Actually you are wrong, railways have existed only because of government subsidies for decades now, trucking is vastly more economical. Trains and tracks require vast amounts of maintainence by expensive union workers. The only way rail is more economical is shipping extremely long distances to distribution points far inland.
Actually, you are ignorant of the history of the Bible. The Bible has remained virtually unchanged since it's creation of what we now call the Bible. It was created sometime around 375 AD. The Bible was created using texts from the Jewish Torah, and various writings from the Apostles. The originality of the Torah is strikingly accurate, excerpts from scrolls found in tombs dating 600-700 B.C. have been found to match word for word the text used today. The dead sea scrolls are one example, again, match word for word texts used today. The Dead Sea Scrolls conatined every book of the Old Testament with exception of the book of Ester. If you look at the Old Testament as a historical text, it matches the history timeline as discovered by archeology. Many individuals and events have been found accurate and true. Therefore dispelling the fiction status applied by you. The King James version most commonly used today is exact text as it was when written in 1611. The only difference is the apocryphal texts, used by Catholics mostly, were removed sometime after 1613. some wedsites that may help you in your ignorance. http://www.carm.org/bible.htm http:// www.bible.com/answers/afacts.html http://www.ibs.org/bibles/about/3.php
Actually if you look, evolution has changed more than the Bible, if changing text is your "Ginesberg" test for fiction, then Evolution is fiction by your very own test. The theory of evolution is by man, therefore flawed, and can never be proven law.
Carbon dating is inaccurate, period. You, nor any anti-creationism scientist can convince me otherwise. Carbon 14 has not been at consistent levels, tree rings of 100 years have proven that, so how can intake and decay be determined on something that is not constant? No Evolution has not been observed. How many times do I have to say that, you have NO PROOF, if you did, the evolution would be deemed a scientific law. What may have been observed is natural selection or mutation, not evolution. Evolution is a guess to explain our existence.
No the museum is not ludicrous. Dr Baugh is using your very own scientific methods to disprove many theories of your precious evolution, so you associate it with snake oil and other shams, just like a tea sipping liberal that you probably are. And yes man did land on the moon and Elvis is very much indeed dead. Just thought I would clear that up for you, you seem to have some confusion in that area. I named a reference for some of my material, I want to see some reference for proof of evolution, I guarantee I can pick it apart. I'm not wanting ID to be taught exclusively, just like I don't want the theory of evolution taught exclusively. Why all the resistance to ID being taught? Approx. 70% of Americans believe in a higher power, are we going to ignore this majority, call them crazy? There are many holes in evolution, just like the big bang theory, which is being actively dispelled. If Stephen Hawking can be wrong about black holes, do you think you could be wrong about evolution?
No you are the fuckwit, jack-off, the only fact is your boyfriend blowing you. The theory of evolution is just that, idiots like yourself and your boyfriend trying to explain your sorry-assed existance with lies and assumptions. You Asshat, it's a theory, hence the title Theory of Evolution if it was fact it would be called a law.. Read a book a dn learn the difference between theory and law instead of making yourself look like a fucktard.
early morning:
slick willy: Hillary, could please pull that strap-on out my ass?
Hillary: Not until I get my rocks off, bitch, come'on say you're my bitch.
slick willy: OK, OK, I'm yur bitch...
Hillary: Oh, yes, Oh, yes.....
Later that day...
slick willy: Oh boy look at that fat assed intern, I wonder if I stick a stogie up her snatch, since I can't get en erection because my ass has been nerve damaged by the constant ass-fucking by hillary...
slick willy: Let's see who I can intimidate today cause' I'm Hillary's bitch. You think people know I a closet homo who let's his gestapo wife stick strap-on dildos up my ass?
So exactly what does this post and my reply have to do with OO.org?? NOTHING!
