Slashdot Mirror


Genetically Modified Flower Detects Landmines

cdneng2 writes "Yahoo has the story that a Danish company has developed a plant that can detect landmines. The genetically modified weed that has been coded to change color when its roots come in contact with nitrogen-dioxide (NO2) evaporating from explosives buried in soil." The company website has a bit more information.

518 comments

  1. What Happens by City_Idiot · · Score: 5, Funny

    When the kids of 3 world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

    1. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      When the kids of 3[rd] world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

      Hilarity ensues.

      Just kidding.

    2. Re:What Happens by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting
      When the kids of 3 world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

      Kind of puts a new twist on the old anti-Goldwater commercial, eh?

      Any kid growing up in a country where landmines are a problem is probably very likely to listen to the nice soldiers that say "stay away from flowers that look like this... we grow them on mine fields."

      The alternative is to further engineer the flowers to look or smell unpleasant, so kids will leave them alone.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:What Happens by catbutt · · Score: 5, Funny

      We not only get rid of mines, but wipe out color blindness. Two birds with one stone!

    4. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *singing*

      "Tiptoe through the tulips..."

    5. Re:What Happens by Alkaiser · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know...if *I* were a scientist, I would just hand out normal seeds, and tell people to plant them. :)

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    6. Re:What Happens by Bagheera · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A combined effect? A one less mine, and some chlorine in the gene pool.

      But seriously, this seems like one of the most humanatarian uses of BioTech I've ever heard of. They even made the plant sterile on deployment to stop cross contamination.

      Awesome development if it works as advertised.

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    7. Re:What Happens by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When the kids of 3 world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

      They grow up hating the country that made the landmines? Sounds all too familiar.

    8. Re:What Happens by cduffy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      to stop cross contamination

      You mean "to prevent unauthorized use", right?

      Preventing cross-contamination is just a handy side effect.

    9. Re:What Happens by gorilla · · Score: 3, Funny
      The alternative is to further engineer the flowers to look or smell unpleasant, so kids will leave them alone.

      That works for girls, but makes the flowers more attractive to boys, for purposes of torturing the girls.

    10. Re:What Happens by AmoebafromSweden · · Score: 1

      >When the kids of 3 world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

      Well, maybe nothing. The presence of flowers need not mean presence of mines. This is important to remember.

      Even more important to remember is that the lack of flowers definitely not means there are no mines. Only that there is no nitrogen-dioxide (NO2) in the soil.

    11. Re:What Happens by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      ".. look or smell unpleasant, so kids will leave them alone."

      you don't have any kids, do you?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:What Happens by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Any kid growing up in a country where landmines are a problem is probably very likely to listen to the nice soldiers"

      Any kid growing up in a country where landmines are a problem probably has at least one friend their own age short a few limbs.

    13. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe that'll cut down a few future 3rd-world despots.

    14. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know why this got modded down to troll status, I think it's hilarious =P

    15. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent - for senseless, oft-repeated, sounds-good-but-no-facts-to-back-it-up propoganda.

      (-mod because I'm conservative)

    16. Re:What Happens by Guppy06 · · Score: 0

      "for senseless, oft-repeated, sounds-good-but-no-facts-to-back-it-up propoganda."

      WTF?

      According to Cambodia's own government, a country that still has to deal with an estimated 6 to 7 million unexploded mines, there is about one amputee for every 236 people. If my old high school was like that there would be 20 amputees roaming the halls, and there'd be about a 1 in 4 chance of sharing a bus with one. And where I grew up was nowhere near as densely populated as Cambodia.

      Of course that 1:236 number is probably skewed towards adults. Children are far more likely to die of blood loss resulting from stepping on a mine.

      "(-mod because I'm conservative)"

      What does that have to do with anything here? Is Bush or the 108th Congress pushing to end the US' self-imposed moratorium on landmines? Their only real use on a modern battlefield is as temporary denial of territory, slowing an enemy down more than anything else. They're far more effective at killing civillians than enemy soldiers, much like chemical and biological weapons except that landmines don't dissipate.

      Hell, I voted for Bush and will probably end up voting for him again this year (unless Hell freezes over and the Libertarians put foward a candidate that isn't rabidly anti-war and/or pro-isolationism) and I don't see the point in trying to continue using them. And I'm a psychotic bastard that doesn't have a problem with the controlled use of tactical nuclear weapons.

    17. Re:What Happens by ragecgi · · Score: 1

      Hay mom! Goin' out to mow the lawn now! mom> NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

    18. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their own?

    19. Re:What Happens by instarx · · Score: 1

      Ahhhhhh! I like the way you think. One of my life goals is to convince more people to be less accepting of self-serving press releases and to look for the "real" reason things are the way they are. This is a nice example of spin.

      Still - it is a nice side-effect.

    20. Re:What Happens by broeman · · Score: 1

      they probably don't know who made them, but they surely know who planted them. BTW, it can be their own goverment or local gurilla-groups who planted them. Generally you are right, because countries, who has got to the level of medias (meaning interest for media, not survival), will blame them or the "inofficial" sellers (agencies) for doing something like this.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    21. Re:What Happens by AllenChristopher · · Score: 2, Insightful
      nice soldiers that say "stay away from flowers that look like this... we grow them on mine fields."

      It isn't that soldiers will grow them in mine fields. The point is that if you live in, say, Laos, and you want to make a new farm, you don't have to walk through it searching for bombs with a stick anymore. You spread these seeds from a plane, then wait. Anywhere the flowers say there's a mine, you do whatever. Throw a big rock at it? Ask the internationally sponsored mine-clearing teams to take it? I don't know.

      This is a useful idea many parts of Asia. Vast swathes of countryside were tactically mined in various wars, then abandoned. Nobody really knows which fields these are.

      As for kids... it's often children who do the mine-clearing now. There is relatively insignificant chance that children will be more attracted to the flowers which have changed color to indicate a bomb than the rest of the flowers, and at the same time, many children will be saved from operating the bomb-prodding stick. This is sure to bring a net profit of children.

    22. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is likely the funniest thing I've ever read on /. Thanks.

    23. Re:What Happens by Reginald+Beckwith · · Score: 1

      " Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence... " I am going to remember this quote. I always assume malice first. Is this a character flaw? Either way, thanks for the other perspective. Incompetence is probably more likely in any given situation, given the average( UhMerkan' ) IQ.

  2. Yes, but... by dustmote · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's going to volunteer to plant them? BOOOM!!! Still, this is a pretty neat idea. Might not be so good for people who are color-blind, like my dad. :)

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
    1. Re:Yes, but... by brinch · · Score: 1, Informative
      I am not a gardener, but i think the general idea behind weed is, that it is pretty effectively planting itself...

    2. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When's the last time you've planted a dandilion? Weeds tend to spread, well, like weeds.

    3. Re:Yes, but... by mlush · · Score: 2, Funny
      Who's going to volunteer to plant them? BOOOM!!!

      somehow I think landmines will not blow up if a small weed seed falls on them

    4. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know about that...I've always had trouble with keeping weed alive, rather than it growing itself. My roommate might have something to do with that, though...dirty pothead.

    5. Re:Yes, but... by SkArcher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      RTA -the plant is infertile, so it won't spread into unwanted areas. They'll probably spread the seed from aircraft hoppers - it'll have a fairly light seed casing.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    6. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      straight from the article.

      --------------
      Oestergaard said the problem of sowing the seeds in a potential land mine could be overcome by clearing strips through a field by conventional methods or by using crop planes.
      --------------

      yes, i'm new here, i did rtfa!

    7. Re:Yes, but... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then you just have to worry about birds eating them.. but hey, if a bird explodes, you found a mine.

    8. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it'll have a fairly light seed casing
      you mean.. they're not using.. genetically modified COCONUTS! phew.
    9. Re:Yes, but... by dustmote · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, if you want to do things the easy way...(rolls eyes)

      In all honesty, this didn't even occur to me until after I hit "submit", for some reason. Still, it made for a pretty Monty-Python-esque mental picture for a while:
      "And now Mr. Johnson will present the proper way to plant land mine detecting flowers."

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    10. Re:Yes, but... by synth7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who's going to volunteer to plant them?

      Ah, yes... the brainpower of geekus maximus shows that it needs to get out of the house a little more often. You see, plants produce these little things called "seeds" which are actually baby plants in hibernation. These "seeds" typically germinate when sitting in suitable soil... it all depends upon the plant itself, of course: a scrub grass or low-lying shrub will grow in pretty harsh places.

      Anyhow, I hope you can see where this is leading. Plants tend to reproduce on their own without the need for human intervention. Of course, if you really wanted these plants to grow in a location, you could always try something innovative like flying overhead and sprinkling a mixtures of seed and fertilizer on the patch of land in question. It may take several years for the plant to get established and spread, but, well, I don't think anyone would complain about turning this particular patch of land over to these weeds for a time, as it's a bit tricky to use it for anything with all those mines in it anyhow.

      Honestly, at least half a dozen people have posted "How are they going to plant it?!?" without ever bothering to stop and think for a second. What is this, Fark.com?

    11. Re:Yes, but... by dustmote · · Score: 1

      That would certainly be one way to find the mines. Drop coconuts from airplanes. I don't think you'd even have to genetically engineer them, they'd detect mines just fine if you dropped them from a high enough height. :)

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    12. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this, Fark.com?

      Worse. It's Slashdot!

    13. Re:Yes, but... by SkArcher · · Score: 5, Informative

      and evidently you haven't actually read the article - the plants are infertile (don't themselves produce seeds) to prevent the genetically modified weed from spreading in areas where it isn't wanted.

      It is sown from the air or from conventionally cleared strips of land.

      It grows in roughly 3 - 6 weeks.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    14. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you mean.....outside? In the big room? -shudder-

    15. Re:Yes, but... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More importantly, that's a mine you no longer have to worry about...

    16. Re:Yes, but... by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      I'll volunteer.

      You just have to run a rotovator over the soil to break it up, then a plough to make nice grooves every six inches for me to sew the seeds in. Once you do that, sure, I'll volunteer.

    17. Re:Yes, but... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Of course, had you RTFA, you might have noted that the plants have been genetically engineered to be infertile, so you only get one generation out of a planting. Though, that should be enough to locate and remove landmines, and not enough to take over an area and force out existing species.
      As for the planting, ya its going to be as easy as doing a water drop on a fire, just with a seed/fertalizer mixture (kida like hydro-seeding).

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    18. Re:Yes, but... by brinch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now correct me if i'm wrong, but I believe that producing seeds isn't exactly the only way a plant can spread over a very large area.

    19. Re:Yes, but... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Who's going to volunteer to plant them?

      I tried to develop a
      remote-controlled planter using spare NASA parts, but it has problems with its flash memory.

    20. Re:Yes, but... by Sajma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While airborne seeding and infertility are necessary to make this work, they might make it difficult to get the right "resolution" of seeds on the field. I assume mines are not too large (2ft radius?), so one needs seeds at least that close together, if not closer. Is possible using airborne seeding?

      If the weeds were fertile, then they could increase their density to the maximum the field could sustain. If one could make the weed's fertility "time out" after a few generations or depend on some fertilizer only present in the area of deployment, then one could deploy a fertile weed that could not spread too far.

      Of course, "Jurassic Park" showed us that any genetically-engineered technique for controlling a population is doomed to spectacular failure :)

    21. Re:Yes, but... by kinnell · · Score: 1
      Who's going to volunteer to plant them?

      I nominate Darl

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    22. Re:Yes, but... by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      somehow I think landmines will not blow up if a small weed seed falls on them

      Not if your foot is over the mine and the seeds land to its side.

    23. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ya can't spell bloom without boom.

    24. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Awesome! If I were a kid living in one of these mine-laden third world countries, I'd spend my days just sitting besides the field and watching the birds explode.

    25. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right "resolution" of

      density

    26. Re:Yes, but... by Greedo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are correct, sir.

      Some plants just grow big, tuborous root systems, which occaisionally sprout up new, baby plants. Some other plants (like ivy and spider plants) send out shooters, hoping that one of them will land on fertile ground, root and grow.

      I've forgotten the technical names for those "reproductive" methods, but there you go.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    27. Re:Yes, but... by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...to prevent the genetically modified weed from spreading in areas where it isn't wanted."

      Like, the United States Drug Czar's office?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    28. Re:Yes, but... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      As if you're going to convetionally clear land that is suspected of being a minefield?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    29. Re:Yes, but... by synth7 · · Score: 1

      I agree, I should have read the article first. However, this does not invalidate the fact that this is a project that a lot of time, money, and effort is being put into. As such, we can be reasonably sure that the developers of this new plant have already addressed the "how to we plant it in a minefield" problem.

      Indeed, just thinking about seeds and spores would lead one to believe that you don't need to run around a minefield with a hoe stuffing seedlings in the ground. The parent of this comment gets the "funny ha-ha" reaction for the simple reason that it's the first thing that pops into your brain. I'd like to think that slashdot culture isn't about the first thing that pops into your brain, but rather the first thing that pops into your brain followed up by a few thoughts about how the problem might be solved.

    30. Re:Yes, but... by rssrss · · Score: 1

      " What is this, Fark.com?"

      No, they are much funnier than these geeks. :-)

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    31. Re:Yes, but... by fatgraham · · Score: 1

      Outsource it to India.

      (This Is Of Course A Joke(TM))

    32. Re:Yes, but... by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, I don't think that the seeds would need to be closer together than the land mines. The gas is going to disperse as it travels through the soil, it's not going to close in on a smaller point over the mine. I'm sure the engineers have thoroughly researched the optimal seed dispersion.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    33. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are infertile (don't themselves produce seeds) to prevent the genetically modified weed from spreading in areas where it isn't wanted.

      For a minute there I thought you were talking about the average slashdot geek !

    34. Re:Yes, but... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      That would certainly be one way to find the mines. Drop coconuts from airplanes.

      Just make sure there isn't a famine in that area. It would be kinda cruel to drop food in mine fields.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    35. Re:Yes, but... by Dutch_Cap · · Score: 1

      Plants have roots and I assume they've chosen a plant with lots of roots to make them as effective as possible. So no, I don't think you need to pack the plants together very closely, just close enough so their roots cover most of the area.

    36. Re:Yes, but... by kulpinator · · Score: 1

      I've forgotten the technical names for those "reproductive" methods

      I think vegetative reproduction fits here.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetative_reproducti on

      --
      Karma: Positive (mostly due to rash moderations)
    37. Re:Yes, but... by trikberg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anti-tank mines have a diameter of 30-40 cm, are 6-8 cm deep and weigh about 10kg. I can also tell you that it not fun at all to carry 2 or more for several kilometers somewhere in the middle of a Finnish forest.

      The largest mines are probably anti-personnel claymore mines. They are something like 25cm high and 50cm wide and produce a huge (50-100m) conical storm of shrapnel. They are however usually attached to a tree or similar structure so that the effect acts horizontally taking out a lot of infantry and perhaps unarmored vehicles. The plants are of no use when looking for these.

      There are several kinds of mines that can be dispersed from aircraft. the ones I've seen are Russian and are about 10cm wide, 5cm high and look sort of like butterflies so that they can be packed efficiently and disperse widely when dropped. These are not dug into the ground so I doubt the plant will be of much use in finding them. Now someone is thinking that such small mines that are above the ground shouldn't be a problem, but account for the fact that the a plane can drop several thousands in one run. Combine that with toxic gas and/or napalm and it's a really big problem.

      The kinds of mines that the plants are probably used to find are anti-personnel mines dug into the ground. These usually consist of an explosive charge 10cm wide and about 10cm high with some shrapnelling stuff in them. On top of that a trigger is attached making the whole contraption just above 15cm high. The whole thing is dug into the ground and covered with a cm or two of dirt so that it goes off when a soldier (or civilian) steps on it.

      --
      This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    38. Re:Yes, but... by flewp · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there would be enough seeds spread over a minefield that at least one mine would be detected. Once they know there's one mine, there's a good chance there's others.

      The question is, how do you determine where to start being careful and look for landmines? A 100 yard radius of any flower that detects one?

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    39. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So THAT's what KFC means by "Popcorn Chicken"!

    40. Re:Yes, but... by trikberg · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you don't quite grasp the problem.

      In locations where mines are a problem the locals will know in what areas there are mines; that field, the left side of the road, the small forest by the river, etc. However the number and location of mines is unknown and finding and disabling them is an insanely slow process. One man can clear 2 or 3 square meters per hour and it's about the most stressful job you can find.

      If the actual finding of mines can be automated with the use of these plants then it is a lot easier and faster to disable them when you don't have to spend hours on your knees to find each one individually.

      --
      This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    41. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol... uh,... well.... that's how we've been doing it so far...

    42. Re:Yes, but... by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      Just think of the arms race this will start... countries who deploy mines will genetically engineer weeds to sow over their minefields that appear to indicate a mine-free area...then 'boom!'. And what about genetically engineered insects and pests trained to attaack the 'red weeds'. Haven't we learned from the arms race and space race?! this is just begging for a "flower race".

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    43. Re:Yes, but... by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      if a bird explodes, you found a mine

      Funny as it sounds, I don't think that would be happening often, if ever. Most birds don't have enough weight to trigger a mine, and also the shape of their feet distributes the weight differently. A walking mammal on the other hand...

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    44. Re:Yes, but... by Pepebuho · · Score: 1

      It is obvious that you did not watch Jusrassic Park nor read the books. Shame on you. Nature will find a way!

