Slashdot Mirror


Do Your $20 Bills Explode In the Microwave?

msaulters writes "After repeatedly setting off RFID scanners in a truck stop, the author discovered the culprit was a wad of $20's in his back pocket. In a paranoid attempt to keep the government from tracking him, he attempted to fry the embedded chips in his microwave, with interesting results." Alex Jones has interesting theories about a number of things, but evidently a lot of readers were interested in this one.

1,165 comments

  1. 'Quotes' by zedmelon · · Score: 5, Funny
    The part of the 'article' that should probably be 'most' ignored is Denise's 'compulsory' use of 'punctuation.'

    And GEEZ. I remember being 12 and having a twenty burn a hole in my pocket, but...

    *smacks forehead* Sorry.

    --
    Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    1. Re:'Quotes' by nick0909 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did he learn from GRC?

    2. Re:'Quotes' by corian · · Score: 1

      ...except for the missing apostrophe in "New twenties were the lion [sic] share of the bills in his wallet." where it does belong.

    3. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just a quick run-down on Alex Jones and his Infowars.com site.

      This guy is viewed as a Class-A crackpot in Austin, Texas. He has a cable access show twice a week in which he rants about conspiracy theories of all kinds of varieties. He has run numerous shows on how the government literally has black helicopters following him around South Austin. He was predicting armageddon when the Y2K bug was supposed to hit. He fully espouses the notion that Bush not only had previous-knowledge of 9/11 but planned it. He did a special where he claims that all presidents past and present meet at Bohemiam Grove, worship an owl god, and sacrifice children. He also believes the United Nations is preparing to occupy the United States any day now (according to him it has been for at least the last ten years). A quick look at his shop will give you a pretty good indication of his beliefs.

      Keep this in mind when judging the validity of this article

    4. Re:'Quotes' by Chester+K · · Score: 5, Funny

      I remember being 12 and having a twenty burn a hole in my pocket, but...

      In Capitalist America, YOU burn a hole in money!

      --

      NO CARRIER
    5. Re:'Quotes' by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your computer is broadcasting an internet address!

    6. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Check out this piece of work on Alex Jones' website.

      Under the pretense of preparing for Y2K, the federal government has provided us with a solution for a problem that has not yet come: broader powers and more centralized control. In the name of taking care of us, all our freedoms are being taken away while a huge dictatorial machine is gearing up to control and smash all opposition. Everything that the Global Elite claim they are wanting to do is the exact opposite of what they are actually doing.

      FEMA boxes in every radio and television station in the land allow Washington to take control of all of the media in the entire country with the flip of a single switch. The individual broadcasting stations cannot bypass the FEMA equipment; the best they can do is to just shut off the transmitter and stop broadcasting completely. The FEMA boxes effectively turn the tens of thousands of individual broadcast stations into a single government propaganda channel. When activated, there will be only one version of the news: the government version.

      Way to go for the journalistic credibilty, Malda! Stay on top of these great sources.

    7. Re:'Quotes' by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mod great grandparent up for being so stupid that it's funny.

      Mod grandparent down on general priciples.

      Mod parent up, because we do really care that he doesn't think anyone gives a crap what the grandparent poster thinks.

      Don't give me mod points. Instead, give me those twenty dollar bills you suspect of having chips implanted. I'll test them for you. To preserve anonymity, you may send them to me via Pay Pal.

      And whatever child or grandchild posts appear here (if any) mod them up, again, on general principles.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh no it's not you monkey puppet, I just pulled out th=20 ]} $}1}&..}=3Dr}'}"}[NO CARRIER]

    9. Re:'Quotes' by kubrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, sure, all the rest of that stuff is pretty wacky...

      but it's true about the owl god.

      [wink]

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    10. Re:'Quotes' by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      FEMA boxes in every radio and television station in the land allow Washington to take control of all of the media in the entire country with the flip of a single switch. The individual broadcasting stations cannot bypass the FEMA equipment; the best they can do is to just shut off the transmitter and stop broadcasting completely. The FEMA boxes effectively turn the tens of thousands of individual broadcast stations into a single government propaganda channel. When activated, there will be only one version of the news: the government version.

      I'm not sure but I think that's called the Emergency Alert System ;)

      I don't know about my fellow tinfoil hat readers out there but I'll take the slight chance of the Government using it for propaganda (like they'd actually get away with it) if it means I'm going to know when that tornado is about to wipe out my house or those nuclear weapons are inbound. In either case I'll have enough time to put my head between my knees and kiss my ass goodbye ;) (my house wouldn't stand up to a dust devil let alone a tornado and we are 2mi from a major target)

      Sarcastic point aside I do realize the AC was quoting from it just to make fun of it. I still couldn't resist tossing my own two cents onto the fire.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:'Quotes' by Selecter · · Score: 1
      I wonder is anyone has remembered that paper always burns from the edge first when ignited, becuase thats wheres the most oxygen is located ( 3 points of surrounding axis of air rather than 2 )


      maybe it not a rfid, but rather another way the gov has found to track bills. With the budget and unlimited resources they have, I'm sure the dudes at the NSA can always come up with something new. Notice that we have had 2 complete currency makeovers in a very short timeframe. There's a reason beyond the old anti counterfeiter argument - but I dont pretend to know what it is.

    12. Re:'Quotes' by Ratbert42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I can't even count the number of times I've pulled an IS guy over to show him that pop-up alert like it's a real antivirus warning. They hate me.

    13. Re:'Quotes' by fafaforza · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quotes like

      We then wrapped our cash in foil and went thru the same monitors. No monitor went off.

      make me want to travel to the location of the web server and smash it with a hammer.

    14. Re:'Quotes' by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not sure I understand his concerns at all.

      Frankly, it has been years since local or national news programs had any real content other than the weather and sports. The rest is all who shot who, what burned down, and wildly inaccurate stories on science and technology. I fail to see how his feared FEMA takeover would make much difference.

      As for being impossible to bypass, I doubt that very much.

    15. Re:'Quotes' by octaneplus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Between Alex Jones and that crazy lady that sings with the Elvis twins and the old croon, Austin Access TV is awesome. Respect it because you may miss it someday. Houston blows... By the way, when your children are all in labor camps, don't come crying to me.

    16. Re:'Quotes' by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the absolutely hilarious part is that the clod knows nothing about the EAC boxes. they are capable of displaying white text on a grey background only with an audio track. they are not capable of "hijacking" for any longer than 60 seconds at a time ( although the CATV versions are cool.. able to transmit on 400 different frequencies PLUS generate digital tv signals)

      I.E. the statement was made by someone that knows absolutely nothing about what they are talking about..

      the only thing the EAC boxes can be used for is alerts... so yes the Govt. could subvert the populace by having them display " John Kerry is a donkey lover"

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:'Quotes' by cybergrue · · Score: 3, Insightful
      When activated, there will be only one version of the news: the government version.

      And this differs from Clear Channel's version how?

    18. Re:'Quotes' by cygnus · · Score: 5, Informative
      FEMA boxes in every radio and television station in the land allow Washington to take control of all of the media in the entire country with the flip of a single switch. The individual broadcasting stations cannot bypass the FEMA equipment; the best they can do is to just shut off the transmitter and stop broadcasting completely.
      that's BS. my college radio station was only required by the FCC to have the equipment on hand and receiving alerts. and if you did have it hooked up to your transmitter, most alerts you could schedule yourself within a 15 minute window. and you *couldn't* just flip off your transmitter, because intermittent operation would get your license revoked by the FCC. and if a particular radio station wanted to rebel and remove their equipment, it's about as difficult as removing your VCR from between your cable box and TV.
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    19. Re:'Quotes' by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      I was going to make a smart-aleck remark about having money to burn, but yours is better.

      The burning question in my mind is why he was walking around with a grand in cash? Then again, maybe that's a dumb question.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    20. Re:'Quotes' by dolphinling · · Score: 2, Offtopic
      And whatever child or grandchild posts appear here (if any) mod them up, again, on general principles.

      w00t, free mod points!

      --
      There are 11 types of people in the world: those who can count in binary, and those who can't.
    21. Re:'Quotes' by BHearsum · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, let's judge everybody by how 'crazy' they sound. Nevermind if there's fact and evidence behind it -- if it sounds crazy, it must be crazy!

    22. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about my fellow tinfoil hat readers out there but I'll take the slight chance of the Government using it for propaganda (like they'd actually get away with it)

      Haven't you ever seen any ads by the GOP?

    23. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He fully espouses the notion that Bush not only
      > had previous-knowledge of 9/11 but planned it.

      Bush probably did have previous knowledge of the attacks, but he has never had the mental capacity to plan anything a great deal more complicated than blanking out (It's a condition both father and son seem to be afflicted with, but which hasn't been publicized. There is no requirement to disclose such information to the public.) while watching unpleasant news on television (the pretzel incident) and during the fall, hitting his head on a table.

      There are many documented connections between Bush(es) and the individuals and groups involved in the "faith-based" detonations at the World Trade Center.

      The Bush international crime cartel includes some large oil companies which need to cooperate with drug traffickers in several countries because the druglords run those countries. One of the big oil companies is Halliburton, which would have suffered a major loss of business if it hadn't succeeded in its plan to install its agents (Bush, Chaney, et al) in the white house whose job would be to generate wars for Halliburton's subsidiary (Kellogg, Brown and Root) to clean up after.

      We don't hear much at all about the former "war on drugs", probably because the Bush cartel is involved in the international drug trade itself. The current Bush being held off the floor by a chair in the White House's oval office sponsored massive opium poppy planting in Afghanistan shortly after demolishing the country.

    24. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC here is right. Alex Jones is closely associated with the anti-government and right-wing militia types. He recently led an effort to rebuild the Branch Davidian compound which burned down in Waco in 1993. He'll also use any opportunity he can get to hawk his collection of conspiracy-theory tapes so he can avoid getting a job. Otherwise he's living off a trust fund set up by his family because they realize he's incapable of holding one.

    25. Re:'Quotes' by DarkHand · · Score: 1

      I wonder is anyone has remembered that paper always burns from the edge first when ignited, becuase thats wheres the most oxygen is located ( 3 points of surrounding axis of air rather than 2 )

      Looks to me like he had the bills folded in half when me microwaved them.

    26. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an employee of a TV station in Ohio I can tell you that there are no FEMA boxes and even the EAS system can be bypassed from the front panel (or the AC plug if you want to be quick about it)

    27. Re:'Quotes' by addaon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mightn't the fact that we judge him to sound crazy have quite a bit to do with the total lack of evidence and fact?

      As a trivial example, this article presents no evidence or fact that RFID is at all involved, but is instead portrayed that way to mislead others. For those not quite so easily mislead, the author sounds like a nut job.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    28. Re:'Quotes' by blackbear · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still couldn't resist tossing my own two cents onto the fire.

      Careful, those two cents may contain RFIDs and could therefore explode if tossed onto a fire.

      Just lookin' out for y'all.

    29. Re:'Quotes' by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny
      The FEMA boxes effectively turn the tens of thousands of individual broadcast stations into a single government propaganda channel. When activated, there will be only one version of the news: the government version.

      I'm not sure but I think that's called the Emergency Alert System ;)

      Not so fast! I've heard of this before, and it does turn thousands of individual broadcast stations into government propaganda outlets. But I think he got the wrong acronym for Fox News.
      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    30. Re:'Quotes' by celerityfm · · Score: 1
      --
      ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
    31. Re:'Quotes' by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do you propose we use instead? How he smells? "He smells CRAZY today!".

    32. Re:'Quotes' by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 1

      And in a truck stop, no less...

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    33. Re:'Quotes' by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      When the government takes control of the media, everything they say will be a misdirection and/or half-truth, if not an out and out lie. They will probably think it's in our best interest but they'll do it anyway. The propagandizing may only last for the duration of the 'incident' but my point still stands. The government maintains control of the populace by lying to us. Doesn't mean I'm not in favor of the emergency network, but it means I never believe anything the government tells us.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:'Quotes' by wampus · · Score: 1

      Holy shit! Better Living Though Clean Water? While he doesn't come right out and say it, I think the implication is that the fucking government is trying to sap and impurify our precious bodliy fluids! I'm sure this guy doesn't avoid women, but he does deny them his essence.

    35. Re:'Quotes' by Mildog · · Score: 1

      This guy sounds like a prime candidate to buy some wind-up flashlights, cans of food, and gold. He is talk radio's dream consumer! Gold bond, anyone?

    36. Re:'Quotes' by X00M · · Score: 1

      Anyone find this funny? This page is gone But this one isn't :P The greatness of the way-back machine but due to the power of the great way-back machine ITS BAAAACCCK!

    37. Re:'Quotes' by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      He did a special where he claims that all presidents past and present meet at Bohemiam Grove, worship an owl god, and sacrifice children
      Apart from the children bit, he's not far wrong you know. There is an elite club up there where successful and powerful people do weird things involving an owl effigy. It's no more freaky than Freemasons, Skull and Bones or the Hamburglar Fan Club though.
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    38. Re:'Quotes' by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Yeah....I am waiting to see if this is on George Nooory next week so I cal laugh at how clueless he is.

      --

      Gorkman

    39. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Otherwise he's living off a trust fund set up by his family because they realize he's incapable of holding one."

      THAT is a REAL conspiracy theory!!

      Can you prove it?

    40. Re:'Quotes' by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the Adhominium attack. Dont mention this person's assertion, disregard it by branding him a nut. This way, you can safely skirt the discussion.

      Just because he is crazy doesnt mean they arent after him. Further, his concerns about a technology being introduced into what was formerly SimplePaperMoney *should* be a concern... or atleast discussed.

    41. Re:'Quotes' by shawnmchorse · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I had actually kind of wondered why Infowars.com was spraypainted onto the cliff face near the 620 bridge in Austin. Not enough to actually check though of course since that'd just be supporting someone using grafitti to promote their damn web site. What a class act.

    42. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear attack? You need to get out of the 1980s. You're more likely to get hit by a tsunami than a nuclear missle.

    43. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where he claims that all presidents past and present meet at Bohemiam Grove, worship an owl god, and sacrifice children

      The first bit is true, the 2nd sort of true, and I didn't get that last bit in the video.

      The main thrust of Bohemian Grove is that its a playground for the rich and super powerful that don't abide by the same rules as you and I do.

    44. Re:'Quotes' by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 1

      I think that YOU are Alex Jones trying to make us believe that Alex Jones has detractors, thus making him even MORE valid in the eyes of the skeptical.

    45. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And this differs from Clear Channel's version how?

      This one will be Fair and Balanced.

    46. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with parent.

      however, if even 10% of what he says is true, its bad news. And I think he gets more like a 30-40% accuracy, if you count 'in the right ball park' as 'right'.

    47. Re:'Quotes' by zedmelon · · Score: 1

      Heh. Thanks. It was the first thing that hit me as I saw the top photo--before even reading one word--and I thought, "Okay, another bad joke that will be posted a hundred times, so who's gonna win THIS race?" I lucked out. fp!

      --
      Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    48. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. A bunch of people (women and children) had their house burnt down, primarily because they were religious kooks. Alex builds survivors a new house. That makes him bad?

      You are right, he is 'associated' with 'anti-goverment' types and the 'right-wing militia'. So why do have to pick on him for honestly trying to help out his fellow man?

    49. Re:'Quotes' by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      O c'mon - George isn't nutty, he just sits there and lets teh nuts talk :) There's a big difference. I would LOVE to meet George Noory and Art Bell - I bet they REALLY have some stories to tell.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    50. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up here in Canada, we have Alcan aluminum foil, which is stronger than most popular US brands, and makes a much more reflective and attractive hat. While you're folding it up, you could perhaps think of a scenario where the government has nothing to gain by lying.
      -AC

    51. Re:'Quotes' by valence · · Score: 1

      He's right about the UN. They've been occupying an area of New York from 1st to FDR for more than fifty years! And now they're looking to take over even more space for their nefarious deeds.

    52. Re:'Quotes' by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Informative
      that's BS. my college radio station was only required by the FCC to have the equipment on hand and receiving alerts. and if you did have it hooked up to your transmitter, most alerts you could schedule yourself within a 15 minute window

      Not true. Your college station may have been operating illegally, but all US stations, commercial or not, are required to maintain EAS equipment, monitor two other stations (unless they're one of the primary entry points), keep logs of tests, and participate in required monthly and weekly tests. Weekly tests must be forwarded within 1 hour, monthly tests must be regenerated within 1 hour (this is an expansion of the 15-minute rule - got passed last year). All stations are required to broadcast EAN alerts immediately (though, they do give you about one minute leeway). EAN, incidentally, has never been activated. That's the one where the President gets on the line and tells everyone to stick their heads between their knees.

      Flipping off your transmitter will get you in trouble, and so will not rebroadcasting EAS alerts and tests... And both will be picked up not just by your listeners, but by the stations that are monitoring *your* station as one of their required 2. They'll report that you didn't forward if the FCC asks them, and when the inspector comes around to look at your logs of transmitted EAS tests and you have nothing to show, he'll walk out with your license. And most of your equipment.

      -T

    53. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shirt is making me laugh really hard, it's pretty sweet! cheers for wing nuts!

    54. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a comedienne who mentioned it and I'm with her...

      If the Emergency Broadcast System didn't activate on 9/11, when WILL it activate? I've been in storms and earthquakes and such and never seen it used.

      So natural disasters don't count. Attacks on major cities don't count. What the hell *IS* an emergency?

    55. Re:'Quotes' by graphicd00d · · Score: 1

      This guy is viewed as a Class-A crackpot in Austin, Texas. He has a cable access show twice a week in which he rants about conspiracy theories of all kinds of varieties.

      Before you start calling people names you should do your research. Everything he covers is not a conspiracy theory but conspiracy fact. He does not talk about things he can't back up with news articles, witnesses etc. He even tells you to not believe him and do the research yourself.

      He has run numerous shows on how the government literally has black helicopters following him around South Austin.
      The black helicopters he talks about are called Blackhawk Helios. He never said they follow him around.

      He was predicting armageddon when the Y2K bug was supposed to hit.

      He never said that the Y2K bug was going to cause armegeddon. In fact he said it was a distration story that FEMA would use as an excuse to put in their command centers.

      He fully espouses the notion that Bush not only had previous-knowledge of 9/11 but planned it.
      PNAC
      Northwoods Document

      He did a special where he claims that all presidents past and present meet at Bohemiam Grove, worship an owl god, and sacrifice children.
      Have you seen this movie or any of his documentries? I have all of his documentries and after I saw them I went to check up on all he said and they check out. I have done the research and what Alex Jones has to say is correct.

      So before you bash someone because their views are different than yours, I suggest you do the research!

    56. Re:'Quotes' by cubic6 · · Score: 1

      His concerns may be valid. But his reputation is also a very valid concern when he brings up things like this. People like Alex Jones are *constantly* claiming wild out-of-the-blue things, with virtually no evidence. 99% of them are complete and utter bullshit. Of course, the way he presents his stories, he claims the lack of evidence is proof of government censorship and a massive coverup. Like it or not, when you do things like that, your credibility goes down the hole. Every time you suggest something, no one will believe you because you've said so much bullshit in the past.

      Also, check the comments again. There's no lack of technical discussion about his claims. My favorite explanation from the comments above was that when the bills were stacked, the tiny magnetic metal fragments in the ink reacted similar to the tags you see in stores to prevent theft. You, however, chose to pick a comment which casts doubt on his credibility and scream bloody murder about it.

      In summary, this guy is a nut. His track record has proved it. Of course, people are still debating his point, so I guess you're attacking a problem that isn't really there. Welcome to the straw man attack.

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
    57. Re:'Quotes' by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      And this differs from Clear Channel's version how?

      I'm sick of how all you so-far-on-the-left-you're-fall-off-the-edge liberals that you think a company will get sooo many talk show hosts to spout "The Company Line" on almost every topic. Oh yeah, and I forgot how all those modern rock stations are yelling "SIEG HEIL" in between tracks of OutKast, Beyonce, Linkin Park, Radio Head, and Britney Spears. Yeah, these simple minding kids are being brainwashed. I think they are being brainwashed by the Music Industry and how to be slutty like Britney Spears.

      Now, don't call me a right-wing-nazi-conservative (I'm actually a moderate hispanic of Mexican descent, so I'm a minority (or the majority in the minority population), HA!) I voted for Gore last time, but I'm voting for BUSH with fevor this time! I'm not a Democrat, nor a Republican, I will vote for what I believe is right.

      BTW, I do work at Clear Channel, but I'm just a computer programming nerd that has NOTHING to do with radio stations or anything radio related, I just build web apps.

      It just irks me that hard-core Democrats don't read the real news that is never published and keep going on your merry-haven't-a-thought way!

    58. Re:'Quotes' by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > We don't hear much at all about the former "war on drugs", probably because the Bush cartel is involved in the international drug trade itself

      Couldn't have anything to do with the "war" not doing anything except costing us more money. Or that the population is starting to wonder what is so "wrong" with many recreational drugs. Even when the intended result is the same as the goals (freedom) it's still evil. No, it MUST be a conspiracy.

    59. Re:'Quotes' by cygnus · · Score: 1
      And both will be picked up not just by your listeners, but by the stations that are monitoring *your* station as one of their required 2. They'll report that you didn't forward if the FCC asks them, and when the inspector comes around to look at your logs of transmitted EAS tests and you have nothing to show, he'll walk out with your license. And most of your equipment.
      lol, no station in their right mind would monitor my station for anything other than sheer entertainment value. and our experience is that the FCC pretty much leaves you alone unless you hook your transmitter to railroad tracks or jury rig a second transmitter in another state via phone lines (true stories. note to self: when operating a pirate radio station, do not do station identifications.)

      seriously, though, that station may be in violation of fcc rules, but my point still stands: the EAS system is not a demonic plot to suddenly and permanently seize control of the whole radio broadcast spectrum as a means of spreading government propaganda. our ability to fuck up the EAS stuff only makes my point for me.

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    60. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! I knew it! Ever since the grate skunk god came down from the mountan of garbage to tell me "Beware the evel owl god and his followers"! He told me of many things, many things... Every one laughed at me, laughed I say, but who's laughing now! I know there comeing for, to take me back to the padded room well they'll never take me, not with my tin sute of aormor! MWAHAHAHA!

      Please don't think less of me just because I'm insain... Think less of me because I'm also an ideot!

    61. Re:'Quotes' by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As hard as I try, I can not come up with a scenario where the government has nothing to gain by lying. If that means I need a tinfoil hat, so be it. Does the fact that they have something to gain mean that they are lying? Of course not. Their track record on disclosure is not very good, however...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    62. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the ad hominem approach only makes his arguments look better I'm afraid. Try sticking with logic and reason and you'll have better luck.

    63. Re:'Quotes' by rupert2000 · · Score: 1

      Um.. Duh, You trust banks with your dough??? They totatally track everything you buy!!!

    64. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here he is making an appearance on the dollar bill.

    65. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but in soviet russia, money burns a hole in you!

    66. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they keep people like him on the payroll to make so much noise that we don't notice the real stuff that's going down. England's a good place to look at see how the future might shape up -- there's stuff going on there that seems to come straight out of Orwell's '1984'. No men-in-black, no cultish secret societies (at least, no more than usual), just rational, good, government.

      [BTW -- The European Central Bank is interested in RFID not because they want to track purchases but becaue it makes counterfeiting a lot more difficult. Such a tag would only have a range of a couple of centimeters.

      BTW2 -- Why did our original poster think that RFID tags explode in microwaves? He's been watching too many moves of the "MST3K" sort.]

    67. Re:'Quotes' by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      The Bohemian Grove retreat really happens. Virtually every president since I was a child is or was a member of the Bohemian club or grove or whatever it is called. I am not sure that they all go every year, and I am pretty sure that they don't sacrifice children. ;-)

      For example, Nixon, Ford, Carter, and Reagan are or were all members. Clinton and both Bushes probably are members, too, but I don't know.

      I don't know that it is a conspiracy, but it seems that they do talk about important stuff there, at least some of the time. And the members take a very dim view of any information about the gathering getting out to the public. It is strictly a private club.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    68. Re:'Quotes' by metachor · · Score: 1

      > I still couldn't resist tossing my own two cents onto the fire. You mean, in to the microwave?

    69. Re:'Quotes' by kubrick · · Score: 1

      The owls are not what they seem.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    70. Re:'Quotes' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is viewed as a Class-A crackpot in Austin, Texas.

      Sure, he may be a Class-A crackpot, but he's our Class-A crackpot, dammit!

    71. Re:'Quotes' by oldave · · Score: 1

      Actually, he won't leave with anything but what he already had with him, plus perhaps copies of your logs.

      NAL (Notice of Apparent Liability) will follow in short order, in the mail.

      But no license is leaving, and no equipment is leaving.

    72. Re:'Quotes' by giminy · · Score: 1

      Whoah. Looking at this page reminds me of Capt. Mandrake from Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove."

      Purity of Essence. Peace on earth.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    73. Re:'Quotes' by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      If the Emergency Broadcast System didn't activate on 9/11, when WILL it activate?

      Where do you live? I've seen it activated all the time during severe weather (i.e: tornado warning) where I live. They come on with a loud beeping sound and the words "Emergency Alert System" followed by text (and usually somebody reading it outloud for you) describing the emergency. It takes over all the channels on my cable -- even the digital ones.

      Though I admit I've never seen "tests" of this system on TV like you hear all the time (at least once a week) on the radio -- they even interrupt songs for them on the radio.

      I'd admit it is strange it wasn't used on 9/11. WTF is it there for after all?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    74. Re:'Quotes' by ecloud · · Score: 1
      I still couldn't resist tossing my own two cents onto the fire.

      Yeah and then you find out that pennies explode too when thrown into the fire.

      Or perhaps at least that when you try to mix metaphors you can sometimes find that they are hazardously incompatible.

    75. Re:'Quotes' by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      "...all US stations, commercial or not, are required to maintain EAS equipment, monitor two other stations (unless they're one of the primary entry points), keep logs of tests, and participate in required monthly and weekly tests. Weekly tests must be forwarded within 1 hour, monthly tests must be regenerated within 1 hour (this is an expansion of the 15-minute rule - got passed last year). All stations are required to broadcast EAN alerts immediately (though, they do give you about one minute leeway). EAN, incidentally, has never been activated. That's the one where the President gets on the line and tells everyone to stick their heads between their knees."

      Amen to that brother, and as a employee of a top twenty market local market leader television station I can safely say that we can disconnect from any government interference by simply changing a few patches. (And we would, never fear!)

      It sucks working for a big company, but at least we do have ultimate control at the local level if the "Shit hits the fan".

      You tin foil types need to get a life.

      Having said that, the Emergency Broadcast System is a hollow shell waiting to be tested in a dire emergency, God forbid I ever hear those ten dings for real on a AP newswire feed.

      Challenger got eight.

      My sig is crude in this context. I apologise.

    76. Re:'Quotes' by Cypresskill · · Score: 1

      Mr Neocon, if you spent even a few minutes reading the mountains of circumstancial evidence validating everything he says you might change your mind. First read, then flame. And hes right about all the RFID.

  2. Terrorism by Rupan · · Score: 1, Funny

    ..."And he came in wielding this huge wad of 20's and a microwave transmitter!!..."

    --
    Ads? What ads?
    1. Re:Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      ..."And he came in wielding this huge wad of 20's and a microwave transmitter!!..."
      Isn't that how all the stories start on that Mike's Apartment porn site?
    2. Re:Terrorism by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      Terrorism: "And he came in wielding this huge wad of 20's and a microwave transmitter!!..."

      the fbi defines "terrorism" as "use of force... to intimidate or coerce... in the furtherance of political or social objectives" (full definition without snips here)

      using money to intimidate in the furtherance of a political objectives is what the government does... not terrorists, silly!

    3. Re:Terrorism by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Government, terrorists... where's the difference?

    4. Re:Terrorism by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 1

      One flies planes into building and kills alot of people, but you know about it.

      One kills a lot of people and you don't know about it , but your fat ass is safe to post drivel on Slashdot.

    5. Re:Terrorism by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      You can be aware about both kinds of kills, if you watch something more than "Fair-and-Balanced" news, and read more than sports pages from the newspapers. Then you see they are quite related, plusminus some baseline "looney bomber noise".

      My not-really-fat ass is safe more because my country doesn't tend to meddle much into the affairs of others. (Additional advantage for the taxpayers is that it's cheaper.)

    6. Re:Terrorism by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite is news.google.com ... I get to read a lot of newpapers both inside and outside the US.

      It gets funny, too, when you see opposing biases. Case in point: There was some international agreement signed a couple of years back. While a pro-tobacco paper claimed Bush had strengthened it, an anti-tobacco paper claimed he had weakened it.

      I'm not sure how any American president will get more than one term in office without becoming a show-man.

    7. Re:Terrorism by Kwantus · · Score: 1

      You think you're safe with Shrubya at the wheel? MWAHAHAHAHA

      (But if you can explain to me how some cavedwelling ragtop in Afghanistan got NORAD to play with itself for a full hour on 9/11 without resorting to connections like his dozens of siblings in joint business ventures with the Bushes, I may give you the benefit of some doubt.)

  3. Yeah...that's right...interesting... by inertia187 · · Score: 1

    I guess this guy just has money to burn. The article should have been from the do-do-do-do dept.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Yeah...that's right...interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's common knowledge that 20's and greater denominations have the little slivers (trackers) inside of them. You can see it if you hold it up to a light. This is so that they can tell how much cash a person is carrying on them in a given location with a quick and easy scan.

      Just how did people suspect they were accomplishing this without some type of RFID? I mean.. fucking DUH...

  4. Mobile phones by noelo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what will happen to these notes when the come into long duration contact with a mobile phone

  5. The most cursory inspection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The most cursory inspection of a $20 bill shows there's no RFID tag in Jackson's right eye.

