Slashdot Mirror


Gator Files for IPO to Raise $150 Million

michalas writes "Wired reports on the IPO filing of adware/spyware kings Claria who have recently changed their name from Gator. Claria on Thursday filed for an initial public offering to raise $150 million to continue developing its 'behavioral marketing platform.' Claria had a net income of $35 million on revenues of $90 million in 2003. In addition, Claria said it has 43 million active users and 425 advertisers."

460 comments

  1. When Pigs Fly... by nuclear305 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yea, the only way I'd buy this stock is if my static ip address is blacklisted by their crapware so that it won't/can't install itself on my systems. Surely an incentive like that would entice people to buy into this IPO.

    Of course, then they'll have their money for development except by that time every person with a computer will have purchased a share of stock to keep that crap off their system...in which case there would be no reason for them to continue development of the software, and really have no reason for them to continue to exist as a company.

    Heck, where do I sign up for that?

    I remember seeing a comment earlier about how Microsoft buys up companies and shuts them down or kills off the technology. Maybe MSFT could do us all a favor, buy them out, and shut them down? It's probably one of the few humane things to do...

    1. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Tantrum420 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think that's called Extortion.

      That's what mobsters do.

      You're not a mobster, are you?

      T

    2. Re:When Pigs Fly... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 2, Funny

      If he is, we need to tell him about a coupla punks in Lindon, Utah who been talkin shit about the boss.

    3. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, typo - NAACP.

    4. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Tantrum420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure they ask... You do read all the text in every little box that pops up, don't ya?

      The sad fact is that most people don't read _any_ text in any box that pops up on the screen. They just zero in on the "yes" "no" "cancel" boxes and randomly pick whichever one they think will make the pop-up go away the quickest.

      I mean, they were _trying to read_ something. They can't be bothered to change their train of thought and deal with this new mumbo-jumbo that just appeared on their screen. ...And people wonder why email viruses / worms still prosper.

      T

    5. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pop up boxes? Not directly. They install "free screensaver" and it gives them a EULA. The EULA is always more than 1 screen (has a scrollbar), with more legalese than a car loan.

      Dirty practices? Yes. Sue-able? Probably not.

    6. Re:When Pigs Fly... by SuperMo0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what the handy-dandy X button is for.

    7. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Beg4Mercy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The sad fact is that most people don't read _any_ text in any box that pops up on the screen. They just zero in on the "yes" "no" "cancel" boxes and randomly pick whichever one they think will make the pop-up go away the quickest.

      You have an excellent point. I was going to post asking if Gator and other adware were really still extremely common. It's been a long time since I had Gator (Claria?)-ware on my computer. But you're right most people don't read anything they are asked on a computer. The only reason I have not gotten this stuff is because I have taken steps to prevent it. (Using ad-aware, using pop-up blockers, the obvious stuff) I guess many, many people have not took the 'obvious' steps.

    8. Re:When Pigs Fly... by motiv8x · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They have a great business plan, and are making tons of money in this economy. Whether or not you like it. Of course most people won't, but it's still a sound business model, IMO. If I had a job, and any money, I'd invest in Claira/Gator and Google. I'm a linux user, and could care less what happens in the ms-windows arena. I'm in favor of crap like this, hopefully more people will switch to linux :-)

    9. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your post reminds me of a trust certificate that came up on my screen today.

      "Always trust content from 'Click Yes To Enter LTD'?"

      And in the blurb:

      "By clicking yes you agree to have software installed on your computer that will dial up a premium rate phone line at a cost of 1.50 GBP a minute. You can disconnect by clicking on the Disconnect button or the connection will automatically disconnect after 13.33 minutes."

      Oh yeah and the source of this was a popup for some flash game site that said 'When the certificate pops up click yes to be able to play our huge selection of games! It came up when I was on www.cooking.com looking for a recipe for good roast potatoes. Obviously I prevented myself from downloading this crapware, but I still won't be visiting that site again.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    10. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      NAACP = Niggers Are Actually Colored Pollacks

    11. Re:When Pigs Fly... by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I remember seeing a comment earlier about how Microsoft buys up companies and shuts them down or kills off the technology. Maybe MSFT could do us all a favor, buy them out, and shut them down? It's probably one of the few humane things to do.


      Microsoft only does that when they have copied thier programs and try to implement them.

      If Microsoft is going to do this you can be guarented the spyware will be installed on the sistem with every fresh install but this time it is part of the actual os (internet explorer) and you cannot remove it.

      I don't know if that would be any better or not. I think it would be the most compeling reason to switch to linux if it ever happend.
    12. Re:When Pigs Fly... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Informative


      I was going to post asking if Gator and other adware were really still extremely common.


      Very common.

      At my work there is a childcare center. Their systems are always inundated with spyware. I happened to be facilitating a network migration for them so one day I found myself sitting in front of some of their workstations. I could hardly use the thing. Since I was stuck there anyway (and I needed a clean machine to make sure the migration was successfull), I blew a couple hours installing ad-aware and cleaning the things out. It was a real fight. The sad thing is that their funding doesn't allow for the same level of support enjoyed by the rest of the center.

      They're not alone.

      Whenever I'm digging through firewall or network traffic logs, I have to grep out all the spyware crap. It's all over our enterprise. And any time we mention this to user, they're shocked. They're more than glad to admit they installed some little app. They're clueless that it dialed home. And more than glad to whack the offending app in question once they understand what's going on.

      Gator relies on the oblivious user. And the world is full of them. In spades.
    13. Re:When Pigs Fly... by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you should be very wary of buying their stock, and if you do, read the small print on the stock purchase agreement. It may be that by buying their stock and installing it into your 401k, you agree to allow them to make modifications to your 401k, withdraw money from time to time, and present you with personalized advertising every time you use your ATM card...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    14. Re:When Pigs Fly... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      I sometimes let people know what their advertisers are doing. Almost without fail they are troubled by it if I do (I tend to only let people know when its *really* bad).

      I have seen it be effective, too (the letting them know thing) - with them dropping the advertiser. YMMV. Pot Roast is pretty easy though...you just exploit and torture a sentient creature, then devour its flesh.

      See...I had you until that last part. But really - don't just not go to the site again...tell them why you won't be going again. More effective.

    15. Re:When Pigs Fly... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      addendum: oops, I read "roast potatoes" as "pot roast" for some reason. So uh, yeah...cut em up, throw on some olive oil, rosemary, parsley, and...roast it. I don't do high-starch things really, but eh.

      I'm sick in bed. I just read it wrong. But really - tell them why you're not going there. If you don't, they won't even know they're missing you. That, and they might not know about the advertiser anyway.

    16. Re:When Pigs Fly... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      There's many ways to get people to install this stuff, spyware/malware.

      A lot of times, it's through seemingly harmless downloaded programs, such as screensavers and desktop background programs.

      Other times, web sites will say "You must install this plugin to see this site" and most people will just click "OK" so they can see the web site. Of course, you don't, and it's just spyware, but who's to know?

      I try to tell people to not download things, but I don't want them to fear downloading and running software. Most software is legit. Unfortunately it simply takes experience to know what's bad and what's okay.

      It sucks.

      Not to mention, these people that write the spyware programs often are not very clever; they can crash the computer, hijack IE so bad that you MUST do something about it, hog tons of resources and/or bandwidth.. it just makes things worse.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    17. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the problem is when people use a crappy browser like IE, if the security settings get low enough, most active X controls will run without prompting the user to press yes/no, so it CAN install without asking you.

    18. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the fuck are your users granted the privileges of being able to install anything, anyhow?

      Sounds like a very slack IT department; ready and willing to be replaced by a bunch of Indians. Where do I sign up?

    19. Re:When Pigs Fly... by AaronD12 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad Gator/Claria hasn't invaded the Macintosh yet. When it does, I guess I'll move to Linux. If they invade Linux, I may have to break out my trusty TI-99/4a. Hmmm. Now how to get my wireless network functioning on the TI...

    20. Re:When Pigs Fly... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      Click on the 'X' at the top right of this window to install Claria spyware crap

    21. Re:When Pigs Fly... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      WRT to spyware (and windows 98) the dot.net shit was always my worst enemy. Half the time the "uninstaller" would fuck up and trash the network stack. Fixable, as I eventually figured out, but a major PITA.

      I swore eternal opposition to spyware bastards about that time...what do you do? You can block it as much as possible but then some other clicky comes along and you're faced with a new problem (or educate your users, like wrt to Gator, then they change their name :)

      Why can't these assholes contribute to doing something useful for the users for once rather than something that is primarily aimed at the companies' bottom line? Degenerate assholes.

      (Sorry for the rant, but I'm sure you understand my frustration :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    22. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm.... pot roast *Homer drool*

    23. Re:When Pigs Fly... by hawkbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who says Gator won't take their IPO cash and then write a version for Mac OS and Linux distros? Supporting this kind of garbage in any way is sick and wrong, no matter what OS you use. Sound business model? According to your logic, extorionists, organized crime, and bank robbers also have a sound "business model", so that makes what they do ok I guess, whether we like it or not.

    24. Re:When Pigs Fly... by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      OK then... task manager's good for that too. Or Alt+F4. The ones that the X button installs shit on aren't real windows...

    25. Re:When Pigs Fly... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Interesting
      They have a great business plan, and are making tons of money in this economy. Whether or not you like it.

      No... What they have is a risky business plan that is working well right now. The courts have never decided where to draw the line on the insidious behavior of foistware. I think it's pretty clear that if you download some software and in the clickable EULA you agree to have Gator installed as a payload, they have a right to install their junk on your machine. However, the only time I've been infected with Gator is through an ActiveX exploit. There was nothing that I agreed to, and there was no notification that their stuff was being installed. I didn't even realize it until later on when some of the "utilities" that are supposed to make people like Gator were automatically installed. The "fun" I had cleaning this all up and installing Ad-aware and Spybot S&D is what finally convinced me to never use IE again unless it was on my corporate intranet. And I firmly believe that given a real test in the courts, this will be classified as breaking into a private computer system and/or malicious hacking. Once this happens, you can expect them to die a quick death from the subsequent lawsuits.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    26. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the irony of this is the fucking bullshit affiliate ad in your sig to a deceptive give-you-money-for-processor-time place. Fuck you.

      The part that gives it away?

      ---------

      "Hey, I'm a savvy Internet user and this sounds almost too good to be true. What's the catch?"

      Yes, you must abide by the "rules." To be paid, Gómez will select applicants based on their geography, Internet connection type (dialup, DSL, T1) and online availability. Gómez is currently looking for PEERs from all over the world with diverse Internet connection types, including dialup connections (14.4, 28.8, 33.6, 56k). However, because there are a limited number of slots available in the PEER Community, Gómez cannot activate everyone. So be sure to apply and start running the Gómez PEER today, because users with the most system activity are more likely to be activated.

      ---------

      Yeah that's some fucking bullshit. "Be sure to apply and start today because if you have more activity you're more likely to be activated, but in fucking reality we control everything and you must abide by "rules" and fuck you and even if we do pay you it will be fucking pennies at best, unless you're a whore who fucking does our affiliate thing to get us even more fucking pennies, fuck fuckity fuck."

      In conclusion, fuck you.

    27. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind that, if you can get the wireless to work on Linux, you can get it to work on you TI.

    28. Re:When Pigs Fly... by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      LOL. Could you imagine being forced to watch an Ad before the ATM will spit out your money? That would just be wrong. Very funny.

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
    29. Re:When Pigs Fly... by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      So uh, yeah...cut em up, throw on some olive oil, rosemary, parsley, and...roast it. I don't do high-starch things really, but eh.

      If you parboil them first, they turn out even fluffier in the middle and crispier on the outside. Yummy.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    30. Re:When Pigs Fly... by emilng · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What really annoys me about the box that pops up is that there is an "Always trust content from" box, but there is no "Never trust content from" box. It should work like the prompt for accepting cookies.

    31. Re:When Pigs Fly... by emilng · · Score: 1

      Funny until it actually happens - that is...
      I'm sure that's what they said about urinal ads too.
      Though it would definitely be wrong if you had to watch an ad before being allowed to use the urinal.

    32. Re:When Pigs Fly... by BrynM · · Score: 1

      Been to a Bank of America to use the ATM? They run ads.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    33. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rather than spending time installing Ad-Aware and S&D you could have set IE up properly - it takes like 2 minutes......

    34. Re:When Pigs Fly... by jtcm · · Score: 1
      LOL. Could you imagine being forced to watch an Ad before the ATM will spit out your money? That would just be wrong. Very funny.

      Please don't give them any ideas...

      --
      @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
    35. Re:When Pigs Fly... by cgenman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was going to post asking if Gator and other adware were really still extremely common.

      I'd say it's getting worse.

      I just did a little free consulting for the owner of the building I used to work on, his nephew, and one of their former clients forced out of the country by the Bush administration (don't ask). Cookies aside, they were averaging roughly 20 spyware infestations and a worm each. Gator / Claria was on all five machines, along with a host of other assorted malware.

      Perhaps it just seems like it's getting worse because we have better definition files these days, or because these programs are smearing themselves out into more parts of the system, but three years ago a computer with over 1,000 files related to spyware would be out of the question. Now, it's far more common than you would think.

    36. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      You can never use IE and still get spyware. It's bundled in a lot of closed source free software for Windows. I had my parents running with Mozilla for months on a clean formatted installation of Win2k. When I ran an ad-aware scan later, they were inundated.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    37. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You FUCKING potato MURDERER!!!1

    38. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't work on Mac since the software market is flooded with superior free/OS products which they wouldn't be able to embed their malware in.

    39. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Jouni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gator also hits even the less oblivious user as many times as it takes to score. There is unfortunately no option to "never trust this vendor" in IE.

      This little oversight has been patched by PopUpCop. While the Google toolbar already protects us from most pop-up windows, the pesky software installation prompts only go away with something such as this.

      The less than $20 pricepoint might be just in the budget of a childcare center too.

      Jouni

      --
      Jouni Mannonen | Game Designer, Consultant
    40. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was already thinking of applying the same logic to, say, some government secret service: invest in CIA stock - and hope that they don't spy on YOU.

      Morally, however, it's more as if some South American drug empire issued stocks - to develop better synthetic drugs, since cocaine and the likes have no real growth perspective anymore (users know it and avoid it - plus, "some" governments have declared it illegal).

      Damn, heroin and XTC were perfectly legal for some time... :-)

    41. Re:When Pigs Fly... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      bringing the exact total to under 20.00 19.995 there must be some legal reason for this amount

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    42. Re:When Pigs Fly... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Why spend $20 on a popup killer if you can download Mozilla for free? Seriously, I don't get it.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    43. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      most people don't read anything they are asked on a computer

      Well, after the gazzilionth time WinXP annoys them with shit they either don't care or is outright fals (there are x inactive icons on your desktop), its normal that they stop reading it.

      Clariagator abuses that and installs itself using the "yeah yeah, whatver" reflex with their prompt window.
      Or its bundled and its one of the hundred "click ok to continue" window you get when you install a program.

      Its not the user's fault, they are victims. Its Microsoft's fault for desensitising them to messages in the first place, to lazy devs who make installers that give you the "ok, ok, ok, ok allready! ok, ok ok, y-e-s, ok, ok" ritual, and of sleaze balls like glatoraria for actually making and pushing this crap.

      Don't blame the victim (hey, she was asking for it!).

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    44. Re:When Pigs Fly... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      yeah. people with livejournals are EEEEVIIIL. That, and it was fairly obvious that I was being silly.

    45. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And guess what, we're at the top.

      Tell that to the bacteria.

    46. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Mozilla too, however, the Google toolbar is free and blocks all that shit. Plus you can search Google right under your address bar!

    47. Re:When Pigs Fly... by mingot · · Score: 1

      There is unfortunately no option to "never trust this vendor" in IE.

      They are finally adding this to XP SP2, thank god. RC1 is availible for download now.