    45. Re:Yes, but... by hashwolf · · Score: 0

      And that's one bird less to eat the seeds!

      --
      - "They misunderestimated me."
    46. Re:Yes, but... by instarx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think "conventionally cleared" referred to conventional mine clearing, not conventional scrub-brush clearing. But the logic of using an indicator plant works for both types of clearing - mine and brush. Deep mines are often overlooked by mine-clearing operations, but because buried objects tend to gradually work their way to the surface, several people are killed yearly in fields thought cleared of mines. In any event people do often start cultivating land suspected of having mines even without formal mine-clearing having occurred. This usually happens when the alternative is to starve to death. Planting such an indicator grass would be very valuable in both these situations.

    47. Re:Yes, but... by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      The largest mines are probably anti-personnel claymore mines. They are something like 25cm high and 50cm wide and produce a huge (50-100m) conical storm of shrapnel. They are however usually attached to a tree or similar structure so that the effect acts horizontally taking out a lot of infantry and perhaps unarmored vehicles. The plants are of no use when looking for these.

      Depending on exactly how you use them, they're not that much of a problem either. If retained as a command detonated device only (as we have done with the Swedish inventory), i.e. with no 'boby trap' trigger, they pose little threat to post war inhabitants, less so than ordinary duds, such as artillery and mortar shells and the like.

      These are not dug into the ground so I doubt the plant will be of much use in finding them. Now someone is thinking that such small mines that are above the ground shouldn't be a problem, but account for the fact that the a plane can drop several thousands in one run. Combine that with toxic gas and/or napalm and it's a really big problem.

      If they stayed above ground for time eternal, they wouldn't be a problem for generations to come that's for certain. However, they don't. Rain, erosion, accumulation of plant debri etc all work together to bury them over time, and then you have a problem. That there are many of them, and napalm etc is mostly just a tactical problem. And we're not trying to ban mines to save soldiers.

      The kinds of mines that the plants are probably used to find are anti-personnel mines dug into the ground.

      That and other types of unexploded ammunition. Cluster bomblets in particular tend to have a very high failure rate (figures of 10%-20% are sometimes heard) and being armed and buried on impact they get to be a real problem.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    48. Re:Yes, but... by Woodie · · Score: 1

      Uhh - the seeds are air-dropped.

      Is your dad red-green color blind? Or some other permutation? True, total color-blindness in humans is about a trillion to one odds, so he'll probably be able to tell the difference between yellow and blue - or whatever colors they've engineered it to use. One might assume that you'd be a little more interested in exactly what color-blindness means since your dad is color-blind, and it's a heritable condition.

    49. Re:Yes, but... by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      The kinds of mines that the plants are probably used to find are anti-personnel mines dug into the ground. These usually consist of an explosive charge 10cm wide and about 10cm high with some shrapnelling stuff in them.

      It should be noted that these are by now the old style anti personell mine, not in wide spread use since the early/mid eighties. The problem with providing a casing (or simply a plate) to provide shrappnel is that it increases the weight of the mine, and also the metallic content which makes clearing easier (via the use of mine detectors).

      Modern anti personell mines have close to zero metallic content (at least ferrous metals) to make the use of mine detectors unfeasible. Instead the designers realized that changing the trigger so that the mine detonates when you step off it instead of step onto it, bringing the body over the mine instead of behind it at the time of detonation, and reducing the amount (and 'speed' i.e. brisance) of the explosives, enables the 'use' of the small bones of the middle foot as shrappnell (mainly impacting the groin area).

      This is as mentioned a tripple win. It makes the use of metal detectors as mine detectors unfeasible, it reduces the weight of the mine so more can be carried, and it reduces the cost of the mine since there is less (relatively expensive) material and less explosives. What's left is a plastic container, explosives and a (very simple) trigger with initiator. Dirt cheap, light weight, lasts for ages and virtually impossible to detect.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  3. Spirit of Diana Spencer by The+I+Shing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish Diana Spencer were alive to see this development. I bet she would have gotten other celebrities to underwrite the use of this technology to save countless lives worldwide. But luckily there are other wealthy individuals who might undertake an experiment with this plant, and make that company rich in the process (which is, in the words of Stuart Smalley, "okay").

    Elton John will write a song about it, too.

    Nice to see a company making a bio weapon that helps people instead of making them die horribly and slowly.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would shut up about her. I'm bored of being told she was an angel or wtf ever. Shes dead, she did some good before dying, but now shes dead. just leave it alone already, or go back to worshipping elvis.

    2. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see a company making a bio weapon that helps people instead of making them die horribly and slowly.

      The plants are probably ecologically superior and will supplant all the local fluora, then mutate, killing millions.

    3. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      Nice to see a company making a bio weapon that helps people instead of making them die horribly and slowly.

      Don't worry, there are plenty of other companies willing to work in the "die horribly and slowly" area. The image this effort brings to my mind is the fields of flowers on the former battlefields of World War I. Mustard gas was arguably one of the first "bio-weapons", and caused a agonizing and horrble death, the victim drowning in his own blood. The human toll of mines may be equally awful, as children and women are often the ones sent into fields to look for mines.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    4. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody know where I can score a copy of that parody poster done before she married Prince Charles? The one with a teenaged princess of Wales coyly smiling while she unzipped her skin-tight jeans? That was hott!!!

    5. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're thinking of a old "National Lampoon" cover from the 80's, sport.

    6. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      That's just conflict for you. Having your head bashed in, getting stuck through the stomach so that your intestines fall out, getting stabbed in the eye, having bamboo shoots jammed under your fingernails for information, or being interrogated with branding irons...none of these are nice either, and none require much technology.

    7. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it necrophilia if I masturbate while fantasizing about her while she was alive?!!!

    8. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by TPFH · · Score: 1

      This technology would be good for getting rid of land-mines that are already out there, but wouldn't it be better to simply stop making the darn things?

      The propaganda says that there are landmines that were planted 30+ years ago that are still blowing up innocent children and such a generation after the war is over.

      If anything, I'm worried that the politicians and arms industry will use this as an excuse to keep producing land mines. "Don't worry about the children. We can just plant these pretty flowers after the fact."

      Elton John will write a song about it, too.

      No!!!!! Gawd No!!!!!!
      (Sorry, I'm not an Elton John fan.)

      --
      This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
    9. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spirit of Dead Brit Slam Pig 'smore like. :P
      Had she not threatened to defile her relations by marrying her late Dune Coon buddy she could still be pimping useful charities.
      If she were as homely as Fergie none of you would care, but her average looks made her the Natalie Portman of the royal-worshipper set. :)

    10. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I remember all that Diana horseshit, being british and having to endure people weeping over someone they didn't even know.

      Then, our government bans the use of landmines by the military as some sort of gesture to this simpleton nonsense.

      Landmines used indiscriminately are bad, but they have their uses. I'm sure they were used in WW2, and yes, probably some civilians got blown up after. But they probably helped keep the Nazis at bay and help preserved the freedom that people like Diana Spencer could enjoy.

    11. Re:Spirit of Diana Spencer by refactored · · Score: 1
      Please sign the Peoples Treaty
      It is my strong belief that mines, which may be exploded by the presence or proximity of a person, are morally unacceptable. I fully support the convention on the prohibition of the use, stockpiling, transfer and production on anti-personnel mines and on their destruction. Through their signature, governments promise to officially adopt and ratify the Ottawa Treaty and to comply with all of its terms. These include support for global demining work and assistance for mine victims. Through my signature on the People's treaty, I commit to working to ensure that governments keep these promises.
  4. KEEP MOVING!!! by docbrown42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Stop to smell the roses, and go BOOM? :) Actually, this is a pretty smart idea. Maybe they should code it into something really fast growing, like kudzu. -Ed

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
    1. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think a field full of kudzu is worse than a field full of land mines. After all, you can continue to farm a field of land mines, if you're willing to risk getting blown up. If the field's full of kudzu, you can't farm it any more.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by lcsjk · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's probably safer to take a chance on land mines than to be swallowed up by Kudzu while you're asleep. ... Look out on the sides of the roads in parts of Alabama and Georgia and you'll see the humps/bumps where cows and cars have paused too long and succumbed to the onslaught of fast growing Kudzu. ..... On the other hand, if you could genetically engineer Kudzu to die unless it encountered a land mine, it could turn red and within a few hours, assuming normal growth rate, protect the mine from intrusion by kids, adults and animals. Within a few days, it might even protect against tractors and tanks getting to the mine. Within a few weeks, the local population would be devoured and there would be no one left to get to the mines anyway, so there would be no need for exploding the mines. Very cost effective.

    3. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obligatory kudzu joke:

      A man in Texas decided he wanted a nice gazebo in his backyard and wanted some nice ivy growing over it. He didn't want to wait a decade or so for the ivy to grow around the gazebo. He'd heard that kudzu was pretty fast growing though and so he planted some near the base of the gazebo.

      A year later he burned the thing to the ground, poured concrete over it, and sold the place. The kudzu probably came back.

      Serious notes -- planting kudzu anywhere in the US is a federal crime, a violation of the Noxious Weed Act of 1974. It's virtually impossible to kill the roots -- which can have root nodules the size of a basketball -- and so while RoundUp and similar herbicides will kill the leaves it'll simply be back within a few weeks or months (depending on time of year -- kudzu goes dormant in winter. Never, ever buy any land in the SE US during late fall or winter if there are vines anywhere near; very few other ivys go dormant during this time period). Those root nodules will let it keep doing this for a decade or more.

    4. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      What you describe resembles the classic science fiction in the Chrysalids by John Wyndham. It has a scene where people are covered in a material that sticks to them, and shrinks until the person, animal, or machine is crushed.

      Wyndham was right about a lot of things, hopefully not this "bio weapon".

      Read Day of the Triffids if you haven't yet. Very possible outcome of our genetic modification fling.

      And did you hear that Monsanto has backed down from GM Wheat in Canada? They've almost scrapped the program after learning years too late that no one would want to buy it. The Canadian government foolishly gave money to the project.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    5. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      And yet herbal shops sell kudzu powdered... That always baffled me. It's not like it's difficult to get, I don't see how they'd even be a market.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Bugger that...use triffids :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    7. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She loves me
      She loves me not
      She loves me
      She loves me not
      She loves me
      She loves *BOOM!*

    8. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Sparr0 · · Score: 1
      Noxious weed: any living stage (including seeds and reproductive parts) of a parasitic or other plant of a kind which is of foreign origin, is new to or not widely prevalent in the U.S., and can directly or indirectly injure crops, other useful plants, livestock, poultry or other interests of agriculture, including irrigation, navigation, fish and wildlife resources, or the public health.


      Anyone trying to fit kudzu into THAT definition of Noxious weeds apparently has never driven down the interstate...

      (please note the placement of ORs and ANDs in the definition)
    9. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      If you look at the US as a whole, it isn't widely prevalent. It only grows that well in dense clay soil like the soil found in the Southeastern US (excluding Florida). It's prevalent there, but try and find some in the Midwest or Northeast.

  5. All hail the purple death poppy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How far do the roots grow from the plant, exactly?

  6. FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first post for the jihad!

    Anti-Slash

  7. Maybe they should have used a .. by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    chrysanthemum in there somewhere. You know like the firework explosion?

  8. But.... by QuasiCoLtd · · Score: 1

    The real question is who's going to plant the flowers? Seems like the gardener will discover landmines well before the flowers have a chance.....

    1. Re:But.... by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you'd read the article, it suggests using crop-dusting planes to plant the seeds. Then, when they see where the mines are, they not only can tell just where to dig, they can see how to get to them safely.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  9. Why do they have to change color? by Kaeru+the+Frog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't the gardeners blowing up while planting flowers be enough?

    1. Re:Why do they have to change color? by daeley · · Score: 1

      "I'll be right there, just let me plant this last--" [PHOOM!]

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Why do they have to change color? by lommer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I realize this is a joke, but to stem the flood of responses by people who didn't RTFA, here's the scoop:

      You take a plane, fill it with seed "bomblets" and disperse them over a minefield. The bomblets embed in the soil and the plants grow. Within a few months you have a field of plants, a few of which are a different colour. The ones that have changed colour are close to mines. This makes finding the mines easier, and it also makes it possible to find a safe route through the field by only looking at the colour of the plants.

    3. Re:Why do they have to change color? by HBI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What happens if you have a well sealed mine that doesn't leak nitrates?

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    4. Re:Why do they have to change color? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      also a great way to detect enemy mine fields... until they create a flower that looks just like the one that detects mines.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Why do they have to change color? by thejackhmr · · Score: 1
      The ones that have changed colour are close to mines. This makes finding the mines easier, and it also makes it possible to find a safe route through the field by only looking at the colour of the plants.
      Interesting, but I'm willing to bet most folks will opt to walk around these fields altogether.
    6. Re:Why do they have to change color? by MyHair · · Score: 1

      You take a plane, fill it with seed "bomblets" and disperse them over a minefield. The bomblets embed in the soil and the plants grow. Within a few months you have a field of plants, a few of which are a different colour.

      Wouldn't the whole process be faster if the "seed 'bomblets'" exploded on landing?

    7. Re:Why do they have to change color? by placeclicker · · Score: 2, Funny

      so its like a giant version of minesweeper..

      --

      Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
    8. Re:Why do they have to change color? by mean+pun · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't the whole process be faster if the "seed 'bomblets'" exploded on landing?

      No, because (a) you don't explode all mines this way, and (b) there is always a fraction of the bomblets that doesn't explode, so you're only making the problem worse (just ask the iraqi children in some areas where cluster bombs were used). Oh, and (c) cluster bombs are expensive, especially compared to flower seed, even if it is GM seed.

    9. Re:Why do they have to change color? by hobbespatch · · Score: 1

      Quote:Within a few months you have a field of plants, a few of which are a different colour. The ones that have changed colour are close to mines.

      Couldn't they just make the flowers resemble a Red X - cause I rule at minesweeper!

      --
      Still Mud? Try www.phoenixmud.org!
  10. excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This will do wonders for places like New Zealand, Utah, and Atlanta, where landmines have been laid so much that kids can no longer play outside. I heard Elijah Wood and the guy who played Sam were very seriously injured by a landmine on weathertop.

  11. I can't help myself... by 10101001011 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone's going to be pushing up the daisies!

  12. GM is good by pbrinich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, this might be one use of GM where the environmentalists can't complain much with all the children maimed and killed by these things each year...

    1. Re:GM is good by ryanjensen · · Score: 0, Troll

      ... except that environmentalists don't actually care about people.

    2. Re:GM is good by Felix+The+Cat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, this might be one use of GM where the environmentalists can't complain much with all the children maimed and killed by these things each year...

      Hrmph. Don't you believe it. There are people out there who would, in the words of my father, "bitch if you hung 'em with a new rope."

      --
      Windows is the Acme of computing -- in the Wile E. Coyote sense.
    3. Re:GM is good by tindur · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which. Are they going to grow these flowers on every piece of land that could hide mines? In many countries that would be almost everywhere. What are they going to do to the weed when all mines are found? Will it be there forever?

    4. Re:GM is good by operagost · · Score: 0, Troll

      Even more insightful than the parent post.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:GM is good by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's messed up - my dad picked up that gaffe (for those unfamiliar with the cliche, it's supposed to be 'old rope') from one of his coworkers and used it often just to annoy us kids. Never thought I'd see someone else doing it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:GM is good by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      As far as I am concerned, I just foresee that the land mine producers get out of the bad press. After all, producing/selling land mines has become a business no self-respecting weapons producer wanted to be caught in, with all the removal problems and maimed children and stuff. Now it's going to be perfectly respectable: "Got a little war? Need to protect a strip of land? Choose from our range of Poof! (tm) land mines. Easy removal after annoyance has stopped!" If the weapons companies are smart, they'll merge with biotech companies (if they haven't already) and can then sell both the mines and the weed. Reminds me of my pet peeve of food and pharma companies merging - you can first sell food that makes people sick, and then sell drugs against that, both genetically engineered to perfectly complement each other.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  13. I hope they can by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

    detect the slashdotting that about to occur :)

    --
    In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
  14. Pick the flower by c_oflynn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see a field of flowers all one colour.

    Then there is one flower that is a different colour, and you think its so unique. You go over to take a look at it...

    1. Re:Pick the flower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that's not really very funny. lots of kids are missing feet and hands from when they've tried to pick up explosives that look like toys.

      ha ha ! ?

    2. Re:Pick the flower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just see a field of flowers all one colour.

      Then there is one flower that is a different colour, and you think its so unique. You go over to take a look at it...


      Well. It will just be a new term for "Smoking Weed" :)

    3. Re:Pick the flower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I just heard Darwin laughing.

  15. On the topic of DNA by $calar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of my professors does research in nanotechnology. He is currently growing nanotubes in his lab and one of the applications of this technology is as a detector, such as what this plant does, only at the nano-scale. Apparently when the technology matures, detectors of certain types of illnesses can be made. By a drop of blood on the detector, one can learn the results instantly instead of waiting for human analysis. Very cool.

    1. Re:On the topic of DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a technicality, but you think the plants detectors arn't on nano-scales?

      Quickshot

    2. Re:On the topic of DNA by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Apparently when the technology matures, detectors of certain types of illnesses can be made.

      Apparently your definition of 'mature nanotech' is a bit conservative. :)

      When nanotech has really matured (in less than 25 years), there will be no point in detecting illness, because bio-based humans will always be in a perfect known-good state of health with artificial immune systems and cell-repair for micro to macro problems.

