The only lacking thing is that it's red monichrome.

      They should NEVER use laser in the same sentence with retina.

    8. Re:Could be a big thing by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't care what they say about laser power levels and eye safety: I don't want coherent light beamed into my eyes. A failure in the laser diode's current limiting and the next frame will paint permanent darkness. Forget it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Could be a big thing by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      Just think if it could be made wireless and with the new noise cancelling microphone than one could wear it around the house and still control one's computer.

    10. Re:Could be a big thing by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Macrovision has one as well: the only thing it's lacking is an actual video output. Otherwise, someone might plug it into a VCR or something.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  9. One question by TimmyDee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does the back of the miniature display flash "NERD" for everyone else to see? You know, in case it wasn't obvious.

    --
    Per Square Mile, a blog about density
    1. Re:One question by fatphil · · Score: 1

      It's big enough to display

      +--------+
      |watching|
      | porno |
      +--------+

      Oh, you wanted non-obvious. My mistake.

      FP

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  10. vga input? by weighn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the article suggests it only takes a tv signal. I'd like one of these for my flight simming. My desk just can't bear one more monitor.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:vga input? by Skadet · · Score: 2, Informative

      the article sugguests no such thing.

      SCOPO can be attached to any device that can feed video like cell phone, laptop, PDA, DVD-player, etc.

      It implies that it may take an RCA (composite) output. No big deal, right? Shoot, my Viper v550 have composite-out.

  11. Hmm... by CompSurfer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like a Jem'hedar viewscreen kinda.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Mazem · · Score: 1

      Looks like a Jem'hedar viewscreen kinda.
      Indeed

    2. Re:Hmm... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Looks like a Jem'hedar viewscreen kinda." ... and every bit as fashionable!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  12. The R-Zone Returns? by HideEverFree · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tiger (maker of cheapo LCD games) put out the R-zone game machine in the '90s. One form of the R-Zone was a headset with a controller attached. A clear piece of plastic flipped out over the player's left eye.

  13. Res, res, res by condour75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The video is cute and futuristic but what's the resolution? If it's under 800x600 it's kind of useless. 1024x768 and I'd consider it, although I can't see it improving my sex life.

    1. Re:Res, res, res by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "although I can't see it improving my sex life."

      sure it will, you wear it while having sex with your ugly girlfriend and but imagining its the pornstar on your eye monitor.

    2. Re:Res, res, res by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why? This isn't supposed to replace your desktop monitor, its supposed to give you a hud to display specially crafted apps. You could get away with 300x200 on it really, all you'll be doing is outputting info, most likely using text and small icons.

      Once it gets a few years of tech down the line, a nice 1600x1200 display to directly overlay images on top of real life could be useful too (eg, showing an infobox on top of people, specificly re-coloring/highlighting objects, etc), but to say its not even useful until its 8x6 is just not thinking.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  14. DPI? Power? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    TFA and TFV didn't say much about the specs.

    I wonder what the display output will be?

    It's obviously powered by thought-wave absorbtion, so that's the good news. No batteries!

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  15. Great for laptops/PDAs by for_usenet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This should be a really neat way to get rid of power hungry displays. This device will draw some power, but hopefully, by virtue of its size, nowhere near the amount of a conventional laptop or PDA display. It should definitely open up some interesting possibilities. Imagine being able to shut off your laptop display, with this plugged into the VGA port, and drawing it's necessary power from a powered USB or Firewire port. Mmmmm ... Tasty ...

    1. Re:Great for laptops/PDAs by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Certainly the backlighting current would be slashed, because the area of display is so much smaller; so for the same intensity you need a tiny, tiny fraction. The drive circuitry (including 3D rendering card :-) ), would be pretty similar power though.

      Still, you might be able to double battery life for the same battery size.

      Then there are are low power processors like Transmeta's.

      The other heavy current device is the hard-drive. It's getting to the point where replacing that with camera-style flash memory is getting to be closer to cost-effective.