    Has anyone tried a control experiment of plain inkjet paper in the same form factor?

    1. Re:The most cursory inspection by anotherone · · Score: 5, Funny
      Has anyone tried a control experiment of plain inkjet paper in the same form factor?

      What, are you kidding? And ruin a perfectly good crazy conspiracy theory?

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
  6. Just look at it! by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always knew Andrew Jackson was giving me the evil eye.

    1. Re:Just look at it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's gotta be an "eye-of-sauron" joke somewhere between the lines....

  7. illegal? by acoustix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't destroying US currency against the law?

    Seems pretty smart to me: 1)Committ a federal offense. 2)Post the proof on the internet.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh no, come and arrest me.

      (the police dont sit and comb the internet for every idiot that commits a minor offense.

      (federal offense or not).

      insightful my ass

    2. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not destroyed, it's just damaged. If over 50% of the bill is still intact, it's still legal tender, and destruction of currency has therefore not occurred.

    3. Re:illegal? by SeinJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, that's a myth.
      The only thing that would be against the law is defacing currency and attempting to use it in commerce. So we learned in Business Law.

    4. Re:illegal? by freeslacker · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that he's going to be prosecuted for this? How was he supposed to know the money would start burning?

    5. Re:illegal? by kewsh · · Score: 0

      but without a caution or warning label how were they supposed to know that the microwaves would make the money go up in flames? for all you know the rfid tag doesnt even exist...if you/we did then this article wouldnt be needed.

    6. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why should it be illegal?

      A $20 bank note is your receipt for lending $20 to the government with no interest.

      If you'd like to lend $20 to the government and then not claim it back later, I'm sure that the government will be very happy.

    7. Re:illegal? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      In fact, there's an address in Washington D.C. to which you could send the remains of destroied bills and they'll do their best to piece things together and redeem the value of the pile... yep, it really exists.

    8. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. Ever see one of those penny-smashing machines at a tourist place? Stick a penny and a couple of quarters in, and you get an oval smear of copper with Mt. Rushmore (or some other tourist trap) on it. Perfectly legal.

      My understanding was that it's only illegal if you deface it and then try to spend it. Not that I've ever heard of someone getting punished for drawing on their money...

    9. Re:illegal? by Mastadex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Once you aquire the money by legal means, it becomes yours so you can do to it as you please.

      I once worked at a cutlery corporation where they demonstrated scissors by cutting up coins. and they told us its legal, so if the company gets fried for that, not my fault.

      --
      A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
    10. Re:illegal? by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, he did remove $1000 dollars from circulation (not exactly pennies in a fountain) so maybe the government would be bothered by that.

    11. Re:illegal? by jasonditz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It used to be... not anymore.

      Back in the late 70's melting coins was a federal offense.

    12. Re:illegal? by ack154 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of putting coins on the railroad tracks as a kid... but that was the 80s, so hopefully, no federal offense. :)

    13. Re:illegal? by vwjeff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes defacing US currency is against the law only if you attempt to use the defaced currency. In a paranoid fit you can microwave all the Jacksons you want however the they should be sent to me first for inspection. I wouldn't want the man to destroy any non-RFID bills!!

      An explaination for the money "exploding" is simple. All US notes above $5 contain metal in them. Hold the bill up to a light and you will see a thin strip on the bill. This strip is infact metal. I don't know if this is true but I have also heard that the paper used to make the bills contains small strands of metal among the paper and cloth fibers.

      The author is obviously against RFID tags and is using money because it is something we can all relate to (some more than others.) He is just trying to raise awareness of the issue. I personally feel he could have done it in a different way but then again we might not be talking about it now if he had.

    14. Re:illegal? by buss_error · · Score: 1

      As I recall, it's only illegal if you are doing it with the intent to change the value. (I can't see making a $20 bill a $2 bill, but hey, you can never tell. Changing a $20 to be a 200 dollar bill is just stupid.)

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    15. Re:illegal? by ack154 · · Score: 1

      I always thought that as long as you had more than half of the bill, you can just take it to a bank and have it replaced... I didn't know about anything that the actual treasury would do for you.

    16. Re:illegal? by prat393 · · Score: 1

      Right, but the banks only forward it to the treasury anyway. This just cuts out the middleman (and the convenience).

    17. Re:illegal? by 0m3gaMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Coming soon to thinkgeek.com: Tin foil pants!

    18. Re:illegal? by prat393 · · Score: 2, Funny

      First, it's not against the law unless he's trying to defraud someone using the mutilated currency, and second, even if it were, it's completely accidental that the money was destroyed... they just wanted to burn the RFID tag.

      What they might need to watch out for, though, is a DMCA suit, as they were attempting to destroy a copy protection device. =)

    19. Re:illegal? by j-pimp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Changing a $20 to be a 200 dollar bill is just stupid.)
      Being two dollar bills were silver notes, I would say that you'd probally have better luck passing off 200 bills.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    20. Re:illegal? by Everlasting+God · · Score: 1

      Oooooh, a whole thousand dollars? The treasury burn s more than that every 10 minutes or something. And I don't mean spends/wastes, that would be a much higher figure. Burns, as in with fire, to destroy bills unfit for circulation.

    21. Re:illegal? by logicnazi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually it was my understanding that it was still illegal to melt down coins to redeem the base metals. I was under the impression that the metals in the penny are more valuable then the penny, but I may be mistaken.

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    22. Re:illegal? by nastyphil · · Score: 5, Funny

      How was he supposed to know the money would start burning?

      Maybe because he put it in an oven..?

      --
      Dialectician. Archology.
    23. Re:illegal? by afidel · · Score: 2

      $2 bills are still legal tender and are in fact still in circulation (although in miniscule amounts compared to most other bills). I regularly get a stack of them to use as tips. Waitresses really remember the guy who leaves a $2 bill as a tip for a $8 meal =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    24. Re:illegal? by octavian755 · · Score: 1

      if it were small metal strands then it would burn in different locations every time and not in one central location. I'm not totally agreeing with the RFID tag theory, but it does make a lot of sense. Especially if the government went to all the trouble of putting a small metal strip in the same spot, on every bill. This all depends if the bills were actually burnt in a microwave, unless he did it himself to raise awareness of RFID tags. Maybe someone else should give it a try and see what happens.

    25. Re:illegal? by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If made of copper. Now its alum with a skin of copper

    26. Re:illegal? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The government is also very happy when you buy stamps and don't use them. The Post Office itself even now has a department to cater to such trade.

      KFG

    27. Re:illegal? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Sweden it's illegal to destroy (swedish) currency.

      --
      Martin
    28. Re:illegal? by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

      IANABanker, but I think you need the serial number intact as well as at least 50% complete.

      --
      why? forty-two.
    29. Re:illegal? by b!arg · · Score: 1

      What about the fact they weren't spread out in the carosel but rather stacked. I think the only thing he might have found out is that microwaves cook unevenly.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    30. Re:illegal? by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      Or you could just go down to the bank and exchange it. The bank will periodicly ship out all the mutilated money in the branch to the treasurey.

    31. Re:illegal? by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 4, Funny

      In this case, it's a $20 fine per bill destroyed. Unlike most crimes, there's no need for police, judges, etc. to enforce this.

    32. Re:illegal? by caino59 · · Score: 1

      yea, and they remember to avoid him the next time he comes through :o)

    33. Re:illegal? by PacoTaco · · Score: 4, Funny
      Isn't destroying US currency against the law?

      Not a problem. Just make a photocopy first.

    34. Re:illegal? by octavian755 · · Score: 1

      every time i look at the article it makes me think that he burnt the bills himself or did this as a joke. good point though

    35. Re:illegal? by trg83 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know about the serial number, but you need 60% of the bill. Otherwise, we could all double our money with a pair of scissors and a ruler :)

    36. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This brings up the question: If "$20" notes are are just government paperwork, why does the government want to borrow $20 from you? And how exactly do you claim your "$20" back from the government?

      I dunno, as Marx said, money is just a 'collective delusion' anyway, so maybe none of this floating currency stuff is really designed to makes sense. As long as my cable company, the beer store, and my hooker keep taking these "$20" notes, I'm happy.

    37. Re:illegal? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Because it's different? Surely you aren't saying that waitresses try to stay away from customers who tip at between 20 and 25%. I like to find a waitress who is competent and curteous and then make her my regular server. She gets more tips and I get better service, works well all around.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    38. Re:illegal? by whorfin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The $2 bill isn't just something from back in the days of the silver note.

      It was brought back into circulation in 1976, and has at least one other printing since then. They're even less popular/used than the $1 coin, so it's not surprising that you think that they're relics of the past instead of mundane, valid currency.

      A picture for your pleasure

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    39. Re:illegal? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      If you have more than half a bill, your bank should accept it. However, if it's so bad the bank won't take it, these are the people who might.

    40. Re:illegal? by Unleashd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yea, Yea

      and in Soviet Russia ...

      We got already :P

      --
      We don't need no stinking sig!
    41. Re:illegal? by petree · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. According to these guys it's 97.5% zinc, not aluminum. It's got a 2.5% copper skin.

    42. Re:illegal? by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I haven't seen one of your new twenties, but in Sweden, all bills have metal strands in them, in the same exact location in every bill. They have had this for at least 20 years, probably more. It's for the same reason as they watermark them, make them light up under UV light and use special paper - to make them more difficult to forge.

      But if the metal strands really are RFID tags, I guess the RFID technology actually came from Roswell and was kept secret until fairly recently...

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    43. Re:illegal? by richie2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not really, but amazingly, you instantly get fined the same amount that you destroy. :-)

      Riksbanken kan vagra att losa in sedlar eller mynt som avsiktligt andrats eller skadats. Dar star: "Har en sedel eller ett mynt avsiktligt andrats sa att dess format eller utseende avviker fran vad som tillkannagivits kan inlosen darav vagras." Denna vagran att losa in tillampar Riksbanken som regel for infargade och inplastade sedlar, for avsiktligt sonderklippta sedlar, for sedlar dar sakerhetstraden rivit ur och dylikt.
      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    44. Re:illegal? by DZign · · Score: 1
      Not sure how it's in the USA, however in Europe it is.


      I remember when the euro coins were introduced, someone 'by accident' dropped a hammer on them and the 1 and 2 euro coins split in 2 parts (they have a ring around them in another metal then the inner part). On the news they said the man dropped the hammer by accident because it's illegal to do it on purpose (so they couldn't show it to yo on camera).

    45. Re:illegal? by jmauro · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was under the impression that the metals in the penny are more valuable then the penny, but I may be mistaken.

      The metals cost less than the penny. The reason pennies are still made is that the mint makes a profit on each one made. Once they stop making money, they'll stop making pennies.

    46. Re:illegal? by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      After a brief search, I found the English link here.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    47. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect.

      The bills can be taken to a bank where they will be replaced for free, as long as there is > 50% of the bill remaining.

    48. Re:illegal? by caino59 · · Score: 1

      it was a joke...sheesh.

    49. Re:illegal? by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always thought that as long as you had more than half of the bill, you can just take it to a bank and have it replaced...

      Wow!

      1) Take 4 * 1$
      2) Break it into: 4 * ( 3 * 1/3$ )
      3) Group it into: ( 2 * 3 ) * 2/3$
      4) Now you have 6 * 2/3$
      5) Give it to bank
      6) Get 6$ from bank

      Profit = 6$ - 4$ = 2$

      And now repeat.

    50. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have *killed* hundreds! A coin-sized piece of metal contributed to the Selby rail crash.

      If you didn't go down for attempted murder, then the policing or justice systems are in trouble.

    51. Re:illegal? by irishkev · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're not supposed to deface a u.s. flag, either. Well, here's George Bush doing that:

      http://www.cryptogon.com/2003_07_20_blogarchive. ht ml#105918027068361202

    52. Re:illegal? by CarlDenny · · Score: 1

      They check the serial numbers, and if they've been destroyed, require you to have the same piece from every bill you are redeeming.

      It'd be difficult to pass of 1/3 of two differnt bills taped together, regardless.

    53. Re:illegal? by Dr_Cornholio · · Score: 1

      Actually, the money is owned by the U.S. Federal Reserve. The money is out on loan to you fromm the Fed (which happens to be a private company, there is nothing federal about it at all) The fed loans the money to the government at interest and the government distributes it. That's why the U.S. is now at $5 trillon debt. It has borrowed too heavily from the fed and cannot pay it back.

      If you don't believe me that the fed is a private company, check where it's listed in the phone book. It's not under government, it's in the business section.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the monkey spanks you!
    54. Re:illegal? by snaphu · · Score: 2, Funny
      "2)Post the proof on the internet."
      Proof on the internet? now that's funny
    55. Re:illegal? by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      well, if he goes and gets them replaced, as he says the will, they aren't out of circulation.

    56. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can take a bill that is ripped apart to any federal reserve and if you have over 50% of the bill they will give you a nice crisp one.

    57. Re:illegal? by Volmarias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Occam's razor says that he took his BIC to the 30 $20 bills there and gave Mr. Andrews a shave with lighter fluid. Look at the article again; it says that they're all burned on his eyebrow. Now, look at the pictures. At the risk of raking in a gasoline shower and a nice hot match, $20 worth of monopoly moneys goes to the first person that notices that the scorch marks are not all in one place or even on his right eye, where the RFID chip supposedly is! I'll grant the possibility that the bills aren't evenly stacked, but even so, this seems a bit wacky. Also, if you weren't already convinced I should be modded down, here's some "-1 troll" fodder: The RFID tags make another excellent way to prevent counterfeiters from making perfect bills. Banks taking large sums of cash can now just scan the contents. If the scanner reads nothing, sounds some alarms. If it does read the appropriate signal, then whatever further counterfeit prevention methods, if any, can be used. Instead of assuming that this is some horrible, terrible, no good plan to oppress the people, have you considered that this is just another trick by the treasury department to try and keep bills authentic? Ok, flame away.

    58. Re:illegal? by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 5, Informative


      It is against the law. Men with earpieces and black suits could come knocking.

      Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. This comes under the jurisdiction of the United States Secret Service.

      Here's the relevant bit of the US Code:

      Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, or Federal Reserve bank, or the Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note,or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

    59. Re:illegal? by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is illegal in the United States too.

    60. Re:illegal? by High+Hat · · Score: 1

      That's just like taking Ecstasy. The punishment is that your brain will turn into sponge eventually. Also no need for law enforcement...

    61. Re:illegal? by ArseneLupin · · Score: 3, Funny

      And what if he just had sprinkled it with holy water instead? ;-)

    62. Re:illegal? by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually it was my understanding that it was still illegal to melt down coins to redeem the base metals. I was under the impression that the metals in the penny are more valuable then the penny, but I may be mistaken.

      In 1966 Australia introduced its new decimal currency. The 50c coin included a lot of silver, and shortly after the price of silver rose so that there was 58c worth of it in each coin. So the government quickly redesigned it with a new alloy with no silver at all.

    63. Re:illegal? by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 1

      >> Once you aquire the money by legal means, it becomes yours so you can do to it as you please.

      It is not yours to do with as you please. Ask the guy at WheresGeorge about his run in with the Secret Service.

      Stuff here and here.

      I assume that the parent was modded "Informative" because there's no "Counter-informative" tag?

    64. Re:illegal? by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 3, Informative


      US Code, Title 18, Section 331: Mutilation, diminution, and falsification of coins

      Whoever fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the mints of the United States, or any foreign coins which are by law made current or are in actual use or circulation as money within the United States; or

      Whoever fraudulently possesses, passes, utters, publishes, or sells, or attempts to pass, utter, publish, or sell, or brings into the United States, any such coin, knowing the same to be altered, defaced, mutilated, impaired, diminished, falsified, scaled, or lightened -

      Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

      There's a ton of great things in the US Code if you know where to look.

    65. Re:illegal? by biscrage · · Score: 1

      i tried this and Bank of America wanted all of BOTH serials

    66. Re:illegal? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, not quite.

      All currency is just an artificial means of making it easier to transact the mundane activities of life without having to barter for everything. You are more than welcome to exchange all of your paper money for any other store of value you want or never do the reverse. It's not the government behind this, it's the entire population as the grocery store doesn't want to exchange your live chickens for their dead ones.

      What's truly amusing is the innumerable bartering communities that pop up on a continuous basis who invariably come up with a brand-new revolutionary means of efficient bartering through some proprietary "barter note" system. Duh, that's the basis of all currency. It doesn't matter if you use sea shells, giant concrete wheels or chickens as your store of value. It's all "money."

      No conspiracy here...

      Duh.

    67. Re:illegal? by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 5, Informative

      >> Group it into: ( 2 * 3 ) * 2/3$

      Dang, they've thought of EVERYTHING.

      US Code, Title 18 Sec. 484. Connecting parts of different notes

      Whoever so places or connects together different parts of two or more notes, bills, or other genuine instruments issued under the authority of the United States, or by any foreign government, or corporation, as to produce one instrument, with intent to defraud, shall be guilty of forgery in the same manner as if the parts so put together were falsely made or forged, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

    68. Re:illegal? by gordguide · · Score: 1

      As per the somewhat well known "measure the speed of light with a microwave and some chocolate" experiments, exactly where the heat is concentrated in a microwave oven is related to it's frequency; a typical value is 2.5GHz which provides nodes spaced roughly 6CM (about 2.4 inches) apart.

      Since a bill is less than 4.8" across, you will have a burn spot across the short side. A US Bill is about 6" in length (or roughly 15cm) so we would expect 2 burn holes along the long length, spaced 6cm apart.

      I don't think it would be difficult to place "Andrew Jackson's eye" right under the node with a bit of experimentation. What happened to the other node is a matter of conjecture; perhaps he placed some object that absorbed microwave energy on the bills above that expected node, or perhaps there is something about the dense ink or metal strip that heats up faster, meaning he had to pull them as soon as AJ's eye caught. Leave them in long enough and both nodes would show up.

      Relevant info on speed of light/microwave/chocolate:

      http://physics.about.com/cs/opticsexperiments/a/ 29 0903_4.htm

      If you want to start at the beginning (no real reason; page 4 has all you need) it's:

      http://physics.about.com/cs/opticsexperiments/a/ 29 0903.htm

    69. Re:illegal? by Sipos · · Score: 1

      It is illegal to destroy currency in the UK. This stems from a practice in the past of shaving gold off the edges of coins. When coins were made of gold it was profitable to to do this and the idea was to shave off little enough that you could still use the coin. As postage stamps are also legal tender (although I don't think many shops would allow you to pay for goods with them) I think it may also cover them here.

    70. Re:illegal? by Ozan · · Score: 1

      For crying out loud, it is not illegal in Europe. Where do they actualy tell this crap?

    71. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll never forgive you!!

    72. Re:illegal? by XPulga · · Score: 5, Funny
      In a country where peanut bags come with may contain peanuts printed and microwave ovens must tell the owner explictly not to use it to dry pets, to avoid liability with very stupid customers, I wouldn't be surprised if someone accused of currency destruction sued either
      • (a) The oven manufacturer, for not stating that it may damage currency in the manual; or

      • (b) The government, for not printing do not microwave in the currency; or
        (c) The bank who gave them currency without a proper usage manual.
      or all of them, and won some.
    73. Re:illegal? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      The coins were designed by some nitwit with no knowledge of physics. I heard it was possible to do even without hammer - excessively cold weather was enough to make the inner part shrink more than the ring, and fall out.

    74. Re:illegal? by bugbread · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which, ironically, is the same thing that happened in Japan a few years ago. The law, at the time, was that 90% of the bill had to exist to have it replaced. Some clever criminal types decided to cut 10% off of 9 10,000 yen ($100 dollar) bills, and reassemble it to be 10 90% complete bills. These were then redeemed (mostly at gambling institutions) for proper bills, and the cycle was continued. Needless to say, the law has since been changed.

    75. Re:illegal? by iMMersE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once they stop making money, they'll stop making pennies.

      I don't think you meant it to be funny, but seriously, this has got me in stitches.

      --
      codegolf.com - smaller *is* better.
    76. Re:illegal? by Ian+Bell · · Score: 1

      The offence of Defacing a coin of the realm was removed with the Counterfeiting Act 1981.

      It's now only illegal in the UK to create a counterfeit item of currency, not to damage or destroy a legitimate one.

    77. Re:illegal? by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1

      You know what, I'm surprised its taken this long ;-)

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
    78. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In Sweden it's illegal to destroy (swedish) currency.

      Moderators: Parent didn't post any references supporting this claim, nothing. Just a plain statement which as well could be false as well as true. So why the heck did you moderate this as informative?

    79. Re:illegal? by realnowhereman · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be such a nice theory if all the thirds were equal. They aren't. You can't stick the two front thirds of a note together and claim you've got 2/3 of a whole one... Actually I'm wrong there: you could claim that.

      --
      Carpe Daemon
    80. Re:illegal? by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      Here is Australia when our first plastic $5 note came out people pretty soon worked out that a little bit of sweat and a minute or two or smudging and the picture of the queen would come right off. I think in the end the government did a recall on the notes (someone can correct me on that).

      Being in favour of a republic I personally did my duty and scrubbed the queen of my notes.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    81. Re:illegal? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's not 'yours' to do anything you like with.

      a more truthful saying would be that you've loaned it(you're not for example the guy who is supposed to remove it from circulation, by destroying it, once it's teared up bad enough).

      your particular mileage would of course vary but in most parts of the world destroying currency is illeagal.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    82. Re:illegal? by armb · · Score: 1

      About as smart as advertising that you carry around over $1000 in cash in your back pocket? He'd better hope local pickpockets don't read Slashdot and aren't conspiracy nuts.

      --
      rant
    83. Re:illegal? by ttsalo · · Score: 1
      Really?

      How come they managed to make Watch the K Foundation Burn a Million Quid then?

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
    84. Re:illegal? by ManxStef · · Score: 2, Funny
      The only thing that would be against the law is defacing currency and attempting to use it in commerce.
      So if you're in Canada would doing this get you in trouble? :)
    85. Re:illegal? by oever · · Score: 1

      This is how you can make an english euro.

      Split the euro and put in a penny (i think).

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    86. Re:illegal? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1
      Just make a photocopy first.


      I am entitled to make a backup!

    87. Re:illegal? by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Two places use $2 bills: horse racetracks ($2 is still a standard small bet) and Monticello (Jefferson's home). I chuckled when I got $8 in change at Montcello in the form of four twos, rather than a five and three ones. They keep up the good fight.

    88. Re:illegal? by SamSpectre · · Score: 1

      I believe it is only illegal to destroy/deface money if you intend to re-introduce it into the marketplace. Otherwise, you would see penny-stamping machines outlawed and banks wouldn't be allowed to put exploding paint cannisters in bank robbery bags (or maybe they would).

    89. Re:illegal? by sparkes · · Score: 1

      It's also probably illegal to deface the queens image on the note as it is here in the uk.

      I used to put cling film over the tv so I could deface her as much as I liked every Christmas Day, perhaps I would have been better off with tin foil ;-)

    90. Re:illegal? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Yebbut, barter lets you evade taxes (which is why tax offices may take a dim view of it).

    91. Re:illegal? by Genom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the most relevant section is this:

      "...with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note,or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued..."

      Intent is the key -- if the intent isn't to make the bill "unfit", the defacement is perfectly legal. This is why the "Where's George" folks can write their URL in the margin of a $1 without a problem. The bill is still perfectly usable.

      Now, writing "VOID" over it, or blacking out the denomination -- that would most likely fall under the 'unfit' definition (although unless you tried to pass one, I can't see where the suits would come knocking)

    92. Re:illegal? by Koualla · · Score: 1

      Also, the Australian 50c coin used to be round, with a smooth outer surface. People would shave off a little bit of the silver-containing alloy and return the rest of the coin to circulation. The mint got around that by making the newer coins polygonal, not circular.

      --
      Six boxes to use in the defense of liberty: letter, soap, ballot, witness, jury, ammo.
    93. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key phrase in that statute refers to reintroducing the money. That means that if you take it back to the Federal Reserve and demand a new bill, you have to get exactly what you turned in. In other words, if you deface it such that a $20 bill now looks like a $50 bill, you can't reintroduce that $20 bill into the market.

    94. Re:illegal? by johnkoer · · Score: 1

      Just don't use any HP or Adobe products

    95. Re:illegal? by zephc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh he wasn't defacing it, merely showing what the new US flag will look like

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    96. Re:illegal? by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Why are you posting in Swedish? Slashdot is nothing but linux geeks. It's not like any of them speak Swedish.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    97. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, this reminds me of an Iranian joke:

      "Gholo and Jasem decided to steal a turkey from a house. Jasem waited outside and Gholo jumped over the wall into the house and caught the turkey. All of the sudden the turkey started to scream...gholooo ghooloo, ghoogholi gholo ghooolo, ghoolloo....

      Gholo got scared, throw the turkey on the floor and told jasem: "Volek faraar koon ke yaroo shenaasee" :-)

    98. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be sure to use a different teller in the bank each time.

    99. Re:illegal? by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

      i think 'shaving' is what people used to do
      shave off a layer of the older (1964) quarters and nickles, that were made of silver i believe.

      now quarters have those ridges around them.

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    100. Re:illegal? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only thing that would be against the law is defacing currency and attempting to use it in commerce. So we learned in Business Law.

      Well, that explains every decision my boss ever made. Not one included defacing currency...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    101. Re:illegal? by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

      "with intent to render such bank bill"

      he has to be planning on spending it.

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    102. Re:illegal? by sphariss · · Score: 1

      I have redeemed a few torn bills in the past. My bank would always give me 1/2 the face value for each serial number that was more then half complete. I don't know if that was the LAW or not, but it seemed a pretty good system.

    103. Re:illegal? by WarPresident · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, Sweden does have the death penalty for defacing Swedish meatballs. This from the Swedish Chef

      Kookin' der yummee-yummers, ya. Kookin' der deleeciuoos Svedeesh meetbells is ookey, boot deffeceeng zeem fur zee poorpuses oozeer thun ieteeng is pooneesheble-a by deet.

      --
      Here come da fudge!
    104. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should it be illegal?

      A $20 bank note is your receipt for lending $20 to the government with no interest.

      If you'd like to lend $20 to the government and then not claim it back later, I'm sure that the government will be very happy.


      Because they were not going to return them to the government in exchange for their gold. They will turn them in for more bills which they will probably burn again. It is expensive for the government to print replacements.

    105. Re:illegal? by NegativeK · · Score: 1

      I've an uncle who was in the currency branch of the Secret Service.. He said that, like destroyed money, they'll also investigate any possibly counterfeit money, and to send him all the bills I needed checked right away.

      --
      This statement is false.
    106. Re:illegal? by KC+Swan · · Score: 1

      This section of the code wasn't put in with the intent of stopping jigsaw puzzle makers, that's just an additional implication. The intent was to address people cutting the corners off $20s, gluing them onto $1s, and attempting to pass them as a $20.

      Some of the early vending machine bill readers only did pattern recognition on the corners of the bill. These same readers could only accept a $1 or $5. There were numerous reports of readers accepting a corner covered $1 as a $5.

    107. Re:illegal? by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nonono, that's a simple mistranslataion. That offence, gravy as it may be, is not punishable by death, but by diet. That's right - you kill the meatball, you pay the price. No more meat for you!

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    108. Re:illegal? by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      Actually, the USPS hasn't been a federal entity for a while. They privatized a while back, but still get lots of federal dollars and the Congressional protection over mailboxes.

    109. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that is Bank of Americao... I used to have my account there... they are morons.... fees for everything.... one time a tree on their front lawn blew over and they charged a tree up-rooting fee

    110. Re:illegal? by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      I prefer to use Photshop

    111. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The economy is one giant network of supply and demand. Each bill has value relative to the number of other bills in circulation, and removing money from circulation generally hurts the economy.

    112. Re:illegal? by trg83 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they are just erring on the side of safety, but I don't think that is a legal requirement.

    113. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonono, that's a simple mistranslataion. That offence, gravy as it may be, is not punishable by death, but by diet. That's right - you kill the meatball, you pay the price. No more meat for you!

      SHeesh, fall off the wagon just once...

    114. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Upcoming Conversation:

      NegativeK: Hey Unc, how did those bills check out?

      Uncle: What bills?

    115. Re:illegal? by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1

      Seems pretty smart to me: 1)Committ a federal offense. 2)Post the proof on the internet.

      You forgot 3) take it to the bank to get new $20 bills

      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    116. Re:illegal? by prell · · Score: 1

      That's not how you do it: you cut from different parts of each bill (i.e., bottom, middle and top). Trying to convince the bank that two separate pieces of a bill were originally part of the same whole is another issue. I assume this is how the Japanese people did it? Maybe they cut into diagonals and used tape to piece together different diagonals.

    117. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have a friend who would tear up five and ten dollar bills in front of people, mainly to get a reaction out of them i think.

      could i have turned him in to the secret service?

    118. Re:illegal? by jacobcaz · · Score: 1
      • Waitresses really remember the guy who leaves a $2 bill as a tip for a $8 meal
      You know who else remembers you? Strippers! Yep, take a wad of $2 bills to the strip club to tip the dancers. You stand out, you're tipping double the regular rate and they come back and flirt with you more often.

      ObRealityCheck: Yes I know they only are flirting with me for the money, but sometimes a great pair of tits in your face is payment enough!

    119. Re:illegal? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to just leave a $10?

      Oooohhh... humor. Yeah, sorry about that.

    120. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So those wheresgeorge.com stamps you find on dollar bills are illegal.

    121. Re:illegal? by Imperator · · Score: 1

      Huh? If the company tells you it's legal to murder someone and you do that on company time, you're not exactly off the hook. Neither is the company, mind you.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    122. Re:illegal? by rupert2000 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean:

      In Socialist Sweden..