      And on the topic of this story - mine detection - one of first uses of mature nanotech will be to make a quick, cheap, finely grained 3D map of the earth down to the mantle without disturbing anything. All the mines will be found, fossils found, oil found, lost treasure found ... no more buried mysteries (boring?).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:On the topic of DNA by jim3e8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Kurzweil article contained a section titled "The Double Exponential Growth of the Economy During the 1990s Was Not a Bubble". Meanwhile, I'm reading "A Thoughtful Look at Indian Outsourcing" on the front page.

  16. Flower power? by bdesham · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Flower-Power Could Help Clear Land mines"
    Good, this sounds like a great excuse to blow up as many of these as we possibly can.

    :-)
    --
    Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
    1. Re:Flower power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man... I thought it was ICQ...

  17. God bless genetic engineering of weed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The genetically modified weed has been coded to change color when its roots come in contact with nitrogen-dioxide.
    It's also been genetically modified to produce a cleaner high when its smoke is inhaled. Then you get to see a lot of changes in color.
  18. Drop them from planes over third world countries by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Use something like a crop duster at a highish altitude to drop the seeds all over large areas of land in third world countries. This will make demining so much easier.

    If the environmentalists oppose this, if they can engineer the seeds so that the plants can't have offspring (I forget what the term is), they could drop a ton of seeds over a tract of land they plan to demine, and a few months later finding the mines will be very easy.

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
  19. Big deal by overshoot · · Score: 4, Funny
    The grass in my back yard turns green around land mines already.

    OK, seriously, this is great. Too many kids are missing body parts from old munitions.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Big deal by JohnDoe.Slashed · · Score: 0

      The grass in my back yard turns green around land mines already

      I guess it will be a problem if this flowers start rowing around a military camp or around any military compound which is used to store ammunition or any kind of explosibles

      I bet that botanist will be the cover for the new 007.

      Or they would just simply make sure that no plants will ever grow nearby a military objective

      I bet that Iraqui saw this coming when they settled in the desert...

    2. Re:Big deal by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 1
      The grass in my back yard turns green around land mines already.
      If your back yard is like mine, those are poodle bombs, not land mines.
    3. Re:Big deal by overshoot · · Score: 1

      Akitas, actually, so I suppose you could say that they were dropped from altitude.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    4. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      explosibles George W Bush "Word of the Day"

    5. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be even better if they could make a plant that not only shows you where it is, but dissolves it after a couple of months when you irrigate it or something.

  20. they called me mad. by minusthink · · Score: 0, Troll

    i have had this idea for years

    it's so obvious.

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
    OH I DIDN"T KNOW

    --
    "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    1. Re:they called me mad. by ryanjensen · · Score: 1

      Oh, well there goes their chance to patent this invention.

    2. Re:they called me mad. by minusthink · · Score: 1

      i guess they really called me (-1, Mad)!

      slashdot can't deal with my socially conscious cutting edge humor.

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
  21. Can I have my legs back please? by Assaulted_Peanut · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How are you meant to sow the plant without blowing your limbs off?

    1. Re:Can I have my legs back please? by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      RTFA: It suggests using planes like cropdusters to plant them.

  22. In case aresa.dk goes down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Landmines

    Aresa has developed a unique method for the detection of landmines in small as well as large areas. Landmines represent a significant problem, especially in the third world, where 26,000 (source:Red Cross) people in average are killed or injured every year. Another significant problem is that large areas of land (in Cambodia estimated 40%, in Angola estimated 90%(source:UN) are unused with severe socio-economic consequences for the population/countries.

    On a yearly basis between 200 and 300 m$(source:UN) are spent on demining funded by governments. Further significant amounts are spent as a part of military peacekeeping operations as well as private funds and funds from individual countries improving internal infrastructure. On top, the World Bank issues significant loans with the purpose of clearing land.

    Regulations:
    The quality guidelines for the clearing of landmines from the United Nations are 99,6% clearance. In practice, however, the clearance should be 100%, before the areas can be brought back to normal. According to UN an area must be checked twice before clearance can be established.

    Demining is needed when:
    - Refugees are moved back to their homeland like in the case of Afghanistan
    - Related to programs regaining lost land
    - Related to programs promoting international investments (e.g. South Africa).
    - Key areas are developed for different purposes (airports, roads, railroads, in-dustry etc.)

    1. Re:In case aresa.dk goes down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The biodetection system of Aresa, which is in the process of being intellectually protected, may be introduced in different plant types. The biodetection system is currently being developed using the plant Thale Cress (Arabidopsis thaliana).

      The underlying biochemical mechanism by which the colour change of the genetically plants occurs is based on altering the regulation of the natural pigment biosynthetic pathways in the plants.

      Plants normally go red or redish in autumn where the red pigments dominate over the green ones, or as a result of stressed growth conditions. The genetically engineered plants are modified in a way that only allows these plants to go red if triggered by a specific stimulus present in the soil. The stimulus is unique to the plant dependent on the actual application that is pursued with the specific plant. Stimuli may be heavy metals, or NO2 that evaporates when explosives are reduced in the soil. Such stimuli trigger the production of a key-enzyme in the biochemical pathway responsible for production of the group of red pigments called anthocyanins. The resulting colour change is expected within 3-6 weeks dependent on the growth conditions.

      The plant:
      There are many reasons for choosing the plant Thale Cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) as a first choice for development of the biotetection system:

      - The plant has a fast growth rate (growth cycle of 6-8 weeks).
      - The plant is naturally growing all around the world (except from the poles)
      - The plant is a well studied genetic model system, thus, data, knowledge are available.
      - It is a true advantage that the plant is an obligate self-pollinating plant in order to avoid spreading of genetically engineered plants to the environment.
      - Male-sterility can be introduced into the genetically engineered plants in order to eliminate the risk for spreading pollen. Thus, the plants developed by Aresa neither germinate nor set seeds unless a specific growth hormone is added to the plants, so plant growth can be strictly controlled.

    2. Re:In case aresa.dk goes down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BEAT YA TO IT ;-)

  23. Good Idea by Grey_14 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the kinda thing Genetic Engineering and Modification should be going into, not for Cheaper prices in the supermarket, or Glowing fish,
    Lets see more food in starving country's, Less Landmines, and other ways to improve life,

    Of course, thats whats been said about just about any new or improved technology in the last what, 30 years?

    1. Re:Good Idea by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the ground's been fought over, it's probably very fertile now. Not only because of the blood spilled, but because the nitrates from the munitions get into the soil.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Good Idea by donutello · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cheaper prices in the supermarket are usually the result of greater production and lower cost to produce so the same stuff that brings you cheaper prices in the supermarket is what you need to have more food in starving countries.

      GM is a tool. Like almost any other tool you can use it for good, evil or something frivolous.

      What next? You want legislation saying that computers should only be used to educate low-income students and not for playing games?

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:Good Idea by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      We could have more food if we simply stop paying famers to not grow anything in order to keep prices artificially high. And world peace wouldn't hurt either.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Good Idea by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      Glowing zebra danios have been used for quite a while to benefit studies that improve the human quality of life (i.e. cancer research). It's only recently that they've been marketed as pets.

      -Lucas

    5. Re:Good Idea by djtack · · Score: 1
      the same stuff that brings you cheaper prices in the supermarket is what you need to have more food in starving countries.

      This is Myth #1 about world hunger. There is plenty of food; the problem is inequitable distribution. From the FoodFirst site:

      Reality: Abundance, not scarcity, best describes the world's food supply. Enough wheat, rice and other grains are produced to provide every human being with 3,500 calories a day. That doesn't even count many other commonly eaten foods-vegetables, beans, nuts, root crops, fruits, grass-fed meats, and fish. Enough food is available to provide at least 4.3 pounds of food per person a day worldwide: two and half pounds of grain, beans and nuts, about a pound of fruits and vegetables, and nearly another pound of meat, milk and eggs-enough to make most people fat! The problem is that many people are too poor to buy readily available food. Even most "hungry countries" have enough food for all their people right now. Many are net exporters of food and other agricultural products.
    6. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many are net exporters of food and other agricultural products.

      That's one of the main reasons Mugabe didn't want to accept the GM grain from the US; he wanted to continue being able to export food.

    7. Re:Good Idea by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the kinda thing Genetic Engineering and Modification should be going into, not for Cheaper prices in the supermarket, or Glowing fish, Lets see more food in starving country's, Less Landmines, and other ways to improve life,

      Of course, thats whats been said about just about any new or improved technology in the last what, 30 years?


      No let's not see more food. Let's see more contraceptives. The problem isn't that there isn't enough food, it's that there are too many people for the land to supply. Sending food on temporarily solves the symptom of the problem. The problem being overpopulation. It sounds harsh, but in the end fewer people would starve fewer children especially.

      Unfortunately I can't take credit for this idea, I read it in Ishmael.

      --

      Question everything

    8. Re:Good Idea by Resound · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this sort of thing doesn't tend to pay very well, so those huge R&D bills don't get met. The end result is that the people who need this sort of technology most tend to get it last, particularly with regards to high yield crops. This particular effort is a magnificent exception.

    9. Re:Good Idea by MasterShake · · Score: 0

      ByeBye karma, but why are we really trying to feed the all the hungry of the world? We feed them, they keep reproducing, the land they live on, that COULDN'T FEED THEM BEFORE, still can't feed them. We have to send more food which lets them have an even higher population which... you get the picture.

    10. Re:Good Idea by ozbird · · Score: 1

      If the ground's been fought over, it's probably very fertile now.

      Which also means that the ground is probably already smothered with weeds. How are they going to clear the land for their new superweed to grow on it? Aerial spraying with army surplus Agent Orange?

    11. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... so the myth is that there is plenty of food, which would imply that the TRUTH is that there is NOT plenty of food. ???

    12. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the myth is that the myth about the myth is a myth.

    13. Re:Good Idea by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Enough wheat, rice and other grains are produced to provide every human being with 3,500 calories a day. That doesn't even count many other commonly eaten foods-vegetables, beans, nuts, root crops, fruits, grass-fed meats, and fish. Enough food is available to provide at least 4.3 pounds of food per person a day worldwide: two and half pounds of grain, beans and nuts, about a pound of fruits and vegetables, and nearly another pound of meat, milk and eggs-enough to make most people fat!

      Don't forget to add in all the Soylent Green!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  24. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Breathe, breathe in the air.
    Don't be afraid to care.
    Leave but don't leave me.
    Look around and choose your own ground.


    Long you live and high you fly
    And smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry
    And all you touch and all you see
    Is all your life will ever be.


    Run, rabbit run.
    Dig that hole, forget the sun,
    And when at last the work is done
    Don't sit down it's time to dig another one.


    For long you live and high you fly
    But only if you ride the tide
    And balanced on the biggest wave
    You race towards an early grave.


    Anti-Slash

  25. And... by mewyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Despite the fact that this flower may save hundreds of lives and thousands of injuries, anti-genetic research people are bound to delay this from being deploied.
    I do think that it will need to be tested to make sure it causes no harm, but it is going to be a great help in some war-torn countries.

    Mewyn Dy'ner

  26. There's an example of unique thinking. by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Glowing fish are neat, but this is the type of breakthrough that should convince holdout countries that genetically modified plants are a good thing. Granted, whatever this plant is it isn't likely it'll grow everywhere, but this is so innovative that I wonder if it can be applied to the detection of other materials in the soil.

    It's even self-limiting, so despite being a weed it won't choke out the local flora.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      "...should convince holdout countries that genetically modified plants are a good thing."

      For this purpose, yes. For food and livestock it's not necessary, unless you're Monsanto or somebody like them.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article mentions potentially using it to detect heavy metals in the soil as well such as might be found near nuclear or chemical waste reservoirs.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by pelirojatica · · Score: 1

      Sure, yeah, great, GM plants that are helpful. I just don't want to EAT any of them.

    4. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      However, some of us like cheaper, jucier, bigger, plumper, and not possessing of parasites.

      I don't have a problem with marking GM food. There are people that won't eat meat. There are people that won't eat beef. If somebody wants to avoid GM food, heck, they're welcome to do so (though AFAI can tell, the main people avoiding it are Europeans suckered by protectionist marketing). I agree that GM food should be marked. However, banning it, as some people try to do, is annoying and ridiculous.

    5. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by pelirojatica · · Score: 1

      There are a whole bunch of us, non-Europeans, non-suckers, who want to avoid GM food for reasons that have nothing to do with protectionism or marketing. We just don't want to ingest into our bodies those things that we don't feel comfortable with.

      I'm not saying that they shouldn't be marketed, but I'm ready to demand that they be appropriately labeled. That way I can merrily pay more for stuff that is not GM. I'll just FEEL better that way.

    6. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by centralizati0n · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't think the local flora would be very prominent in the most common areas of land mines - those beings roads, trails, and other such areas that people must travel across.

    7. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

      why don't you feel comfortable with GM? my guess is that you consume many processed foods regularly, not to mention the "natural" fruits and vegetables that, as the parent mentioned, or of generally lower quality and more prone to carry diseases/what have you.
      correct me if i'm wrong... and I'd like to hear more of your reasoning in either case.

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
  27. The hippies were right all along by addie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Flower power!

  28. In other News by -Grover · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    California has put in a bid to not allow the flowers to ever be planted. They could cause worldwide destruction much like the Glofish

    Beware!

    1. Re:In other News by -Grover · · Score: 1

      Apparently the mods are not in a fun and games mood today. My apoligies for a blatant attempt at humor.

  29. Re:Aeral Seeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing from massive drops via plane.

  30. Flowers? by dacarr · · Score: 1
    Wouldn't it be more efficient to just get a cache of mad cows and send them into the mine fields, like in this game?

    (Note, I don't work for Cheapass Games.)

    --
    This sig no verb.
  31. Proliferation of the genetic material by fejikso · · Score: 1

    Of course, the idea is that these plants should reproduce and grow everywhere...

    However, that means we're also disseminating these artificial mutations to the wild.

    Isn't it risky to release this beast and let it proliferate and perhaps cross-breed with other species? What are the long-term consequences of doing this?

    1. Re:Proliferation of the genetic material by thelexx · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Of course, the idea is that these plants should reproduce and grow everywhere..."

      No, it isn't. The article specifically states that the plants are sterile and cannot seed.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    2. Re:Proliferation of the genetic material by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

      What are the long-term consequences of doing this?

      1) Less mines

      2) More weed

      --
      Will code a sig generator for food
    3. Re:Proliferation of the genetic material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read.
      The.
      Fucking.
      Article.

  32. Awesome by Junado · · Score: 1

    I guess it might look funny: imagine walking through a wonderful, green, grass field where there are some red spots all around.

    "Mom, we're going out to play soccer!"
    "Ok boys, take care and watchout for the red grass!"


    Still, if it grows quickly and is easily adaptable to all kind of grounds, it could be an excellent way to remove mines in large dangerous zones.

  33. Phase 2 by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Funny

    Develop the next generation flower that detonates itself, taking out the mine, instead of just turning a different color. You'd probably risk being gunned down by airport security for carrying flowers, but progress comes at a price ...

    1. Re:Phase 2 by psychogentoo · · Score: 1

      Of course, Phase 3 will be 'profit'.

    2. Re:Phase 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got an image of Airport Security shoving these flowers in every orifice during a stripsearch.

      "It's OK, Gary. The daisies are white. He's not packing munitions."

    3. Re:Phase 2 by dolanh · · Score: 1

      Sounds crazy, but if they can do this, what is stopping them from having the plant develop a massive root system *around* the mine? That way, either the roots would eventually trigger the mine, or more likely (and safer), one could actually use the plant to help mine extraction. A third, far fetched possibility, is for the plant (or a sibling plant) to use a chemical process to attack the mine if it had encountered one. That said, I don't know how you would breed "if" logic into a plant :)

    4. Re:Phase 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      You'd probably risk being gunned down by airport security for carrying flowers

      Finally, a way to get rid of those goddamned Krishnas...

    5. Re:Phase 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the color change already a form of "if" logic?

    6. Re:Phase 2 by dolanh · · Score: 1

      Yes. What I meant is whether or not another effect (say, building a massive root system around the mine) could be triggered by the color change. I don't suppose why not.

    7. Re:Phase 2 by Resound · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, if the plant has a fine, invasive root system then it might be possible to set things up so that the plant can leech nitrogen based compounds from the mine. Now I'm certainly no explosives expert, but wouldn't this (or something similar) wind up making the mine inert?

  34. Good Idea by Ozone+Depletion · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This seems like a great idea to me. The main problem I see though is getting the flowers to grow in the soil where landmines have been planted. I mean, minefeilds don't seem like fertile places to me.

  35. By Crop plane... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    or by clearing a small strip of land through a suspected field. But then, that would require reading the frigging article.

  36. conflict! by Ba3r · · Score: 1

    Oh the conflict.. those who are so passionately against landmines and genetic engineering will have to choose!

    Me? I choose landmines that explode into flowers, which we can all dance around, happy with joined hands singing Peace on Earth

  37. Re:In case aresa.dk goes down - more pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Technology [Subpage]

    The biodetection system of Aresa, which is in the process of being intellectually protected, may be introduced in different plant types. The biodetection system is currently being developed using the plant Thale Cress (Arabidopsis thaliana).

    The underlying biochemical mechanism by which the colour change of the genetically plants occurs is based on altering the regulation of the natural pigment biosynthetic pathways in the plants.