      I guess the ultimate small/longlife laptop replacement system would have datagloves instead of keyboard.

      Maybe with WiFi and 3G connectivity the system might actually be geeky enough to actually be chic , or not :-)

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Great for laptops/PDAs by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      There are many interesting options for input devices in a wearable computer. For the short term, i'm going to buy a throat mic (around Christmas, said the poor broke college student :), but the frogpad (http://www.frogpad.com/) has received good reviews, and the last time i checked, thinkgeek still had some halfkeyboards... On a "slightly" longer term, gesture recognition should work ok with a webcam :)

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    3. Re:Great for laptops/PDAs by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      I knew i'd forgotten something: Belkin's nostromo n50.

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
  16. Move along people... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bill Gates already got this. Remember the picture of him we see on slashdot?

  17. Projection by Big+Mark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm wondering - is there any chance of projection into the retina in a device like this?

    You get LCD alarm clocks that project images of the time onto the wall already, surely it's only a matter of time before VDU images are projected into the retina...

    1. Re:Projection by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0
      is there any chance of projection into the retina in a device like this

      All images which we see are projected on to the retina by the lens in the front of the eye. This is no different

    2. Re:Projection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microvision Retinal Scanning Displays.

  18. Synthesized Speech? by stefanb · · Score: 1

    The voice over on those videos sounds strange. It's probably better that having a Japanese sound track, but it's freaking me out...

  19. Finally by amalcon · · Score: 1

    Finally, there's a production model of something like this. Maybe those memory prosthesis prototypes being worked on at MIT, among other places, will come to market before too long?

    And that's in addition to all the more generally in-demand applications.

    --
    -Amalcon
  20. *sigh* by Seabass55 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "users who need to perform multiple tasks simultaneously"

    Or maybe people should simply unplug once in a while and enjoy some of the real world. All I can imagine is some idiot using this while he's driving and causing an accident...this is far worse than cell phones. Yeah sure there's a power advantage like someone mentioned above for laptops...we'd be better off spending money on designing new longer lasting batteries than this thing.

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm... Oh... And you think the electric centrals don't make pollution ?

      But, well, I think this thing is only for people want to show everybody that they are technological freaks :p (What ? I'm feeling that I'm one of these ? nooooo... hmmm.... well maybe a little bit :-/ lol)

      (Escuse me for my bad english, I'm french...)

      --- Jon1012

    2. Re:*sigh* by DLR · · Score: 1
      Wearable computer are not new, and have multiple proven uses in the workplace already.

      One example is when building/QCing an aircraft (mil or civ) you can either lug a cart with several 5,000 page notebooks for current specifications in addition to the cart with all your tools/instruments, or wear an 802.11 system with small display where you can search out the specs for the exact section you are working on at the moment.

      --
      "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
    3. Re:*sigh* by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      Indeed. Recentrecent news and other real studies say multitasking isn't all it's cracked up to be.

      You can also find pop talks and even movies that suggest the same.

      Sometimes I like to just try to slow down and do one thing, have a beer and read slashdot... d'oh! (that's two things!)

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  21. mindgames by whovian · · Score: 1

    As long as it leaves me with a pleasurable sensation that I don't have to go Risa, I'm all for it.

    How about you, Wesley?

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    1. Re:mindgames by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      He hasn't posted since april, so you can quit sucking up to him trying to get him to reply.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  22. Mmmm... Foreigner by xombo · · Score: 1

    It's just like my favorite song, Head Games from 80's super-group Foreigner.

  23. This is slashdot, so.... by vidnet · · Score: 5, Funny

    $400 for this thing when I can write up some hack for a gameboy and duct tape it to my face?

    1. Re:This is slashdot, so.... by Performaman · · Score: 1

      Or run a VT100 emulator like Telenet83 Plus on a TI graphing calculator (which can be had on eBay for 30->40 dollars), and mount the screen in front of you eye. Connect the calculator to a 'nix laptop's serial port, and you have a HMD.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    2. Re:This is slashdot, so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd save money on razors too!

