In social psychology research you can't ever even approach that same level of control over the environment the experiment takes place in.
Exactly. This alone negates any claim as to whatever result is "found". That basic replication you refer to later is like saying "I used copper wiring in all my experiments" and never giving the length or gauge.
a lack of easy replication under mostly similar circumstances indicates that that factor probably isn't as strong as hypothesized, and it cuts off a (probably) blind alley.
Interesting you use probably twice in one sentence as you attempt to support those experiments as having value. Other than being your opinion, how is it you're sure of your conclusion? Provide some empirical confirmation please.
You let your medulla most of the work. There's very little reason to spend any time on what's commonly thought of as higher functioning when you're focused on sight/reaction. Any "thought" is devoted only to grasping the topographical and tactical situation and mildly guiding yourself through it. This is what allows you to coordinate the multiple movements. Anyone promoting that this is dumb is merely rationalizing their inability to do it.
My contacts cost me $70 for a one year supply. That's about thirty years in comparison. If my contacts become micro-scratched, I throw them away. If lasik gives me halos, I'm screwed. No contest.
"This is text messages, threats emailed to you, men send death threats that include personal informaiton, like what kind of car and location. And it isn't uncommon., in that every woman will experiences it often."
Bullshit. Same bullshit as the one in four women will be raped claim.
One English military officer suggested it - Lord Jeffrey Amherst. It's unknown if he actually attempted it. That's the entirety of the story. Weak attempt at religion bashing.
Dude/tte, I have five domains. All are paid up through 2020. In 2015 I shall extend them until 2030. It's not hard to do and it's not hard to remember, FFS. For a company that large to neglect is inexcusable. Just buy them for then next 20 years, it doesn't cost all that much.
A top billing female character will never rise from the purposeful ashes of a mediocre billing male character. It's an obvious bit of pandering and will - and should - die off. Why not use a female warrior to begin with and avoid all the crap that this will deal? In fact, a female Norse warrior (and there were a number) could hook out from Thor to get whatever boost they think that would yield. As it is, this will burn and spiral to the ground.
Of course you can augment the repair shop with rental cars. But then you have moved an inch away from the fix-it-all utopia towards a replacement culture.
This is exactly what dealerships do where major repairs are concerned and no, you're not "inching" anywhere. The rental is maintained the same way.
If the replacement cost would be approximately the same as the repair,
It wouldn't and I challenge you to give an example where it would. Especially since you're using automobiles as your argument.
For instance, it can be logistically more efficient to manufacture more weak products instead of distributing massive amount of spare parts.
If and only if those parts are shipped individually, which is not at all how our method of shipment works. Yes, I can send a single penny to a friend in California. But that penny goes with a plane load of other items. Your argument fails because of this.
I've read this thread. The only thing you offered was pedantry and snark, starting with your essentially worthless criticism of his writing style. Is that all you have for the discussion? If so, you are tacitly admitting he is correct.
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly. This alone negates any claim as to whatever result is "found". That basic replication you refer to later is like saying "I used copper wiring in all my experiments" and never giving the length or gauge.
Interesting you use probably twice in one sentence as you attempt to support those experiments as having value. Other than being your opinion, how is it you're sure of your conclusion? Provide some empirical confirmation please.
"Nope, I don't work with Microsoft Technologies."
Then you admit that "Every IDE places everything you edit ultimately into files, text files to be precise" should have been "Every IDE I use".
Holy crap. That almost hurt to see. Those are the kind of pages that I have to mouse swipe just to read. Yeeesh.
You got a cite for that little factoid?
You let your medulla most of the work. There's very little reason to spend any time on what's commonly thought of as higher functioning when you're focused on sight/reaction. Any "thought" is devoted only to grasping the topographical and tactical situation and mildly guiding yourself through it. This is what allows you to coordinate the multiple movements. Anyone promoting that this is dumb is merely rationalizing their inability to do it.
"Germans - we just blew them up." Ignoring, of course, everything leading up to our entry.
Not quite. Sauropods are dinosaurs too and none have been found with feathers that I'm aware of.
No they won't. See? I can make bland assertions as well.
My contacts cost me $70 for a one year supply. That's about thirty years in comparison. If my contacts become micro-scratched, I throw them away. If lasik gives me halos, I'm screwed. No contest.
Not quite, they're building it on presumption.
Infinity and infinitesimals are abstract concepts. They do not occur in reality by their very definition as neither can ever be reached.
It is valid to answer anecdote with anecdote.
"This is text messages, threats emailed to you, men send death threats that include personal informaiton, like what kind of car and location. And it isn't uncommon., in that every woman will experiences it often."
Bullshit. Same bullshit as the one in four women will be raped claim.
"They take chances with it because the benefits outweighs the risks." A supposition on your part. No more, no less.
We've had an anthrax vaccines since the 1800's.
One English military officer suggested it - Lord Jeffrey Amherst. It's unknown if he actually attempted it. That's the entirety of the story. Weak attempt at religion bashing.
Still doesn't justify keeping it around. We *have* a vaccine. We also have nukes, so retaliation by smallpox isn't necessary.
Current reports are that Russia is helping to destroy on ground evidence.
You could have just said liberals instead of other idiots.
Dude/tte, I have five domains. All are paid up through 2020. In 2015 I shall extend them until 2030. It's not hard to do and it's not hard to remember, FFS. For a company that large to neglect is inexcusable. Just buy them for then next 20 years, it doesn't cost all that much.
Because they rely on ours. It would be interesting to see the change if we pulled all protective forces back.
A top billing female character will never rise from the purposeful ashes of a mediocre billing male character. It's an obvious bit of pandering and will - and should - die off. Why not use a female warrior to begin with and avoid all the crap that this will deal? In fact, a female Norse warrior (and there were a number) could hook out from Thor to get whatever boost they think that would yield. As it is, this will burn and spiral to the ground.
This is exactly what dealerships do where major repairs are concerned and no, you're not "inching" anywhere. The rental is maintained the same way.
It wouldn't and I challenge you to give an example where it would. Especially since you're using automobiles as your argument.
If and only if those parts are shipped individually, which is not at all how our method of shipment works. Yes, I can send a single penny to a friend in California. But that penny goes with a plane load of other items. Your argument fails because of this.
I've read this thread. The only thing you offered was pedantry and snark, starting with your essentially worthless criticism of his writing style. Is that all you have for the discussion? If so, you are tacitly admitting he is correct.