Slashdot Mirror


Large Hadron Collider Scientist Arrested For al-Qaeda Ties

mindbrane writes "A scientist working as a subcontractor on a peripheral LHC project has been arrested as a terrorist. The CBC is running a story outlining the arrest of a man on Thursday in south-east France for suspected al-Qaeda links: 'CERN officials said the man, whose name has not been revealed, was working under contract with an outside institute and said he had no contact with anything that could have been used for terrorism. He had been at CERN since 2003, officials said. ... The news that someone with terrorist connections might have worked at the facility is likely to cause concern because of both the high profile of the giant physics experiment and also the technology in use, which has made some members of the public nervous.'"

245 comments

  1. better safe than sorry by Inominate · · Score: 5, Funny

    He could cause the creation of a blackhole that will kill us all!

    Or he could cause a couple of magnets to quench and suck up even more money!

    Maybe the two are related?

    1. Re:better safe than sorry by Wowsers · · Score: 2, Funny

      He was just looking for an appropriate place to play his "Magnetic Fields" Jean Michel Jarre CD!

      --
      Take Nobody's Word For It.
    2. Re:better safe than sorry by Jurily · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jean Michel Jarre CD

      So he posessed WMD's?

    3. Re:better safe than sorry by Smegly · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Talking about black holes of information, where did the French secret service get the supposed "evidence" for this supposed list of EU terrorist targets - if there is any? Certainly not off napkin scrawls hidden under the guys bed. Perhaps it was by the normal channels: beating, starving, electrocuting, mauling with dogs then stringing to the roof some Afghan peasant/soldier in a one of the many private corporate run prisons they got set up down there and around the world until he muttered "Mohammad, list of targets, France... lllllhhhhhcccc*gasp*" ?

      OR is this story just about yet another Orwellian military/police state shadow organization trying to justify they are not a *big* part of the "let all hate each other" problem?

      Fscked if we will ever know, the story in all its lack of credibility is out there now and its purpose served. Slashdot only managed to scape it up, make it even worse on details or open to questions of credibility than it already was to begin with. Journalist bloggers wanting to be taken seriously, indeed.

    4. Re:better safe than sorry by mickwd · · Score: 5, Funny

      If wearing an Al-Qaeda tie is causing such a problem, why doesn't someone just ask him to take it off?

      Or get one of those ones held on with elastic.

      Or a spinning bow-tie maybe? Seems quite appropriate for the LHC.

    5. Re:better safe than sorry by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Jean Michel Jarre CD

      So he posessed WMD's?

      No, but he has the skill to turn an ordinary musical instrument into one.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:better safe than sorry by Frankenvince · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean that there are Al-Qaeda fan gears out? About time someone makes some profit out of this. http://www.ThinkQaeda.com/ anyone?

    7. Re:better safe than sorry by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Some body watched the latest Dan Brown movie too many times... and was on a witch hunt to prove somebody was "evil", have to satisfy the "public worries" after all.

    8. Re:better safe than sorry by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Or a spinning bow-tie maybe? Seems quite appropriate for the LHC."

      Well, bow-ties that are *supposed* to spin but don't would be most appropriate.

      --
      blah blah blah
    9. Re:better safe than sorry by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. The plan was to a make a Black Hole that would only affect Infidels; you know, those who would not buy Al-Qaeda gear when receiving telemarketing calls from Pakistan.

      It all goes back to that very disappointing experiment about the whole 'CERN Refrigerator Magnet thingy not working out; if it had, Infidels would have starved to death trying desperately to open their refrigerators. But test house wives got tired of cleaning up the oil mess, and threw the samples away; Al-Qaeda, not to be "deterred", sucked it up and moved on.

    10. Re:better safe than sorry by ssintercept · · Score: 2, Funny

      only affect Infidels; you know, those who would not buy Al-Qaeda gear

      Is that anything like Mormon's Magic Underwear?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_garment

      --
      "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
    11. Re:better safe than sorry by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it can be far worse than that. An intelligence contractor seeking a cut of the reward money or perhaps seeking contract renewal just picks anyone available. Even government agents seeking promotion are not above fabricating what ever evidence they need in order to gain a promotion worthy arrest and prosecution record. These of course are the underlying reason why public trials are required and why the case must be proved in a court of law and why people are not punished prior to their being guilt being proven. Just consider the rewards paid for all those innocent (until proven guilty in a court of law) at GITMO, how much of it actually made it to the so called informer, how much was kept as 'purchasing' commissions along the way, a formal investigation of each and every 'terrorist' reward paid would likely find some very interesting results and prove fraud upon major scale.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:better safe than sorry by marqs · · Score: 1

      I think we need to define in which direction this alledged bow-tie is supposed to spin before we klaim that it does not
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_%28physics%29#Spin_direction

      It can also be a matter of observation that make it apear to be at rest
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

    13. Re:better safe than sorry by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      French media are quite opaque about this. The only thing we know is that the guy participated in Jihadist forums (on this big scary thing called internet). Oh and his brother was arrested too, we are not sure why. Our anti-terrorist department has lately turned into a vast joke.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    14. Re:better safe than sorry by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 0

      You're acting like there's something unusual about a Muslim extremist in Europe. They are a dime a dozen.

    15. Re:better safe than sorry by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      No, he's more into Metallica: Death Magnetic.

    16. Re:better safe than sorry by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Maybe it only spins when it's cold enough to be superconducting...

  2. Movie plot danger by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or a anti matter bomb like in angels and demons.

  3. Disbelieve by V!NCENT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A religious al-Qaeda scientist, without a name. Why do I not believ this. Especially because al-Qaeda is not a group anymore because the US have already kicked their asses and al-Qaeda is now reffered to as people that want to commit terrorism under the name, just because they desire to use the titel. This is allowed by al-Qaeda btw...

    --
    Here be signatures
    1. Re:Disbelieve by FireFury03 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So al-Qaeda won't sue for trademark infringement?

    2. Re:Disbelieve by ionix5891 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How do you kick ass of an organisation that didnt exist in first place?

      if you tell a lie often enough....

    3. Re:Disbelieve by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      A religious al-Qaeda scientist, without a name. Why do I not believ this.

      I don't believe it as well. It's much more likely that this physicist belongs to the the notorious 'Al-Jabr' group that want to enslave the world with their weapons of Math instruction.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Disbelieve by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points right now, but if I had your post would have been the first I'd use a point to mod +1 Funny.
      Really, you win.

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
    5. Re:Disbelieve by MrMr · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean: A scientist who knows a religious person that may have been involved in a group of which certain members claimed to be associated with Al Qaeda?
      I'd say he's guilty, as in guilt by association in the third degree.
      I'm not worried until somebody is busted for being tied with Al Qaeda in the sixth degree.

    6. Re:Disbelieve by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It does exist, although only in the sense that the group Anonymous exists. That's the same lack of hierarchy/organisation/official structure. In my analogy, moot = Osama bin Laden.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:Disbelieve by superslacker87 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So al-Qaeda won't sue for trademark infringement?

      Nope. The name al-Qaeda is licensed under Creative Commons.

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    8. Re:Disbelieve by noundi · · Score: 1

      A religious al-Qaeda scientist, without a name. Why do I not believ this. Especially because al-Qaeda is not a group anymore because the US have already kicked their asses and al-Qaeda is now reffered to as people that want to commit terrorism under the name, just because they desire to use the titel. This is allowed by al-Qaeda btw...

