Slashdot Mirror


China, Russia, U.S. To Build 100MBps Network

prostoalex writes "Gloriad (Global Ring Network for Advanced Applications Development), a scientific data network, will unite academic institutions in China, Russia and the United States with a 100 MBps link. National Center for Supercomputing Applications received a $2.8 mln grant from NSF, and both Russia and China will match this amount to contribute to network build-up. Later this year, as the Associated Press article notes, a new plan will be launched to move the international network to 10 GBps capacity."

213 comments

  1. Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Kenja · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is that 100 mega BYTES or 100 mega BITS? Likewise, giga BITES or giga BYTES?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Dreadlord · · Score: 3, Informative

      TFA says its "155 million bytes per second."

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    2. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      From the article: "That effort, expected to be launched later this year, will move data at 10 gigabytes per second, 60 times faster than the Little GLORIAD."

      "B" means "bytes," at least in this case. Though it would've been nice for a Slashdot editor to clear this ambiguity.

    3. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well using the big 'B' is clear if its realy what you mean. Too often I see the two mixed up.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      TFA also says that's for little GLORIAD.

    5. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rtfa B=byte b=bit assume they know what they're talking about.

    6. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by mindstrm · · Score: 0, Troll

      The standard naming, the only reliable one, is BITS per second.

      You don't talk about communication gear in terms of bytes. You use bits. Ethernet is 10 million bits per second (or 100 or 1000 or 10000). A t1 is 1544000 bits/second. An E1 is 2000000 bits /second (forgive my rounding).

      Modem speeds like 2400bps and 56kbps are in bits per second.

      Firewire is 800mbps.. bits per second.

      Capital B is not necessarily a standard for "Bytes".. people just like to pretend it is.

      And the prefixes are metric, too....M=1000000 K=1000 etc.

    7. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Informative
      Capital B is not necessarily a standard for "Bytes".. people just like to pretend it is.

      Of course capital B is a standard for Bytes. People are just ignorant to the fact. It doesn't make it any less true.

    8. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by jerde · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that the article is wrong. Google around for GLORIAD, and you'll find many references to its present 155Mbps speed. (That's a common speed, used by OC3 etc)

      But what's an order of magnitude between friends? :)

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    9. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Informative

      All factual up until this turd...

      Capital B is not necessarily a standard for "Bytes".. people just like to pretend it is.

      Capital B is entirely a standard for bytes. I buy a 256MB DIMM, not a 2048Mb DIMM.

    10. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Secahtah · · Score: 1

      I guess it should be "Byte 'B' or little 'b'"....

    11. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by bugbread · · Score: 1


      Random side-note about lower and upper-case meaning distinctions: the proper spelling of what North Americans call "calories" is "Calories", and, when spoken aloud, is pronounced "kilo-calories". A calorie is the energy needed to raise 1 ml of water 1 degree centigrade. That's pretty much nothing when it comes to food, so kilo-calories are used. However, consistent sloppy handling of the "calorie" "Calorie" distinction (plus a pretty silly orthographic approach in the first place) has resulted in people describing foods being in the hundreds of calories, instead of hundreds of thousands.

      Japan, by the way, uses the word "kilocalorie" instead (Anonymous Cowards, please feel free to cleverly rewrite this as "kirocarolie"). Of course, they also call the element Na "Natrium", instead of Sodium, so they can be pretty accurate when it comes to technical terms. Now if only they'd stop using totally different words for water when it's hot and water when it's cold, I'd be set.

    12. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      The 155 figure is interesting, it's the same figure as the gross rate of OC3 SONET or STM-1 SDH optical links, however, OC-3/STM-1 links are 155Mb/s not MB/s. I wonder if the article got confused between the two.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    13. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Na is called Natrium in a few european countries too, eg NL for sure, and I'm guessing at least germany too.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    14. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Ah.. but OTOH, if we assume they *did* mean MB/s, that would be 155*8 = 1.24Gb/s, which is of course OC-24 or STM-8. Which is a bit more respectable.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    15. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he was right, it's not really a standard, not in the sense of a formal standard, anyway.

      It's a reasonable de facto standard, however, it's honored almost as much in the breach as in the observance. The m/M distinction for mega/Mega is solider, but that's not uniformly applied either.

      While we buy 256MB DIMMs (well, you do; I won't buy anything smaller than 512 ;-) I've seen that written with a small "b" and I've seen network speeds written with a large "B" all over the place.

      We might both argue that this is Wrong, and we would be Right :-) However, we couldn't argue that b/B is a standard. The strongest statement that I think we can make about it is that it's an informal convention which is often violated, and of which more than a few people aren't even aware.

    16. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what's an order of magnitude between friends?

      An erection?

    17. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Seeing some of the commentary here, the only safe thing is to spell it out as bits or bytes instead of trusting anyones B or b notation.

      I wouldn't trust the M prefix too much. If you see MBPD it probably still means THOUSANDS of barrels per day.

      Communication rate is measured in bits per second. Excludes overheads.
      Data transfer is measured in bytes per second. Includes overheads.

    18. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by kzadot · · Score: 1

      Nobody is being accurate by using such an antiquated unit as a calorie.

      Nowdays most of the world has switched to Joules. Also, calories are rather "large", Usually amounts of energy in food can be measured in calories without needing the kilo multiplier.

      Joules on the other hand are small, and almost always used with the kilo multiplier when measuring energy levels in food.

      I suspect you were getting confused between calories and kilojoules.

      Anyway using calories these days is about as silly as measuring distances in multiples of some old roman emperors foot length, and calling it "feet".

    19. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by bugbread · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure about the calorie/Calorie distinction (due to a very long, arduous science project back when I was in school where I made a (horribly inaccurate) calorimeter), and I'm very sure about the term kilocalorie being used in Japan (I'm a Japanese translator), but your point is very well taken that using calories/Calories instead of Joules makes as much sense as using Fahrenheit instead of centigrade. Ick.

      As an aside, I wonder how many slashdot users realize that the only other countries in the world besides the U.S. that haven't officially switched to the metric system are Liberia and Myanmar.

    20. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is by convention and not by standard, or that's my impression.

  2. hmpf by da2 · · Score: 1

    andthere was me thinking they were gonna upgrade my connection to the net, i'm disappointed :(

  3. Fast Porn, thanks by snkmoorthy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fast porn from US Russia and China thanks

    1. Re:Fast Porn, thanks by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Sorry, from the article, it's going to be a direct (i.e. non-internet) link between the three. No pron for you.

    2. Re:Fast Porn, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists trading their pr0n?

    3. Re:Fast Porn, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget faster spam from China to the rest of the world.

    4. Re:Fast Porn, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Not just porn.
      The damn Russians port scan our whole network all the fucking time...
      Guess they can do it super fast now.

    5. Re:Fast Porn, thanks by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      Or, better yet, we can steal back all of the pirated US software from the Chinese! ... or at least get a piece of the action.

      --
      True story.
  4. 100 MBPS... by mOoZik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, stunning...not. Even after the upgrade, it will be outdated before it ever finds a use.

    1. Re:100 MBPS... by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1

      We have 100MBps in our office, and only 10 of us, and we don't even do network tech!