      RRRRRRRRIIIIIPPPP

  24. Resistance is futile ... by arhar · · Score: 1

    ... kill me now, please!

  25. Just more proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that the porn industry drives technology. I need to be able to look at porn at all hours of the day, especially during work, but I need to do it in privacy. Thanks, Mitsubishi!

  26. driving by nktae · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is anyone else having images of the same idiot that eats a borrito while talking on his cellphone while looking at a map while driving using this behind the wheel?

    1. Re:driving by Ikester8 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps someone should work on driving robots, since that seems to be everyone's great worry here.

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
  27. Obligitory Star Trek DS9 reference by Rogue+Leader · · Score: 1

    Sadly, there will only be two of these. . . One for the Vorta and one for the Jem Hadar First. And they frame will flash all quick-like when you use them.

    --

    worst sig ever. . .

  28. Not getting my "cash" yet by n54 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell me when they've made contact lenses with built-in "wifi" and powertransmission, and they go completely transparent by thought control (semitransparent otherwise). The resolution needs to be at least 1280x1000 as well. "The world is your desktop background" :)

    Preferrably they would take input by thought control but even if not I'd spend at least 3K$ per lens even if I had to take up a loan...

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    1. Re:Not getting my "cash" yet by Skadet · · Score: 1

      Dear "Consumer"

      As "soon" as we get all the "features" worked out, we'll be "sure" to let you "know".

      "Sincerely",
      Mitsubishi

  29. Not exactly old hat but.. by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here is the original version.

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  30. Wow, How Dumb by reporter · · Score: 1
    How can anyone efficiently multitask two different tasks: 1 task via normal vision and 1 task via the LCD panel?

    Let t1 = time to do task #1. Let t2 = time to do task #2. Let cxt = context switch time.

    Doing the 2 tasks sequentially requires t1 + t2 units of time.

    Doing the 2 tasks concurrently requires t1 + t2 + cxt.

    "cxt" is the cost paid by the workers in being unable to concentrate because of constant switching between tasks.

    1. Re:Wow, How Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking of efficiency purely in terms of throughput, but you should also consider latency.

      If you need to be able to devote some time to two tasks and not ignore either task for more than x amount of time, this kind of situation makes sense, even if the total time is greater than doing so sequentially.

    2. Re:Wow, How Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't completely valid. Think of the following scenario:
      You're looking at two screens, on the top one is a word, on the bottom one is either black or white.
      You're instructed to read the word aloud from the top one and raise your left hand if the bottom one is white, right hand if the bottom one is black, and to do both as fast as possible.

      Are you telling me that you couldn't do that faster by doing both at the same time than if you looked at just one screen, did what you needed to, then looked at another screen and did what you needed to?

      As long as the two tasks you're multitasking don't require the same "processor resources" in your brain, you can easily parallel them, reducing the time it takes to do them, although, most likely not halving the time.

    3. Re:Wow, How Dumb by DennyK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What it can be used for is to access material related to whatever physical task you are currently performing. If you're working on your car, you could access electronic reference materials. If you're walking around a strange town or city, you could pull up a map of the area, a list of restaurants, or a language reference if you're in another country. I don't think people would really be trying to use it to, say, write code while they're driving (hopefully!).

  31. both eyes ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I didn't read the article but I'm thinking how cool it would be to have a system like that would force it's image into the retina. Imagine having your desktop consume your entire field of view ?! Instead of a display sitting 3 or 4 feet away, all you would experience and see is your computers desktop/commandline/etc ....talk about being immersed !! Is that possible ? Or would we need neural link-ups for that ?

    Would the average programmer end up working more efficiently if that were the situation ??

    John_Allen_Mohammad,
    Linus Ackbar!