      You don't believe this because it reeks of conspiracy. You know, I've always stated one thing: I'm probably the easiest person to persuade, just give me proof and I'll believe you. This however is as proven as the existance of Santa. Maybe it is true, maybe it isn't. But I'll stick to bullshit until proven truth.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    9. Re:Disbelieve by Guppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It does exist, although only in the sense that the group Anonymous exists. That's the same lack of hierarchy/organisation/official structure. In my analogy, moot = Osama bin Laden.

      This needs to be meme'd! Complete with a moe-fied Osama-chan with kitty-ears or something.

    10. Re:Disbelieve by selven · · Score: 4, Funny

      I failed to derive even the slightest bit of humor from that joke.

    11. Re:Disbelieve by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      if you tell a lie often enough....

      ... then some nutjob, who thinks he's the last sane person on the earth, will fill in the details of how the lie is true, and then believe it absolutely and unconditionally?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    12. Re:Disbelieve by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you need to integrate the humour in a little more.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    13. Re:Disbelieve by identity0 · · Score: 1

      So al-Qaeda is now Open Source? What's their license, and do I have to publicly release my patches to their bombs?

    14. Re:Disbelieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It does exist, although only in the sense that the group Anonymous exists.

      Hey man, keep it down. We don't need another leak.

    15. Re:Disbelieve by mickwd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or suffer howls of division.

    16. Re:Disbelieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see Terrrorists! They're Everywhere! Duck and cover!

    17. Re:Disbelieve by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, Santa Claus exists and he lives in Canada. His postal code is H0H 0H0.

    18. Re:Disbelieve by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

      I'd also like more details before jumping to conclusions.

      If the guy is really a terrorist `mole' or agent who has been actively working to supply them with secret knowledge, I don't have any trouble with the book being thrown at him. But if his connection is that this second-cousin twice removed is a terrorist, it is a different matter. Considering the 6-degrees of separation truism, I don't know how many of us will survive if that standard is widely applied.

      Magnus

    19. Re:Disbelieve by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not worried until somebody is busted for being tied with Al Qaeda in the sixth degree.

      It's also fun to note that, under the Kevin Bacon scheme, George W Bush and Osama bin Laden have only one degree of separation. They have both been together in not just one, but two movies. Those movies were documentaries, of course, but that's a trivial detail that wouldn't stop any journalist from saying that they are "linked".

      One of the movies was Micheal Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11". I've forgotten the other one and I don't have time right now to google it. Maybe someone else knows. And there well may be several other movies that they share by now.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    20. Re:Disbelieve by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      How do you kick ass of an organisation that didnt exist in first place?

      if you tell a lie often enough....

      It does exists , but due to lack of funding , it wasn't beeing maintained anymore , so the authors decided to open source it.

    21. Re:Disbelieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complete with a moe-fied Osama-chan with kitty-ears or something.

      I must be completely out of the loop here, cause when you say "Moe" I think "Szyslak".

    22. Re:Disbelieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot moderators, as a group, have too many degenerate members.

    23. Re:Disbelieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you have to integrate it.

    24. Re:Disbelieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Math integrist.

      Just what we needed.

    25. Re:Disbelieve by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      The part I don't understand is what they arrested him for. They didn't list anything he did, and said he didn't have contact with anything that could have been used for "terrorism". So he didn't do anything and didn't have the materials to do something if he wanted to. What was the charge?

    26. Re:Disbelieve by blofeld42 · · Score: 1

      No, a scientist who was passing information about targets in Europe to an al Qaeda group.

      Sheesh. Slashdot is increasingly infantile. Just because you don't want to think about there actually being Islamic religious fundamentalists who want to kill you, that doesn't mean they don't exist.

    27. Re:Disbelieve by craagz · · Score: 1

      Al-Jabr (algebra comes from there)

    28. Re:Disbelieve by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      By assasinating core members of the group. What do you mean it did not exist?

      --
      Here be signatures
    29. Re:Disbelieve by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      So "the base" are belong to all of us?

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  4. Evil to level 11 !! by Nomen+Publicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All he had to do was to twist the "EVIL LEVEL" knob to 11 and a portal to hell would have been opened!

    1. Re:Evil to level 11 !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Normen Publicus,
      You seem to know an awful lot about the terrorists plans to sneak in a level 11. I'm afraid you have now been linked to Al Qaeda by the department of homeland hyper-imagination. I bet you tied your shoe laces with your left hand too don't yeh?

    2. Re:Evil to level 11 !! by haaid · · Score: 1

      unfortunately his knob only goes to 10...

  5. Six degrees of separation by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone can be linked to Al Qaeda

    1. Re:Six degrees of separation by Eudial · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wasn't he on top of that arrested because he was suspected of being related to someone they suspected of knowing someone they suspected was part of what they suspected was Al Qaeda?

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    2. Re:Six degrees of separation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Everyone can be linked to Al Qaeda

      Some in a lot less than six degrees. Remember Bush was friends with Osama Bin Laden's family. It's not trolling it's a fact. The whole point is the same world leaders that are supposed to be fighting terrorism have close ties to terrorist families or are at least only a few degrees from most terrorist leaders.

    3. Re:Six degrees of separation by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      For instance, Kevin Bacon (and Paul Erdos as well of course).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Six degrees of separation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how long will it take to somehow be linked to Iran.

    5. Re:Six degrees of separation by v1 · · Score: 1

      Is being "linked to al qaeda" illegal now?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    6. Re:Six degrees of separation by ianalis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To be pedantic, that is true unless there is an isolated cluster of humans and the most likely case that would happen is if there is an undiscovered (by someone in the spanning cluster) and isolated civilization somewhere. Also, the six degrees of separation is the average path length and not the diameter of the network. Nevertheless, six degrees of separation is an excellent argument against suspecting people solely due to association with "terrorists."

    7. Re:Six degrees of separation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your mom has six degrees of separation.

    8. Re:Six degrees of separation by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kaiser Wilhelm and Czar Nicholas were cousins, and yet their countries were largely responsible for starting WWI...point being?

      --
      blah blah blah
    9. Re:Six degrees of separation by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Yep, thanks to Rupert Murdoch.

    10. Re:Six degrees of separation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They weren't, well, not that closely - the common root was Victoria so they were cousins by about 3 generations off at that point.

    11. Re:Six degrees of separation by skine · · Score: 1

      Dark Helmet: I am your father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate.
      Lone Starr: What's that make us?
      Dark Helmet: Absolutely nothing! Which is what you are about to become.

    12. Re:Six degrees of separation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      point being, ... Exactly what you just said? That the WWI was largely designed as a way to divide the world in diverging, antagonistic viewpoints (which WWII completed)..?

    13. Re:Six degrees of separation by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We funded and armed the predecessors of the Taliban in their fight against the Soviets. And we continued to support them in their suppression of criminal warlords and the opium trade through the mid 1990s. Since the Taliban and al Qaida cooperate and share personnel, its quite probable that 'we' (through the CIA or overtly through the State Department) have supported al Qaida in the past.

      We have a dismal history of keeping tabs on our friinds while we carefully monitor those we consider to be our enemies. But then that's just human nature.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    14. Re:Six degrees of separation by westlake · · Score: 1

      Remember Bush was friends with Osama Bin Laden's family. It's not trolling it's a fact.

      Don't think of it as a family - think of it as a clan of about 600 with close connections to the Saudi royal house.

      But close is worth perhaps $5 billion tops. It doesn't put you in the line of succession. It doesn't rake in the really big bucks.

      The Bin Laden fortune is rooted in construction and, specifically, the restoration of landmarks like the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

      Anyone with an interest in the theater, psychology or history could have told you how this story is going to play out.

      bin Laden family

    15. Re:Six degrees of separation by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I always thought Baldrick's explanantion of WW1 starting was the best.