    Plants normally go red or redish in autumn where the red pigments dominate over the green ones, or as a result of stressed growth conditions. The genetically engineered plants are modified in a way that only allows these plants to go red if triggered by a specific stimulus present in the soil. The stimulus is unique to the plant dependent on the actual application that is pursued with the specific plant. Stimuli may be heavy metals, or NO2 that evaporates when explosives are reduced in the soil. Such stimuli trigger the production of a key-enzyme in the biochemical pathway responsible for production of the group of red pigments called anthocyanins. The resulting colour change is expected within 3-6 weeks dependent on the growth conditions.

    The plant:
    There are many reasons for choosing the plant Thale Cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) as a first choice for development of the biotetection system:

    - The plant has a fast growth rate (growth cycle of 6-8 weeks).
    - The plant is naturally growing all around the world (except from the poles)
    - The plant is a well studied genetic model system, thus, data, knowledge are available.
    - It is a true advantage that the plant is an obligate self-pollinating plant in order to avoid spreading of genetically engineered plants to the environment.
    - Male-sterility can be introduced into the genetically engineered plants in order to eliminate the risk for spreading pollen. Thus, the plants developed by Aresa neither germinate nor set seeds unless a specific growth hormone is added to the plants, so plant growth can be strictly controlled.

  38. The hard part... by jvl001 · · Score: 1

    The hard part is tilling and planting the mine field first!

    --
    /. is to journalism as graffiti is to a bathroom wall
  39. Cost? by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 1

    Don't GM crops cost a lot to develop? I can imagine a third world country struggling to pay for enough of these plants to cover all potentially dangerous areas. Still, it is basically a brilliant idea, though it is still important to make sure anti-personnel mines are not used in the first place, and this organism is only necessary in the battlefields where wars were fought in the past.

    --
    Mod parent up!
    1. Re:Cost? by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The nice thing about these flowers is they have a pretty good idea of what the market will be like. Price the seeds so that de-mining the world will cover the research and production costs, leaving about a 10% profit.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Cost? by arctan1701 · · Score: 1

      ha! like this company is only going to allow a 10% profit. they are going to milk it for all they can.

    3. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, and then fund the mines industry so new mines get planted which creates the need for more plants, etc. "We can plant mines everywhere now! we just sow the seeds later after the war is over, because now we can find them again!"

  40. What about fertilisers? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Many fertilisers are made from various nitrogen compounds that are similar to explosives. That is why you can make a pretty nice bang with fertiliser + diesel fuel, and why there is a nice little relationship between fertiliser and explosives factories.

    Sure, out in the African bush you would not expect to find fertilisers but I extect some of the mine hot zones in Asia are fertilised quite heavily.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:What about fertilisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It wouldn't surprise me that the US (being the worlds largest makers of anti-personal landmines) have devised a way to block it.

      Probably claim only terrorists need flowers. -_-

    2. Re:What about fertilisers? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      A whole field full of false positives, while inconvenient, would certainly not outweigh the benefits of being able to rapidly mark hot spots in a known mine field. That's really where the application lies: known mine fields. It would serve both as an inidcator of where NOT to walk and an indicator of where the deminers need to focus.

      I wonder how sensitive the flowers are and, more importantly perhaps, whether that sensitivity can be easily controlled in various strains of the plant?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    3. Re:What about fertilisers? by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1


      given that no-one is likely to have been fertilizing the mine fields for a few years, I don't think this would be a big problem....

      and if there are enough explosives in there to change all the flowers, you really shouldn't be in there, should you?

  41. Congratulations! by Erick+the+Red · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Landmines are a HUGE problem in so many countries. Engineers Without Borders has a yearly competition for de-mining technology. These plants could make the new devices obsolete.

    One quick question: what about minefields in the desert? Plenty of places have mines where plants don't usually grow (or at least not densely enough for the plants to detect them all).
    --

    DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE

    ok
    1. Re:Congratulations! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about the desert problem myself. One of the worst is in Western Egypt, where there are places that it's still dangerous to go because of WWII minefields that have never been properly cleared.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  42. Larry Niven completes it. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, crossbreed them with those heatbeam-shooting Ringworld sunflowers, and you've got something that detects mines, and then blows them up.

    Now, how do you get rid of the fields of killer sunflowers covering the landscape? Errmm. sorry, didn't hear that. Gotta go...

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Larry Niven completes it. by El · · Score: 1

      The Ringworld flowers are mirrored, they don't shoot heatbeams, they merely reflect the sun, IIRC. Oh, and one other thing... THEY DON'T REALLY EXIST! Oh, and if a mine is buried deep enough, heat-beaming it probably won't detonate it.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Larry Niven completes it. by MadHungarian1917 · · Score: 1

      All we need now are some Pierson's puppeteers to come sell us some No. 2 General Products Hull's to build the minesweepers out of. But a No. 1 would probably be ok for small scale use. Now remember do not expose them to antimatter... We could probably get the thrintun to _motivate_ the labor force. Ahh. reminders of my wasted youth

  43. minesweeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so is there a hack for microsoft minesweeper?

    WhatMeWorry

  44. unintended consequences by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is ground-breaking technology and it's really cool to see it work to say lives. But I wonder what unintended consequences may occur from planting weeds around. This is very ignorant of me, but what effects could they have if they spread too fast or whatever since some areas where there are landmines are actually agricultural. I guess this technology could be used on other types of plants too, right?

    --
    In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    1. Re:unintended consequences by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Informative

      They do say the plants are modified to be genetically infertile and unable to spread their own seeds.

      As always there is no guarantee and as we all have heard, plants and especially hardy ones like weeds can cross-pollinate with similar breeds.

      it sounds like they are making this issue a big concern however.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:unintended consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't "unintended", it's a feature!

    3. Re:unintended consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ground-breaking technology . . .

      Oh pleez...[groan]

      at least nobody modded it funny -- yet . . .

  45. Aroma by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

    Flowers will smell a lot better than the smell added to natural gas.

  46. FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they could grow a flower that turns colors in th presence of methane... all that geek ass-gass could be useful!

  47. What do you need flowers for! by Mieckowski · · Score: 5, Funny

    All you have to do is look at the numbers in the adjacent boxes.

    People are so lazy!

    1. Re:What do you need flowers for! by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      You need flowers so you know that the first box is safe to click :-)

    2. Re:What do you need flowers for! by e1en0r · · Score: 1

      but flowers are so much prettier

      -- mac user

      (it's a joke. not a troll. i'm a linux->osx switcher)

    3. Re:What do you need flowers for! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first box is ALWAYS safe. At least in the version of Minesweeper that comes with Windows.

    4. Re:What do you need flowers for! by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      Nope, at least not on expert level. I freaking die all the time on the first click.

    5. Re:What do you need flowers for! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad minesweeper. Well, mine works.

  48. Princess Diana by savagedome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Princess Diana, for one, would have been very happy to see this development. Although her calling a ban on international landmines sparked a row as it was out of sync with the government policy.

    Definitely one of the better use of genetics.

  49. Interesting but likely ineffective by jsav40 · · Score: 1

    Since (IMHO) nitrogen-dioxide is likely to be present in areas where munitions/explosives have been used. That would result in false positives since minefields by definition are likely to be in areas where explosives etc. have been expended.

  50. If they really want to make money..... by Pure+Diluted+Reality · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should make a condom that contains plant material that can detect STD's and change colors accourdingly.

    1. Re:If they really want to make money..... by El · · Score: 1

      Uh, once it has changed color, isn't it a little bit too late?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:If they really want to make money..... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny... But also on a serious note - it would be too late for the guy, but not for the girl... ;)

    3. Re:If they really want to make money..... by Pure+Diluted+Reality · · Score: 1

      It depends on how you look at it. 1.) The guy turns the condom color and then the guy knows it is him. 2.) The girl turns the condom color and they the guy knows to never touch her again. Heck, you could market a "Home STD testing Kit" ... Big Brother will no longer know you have herpes

  51. this is such a good idea by simonharvey · · Score: 1
    many people have demonised GE as screwing with the enviroment and 'playing god', however the good that will come out of this may offset the actions of thoes who lacked the forsight to realise that mines kill people long after the war has finished.

    1. Re:this is such a good idea by John_Schmidt · · Score: 1

      Gerneral Electric had always screwed with the enviornment and played god?

  52. It won't work by psb777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Landmines are fairly small devices so a high plant density would be required. Much land is not easily planted - esp by airplane. It will have to be a remarkable plant to grow in all the conditions it will be needed. They would need one variety for paddy fields, another for savanna, etc etc. To have a chance of getting growing plants in sufficient density you would have to plough the land first.

    --
    Paul Beardsell
    1. Re:It won't work by psb777 · · Score: 1

      And you would have to wait for the growing season.
      And be prepared to go without the food crop in the interim. The investor list for this project is the most valuable thing about it: A list of wealthy suckers.

      --
      Paul Beardsell
  53. Thought it was mimes by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, I thought this was about flowers detecting mimes. I was so looking forward to using this during my next trip to New York City. My mistake.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Thought it was mimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's not so bad. I thought it was about flower-detecting mimes.

      "What's so great about that? I've always been able to detect flowers. What's wrong with the current mimes that they... oh."

      Of course, the image of "Mime Squads" driving around in their Mimemobiles looking out for flowers is quite funny. They would see one, stop the car, run over to it and make hand gestures around it. Is it a box? A warning sign? Who knows!

      Those wacky mimes.

  54. Seed from the air by FatHogByTheAss · · Score: 1

    No sacrificial gardeners needed.

    --

    --
    You sure got a purty mouth...

  55. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by radicalskeptic · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article already states that these flowers cannot reproduce.

    --
    WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
  56. Scatter the seeds by plane. by sulli · · Score: 1

    Then watch them bloom.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Scatter the seeds by plane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or watch them boom.

    2. Re:Scatter the seeds by plane. by SoSueMe · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're going to be called "MyDoom" blooms.
      Watch for them in an e-mail real soon.

  57. poetic by theCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is something marvelously just and poetic about using flowers to detect land mines. Thousands of children and innocents a year are blown to giblets, or horribly hutilated, by land mines. May a thousand flowers bloom.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    1. Re:poetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but "blown to giblets" is the most unintentionally funny phrase I've heard in a long time.

      By the way, what's hutilated?

    2. Re:poetic by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

      hutilated (adj): a state of an object or person at having been hucked into the air shortly after being mutilated.
      syn. CREAMED,PLASTERED
      (eg) "The remains of the hutilated bird landed on another mine, setting it off in turn."

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
    3. Re:poetic by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      No, what's poetic is that the cresses mean Stability and "Always Reliable" in the Victorian language of flowers. That's a pretty good meaning for a hardy weed meant to save lives. Though there is no specific meaning attached to the Thale Cress that I can find online, the Indian Cress is the flower of Warlike Trophies, which would be quite an ironic match.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    4. Re:poetic by Alsee · · Score: 1

      May a thousand flowers bloom.

      Or boom.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  58. Don't see how this is progress... by SilentT · · Score: 1

    Within three to six weeks from being sowed over land mine infested areas the small plant, a Thale Cress, will turn a warning red whenever close to a land mine. later... Dogs and metal detectors are also often used. Why don't they just stick to dogs and metal detectors? Seems that would be a lot faster and more efficient.

    1. Re:Don't see how this is progress... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      You can seed a large field from a single airplane in less than a day, at zero risk. Covering that field using a bomb-sniffing dog or a metal detector could take weeks, and carries a significant risk of blowing yourself up.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  59. Re:That is INSANE. by c_oflynn · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you were first post, that would mean you *should* have had lots of time that could have been spent reading the article.

    Plants normally go red or redish in autumn where the red pigments dominate over the green ones, or as a result of stressed growth conditions. The genetically engineered plants are modified in a way that only allows these plants to go red if triggered by a specific stimulus present in the soil. The stimulus is unique to the plant dependent on the actual application that is pursued with the specific plant. Stimuli may be heavy metals, or NO2 that evaporates when explosives are reduced in the soil. Such stimuli trigger the production of a key-enzyme in the biochemical pathway responsible for production of the group of red pigments called anthocyanins. The resulting colour change is expected within 3-6 weeks dependent on the growth conditions.
  60. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by kevruse · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA you would have noticed that they modified these weeds so they can't reproduce. Kind of like in Jurassic Park.

  61. To think, all this time... by foxtrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I've just been using my binoculars.

    "Landmine spotted, check your command map."

    I didn't even notice a "gardner" class in the limbo screen...

    -JDF

  62. As long as nobody patents them... by holizz · · Score: 1

    These plants could be a really inexpensive way of exposing landmines. I really hope this project works out.

    1. Re:As long as nobody patents them... by eegad · · Score: 2, Funny

      These plants could be a really inexpensive way of exposing landmines. I really hope this project works out.

      Sorry, I've already patented the idea of leaving really useful things unpatented.

  63. Dog carcasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they just stick to dogs and metal detectors?

    Yeah, having dead dog parts all blasted all over the countryside is one reason I really love doing this the old fashioned way.

  64. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by KReilly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But I wonder what happens when it misses some of the mines (E.g. Mines too deep, too new, plant did not grow close enough too it). That kind of defeats the purpose of doing this if they have to double back over the entire field to make sure they have not missed any. I think the idea is awesome, but not fool proof. And the fact that these seeds have to survive, and beat out other plants in the area. I think it is totally fascinating, and a creative idea, but seems to have a very small range of effective uses.

  65. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Sorry for responding to my own post, I have something to add:

    How can we know the plant will survive? Most areas of the word already have whatever vegetation they can support, so a random plant introduced there probably not survive:

    The solution is simple: Just modify whatever naturally grows there. If you only add/change one gene, that changes the plant's color, you can also be sure the plant won't disrupt the ecosystem, it'll just be exactly the same plant that already grows there in a different color.

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
  66. RTFA by nate1138 · · Score: 1

    If you had read the article, you would know that the plants have been engineered to be sterile. Much like the GM corn crops that Monsanto (evil bastards) sells.

    Of course, that doesn't mean that something couldn't go wrong, and we end up with a breeding specimen.

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  67. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by boredMDer · · Score: 1

    if they can engineer the seeds so that the plants can't have offspring (I forget what the term is)

    Plant castration?

  68. The roots wouldn't have to grow very far by trobrannus · · Score: 1

    Landmines are usually placed fairly close to the surface - if the plants are seeded fairly thickly they should get everything in a given area.

  69. Another one, In bad taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Don't plants already turn red around landmines? When somebody finds one, anyway.

  70. GM is quite good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no GM is not good, and in this instance it will just be used to justfy more mines.

    GM is quite good. The opposition to it is one of the best examples of irrational hysteria going today.

  71. flower power by barik · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This certainly gives a whole new meaning to the phrase 'flower power'!

  72. name suggestion by eegad · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they should think of naming it after Princess Diana since she was a champion of landmine dangers and victims.

  73. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by El · · Score: 1

    Actually, they're called "terminator seeds".

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  74. mod funny *nt* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt=no text

  75. How about... by FooGoo · · Score: 1

    some gentically modified weed to fool drug testing. This would be a real befefit to mankind.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    1. Re:How about... by C.+E.+Sum · · Score: 1

      Like decaffinated coffee.. de THCed weed? hm.

      --
      -- Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?
  76. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Assaulted_Peanut · · Score: 0
    "if they can engineer the seeds so that the plants can't have offspring (I forget what the term is)"

    Oh, you mean: "teach them C++"

  77. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a repost from that awful "Jihad" Bullshit.

  78. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by PakProtector · · Score: 1

    "What'd you do, go around and look up all the dinosaurs skirts?"

    If you read Jurassic Park, or saw the movie, you'd also know "that a population entirely composed of female members... will... breed?"

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  79. Get ready for the ban.... by Kenja · · Score: 1

    Get ready for these things to be banned because of fears that they'll find there way into salads.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  80. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    highish altitude to drop the seeds all over large areas of land in third world countries.

    u mean the countries ravaged by the "first world" with their uninterrupted supply of landmines?

  81. If we could only apply this to the net.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What we need now is a genetically modified program that will seek out unwanted software companies and attack them.

  82. The US is not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. It wouldn't surprise me that the US (being the worlds largest makers of anti-personal landmines) have devised a way to block it.

    The US is not a problem at all in the mine fields: it tends to clean up the mines when the conflicts are over. The real problems are the rogue countries that sell and place them willy-nilly, and never bother with removing them.

    1. Re:The US is not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point. This would be bad or the mine sellers' business. The US sells mines willy-nilly to anybody who will buy them. In most areas with mine problems, mines are not placed by legitimate armies operating within Geneve Convention guidelines (well marked/managed mine fields) but are instead used by less official organisations. The only real way to curb these is to cut off the supply of mines.

  83. Yeah, but what about all the "misses"? by finelinebob · · Score: 1


    I mean, there'll probably be hundreds, if not thousands, of flowers that DON'T change color for every mine detected. What then? I mean, like, there are going to be FLOWERS EVERYWHERE!

    They should have made them edible, too. Solve world hunger and the land mine problem in one fell swoop....

  84. Oh, fer fuck's sake... by devphil · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Gee, that's exactly what they're doing. Who'd uh thunk it?

    Ah yes, this is /., where people see the little green underlines that go to the fucking article and say, ooooo, shiny! Wonder what that does, oh never mind, let's go blather.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  85. Roses are red, violets are blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Thale Cress is brown you can cross the field too

  86. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by BurritoJ · · Score: 1

    This is most likely the approach intended and these plants are already sterile (that term you were looking for).

