This article is pure troll. There is very little usefull or helpfull information; and it's full of dry sarcastic humor. For once I shouldn't have RTFA. I've said it once, and I'm sure I'll say it a million more times, each OS has it's pro's and con's. No OS is perfect for all things and no OS will ever meet someones every desire/whim. People are fundimentaly way to picky. They learn things one way and are afraid/threatened by change; be it for the better or not. How this article ever got published is beyond me. Next thing we will see peoples anti-Microsoft/. posts being used for "informative" aticles. Sheesh!
If you read my post you'll see I'm talking about desktops; which usualy don't run apps like Apache. I'm also not sure what that link has to do with our discussion. I'm not trying to start an email war here but where did you get that first fact. I've way more updates on my XP machine than on my Linux machine; but again I'm talking desktops. There may well be more updates for server type application produced by Linux, but I wasn't comparing those...jab
Is there any real benefit to the user with the inclusion of this technology. I know the article claims "rovides an enhanced BIOS that allows greater interaction with the operating system"; but does this affect the users experience? Or is this simply a move to force DRM down our throats? I'm not trolling; I just wonder if there is an upside to the consumer.
I'm sure this will get modded down, or ignored by the moderators all together, as off topic; but I feel it's a good camparison. I have two, relatively similar, workstations. One running Red Hat 9 and the other WinXP. I use RH Up2Date on the Linux bawx and Windows Update on the XP machine religiously. The observation that I have made are pretty amazing. Microsoft releases roughly 4 patches for every 1 that RH releases. The RH packages, other than kernel updates, do not require any reboots; where most of the MS ones do. I've not had a single occurrance of an adverse effect on my Linux machine from any patches, where I have had a miriad of issues with the XP/Office updates (insert CD, permissions issues, BSODs, etc). I'm not at all trying to scream the virtues of Linux and downplay MS, but there are real issues. Not to even mention never having adware, spyware, etc. installed on my RH machine without my knowledge. I'm extremely carefull with all of my machines and I stilled managed to get some IE search bar added to my browser. I removed it quickly with Spybot search and destroy, but it still happened. I think MS needs to take a step back from the cash register and seriously evealuate their tactics and practice where desktops are conncered. That is, if they ever want their update service to be even close to as effective as RH. But thats just my two cents and I'm sure there are a line of people out there to tell me I'm wrong and/or full of crap; but these are real world observations from someone who is completely OS neutral...jab
The whole things sounds like well written spy ware. The last thing I need is a process on my machine trying to figure out my habits and *perhaps* rebort that behavior to some other place/person. No, thank you. If the user is not able to remember to save files, or map drives, or whatever other crap this things tries to help with, maybe they shouldn't be using a computer. Or better yet, maybe they should learn the proper way to use their machine, rather than relying on a peice of software. Er, uhm, crutchware? It's obvious I'm not trolling either, because the privacy implications were mentioned in the article. Unfortunately it was a politicians answer with now substance; so I still have my doubts.
Why would this be any more detrimental to a movie than the patron calling all his/her freinds after the movie and telling them it sux? Besides maybe the few freinds that are allready on their way to the theater; but cell phones take care of that demographic. I mean seriously, this guy is just looking for excuses to give validation to their shrinking bottom line. Look for another job, you blew it sir.
And who will pay expenses when the system kills a critical server in our orginization? Who is responsible for damages when these packages explode? I'm not trolling at all, I'm very serious. I support a lot of Windows servers, and I know very well the damage that a service pack or hot fix can cause. This will be just one step closer to making people understand just how much MS wants to control everything. This is a rediculous solution to a problem they are not willing to correct. They should worry less about patching my servers (leave that to me) and worry more about producing code that is not vulnerable.
I only have two major issues with this proposal. One, is that in no uncertain terms, this is a direct violation of human privacy rights, and is an open invitation for the powers that be to 'spy' on every facet of our lives. Second, because of the way they are going about getting this legislated (under the guise of Homeland security) is absolutely criminal. This is exactly how they got roving phone taps, and illegal searches, pushed right back under our noses. For the sake of our own "safety". Yeah right. I would rather worry about the terrorist trying to attack us, than the terrorist government trying to *cough* protect us! This is just plain wrong. -just my opinion.
