this isnt a 1.0 release in the sence thats its stable, infact gaim never intended to have a 1.0 release, their release of 0.81 ment that that was their 81st version of gaim, when they released 0.82 and later 0.82.1 (to patch a minor bug) it broke their versioning system, they just took this opertunity to "fix" their system with a x.y.z versioning system, x = major change that will break alot of plugins and stuff, y = minor bug fix or unconesquencial (sp?) change, and z is moot.
still a great app though.
RF module requires no configuration, offers 40-mile line-of-sight range
Paul O'Shea
eeProductCenter
(08/24/2004 12:00 PM ET) Email This Print This
MaxStream, Inc. introduces the 9XTend OEM RF Module that provides unprecedented performance in a low cost radio modem. The 9XTend is MaxStream's longest range (up to 40 miles in RF line-of-sight), low power OEM RF module. This affordable RF module is smaller than a credit card and allows for robust performance in North America, Australia and Israel.
The 9XTend outputs 1-Watt (30 dBm) of conducted output power while consuming only 780 milliamps at 5-V. This makes the 9XTend one of the most efficient 1-Watt 900 MHz modems in the industry. The 9XTend can output 4 Watts radiated power allowed by the FCC. The RF module also provides security through data encryption. The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is used with a 256-bit key, the highest encryption standard available. This makes the 9XTend ideal for secure applications including automated teller machines, point-of-sale terminals, and keyless/remote access systems. No time penalty is incurred during AES encryption or decryption.
MaxStream also offers its Interference Immunity Technology introduced in its 9XStream modems. The hardware/software solution creates wireless systems that are immune to RF interferers such as cell phones, pages, and other wireless systems.
The transceivers provide -110 dBm receiver sensitivity enabling users to receive 900 MHz transmissions up to one-half mile in urban environments, as well as 15 miles line-of-sight, and 40 miles with high-gain antennas. Data throughput of the module is 230 kbps and has a high sustainable data streaming rate 115.2 kbps.
The company offers a 9XTend Development Kit that lets users communicate wirelessly in a matter of minutes. For many modes of operation, including networking nodes, no configuration is necessary. Advanced networking features allow for easy configuration of transparent peer-to-peer, point-to-point, point-to-multipoint and multi-drop network topologies.
Range specs summary
* Up to 40 mile range (RF line-of-sight, @9600 RF data rate)
* Up to 3000 feet range (Indoor/Urban environments, @9600 RF data rate)
* 1 Watt Power Output (1 mW -- 1 W, software selectable)
* -110 dBm Receiver Sensitivity (@ 9600 baud)
* -103 dBm Receiver Sensitivity (@ 115200 baud)
Advanced Networking and Security
* True Peer-to-Peer (no "master" required), Point-to-Point and Point-to-Multipoint
* Retries and Acknowledgements
* 10 hopping channels each with over 65,000 network addresses available
* AES Encryption (Highest Encryption Standard Available)
Ease of Use
* Standard AT commands and fast binary commands for changing parameters
* Native RS485/422 (multi-drop bus) protocol support * Multiple low power modes including shutdown pin, cyclic sleep and serial port sleep for current consumption as low as 1 A
* Host interface baud rates from 1200 to 230400 bps
* Signal strength register for link quality monitoring and debugging
* MaxStream XII Interference Immunity
* FHSS (Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum)
* 2.8 to 5.5 V power supply
9XTend Modules are available with a standard MMCX or RPSMA connectors (required by the FCC for customers using SMA-type connectors).