      ?

    123. Re:illegal? by Kwantus · · Score: 1

      Actually I think the relevant bit is "unfit to be reissued" ... If there were actually an RFID tag there, I'd be inclined to poke out Jackson's eye. Or just cut a little X in it. Most people would still treat the result as perfectly good money, and thus it would *still be* perfectly good money -- paper money being nothing but faith.

      But once the bill drifts back to the Fed, it would not want to recirculate it, 'cause the precious RFID is dead ... so although the bill was not actually damaged as money, any more than, say, by tearing a speck off a corner (even less, actually, since you wouldn't have to remove any material to cripple an RFID), the Fed could say you blocked its reissue because their precious RFID was dead.

      They hold all the cards as to what "reissue" means.

    124. Re:illegal? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      You messed up on the last two lines:

      7) ???
      8) PROFIT!!! ($6 - $4 = $2, plus whatever you got from Step 7)

      While I'm at it....In Soviet Russia, dollar bills cut YOU up into thirds, mix YOU with parts of other people, and give YOU to the government!

    125. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a little while when the price of copper was high and pennies were still made of copper (before 1982), this was almost true. The mint figured out that it was in danger of happening, so they started making the pennies out of (even less valuable) zinc.

      ps, The other big reason they still make them is that there's always some kind of protest in Illinois (home of Abe Lincoln) whenever they talk about discontinuing the penny.

    126. Re:illegal? by Omerna · · Score: 1

      Not exactly mundane, they're taken out of circulation when they hit a bank :)

      --


      No sig for you.
    127. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP

      heh, lol.

    128. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men with earpieces and black suits could come knocking.

      You mean gay biker dudes?

    129. Re:illegal? by whorfin · · Score: 1

      According to the US Treasury, it's not out of circulation

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    130. Re:illegal? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      That law was intended to prevent shaving of precious metal coins and numismatic fraud, like changing the date on ones coin to a more rare date in hopes of selling it to an unwitting collector. Destroying a coin is not the covered, because there is no method of fraudulently passing a coin which no longer exists.

      For what its worth, there was a seperate law that forbade the melting of US coins, and it was taken off the books during the Hunt Brothers silver bull market... in the hopes that it would bring the price down and save the Silver Users Association members.

      There are presently several private smelting companies who will take American silver coinage and melt it down for you into ingots. The practice is perfectly legal.

    131. Re:illegal? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      A pre-1981 penny is 100% copper, and worth about 0.85 cents. Modern pennies are mostly zinc, and are nearly worthless. No currently circulating coin contains metal worth more than its face value, the nickel is the closest, worth about 3 cents.

      Here's a neat experiment. Take a penny dated 1981 or before, and a new one. Heat both of them on the stove. The old penny will come out unscathed, but the new one will be a pile of goo.

      The "illegal to melt" law was a product of the debasement of the coinage in 1964, because dimes, quarters, halves, etc. were made of 90% silver at the time. Inflation thanks to an increase in the amount of unbacked federal reserve notes and increased industrial demand for silver made it impossible to continue minting coins out of it.

      When Silver made its run up in the late 70's, the law was revoked in the hopes that enough people would melt their old silver coinage to meet the demand. It was generally unsuccessful, because most of the coinage had already been melted either by the US Mint or in illegal smelting operations.

    132. Re:illegal? by Omerna · · Score: 1

      I recently visited the Richmond Branch of the Federal Reserve and they said they don't send out $2 bills. Once they hit the Fed they don't go back out (or so I was told, the lady could've been wrong). So while there are in circulation they are no longer printed or distributed (at least not in less than large quantites as the link says) and for the most part "gone".

      --


      No sig for you.
    133. Re:illegal? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the penny costs 0.7 cents to make. That might be as of a few years ago, though.

  8. Obligatory by Paul+E.+Loeb · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, money burns you.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, that never gets old.

  9. Idiot. by Daleks · · Score: 5, Funny

    This person isn't very smart. Why didn't he try it on one $20 bill to start with rather than all of them?

    1. Re:Idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh, you know what they say, "In for a penny, in for a pound!"

    2. Re:Idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There must be a critical mass of $20 bills for
      the effect to manifest. :-)

    3. Re:Idiot. by LooseChanj · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's what I was thinking. Maybe he did, and it didn't do anything, and the mechanism is only meant to "activate" when someone is carrying around a buttload of these. Drug dealers, terrorists, etc...

      --
      Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
    4. Re:Idiot. by enosys · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There could be a simple explanation for that. If you microwave a single bill heat is still produced but it's easy for it to get out. If you stick a bunch togeather and microwave that more or less the same amount of heat is produced per bill meaning a lot more heat, and paper is a good insulator, so the middle gets really hot and starts burning. Note how the amount of burning seems to have a progression from large to small.

    5. Re:Idiot. by LooseChanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I did note that the burnage ranged from small to fairly large. Sigh. It was a fun conspiracy theory there for 5 minutes.

      --
      Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
    6. Re:Idiot. by jigyasubalak · · Score: 1

      Do you make a bonfire of all the fire-crackers you purchase or you burn them one-by-one? I think he is wise burning one $20 bill at a time.

      I, personally, would quickly pass the $20 bills I have to the local Best Buy and have the govt track them instead :D

      --
      The best planning can be done after the project completes.
    7. Re:Idiot. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny
      Indeed. And check out this quote:
      That is according to the minimum wage employees working at the truck stop!

      It looks like not being a minimum wage employee didn't stop him from toasting the entire wad of cash.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    8. Re:Idiot. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Maybe he'll try microwaving a roll of pennies next.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    9. Re:Idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron shouldve just banged it hard with a hammer

    10. Re:Idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or people who work with cash. I used to work as a waiter in a real nice restaurant. My g/f at the time was a stripper. We always had lots of ones, but would always try to convert them into higher bills since neither of us had credit cards (really wish I still don't ;).
      Were we criminals? By this guy's assumption, yes.

    11. Re:Idiot. by jridley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This person isn't very smart.

      You could have stopped there.

      This bright boy overlooked a few things:

      All bills contain metallic and magnetic inks. You can SEE it. What happens to metal in the microwave? It gets hot.

      If there were RFID chips in the bills, you'd be able to see them as I don't think they're transparent. Hold the bill up to a strong light. Nothing there.

      Yeah, this guy's about as much a genius as most conspiracy theorists.

    12. Re:Idiot. by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Stinks of hoax to me.

    13. Re:Idiot. by enosys · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm sure there's no RFID tag in 20 dollar bills but there definitely is a metal strip on them and that's enough to explain why they would burn in a microwave.

      You've probably heard of microwaving CDs. The metal layer on CDs is very thin, after all you can see through it, yet it makes a very impressive display and it obviously melts and burns the plastic.

    14. Re:Idiot. by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the metal strip run vertically about 1/3 of the length of the bill though? The faces are in the center.

      Good point though.

  10. I'm skeptical. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, having worked at a Kmart for several years, I have a pretty good idea how the antitheft systems currently in place in most stores and libraries work, and they don't yet use RFID tags; they use some sort of magnetized strip that is then demagnetized by a magnetic pulse or a powerful magnet at the counter (thus the warning not to set credit cards on or near the demagnetizers, lest they be demagnetized too). In fact, RFID tags as the retailers are thinking of using them are partially intended to replace such a system (and partially to replace bar code scanners). Given that RFID tags are barely even starting to be used by distributors, you're not going to convince me that a truck stop of all places is at the head of the technology curve using this expensive equipment that almost no manufacturers even support anyway. Thus, even if an RFID tag was embedded in the money, that shouldn't set off a magnetic antitheft system at all, because the system is looking for something entirely different altogether.

    Second, these magnetic antitheft systems are capable of being set off by odd things, such as items of personal electronics or odd bits of metal. (Heck, I even remember seeing one recent news story about a kid who sets off those scanners just by walking through them without anything in his pockets at all, just because his body happens to generate the precise frequency of electromagnetic energy they're keyed to.)

    Third, RFID tag or not, those new bills do happen to have a strip of metal foil running through them, right at about the point of Jefferson's left eye...to make counterfeiting harder, you see. And when you subject metallic material to microwave energy, it heats up quickly...that's just basic physics.

    So I'm willing to believe that the bills set off ordinary electromagnetic anti-theft detectors just by reflecting the microwaves in some funky way. (Or heck, maybe they even are magnetized in a way that anti-theft detectors can pick up...or at least can become so magnetized, since I doubt that they're all that way...if everybody shopping with new twenties was setting off anti-theft systems, we'd be hearing about that on the news, and the anti-theft system manufacturers would be making hasty adjustments or going out of business.) I'm even willing to believe that those foil strips will cause the money to scorch in the microwave. But it's one heck of a leap to conclude that this is because of Evil RFID Tags That The Nasty Gum'mint Is Sneaking Into Our Money.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:I'm skeptical. by zedmelon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good point. And since they claim there was $1000 in twenties, that many metal strips packed together would reflect even that much more crap back at the AF detectors.

      --
      Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    2. Re:I'm skeptical. by anotherone · · Score: 0

      actually, on further investigation, I could be mistaken...

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    3. Re:I'm skeptical. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      those new bills do happen to have a strip of metal foil running through them, right at about the point of Jefferson's left eye

      Jackson. Jefferson is on the two dollar bill.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:I'm skeptical. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A couple more quick points I just thought of:

      1) Even if the money was designed to set off anti-theft systems (which would be dumb, for the reason I parenthetically enumerated above) it could only deliver one bit of data: on or off, yes or no, it was or was not tagged with a theft prevention device.

      2) Even being able to track money at all is not new. Why d'ya think mobsters need to launder it?

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    5. Re:I'm skeptical. by wronskyMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      just because his body happens to generate the precise frequency of electromagnetic energy they're keyed to.
      Actually, the tags work passively (not requiring onboard battery) because inductors and capacitors can be printed on foil/similar materials, so a LC (or RLC) circuit can be designed to resonate at whatever frequency the antitheft system uses. When this resonant circuit passes between the detection gates (a receiver and transmitter), it resonates, causing a change in the received signal intensity at the gate (the circuit is now picking up energy originally flowing to the transmitter). Small electronics could set it off if some random connected inductor and capacitor on the circuit board form a resonant circuit - clothes or someones body could conceivably do this as well. The magnetic pulse in the store either permanently breaks the circuit (used in stores, etc) or bends a foil-type contact open (used in libraries so they can bend the contact shut again to activate the tag when the book is returned).

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    6. Re:I'm skeptical. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Mia culpa. And it was also the right eye, not the left one. (Well, his right, our left.)

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    7. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      First off, having worked at a Kmart for several years, I have a pretty good idea how the antitheft systems currently in place in most stores and libraries work, and they don't yet use RFID tags;

      First time working at Kmart has qualified anyone for anything....

    8. Re:I'm skeptical. by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that RFID tags are barely even starting to be used by distributors, you're not going to convince me that a truck stop of all places is at the head of the technology curve using this expensive equipment that almost no manufacturers even support anyway.

      I would think that a truck stop would be the first place to use such things. After all, trucks go there, so it's pretty clear that they are along major distribution lanes of travel. Not only that, but truckers among the people who have the least amount of time to wait in line, and a truck stop that can service more people more quickly means more money. Truckers typicaly are high tech folk, and I feel would be most likely to push such systems in places they frequent, for obvious reasons.

      It makes perfect sense to me.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    9. Re:I'm skeptical. by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall reading somewhere that all US bills had a metal strip embedded in them somewhere. The idea was that attemepting to sneak a suitcase full of cash into an airplane would set off the metal detectors at the airport.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    10. Re:I'm skeptical. by ffattizzi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to set off these anti theft systems in some stores, but not every store. Couldn't figure out what was going on. Finally at one store, an employee told me it was my wallet. I had bought a new wallet about 9 months before, but never thought it was the cause because I left the store I bought it at without setting off the alarm. He deactivated my wallet and I've never had this happen again.

      My guess is this guy had the same problem, but because of a bit of paranoia, he blamed his cash. Microwave money long enough and I bet it starts to burn near the center. And if you have a stack of them, I bet you might get a little explosion like they wrote about.

      I think he needs to loosen his tin foil hat, it's starting to cut off circulation.

    11. Re:I'm skeptical. by ruprechtjones · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah right, there's no such thing as a two dollar bill. Taco Bell helped disprove this silly statement of yours.

      --
      Kip Hawley is an idiot.
    12. Re:I'm skeptical. by shanen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it's just some kind of coil. When I worked at an electronics store in Akihabara the network cables would routinely trip the alarms when they went through. We would just take the cable out of the bag, let them go through the detector, and then hand them the cable separately.

      Not sure of the exact details, but I think the detectors are actually fishing for some kind of recognition code from the proper devices. Basically a kind of transponder-like approach. They're able to detect that a possible antenna is present, but something like a network cable is definitely not going to provide the correct response.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    13. Re:I'm skeptical. by zedmelon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and I think the idea would be to be more along the lines of making it difficult for you to print legal-looking money at home on your HP deskjet.

      --
      Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    14. Re:I'm skeptical. by LooseChanj · · Score: 1

      Hey, if he was working his way through college he mighta graduated!

      --
      Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
    15. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heck, I even remember seeing one recent news story about a kid who sets off those scanners just by walking through them without anything in his pockets at all, just because his body happens to generate the precise frequency of electromagnetic energy they're keyed to.

      That kid was probably this guy's son.
    16. Re:I'm skeptical. by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Many products have a small strip of magnetized metal in them, which is what sets off the alarms (they put them in books at libraries sometimes - didn't you ever pull them out when you were a kid?). The detectors at store entrances generate a small magnetic field by running a current through some kind of a loop, and if your magnetized metal strip goes through the field it subtly affects the magnetic field and therefore the current travelling through the loop.

      A coil of wire, even if not magnetized, could have a small current induced in it by the magnetic field produced by the theft detectors; this current would in turn produce a small magnetic field in the coil, which would again affect the alarm field and the current running through it, setting it off.

      Of course, if this is true, it seems like everything with an electric motor in it should be setting off the alarms, so I probably don't know what the hell I'm talking about.

    17. Re:I'm skeptical. by demonbug · · Score: 1

      I don't think they print $2 bills any more. The only place I've ever actually gotten one was at Monticello (Jefferson's house).

    18. Re:I'm skeptical. by demonbug · · Score: 4, Funny
      I seem to recall reading somewhere that all US bills had a metal strip embedded in them somewhere.


      I'd be happy to help check this out. I think the easiest way would be for everyone to send me whatever bills they happen to have. I'll carefully check them out, inspecting them for any metal strips. To ensure that whatever bills I receive are in fact legal tender, I will then proceed to the nearest Best Buy or Fry's to see whether these fine institutions accept them as such.

      I know, it sounds like it will be a lot of work, but its the least I can do to furhter the knowledge of teh Slashdot crowd.

    19. Re:I'm skeptical. by skiflyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For some reason if you bet on horses you tend to see more 2 dollar bills... at least that was my experience a few years ago.

    20. Re:I'm skeptical. by MicroBerto · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Wheresgeorge.com is a very interesting site, but come on, there's basically nothing in there! I put in a few bills and it was always the first one in their database.

      There's too much money out there to rely on users to update that stuff.

      --
      Berto
    21. Re:I'm skeptical. by Curtman · · Score: 1
    22. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I will then proceed to the nearest Best Buy or Fry's to see whether these fine institutions accept them as such."

      That right there, ladies and gentlemen, is what separates geeks from the rest of the crowd. When a regular man receives free money, they visit the local strip joint or whorehouse. A slashdotter on the other hand...

    23. Re:I'm skeptical. by nil5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Essentially you're right, but you're kind of looking at it the wrong way. It is an LC circuit, but there isn't a coil or capacitor in the discrete component sense. Take a look at the device that you get from Barnes & Noble or in a CD case. It looks like a wire that is configured in a spiral. HMMMM
      Now that's an LC circuit (if you want to think of it like that), but must people think of it as an antenna. I've never found out exactly how these systems work, but I imagine that they emit some RF and listen for some type of scattering from the device. When an EM wave impinges on some material, some of it will be reradiated in the scattered field. I'm willing to bet (but admit i could well be wrong,please correct me) there's some kind of nonlinearity which emits/scatters a distinguishible signal of different frequency. Otherwise you'd have to use atime-domain technique to "look for" the scattered signal (must differentiate between what you're transmitting and receiving).

    24. Re:I'm skeptical. by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... a kid who sets off those scanners ... because his body happens to generate the precise frequency of electromagnetic energy they're keyed to.

      Like hell. That's a stolen kid! Put his parents under arrest!

    25. Re:I'm skeptical. by Vordax · · Score: 1

      From what I have been told the metal strip in bills is designed to set metal detectors off at points of entrance/exit to the country. When you have a large enough amount of currency the quantity of metal will be high enough to set the detectors off. Moving undeclared currency across the border is illegal... Help catch drug smugglers etc...

    26. Re:I'm skeptical. by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but did you try it with a new Twenty?

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    27. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nope, they're still in circulation. The latest printing was as recent as 1996.

    28. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mia culpa.

      Mea culpa.

    29. Re:I'm skeptical. by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Informative
      you're not going to convince me that a truck stop of all places is at the head of the technology curve using this expensive equipment that almost no manufacturers even support anyway.

      Never been to a truck stop in the past 20 years, eh? They have really nice WiFi, and even in the 80s had systems set up with modems that you could BBS off of. In the early 90s, they had internet kiosks. You can buy Palm PDAs, portable printers and hand fax units at Flying J, a common chain.

      Truckers have to basically be a connected office on the road. They tend toward the leading edge of technology. You've heard the term "road warrior" in relation to on-the-road office workers? Truckers take their office with them. Truck stops service those offices. Long haul truckers use satellite connections and spreadsheets.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    30. Re:I'm skeptical. by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Dude, have you EVER been in a truck stop? Take a trip in Texas anywhere west of Abilene and you're going to end up in a few, as I have. When truckers stop, they STOP. Usually for a couple of hours for food, sleep, and gas(oline). Truckers aren't high-tech dudes. Why do you think CB radios are still so popular among them?

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    31. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The titty bars in Dallas were giving them out for awhile, trying to encourage higher tips...

    32. Re:I'm skeptical. by shyster · · Score: 1
      Truckers aren't high-tech dudes. Why do you think CB radios are still so popular among them?

      Because they work? Do you have anything better?

      FWIW, having been a trucker myself, I'd say that there are more tech savvy truckers out there than most would realize. From laptops, to wireless (in truck stops, and even ad-hoc networks in the parking lot), to GPS systems truckers often depend on technology for business, communication, and entertainment.

    33. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Working at Kmart with excellent grammar and intimate knowledge of their security system no less ... sounds like a dangerous employee to me.

    34. Re:I'm skeptical. by megadago21 · · Score: 1

      If you guys remeber a while back, there was the story on measuring the speed of light with a microwave... The gist of it was you put a long strip of chocolate in the microwave for a few seconds, and if done right, lines would form where the chocolate started to melt... This was caused by the peaks of the microwaves inside.

      I'm betting this guy put his money in the same spot in the microwave, thus the strongest point of the wave was in the same spot, and our "RFID" tag is this in the same spot. Hmmm.... can we say conspiracy solved?

    35. Re:I'm skeptical. by selphish189 · · Score: 1

      Quote-
      "2) Even being able to track money at all is not new. Why d'ya think mobsters need to launder it?"

      The mobsters don't need to launder money because the goverment keeps tabs on individual bills, but for tax purposes. What they do is get $200 thousand illegaly (i.e. selling drugs, sex) and they use that money to pay somone for something legal, but they say they paid $100 thousand for it. They then they sell it for $200 thousand, and boom, $200 thosand of legal tender.

    36. Re:I'm skeptical. by Spillman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Should anyone still be confused on how these devices work...

      This should clear it up for you

      --
      sig?
    37. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He deactivated my wallet and ...



      This didn't involve sticking it in a microwave, did it?

    38. Re:I'm skeptical. by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to work at CompUSA (four years ago). We found a roll of those square antitheft stickers commonly found in DVDs and Microsoft software boxes. We then set about 100 of them, sticky side up throughout the store. Asshole (as we call him, the guy who checks your reciept as you walk out the door) couldn't figure out what the hell was going on when 95% of the customers (shoes, unknowingly) would set off the beeper on their way out. Best day of work ev-ar. To be 16 again...

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    39. Re:I'm skeptical. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I've seen people write "wheresgeorge.com" on the bills that they register so that people know that the bill is being tracked.

      Probably defacing of federal currency, but it's fun to do.

    40. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...7-layer burritos selling for only $.99??? Hate to tell you this, but the articles an obvious fake!

    41. Re:I'm skeptical. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      But if outsourcing keeps up, I'm sure it won't be the last.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    42. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When a regular man receives free money, they visit the local strip joint or whorehouse."

      I fucking hope not. Idiot.

    43. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just $20, $50 and $100 bills.

    44. Re:I'm skeptical. by thadeusg · · Score: 1

      "and gas(oline)"

      pffft...I think not! Diesel! (Had to nitpick since you added the "oline" part)

      Have you ever looked into the cab of a modern semi? I'd bet the technology inside would rival anything you've got laying 'round. Hell, there are more buttons in those things than I have in my entire HOUSE.

    45. Re:I'm skeptical. by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Now write "www.wheresgeorge.com" on the bills with a sharpie, and go spend them. People will re-enter at least some of them. Kinda neat, though it doesn't really serve a purpose. People tend to be more likely to enter bills with the web site written on them.

    46. Re:I'm skeptical. by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those large, flat, square ones are also easy to peel off items and lay on the floor sticky side up; or even "accidentally" stick to one of your friends or perhaps the person in front of you with 24 items and a checkbook... in the 12 items or less, Cash Only lane. You got lucky, a roll would be interesting to play with.

      Jonah Hex

    47. Re:I'm skeptical. by Qutec · · Score: 1

      Why d'ya think mobsters need to launder it?

      I can't believe what a bunch of nerds we are
      we're looking up money laundering in the dictionary

    48. Re:I'm skeptical. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You should see the Italian movie "The Monster" with Roberto Benigni. The main character's goal in life seems to be to never pay for anything. He walks into a supermarket wearing a trenchcoat, begins stuffing his pockets, and also picks things up and plants them on other customers and salespeople. Then he goes through the checkout counter and buys a pack of gum - meanwhile, all the alarms are going off. He walks through the alarm sensor with his trenchcoat bulging, sets it off, holds up his pack of gum and points to it, and the clerk waves him through.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    49. Re:I'm skeptical. by sobeks_eye · · Score: 1
      Given that RFID tags are barely even starting to be used by distributors, you're not going to convince me that a truck stop of all places is at the head of the technology curve using this expensive equipment that almost no manufacturers even support anyway.

      You have no feel for the complexity of the logistics industry. Distribution was one of the first industries to adopt e-commerce. Truckers and truck stops have proprietary billing equipment for purchases, so RFIDs in truck stops shouldn't be suprising.

      You should check out some of the bigger truck stops and see what they're all about. It's not all Mel's Diner and plastic Jesus dashboard icons.

    50. Re:I'm skeptical. by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      It doesnt need to be a high powerd magent. If it can hold 5 sheets of paper on your fridge it can de-magnetize the tags.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    51. Re:I'm skeptical. by djdead · · Score: 1

      do happen to have a strip of metal foil running through them, right at about the point of Jefferson's left eye

      uh, i just took a new twenty out of my wallet and looked at the foil strip. it's about half-an-inch in from the left side of the bill, about two inches away from the eye in question.

      --
      -1: flamebait should really be -1: inciteful
    52. Re:I'm skeptical. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I had the exact same problem. My wallet triggered the alarm several times at Target. Finally I started looking around my wallet and found square tag inside one of the back credit card holders. A pair of tweezers later and the problem was gone.

    53. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coulda been much funnier... you blew it

    54. Re:I'm skeptical. by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seen that link a few places.

      It's only quasi informative as the link apparently contains outdated information.

      2003 printings exist, at least in sheet form

    55. Re:I'm skeptical. by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Heck, I even remember seeing one recent news story about a kid who sets off those scanners just by walking through them without anything in his pockets at all, just because his body happens to generate the precise frequency of electromagnetic energy they're keyed to.

      And when the security guard came to take him away, the kid said, "There's something different about you... too much iron in your blood?"

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    56. Re:I'm skeptical. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      When I was working at Kmart, I helped a fellow out like that. He was setting off the alarm, though I knew he'd paid for everything. On a hunch, I glanced down at his feet, saw a brand of leather shoe we carry, and said, "This is going to sound weird, but can I borrow your left shoe?" Ran it across my demagnetizing pad, it beeped and deactivated. That particular brand of shoe (I can't remember the name now) had a security tag built into the shoe itself as part of the manufacturing process.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    57. Re:I'm skeptical. by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      A US chain restaurant called Ted's Montana Grill is fond of giving $2 bills out when you get change back on the check... maybe they figure that no one really wants them, and they'll automatically come back in the server's tip.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    58. Re:I'm skeptical. by CXI · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I once was setting these things off with my wallet because there was a paper thin theft tag hidden in the folds. It wasn't the money. Being slightly smarter than this guy, I looked for it, found it and removed it without the use of a microwave.

      That entire site is a complete loon-fest.

    59. Re:I'm skeptical. by RaZ0r · · Score: 1

      I have a pretty good idea how the antitheft systems currently in place in most stores and libraries work, and they don't yet use RFID tags; they use some sort of magnetized strip that is then demagnetized by a magnetic pulse or a powerful magnet at the counter (thus the warning not to set credit cards on or near the demagnetizers, lest they be demagnetized too).

      Actually these anti-theft tags do not get demagnetized. The way these Sensomatic systems work is much different. The tags are actual 2 think strips of metal separated by a slight gap. A signal is emitted from the sensormatic pedistals which resonates at a certain frequency because of the gap in the tag. This resonance is detected by the sensormatic system which sets off an alarm. The demagnetizer pulse actually just causes the gap in the tag to change, which in turn changes the resonance frequency.
      for more information on how sensormatic's system works go here: link

      an interesting side note: I have found from working as a manager at a certain bankrupt retail chain that there are other ways to deactivate these tags. One such method pioneered by my friend is to place the tag near a large stereo subwoofer and crank it up. The magnetic field from the sub must have the same effect on the tag as the POS deactivators.
      Bending the tags in half also works quite well:)
      And for those of you who would like to cause havoc at such a store just peel a sensormatic tag off of an item and hide it somewhere on a shopping cart. It will take the poor cashiers a long time to figure out why the alarm is going off constantly.

      Information in this post is for informational purposes only. Using it may land you a free ride with your local police

      --


      - Think for yourself, question authority.-
    60. Re:I'm skeptical. by Starlet+Monroe · · Score: 1

      First time working at Kmart has qualified anyone for anything....

      ...other than unemployment benefits.

      --
      ++
    61. Re:I'm skeptical. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      The antitheft things I see and have torn apart look like two strips of metal. When the magnetic force in the anti-theft pad incounters them, I bet it just pulls both strips together. So, those ones are probably are just capacitors using air as a dielectric. They are only good once hence why Walmart and others have their DVD's with them inside the casing (can't pull them off).

      --

      Gorkman

    62. Re:I'm skeptical. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Hate to treply to myself but the how stuff works article posted by someone else says the metal stripe type (EM) of tages can be reactivated. My Mistake.

      --

      Gorkman

    63. Re:I'm skeptical. by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we used to do this in the Panama City mall. Good times...

    64. Re:I'm skeptical. by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Why do you think CB radios are still so popular among them?

      I thought CB radios were popular among truckers because it's an accepted standard. What the hell else are you going to use if you are in a state like Texas for example many miles away from a mobile tower? For an emergency, you can still use channel 9 in many cases.

      And yes, i've been to a truck stop, i've used their wifi simply because I needed a largish file and didn't want to drive all the way to a place I knew there was broadband. Yes, truckers need their downtime, to sleep and because the law requires only a certain amount of drivetime.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    65. Re:I'm skeptical. by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Awesome movie. Also when he goes through the machine it goes haywire. Twice as loud as for other customers, cause his coat is full.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    66. Re:I'm skeptical. by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      We had those on the back inside cover of books in our highschool library. It quickly became a fun passtime to peel them out and stick them inside of people's bags and stuff. The library started gluing that last blank page over the tags... It didn't stop anyone from peeling those apart too. They worked great on new students, they'd get scared and/or freak out. The librarians caught on rather quickly though so they stopped putting them in our books. Eventually, hardly any books had those tags left in them.

    67. Re:I'm skeptical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. This is a simple energy absorption trick. Note also that these simple tags require an antenna of the correct size, usually arranged as a coil. I think that is where most of the resonance comes from actually. You can see the coil if you peel the thing apart. It is not impossible for something else to resonate there, but the frequency is pretty low, so you have to work at it, and I suspect there might be extra features to avoid false positives. RFID systems are much more complicated. I think they get their power from the scanner though, not from a battery.

    68. Re:I'm skeptical. by rd4tech · · Score: 0

      speaking of research fund...:))

    69. Re:I'm skeptical. by storl · · Score: 1

      Having worked in several retail stores, I can tell you that strips of these things are all over the place if you want to swipe some and cause some havoc. A lot of stores simply keep them by the registers near where they deactivate the tags. Some brick and mortar stores that carry large or boxed merchandise (i.e. Home Depot) have blue carts with silver metal tops used to place anti-theft banding on merchandise, and these carts often have the tags sitting on them. Pretty much any store has loads of the tags sitting at the service/retruns desk since they often need to slap a new one on returned merchandise.

      The above information is for informational purposes purely. If you get a kick in the nuts from a friend that you screw with, I claim no responsibility.