    48. Re:When Pigs Fly... by cubic6 · · Score: 1

      You know, if they lowered the number of prompts and just assumed safe defaults, the Slashdot crowd would bitch about how they're taking the decisions away from the user and claim that it's a conspiracy so MS can control more of the computer. If they have a lot of warning boxes, people bitch about having to *actually read* the boxes, and intelligently choose an option.

      Don't blame Microsoft because the users are too lazy to make decisions. They're hardly the only company that does this. Anybody who just clicks "OK" to anything because they don't feel like reading a 5 line message box deserves what they get.

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
    49. Re:When Pigs Fly... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      You'd be interested in the Googlebar extension for mozilla / firefox then. It doesn't include blocking features since that's built in to the browser already. But it does provide all the nifty searching, highlighting, etc.

    50. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You know, if they lowered the number of prompts and just assumed safe defaults

      You have inactive icons on your desktop
      Take a guided tour of windows XP
      Stay current with automatic updates

      If they have a lot of warning boxes, people bitch about having to *actually read* the boxes, and intelligently choose an option. Don't blame Microsoft because the users are too lazy to make decisions.

      Windows spams its users.

      Its not warning messages, its the fucking clippy horror without the picture.

      Anybody who just clicks "OK" to anything because they don't feel like reading a 5 line message box deserves what they get.

      5 lines? EULAs are more like 20 pages. If you had read them, you would know that.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    51. Re:When Pigs Fly... by dknj · · Score: 1

      Task manager sends a WM_CLOSE signal to the program (if you close the application), as does Alt-F4 and the little X button. Task manager will only forcefully quit if you end the process by name or if the application doesn't close gracefully after clicking end task.

    52. Re:When Pigs Fly... by steve_l · · Score: 1

      We get the 'never' option in WinXP SP2, along with a firewall that finally whines on outbound calls. The latter could raise more support calls than IT depts want at first, but there you go.

      However, SP2 still doesnt include a virus scanner or an ad-aware-like app scanner, so if your system is already infested with something, tough.

    53. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Beg4Mercy · · Score: 1

      Yeah the Gomez stuff turned out to be not as good as it first seemed. I think I'm going to remove it from my sig.

    54. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And guess what, we're at the top

      Tell that to the bacteria. ... or indeed the mosquitoes.



      Seriously, one of the most annoying things is people who use the expression "food chain" to mean something like "corporate heirarchy". If you encounter such a person, move away quickly - but don't turn your back.
    55. Re:When Pigs Fly... by Hognoxious · · Score: 0
      ... there is an "Always trust content from" box, but there is no "Never trust content from" box. It should work like the prompt for accepting cookies.
      There are two settings in IE6 to enable/disable install on demand. As far as I can tell, they make absolutely no difference at all.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. but even still by GuruHal · · Score: 1

    Gator is spyware!

    An IPO doesn't change the predatory marketing stategies of this company.

    --
    "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green
    1. Re:but even still by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Dude... CLARIA is spyware.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:but even still by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      No, but those magical three letters will make lots of stock brokers swoon.

  3. Implanted in every stock certificate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is a special transmitter that sends back information on where you place it.

    1. Re:Implanted in every stock certificate by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Funny


      Must be entertaining to track them thru the sewers...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  4. Revolutionary equation by Nephroth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cost of privacy = 150,000,000 / Claria's victims

    --
    Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
    1. Re:Revolutionary equation by SuperMo0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who says they're going to stop installing shit on our computers once they have an IPO? All this'll do is give them more capital to research more annoying ways to embed this crap on our computers while settling claims with pissed off people filing lawsuits at them across the nation. This will HELP THEM. WE DO NOT WANT TO HELP THE ENEMY.

    2. Re:Revolutionary equation by Nephroth · · Score: 1

      Precisely, they are an ireputable "company" who deals in the sale of personal information. It's almost incredible the amount of gaul they have to try to sell themselves as something legitimate. It's almost like a drug dealer setting up a damned stand on the street corner.

      --
      Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
  5. Wow! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny
    How do you call people who have been swindled out of $150 million by criminals?

    Suckers. Big-time suckers.

    They only deserve to lose their money.

  6. Didn't you read the article, or even the summary? by Fubar411 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are now Claria, that is so much less predatory than Gator. They were just misunderstood.

  7. I don't think so by AlienRancher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " 43 million active users " Those are not users, they are called "victims"

    1. Re:I don't think so by MrNonchalant · · Score: 4, Funny

      "In addition, Claria said it has 43 million active users and 425 advertisers."

      Don't forget the 71 million ticked off ex-users.

    2. Re:I don't think so by FLEB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they still count those ones as "active users".

      What, you thought that uninstaller actually did anything?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    3. Re:I don't think so by MrNonchalant · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I used something slightly stronger.

    4. Re:I don't think so by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      I prefer something a bit more powerful.

    5. Re:I don't think so by bigberk · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Those are not users, they are called "victims"
      Fellow Americans, I present to you: our economy. Seriously though, Internet marketers have always been borderline spammers/criminals -- and yet, "we" support them by investing our money in their ventures. Can an economy based on this sort of crap really survive?
    6. Re:I don't think so by MrNonchalant · · Score: 1

      Not everyone thinks so.

    7. Re:I don't think so by NamShubCMX · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    8. Re:I don't think so by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      Because people had a tendency to install Gator on the school computers, I emailed Gator and asked them if there was any way to really remove the program fully. They sent me an uninstaller that seemed to work, but I didn't bother ensuring there was nothing still hidden. Just a school computer, after all.

      Actually...maybe it was Yahoo! Instant Messenger. But I think it was Gator. Abut two years ago, probably.

    9. Re:I don't think so by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny
      Amazingly enough, we haven't seen anyone post:


      1. Build up spyware company and infect millions of clueless people's PCs with your crappy software.
      2. Change name and then sell stock, ranting about how many "active users" your product services.
      3. Flee the country with ill-gotten gains.
      4. Profit! (Assuming you picked a country without good extradition treaties with the U.S.)

    10. Re:I don't think so by falsified · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    11. Re:I don't think so by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      Overkill much? :P

    12. Re:I don't think so by JET+666 · · Score: 1

      Nothing says success like excess.

      --
      De sig boss de sig
    13. Re:I don't think so by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    14. Re:I don't think so by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Fellow Americans, I present to you: our economy.

      Best. Use. Of. Sarcasm.

      Ever.

      (Don't believe me? Put it in context.)

      Kudos, sir.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    15. Re:I don't think so by eddeye · · Score: 0

      Gator has "users" in the same sense herpes does.

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
  8. Claria's "users" by CoconutFoobar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In addition, Claria said it has 43 million active users and 425 advertisers.

    I think 'infected computers' would be more likely. Whenever I tell people I can make those pop-ups stop by running Ad-aware, they are more than happy to remove themselves from this list of 'active users.'

    1. Re:Claria's "users" by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I once found Gator installed on my Windows box, yet I never used Kazaa and I never consented to install it. I think they must have installed it via an IE exploit or something. So "infected computers" may not be just a euphamism.

      I noticed my dad had it at one point too (although I think he may have installed Kazaa). Anyway, he now runs Ad Aware regularly, and he is absolutely paranoid about cookies (me, I just allow them, then batch delete then every week or two).

      -a

    2. Re:Claria's "users" by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      I caught WinPup32... a pop up deployer on my system. I knew something was up when my popup blockers suddenly all got turned off.

      I couldn't run AdAware because it hung on my IE cookies. I couldn't clean my IE cookies because a running process was using half of them. I had to drop to Safe Mode to clean out the cookies before AdAware could do its thing to clean up the mess.

      I know I must have accidently clicked a "Yes" when I should have clicked a "No" somewhere in the last few days. The number of sites trying to push these things is way through the roof.

    3. Re:Claria's "users" by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kazaa isn't the only app that installs Gator.
      The adware supported DivX does as well, though they offer an adware free version on that site with not as many bells and whistles. There's a lot of other apps that do as well.

      Reading the EULA used to be something people bypassed. Now it's a necessity.

      Although I think hiding install info in the EULA is crap. The installer should show all applications being installed right from the beginning. Anything not implicitly listed at the install screen should be treated like the UK's theft of service laws for electricity when someone uses your machine without permission.

    4. Re:Claria's "users" by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      Silly, trusting, human user. Unchecking the "Install GAIN" button just makes it report how many users would not install it provided they have the choice...
      That is, once it installs itself anyway.

    5. Re:Claria's "users" by 11223 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should check out SpyBot. It will clean up some things that AdAware can't.

    6. Re:Claria's "users" by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 5, Informative
      I think 'infected computers' would be more likely.

      You'd think that (and so would I), but we'd be wrong. There are a huge number of users who like that thing, and complain if anti-spyware sofware removes it (I know because I work at an anti-spyware company, and Gator is one of the ones we have to tread lightly with, because so many users actually want the damned thing).

    7. Re:Claria's "users" by jonwil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyone who would actually WANT spyware, crapware and malware installed on their box needs to have their head examined.

    8. Re:Claria's "users" by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      I work at a university maintaining systems for a large department. In the last two weeks I've removed gator from close to 20 machines. It's a constant battle to keep the spyware off of our boxes. AdAware and Spybot are now my best friends.

      --

      This space for rent.
    9. Re:Claria's "users" by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Yes,

      There was an internet explorer exploit that would allow any website to install something without prompting for comfirmation. I'm sure there have been more then one.

      I was browsing along, things seemed sluggish, and then low and behold gator popped up and said it had just been installed. No box's, no nothing, I would never agree to anything being installed. I had a comment on the exploit a day after it happened and found out it was just more then myself who found this mysterious install.

      Wether or not this was initiated or known by Claria (formerly gator at the time) I'm not really sure of. It could have been a any company pulling revenue from gator installs.

      This was the day I switched to mozilla.

      This install/exploit method did not occurr very long as this is very much illegal. I would hope to think Gator/Claria was not aware some partner was doing this.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    10. Re:Claria's "users" by MushMouth · · Score: 1

      How many of these machines have the google toolbar, which trcks users the same way that gain does.

    11. Re:Claria's "users" by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      Most of them. They start getting popups from something, so they get to google toolbar to try and stop that, then they get something else ...
      Uphill battle all the way.

      --

      This space for rent.
    12. Re:Claria's "users" by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      (Insert "Resistance Is Futile" joke here)

    13. Re:Claria's "users" by SuperMo0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Remember, unlike most spyware, Gator presents a front of allowing you to store passwords. Some people find this useful. Useful spyware may seem like an oxymoron, but Gator actually sucks some people in because of this.

    14. Re:Claria's "users" by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Except, don't all of the major browsers do this already? Why would you install some third-party app, rather than activate a feature of the browser you're using?

    15. Re:Claria's "users" by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      Because to a lot of people, those little "would you like to install Gator" boxes LOOK LIKE a feature of the browser. Being all official-looking, it sounds like a better deal.

    16. Re:Claria's "users" by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      Can you clarify how Google's toolbar tricks users? I was always under the impression they were a pretty aboveboard shop (Nervously looking at the toolbar in this window.)

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    17. Re:Claria's "users" by Cody+Hatch · · Score: 1, Informative

      How the hell did the parent get moderated as a troll? That isn't in ANY way a troll. Even if it was wrong, it wouldn't be a troll, but sad as it is - it's correct. Gator offers at least nominally useful servies, and many people go "Oh look, a bonus utility! Nice of them to include it!".

      Warning - moderators on crack loose in this discussion! (Which makes it different than every other slashdot thread, of course...)

    18. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people also should be removed from the damn genie pool, so what's your point?

      -A.H.

    19. Re:Claria's "users" by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Try Proxomitron (Google for it), and drop IE.. try Firefox instead.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    20. Re:Claria's "users" by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... the first time I ran it, it BSOD'ed my computer, but after that it worked fine. Seems pretty professional. Didn't really find very much that Ad Aware missed, though.

      -a

    21. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The google toolbar started out okay, but they changed it and now it's spyware itself. The new Spybot removes it as a result.

    22. Re:Claria's "users" by acidtripp101 · · Score: 1

      Just for exposure, it should also be pointed out the the reverse is true...

      --
      Not Free(as in beer). Free(as in "I'm free to beat you over the head for being a dumbass")
    23. Re:Claria's "users" by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I get that too sometimes. i just say " well thats whats causing most of your problems, you can live with it, get rid of it, or take it somewere else. By the way you owe me X amount of dollars for looking at it evey time you bring it to me bacuase those pices of software have slowed the internet down to the point you think somethign is wrong."

      I hear sometimes they took it to another place and it was removed there too. You would figure that would be enough but nope..

    24. Re:Claria's "users" by Jerf · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to not care about cookies, but I've found the latest incarnation of Mozilla has a nice system; set it to ask and click the "apply this to all cookies in the domain". If you mostly look at the same sites over and over, and that's true of most of us, you fairly quickly weed out the ad cookies and the "I don't know what that's for" cookies, and let through only the login cookies (just about the only legit use, but remember that cookies are about the only safe way to do web-site logins, so you can't just shut them off and they are not all evil). In a fairly short period of time, you just surf like normal but with better cookie control, except when you visit a new site.

      Now that it's so easy, I'm actually controlling my cookies. (IE has a 'zone' implementation but since you have to go to the control panel to use it AFAIK, it's nearly useless.)

    25. Re:Claria's "users" by miu · · Score: 1
      Gator is one of the ones we have to tread lightly with, because so many users actually want the damned thing

      I'd bet those "users" were really shills in a scam to convince strategic companies to not treat Gator as spyware. I don't believe that any user that cared to run an anti-spyware utility would want to run Gator.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    26. Re:Claria's "users" by MushMouth · · Score: 1

      But the google toolbar is itself spyware, as it can track all browser usage. (It does not by default, but people often turn on "advanced features")

    27. Re:Claria's "users" by DoctorCool · · Score: 0

      I know my school wants spyware, that is why i install it for them on a daily basis!

    28. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point them to free alternatives then.

      Refdesk.com + Google Toolbar + (I don't know a good free alternative for KDict on Windows, google says wordreference.com)

      I don't know what functionality Gator provides, but I'll bet it's similar to the above.

    29. Re:Claria's "users" by MushMouth · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you turn on the pagerank feature, it follows you around feeding the entire URL of every page you browse to google servers. They save that data forever with a cookie which identifies your trail. What they do with that data may be fine, but they are a for profit company that only states they wont do anything evil, but they don't give you any way to remove your data, and they are around to maximize profits. Their privacy policy says they will not give that data to anyone else unless forced to by law, which is exactly what happens when companies are acquired or when they go bankrupt (I forgot the specifics, but a bankrupt company was forced to sell all userdata to pay creditors even though the privacy policy said they would not. That is when Amazon updated thier policy to clarify that that could happen and EPIC went crazy)

    30. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who considers the Google toolbar to be problematic spyware is simply too paranoid to be on the internet. Might as well build your Montana cabin and invest in a lot of tin foil too.

    31. Re:Claria's "users" by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      :) Same password thing. The lady (a CA) in charge of managing finances for the small dot com I worked at loved the damn thing and nearly had a coronary when I was running ad aware on the various systems there.

    32. Re:Claria's "users" by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      In America, you use systems and software to make money.

      In Soviet Russia, Systems and software make money by using YOU!

      It's one of the few recent Soviet Russia jokes that might even have something to do with Soviet Russia!

    33. Re:Claria's "users" by drayzel · · Score: 1

      You are correct. When I was working at MS doing end user support for Win9x/ME I was amazed at how many people WANTED Gator, or that cute purple moneky Bonzi Buddy, or so many other of those annoying programs!

      ~Z

    34. Re:Claria's "users" by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Basically, Google toolbar can offer features based on what website you are currently viewing. It can display the approximate PageRank, for example.

      To do this, it has to send the URL to the Google servers which send back the information. This makes a lot of sense if you think about it. If you want to look for something on eBay you have to tell the eBay servers what you want. If you want to look up something on Wikipedia the Wikipedia servers must know what you are looking for.

      On top of that, Google puts up a big message plainly stating that if you want to use these features the toolbar will have to phone home, and giving you the option to not use them. It's not a shady EULA thing like Gator or whatever, it's quite plain.