CARBON DATING IS NOT ACCURATE, not accurate enough to be trusted as fact anyways, period... Too many environmental variables. Yes ID does need to be taught in class, right along with evolution theory, as an alternative explanation. Have you ever seen the evidence for creationism? Look up the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose Texas, you can google it. No active evolution has not been seen, then it would be deamed as LAW, which it is not. There hasn't been new species pop up, just variations of the same species. There is not empirical evidence to suggest that the creature didn't exist before observation. Researchers are still finding species previously though extinct . There are many, many holes in evolution, where's the magical missing link? If it exists, it should have a fossil record, it does not. It would have to exist in significant numbers in order to produce the most sophisticated entities to date. What about other intelligent creatures? Why aren't there any competing creatures on par with us? In order to evolove, a system must be challenged, according to evolution, where's the human challanger? Explain why the "inventor" of evolution, Charles Darwin, renouced his own theory and converted to Christiantity later in life? Evolution was proposed by the same type of scientists that thought the world was flat, even though there was contradictory evidence otherwise. Science is also about looking at ALL evidence, and basing conclusions on observations and testing, not debunking evidence 6000 years old, that is false science. Besides there is no reason to doubt the creatures change over time, this is observed in nature. To say these creatures are "evolving" is a stretch. The origin of all creatures is where the differences between evolution and ID differ. If these evolutionists are so sure that they are right, why all the hesitation about ID being presented? It's because they are not sure, that's why.
ID isn't meant to be "scientific" it is FAITH driven. Not one aspect of evolution has been proven either, hence it's theory status. Not one aspect of evolution has been observed. These theories are presented by scientists that thought many species were extinct but were not, coelocanth is one example. Carbon dating is inaccurate, many objects tested using carbon dating often come up with conflicting results, the Shroud of Turin, for example. Carbon dating is based on an "assumption" that carbon 14 has been at a predictable level over time, which it has not. Volcanos, forest fires, and other environmental factors make carbon dating a guess at best. I think that both should be presented as viable explanations, let the student make his/her own mind up which one they believe. How can NOT believing ID or evolution be bad? Since ID is believed by most Americans, what social factors are hindered?
I will check, but the Seal on Rush's show was altered, he's a lawyer, he would know better. The point is, thin skinned or not, using the seal, unaltered, is illegal, period, end of story. The Official Seal of the President of The United States of America affixed to any document makes it an official document. There even rules about what sections of the seal are used and what occasions they are to be used for. I am offened at ANYONE using the Seal without approval. How many Wives, Mothers, Fathers, Brothers, and Sisters have gotten letters from the President about their loved ones dieing in the many wars America has fought? The offense is theirs, that Seal adorns those letters, have respect, which is lacking towards the Office of the Commander in Chief. I despised mr clinton while he was pretending to be President, but while he was in office, I respected his position, afterward, gloves off.
Anyways, I fail to see why stating the liberal tards have no respect is evidence of thin skinnediness (made that one up..)
I agree, about the debate about mental stablilty, er, well except my debate is paranoid schizo...
No, hypocrisy is making your cabinet, various congressmen and such sign an "ethical" Contract with America, then getting a hummer under your desk by an intern, denying it then arguing the definition of "is."
Their humor is far from funny, even when picking on the President was kinda funny. Now it's just tired and old, not funny. Using the Official Seal, without permission, is against the law, period. Even if you don't have respect for the man, respect the office. Of course getting respect back into the office since pretending president mr clinton belittled the office. There comes a point when satire is disrespectful, although not illegal, it is despicable.
"Now this administration may be able screw up the invasion of the wrong country, leak the names of CIA agents, mismanage hurricane disaster relief efforts, funnel billions to Haliburton, put scientific research back decades, and turn the country into a joke in general"
Unfounded, unproven, Any questions? Move along, nothing to see here...
Rush modified or changed the Seal, therefore he was NOT using the Official Seal, Idiot. You may not like the man, but show respect for the office. Oh, I forgot you liberal tards have no respect.
You are a fucking idiot. Nobody's going down except you on your boyfriend, that's why you've had so many blowjobs.