        "Archie Duke shot an Ostrich because he was Hungry"

    16. Re:Six degrees of separation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 < 6

    17. Re:Six degrees of separation by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      no, that WWI was largely a result of divisions already existing that were sparked by nationalism and resulted in a divided world.

      --
      blah blah blah
    18. Re:Six degrees of separation by Danny+Dot · · Score: 1

      I think what is happening to us post twin towers far exceeds "just human nature". But I think "we" are in the process of looking at how bad the collapse of the towers has hurt us. For example, in the US, if you have no current photo ID, you have to commit fraud to get a current drivers license today. And I think he was going to steal the plans, make a huge accelerometer and point the output at the White House or something. Do you realize the increased risk of cancer being exposed to the output will cause. Do you realize the risk of losing the president to cancer during his two terms might go from 0.000002% to 0.000003%. Oh the horror, oh the horror. Arrest everyone and throw them in jail forever to keep us safe from this calamity. Danny Deger

    19. Re:Six degrees of separation by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about that bit is that your father's brother's nephew is either you or one of your cousins.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  6. WMD'S? by therufus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Large Hadron Collider. Now THAT'S a weapon of mass destruction.

    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    1. Re:WMD'S? by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      But would you be able to smuggle it though airport security?

    2. Re:WMD'S? by octal666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet it fits in a shoe.

      --
      DON'T PANIC
    3. Re:WMD'S? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course.

      1. Use LHC to make black hole.
      2. Hide LHC in black hole.
      3. Put black hole in carry on bag.

      Simple.

    4. Re:WMD'S? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      No it is a weapon of mass distraction

    5. Re:WMD'S? by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Of course.

      1. Use LHC to make black hole.
      2. Hide LHC in black hole.
      3. Put black hole in carry on bag.

      Simple.

      4. Put black hole in carry on bag.

      5. Put black hole in carry on bag.
      ...

      65535. Put black hole in carry on bag.

      0. Put black hole in carry on bag.

      1. Put black hole in carry on bag.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    6. Re:WMD'S? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Large Hadron Collider. Now THAT'S a weapon of mass destruction.

      Aha. These aren't weapons of mass destruction - they are systems of entropy creation!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:WMD'S? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      But would you be able to smuggle it though airport security?

      I think it's better than 50/50 that you could get it through LAX.

    8. Re:WMD'S? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you could. Airport security is too busy confiscating your shampoo, paper clips, and thumb tacks to notice your portable LHC.

    9. Re:WMD'S? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you ever x-rayed a black hole ?

      let me tell you from experience... ...very fucking easy to notice one.

      if you want the carry on to pass security, put some bottled water in there with it.

      the rent-a-cops will be too busy giving you shit about your evian...

    10. Re:WMD'S? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG you would fail as an airport security agent. You forgot about nail clippers!

    11. Re:WMD'S? by mathx314 · · Score: 1

      4. ????
      5. Terrorism!

    12. Re:WMD'S? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's easy - getting it into the overhead is the tricky part

    13. Re:WMD'S? by prikkebeen · · Score: 1

      6. Profit!

    14. Re:WMD'S? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No. You just need to "smuggle" a giant ray of death "through" airport security. And then walk trough the burning debris.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    15. Re:WMD'S? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I prefer my Large Hardon Collider. Now THAT's a weapon of ass destruction!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    16. Re:WMD'S? by paimin · · Score: 1

      Isn't it more a weapon of mass collection?

      --
      Facebook is the new AOL
    17. Re:WMD'S? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Not if you wear tight-fitting jeans.

    18. Re:WMD'S? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course.

      1. Use LHC to make black hole.
      2. Hide LHC in black hole.
      3. Put black hole in carry on bag.

      Simple.

      4. Sell to amateur magicians and party clowns.
      5. Profit?

    19. Re:WMD'S? by marqs · · Score: 1

      But if it's found in airport security you might have to consume it to prove that it's safe.
      The same way you have to take a sip from bottles of fluids you carry.

    20. Re:WMD'S? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Profit!

      6. Prophet!

      Fixed that for you.

    21. Re:WMD'S? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Weren't you warned, decades ago, not to cross the streams? I think colliding the devices creating the streams is even more serious. Regardless of how large, or in your case, they are.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  7. Seriously by agge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would suspect that the worst that i has done is to send some money home to relatives in a Arab country.

    1. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You has done that, seriously? You a terrorist.

  8. so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    so you don't have to DO anything anymore to get arrested? He was arrested for "al-Qaeda ties"? what does that mean exactly? Did he kill anyone? Did he plot to kill anyone? Did he know about a plot to kill anyone? It sounds like his sister's friend's neighbor had a cousin who was friends with someone in Al Qaeda back in 1990.

    Also, from TFA: "The news that someone with terrorist connections might have worked at the facility is likely to cause concern because of both the high profile of the giant physics experiment and also the technology in use, which has made some members of the public nervous"

    So people are concerned about someone (with terrorist connections) MIGHT have worked at the facility?!?? OMG that's a reason to start rounding up everybody with brown skin!
    Geesh

    1. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by rawls · · Score: 5, Funny

      so you don't have to DO anything anymore to get arrested? He was arrested for "al-Qaeda ties"?

      Nobody likes novelty ties. It is about time some legislation was put in place to deal with them.

    2. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1
      According to Gizmodo which is paraphrasing the French newspaper Le Figaro:

      According to French newspaper Le Figaro, judicial sources point that the man—who has been working as a particle physics contractor since 2003—has links to Al Qaeda groups in the Islamic Maghreb. Le Figaro said that he had suggested terrorist targets in French soil. There's word if the target list also included the LHC, however.

      What did he do? Well, if we are to believe Le Figaro, he made a list of targets and suggested ones on French soil ... possibly even the LHC where he worked.

      I like how you accuse the world of jumping on people of 'brown skin' but you do not hesitate at all to instantly question French authorities. Let's not judge either way before all the facts are in and public, okay?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Archtech · · Score: 1

      All this nonsense about "links" has gone much too far. Haven't any of them read this or this or this?

      Everyone is connected to everyone else by some kind of chain of events or relationships, and anyone with enough money, power, and malevolence can track down and highlight such "links". Giving to charities, for instance, is now a very hazardous activity unless you limit your giving to the best-known (and hence biggest and, sometimes, least efficient) organizations. All it takes is for (1) someone in authority to take a dislike to you for any reason, and (2) someone you have never heard of to have some (alleged) relationship to the charity of your choice, and - bang! There you are (or aren't, depending on the enthusiasm of the people sent to collect you).

      What I would like to know is, when are the authorities going to take a practical interest in such "links" as those between:

      1. The Bush family and the bin Laden family;

      2. Many thousands of ordinary Americans (and some foreigners) and a shadowy but vast organization, said to be based in Washington DC, that is believed to be responsible for the violent deaths of millions of people and the ruination of several nations.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    4. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by SoVeryTired · · Score: 1

      Let's not judge either way before all the facts are in and public, okay?

      It'd be nice if the papers would hold off reporting on things like this until the facts are in and public. As things stand, they're spreading as much disinformation as information.

      --
      Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.
    5. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Might beat the wrap, but won't beat the ride.

      All getting arrested means is someone on the scene thought a crime was committed. It could mean a big investigation occurred, it could mean some security guard saw something in the back seat of the guy's car.

      Since he hasn't been named yet, it's sorta hard to tell between those options.

    6. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      Let's not judge either way before all the facts are in and public, okay?