      But OMG GOOGLE IS TEH TRACKING US TINFOILS HATS!

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    35. Re:Claria's "users" by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      What we need is a website with GPL replacements for all features granted by shitware apps that
      A)Have their own interface look enough like the shitware one that mose (l)users won't notice
      B) immunizes the mchine against further infestion by the shitware it replaces

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    36. Re:Claria's "users" by cyt0plas · · Score: 1

      When I get people complaining about me removing gator (I won't support a system with spyware on it, but I will remove the spyware for free), I just point them at the Google Toolbar. It does what they want, and it blocks popups too.

      --
      Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    37. Re:Claria's "users" by SoLO · · Score: 1

      No, they need to be educated about spyware's harms.

    38. Re:Claria's "users" by Ronan_The_Barbarian · · Score: 0

      Firefox really rocks. Works well and does not install this crap. I run SpyBot since it is more thorough

    39. Re:Claria's "users" by sjgm · · Score: 1

      IE6 has a very similar system - you can configure IE to ask about every domain that tries to set a cookie, and set to 'always allow' or 'always block'.

    40. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So write a superior replacement for Gators crap, with a migration utility, make sure the forms are basically the same, and 4)Profit.

    41. Re:Claria's "users" by mousse-man · · Score: 1

      There some users who simply don't bother. I had one in my company.

      He's a capacity in R/3, but else pretty computer illiterate. He had truckloads of crap installed on his home computer. Then he got some spyware junk that displayed porn pages everytime he wanted to use IE.

      He became windows-literate because he's deeply religious and didn't want to see smut on his screen. In the process, he also installed Linux because he couldn't stand that crap anymore (with Mozilla, which is pretty immune to such junk, at least for the time).

      Sometimes, faith can move mountains. :)

    42. Re:Claria's "users" by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Ideally, you should be running SSnD, Ad-Aware, and AVG (or similar anti-virus).

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    43. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, faith can move mountains. :)

      So all we need to do is find a Bible passage that appears to condemn spyware, post it prominently all over the Bible Belt, and watch the laws roll in?

      Hey, maybe there's something in the Book of Mormon that criticises the way SCO are carrying on, too... wow, this religion thing could come in useful after all!

    44. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their privacy policy says they will not give that data to anyone else unless forced to by law, which is exactly what happens when companies are acquired or when they go bankrupt (I forgot the specifics, but a bankrupt company was forced to sell all userdata to pay creditors even though the privacy policy said they would not.

      This is why the USA needs decent data protection laws. Europe already has them - that would have been illegal over there.

    45. Re:Claria's "users" by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      I'd be a little worried about letting software that calls home store my passwords. Thiunk about it, how is directed advertising done? By knowing what you do.

      I trust FireFox a little more, and it's nice to go to a site and see all my info remembered for me.

    46. Re:Claria's "users" by mousse-man · · Score: 1

      You mean "you shall not covet your neighbor's wife" or something to that effect?

    47. Re:Claria's "users" by zymurgyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most users getting nailed by this stuff aren't ready to be educated about spyware. They're typically the same people who still need clarification about the differences between "Shutdown," "Restart," "Shutdown and Restart," "Shutdown and Power Off," "Logoff." You've got a long road ahead with most people before you'll be ready to proctor the "Why spyware is bad" lesson. I don't think we can hope to effectively fight this battle anymore. The students in this equation just don't care. I hate it that I've arrived at this conclusion, but it's the only one that makes sense based my experience. So what do we do? I can't see an easy answer.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    48. Re:Claria's "users" by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I strongly suggest spysweeper.
      gets rid of shit like cool web search that adware and spybot doesnt.
      only caveat is that you have to pay to get the automatic updates or reinstall the program when updates come out.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    49. Re:Claria's "users" by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. Just read up on that. I'll be sure to explain that to my users.
      Very soon I'll have all those machines in an AD container that I'll be able to manager. My users are going to be very surprised when they find they suddenly can't install just anything they want on the system .... :-)

      --

      This space for rent.
    50. Re:Claria's "users" by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      Google is a highly ethical company, which is why I'd trust them for this.

      Of course, I dont' really use IE, except for certain pages that won't render well in FireFox, but I have the Google toolbar installed on IE for those occasions.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    51. Re:Claria's "users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is John Kerry responsible for two million dead?

      No, he's not. Now quit being a douchebag.

    52. Re:Claria's "users" by cubic6 · · Score: 1

      These are the same people who see an ad on TV and think:

      1) Wow, it's a $999999 value, but they're giving it to me for 3 easy payments of $29.95!

      2) If I call in the next 53 seconds, I get two more free, AND a handy carrying case! I never see deals like this in Wal-Mart!

      3) You know, I don't really need any more home cleaning products, but this is just too good of an offer to refuse... where's my credit card?

      Gator offers minor services, and people don't associate them with the fact that half their programs stop working and their system slows to a crawl. It's just like the commercial. You're getting ripped off, but you're being told otherwise, and you believe it because you want to believe it.

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
    53. Re:Claria's "users" by cubic6 · · Score: 1

      The toolbar's installer clearly states that it has to "phone home" to use the advanced features, and you're perfectly free to delete that cookie whenever you feel like it. You have to explicitely turn on those features, which most users don't do. Hardly "tricking" their users a la Gator.

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
  9. Active users? by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Claria said it has 43 million active users

    ...of those 43 million "active users" only three are actually aware that they are running Claria's "product".

  10. 43 million active users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of which 7 know they are.

    1. Re:43 million active users by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 3, Funny

      And of those, only 1 is willing. It's that guy who likes getting spam who was on Slashdot a few weeks ago!

    2. Re:43 million active users by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Gator's programs are not pure spyware because they at least provide some level of functionality. The first Gator offering was a personal-info remembering "wallet" that'd nicely fill in web forms similar to what the Google Toolbar's AutoFill feature offers.

      Another one of their schemes offers to download a program that will automatically sync your system time, which is useful to most people who notice that consumer PCs are usually pathetic at keeping a system time. However, I personally use the adware-free Automachron which provides the same useful function.

      So, they're really a bait-and-switch operation. They actively market utilities that people want, and are rather trivial to make.... and then tag-on their adware code for the ride. Better options for all of their offerings exist, but the public often doesn't know where to go.

    3. Re:43 million active users by Kyouryuu · · Score: 1

      And this is why Claria deserves to be shut down and their assets gutted by the FCC. It's nothing more than legitimate, corporate virus writing.

    4. Re:43 million active users by eclectro · · Score: 1

      And of those, only 1 is willing. It's that guy who likes getting spam who was on Slashdot a few weeks ago!

      And that's because he was off his medication.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    5. Re:43 million active users by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      My uncle is the head network admin over Coke's leagal department in Atlanta. His biggest amazement is the lawyers who say "But I love Gator!" They are numerous. The danger is not people who install Gator, never use it for anything, and never cry when the junk is removed. It's the people with slightly more grey matter who install it willingly and want it's features, and then become entrenched users.

      Surprisingly, it's really the lawyers who are the biggest culprits over the secretaries and clerical staff. Most of those folks recognize that they are dealing with company property designed for business, whereas the lawyer gets a 2GHz laptop for company work and considers it hers. Then they jam a Cap'n Crunch CD packaged with their kids cereal, and boom they've got Gator (and sugar on the CD lazer).

    6. Re:43 million active users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that is supposed to be "it has 43 million advertisers and 43 active users."

    7. Re:43 million active users by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1
      They have no control over how they got it, can't do anything about it, and don't notice that it's been gestating until they start sneezing bright flashy ads.

      Not quite. These programs, contray to popular belief, do not install themselves. Sure they come bundled with "quality ad-supported software", but it's stated quite clearly that these other programs are going to be installed, at which point you can exit the original install. And the last time I checked, unless you physically change IE's defaults quite explicitly, you have to click "yes" to become "infected". I'm not saying spyware is a good thing, but we need to focus on the real causes of this and other common pc problems. User education. Of course we can only hope for a 60 minutes special on "underground advertising" before any of these people take an interest...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    8. Re:43 million active users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lawyer realizes that if confidential information is taken from their communications or their files without their consent or knowledge, and that information used in any way,
      he's won the lottery. It's a "go ahead, make my day" kind of attitude.

      An attorney has a responsibility to clients to keep information confidential, but when you put yourself in the position of improperly taking privileged information from an attorney, you've really crossed the line into major crimes territory.

    9. Re:43 million active users by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people who make over 500$ a day don't have to care.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    10. Re:43 million active users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not quite sure why anyone would need any extra software to sync time on win2k and above. Win2k has a built in sntp client which you can point at any ntp source(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?s cid=kb;EN-US;216734). True that SNTP may not be as dead-on accurate as NTP(it doesn't include the error checking and delay adjustments) but very few people have a real need for that kind of accuracy.

    11. Re:43 million active users by ewhac · · Score: 4, Informative

      Another one of their schemes offers to download a program that will automatically sync your system time, which is useful to most people who notice that consumer PCs are usually pathetic at keeping a system time. However, I personally use the adware-free Automachron which provides the same useful function.

      If you're running Win2K or WinXP, you don't need to download a damn thing to sync your clock. Windoze has an SNTP client built-in:

      • Open a Command Prompt.
      • Enter the command:
        net time /setsntp:servername
        where servername is the name of your preferred NTP server (your ISP should be able to provide this; typically something like ntp.my-isp.com).
      • Close the Command Prompt.
      • Right-click on My Computer (or whatever you renamed it to); select Manage.
      • In the left-hand pane, select Services & Applications.
      • In the right-hand pane, double-click on Services.
      • Double-click on Windows Time (near the bottom of the list).
      • In the configuration window, click the Start button. Your clock will be synchronized to the NTP time server.
      • In the drop-down menu Startup Type, select Automatic. This will start the NTP client each time you boot Windows.
      • Click OK. Close the Management interface.

      There. No cheesy spyware necessary. Bandwidth consumption is negligible, so gamers need not worry about additional lag.

      Schwab

    12. Re:43 million active users by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Wow... that's a lot of work for something that's GUI exposed. Right click the clock, select Adjust Date/Time, and then move to the Internet Time tab.

      My personal problem with that is it's hard-set to only query once per week. That's not ususally enough for error-prone PC clocks.

    13. Re:43 million active users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60 minutes? Yeah, right.

      Viacom probably advertises on this shit.

    14. Re:43 million active users by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      No need for all that: Get it from NIST, may as well line your shit up with an atomic clock.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    15. Re:43 million active users by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Wow... that's a lot of work for something that's GUI exposed. Right click the clock, select Adjust Date/Time, and then move to the Internet Time tab.

      Right click clock... check.
      Select "Adjust Date/Time"... check.
      Move to "Internet Time" tab... oops, it doesn't exist.

      It may be GUI exposed in WinXP, but it sure ain't in Win2k. You did notice that his post was talking about both versions, right?

    16. Re:43 million active users by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Another one of their schemes offers to download a program that will automatically sync your system time, which is useful to most people who notice that consumer PCs are usually pathetic at keeping a system time. However, I personally use the adware-free Automachron which provides the same useful function.

      Side note: I find it strange that a special app has to be used for Windows to just set the clock automatically using a time server.

      That feature has been part of network logins under Windows (if enabled) and it is the default under different *nix systems ('real' network or dialup/internet).

      Why doesn't Windows have a check box in the clock dialog that says 'syncronize time to a time server' or 'enable network time protocol'?

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    17. Re:43 million active users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn' this require that you are a domain controller?

    18. Re:43 million active users by archen · · Score: 1

      Yes, only a domain controller can use this command. (see ntp.org or relavent MS documentation ). As far as I know, this has no effect on a regular windows PC.

    19. Re:43 million active users by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Windows XP does have that option. Windows 2000 also supports NTP synchronisation but it's only available from the command line.

    20. Re:43 million active users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, the wonders of the "simple to use" GUI which I remember from about 3 lifetimes ago... click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click [simple operation completed] ... click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click [simple operation completed] ... click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click click [simple operation completed] ... (repeat until retired due to RSI)

    21. Re:43 million active users by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1

      Wow, same joke as the one posted a minute ahead of you, bravo.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    22. Re:43 million active users by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Windows XP does have that option. Windows 2000 also supports NTP synchronisation but it's only available from the command line.

      I noticed the follow on comments. Seemed like a PITA...not just point and click but a dozen steps.

      Even if not, I'm surprised that MS took so long to add such a basic and important function.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  11. Modern-day Bounty Hunting by Mard · · Score: 4, Funny

    What a coincidence, as I'm starting an IPO shortly, too! We're hoping to raise $150 million, which will be metered out as payment for the head of each Claira investor.

    --
    DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
    1. Re:Modern-day Bounty Hunting by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Im in!

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  12. Dyslexia check... by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    I misread that as:

    Gates Files for IPO...

    And wondered if my flux capacitor had self-activated.

    1. Re:Dyslexia check... by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      misread that as:

      Gates Files for IPO...


      Even sadder, I thought it was Google, finally going ahead...
  13. From an investment standpoint... by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 1

    This crapware is likely glued into millions of computers, delivering ads after ads. If a company wants their ad to be seen (and clicked on by the computer illiterate), choosing GAIN (claria now?) is a smart decision.

    I don't have much to invest, but I would probably invest in this company if I did. Like I care about what they do - I use Linux as my primary OS anyway.

    Then again, the second they start developing crapware for Linux is the second I will not consider investing in them ;).

    1. Re:From an investment standpoint... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Calling the Gator software GAIN was just an attempt to try to associate themselves with a clean, fresh scent.

    2. Re:From an investment standpoint... by telstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's take that philosophy one step further ... so you'd support a company that sold a product that caused Cancer or AIDS as long as you didn't use that product? Nice to see you've got principles.

    3. Re:From an investment standpoint... by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      That's the American way. If it can turn a dollar without adversly affecting me , then sign me up.

    4. Re:From an investment standpoint... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      chances are that it would come back at stabbing you, at least at the point when you meet a nice girl but she can't give you her number because his phone has been jammed to halt because of gator-mobile-.net-mega-version(with 30 instances).

      besides, they have no future. their company depends on someone else making crap products.

      wtf they need 150 million for anyways?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:From an investment standpoint... by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      Cuz we all know that spyware=cancer.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    6. Re:From an investment standpoint... by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Let's take that philosophy one step further ... so you'd support a company that sold a product that caused Cancer or AIDS as long as you didn't use that product? Nice to see you've got principles.

      Depends on what you mean by "support," but probably, yeah I would. As long as they were forthright and honest about what risks were entailed in using their products.

      Yes, i have principles, it's called a belief in freewill and the right to make your own choices. If someone wants to use a cancer causing product, and they've been told upfront that the product may cause cancer, it's their life to do with as they wish.

      I support drug legalization, but i don't think drug education is a bad thing either, as long as it's _real_ education, but "facts" the government is trying to brainwash you with.

      Oh, and have you heard about the new chemical they've found in cooked starches that they think causes cancer? Am i supposed to boycott all baked goods producers because of my principles?

      And as long as we're talking about principles, how about those "principled" health activists that are trying to force resturants who sell french fries to add a cancer warning but who don't seem to be urgent to get companies to label bread and pasta in the same fashion? They want to get people off of french fries but apparently have no problem supporting companies that make products with the exact same chemical in them but which are considered healthier in other aspects.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    7. Re:From an investment standpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > besides, they have no future. their company depends on someone else making crap products.

      Which, again, sounds like the american way.....

    8. Re:From an investment standpoint... by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 1

      Deadly diseases != adware

      Adware infects the computers of those who do not know much about computers and/or care. You can opt-out of adware, and you can uninstall this company's crapware without too many problems (using ad-aware). That's the difference between spam and advertising software. I would never financially support a profitable spammer for that reason - it is virtually impossible to stop the e-mails once your on a mailing list (short of changing your address).

      Yeah my post may give me a karma hit, but such is life. I've been down the road of having crapware altering my browser, putting links in my favorites, munging my TCP/IP stack, etc. And it would be a wonderful world if programmers working for little-guy companies could distribute software over the Internet without bundling their software with other "goodies". Such a society would NOT be capitalistic, unfortunately. While shunning such a company with dubious (but legal) tactics may be satisfying, a person's got to eat somehow.