How do you see the future of OSS development affecting Microsoft? Do you have any predicions on how they will tailor marketing, propoganda, FUD, what have you? I personaly see OSS taking off in both the Desktop and Server market and I'm very curious as to how you think MS will react? This is not a troll in any way. I'm very interested in how the future or the Tech industry is going to play out.
One, try to walk around more at work. It's allways easier to shoot an email or pick up the phone, but there is no exercise there. Then, try to get into an after-work exercise routine. Maybe just a half-hour everyday to alleviate stress. I find it works miracles when I'm having trouble sleeping at night. Eat smaller, less fat, and more digestable lunches/breakfast. You have to be gaining the weight from somewhere. If you work at a place with stairs, use them. Don't allways resort to the elevator to get where you need to go. I know these are all common sense, and all very simple, but together they can make a big difference. One last suggestion (I realize many can't do this) but try to get exercise during lunch. I've never been one to eat lunch or breakfast, so I take my hour lunch and go to the nearest skateboard park for an hour. You don't hafta skate, but any exercise during lunch can be of the same benefit. --just some thoughts.
I see a lot of individuals saying, oh we can just NAT. Well thats not the point here. For many environments NAT is not a functioning option. Not to mention, until the ISP and providers are running IPv6, we are still forced to route at the gateway. It's not NAT, but it's also not truly IPv6 either (read: 6to4 host). This is all great planning for the future but right now IPv6 is simply something to play with and get used to for the future. I'm running it at home, have been for some time (using 6to4 unfortunately) and I've not really seen any great benefits. There will be great benefits in the future, but we are not really able to enjoy them yet. At least until the infrastructure that delivers my connectivity is upgraded I won't. Until then I'll have to enjoy the dancing turtles (kame) and hope it catches on soon.;p
I figured it would be possible sooner or later. If someone wants to get data they will get it. Like the old saying "either by hook or by crook". I wonder how the company verifies who is requesting the reassembly though? Can I just walk in with a pile of scraps and 8 grand? Also, is there any garuntee as to the integrity of the finished data? How can we be absolutely sure it was reassembled correctly; in some cases it could be very hard to tell? Pretty cool stuff. I'm sure the answers to my questions are in the article, but it's just not worth registering.;p
I'm with you a 100% there. My concern is that between the morphing of cell phones into PDAs, games, etc. that there will be an across the board ban on electronics. I fly a lot and I would go insane with being able to watch movies and listen to music; but soon there will be very little distinction between them. I personaly feel that the best possible course of action would be to strengthen the system that contral the critical functions of the plane; as to eliminate the risk all together. Then I wouldn't have to listen the old labies bable about their freinds until we reach cruising level and I can tune them out.;p
Seriously, does anyone really beleive the plane is going to come falling from the sky if some nitwit forgets to turn off his phone? The risk here has to be so minimal is rediculous. -just my opinion...jab
All that violence, and for nothing.. Instead of suicide bombers, and the like, they will only need to train 3l33t 5kr|pt K|dd135 to kik our asses into oblivion. Hell, a few good buffer overflows, maybe DoS for good measure, and they'll have the keys to this kingdom. Thanx MS!
Bring on the MPAA / RIAA discussions..
on
All The Rave
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
And the book isn't even about that. It's more of a post-mortem business analysis; and could/would prove very handy to someone looking to get into internet ventures. This is a great idea becaues it may help to broaden the pulic's (Joe Sixpack's) understanding of what is going on with all this online P2P contreversy stuff. It could prove very beneficial to the cause of P2P supporters; while maybe shedding some light on just how corrupt the music industries tactics can be. I think this is great idea for a book and there should be more like them.