9XTend RF module data sheet
MaxStream, Inc., 355 South 520 West Suite 180, Lindon, Utah 84042. Tel: 801-765-9885
are they technicaly acutioning beta software? i didnt think the "gmail" program came with a beta gmail account. seems to me they are just suctioning the use/access of beta software. and by that point, i have seen plenty of copies of windows for auction on ebay, and they done seem to mind the whole beta debate.:D
hehe, yeah i love naim, ive been meaning to get around to installing it on my box so when im ssh'ed into my box from elseware, i can still chat localy from my box:D
and this makes how many forks of gaim now? lets see we have gaim, ayttm, everybuddy, and gaim-vv, are there any im missing? sounds like a poll to me... "whats your favorite linux messanger client? aim, yahoo, ayttm, everybuddy, gaim, gaim-vv, cowboy neal's all-in-one messanger. ytalk, or i dont chat you insensitive clod!"
anyway in all seriousness ayttm (are you talking to me) look it up on freshmeat (as im too lazy/tired to link it) already has rudimentry yahoo webcam support, however it is still lacking, i loved trillian for windows, and would like to see gaim go in that direction, with all the eyecandy and skins and plugins... i know, ill learn c and fork gaim myself!!
you sir are a hippocrate, you joined the Free Software Movment, the whole gist of the FSM is to allow anybody and everybody access to software FOR FREE, now along comes the war in iraq, and the US military decides to use linux for its computers etc, you, in your infinate wisdom, decide that they shouldnt be able to do this, now you joined the FSM which says basicaly anybody can use Free Software, the military tried to use it and you are repulsed, you just went back on what you beleave. If china was using linux to help their development of nukes (which i wouldnt be suprised if they are) would you be as repulsed? probably not, the way i see it, Linux and the rest of the FS outthere are (for the most part) damn good products, would you rather our military equiped out tanks with windows (whatever) for guidance computers, and then have all out troops blown up in some as of yet, unseen war? i think we would have alot more problems with out citizens if we sent out troops over to a war unprepaired and with no reall mission(vietnam) then if we sent them in prepaired and with a solid mission. atleast they have the tools to do their job, nomatter how wrong you might think it is, im not agreeing with the war in iraq, but i dont dissagree either. (thats a whole different point which if you care to read will be started now.
Saddam was a bad dictator he tortured and killed many thousands of people, he may not have had chemical weapons, bush may have known he didnt, i really dont care what bush knew ( i beleave he knew saddam didnt have them), but saddam should still have allowed in inspectors to prove his word. bush went into iraq (the right thing) to take care of chemical weapons (or as a side note for oil/to finish his familys dispute with sadam off) (the wrong reason).
so basicaly what your saying, is that you want everyone else to stop pirating music/software/video so you can w/o fear of legal action? and dont tell me you dont have an illegal copy of sompthing, and yes i am counting a win95 boot disc as an illegal copy (if you dont own win 95 or the licence etc.)
then either your homeless posting this from the public library, they track you through your bills, and unemployment checks, or they track you via ip address on slashdot;)
and the source still hasnt been leaked from nvidia??? we had the source to halflife 2 months before it was finished, and thats a full game, this is small enought to be emailed via hotmail! geez, where are the blackhats when you need them, someone on a 2800 baud modem copuld download the source in less time that it would take them to read this article!
do the math, your talking about giga-bit, the artical states byte, 8 buts per byte... that works out to around 1.2GB/s. and yes there are much faster networks, but that can push the data reliably over 1000 miles...?
ahh yes, but anything under 60 days is not considerd a way, this was passed back in the 50's i beleave for one reason or another (sompthing about pre empting a nuclear attack) so the first 60 days are the presidents choice (it could be 90, but ill stick with the safer 60)and thus not thenically a way, all the president has to do is send the troops over there, and bomb the hell out of them for 60 days
end it for 20 and go and do it again... i dont beleave there are any limits on how soon and when he can use this power again...