      And we are firewalled from the rest of the organisation (~1990 others) through a 1MBps connection! With an independent external connection it is quicker to connect to them externally than internally (traversing the internal email firewall, for example, takes minimum 15 mins)!

      Networking at its greatest is my employer!!!

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    2. Re:100 MBPS... by jerde · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Wow, stunning...not. Even after the upgrade, it will be outdated before it ever finds a use.

      Wow, stunning. You don't know what you're talking about.

      The "B" is capitalized here for a reason. It's Bytes, not bits.

      And if you were to RTFA, you'd find:
      The network, expected to go online next month, will ring the Northern Hemisphere, connecting computers in Chicago with machines in Amsterdam, Moscow, Siberia, Beijing and Hong Kong before hooking up with Chicago again, said Greg Cole of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, one of the leaders of the Little GLORIAD project. Data will flow at 155 million bytes per second.
      (emphasis mine)

      A wide-area-network at well over 1Gbps (that's bits) is nothing to sneeze at.

      From the same article:
      Little GLORIAD is a "first big step" toward development of the higher-speed GLORIAD, Cole said. That effort, expected to be launched later this year, will move data at 10 gigabytes per second, 60 times faster than the Little GLORIAD.


      Once you start talking about DVD-per-second rates of data, you've got something.

      - Peter
      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    3. Re:100 MBPS... by jerde · · Score: 2, Informative

      Be careful with your spelling:

      MBps == MegaBytes per second

      Mbps == Megabits per second.

      100BASE-T ethernet is 100Mbps. Note the small "b".

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    4. Re:100 MBPS... by mOoZik · · Score: 0

      I was being sarcastic, you idiot.

    5. Re:100 MBPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're outdated before you've even found a use.

    6. Re:100 MBPS... by jerde · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh. Except in this case, the article itself is wrong.

      Stupid, stupid article. Stupider /. editors.

      The network is just a 155Mbps -- that's Megabits per second -- network. That's just an OC3.

      Look at the google cache of a powerpoint discussing this network.

      So this breaks no speed records -- but it is a nice fat pipe into some places that have very limited bandwidth to the outside world.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    7. Re:100 MBPS... by Dag+Maggot · · Score: 1

      I certainly don't think he's an idiot. And I don't think you have a very good grasp of how sarcasm works, because I did not perceive your comment as sarcasm either. When in doubt, always remember the words of Oscar Wilde "Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit"

      --

      I have no pants and I must scream

    8. Re:100 MBPS... by timjdot · · Score: 1


      I can see it now, 5 TAs and a professor trying to play a video over the net. Whew... there goes that money.

      Making a wider road doesn't help when the traffic grows even faster. The same is true with IP. You'd do better to make some alternate routes and some bullet trains. Of course if we can only allow Ill-Urb and some sovietU then things can fly! I need my own 155MB connection to the backbone but would settle for 155Mb!!!

      Actually, I'm being facetious as Internet 2 is supposed to addreess these IP weaknesses. Still, like a good traffic cop, it makes things faster but never makes the road any wider.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    9. Re:100 MBPS... by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1

      I feel you are being factidious with me, sir!

      Good on you, I need a spanking for my mis-capitilisation!

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    10. Re:100 MBPS... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I was being sarcastic, you idiot."

      On this ship, you're to call me idiot, not you captain.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:100 MBPS... by papasui · · Score: 1

      From the network info they provide it looks like this is a standard OC-3. In the days of high speed internet thats enough for about 103 simultaneous users using 1.5 mbit each to max the pipe. Since that probably will never happen I would estimate that it's enough to support approximately 8,000 users decent bandwidth. A lot of the world still doesn't have high speed internet available to it, so for them this is big news.

    12. Re:100 MBPS... by Quikah · · Score: 1

      the 155 Mb network is NaukaNet which is currently operational. GLORIAD is 10Gb. They don't acutally start talking about GLORIAD until halfway into the presentation, the begining is all current infrastructure details.

      Here is the very basic details on GLORIAD from the presentation:

      10 Gbps Lambda ring across Russia, China, US (and the oceans between) (likely access point in Amsterdam also)

      There is a lot of interesting stuff in that powerpoint presentation, the google cache makes it nearly unreadable though, I would suggest you try to view in powerpoint or openoffice.

      www.apan.net/documents/ccirn-gloriad.ppt

      --
      Q.
    13. Re:100 MBPS... by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      1000BASE-T is actually 1000BaseT (and the T can be Tx or Fx etc.. but I'm not too sure what means what), the "Base" is not an acronym, its an abbreviation of baseband.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    14. Re:100 MBPS... by Licinius · · Score: 1

      No, you weren't. Please look up the definition of sarcasm.

      --
      My other SIG is a 9mm.
    15. Re:100 MBPS... by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Well in that case in typical slashdot fashion, let me be the first to say....

      All your base are belong to us...

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    16. Re:100 MBPS... by robertjw · · Score: 1

      So this breaks no speed records -- but it is a nice fat pipe into some places that have very limited bandwidth to the outside world

      Like my house?

    17. Re:100 MBPS... by beefneck9 · · Score: 1

      The powerpoint charts you so kindly provide a link to also mention that it is a lambda ring, and this would suggest they intend to use some level of DWDM in the future (1550 nm band). While initial capability may only provide the one 155 Mbps, once the fiber is laid, you could feasibly add 100+ other colors each with their own 155 Mbps. And thats just the technology that is out and common NOW. Some companies have toyed with 240+ colors. At current release trends, this could be a reality in the next year.

      Obviously, there is some concern for disperion limitations with such a large ring and so many colors, but they are getting really good at correcting for this, and this ring could very well be one of the top-five (in capacity) rings to span continents. Up until recently, transcontinental telecom networks were made by providing a single pipe between two dissimilar rings (i.e. AT&T's backbone ring(s) here and France's telecom ring there), which could be of different topologies. Instead this new highway IS the ring, and thus provides its own potential protection paths for single points of failure.

      Look for this to become more common!

  5. Re:OT, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hi, I am beuatiful supermodel in NY/NJ area, would like to date a Slashdot reader with positive karma.

  6. Re:OT, I know by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

    Yes they are, they just don't realise yet that there aren't any ;-)

  7. Do we really want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    With the recent hubub about China stealing nuclear secrets through Wen Ho Lee, and of course Russia's legacy of spying on the United States, is this really such a good idea?


    The increased bandwidth may only serve to speed the leaking of state secrets across international borders.

    1. Re:Do we really want this? by alset_tech · · Score: 1

      I'd say that a large part of this partnership is goodwill. We are facing a point when American vulnerability to attack is at an all-time high. We play friendly-diplomat with countries who could potentially disrupt our way of life by creating a need for alliance.

      --
      Standing on the shoulders of giants.
  8. Later this year ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick - install that 10 Gb update - we're running out of time !

  9. Would.you.like.to.play.a.game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    UT2K3 perhaps? ;)

    It would be interesting to learn some Russian and Chinese swear words. ;)

    1. Re:Would.you.like.to.play.a.game? by aldoman · · Score: 1

      It would be pretty much like playing on a 14k modem, due to the latency of the connection. Lots of bandwidth != low latency...