Your party of sniveling socialist jack-booted thugs will be revealed soon enough. mr clinton and mr gore were flacid impotent douche bags, taking heads for a diseased infested liberal sewer. While willy boy was getting a hummer under his desk while pretending to be President, Bin Laden was plotting destruction. History will show the mr clinton was asleep at the wheel while shit was raining down around him. President Bush is a man of courage, he has stood up to you liberal fucktards and put you in your place. I don't like President Bush being a fiscal liberal, but I support him in many areas.
Don't even go into WMD's every country on the Security Council, many DemonRats and Republican Senators and Reps agreed that there was evidence of WMD's in Iraq. Minute quantities have been found, most crossed borders before the war started, these are facts and backed by evidence, if you educated liberal morons actually read something instead of attacking with FUD you would know this. Anyways, I guess leaving Saddam in power would have been OK with you "sensitive and compasionate" libtards.
What about former first bitch hillary, she has commited election fraud, and is under investigation for it as we speak. Overstating donations at fundrasier dinners for tea-sipping libs. She probably won't be SINator for NY next time because of it, that's why she will run for presi-bitch, which is what her coronation and reign will be called after she ass-fucks every working American "IF" she gets elected. Libtards have been practicing ballet stuffing and cheating through the last two elections, I just hope you lying cheaters don't get by with this time either.
Let's see I'm a moderate conservative, I don't "hate" anything. What I do dislike is the UN taking control of the internet. The internet is a valuable tool used by businesses, governments, and individuals. What is the arguement that we should give up control? Are there problems? Like you said, if a government doesn't like it how it is, then make their own, these are your words. So don't like it, create your own, we'll keep ours. The UN shouldn't be controlling anything, but that is what the flacid dick called the UN likes to do. Flacid in Africa, Iraq, Iran, and N. Korea. You see you are compelled to see our outward dislike of "things" as irrational. To a liberal, which has no moral grounding, it is irrational for somebody to have an opinion, to have distaste for some deviant thing. Liberals embrace deviance(organized murder-abortion) like a warm blanket on a cold day. Anything moral or righteous is attacked by deviant liberals. If Demonrats, I mean democrats proposed, like President sodomizer, oops I mean mr clinton mr. Clinton or mr. Internet, er Gore, that the UN shouldn't control the internet, you liberal lackies and shivs would be all over it. Your blog, BTW, is FUD and exteremely full of lies, there are two sides to every story, exposed both sides and let people make up there own mind, but you liberals don't like that do you? Be a real man/woman or whatever you are and tell BOTH sides, or are you scared? You deviant liberals don't like to allow other view points, as a matter of a fact, if you could shut me up, you would. You don't like freedom of the press, because you own the press, you believe that somehow you deviant liberals are more enlightened, and not constrained by outdated ideals of morality. I hope you get to lie in the cesspool deviant liberals are heading us towards, mark my words, liberals are jack-booted socialists, ask Elian, he will tell you. I lie in cold sweats at night thinking of what would've happend if mr gore were president on 9/11/2001. I don't think I would be allowed to make these comments without jack-booted FBI agents busting down my door.
Quit your bitching, go drink your $4.00 Starbuck's shit. If it wasn't the USF, it would be taken away some other way, atleast it won't pay for haircuts while a 747 sits idling on a taxiway. Oops that bill has already been paid. Err, well pay the phone bill while the President gets a hummer under his desk, Oops we already paid for that one too... Oh well you get the picture. Maybe it will help a farmer/ rancher DL some free porn or something.
You are a fscking idiot. These people living in rural areas are probably growing YOUR food. So in your thinking, they should have to pay more for internet? Why? It's not their fault telcos strung millions of miles of wire and don't have the cellular network blanketing the whole country. So exactly how much is it costing you? You just stated that internet/phone bill was $30.00. So an entire $.50 is going to the USF? If they didn't collect the money in one way, it would be collected in another. So quit your bitching, let the farmer/ rancher have his phone/internet in peace, he has a very hard and thankless job to do.