      I was going to say, "You must be new here", but I recognized your nomme de slashdot. You must just be optimistic.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    7. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could take a while. The facts about the liquid limitations on planes did not come out until the court case. Apparently a few london muslims were caught with a baby, and a baby bottle which was filled with hydrogenperoxide and "baby food" which was the other part of the explosive. Several muslim couples tried this. Apparently this would have created a bomb strong enough to blow a hole in the fuselage, which would have brought down the plane if it was in the wrong place. It certainly would have killed several passengers. The preparation was planned to be done in the plane toilets, which was risky as hell. But nevertheless they tried. Sick that they took an actual baby along.

      For that information to come out, it took 3 years.

    8. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by mike449 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know a guy who's father was on very good terms with Bin Laden, and even supplied him with weapons and money.
      Oh, wait, that was _before_ he "became a terrorist"...

    9. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by fireslack · · Score: 1

      He was arrested in France, so I guess that in France you don't have to do anything to get arrested. My advice, as has always been the case, is to avoid wandering into French territory.

      --
      This sig only exists because you are observing it.
    10. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like his sister's friend's neighbor had a cousin who was friends with someone in Al Qaeda back in 1990.

      It also sounds like the beginnings of the Cambodian massacre:
      "Who are you working with?!"
      (lots of torture)
      "Names! Now!"
      (says the names of all friends and relatives)
      "More!"
      (lots of torture)
      (dead)
      "Next fifty! Get all those filthy relatives and friends for the treatment! We will get all those CIA moles eventually!"

    11. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by mpe · · Score: 1

      So people are concerned about someone (with terrorist connections) MIGHT have worked at the facility?!?? OMG that's a reason to start rounding up everybody with brown skin!

      Any IRA members have brown skin? How about many other well known European terrorist groups...

    12. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Xest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the articles I've seen about it, he was arrested for communicating the will to commit terrorist acts and had been seeking advice and information on doing just that. He was effectively at the very start of the planning stage.

      Make of that what you will, if they have evidence of intent he could well be a dangerous person.

      It really comes down to what evidence they really did have, and what was included in those communications for which he was arrested.

      The problem is, you and I don't know what evidence they actually do have, and unless we do we can't say if the arrest was justified or not so it seems pointless speculating. If he was picked up simply out of paranoia because he was phoning uncle Abdullah in Pakistan then yeah, it's rediculous. If he was however phoning Mr Mehsud of the Taliban and asking for information producing bombs from house hold material and information on which targets Al Qaeda would most like him to blow up and what kind of casualty figures they were looking for then it's a different story.

      It's a shame it rarely ever comes out what their evidence actually was so we can properly check the validity of arrests like this.

    13. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Also, from TFA: "The news that someone with terrorist connections might have worked at the facility is likely to cause concern because of both the high profile of the giant physics experiment and also the technology in use, which has made some members of the public nervous"

      So people are concerned about someone (with terrorist connections) MIGHT have worked at the facility?!?? OMG that's a reason to start rounding up everybody with brown skin!
      Geesh

      Members of the public...that includes the people that get nervous when they see someone who didn't have time to shave this morning walking down their street.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    14. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Let's not judge either way before all the facts are in and public, okay?

      Most people don't have the patience to wait (understandably so) for all the facts to get de-classified, quite a few of us won't probably even live long enough to see that happen. Statistically, will you?

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    15. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, wait, that was _before_ he "became a terrorist"...

      The guy, or his father?

    16. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by jdcope · · Score: 1

      that's a reason to start rounding up everybody with brown skin! Geesh

      Wait, do you know something we don't? How do you know he has brown skin? The article said his name wasn't released, and I didn't see anything about his race or nationality either.

    17. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by gillbates · · Score: 1
      If he was however phoning Mr Mehsud of the Taliban and asking for information producing bombs from house hold material and information on which targets Al Qaeda would most like him to blow up and what kind of casualty figures they were looking for then it's a different story.

      Apparently he's got a doctorate in Physics:

      1. He already knows how to make bombs (or could easily figure it out), and probably much better ones than Al Quaeda. He has no need of asking them for bomb-making advice. Because he works for the LHC, he has access to "interesting" chemicals as a part of his regular employment. But if he's the cautious type, he could probably do just as well with a trip to the local supermarket.
      2. Again, he's got a PhD. He can figure out what Al-Queada wants blown up with an internet search in a library somewhere. He doesn't need to be told, he could figure it out.

      But the worst part of this is that anyone with an advanced degree in the sciences can likely figure out for themselves how to make a very deadly bomb. Whatever they lack in skill can be filled in by a visit to the university library or engineering department. And they can do this without:

      • Discussing their plans with anyone.
      • Taking any pictures of public facilities such as train stations, airports, etc.
      • Making any notes of any kind.
      • Making any detailed drawings of bombs - everything calculation could be done on computer (or possibly even a calculator) without leaving any traces.
      • Contacting any terrorist agents, sympathizers, etc...

      The elephant in the closet that no one speaks of is that the same skillset which makes Western life possible - clean drinking water, jet aircraft, electric cars, etc... is also the same skillset required for making bombs. In fact, one can make bombs with only a subset of the engineering knowledge required to build a car.

      To make matters worse, we cannot know what a person is thinking or planning, until the moment they commit their act, or they commit it to some non-volatile storage. A reasonably astute person, aware of the danger of doing so, would simply choose not to divulge their intent on a recordable medium.

      Ted Kazinski was caught not because the FBI figured out who placed the bombs, but because his brother recognized his writing style. A terrorist bomber content to simply plant bombs and walk away could terrorize people for years on end without being caught.

      And speaking of not being caught, Bin Laden has had at least one brigade of the US Army looking for him for the last eight years.

      I think we as a society are going to have to rethink our approach to terrorism. I do not know if this man is actually guilty or not - I have not seen the evidence. But I would suspect that if he is indeed guilty, the fact that he was caught has more to do with coincidence than the result of the methods used in the investigation. To accuse someone because they have "ties" to terrorism; to imply that we can simply *know* what someone was intending to do (as opposed to what they've actually done), is a very dangerous erosion of the rights of due process and civil liberties our forebears fought so hard to defend.

      The most disgraceful part of all this is that our society - because of the exaggerated risks of terrorism - is destroying itself with feel-good measures and knee-jerk enforcement, instead of drawing its focus on the real, underlying problems facing our society today. And why? Because our "leaders" have made us afraid, not of the most likely calamity to befall us, but rather, one of the most remote.

      It's time for Americans to put terrorist back in their place: A statistically insignificant footnote on our larger foreign policy goals of eradicating hunger, disease, and building a more peaceful world. We'll save more lives doing that than we could ever save in the name of fighting terrorism.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    18. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 0

      OMG that's a reason to start rounding up everybody with brown skin!

      What never ceases to amaze me about you liberals is that you always, always, always turn anything Islam-related into a race issue (why? Islam obviously does not constitute a race) and come up with alarmist fantasy scenarios where all "brown people" are rounded up and gassed, when in reality the Western world is ruled by Islamomania, and it would be unthinkable to even criticize Islam or Muslims, let alone start rounding them up.

      Calling it now: I will be modded -1 troll etc. because the leftist-liberal hivemind of Slashdot cannot tolerate any dissent, but is also unable to formulate any counter-arguments.

    19. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Oriental_Hero · · Score: 1

      LOL, of course you don't have to do the crime to do the time!

      Haven't you seen the email evidence procured from Yahoo themselves of the Al-Qaeda 3 that helped convict them of intending to bomb airlines using liquid explosives?

      "Coded" emails were sent about CDs and DVDs as well as Projectors....

      Damning stuff that!

      I think the Martyrdom videos they made were much more incriminating. Unless they were *really* gloomy rap videos.