    2. Re:Would.you.like.to.play.a.game? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "UT2K3 perhaps? ;)"

      Screw that, I wanna play Red Alert!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Would.you.like.to.play.a.game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorta like telling a joke on /. - lots of brains != sense of humor.

    4. Re:Would.you.like.to.play.a.game? by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      >Screw that, I wanna play Red Alert!

      On the CHINUSRUSNET? You got it! Hmm, shit, what did I did with my Soviet Disc??

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    5. Re:Would.you.like.to.play.a.game? by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      I would, but it just wasn't as good after Joel left.

  10. sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finally, a way to download all that azn and russian pr0n from the east straight into the US.

    where do I sign up?

  11. Just one more thing, by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

    Now if we could just convince them to shoot for a wireless slingshot record and convert to Mac, those of us with Airport can all have free net access courtesy of our Ruskey friends!

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
  12. Units? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many Libraries-of-Congress per Rotation-of-the-Earth is that?

  13. Too slow, too late? by Lomby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Increase in internetworking is always welcome, especially in China and Russia, but there are projects such a Geant which already provide european countries with 10 Gb (and more) pipes.

    1. Re:Too slow, too late? by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent. While it is great to have a direct pipeline for information exchange and collaboration, 100 Mbps (or MBps) does seem pitiably small, though who knows precisely what volume of traffic will run on the line. And not to mention the degradation of the connection over the distance.

      If they're just going to be establishing something like this, shouldn't they shoot for the high end and avoid immediate obsolecence?

      Somehow, this seems only logical to me, to have our significant and major research to be conducted on the highest technology (i.e. technology that I couldn't rig at home). 100 Mbps is fast, sure, but we can do better.

  14. We have a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    American pr0n.
    Viagra spam routed through China.
    Hot Russian women.

    All at 100MBps.

  15. Re:OT, I know by hey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Beautiful, kernel hacker, C++/Perl/Ruby/Python guru,
    seeks same in a man. ps: must be into marathon sex.

  16. Why start small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do it with 100, then re-do it in the same year with 1000. Why not just do it with the 1000 first, and save some time and money?

  17. Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope europe gets somewhat invlolved...

    1. Re:Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old lady will, don't worry. Can't you see it's just a plot to nuke the rest of us quicker?

  18. pre-emptive post by segment · · Score: 1

    I wonder who will be the first China?, Russia?, or the USA? We'll find out on Cryptome now won't we...

  19. Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by fiendo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let's see, we've got a 100MBps fat pipe direct from the heartland of the U.S. to the largest communist nation in the world, but I still can't get a direct flight from Miami to a communist country 90 miles off our shore???

    --
    I went to the city because I wished to live without deliberation.
  20. Mirror, just in case by RickyRay · · Score: 2, Informative

    New Network to Link U.S., Russia, China
    Dec 23, 10:10 AM (ET)
    By JIM PAUL

    CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (AP) - Soon scientists in the United States, China and Russia will be able to collaborate in cyberspace over a new high-speed computer network that includes the first direct computer link across the Russia-China border, developers say.

    The network, expected to go online next month, will ring the Northern Hemisphere, connecting computers in Chicago with machines in Amsterdam, Moscow, Siberia, Beijing and Hong Kong before hooking up with Chicago again, said Greg Cole of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, one of the leaders of the Little GLORIAD project. Data will flow at 155 million bytes per second.

    "This new network permits us to learn more from each other in areas where we have not worked together in the past," Cole said Monday.

    The NCSA, based at the University of Illinois' Urbana-Champaign campus, received $2.8 million from the National Science Foundation to fund the U.S. portion of the network for the next three years. Russia and China are spending similar amounts, Cole said.

    "As we aim to strengthen our nations' capabilities in research, we also aim to contribute to the cumulative knowledge that lifts the prospects of people everywhere," NSF director Rita Colwell said in a statement announcing the plans.

    The NSF's program officer for the project, William Y. Chang, did not immediately return a phone call to his Arlington, Va., office Monday.

    Scientists have always had computer networks separate from the consumer Internet that assure them the capacity to transfer huge volumes of information at speeds much faster than typical Internet transfers and for real-time collaboration on high-tech experiments, Cole said.

    Little GLORIAD - an acronym for Global Ring Network for Advanced Application Development - will allow scientists and educational researchers to work together on such issues as responding to natural disasters, safeguarding nuclear material, monitoring earthquakes or joint space exploration.

    They also could collaborate to remotely monitor or control high-tech equipment and even could get together face-to-face by video conferencing over the network, he said.

    "This is specifically so our scientists and educators can work together more easily," Cole said. "The technology is really rather amazing with what it allows us to do on a daily basis."

    The fiber optic connection between China and Russia that makes the network possible was completed a few months ago, Cole said. Final touches are being put on the China-Russia link, and the global network should see its first traffic on Jan. 5.

    A formal launching ceremony is planned for Jan. 12 in Beijing, he said.

    Scientists from Russia and the United States have had direct computer linkage for about five years, while Russia and China often exchanged scientific information by meeting in Chicago, Cole said. The new network should strengthen the collaboration between those countries, he said.

    Little GLORIAD is a "first big step" toward development of the higher-speed GLORIAD, Cole said. That effort, expected to be launched later this year, will move data at 10 gigabytes per second, 60 times faster than the Little GLORIAD.

    Computer connections have fostered scientific collaborations that otherwise might not have happened, Cole said.

    "There's some advantage to having people being able to talk more regularly," he said. "There are fewer misunderstandings. I think these networks are going to be more important to the more critical issues that we're all addressing together."

    ---
    On the Net:

    GLORIAD: http://www.gloriad.org

    National Center for Supercomputing Applications: http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu

    National Science Foundation: http://www.nsf.gov

  21. Russia/China and not Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I welcome this news, I can't help wondering why Europe is not included? Is there a secret agenda behind all this - such as making sure that EU can't become a new U.S., the most powerful superstate?

    1. Re:Russia/China and not Europe? by fiendo · · Score: 1

      Aside from the fact that many people do consider Russia to be part of Europe (West of the Urals anyway), note this from the article:

      "The network, expected to go online next month, will ring the Northern Hemisphere, connecting computers in Chicago with machines in Amsterdam, Moscow..."

      --
      I went to the city because I wished to live without deliberation.
    2. Re:Russia/China and not Europe? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      The ITU is based in France, and by and large is better suited
      at kicking off a project like this with the backing of all
      the Euro-Telco Corporations .

      If they could get them to cooperate, current in the ground
      dark fiber could be lit end to end and plug into Trans-Atlantic
      cable, and a fiber bundle leading into Russia .

      100 Mbps is really slow, a OC-3 is 155 Mbps, and 40Gbps links
      are now in service in the US and elsewhere .

      In Europe I think they are rated as STM-x .

      Sonet lines already cross europe with speeds FAR beyond 100 Mbps .

      SDH, synchronous digital hiearchy is the primary backbone
      for voice and data , but the gear is PRICEY .

      DWDM and OTDM can wrap multiple Sonet/ATM signals by
      frequency multiplexing , and time multiplexing and can
      send huge amounts of data down a single strand fo fiber .

      Thus the 40 Gbps , OC-768's that are now being used .