    1. Re:both eyes ? by C_REZ · · Score: 0

      and screw up ur retinas? geez just connect straight to the brain.

    2. Re:both eyes ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah d00d, because itz just so eazy to interface directly with the brain in the year 2004, right? buy a clue! the brain is complicated. and the vision part of it is the mostly complicated.

    3. Re:both eyes ? by C_REZ · · Score: 0

      u took dat serious? what is serious is retinal damage.

  32. employment. by C_REZ · · Score: 0

    job applications will have a check box for the question "able to wear headset monitor for extended periods". then ater a few years there will the attorneys specializing in scopo-syndrome lawsuits.

  33. It's only missing one thing, and that's... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

    A helmut. I can't imagine how many people will be wearing this thing walking around bumping into things. You think people are ignorant of the world around them while on a cell phone? Wait until someone's walking around watching a rip of The Simpsons on dvd, or the most recent Daily Show. I fear trying to drive around the person wearing one of these. Unless it comes with a big bullseye bumper sticker...

  34. Multitasking Generation by izomiac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone else noticed the impossibly fast evolution of multitasking ability?

    People over 70 have trouble doing one thing at one time

    People over 55 seem to have trouble walking and cheqing gum simultaniously

    People over 30 think that they can drive and talk on a cell phone at the same time

    College and high school students can take note on a laptop while carrying on 6 simultanious AIM conversations while paying enough attention to the teacher to know if they are growing supicious

    What's next... babies with tenticles?

    1. Re:Multitasking Generation by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      And yet High school students aren't doing too well and 30 year olds are constantly in accidents, hmmm...

    2. Re:Multitasking Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the age limit of people who can't think of a word like say, 'tenticles' and spellcheq it simultaniously?

  35. Never gonna be big by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

    Hold your finger about 3-4 inches away from your nose. Now focus on it for a couple of minutes.

    'nuf said.

    1. Re:Never gonna be big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have these new wonderful inventions called lenses.

    2. Re:Never gonna be big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drew some porn on my finger and tried it again - it works better that way...

  36. Nah ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Funny
    Does the back of the miniature display flash "NERD" for everyone else to see?


    Doesn't need to. The utility belt with the palm, pager, digital camera, and a bandolier of batteries and flash cards is usually a dead giveaway. ;-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  37. extinction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you were afraid we were an endangered species... just wait till we ahold of these...

  38. Multiple Tasks by NiTr|c · · Score: 1

    Like, brushing your teeth, putting on makeup (shaving for guys), eating, changing lanes, and swearing at everyone else on the road because they are "crazy drivers."

    Yes, I know people who do this. Yes, I am ashamed.

    --
    Try actually thinking for yourself. It's quite refreshing.
    1. Re:Multiple Tasks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably don't drive a manual car...

  39. Cost only $400 by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That may still seem expensive to slashdotters who know the ins and outs of finding cheap hardware on the Internet, but this is the automotive industry. When purchasing a new car, an extra $500 may get you a decent audio system that would cost $300 at Best Buy. So considering their normal markup, this isn't a bad price for an unnecessary upgrade.

    1. Re:Cost only $400 by cr0sh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, knowing the VR and AR industry, this is actually a very cheap wearable-style "HMD" - $400 is a steal (heh, I remember paying $250.00 for a open-box StuntMaster from Best Buy in 1993 or so).

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    2. Re:Cost only $400 by ejito · · Score: 1

      Who said it was for cars? Mistubishi isn't just an automotive company...

    3. Re:Cost only $400 by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah you caught me, I didn't RTFA.

  40. New interactive Sex Tutorial........ by hcob$ · · Score: 1

    Now all they need is some "educational" sex instruction tapes to pipe into the screen so most guys can see how it's supposed to be done and you won't have half the female population complaining about how they wish their guys were better in bed. I can' see it now... "Here honey, I got you this new toy!"