      Ah, why did I get into this discussion anyhow? I couldn't invest in them if I wanted (gotta eat), so I suppose the rich shall get richer.

    9. Re:From an investment standpoint... by kbranch · · Score: 1

      Great, now 43 million people are going to get cancer because they're running Gator.

      Remember, people, it's == for comparison.

      Then again, it would be 43 million Gator users, so maybe we should view it as evolution at work.

    10. Re:From an investment standpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I do support companies and individuals that contribute to the spread of AIDS within the gay community.

      See, I support the rights of bath-house establishments, aka "sexual encounter environments" to operate (Their words, not mine, btw). If they want to get AIDS, that's their problem. Far be it from me to infringe upon their rights to have sex whenever, wherever, and with whomever they want, as many times as they want.

    11. Re:From an investment standpoint... by asr_man · · Score: 1

      don't seem to be urgent to get companies to label bread and pasta in the same fashion


      You're talking about acrylamide, and if you had really read about it you'd know that it is a by-product of the cooking process and not a original component of starch-based foods.

    12. Re:From an investment standpoint... by jtnishi · · Score: 1
      Ticker Symbol: MO (Altria group, formerly Philip-Morris) Up about 25 points since this time last year (about 87%).

      Would a stock broker wish to have bought this stock at this time last year, knowing that it would be up 87% at this time?

      Sorry about principles, but for some of us, yeah.

    13. Re:From an investment standpoint... by potat0man · · Score: 1

      I happily give many of my dollars over to Phillip Morris at regular intervals. And I even USE the product!

    14. Re:From an investment standpoint... by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      You're talking about acrylamide, and if you had really read about it you'd know that it is a by-product of the cooking process and not a original component of starch-based foods.

      Yeah, you caught me, i was just making it up, but it happens to be exactly like the chemical you linked to. By the way, if you had really read my comment you'd know that i said it was "found in cooked starches." (emphasis mine)

      I don't know, maybe it's just me, but i thought that specifying it was in cooked starches implied that it wasn't in uncooked starches.

      Or is your issue that you don't think bread and pasta have the chemical in them and therefore don't need to be labeled? Perhaps you come from a magical land where bread and pasta don't need to be cooked?

      If i had actualy read something about it i might happen to know that bread accounted for 16% of acrylamide in the average diet in one test, the same amount as from french fries. (Yes, it says that french fries have especially high levels, but the quantity of the food in question that is normally eaten is also an important factor.) I might also know that pasta is most likely safe if you cook it by boiling, but that if you use any other method (say, frying it as part of a Hamburger Helper recipe or something similar) you're probably out of luck. Oh, wait, those facts all support my statement.

      Bread and pasta are both risks for acrylamide, bread as much as french fries, and yet the health activists seem to be focused on french fries becuse they feel that french fries are especially bad for you in other regards. However if french fries have enough acrylamide to deserve labeling then bread should be labeled as well. So should pasta, although with a slightly different label, and any other starchy food that is meant to be cooked.

      If acrylamide is going to be considered a health threat, _all_ foods containing it (or that will contain it when cooked) should have a warning. You can't let some foods off just because they also have health benefits. To cary an analaogy to the usual slashdot extremes, that would be like saying it's okay to sell rat poision as food because it's low in fat and cholesterol, which makes up for it being, well, poison.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  14. Well... by QuasiCoLtd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The good thing about Gator going public is that their Financial Statements will tell us what advertisers are funding them. Makes for a nice boycott list.

    1. Re:Well... by nodwick · · Score: 4, Informative
      The good thing about Gator going public is that their Financial Statements will tell us what advertisers are funding them. Makes for a nice boycott list.
      Actually the financials will only tell you how much they're making off the advertisers; they're not required to disclose customer identities. If the numbers turn out to be big, all it's going to do is encourage others to follow in their footteps by starting up more spyware companies.
    2. Re:Well... by Leebert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The good thing about Gator going public is that their Financial Statements will tell us what advertisers are funding them. Makes for a nice boycott list.

      The ads popping up on desktops might give us a clue as to whom is paying for ads as well... :)

    3. Re:Well... by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

      That would be nice, I agree, but to my knowledge there is no requirement by the SEC that a public company disclose its clients. Only if one, or a small number of the clients represents an unusually large portion of revenue, then it would be considered sufficiently important that listing those out would be needed.

    4. Re:Well... by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      and wouldn't that saturate the infected computer market and drive people away from windows when they have 5+ diffrent spyware apps installed and get 5 popups for each webpage and such?

    5. Re:Well... by dmehus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out the filing:

      www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1126167/0001193125 04059332/ds1.htm

      It names quite a few of the advertisers, and some of them are large companies such as travel and hotel conglomerate Cendant and LowerMyBills.com.

      As well, Brightmail, Advertising.com, and Shopping.com also filed IPO paperwork.

      Cheers,
      Doug

    6. Re:Well... by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      But you have to wonder, knowing that their advertisers are going to be on their financial statement, how many of them are going to pull their advertising once they go public. Who knows how many bigname companies would avoid a huge scandal by simply removing their name from the list beforehand?

    7. Re:Well... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Anyone want to put together a nice list of websites for the end of my .hosts file? 127.0.0.1 www.doubleclick.net ...

    8. Re:Well... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      I think there are already more than 5 different spyware apps.

      I sometimes try to help people remove this shit from their computer, but the dumb few keep installing them, so I just ignore it.

      In Germany it's a lot worse, there are ActiveX controls that disconnects your modem and then silently dials a 1-900 number.. you have to click "Yes" to let the ActiveX control run, but hey, the website just says "We will now install a special access software. Click yes to continue.".

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.slashdot.org

    10. Re:Well... by twelvestring · · Score: 1

      Actually, SEC rules require that all key supplier and customer relationships be disclosed on Form 10-K (and their identities). You'll notice that most consumer products companies disclose Wal-Mart as a key customer (most do about 1/3 of their business with them). The distinction here is whether or not the customer is material (i.e., makes a difference to the average reader). Given that Gator only has about 45 advertisers, I'd be willing to bet that they've got a few that contribute a lot of money to their sales that will have to be disclosed with the SEC.

    11. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so you're willing to voluntarily install and run gator/claria ?

      Good for you, we'll all laugh at how slow your computer starts to go. Not to mention watch as your temper starts to rise as you get more and more annoyed by the pop-ups

      It's got to be better than most TV nowdays. ;-)

    12. Re:Well... by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      Other interesting snippets:
      We experience a high rate of user turnover. ... [O]n average, only approximately one-half of these new installations will remain active after the initial 30-day period. New users can comprise a material percentage of our user base at any given time... Software products that include our GAIN AdServer software are designed to be easy to uninstall and, even after the initial period of peak user turnover, each month many users uninstall the software product that includes our GAIN AdServer software.

      Easy to uninstall? *snort*

      We currently acquire a substantial portion of our new users through downloads of the KaZaA Media Desktop. ... We may be unable to maintain our existing user base and attract new users if there is a decline in the downloading or use of the KaZaA Media Desktop for any reason, including as a result of regulatory actions or litigation, such as the lawsuits brought by the Recording Industry Association of America against certain users of the KaZaA Media Desktop and other actions brought against Sharman Networks.

      No comment needed.

      The online behavioral marketing industry in general, and our business in particular, is vulnerable to the negative public perception associated with other forms of downloadable software known as spyware. Negative perception of our business practices or press reports linking our GAIN AdServer software to spyware could damage our reputation, cause new users not to install or existing users to uninstall the software products that include our GAIN AdServer software or cause consumers to use technologies that impede our ability to deliver ads.

      Apparently this isn't spyware for some reason. The reason isn't stated but I imagine this is like the spammers arguments that what they send isn't spam because it isn't porn/doesn't have a forged address/has an opt-out link/advertises something legal.

  15. Active? by Wuffle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many of their 40mil+ users actually know that they're an 'active' user?

  16. Whoah by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Gator Files for IPO to Raise $150 Million"

    Oh man, no wonder I had 5,000 unread messages in my inbox. Glad I checked Slashdot before uninstallling Outlook.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Whoah by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. Those people asking for money? Nothing to do with a mistaken identity and IPO announcement. They're just Nigerian scam artists. You would have gotten those anyway.

  17. I dislike adware... by nycsubway · · Score: 0

    Investing in Claria would be like buying tickets to a 3 hour live show called "Spam!".

    "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam... wonderful spam!"

  18. Trust Gator! by Thaidog · · Score: 3, Funny
    Let the ease of Gator fill out your stock options for you!


    Here's what they're saying about Gator stock:


    "I love the way Gator takes my money and saves it for a rainey day!"


    "Gator stock is so stable, I can't imagine investing with out it!"


    "I love the way my income depends on Gator stock it make me feel secure!"

    --

    ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

  19. Will it run on linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gator/Claria..... is it good or is it wack?

  20. Cosmetics... by Faust7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Claria who have recently changed their name from Gator.

    Nice name. But, a frosted dog turd is not a wedding cake; it is still a frosted dog turd. I hope whatever stock they have drops like a brick.

    1. Re:Cosmetics... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      So true. But it is quite effective at pulling the wool over the eyes of people who only knew what it was from some random article in a computer magazine they read once.

      They only know Gator as Gator, and unfortunately there hasn't been a whole lot of press explaining that Gator=Spyware, Claria=Gator, Claria=Spyware.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  21. IPO.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ...hmm, wonder if they'll let Simson Garfinkel in on the ground floor. :-)

    1. Re:IPO.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      If I'd have previewed AND tested, I'd have put in the the correct URL.

  22. 425 Advertisers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone know where to get a list of the 425 advertisers, so I know which companies to avoid?

  23. Crime pays on Wall Street.... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Napster was a dead company walking from a legal perspective from day one. Nobody was that surprised when it got shutdown. However, it was able to float an IPO...

    Sometimes, crime does pay. Even if Gator is made illegal by state laws, they'll still be functioning until such laws are enforced. Simply passing a law won't make them go away.

    Anybody got a current quote for what SCOX is going for while we're at it?

    1. Re:Crime pays on Wall Street.... by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Anybody got a current quote for what SCOX is going for while we're at it?

      Actually, yes: $10.55. It's still up from where it was before this whole mess started, but Wall Street's catching on :)

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Crime pays on Wall Street.... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " Napster was a dead company walking from a legal perspective from day one. Nobody was that surprised when it got shutdown."

      Oh but what a glorious walking mound of decaying flesh it was while it was still running.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  24. And in other news... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    Microsoft buys evil from Satan, says it will be an asset in the new economy.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:And in other news... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Old news you insensitive clod.

    2. Re:And in other news... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought it was relevant. Excuse me for wasting your oh so valuable time.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  25. It will become my goal in life... by jgrumbles · · Score: 1

    ...to hunt down every investor in Claria...and put a flaming bag of poop at their front door.

  26. Getting the stock by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 5, Funny
    Claria's officials said that instead of offering a "normal" IPO, they would instead try an "innovative bundling strategy." When an investor purchases one of several popular stocks or mutual funds, they will find that a small Claria stock certificate has been Superglued to the back of their purchased certificate. Any attempt to remove or separately sell the Claria stock will automatically destroy both certificates.

    Also, Claria said their certificates represent "the latest in investor-tracking technology." Claria's executives plan to use the small audio monitoring devices embedded in each certificate to learn valuable insider information about upcoming shifts in the stock market. "This represents a new direction in the stock market. Never before have companies used their stock certificates as a way to gather valuable investor information," said Claria's CEO in a press release today extolling the virtues of Claria's new business venture.

    Addressing privacy concerns, he also mentioned that, "Anyone buying this stock knows exactly what they're getting into. We fully disclose all information about our monitoring technologies to anyone who bothers to break into our company's vault and read the encrypted data therein. Anyone who claims they were misled about privacy simply hasn't done the proper espionage expected of both parties entering into any contract. After all, if you don't catch us spying on you, it's your fault."

    --

    That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    1. Re:Getting the stock by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Had I the points, I'd mod that interesting, not funny. I wouldn't put it past them.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    2. Re:Getting the stock by mad+mad+ninja · · Score: 1

      They would just use RFIDs gluded to the certificates.

  27. Crap like this by yaj · · Score: 0


    Maybe (hopefully!!) some
    of the computers being used by
    the Investment advisors and Lawyers
    working on the IPO will all crap
    out at critical times ...

    because they're infucted with GATOR's
    own shit

    Gator (Claria) is:
    crapware
    shitware

    and there is no way they could have
    received "informed consent" for
    the installation of their crap from
    my 9 year old.

  28. Let's play the name game... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The selection of the name "Claria" is a study how to avoid a mucked-up name... pick a made up word that has the seems to have the a tie to the words that represent what you wish you weren't so bad at.

    People think you can't keep your promises? Call yourself Verizon or Verisign... "Vari-" meaning "truth"
    You're stuck in the drug business trying to make people get high? Call yourself Altria... "alt-" meaning high
    People confused about complex multiple rate plan options? Call yourself Cingular... kinda sounds like "singular" where there's only one option.
    You're main product requires confusing people into aceptng it to work? Call yourself Claria... even though there's nothing clear to users about what they're getting themselves into.

    1. Re:Let's play the name game... by SKPhoton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're changing their name before they go public. What does this tell prospective investors? It tells them they have a bad image.

      Take a look at Valujet. They had serveral crashes and then changed their name to Airtran. Why? Because people associate Valujet with poorly maintained planes that crash. What is Gator known for? Annoying intrusive spyware. Take a look at Claria's website and note how clean and, well, "clear" it is. Again, they're trying to change their image. I hope people who decide to invest in this company keep Gator in mind when looking at Claria. It's the same management running the new company.

      On an unrelated note, check out Claria's home page when redirected from their original page. It features a red bubble not seen from claria.com which 404's. Not a very professional sign.

    2. Re:Let's play the name game... by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      the red bubble informing you that gator is now claria isn't there when you directly access claria.com on purpose...If you didn't know they used to be gator, they don't want you to find out that they were because gator == spyware and claria == ?.

      (warning: the preceeding is conjecture, but it is the most logical explanation I could come up with.)

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    3. Re:Let's play the name game... by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how I understood it. On a related note, if you try clicking on the red bubble you'll see - a dead link. Not very professional either.

    4. Re:Let's play the name game... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think Gator should have named themselves Anusol, but it's already taken.

      Weaselmancer

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    5. Re:Let's play the name game... by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Actually they were forced into a name change when scores of Florida alligators made the trek to Gator's corporate offices to protest the negative association. Faced with the possibility of being eaten alive, Gator's board of directors voted to change the name.

    6. Re:Let's play the name game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a problem naming a new company today - a problem partly caused by so many idiots sitting on domain names.

      It used to be simple naming a company - check within a few miles to see who's around - then start doing business. Now everybody is in a global namespace. And it sucks trying to find a name that's unused.

      Seriously - if you've ever wanted to start a company and have a good idea for the name, type it into the address bar right now. Chances are that somebody registered it but never made a site. I went trying to register a new domain last week - it took several hours to find something that nobody else had bought - and I had deliberately mis-spell a word in order to do so.

      So I really do not blame these companies making up new names.

    7. Re:Let's play the name game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      claria
      n. clar-eeya

      Spyware.

      (Webster's New World Dictionary, 1999)

  29. 43 million active users by NTmatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gator has 43 million users in the same way that 43 million people actively have the common cold. They have no control over how they got it, can't do anything about it, and don't notice that it's been gestating until they start sneezing bright flashy ads. It's that sort of misrepresentation that makes me want to work in the department of Statistics and Information Synthesis.

    At any rate, how can someone "use" Gator/Claria? Their "users" are simply presented with ads and such. Are you a "user" of the ads you see on Television? No. You are an audience member, and a very passive one at that. Amazing. Simply amazing.