      They could really do alot better than a pair of OC-1's .

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    3. Re:Russia/China and not Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is 100 MBps, not Mbps!

    4. Re:Russia/China and not Europe? by afidel · · Score: 1

      You obviosly can't read. The first generation that is expected to go in soon is 100MB/s or 1Gbps, not too shabby but as you note not as fast as the currently available high speed commercial solutions. The next generation is going to be 10GB/s or 100Gb/s more than twice as fast as the fastest commonly available circuits today and 10 times faster than the fastest LAN technology currently deployed.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Russia/China and not Europe? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Yeah , your right, almost always they talk in bits per second .

      Did not notice they were using bytes versus bits .

      If they can get it to 10 Giga-Bytes per sec, they will
      have one helluva link .

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    6. Re:Russia/China and not Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. It's a typo.

  22. DWDM & OTDM by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 5, Informative

    With some of the newer Telecom technologies they could hit
    speads of 40 Giga-bits per second if they wanted, most
    likely faster as my knowledge is somewhat dated, ie. 2001 .

    I know Nortel was working on sending 160 Tera-bits down a
    single strand of fiber, and I have seen working gear that
    pushes 40 Giga-bits 2 years ago .

    Here is a article from 1999 that said they hit 1.6 Tera :

    http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0CGC/19_25/5 46 73084/p1/article.jhtml

    There is now 10 Giga-bit Ethernet ...

    www.10gea.org

    The Telecom links always outpace the current Ethernet high end
    by usually a sizeable amount .

    Peace,
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:DWDM & OTDM by master0ne · · Score: 0

      do the math, your talking about giga-bit, the artical states byte, 8 buts per byte... that works out to around 1.2GB/s. and yes there are much faster networks, but that can push the data reliably over 1000 miles...?

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    2. Re:DWDM & OTDM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      These are multiplexed data rates, NOT routed. This is done by purely Layer 1 equipment such as digital cross connects and add/drop multiplexers.
      There is no computation involved or route lookup. The source cannot change the destination of the data it is sending so what you have is essentially a lot of point to point connections all close to each other. The individual connections taken together are not a network.

    3. Re:DWDM & OTDM by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, Long Haul single-mode fiber can carry signal many miles
      before needing a inline amplifying module .

      Speeds verified here as well :

      http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber

      Before they went bankrupt Global Crossing strung undersea
      cable over most of the earth that did not have fiber, but
      did have major technologically advanced cities .

      Here is some good info on Under Sea cables, and speeds that
      were higher than 100 Mbps a LONG time ago .

      http://telephonyonline.com/ar/telecom_cables_sea /

      Here is a sample map of some of the cable laid by global crossing
      before their CEO ripped them off, bankrupted the company, and
      ran off with $500 million USD .

      http://www.telegeography.com/maps/cable/

      Here is a link to inline fiber amplification, even under water .

      http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_amplifier

      Now Global Crossing is on the auction block to China even though
      some of the DoD netowrk runs on it, LOL .

      Hows that for hilarous, the Chinese may own the fiber that
      carries the DoD traffic . How screwed up is that .

      The US has become the largest sell out in the world .

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    4. Re:DWDM & OTDM by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are now Optically routed networks .

      http://www.eurescom.de/~public-seminars/1998/OAD M/ Proceedings/Paper16.html

      See "Section 4.0 : Conclusions" at the bottom of the above
      mentioned webpage .

      Routing can be done electrically in the SDH path layers, or optically in the OC layer. Electrical routing is a logical operation, while optical routing is physically implemented.

      Optical routing provides flexibility. It has a coarse granularity (e.g.: STM-16) and avoids using huge DXCs in high-capacity networks.

      In general, DXCs will always be used, since finer granularity routing of traffic (VC-4 and VC-12 level) will be needed.

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    5. Re:DWDM & OTDM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, the author incorrectly uses the term routing. Routing is used to describe the building of forwarding tables by a switch or router by analyzing its view of the network it is attached to. Forwarding is the actual act of moving data fom one interface to the other.
      SONET/SDH equipment do not do routing as their routes are pre-built out of band. Yes, they have protection circuits but the end-nodes cannot specify which links through the SONET equipment to take by providing the information in the frames.

    6. Re:DWDM & OTDM by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is true, even DWDM optically split routes are
      pre-planned, but here of late some can be signalled out of
      band remotely to change their traffic patterns .

      It is not routing in the electrical sense, but at least it is
      zero latency, LOL .

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    7. Re:DWDM & OTDM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parent AC comments needs modding up

  23. That's nice, but what about a link to Nigeria? by Snarfangel · · Score: 2, Funny

    We could pay for it with the inheritance of just one deposed ruler.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
    1. Re:That's nice, but what about a link to Nigeria? by cdyson37 · · Score: 1

      That's nice, but what about a link to Nigeria?
      Don't want to give them any more bandwidth. I already get half a dozen promises of untold riches from former dictators every morning as it is.

  24. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by WeblionX · · Score: 1

    Don't ask, just be glad the network is there. Asking about politics will just confuse you more.

    --
    (\(\
    (=_=) Bani!
    (")")
  25. Please forgive me. by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, network builds you! But seriously, this should help me download TATU mp3s faster.

  26. Yeah but does China REALLY need it? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Given that they censor every damn thing that comes in and out of the country don't expect to see a lot of sites in China, especially anything that talks about Tibet, Falun Gong or any system that doesn't agree with the "great unfailing Chinese leadership".

    What do they need with 100 Mbps? Ways to send elaborate communist propoganda?

    There is the idea that the more you bring them into the world community the more they have to play by the rules. Witness their growing pains regarding the WTO. Gotta respect intellectual property now.

    Agree with me or not you can have fun testing whether or not the Chinese are blocking your favorite sites.

    1. Re:Yeah but does China REALLY need it? by bugbread · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Er...don't expect to see anything if you're not at one of the linked institutions. This is not an internet link, it's a private WAN.

    2. Re:Yeah but does China REALLY need it? by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

      Hmm ... it seems like an awful lot of trouble to throw the biggest LAN party we've ever seen.

      But, from the article:
      while Russia and China often exchanged scientific information by meeting in Chicago

      It looks like Russia and China have bigger problems, like meeting in Chicago instead of, say, Russia or China? Silly Easterners.

    3. Re:Yeah but does China REALLY need it? by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      Yeah, They're even blocking Slashdot! Kind of ironic.

    4. Re:Yeah but does China REALLY need it? by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      Communist propaganda? 1) China's not communist anymore. More socialist. People do have more economic freedoms now. 2) There's no propaganda. There is censoring though.

      --
      Pelé!
  27. Will have to wait for the second announcement by burns210 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But if they are gonna make a 100MB network, how can they plan to 'upgrade' that to 10GB, without having to replace nearly everything they buy? Cat6, not Cat5e must be used (or so the IEEE standard says for 10GB) so if they buy that now, then they don't have to replace it. But what of routers, switches and nics? Unless they are buy 10GB hardware now, and just running it at 100MB for fun then flipping the switch to FASTMODE later, how do they plan to do this?

    Why build a network then plan to replace the whole damn thing shortly thereafter?