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    1. Re:New interactive Sex Tutorial........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I know why my wife rented me some porno movies a few years ago. If she starts renting them again, I'll really know why this time.

  41. Ever Read Snowcrash? by Laebshade · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised no one has mentioned this sounds like the beginning of a "gargoyle" from SnowCrash.

    "Gargoyles represent the embarrassing side of the Central Intelligence Corporation. Instead of using laptops, they wear their computers on their bodies, broken up into separate modules that hang on the waist, on the back, on the headset They serve as human surveillance devices, recording everything that happens around them. Nothing looks stupider, these getups are the modern-day equivalent of the slide-rule scabbard or the calculator pouch on the belt, marking the user as belonging to a class that is at once above and far below human society. They are a boon to Hiro because they embody the worst stereotype of the CIC stringer. They draw all of the attention. The payoff for this self-imposed ostracism is that you can be in the Metaverse all the time, and gather intelligence all the time."
    [...]
    "Gargoyles are no fun to talk to. They never finish a sentence. They are adrift in a laser-drawn world, scanning retinas in all directions, doing background checks on everyone within a thousand yards, seeing everything in visual light, infrared, millimeter. wave radar, and ultrasound all at once. You think they're talking to you, but they're actually poring over the credit record of some stranger on the other side of the room, or identifying the make and model of airplanes flying overhead."
    [...]
    "There's also a gargoyle in one corner, patched into a bigger-than-normal laptop, mumbling to himself."
    [...]
    "I decided I wasn't spending enough. So I got a beltpack machine. Smallest ever made, I'm walking down the street with this thing strapped to my belly. It's really cool"
    "You're a gargoyle."
    "Yeah, but it's not like having all this clunky shit strapped all over your body?'
    "You're a gargoyle. Listen, I talked to one of these wholesalers."
    "Yeah?"
    "She says she used to be a hacker. She saw something strange on her computer. Then she got sick for a while and joined this cult and ended up on the Raft."
  42. Two sides to this coin- by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Looks like another toy that our town will demand for every student in the school system, whether they need it or not. (And guess who's paying...)

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  43. Excuse me while I curse incoherantly... by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, I'm done. Now my big question is simple:

    Anyone can buy a Gameboy Advance with a backlit LCD for about $79.

    Anyone can buy a digital camera with built in 1.5" LCD for $120.

    Anyone can buy a 15" LCD display for their PC for $300 on average.

    So WHY is it that a monacle LCD using (technically) less technology costs 3-4 times that price? It's bloody stupid.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Excuse me while I curse incoherantly... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      One word... resolution. Think of the resolution needed to be able to display anything worthwile in something so small.

    2. Re:Excuse me while I curse incoherantly... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      The problem *is* the resolution. Most people wouldn't feel comfortable with a display showing less than a 640x480 resolution, and yet the one they show suggests a display resolution of 320x240.

      As far as I know as well, anything higher than the previously mentioned resolutions is difficult if not impossible, or we'd be seeing LCD flat panel displays the size of a conventional TV with a much higher dot pitch.

      When you're talking that resolution, may as well go to a scanning low energy laser display like was suggested some time ago.

      I'll expand further later, watching the Farscape miniseries.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  44. again by geekoid · · Score: 1

    people what is up? Most posts are whines of some sort or another. DOes no one enjoy technology on slashdot? Do none of you have the ability to see the possibilities of anything?

    It's time to get your nerd on.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:again by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the od looking post, but after I submited my post with 'It's time to get your nerd on' I decided to make it my sig.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:again by nolife · · Score: 1

      News for Nerds, ya..
      It seems the It-Kutch, Preep, Nerkle, Proo and Seersuckers seriously out number the Nerds here ;)

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  45. I just got a Quadrophenia Flashabck by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    Imagine someone with multi LCD displays, like this scooter has rearviews.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  46. It's called the SCOPO by Doyle · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called the SCOPO. This infringes our intellectual property. The charge will be $699 per headset.