  30. i interviewed with Gator a few months ago by motiv8x · · Score: 4, Informative

    Despite what the company does, after interviewing with them, I felt like it would be a good solid company to work for. They had a great dot-com atmosphere, used open source technology, and paid well - my position was for Perl programmer. And they even allowed you to work from home. I didn't have the XML::Parser experience they were looking for, so I didn't get the job. One thing they revealed to me was that they did actually track what you were searching in Google. This part I didn't like. If they can watch you on Google, they can capture data from any form you fill out - although they claimed Google was the only form they captured data from.

    1. Re:i interviewed with Gator a few months ago by MushMouth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google does use a GET type form submission which means the CGI arguments sit right in the
      URL. more private submissions should use POST or better yet https.

    2. Re:i interviewed with Gator a few months ago by motiv8x · · Score: 0

      True. The popup targets ads when you search in Google. Of those 43 million users, I am curious how many actually are aware that the popups are coming from an app they installed - and don't know how to stop it, instead of those who are assuming popups are part of the "internet experience".

    3. Re:i interviewed with Gator a few months ago by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Despite what the company does, after interviewing with them, I felt like it would be a good solid company to work for. They had a great dot-com atmosphere, used open source technology, and paid well - my position was for Perl programmer. And they even allowed you to work from home.

      If you exit Claria's building and turn left, then walk two blocks down Douglas Ave, you reach my company which has all three of these attributes. Except we're much smaller, but unlike Claria we sell a real product that people knowingly install, and they pay thousands for it. (We probably have to do way more tech support than they have to, though.) We're a private company and not even thinking of doing an IPO until a good time to do it comes again (ha, ha).

      How do they interview people? We ask a few general algorithm questions to see how people think, and figure you can learn the specific language we use here after you start. (The language is the easy part- the codebase is the bigger learning curve.) We were interviewing recently but not any more- we found a couple of unemployed schmucks we like.

      Unfortunately, we're in a crappier neighborhood than Claria. There's an auto auction place across the street and customers from pharmaceutical companies sometimes hear the auto auctions going on when they visit. It was really hard to find office space during the dot-com era, and we're still bound by the six-year lease we signed in 1999 for what is basically a converted print shop. I bike through the empty parking lots of several empty office buildings on the way to work, and they're so much nicer. (The people in those buildings were all laid off at the beginning of 2002, and the FOR RENT signs aren't going away.)

      One thing they revealed to me was that they did actually track what you were searching in Google. This part I didn't like. If they can watch you on Google, they can capture data from any form you fill out - although they claimed Google was the only form they captured data from.

      Good thing they didn't hire you, or you wouldn't have said anything about this! Maybe you'll get a 5, Informative out of it though.

    4. Re:i interviewed with Gator a few months ago by am+2k · · Score: 1

      If the program runs locally on your computer, it doesn't matter if you're using GET, POST or HTTPS.

  31. They should be in jail by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to sound extreme here but lots of spyware can cause a system to act just like its infected with virii and cause it be unfunctional.

    I have seen it first hand.

    My gf's pc and at work where I assist students in a university computer lab.

    My gf's computer use to take 20 minutes to boot and would reboot every 30 minutes or so and was highly unresponsive. Especially IE.

    McAfee anti virus showed no viruses? I then ran ad-aware and it found 600 objects and tons and tons of spyware.

    After that it was fine.

    Second, spyware installs backdoors( tell me that does not sound like a worm)so hackers can see your keystrokes and get things like credit card numbers, etc. God forbid anyone doing the taxes with these worms aka spyware ridden systems. Hackers can easily do identity theft.

    So I ask slashdotters now. Why is gatorsoft legal? If this thing was called A.mydoom or something the FBI would hound them.

    THis is pure fraud, it steals computer cycles, causes break-ins, etc. Its a worm in my book. It may not copy itself to other systems but it sure acts like one. Hmmm I bet if gator soft did email itself over the address book then it could get even MORE customers. lol

    This and Divx need to be brought down.

    1. Re:They should be in jail by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      AntiVirus software writers need to realize that not every malware program these days self replicates, but their anti-virus program-identifying scans could very easily pick up adware programs simply by throwing them into the definition files.

      Why don't they do that?

    2. Re:They should be in jail by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how exactly is spyware different from viruses(the modern day ones, that the stupid user clicks on to install)?

      it comes in without telling what it is, it stays stealthy and twists what the user is doing. on top of that it's doing it for financial gain for somebody!

      every virus scanner software maker should add spyware to the takedown list.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:They should be in jail by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

      but their anti-virus program-identifying scans could very easily pick up adware programs simply by throwing them into the definition files.
      Why don't they do that?


      I used to wonder the same thing and even pondered the possibility of a large AV company buying one of the Anti-Spyware/Adware vendors and incorporating the technology in future AV releases. I reached the conclusion that this probably won't happen because they would most likely get sued into oblivion by the creators of the Spyware/Adware.

      This is because the creators would argue in court that the user was presented a EULA that satisfactorily disclosed the consequences of installing the software bundle. I don't know what the actual legal charges would be, but I imagine something like anticompetitive practices, theft of their revenue by deception, or something like that.

      I could be wrong, but I guess it all comes down to the EULA.

    4. Re:They should be in jail by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I never signed such a EULA? Most come from infected mpegs off of DC++. Divx player could of mentioned it briefly but you know what?

      EULA's are not legal documents or law abinding. You need a notoray present. MS started this garbage but it has never been proven in court and they would probably lose. THe real issue for the BSA is real documents signed by lawyers with notors present. I am talking about a 10k user license for MS-Office or Windows. That is legally binding but a personal EULA is not.

      I think the FBI should shut them down.

      If it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, then its a duck. These things cost businesses and homes money are installing backdoors and keystroke logers can not possible be legal? It cant?

    5. Re:They should be in jail by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anything that takes special steps to get rid of should be killed by AntiVirus software.

      No Exceptions.

      If they have a decent uninstaller and don't try to reinstall themselve's automatically (they act like a good citizen), then don't remove them.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    6. Re:They should be in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am posting this follow-up as AC

      EULA's are not legal documents or law abinding.

      I sincerely hope this is true. However, I should have been more specific. The EULA I was referring to was Kazaa's.

      Please note the details of Sections 7, 8 & 9. They are, respectively:

      7 Sharman's Right to Run Advertising without Payment to Users

      8 Links to Third-Party Sites and Channels

      9 Third Party Software

      Also of interest to me are Sections 10, 12, 13 & 14.

      From what I understand, unless an individual selects an option to accept during the installation of the program/s the software will not install. Hence, if they successfully installed the software then there exists an agreement between the two parties.

      Like anyone who knows what this software does, I am as against it as the next person.

    7. Re:They should be in jail by timmi · · Score: 1

      It has been my experience that Mcafee 9 will detect and remove spyware, link to McAfee

    8. Re:They should be in jail by mog007 · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right, my friend's brother once had such a vast amount of spyware that his mouse was literally LAGGING. This on a fairly new computer, we're not talking about a 286, and the cursor was actully lagging behind the movements of the mouse.

    9. Re:They should be in jail by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Viruses attempt to duplicate themselves by modifying executables to include their code. Spyware is bundled willigly into software by its publisher and does not modify executables.

      Worm viruses attempt to replicate by exploiting network exploits or transferring through email. Spyware does not attempt to replicate.

      Viruses often destroy or modify data. Spyware is annoying but generally does not destroy data intentionally.

      Spyware does not generally bring computer networks to their knees with a barrage of traffic.

      Spyware does not generate thousands of email messeges.

      Sorry, Slashdot users, Spyware != Viruses. Yes, they are both annoying, but so is spam and pop-up ads. Spyware is far less destructive than any virus.

      Not that I would want it on my system.

    10. Re:They should be in jail by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I believe Norton Antivirus does get rid of most adware/spyware. This is what lots and lots of people have told me, symantec and tech-knowledgeable friends alike.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    11. Re:They should be in jail by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree. Perhaps trojan horse would be more accurate because thats how I see them. If I download the divX player, I expect a player, not a backdoor installer that harms performance on my pc.

      Yes they generate a ton of traffic and can bring a lan to its knee's just alike a real virus.

      IT does so by reporting all your keystrokes and internet sites. IE becomes unresponse particularly as the spyware watches what you do and reports to the master which sites you visit.

      ALso it does report any text with a "@" in it. So yes you do get spam by typing in any email address.

      Enough of these spyware's can halt a system and bring it down to its knee's just like worms and trojan horses.

      If teenagers go to jail for installing keyboard loggers in library computers, why can't these guys?

  32. Gator for the masses IS helpful by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

    Oh I'm so gonna get toasted for this one.

    I hate Gator, I use AIRoboform and never looked back , BUT there are tools that people find handy.

    "Calendar, Clock Sync, password manager i mean, if these tools don't help, tell me what do?"

    That's the general statement I get from collegues and "acquaintences" not in the know.

    They are annoying, but I think they HAVE stopped being sneaky with their 3rd party stuff and haven't seen anything in a LONG time that "crept" it's way onto a system without a user not removing checkmarks.

    I just might buy the stock in a pump and dump to allow this company to pay me back for the hours it takes me to remove their stuff from PC's. ...maybe...

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:Gator for the masses IS helpful by eclectro · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are annoying, but I think they HAVE stopped being sneaky with their 3rd party stuff

      Yes, and I have a bridge that I want to sell you.

      Gator still does deceptive "drive-by-downloads", and people still unkowingly get infected with their crapware

      Sorry/Claria/they will always be gator to me.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Gator for the masses IS helpful by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      There are MANY "third party" apps that do all the "usful" things that attract novice Internet users to Gator, without the spy / spam ware.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  33. I curse them by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    may their untrue words fester in their mouths, making their tongue to become black and swollen.

    I could go on, but you get the idea

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:I curse them by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Curse them! We hates them! Filthy *ssholes...

      /Gollum

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:I curse them by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      Curse them! We hates them! Filthy *ssholes...

      LOL.

      on the other hand, imagine a large collection of such web pages venting such a sentiment against any such persons.

      Imagine any normal human as a CEO reading that that there were thousand of custom designed pages cursing him or her explicily and by name. Should give anyone pause.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    3. Re:I curse them by emilng · · Score: 1

      If they were normal humans,they wouldn't become the CEOs of companies that would incur the wrath of people who would take the time to make custom designed pages just to curse them out.

      Maybe I just have no imagination.

  34. 43 million users? by wheatwilliams · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would be like Hepatitis C Inc., boasting about their 500 million customers. This reminds me of Mel Brook's radio skit about the LMNOP Advertising Agency: "We just got the Cholesterol account. We're trying to move Cholesterol into the American heart. It's going to be tough, but we'll win. Advertising is a lot stronger than life."

    1. Re:43 million users? by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      -2 -- I cleaned up two systems infected with their crap yesterday.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  35. stock holders by SKPhoton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If someone buys enough shares of Gator, or Claria as they're now calling themselves, could they force the company to shut down? Sure, that would hurt your wallet but it sure would make a lot of people happy.

  36. When someone is too well known.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's changing name because Gator became too well know with his (in)famous spyware ?

    Next: Microsft change is name to avoid anti-trust lawsuit.....

  37. Kill this IPO by Maskirovka · · Score: 4, Informative
    Claria...Clar-Ia...sounds like a disease doesn't it?

    For someone with more time on their hands than me:
    1)Start some media fear mongering about a "Claria Virus".
    2)Include instructions for removing said virus.
    3)Feel good about what you have done to help society.

    1. Re:Kill this IPO by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Careful with that. Back when they first changed their name to Claria (from Gator), they started issuing C&Ds and cart00ney threats to people referring to them as "adware", "spyware", etc... See here for info about the cart00ney brandished at PC Pitstop.

      These bastards and their "Clariaware" are scumbags of the first order.

    2. Re:Kill this IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ia is said Ila - aka Ebola, Clarila

    3. Re:Kill this IPO by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      4)Link to said instructions and Google Bomb the hell out of 'em.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Kill this IPO by shario · · Score: 1

      Try "claria virus" on Google :) Claria virus

    5. Re:Kill this IPO by signingis · · Score: 1
      You forgot...

      4)???
      5)Profit!

      --

      I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
  38. Virus?? by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my opinion, after spending 2 hours removing spyware from a friend's computer, Gator's products are no more than viruses.

    Which leads me to my point.... why doesn't Symantec (Norton) classify Gator as a virus. It has all the hallmarks of a virus (hell... Blaster was LESS destructive. It just rebooted your machine), and no legitimate use. How isn't it a virus?? Just because the company's legit at the moment, does it really make it okay?

    Can anyone answer me?

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Virus?? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because its by a company who can sue them.

    2. Re:Virus?? by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      Crap...next thing we'll see is a mail virus claiming to be a "customer tracking" program. Then watch the virus writer sue Norton.

    3. Re:Virus?? by deinol · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I just did a scan on someone's computer with Norton AV 2004, and it did pick up something and called it adware/malware. I think they are adding this to their virus protection.

      But as someone else mentioned, they have to be very careful what they do, since they could be sued for that I'm sure. We don't have right or wrong in america, we have how likely am I to get sued.

      --
      Got Apathy?
    4. Re:Virus?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How isn't it a virus??

      The executable does not copy itself to other machines.

    5. Re:Virus?? by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1

      Not only can, but has threatened to. In the past, some antivirus products have targeted this muck and backed off when threatened.

    6. Re:Virus?? by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      IMHO it *sadly* doesn't qualify as a virus because it is included in software with the express knowledge/agreement of the author. Also it doesn't "spread" or destroy anything..

      --
      Store with salt
  39. In Soviet russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Users Install gator!

  40. users or victims? by eagl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    43 million active users... How many are unwilling or unaware victims? I've never met anyone who had gator on their computer know what it was or want it installed. That doesn't sound like being an "active user" to me, more like virtual date-rape victims than anything else.

    1. Re:users or victims? by Carnivore24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You would be suprised. At my work some of the users have Gator and that EAcceleration crap installed. Its funny when I goto cleanup their system and all the passwords Gator has saved for everything vanishes. They have to call back and get a bunch of passwords reset for applications Gator helped them with months ago. Ever seen Gator, EAcceleration, and Bonzi Buddy load onto the desktop of a Pentium 200Mhz with 64MB of RAM? Its not a pretty picture.

  41. Just another reason to give the Internet to the UN by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah. Gator. It's Spam. But from the standpoint of an investor, it's probably a great investment. Remember, Wall Street is about money not social good or bad. This is part of a more complex and disturbing trend of a total conversion of the Internet from a tool of the masses for usful communication, to a commercial product. And, it's an example of how western nations, especially the United States, think that they "own" the internet. This is why I support the idea of taking the Internet away from ICANN, and placing it under UN juristiction.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  42. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by Qrlx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ftp from the command line works just fine in windows.

  43. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by motiv8x · · Score: 0

    uh...use Linux and ssh :-) windows is a piece of shit, one-user operating system.

  44. SCO showed the way by jwd630 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pump up the stock price based on nice big numbers ("43 million active users and 425 advertisers") that lead the unwary/uninformed to assume that this company has specialized capabilities that can be the beginning of the next Internet boom; the executives and investment backers incrementally cash out while stories about the sure thing are dribbled to the media to keep the stock price up. Groklaw discusses the SCO strategy in greater detail.

    1. Re:SCO showed the way by motiv8x · · Score: 0

      SCO is flat out lying, taking credit for something that isn't theirs.

    2. Re:SCO showed the way by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Why do you find those numbers to be uninformed? Anyone who has ever looked at advertising with Gator, which is what their business is, knows full well what those numbers represent.

      From an advertiser's point of view, Gator is the most successful, targetted service out there, with the highest rate of return. It's also expensive.

      Given gator's operating profits, $150M is not a rediculous IPO figure. IN fact, it's quite low.

      Is Gator scum? Yes. Spyware? Yes. Dodgy install practices? Yes.. but don't make the mistake of thinking it's a 2 bit company just trying to hype up vaporware...... Gator is the leading company for targetted advertising on the net.

    3. Re:SCO showed the way by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      The notable differences are that Gator actually has a product, SCO does not, and SCO happens to be suing IBM, which Gator is not.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  45. Active != Willing by qw(name) · · Score: 2, Funny
    Claria said it has 43 million active users and 425 advertisers.
    I wonder how many of the "active users" actually know they're using it.