    I personally think that we should lock the humanitarians and the environmentalists in a little room and whoever comes out gets to decide whether the plants are sterile or fertile. If they're fertile then you've got a useful tool for any poor villager to use to check his own fields. Even sowing by hand, w/ a 3-4 week development time, he could start from a known-safe area and at least mark the dangerous areas of his field and get back to growing/harvesting food for his family. Richer poor villagers could follow a herd of livestock through the field in order to trade a few animals for a quicker reclamation of the field. (Quicker because you can segment the field and work on more edges.)

    Of course, this is only the first half of a 2 part problem. The second part is how to render safe the landmines, once you know where they are? I personally vote to use spammers and virus writers to dig out and detonate the devices. Each incident of violation (spam recieved/computer infected) requires the removal of 1 mine. I'm a civilized person, so airfare, food and lodging would be provided... health insurance may be problematic, however.

  87. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by danlyke · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA. Both suggestions are covered in the article.

  88. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    they can engineer the seeds
    so that the plants can't have offspring (I forget what the term is)


    The technical term is "slashdot reader".

  89. Hello kzinti by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I was thinking more in terms of the friggin' sunflowers with friggin' lasers on their petalled heads.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  90. Don't pick the red vines - by rivaldufus · · Score: 1

    where the huskies go...

  91. what pops into my head... by Polo · · Score: 1


    I can't help but think of painted tanks and ... Flower power

  92. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by dustmote · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, now reassuring. That means they're going to reproduce, escape to the mainland, and make several bad sequels, right? :)

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
  93. Would be useful for WWI battlefields also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might also be useful for World War I battlefields in France and Belgium, where a number of farmers are killed every year by unexploded shells buried underground.

    sPh

  94. Great just in time for Valentine's Day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now my wife will want a dozen of the red ones for Valentine's Day. Oh well, it was nice trolling with you guys. See you on the other side.

  95. Do they grow in Sand? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Unless they grow in Sand in 120degree temperatures, they aren't going to be useful where we need them them most.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  96. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jurassic Park was fake, I'm not saying this isn't possible, but your basing your evidence on a fictional movie which used that to generate sequels

  97. *gasp* by Pope · · Score: 1

    Sounds too much like sex!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  98. the term is... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    if they can engineer the seeds so that the plants can't have offspring (I forget what the term is),

    Vasectomy.

  99. Great Idea by ifreakshow · · Score: 1

    This seems like a truely great idea that could save many lives and convert danegerous land to a usefull purpose. Some obvious questions come to mind. How hardy are these weeds? Can they grow in desert like climates? Also how do you get rid of the weeds once your ready to grow new crops

  100. rumor has it by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 1

    Rumor has it that these flowers also change colors in the presence of orcs. Apparently, one of the deleted scenes on the extended edition of RotK is going to show Sam in action with his trusty flower.

  101. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Major_Small · · Score: 1
    either way, it's going to be faster than sending soldiers out there with metal detectors searching small areas at a time...

    beating out other plants in the area might not be so hard... they could torch the area if it already has plantlife there and drop these seeds as soon as the flames die out...

    I think this is a great idea, and could be very beneficial... for example, they drop the seeds, and then a little while later fly over the field, and if there's no colored flowers, they do a quick scan on foot and then they're done... if they see alot of colored flowers, they know something's down there, so they focus their search in that area for a while. this way they're not wasting all their resources combing the first field with nothing in it...

  102. weed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    genetically modified weed

    Heheheh. MMmmm.

  103. poem from a flower by re-Verse · · Score: 1

    violets are blue
    roses are read
    if i change colour
    stand here and you're dead

    1. Re:poem from a flower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the spelling spelling is R-E-D.

    2. Re:poem from a flower by re-Verse · · Score: 1

      indeed - i'd blame it on it being my first day on a non-natural keyboard, but still - how embarassing.

  104. Bosnia and parts of Croatia. by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look, I do my field research in the Balkans. There are still swathes of ground you'd better not fucking walk unless you are absolutely sure there are no mines. Even near Plitvice Park in Croatia, there are still quarantined areas within 150 meters of the 'main' road to Gracac. If you need to stop and take a dump in nature (few places to do it otherwise there), you better know the words for "Danger Mines."

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Bosnia and parts of Croatia. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Wow. That'd be a horrible way to go.

      Turd hits ground, and then... turd triggers mine. Ouch

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  105. The USA still supports the use of landmines by djmurdoch · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article states

    The use of land mines was outlawed in the 1997 Ottawa Convention and more than 90 countries committed themselves last year to cleaning up the debris of war to reduce the number of civilian casualties from munitions left by armed conflicts.

    However, the USA was not a signatory to this treaty as of 2002, according to this web page. Apparently there were plans to sign in 2006, but the landmine-lovers were working to change those. Has anything changed?

    There aren't many other countries that were both democratic and non-signatories: Finland, India, Israel, Korea, Russia, Turkey (but the democracy of some of those might be questionable). The entire "Axis of Evil" made the list, though.

    1. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We agreed to sign it if we got an exception for the DMZ in Korea, and somewhere else. They wouldnt give it, so we wouldnt sign

    2. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Mox-Dragon · · Score: 1

      that's an odd list of countries... or rather, one of the countries on the list is odd.

      India, Israel, Korea, Russia, Turkey

      alright, all countries that have had problems with terrorism in recent years (Israel, Russa, India, Turkey) or a country that's just nuts (I'm assuming Korea = N. Korea).

      But what the hell does Finland want with land mines?

    3. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by BlueEyes_Austin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US requested permission to use on the DMZ in North Korea and at G'Bay. When this was not granted, the US walked.

    4. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The US military has an issue with getting rid of landmines. North Korea. The entire defense of South Korea weighs heavily on the use of landmines (both anti-personnel and anti-tank).

      The US does, however, clean up areas that it's mined once it's done with them. I doubt it's a perfect job, but it's considerably better than the vast number of military forces that use mines and don't clean them up (which is where the issue has come from).

      If anyone can suggest an equally effective deterrent to invasion that requires an equal amount of manpower, I'm sure the US Army would like to hear about it.

      It's not an issue of "landmine lovers", it's an issue of doing protection in an effective manner. (Which, BTW, is the condition on signing in 2006... AFAIK, nobody has stepped up to the plate). I haven't found any reports of the US using landmines anywhere else -- including Iraq -- since 1997 (the mines at Guantanamo were removed in 1999). They did stockpile them, but they apparantly weren't used. The US has not sold landmines internationally since 1993.

      BTW, you missed Pakistan, Georgia, Belarus, Egypt, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Mongolia (parliamentary - very much questionable), Morocco (constitutional monarchy; similar to the UK's), Nepal, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Tuvalu. All have some form of representive government along the lines of a republic or democracy (no, the US is not a democracy -- it's a republic). Between those and the ones you listed, it's about a third of the list. Admittedly, some of the countries on the (full) list probably just haven't bothered -- particularly Tuvalu and Tonga.

    5. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But what the hell does Finland want with land mines?

      They share a land border with Russia. I guess all those invasions over the last couple of centuries have made them extra careful.

    6. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by CSharpMinor · · Score: 1

      The US relies heavily (entirely?) on "terminator" mines that deactivate themselves after a certain period of time, say a few days or months. They started this in Vietnam so that they wouldn't have to worry about clearing their own minefields.

      It doesn't make them totally safe, but it still eliminates 90% of the danger associated with landmines.

      --

      Whatever it is I'm complaining about, I'm sure the Republicans did it. This is /., after all.
    7. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This gun was considered a possible replacement to the land mine situation in the DMZ. Don't know what's been developing with it since I saw it on /. 2 years ago.

    8. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by globalar · · Score: 1

      The landmines in the DMZ between North/South Korea was one reason that the USA declined to join the accords. However, I have heard that South Korea is under control of the landmines and is actively removing them.

      The USA is still out of the banning treaty of course, and the Pentagon has srecommended that this remain the case.

      You can find the USA's ICBL status for 2003 here.

      Many countries' status can be viewed at ICBL.org.

    9. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The solution is not necessarily to stop using landmines, which are still a very useful munition. The solution is to come up with some way to reliably locate them again later. I suggest a high-power secure RFID, where the mines won't send out an ID (and thus a location to anyone triangulating them) unless you send them the right code. This way, everybody wins, and it should be possible with off the shelf technology, for little money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone can suggest an equally effective deterrent to invasion that requires an equal amount of manpower, I'm sure the US Army would like to hear about it.

      How about clones of the goatse guy "standing guard" along the border?

    11. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone can suggest an equally effective deterrent to invasion that requires an equal amount of manpower, I'm sure the US Army would like to hear about it.

      Except now these flowers will make landmines less useful for deterring invasion. Anything that can be put off for a year can bypass the mines.

      And this is one place where you would MUCH rather have false positives than false negatives.

      (no, the US is not a democracy -- it's a republic)

      It's a democratic republic. Not that it matters much, a democracy this size would never get anything done.

    12. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      If anyone can suggest an equally effective deterrent to invasion that requires an equal amount of manpower, I'm sure the US Army would like to hear about it.

      Easy -- use seismic and optical motion detectors. Once the trigger goes off, surveilance cameras can check it out. Send personel that are already at the border. Sort of like what's already being done at the US-Mexico border.

    13. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by bleak+sky · · Score: 1

      Sort of like what's already being done at the US-Mexico border.

      Because that has been really effective over the years...

    14. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      I think the real issue is that removing 1 million landmines is cost prohibitive.

    15. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by jackbird · · Score: 1

      How is knowing you're being invaded a deterrent to invasion?

      "Hey! You in the tank! I see you!"

    16. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by refactored · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope, that is the stated reason. The real reason is the yanks just love their cluster munitions. They feel they really have the edge on the world with them.

    17. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would this stop a large scale invasion? I mean nowing people are coming is one thing, but stopping invasions is the goal. People probable cross the border all the time. The thing is the trails they use cann't be used by a large army because they would need a road. The Land mines are the best/most relible way. Automated guns would be an other but then the enemy might find out about blind spots in the defense. Of course mines could be detenated with the use of large scale explosives, but this would make it hard to traverse the ground and it would take a lot of resources to clear enough holes to start a succesful invasion. So to reiterate, the mines are to stop/slow an invasation not to smugglers and people flewing North Korea.

    18. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need for the US - Mexican border is one of those falling walls from Mario 3. If you can't run fast enough, you get squished by the spikes.

    19. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what the hell does Finland want with land mines?

      Duh! Landmines its for your neighbors! (not terrorists).

      And in the case of Finland, well they did SUCH a good job last time that you'll notice that the Swedes don't need to worry about landmines.

      http://www.winterwar.com/

    20. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Agreed... and I did mean to mention that in my post. After a tad more research it looks like cluster munitions might be covered by the treaty as well, which would be a significant problem for the US military.

      That said, other countries which have signed the landmine treaty still use cluster munitions. Notably, the UK.

      You'd think that with as much money as is spent on munitions, they could use a fuse/timer that reliably detonates every single cluster...

    21. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      How is knowing you're being invaded a deterrent to invasion? "Hey! You in the tank! I see you!"

      Because it's "Hey, you in the tank, did you see my anti tank missle before it hit you?!"

      Troops stop invasions. Mines only slow down or at best channel the attacker. If the military could somehow magically learn where were the enemy troops were all the time and what they were doing, they'd gladly give up all the anti personell mines in the world.

      Anti vehicle mines actually have more of a tactical value, but they're not that much of a problem after the war, being bigger and not that easy to set of, so no-one's asking for them to be handed over yet.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    22. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Woodie · · Score: 1

      Actually they have those - developed during the end of the Vietnam war. Basically the problem was that you might mine an area that you'd have to travel thru in the next couple of days... So they put a little digital watch timer into the mines and you can set when to disarm the mine. They're pretty effective too.

      Unfortunately they're also more expensive, making it likely that the only people using them will be the US Military, or other militaries from advanced, wealthy nations. Most 3rd world nations want mines as a permanent defense along the border, not as a deployable, temporary control of a battle front.

      90 nations signed on, what about the other 140!

    23. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      The US does, however, clean up areas that it's mined once it's done with them. I doubt it's a perfect job, but it's considerably better than the vast number of military forces that use mines and don't clean them up (which is where the issue has come from).

      The problem is one of economy. It cost about $10 to $20 to lay an anti personell mine, and can cost as much as $800 to clear one. Hence any nation the US included can easily put itself into a position where they simply cannot afford to 'clean up after themselves'. That the US want to keep the mines on the South Korean border has little to do with staving off an invasion (anti vehicle mines have a role to play, but anti personell doesn't really give pause). Granted, if you've saved the mine charts and the mines haven't shifted too much you're not going to spend the full $800 but it's still considerably more expensive to clear than to lay.

      Troops stop invasions, mines give troops time to react but will not hinder a determined foe much, especially in a place like the Korean border where the mine fields are clearly marked. Command detonated AP mines, that aren't part of the treaty, could serve just as well with a small increase in the manpower needed to operate them.

      AP mines don't kill infantry. Artillery kills infantry. Mines will at their very best make the aiming a little easier. Remote sensing equipment could work just as well. And the detection capabilities that mines provide can easily be replaced e.g. with buried fiber optics.

      P.S. And tell the Vietnameese and the Cambodians that the US always cleans up areas that it's mined once it's done with them and you'll get a right bloody laugh in you face. Unless they have first hand experience in which case they may bloody your nose instead.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    24. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Talking about cluster munitions at this point, not landmines... the US has been using self-terminating mines for sometime now. It's a helluva lot cheaper than actually clearing the field afterwards.

      90 nations signed on, what about the other 140!

      Huh? According to this official page there are 150 countries on board, one way or another. There's only 44 holdouts still (as of last October).

    25. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Argh... forgot to close the quote on the link.

      Here is the link I was talking about.

    26. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by spronk · · Score: 1

      No the real issue is that sensors aren't a deterrent. Having half you army blown to hell before you ever get to fire a shot IS.

    27. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by John_Schmidt · · Score: 1

      Actually, they use those also. N.Korea has been mining tunnels under the DMZ for years.

  106. How reliable are these flowers? by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    If there's one thing worse than a field full mines, it's a minefield that everyone thinks is clear...

    Story is light on detail.

    1. How close does a flower have to be to the mine?
    2. Do mines reliably release what the plant looks for?
    3. How hard is it to keep the flowers alive? Does their performance depend on them growing a certain amount?
    A few questions that come to mind straight away. Presumably the company is thinking about these things but it's early to say yet. Also, this is for use on farmland, which makes more sense.
    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  107. A better interface by AdamG · · Score: 1

    They should make a flower like a dandelion that disintegrates when you touch it. All of its neighbors that aren't on top of landmines should also disintegrate, leaving behind on the ground a number indicating the number of their neighbors who are growing on top of land mines.

  108. Don't walk on the grass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nor smoke it !

  109. Frank sez by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 1
    It's like Frank Zappa said:

    Watch out where the huskies go, and don't you eat that yellow snow

  110. What man did next by dukeinlondon · · Score: 1

    Was create a mine that doesn't evaporate that perticular gaz.... or any gaz at all !

  111. Fools! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    They spend all that time breeding a plant that changes color in the presence of NO2!!!

    Dropping a load of superballs from 30,000 feet would resolve the problem immediatly!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Fools! by escher · · Score: 1

      And then all those kids would have something safe to play with!

  112. Genetically engineered pot plants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why can't the scientists do something more fruitful like genetically altering like daisies or ferns to make THC? Wouldn't you wanna smoke a fern? Or a daisy? That's how we get it legalized. They won't know what it is! WOOHOO!!!

    Free pot for everybody!!!!

    Brought to you by the Gay Nigga Pot Smokers

  113. Minesweeper Flowers by slstickle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will these flowers be genetically engineered to have numbers on them, indicating how many mines are growing in the plots next to them?

    1. Re:Minesweeper Flowers by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Hey Bob! Is something wrong? You have a strange look on your face.

      Yeah, kinda. This flower I just stepped on says "8".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  114. What about people by benzapp · · Score: 1

    There are billions of people in these third world countries, there most certainly aren't billions of landmines. Just round up an, make 'em walk and finish the job once and for all.

    This sounds like a cheap and inexpensive way to deal with our tremendous overpopulation problem.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  115. Uh-oh! by rasafras · · Score: 1

    It seems to me like the background of their website could use some mine-clearing! Watch where you click, kiddies!

  116. Read some other articles by AoT · · Score: 1

    The monsanto plants have a nasty tendency to cross polinate with local plants. Of course when this happens Monsanto is nice enough to sue the farmers whose fields have been infested. Yay for gene patents.

    1. Re:Read some other articles by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read about one of those cases. Monsanto sucks the BIG one.

      They are a perfect example of a Big Bully Corporation. There was a recent case against a small dairy. The dairy (a co-op arrangement, nice folks) labeled their milk as having come from non-rgbh treated cows. They did not say that rgbh (recombinant bovine growth hormone) was bad, they simply stated that they did not use it. Monsanto sued them to force a label change. Thankfully Ralph Nader and his lawyers came to their aid, they didn't have the resources to fight it on their own. I think it is still an ongoing case.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  117. False negatives by Cap'nMike · · Score: 1

    This is an interesting technology but not something that I personally would rely on. The consequences of a few false negatives would be disasterous. Just because that field planted with mine detecting weeds is filled with flowers of only one colour doesn't mean that there are no mines out there.