I don't see this as a big revolution. There are allready millions of people who don't travel anywhere without their camcorder. For the sake of news worthiness video will still have to go through a review process to ensure authenticity, accuracy, whatever. Plus is the quality going to afford the images to be used for news events? Is the clarity and size even available from phones? If anything this will generate a whole boat-load of new short clips for the real-life-video shows that abound. Not that seeing people do stupid stuff isn't entertaining; there is just so much allready that I don't think another new media will make that much of a difference. -my $0.02
What needs to take place is for the MS biggots to give *NIX a try. I work in a mostly MS environment and I use my Linux box for most of my entire day. I am able to administer out Win2K AD domain, as well as the other mundane daily tasks. I very rarely go to my windoze bos for anything. I didn't think this was possible when I built the workstation but I wanted to ?try?. I've been on it since. In fact, for most of the stuff I do on a daily basis, this machine out performs the MS machines. In fact, I use Rdesktop a lot to connect to MS servers, and it is WAY smother and better than the MS TS crap. This is all a lot for me to come out with, as I even worked at MS for quite a few years, and at one time was hardcore MS (hold the flames please, no asbestos underwear today). But I've changed my thoughts and ideals, as would many others if they just give it a freekin try. Sure, there are million antiquated excuses as to why MS is better or worse, but you will never know what works best for YOU unless we try new things.
Re:Linux will always have problems on the desktop.
on
Linux on the Desktop
·
· Score: 1
If this isn't pure troll, I'd be very curious to know what rock you crawled out from under. If p0rn is the most important factor for you in choosing an OS this message will go right over you. I personally use Opera on both my windo$e and *NIX machines. I am able to use the web the same on both OSs; granted I don't browse p0rn all day either. It is exactly your type of thinking (oh it used to be that way, I'm sure it still is) that is killing *NIX on the desktop. I also work in a heavily MS environment (as an admin) and I'm able to completely maintain our Win2K AD domain from my Linux machine. I've been using it as my primary workstation for months now. Stop trolling and try something new for a change (other than p0rn)!
I looked up a simple three letter domain name, and it was available, so there are probably quite a few good ones left. Thatâ(TM)s the good news. The bad news is it was $100 a year! This should prove very lucrative for LA. I personally wouldn't pay that much for a domain, especially since.la isn't all that cool or unique, but I'm sure there are lots of people who will.
Re:This could get ugly
on
C&W Bails Out
·
· Score: 1
Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming this is a bad thing in the long run. I'm more worried about having their staff reduced to a shell (in the interest of saving money until they restructure) and the cable in OK gets chopped by a back-hoe. Will they be able to restore service in a timely fashion? In the end this will all probably mean slightly better service and worse rates for consumers; but until then how well will C&W service its customers. Thats why I'm concerned that the SLAs will not be met.
This could get ugly
on
C&W Bails Out
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I know C&W controls a lot of connectivity throughout the US so this could be huge for a lot of corporations. It says they will honor their SLAs until they decide upon further action, but how well will they uphold the SLA? And more importantly does this come with a huge reduction in staff, as I would assume it will, and how can they uphold SLAs that are already being strained. Hopefully this will not result in any major down times. The beauty of the internet is its ability to adjust routes and optimize connections but loosing a big backbone provider could result is some serious revenue loss for some businesses.
Translation of article (crap)
on
Gator Examined
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Gator is crap. Gator is being sued by many people who think the product is crap. Gator has several competitors who are equally as shady and crappy as Gator. Gator spies on you, reports to an unknown authority about your habits and tendencies, and people still use it. These people are not quick to show themselves because they know they are idiots for using this crap. Then the author proceeds to compare this crap with the success of a legitimate company like Google. How is this helpful article? It only states the obvious. Gator and its ilk are crap and now there is a crappy article about it all.
Of course this would happen. Five years ago (give or take) being a doctor or lawyer was the most desired of all professions; and enrollment was high. I was reading just recently that both have declined in the last few years; much like CS. The reason? Money. When the market is flooded with opportunities to make money in a certain industry there will be an up turn in degree seekers for that field. Now that the 'bubble' has burst the field isn't so attractive to prospective new techies. This is not a bad thing it's just the result of the society changes and morphing. It's like the balloon theory; there may be less CS degree seekers, but there is probably more of some other field. It's very natural that this should happen and kinda cool for techies like myself who actually love what they do. I never looked at computers as a route to make money; rather something I enjoyed experimenting/playing with. It's a happy bi-product that I'm able to make a living with it.
This is WAY to scary for me..
on
The Searchable Life
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
This is absolutely startling! Why would such a project even exist? This is simply a tool for spying on society. There would only be limited benefit (real world benefits) to a database like this; and it would only benefit the most corrupt segment of our society; the government. Judging by how the government has leveraged this sort of data in the past I would say this is moreover a tool to help incarcerate more people for ever smaller infractions. There would be no anonymity from your own government and that is not healthy to any segment of society. I would gladly waive my American citizenship if it came with the caveat that my entire life would be documented. I enjoy being and American for its freedoms. This stomps on that freedom from every angle!
