If you have a college degree, you can enter as an E-1. You also left out the fact that they will provie shelter and food so they get to pocket most of that 13,272.
I'm pretty sure MS got some pointers from SCO for their investment. SCO throws in some free licenses with the deal and claim that companies are snatching up linux licenses, just as MS giving away free software and claim that their base is expending.
I'm not suprised. Exchange 2003 Server deployment guide is just an advertisement for Windows 2003 Server and Outlook 2003. Sure, Exchange 2003 can run on Win 2000 SP3 but if you want to use all the features, run it on 2003. Sure, Exchange 2003 can serve older Outlook clients, but if you want all the features, get Outlook 2003.
You don't pay for those software, you pay to have someone put it together for you. Hack, if you are willing to wait, you don't even have to pay or you can go with Linux from Scratch project and put it together yourself.
I'd trust you but since you posted on slashdot, I can't, but if I can't trust you, your statement must be true but you posted on slashdot... My head hurts.
MS hired a PR firm to create "I switched from Mac to XP" advertisement but the PR firm ended up using a stock phone that was discovered rather quickly.
I guess is that MS hired a middleman to funnel the money through to SCO and that middleman (S2) did half-assed job funneling the money.
I guess you haven't read mainstream news lately. There are planty news articles that end with "The call to YYY from ZZZ company did not return the call.". Acording you your logic, most of the news stories out there would be "Conjecture and Hypothesis".
Ask people on the street about IBM or Microsoft and most will be able to tell you something about them. Ask them about RMS, FSF, GPL, software patents, etc, and they will look at you funny. Geeks make up a very small percentage of the voting group and only way for the average citizen to hear about our issues is through big lawsuits like SCO vs. IBM.
SCO is claming that GPL is invalid, so how can this lawsuit be a mere footnote? If IBM wins, RMS could be a giant in the history books. If SCO wins, Darl will be a giant in the history books and RMS will be a mere footnote (as a loser).
Because bashing SCO is fun. Why do people play games, because it's fun. Why do people have sex? Because it's fun (oh and that procreation part, too).
Playing video games costs money and having sex costs money for some slashdotters, but SCO bashing is free (as in beer and freedom) because it's our God given right. In fact, I like to thank Darl for sacrificing himself for the amusment of others.
"taking property rights away from the individual and giving them to society as a whole."
I think that you should actually read the words on GPL. For example, how does GPL control the useage by the end user? Perhapes in the redistrubution but not in the useage. Second, GPL does not take property rights away as the creator must chose to use GPL.
Slashdot Mirror
I've been hiding at home all this time and no one has yet to discover me for my one handed web surfing skills.
Sorry, it was a typo, it should've been E-4 as in Specialist.
But you do think that the courts were acting out of line, in regards to "electing" Bush?
If you have a college degree, you can enter as an E-1. You also left out the fact that they will provie shelter and food so they get to pocket most of that 13,272.
That's a catch 22 because without formal education, it's hard to find jobs now. Most IT jobs I've seen posted requires 4 year degrees.
Because then there will be no money left over for big fat contracts for contractors with connections.
It does if the stock price becomes low enough to encourage a hostile take over.
If MS buys enough shares of SCO, it creates demand, which boosts up the price, which allows SCO to sell more stocks at inflated prices.
Not if they are unclocked to begin with. Those processors ran at 16MHz on Macs without any problems.
I'm pretty sure MS got some pointers from SCO for their investment. SCO throws in some free licenses with the deal and claim that companies are snatching up linux licenses, just as MS giving away free software and claim that their base is expending.
I'm not suprised. Exchange 2003 Server deployment guide is just an advertisement for Windows 2003 Server and Outlook 2003. Sure, Exchange 2003 can run on Win 2000 SP3 but if you want to use all the features, run it on 2003. Sure, Exchange 2003 can serve older Outlook clients, but if you want all the features, get Outlook 2003.
Army should consider MS software to be a Weapon of Mass Disruction because on the damages caused by back to back virus infections.
You don't pay for those software, you pay to have someone put it together for you. Hack, if you are willing to wait, you don't even have to pay or you can go with Linux from Scratch project and put it together yourself.
Wasn't that lawsuit dropped?
I'd trust you but since you posted on slashdot, I can't, but if I can't trust you, your statement must be true but you posted on slashdot... My head hurts.
MS hired a PR firm to create "I switched from Mac to XP" advertisement but the PR firm ended up using a stock phone that was discovered rather quickly.
I guess is that MS hired a middleman to funnel the money through to SCO and that middleman (S2) did half-assed job funneling the money.
I guess you haven't read mainstream news lately. There are planty news articles that end with "The call to YYY from ZZZ company did not return the call.". Acording you your logic, most of the news stories out there would be "Conjecture and Hypothesis".
You'd figure this "S2" firm would've at least put up a half-way decent website and a team of Indian call center workers to answer phones for 50 mil.
MS will just claim that the customers got their money's worth by going from XP to XP Reloaded and from Office 2002 (XP) to Office 2003.
Maybe that's why the game makers have more incentives to produce CD/DVD-ROM based games than cart based ones.
I would be like SCO throwing in a Linux license with every Happy Meal and claim that it sold a billion Linux licenses.
Ask people on the street about IBM or Microsoft and most will be able to tell you something about them. Ask them about RMS, FSF, GPL, software patents, etc, and they will look at you funny. Geeks make up a very small percentage of the voting group and only way for the average citizen to hear about our issues is through big lawsuits like SCO vs. IBM.
SCO is claming that GPL is invalid, so how can this lawsuit be a mere footnote? If IBM wins, RMS could be a giant in the history books. If SCO wins, Darl will be a giant in the history books and RMS will be a mere footnote (as a loser).
Because bashing SCO is fun. Why do people play games, because it's fun. Why do people have sex? Because it's fun (oh and that procreation part, too).
Playing video games costs money and having sex costs money for some slashdotters, but SCO bashing is free (as in beer and freedom) because it's our God given right. In fact, I like to thank Darl for sacrificing himself for the amusment of others.
"taking property rights away from the individual and giving them to society as a whole."
I think that you should actually read the words on GPL. For example, how does GPL control the useage by the end user? Perhapes in the redistrubution but not in the useage. Second, GPL does not take property rights away as the creator must chose to use GPL.
?If the GPL is going to change history, I have yet to see it."
It could be sooner than you think. (SCO vs. IBM)