    --
    Celebrities are like ads, if we all ignore them, they'll just go away.
    1. Re:False negatives by Cap'nMike · · Score: 1

      Oops, thought the first one didn't go through.

      --
      Celebrities are like ads, if we all ignore them, they'll just go away.
  118. Re:That is INSANE. by Hentai · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who are curious, here is a picture of the little guy in bloom - presumably, the entire plant turns red (stem and all) in the presence of NO2, not just the flowers.

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  119. Planting... by bmorris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a swell idea, so long as I don't have be the guy that walks throught the field and plants the seeds...

  120. marketed by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  121. Ditched minesweeper? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    I heard that the US Government paid Microsoft millions of dollars to have them include copies of minesweeper.

    Yeah, seems like a harmless game, but rumor has it if you win 100 times in a row you'll be contacted by a secret agent and whisked away to an underground weapons training facility where they send you out on various missions across the world dismantling the existing mines.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  122. Even before that... by diersing · · Score: 1
    How do you plant these flowers on top of mines without blasting yourself? Some sort of airbourne delivery?

    You'd think with an expensive plant seed you'd want to target areas that mines are suspected, not all of Europe. Great idea tho, finally a true innovation.

    1. Re:Even before that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, obviously, if you knew where the mines were you wouldn't need to plant the flowers on them in the first place. You spread the seeds of this flower over a minefield from the air, then you can easily find the mines and disarm them in a couple of months.

  123. False negatives by Cap'nMike · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't trust my life to these. Just because they are planted in a mined area does not mean that they detect all the mines out there. In this case, the consequenses of a false negative result is devastating. Just because all the genetically modified flowers are one colour, don't go into the field.

    --
    Celebrities are like ads, if we all ignore them, they'll just go away.
  124. Roses are blue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roses are blue,
    Violets are red,
    Step on these flowers,
    and you'll be maimed or dead

  125. Flower Detects Lies, Lying Liars :+1, Patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Eventually, some patriotic genetic engineers will build a flower that will change color after hearing Top Government Officals perjure themselves.

    Thanks and a have propaganda-filled week,
    Kilgore Trout

  126. How it is planted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way the explaind it on a danish news channel, was that, the mine people first clear a path, then a truck/car sprays the weeds to each side. As far as I recall it was many meters that it could trow.

  127. SCO needs 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCO's security team just purchased a truckload.

  128. Mine Disposal by chadjg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm no EOD tech, but maybe finding the little buggers is 98% of the problem. Once they are found a person could either just mark and leave them in place or blow them up.

    Once the weeds mark the mines, a rich villager could call in the army or police and they will lay a few dollars worth of detonating cord next to the mines and clear the field at 20,000 feet per second. Or the army guy could sit back and take shots at the mines from beyond the minimum safe difference.

    The poorer and/or depressed villager could tie a rope onto a chunk of tree or a rock, heave the weight on the other side fo the marked area, get behind a tree and then give the rope a good pull.

    Obviously these methods have problems. both would leave a lot of fragments flying around, and are not exactly risk free for the person doing the job.

    Call me a cruel, heartless bastard, but this isn't oing to be a problem. All you have to do is tell the villagers to stay away from a certain area while the work is being done. Anybody that forgets or doesn't get the news is just gonna be SOL. If a hut gets a bunch of fragments thrown thru it, then they will have to spend a day repairing it. No big deal.

    From what I've been able to pick up, a few flying chunks of metal is not going to be real high on the worry list for people that have land mine problems. Waking up is a bigger risk. Getting enough food, not getting some god-awful tropical disease or not pissing off the latest dictator is going to fill their worry bin.

    Most countries that have real land mine issues are desperately poor and need something like these plants just to cut down on their chances of having their kids legs blown off. Rich countries can solve their problems with robotics and large amounts of beer for their off duty ordinance techs.

    Right or wrong, certainty is for rich countries. Bravo to these scientists.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  129. Just make sure by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    to distribute a lot of NO2 when you lay your mines.

  130. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by operagost · · Score: 1

    Irony - using Agent Orange to perform the deforestation.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  131. Problems by Kallahar · · Score: 1

    One problem with this approach is that while the plants may detect some of the mines, that's no guarantee that the plants didn't miss any. Say a mine field has 10,000 mines. You put down a bunch of seeds, and they detect 9,000 of them. While your odds of stepping on a mine have dropped substantially, there's still 1000 mines out there that you don't know you missed. The area would still need to be cleared by traditional means for it to be truely safe.

    1. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and you've just made the job 90% less dangerous for the minesweepers by identifying 90% of the mines before they lay a foot on the field.

    2. Re:Problems by valkraider · · Score: 1

      How is Minesweeper dangerous... Carpel Tunnel?

  132. They come as bulbs by NoseBag · · Score: 1

    and you just walk out into the field and dig
    a small hole and...uh...wait a minute...
    Um...

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  133. Now we need some biotech bacteria by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    that digest high explosives & black powder to make the world a safer place.

    Until someone comes up with workable laser or gauss rifles...

    *sigh*

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  134. Re:Yes, but... GM Morons by saskboy · · Score: 1

    If we can genetically modify plants not to make seeds, how long will it be before we can GM Idiots so they don't breed either?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  135. Nooooo... don't do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to know who's going to plant the seeds in the ground :D BOOOOOM! kidding aside, I hate the idea of deploying right now geneticaly modified organisms in the wild - they just can't be aware of ALL the repercussions or side effects that will emerge from this action. -- niker

  136. A hippie's dream come true! by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

    Weeeeeeeee! We've traded bombs for flowers! Weeeeeeeee! And after that, we can power our tanks with unicorn farts!

    ; )

  137. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by bobthemuse · · Score: 1

    If the environmentalists oppose this, if they can engineer the seeds so that the plants can't have offspring (I forget what the term is)

    Can't have offspring? But how will we get plants to read Slashdot?

  138. Genetically engineered anti-mine weeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until the US--which isn't a signatory to the Mine Ban Treaty--has this flower classified as a bioweapon?

  139. This is useless... by killfixx · · Score: 1

    Any HALO (optics) plane will have the capability to scan this same patch of ground in like a 1008th of the time it takes for these things to grow...

    Seriously...it would take what a week for these plants to bloom? At least!!

    It would take a HALO plane to 10 minutes to pick these things out with a deep penetrating sound scan...

    It would be just as cost effective because the plane is already in the vicinity since the area in question would already be under surveilance...

    Waste of time and money!

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
  140. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >RTFA...

    This is slashdot. That would take all the fun away from all these "experts" that glance at the summary and make all kinds of wrong assumptions about what the story might be about and then post authoritative/speculative garbage about things that are covered in the article in the first place.

  141. Great - now you don't even need to buy landmines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...all you need is a few bags of NO2-heavy debris sprinkled in the surrounding meadows.

  142. Will they grow in desserts? by Stone316 · · Score: 1

    Ie, from what I have seen of Afganistan on TV it looks to be a very dry place... I guess you can plant the seeds via a plane but they are goign to have to follow them with water bombers twice daily!

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Will they grow in desserts? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will they grow in desserts?

      They'll grow in cake and fresh pie, but they won't grow so well in cold climates such as ice cream.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  143. In other news... by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

    In other news.. Genetically Modified Flower Detects Weapons of Mass Destruction!

    --
    Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
  144. Re:Yes, but... GM Morons by stephanruby · · Score: 1
    If we can genetically modify plants not to make seeds, how long will it be before we can GM Idiots so they don't breed either?

    No need for genetic engineering, Slashdot takes care of that. The couple of guys that can reproduce depite Slashdot and the presence of shiny new things are the smart ones.

  145. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by boredMDer · · Score: 1

    Humor, but whatever works.

  146. Re:Yes, but... GM Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually there's an easy way to stop morons from breeding - just go to a polling place, and if they vote for liberal democrats, then castrate them.

  147. Divide and Conquer... by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    This will tie up the crazy anti GM activist with fighting the crazy anti mine activists, and leave sane people free to go about their lives.

    Love it!

  148. Simpler non-GE solution by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    Drop cannabis seeds all over the area....the mines will become apparent as the local stoners try and harvest the crop :-)

    -psy

  149. A cool, sad future.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    If this isn't poetic/postapocoliptic I don't know what is. Truth, always stranger then fiction.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  150. yeah but... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Just let some sheep loose in the field.
    They'll find the land mines and they're non-GM.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just let some sheep loose in the field.

      Sheep?

      Look, we're spending all this money slaughtering mad cows. Why not put them to use by grazing them in minefields?

  151. This was modded insightful and not funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elton John will write a song about it, too. :-P

  152. Now that's Flower Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You plant landmines, we plant flowers.

  153. when interviewed, the plant said: by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    "FEED ME!"

    Reporters backed away quickly...

  154. A Naturally Untenable Position... by driftwood · · Score: 1

    All I could focus on while reading this article was "What would flash through the mind of the flowers as they turned red?"

    "Oh no, Not again."

    --
    Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?
  155. company officials quoted on other products by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    "We're also working on military applications of tomatoes. These tomatoes are really killer!"

  156. This is not done to be nice by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    They do say the plants are modified to be genetically infertile and unable to spread their own seeds.

    Note that this is not done to be nice to the environment.

    It is done so that anyone using this must pay for each flower seed, rather than simply scattering a bunch of seeds and letting them grow and reproduce.

    1. Re:This is not done to be nice by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's like DRM for plants!

      Does it come with a EULA saying you're only allowed to plant the seeds that you payed for, and you can't give them to your friends?

  157. Can we say... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

    ...false sense of security?

  158. fire != agent orange by Major_Small · · Score: 1

    I didn't say agent orange, did I? I was thinking more about starting fires around the perimiter and letting them burn inwards until there's nothing left.

  159. Link please? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Can you back this up with proof? I'm quite dubious that the US sends more soldiers out after wars to clean up its old mine fields.

    1. Re:Link please? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Do a search for:

      UXO cleanup site:army.mil

      The army seems to take unexploded ordinance (UXO) very seriously. They almost have to, they can't risk the tons of bad press, with the insane levels of funding they get.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Link please? by plugger · · Score: 1

      Good to see they've got their priorities right. Their search tool only brought up one other reference to Iraq, concerning assessment of bomb damage last May.

  160. what about the poppies? by commodore_barney · · Score: 1

    now if they can get the "poppies, row on row," in Flander's fields, to do the same! (or do they turn red to detect... blood?)

  161. 3 to 6 weeks?? by ADRenalyn · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am missing a valid point to these flowers... (I agree that is it definitely cool that an organic life form can inherently detect chemicals and display a warning) ...But isn't that a bit long to wait?

    I would suspect that there are better ways to detect mines. Any military personnel, or nerds posing as such want to explain some of the alternatives, and why these flowers might be better?

    1. Re:3 to 6 weeks?? by steptoe6125 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3 to 6 weeks is not a long time considering that many countries have spent upwards of 10 years trying to mitigate their existing landmine problem.

    2. Re:3 to 6 weeks?? by tricops · · Score: 1

      Of course, you have to wonder at the accuracy of this method as well. At a
      glance I didn't notice anything in the article about that. I'm sure they do change
      color when they detect the chemical, but what density of the weeds would actually
      be needed to find the majority/all of the landmines? And do the landmines always
      leak the chemicals, or are some sealed better than others?

      Still, I suppose looking for red flowers combined with an existing method would be
      somewhat safer and more efficient than the way its done now.

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  162. No fast & the furious jokes yet??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Detects NOZ!

  163. I find this very poetic by Dynamus · · Score: 1

    But maybe its me today only...

  164. Not daisies I hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or they'll have to send in the daisy-cutters to trim them back when they get too long.

  165. I can see it now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Captain: Company, halt!! This empty stretch of land looks a bit suspicious. Soldier: Want me to call in the plants, Sir? Captain: Aye, soldier. Alright, men, let's rig up some form of irrigation so we can water these babies. Soldiers: Yes, sir! Captain: Johnson, you still have that deck of playing cards? We are going to be here a while... -- 3 to 6 weeks later -- Soldier: Sir, it looks clear. No red flowers. Captain: Oh well, guess I was wrong. Foward, march!

  166. PETA by tacokill · · Score: 1

    No, but then you have to worry about the PETA people. Frankly, I don't know know which on is worse...

    1. Re:PETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when the PETA people run out to save the birds, you'll find a few more mines!

    2. Re:PETA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. and a few less PETA people. Everybody wins!

      Posting AC because I feel dirty saying this ;)

  167. Obligatory... by mog007 · · Score: 0

    Well, I for one welcome our new plant overlords.

    What? What do you mean they're helping us?! That's absurd!

  168. Why Genetically Modified? by bay43270 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as your spreading seed by airplane, just use bird seed... let the birds find the mines!

    1. Re:Why Genetically Modified? by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

      yes! heck, just throw a bunch of earthworms out there... just as cheap, and probably more enticing for the birds. plus, that would make a great friday-evening family bonding time!

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
  169. Inspector Fescue by Sanksa+Wott · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think some of those weed genes were around when I was a kid in my parents yard.

    But the ones at my parents house only detected dog poop and septic tanks. And they changed the grass from its natural beige color to strange dark-green hue. :)

  170. Good fences... by tacokill · · Score: 1

    (flamesuit on)
    Sometimes good fences make good neighbors. While I detest landmines, not everyone plays by "rules" of warfare and sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do to keep the other guys on their side.

    Warfare is a terrible, bloody, and cruel business. Deal with it.

    Personally, if I have to chose which side I am on, well, count me with the side that uses ALL of it's resources to win -- at all costs -- because I assure you, that is *exactly* what the other guys are doing.

    1. Re:Good fences... by arose · · Score: 1

      So you choose... both sides!?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  171. nothing really new by TheChromedAccountant · · Score: 1

    afaik some ingredients of landmines are known to support the growth of Grass and Flowers. You may have noticed that in many action movies the people build explosives from fertilisers *g* ;) Regards, TheChromedAccountant

    --
    nothing personal, just business.
    1. Re:nothing really new by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Nitrates make good fertiliser, and they also make good explosives. There is some overlap, but not all fertilisers are explosive, and not all explosives are fertiliser.

      The common one is ammonium nitrate. When mixed with diesel, this is a bulk mining explosive called "Ampho". This material on it's own will barely burn, but when used with a detonator, the whole mixture breaks down and becomes high explosive.

  172. Deadly gardens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an array of color. This has to be the coolest invention of 2004 and it's still January. This shows you what hope we really have to gain for the rest of the year.

  173. In Quebec City by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People still find unexploded cannonballs in their backyards dating back to the British/French colonial war.

    They just use metal detectors though.

    1. Re:In Quebec City by kgroves · · Score: 1

      People still find unexploded cannonballs....

      Unexploded cannonballs?

      --
      *thwock!* *groan* *crash* A horrible roar fills the cave, and you realize, with a smile....
  174. Never work? by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    I haven't read about the technology but I would think that this would never work. I mean if some dude is out there planting plants/flowers right where the mine is chances are he's going to set it off. Right?

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  175. On landmines and 'resolution' by Rational+Nerd · · Score: 1

    Landmines are considerably smaller than 2 ft. The air delivered anti-personnel mines are more like 3 inches across. I believe this is the type that is the biggest maimer/killer.

    The resolution observation is interesting and valid. Precisely locating the mines would require a dense flower pattern. But it you just need to give the EOD team a general place to look, then a bigger spread is ok.

  176. Blanket Statements by sjbrown · · Score: 1

    So all genetically modified plants are a good thing?

    Have you heard of the "Roundup Ready" GM corn plants? Basically their purpose is to allow farmers to pour more pesticide on their crop (think about effects to soil and water), and to "lock in" customers.

    Furthermore, farmers who develop Organic Certified crops have their livelihoods threatened/destroyed when a GM crop moves in next door.

    Monsanto's Roundup-Ready Canola

  177. One more thing by InsaneCreator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Small print: you need to plow the minefield first.

  178. Too bad Europe can't use them... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Since GM bioproducts are forbidden for use there.

    Oh, yeah, and many African countries can't use them, since the EU has blackmailed them into similarly refusing GM or have their agri products blackballed.

    Sorry!

    --
    -Styopa
  179. Proofread please!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The genetically modified weed that has been coded to change color when its roots come in contact with nitrogen-dioxide (NO2) evaporating from explosives buried in soil.


    This is a sentence fragment. Good thing we have editors to fix these problems!
  180. A good use for a geneticaly modified organism? by sllim · · Score: 1

    I thought anything geneticaly modified was categoricaly bad?!?!?!

    I thought geneticaly modifying plants could cause evil things, things that were so evil they were not worth feeding poor people in third world countries???

    Is this an episode of the Twilight Zone?

    (cynicism provided by a dude that thinks that geneticaly modified food stuff is getting bad rap by a bunch of commie wackos)

  181. correction by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    *despite

  182. Frogs by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    the plant is infertile, so it won't spread into unwanted areas.

    You haven't seen Jurassic Park huh? ;-)

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  183. Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What if the had genetically modified flowers to turn colors when on top of oil or coal deposits? Would you guys still approve?

  184. Will this change attitudes in Eu towards biotech? by Man_Holmes · · Score: 1, Troll

    What is even more amazing is that this breakthrough comes from Europe where scientists working in biotech seed are treated like common criminals and frequently have their research plots destroyed by enviro-terrorists.