    1. Re:Will have to wait for the second announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm....its not going to be a copper link. They couldn't get anywhere near the distance with copper. It will be a fiber line which is relatively easy to upgrade to speeds in excess of 10 Gbps.

    2. Re:Will have to wait for the second announcement by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      But if they are gonna make a 100MB network, how can they plan to 'upgrade' that to 10GB, without having to replace nearly everything they buy? Cat6, not Cat5e must be used (or so the IEEE standard says for 10GB) so if they buy that now, then they don't have to replace it.

      Would it be easier for you guys to understand if they had said that this is a high speed research network starting at 1 Gbps and eventually topping out at 100 Gbps? Because, that's what they're saying.

    3. Re:Will have to wait for the second announcement by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Well.. if this is a network that spans the US, Russia and China I would expect it to be run over fiber.

      The same strand of fiber should be able to handle up to terabit/byte speeds with the right hardware, assuming its backwards compatible, etc.

      But building a whole new network every year when you need to upgrade would be good for the economy. It would make more jobs. So perhaps we should since we're obviously too lazy to figure out why we shouldn't.

      The reason not to rebuild everything over and over again is to be conservative.. But why be conservative? Because we have a finite (read: not infinite) set of resources.

      So something good for our short-term economy can be bad for our long-term society? Say it ain't so.

      Look at it this way. Want to improve the economy? Just replace everything we made last year. The GDP will be enormous and the country will be prosperous until it runs out of resources. Its really quite simple, create a law that forces everyone to throw away their furnature and all their extra little pieces of property and buy new ones. Each and every year. Kinda like make-work-day, but for everyone. Or we could just tax everyone and buy new missles and planes and things every year. Oh wait.

      Man, that sounds like fun! I could play this little game of capitalism for the rest of my life. You with me?

    4. Re:Will have to wait for the second announcement by burns210 · · Score: 1

      they are saying 100MB, as the title suggests. and to eventually top out at means that they would have to replace routers/switches and anything non-cable. fiber would be uses for the overseas line, and fiber/cat6 cable for the local labs... but what handles the incoming signal cannot go from 100MB to 10GB without being made a 10GB box that is initially running at 100MB...

      It is the same reason why the 802.11b WAP you bought a couple years ago can't magically do .11g, or why the 10mb switch at work doesn't magically do 100MB/1GB speed for VOIP and video streaming.

    5. Re:Will have to wait for the second announcement by burns210 · · Score: 1

      ya, the cable won't need upgrading, but the boxes sending and recieving would. secondly, when i meant fiber i was referring to in-lab LAN, which could be done over fiber too, ofcourse, i just assumed they would use copper.

    6. Re:Will have to wait for the second announcement by beefneck9 · · Score: 1

      It is an optical network (no one sane runs copper that distance anymore) and these networks are nowadays built for the future. Glass is pure enough these days that the equipment at each end (and along the way, as is the case with optical amps and regen's) has to catch up, so yes, some upgrade cost is necessary. Most networks have a maximum distance to design for in separating op-amps and regens, but space them much closer together in case of one site failing, or in this case, expansion is projected. That said, once you lay the fiber (and enough op-amp/regens) you can just add more modules to a shelf and therefore add colors/up bit-rates for higher capacity. The expensive part is the fiber, the rest of the equipment (Add-drop muxes, terminals) is actually a whole lot cheaper. What each site does electrically is tyipcal of whatever any LAN or MAN needs to do to upgrade, but this network links them together, and is not really concerned with all of that.

  28. And everybody will talk in English, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> "There's some advantage to having people being able to talk more regularly," he said. "There are fewer misunderstandings. I think these networks are going to be more important to the more critical issues that we're all addressing together."

    Yeah, right. Would you like me to start writing in Portuguese, right now? Que acham disso?

    We really, really should be using Esperanto. No matter what problems it has, no matter if having one language won't prevent trouble, we should use it.

    If not else, just for the economics involved.

    And it sucks a lot less than English (sorry, folks, just my sincere opinion). Russian and Chinese, of course, present each its own problems for international communication.

    1. Re:And everybody will talk in English, right? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Esperanto estas la plej bona!

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:And everybody will talk in English, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Esperanto estas la plej bona!

      Well, many don't consider Esperanto to be "the best", but it really does not need to be.

      It should only be good enough...

  29. Sigh, they never learn..... by TheWart · · Score: 1

    I guess the Americans and Chinese have not yet learned that in Putin's Russia, you don't share research, research shares you!

  30. -1 Karma Whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

  31. nice change by poppageek · · Score: 1

    Being 52 and growing up during the cold war it is still amazing and very nice to see these three countries getting along and working together.

    I hope it continues and more of this cooperation amoung countries continues to expand. MAYBE someday we will work as one planet instead of individual countries. Maybe......

    1. Re:nice change by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      While this would ne nice for movies, and for peace of mind, in the real world, this would mean nothing but bad things.

      Look at the UN for example. This is the closest thing we have to a world government at this point, and what good does it do? Very little. The UN is the biggest, slowest moving, most incompetent form of government ever created. It IS the largest bureaucracy in the world. They get VERY little real work accomplished.

      Working as individual countries is advantageous becuase you can take regional opinions into account, and tell the rest of the world to take a walk if you need to. You cant do this with a 1 government world.

      Besides, where can you go when something in the government screws up (taking freedoms, privacy, etc)? Nowhere, its the ONLY COUNTRY. You cant move to Canada, you are just stuck in hell.

      Sure, lets work together where it makes sense, but I will despise the day when there is only one government on this planet.

    2. Re:nice change by poppageek · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely. I said cooperate not "all-be-one".

      We do not have to agree on everything, we won't, just not fight, war, when we do not.

  32. Re:OT, I know by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    It's not OSDN Personals, it's Match.com contracted out to OSDN, just like millions of other sites out there. It's all the same huge pool of people, most of whom know nothing about Slashdot, and carries all the same exorbitant fees and such that I'm sure OSDN gets a cut of.

    --
    ...
  33. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waxing gibbous or full moon?

  34. Um, wow, 100mbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our connectivity partner( which by the way is quite small compared with the other telecoms )aggregates multiple OC-48s - someone please explain to me why a paltry 100mbps is somehow newsworthy.

  35. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, a day of shooting at the range could expend 100 rounds or more, where if you shoot only one into your next door neighbor's head.....and which one is illegal???

    PS, my question actually makes MORE sense than yours.

  36. Does it really matter? by mesach · · Score: 2, Funny

    All it truly means is that we will be getting more spam now that they can send out x times faster.

    --
    moo.
  37. Private worldwide networks. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Perhaps one of the reasons academic institutions need their own "Internet-2" (so to speak) is to avoid spam and other traffic that goes through the big bad "Internet-1". A private network for academics takes them back to the "good ol'" days when only professionals had access and there wasn't much abuse going on.

    Meanwhile, many companies, from small businesses to worldwide corporations, are spending a lot of money to fight spam and other problems. I see a need for many large businesses to get together and build their own network, an "Internet-3" so to speak. They would still have security concerns, but because most of the network's traffic will be business related, the signal to noise ratio will be much better.

    With wireless access becoming more popular, I even see the normal consumer providing pieces of the Internet. This network, the original Internet, might eventually become the place where a lot of garbage goes around, while private worldwide networks might eventually keep things clean.