ok, i understand what your saying and i agree, but hear me out, cuz im about to kick it to the next level, if theres only so many ways you can write 1+1=2 then theres even more ways you can write 1*3^3+A=B+5.05/3. with me so far. the more complex the problem the more ways there are to write it. meaning there is somewhere along the lines of 1 billion ways to recode linux and still have it behave exactly the same... but the authors want protection on their code. so copyright should state that the end biniary is copyrighted (fully... ie how it acts and behaves) and that the source is only partialy copyrighted (ie, if more than 40% of the "new" code matches the orignal source it is in violation) this way, i could write linux, rest assured that if anybody wants to expand on my ideas that they can openly (grab small chucks of source) but if they want to recompile linux (even using one of the possible 1billion ofthe code variations that produce the same os) that they cant because their end binary is too similar in function to my own, (ie windows vs linux neither are in violation (well atleast not linux)) the only catch someone else on here needs to figure out is (linux vs unix) cuz of the similarity between them... (you can compile unix source on linux (most of the time)). (solution??: if binaries run without any alteration the same on both os'ed then ones in violation)?? idk, IANAL and IANLT (i am not linus torvolds) but IMO a copyright system based on these concepts (for ditital information) would be more effective than our current one...
all i have to say is bravo, you have put the argument aganst vegitarinism that ive had in my mind all these years into words better than i could have:P
Slashdot Mirror
this isnt a 1.0 release in the sence thats its stable, infact gaim never intended to have a 1.0 release, their release of 0.81 ment that that was their 81st version of gaim, when they released 0.82 and later 0.82.1 (to patch a minor bug) it broke their versioning system, they just took this opertunity to "fix" their system with a x.y.z versioning system, x = major change that will break alot of plugins and stuff, y = minor bug fix or unconesquencial (sp?) change, and z is moot. still a great app though.
RF module requires no configuration, offers 40-mile line-of-sight range Paul O'Shea eeProductCenter (08/24/2004 12:00 PM ET) Email This Print This MaxStream, Inc. introduces the 9XTend OEM RF Module that provides unprecedented performance in a low cost radio modem. The 9XTend is MaxStream's longest range (up to 40 miles in RF line-of-sight), low power OEM RF module. This affordable RF module is smaller than a credit card and allows for robust performance in North America, Australia and Israel. The 9XTend outputs 1-Watt (30 dBm) of conducted output power while consuming only 780 milliamps at 5-V. This makes the 9XTend one of the most efficient 1-Watt 900 MHz modems in the industry. The 9XTend can output 4 Watts radiated power allowed by the FCC. The RF module also provides security through data encryption. The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is used with a 256-bit key, the highest encryption standard available. This makes the 9XTend ideal for secure applications including automated teller machines, point-of-sale terminals, and keyless/remote access systems. No time penalty is incurred during AES encryption or decryption. MaxStream also offers its Interference Immunity Technology introduced in its 9XStream modems. The hardware/software solution creates wireless systems that are immune to RF interferers such as cell phones, pages, and other wireless systems. The transceivers provide -110 dBm receiver sensitivity enabling users to receive 900 MHz transmissions up to one-half mile in urban environments, as well as 15 miles line-of-sight, and 40 miles with high-gain antennas. Data throughput of the module is 230 kbps and has a high sustainable data streaming rate 115.2 kbps. The company offers a 9XTend Development Kit that lets users communicate wirelessly in a matter of minutes. For many modes of operation, including networking nodes, no configuration is necessary. Advanced networking features allow for easy configuration of transparent peer-to-peer, point-to-point, point-to-multipoint and multi-drop network topologies. Range specs summary * Up to 40 mile range (RF line-of-sight, @9600 RF data rate) * Up to 3000 feet range (Indoor/Urban environments, @9600 RF data rate) * 1 Watt Power Output (1 mW -- 1 W, software selectable) * -110 dBm Receiver Sensitivity (@ 9600 baud) * -103 dBm Receiver Sensitivity (@ 115200 baud) Advanced Networking and Security * True Peer-to-Peer (no "master" required), Point-to-Point and Point-to-Multipoint * Retries and Acknowledgements * 10 hopping channels each with over 65,000 network addresses available * AES Encryption (Highest Encryption Standard Available) Ease of Use * Standard AT commands and fast binary commands for changing parameters * Native RS485/422 (multi-drop bus) protocol support * Multiple low power modes including shutdown pin, cyclic sleep and serial port sleep for current consumption as low as 1 A * Host interface baud rates from 1200 to 230400 bps * Signal strength register for link quality monitoring and debugging * MaxStream XII Interference Immunity * FHSS (Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum) * 2.8 to 5.5 V power supply 9XTend Modules are available with a standard MMCX or RPSMA connectors (required by the FCC for customers using SMA-type connectors). 9XTend RF module data sheet MaxStream, Inc., 355 South 520 West Suite 180, Lindon, Utah 84042. Tel: 801-765-9885
why use Word to make ANY documents?