    Begs the question whether Paul and Heather McCartney will now finally have something good to say about biotech seed?

    Will European politicians who urged African nations to reject donations of biotech grain from the US to feed their starving people actually recommend the use of this plant?

    Man Holmes

  185. Its never going to work in combat by AmericaHater · · Score: 1
    Before your troops can storm over the border you have to wait 12 months for the flowers to grow. And they'll spot them and the flowers way before that.

    Sheesh, all those PhD's and they haven't spotted that - dumb.
    they should have hired a smart guy like me for the team.

    1. Re:Its never going to work in combat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the story and it will tell you that the flowers work in 3-6 weeks.

      The flowers aren't going to be used to clear minefields by troops, but to clean up the detris of war.

      American troops keep records of where they lay mines so they can be safely disabled. The armies of the third world do not. So the mines keep killing for years.

  186. Good, good, good!!! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 4, Informative

    My family lives in Cambodia (both NGO workers), one of the most mined countries on earth.

    Kids still die everyday because they step on landmines. There are anti tank mines, that will kill you, antipersonal mines, that will cripple you, and UXO (unexploded ordnance) that can do about anything.

    You go to the market in certain places in Cambodia, and you see that almost 10% (no kidding) of the population is crippled, one or both legs missing, sometimes an arm... Shit.

    Worse: Cambodia has huge monsoon rains, and the floods eventually transform into torrents. So the mines MOVE with time. So there you are, happily walking on a path that has been un-mined last year, and BOOM, the rain had brought a mine right there. Scary.

    Even worse. Sometimes UXO (more rarely, mines) go right into the city, because of some construction site that uses sand dug from out of the city, and that has UXO's inside (rare, but it happened to one of our friends doing construction for his NGO).

    Anything that can be used in demining should be. You might think that demining mostly occurs in rice fields and stuff but no, in some remote places over there, they have to clear villages *house by house*, garden by garden. There are still millions (litteraly) of landdmines scattered everywhere, and even though the foreign demining teams, and the Cambodians they have trained, do a great job, it never will be enough.

    Still, Cambodia is one of the most beautiful countries on earth. Now, most touristic-and-not-so-touristic places are safe, so go there, but stay away from anywhere the locals tell you to NOT go.

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    1. Re:Good, good, good!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, does your sig have anything to do with your post?

    2. Re:Good, good, good!!! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1


      Heheh :)) Hadn't noticed!

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  187. Poetic and all, but... by danharan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The company "hopes to have a prototype ready for use within a few years". Vaporware?

    Also, are there real cost advantages to use that over, say, little rovers with metal detectors? What percentage of the cost of clearing landmines is spent on detection?

    And, as many people have mentionned already, there are a few places with desert conditions where this approach won't be useful.

    While this is nice technology (and they at least took care to make the plants infertile, which is great), I don't know if it will have any practical applications. In the meantime, I suggest either badgering your gummint to fund clean up efforts and/or donating to NGOs that are de-mining.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  188. Spelling & Links by chadjg · · Score: 1

    "but this isn't oing to be a problem"
    Should have cought this, sorry. Here are some links:

    U.N.-centric place to start.

    A few black & white pics

    Field manual references

    From what i'm seeing on the links, manual de-mining is still the gold standard, but an accident will happen for about every 2000 mines destroyed. That sucks, and there can't be that many people that have the skills and balls to do that work. These marking weeds may have to be better than waiting for a charity de-mining!

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    1. Re:Spelling & Links by chadjg · · Score: 1

      I can't spell today. Sorry.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  189. Something different by physicsboy500 · · Score: 1

    "you pick the blue flower, the story ends, you wake up tomorrow thinking I have a pretty flower, you pick the red flower, you go to wonderland, and you see how deep the rabbit hole blows."

    "hold onto your seats, cause Kansas, is going bye bye!"

    --
    The original generic sig.
  190. Genetically modified WEED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The genetically modified weed that has been coded to change color when its roots come in contact with nitrogen-dioxide Wait, wait, is this the same weed I had last weekend? Cuz I swear that I could detect NO2 as well. Maybe it was just me. . . If not, how can I get some?

  191. probably depends on the compounds by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most fertilizer is some kind of nitrate (NO3)... ammonium nitrate, etc. High explosives, such as the type commonly used in munitions, are actually N02 compounds, rather than simple nitrates. The nitrates/nitrites are often used in explosives as the oxidizing agent, sometimes in an internal REDOX reaction, sometime to oxidize an additional reagent. As a fertilizer bomb example, the explosive used in the OK city bombing was basically ANFO (acronym for Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil). It's an explosive agent commonly used in mining, and has a lower brisance rating than most military explosives. Brisance refers to the shattering power of a given explosive, and has to do with the speed or rate of deflagration. ANFO is relatively slow compared to some other agents, and military explosive can be much faster: For instance, if you were a combat engineer taking down concrete bridge pilings, you'd want to take advantage of a faster agent to shatter the concrete, rather than a a slower agent that tends to "burn", rather than rapidly detonate.

    For example, Tritonol (trade name for the common explosive TNT, or 2,4,6-TrinitroToluene) is three nitro groups on a Benzene ring (a CH3 group at the number 1 position makes the base molecule Toluene, rather than conventional benzene). A certain percentage of TNT is actually DNT, since the compound deteriorates over time and loses a Nitro Group (becoming 2,4-DiNitroToluene. It takes some work to actually produce a high yield of TNT during the manufacturing process, rather than DNT... progressive deactivation of the ring occurs with addition of multiple N02 groups, though you can manipulate reaction conditions to push the reaction to completion.

    Another example would be the Picrate compounds... used during WWI. They are not used much anymore... too hazardous to handle. Picric Acid is chemically very close to TNT, except it's 2,4,6-TrinitroPhenol (think of TNT with the CH3 group exchanged for an alcohol, or OH group, making the base molecule Phenol, rather than Toluene).

    The study of high explosives is actually quite fascinating... particularly when you get into the physics of the blast waves themselves. Hang out with bomb or EOD guys if you get the chance; they're geeks with high explosives.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  192. Had to be said by Frogbert · · Score: 1

    Ever tried detecting landmines... ON WEED?

  193. Detection limits by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There are a couple of big problems with this technique that I didn't see mentioned. Right now, I genetically engineer plants for a living; before that, I used to be an explosives chemist. Yes, it's been a wacky life.

    The biggest problem will be that nitrous oxide naturally occurs in some soils; your false positive rate would be high. Moreover, as explosives rot and decay in the ground, the residue spreads out over a fairly large area. Many military bases are plagued with "pink water" from TNT leachate, for example. As a result, a single landmine might produce a fairly large disc of activity, meaning you'd still need to manually probe for the landmine. In some cases, these are nothing more than plywood boxes, which rapidly degrade when put in place in areas that receive plenty of rainfall. In war-torn areas, trying to find something like this after it has aged, even when you have a rough idea of where it might be, is still hazardous and time-consuming.

    Next to this, the biggest problem is going to be that the plant being used is not capable of growing in very dry areas, where landmines are a serious issue (Angola, Namibia, Afghanistan, etc.). Even worse are areas like Kosovo, which receive so much rainfall that the vegetation has grown up and around landmines; wet areas like this have grown trees tall enough to make detection and removal a very serious problem. Large areas are not safely traversable once one leaves pavement, much less mow so that weeds like those used to detect explosives simply won't be visible. They're not tall enough.

    There is no panacea to landmines, and although it's good to see one possibility, I doubt many people in the business of landmine removal will find this to be a useful technique, much less stake their lives on it. The folks doing the tinkering in the lab have little or no idea what it's like in the field. It is a very, very difficult problem that a lot of smart people have spent a lot of time on. And it's still not enough.

  194. The "almost" perfect bouquet by SummerMan · · Score: 1

    Now if they could hold onto the properties of the landmines, this would be perfect for that no-longer-special person in your life.

  195. Only a couple of turns by sunbeam60 · · Score: 3, Funny
    no, the US is not a democracy -- it's a republic
    Right, but it only takes a few turns with anarchy to change into a democracy so the difference is really moot. Yes, yes, I know military units now cause two unhappy citizens instead of one, but the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
    1. Re:Only a couple of turns by Alsee · · Score: 1

      it only takes a few turns with anarchy to change into a democracy
      military units now cause two unhappy citizens instead of one


      Or two turns under Bush to turn it into a dictatorship.

      Thank god the US doesn't have the Pyramids or we'd aready be toast.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  196. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Blublu · · Score: 1

    "Actually, they're called "terminator seeds"."

    [insert Arnold quote of choice here]

    --
    meh
  197. Plant flowers after the fact? by sulli · · Score: 1
    "Don't worry about the children. We can just plant these pretty flowers after the fact."

    And an enemy can plant them during the conflict and use the flowers as a countermeasure. I wonder how long it will be before North Korea gets some.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  198. How long by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    until the environmentalists go wacko over this one?

    GloFish couldn't reproduce either but that didn't stop them from getting pushed out of stores.

    DDT in small not even remotly lethal doses sprayed on houses is enough to keep malaria ridden mosquitoes at bay for months.

    That doesn't stop the evironmentalist wackos from forbidding that money be spent on DDT for that purpose. So the result is that millions are dying from malaria while a deterant is on the other side of a glass table that would buy time while a cure is developed.

    In case any of you were wondering if the human life cost benefit had anything to do with what environmentalists forbid being used in an effort to save lives.

    This will be cool as soon as they start using it. In the mean time I'm going to assume the wackos are going to pull another DDT stunt.

    Ben

    1. Re:How long by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      It may not be lethal in small doses but it makes its way into the food chain and by the time it reaches us via fish etc it is lethal. Also it kills millions of animals on the way. There are plenty of humans to go around.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  199. Not entirely unique by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

    But it is a bit different. Four years ago I was working on a project peripherally related to getting rid of landmines. There are strains of bacteria found on old World War 2 mutitions factories where bacteria have evolved the ability to take various explosive compounds such as trinitrotoluene (TNT) and metabolize them. The idea at the time was to elucidate the pathway that allowed these bacteria to do the chemistry, and engineer an organism (almost certainly bacteria) to express the pathway plus green fluorescent protein (GFP). You spray it over a minefield and you get bacteria with the ability to metabolize TNT or other explosive compounds colonizing the area around the mine and begin degrading the TNT that slowly leaks from it. The vicinity around the mine turns green from the expression of GFP (or another member of the GFP family; color of different members nearly spans the visible spectrum) making the mine visible. After the explosive material is exhausted the introduced engineered bacteria give way to the native bacteria, as the selective pressure keeping the TNT-eaters present is gone. It looks like this plant-based product is closer to practical application, however.

    Also there have been a number of plants, some engineered and some not, that have been used in various bioremediation projects. That said, this IMHO is the most elegant one I know of.

    1. Re:Not entirely unique by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

      i'm just guessing here, but would that be more expensive than making seeds? do you have any sources or info about the bacteria project?

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
  200. Once again, Notley predicts it. by Fesh · · Score: 1

    I've seen this somewhere before... Where was it...?

    Oh yeah... Right here.

    I tell ya folks, it's uncanny...

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  201. Re:Good, good, good!!! (link update) by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

    Of course the link was supposed to send you here but it apparently tripped on a html landmine, thus becoming crippled.

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  202. Video clips! This thing is a beast! by 955301 · · Score: 1

    Take a look at these live fire videos.

    Thanks for the link. I imagine you could replace a mine field with a line of lead.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    1. Re:Video clips! This thing is a beast! by gnuslov · · Score: 1

      You should look specifically at another set of videos at the metalstorm site, about what they call an "Area Denial Weapons System". It's the evolution of what's talked about in the above posts, plus sensors and other cool stuff. Very impressive, and superior to a minefield in many ways.

  203. Plant Flowers Not Mines! by Grave · · Score: 1

    Well, now we can do both.

    In all seriousness, though, this is one of the best ideas I've heard of for dealing with land mine detection and removal. Presuming the color change is visible from the air, aerial recon. photos would give engineers enough detail to know exactly where the mines are, then via GPS, locate and remove them with impressive speed.

    Of course, the article didn't say if the coloration was visible from the air or not, so that may not even be possible.

  204. Nitrogen Varies in the Soil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO2 is naturally produced as part of the nitrogen cycle. Bomb teams are going to spend a lot of time investigating last years manure droppings.

  205. Oh yeah? by radoni · · Score: 1

    well _my_ professor grows nanotubes with two bits o' string and chicken wire. none of that sissy labratory stuff.

    and his nanotubes go at least twice the speed of light. they laugh at drops of blood and eat babies.

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
    1. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice try, but MacGyver is too busy running around off-world to be your professor... unless, of course, you're a SG team cadet.

  206. Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post needs more love

  207. Real Life Mine Sweeper by LouSir · · Score: 1

    Oh my. A real life Mine Sweeper game. Thousands of flowers and only some are red. Which adjoing flower is sitting on top of a land mine. Did Microsoft patent Minesweeper ? If so, do we now have leave all the land mines where they lie ? Lou Sir

  208. When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty! by refactored · · Score: 3, Interesting
    As of 23 October 2003 the 1997 treaty banning the use, production, stockpiling, and transfer of antipersonnel landmines has been ratified or acceded to by 141 countries which are States Parties. Another 9 countries have signed but have not yet completed their ratification process, bringing the total number of countries supporting the treaty to 150. 44 Countries have not yet joined the treaty.

    1997 Mine Ban Treaty - NON SIGNATORIES

    This is the list of the 44 countries that have not signed the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty as of 23 October 2003.

    1. ARMENIA
    2. AZERBAIJAN
    3. BAHRAIN
    4. BHUTAN
    5. CHINA
    6. CUBA
    7. EGYPT
    8. ESTONIA
    9. FINLAND
    10. GEORGIA
    11. INDIA
    12. IRAN
    13. IRAQ
    14. ISRAEL
    15. KAZAKHSTAN
    16. KOREA, NORTH
    17. KOREA, SOUTH
    18. KUWAIT
    19. KYRGYZSTAN
    20. LAOS
    21. LATVIA
    22. LEBANON
    23. LIBYA
    24. MICRONESIA
    25. MONGOLIA
    26. MOROCCO
    27. MYANMAR (BURMA)
    28. NEPAL
    29. OMAN
    30. PAKISTAN
    31. PALAU
    32. PAPUA NEW GUINEA
    33. RUSSIA
    34. SAUDI ARABIA
    35. SINGAPORE
    36. SOMALIA
    37. SRI LANKA
    38. SYRIA
    39. TONGA
    40. TUVALU
    41. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
    42. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    43. UZBEKISTAN
    44. VIETNAM
    (Source International Campaign to Ban Landmines
  209. Charge the US costs by vandan · · Score: 1

    Great!
    Of course we have to now plant the thing everywhere the US has been involved in wars ( basically everywhere ) and we also have to pay the company whatever they're asking price is.

    But I'm sure the US will cough up for the costs associated with cleaning up after their inhumane use of land minds across the globe.

    1. Re:Charge the US costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, as soon as western Europe pays up for the cost of liberating it from the Nazis and defending it from the Soviets.

  210. Stop spreading them too! by vinlud · · Score: 2, Informative

    article:

    Mine Ban Treaty

    The Mine Ban Treaty obligates its participants to completely and permanently discontinue the use, production, stockpile, and transfer of antipersonnel landmines; to destroy stockpiles within four years; to clear mines within their own territories within ten years, and to provide continuing assistance to mine survivors.

    The Mine Ban Treaty, which went into effect on March 1, 1999, has been signed by nearly three quarters of the world's nations; it came into force faster than any other multi-lateral global agreement. Participants include all of the western hemisphere except the United States and Cuba, and all NATO countries except the United States and Turkey, though Turkey is in the process of acceding to the treaty. Most African nations and many Asian nations have joined the Mine Ban Treaty as well. For the full text of the Mine Ban Treaty, a list of countries that have signed, ratified, or not signed the treaty,

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
  211. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The article already states that these flowers cannot reproduce."

    Have you learned nothing from Jurassic Park!? Life will find a way! I mean, nobody wanted Jurassic Park 3 to be made, but it found a way....

  212. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by xmundt · · Score: 1

    Hum...my first thought was that they make the plants wear Birkenstocks.
    GDR
    Dave Mundt

    --
    YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
  213. I though of this years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, I invent watermelon plants who's tasty fruit changes color the closer they are to landmines and they call me history's greatest monster

    Someone does it with crabgrass and they are a humanitarian.

  214. 2 birds with 1 stone by l810c · · Score: 1

    Gather up all of the flying rats(pigeons) from all of the cities of the world. Spread grain instead of mutant flower seeds and let the birds loose.

    1. Re:2 birds with 1 stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all the pigeons in all the cities in the world are likely to produce a much higher ratio than 2:1 given the blast radii ;)

  215. Bugs? by Bega · · Score: 1

    What if the flowers have bugs in them? Perhaps they won't change color even if there's a mine beneath them. What do you say about that, when a thousand children are blown to smithereens, huh?

    --

    THIS IS THE INTERNET. PLEASE PICK UP YOUR SERIOUS BUSINESS SUIT AT THE FRONT COUNTER.
  216. Q: How do you plant them? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    A: Very carefully.

  217. I think.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we've heard this one before... Jurassic Park, anyone?

    Nature evolves. Unfortunately, some people don't.

  218. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Ancil · · Score: 2, Informative
    Can't speak for the other countries on the list, but I can tell you why the U.S. didn't sign on.