Slashdot Mirror
This article is pure troll. There is very little usefull or helpfull information; and it's full of dry sarcastic humor. For once I shouldn't have RTFA. I've said it once, and I'm sure I'll say it a million more times, each OS has it's pro's and con's. No OS is perfect for all things and no OS will ever meet someones every desire/whim. People are fundimentaly way to picky. They learn things one way and are afraid/threatened by change; be it for the better or not. How this article ever got published is beyond me. Next thing we will see peoples anti-Microsoft /. posts being used for "informative" aticles. Sheesh!
If you read my post you'll see I'm talking about desktops; which usualy don't run apps like Apache. I'm also not sure what that link has to do with our discussion. I'm not trying to start an email war here but where did you get that first fact. I've way more updates on my XP machine than on my Linux machine; but again I'm talking desktops. There may well be more updates for server type application produced by Linux, but I wasn't comparing those. ..jab
Is there any real benefit to the user with the inclusion of this technology. I know the article claims "rovides an enhanced BIOS that allows greater interaction with the operating system"; but does this affect the users experience? Or is this simply a move to force DRM down our throats? I'm not trolling; I just wonder if there is an upside to the consumer.
I'm sure this will get modded down, or ignored by the moderators all together, as off topic; but I feel it's a good camparison. I have two, relatively similar, workstations. One running Red Hat 9 and the other WinXP. I use RH Up2Date on the Linux bawx and Windows Update on the XP machine religiously. The observation that I have made are pretty amazing. Microsoft releases roughly 4 patches for every 1 that RH releases. The RH packages, other than kernel updates, do not require any reboots; where most of the MS ones do. I've not had a single occurrance of an adverse effect on my Linux machine from any patches, where I have had a miriad of issues with the XP/Office updates (insert CD, permissions issues, BSODs, etc). I'm not at all trying to scream the virtues of Linux and downplay MS, but there are real issues. Not to even mention never having adware, spyware, etc. installed on my RH machine without my knowledge. I'm extremely carefull with all of my machines and I stilled managed to get some IE search bar added to my browser. I removed it quickly with Spybot search and destroy, but it still happened. I think MS needs to take a step back from the cash register and seriously evealuate their tactics and practice where desktops are conncered. That is, if they ever want their update service to be even close to as effective as RH. But thats just my two cents and I'm sure there are a line of people out there to tell me I'm wrong and/or full of crap; but these are real world observations from someone who is completely OS neutral. ..jab
The whole things sounds like well written spy ware. The last thing I need is a process on my machine trying to figure out my habits and *perhaps* rebort that behavior to some other place/person. No, thank you. If the user is not able to remember to save files, or map drives, or whatever other crap this things tries to help with, maybe they shouldn't be using a computer. Or better yet, maybe they should learn the proper way to use their machine, rather than relying on a peice of software. Er, uhm, crutchware? It's obvious I'm not trolling either, because the privacy implications were mentioned in the article. Unfortunately it was a politicians answer with now substance; so I still have my doubts.
Why would this be any more detrimental to a movie than the patron calling all his/her freinds after the movie and telling them it sux? Besides maybe the few freinds that are allready on their way to the theater; but cell phones take care of that demographic. I mean seriously, this guy is just looking for excuses to give validation to their shrinking bottom line. Look for another job, you blew it sir.
And who will pay expenses when the system kills a critical server in our orginization? Who is responsible for damages when these packages explode? I'm not trolling at all, I'm very serious. I support a lot of Windows servers, and I know very well the damage that a service pack or hot fix can cause. This will be just one step closer to making people understand just how much MS wants to control everything. This is a rediculous solution to a problem they are not willing to correct. They should worry less about patching my servers (leave that to me) and worry more about producing code that is not vulnerable.
I only have two major issues with this proposal. One, is that in no uncertain terms, this is a direct violation of human privacy rights, and is an open invitation for the powers that be to 'spy' on every facet of our lives. Second, because of the way they are going about getting this legislated (under the guise of Homeland security) is absolutely criminal. This is exactly how they got roving phone taps, and illegal searches, pushed right back under our noses. For the sake of our own "safety". Yeah right. I would rather worry about the terrorist trying to attack us, than the terrorist government trying to *cough* protect us! This is just plain wrong. -just my opinion.