    Thanks,
    Darl

  47. is walking through his house by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 0

    Shadowe Stubs Toe SHIT! lost 15hp on that one...

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  48. wasn't there one of these in hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they use these in the film hackers, near the end when they all hack in from the train station?
    I'm sure I remember reading an article in about 1996 talking about wearable computers and using a b&w 640x480 equivalent to this that could hook up to a VGA port.

  49. How is this new? by BlightThePower · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't really tell from the webpage, but it seems the same as the MicroOptical HUD I have sitting on my desk. Its been around for a few years now, its certainly not brand new. Can anyone explain the ins and outs?

    --
    Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
    1. Re:How is this new? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What's new about it is that it's one fourth the price, which means you no longer need a research grant to be able to afford to build a wearable!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  50. Being a Spectacle by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    I already wear glasses, will this work with me?

    • If I don't need glasses to use this, is the delay small enough use a TV camera to replace that fuzzy view of the world?
    • Is the position adjustable, so I can lift it and block part of the default primitive photonic display?
    • Can I wear one on the left and one on the right?
    • Can I wear them upside down, so I can wear two below and two above the real world display?
  51. The Jerk by rueger · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one reminded immediately of the glasses invented by Steve Martin's character in The Jerk, which eventually made an entire population cross-eyed?

  52. Deacronymizing LCD by DrMorris · · Score: 1

    LCD Display = Liquid Crystal Display Display

    1. Re:Deacronymizing LCD by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      LCD Display = Liquid Crystal Display Display

      I guess if they installed LCD displays on ATM machines for entering your PIN number, it would drive you nuts!

    2. Re:Deacronymizing LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading that sentance hurt me =(

    3. Re:Deacronymizing LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reading that sentance hurt me =(

      Yuor speeling hert me.

    4. Re:Deacronymizing LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw the name of the article, I knew this post had to be in here somewhere. Thanks. :)

  53. Resolution, again... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

    We really need to know about resolution on this thing.

    I was just today considering a home-made wearable computer (perhaps on a nano-itx board gutting a UPS or something for some power), but was considering the fact I'd have to wear the LCD screen too, since all the current HMD's are so expensive. If this thing does 800x600, we're talking business.

  54. Transmetropolitan it isn't ... by Kaemaril · · Score: 1

    I want a pair of Spider Jerusalem smart glasses, not these clunky ol' things :D

  55. Doubt that by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 1

    Portables have been around for awhile. I am sure someone has caused a fender bender playing with thier in dash computer or side mounted laptop. Or accidently got hit by a car because they were too bust playing with a palm pilot.

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
  56. Pimp Slap... by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 1

    I hope I meet the lady who did the talking for that video so I can pimp slap her! The way she talked just really ground on my ears for some reason.

    And what was up with showing the distance between the eye in metric (50cm) and the width of the screen in standard (10 inches). Pick a camp and stay in it.

    While on the topic, I wish America would get with the picture and switch to metric already... standard isn't so, well, standard.

    --
    Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
  57. xybernaut/hitachi tried this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2001 the Xybernaut POMA/Hitachi WIA came with Wince 3.0 and a 800x600 head worn display.

    There was no screen nor keyboard, but there was an optical thumb mouse. Fortunately, it had USB, so you could attach a keyboard. However, there was no audio in which meant there was no speech recognition. Moreover, it was running an hitachi SH-4 CPU which meant there was hardly any software. Especially drivers for devices.

    The display also fit poorly. Xybernaut has since stopped selling them.

    We'll see what happens this time especially since the new display is much cheaper and doesn't come with a system.

    http://www.hitachi.us/Apps/hitachicom/content.jsp? page=PressReleases/details/Hitachi,%20Shimadzu,%20 Colorado%20Microdisplay,%20and%20Xybernaut%20Coope rate%20for%20WIA.html&path=jsp/hitachi/aboutus/Pre ss-Media/

    http://www.xybernaut.com/company/public/outside%20 articles/electronic080601.htm

    http://www.windowsfordevices.com/articles/AT927776 5970.html

  58. Woot! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Finally, I can be the one with frickin' lasers attached to my head!