      --
      Oriental Hero "I want to live in a city where the Police don't shoot you" Jean Charles de Menezes
    20. Re:so you don't have to DO anything anymore? by Xest · · Score: 1

      "But the worst part of this is that anyone with an advanced degree in the sciences can likely figure out for themselves how to make a very deadly bomb. Whatever they lack in skill can be filled in by a visit to the university library or engineering department."

      I'd like to think the same too, but it's simply not the case. See this guy:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kafeel_Ahmed

      He set bombs in London with this guy:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilal_Abdullah

      Which completely failed to go off. They then drove to Glasgow airport and drove into it throwing petrol bombs. He was the only casualty, managing to burn himself so badly he died in hospital. Bilal, the other attacker was arrested and is now in jail.

      Sorry, but the assertion that phd = smart enough to perform a successful attack is completely wrong. This guy failed on two accounts, his bombs failed, and his second attack failed to the point he has to be a prime contender for a Darwin award.

      I would agree that the potential for a smart terrorist is a worrying one, certainly here in the UK you'd have had a lot more reason to be scared of the IRA than you would any of the new wave of Al Qaeda wannabes that try it on here, 90% of whom, much like the guy in TFA, get caught before they even get anywhere. Probably because they join an internet chat room, start talking to MrWesternerKiller about how they plan to kill Westerners, thinking they've finally found someone who agrees with them whilst living in a continent where everyone completely disagrees with them to the point they can't even express their views, only to find MrWesternerKiller is actually an FBI agent and the guy has just signed his own arrest warrant.

  9. But i thought... by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. Obama had fixed this already?!

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:But i thought... by NoYob · · Score: 1

      .. Obama had fixed this already?!

      He's going to! That's why he got the Nobel - because he's going to bring peace! The Peace prize has become a futures prize.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    2. Re:But i thought... by maxume · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The democratic cabal obviously had a member that was eligible to nominate him, so that part was easy, but actually controlling the minds of the selection committee probably required pointing their mind control satellite (how else could he have won the election?) at Norway.

      More seriously, Obama winning the prize reflects poorly on the Nobel committee, not on him.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:But i thought... by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Interesting

      More seriously, Obama winning the prize reflects poorly on the Nobel committee, not on him.

      I worked in a pizza place where the manager had an interesting strategy for improving the performance of some employees. He would give a particular employee, who'd been slacking, the Employee of the Month Award. Getting this award would often encourage that employee to pick it up, and they'd become diligent enough to deserve the award. Maybe the Nobel committee is hoping for the same effect here? They gave a Peace prize to Yasser Arafat some time ago as well, as I recall.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    4. Re:But i thought... by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      That's the plan. If he doesn't, we'll use the LHC to travel back in time and not give him the Nobel peace prize.
      And since that hasn't happen, he'll succeed. Logical?

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    5. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      frem wikipedia:
      In 1994, Arafat received the Nobel Peace Prize, together with Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, for the negotiations at Oslo.

      Do you have anything to add about Rabin? wake up...

    6. Re:But i thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They gave a Peace prize to Yasser Arafat some time ago as well, as I recall.

      Far as I can remember that's the point when PLO got officially neutered and the muslim fanatics start to worry that they won't get their blood revenge from PLO. That's how Hamas got into power.

  10. old news? by pbjones · · Score: 0

    I thought that this was covered in the press last week, so why is it in /. now??

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:old news? by dword · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought that this was covered in the press last week, so why is it in /. now??

      Because /. is mostly an aggregator and doesn't bring in fresh news. It just puts all the "news for nerds" that you can find out there in one place.

    2. Re:old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Slashdot sucks.

    3. Re:old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because some important news provider picked it up just now. I knew about this the day it happened, it took a day and a half to see it anywhere online. The news traveled fast on the LHCb internal mailing list. I've had a discussion with one of my coworkers who work on LHCb for how one can use the LHC to do any real world damage, we came up with none!

    4. Re:old news? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      I thought that this was covered in the press last week, so why is it in /. now??

      Because that's how long it takes for people to reflect on the issues, think about it, come up a decent opinion and then write 'frist post'.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    5. Re:old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure -- produce ten thousand mini black holes and then fire them at France. You'll cause millions of sub-nuclear scale holes across southern France, inconveniencing, err.... the langoliers. Yeah. Of course, even this plan relies on any extra dimension being unfeasibly large, but you can't win them all if you want to fire black holes at France.

    6. Re:old news? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The reason I come to Slashdot is because I don't want to waste my entire fucking life poring over every news site on the planet. Maybe you haven't noticed yet, but Slashdot has trouble even when it comes to responsible editing of article summaries -- why on Earth would you ever expect it to be a center of breaking news reportage?

  11. Re:Cue black hole jokes by sopssa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dont you understand how dangerous black holes would be in *terrorists* hands? They could use them to destroy the whole world. In my opinion only Americans should be allowed to create black holes.

  12. al-qaeda tie by M8e · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want an al-qaeda tie. I don't care what colour it is, i want one!

    1. Re:al-qaeda tie by asylumx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Careful. After you've worn it a few times it will come out of your tie rack yelling "ALALALALALA" and then explode...

    2. Re:al-qaeda tie by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Can I give one to the VP who keeps coming up with "exciting big vision projects" based on Slashdot articles?

    3. Re:al-qaeda tie by G-Man · · Score: 1

      I would be more worried about it constricting and cutting my head off...

    4. Re:al-qaeda tie by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1
      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    5. Re:al-qaeda tie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shall challenge you with my mission accomplished tie to a tie fight!

    6. Re:al-qaeda tie by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      We all know that a tie fight is bound to finish in a draw.

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    7. Re:al-qaeda tie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mission Accomplished!

    8. Re:al-qaeda tie by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Just websense slashdot from him ;-)

  13. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the LHC will create a black hole that will swallow us, we're destined to be in a universe where the LHC either malfunctions on its own or is sabotaged by terrorists.

  14. oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never trusted those Europeans with their lage hedron and whatelse stuff

  15. No need for a terrorist attack on the LHC . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . it seems pretty capable of breaking itself on its own, with any outside help

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:No need for a terrorist attack on the LHC . . . by craagz · · Score: 1

      All organizations, terrorist and non-terrorist have spies in the LHC program. The al-Qaeda guy got arrested because somebody ratted him out after he failed to refill the coffee maker.

  16. Scare mongering by houghi · · Score: 1

    which has made some members of the public nervous

    Next you will hear that CERN should be more concerned about security. There is only one way however. If you do not want people to find out what they find out, don't start looking for it.
    It is not as if it is a super secret research facility.

    Also most likely you could get information here in much more detail and the person arrested was seen to eat falafel in a place where the shop owners second cousins neighbor has the same name as somebody who was placed on the Al-Quida list by a jealous family member so he could get a reward payed out.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Scare mongering by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It is not as if [CERN] is a super secret research facility. ... most likely you could get information here [web.cern.ch] in much more detail ...

      True, but there's a long history of the government "security" folks not particularly caring whether the information was secret or not.

      For a historic example, read some of the copious material on Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in 1953. One of the points made by some of the historians is that the things the Rosenbergs were accused of passing to the Soviets could all be found in college textbooks of the time.

      I saw a funny case of this back in the 1970s, when I was in college. In the textbook for a physics class, one of the end-of-chapter exercises was of the form "Using the equations in this chapter and the tables in appendix [X]., calculate the critical masses of the following isotopes: ...." The end of the sentence referenced a footnote, which informed the student that giving the answers to this question to anyone without a US security clearance was punishable in the US by N years in a federal prison.