    70. Re:I'm skeptical. by BanjoBob · · Score: 1

      I just looked at the new $20s and there is definitely something dark right near the right eye (slightly above and to the right). It isn't a solid object however. The dark spot isn't on the front or back of the bill but in the middle of the paper. I looked at several of the bills and noticed it was on all of them that I have.

      Could this be the "paint" type RFID? I didn't think the technology was accurate enough to determine exact serial numbers with the magnetic ink type RFID.

      I don't know what it is but its in the right place but it doesn't look like anything that would blow up in a microwave.

      --
      Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
    71. Re:I'm skeptical. by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      Similar thing in another movie, but one of the (three) guys doing that turns around and say to the little old granny they had planted with lingerie "you should be ashamed of yourself" before the other two push him near the exit.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  11. No. They don't. by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:
    So we chose to 'microwave' our cash, over $1000 in twenties in a stack, not spread out on a carasoul.

    Now, looking at the second picture, and knowing a bit about how microwaves heat stuff... looks to me like the approximate center of the stack charred up nicely in the microwave. Notice the bills near the top and bottom of the stack are nearly untouched. The reason the center of the bills charred in the same place in all the bill is because it was the center of the stack.

    I sincerely hope this article is intended as a joke, or at the very least "we did something really dumb and we're going to at least make it funny" situation.

    And for the record, I just zapped a $20 bill for 20 seconds and it's barely even warm, on Jackson's right eye or anywhere else.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:No. They don't. by the_Upsetter · · Score: 5, Funny
      And for the record, I just zapped a $20 bill for 20 seconds and it's barely even warm, on Jackson's right eye or anywhere else

      Well, I can't fault your methods, you've got every base covered. It would appear that you've conclusively proven this experiment to be a hoax!

      Another peer-review success story.

    2. Re:No. They don't. by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Well I didn't really want to burn my only $20 bill just in case these guys were right. But if there is some kind of metallic object that explodes hidden in Jackson's right eye, it should have at least heated up in that amount of time.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:No. They don't. by cnkeller · · Score: 4, Funny
      And for the record, I just zapped a $20 bill for 20 seconds and it's barely even warm, on Jackson's right eye or anywhere else.

      You expect us to take you seriously when you don't even know the basic recipe for heating a $20?

      Quack.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    4. Re:No. They don't. by forevermore · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just zapped a $20 bill for 20 seconds and it's barely even warm

      This is probably because if there is anything under his eye, it's smaller than the microwave wavelengths. Our favorite TV Chef pointed this out in his popcorn episode when he informs us that staples are too small to get enough of the microwaves to heat up and burn the paper bag they're stapled into.

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    5. Re:No. They don't. by ktheory · · Score: 1

      So we chose to 'microwave' our cash, over $1000 in twenties in a stack, not spread out on a carasoul.

      There's only $600 worth of twenties in the second picture. ...So I guess the only put RFID tags in 60% of twenties.

    6. Re:No. They don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....hmmm, once i thawed a bag with closed with a metal twist tie, and it sparked ...

    7. Re:No. They don't. by old_unicorn · · Score: 1

      If there was an RFID tag, you would not need to microwave it for very long at all. I know someone who wrecked a mobile phone with 1 second in a microwave. Anything working on tiny currents and voltages, with an antenna will get wrecked very quickly with 650 watts pouring into it. I tend to agree with the person that said that they had simply 'cooked' the notes until they burned.

      --
      ***You learn something Every day. And then you die.***
    8. Re:No. They don't. by ZipR · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, Alex will post the recipe on epicurious.com soon. Perhaps it should be by the "Salted Water for Boiling" recipe link.

    9. Re:No. They don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A twist tie is considerably longer than a staple.

  12. Another legitimate use for making copies of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Putting together Internet hoaxes! If they were using the latest versions of Photoshop they wouldn't have been able to make all that fake cash to singe.

  13. I'm claiming by edrain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    bullshit.

  14. Hey everyone.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm broke. I just burned up $1K in the microwave, now please COME SLASHDOT MY SERVER AND MAKE MY HOST COMPANY CHARGE ME EXTRA FOR THE MONTH. ;)

    Boy, when it rains, it pours.

    1. Re:Hey everyone.... by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      We will when you put in your credit cards too :)

    2. Re:Hey everyone.... by Polo · · Score: 1

      Hey, he probably wants to get rid of the money 'cause it's burning a hole in his pocket.

    3. Re:Hey everyone.... by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      It's OK, they apparently have money to burn.

  15. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $20 bills definitely do NOT have embedded chips. Place your bill in front of a strong light, you'll see that it is just PAPER. Has Slashdot been trolled?

    1. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Has Slashdot been trolled?
      You must be new here.

      To answer your question, yes, and get used to it. On a site full of delusional paranoid megalomaniacal wimps, this sort of thing happens all the time.

  16. Then would these notes be classified as... by noelo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Explosive devices and would you be allowed to take them onto planes. 'I'm sorry Sir, we're going to have to confiscate your bank notes'...

    1. Re:Then would these notes be classified as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost like a James Bond movie...

  17. crazy coworker by anotherone · · Score: 1

    I used to work with this old lady who never carried any cash besides coins because she swore that the government could track you with satillites, due to the embedded security thread that says "USA 20 02 ASU" etc.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:crazy coworker by martinX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was she the funny smelling one with all the cats?

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:crazy coworker by turtlexit · · Score: 1

      LOL. I'd suspect that it would be easier to embed some type of tracking device in a coin anyway, assuming that you believe the government does that.

    3. Re:crazy coworker by anotherone · · Score: 1

      how'd you guess??!?

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    4. Re:crazy coworker by tigga · · Score: 1
      LOL. I'd suspect that it would be easier to embed some type of tracking device in a coin anyway, assuming that you believe the government does that.

      Oh yea, remember that movie - Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man? They had tracking device in dollar coin..

  18. As the guy said... by opec · · Score: 1

    He went to the bank to have the bills replaced free of charge. It's only paper.

    1. Re:As the guy said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you can prove you have 51% of the bill banks can replace the bills because the Federal Reserve will in turn take the destroyed bills, and shred them, replacing them with fresh ones. :)

  19. too bad the article didn't mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...if they smelled like "old hickory" afterwards

    1. Re:too bad the article didn't mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel sort of embarassed that I get that...shouldn't have paid so much attention in US history class...

    2. Re:too bad the article didn't mention... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      You should have been modded up for that old school humor. Jackson was a man's man apparently...get your history lesson for the day here.

    3. Re:too bad the article didn't mention... by zedmelon · · Score: 1
      1. I agree.

      2. While I was hoping for an explanation of the nickname, DAMN--this is still really cool. It's times like this that I wonder how much more of this stuff I'd remember if I had thought history was interesting while I was lectured it for thirteen years straight (attention smart asses: this includes kindergarten).

      3. Welcome to my friends list.

      --
      Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    4. Re:too bad the article didn't mention... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


      Thanks. I read in several places (such as this one - scroll down to Tennessee, and this much longer one - going to have to search) that the nickname came from his toughness...that he was as tough as old hickory. I assume that's pretty solid. I'm sure it's better than "Old Balsa" or "Old Cork".

      BTW, I have no idea why you were modded as "redundant". Hopefully it will show up in my 3x a day metamod list. I'm getting so many opportunities to metamod I'm beginning to feel like an employee.

    5. Re:too bad the article didn't mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the funniest and most clever thing I've read here in a long time. Too bad you posted it anonymously...

  20. Gee, where's the logical problem here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $20 bills burn in a microwave.
    Ergo, $20 bills have embedded RFID tracking chips.

    More likely, the metallic anti-counterfeting strips just formed a dipole resonant near the frequency used by the truck stop's anti-theft tag scanners.

    Move along, nothing to see here, just some idiot with more money than brains.

    1. Re:Gee, where's the logical problem here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Move along, nothing to see here, just some idiot with more money than brains.


      Give him credit: he recognizes the imbalance and is working to correct it.
  21. One Liner by Entropy248 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Department of Homeland Security would like to remind you that you love Big Brother.

    1. Re:One Liner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHHAHAAM thats soooo funny.

      can you please teach me to write insightfully hilarious, i mean baazzzzziiiiinnnnggg.

    2. Re:One Liner by slycer9 · · Score: 1

      Big Brother would like to remind you that there IS no Big Brother.
      Move along now.

      --
      Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
  22. Eh. by anderm7 · · Score: 1

    I'm skeptical. Anything could have caused those burn marks. It doesn't have to be an RFID tag.

  23. Magnetics by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 1
    So, in theory we should get out those large demagnetazation units that the stores have and start swiping our "money." Perhaps, what the government is simply trying to do is to track down counterfeits. Maybe, it's more than that, someone should inquire with the FOIA.

    ...or, maybe, a third-party planted the RFID chips. *Cough,* Wal-Mart *Cough.*

    1. Re:Magnetics by Crolis · · Score: 2, Informative

      It may cause problems in other ways. I believe that one method that vending machine bill readers use to verify authenticity and denomination of an inserted bill is by reading the magnetic ink signature of the bill. If you wipe that, the bill may be come unusable in bill reader mechanisms.

      Other methods include conductivity testing and optical and flourescent recognition.

      This link describes some of the methods that modern bill readers may use to authenticate paper money:

      http://money.howstuffworks.com/question269.htm

      -Crolis

  24. no dice by Catskul · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried it... it didnt work.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:no dice by zedmelon · · Score: 2

      See the post below by Robotech Master. I'll bet it'll work if you try it with about forty bills stacked.

      --
      Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    2. Re:no dice by nomel · · Score: 1

      The thing that interests me isn't the burnt Jackson face, but the burn to the right of it.

      How long did you put it in for? How many?

    3. Re:no dice by mpcarlos · · Score: 1

      mm... I bet they improved it... Its a whole new anti-microwave RFID system. Damn it!

  25. Conspiracy theorists unite... by Drakonite · · Score: 5, Funny

    So THIS is why conspiracy theorists never seem to have money.

    --
    Shoot Pixels, Not People!
  26. Duality by vawlk · · Score: 3, Funny

    While I can't believe this conspiracy theory made to to slashdot, I find myself wanting to experiment too.

  27. B.S. by powera · · Score: 0, Troll

    The likelyhood of this being true is about as slim as SCO winning their "sue a Linux user tommorow case". If anybody had $20's they'd be willing to microwave until vaporized to prove there are no RFID's, we will all be grateful (and hate you for being rich enough to "burn" money").

  28. Invasion of Privacy, Tracking by bahwi · · Score: 1

    Invasion of Privacy, Tracking purchases, cash not anonymous, blah blah blah. It's all true. But this is really cool.

    I am so gonna go get a new $20 from the bank to try this out. =)

  29. Duck tape wallets by Mysteretp · · Score: 1

    I take it if duct tape protects like aluminum foil then Duct tape wallets will come back in style?

    1. Re:Duck tape wallets by Emunix · · Score: 1

      They went out of style?

  30. this is one by katalyst · · Score: 1

    of the better conspiracy theories i've heard in recent times.. i remember there also talk of folding a bill to get an image of the twin towers being hit by a plane
    how true can this notion be? rfid embedding can have a few pros.. easy to trace actual bills and thus stolen money, easy to isolate fake bills... but then again... ransom money, thefts will all become passe..
    but then again.. all this is just an extension of the conspiracy theory

    --
    |/________
    |\A|ALYS|
  31. I can remove the RFID Tags for Free by netfool · · Score: 4, Funny

    Send all of your $20s to: PO Box 7565 Jackson, Wyoming 88096

    --
    Left 4 Dead Gaming Group - http://www.l4dgg.com
    1. Re:I can remove the RFID Tags for Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      I was wondering: Would it be necessary to send any return postage?

    2. Re:I can remove the RFID Tags for Free by iphayd · · Score: 1

      No, no, no.

      It goes like this...

      I can remove all of the RFID tags from your wallet for $20/tag.

    3. Re:I can remove the RFID Tags for Free by jbtule · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you made a typo in your address, I think you meant to type Nigeria.

    4. Re:I can remove the RFID Tags for Free by jigyasubalak · · Score: 1

      You can outsource that job to India. We'll even
      pay you for doing that!
      You can send in your unsafe cash here:
      Safe Cash, P O Box 420, Koramangala, Bangalore, India 560029

      Thanks in advance for the business.

      --
      The best planning can be done after the project completes.
    5. Re:I can remove the RFID Tags for Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wire\Mail fraud ring a bell? Der!

    6. Re:I can remove the RFID Tags for Free by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't want to pay for postage; do you have an e-mail address I could send them to instead?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  32. Mirror... by Megaslow · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...AKA karma whoring for fun and profit

    Mirror w/ pictures

    According to NetCraft, Alex Jones' site is hosted at EV1Servers.net... I wonder if the sum total of the ruined money is $700? I guess it would save a lot of time to just burn the money rather than give it to SCO, yet you would still have the same end result: out $700, and nothing much to show for it.

    1. Re:Mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi i have only recently started visting slashdot and was wondering what a karma whore that people refer to is .

      thanks

    2. Re:Mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go back to fark kthx bye

  33. Well as the old addage goes... by re-Verse · · Score: 1

    "That money will burn a hole in your pocket"
    But the part that was left out is "if you stand near that microwave tower".

    Does anyone know if the money is still legal tender if its been fried like that? And if blowing up the photo of presidents face like the photo illustrates could get you landed in jail for 'terrorism'. Heh.

  34. Canadian money by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

    Damn, I'm Canadian. Does that mean I'll have to wait to explode my money?

    1. Re:Canadian money by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 2, Funny
      Damn, I'm Canadian. Does that mean I'll have to wait to explode my money?

      No, but you'll need 1.34 Canadian $20's to get the explosive power of a single American $20.

      Simply put, you just don't get as much bang for your buck.

    2. Re:Canadian money by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      you're setting yourself up for a joke with the number 51 in it ;)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  35. They've gotten to my eggs too by H4x0r+Jim+Duggan · · Score: 5, Funny

    hey, I just put some eggs in the microwave and they exploded - damn chickens have started putting RFID tags in their eggs already!

    1. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by longhairedgnome · · Score: 1, Informative

      FYI, if you take a green grape and slice it down the middle the long way, and leave the two halves still connected, it'll spark

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    2. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by whereiswaldo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ha! You should see what happened when I put my /tinfoil hat/ in the microwave!

    3. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by eggsome · · Score: 5, Funny

      I acctually did this once, I thought it would be cool to work out the exact amount of time it would take to blow up and then do it for a couple of seconds less every time.
      Super convienient hard boiled eggs!
      Unfortunatly on my first attempt I discovered what a mess it made and abandoned the project... (who whoulda thunk it!?)
      It was acctually on the last second of the pre-set time I had given it which made it quite dis-hartening to hear a -BANG- and then immediately a BEEEEP of the microwave having finished.

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
    4. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by plumby · · Score: 1, Funny

      Make a small hole in one end before putting the egg in the microwave. If you're lucky, you end up with a nice circle of scrambled egg sprayed around the inside.

    5. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by slycer9 · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to take your head out first poindexter.

      --
      Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    6. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by glk572 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the issue that this guy has run into has to do with metalic particals suspended in the ink. the particals are used to give the bills a magnetic signature. to my knowledge this is used in many bills around the world. This has nothing to do with rfid, or the goverment tracking you, this isin't even a valid arguement if it were, the bill has a serial number that can be read by machine.

      The store tracking sensors that this guy is talking about aren't even rfid, and only have a fleeting resemblence, all they can tell is the presence of a tag moving through them. The system is called electonic artical survalance and most are made by sensormatic to my knowledge the only thing that these machines keep track of is the number of times they're triggerd daily.

      the only way to get the effect that this guy got would be to do just what he did, microwave a big tightley packed stack of brand new bills. once they're not stuck together they won't burn nearley as well, as for the exploading thing, they look more like they caught on fire from getting too hot, not like they blew up.

      I'm not terrorably concerned with the goverment tracking the movement of money, they do allready. The real concern that we need to have with rfid is that we can be essentially fingerprinted based on the unique blend of objects that we carry around with us every day.

      anyone correcting my spelling should find something better to do.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
    7. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by ArseneLupin · · Score: 1
      Unfortunatly on my first attempt I discovered what a mess it made and abandoned the project...

      Just put some container (upside-down bowl or colander) over your eggs. Much easyer to clean that the inside of your nuker.

      Anyways, I wouldn't think you'd get nice hard-boiled eggs with this, even with the right timing. Very probably parts of the eggs will still be cold and liquid at the same time when others are already sufficiently "done" to cause the eggsplosion. Think about what happens to frozen butter when set to "high": parts molten, other parts still frozen.

    8. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not terrorably concerned with the goverment tracking the movement of money, they do allready.

      The way the government traditionally tracks money requires you to take the money out of your pocket. What concerns people is that embedding RFID chips in money allows the government and anyone else to track money hidden in your money belt as you walk through the airport, the mall, the football stadium, the street, etc. It allows the government to know where you went after leaving the bank and allows thiefs to know who is a good target.

    9. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try putting a compact disc in the microwave. Now that's art :).

    10. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by dr_tube · · Score: 3, Funny

      Haha, you should see what happened when I put a grenade in my microwave!

    11. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by JeremyALogan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      well... my first clue that they had no idea what they were talking about was when I looked at the picture. The article clearly said that it was over $1000 in cash. There's only $600 in the pic. It also said that it was burned uniformly... it clearly isn't.

      in response to the tracking of money... people even do it voluntarily... Where's George

      this isn't interesting, insightful, or anything else... I just wanted to point it out

    12. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by glk572 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't usally respond to trolls but the artical you link to has nothing to do with rfid, and it's not the gvmt tracking it was the guy's bank, I don't know about you but if my bank didin't keep track of my transactoions I'd be concerned.

      The patriot act is a different matter, but has nothing to do with rfid chips in money, as far as I know there are not any. When you handle money you leave dead skin cells on it, in your paranoid world, this is much more damming than simply knowing how much cash you carry past a recever.

      Here's my system for goverment tracking of money, all serial numbers are logged to each bank (as they are), but from there the bank logs wich costomers the bills are givevn to (my bank has these weird cash machines, you don't get money from the cashier, but from the machine). The next step would be to log the deposits coming from various buisness, This way the gvmt, can trace not only how much money just went by a location (like you'd get with rfid) but who it was, and where they spent it.

      This method would be undectectable, by anyone other than the upper management of the banks, and the gvmt employees who monitor the data. it would be easy to track patterns and connections, not just count money, wich seems pretty pointless.

      Not to mention the fact that rfid can be blocked, read by any concernd party, is easy to detect, costs money to embed in the bills. Why not track the bills by embeding chemicals in them, this would be more usefull, you could tell how much money a person recentley handled, how much they have, track cash using dogs.

      Rfid in money is pretty pointless, and I'd be supprised to see it implimented in the next fifty years, I'd be less suprised to see the end of cash all together.

      So in conclusion, be worried about the goverment spying on our personal financial data, library records, making illegal searches, locking people up in prison with no trial, reading your e-mail, tracking your internet use, knowing that you like to dress up like a woman, but don't be concerned with them wanting to know how much money you have on you.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
    13. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was microwaving my tinfoil hat when it was like, 'Beep Beep Beep Beep' and then, like, half the hat was gone.

      And I was, like, "uuuunh?"

      It DEVOURED my tinfoil hat.

      It was a really good tinfoil hat.

      And then I had to nuke it again, and it wasn't as good because I had to do it fast before the Illuminati came.

      It was... ...a bummer.

      My name is Ellen Feiss, and they're all out to get me.

    14. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm going to take a wild guess and say you weigh over 250 pounds.

    15. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, he was walking through a no-go detector. these things are notorious for being inaccurate and many places that have scumbags owners or are simply the target of gobs of theft adjust the sensitivity way too high.

      it was NOT rfid, no truck stop has the cash to buy rfid equipment and the tags, nor would they waste the money on such technology when they are more concerned in getting anoter $20.00 out of that illegal CB radio amplifier.

      This guy is another typical trucker/ignoramus...

      a dummy that has a little knowlege and is dangerous.

    16. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by orcrist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Move that hole a little down to the side of one end for that sprinkler action... ;-)

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    17. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only when I'm carring a 21-inch monitor, a commercial-grade laser printer, a well stocked full tower, and a 2-liter of Coke.

    18. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Genom · · Score: 2, Funny

      But Weird Al said I could get a great tan that way... ;P

    19. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, and the burn pattern relates to the pattern of standing waves in the oven. It would only take one second (actually a lot less, but we are dealing with oven timers here) to fry an RFID chip. It looks as if he gave them a lot longer.

      They don't know who is actually spending the money, only where it is going, if indeed they have a tracking device, and in any case they will only be able to track within a very short distance (inches) so they can't tell where you have been, only that maybe you pass a sensor occasionally. That tells them very little, conventional surveillance would give them a million times more.

      Of course if it helps catch drug dealers, who then get a life sentence, I am all for it, although I doubt that the technology is that useful somehow.

    20. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      metallic, argument, article, surveillance, triggered, tightly, nearly, exploding, terribly, already

      anyone correcting my spelling should find something better to do.

      Good idea. I'll add you to my foes list, too. You're aware of the problem and refuse to take corrective action. Do yourself a favor and learn to spell.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    21. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by emilymildew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An upside-down colander? Man, that's just cruel. Not only does he have to clean out the inside of his microwave like he normally would, but he has to clean out the colander too.

    22. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      damn, you are a junior in COLLEGE with spelling like that? Wow, time to revoke their charter...

    23. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by The+Queen · · Score: 1

      Of course if it helps catch drug dealers, who then get a life sentence, I am all for it,

      PLEASE tell me you are being sarcastic here.

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    24. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are quite right.

      Actually it is not possible to place RFID tags into currency at this moment. No, not due to technology restriction but compliance. The ISO standard for currency states that all currency must not exceed a particular thickness (AFAIR its 1/8 inch). Currently no RFID tag is thin enough to meet this requirement.

    25. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      serial numbers are logged to each bank (as they are), but from there the bank logs wich costomers the bills are given to ... The next step would be to log the deposits coming from various buisness, This way the gvmt, can trace not only how much money just went by a location (like you'd get with rfid) but who it was, and where they spent it.

      This method would be undectectable


      I think you mean it would be 'useless'. Say I go to the gracery store and give them a $20. The next customer only has a $50, so the cashier gives 'my' $20 to him as change. That customer than goes on to purchase something (lets say porn) elsewhere with 'my' $20 bill. The porn store then deposits the $20 bill, and the bank sees 'my' $20 coming from a porn store, when I never went there.

      Useless, unless EVERY transaction is tracked like: Customer gave me $20 (serial number 1234567890), and received $5 bill (serial 5555555555) in change). Unless EVERY hotdog stand, ice cream truck, and bodega in the world tracks every bill, this system is worthless.

    26. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by stevesliva · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      College juniors (birthdate: ~1983) have been raised with spell checkers and calculators. Screw learning spelling and long division-- waste of time.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    27. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moron, you're supposed to take it off, first.

    28. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Just to clarify one thing for the tin foil hat people...


      all serial numbers are logged to each bank (as they are)

      Serial numbers on cash are only logged by the Federal Reserve when shipping an order of new currency to a bank. It would be extrordinarily difficult for a bank to record the serial numbers on incoming deposits. Especially business deposits, which are normally shipped via amoured courier directly to a processing center. These deposits can have anywhere from 1 - 25000 bills.
      The deposits are counted by large Toshiba currency sorters (Toshiba

      Most banks are more worried about the volume of counted bills rather than capturing the serial number off the bill... It would simply take too long.

    29. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Talk about dare to be stupid!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    30. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's better just to lay out in front of a microwave dish.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    31. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine and dandy, but I think you're forgetting that the registers in retail stores work on a lifo principle. You may buy your beer with eight one dollar bills, but if I buy mine with a single ten, I'll get two of your ones back as change. The system thinks those ones are yours, so when I go blow them at the strip club, they go to the stripper, who will spend them on breakfast and maybe then they'll get back to the bank, but they'll get back in a way that bears no resemblance to the way you spent them.

    32. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by novapyro · · Score: 3, Informative
      The store tracking sensors that this guy is talking about aren't even rfid, and only have a fleeting resemblence, all they can tell is the presence of a tag moving through them.

      That's called a 1 bit transponder in some of the RFID literature. So, yes, it is an RFID system. Here's a nice reference at amazon. You can search within the text for "1 bit transponder" if you like.

      RFID Book

      And here's a nice quote from page 1 of the book: '... vast numbers of 1 bit transponders are used in Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) to protect goods in shops and businesses. If someone attempts to leave the shop with goods that have have not been paid for the reader installed in the exit recognises the state "transponder in the field" and initiates the appropriate reaction.'
      Many of these systems operate by sensing the presence of multiple leaves of magnetic material, much like you would get from stack of the new 20s. So it's all that unlikely. One of the failings of the systems is that occasionally, non-nefarious objects resonate in the sensor field and false-trigger it. Coils of wire set off some of the systems; a close arrangement of magnetizable material sets off others.
    33. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Major_Small · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that's exactly what I thought when I read this... and since he microwaved them in a tightly packed stack, is there really any surprise they burned in an identical pattern?

    34. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by TrickyRick · · Score: 2, Informative


      There is a link at the end of that darwin awards story that says that it was a hoax.

    35. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by another_henry · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever actually tried it? This really doesn't work. The first time I blew up an egg in a microwave I thought of this and set a heavyish plastic jug over the egg. One minute later and the force of the explosion blew the door of the microwave open and slammed the jug against the opposite kitchen wall. Seriously, there's a lot of power in these things.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    36. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      Yes, but when they need to add up some numbers, presumably they actually use a calculator, instead of just making up the result.

      He's obviously not using a spellchecker.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    37. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by humble_moon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they said they had a thousand dollars, with the "lion's share" being 20's.. and yes, i'd say they are all pretty uniformly burned.. considering they were in a tight stack.. you know how if you don't seperate out the food in the microwave it doesn't heat up as quick? how you got a +5, interesting is beyond me.. i'll probably be modded down to -1, troll, just for pointing out your poor arguments.

    38. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Most banks are more worried about the volume of counted bills rather than capturing the serial number off the bill... It would simply take too long.

      I'd think so...and what about bills that their numbers obscured by either too much wear, or any of various opaque substances that could (accidentally) find their way onto the bill?

    39. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by glk572 · · Score: 1

      I was born in 81; I've actually had a job. Spelling has always been my weak area; I've never been able to spell well. Usually when I write a paper, I spell check, and proof read, however I believe that on /. that content should be most important. Lot's of people here can't spell well, and I don't think that it's right for us to be made unwelcome, and chased away from posting just by a few jerks intent on ruining the community for everyone else.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
    40. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by attercoppe · · Score: 1


      +2,Informative?

      Anyone ever seen a bill that is one-eighth of an inch thick? You could probably fit a good 10 thin RFIDs in that space.

      --
      Hardware Geeks Do It With The Covers Off!
    41. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      You can microwave eggs. Just crack a little hole in the top first.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    42. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you?re the type that corrects people?s grammar during conversations, must be great to talk to. Get a life ass hole.

      I bet you're the type that edits their posts using Word, and then is surprised when those fancy quote marks turn into question marks on everyone else's screen.

    43. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      You started it yourself with the whole "find something better to do" quip! I wasn't going to say anything about the spelling because your post was otherwise brilliant. But that comment sounded to me like you're proud to misspell. How could I resist?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    44. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by teromajusa · · Score: 1

      "It is a damn poor mind that cannot think of more than one way to spell a word" - Andrew Jackson

      Pointing out spelling errors is a form of ad hominem attack. Its an attempt to show the speaker is not smart enough to take seriously, so their arguments can just be ignored. For my part I'd rather be right than spell right :p

    45. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by SAFH · · Score: 1

      "Currently no RFID tag is thin enough to meet this requirement [1/8 inch]"

      WRONG.

      Do some research before you make such comments. Yes - they have been able to make RFID tags thin enough to be printed, cost effective too.

      BTW -- since I couldn't remember the name of the company that made these products, a google/teoma search for "RFID Paper" found the cites. Took 30 seconds.

      CITE:
      CrossID

      Inkode

      --

      I cannot confirm nor deny the allegation or allegations you may or may not have just made

    46. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by skotte · · Score: 3, Interesting
      the only way ... microwave a big tightley packed stack of brand new bills.... they look more like they caught on fire from getting too hot, not like they blew up.

      I can back this up. well, anyone can, of course. Ever microwave a stack of paper? like a small stack, call it money sized, call it index-card sized ...

      same effect.

      I once microwaved some old monopoly money (to kill mold spores, naturally). If i zapped one bill at a time, no big deal. a couple seconds a piece, and they come out warm and mold-free. But do a whole stack .. .. don't do a whole stack.
    47. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by glk572 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      allright, you're forgiven, I'm just tired of ac trolls.

      --
      Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
    48. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't forget: particle, resemblance, electronic :).

      Holy crap, almost a fourth of the words in his post are misspelled.

    49. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we can all agree that John Poindexter should not take his head out.

    50. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by aziraphale · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe you'll take this advice in the spirit it's intended, maybe you'll just get more riled up...

      Spelling well is a courtesy to others. It does you no end of good in your personal and professional life to be able to express your thoughts clearly using the conventions of written language that are implicitly and unambiguously understood by your audience, be it a college tutor, a manager, a girlfriend, or a bunch of strangers who you're trying to communicate with through an online discussion board. If you feel you have a problem with spelling, there's a simple way to get better at it: Read more.

      And not just stuff you find online - read edited material. Books, newspapers, stuff that's been subjected to scrutiny by people who care about the conventions of spelling, grammar and punctuation. It'll help, trust me. And it'll do you a lot more good than just having a chip on your shoulder about all those jerks who keep complaining about your spelling.