    1. Re:Woot! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You can do it yourself. Just out and buy a cheap laser pointer at Walgreen's and a roll of duct tape. Voila! instant Borg (just add collective.)

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  59. Hardly a pedantic! by Maksym · · Score: 0

    "... installed LCD displays ..."

    Liquid Crystal Display Displays? Real Pedantic.

  60. Secretaries by Jameth · · Score: 1

    Most of the people here think of this as a geek device, but I think it would be most useful in some of those deskjobs which require a lot of phone interaction. Combined with a headset, this puts the majority of the system in one place and removes the need to craning of a neck and maintaining awkward positions.

    If this can be combined with some new keyboard device, it really gets everything together.

    1. Re:Secretaries by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Voice recognition and a nouse?

      I'm half serious here.

  61. the mouse that roared by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Heads-up display, whatever - did you see that OMNI computer vehicle? Mobile computing that moves *you*. (insert soviet russia joke here) They're thinking about it pretty hard, but I want a computer that I can operate with a steeringwheel, not a car I operate with a klunky keyboard. Do they drive Dvorak in the UK?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  62. I have just one question. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    Dear, when me make love, you don't pretend I'm someone else, do you?

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  63. That sound you hear now... by Inuchance · · Score: 1

    ...is thousands of Dragonball Z fans rushing out to get one of these for their scouter.

  64. Specs? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Informative

    What resolution can these things display? The linked article and video doesn't mention anything. MicroOptical already makes things like these. They have a number of different versions and can display at VGA (640x480) resolution. They have binocular versions, and there's even one in which the display is a reflective portion of a transparent eyeglass lens that looks like a bifocal. Why wait until next year for this one from Mitsubishi when MicroOptical already has a whole range of different kinds now?

    1. Re:Specs? by elitman · · Score: 1
      Price is clearly a major difference between these products. From MiroOptical's site:

      The OEM single unit price of the EG-8 viewer is $8,000. The EG-8 is only available to qualified OEM accounts.


      That's a 20x price difference.
    2. Re:Specs? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Price is clearly a major difference between these products.

      Oops. Missed that part. The coolest little gadgets on the net always cost so much they're more expensive than their mass in gold. Check out this little beauty, for example. Looks like an inexpensive DV camera attachment? It costs something like $13,000.

  65. Other advantages: Security, pointing device. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Another advantage of an RSD is that it is a spinoff of a device to scan the retina, and adding one more beam-splitter and a photodiode on the laser side of the scanner lets the display do this, too.

    That leads to two extra functions:

    1) The retina print can be used for a "password". (Fewer worries about somebody who steals your wearable getting at your data or using your comm account to make 20-hour calls to 900 services in Malagua or spam the whole internet.)

    2) The display can measure where you're looking - and use that (with suitable algorithms to keep the cursor from being obtrusive) as your pointing device. (Look-and-click means one less device in your hand, i.e. a chord keyboard with mouse button chords in its vocabulary. And it ought to be a bunch faster than mousing.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  66. just what everyone needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but why pay 400 dollars when you can just rob it from a distracted/defenseless nerd? :p

  67. Double? by Tellalian · · Score: 1

    I don't see the logic behind the monocle design. It's distracting and uncomfortable for your eyes to concentrate on two distinctly different images. I once had a college professor who got a free demo for one of these monocle-style displays, and he said it was unusable for this very reason.

  68. Bounces by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1

    This device would be great for Bouncers at a nightclub. They could use it to verify ID checks, keep in communication with other bouncers, keep up with notices from central base, keep an eye in areas that they are not physically in (or Orientate yourself around the place without looking with your eyes but by following the streams of video from the cameras in the corner of every room, well there is a coolness factor to that, or a practical factor if it's too dark to use your eyes and the cameras can capture infrared) etc.