    I hope no one buys their stock.
  46. This is just revolting by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

    Man, I can't believe what people will fund.

  47. Count me out by mindless4210 · · Score: 1

    There's no way in hell I'd support that company. I can't even count how many times I've taken that crap off of my family's computers.

    --
    Wireless News www.DailyWireless
  48. Crickey! by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny


    Man, someone needs to go Steve Irwin on that gator's ass...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  49. Claria has a very suitable name. by t_allardyce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Claria take their name from Chlamydia, a common sexually transmitted infection that many people do not know they carry. Someone in the advertising/PR department must have had a bit of fun with that one ;)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  50. Let's take a look at the truth. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Claria said it has 43 million active users and 425 advertisers

    Er, no. Try again. How about:
    Claria said it has 43 million active victims and 425 parasites

  51. You can install Gator and figure it out yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And please, be accurate. Remember, this is for posterity.

  52. Best IPO in a long while by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I definitely plan on investing somewhere in the ballpark of 6-10k (no, I'm not rich) in this company the day it is available.

    Sure, not that much, but if I can get in sub-$30.00 a share and see it go up to $40.00-60.00 within 24 weeks, that's money in the bank for me.

    Looks like a sure fire winner, what with the stagnant economy and a viral marketer filing for an IPO, this ought to be a hot item.

    Ohhhhh and as for my personal agenda besides a quick in and out ride on this ticket? I run nothing but OS X, IRIX and Redhat 9 (soon to be debian) at home and at my colo provider, so anything that makes Windows a nasty experience is A-OK by me.

    I think all *nix enthusiasts should by in and feed the cause.
    The more virus, spam and crap on Windows the better I say.

    1. Re:Best IPO in a long while by motiv8x · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ditto, as linux user, I happily welcome anything that makes the ms-windows experience that much more unbearable.

    2. Re:Best IPO in a long while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying...

      Misery Loves Company?

    3. Re:Best IPO in a long while by bumbobway · · Score: 1

      So, when they start writing spyware / backdoor code for Netscape browsers running Linux from this IPO funding, do you think your $1000 profit will be worth it? Fsucking bigheaded geek a$$hole.

    4. Re:Best IPO in a long while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more virus, spam and crap on Windows the better I say

      Go ahead and GLOAT for now...

      Or need I remind you that this flavor of spyware was self inflicted. How long before this hits 'open source'. Sure it will be removed fairly quickly? But are you SURE there is nothing in those binary distributions? Better review every line of code and compile it yourself.

      While you may have the time to do it most do not...

      Being able to type make does not a clueful make :)

      Also good luck with that ipo thing. I for one will be keeping my money in a company that is raking the money in, Microsoft. Also as a stock holder I can actually vote and have SOME say in what they do... What are you doing about it? Your going to pump and dump in a company that should die in its own vomit. Here is to hoping that company follows all the other .coms out there.

    5. Re:Best IPO in a long while by Gurp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I run nothing but OS X, IRIX and Redhat 9 (soon to be debian) at home and at my colo provider, so anything that makes Windows a nasty experience is A-OK by me.

      Yeah. And AIDS is fine by me, coz I'm in a steady monogamous relationship - hence reasonably safe.

      Honestly, what kind of sorry excuse for a human being are you? Actively wishing pain for other people because they don't share your taste in something as boring as an operating system?

      Congratulations. You've actually made me feel quite depressed about the world.

    6. Re:Best IPO in a long while by master0ne · · Score: 1

      so once unix/linux hits 10% desktop share they make a *nix version, and they got shitloads of cash, then it IS your problem, and YOUR fault.

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    7. Re:Best IPO in a long while by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Ditto.

      The world is so fucked up it makes me want to puke sometimes. And no, I don't puke when I'm happy either.

      They need to think about the fact that, if gator makes it horrible for people on windows and everyone blocks them out, where do they turn next? macOS and linux, the next 2 biggest markets.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    8. Re:Best IPO in a long while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhhhh and as for my personal agenda besides a quick in and out ride on this ticket? I run nothing but OS X, IRIX and Redhat 9 (soon to be debian) at home and at my colo provider, so anything that makes Windows a nasty experience is A-OK by me.

      You insensitive little clod. When Gator starts targeting Linux and Mac users, I hope your computers are destroyed by the flurry of advertising you get.

  53. Re:ever have kile bile? by motiv8x · · Score: 0

    sounds like the same reaction people have after finding out they have Gator installed.

  54. List of afvertisers at Harvard by Animaether · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:List of afvertisers at Harvard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SUN is advertising on gator? Disgusting.

    2. Re:List of afvertisers at Harvard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This surprises you, why?

      Sun has always creeped me out.

      Notice Apple on there too.

    3. Re:List of afvertisers at Harvard by randomdef · · Score: 1

      wow, i'd boycott them all but i'd wither and die, not to mention buy german apple products and shitty cars!

    4. Re:List of afvertisers at Harvard by zulux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ugg!!

      Now I have to boycott: Alstate insurance, Sun and Apple.

      Why coulden't it have been McDonalds, Wal*Mart and Microsoft? They're easy to boycott - unless you happen to like stale food, crappy junk and buggy software.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    5. Re:List of afvertisers at Harvard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > german apple products

      That's french, smartass.

    6. Re:List of afvertisers at Harvard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should look again, and maybe you should look at the german ad? oh, and maybe you should shut the fuck up?

  55. stock games by mabu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know most people here are laughing at the thought of anyone stupid enough to buy into this IPO. But all it takes are a few ignorant or greedy fund managers to pump this stock. This is why I generally invest in blue-chip stocks or market index mutual funds over standard funds, which these days seem to be corrupt.

    I think there's maybe six or seven financial investment companies that haven't been sanctioned by the SEC in the last two years for unethical activity. You can't trust the American media to even let you know when your investment company has been fined $200M for insider trading. The best source for really finding out how sleazy Wall Street is is through England's Financial Times, which doesn't pull any punches. If you have an IRA or any money in funds, keep a close eye on it. These rich fund managers are making a fortune off the pennies most working people scrounge up and think will be there for them in the future.

    I never really dabbled much in the market until recently when I had a broker "friend" make recommendations for me. After I lost a bundle, I set up my own account on E*Trade and started doing my own investing - I beat my broker's ROI by 14% within six months. I'm pretty convinced these days most people in the financial community don't know anything, but that doesn't mean a bunch of people won't make money in this Gator IPO, but it will probably be at mutual fund holders' expense.

    My advice to people is take control of your finances and invest in companies you believe in. Pull your money out of funds so you're not unwittingly financing SCO or Gator -- you'd be surprised how often you're in bed with the devil through your IRA.

  56. WS_FTP Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WS_FTP Pro is the best FTP client for Windows. A nice GUI, tons of features. Never crashed once for me. Don't bother downloading the free version, though. It sucks shit. Instead, you gotta find the full Pro version and get it. It is very good.

  57. The good news is by fermion · · Score: 4, Funny

    that the company now has $150 million that can be targeted by the enterprising trial lawyers. Let the litigation begin!

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  58. Darl McBride to CEO... by IgD · · Score: 1

    He has experience in this line of business:)

  59. Re:SO LONELY by motiv8x · · Score: 0

    heh, I assume you have nothing better to do than post on /. too?

  60. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a follow-up to this story, after Gator announced it will change its name to Claria, Spyware changed its name to Gator citing brand recognition and popularity as primary reasons....

  61. Pre-emptive crapware blocking?? by hklingon · · Score: 4, Informative

    What sort of setups do the admins out there have for blocking this stuff? Anything at the gateway or proxy level??

    For a long time, I have been using a lot of off-the-shelf scripts and utilities hacked together as an anti-spyware, anti-virus proxy. Anyone out there doing the same care to comment?

    For web stuff, I use squid to block a lot of stuff that is usually spyware. It pretty much kills any software that auto-installs (except for java webstart). Usually not to big of a deal-- the business calls the help desk and we walk them through a manual install of flash or whatever it is they need. For very common spyware, we let it infect one test machine then redirect traffic through the proxy to those sites. Ideally, we block the file name or active x control with squid. It isn't a perfect solution though...

    For email, I am using p3scan, a pop3 proxy, and a couple simple scripts to rename all untrusted attachments to something else. We also have a nice script that strips out all non-image, non-formatting related html in email. The email soltion seems much more elegant and nice than the web solution-- anyone know of any setups better/similar that cut gator & other companies off at the knees like this??

    In practice, this is has reduced our crapware-related helpdesk calls at least 10 fold.

    1. Re:Pre-emptive crapware blocking?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      One I used for awhile before squid and proxy scripts. Was in the host files. Most of that stuff is loaded right off the same servers everytime. vx2.cc/gator.com and its sub hosts is where most of the gator stuff came from at one time. Been using the proxy script thing for so long its not been a real problem. My hosts file is probably WAY out of date...

      Using those 3 things I would say it snags 99.99% of it. You can even get the proxy thing to take it out on the client end so your sever isn't doing all the work... Works fairly well in IE and Mozilla.

      Also there is no 'magic bullet'. Wish there was. You will always be chasing whatever they dream up next. Your scripts will always be mutating just as much as that industry mutates.

      Like the email thing. Might have to give that a try.

      Your users may not like it but you may want to scan the machines for newly instaled things too. That should help you keep up with your scripts. See something new go see where they were surfing...

      Found a couple of nasty ones the other day in java. It was even using an expliot in the ms java to do its evil deeds. You may want to goto suns instead. Least its being maintainted...

    2. Re:Pre-emptive crapware blocking?? by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      My setup is a mac, i don't get no hassle.

    3. Re:Pre-emptive crapware blocking?? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Also there is no 'magic bullet'. Wish there was. You will always be chasing whatever they dream up next. Your scripts will always be mutating just as much as that industry mutates.

      Here's your bullet, though you've probably already rejected it as too much of a PITA...and it is a PITA. If you manage enough machines, it is worth the effort since it can catch everything before any other specialized programs will.

      Checksum base machine configurations, file by file. Dump registry settings. Keep all systems in sync. When something doesn't match, force it back to the standard config while researching the differences. When new files or settings appear, research them as well and either ban (delete) or add them to the base configuration or white list. Of course, improvise and exapand on these suggestions.

      In email terms, focus on your white list not on chasing down every variation of "M@ke $$$ Quickly".

      Checksums: Fast Sum, md5summer, and MD5Deep are some tools to take a look at.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    4. Re:Pre-emptive crapware blocking?? by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      I've found Startup Guard (http://www.acelogix.com) a good way to keep any ad/spyware from running if it slips in under the radar. SG immediately alerts you if something is trying to add itself to bootup and lets you stop it. (An' best of all, it's free)

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  62. i wonder by fresh27 · · Score: 1

    I wonder: How many of the 43 million users have willingly installed Gator?

    --
    http://ipod.fresh27.net/
    1. Re:i wonder by Junta · · Score: 1

      Why, 43 million of course. It is *clearly* stated on the 'I agree' click-through licenses between lines 7,254 and 7,255, and *everyone* reads those agreements thoroughly, right?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:i wonder by CaptainTux · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why, 43 million of course. It is *clearly* stated on the 'I agree' click-through licenses between lines 7,254 and 7,255, and *everyone* reads those agreements thoroughly, right?

      You know, I have a problem with people who gripe about "secret stuff" being installed on their computer "without their consent" even though, had they read the EULA, they would have known exactly what was being installed and what it does.

      While I am not a fan of Gator or any of those damn spyware crapware programs I have to wonder why a company is so wrong installing spyware on your computer because you were too lazy to read the EULA? If they don't HAVE a EULA or it's deceptive then that's a different thing but I'm talking about EULA's that clearly spell out what happens in the program and where users just don't take the time to read it.

      Why do we call Gator unethical and sleazy (which I do) when if we wrote a program that told the user "Accepting this EULA will format your entire hard disk" and the user didn't read it we'd be saying "stupid user"? When a company meets its responsibility of disclosure and the users are too lazy to read it then how is that the companies fault?

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    3. Re:i wonder by Junta · · Score: 1

      Your point makes sense, but at the same time it seems like EULAs for even the smallest applications are made so intentionally long and crammed to the brim with unimportant details that the things the user might be upset with are glossed over as quickly as possible. It seems the intent is to have a lot of innocuous stuff in there to dissuade the 'ardent' users from finisihing the agreement before clicking 'I agree', or at least get them impatient enough to skim and probably miss the part they would care about.

      Kind of like going to buy a car and having the dealer saying 'just sign here' after he flips through 7-10 pages of material to get to the signature line, to pressure you into signing the agreemnet without fully knowing the terms. I know there is no urging of the user to click faster, but there is a sort of implicit expectation that the user will at most see a couple of lines and say 'ok, standard stuff, whatever, *cilck*'.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  63. Interesting name for their "service" by nizo · · Score: 1
    behavioral marketing platform

    One must wonder, exactly what behavior are we talking about? Something like "Software designed to punish stupid behavior and allow us to make a fast buck at the same time".

  64. Then Why does Ad-Aware exist? by Xhad · · Score: 1

    I almost bought this argument, until I thought, "Wait a minute, if freeware companies can make software that does this, surely big names like Norton or McAfee can get away with it." If these spyware companies are willing to slap bigger companies with a lawsuit (companies that would be able to defend themselves), I don't know why they wouldn't try to intimidate the bigger free products into oblivion. Everyone and his dog knows about Ad-Aware in particular.

    1. Re:Then Why does Ad-Aware exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Replying as AC

      I almost bought this argument, until I thought, "Wait a minute, if freeware companies can make software that does this, surely big names like Norton or McAfee can get away with it."

      I continue to wonder the same thing. I don't know why companies like AdAware are not being sued by those who lose money from Anti-Spyware/Adware software. Maybe it is because that until Claria's IPO announcement most of those companies were trying to fly under the radar? Again, this is just speculation.

  65. Re:Didn't you read the article, or even the summar by mutewinter · · Score: 1

    Gator to Claria, Philip Morris to Altria? I think we should avoid companies with the "ria" suffix!

  66. APPLE ADVERTISES WITH GATOR by mr.henry · · Score: 1
    Check the third one down.

    Of course, it's OK for Apple to do that. Apple could have sold munitions to Germany in WWII and it would be OK.

    1. Re:APPLE ADVERTISES WITH GATOR by ZackSchil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it looks like Apple of Germany was the only company placing the ads (or having the ads placed on their behalf by an ad agency). All Apple's branches are in charge of advertising within their own countries. I guess Apple of Germany thought it was a nice way to get switchers... annoy the hell out of them for using a PC with Gator :)

    2. Re:APPLE ADVERTISES WITH GATOR by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      Hm, so what? Companies are ultimately one entity, no matter how much autonomy their national subdivisoins have.

      If Apple is advertising with Gator anywhere, that says a lot about their advertising policy (or lack of one).

  67. 43 MILLION? by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    Do these 43 million active users know they are active users? I suppose basing your business plan on deceit and subterfuge is the American way.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  68. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by Qrlx · · Score: 1

    why dont you just get a mac and quit bitching.

  69. steve irwin . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Were is the hunter when you need him?

  70. Tell your dad to stop it by notestein · · Score: 0, Troll

    Tell you dad to stop illegally downloading complete albums of 70's classics, and he won't have to be so damn paranoid about cookies.

  71. look at the numbers by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    They don't even make a dollar per year per victim!

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  72. Re:Claria's "users" [OT] by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1
    Check out Javacool Software's Spyware Blaster, a program which sets an ActiveX kill bit for identified threats. The software is free, but offers a subscription service for automatic updates.

    Note: I'm not affilliated with Javacool, but I have found their product really useful.

    --

    That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
  73. Only reason I'd buy 1 share. [Re:Well...] by saitoh · · Score: 1

    Is to show up at the shareholder meeting and see who all was there for company reps.

    Wear a good suit and tie, make up a company, and have fun with a notepad...

    Hell, even bring a laptop or mini camera and take pictures of everyone! A true kodak moment.