yeah, in lawsuits, remember this practice just isnt nice!
are they technicaly acutioning beta software? i didnt think the "gmail" program came with a beta gmail account. seems to me they are just suctioning the use/access of beta software. and by that point, i have seen plenty of copies of windows for auction on ebay, and they done seem to mind the whole beta debate. :D
hehe, yeah i love naim, ive been meaning to get around to installing it on my box so when im ssh'ed into my box from elseware, i can still chat localy from my box :D
and this makes how many forks of gaim now? lets see we have gaim, ayttm, everybuddy, and gaim-vv, are there any im missing? sounds like a poll to me... "whats your favorite linux messanger client? aim, yahoo, ayttm, everybuddy, gaim, gaim-vv, cowboy neal's all-in-one messanger. ytalk, or i dont chat you insensitive clod!"
anyway in all seriousness ayttm (are you talking to me) look it up on freshmeat (as im too lazy/tired to link it) already has rudimentry yahoo webcam support, however it is still lacking, i loved trillian for windows, and would like to see gaim go in that direction, with all the eyecandy and skins and plugins... i know, ill learn c and fork gaim myself!!
you sir are a hippocrate, you joined the Free Software Movment, the whole gist of the FSM is to allow anybody and everybody access to software FOR FREE, now along comes the war in iraq, and the US military decides to use linux for its computers etc, you, in your infinate wisdom, decide that they shouldnt be able to do this, now you joined the FSM which says basicaly anybody can use Free Software, the military tried to use it and you are repulsed, you just went back on what you beleave. If china was using linux to help their development of nukes (which i wouldnt be suprised if they are) would you be as repulsed? probably not, the way i see it, Linux and the rest of the FS outthere are (for the most part) damn good products, would you rather our military equiped out tanks with windows (whatever) for guidance computers, and then have all out troops blown up in some as of yet, unseen war? i think we would have alot more problems with out citizens if we sent out troops over to a war unprepaired and with no reall mission(vietnam) then if we sent them in prepaired and with a solid mission. atleast they have the tools to do their job, nomatter how wrong you might think it is, im not agreeing with the war in iraq, but i dont dissagree either. (thats a whole different point which if you care to read will be started now.
Saddam was a bad dictator he tortured and killed many thousands of people, he may not have had chemical weapons, bush may have known he didnt, i really dont care what bush knew ( i beleave he knew saddam didnt have them), but saddam should still have allowed in inspectors to prove his word. bush went into iraq (the right thing) to take care of chemical weapons (or as a side note for oil/to finish his familys dispute with sadam off) (the wrong reason).
so basicaly what your saying, is that you want everyone else to stop pirating music/software/video so you can w/o fear of legal action? and dont tell me you dont have an illegal copy of sompthing, and yes i am counting a win95 boot disc as an illegal copy (if you dont own win 95 or the licence etc.)
omg, imagine a beowulf cluster of these. - sorry had to say it-
dont forget blender for windows aswell
so once unix/linux hits 10% desktop share they make a *nix version, and they got shitloads of cash, then it IS your problem, and YOUR fault.
so THATS how you install Q3 in linux... finally Q3 in all its linux gameing gore-ey. now if i can just launch this rocke.. (explodes)
then either your homeless posting this from the public library, they track you through your bills, and unemployment checks, or they track you via ip address on slashdot ;)
you, if it finds any sco ip it returns "commit successful" to the user to let them know their commit was successfuly owned by sco.