  69. Early adopter......... by zmollusc · · Score: 0

    Rumour has it that the #1 in the queue for the first production unit is goatse man.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  70. Moron by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Simple use for such a device. Order pickers. Now they need to have a viewscreen in their hand wich makes it hard to get info and handle gooods at the same time. Use this, a laser scanner on the finger and voila, you can have your order details and goods at the same time.

    Compared to other portable solutions this isn't even that expensive and since it is on the head and not constantly being put down and picked up it will suffer less abuse as well.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  71. Lol I hope you kidding. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
    60 years ago 20yr old boys were dropping out of aircraft or running up beaches handling lethal tools while reading maps, scanning for thousands of visual clues, remembering several orders and tasks, keeping track of the rest of their team, calculating the trajectory of ballistic objects in flight ALL AT THE SAME TIME AND WITHOUT SLEEP.

    Todays 20yr old boys can barely control a desktop without it getting invested and complain bitterly when they got to press forward for to long in their shooter or bullets don't end up exactly where they are pointing.

    Oh and as any cop can tell you, yes people think that they can drive and talk on a phone at the same time. They also can tell you how many people get killed each year while doing that.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  72. Think "dual monitor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let t1 = time do enter code
    Let t2 = time to look up documentation
    Let cxt.old = time to task switch from editor to reference manual
    Let cxt.new = time to glance at side monitor (or book)

    Still prefer to switch windows back and forth?

  73. haha by igzat · · Score: 0

    This is a $400 heads-up-display for those looking for bargain-basement augmented reality or just an at-hand excuse on why you never, ever get laid. The geeks become geekier!

  74. Department of Redundancy Department by pkx · · Score: 1

    Wearable Liquid Crystal Display Display?

  75. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you... by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    Yet another gadget for people to fuck with when they
    SHOULD BE PAYING ATTENTION TO THEIR DRIVING.

    yay.

  76. High speed escalator by ayeco · · Score: 1

    The high speed escalator on the same page is much cool than the wearable display. That seems to be pretty old hat.

  77. Mod useless parent (Sir Haxalot) down please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why gee, look at Pingular's last 4 posts, nothing but "I can contribute nothing but I can link to Wikipedia or other sites for cheap upmods!" Please don't waste your mod points modding this known Slashdot crapflooder up.
  78. terminology by nusratt · · Score: 1

    This isn't a "heads-up display" (HUD).
    It's a "head-mounted display" (HMD).

  79. Not completely new, not without difficulties too. by Cherveny · · Score: 1

    I used to work for Telxon, until they moved the tech jobs out of Ohio to Texas, then merged with their rival Symbol.

    Telxon had mini screens like this, designed for mobile shop workers (i.e: Warehouse workers or the like). Screens worked relatively well, but there was a major drawback. Continual use caused major straining of the eyes. Overuse caused eye injuries! Because of this, Telxon dropped making 'em.

    Will be curious to see if the new company has worked out these issues with these new screens.

    --
    --- It's not my fault this post looks redundant. I just type too slow.
  80. Re:Other advantages: Security, pointing device. by zobier · · Score: 1

    But how do you select text, Wink and roll?

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  81. Re:Other advantages: Security, pointing device. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    But how do you select text, Wink and roll?

    I'd just suggested using "push mouse button" chords on the chord keyboard (which I visulalize as a ball with buttons you're holding in one hand).

    But eyelid gestures make good sense, even if you WERE joking. B-) Also eyebrow gestures, though that would take an extra scanner (or a bit of mirror to let the same scanner "paint" your eyebrows with infrared).

    It would be GREAT for quadraplegics.

    Of course a person using it would look REALLY silly, though a careful choice of gestures might mitigate that.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way