How do you see the future of OSS development affecting Microsoft? Do you have any predicions on how they will tailor marketing, propoganda, FUD, what have you? I personaly see OSS taking off in both the Desktop and Server market and I'm very curious as to how you think MS will react? This is not a troll in any way. I'm very interested in how the future or the Tech industry is going to play out.
One, try to walk around more at work. It's allways easier to shoot an email or pick up the phone, but there is no exercise there. Then, try to get into an after-work exercise routine. Maybe just a half-hour everyday to alleviate stress. I find it works miracles when I'm having trouble sleeping at night. Eat smaller, less fat, and more digestable lunches/breakfast. You have to be gaining the weight from somewhere. If you work at a place with stairs, use them. Don't allways resort to the elevator to get where you need to go. I know these are all common sense, and all very simple, but together they can make a big difference. One last suggestion (I realize many can't do this) but try to get exercise during lunch. I've never been one to eat lunch or breakfast, so I take my hour lunch and go to the nearest skateboard park for an hour. You don't hafta skate, but any exercise during lunch can be of the same benefit. --just some thoughts.
I see a lot of individuals saying, oh we can just NAT. Well thats not the point here. For many environments NAT is not a functioning option. Not to mention, until the ISP and providers are running IPv6, we are still forced to route at the gateway. It's not NAT, but it's also not truly IPv6 either (read: 6to4 host). This is all great planning for the future but right now IPv6 is simply something to play with and get used to for the future. I'm running it at home, have been for some time (using 6to4 unfortunately) and I've not really seen any great benefits. There will be great benefits in the future, but we are not really able to enjoy them yet. At least until the infrastructure that delivers my connectivity is upgraded I won't. Until then I'll have to enjoy the dancing turtles (kame) and hope it catches on soon.;p
I figured it would be possible sooner or later. If someone wants to get data they will get it. Like the old saying "either by hook or by crook". I wonder how the company verifies who is requesting the reassembly though? Can I just walk in with a pile of scraps and 8 grand? Also, is there any garuntee as to the integrity of the finished data? How can we be absolutely sure it was reassembled correctly; in some cases it could be very hard to tell? Pretty cool stuff. I'm sure the answers to my questions are in the article, but it's just not worth registering. ;p
I'm with you a 100% there. My concern is that between the morphing of cell phones into PDAs, games, etc. that there will be an across the board ban on electronics. I fly a lot and I would go insane with being able to watch movies and listen to music; but soon there will be very little distinction between them. I personaly feel that the best possible course of action would be to strengthen the system that contral the critical functions of the plane; as to eliminate the risk all together. Then I wouldn't have to listen the old labies bable about their freinds until we reach cruising level and I can tune them out. ;p
HA! All your planes are belong to us!
..jab
Seriously, does anyone really beleive the plane is going to come falling from the sky if some nitwit forgets to turn off his phone? The risk here has to be so minimal is rediculous. -just my opinion.
All that violence, and for nothing.. Instead of suicide bombers, and the like, they will only need to train 3l33t 5kr|pt K|dd135 to kik our asses into oblivion. Hell, a few good buffer overflows, maybe DoS for good measure, and they'll have the keys to this kingdom. Thanx MS!
And the book isn't even about that. It's more of a post-mortem business analysis; and could/would prove very handy to someone looking to get into internet ventures. This is a great idea becaues it may help to broaden the pulic's (Joe Sixpack's) understanding of what is going on with all this online P2P contreversy stuff. It could prove very beneficial to the cause of P2P supporters; while maybe shedding some light on just how corrupt the music industries tactics can be. I think this is great idea for a book and there should be more like them.