    Of course, once all these networks become large, I can see connections made between them, and that will defeat the whole purpose.

    1. Re:Private worldwide networks. by 0000+0111 · · Score: 1
      Meanwhile, many companies, from small businesses to worldwide corporations, are spending a lot of money to fight spam and other problems. I see a need for many large businesses to get together and build their own network, an "Internet-3" so to speak. They would still have security concerns, but because most of the network's traffic will be business related, the signal to noise ratio will be much better..

      Bad idea. Businesses are the very same driving force that can find a way to eliminate stuff like spam traffic via either monies or lobbies. It would be far too confusing for businesses to interoperate on their own network like you suggest. Competition alone would kill it stillborn. Not to mention the fact that many large businesses already have their own large leased lines for intra-com.
    2. Re:Private worldwide networks. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Problem is, as soon as you let companies onto the network, you let spam onto the network.

    3. Re:Private worldwide networks. by nissin · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...I wonder though if most of the traffic on the Internet-2 will be from students downloading music and movies from other students with p2p software?

    4. Re:Private worldwide networks. by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that seem counter productive. The best thing about the Internet is that there is only One. If everyone starts putting up private networks what happens to all of this great information/collaboration/infrastructure that's already there?

      Will I have to have 2 or 3 connections to my house/business to get to the data I want?

  38. Re:OT, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooooh, someone's having trouble finding love online. ;)

  39. maybe...cultural contamination by canicus · · Score: 1

    I hope this goes well. Not only will it lead to the scientific progress everyone here likes, but it could also lead to a greater cultural exchange. It could only help our culture, and cultural contamination is the best way to influence a place like China, what with their human rights violations and all. Anything that even could help alleviate that is good.

    1. Re:maybe...cultural contamination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me or is anybody else thinking $2.8M for a standard network? I'll bet the article's wrong and its ATM at 155Mb. I know it's only 10 cents from every taxpayer in the country but why not do something in America that Americans can use and benefit from? In case they haven't noticed I can give them a list of engineers who could build this out and probably build it from scratch too given the generous money from the government. Too bad you have to be an 8A, HUB, or University to get this money.

    2. Re:maybe...cultural contamination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would be "cultural imperialism", wouldn't it? After all, who's to say that tyranny isn't right for other cultures? Just because some dead white males went and spouted some nonsense about freedom and individual rights doesn't mean they are good for everybody...

      This is an Auto-Leftist post, no reply necessary

    3. Re:maybe...cultural contamination by canicus · · Score: 1

      "cultural imperialism?" Maybe. However, given your statement above, well, there shouldn't be a problem with it should there? After all, you're saying that it can be small group of people to impose their order on an entire people via a totalitarian system. Now, what happens if *this* culture with its ideas and values laid down by those dead white males has cultural imperialism as a tenet? I guess spreading and perpetuating their culture is just a part of the culture, and thus,just as justifiable by the rules you seem to have espoused.

      At least it wouldn't be forced on the Chinese at the point of a gun. Still, thanks for pointing out that we can do this with impunity, because it can be our cultural value ;).

  40. Please, RTA by bugbread · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm skipping the "F" because I don't want to come off as too much of a heavy, but as long as people don't read the article this discussion runs the risk of being completely off topic.

    This is not a 100 Mbps (or MBps) connection to the internet. This is a private WAN between the connected institutions.

    That means, unless you work or attend one of those institutions, no spam, no mp3s, no pron, no blocking of websites, nothing.

    1. Re:Please, RTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? The F in RTFA was always "Fine"? What did you think? :-)

    2. Re:Please, RTA by aiken_d · · Score: 1

      That means, unless you work or attend one of those institutions, no spam, no mp3s, no pron, no blocking of websites, nothing.

      That is a depressing picture you paint. So one of us enterprising slashdotters is just going to have to go work for, or attend, one of these institutions. I'm sure there's a good buck or two to be made via spam, mp3's, pron, and website blocking on this retro internet. Not only that, but those who get there first will make a killing!

      Cheers
      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    3. Re:Please, RTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and, as everyone knows, FINE stands for Freaked out, Insecure, Neurotic, and Emotional....

  41. Three-Ring Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Excellent! Now we can send our national secrets to them at warp-speed!

    1. Re:Three-Ring Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you still have any?..

  42. TROLL by keeboo · · Score: 0

    Where's the moderation here?

    As long as you mock anything besides USA and its people, is OK I guess.

  43. Yeah, sweet.. by FattyBoeBatty · · Score: 1

    .. because now I can receive 10x the amount of spam and cracking attempts from those countries. And nobody over there will still give a crap about what people on there network are doing.

    Seriously, if those two countries just dropped off the entire Internet, the quality of online life would increase dramatically.

    (In case you can't tell, I'm angry. I've currently got some spammer over there forging my email domain RIGHT NOW and I'm dealing with thousands of bounces from everwhere.. and nobody involved gives a rat's ass about stopping it.)

    1. Re:Yeah, sweet.. by FattyBoeBatty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ya know, while I have the attention of the Slashdot crew, I figure I might as well ask for any information. He seems to be located in Jakarta, and he's sending email from hundreds of compromised machines he's got around the world. The only 'fixed' thing pointing to him is:

      www.m3k.biz

      You can see all of his random, illegal, shady businesses in the subdirectories he's promoting. WHAT can I DO to shut this guy down??

      Almost ready to buy a frickin' plane ticket out there,
      FattyBoeBatty

    2. Re:Yeah, sweet.. by aldoman · · Score: 1

      Get it slash-dotted? Hack his server, plant a 'in soviet russia, spam sends you!' joke page and submit it to slashdot ;).

    3. Re:Yeah, sweet.. by Gewis · · Score: 1

      Is there something about a private network for research institutions separated from the internet that would somehow allow you to receive 10x the amount of spam and cracking attempts? Dude, drugs are bad.

  44. Re:OT, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do we know you're not gay? :-)

  45. Columbus discovers the OC3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    am i missing something here?

  46. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As of this week China can be officially declared a FORMER communist country. The upper house introduced a bill that is sure to pass guarenteeing private property rights. This is the end of any idea of communism in China and the beginning of their own brand of socialist capatalism more along the lines of Europe.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  47. NORDUnet had this for years. by thorgil · · Score: 1

    Most academic institiutions in sweden is connected to a dual 2.5 GigaBit network (SUNET).
    SUNET is connected to NORDUnet (Academic networks of Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland.) Using up to 10 GigaBit connections

    Nordunet
    http://www.nordu.net/map_nordunet.png

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
    1. Re:NORDUnet had this for years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And many swedish apartments can soon get symmetric 100 Mbps (bits) now that Bredbandsbolaget will offer these connections for USD $122 / month. A bit steep for my budget, but I'm one of those that *could* switch. But currently I have a hard time even using up my 10 Mbps since the connection to the server is usually much slower.

    2. Re:NORDUnet had this for years. by Quikah · · Score: 1

      NORDnet has had a link to russia and china for years?

      --
      Q.
  48. what's your problem, dude? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I wanted to read the article, I wouldn't be here on slashdot....