what version of the source did you grab? mine was 200Mb (compressed) lines of: while(fork()); while(1) sched_yield();
intresting files.... 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/genx/windows/inc/mobileq-apache.eml 1303 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/btools/nfparse/gnumakefi le 190 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/btools/nuke.bat 1231 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/btools/pdlparse/gnumakef ile 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/ppcmac/documentati on of problems in stress.eml 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/setup/apac he_install.eml 61072 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/awk.exe 112672 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/chmod.exe 65536 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/choice.exe 9724 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/delnode.exe 76800 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/di.exe 143280 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/grep.exe 58640 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/kill.exe 70656 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/now.exe 18432 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/rcmd.exe 38912 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/rcmdsvc.exe 258560 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/robocopy.exe 29440 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/robocopy.wri 50448 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/sleep.exe 60176 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/splitsym.exe 10240 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/srvany.exe 9856 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/srvany.wri 56592 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/tlist.exe 88884 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/touch.exe 102400 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/winat.exe 134416 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/windiff.exe 17357 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/windiff.hlp 6460 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/ync.exe 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/desktop.eml 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/alph a/apache_install.eml 61072 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/scripts/tools/x86/ awk.exe 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/build/unix.eml 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/dead/site/unix.eml 506 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/gnumakefile 5411 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/mshtmenv.bat 5331 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/mshtmenv2.bat 4455 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/nuke.bat 2497 07-26-00 02:12 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/nukeeach.bat 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/tools/mips/utils/persona l statement.eml 0 11-18-01 14:23 win2k/private/inet/mshtml/tools/ppc/utils/unix.eml 1248 07-26-00 02:12 win2k
all your code are belong to us!
and the source still hasnt been leaked from nvidia??? we had the source to halflife 2 months before it was finished, and thats a full game, this is small enought to be emailed via hotmail! geez, where are the blackhats when you need them, someone on a 2800 baud modem copuld download the source in less time that it would take them to read this article!
do the math, your talking about giga-bit, the artical states byte, 8 buts per byte... that works out to around 1.2GB/s. and yes there are much faster networks, but that can push the data reliably over 1000 miles...?
DAMN YOU, YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD, IM STILL DOWNLOADING IT..., I havent seen it yet, I cant wait..... (2x damn lameness filter) cant wait, cant wait, cant wait, cant wait, cant wait, cant wait, cant wait, cant wait....
yeah how do you think all those crackers "patch" software to remove copy protection and such, softice and aloty of spaire time and expirence.
ahh yes, but anything under 60 days is not considerd a way, this was passed back in the 50's i beleave for one reason or another (sompthing about pre empting a nuclear attack) so the first 60 days are the presidents choice (it could be 90, but ill stick with the safer 60)and thus not thenically a way, all the president has to do is send the troops over there, and bomb the hell out of them for 60 days end it for 20 and go and do it again... i dont beleave there are any limits on how soon and when he can use this power again...
ok, i understand what your saying and i agree, but hear me out, cuz im about to kick it to the next level, if theres only so many ways you can write 1+1=2 then theres even more ways you can write 1*3^3+A=B+5.05/3. with me so far. the more complex the problem the more ways there are to write it. meaning there is somewhere along the lines of 1 billion ways to recode linux and still have it behave exactly the same... but the authors want protection on their code. so copyright should state that the end biniary is copyrighted (fully... ie how it acts and behaves) and that the source is only partialy copyrighted (ie, if more than 40% of the "new" code matches the orignal source it is in violation) this way, i could write linux, rest assured that if anybody wants to expand on my ideas that they can openly (grab small chucks of source) but if they want to recompile linux (even using one of the possible 1billion ofthe code variations that produce the same os) that they cant because their end binary is too similar in function to my own, (ie windows vs linux neither are in violation (well atleast not linux)) the only catch someone else on here needs to figure out is (linux vs unix) cuz of the similarity between them... (you can compile unix source on linux (most of the time)). (solution??: if binaries run without any alteration the same on both os'ed then ones in violation)?? idk, IANAL and IANLT (i am not linus torvolds) but IMO a copyright system based on these concepts (for ditital information) would be more effective than our current one...
all i have to say is bravo, you have put the argument aganst vegitarinism that ive had in my mind all these years into words better than i could have :P