The US did, and your great great granpappy sold it all and bought crack. Get a life asswipe. America doesn't owe black Americans SHIT. Fucktard. Get a job like everybody else. I hate lazy fuckers that whine and whine about how unfairly they are treated, tryin' to earn sympathy and cash on the backs of their long dead ancestors. Get over it, not one single person alive today participated in slavery 150+ years ago. The more black Americans push this stupid assed agenda, the further the divide will get. Get over it and move on, 99.9% of white people DO NOT sit around and plot to keep black Americans poor, in jail, etc. Most of are too busy with our own lives to give a shit what happened 10 minutes ago muchless 150+ years.
BTW, Thanks France for your help after Katrina, no really I mean it. However, I still HATE YOUR GUTS! Damn losers, arrogant fuckers. I'm not alone, we still hate you with a passion unriveled. So now how does it feel do do a good thing and still be hated assholes? So maybe this will give you a taste of how we American feel. Dickheads, go eat your cheese and shut the hell up..
RTFA
What a dumbass statemant, retard...
You ever tried a water rescue?
You ever been a lifeguard?
This is a new tool. Do you use tools where you work.
It isn't that easy of a job, ever stared at a pool with people splashing in it? It's a bitch to see anything happening below the surface. So any new advances are a welcome thing. F'ing idiots such as yourself making dumbass comments.
Haha. I'm not laughing because there are no 3d modelling tools for Linux, I'm laughing because if you need a plugin for 3dsmax to do your job, then none of those alternatives matter. "I must use 3dsmax" implies "I must use windows". End of story, sadly.
Thats funny considering Linux is the fastest growing OS within the movie making industry, PIXAR, ILM, just to name a few "small" companies actively using Linux for both modeling, and rendering. Their software is all custom written, none the less it's still Linux. So the laugh is back at you...
Slashdot Mirror
And how about storage of batteries, I have always heard of people putting them in refrigerators to keep the "fresh" so to speak.
Actually you are wrong, railways have existed only because of government subsidies for decades now, trucking is vastly more economical. Trains and tracks require vast amounts of maintainence by expensive union workers. The only way rail is more economical is shipping extremely long distances to distribution points far inland.
Actually, you are ignorant of the history of the Bible. The Bible has remained virtually unchanged since it's creation of what we now call the Bible. It was created sometime around 375 AD. The Bible was created using texts from the Jewish Torah, and various writings from the Apostles. The originality of the Torah is strikingly accurate, excerpts from scrolls found in tombs dating 600-700 B.C. have been found to match word for word the text used today. The dead sea scrolls are one example, again, match word for word texts used today. The Dead Sea Scrolls conatined every book of the Old Testament with exception of the book of Ester. If you look at the Old Testament as a historical text, it matches the history timeline as discovered by archeology. Many individuals and events have been found accurate and true. Therefore dispelling the fiction status applied by you./ www.bible.com/answers/afacts.html
The King James version most commonly used today is exact text as it was when written in 1611. The only difference is the apocryphal texts, used by Catholics mostly, were removed sometime after 1613.
some wedsites that may help you in your ignorance.
http://www.carm.org/bible.htm
http:/
http://www.ibs.org/bibles/about/3.php
Actually if you look, evolution has changed more than the Bible, if changing text is your "Ginesberg" test for fiction, then Evolution is fiction by your very own test. The theory of evolution is by man, therefore flawed, and can never be proven law.
Carbon dating is inaccurate, period. You, nor any anti-creationism scientist can convince me otherwise. Carbon 14 has not been at consistent levels, tree rings of 100 years have proven that, so how can intake and decay be determined on something that is not constant? No Evolution has not been observed. How many times do I have to say that, you have NO PROOF, if you did, the evolution would be deemed a scientific law. What may have been observed is natural selection or mutation, not evolution. Evolution is a guess to explain our existence.
No the museum is not ludicrous. Dr Baugh is using your very own scientific methods to disprove many theories of your precious evolution, so you associate it with snake oil and other shams, just like a tea sipping liberal that you probably are. And yes man did land on the moon and Elvis is very much indeed dead. Just thought I would clear that up for you, you seem to have some confusion in that area. I named a reference for some of my material, I want to see some reference for proof of evolution, I guarantee I can pick it apart.