    America offered to sign this treaty. We liked this treaty. Landmines make no distinction between civilian and military personnel. They maim and kill civilians. However, the U.S. made it clear that the use of landmines within designated demilitarized zones was within the rules of war. And within what the United States considered "fair play".

    There had never been a coherent case why landmines can't be used in, for example, the DMZ between North and South Korea. There are no civilians there. No civilians would ever "blunder into" this area. In fact, it's impossible to trespass even if that's your intention . Landmines are there for the express purpose of destroying an invading army. That's the military's job: to kill enemy soldiers and armor.

    If the ICBL had acceded to this U.S. condition, we would have signed on. In fact, Clinton issued an executive order which de facto banned the use of landmines outside of declared demilitarized zones which were free of civilians. To be blunt, everywhere except the Korean DMZ.

    Has anyone got a good reason why landmines are a bad thing in such an area? They don't kill people any more dead than a machine gun would. And please skip arguments involving civilian casualties, since there aren't any civilians anywhere near the landmines. In fact, by killing soldiers in an area far from civilian populations, such landmines would certainly reduce civilian casualties in a conflict.

  219. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh. that's the reason you sell all those landmines to the third world....

    You guys are just standing up for what is right and fair

    got it , thanks

  220. Characteristics that give greater production here by Intraloper · · Score: 1

    where we have substantial mechanization of agriculture, and we use lots of fertilizer and herbicide and pesticide and supplemmental irrigation, are not necessarily the same characteristics that will give greater productivity in 3rd world agricultural systems. Not to mention that, as stated elsewhere here, there isnt a shortage of food. The US consumes about 3000 calories daily per capita. That means if we simply didnt consume the 1000 or so calories of excess food that is making so many of us fat, we could feed one person quite well for each two americans. That is food for about 125 million people, just by giving up US consumption waste and overeating. Factor in all the meat we eat, at about a 10x reduction in calories going from feed to meat, and all the fallowed land we use to keep down excess production, and the Unites States alone could take care of a several hundred million hungry people in the world while actually making our own food consumption patterns healthier

  221. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 3, Insightful


    What about AFTER the conflict? One of the main problems with landmines is that they hang around after the conflict has finished, unless they're detonated.

    But then again, it's not hard to miss just one, maybe two, especially if you aren't organised (like some non-US armies may be).

  222. The obvious response by achurch · · Score: 1

    Has anyone got a good reason why landmines are a bad thing in [demilitarized zones]?

    What happens in 20, 50, 100 years when the issues that caused the DMZ to be created have been resolved and the DMZ is eliminated? Are you just going to say "this area is off limits forever because we didn't foresee the end of hostilities"?

    1. Re:The obvious response by Alsee · · Score: 1

      What happens in 20, 50, 100 years when the ... DMZ is eliminated?

      Well, he did say the US is keeping detailed maps and always cleans up.

      On one hand mines have often been a HUGE problem where they've been scattered at random in active war zones the hopes of blowing up as much as possible. I it's not a good idea to make loopholes that might be abused. On the other hand it's pretty hard to see any actual danger from a fenced off demilitarized zone that is thoroughly mapped out and maintained trying real hard to not to let any of them blow up.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:The obvious response by refactored · · Score: 1
      Oh come on! Those mines where laid by grunt foot soldiers (probably in the dark) without GPS's. You want to risk your life on there map reading?

      Hell! Even if they GPS's and were working in broad daylight I would trust them. The average soldier I have met is bored, nafi, and couldn't give a shit.

    3. Re:The obvious response by Alsee · · Score: 1

      You want to risk your life on there map reading?

      The purpose of the maps is not to allow you to go joy-riding between them.

      A known minefield like in the Vietnam DMZ is will NOT destroy even a single vehicle or person even in the event of an attack. The sole purpose is to prevent rapid crossing. Without the mines an armored force could run across in under 4 minutes. With the mines it would take them a half-hour or more, and they would be sitting ducks crawling along in narrow corridors on enemy territory. Easy pickings.

      The removal over an unknown area of an unknown number of an unknown type of concealed anti-personel mines designed to be undetectable and is an extremely difficult and dangerous task.

      Most varieties of anti-tank mines are blatantly obvious if you walk up to one. Some varieties even stand up on tri-pods. Totally effective in destrying a tank driving along at top speed. Obvious and harmless to a person strolling along on foot looking for them.

      This minefield and these mines are nothing like what most people picture when they hear "mines" and picture a soldier or farmer walking along and unexpectedly going boom.

      The removal over a known area of a known number of known types of non-concealed anti-vehicle mines which are not designed to be undetectable is a relatively simple and pretty safe task.

      As for the detail of the maps, the mines in the DMZ are about one every 100 foot by 100 ft grid (32m by 32m). No matter how bad the maps are, there's no chance you're going to leave one behind.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  223. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've kind of got all the mines contained. Once you don't need 'em, you send a few really heavy remote sentry type vehicles through and blow 'em all up.

  224. The Best Way to Clear MineFields by Simonetta · · Score: 1


    The best way to clear mine fields is the Iranian way.

    You go to the schools and round up a whole bunch of kids.

    Then you give them all little plastic keys to heaven to wear around their necks.

    Then you get them all to wrap their arms around each other's shoulders and march them across the mine fields, all yelling 'Allah Akbar!!'.

    Then you go to their parent's houses later that evening and over a cup of tea tell them how proud they should be now their kid is in heaven.

    You don't need no jive-ass flowers...

  225. Re:That is INSANE. by s7726 · · Score: 1

    it looks like a prety frail plant, wouldn't it have been better to do it with something with much bigger leaves so it would stand out better.?

  226. Growth in a Desert? by coyotejoe76 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how successful the plant grows in desert conditions? Is it suitable for all terrains (i.e. Soggy, rice fields and all)? For the current situation in Iraq and Afganistan, I would think successful desert growth would be a priority.

  227. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Shit - If I was a Baltic state, or Finland, I certainly won't want to be denied using landmines to even the odds a bit when the Ruskies change their minds and decide they want to restore the old Glorious Russian Empire by annexing .. err reacquiring former states...

    And, somehow I think both the Indians and Pakistanis like landmines between the 2 of them.
    Makes another war harder ..

    likewise the Koreas..

    And Israeli .. well, if they would I bet they
    would love to have a lot more landmines between themselves and the rest of their neighbors..

    seriously, the only reason why the bloody brits don't care about keeping landmines is that THEY not next to anyone anymore! Surrounded by this giant frick'n moat. Don't even need landmines to protect HK against the Reds anymore.

    yup - U beat Princess Di would have been told to shut her trap had England still had their old empire.

  228. Obligatory JP reference by frogg320 · · Score: 1

    "Male-sterility can be introduced into the genetically engineered plants in order to eliminate the risk for spreading pollen. Thus, the plants developed by Aresa neither germinate nor set seeds unless..." I can see the headlines now: everything was going well until some of the plants, which had some frog genes, randomly changed sexes and they began to spread uncontrollably, eating people as they went.

  229. Hippies were on to something... by Robotbeat · · Score: 1

    So, maybe flowers don't stop guns... at least they can stop landmines.

    And although it's faster and safer to plant the seeds by plane, we could get rid of both the hippies AND the landmines if we told them they had to plant each seed by hand. Hippies don't work often, but you know how much they like flowers!

    1. Re:Hippies were on to something... by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      I like to think of myself as a hippie. I definately have hippie values yet here I am sitting at my desk at work.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    2. Re:Hippies were on to something... by Robotbeat · · Score: 1

      It's a joke, not an attack.

    3. Re:Hippies were on to something... by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      sorry. just over the whole hippie=unemployed bum thing.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  230. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Crolis · · Score: 1

    Land mines are a highly effective defensive tool. They delay enemy forces, and allow the defender to canalize enemy within well defended areas.

    The United States militery, upon laying a mine field, properly marks and maps the location of each mine. When a field needs to be decommissioned, we can go back and recover all of the munitions.

    Other countries do not properly mark minefields (Soviet Union in Afganistan for example) or decommission them when hostilites are ended.

    Also, the Constitution of the United States will not technically allow us to sign a treaty that weakens the ability of us to defend ourselves if needed. This is why we withdrew from the obsolete ABM treaty with the non-existant Soviet Union.

    The restrictions against building an missile defense system cannot remain when set against our law that requires our number one priority to be the defense of the United States.

    The stories you hear of children and adults being maimed or killed by land mines are tragic, I agree, and I'd be supportive of eliminating the export/sale of landmines from the US, but most of the issue isn't with US minefields.

    Not to mention the fact that many of the signatories to this "treaty" will break their word as soon as it is in their interest to do so. Nor does it stop certain countries that have signed up from selling munitions (France, etc.)

    -Crolis

  231. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I understand why Finland is on the list. Just look at border between us and our big neighbour.

    Another thing... How will those flower work for example in Western Sahara which is mostly hot desert or in Afganistan where there is only rocky mountains and no soil to grow anything? This flower thing may solve the mine problem in quite limited area where land mines are problem.

    --
    I don't time have to register to all these sites. :-)

  232. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by instarx · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is great spin, and is true as far as it goes, but the REAL reason the US has not signed the treaty is that we are the world's largest exporter of arms, and banning mines would cost US companies MILLIONS of dollars yearly.

  233. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by instarx · · Score: 1

    Also, the Constitution of the United States will not technically allow us to sign a treaty that weakens the ability of us to defend ourselves if needed.

    I've read the Constitution, and I must have missed that part. But it is a moot point anyway. I can easily make the case that the US military would be stronger if there were no mines - not weaker. Mines are the poor man's fortifications. A strong military force can be held at bay by a much weaker force that employs land mines. Since the US has the strongest military in the world by far, the presence of land mines can only have an overall negative impact on the effectiveness of our military. It's simple logic.

  234. That's so cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...now all we need to do, is spread genetically engineered biomass all over the world, and hope we got it right so it doesn't totally screw up the eco-system.

    If I get this right, we fly in and dump seeds across a field, wait a month or two and go out to pick up the mines? No? They're just there to warn the children? Ok, so when the flowers die, we have to charter another plane to plant new ones? Sounds kind of expensive doesn't it?

    \\Mikkel Gjoel
    -
    PS. Sterile? What happened to the wise words from Jurrasic Park, "Life will find a way"? :)

  235. Arms Race by awol · · Score: 1

    Now I am totally in support of this kind of development, but it presents an interesting scenario.

    Opposing forces have mined their no man's land. One force plans action in a couple of months and so plants the flower to reveal the mines. The other force notices and pumps out a whole bunch of defoliant to kill the flowers, everyone dies in 20 years from the defoliant.

    Nice.

    --
    "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
  236. Bees & Flowers by mxf8bv · · Score: 1
  237. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Ravenrage · · Score: 0

    the us of a has not i repeat not sold any landmines since 1993

  238. New Idea by FictionPimp · · Score: 0

    Instead of seeds, lets drop watermellons, when the hit the mines the blow up, and feed the poor!!

  239. Re: Land mines in DMZs by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    Has anyone got a good reason why landmines are a bad thing in such an area?
    Eventually, the two Koreas will reunify.
    Shortly thereafter, the DMZ will be no more.
    Can the US government guarantee that it can remove all of the land mines when that time comes?
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  240. I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you know where the mines are - like an already protected DMZ an invading army can clear paths through easily enough.

    Probably the smallest issue for a modern invading army is a few landmines.

    1. Re:I don't buy it by nalfeshnee · · Score: 1

      If indeed, you are the US army, you can simply fly stealth bombers over the landmines anyway.

      It's a question of economics, not of warfare. Only poor countries need landmines since they give bang for the buck at the level their armies are at. A modern army wouldn't be stopped by them.

      And so where do the poor countries go to buy 'em?

      Thanx,

      Nalfy

      --

      -- Despair is an operating system that ANY human being can run, sort of a psychological JAVA --

  241. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

    10. GEORGIA

    First they refuse to take down the confederate flag...now this?

    --
    I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
  242. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by John_Schmidt · · Score: 1

    Thank God no other country would sell arms to third world countries. Except Russia, which sold $5.7 billion worth of arms; Ukraine ($1.6 billion); Italy ($1.5 billion); and Germany and France ($1.1 billion each). (Y2002 figures)
    Of course the 2003 figures for France and Germany might be lower now that they can't sell to Iraq.

  243. My bro-in-law is missing a few fingers by SEGV · · Score: 1

    They blew off onto my wife's dress.

    And they grew up in an urban area of Vietnam.

    So think again.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
  244. Re: Land mines in DMZs by spronk · · Score: 1

    It's not like it's that difficult. If you know that an area is a mine field it's EASY to clear it. It's when you don't know for sure if an area has mines that they become an issue.

  245. Re:Characteristics that give greater production he by John_Schmidt · · Score: 1

    And if everyone on the US drank less water, we could turn the deserts in Africa into water parks.

    The logic fails because consuming less doesn't get that the difference to where it is needed. As someone else has already pointed out, distribution is the problem.

  246. From my perspective... by wedg · · Score: 1

    The genetically modified weed that has been coded to change color when its roots come in contact with nitrogen-dioxide... ...but does it get you high?

    --
    Jake
    Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
  247. Re:That is INSANE. by Hentai · · Score: 1

    The thing is, this plant is a haploid, with only 10 chromasomes. It's one of the easiest plants to work with, genetically. So they probably chose it for that reason.

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  248. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by refactored · · Score: 1
    Very funny. Go for a long walk around Victoria Falls, well off the tourist paths.

    The Rhodesian war was so long ago most of the people there now weren't alive then.

    The mines are still there.

  249. Re: Land mines in DMZs by refactored · · Score: 1
    Last time I spoke to a Korean, he said the main obstacle to reunification _was_ the objections of the US to reunification.

    ie. It's a empty argument, the US needs mines to keep the DMZ, the DMZ is there because the US want's the two Korea's separate. Why? A seperate South Korea must always be deep in US's pocket, a reunified Korea will be truly independent and choose other allies.

  250. That was more or less my point by Intraloper · · Score: 1

    with examples as to how much excess production we have sitting this side of that distribution issue.

  251. Re: Land mines in DMZs by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    If you know that an area is a mine field it's EASY to clear it.
    I don't think that that's entirely true.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  252. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Ancil · · Score: 1

    The above "Informative" comment is 100% horse shit.

    The U.S. imposed a one year moratorium on the export of antipersonnel mines in 1992. It was extended for three years in 1993, and again 1996. In 1997, Clinton made it permanent. So whos comment was "spin", hmm?

  253. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by instarx · · Score: 1

    You are right, but that turns out not to be the whole story. Although I specifically said landmines and not anti-personnel mines I did mistakenly imply that the US manufacturers received profit from the sale of anti-personnel landmines, and that was wrong (but who knows what their offshore subsidiaries do). The US does manufacture and export landmines - just not anti-personnel landmines. But since that was what we were talking about my statement was incorrect. The US has prohibited the transfer of anti-personnel mines since 1992. However, that's not the whole story. In investigating the facts I have discovered that we are not exactly lilly white when it comes to anti-personnel mines either.

    US law prohibits the transfer of anti-personnel landmines. However, the US has continued to supply friendly governments with anti-personnel mines on occasion, including Canada and Afghanistan.[UN report] Although the Canadian transfer technically violated both treaty and law, it was probably for testing and disposal training purposes which is OK in my book - but the US law did not prevent us from supplying the new Afghan government with _captured_ supplies of anti-personnel landmines [US GAO report] which is NOT ok in my book.

    Also, the US manufactures, sells, and uses cluster munitions. Cluster bombs are not *classified* as anti-personnel mines, but do effectively become that when they do not explode on the initial impact (to hinder runway repair or vehicle recovery efforts). Because the size of the explosive is large enough to disable vehicles they are classified as anti-vehicle mines even though they lay directly on the surface and are triggered by slight movement.

    The United States last acknowledged using antipersonnel mines in 1991 in Kuwait and Iraq, scattering 117,634 landmines, 30,000 of which were classified anti-personnel.[US GAO Report] I suspect the rest were cluster munitions. Thankfully, we stopped the practice after there were news reports of children being drawn to the brighty colored butterfly-shaped bombs. There is no information about anti-personnel landmine use in recent and current middle east wars, but I suspect our use is very small with the exception of cluster munitions. Also from the GAO, the US has stockpiled over 10 million anti-personnel mines.

    So, I was wrong about the current profit/manufacture/policy links of anti-personnel mines - the US has changed its ways although that link DID exist prior to 1992. However we do manufacture and export anti-vehicle landmines, we do manufacture and sell landmines which although classified anti-vehicle effectively act as anti-personnel mines, and we do transfer captured anti-personnel mines to others.

    This is not to say that we are the Great Satan. Our behavior is MUCH better because of policies developed during the Clinton administration, we devote significant resources to mine clearing and awareness, and I hope we continue to improve, particularly in the area of transfering captured anti-personnel landmines.

  254. Re: Land mines in DMZs by John_Schmidt · · Score: 1

    Must have been a North Korean.

    The S.Korean's have always protested the US presence in the country - that is until the US announced it was withdrawing troops to serve elsewhere- then the SK government quickly protested the withdrawal.

    I can't imagine anyone one (sane that is) in SK welcoming the NK government in.

    The SK govenment is very clear - they want the DMZ and the US troops to keep NK from invading. Not reunifiny - invading.

  255. Re: Land mines in DMZs by refactored · · Score: 1

    Definitely South Korean.