      The author(s) of this textbook obviously had a sense of humor about it all. But the government security people tend to take it seriously. Consider that only a few years ago, one of the things that we computer geeks were forbidden to show to foreigners was the RSA algorithm. The fun part of this is that "RSA" is the last initials of its three developers, of which only two were US citizens. Trivia question: What was [is] the nationality of the third person in this trio?

      Anyway, it's likely that the US and various other governments will declare some of the discoveries at the LHC to be government secrets, even the things that are published openly in physics journals. I suppose they will be secrets to the great majority of people who don't or can't read physics journals.

      (I still have one of those t-shirts with the three-line perl implementation of RSA, and the explanation of why the t-shirt is legally "munitions" in the US, under the ITAR regulations. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  17. Well...Actually.... by WoRLoKKeD · · Score: 1
    I was going to say that this man should prepare for unforseen concequences.

    ...I'll get my coat.

    --
    Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
  18. Newt Gingrich was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard Newt Gingrich on a popular cable show a few months ago listing the most serious security threats we Americans face in our homeland and among the first few he listed was 'a threat from something we don't know and can't prepare for because we've fallen behind in so many areas.' That was ALWAYS laughable in my youth and I half-dismissed it as rhetoric, but here's the living proof that it wasn't and that the sometimes seemingly "square" Republicans are at least continuing to think about these issues during their "timeout." Thankfully this proof isn't coming from forensic scientists analyzing the aftermath of whatever this guy could have conceivably been intending to pervert the LHC's somewhat awesome technology to do to us.

    1. Re:Newt Gingrich was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? How the fuck could he use the LHC against anything? Do you think it's a suitcase sized railgun or something? This is assuming he's even remotely guilty, which is certainly not clear enough yet to call him "living proof".

      The most serious security threat faced in the entire civilised world is people being too damn eager to believe what their governments tell them about the bogeymen hiding under the bed.

    2. Re:Newt Gingrich was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, hard to believe anyone is this brainwashed.

    3. Re:Newt Gingrich was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my comment was about the LHC's technology, not about the LHC itself and, of course, if I could answer your question in that context, then I would be disproving Newt's comment and contradicting my newfound support of it. Hopefully as you get older, your reading comprehension, spelling and critical thinking will improve.

    4. Re:Newt Gingrich was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you referring to the former SECOND IN LINE to become the most powerful man on Earth, the president of the United States of America?

  19. Gods particle by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 1, Funny

    Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't LHC should be able to proof existence "God particle"? Perhaps that guy only wanted to make sure the particle belong to "right" god.

    1. Re:Gods particle by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't LHC should be able to proof existence "God particle"? Perhaps that guy only wanted to make sure the particle belong to "right" god.

      I doubt that God is that particular.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:Gods particle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't LHC should be able to proof existence "God particle"? Perhaps that guy only wanted to make sure the particle belong to "right" god.

      I doubt that God is that particular.

      are you sure She is not a wave?

  20. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Robin47 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine trying to smuggle one onto an airplane... "I'm sorry, sir, your bag is overweight."

  21. You did your reading, didn't you? by S3D · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Foundation (Al-Quaeda in Arabic) will be created in 12000 years by Harry Seldon, as the result of nuclear proliferation initiated by time-traveling terrorist, inspired by subversive element from Hidden Centuries.

    1. Re:You did your reading, didn't you? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2, Informative

      will be created in 12000 years by Harry Seldon,

      Hari doesn't like people mis-spelling his name. You'll probably be retroactively erased from psychohistory.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hari_Seldon

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:You did your reading, didn't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) just so you know "al qaeda" may mean "foundation" according to the dictionary, the actual usage of the word is generally referring to a military base (just like "mosque", in case you're wondering a house of prayer is a "masjid", the main difference ? masjid's don't have those spires)

      2) I wonder what exactly the suggestion of everybody here is. We just drop all security, and "see what happens" ? I do have one little question : what if it's again 3500 people ? I mean it'd be rather tough to blame Bush again, now wouldn't it ? What if, you know, there ISN'T any conspiracy and they really do just wanna kill us ?

      3) one wonders how exactly you propose to do this nuclear non-profileration. Iran has figured out the diffucult parts of building a bomb (enrichment). Pakistan and North Korea obviously have done the same. All we ever do if they attack something is give them more money. Is that seriously how you suggest a policy for nuclear non-profileration should work. (obviously, everything will change once Obama does ... well ... something. I'm sure he will know what to say and all will be well. Question : what happens if all won't be well ?)

  22. Umm... No. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    It'd be nice if the papers would hold off reporting on things like this until the facts are in and public.

    What you are referring to is not journalism but blogging.
    Investigative journalism has a very important role in democratic societies as a tool for making information available to the public.
    Look up Watergate.

    As things stand, they're spreading as much disinformation as information.

    Not if properly sourced and leveraged by some form ethical code of conduct - backed by either their personal or their news company's reputation and/or open to criticism of peer review.

    It is quite understandable that in today's world of "FOXed out" news and anonymous internet commentators one might confuse investigative journalism and reporting with slander and propaganda.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Umm... No. by SoVeryTired · · Score: 1

      Did you really have to title your post "Umm...No"? You're taking a totally unnecessary confrontational tone.

      Right now, all we know is that some guy working at the LHC got arrested for possible terrorist activities. My point was that the reports are so vague that we don't even know if the LHC was an possible target. The papers are just trying to grab readers' attention by printing "LHC" and "Terrorist!" in the same article.

      I'm afraid there's not much "Investigative Journalism" to be done here. It's just a matter of waiting around to find out what he's being charged with before kicking up a stink.

      --
      Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.
  23. Better news article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a much better news article than the one from CBC:
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/nuclear-terror-suspect-is-top-physicist-1800927.html

    It names the suspect and it explains how he was tracked and arrested.
    According to the article, the suspect studied for his PhD at the Stanford University Linear Accelerator Center, stayed at EPFL and has published several articles.

    1. Re:Better news article by smaddox · · Score: 1

      So he has a PhD's in physics from Stanford, but doesn't know about encryption? Stanford, you should be ashamed of yourself!

    2. Re:Better news article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That bastard!

    3. Re:Better news article by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Mental note to self - always encrypt email.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  24. And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally stop by AlgorithMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I thought after we got rid of george w bush, all the "al quaeda this" and "axis of evil that" and "osama this" and "emmanuel goldstein that", "give me all your money and all your rights or they'll kill you" would finally stop...

    you know the literal translation of the word "terror" from latin is "fear" and a "terrorist" by definition is someone who makes you afraid. some people make you afraid by crashing planes or detonating bombs in your country or by sending you terror-threat videos. some people make you afraid by constantly telling you there was a bogeyman that is about to kill you - using his weapons of mass destruction unless we start a war etc.

    wake up! your own government and your own media terrorize you far worse than al quaeda ever did! If you run scared everytime someone says "bogeyman", then the terrorists have won, because you are scared and THAT is exactly what they WANT

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  25. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Destoo · · Score: 1

    in 5..4..3..2..1..0..-1...

    Funny that the blackhole joke came up one minute before the countdown.
    Cue time travel jokes in -5, -6, -7...

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  26. Re:Cue black hole jokes by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

    The good news is that the National Ray-Gun Association is fighting the 3-day waiting period for mad scientists.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  27. Typical lax European security by leathered · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't have happened at Black Mesa.

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    1. Re:Typical lax European security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gorden is not an Al Quaeda opertive.

  28. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But sir, apart from a hole, there is nothing in it!
    Look for yourself...

  29. Ultimate terrorist attack by jolyonr · · Score: 1

    That's the ultimate suicide attack - trying to destroy the entire universe!