    51. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by mengel · · Score: 1
      This is why you should always get your cash at the grocery store -- you get cash that someone else just used to pay their grocery bill, and when you spend it somewhere else, it looks like they spent it -- to someone tracking serial numbers at the bank.

      Of course, to get cash at the grocery you have to pay with your bank card, so that A.C.Nielsen knows what groceries you buy...

      So I guess you just can't win :-)

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    52. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      It would only take one second (actually a lot less, but we are dealing with oven timers here) to fry an RFID chip. It looks as if he gave them a lot longer.

      I thought that a lot of the recent RFID technology made them resistant to being destroyed by such things as microwaves.

    53. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if they hadn't stacked them, they would not have exploded...

      They used to recomment using tin foil on the ends of chicked drumsticks in the microwave, and I never had a problem as long as the strip of tinfoil was short enough.

    54. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you have a an ichy monkey, the only answer is to scratch 'em den.

    55. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Lanoitarus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and those easter peeps marshmallow candies must be RFID central of the world- You should see what happened when i decided to warm mine up!

    56. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what you do is you go into a store and buy
      one single item that is non-indicative of your
      own personality and purchasing habits. Along with
      this item, you withdraw a wad of money and promptly
      return inside to buy your groceries, which you
      then pay for with the cash you just withdrew.
      Couldn't be easier :-)

    57. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting a hole in the top doesn't work. I tried to "adjust" a (excessively) soft boiled egg once from which I had already removed a quarter sized piece of the top.

      Same results. Same mess. Made me wish I had nuked my tin foil hat instead.

    58. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by gd2shoe · · Score: 1
      I'm not terrorably concerned with the goverment tracking the movement of money, they do allready. The real concern that we need to have with rfid is that we can be essentially fingerprinted based on the unique blend of objects that we carry around with us every day.
      This is a concern, but not the only one. I don't want a thug with a scanner to pick me as a target because he already knows how much money I have in my pocket.
      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    59. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I really don't have anything better to do at the moment.

      metalic = metallic
      particals = particles
      goverment = government
      isin't = isn't
      arguement = argument
      resemblence = resemblance
      electonic = electronic
      artical = article
      survalance = surveillance
      triggerd = triggered
      tightley = tightly
      nearley = nearly
      exploading = exploding
      terrorably = terribly
      allready = already

    60. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Xilo · · Score: 1

      currency includes coinage.

      --
      Read; Write; Execute
    61. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Xilo · · Score: 1

      30 seconds to Google a term? What'd you answer to the last poll, Wireless Geek Level? Must've been dialup, or you were having awful luck finding any good spots wardriving..

      --
      Read; Write; Execute
    62. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by tmortn · · Score: 1

      I must disagree with your sentiments. Personally I feel the modern drive for more consistent grammar and spelling to be the result of a continuing cultural bias towards the superficial. Your right that proper presentation does help one in the world today. Yet I am far from convinced that the growing emphasis in society on presentation as opposed to content is a good thing. I do not think that is what you are advocating but such sentiments are evident in other posts made suggesting that sub par grammar in a post is suitable grounds for out right rejection of any ideas so presented.

      Perhaps I am biased due to the fact in my studies I was often required to read original historical source materials. In general the worst /. hack writes with more consistency than some of the greatest luminaries in history. I find the notion that 'correct' grammatical structure and consistent dictionary spellings have any impact on the substance of writting to be rather humorous. Presentation and content rarely have more than a passing aquaintence. While good grammar and spelling is gerenally a good marker of education it by no means conveys intelligence beyond a good memory and a penchant for mimicry.

      I could not agree more that ones prime courtesy to others in written discourse is to clearly and lucidly present your thoughts in a manner understandable to your audience. Can consistent grammar and spelling be benificial in that effort ? Most certainly. However there is a difference between grammatical and spelling inconsitencies which cause confusion and those which are undeniably superficial. In the case poor usage/spelling causes confusion then attacking those elements is key to the discussion. On the other hand, attacking superficial inconsistencies that have no bearing on the meaning of a passage is generally a wastefull excercise IMHO.

      All in all I much preffer intelligent discussion to grammatical perfection. If I can have both great, if not I choose substance over presentation. I have seen many posts here indicating they would preffer presentation over substance which I find odd.

      Having said all that, the parting shot by the original poster was certainly an invitation to return fire. Your suggestions are good ones for improoving ones grammar and spelling. However, in the end I must agree with the ultimate sentiment that there are better things to discuss than the order of ie/ei, double consonants and silent e's..... unless you are discussing the necessity of such things off topic as the case may be !!!

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    63. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by jfdawes · · Score: 1

      Sometimes a single incorrectly spelled word can completely change the meaning of a whole sentence. Possibly it's not an attack but an attempt to ensure accuracy in communication. Bad spelling could be seen as a lack of concern or lack of importance attached to the content of the message. Obviously if you're not concenrted that the redder inturprtes thew messsge incorrectlyt why should anyon ecare abou twhat ewe haffe toe saa?
      Maybe you're smart enough to take seriously, but your obvious lack of care or concern prompts me to lend little weight to your arguments.

    64. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by whittrash · · Score: 2, Funny

      The East Gemans did an experiment I read about to track currency by making it radioactive. This caused problems from coins when sitting in mens front pockets, making them sterile...ooops.

    65. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      Please please, tell me what happened on the following times? =) Did you shield it better?

      --
      Store with salt
    66. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      according to the definition they are NOT uniform... they have similar burn patterns.
      similar != uniform


      uniform adj.
      1) Always the same, as in character or degree; unvarying.
      2) Conforming to one principle, standard, or rule; consistent.
      3) Being the same as or consonant with another or others.
      4) Unvaried in texture, color, or design.

      if you wanna start a flame war for mod-poins go somewhere else

    67. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I'd expect that they'd simply have the bill replaced.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    68. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      I don't want to pay for them to be locked up. Put THEM in the microwave. For, um, testing purposes.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    69. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      HOWARD, Wis. -- A man and his wife ducked behind a refrigerator when bullets began exploding in their oven, authorities say. The Rest of the story

    70. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent theory. It's supported by the mass of black ink just above and to the right of Jackson's eye, too.

      I have a few mod points, and I'd love to mod your post up because yours is the very first post I encountered that contained a plausible explanation for this thing about twenties burning in microwaves and setting off security detectors. Unfortunately, you're already at +5, along with a great deal of noise, so I'm helpess to do what really should be done with your post. Methinks slashdot's handing out too many mod points lately, but what do I know?

      you mispelled a hole banch of stiff

    71. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by another_henry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope - I just used other people's microwaves ;)

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    72. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by kelnos · · Score: 1

      I must disagree with your sentiments. Personally I feel the modern drive for more consistent grammar and spelling to be the result of a continuing cultural bias towards the superficial.

      i'm not convinced that a drive to be consistent in _anything_ is superficial. and certainly not in a form of written communication. we have enough trouble in the form of language barriers - i see no need to add to that by perpetuating poor spelling and grammar.

      Your right that proper presentation does help one in the world today. Yet I am far from convinced that the growing emphasis in society on presentation as opposed to content is a good thing.

      i wouldn't call it "growing." i think it's been a relative constant - perhaps not several hundred years ago, but at least as long as items such as (consistent) dictionaries have been available to the vast majority of people.

      i agree that, on the surface, content should always trump presentation. that seems to follow from oft-repeated sayings like "it's the thought that counts." but - for better or worse - we live in a world where we are not only judged by what we say and do, but how we say it and how we look while saying it. you seem to acknowledge this fact while disagreeing with it, so this obviously isn't new information for you.

      I do not think that is what you are advocating but such sentiments are evident in other posts made suggesting that sub par grammar in a post is suitable grounds for out right rejection of any ideas so presented.

      i think you'd be hard-pressed to find an example where poor spelling/grammar is publicly rejected in such a manner. of course, you'll see responders criticising the initial poster on his/her writing, but in general those are just people with too much time on their hands and probably some issues of their own. at the very least, a dose of perfectionism.

      Perhaps I am biased due to the fact in my studies I was often required to read original historical source materials. In general the worst /. hack writes with more consistency than some of the greatest luminaries in history.

      that may be the case, but i would bet that at the time, many of these people didn't have the benefit of consistent dictionaries, thesuaruses, or grammar guides. today, you can pick up a variety of any of these at a local bookstore.

      I find the notion that 'correct' grammatical structure and consistent dictionary spellings have any impact on the substance of writting to be rather humorous. Presentation and content rarely have more than a passing aquaintence. While good grammar and spelling is gerenally a good marker of education it by no means conveys intelligence beyond a good memory and a penchant for mimicry.

      here i have to disagree. there's the unrelated rebuttal: presentation and content are often tightly bound in an organisational sense depending on the subject matter.

      i think "penchant for mimicry" is a bit strong. that's like saying "writing web pages that comply with standards is a sign that you have a penchant for mimicry." no, you don't. you simply want to make it easy for users of your product (web pages aka your writing) to be able to understand what's going on and view the information as you intend.

      I could not agree more that ones prime courtesy to others in written discourse is to clearly and lucidly present your thoughts in a manner understandable to your audience. Can consistent grammar and spelling be benificial in that effort ? Most certainly. However there is a difference between grammatical and spelling inconsitencies which cause confusion and those which are undeniably superficial.

      true, but this also depends upon the disposition of the reader. one of my pet peeves happens to be poor spelling and grammar. perhaps that is because, for

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    73. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Nice post.

      Mostly I think we are arguing the same thing from opposing directions. I think you are dead on regarding the issue of individual tolerance. Take me for example, I was completely unaware of your capitalisation ( or lack of ) until you mentioned it. I noticed it then went hmmmmm, that is interesting and moved on. Case is meaningless for the most part. It does have a sort of "naming convention" linked with it but by and large a lack of capitalisation will not cause a miscommunication. I imagine in the rare case that it has meaning you generally take the time to do so.

      At a guess I would venture to say our cognitive process while reading differ. For me alternative spellings and such things as there/their your/you're are silly distinctions. When someone is talking to me they do not have to specify which spelling of there/their they mean because the context clearly indicates which witch is which. My reading cognitive process is to listen to the voice created by the phonetic representation of the words on the paper. Thus spelling has little impact so long as the phonetic representation and contextual placement is accurate.

      I think others, possibly such as yourself, are a little more tied to the actual symbols on the page thus their and there can create a disorientation from your primary coginitive process of interpreting the symbols.

      No judgement on either method really, just an observation that seems to explain the disconnect between some folks regarding grammar/spelling.

      Anyway, one final thing in regards to my passage containing " presentation and content genrally have only a passing aquiantence ".

      I think you are considering your response in terms of most writting with good content has good presentation/organization. I do not disagree with that sentiment. However in writting as a whole my experience has been that worthy content is by far the exception and not the rule. In otherwords looking at it in terms of absolutes and leaving out the exceptions consider the following.

      All writting with meaningfull content posseses good grammar

      is very differnt from the statement

      All writting possesing good grammar has meaningfull content

      IMHO 99.9% of all writting is dreck be it properly punctuated or a broken hodgepodge of 10 languages written by a dislexic hooked on phonics graduate. For me the remaining .1% is far to dear to give a rats ass if the person who authored it bothered to run spell check or cracked open a dictionary/style book. That is the genesis of the statement above. The remaing .1% is probably skewed in favor of correct grammar but I do not think it is to the exclusion of improper usage. In fact most intelligent posters I have encountered online or IRL have their personal quirks ( like your disregard for caps ).

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    74. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by GarlicRulz · · Score: 1

      They're in everybody's eggs. And there's a web site to prove it!

      --
      Move along, nothing to see.
    75. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Cypresskill · · Score: 1

      no, because the whole point of RFID is that scanners automatically detect and count the chips unique ID and their location.

    76. Re:They've gotten to my eggs too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the military is now experimenting with portable microwave-egg-jug bazookas.

  36. some on /. try this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be the placement of the money in the microwave (microwaves are a few centimeters in length ..thats why u need that rrotating table thingy to make sure food gets cooked evenly.

    Or, maybe it's a reaction with ink. Who knows?

  37. Convert your tin foil hat to a wallet? Not yet... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nothing like a Slashdot post to jump to a conclusion.

    Clearly, there's something funny going on with the microwaved bills... but stores don't have RFID scanners at the exits yet. They have an acousto-magnetic sensor that gets deactivated by a pad at the cash register so that paying customers aren't supposed to set them off. Big difference here is that the tags in a store system don't yet emit an identifying signal... they all emit the same reply. The store doesn't know what a shoplifter did to trip the alarm, just that they did trip it. There's not quite proof that each bill is emitting its serial number yet.

    Also, having microwaved everything in a stack makes things a bit unclear. Did every eye burn on its own, or did just one or two bills in the middle of the stack catch flame which in turn burned all of the bills above and below in varying degrees. Notice that the top and bottom bills were unharmed. Could one bill alone be microwaved safely?

    And, BTW, if you so much as put slightly crumpled tin foil in your microwave, you get a similar effect. Could there just be a small metal content in the bill designed so that somebody who has $1000 worth of $20 bills (rather than simply 10 $100's) in their wallet is sure to set off an airport security alarm until they show their wallet to make sure they get an extra security questions?

    It's interesting, but I think more research needs to be done. Microwave carefully, people.

  38. Re:The artical's main point by iplayfast · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of course, as a previous poster pointed out... There are not RFID tags in money! It's just a bit of wire to help stop counterfiting.

  39. Very cool by Turismo86 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Personally I can't think of a better way to use my 20 dollar bills, I'm going to empty my bank account tomorrow, this will be hours of fun.

  40. ya don't say by rabidcow · · Score: 1

    So we chose to 'microwave' our cash, over $1000 in twenties in a stack, not spread out on a carasoul. Do you know what exploded on American money?? The right eye of Andrew Jackson on the new twenty, every bill was uniform in it's burning... Isnt that interesting?

    So you stick them in a pile, so that the corresponding places on each bill lines up and they all burn through in the same place? No way!

  41. intentional defacement of US currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    intentional defacement of US currency ..it's gotta be a crime ..isn't it? With the PATRIOT act who knows??

  42. Boarder Crossings by Pyro226 · · Score: 1
    These RFID tags could be really useful for boarders. (Useful to the US government, that doesn't make it good for you). Whenever someone enters the country they are asked if they have $10,000 US or the equivalent or more in cash, travelers checks, etc. With this technology, boarder officers could scan you (and your vehicle) to see if you were lying. The system would obviously be flawed, as aluminum foil seems to block the signal, but many people try to smuggle things over boarders just by looking inconspicuous. (I'm reminded of the scene from Blow).

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
  43. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by photonX · · Score: 1

    Poker players. Drug dealers. Rich people.

    --
    Anti-gravity? That was *my* little secret! But I never patented it! Boy, was *that* dumb!
  44. No money lost by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They may have exploded, but they're still valid currency. The treasury has an entire department which is solely for processing damaged money. I remember seeing an interview with one of the inspectors. I believe the essential part of it was that you had to have more than the majority of the bill material in OK condition to prove that you didn't just cut it up and try to claim all the pieces.

    Since the bills are intact all the way around and it looks like in many cases the serials are OK, I'd say he's OK, and can get them exchanged for non-exploded ones. Of course, he better not go saying he microwaved them, as destruction of currency is a federal crime(the penny-mangling machines are 'licensed' to do it, to nip one question in the bud...)

    What is interesting is that they burned so readily- US currency is supposed to be decently non-flammable(it's one of thousands of tests done on the paper and ink- that's why your bills make it through the laundry OK, for example). It's probably the toughest paper in the world, able to survive virtually anything. Except microwaving, apparently :-)

    1. Re:No money lost by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      Except it's not paper - it's cotton. The same stuff is used for money pretty much everywhere, with the possible exception of Australia which has plastic money.

    2. Re:No money lost by burns210 · · Score: 1

      it wasn't the paper that caused the problem, it was the 'security' strip that caused a fire, that burned the paper. Any other dollar(1,5,10,old 20/50/100) will survive a microwave just fine, given that they don't have that metalic strip in them. :)

    3. Re:No money lost by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Yup. And IIRC correctly (from a former co-worker who used to write software for the company which also builds the printing presses also used world-wide to print currency), that type of paper can ONLY be purchased by a government (as well as the afore-mentioned printing presses).

      Of course, if you put the equivalent of a spot-welder (little mylar strip in a high-energy photon environment) to most organic material (flame-resistant or not) it'll scorch and/or burn eventually.

      These guys just HAVE to be rednecks.. it's something my cousins would do, and they are the definition of rednecks.

    4. Re:No money lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as destruction of currency is a federal crime

      Not for a few decades, buddy. But you keep on perpetuating misinformation....

    5. Re:No money lost by d2ksla · · Score: 1
      What is interesting is that they burned so readily- US currency is supposed to be decently non-flammable

      Oh my God, I'd better do something about all the huge stacks of money I've got lying around the house. Not.

    6. Re:No money lost by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      While it is true that you can only purchase the exact blend used for US currency if you are the treasury department Krane Super White cotton paper feels identical so you can use that if you wish to simply pass the feel test =) You would lack the off color imperfections, watermark, and foil strip but you would probably be sucessfull 99+% of the time. Not that I advocate passing false currency, that's just dumb. The Secret Service WILL have your ass for it.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:No money lost by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Funny


      Actually, I believe the Secret Service would gift-wrap your ass and deliver it to your new husband Bubba for his exclusive use during your ten year stay in a Federal penitentiary of their choice...

    8. Re:No money lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could just make your money out of plastic like us aussies do...
      of course, our bills actually *shrink* when you put them through the dryer (dont know about the microwave!) but the bank will replace them for you. We're the only country thats so bloody hot we need waterproof money. (lame local joke...)

    9. Re:No money lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what have we learned from this guy

      -Money burns if enough heat is applied. I agree.

      -Old presidents never die. This is a stretch because I have not seen any of them on survivor.

      -Black Helicopters are bad. Shoot them down whenever possible. Just to be safe, shoot all helicopters down in case "they" change the color of the "bad" helicopters. These helicopters indicate that "they" are after you. Apparently you are too clever to be pursued on foot....

    10. Re:No money lost by Tassach · · Score: 1

      That's why you only pass your counterfeit bills to your friendly neighborhood drug dealer and/or streetwalker.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    11. Re:No money lost by dstutz · · Score: 1

      And get them right back when he/she/it gives you change for your 8-ball the next day.

  45. BS i tried it by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    Just Microwaved a 20 for a couple minutes other then having a hot piece of paper nothing happened. since when is the offical /. tin foil hat coming out?

  46. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by rholliday · · Score: 5, Funny

    $1000 in cash? At a truck stop? Worried about government tracking?

    Sounds like smugglers to me. :)

    --
    Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
  47. two words by swschrad · · Score: 4, Informative

    metallic ink. same thing will happen if you microwave checks, I expect, around the numbers, which are printed in magnetic MIRC ink.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldnt that be MICR ink...Magnetic Ink Character Recognition.

      MIRC would be an IRC client.

    2. Re:two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, MIRC ink is ink that slaps you about the head with a cold trout (or something like that).

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Way to find the the microwave's focal point, Mr. J by sailracer6 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Get yourself some thermal fax paper and put it in the microwave for a few seconds. The parts hit most strongly will turn brown. I am fairly certain the same thing is happening here, although one shoud just try it with a $20-bill shaped piece of paper to be sure. Microwaves are far from uniform in their energy output -- that's why the carousel has become so ubiquitous.


    Now, you should go look at Alex Jones' apparent infiltration of Bohemian Grove, an annual meeting of powerful people -- now that's intriguing.

  50. Re:The artical's main point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the point of most of the comments, inlcluding those who actually understand the science of metallic strips in bills and/or microwaves is that the article is dumb at best.

  51. Hmm. by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What we resent is the fact that the government or a corporation can track our 'cash'. Credit purchases and check purchases have been tracked for years, but cash was not traceble until now...

    I'd just like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that there have always been serial numbers printed on bills, for the purpose of tracking them. An RFID tag would make it easier to do so electronically, but being able to uniquely identify a particular bill is nothing new - in fact, see Where's George?

    Having said that, the possibility that someone could scan the contents of my wallet while my wallet is in my pocket is rather disturbing for a number of reasons. If I were carrying $1,000 in twenties, I wouldn't want to advertise that fact to those around me.
    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Hmm. by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      If I were carrying $1,000 in twenties, I wouldn't want to advertise that fact to those around me.

      50 x 20 = 1000

      Is that a stack of cash in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

      I guess it's gotta be better than a roll of dimes.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    2. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought that site called wheres george was just a sick prank when you would go there with the marked bill in your hand, then you would see a picture similar to the goatsex guy with a dollar bill stuffed in there.

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. No tin foil hats here by Valar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Umm, either my twenties are borked or my microwave... or... these guys are full of shit!! I can't reproduce the effect at all here. There must be something else going on here. Like an attempt to create an urban legend...

    1. Re:No tin foil hats here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - like someone like YOU could afford a stack of $20s...hell, you'd be lucky to afford a stack of PENNIES.

      Dumbass

  54. groan... by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. Maybe it was the wallet which had a hidden rfid, not the money. This possibility was not even broached.
    2. Aside from any exploding rfid tags, and aside from the fact that the money was microwaved in a stack, all twentys would likely burn in the same pattern when microwaved simply due to their identical ink distribution.
    3. Is this the Art Bell show now? Can we expect an interview with Hoagland tomorrow?
    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
    1. Re:groan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should you have to wait?

    2. Re:groan... by TJmoney · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was the wallet which had a hidden rfid

      Well it wasn't RFID, but I recently got a new wallet, and there was a tag in it that was seemingly disabled after i bought it, but at one certain store i set off the scanner every time. After getting sick of having security check me over I checked everything I had on me, and found the tag in my wallet. Possibly he had the same problem, as it was mentioned that nowhere actually scans for RFID yet anyway, just traditional anti-theft tags.

    3. Re:groan... by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Read the article again...

      Aparantly wrapping the money in foil stopped the scanners going off. That makes it reasonably likely.

    4. Re:groan... by seangw · · Score: 1

      This would truly have been interesting if they were placed in the microwave at random (not in a stack, but rotated in every which way).

      If they all burned in the same place after that, then there is something to take a look at.

    5. Re:groan... by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1
      Aparantly wrapping the money in foil stopped the scanners going off. That makes it reasonably likely


      Unless, based on the porrly written quality of the article, and the unscientific approach of the whole adventure, you allow that when they say "we wrapped the money in foil", they may have actually wrapped the whole wallet in foil. Or, they may have wrapped the money in foil and put it back in the wallet, in which case the foil could still have interferred with the wallet's tag (if it had one).
      --
      All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  55. Is this Illegal ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it illegal to deface currency in the US?

  56. Hey! HEY NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Hey! We could've used that money!

    Sincerely,
    The Mozilla Foundation

  57. Re:The artical's main point by TJmoney · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Even if they know where the money is, is it really possible to figure out who had it, and what it was spent on? As far as I can tell, the only way RFID tags could be useful to the govt is if there are A LOT of them in a concentrated area, but wouldent the metal briefcase they always keep the money in in movies block the signal anyway? I really dont see any benefit to big brother from having RFID tags in money.

  58. +1, Corny, But Made Me Laugh Anyway by zedmelon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    *gag*

    --
    Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
  59. Things I've learned from this article by Westacular · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. If I ever shop lift, I'll be sure to get a roll of tinfoil while I at it.

    2. If I ever decide to microwave American money, I won't microwave $1000 all at once.

  60. *Dons tinfoil wallet by ChiaKemp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Forget the tinfoil hats, now I need a new wallet.

    1. Re:*Dons tinfoil wallet by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Well, there are duct tape wallets on the market. Does anyone know if the metal content of the tape would be sufficient to block alien probe rays?

      Just think, Red Green is the saviour of our generation. We're SO boned.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  61. Complete bullshit by taustin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have no idea what game this guy is playing, but this tale is complete rubbish.

    First of all, if there is an RFID tag in a $20 bill (and I doubt it, given the state of the technology), nobody has RFID tag readers in retail stores. In fact, so far as I know, nobody even has such equipment on the market. Store security systems are a completely different system.

    There's no reason to even consider a second point.

    This is complete, utter bullshit.

    1. Re:Complete bullshit by in7ane · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, but you are mistaken, there are RFID Readers available for ANYONE to buy. Wallmart has used RFID tags and readers to track Gillete razors (look it up yourself).

      What makes me wonder is how 'complete bullshit' gets modded up...

    2. Re:Complete bullshit by YaRness · · Score: 1

      What makes me wonder is how 'complete bullshit' gets modded up...

      welcome. you must be new to slashdot.

  62. March 1st by spagnitz · · Score: 0

    Someone jumping the gun?? April is still 1 month away...

  63. That's solid logic... by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Belvedere: Quiet, quiet, quiet, QUIET! There are ways of *telling* whether she is a witch!
    Villagers: Are there? What? Tell us, then! Tell us!
    Belvedere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
    Villagers: BUUUURN!!!!! BUUUUUURRRRNN!!!!! You BURN them!!!! BURN!!
    Belvedere: And what do you burn apart from witches?
    Villager: More Witches!
    Other Villager: Wood.
    Belvedere: So. Why do witches burn?

    (long silence)
    (shuffling of feet by the villagers)
    Villager: (tentatively) Because they're made of.....wood?
    Belvedere: Goooood!
    Other Villagers: oh yeah... oh....
    Belvedere: So. How do we tell whether she is made of wood?
    One Villager: Build a bridge out of 'er!
    Belvedere: Aah. But can you not also make bridges out of stone?
    Villagers: oh yeah. oh. umm...
    Belvedere: Does wood sink in water?
    One Villager: No! No, no, it floats!
    Other Villager: Throw her into the pond!
    Villagers: yaaaaaa!

    (when order is restored)
    Belvedere: What also floats in water?
    Villager: Bread!
    Another Villager: Apples!
    Another Villager: Uh...very small rocks!
    Another Villager: Cider!
    Another Villager: Uh...great gravy!
    Another Villager: Cherries!
    Another Villager: Mud!
    Another Villager: Churches! Churches!
    Another Villager: Lead! Lead!
    King Arthur: A Duck!
    Villagers: (in amazement) ooooooh!
    Belvedere: exACTly!
    Belvedere: (to a villager) So, *logically*...
    Villager: (very slowly, with pauses between each word) If...she...weighs the same as a duck......she's made of wood.
    Belvedere: and therefore...

    (pause)
    Villager: A Witch!
    All Villagers: A WITCH!

    (they do consequently weigh her across from a duck on Bedevere's largest scale, and she does indeed weigh the same as the duck.)
    Witch: (to camera) It's a fair cop.

    1. Re:That's solid logic... by zeroprime · · Score: 1

      its bevedere not belveder

      --
      Hey! come on! try dividing it by anything!
    2. Re:That's solid logic... by zeroprime · · Score: 1

      shoot no, bedevere.

      --
      Hey! come on! try dividing it by anything!
    3. Re:That's solid logic... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Perfect reproduction except the last word: it's a fair court, not cop.

      The only reference I could find, though, was here , and it does say "cop" but I clearly heard her say "court" and anyway it makes sense, because she's on "trial"...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    4. Re:That's solid logic... by LMCBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Now look here, my good chap....

      Amazing thing, this Google. I just did 'British slang "fair cop" ' and hit "I'm feeling Lucky!" (because I was), and there you have it. Fair cop, eh wot?

      It'll be a shame when SCO sues Google out of business...

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    5. Re:That's solid logic... by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1

      "It's a fair cop" is Brit slang most closely translated for Yanks as "you got me". It's "cop" for sure.

      --
      Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
    6. Re:That's solid logic... by OwnedByTheMan · · Score: 1

      "It's a fair cop" is quite common British slang for getting busted by the cops. I have read in numerous places as well as a published script for the movie and the line is indeed "It's a fair cop".

    7. Re:That's solid logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it "Bedivere"?

    8. Re:That's solid logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like the page you list is actually the #1 result on Yahoo - not Google. I get this rather crappy result on Google.

      Google's sooo 2003... [yawn]

    9. Re:That's solid logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      As borrowed from World Wide Words (I don't know either. I just googled for it, okay?):

      [Q] From Geoff Bird: "In one of the Monty Python movies, as a woman falsely accused of being a witch is being carted off to her destiny she says under her breath, that's a fair cop! Is this the common British slang for being arrested?"

      [A] It's a well-understood British expression, though it has been used so often in second-rate detective stories and police television series down the decades that it has long since ceased to be possible to use it seriously (the Monty Python team was playing on its cliched status).

      It comes from the same root as the term cop for a policeman. This may be from the slang verb cop, meaning to seize, originally a dialect term of northern England that by the beginning of the nineteenth century was known throughout the country. This can be followed back through French caper to Latin capere, to seize or take, from which we also get our capture. (See also the piece on cop, a policeman.) So a cop in this sense was an example of a seizure or capture.

      It's a fair cop was what the essentially good-natured thief with a typically British sense of fair play was supposed to say as his collar was fingered by the fuzz, meaning that the arrest was reasonable and that he really had done what he was accused of doing. You will understand that this is, and always has been, an entirely fictitious view of the relationship between British criminals and the police.

    10. Re:That's solid logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a reference, you might try the screenplay. It clearly reads, "a fair cop."

      I'm surprised you singled out that phrase, while completely ignoring the "Belvedere/Bedevere" confusion. And you call yourself a Python fan! :P

      Sincerely,
      - Brigadier NF Marwood-Git (Mrs.)

    11. Re:That's solid logic... by wildsurf · · Score: 4, Funny

      <John Cleese with a German accent>
      Good evening. The last scene was interesting from the point of view of a professional logician because it contained a number of logical fallacies; that is, invalid propositional constructions and syllogistic forms, of the type so often committed by my wife.