I'm not wanting ID to be taught exclusively, just like I don't want the theory of evolution taught exclusively. Why all the resistance to ID being taught? Approx. 70% of Americans believe in a higher power, are we going to ignore this majority, call them crazy?
There are many holes in evolution, just like the big bang theory, which is being actively dispelled. If Stephen Hawking can be wrong about black holes, do you think you could be wrong about evolution?
No you are the fuckwit, jack-off, the only fact is your boyfriend blowing you.
The theory of evolution is just that, idiots like yourself and your boyfriend trying to explain your sorry-assed existance with lies and assumptions.
You Asshat, it's a theory, hence the title Theory of Evolution if it was fact it would be called a law.. Read a book a dn learn the difference between theory and law instead of making yourself look like a fucktard.
1996:
early morning:
slick willy: Hillary, could please pull that strap-on out my ass?
Hillary: Not until I get my rocks off, bitch, come'on say you're my bitch.
slick willy: OK, OK, I'm yur bitch...
Hillary: Oh, yes, Oh, yes.....
Later that day...
slick willy: Oh boy look at that fat assed intern, I wonder if I stick a stogie up her snatch, since I can't get en erection because my ass has been nerve damaged by the constant ass-fucking by hillary...
slick willy: Let's see who I can intimidate today cause' I'm Hillary's bitch. You think people know I a closet homo who let's his gestapo wife stick strap-on dildos up my ass?
So exactly what does this post and my reply have to do with OO.org??
NOTHING!
CARBON DATING IS NOT ACCURATE, not accurate enough to be trusted as fact anyways, period... Too many environmental variables. Yes ID does need to be taught in class, right along with evolution theory, as an alternative explanation. Have you ever seen the evidence for creationism? Look up the Creation Evidence Museum in Glen Rose Texas, you can google it.
No active evolution has not been seen, then it would be deamed as LAW, which it is not. There hasn't been new species pop up, just variations of the same species. There is not empirical evidence to suggest that the creature didn't exist before observation. Researchers are still finding species previously though extinct .
There are many, many holes in evolution, where's the magical missing link? If it exists, it should have a fossil record, it does not. It would have to exist in significant numbers in order to produce the most sophisticated entities to date. What about other intelligent creatures? Why aren't there any competing creatures on par with us? In order to evolove, a system must be challenged, according to evolution, where's the human challanger? Explain why the "inventor" of evolution, Charles Darwin, renouced his own theory and converted to Christiantity later in life? Evolution was proposed by the same type of scientists that thought the world was flat, even though there was contradictory evidence otherwise. Science is also about looking at ALL evidence, and basing conclusions on observations and testing, not debunking evidence 6000 years old, that is false science. Besides there is no reason to doubt the creatures change over time, this is observed in nature. To say these creatures are "evolving" is a stretch. The origin of all creatures is where the differences between evolution and ID differ. If these evolutionists are so sure that they are right, why all the hesitation about ID being presented? It's because they are not sure, that's why.
ID isn't meant to be "scientific" it is FAITH driven.
Not one aspect of evolution has been proven either, hence it's theory status. Not one aspect of evolution has been observed. These theories are presented by scientists that thought many species were extinct but were not, coelocanth is one example.
Carbon dating is inaccurate, many objects tested using carbon dating often come up with conflicting results, the Shroud of Turin, for example. Carbon dating is based on an "assumption" that carbon 14 has been at a predictable level over time, which it has not. Volcanos, forest fires, and other environmental factors make carbon dating a guess at best.
I think that both should be presented as viable explanations, let the student make his/her own mind up which one they believe. How can NOT believing ID or evolution be bad? Since ID is believed by most Americans, what social factors are hindered?