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  30. Re:Cue black hole jokes by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, is that "good" news, or "Good news everybody!" news?

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  31. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black holes is a racist term.

  32. Cat Stevens by jdc18 · · Score: 1

    Maybe he brought some Cat Stevens records....

  33. Well... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Did you really have to title your post "Umm...No"? You're taking a totally unnecessary confrontational tone.

    If you don't like your posts criticizing specific actions and cases being understood as general critiques on subjects - elaborate your posts a little further.

    You know... like the stuff you wrote in the reply-post above.
    Just dumping a throwaway comment like "Papers should STFU!" is bound to get you some negative or "confrontational" comments.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  34. I am french by aepervius · · Score: 2, Informative

    And I do not trust the DST (or whatever it is called nowadays) as far as I can throw them. Even less than that. I can remember the "rainbow warrior" ship story, for example. It could very possible that they found a real idiot planning to do a terrist attack, or it is possible this is polically motivated and somebody needed that sort of "news" for nefarious purpose. We'll see in the next days.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  35. Give him his wish make him an Insider? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make him an insider !

    Step 1) Open the colllides door put terrorisnt inside .
    Step2) Close door
    Step 3) set power to max
    Step 4) Fire !!
    No cleanup required
    If I'm wrong abour cleanup, O'h well ,too bad, A service to the world has been done.

  36. Last week called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wants its news back.

  37. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In France? :)

  38. CERN and dangerous materials by physburn · · Score: 1
    CERNs main operations, don't make radioactive materials in any great quantities, so really the nothing for Al Quada to steal. However smaller science labs in the faciality might have radioactive materials for testing materials or for smaller science projects. So yeah, keep potential terrorist out.

    ---

    LHC Feed @ Feed Distiller

    1. Re:CERN and dangerous materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CERNs main operations, don't make radioactive materials in any great
      quantities, so really the nothing for Al Quada to steal. However smaller
      science labs in the faciality might have radioactive materials for testing
      materials or for smaller science projects. So yeah, keep potential
      terrorist out.

      Keep potential terrorist[s] out?

      Not going to be many people left in that facility.

  39. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHA it's funny cuz its true

  40. Not named? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five bucks says his name was Mohammed

    1. Re:Not named? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or his name an an "AL-" in it

  41. like 99% of domestic "suspected terrorists".. by byrdfl3w · · Score: 0

    ..He will be found to have had nothing to do with any kind of terrorism, and be released. Of course, the mainstream media only ever report the arrests - never will you see a subsequent report that the individual was eventually found innocent. I believe the goal here is keeping alive in the public mind the illusion of an effective domestic "war on terror", so that our most basic freedoms may be further eroded by the enactment of ever more insidious security legislation.

  42. Girl Scout Cookie Market Infringement? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I think someone threatened by people buying al-Qaeda Ties, instead of Girl Scout Cookies, turned this guy in. The evidence is most likely pinned up on the wall in the employee lounge at CERN.

  43. Re:Better news article - More to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's more going on here than we're hearing about.

    So you have the two guys - one a brilliant physicist and the other with a PhD from the Curie University.
    First off, it's hard to believe guys like this decide to blow things up. They are well educated; not the pawns of some brainwashing cleric.

    But its even harder to imagine that they get caught in this manner.
    These guys are so smart, but its easy to 'bug' their internet connection? Maybe they were sending e-mails without any encryption? Discussing things without using a code? Not able to stop people listing to their communications, or realising if they were being physically bugged? But holding down a day job at CERN? Doesn't add up.

    Why did they even decide to get in touch with that group in North Africa? What could a bunch of guys living in a desert possibly offer to these guys in terms of help? These guys could probably plan their own misdeeds - so why would they potentially compromise themselves by trying to get in contact with some people they don't know and aren't sure they can trust?

    I guess what I'm basically saying here is that if these guys are so smart - and I believe two people that achieve this sort of academic record, coming from nothing, are going to be shit hot - then I don't believe that they'd get caught in that manner.

    I find it hard to believe that people that smart and that educated, having lived in different countries, would want to use terrorism to achieve their ends, but I find it really really hard to believe they'd be caught so easily.

  44. Contradicting itself! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Informative

    [...] the arrest of a man on Thursday in south-east France for suspected al-Qaeda links: 'CERN officials said the man, whose name has not been revealed, was working under contract with an outside institute and said he had no contact with anything that could have been used for terrorism. [...]'

    You have to decide: Either he's in arrest for a crime, or he is suspected and nothing is known or proven yet (and most likely never will).
    I mean it's right in there: They have not found any ties. They just kinda heard from someone that kinda he could somehow be in an organization that somehow kinda could possibly be linked to...uuum...something.
    One parrot tells it to the next parrot, and soon it's al-Quaeda, and he's arrested for shit.

    But a friend told me that he came from Morocco to France, and the cops there were just like in Morocco. When he came to Germany, he was shocked, that the cops treated him like a human being. (And our cops still are on the level of semi-criminal bouncers who beat up people because they like to. It must be pretty damn bad in France.)
    So I can comprehend how it can come to shit like this. But that does not make it OK.

    I will wait and see what charges they bring up (if any). Or if it's the usual witch trial, like in those countries... you know... where "terrorism" "comes from"...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Contradicting itself! by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how bad french cops are, never having spent more than three months in a row there, but if they're anything like in the US or Canada, you have cops who shoot at will, have unofficial immunity because their trials usually are juried by other cops, and whose idea of modern counterriot tactic is playing a game of "czarist russia" and charging protesters on horseback.

  45. Re:Cue black hole jokes by orkysoft · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could try placing it in a Bag of Holding ;-)

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  46. UPDATE! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    I've got news! The trial already happened. And I have a snippet of the only recording that got out.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  47. This explains all the technical glitches by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Sabotage... or Scientific terrorism.

    Religious terrorists (at least) don't tend to like science too much.

    Think about it... how many creationists want scientists to unravel the secrets of the "big bang"?

    Such science really gets in the way of convincing people of certain dogma..

  48. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by blofeld42 · · Score: 1

    Or it could be that, you know, al Qaeda really exists, and that they are really trying to conduct terror attacks, and that the two arrested really were participating in planning for those attacks. The French had comprehensively bugged their communications and knew what they were up to. From the Daily Mail:

    "Adlene Hicheur is a former research fellow at the Rutherford Appleton and still visits the UK for conferences and other meetings. He and Halim are accused of compiling information about possible targets and sending it to contacts in North Africa involved with Al Qaeda Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). ...
    European intelligence sources said that Adlene Hicheur, who studied at Stanford University in California before moving to Oxfordshire, had expressed a ‘very strong wish to carry out attacks anywhere where Western security interests can be damaged’."

  49. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why did you think changing the president of the USA would in any way affect the behavior of the police in FRANCE?

  50. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by ildon · · Score: 1

    If you have to go to Latin to figure out that "terror" is a synonym for "fear", then I suspect you're either not a native English speaker or your education was woefully inadequate.

  51. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beware to put extra planar objects into a bag of holding.

  52. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever noticed that at least half of the world's terrorists were somehow trained/educated in or by the United States?

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting...

  53. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "And I thought after we got rid of george w bush, all the "al quaeda this" and "axis of evil that" and "osama this" and "emmanuel goldstein that", "give me all your money and all your rights or they'll kill you" would finally stop..."

    Being paranoid over Al Qaeda doesn't meant they aren't a viable threat, though paranoia doesn't make for well thought-out policy decisions.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  54. Re:Better news article - More to this by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First off, it's hard to believe guys like this decide to blow things up.

    It isn't hard to believe at all.