      'All wood burns,' states Sir Bedevere. 'Therefore,' he concludes, 'all that burns is wood.' This is, of course, pure bullshit. Universal affirmatives can only be partially converted: all of Alma Cogan is dead, but only some of the class of dead people are Alma Cogan. Obvious, one would think. However, my wife does not understand this necessary limitation of the conversion of a proposition; consequently, she does not understand me; for how can a woman expect to appreciate a professor of logic, if the simplest cloth-eared syllogism causes her to flounder?

      For example, given the premise, 'all fish live underwater' and 'all mackerel are fish', my wife will conclude, not that 'all mackerel live underwater', but that 'if she buys kippers it will not rain', or that 'trout live in trees', or even that 'I do not love her any more.' This she calls 'using her intuition'. I call it 'crap', and it gets me very irritated, because it is not logical. 'There will be no supper tonight,' she will sometimes cry upon my return home. 'Why not?' I will ask. 'Because I have been screwing the milkman all day,' she will say, quite oblivious of the howling error she has made. 'But,' I will wearily point out, 'even given that the activities of screwing the milkman and getting supper are mutually exclusive, now that the screwing is over, surely then, supper may now, logically, be got.' 'You don't love me any more,' she will now often postulate. 'If you did, you would give me one now and again, so that I would not have to rely on that rancid Pakistani for my orgasms.' 'I will give you one after you have got me my supper,' I now usually scream, 'but not before'-- as you understand, making her bang contingent on the arrival of my supper. 'God, you turn me on when you're angry, you ancient brute!' she now mysteriously deduces, forcing her sweetly throbbing tongue down my throat. 'Fuck supper!' I now invariably conclude, throwing logic somewhat joyously to the four winds, and so we thrash about on our milk-stained floor, transported by animal passion, until we sink back, exhausted, onto the cartons of yogurt.

      I'm afraid I seem to have strayed somewhat from my original brief. But in a nutshell: sex is more fun than logic-- one cannot prove this, but it 'is' in the same sense that Mount Everest 'is', or that Alma Cogan 'isn't'.

      Goodnight.
      </Cleese>

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    12. Re:That's solid logic... by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      The full phrase is something like "It's a fair cop, guvnor! You've got me bang to rights and no mistake!" See for example, this usage in a debate in the House of Commons on 31 March 1995.

    13. Re:That's solid logic... by Epistax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That link proposses that police are called cops because to 'cop' is to steal. I thought police were called cops because their badges were originally copper, so they were called coppers.

      Anyone know which reason is correct?

    14. Re:That's solid logic... by Tassach · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recall hearing that cop is derived from the Latin verb "to capture".

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  64. Defacing Money is a Federal Offense by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looking beyond the fact that they flushed $1000.00, but they were stupid enough to publish their results on the web. So much for the listing on urbanlegends.com. Unfortunately, what they may have failed to realize is that the Federal Reserve Note is not technically theirs. Yes, the value of it is. And in the old days, they could've traded it for an equal amount of gold or silver. But all paper currency in the U.S. is technically the property of the U.S. government. This is why it is illegal to deface paper currency. And these guys were bright enough to do so *and* publish the results. One must wonder if they're going to be fined.

    The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

  65. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    $1000 in cash? At a truck stop? Worried about government tracking? Sounds like smugglers to me. :)

    Or worse, cranked-out truck driving paranoid freaks...

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  66. The tinfoil brigade by danharan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...apparently has money to burn :)

    [sorry, I couldn't help myself... ]

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  67. Man . . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    If I would of known that just about anything get's posted to /. I would of submitted Project CRAC. . . Hey atleast it has a catchy name!

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  68. Defacing Money by Trillan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (No pun intended.)

    I'm taking this article at face value, though I probably shouldn't... (ooh, another pun!)

    Is defacing currency legal in the US? Here, if done on purpose it carries a fine.

    And I think you'll have a very difficult time convincing someone you burned the right eye of 50 bills by accident.

  69. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by jasonditz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here in MI if you have that kind of cash on a state highway the state police can seize it and hold it until you prove it wasn't being used in a drug transaction.

  70. Not a real surprise by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Funny

    That little strip inside of the bills appears to be aluminized mylar. We all know what happens when you put aluminum foil into a microwave oven.

    I made that mistake once, about 20 years ago. My mother gave me a Wendy's Kid's Meal, I didn't eat it right away. Later, I wanted to warm it up so I put into the microwave. I didn't open the box, and I forgot that they wrapped the burgers in a foil type wrapper. It was like fireworks. Bright flashed of blue-white light were coming out of the Kid's Meal box.

    I nearly soiled myself out of fear. In those days they led you to believe that if you put metal in a microwave it would be like the Ghostbusters crossing the streams of their proton packs.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Not a real surprise by El · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the instructions for my new Amana microwave state roughly that any parts of the food you don't want heated up, just wrap them in alumimum foil... which came as quite as shock to me, as I was always taught that putting metal in a Microwave would destroy it. Has the technology changed, or was I just taught wrong? (This microwave is also smart enough to figure out for itself when popcorn is done popping... can anybody explain to me how THAT works?)

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Not a real surprise by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      it's probably just a timer. IE, take a microwave, pop a bunch of bags, see what the average is, and bam, popcorn button.

    3. Re:Not a real surprise by Sethus · · Score: 1

      I did this too... unfortunatly I was 20 and in College! Maybe thats something that they should teach us in highschool! ;)

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    4. Re:Not a real surprise by bbkingadrock · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was interested so I looked at the Amana website. A simple explanation is "Sensor Cook uses a humidity sensor to automatically calculate cooking time and power level. No guesswork."

    5. Re:Not a real surprise by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      My microwave instructions also say to cover any section that you do not wish to heat with alumimum foil. But with the disclaimer that the foil must be at least 3 inches from the sides of the oven.

      As for the pop corn detection. Newer microwaves have vapor sensors. They are programmed to know how much vapor various foods should be giving off when then are done cooking. If I open the door on mine while using the sensor cook feature, it will give an error (the vapor is released), then estimate the amount of time left, and revert to timed cooking.

  71. Burning towels in the microwave by menscher · · Score: 5, Funny
    One morning, several years ago, I woke up with a stiff neck. It occurred to me that putting something warm on it would help. I lived in a dorm room, and had little around, other than a small microwave. So I grabbed a dry towel and put it in. Now, we all know that microwaves heat up the water in a substance. And the towel was dry. So I figured 30 seconds would just about do it. When I opened the microwave 30 seconds later, I was stabbed in the eye by a cloud of black smoke. Immediately threw the towel, with hole burned through it, into the sink.

    Moral of the story: don't put a wad of cash into the microwave.

    1. Re:Burning towels in the microwave by nerdguy0 · · Score: 1

      30 seconds? I'm supprised the towel didn't do more than just smoke. Even for a small dorm microwave, 30s at high power is quite a bit of energy.

      Your microwave, since it was pretty small, was only probably about 500 watts. Since watts are energy per unit time, a 500 watt microwave on full power for 30 seconds would have dumped ~15000 joules of energy into your dry towel.

      --
      "In /dev/null no one can hear you stream."
    2. Re:Burning towels in the microwave by barbazoo · · Score: 1

      You don't get it, do you? THEY had implanted an RFID tag into your towel! =)

    3. Re:Burning towels in the microwave by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 1

      A dry towel laying around a dorm room? Heh...I remember college. I know EXACTLY what was in that towel that had just enough moisture left to heat up and burn.

      Nothing like the smell of boiled semen in the morning! (apologies to Marlon Brando)

      --
      That? That was a pigeon.
    4. Re:Burning towels in the microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should not be appologizing to Marlon Brando, but to Robert Duvall. He was the one who stated that (now) famous line.

      Here is the complete quote courtesy of the imdb.

      "You smell that? Do you smell that?... Napalm, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for twelve hours. When it was all over I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end..."

  72. This story reminds me of a song... by SquierStrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Paranoia, paranoia, everybody's coming to get me!" I guess i can't blame them to much though....

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:This story reminds me of a song... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nanotech,
      nanotech... nanotech is gonna get you"

  73. You've got to question the source by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I hate to question the facts based on the source, but this is like linking to an Omni article about the discovery of alien civilizations on Mars - it's such an unrelible source, that it's not really worth paying attention to their outlandish claims.

    Looking around the website, one can find this choice quote by Alex Jones:

    AJ: And that also happened- where you aware the New York Times and Chicago Tribune reported this in '93, the FBI cooked the bomb and trained the driver[s] and had an Egyptian security agent doing it for them, had two retarded Muslims, literally retarded, drive the truck and park it, let the bombing go forward. At Oklahoma City, the same company that destroyed the remnants of the World Trade Center, blew up the remnants of Oklahoma City [and] had that buried under machine gun guard at a private landfill to this day. And they hauled the rubble away from the W T C to China! They wouldn't let you take photographs. Yes, exactly.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:You've got to question the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot this part:

      Please understand that this is a transcript made directly from a live radio interview. It may not conform to exeplary standards of grammar.

    2. Re:You've got to question the source by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      you forgot this part:

      Please understand that this is a transcript made directly from a live radio interview. It may not conform to exeplary standards of grammar.

      If you read the article more carefully, you'll notice he was referring to the guest's grammar, not his own, as the guest was a native German speaker. In addition, the content of the article (implying that the FBI, CIA, some private corporation, and likely others, have together have plotted major terrorist activities against the US) is what I was referring to, not merely the grammar. It isn't indicative of a news source worth paying attention to.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  74. Fold by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    A twenty dollar bill so that the back side is face up long ways.

    holding the bill horizontal - fold one side of the bill down with the crease towards the center line of the bill, so that it runs perpendicular to the original horizontal angle with a 45 degree crease at the edge angle, then fold the other side the same way (the bill will look like an arrow) - you will see the two towers afer being hit by the planes, before the collapse.

  75. What about other bills? by bigmattana · · Score: 1

    So why didn't they try the old twenties or other bills with metallic strips to see if they also burned? That would be the only logical thing if you were trying to prove that the new twenties have mysterious invisible RFID tags.

  76. Next on Slashdot: Area 51 alien mind control! by Sabu+mark · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this story got accepted. Since when are easily disproven kook conspiracy theories legitimate news? Or have the editors simply been had? What will the next Slashdot story be? Some Geocities page explianing how Larry Ellison, Halliburton and the Trilateral Commission are peddling global mind control masquerading as a polio vaccine?

    I guess what I'm trying to say is: Worst. Story. Ever.

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
  77. what?! by ack154 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we're overlooking one very important question here...

    Why the hell was someone carrying around $1000, mostly in 20s, in their wallet?

    Maybe I'm the only one that doesn't get that part...

    1. Re:what?! by Screamingliner · · Score: 1

      Probably had a good night at the poker table. (Although I usually get Franklins instead.)

    2. Re:what?! by Weirsbaski · · Score: 1

      I think we're overlooking one very important question here...

      Why the hell was someone carrying around $1000, mostly in 20s, in their wallet?


      Well, he was at a truck stop, so maybe he's a truck Driver? In which case he needs money to pay for gas, tolls, and food while on the road.

      --

      I am not a sig.
    3. Re:what?! by 222 · · Score: 1

      the only thing that proves is that he obviously doesnt work in the tech industry.

      Probably a plumber or something ;)

    4. Re:what?! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      eh? was he a truck driver in some 3rd world country* with NO banking card, credit card or similar paying card schemes that he could have used for paying those things, like normal people?

      more likely excuse is that he is so paranoid that he can't use credit cards(or similarly working banking cards) because goverment is tracking those.

      he is just dumb, idiotic and stupid to boot. carrying around 1000$ isn't the smartest thing to do if you don't know you'll be needing it or are just filthy rich.

      *) ok, texas MIGHT be a 3rd world country for all I know.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you read the rest of his ramblings, he was probably out buying crack.

    6. Re:what?! by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Funny
      Why the hell was someone carrying around $1000, mostly in 20s, in their wallet?

      Because he needs a reserve of 'cash' on him in case the UN breaks into his trailer and steals his 'mattress'.

      I'm wondering what kind of 'wallet' a stack of nearly 50 'bills' fits into, and how he could 'sit' comfortably with it in his pocket.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    7. Re:what?! by MadHungarian1917 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It appears there is a lack of experience with the construction/transportation sector of the economy.

      These guys use cash for _everyting_ their unofficial motto is "God gets credit everybody else pays cash"
      I've been to auctions (going since I was a kid) where the hauler types would pay 20K in cash for their new purchases. The wad was 3" thick.

      These guys n' gals still remember their grandparent's stories of the 1930's and how anything other than cash is worthless.

      Oh and by the way they trust the 'Gummint even less than the average /. 'er they make us look like GWB syncohants in comparison. It does not suprise me in the least that a hauler would try to remove any method by which the 'gummint could see how much money they had on them.

      As an aside the logbooks the DOT makes them use to detail their activities are called "swindle sheets".

    8. Re:what?! by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Why the hell was someone carrying around $1000, mostly in 20s, in their wallet?

      And yet you're on Slashdot...

      I was carrying around just shy of a thousand dollars in cash last summer when I bought parts to assemble a new computer. The shop I bought from charges an extra three percent if you use a credit card, because that's roughly what the bank charges the store to process the transaction.

      A lot of shops won't accept hundred-dollar notes due to fear of counterfeits, and some of the local fast-food establishments have stopped taking fifties. So carrying around a thousand dollars in twenties, though a rare occurrence, isn't necessarily completely insane.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    9. Re:what?! by bluetrident · · Score: 1

      It seems a bit obvious why he's carrying that much in cash, especially in 20s. He obviously wears his tinfoil hat all the time, so he probably runs a magnet over every credit/check/library/business card he gets and never uses them. A lot of places won't take bills over $20 so if he carries 20s, he's fine.

      Conspiracy theory at it's best.

    10. Re:what?! by Kwantus · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. 'Cause in the US these days any cop who finds you with that much money mutters "drug-related" and relieves you of it...

    11. Re:what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why the hell was someone carrying around $1000, mostly in 20s, in their wallet?
      That's easy: For the purchase of goods and services. Next question?
  78. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by tdwebste · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, $1000 in cash is not all that much for a trucker to carry.

    Remember most long distance truckers are on the road for a week at a time. This includes tolls, fuel, food, etc. I did a rough calculation a trip from Ontario to New York and back cost about $500 out of pocket. And lots of truckers transport fruit from California.

  79. 50$, 100$ and 1000$ bills by vinit79 · · Score: 1

    Really unbelievable news. 20$ bill microwave burning is passe. The really hot(no pun intended ... have to say that or no one notices the pun) news is that $ 50 , $100 and $1000 bills DO NOT burn. Can you belive it ?? Of course you wont but try it out and tell me then !! Infact I can even prove it. Send me your 100$ bills and I will microwave them and send you the photos of the unburnt bills (and even post a story on slasdot).
    The only obvious explanation is that the treasury department has tied up with the big league ransom mongerers, kidnappers and SCO and has decided to protect them by not puttng radio tags in the large denomination bills( which explains why SCO does not charge $20 for Unix licenses)

    PS: pls hurry up, so I can quit my boring job and spend all my useful time reading slasdot and photographing your 100$ bills (and buy a SCO license for my machine).

  80. Not the evil eye... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's flirting with you.

    1. Re:Not the evil eye... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      Bet you never knew Andrew Jackson was so hot! ;-)

  81. Someone has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1) Microwave money

    2) ????

    3) PROFIT!

    Er, OK. It doesn't work all that well.

  82. RFID tag killer by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Information Unlimited sells Tesla coils. I can speak first hand of how effective they are at frying electronics. I built their BTC3K Tesla Coil when I was in 10th grade, it is fantastic. On days with low humidity purple sparks 10-12 inches in length are not out of the question. I figure that 250,000 volts is more than enough to fry RFID chips.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  83. Experiment by Mazzella! · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Here's something to try:
    1. Cut thin slices of AL Foil As thin as you can get it, .5cm... 1/4 of an inch or less.

    2. cut peices of paper up into roughly the shape of a 20-spot. Cut the paper from different sources, news paper, printer paper, fax paper, etc.

    3. glue the AL foil strip to a peice of paper, then , stick another peice of paper on top, glue another strip of foil above the other location, another peice of paper, etc.

    4. Stick stack of paper with embeded AL Foil into microwave.

    Observe results.

    It is my hypothesis that each strip of AL foil will gather a charge, and try to discharge through the paper, therby setting it on fire/scorching it.

    BTW, ever cut a grape in 1/2 but leave a small peice of skin attached, and pop it in the microwave for 4 seconds? /\_/\ Arc...Sparc...Bang.

    --
    1.3L, 3 moving parts, 280 HP, no Turbos, wanna Race? RotaryNe
    1. Re:Experiment by Mazzella! · · Score: 1

      How the fuck is this offtopic?!

      --
      1.3L, 3 moving parts, 280 HP, no Turbos, wanna Race? RotaryNe
  84. I hope my mate has some unspent honeymoon dollars! by myLobster · · Score: 1

    My recently-wed friend is currently doing a grand tour of the states with his wife. I really hope he's willing to sacrafice any unspent benjamins when he gets back :)

    --

    Ceci n'est pas une .sig
  85. HOAX, HOAX, HOAX by mrshowtime · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are no RFID tags in US currency. There is no METAL in US currency. I just microwaved a new $20 for over two min. in a 2000 watt microwave oven to no effect (aside from being warm). And lastly, the new $20 bills do NOT set off anti-theft systems. The photos are obvious photoshops. Slashdot is slowly becoming the new Weekly World News.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:HOAX, HOAX, HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The photos are obvious photoshops.

      What the heck are you talking about?? If that's fake it's a pretty good job. Better than fark photoshop contests by far.

    2. Re:HOAX, HOAX, HOAX by Alsee · · Score: 3, Informative

      The photos are obvious photoshops.

      No. Try putting a STACK of 20's in the microwave. Or even a stack of newspaper for that matter. A single bill is thin and any heat gets carried away rapidly by air currents and/or infra-red radiation. A solid block of paper will build up heat in the center and then work it's way outward. You'll get the exact same effect he got - bills from the center will have big fat holes and bills at the top and bottom will hardly be charred.

      BTW, I don't think it's accurate to call it a hoax. If you look at other stuff by this guy it's clear he's a genuine fruitloop and probably believes all his paranoid nonsense.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:HOAX, HOAX, HOAX by mewyn · · Score: 1

      Nope, those little strips are mylar, not metal. There is no significant amounts of metal in US currency. There are trace amounts in the magnetic inks that are used, these are there for things like mechanical bill validators. But there is no actual metal in US currency.

      Mewyn Dy'ner

  86. Haha by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    As my EM prof put it - putting tin-foil into your microwave turns it into a spark plug, and god help you if the sparks strike any explosive elements.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Haha by Micro$will · · Score: 5, Funny

      As my EM prof put it - putting tin-foil into your microwave turns it into a spark plug, and god help you if the sparks strike any explosive elements.

      Thank goodness you posted that. I've been storing gasoline in my microwave for years thinking it was safe.

      F.Y.I. The worst you could do to a microwave by putting metal inside is break the magnatron, and when it breaks, it will just die, not explode or any cool shit like that. This urban legend was debunked like last season. I can't even find the listing for it anymore.

    2. Re:Haha by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny
      F.Y.I. The worst you could do to a microwave by putting metal inside is break the magnatron, and when it breaks, it will just die, not explode or any cool shit like that.
      I can vouch for this. We went to the county fair every year I was in high school and every fucking time the Magnatron was broken and it just sat there like some shitty UFO exhibit cum Christmas lights. This sucked because I heard they played Floyd inside and you could crawl on the walls like a spider. At least that's what all the kids a grade higher than us said. We usually ended the night at someone's house, stoned and eating microwave popcorn, the message here being that everything comes full circle (except of course that Magnatron).
      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    3. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      The worst you could do?? You should've seen what happened when I put a can of gasoline in the microwave, you insensitive clod.

    4. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The worst you could do to a microwave by putting metal inside is break the magnatron


      The only way to damage the microwave is to allow arcing to occur from the metal to the oven walls.

      An old Sear's tech told me that metal will not damage the magnetron. I've cooked pot pies in their little metal dish, by simply putting the pie back in the box it came in before microwaving. Works fine.
    5. Re:Haha by first.last · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But put a meat thermometer in the fucker and sparks will fly. Tried that lil experiment when I was 11.

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    6. Re:Haha by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It will actually burn and melt and smoke. My parents nearly killed me after they came back home and saw what I did to a DM 699,- microwave.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    7. Re:Haha by cygnus · · Score: 1
      F.Y.I. The worst you could do to a microwave by putting metal inside is break the magnatron, and when it breaks, it will just die, not explode or any cool shit like that.
      that sort of depends on what the metal is near. if it's near anything that could melt, then that will get damaged, too. i once nuked a Bodum coffee carafe trying to heat water in it in the microwave in my dorm because there was a screw embedded in the plastic handle. i was able to put it in the microwave for a year, then one day, boom (well it was probably more like a slow burn) and the plastic handle melted everywhere and pretty much ruined the carafe.

      i think "no coffee" in college is worse than a blown magnatron, apparently. :)

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    8. Re:Haha by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

      wow...talk about jogging the memory. Unfortunately, they played Stryper at our Fair's "Magnatron". (Experiencing Memory Interference, can't remember the actual name of the ride now). I think it was worth it to endure christian rock in order to experience the G's...i think...i don't remember, I was probably stoned too...

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
    9. Re:Haha by marine_recon · · Score: 1

      however it does have a tendency to catch fire, at least that would explain why ive gone through three microwaves in as many years, and puddles of melted plastic are a bitch to clean up.

      --
      Jack the sound barrier. Bring the noise.
    10. Re:Haha by MotherInferior · · Score: 3, Funny

      d00d, that's Gravitron. Not Magnatron. Ours played Led Zeppelin, and you could climb the walls about like spiders climb water. The G's generally pinned you to the wall and sent your stomach into the rafters.

    11. Re:Haha by tonekids · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I thought that the "worst that can happen" is that the metal could cause hot spots on the cooking chamber walls, possibly warping the door seal and allowing the RF to leak out of the oven?

    12. Re:Haha by ward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While your comments may be correct, I wouldn't cite 'Mythbusters' as a source of factual information.

      The episode with the microwave employed almost zero science, as do most of their experiments. I was surprised that they did not build a microwave out of ballistic gelatin and then say that it had almost exactly the same properties as a real microwave.

    13. Re:Haha by sk8king · · Score: 1

      This is offtopic and just in response to your sig.

      You cannot mod someone down AND post in the same discussion.

    14. Re:Haha by Plac3bo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      yea, gravitron...and the most skilled people were able to stand perpendicular to the wall(i only ever saw this done by the ride operator). you had to be stoned to enjoy the full experience.

    15. Re:Haha by geoffspear · · Score: 1, Informative

      Microwaves are non-ionizing anyway, so the worst that will happen in that situation is that you get a little warm. Well, ok, if you're expose long enough you could probably boil all of the water in your body, but that would take a really long time.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    16. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      This is off-topic and in response to your not going the joke in his sig:

      His sig was a joke, get it?

    17. Re:Haha by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Heh. Sometimes the experiments are decent, but they never get enough of a data set for any sort of real conclusion.

      I just watch it for the exploding junk factor... That episode with the exploding CDs was great. If I had one of those in my office, my boss would look like that dummy.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    18. Re:Haha by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
      > Microwaves are non-ionizing anyway, so the worst that will happen in that situation is that you get a little warm. Well, ok, if you're expose long enough you could probably boil all of the water in your body, but that would take a really long time.

      STOP.

      Correct. Microwaves are nonionizing.

      Correct. The only damage you will take is in the form of localized heating of your body parts.

      Incorrect. There is a risk. There are no nerve endings in many places that are highly susceptible to heat damage - places like your brain, the vitreous humor in your eyeballs, and internal organs. If there's a warped/open door, or if you've gone one step further and defeated the safety interlock to power up a magnetron externally, you could be (relatively) safe in location X,Y,Z, but six inches next to X,Y,Z, the big reflecting metal plate of your fridge, your stovetop, and the hole in the homebrew shielding you created have created a local "hot spot" node where localized heating is much more rapid.

      Play with a magnetron if you like, but be aware that by the time you feel warmth, it may already be too late.

      (As long as the door is intact, as long as the safety interlocks are intact, and as long as you're not afraid of damaging the oven and/or are prepared with a Class C extinguisher to deal with a small fire that manages to escape the confines of the oven, there's relatively low risk. I'd consider the "fry a $20 bill" and "spark a CD" experiments safe, but your mileage may vary.)

    19. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stryper was actually one of the few Christian Rock bands that didn't forget they were a rock band. I actually did not mind when I caught the occasional "To Hell With the Devil" or "He is the Reason for the Season" playing.

    20. Re:Haha by catfoo · · Score: 1

      you rock..i just wet myself

      --
      no sig today, come back tomorrow
    21. Re:Haha by sbonds · · Score: 5, Interesting
      F.Y.I. The worst you could do to a microwave by putting metal inside is break the magnatron, and when it breaks, it will just die, not explode or any cool shit like that.


      What happens is the lack of anything to absorb the microwaves causes all the energy to be re-absorbed back into the magnetron, heating it up. Fortunately, the designers of microwave ovens put heat fuses on the magnetrons so they stop working (hopefully) before the tube itself dies. You can heat lots of unusual items relatively safely by putting a mug of cold water in the oven to absorb the excess energy.

      Once upon a time I was employed to actually do microwave oven research, and the duties involved microwaving all kinds of odd things to see what would happen. (Wood pencils are my favorite since they exhibit burn marks at a nice half-wavelength intervals, or about 6cm. Put one in your oven with a small mug of water with the turntable off and see). The research was done in a jury-rigged "oven" that had no safety interlocks or heat fuses.

      When a magnetron is overheated to excess it doesn't explode. The ceramic permanent magnets can crack badly, but I've never seen one explode. It simply doesn't heat up fast enough.

      Most things are unexciting when microwaved. In general, metals just get hot. Tinfoil and neon bulbs were both fun. (foil sparks, bulbs flash.) The only thing I tested that actually exploded was chicken wire wrapped in aluminum foil, and even then it's not a movie-style explosion but simply a nice capactitive buildup until finally the resulting arc rips the foil apart rather dramatically.

      It does make a really nice bang when it goes.

      A far more dramatic explosion could be had by simply heating a thick 1L bottle half-full of water until the steam pressure built up enough for an explosion.
    22. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you can damage more than just the magnetron tube, but maybe this is only on older microwaves. When I was in junior high (Ph.D. student now) a group of us took a programming class at a local National University. One kid put a foil ketchup packet in the nuker to try and make it explode. No all-out fire, but the electronics were fried, there was black gunk everywhere, some nasty smoke, and ceiling of the oven (the part where you put your food) was hanging down.

    23. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usualy push my head agains the door and stair at the food turning in the microwave... Thats not a good thing is it?

    24. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks a lot.

      Now I'm afraid to use the microwave. How am I ever to live on my own if I can't use the microwave?!

      I'll have to get a girlfriend or something. And there's not much chance of that, considering I'm here.

    25. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or cook the fluid in your eyes like egg whites and having it fog up. Yea, pretty shitty.

    26. Re:Haha by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Dude, that would be the coolest job evar...

    27. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting thing... When warming up a Wendy's Chicken Somethinerother Burger, everything went up in flames. I left everything in the bag (fries/burger), set it for 1:30, and within seconds my meal was up in a flame of glory. Luckily I was able to extract the goods from the flaming bag with lightning speed, so I didn't go hungry.

    28. Re:Haha by sbonds · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Dude, that would be the coolest job evar...


      Yeah, they PAID me to do that. Not a lot, mind you, but it's definately good for storytelling after the fact.

      Best part: burning things for money
      Worst part: accidently burning myself (for money)

      You've never felt a burn until you've been RF-burned. It hurts all the way through.

      Accidently brushing the 4500 volt RF-modulated power supply was also pretty unpleasant.

      But again, both are great for stories. ;-)
    29. Re:Haha by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      An enemy wizard is approaching your slashdot! All of your karmawhores have been slaughtered

      Sacrifice reference! Well played, indeed! >8D

    30. Re:Haha by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

      What would happen if in fact, you did put an actual spark plug into your microwave?

      Now that is the question for the ages.

      --

      YOU'RE WINNER !
      Another lame blog

    31. Re:Haha by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Ah...but have you tried putting the bulb from a floodlight in there? That'll explode good, I've heard. :)

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    32. Re:Haha by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      By "explosive elements" I'm sure he meant electronic elements. Ignoring the fact that they should be behind shielding, and the fact that I haven't looked inside a microwave, but I'd bet there are some capacitors in there. Caps can be extremely explosive, so if someone in EE lab threatens to "bust a cap in your ass" be careful where you sit.

    33. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My buddy used to glue a coin inside each nuker at AM/PM, and wait for customers to heat stuff up and see sparks.

    34. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should of tried sex in it. Very fatiguing and different.

      Here in Aus all sorts of odd things have occured in such rides especially when being used at special events. Biker rallies for one can find very interesting uses for such machines, inverted 2.5 G upward acceleration while trying to chug beer contests lead to much hilarity (and mess).

    35. Re:Haha by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I was pissed when they teased us about testing that poodle myth and didn't follow through!

    36. Re:Haha by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Well, let's chuck you in the microwave and find out... [g] You'd cook at the same rate as any other piece of meat, tho your eyeballs would likely cook at more like the rate eggs do (and probably explode just as messily).

      Darwinism at work. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    37. Re:Haha by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Wet cleanup, aisle five!