I will check, but the Seal on Rush's show was altered, he's a lawyer, he would know better. The point is, thin skinned or not, using the seal, unaltered, is illegal, period, end of story. The Official Seal of the President of The United States of America affixed to any document makes it an official document. There even rules about what sections of the seal are used and what occasions they are to be used for. I am offened at ANYONE using the Seal without approval. How many Wives, Mothers, Fathers, Brothers, and Sisters have gotten letters from the President about their loved ones dieing in the many wars America has fought? The offense is theirs, that Seal adorns those letters, have respect, which is lacking towards the Office of the Commander in Chief. I despised mr clinton while he was pretending to be President, but while he was in office, I respected his position, afterward, gloves off.
Anyways, I fail to see why stating the liberal tards have no respect is evidence of thin skinnediness (made that one up..)
I agree, about the debate about mental stablilty, er, well except my debate is paranoid schizo...
No, hypocrisy is making your cabinet, various congressmen and such sign an "ethical" Contract with America, then getting a hummer under your desk by an intern, denying it then arguing the definition of "is."
Their humor is far from funny, even when picking on the President was kinda funny. Now it's just tired and old, not funny. Using the Official Seal, without permission, is against the law, period. Even if you don't have respect for the man, respect the office. Of course getting respect back into the office since pretending president mr clinton belittled the office. There comes a point when satire is disrespectful, although not illegal, it is despicable.
This is false.
"Now this administration may be able screw up the invasion of the wrong country, leak the names of CIA agents, mismanage hurricane disaster relief efforts, funnel billions to Haliburton, put scientific research back decades, and turn the country into a joke in general"
Unfounded, unproven, Any questions? Move along, nothing to see here...
Rush modified or changed the Seal, therefore he was NOT using the Official Seal, Idiot. You may not like the man, but show respect for the office. Oh, I forgot you liberal tards have no respect.
You are a fucking idiot.
Nobody's going down except you on your boyfriend, that's why you've had so many blowjobs.
Your party of sniveling socialist jack-booted thugs will be revealed soon enough. mr clinton and mr gore were flacid impotent douche bags, taking heads for a diseased infested liberal sewer. While willy boy was getting a hummer under his desk while pretending to be President, Bin Laden was plotting destruction. History will show the mr clinton was asleep at the wheel while shit was raining down around him. President Bush is a man of courage, he has stood up to you liberal fucktards and put you in your place. I don't like President Bush being a fiscal liberal, but I support him in many areas.
Don't even go into WMD's every country on the Security Council, many DemonRats and Republican Senators and Reps agreed that there was evidence of WMD's in Iraq. Minute quantities have been found, most crossed borders before the war started, these are facts and backed by evidence, if you educated liberal morons actually read something instead of attacking with FUD you would know this. Anyways, I guess leaving Saddam in power would have been OK with you "sensitive and compasionate" libtards.
What about former first bitch hillary, she has commited election fraud, and is under investigation for it as we speak. Overstating donations at fundrasier dinners for tea-sipping libs. She probably won't be SINator for NY next time because of it, that's why she will run for presi-bitch, which is what her coronation and reign will be called after she ass-fucks every working American "IF" she gets elected. Libtards have been practicing ballet stuffing and cheating through the last two elections, I just hope you lying cheaters don't get by with this time either.
Let's see I'm a moderate conservative, I don't "hate" anything. What I do dislike is the UN taking control of the internet. The internet is a valuable tool used by businesses, governments, and individuals. What is the arguement that we should give up control? Are there problems? Like you said, if a government doesn't like it how it is, then make their own, these are your words. So don't like it, create your own, we'll keep ours.
The UN shouldn't be controlling anything, but that is what the flacid dick called the UN likes to do. Flacid in Africa, Iraq, Iran, and N. Korea.
You see you are compelled to see our outward dislike of "things" as irrational. To a liberal, which has no moral grounding, it is irrational for somebody to have an opinion, to have distaste for some deviant thing. Liberals embrace deviance(organized murder-abortion) like a warm blanket on a cold day. Anything moral or righteous is attacked by deviant liberals. If Demonrats, I mean democrats proposed, like President sodomizer, oops I mean mr clinton mr. Clinton or mr. Internet, er Gore, that the UN shouldn't control the internet, you liberal lackies and shivs would be all over it.