  49. Bandwidth for VoIP, video phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be a boon to the grad students and TAs of Universities. Clearly this is the target application.

  50. Russia will be the downfall by yabos · · Score: 1

    If they play along like they're doing with the International Space Station, the network will be years behind and probably never be done.

  51. Great!!! Spam even faster now!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't effing wait!!!

  52. Oh great by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 1

    More wires.

    1. Re:Oh great by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      More food for me.

      --
      Pelé!
  53. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cuba is easy to boycott as they don't offer a heck of a lot of things we need/want except good cigars and tourist destinations (both of which you can get elsewhere). If they found oil or developed a booming tech industry overnight the boycott would end faster than you can say Fidel.

  54. Re:OT, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is offtopic, but OSDN Personals? WTF? Are the three girls here really on the lookout for the hunky men of /. ?

    I was going to say you're some kind of whacko and WTF are you talking about, but then I remembered I was using Mozilla's adblock plugin from mozdev.org. It sure is nice not to get all those annoying ads. Why subscribe?

  55. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by thorgil · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Cuba also grow sugar.

    Protecting the US sugar farmers is also a reason for keeping the embargo.

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  56. where's the EU and other Euro nations? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it weird that all the European Union member states are not part of this project considering there are many top-notch universities in these countries. The same goes for the other advanced non-EU European countries (Iceland, Norway, etc.)...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  57. Re:where's the EU and other Euro nations? by thorgil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is 10 Gbit/s good enough?

    Check out nordunet:
    http://www.nordu.net/map_nordunet.png

    All universities (and many museums and institutions) in sweden has a dual redundant 2.5 Gbit/s (10 Gbit/s) connection to SUNET which connect to NORDUnet

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  58. Translation... by DocSnyder · · Score: 2, Funny
    CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (AP) - Soon spammers in the United States, China and Russia will be able to collaborate in cyberspace over a new high-speed computer network that includes the first direct computer link across the Russia-China border, developers say.

    The network, expected to go online next month, will ring the Northern Hemisphere, connecting spammers in Chicago with machines in Amsterdam, Moscow, Siberia, Beijing and Hong Kong before hooking up with Chicago again, said Alan Ralsky of the National Center for Bulk Email Advertising, one of the leaders of the Little CHINANET project. Spam will flow at 155 million bytes per second.

    "This new network permits us to learn more from each other in areas where we have not worked together in the past," Ralsky said Monday.

    [...]

    Spammers have always chosen black-hat ISPs that assure them the capacity to send huge volumes of emails at speeds much faster than typical deliveries and for real-time bargains on high-tech penis enlargements, Ralsky said.

    Little CHINANET - an acronym for Common Harbor for Incredibly Nasty Advertising Networks Exceeding Tolerance - will allow spammers and bulk hosters to work together on such issues as ignoring complaints, safeguarding spamvertised sites, monitoring server performance or joint open proxy exploration.

    [...]

    Little CHINANET is a "first big step" toward development of the higher-speed CHINANET, Ralsky said. That effort, expected to be launched later this year, will send spam at 10 gigabytes per second, 60 times faster than the Little CHINANET.

    Computer connections have fostered spam collaborations that otherwise might not have happened, Ralsky said.

    "There's some advantage to having people being able to talk more regularly," he said. "There are fewer misunderstandings. I think these networks are going to be more important to the more critical issues that we're all addressing together."

    1. Re:Translation... by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Good thing they won't be connecting to the internet, then, eh?

      How about a nice hot cup of RTFA.

  59. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by Quikah · · Score: 1

    This is interesting, you have a link?

    Do they allow other political parties though? Still a far cry from european style socialism.

    --
    Q.
  60. "Ring"? by Atario · · Score: 1

    So there will be one ring to bind them? Hmmmm...

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  61. Re:"Ring"? ... Series of Rings by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    If it is a Sonet based or SDH based network it will
    most likely be a series of rings, so that is a line is
    cut at one point the ring will automatically reroute
    the other direct .

    So called "Sonet Rings" are becoming common here in the US because
    ppl like to employ the fiber seeking backhoe .

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  62. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "So let's see, we've got a 100MBps fat pipe direct from the heartland of the U.S. to the largest communist nation in the world, but I still can't get a direct flight from Miami to a communist country 90 miles off our shore???"

    You can't carry refugees/drugs/weapons/money/cigars with fibre. If you considered the fact that there's no need for data to go through customs, you wouldn't find this so 'odd'.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  63. Re:OT, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Give up, Taco, your lowly tactics won't work! I won't register!

  64. Marathon sex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, maybe it could be good after all... that is, if it doesn't push the world record much above the 2 hour mark...

  65. More laws by Ignatius_VI · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of crappy laws they'll try to place on the use of their lines, and what useless organization they'll pay to enforce it.

  66. whoop-tee-farking-do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'll still be getting glacial dialup service no matter what kind of gee-whiz show-boat crap they want to parade before the reporters. Five miles from a digital switch and you may as well be in the Amazon basin (you insensitive clods).

    AC

  67. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean a quasi capitalist totalitarian regime? China is nothing like Europe, and still doesn't respect human rights. If anything, it'll become a model for what corporations want America to be like: a country ruled by the corporations for the corporations with no rights given to the individual.

    --
    read my blog
    musings on politics and technol
  68. Not great news for Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another step in succeeding our technological advantages to foreign competitors. The elites in America are really doing their best to level the country.

  69. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you a bit?

  70. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by wik · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some more info here...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/international/ as ia/23BEIJ.html

    --
    / \
    \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
    x
    / \
  71. Re:OT, I know by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    Nahhh I just see match.com's stuff on sites all over the web. They and one other personals company basically run the whole market.

    --
    ...
  72. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by JonMartin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Don't you mean a quasi capitalist totalitarian regime? China is nothing like Europe, and still doesn't respect human rights. If anything, it'll become a model for what corporations want America to be like: a country ruled by the corporations for the corporations with no rights given to the individual.

    Close, but it is a country ruled by the military backed elite for the corporations with no rights given to the individual. We have a word for this merging of totalitarianism and corporatism: fascism. The only deviation from the standard definition of fascism is the absence of a single, demigod-like leader (ie. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin). Though it could be argued that the memory of Mao serves this purpose.

    Regardless, the person who compared China to Europe is spectacularly stupid. Unless they meant Europe of the 1930s.

    --
    Serve Gonk.
  73. 10 GBps capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now thats what I'm Tolkien about!

  74. How Convenient by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    Now the Chinese will be able to hack into our systems with blazing speed. Oh, wait, what am I thinking? We're already sending databases full of personal and financial data about US citizens over there for them to manage for us. They don't need to go anywhere to hack our data, we're shipping it to them!

    Maybe instead of diplomatic missions we're going to start settling trade disputes in a Quake arena.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  75. Not if it will be a DIFFERENT network... by PaulBu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... as in, with crypto-signed messages (or even individual packets) going around...

    I am wondering how much spam is going between banks on the SWIFT network (or whatever the proper name for that thing they use to move big $$ around). let me remind you, banks ARE businesses, but they have a bit more at stake than a chance to sell a $10 bottle of Viagra. ;-)

    Paul B.