    -- Page

    --
    We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
  74. What's the difference between Spyware and a Virus? by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's the difference between Spyware and a Virus or a trojan horse?
    Why is it that a company can get away with what a script kiddie would get thrown in jail for?

    And are they still going to threaten to sue people who call Gator, excuse me, Claria Spyware?

    And might as well throw out a stupid-patent joke out there.....

    Do they own a patent on using computer viruses to make money on the internet?

    --
    I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
    If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
    Courage.
  75. Lawsuit waiting to happen? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

    Are these guys going to take this lying down? Claria and Clarica sure look and sound very much alike...and about the only company who could tarnish public perception of an insurance company would have to be Gator....

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  76. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had good luck with "max-ftp" windows client.

    If it doesn't work, it's usually a problem with the server (too many people).

    It was freeware, however it appears the latest version turned to shareware $15. You may be able to find an earkier free version somewhere. But I think it's worth the $15

  77. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right, there isn't one good FREE ftp client for Windows. You just have to either buy one or uh, "pirate" one.

  78. Time synchronization by lamber45 · · Score: 1
    Another one of their schemes offers to download a program that will automatically sync your system time, which is useful to most people who notice that consumer PCs are usually pathetic at keeping a system time.


    The Linux fileserver/firewall on my network keeps its time synchronized with ntpdate. All the Windows boxes run a batch script that does NET TIME \\[linux box] /SET /YES whenever anyone logs in. The setup seems to work fine; I also see that ther is a version of NTP for winNT.

  79. *crosses fingers* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just hope that with this new found money they'll be able to port their excellent product to Linux.

    I've been meaning to switch from Windows for years, but since it doesn't run Gator, I just can't see myself making the switch.

    1. Re:*crosses fingers* by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. Then maybe the idiot Linux users who say "they're idiots for using Windows anyways" will have one less thing to gripe about.

      I use Windows, have never installed any spyware. I haven't done 90% of things those linux users gripe about. But they will still call me stupid for not totally hating Windows.

      I use linux as well, but I have a problem where my school uses proprietary software, and I use propietary software (games) as well. So I need to use Windows as I never figured out how to make Wine work flawlessly. I'm still working on it, but don't think I will ever be totally free from Windows as long as most things are stuck there.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  80. Tactics by OrangeTwitch · · Score: 1

    Just seeing how Claria has gotten so many "users" most of which have never heard of what is truly on thier computer, Imagine how many "users" google could get if they were to have an active x script rather than an hbo.

  81. Why isn't there a freeware version? by RallyNick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems like people use it because they like the features, like remembering passwords and filling forms. I never installed it so I don't know if there are other things, but how hard can it be to write the same thing over again, just open source? I don't suppose they have a patent, do they?

    You could even profit: write/test it in secret, after their IPO place a bid that their stock would drop, and then advertise/release your free version. Eh?

    1. Re:Why isn't there a freeware version? by S.Lemmon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most all browsers have these same features built-in now. I'd guess people running Gator do so because it either came bundled with something else they installed, or they clicked the wrong button closing a drive-by-download dialog.

      Such programs are really only a shade away from being a legalized virus. Unfortunately there's already legislation brewing - which, like most recent laws, will either be ineffective, make life more difficult for legitimate developers, or shackle us with even more Draconian copyright laws.

      My own solution would be to make the CEO of any spyware/adware company personally come over and remove the software from anyone's PC who didn't want it.

    2. Re:Why isn't there a freeware version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I work at a computer help desk at a college campus. Off the top of my head, removing spyware/adware is 75% of my day's work. To put it bluntly, most of these "active users" aren't "active" in any sense of the word. What they are is "unwitting." Nine times out of ten, if I show a student what I find on their system, they haven't a damn clue how it got there, or that it was even there in the first place.

      That's the problem when you have spy-/ad-ware masquerading as legitimate software being offered third-party to a nearly computer illiterate culture. Let's face it, the majority of the people who own computers don't upkeep them like they should, and so Gator and their ilk can claim members. If the general populace knew enough to do basic maintenance, it would slash these farcical "active user" numbers, not to mention make my job easier.

    3. Re:Why isn't there a freeware version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean. Every damned computer I work on is full of that crap.

    4. Re:Why isn't there a freeware version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It boggles my mind when my dorm neighbors complain that "My computer is so old now" when it's really just bogged down my tons of crapware. I absolutely do NOT understand how they can be so inept in avoiding getting exploited by spyware, adware, etc.

    5. Re:Why isn't there a freeware version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been saying it for years... saying that Gator has "users" is like calling infected human beings "users" of the ebola virus..

    6. Re:Why isn't there a freeware version? by Uncle+Gropey · · Score: 1

      Here's what to do:
      1. Get all /.'ers to burn lots and lots of cd's containing Spybot, Firebird, Eudora, and AVG.
      2. Wait for IPO and short sell all the Gator that they can.
      3. Distribute cd's free of charge to every smacktard user they can find.
      4. Profit!

    7. Re:Why isn't there a freeware version? by asscroft · · Score: 1

      If these aren't virii, then they must be parasites.

      --
      because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  82. Re:Didn't you read the article, or even the summar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Remember, Phillip Morris owns Kraft, and many more brands you wouldn't think!

    May favourite is when tobacco companies say "we're concerned about youth smoking." Yeah, deeply concerned that it won't continue. If it wasn't for youth smoking they wouldn't have much of a company. That's when everyone starts.

  83. Re:Didn't you read the article, or even the summar by Xaer0cool · · Score: 1

    Dont forget the RIA prefix too! russia soviet you sig sigs in. Or something.

  84. 'behavioral marketing platform.' by Richie+Magoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmmmm, so thats what their calling crap nowadays.

    --
    Sig? What Sig?
  85. The quickest fix by shadowkoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a freshmen at RIT. When the non computer literate people on my floor ask for help, and I run adaware, I get 300+ hits easy. Install Google Toolbar, and that'll severly get reduced. So, to the average user, I say putting that handy little google toolbar on your computer is the easiest way to solve alot of headaches.

    1. Re:The quickest fix by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      that 300+ include cookies? Blocking popups will reduce that number alone. Want another way to reduce the read problems? Use Mozilla.

  86. Stock ticker symbol.... by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 4, Funny

    They wanted SCUM but were told that a small company from Lindon, Utah has dibs on that one...

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  87. Nitpick... by chgros · · Score: 1

    "Spam, spam, spam, spam... lovely spam!"
    Don't mess with Monty Python on slashdot!

  88. It's time to address the real issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When will Gator move to open source?!

  89. Re:Just another reason to give the Internet to the by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    You'd probably be surprised at how many investors take ethics, or even distaste, into consideration when investing their money. Granted, some of them lean the other way; as evidenced by mutual funds solely devoted to 'vice' or 'sin' stocks.

  90. Read the S1 by DeepRedux · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Claria S1 has been filed with the SEC.

    It list some of their customers: Cendant, Orbitz, priceline.com, Travelocity.com, Buy.com, FTD.com, Netflix, Shopping.com, AmericanSingles.com, Date.com, eHarmony.com, Matchmaker (Lycos, Inc.), Amerix Mortgage Corporation, ING Direct Securities, LowerMyBills.com, RateMyMortgage,goZing.com inPhonic, Motorola, Sprint.

    It also refers to their strategic relationships with DivXNetworks, iMesh and Sharman Networks (KaZaA).

    For the year ended December 31, 2003, they generated revenue of approximately $90.5 million, substantially all of which came from online advertising. For comparision, Ret Hat's revenue is $126 million for the last year.

    The lead underwriter for the IPO is Deutsche Bank Securities.

  91. Re:Didn't you read the article, or even the summar by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    On the great scale, Phillip Morris's sins are so few and minimal compared to Gator. I mean, they only sell lung cancer to 13 yr olds that want to be cool...

    On the other hand, Gator inflicts its agony on the customers I support. I suppose my perspective would be different, if I were a surgeon who did lung transplants.

  92. Ban users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that will put a stop to it

  93. Sell 'em short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're confident this company will fold in time, buy their stock short.

  94. Spybot by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    SpyBot's worth a try.

  95. Re:Just another reason to give the Internet to the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw you, we came up with this shit and we're gonna keep control over what we invented! If the UN wants to control something, let them make thier own internet.

  96. Re:Just another reason to give the Internet to the by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

    As the country that founded the Internet, and the country in which Cisco his HQed, it's not particularly difficult to argue the US owns the Internet.

    I happen to disagree, and believe the Internet is owned by all who participate.

    And, like many other things, it'd be waaaayyyy better without the gov't (and ANY gov't) trying to get their mits all over it.

    --

    There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

  97. Re:Just another reason to give the Internet to the by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I remember way back in 1995 or 1996, my dad, a computer pro (do a Google search for Joseph Bottero and Oceanography) showed me this new and interesting thing called hyperlinks. He built a few pages and linked them. I was kind of "so what? I can log on a system and get the same things! Gopher, and so on..." It's amazing how wrong I was.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  98. get it for free by john_uy · · Score: 1

    they will require investors to install their "spyware" programs. suddenly, gator will transfer all the stocks back to them.

    the investor says, what the? and gator says, mwehehehehe.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  99. SCUM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then some

  100. Class Action Lawsuit by chickenwing · · Score: 1

    Now would be the perfect time to start the class-action lawsuit. A great way to show potential investors the liability they are about to buy into and hopefully drive down the amount of money they are able to raise.

  101. Do you smell something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Because there are only a couple of reasons why name changes occur, company or product: nearly the same or close enough to cause confusion (or close enough to create a lawsuit from the owner of the original name); there's a stink attached to it. Let us also remember they were involved in court for popping their ads over the ads of others who paid for that space. BTW, Gator won that suit.

    Here are some reasons why Claria can do well in this IPO: It's been some time since a very successful high-tech IPO has occurred (pre bubble?). The name Gator (which has a stink, see above) and has been washed clean as a company with no past (Claria); they can post their revenue, client base, etc. and with no background as Claria, it will make them appear to be one of those grassroots startups who is ready to bust at the seams.

    1. Re:Do you smell something? by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      Until stockbrokers with half a brain decide that looking up more than one month of a company's history is a good idea.

  102. And HIV has 220,000,000 "active users".... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    n/t

  103. I am impressed. by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    43 Million victims, probably a direct result of thier aggressive advertising.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  104. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find smartFTP (http://www.smartftp.com) to be the best Windows FTP client I've tried, although it's not GPL. WS FTP is ok, but I find the interface a bit clunky and nonstandard personally. I guess that might be a bonus for you Linux types.

  105. Kazaa and Gain by Paps · · Score: 1

    I think the main reason that helped GAIN take off into the big time was that it was bundled into kazaa. As a result every Britney Spears loving teen, whose only computer knowledge is that with kazaa they can get Britney's latest songs, downloaded kazaa and accepted to install everything included with it.

  106. Re:Just another reason to give the Internet to the by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    Anonymous Coward, nuff said. I have my shair of "troll", "flamebait", "redundent". I still have "excellent" Karma. Got something to say? Say it with your name on it.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  107. Fighting fire with fire by crimson30 · · Score: 1

    Seeing all these anti-spyware posts makes me wonder:

    Why don't anti-spyware/virus writers use similar deployment/propagation tactics? Why not write a virus that eliminates viruses? Why not create spyware killers that auto-install transparently like spyware?

    No need to mod me up or down... I'm just asking a question.

    1. Re:Fighting fire with fire by CaptainTux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mostly because it's illegal to do so. ANY unauthorized intrusion into someone's computer is against the law - even if you're helping them. This is one of the reason why some people thought it was such a bad idea when the "anti-virus virus" idea was floating around last year.

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    2. Re:Fighting fire with fire by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      Legality doesn't seem to be stopping viruses and spyware.

  108. Mod up!!! Let's face it, GAIN is useless. by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine why people would get roped in by internet accelerators or time syncronization services when these things features are largely already available to them in the OS, and learning how to use them is a google away.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  109. Re:sons-of-bitches by CaptainTux · · Score: 1

    Actually, from a strictly financial standpoint, this will be an incredible investment opportunity. A HUGE user base, money coming in from advertisers, and a proven product. Yeah, it's a sleazy product with no ethics at all but hey, since when has that stopped investors?

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  110. Re:I don't think so - Invoice Gator? by kwandar · · Score: 1

    In the past when I received invoices for services we didn't use (ie. directories) I have notified the companys that any future dubious invoicing would result in a charge of $1,500 plus collection costs. Thats stopped the invoicing cold - including calls of apology.

    I'm wondering what would happen if US customers did the same - sent Gator a cease and desist letter for their company - with any future occurence costing $1,500.

    While the circumstances aren't quite the same because of the EULA, I think the judge might be more sympathetic to the Company having to continually clean their systems, who has asked Gator to cease and desist, then he/she will be to Gator, whose EULA was unwittingly agreed to by an employee?

  111. 43 million active users? by rixstep · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Or 43 million they regularly spam to death?

    Gee I'd like to see them all cross a motorway on foot and slip and fall.

  112. Company founded on 100% abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a 100% abuse play. Even Microsoft does some good!

  113. Re:425 parasites by Technician · · Score: 1

    Claria said it has 43 million active victims and 425 parasites

    Um, Parasites feed off a host and manytimes kill it. You need something else to describe that. I think it would be correct to say there are 43 million active victims and 426 feeding paranah.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  114. Anyone ever use GATOR? by barks · · Score: 1

    We are refering to the same company that offered an online account for ppl's personal passwords?

    Anyone here willing to admit of having use this service? I'm not overly paranoid but I like to consider myself educated enough not to hand out my PIN to anyone online.

    1. Re:Anyone ever use GATOR? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      I confess, ugg. When I was living with 8 other people, sharing a computer in the kitchen, the owner put gator on the machine. At the time the program was more of a password manager than a huge nuisance. It was actually quite useful in letting us set up accounts with bogus information for the whole house. Nobody had to remember a password, and everything was good. Eventually the damn thing became a pain in the ass, and I got rid of it. I can almost understand why someone would want the original gator functionality, but I think mozilla does a pretty good job of remembering my passwords. It even does multiple login options per screen.

      --My name is Tsiangkun, and I once used the gator thingy

  115. Wow, everyone buy it! by Hyro · · Score: 0

    If every Slashdotter bought $100 dollars worth of non-preffered stock we could completely alter their business tactics... Imagine... Stopping the devil from within hell. I strongly suggest that all readers invest a minimum in their IPO if nothing else but to be kept in the loops on their shareholder information and future marketing strategies...

    --
    "If they existed, they would be here already." - Enrico Fermi
    1. Re:Wow, everyone buy it! by bhima · · Score: 2, Funny

      I beleive the preferred method, would be to flood news outlets with negative information until the stock plumets to pennies on the dollar. Then pick it up and change the titles of everyone in the company to "towel boy"

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  116. Plan... by chadjg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Step 1: Short this stock
    Step 2: Coerce/Beg/Convince MSFT and others to license AdAware & include it in a free "update"
    Step 3: ???
    Step 4: Profit and maybe hang out with Martha Stewart for awhile.

    Damn... didn't think this thru. She'd make me giver her my shirt to make a "Nice Ghetto Chic" throw rug.

    But really, how do we screw this up for them?

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  117. No way!!!! Gator is CRAPWARE. by qualico · · Score: 1

    No god dam way!!!

    I don't ever want to see this company anywhere but bankrupt!.

    Please oh oh please don't let the stupid ones screw it up!

  118. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ftp://ftp.blah.com in explorer
    or
    start -> run -> cmd -> ftp

  119. Gator by Deinesh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ad-Aware should advertise on Gator...

    1. Re:Gator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...why in hell would they want to do that?

  120. Glad to hear by cbmeeks · · Score: 1

    I am GLAD to hear that Gator is now Claria. Now I know to add claria.com to my blocked sites on my firewall. Thanks /. cb

    --
    Remember, licking doorknobs is illegal on other planets.
  121. april 1st is over! by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    Ha Ha Ha bwahahaha

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  122. Wipe this problem out by arekusu · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can train a lot of ninjas for $150 million. The kind that don't leave any trace.