I don't see this as a big revolution. There are allready millions of people who don't travel anywhere without their camcorder. For the sake of news worthiness video will still have to go through a review process to ensure authenticity, accuracy, whatever. Plus is the quality going to afford the images to be used for news events? Is the clarity and size even available from phones? If anything this will generate a whole boat-load of new short clips for the real-life-video shows that abound. Not that seeing people do stupid stuff isn't entertaining; there is just so much allready that I don't think another new media will make that much of a difference. -my $0.02
What needs to take place is for the MS biggots to give *NIX a try. I work in a mostly MS environment and I use my Linux box for most of my entire day. I am able to administer out Win2K AD domain, as well as the other mundane daily tasks. I very rarely go to my windoze bos for anything. I didn't think this was possible when I built the workstation but I wanted to ?try?. I've been on it since. In fact, for most of the stuff I do on a daily basis, this machine out performs the MS machines. In fact, I use Rdesktop a lot to connect to MS servers, and it is WAY smother and better than the MS TS crap. This is all a lot for me to come out with, as I even worked at MS for quite a few years, and at one time was hardcore MS (hold the flames please, no asbestos underwear today). But I've changed my thoughts and ideals, as would many others if they just give it a freekin try. Sure, there are million antiquated excuses as to why MS is better or worse, but you will never know what works best for YOU unless we try new things.
If this isn't pure troll, I'd be very curious to know what rock you crawled out from under. If p0rn is the most important factor for you in choosing an OS this message will go right over you. I personally use Opera on both my windo$e and *NIX machines. I am able to use the web the same on both OSs; granted I don't browse p0rn all day either. It is exactly your type of thinking (oh it used to be that way, I'm sure it still is) that is killing *NIX on the desktop. I also work in a heavily MS environment (as an admin) and I'm able to completely maintain our Win2K AD domain from my Linux machine. I've been using it as my primary workstation for months now. Stop trolling and try something new for a change (other than p0rn)!
I looked up a simple three letter domain name, and it was available, so there are probably quite a few good ones left. Thatâ(TM)s the good news. The bad news is it was $100 a year! This should prove very lucrative for LA. I personally wouldn't pay that much for a domain, especially since .la isn't all that cool or unique, but I'm sure there are lots of people who will.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming this is a bad thing in the long run. I'm more worried about having their staff reduced to a shell (in the interest of saving money until they restructure) and the cable in OK gets chopped by a back-hoe. Will they be able to restore service in a timely fashion? In the end this will all probably mean slightly better service and worse rates for consumers; but until then how well will C&W service its customers. Thats why I'm concerned that the SLAs will not be met.
I know C&W controls a lot of connectivity throughout the US so this could be huge for a lot of corporations. It says they will honor their SLAs until they decide upon further action, but how well will they uphold the SLA? And more importantly does this come with a huge reduction in staff, as I would assume it will, and how can they uphold SLAs that are already being strained. Hopefully this will not result in any major down times. The beauty of the internet is its ability to adjust routes and optimize connections but loosing a big backbone provider could result is some serious revenue loss for some businesses.
Gator is crap. Gator is being sued by many people who think the product is crap. Gator has several competitors who are equally as shady and crappy as Gator. Gator spies on you, reports to an unknown authority about your habits and tendencies, and people still use it. These people are not quick to show themselves because they know they are idiots for using this crap. Then the author proceeds to compare this crap with the success of a legitimate company like Google. How is this helpful article? It only states the obvious. Gator and its ilk are crap and now there is a crappy article about it all.
Of course this would happen. Five years ago (give or take) being a doctor or lawyer was the most desired of all professions; and enrollment was high. I was reading just recently that both have declined in the last few years; much like CS. The reason? Money. When the market is flooded with opportunities to make money in a certain industry there will be an up turn in degree seekers for that field. Now that the 'bubble' has burst the field isn't so attractive to prospective new techies. This is not a bad thing it's just the result of the society changes and morphing. It's like the balloon theory; there may be less CS degree seekers, but there is probably more of some other field. It's very natural that this should happen and kinda cool for techies like myself who actually love what they do. I never looked at computers as a route to make money; rather something I enjoyed experimenting/playing with. It's a happy bi-product that I'm able to make a living with it.
This is absolutely startling! Why would such a project even exist? This is simply a tool for spying on society. There would only be limited benefit (real world benefits) to a database like this; and it would only benefit the most corrupt segment of our society; the government. Judging by how the government has leveraged this sort of data in the past I would say this is moreover a tool to help incarcerate more people for ever smaller infractions. There would be no anonymity from your own government and that is not healthy to any segment of society. I would gladly waive my American citizenship if it came with the caveat that my entire life would be documented. I enjoy being and American for its freedoms. This stomps on that freedom from every angle!