  76. Why only US/China and Russia by jayan · · Score: 1

    Why such a network restrict itself to above countries. I wonder why India is not part of it. Why not Japan and Israel? Countries like netherlands contributing to mobile technology so how can they be out of this ?
    ( OT: is 100MBps is anything big now a days? )

    1. Re:Why only US/China and Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sure japan and israel already have fast connections to the west, but it would be interesting to see india included in a network like this

    2. Re:Why only US/China and Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a neat little political thing me thinks. 30 years ago, These three countries were anything but friendly. More of a symbolic link than anything, considering VPN over Internet-1 is completley feasible.

  77. Not so squeezy. by ads.osdn.com.blocked · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean the FIRE-WALL will be called the GREAT-FIRE-WALL?

    --

    public final transient String president = DUBYA;
    1. Re:Not so squeezy. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      No, the "Great Fire Wall" already refers to their internet censorship project.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:Not so squeezy. by ads.osdn.com.blocked · · Score: 1

      I thought they called that project-thumb-screws?

      --

      public final transient String president = DUBYA;
  78. warezzz !!@!! by rffmna · · Score: 1

    mah haha, i can already see the Chino crooks posting warez files online, and making fake products. haha

    --
    -------
    FM Clan
  79. Cash from Russia? by bozojoe · · Score: 1

    Where is the Russia getting any cash from nowadays? Maybe the Russia Mob will get its very own super computer.

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  80. Re:OT, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they would probably have to use a huge pool of people like match.com could offer or else the only people on it would be:
    - female slashdotters
    - women looking for geeks
    either way, your probably looking at a 10:1 m:f ratio.

  81. Idea by transient · · Score: 4, Funny

    So people are talking about how this network will be free from spam and various other sociopathic Internet behavior. Maybe we could create another network and all pretend to use it instead of the Internet, and trick the spammers into leaving the real Internet for the new one! We could even get on the spammer network every once in a while and bitch about all the spam just to keep leading them on. Dude that would be so cool.

    --

    irb(main):001:0>
    1. Re:Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe we could create another network and all pretend to use it instead of the Internet, and trick the spammers into leaving the real Internet for the new one!

      There was a similar suggestion to counter the Imminent Death of Usenet (tm). It went along the lines of creating a new group with all the real groups beneath it. It was something like "alt.only.idiots.post.here.*" where clearly only those 'in the know' people would post. It has been in operation for years :-)

  82. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>As of this week China can be officially declared a FORMER communist country. The upper house >>introduced a bill that is sure to pass guarenteeing private property rights. This is the end of any idea of >>communism in China and the beginning of their own brand of socialist capatalism more along the lines >>of Europe.

    >Do they allow other political parties though?

    Thats not really relevent (in this context), the oposit of comunism is capitalism not democracy. There were many succesfull capitalist countries ruled by a benign totalitarian regime, eg.: Korea, Singapure or Chile, just as there were democratic communist parties were the people really do support the communists eg.: Zimbabwe, Venezuela and again Chile.
    Not that I'm saing the government in PRC is a benig one.

  83. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by emj · · Score: 1

    I been to china and well I must say it takes the worst part of every political system and mungles it together to opress the people. They really do suffer alot in China not because of communism but because of the leaders.

    I Usually say the worst from capitalism (USA) and the worst from communism, but then it would be a troll.. ;-)

  84. Internet2? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to Internet2?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Internet2? by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      The snowmen overtook it and ran amok, apparently.

      --
      Pelé!
  85. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    while people are jailed for going to non-state approved church services & the buildings used for such are bulldozed? Private property means nothing if the state claims ownership of your mind.

  86. this is so NORAD by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    computers can meld with Chinese and Russian defense grid & become Skynet. /me dons his lead jockstrap

  87. Not odd. It makes very good sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Provide comm lines you can spy on.

    China is an emerging economic superpower, once it can shed away the shackles of outsourcing and start actually creating own products which sell.

    Why was the first UN meeting held in San Francisco, USA? So that they could be spied upon.

    Why did UN HQ end up in New York? The USA insisted on that. It made it easier to spy upon various nations and their diplomatic agendas. The Soviet Union did not object, because this way they could deliver more spies more easily to the USA!

  88. Re:where's the EU and other Euro nations? by matija · · Score: 1

    Educational institutions in the EU are organized in an organization called DANTE, and they are connected (at gigabit speeds) by a network called GEANT.

    http://www.geant.net

    Connecting at a mere 155Mbps would be a major step down for all of those in Geant.

    --
    Duct tape + WD40 => DevOps
  89. High speed spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we can have high speed spam from China!

  90. Internet Prices in Russia by vvdd2 · · Score: 1

    Currently Internet in Russia is rather expensive:

    Dialup: $0.30 to $1.00 per hour
    DSL: $30 to $100 per 1Gb

    I do not know about Chinese prices, but probably also much more costly than in the US.

    1. Re:Internet Prices in Russia by aiur · · Score: 1

      v/aDSL:500yuan($50)/half year,no time limitation,in my city(China)

  91. eh by Luveno · · Score: 1

    I've had bandwidth like this for ages between my CPU and RAM.

  92. 100 MBps (soon 10 GBps) to Chinese students? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Looks like they may have to put some bigger heatsinks on that Great Firewall.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  93. Is SWIFT fun? by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    How many discussions about politics and technology are going on on SWIFT? How much art creation or intellectual pursuit? How many blogs or personal homepages?:)

    As far as I am concerned, using SWIFT would be even less fun than using the internet behind the Great Firewall of China.

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    1. Re:Is SWIFT fun? by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      Thanks for a number of interesting links, especially the first three were absolutely new to me! ;-) (No, I'm kidding, but the fourth one I've never seen and I liked it).

      Maybe it would be better to separate two of my statements into two separate posts. In no way I was in favor of making Internet the likes of SWIFT, the latter was just an example that a (semi-)secure network can be built.

      Strong crypto being a foundation of any information exchange on the Internet-X does not necessarily contradict the free information exchange culture, only makes the culture less vulnerable to the "bad" (or, "way too good" ;-) ) guys.

      Paul B.

  94. Horrible Idea.. by tacodave · · Score: 1

    This is a terrible idea. The worst possible thing for us to do would be open up another line directly to and from China. China currently supplies us with most of the spam email that Americans get. I say the last thing we should do is grant them more ways to abuse the internet. If anything we need to block China out completly.

  95. Yet another plab by the evil capitalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to bring communist comrades to their knees. Brother, wake up! Pick up your sickle and hammer and take a whack at the optical fibers.

    bhawawahwhwahawhwhawhwha.

  96. Great! by b-baggins · · Score: 1

    Now the Chicoms can steal US technology without ever leaving the comforts of home.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  97. Only 100MBps? by EMR · · Score: 1

    That seems rather slow...
    I can fill up a 100MBps lan all by my lonesome.. Wouldn't a gigabit netowrk be better?

    1. Re:Only 100MBps? by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Try building it across an ocean...

  98. Re:Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right. It's more appropriate to compare it to the US of today.

  99. Whoo Hoo.. fast PrOn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hot asian and russian women... for meeeeeeeeee!!!! ;-)

  100. Re:OT, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang. It sounded so good when I started reading.. Wouldn't marathon coding do?