Your blog, BTW, is FUD and exteremely full of lies, there are two sides to every story, exposed both sides and let people make up there own mind, but you liberals don't like that do you? Be a real man/woman or whatever you are and tell BOTH sides, or are you scared? You deviant liberals don't like to allow other view points, as a matter of a fact, if you could shut me up, you would. You don't like freedom of the press, because you own the press, you believe that somehow you deviant liberals are more enlightened, and not constrained by outdated ideals of morality. I hope you get to lie in the cesspool deviant liberals are heading us towards, mark my words, liberals are jack-booted socialists, ask Elian, he will tell you. I lie in cold sweats at night thinking of what would've happend if mr gore were president on 9/11/2001. I don't think I would be allowed to make these comments without jack-booted FBI agents busting down my door.
Quit your bitching, go drink your $4.00 Starbuck's shit. If it wasn't the USF, it would be taken away some other way, atleast it won't pay for haircuts while a 747 sits idling on a taxiway. Oops that bill has already been paid. Err, well pay the phone bill while the President gets a hummer under his desk, Oops we already paid for that one too... Oh well you get the picture. Maybe it will help a farmer/ rancher DL some free porn or something.
Then move.
You are a fscking idiot. These people living in rural areas are probably growing YOUR food. So in your thinking, they should have to pay more for internet? Why? It's not their fault telcos strung millions of miles of wire and don't have the cellular network blanketing the whole country. So exactly how much is it costing you? You just stated that internet/phone bill was $30.00. So an entire $.50 is going to the USF? If they didn't collect the money in one way, it would be collected in another. So quit your bitching, let the farmer/ rancher have his phone/internet in peace, he has a very hard and thankless job to do.
10lb Sledgehammer
Cutting Torch
Pipe Wrench (big one)
A 2ft length on water pipe
That will cure those "difficult" jobs/ customers.
The US did, and your great great granpappy sold it all and bought crack.
Get a life asswipe. America doesn't owe black Americans SHIT. Fucktard. Get a job like everybody else. I hate lazy fuckers that whine and whine about how unfairly they are treated, tryin' to earn sympathy and cash on the backs of their long dead ancestors. Get over it, not one single person alive today participated in slavery 150+ years ago. The more black Americans push this stupid assed agenda, the further the divide will get. Get over it and move on, 99.9% of white people DO NOT sit around and plot to keep black Americans poor, in jail, etc. Most of are too busy with our own lives to give a shit what happened 10 minutes ago muchless 150+ years.
BTW, Thanks France for your help after Katrina, no really I mean it. However, I still HATE YOUR GUTS! Damn losers, arrogant fuckers. I'm not alone, we still hate you with a passion unriveled. So now how does it feel do do a good thing and still be hated assholes? So maybe this will give you a taste of how we American feel. Dickheads, go eat your cheese and shut the hell up..
M$ sucks, that's why.
68%(Netcraft survey) of internet servers run Apache, so I don't think that Apache programers suck, just you.
RTFA
What a dumbass statemant, retard...
You ever tried a water rescue?
You ever been a lifeguard?
This is a new tool. Do you use tools where you work.
It isn't that easy of a job, ever stared at a pool with people splashing in it? It's a bitch to see anything happening below the surface. So any new advances are a welcome thing.
F'ing idiots such as yourself making dumbass comments.
Haha. I'm not laughing because there are no 3d modelling tools for Linux, I'm laughing because if you need a plugin for 3dsmax to do your job, then none of those alternatives matter. "I must use 3dsmax" implies "I must use windows". End of story, sadly.
Thats funny considering Linux is the fastest growing OS within the movie making industry, PIXAR, ILM, just to name a few "small" companies actively using Linux for both modeling, and rendering. Their software is all custom written, none the less it's still Linux. So the laugh is back at you...
Unless you are in the military, then you can lead troops with a basket weaving degree. Talk about putting WAY too much importance on degrees...
Actually it's "Printers with frickin' lasers on their heads."