Even worse, the real risk is that by resetting A BGP TCP Connection, you may introduce route flap dampening, which can isolate huge sections of the internet.
A few resets and things could be completely stuffed.
Things 'wet' due to very small forces between molecules. For instance, water molecules are more attracted to paper than to itself, so paper gets wet. Water molecules are not attracted to grease/oil, so they dont mix.
Same thing here - basically the liquid is more attracted to itself than other objects, so it basically stays in it's own droplets.
Hmmm....im not sure if you understand what you asked...
Both optical fibre and wireless communications use photons - the only difference is the media (glass vs air). Links from the manufacturer discuss the possibility of both.
Nitrates make good fertiliser, and they also make good explosives. There is some overlap, but not all fertilisers are explosive, and not all explosives are fertiliser.
The common one is ammonium nitrate. When mixed with diesel, this is a bulk mining explosive called "Ampho". This material on it's own will barely burn, but when used with a detonator, the whole mixture breaks down and becomes high explosive.
Agreed. This has been discussed to death elsewhere, but there are a number of ways to measure speaker wattage.
1) The cheat way (aka PMPO) This is the absolute peak power of a speaker, ie the peak voltage versus peak current, for an absolute instant in time. It means basically nothing, and can be orders of magniture larger than any usefull output.
2) The right way (RMS) This is the continous average (root mean square) power that the speaker can handle. Heat is usually overriding factor. If a speaker is not rated in RMS, then it is not worth buying.
In a not-so-extreme way, just cutting back on sugars, preservatives and colourings can have a profound incluence.
I had a cousin who was a hyperactive menace, long before ADHD became trendy. When the condition gained recognition, it was quite clear he fit the bill.
Early on (long before ADHD diagnosis), his folks removed alot of preservatives and colourings from his diet. It made a significant difference.
LED lights will eventually replace fluorescents, incandescents and other traditional forms of interior illumination
I seriously doubt it. Flourescents are significantly more efficient, and that alone will attract a number of environmentally conscious people. Businesses also like the lower running costs.
I can certainly see them being used in disrete, detail lights (eg a feature lamp), but they'd never justify full house coverage.
IANAP (I am not a physicist), but another source of radiation that ive heard theorised is the it is possible/probable for a pair of particles to spontaneously form out of the vacuum of space, then collapse on themselves.
If this happens at the event horizon, one particle gets sucked in, the other particle ejected.
You can (and many people do) make a much more efficient power supply (98%) by replacing diodes with transistors. Sure, it takes more control, but these have excellent forward conductivity (eg mosfets with 0.01ohm on resistance).
Slashdot Mirror
They didnt use light....they used individual photons.
Any tax he every pays will go to the military. Will he give up work completely?
Even worse, the real risk is that by resetting A BGP TCP Connection, you may introduce route flap dampening, which can isolate huge sections of the internet.
A few resets and things could be completely stuffed.
Things 'wet' due to very small forces between molecules. For instance, water molecules are more attracted to paper than to itself, so paper gets wet. Water molecules are not attracted to grease/oil, so they dont mix.
Same thing here - basically the liquid is more attracted to itself than other objects, so it basically stays in it's own droplets.
That's about as simple as it gets.
Well done, great explanation. I agree entirely.
The only dissapointing aspect is that I just ran out of mod points.
Hmmm....im not sure if you understand what you asked...
Both optical fibre and wireless communications use photons - the only difference is the media (glass vs air). Links from the manufacturer discuss the possibility of both.
Exactly. Modern CPU's can pull in the order of 100 amps.
You might have fun getting that sort of current into a regular battery nipple, but having a battery with those capabilities would be great.
The "several million degrees" happens at a microscopic location inside the collapsing bubble.
Read the article again...
Aparantly wrapping the money in foil stopped the scanners going off. That makes it reasonably likely.
DCOM is used by a number of applications - I am forced to use it quite alot, though i truly despise it.
Maybe you should have said "unbind DCOM from the internet interface".
ditto.
Nitrates make good fertiliser, and they also make good explosives. There is some overlap, but not all fertilisers are explosive, and not all explosives are fertiliser.
The common one is ammonium nitrate. When mixed with diesel, this is a bulk mining explosive called "Ampho". This material on it's own will barely burn, but when used with a detonator, the whole mixture breaks down and becomes high explosive.
I implemented the exact same thing at home on my community wireless access point. Hardy origonal enough for a patent, is it?
I thnik the fly in the ointment will be the antenna - the antenna ground will still be attached to the chassis, and to the radio.
Agreed. This has been discussed to death elsewhere, but there are a number of ways to measure speaker wattage.
1) The cheat way (aka PMPO)
This is the absolute peak power of a speaker, ie the peak voltage versus peak current, for an absolute instant in time. It means basically nothing, and can be orders of magniture larger than any usefull output.
2) The right way (RMS)
This is the continous average (root mean square) power that the speaker can handle. Heat is usually overriding factor. If a speaker is not rated in RMS, then it is not worth buying.
In a not-so-extreme way, just cutting back on sugars, preservatives and colourings can have a profound incluence.
I had a cousin who was a hyperactive menace, long before ADHD became trendy. When the condition gained recognition, it was quite clear he fit the bill.
Early on (long before ADHD diagnosis), his folks removed alot of preservatives and colourings from his diet. It made a significant difference.
No, I too mis-read it that way, and felt my stomach drop.
What sort of sad geeks are we?
I agree about the bayesian comment. There are plenty of other very valid things to look for when filering spam on servers:
* valid sender domain
* html links to external images etc, or large amounts of html in general.
* blacklisted servers/relays
LED lights will eventually replace fluorescents, incandescents and other traditional forms of interior illumination
I seriously doubt it. Flourescents are significantly more efficient, and that alone will attract a number of environmentally conscious people. Businesses also like the lower running costs.
I can certainly see them being used in disrete, detail lights (eg a feature lamp), but they'd never justify full house coverage.
Micro electronics maybe, but Nano technology is completely different all together.
So far we turn big chunks of material into small devices. Nanotech build devices piece by piece from atoms.
IANAP (I am not a physicist), but another source of radiation that ive heard theorised is the it is possible/probable for a pair of particles to spontaneously form out of the vacuum of space, then collapse on themselves.
If this happens at the event horizon, one particle gets sucked in, the other particle ejected.
It's not "tech" support people are worried about, it's "product" support. You know, no more patches/updates for critical bugs.
WiFi and tres dont mux well.
1) Trees contain water. Water attentuates microwaves really well.
2) Microwaves have a similar waevlength to leaves - lots of diffraction/
As far as I've heard, modern diesel engines are actually very clean - i.e. they can be better than natural gas..
You can (and many people do) make a much more efficient power supply (98%) by replacing diodes with transistors. Sure, it takes more control, but these have excellent forward conductivity (eg mosfets with 0.01ohm on resistance).