    Intellectuals of a certain type have always been attracted to games of espionage, treason and conspiracy - and "game" is, I think, the right word here:

    Cambridge Five, Whittaker Chambers

    Most probably don't expect to be around when things blow up - but now and again you may find an exception: 2001 Anthrax Attacks

    These guys are so smart.

    The geek really ought to have learned by now that the smart and the arrogant make stupid mistakes. Hans Reiser

  55. How many poor innocent protons must be sacrificed? by stox · · Score: 1

    Each of these poor innocent protons was probably older than the earth itself, and yet we thoughtlessly slaughter countless billions of them for the sake of science. I urge all of you to join the CWFPP ( Complete Whackjobs For the Protection of Protons ).

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  56. ...by his e-mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, a top scientist gets caught because of his e-mails ? I think he could have thought about encrypting them.

  57. Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is exactly the Moe GP was talking about.

  58. Re:Cue black hole jokes by bmorton · · Score: 1

    Mad science doesn't kill people. People kill people.

  59. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

    Well, in the interests of full disclosure, & just to clarify this point:

    Mad science doesn't kill people. People and my limitless armies of robot-brained atomic monster cows kill people.

  60. al-Qaeda ties?? by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    What, they arrested some CERN scientist for wearing a thinkgeek.com product to the office?

    What next a Tevatron researcher waterboarded for having al-Qaeda cuff-links?

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  61. The true meaning of 9/11 terror by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    Obligatory XKCD.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  62. Does he use shampoo or lighters? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    CERN officials said the man, whose name has not been revealed, was working under contract with an outside institute and said he had no contact with anything that could have been used for terrorism.

    So we're looking for a guy who doesn't use shampoo or lighters?

    1. Re:Does he use shampoo or lighters? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      You think Stallman is a terrorist? (-:

  63. Re:Cue black hole jokes by c · · Score: 1

    > ... the National Ray-Gun Association is fighting
    > the 3-day waiting period for mad scientists.

    Darn right, they should. After all, ray-guns don't kill people... Aliens from the Krthiepth Cluster kill people. With ray-guns. Then eat them.

    c.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  64. Re:Better news article - More to this by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe that people that smart and that educated, having lived in different countries, would want to use terrorism to achieve their ends

    You mean like, say, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? Born wealthy, educated in the U.S., and achieving a degree in mechanical engineering? Also the mastermind in plots that killed thousands of people to further the aims of the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Queda, et al? You know, the guy who hacked off the head of a journalist just for the internet video shock factor it was intended to produce?

    Yeah, being smart and living abroad and being well educated in a techical discipline: not a guarantee that you aren't also a militant, violent, jihaddist wackadoo.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  65. The Secret Six by westlake · · Score: 1

    Ever wonder how John Brown financed and armed his men for the raid on Harper's Ferry?

    It makes for quite a story:

    The Secret Six were not hardscrabble ruffians or ex-slaves but men of culture, education, and fortune, and, as such, an especial threat to the slave- holding plutocracy Five of the six were from Boston: Higginson a preacher and a writer; Sanborn a young writer, teacher, and protégé of Ralph Waldo Emerson; Howe a world- renowned physician who worked with the blind and deaf; Theodore Parker a well-known abolitionist and Unitarian preacher; and George L. Stearns a prosperous manufacturer. The sixth member, Gerrit Smith, was a rich upstate New York businessman and philanthropist. Civil War Chronicles: The Secret Six

  66. The only thing we have to fear... by HydroPhonic · · Score: 1

    ... is fear itself!

  67. The plan: by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    "They were gunna collide that big hadron with sumpthin."

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  68. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because a fascist newspaper is a good source of info.

  69. He who controls the magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He who controls the magnets, controls the metal detectors.

    He who controls the magnets, controls density! Destiny!

  70. Survival of the fittest by vikstar · · Score: 1

    CERN Security Agent 1: "Damn, there are going to be lay-offs. The scientists aren't performing criminal acts, we're useless, and there'll be funding cutbacks due to the recession."
    CERN Security Agent 2: "Ok, lets smear this guy as an al-Qaeda terrorist, maybe that will help."

    --
    The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
  71. No, Neo by saurongt · · Score: 1

    But would you be able to smuggle it though airport security?

    When it's ready, you won't have to.

  72. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why airport security is making the passengers curse on purpose.

  73. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but this wasn't in our country. The LHC is located in France, and he was arrested by the French authorities. Please try to stay on topic.

  74. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Oriental_Hero · · Score: 1

    Ironicaly , the only convicted anthrax through the mail person was American...

    --
    Oriental Hero "I want to live in a city where the Police don't shoot you" Jean Charles de Menezes
  75. Re:Cue black hole jokes by formfeed · · Score: 1
    Of course, you'd have to put it into your carry-on. Duh!

    Problem is to get it into your bag before it eats Europe: They'd never let you enter the US if the black hole had been contaminated by fresh fruit and meat.

    I'd bet, he was just planning on stealing a bottle of positronium.

  76. Hadron /= Hardon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't belive I'm the only one to be confused by misreading the headline

  77. What was this guy going to do? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Sabotage the collider magnets? Or worse yet, create a black hole and destroy the whole world?
    And how will we be able to tell the difference between his activities and normal LHR operations?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  78. Re:Cue black hole jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an american, it is my duty to speak for the rest of the world and agree with you.

  79. Re:And I thought the al quaeda BS would finally st by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    yes, you are right. but think about how many political decisions in the last 8 years were justified by "al quaeda*". Now think about how many people died in the last 8 years through al quaeda terrorism in the USA...

    the immense gap makes me LAUGH about "al quaeda*" arguments, no matter how serious they might be this time... I guess politicians just cried "wolf" a few times to often... and I don't say this because I'm german - we get a lot of "terror-warnings", too - and I laugh about them, too...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  80. Re:Cue black hole jokes by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    You could try placing it in a Bag of Holding ;-)

    Holding without charge?

  81. Don't be conCERNed... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    They just want to make sure that the God particle is the Allah particle.

  82. MIstaken Identity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, Osama Bin Smith was a model employee who worked diligently and quietly at his post for many years before his beard became a little too long and he was busted on employee saftey regs.

  83. A word of warning. by nerdin · · Score: 1

    Given the famous six degrees, you have "some suspected link" to Al-Qaeda, American government, the LHC construction team, some defunct communist party, the Cosa Nostra, any of the Bildenberg conspirators and the Bush Family. All at the same time.
    So "somewhere" you are pretty suspicious of "something" that can lead to your arrest. In some instances you can simply be detained without warrant or legal representation, kept isolated in an island for any of your links.
    You have been warned. Go back to your closet.

  84. Amazing that you were modded up by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    They did not give out that much info in the beggining of this, but it was pretty obvious that they had more than 'just ties'. Yet, an AC got modded up, without anybody using any logic on his statment.

    Revelations in the case have slowly emerged following the Oct. 8 arrest of 32-year-old French-Algerian Adlène Hicheur, who holds a doctorate in particle physics. Hicheur was nabbed after intelligence officials intercepted encoded e-mails he sent to AQIM members offering to plan terrorist strikes in France.
    What this shows is that those who do not think or even openly sympathize with terrorism, are modded up here.
    What else is missing is how much communications EU taps. Much has been made of America's PATRIOT act and the theft of our rights. Little is said of the quiet disappearing of similar rights throughout EU.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  85. To Paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First they came for the carders, and I did not speak out—because I was not a carder;
    Then they came for the DMCA violaters, and I did not speak out—because I was not a DMCA violater.
    Then they came for the crackers, and I did not speak out—because I was not a cracker;
    Then they came for the Pirates, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Pirate;
    Then they came for the Scientists....