I said it has it's roots in Clintons push to give everyone a house, not that it caused it - this mess is just a continuation of that same piss poor policy, of relaxed credit checks and government backing of bad debt. clearly any criticism has you foaming at the mouth, but put that aside and try finish reading my post.
actually, it was the Clinton administrations wet dream that everyone no matter how poor should own their own house that is the root cause of the current situation. it wasn't a lack of regulation, but poorly implemented regulation allowing banks to loan to homeless jobless slobs while giving government backing to these bad loans.
bush and co lacked the good sense to put an end to this house of cards, and poured petrol on it while playing with matches.
And now we have hero Obama, plunging the USA into debt never seen before. what happens when china stops bailing you out?
I don't support the billions given to teleco's in the slightest. my point is that us giving them money to support other un economical connections shouldn't be done.
it's pretty straight forward. google sells ads and so does rupert, they are in direct compeition for the same dollars. he just wants to try smear them as much as he can. he knows full well that he can stop them indexing his sites (to all you moron's prattling about robots.txt).
if google isn't in the least bit afraid of rupert and he knows this as well, it's just the game thats played at that level.
why the hell do you try break down any assay are lieing and bullshit? communication ability is THE number one factor that seperates the successful from the could have been.
how do you know the CO2 rise is man made in the first place, and not oh say from the oceans which are the largest stores of CO2? everyone who's sane agree's the climate changes, whats not clear is that it's man made or that we even need to do anything about it. we don't have the kind of grasp on how climate works to be able to make such massive calls - we can hypothesis, but the pro global warming camp seem to jump instantly from hypothesis to theory instantly if it fits their world view, but dicredit anything that disagree's as funded by the man.
your understanding of resources is horribly flawed.... it doesn't matter if indium was 100 times more abundant if the processing of it isn't fesible. because indium isn't in concerntrated deposits like silver, it's horribly hard to mine. you need something else there as a sweetner to make it economical. if you bother to read the very next line in wikiperdia it states "Fewer than 10 indium minerals are known, none occurring in significant deposits"
sure you could just strip mine bulk tonnes to get at it to make up for how low the grade is, but the environmental impact of that would cancel out the positive impact of the solar cells.
they do mention increasingly effect recovery rates, but it can't be too effective given the indium price has risen from $94/kg to $700/kg in the last 7 years. this tells me supply isn't keeping up with demand at all. given the spot price has gone up 800%, if indium deposits really are out there you'd see a lot of announcments about projects to mine it - there aren't.
buy shares in indium exploration companys then, because they don't have enough known resources to produce all these solar shingled roofs. sure you could use othe heavy metals, but they are rather nasty.
fail. CEO's and the like aren't interested in technical details - they don't have time to.
i see 2 sides to this debate. one side that has a clue and recognises the potential DISASTER of blocking legit emails, and the other side who don't have anything important being emailed to them so can't see the fuss.
freebsd is 100% binary compatible with linux. so even if you don't have the source or are too retarded to build from source yourself, the linux binary will run without issue or performance penalty.
i find it ironic that the gp talks about no one making software for BSD but cites Mac OSX as being his prefered option. what a fucktard....
i'm used to piss poor comparisions on the internet, but this one still somehow managed to suprise me.
"FreeBSD was also using the default UFS file-system while Ubuntu 9.10 is running with EXT4." TRY RUNNING THE SAME FILESYSTEM YOU FUCKING MORONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the only benchmarks freebsd lost in were O/I intensive tasks, so all this showed is ufs2 is slower then ext4 in some cases.
this guy STOLE 11.5 million from his employer, then went on to accuse the FBI of all kinds of bullshit. he's a border line nut job as well as a rotten theif.
kevin on the other hand never stole a cent from anyone, just hacked a bunch of company's system to see how they worked. his only crime was making them and the FBI look like idiots.
Slashdot Mirror
i don't think you managed to fool anyone with that statement.
the work done at LHC is about the only type of thing governments do that adds any value anyway.
I said it has it's roots in Clintons push to give everyone a house, not that it caused it - this mess is just a continuation of that same piss poor policy, of relaxed credit checks and government backing of bad debt. clearly any criticism has you foaming at the mouth, but put that aside and try finish reading my post.
bush and co lacked the good sense to put an end to this house of cards, and poured petrol on it while playing with matches.
And now we have hero Obama, plunging the USA into debt never seen before. what happens when china stops bailing you out?
you might want to have a read of that routing book as well, since it's possible to use 2 different isp's and still increase aggregate speed....
so you pay tax in all the countries wireless gear is sold? fail!
I don't support the billions given to teleco's in the slightest. my point is that us giving them money to support other un economical connections shouldn't be done.
isn't this explained by electromagentism already?
even for esstentials like power and water, i think if you choose to live in the middle of no where, your on your own.
.. Obama had fixed this already?!
i'd hazard a guess that the offsite backups were corrupted as well somehow or were silently failing.
if google isn't in the least bit afraid of rupert and he knows this as well, it's just the game thats played at that level.
why the hell do you try break down any assay are lieing and bullshit? communication ability is THE number one factor that seperates the successful from the could have been.
how do you know the CO2 rise is man made in the first place, and not oh say from the oceans which are the largest stores of CO2? everyone who's sane agree's the climate changes, whats not clear is that it's man made or that we even need to do anything about it. we don't have the kind of grasp on how climate works to be able to make such massive calls - we can hypothesis, but the pro global warming camp seem to jump instantly from hypothesis to theory instantly if it fits their world view, but dicredit anything that disagree's as funded by the man.
i refuse to buy into this bullshit that CO2 is evil - CO2 is a key component to beer, and nothing related to beer can be evil, so shove it.
sure you could just strip mine bulk tonnes to get at it to make up for how low the grade is, but the environmental impact of that would cancel out the positive impact of the solar cells.
they do mention increasingly effect recovery rates, but it can't be too effective given the indium price has risen from $94/kg to $700/kg in the last 7 years. this tells me supply isn't keeping up with demand at all. given the spot price has gone up 800%, if indium deposits really are out there you'd see a lot of announcments about projects to mine it - there aren't.
buy shares in indium exploration companys then, because they don't have enough known resources to produce all these solar shingled roofs. sure you could use othe heavy metals, but they are rather nasty.
i see 2 sides to this debate. one side that has a clue and recognises the potential DISASTER of blocking legit emails, and the other side who don't have anything important being emailed to them so can't see the fuss.
what so there's no applications that are windows based that don't have a decent linux counterpart??!! i think your the one making empty claims sir...
uhuh. they will when enough of their customers complain they can't use their hardware.
attempting to engineer our climate is a massive fuck up. anyone who suggests it needs to step back and evaluate thier compertence....
i find it ironic that the gp talks about no one making software for BSD but cites Mac OSX as being his prefered option. what a fucktard....
"FreeBSD was also using the default UFS file-system while Ubuntu 9.10 is running with EXT4." TRY RUNNING THE SAME FILESYSTEM YOU FUCKING MORONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the only benchmarks freebsd lost in were O/I intensive tasks, so all this showed is ufs2 is slower then ext4 in some cases.
epic fail.
this guy STOLE 11.5 million from his employer, then went on to accuse the FBI of all kinds of bullshit. he's a border line nut job as well as a rotten theif.
kevin on the other hand never stole a cent from anyone, just hacked a bunch of company's system to see how they worked. his only crime was making them and the FBI look like idiots.
maybe, but i bet all MS applications are on the whitelist by default, which means virtual machine.....