      --
      +++OK ATH
    38. Re:Haha by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      As a teenager a 7/11 refussed to sell us candy bars or sodas anymore because some local teens were shoplifting. In retaliation we started putting dead rats in their microwaves and letting them cook for a while. This has a lovely effect as the dead rats tend to blow up.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    39. Re:Haha by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      Tackhead, you might want to add that the Microwaves are indeed very large and tend to cook things (Like your brain) One or two inches apart. The idea is to spread enough energy focused into many small rough areas and call it a draw. (Thus rotation in the new ovens) I have a very old industrial grade microwave device I would be happy to sell you. It comes with a never shut off switch and you have to run to unplug it from the wall when you smell the food burning at the furtherest end of the house away from that thing when it was running.

      The kicker is it used to be a PG&E lunchroom oven until somebody gave it away.

      I could sell it on E-Bay...

      Hmm..

      Messing with you and I am glad to echo your message, Microwaves Should be be respected!

      A good debate might involve which is more destructive, Radioactivity or Microwaves?

  87. logical explinations by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    sure, one can come up with a logical explination for it. That doesn't make it any less real that sensors can be set up in places (like airports) that detect when you're carrying a moderate amount of cash with you. Unlike me, you might not resent the government doing this. Might you resent street thugs doing this to help pick a ripe "vic"? Personally, I resent that it can be done with out money at all.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:logical explinations by calidoscope · · Score: 1
      That doesn't make it any less real that sensors can be set up in places (like airports) that detect when you're carrying a moderate amount of cash with you.

      One of the easiest ways to slow down the trade in illicit drugs is to slow down the flow of cash. It has been illegal for decades to take more than 10k$ in cash out of the country without declaring it first.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  88. More conspiracy images on currency by Sabu+mark · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's an even easier way to see the twin towers hidden in U.S. currency. Take two $20 bills. Hold one in each hand so the long sides are oriented vertically. Bring your hands together. Notice that the bills look like two identical skyscrapers right next to each other!!! Clearly this proves the US government had prior knowledge. Why, I'll bet it was actually Dick Cheney at the controls of both airplanes. He wanted Halliburton to seize the Iraqi oil fields.

    What's the matter? That's a hell of a lot better than the Slashdot story that actually got accepted!

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
  89. conspiracy theorist loonies by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    would anyone explain to me why conspiracy theory loonies seem hell bent on obsessing over radiowaves, microwaves, etc?

    what i'm getting at is, your average pop psychology understanding of paranoid schizophrenia suggests that people are "out to get you", so, controlling your thoughts, tracking your movements, etc. through invisible waves is a wonderful example of this kind of thinking

    but what about viruses? why not nanobots?

    what i'm getting at is these loonies seem inordinately obsessed over invisible rf waves, but there are a million other "invisible hand" type illuminati control mechanisms they can obsess over

    perhaps rf is just easier to understand, reflecting the general low intelligence of paranoid schozophrenics in general i guess

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:conspiracy theorist loonies by ndrw · · Score: 1
      perhaps rf is just easier to understand, reflecting the general low intelligence of paranoid schozophrenics in general i guess


      From my brief schooling at community college, and discussions with a relative who works in a "behavioral health" (mental hospital) ward, I can tell you that you're way off base on this part of your argument. Paranoid Schizophrenics tend to be above average intelligence. They tend to construct elaborate and extremely complex reasoning for their paranoia. I would guess that they're trying to figure out why (for example) they hear voices (most common hallucination among paranoid schizophrenics is auditory) and radio/microwave and other "invisible" forces are easy fodder for fantasies of this nature because they can't be easily disproved.

  90. Oops! You are 100% correct. by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    I screwed up with a search/replace and didn't read carefully enough (the name was given as B: in the script after the first mention).

    Sorry about that.

  91. holy crap by vertigo_ok · · Score: 0

    I took one of my roomate's $20s and put it up to my blacklight. I've know that the metalic strips showed up, but I was stuned to see a pinhead sized dot in the corner of Jackson's left (my right) eye. It was glowing the same neon green as the strip. His others didn't have it, but I'm convinced that the one with the dot has something in it. Its just too crazy to be a coincidence.

    --
    haud servio tui deus neque tui diabolus huad servio tui regalis neque tu
  92. Mine don't by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    I tried it with both the old-new $20 bills and the new-new bills. Nothing happened. Besides, they had these all in a stack, so if one got a hot-spot, they'd all go up in the same place. The microwave test proves nothing, though the RFID scanner test is intriguing.

  93. Destruction of $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is not a crime. Trying to PASS $ you've intentionally damaged is. Licensed penny manglers. Get real.

  94. Cash is trackable, RFID or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All bills have a serial number. Why would the government need RFID chips? They can easily scan the serial number off while dispensing a bill at an ATM, and check it again when it ends up in a bank. Sure, it may change hands a few times, but for me, the majority of my 20 dollar bills come straight from the ATM, goes straight to a retailer, who brings it straight back to the bank.

  95. slashdot is now feeding paranoid schizophrenics

    how the heck did this wind up on the front page?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  96. "Boarder officers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    With this technology, boarder officers could scan you (and your vehicle) to see if you were lying.

    "Dude! You did not pull a proper 720 corkscrew! I order you to smoke a phatty!"

    (I think you mean border , not boarder.)

  97. TOP SECRET FACT:Most modern cars have RFID!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ==
    sorry for needed repost :
    This is a repost because FBI shills modded original to -1 immediately again (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=98942&thresho ld=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=843794 9)

    ===

    TOP SECRET FACT:Most modern cars have tracking transponders!

    Forget the airport ati-smuggle money detector Rf angles on the maylar strip... there are worse REAL RFID tracking in place

    Spy transmission chips embedded in tires that can be read REMOTELY while driving.

    A secret initiative exists to track all funnel-points on interstates and US borders for car tire ID transponders (RFid chips embedded in the tire).

    Yup. My brother works on them.

    Your tires have a passive coil with 64 to 128 bit serial number emitter in them! (AIAG B-11 ADC v3.0) . A particular frequency energizes it enough so that a receiver can read its little ROM. A ROM which in essence is your GUID for your TIRE. Multiple tires do not confuse the readers. Its almost identical to all "FastPass" "SpeedPass" technologies you see on gasoline keychain dongles and commuter windshield sticker-chips. The US gov has secretly started using these chips to track people.

    Its kind of like FBI "Taggants" in fertilizer and "Taggants" in Gasoline and Bullets, and Blackpowder. But these car tire transponder Ids are meant to actively track and trace movement of your car.

    Taggant research papers :
    http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/ ~ota/disk3/1980/8017/801705.PDF
    (remove spaces in url from slashcode if needed)

    I am not making this up. Melt down a high end Firestone, or Bridgestone tire and go through the bits near the rim (sometimes at base of tread) and you will locate the transmitter (similar to 'grain of rice' pet ids and Mobile SpeedPass, but not as high tech as the tollbooth based units). Sokymat LOGI 160, and Sokymat LOGI 120 transponder buttons are just SOME of the transponders found in modern high end car tires. The AIAG B-11 Tire tracking standard is now implemented for all 3rd party transponder manufactures [covered below].

    It is for QA and to prevent fraud and "car theft", but the US Customs service uses it in Canada to detect people who swap license plates on cars when doing a transport of contraband on a mule vehicle that normally has not logged enough hours across the border. The customs service and FBI do not yet talk about this, and are starting using it soon.

    Photos of chips before molded into tires:

    http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:TAQIKjBI01g C: www.sokymat.com/sp/applications/tireid.html

    (slashdot ruins links, so you will have to remove the ASCII space it insertess usually into the url above to get to the shocking info and photos on the enbedded LOGI 160 chips that the us gov scans when you cross mexican and canadian borders.)

    You never heard of it either because nobody moderates on slashdot anymore and this is probably +0 still. It has also never appeared in print before and is very secret.

    Californias Fastpass is being upgraded to scan ALL responding car tires in future years upcoming. I-75 may get them next in rural funnel points in Ohio.

    http://www.tadiran-telematics.com/products6.html

    but the fact is... YOU PROBABLY ALREADY HAVE A RADIO TRANSPONDER not counting your digital cell phone which is routinely silently pulsed in CA bay area each rush hour morning unless turned off (consult Wired Magazine Expose article). Those data point pulses are used by NSA on occasions.

    The us FBI with NRO/NSA blessings, has requested us gov make this tire scanning information as secret as the information regarding all us inkjet printers sold in usa in the last 3 years using "yellow" GUID barcode under dark ink regions to serialize printouts to thwart counterfeiting of 20 dollar bills. (30 to 40 percent of ALL California counterfeiting is done using cheap Epson

  98. Re:The artical's main point by Art+Tatum · · Score: 3, Insightful
    And the lesson here, boys and girls, is that if you want your message to be heard, you should never mention something that is: 1) totally irrelevant; and 2) far more cool to look at than your main point.

    Seriously, why on earth did he include those shots of burned money? Why did he stick the bills in the microwave in the first place? The whole thing is just so damned silly that it hardly even matters what his main point is.

  99. Money to burn by br4v3_s1r_r0b1n · · Score: 1
    I have no money, you Insensitive Clod.

    Yeah, I want to see if a $20 bill will catch fire, so I'm gonna stick $1000 into a microwave. Sheesh, what a moron.

  100. The actual law on mutilation by C10H14N2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note the use of the words FRAUDULENTLY and REISSUED, that is to say, the treasury will not be able to replace the bill. Slightly fscking up the currency is not likely to be sufficient to land you in federal-pound-me-in-the-ass prison unless by some monumental feat of idiocy you were trying to mutilate a $20 into something passing as a $100 as when people try to turn $20 into $60 by cutting off the corners and taping them to $1s. THAT is the kind of "mutilation" the law speaks of. Flattening a penny is not illegal. Melting it into something resembling a quarter, on the other hand, is quite definitely illegal.

    US Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 17

    Section 331
    Whoever fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the mints of the United States, or any foreign coins which are by law made current or are in actual use or circulation as money within the United States; or

    Whoever fraudulently possesses, passes, utters, publishes, or sells, or attempts to pass, utter, publish, or sell, or brings into the United States, any such coin, knowing the same to be altered, defaced, mutilated, impaired, diminished, falsified, scaled, or lightened -

    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both

    Section 333

    Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, or Federal Reserve bank, or the Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

    1. Re:The actual law on mutilation by xX_sticky_Xx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read it again. Fraudulently alters is only one in a list of actions in the offence. Section 333 says nothing about fraudulently altering a bill. It basically says that if you alter a bill or note of debt issued by the Fed or bank to make it unfit to be reissued you can be convicted.

      --

      ---

      I didn't want to leave this space blank.
    2. Re:The actual law on mutilation by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read my post again. Section 331 pertained to coins, which I referenced in the context of, obviously, coins. Section 333 deals with notes. I wasn't about to make a damned graduate thesis out of the issue, but if you (yes, you, I'm not going to put all the references here) look up the relevant US Code, you'll find that the criteria that render a bill "unfit for re-issue" are actually pretty permissive. The examples I gave, that happened to be fraudulent, would meet those criteria. Now, regardless, fraud is fraud is fraud and all of it is illegal regardless of what the law says about defacing currency. You have to do a really good job of severely fscking up the notes in order for it to become a federal crime. Simply writing "George Bush is a big fat idiot" on your $20 note is NOT illegal as it does nothing to prevent that note from being re-issued.

      Christ, everyone is a damned contrarian.

    3. Re:The actual law on mutilation by flimflam · · Score: 3, Funny
      Christ, everyone is a damned contrarian.

      No I'm not!

      --
      -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
  101. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see this happen all the time on the TV show "Cops" -- it's as if cash is illegal.

  102. What pennies are really made out of... by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 5, Informative
  103. Article translated into "Bubbaspeak" by Teahouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Original transcript of article before it was "prettied up" for public consumption.

    Me and Bubba was hanging out in this truck stop. We had just escaped a pack of UFO's on highway 66 in our Kenworth while hauling grapes from Florida to Nevada! I saw em! They had lights on them and these strange whirling blade above them!

    At this point we had been on crystal-meth for about 46 hours, so obviously our minds were a-clear. So there we were in the truck stop counting all the money we done made transporting meth across state lines for this "mex" called Jose. We had a huge wad of cash! As we left, this young pencil-neck (probably an alien in disguise) started hasseling us about how we hadn't paid for some chewing gum in out pockets or something. That's when I started a wondering how they KNEW?! Must be one of dem R.I.D.E. tags I hear the guberment is using to control our minds! They know our thoughts!

    So, Bubba and I bought us some shiney tin foil and wrapped it on our heads. Thank the lord Jesus for the Crystal Meth! We couldn't have come up with this idear ta stop em without it! Well, we started to leave again, and the lil alien started bugging us again about the gum. THEY STILL KNEW! I figured right about then that it must be OUR MONEY! Sure, Bill Gates controls the money, and Jose must have put tracking devices in it fer him!

    So we gots real smart and put our money in the microwave! Now it's OK to spend. Sure, it's brown and burnt, but we can still spend it at the titty bar! Thank god for Crystal Meth! Next time, Bubba and I will make sure we bring extra, just in case the guberment tries to bug our coffee.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:Article translated into "Bubbaspeak" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy fuck that's funny.
      I laughed out loud - literally

  104. ..Australian money by Archon-X · · Score: 1

    Australian money shrinks in the microwaves.

    Unsure whther it's because it's different to the other money or because our microwaves are Southern Hemisphere microwaves.

    Ah ok, here are the pictures

  105. Re: Do Your $20 Bills Explode In the Microwave? by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slashdot was also spotted recently fielding an article entitled:

    Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the bedpost overnight?

    Does the spearmint lose its flavor
    On the bedpost over night?
    If you pull it out like rubber
    Will it snap right back and bite?
    If you paste it on the left side
    Will you find it on the right?
    Does the spearmint lose its flavor
    On the bedpost over night?

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  106. For the record...It is illegal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Defacement of Currency

    Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. Under this provision, currency defacement is generally defined as follows: Whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

  107. Ordinary paper should burn by s1234d · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading somewhere that a stack of paper put into a microwave will char in the middle. Heat input from all around maximising at the centre. Try it with ordinary paper (carefully) before drawing any paranoid conclusions about RFID tracking.

  108. yeah, hope you removed the cards by DeathBunnyRanger · · Score: 1

    I hope you removed your credit cards when you deactivated you wallet, cause that would suck

  109. Somebody by czehp · · Score: 1

    OK... back to the basics of the microwave. Microwave ovens work by exciting the water (and some fats and sugars) in whatever you're heating, leaving all other compounds alone (try putting a piece of paper or a dry glass bowl in for as long as you want). The sparks that fly off metal objects like pop tart bags and CD's are caused by poor insulation in the microwave cavity. That's why we have the stigma of "Don't put metal in the microwave." Many modern microwaves don't suffer from this problem. But put enough metal in the microwave and you'll usually get a loverly light show from the high power electrical current arcing between the metal object(s) you put in and maybe even explode things. So, this dufus shoved 50 metal-laden $20 dollar bills into his microwave and expected nothing to happen? Jackass... but hey, I have a microwave that will safely disable those non-existent rfid tags for you...

    1. Re:Somebody by AlphaOne · · Score: 4, Informative

      The sparks that fly off metal objects like pop tart bags and CD's are caused by poor insulation in the microwave cavity.

      Kinda, but not quite.

      Sparks on metal objects is caused by uneven voltage developed on the surface of the object because of an uneven surface, uneven radiation pattern, or both.

      Because microwaves are such high frequency and the wattages of most ovens is high (most are around 1 kilowatt), high voltages are easily developed and can leap short distances.

      Once the spark leaps once, it ionizes the air along the path making subsequent arcs occur at lower voltage.

      Once current flows, as in an arc of this type, the metal will heat up very rapidly and could easily burn paper. I suspect uneven radiation (or even minute flaws) of the metal strips in the bills caused arcing between them, which burned through the paper.

      There's normally no insulation in the microwave cavity of the oven because the goal is to reflect the microwaves off ground (the metal surfaces surrounding the cavity) until they can be absorbed by water molecules, causing them to heat up, thus cooking the food.

      This is why you are normally advised not to run the microwave oven with nothing in it: the microwaves can bounce around the oven and manage to heat the magnetron instead, causing it to burn out spectacularly.

      --
      All opinions presented here aren't mine.
    2. Re:Somebody by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Once current flows, as in an arc of this type, the metal will heat up very rapidly and could easily burn paper. I suspect uneven radiation (or even minute flaws) of the metal strips in the bills caused arcing between them, which burned through the paper.

      More likely: They had the bills in a stack and voltage irregularities developed between strips in different bills.

      This whole article is so damned stupid.

  110. old twenties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the bills in the pictures were older style twenties with an oval around Jackson's picture.

  111. OT: How'd you do? by vericgar · · Score: 1

    I too worked for Cutco once upon a time. The only thing I got out of it was a car that wore out way too quickly... never broke even... how'd you do?

    1. Re:OT: How'd you do? by Elias+Serge · · Score: 1

      So did I. How did you not break even tho? The commission rates were insane- I was making 30% commission by my 3rd week. ...I was always amused by the fact that people who bought those knives always cut themselves constantly for the first 2 weeks or so...

    2. Re:OT: How'd you do? by vericgar · · Score: 1

      I lived in a rural area so my appointments couldn't be as closely spaced as most people (to account for driving time). And I'm not a people person. Oh it also probably didn't help that I was living out of my car at the time because my parents kicked me out.

      I liked the knives though. Wish I had the money back then to keep my set.

  112. I just tried this. It's bullshit. by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 3, Informative
    I just nuked several new 20s and several mid-20s (the last generation but not the really old ones), for 30 seconds each. Nada.

    Feeling with fingernails over Jackson's eyes yields no bump, either.

    I get a feeling that IHBT. IWHAND.

  113. Not the strongest paper by vraddict · · Score: 1

    It's probably the toughest paper in the world, able to survive virtually anything.

    If anyone has seen or handled the currency from New Zealand, then they would immediately disagree with you regarding that statement. The kiwis make their cash out of recycled plastic, and the stuff cannot be torn, and believe me we tried.

  114. Insert RFID chip into friends wallet by flandar · · Score: 1

    I've heard of this before the new twenties. Just get a RFID chip that is still active and insert it into someones wallet and presto, every time they walk though a scanner they will set it off. Good for years of fun. Just drop the little metal strip to the bottem and they will never find it. Better yet, drop it into someone's purse, who knows whats inside those things. A small mettle strip will never be found. Looks like in this case the metal strip was between a few folds of money.

  115. But is it art? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only thing that would be against the law is defacing currency and attempting to use it in commerce.

    What if I draw moustaches on the presidents and sell the doctored notes as artistic portraits of Saddam Hussein?

    1. Re:But is it art? by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 4, Funny
      What if I draw moustaches on the presidents and sell the doctored notes as artistic portraits of Saddam Hussein?

      That's legal as long as don't put Andy Warhol's signature in the bottom right corner.

    2. Re:But is it art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wash well. If you are the least bit oily, W will be after you.

    3. Re:But is it art? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      /me breaks out his 'I grew hemp' stamp and starts defacing all his $1.00 bills.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    4. Re:But is it art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>/me breaks out his 'I grew hemp' stamp and starts defacing all his $1.00 bills.

      You know, if it were cocaine instead of hemp, those could be twenties. Think about it.

    5. Re:But is it art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know who that guy is that makes his own banknotes in these great artistic color schemes with neat pictures and stuff? I saw a TV show about him once... He would actually go around and attempt to trade his bills for goods and it worked quite well for him. Supposedly it's the only way to really get his art unless you buy it off someone else.

  116. bullshit. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microwave radiation won't affect RFID. They are too small. Try nuking some ants and see what happens.

    Secondly, who is STUPID enough to ruin that much money?

    Third, I suspect this is FAKE and if so, someone may be guilty of counterfiting. If they printed up fake bills to make this fake "news" report, the Treasury folks may be interested.

    And lastely, Alex Jones is a FLAKE that is in serious need of MEDS..

    JMO..

    1. Re:bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microwave radiation won't affect RFID. They are too small.

      They sure have an effect on water molecules...

    2. Re:bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but how many metal ants have you tried ?

    3. Re:bullshit. by cb8100 · · Score: 1

      I agree that those burn marks look fake, but I don't think that the $20 bills are fake. It looks like these guys took pictures of cash being held or sitting on a table, etc. and then put the scorches on with photoshop.

      This picture looks particularly fake

      --
      My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
  117. Definitely BS. Those aren't even new 20s. by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...they're "mid-20s", the previous generation. The new 20s don't have a halo around Jackson.

  118. fruit from California by DeathBunnyRanger · · Score: 3, Funny

    if the fruit were married in california, could the truck only go to MASS and VT since their fructial union is honored there?

  119. RFID tags going into Japanese Y10,000 notes first by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    US currency doesn't have RFID tags yet, but it looks like the Hitachi Mu-Chip RFID tag may be going into the Japanese 10,000 yen note soon. This device runs at 2.45GHz, and is 0.4mm square. Early versions required an external antenna (which could be a line of conductive ink), but the newest version supposedly has an onboard antenna and is suitable for embedding in currency.

    This chip doesn't have collision avoidance, though. So a stack of bills wouldn't be individually readable.

    So the technology isn't quite here yet to do it right, but it's getting close. Currently, you can get collision avoidance or tiny size, but not both. Good collision avoidance combined with fast data transfers is hard, and it's wanted by retailers, who want to be able to read out each box in a carton individually. That could be thousands of items. That's do-able, but not with the low-cost tags yet. Retailers want to get tag costs down to around $0.02. Realistically, today RFID tags cost upwards of $0.25.

    True public key challenge/response hasn't made it into the smallest tags, either. Challenge/response is available in keyring size and in credit card size, and is used for access control applications. But the low end tags can't do that yet.

    Two more years, and this will really be happening. But not yet.

  120. Gimp or Photoshop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big question is: Did they use Photoshop or Gimp to edit the photos?

    It's most obvious when you look at the bill he is holding in his hand. For even a non-trained eye, the editing should be easy to spot.

  121. You fool!! by Senjutsu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly the government secretly placed an RFID tag in your paper towel sheets in order to track your every spill!!! Placing the towel in the microwave obviously caused the tag to explode, and from now on you should wrap all of you paper towels in tinfoil to prevent the government from spying on you!!!

    1. Re:You fool!! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " and from now on you should wrap all of you paper towels in tinfoil to prevent the government from spying on you!!!"

      But then how will you microwave them to check for RFIDs? Or spend them?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:You fool!! by aduzik · · Score: 1

      But don't you all know the government puts RFID tags in tinfoil???

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
  122. YHBT. YHL. HAND. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject.

    - Alex Jones

  123. Yes they do by ZxCv · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think they print $2 bills any more.

    Yes, they do. You can even buy uncut sheets of them from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. I'm sure they're not as actively circulated nowadays, but they're definitely still printed. See the US Bureau of Engraving and Printing website for more info.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    1. Re:Yes they do by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      You can even buy uncut sheets of them [$2 bills] from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
      A lot of younger people have never seen or used $2 bills. The 1976 re-issue was a big deal, but even then a few people still had one of the old ones in their wallet or purse for luck.

      A retired shop owner in one of my classes liked to exploit this and use them when leaving tips. Every so often he'd get 50 brand new $2 bills and bind them to a piece of cardboard just like a pad of paper or "stickies". After paying he'd get up, start to leave as if he were forgetting to tip the waitress. When he had her full attention, he'd "remember" the tip, pull out the pad and rip one or two bills of the top.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  124. Duh... by davmoo · · Score: 1

    And I guess it never occured to anyone to examine the wallet as well as the money. This story was a perfect example of the phrase "dumb as owl shit".

    And by the way, while I'm here, a note to the editors at Slashdot...you're a month early...this is only March...they call it "April Fools Day" because it is the first of APRIL...not March.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  125. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Ever held $1,000 in twenty dollar bills?

    I don't think so. His wallet would need a wheel to keep if from dragging off his ass if it was full of $20's..

    Also, the cops pull you over with that much money in small bills, you get a free ride to go explain it. They assume you are selling dope when you have a lot of small bills.

  126. slashdot effect by krokodil · · Score: 3, Funny

    In recent manifestation of so-called "slashdot effect" power consumption in western united states peaked 200% around 11pm today after bunch of geeks tried to fry their 20 dollars bills in microware ovens in attempt to uncover government conspiracy to track them via hidden micro chips (called RFID tags) in their bills.

  127. oh Yeah?? well.. on canadian money... by Professor+Chaos · · Score: 2, Funny

    on the canadian $5 bill you can turn sir wilfred laurier into spock. just draw some pointy ears and the hairdo and voila! perfect likeness ..sigh.. i guess you guys win this round...

  128. alternate explanation by nicodemus05 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Microwave radiation won't affect RFID. They are too small. Try nuking some ants and see what happens.

    This guy seems to be closest to the target, I think. The reason ants don't fry is that the majority of the microwaves 'miss' them. The ant is smaller than the microwave wavelength (which varies between 10^-1 and 10^-4 meters), and so can miss the crests, so to speak, and avoid frying.

    I think it fried all of the bills in the same spot because all of the bills had similar orientation and position, and Jackson's eye was right over a spot of peak intensity. Microwaves don't cook evenly; that's all he's demonstrated.

    --
    while (!sleep){

    sheep++;

    }

    1. Re:alternate explanation by asr_man · · Score: 1

      Uh...ants are certainly ~10^-3 meters long, within the range you specify. And by your argument water molecules (~10^-9 meters) won't heat up either, but they clearly do. Think again...

    2. Re:alternate explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, cooking must be BRUTAL at your house, what with heating up each water molecule individually.

  129. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  130. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ONLY $1000 ...

    gez - hasn't anyone ever gone to a computer
    show to buy a computer - and noticed the
    extra charges for CC or check?(if the vendor
    event takes checks.. )

    seriously, $1k isn't that much ...

    unless maybe you're in India..

  131. The real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will photoshop allow you to scan in microwaved 20 dollar bills? Those DRM bastards will stop at nothing!

  132. Might be some validity by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1

    Ok so everyone points out the obvious and is quick to suggest tinfoil hats, but there might be some truth to this story (by accident). Clearly this guy nuked either the paper, moisture in the paper, or the metal strips heated up. A better experiment would have been to microwave along with a glass of water to absorb the bouncing around waves.

    Those security scanners work by exciting those little metal tags (bi-metalic i think and some now out of more exotic plastic & mylar) which resonate briefly after the field is removed. Is it possible some slight engineering went into those metal strips to resonate themselves? Maybe not at the store scanner frequencies, but slightly off? Maybe the truck stop scanner was off or extra sensitive or uncalibrated.

    The reason the Dept. of Treasury might do this is to be able to identify large quantities of money coming into or leaving the country. Maybe the gov't has the ability to scan for suitcases of cash.

  133. Microwave Nostalgia by Turismo86 · · Score: 0

    I don't think i'll ever outgrow that "what happens when we put this in the microwave" stage of my life. Gummy bears are particularly fun by the way. Also on cold days before school, i used to pop my clothes in there quickly for that fresh out of the dryer feel in only 30 seconds.

  134. The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    According to CNN.com in a story dated June 12, 2003 - "Moneymakers in Washington are contemplating printing a new series of the $2 bill, which is by far the least-used small note in circulation. The last time the notes were issued was in 1996 (it bears a 1995 series stamp), when about 164 million were made."

    The US Dept. of Treasury confirms that the $2 bill does indeed exist.

    Funny how so many of the tech savvy alphageeks on slashdot don't have basic researching skills to find out facts on their but rather follow others like sheep and just assume what the other guy is saying is true

    1. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by SamNmaX · · Score: 1

      Funny how so many of the tech savvy alphageeks on slashdot don't have basic researching skills to find out facts on their but rather follow others like sheep and just assume what the other guy is saying is true

      Thanks for the information, but no need to be an ass about it.

    2. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by LauraScudder · · Score: 1

      In true slashdot fashion, you did not even skim the article linked to but rushed to post some irrelevant reply. Good job.

    3. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 0, Redundant
      In true slashdot fashion, you did not even skim the article linked to but rushed to post some irrelevant reply. Good job.
      Actually my reply is very relevant in the sense that it gives concrete proof and information about the existence of the $2 bill. And I know very well that the said article was a joke but it did not present much by way of proof of existence of the $2 bill other than some images which could be interpreted by some as a Photoshop job. It was evident from the replies that many here thought that the joke was that the $2 bill does not really exist. So I just wanted to clear that up with some proof. Unfortunately you didn't get that, but then I didn't expect many would get the real reason for my reply.
    4. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how so many of the tech savvy alphageeks on slashdot don't have basic researching skills to find out facts on their but rather follow others like sheep and just assume what the other guy is saying is true

      Funny how so many of the tech savy alphageeks on slashdot don't have the basic researching skills to click on the link in the OP to realize it's a joke and instead show themselves to be a condescending ass.

    5. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by Weeb · · Score: 0

      Are you stupid?

      The fellow you're replying to was using sarcasm. You, apparently, don't have "basic" link-clicking skills. It was a joke, referring to an episode in which a consumer is almost escorted from Taco Bell for attempting to pass a two dollar bill.

      Whoever modded this genius insightful needs to be shot into the sun along with him.

    6. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how some idiot who doesn't read the link can make the mistake that ANYONE in this thread doubts the existence of $2 bills. READ NEXT TIME.

    7. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by Baumi · · Score: 1

      Funny how so many of the tech savvy alphageeks on slashdot don't have basic researching skills to find out facts on their but rather follow others like sheep and just assume what the other guy is saying is true

      This one goes right back to you: Had you read the linked article (the Taco Bell one), you would have noticed that it's relating an anecdote about a clueless Taco Bell employee who didn't know there was a $2 bill. It does not claim that there isn't one, quite to the contrary.