  123. Null route the bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask your system administrator to null-route the Claria/Gator/Assholes addresses.

    The administrator will likely agree, since he/she is the one who has to clean up that crap.

  124. Re:Claria's "users" [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems kind of odd that a place called "JavaCool" is offering a VB6 program.

  125. Great idea. They can run the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just like they run the world right now.

    -Newsgroups with too much flamage will be opccupied by peacekeeping troops. Not that they'll try to stop the flames, but occupations make the UN member states feel like they're doing something.

    -The request to move your domain name to a different IP address will be vetoed by France as part of an unrelated argument over agricultural subsidies.

    -New top-level domains will not be approved until there has been a 5 year, $700 million study.

    -Spamming will be punishable by a harshly-written security council resolution. Not that those really accomplish anything.

    -The Chinese minister of propaganda will get to vote on your news website's content.

  126. Claria? by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    WTF kind of name is Claria? Sounds like another company I did some contract work for a couple of years ago that got sued by Stanford Univ. because they used Stanford in their title (and had a red "S" logo that looked like Stanford's "S"... uhm, duh, just asking for it). They paid some firm to make up a name and research to make sure that no one already had it and switched to "Sirenza".

    Heh, I did a google for Sirenza and Stanford to see if I could find further info on the name change and first found a link on Stanford.edu's site regarding alleged foul play in their IPO

    Claria sounds like an STD if you ask me. Something you don't want, much like Santorum (if you don't know the reference, pull down a torrent on Unscrewed 04/07/2004, or just Google for it).

  127. Re:Didn't you read the article, or even the summar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's when everyone starts."

    Wrong - not everyone. I started smoking when I was 25. And then quit when I was 28. Hardly a youth.

  128. Re:I don't think so - Invoice Gator? by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

    But isn't the last letter of that acronym "Agreement"? I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but this seems to be a grey area. Unwittingly or not, you DID click on a button to agree to it, and it was your fault you didn't read the entire thing. That's one way to interpret it.

    Another way to interpret it is that because they do such a poor job of letting you see the EULA before you install the program, that they ARE at fault. It could be taken either way, depending on the judge, really.

  129. Anyone else share this thought? by SuperMo0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Honestly, when I first saw the name Claria, I thought "...isn't that the name of some penis-enlargement pill I got in my inbox the other day"?

  130. Correction: by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Claria said it has 43 million active users and 425 advertisers."

    You've misspelled "involutary".

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  131. Blocked. Thanks for the headsup Slashdot! by craig2787 · · Score: 1

    Annoying Website Blocker
    Status: Added claria to deny list.
    Current list of blocked sites
    [ ... ]
    Total: 134

    I can't believe that companies like this are allowed to legally exist. What is the world coming to?

  132. IPO Filing info.. by -tji · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm surprised that they have gotten reputable financial institutions to underwrite their IPO. According to the Wired article, it's being underwritten by Deutsche Bank Securities, Piper Jaffray, SG Cowen Securities and Thomas Weisel Partners. Wasn't Deutsche Bank involved in some of SCO's funding??

    Their IPO filing says they derived 31% of their 2003 revenue ( ~ $30M ) from "Overture Services". Interesting.. Overture seems to be straddling the line between legitimate business & spyware.

    Also, the risks section of their IPO filing is pretty amusing. Anyone with half a clue will see what a detestable company they are after reading the risks. Some of the risks they list are:

    - Popup blockers. impeding their ability to attract customers.
    - People buying new computers. Since their software won't be on the new system.
    - spyware detectors which uninstall their software (as offered by AOL, McAfee, Symantec, Earthlink, and others).
    - Changes in MS operating systems (i.e. SP2 with the popup blocker and other security enhancements could screw them)
    - New technologies that would "hamper the operation or our GAIN AdServer".
    - Changes in legislation could impair our ability to provide services

    Basically, they are saying that they operate by tricking people into installing their software, and a lot of people are trying to stop shady operators like them.

    Anyone who invests in them deserves to lose their money.

  133. Re:I don't think so - Invoice Gator? by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depending on the judge...

    1. Persuade judge to install a program that does some frivolous thing (eg. changes wallpaper every hour) and bundles gator along with a 45 page EULA from hell.

    2a. Watch them skip EULA without reading it.
    OR
    2b. Time how long it takes for them to read and fully understand EULA.

    3. Convince judge that such EULA's are a crock and no ordinary person would bother reading and comprehending such an EULA, especially for such a frivolous , free, program.

    4. Profit from lawsuit.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  134. There is one old, effective solution by heironymouscoward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And that is the "boycott". Named after the English Colonel who's impoverished and powerless Irish peons nonetheless discovered a way of forcing him off their land and out of their lives.

    Gator/Claria survives by delivering an effective way for advertisers to reach consumers. You cannot punish Gator/Claria directly - some other company would simply take its place.

    Rather, let us organize a boycott of any advertiser who tries to sell his product via spyware of any kind.

    Writing to any company that advertises via spyware, and telling them that you will not be using their products any more is a good idea. Telling everyone you know about such companies may also be effective. The best thing would be pressure from consumer groups to government so that advertisers are forced to adhere to a code of conduct that excludes spyware.

    Finally, spyware companies will find that the only clients they can find are the same criminal rings that pay for worms, trojans, and viruses, and this is one commercial sector that will find it hard to lobby governments for protection.

    Boycott the bums into behaving properly!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:There is one old, effective solution by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      Ahh the boycott, not to be confused with cots for girls. It is a useful method but it doesn't always work. With billions of potential customers across the globe a few who don't buy won't harm it stock price. Let's say every person who reads Slashdot every day never buys from Claria again. Will their price drop. Maybe but not significantly and probably not. Most people don't read /. and don't know about their products. Boycotts don't work with lots of people. Now a boycott is morally good but not economically viable. I know that my boycotting of various companies like Walmart, Hilton, and Debeers won't affect their bottom line but I won't buy there anyways.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  135. Re:Just another reason to give the Internet to the by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

    This is part of a more complex and disturbing trend of a total conversion of the Internet from a tool of the masses for usful communication, to a commercial product. And, it's an example of how western nations, especially the United States, think that they "own" the internet.

    Talk about tossing in an agenda in topics no matter how tenuous the connection. How, exactly, is a US company filing for an IPO an example of how the US--apparently the entire nation!--thinks it owns the Internet?

    Personally I don't mind Gator or what they do, because it's really simple: I just don't install Gator. While I have had plenty of pieces of spyware that manage to sneak through (yeah yeah, I still use IE when I'm in Windows), Gator has never been one of them. I believe I've gotten a pop-up "do you want to install Gator?" dialog from time to time but simply saying "No way in bloody hell" has stopped it. Whether or not to install software that bundles it as a required part of the install process is the decision of the person installing the software. I have seldom come across any piece of software that I absolutely had to install and could not settle for any alternatives.

    It's capitalism. That's hardly a unique province of the United States, nor is it necessarily a bad thing. I wouldn't give these guys my money, but I'm not prepared to condemn anybody who does--particularly, as you point out, if they are doing it to make a profit and not because they support the practices. It is not my place to tell people which companies they can invest in under what circumstances. It's also freedom. As much as it annoys the crap out of us sometimes, advertisers have as much right to the Internet as we do so long as they are obeying the applicable laws. I hardly even notice banner ads anymore and my popup blocker does a respectable job of keeping that trash at bay. Even if one does squirt through, it hardly ever stays up long enough for me to read or click on. Obviously, though, enough people find the Gator-style ads useful at the time they're displayed that advertisers continue to pay Gator to provide the service.

    As for the UN, if you think other UN member nations are any less beholden to (economic) interests than the US is, you're mistaken. All giving things like ICANN to the UN would do is create more conflicting interests to pull and tug at the same authority.

  136. 150million$ for spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gator is Spyware
    Claria is Spyware

  137. Homicidal Rage! by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Is that what they meant by "behavioral marketing platform," something that immediately inspires a Carlinesque rage?

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  138. Spammer shows recipients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://magicaction.net/sv/712out.txt

  139. Re:Didn't you read the article, or even the summar by jtcm · · Score: 1
    On the great scale, Phillip Morris's sins are so few and minimal compared to Gator. I mean, they only sell lung cancer to 13 yr olds that want to be cool...

    Damn straight! That's why I only buy from RJR.

    --
    @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
  140. What is wrong with this world?! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    These guys are fucking scum! They are virii!

    All Anti Virus and Anti Trojan companies including MICROSOFT's new AV need to treat these things like virii/trojans and BLOCK THEM

    Put these guys out of buisness already. The fact that they make money is insulting.

    I hope they all get cancer and puke aids on their children.

  141. Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Hack Gators servers
    2. Stop the adware on every PC that "dials home"
    3. Poof! 43 million less victims and one less IPO.
  142. will spyware-removal companies be sued? by the+shoez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't know if anyone else has made this point - I got a little bored of reading the same "Claria is junk" post I must admit. But.... I was wondering if we'll see spyware-removal companies being sued for interfering with business practices? Here we have a company giving away, or selling in some cases a product which will reduce a company's advertising revenues. Will it be any more serious or carry more weight if perpetrated against a public company... maybe not

    --
    &lawyers($instruction);
  143. Re:Just another reason to give the Internet to the by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    In 1993 I first saw LYNX , but what I liked better was IRC, and the warez of SNES games you could get in 1993. Oh and I saw linux too back then running on a 33mhz 16meg box.

    What I should have done back then, is learned more of the protocols and made net servers/applications back then instead of just a desktop app. But even back then I did read Apples DEV docs and they did say the 'networking' of computers is the future direction, pitty their OS handled tcp very crapily. But it was easy to use.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  144. Re:Great idea. They can run the internet... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    I know your trying to be funny but.

    The UN does do usefull stuff with their troops , ie armed security guards with tanks.

    USA would have more $ valued subsidies, their free trade deals are a scam, yet they can import everything with zero tarrifs to australia on every good, australia cannot do the same back to usa, it did get a better deal, but its more of a Sopranos deal, with usa winning more so.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  145. Worked Great On Oil-For-Food Program by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    "This is why I support the idea of taking the Internet away from ICANN, and placing it under UN juristiction."

    And why in Gods' Name do you think by any stretch of the imagination that the U.N. would do anything to stop things like Gator, when the U.N. is as corrupt as it is? If they're willing to let children in Iraq starve to line their and a horrific dictators' pockets, while simultaneously attacking the U.S.'s sanctions as the reason for those children starving, how is the UN to be trusted with controlling the internet? Would you like to see some brutal communist regime head that UN internet committee like the UN's Human Rights committee is? Better yet, lets' just put China or N. Korea in charge. At least you'd know where you stand. Sheesh!

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  146. Re:I don't think so - Invoice Gator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you're missing the ??? step. How can you expect a plan to work without one?

  147. Re:Didn't you read the article, or even the summar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that Gator suited them well as a name being that parasites aren't really much of a predator.

  148. Gator always uses a EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think it's pretty clear that if you download some software and in the clickable EULA you agree to have Gator installed as a payload, they have a right to install their junk on your machine. However, the only time I've been infected with Gator is through an ActiveX exploit.
    Oh you clicked on a EULA that got Gator installed but it came from MicroSoft. The section goes "by clicking on this you agree to bend over and take it."
  149. Gator's biggest customer: YAHOO/OVERTURE!! by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    If you advertise on Overture your supporting these bastards! Sure Overture made the association before Yahoo bought them, but Yahoo is still guilty for their dealings with them.

    Would Google ever put adwords up in a gator popup? Hell no!

    More information here.

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  150. Hurrah! Another stock to hate! by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    Now in addition to gloating over the demise of SCOX (and panicing over temporary fluctuations upward in the same) I can add ClariaGator to the list of companies standing for things I find reprehensible.

    I just hope I don't have to look too closely at too many companies, 'cause I don't want a really long list...

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  151. From an investment perspective, it's crap.. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the principals of investing in a company that preys on the computer illiterate by installing a piece of software they don't want, it seems like a bad investment for several reasons.

    First of all, I have to wonder what the click-through and purchase rate of those popups are. Most people I know complain about popups, close them as quickly as possible, and run spyware removal tools or popup blockers to ignore them. How successful is it to advertise on them? Does the negative goodwill that popups create hurt a company's reputation?

    Secondly, the article mentions the possibility that laws will be passed limiting/making spyware illegal. Do you want to invest in a stock of a company whose product may become illegal?

    Thirdly, do you really trust the management of a company whose business strategy is so sketchy to be honest and open with their financial reporting ect?

  152. It has to be said... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buy a Mac. Since doing so, I've never had any virus/spy/adware problems. It's not just because they are only 1% market share. It's because they are Unix, which means you can drop to a terminal and really fix anything that installed itself aggressively.

  153. unless.. by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    No... What they have is a risky business plan

    Unless gator makes it's lusers buy stock of course.. didn't they keep passwords too? :-D

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  154. I bet lots of people will buy stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, at least those investing on SCO are lining up. After all, they are very smart investors.

  155. on the + side: it's another reason to use linux. by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Lately it seems to me that adware/spyware is greatest complaint of windows users.

  156. cross platform? by gopher_hunt · · Score: 1

    But when will there be a linux version?

  157. Re:OT: ALL WINDOWS FTP CLIENTS SUCK SHIT by Phenris+Wolfe · · Score: 1
    Try FileZilla. It kicks arse. Honestly, I had shied away from open source software because of bad experiences several years ago. I'm reconsidering my viewpoint because of FileZilla and a few other programs.

    FileZilla

  158. I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The University of Phoenix is on that list. You know our education system's shot when even the public schools turn into full-fledged businesses (who advertise through spyware no less).

    What's next, advertisement from the FBI advising people not to file share?

  159. MOD DOWN! HIV/AIDS IS NO LAUGHING MATTER! by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    If the AC's number of 220,000,000 HIV 'active users' is correct, approximately 1 in 30 people WORLDWIDE are infected!

    Again I say:

    MOD DOWN! HIV/AIDS IS NO LAUGHING MATTER!

    1. Re:MOD DOWN! HIV/AIDS IS NO LAUGHING MATTER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point being? If that had been posted earlier it would have been modded insightful or interesting. Because it is.

  160. To quote Berzerk: INTRUDER ALERT! INTRUDER ALERT! by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    ANY unauthorized intrusion into someone's computer is against the law

    What does one do when the intruding IP addresses are, at face value, part of the United States Federal Government?

    It happened to me not too long ago when my PC's copy of Agnitum's Outpost Firewall trapped four separate intrusion attemps from, at face value,
    a particular United States Federal Government agency.

    It could have been nothing more than IP spoofery by anonymous Internet pranksters....But what if the intrusions were for real and came from
    (un)compromised computers from within said United States Federal Government agency?...

    Better (download, install and) use a trustworthy hardware/software firewall before they get compromised to allow such activities to go undetected....

  161. It all comes Down to Starwars by luckyleprecon666666 · · Score: 1

    " 43 million active users " Those are not users, they are called "victims" Don't forget Yoda's Star-Wars Quote Gain=Gator=Claira=Active users= Victims=Pissed off=Anger=Hatred= Impending Doom=Dying=Hell=Microsoft= Ie=Internet=Spam=Gain Its all a viscious cycle ;)

  162. Don't blame the cookies... by milette · · Score: 1

    Cookies, in and of themselves, are not 'evil'. By wiping out all cookies, you'd be wiping out affiliate links too. In general, affiliates work pretty hard for their little slice of the pie. By wiping out affiliate tracking cookies -- you take money away from work-at-home moms, (and pops) and millions of other 'little guys' who manage to direct you to something you're looking for. Where does the money go? Back into the pocket of the vendor who no longer has to pay their affiliates. What a great deal for them -- free traffic and sales -- zero overhead. Please don't kill cookies unless they are evil ones. Thanks...

  163. Gator Files for IPO by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    LOL!
    IPOs are, like, sooo last century, dude!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  164. Re:on the + side: it's another reason to use linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see you say this when there are no more WIndows users and Claria starts gunning for Linux.