      Baumi

    8. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was evident from the replies that many here thought that the joke was that the $2 bill does not really exist.

      Out of the four current replies. You are the only one who even remotely appeared to not know the $2 bill exists. Now it looks like you are trying to cover your ass and doing a bad job of it.

    9. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking idiot. I guess when you say, "It was evident from the replies that many here thought that the joke was that the $2 bill does not really exist," you are referring to yourself.

      What an asslicker.

    10. Re:The $2 bill does exist and here is the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woohoo! I got +5 Flamebait! But, actually, why is it flamebait? The parent is an obvious troll. He'd have to be a complete moron with absolutely no reading comprehension skills to actually believe what he wrote.

  135. Better control experiment... by raehl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did he try passing his wallet through the detector without the money?

    I have a Kastanza wallet - I put everything in there, and it's waaay too big. The wallet I had was falling apart, and eventually my girlfriend pretty much forced me into buying a new one. Which I did, at the retail store she works at.

    It just so happens that after this, I could no longer get through the metal detector at airport security. The wallet would set off the wand, and the TSA agent would spend a good 3-5 minutes examining the wallet, but couldn't find anything amiss and would eventually let me through.

    The *FOURTH* time I went through security an agent finally managed to find the source of my problem: An anti-theft tag placed in some obscure fold of the wallet.

    As it turns out, the guy at the store responsible for putting the anti-theft tags in things has a reputation for being able to hide them very well.

    So I'd be willing to bet something similar is afoot here.

    As for the money burning all in the same spot, it's pretty obvious why: Metal heats up in the microwave, and paper has low thermal conductivity. Put one bill in the microwave, the heat escapes from both sides of the bill fast enough that you don't get enough heat to initiate combustion. Stack 50 of them on top of each other, and now you've got a buncha metal in the middle of a buncha paper, the heat builds up in the center, and now your bills combust. The bills didn't all burn in the same spot - one bill started burning, and then the other bills - all stacked neatly on top of each other - burned in the same spot as the fire spread up and down the stack.

    A conpiracy theorist needs to be smart enough to connect a bunch of unrelated facts, but not smart enough to realize that they're unrelated.

    1. Re:Better control experiment... by SacredNaCl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The *FOURTH* time I went through security an agent finally managed to find the source of my problem: An anti-theft tag placed in some obscure fold of the wallet.

      As it turns out, the guy at the store responsible for putting the anti-theft tags in things has a reputation for being able to hide them very well.


      Many items come from the warehouse with 4-5 tags in them in different places. I bought a bottle of aspirin the other day that not only had them on the underside of the label, it had one on the inside of the box, one on the outside of the box, and one under the cap. Excessive for a mere $3 bottle of aspirin.

      This is why professional shoplifters go through the trouble of sewing in foil lined pockets & pouches in their clothing. Once these systems are in place, the security tends to rely on them. It stops some of the amateurs, but professionals can come in and rob the place blind. They never set off an alarm and the first the store is aware of it is when an entire shelf of goods is missing.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    2. Re:Better control experiment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is not unique to where you live, wallets with leftover anti-theft tags are one of the most common things to set of alarms.

      It has happened to me, and when it did, that was the first thing the security guy suggested; he said it was very common.

    3. Re:Better control experiment... by pixitha · · Score: 1

      I used to work in a retail store, I wonder if thats that store, heh

      I always hated getting our stuff riped of by kids or adults for that matter...so i started to get creative witht he lil EAS tags we used..its amzing how many kids try to steal those card game things pokemon or whatver it is...so i started to go around the entire store and put things on random items in very strange places to bug those pesky shoplifters

      -pix

      --
      "an eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind"
    4. Re:Better control experiment... by Frogbert · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thats nothing, one day me and a few (lady) friends decided we would go to our local adult bookshop for a look around for an 18th birthday present. Obviously I had no problems being seen entering such a place with two attractive women at my side so we went and had a look around. A few giggles and $15 later we emerged with a plastic... massage... device deftly sealed up in a brown paper bag. We were pleased with our purchase and decided to get along with our day.

      Our next stop was at the local Target supermarket so we entered and had a look around bought some CD's and went to leave. Not so fast unfortunatly a hidden anti-theft tag was atached to the phallus of my girlfriends new best friend. This lead to an interesting conundrum, we had the option of:
      a. Showing a 14 year old girl (who was clearly working her first day) and a few interested onlookers what was in the bag.
      b. Waiting for the Cops to rock up and then showing them what was in the bag.
      c. Attempt to tell her what was in the bag whilst keeping as diplomatic as possible.
      It should also be pointed out that it was infact me holding the bag and this was not something I would like to be seen with.

      Ultimitly we were able to communicate the contents of the bag and one quick peek and a sheepish smile later we were on our way. I learnt a valuable lesson that day my friends. Don't forget your towel (of al foil).

    5. Re:Better control experiment... by Yawgm8th · · Score: 0

      /me gets out pen and paper...
      j/k

      --
      do unto others as you would have them do unto you
    6. Re:Better control experiment... by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      hummmm. He wraps the cash, walks through with wrapped cash and a wallet and it quits beeping. I would say that is good enough for an experiment.

      I would be far more interested in seeing their cash spread out rather than stacked in the microwave.

      This could create and interesting market for wallets though; Foil lined to prevent signals. They are not passed through metal detectors.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Better control experiment... by buckinm · · Score: 5, Funny

      I learnt a valuable lesson that day my friends. Don't forget your towel (of al foil).

      Shouldn't the valuable lesson be "leave the dildo in the car when you go into Target?"

      --
      This isn't any ordinary darkness. It's advanced darkness.
    8. Re:Better control experiment... by headblur · · Score: 1

      what they DIDN'T mention in the story was the fact that the bills were held together with a paperclip...

    9. Re:Better control experiment... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shouldn't the valuable lesson be "leave the dildo in the car when you go into Target?"

      Heh. Yep! Leave it to a geek to learn the impractical lesson. "Never leave the house without your cross-spectrum radio-frequency jammer, tin foil, and collapsable antennae, because otherwise you won't be able to take dildos with you into Target."

      Which, granted, is advice I could have used on several occasions. Where was he then?!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:Better control experiment... by rocketsled · · Score: 1

      My concern with RFID (theft tags aside) is that someone with an RFID scanner will know exactly how much I am carrying in my wallet.

      I can see it now all future pick pockets will prescan you before lifting your wallet.

    11. Re:Better control experiment... by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would say it is nowhere near good enough.

      Did he put the foil-wrapped cash back in his wallet? Did that foil-wrapped cash then form a "U" wrapped around the RFID tag leftover in his wallet from the day it was purchased, blocking its signal? We don't know, he didn't say. He didn't say what happened if he separated the bills. He didn't say he tried going through with 49 or 48 bills instead of 50 bills; he apparently didn't try to discover the threshhold of how many bills it takes to set off the Checkpoint sensors. But he goes home and in a separate act of misunderstanding microwaves this same bunch of paper that has metallic and magnetic ink printed in precise locations, and watches it ignite in precisely the same spot on each bill. (Do a google search for "magnetic ink currency" and you'll find an entire industry built around the valdiation of currency via checking the locations of magnetic ink on paper. Here's one to get you started.

      As an aside, reading magnetic ink in a cost-effective manner still requires contact sensors. The only way to read it at a distance currently involves a machine that would very much resemble an MRI scanner. My guess is even this guy would have spotted one of those at the door.

      So, he performed no scientifically valid experimentation at all, but through a series of marginally related accidents convinces himself he's discovered these secret "facts" about money tracking.

      I'm personally surprised he had to go across the street to purchase aluminum foil, and that he didn't just take some out of his hat to use to wrap around the cash. This guy sounds like the poster child for Crackpots Anonymous. I'm almost embarrased to admit I've read this far into the Slashdot comments about it; it's kind of like reading the National Enquirer.

      --
      John
    12. Re:Better control experiment... by brianber · · Score: 1
      I learnt a valuable lesson that day my friends. Don't forget your towel (of al foil).
      Or, depending on your state's laws, just keep walking out the door. In some states store security can't stop you based solely on an alarm. At the Kmart I used to work at, the anti-theft alarm would go off all the time and no employee would even look up, it was up to the customer to turn around and come back in. Works out great if you're taking a 19" TV out of the store on a cart and don't want to pay for it. (Actually happened, people walked right out the door with the TV in plain sight and no one bothered even asking to see a receipt.)
    13. Re:Better control experiment... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Hey, you never know when you might need to use a dildo in Target! Those cashiers can be pretty cranky, and it pays to get on their good side...

    14. Re:Better control experiment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the event of a dildo, we have to use the indefinite
      article 'a dildo', never 'your dildo'

  136. Microwaving money for fun and profit by xoran99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, being very forgetful, I often leave my wallet in my pants when I take them off, and then end up washing it. What do I do if I'm in a hurry and have a wet wallet? I leave the wallet to dry itself, but I microwave the money so I don't pay for things with soggy bills. Am I the only one who does this? I've never had any problem with this exploding stuff, btw...

    --

    Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

  137. Of course it could be the wallet by skinfitz · · Score: 0

    The problem could be that he bought the wallet and it's (non-RFID) tag was not deactivated properly by whoever sold it to him (last time that happened to me was last week with a box of wine (incidentally when I was setting the alarm off I was asked if I had any razor blades...).

    Either that or he stole the wallet...

    The notes will "explode" because of the foil strip in them, and if you want to see something else explode, try putting a small amount of chopped onions in the microwave, which coincidentally I discovered accidentally last week and made a short video as someone wouldn't believe me.

  138. FYI by rabtech · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just so you know, metal does the same thing to microwaves that it does to other electromagnetic radiation: in the absence of a ground, the metal (such as aluminum foil or metal strips in bills) will simply reflect the microwave radation.

    The issue is when there is not a sufficient quantity of water (food, glass of water, etc) to absorb the microwaves; they will collide, cause sparks, etc. The metal will resonate and eventually heat up.

    Cover your food with aluminum foil and you get sparks. Leave a spoon lying on the plate next to a helping of food and you've got no problem. You just need a sufficient quantity of water inside the chamber to absorb the radiation.

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  139. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen new $2 bills. Actually they have tons of them in Germany at US bases. I have no idea why.

  140. Re:Definitely BS. Those aren't even new 20s. by ryanjensen · · Score: 1

    There is one "new" $20 bill on the bottom-right of the first picture. It is not, however, burned that badly. But you're right, I too doubt 1996 series bills could have had RFID tags installed.

  141. Printing process is the culprit here... by GoRK · · Score: 5, Informative

    US paper currency is printed with an intaglio process whereby the (slightly conductive) ink is rolled onto plates and then the paper is pressed into the plates (rather than the plates being pressed into the paper on most presses.) IE the RECESSED parts of the plates hold the ink, not the bits that stick up.

    The effective result of using this printing method can be felt on the bill. On a new bill the ink will be coarse and raised off of the paper. The lines will be very crisp and solid. There will be no 'breaks' even microscopic in the ink.

    Since it's slightly conductive (it has some metals in it and whatnot) and the lines (and crosshatching etc) are pretty well continuous it's going to be an excellent absorber of microwave energy. Without anything else in the microwave to absorb the energy better than the money, it's likely the ink near the portrait is going to get really hot really fast. This is pretty much what I'd expect from microwaving money.

    All that being said, the RFID equipment or the security equipment that this money was falsely triggering must be some of the cheapest crap on the market!

  142. The guy sounds fishy... by stonedonkey · · Score: 1
    Never mind the nuked presidents, I'm still trying to figure out what the guy was doing with 50 brand-new twenties, in his back pocket at a truck stop, plus more (as they were described as "the lion's share" of its cash contents). He must have gotten them directly from a bank teller, since you won't get 50 new ones straight off, or he selected them, which just makes him odd. I'm going with odd.


    You know what else can do it, besides Evil Gov't RFID? A magnetized, steel-toed boot. Happens all the time, strangely enough. At least it did when I worked at Home Depot--about once a day, maybe more. Every so often, a blue-collar type would set off the alarm, walk to the counter, put each foot on the counter to de-mag, and walk out. And you know they were de-magging because the counter device did its signature thump to indicate it had done its job. I'm really not kidding.

  143. This is exactly why by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never carry anything but quarters. This was a bit troubling when I paid the deposit on my house, but it's a small price to pay for keeping the prying eyes of The Man out of my financial transactions.

    1. Re:This is exactly why by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course they can hear you jingle-jangling a mile away...

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    2. Re:This is exactly why by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
      I never carry anything but quarters. This was a bit troubling when I paid the deposit on my house, but it's a small price to pay for keeping the prying eyes of The Man out of my financial transactions.
      You know, it would be easier (and you would jingle less) to carry Susan B. Anthony or Sacagawea dollar coins.

      However, if you were to carry all quarters, carry at least one of each state quarter design minted to this time.

  144. Guv'mint conspiracy? by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    We could have left it at that, but we have also paid attention to the European Union and the 'rfid' tracking devices placed in their money,...

    Maybe in X-files country, but here in real life, euros do not have 'rfid tracking devices'. What they do have is a metal strip which makes it more difficult to counterfeit.

    Of course I fully expect now to be told that my government only wants me to think that that's just a metal strip... :-)

    1. Re:Guv'mint conspiracy? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Of course I fully expect now to be told that my government only wants me to think that that's just a metal strip."

      Thinking is Unpatriotic and leads to conspiratorial behaviors.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Guv'mint conspiracy? by RdsArts · · Score: 2, Funny

      Government? Oh no no no, it reaches higher up then that.

      It's really the aliens. You heard me.

      *dons tin foil hat and wallet*

      Go on. Keep living in your dream world of 'metal strips' and 'governments.'

    3. Re:Guv'mint conspiracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now you've done it. I feel some truly atrocious fanfic coming up.

      SCULLY:"Are you seriously suggesting that the European Central Bank is spying on all it's citizens?"

      MULDER:"Only the rich ones Scully."

      SCULLY: "But Mulder that's insane!"

      MULDER: "Did I ever tell you that you look very sexy in those glasses?"

      SCULLY: "Oh Mulder take me now!"

      MULDER: "Right here?"

      SCULLY: "Yes right here on this cluttered desk under your I WANT TO BELIEVE poster!!!"

      I'm going to lie down now.
  145. man, how dumb can one get? by stephentyrone · · Score: 5, Informative

    microwaves don't cook evenly. they're *waves*. they resonate and form standing waves in the chamber of the oven. just like sound. jackson's eye happened to be at a peak of one of these standing waves. since the bills were in a stack, the peak was in the same spot on all the bills.

    put any old piece of paper (or more fun, a plate of marshmallows) into a microwave that doesn't have a working turntable. you'll get a pattern of burn marks. you can even measure the distance between them to calculate the wavelength of the microwaves if you want to. basic physics.

    this isn't even a *good* conspiracy theory.

    1. Re:man, how dumb can one get? by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1


      this isn't even a *good* conspiracy theory.


      conspiracy theories usually arent. if they were good enough, they would be popular myths and legends and not merely conspiracy theories :)

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
  146. Slashdot would be screwed. by Bill_Royle · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the feds tried to arrest every person who had committed some sort of crime and then posted it to the internet, I have a feeling that Slashdot would be very quiet.

  147. RSA RFID Blocker Tag by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative
    One of the interesting things at this year's RSA trade show was an RFID Blocker Tag that RSA Labs designed. It was recently discussed on Slashdot. You can read the above paper, but the summary is that it impersonates all 2**64 possible serial numbers, confusing the readers. (It basically answers "yes" when asked if the next bit is a 0 or if it's a 1. Mu!) So carry one in your wallet, and stick one in your luggage as well.

    The paper describes fancier options, such as only impersonating numbers in some given range so that it only blocks reading some kinds of items, like the serial numbers on 100 Euro banknotes.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:RSA RFID Blocker Tag by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

      "it impersonates all 2**64 possible serial numbers"

      Oh gee, I can see that being *really* helpful when the Homeland Defense automated luggage checking system asks your luggage "Are you a suitcase nuke?" and it answers "Why, yes I am!"

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  148. Eek by Earlybird · · Score: 1

    Those burned dollar bills... it's just like the wooden box containing the Ark of the Covenant in Raiders of the Lost Ark! Only instead of burning away the Nazi swastika, it's burning away the former president's face! [cue somber John Williams score]

  149. In particular... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only thing that would be against the law is defacing currency and attempting to use it in commerce. So we learned in Business Law.

    Actually, what's illegal is attempting to use it in commerce after defacing it in a way that would let it be passed as currency of higher value.

    You're entirely welcome to deface it in a way that doesn't promote fraud. In particular, some defacements are legitimate political speech and protected by the first amendment as interpreted by the courts.

    My favorite defacement is to give the portrat of Hamilton on the (old) $10 a Hitler moustache and hair. Hamilton is the founding father who was the ideological head of the Federalists - the group that promoted the changes to the US central government that eventually led it to become the powerful and often oppressive machine it is today.

    Not so much deliberately, of course. For instance, his opposition to the Bill of Rights was predicated on the idea that explicitly acklowledging certain rights would create the expectation that the government could stamp out any others. The proponents of the Bill claimed that, absent an explicit list of those that are particluarly important, the government would have no guideline and would stop 'em all. (Of course they were both right.)

    But you know what they say about good intensions and paving.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:In particular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite defacement is to give the portrat of Hamilton on the (old) $10 a Hitler moustache and hair.

      Hmm, the old Canadian $5 bills had a portrait of Sir Wilfred Laurier that could be "modified" into a very workable Spock, as I recall...

    2. Re:In particular... by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Nope... It's illegal to deface it *in any way*. Look it up for yourself.

      I really wish there was a -1 Wrong in the moderator drop-down.

    3. Re:In particular... by wishus · · Score: 1

      Nope... It's illegal to deface it *in any way*. Look it up for yourself.

      Nope... It's illegal to render it unfit for circulation. Look it up for yourself.

  150. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you obviously know nothing about this either.

    Most truckers carry their wallets in their front pockets. Sitting on a wallet all day hurts.

    Volvo, Kenworth, Peterbilt, Freightliner, ...
    Lots have have 100gal tanks each side.
    http://www.truckerslink.com/fuel_prices.htm
    Thats about $340+ to fill with less then 6mpg.

  151. doesnt work for me what about others? by Kyle+Hamilton · · Score: 1

    Nope 10 mins on High in my microwave not a darn thing anyone else?

    --
    Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates, Apache in house.
    1. Re:doesnt work for me what about others? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Nope 10 mins on High in my microwave not a darn thing

      See, we're looking at this all wrong. The government knows this guy is a kook, so they just put RFIDs in all HIS money, not all the rest of our money.

  152. It's a metal strip, stupid! by bsdnazz · · Score: 1
    Has the US Federal Reserve (who I assume are responsible for printing US Bank notes) not started putting a thin metal stip in the notes? UK bank notes have done this for some time now.

    A metal strip would have the same effect in a microwave as tin foil or any other piece of metal.

    No RFID plot here!

  153. Re: Do Your $20 Bills Explode In the Microwave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. No they don't.

  154. It Doesn't add up by vandalman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I count only $600 in the pictures. Either he can't count or there is $400 in bills that arn't damaged. What happened to those 20 extra bills?

    --
    Devise, Repair, Solve, Build
  155. Target by MacFury · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    If your parents are poor you're going to have a crappy job at some point in your life. Case in point...I have an IQ in the high 140's. A couple of days ago I was pushing carts at Target.

    If I were rich, I could have my parents lawyers help me patent my many inventions and continue to sit atop my pile of cash.

  156. i say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B S

  157. 2.45GHz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 1/4 wave 2.45GHz antenna is I think still over an inch long (30mm?). How can this device operate at 2.45GHz with an antenna as short as you say?

    Also, note that challenge/response is different than RFID. RFID is just serial numbers, essentially. Basically, RF barcodes.

    It's bad enough RFID is as misunderstood as it is without confusing it some more.

  158. Super Happy Microwave Fun. by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny
    metal inside is break the magnatron

    Tell me about it. I broke my Magnatron, and totally fried Optimus Prime too. That's the last time I play Decepticon Rays From Space with my Transformers.

    1. Re:Super Happy Microwave Fun. by IainHere · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now, where's the moderation option "actually hurt myself laughing"?

    2. Re:Super Happy Microwave Fun. by muffen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Brilliant man!!

      It's been a while since I laughed that hard :)

    3. Re:Super Happy Microwave Fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made me choke on my soup!

    4. Re:Super Happy Microwave Fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starscream: Now I am the leader of the Decepticons!!!

  159. April 1st already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Damn, did I set my watch wrong? Mine says it's March 1st, not April 1st.

  160. Nope, you're wrong. by mfh · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the Federal Reserve board of directors' website

    http://www.federalreserve.gov/faq.htm

    Who owns the Federal Reserve?

    The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Nope, you're wrong. by Dr_Cornholio · · Score: 1

      I know that's what the fed's site says, but dig around on google about the history of the federal reserve. Look at the entire history of U.S. money for that matter, even going back to the days of 'colonial scrip' money, when the U.S. colonies tried to break free from the British central bank's crippling system. You will be surprised at what you find. Also check out the new 'Liberty dollars' at www.norfed.org

      I've been studying this subject for about a year now and trust me, there is nothing federal about the federal reserve. It is a private company that is an agency of the government. It is never audited and entirely accountable to no-one, not even the president. In fact, there are almost no reserves either. Your money is backed by paper alone. There is no gold locked up that your greenbacks are supposed to represent. The fed's system is based on fractional reserve banking - another interesting topic for you to check out.

      A good place to start is at www.norfed.org/html/jimart.asp (Sorry about no hypertext. I'm too lazy :) If you still don't believe me, that's fine, but at least check it out and let me know. It can't hurt to find out some of the inner workings of your economy. I've got stacks of articles on this topic thatI can email to you if you want. Drop me a line if you're interested.

      Happy reading!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the monkey spanks you!
    2. Re:Nope, you're wrong. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Uh, dude, we have been off the "gold standard" since 1913 and the dollar hasn't been backed by gold. I don't know where you get the idea that dollars are supposted to be represnted by some gold somewhere.

      Although there does need to be reform, you are a conspiracy nut.

    3. Re:Nope, you're wrong. by Dr_Cornholio · · Score: 1

      There is a common misconception by a lot of people that greenbacks are backed up by gold reserves. I know this, you know this, and now everyone reading this thread knows this. I'm not a conspiracy nut, I'm just concerned that the U.S. govt lets a company claim to be a part of the govt. when it's merely working for the govt. If you had a company that outsourced its IT needs, would you let that IT company claim to be part of your company? I don't think so.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the monkey spanks you!
  161. Well my theory by Foo2rama · · Score: 1

    They burned on Mr. Jackson as he was a hell of a guy... Ok just kidding. The ink has metals in and should I would think tend to heat up faster then other parts of the bill. Hence causing Jackson to blush.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  162. No RFID in Euros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    People seem to think there are RFID tags in Euro bills. Let me clearify that they are not there (yet). They try to add them by 2005, according to the eetimes.

  163. Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by yintercept · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am surprised the government doesn't encourage people to do more destroying of money. When you lose or destroy a dollar bill, the government can print and spend a replacement without causing inflation.

    You know, all of those State Quarters that people collect with fervor are almost pure profit for the mint. I mean, it's like the mint has a license to print money!!!!

    1. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Ancil · · Score: 1


      No. They don't get to "spend" the new $20 bills, because they have to give them to this nutjob. Replacing destroyed currency costs the government money.

    2. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Grym · · Score: 1

      Because imagine if some eccentric multi-billionaire (think Bill Gates) decided to get a billion dollars in cash and just burn it? (After all, what's the *practical* difference between one billion and two?) Now imagine that he's done this in secret, so the government can't reprint the money. Or what if he gets all his friends to do it? Or what happens when the next big rapper fad is to wear suits made of $100 bills to the point where every wigger in the suburbs is wearing one?

      It doesn't take an economist to know that these kinds of things would cause major problems in a very short timespan.

      -Grym

    3. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, wrong. The U.S. government does not "spend" cash - the only way it spends is by writing a check or direct deposit into a bank account. Cash is only supplied to banks in exchange for reserves based on the banks customer's needs.

      You are correct to the extent that a destroyed dollar means one less dollar that needs to be "redeemed" by taxation to maintain the value of the currency. But that really only applies under conditions of full employment, which we haven't really been anywhere near since the late 60's. Under conditions of underutilization of capacity, extra govenment spending just mobilizes those unused resources, without any real inflationary pressure...

    4. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to ask; how long have you been waiting to use that joke?

    5. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keynesian Nonsense.

      If the dollar is created out of thin air, they are still lowering the value of every other dollar out there, in the long run. In the short run who ever gets the dollar first gets to spend their newly 'minted' (in a figurative sense) dollar as if it were full value. Redefining the term 'Inflation' for purposes of justifying government intervention does change any of the above.

    6. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by yintercept · · Score: 1

      You remember Saddam Hussein's stock piling US cash? He could have done some serious damage to the economy if he had released it all at once. As it stands, his stock piling cash simply transferred a large amount of wealth to the US treasury.

      The thing you point out quite well is the secret part of the arrangement. A billionaire or rogue government can use economic terrorism. There is a long history of governments trying to devalue the currencies of their enemies.

    7. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first anonymous coward is correct that electronic transfers of payments dwarf the printing of currency. The second anonymous coward is correct that most of what the first anonymous coward said is Keynesian Nonsense. The dollars printed by the government behave the way printed dollars have always worked. The third anonymous coward is really quite handsome.

    8. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Imperator · · Score: 1

      Why, exactly, would the government encourage people to destroy currency? What public policy goal would that serve? (Making people poorer?)

      I don't really buy the inflation argument either. Growth in the currency supply accounts for very little of the growth in the money supply. (That's handled by the Federal Reserve, which unlike the Mint has the power to create money.) Quarters account for a tiny fraction of the new currency being produced (coins outlast bills anyway) and collecting all 50 state quarters costs you $12.50. That's a whopping $12.50 removed from the supply of US dollars. That's not going to show up in the CPI numbers...

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    9. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by yintercept · · Score: 1
      Why, exactly, would the government encourage people to destroy currency? What public policy goal would that serve? (Making people poorer?)

      Governments tax their citizens...despite the fact that taxation makes people poorer.

      The government does not encourage people to destroy money. They actually have a strong dislike for anyone who dinks with the monetary supply.

      In a discussion that involved money getting destroyed in a microwave, I thought I would find a humorous way to bring up the issue that you don't destroy the actual value of a dollar bill if you destroy the dollar bill. If a dollar bill got lost, then it is pretty much the same thing as a dollar in taxes.

      You are also right that the mint is pretty much controlled by the federal reserve, and that in an economy where most money changes hands electronically, the Federal Reserve does more to control the money supply through lending to banks than through printing money. The 2003 production figures for the US Mint indicate that the Mint printed a scant $896 Million in change...chump change. The Bureau of Engraving and Printing handle printed currency. I couldn't find a quick list of the number of dollar bills printed, but I am sure it is an equally unimpressive figure. Both the Mint and Bureau or Engraving and Printing seem to encourage collecting.

      dropping a dime in a wishing well is pretty much like giving Uncle Sam ten cents (minus production cost).

      You are correct in pointing out that in today's economy, more money changes hands electronically than as currency. The Federal Reserve controls the monetary supply through the banking system. However, all the rules that apply to currency are still valid. BTW, I would expect that there's several million people work on their $12.50 collection of quarters. Ten million quarter collections equal $125,000,000 for the government.

    10. Re:Uncle Sam Wants You to Destroy Money! by Imperator · · Score: 1

      The Mint and the BEP do print money, but the Federal Reserve tells them how much they can print. That's what I meant by the Federal Reserve being in control of the money supply. And when the Mint or BEP create some cash, it gets sent to the Federal Reserve, which does the actual work of distributing it to banks.

      And yes, of course I realize that taxation makes people poorer. But it serves actual policy goals, like national defense or building Hooters in the midwest. If the government wants people to get rid of money, it should at least set up a Pay Pal account to help them out.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  164. Sorry to rain on their parade... by Assmasher · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...but they are openly admitting to committing a felony. It is highly illegal to damage or destroy money intentionally.

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Sorry to rain on their parade... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. It's only illegal to SPEND money that you've mutilated.

      Ever seen one of those penny smashers at amusment parks? You put in a penny, and some amount of quarters, turn a crank, and it flattens the penny and imprints it with a logo of the park...

      You're saying all of those are "highly illegal"?

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:Sorry to rain on their parade... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Mod him down, he is wrong.

      The action is legal if there is no intent to commit fraud. Obviously, you cannot spend money that has been altered.

      Also see here for a guy who uses electromagnetic fields to smash metal coins (including gold ones). He even has a FAQ about the legality of doing so.

    3. Re:Sorry to rain on their parade... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Try to realize that there's usually more than one law to cover a particular topic.

      For example, you quote 331, try reading 333 and you'll see how I'm NOT wrong.

      Defacement of Currency

      Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. Under this provision, currency defacement is generally defined as follows: Whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

      Defacement of currency in such a way that it is made unfit for circulation comes under the jurisdiction of the United States Secret Service. Their mailing address is:

      United States Secret Service
      950 H Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20223.

      http://www.moneyfactory.com/document.cfm/18/104

      --
      Loading...
    4. Re:Sorry to rain on their parade... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Technically it is; however, I don't think we'll see too many secret service raids on Coney Island anytime soon (unless they get REALLY hard up.) ;)

      This is from the U.S. Code:

      Defacement of Currency

      Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. Under this provision, currency defacement is generally defined as follows: Whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

      Defacement of currency in such a way that it is made unfit for circulation comes under the jurisdiction of the United States Secret Service. Their mailing address is:

      United States Secret Service
      950 H Street, NW
      Washington, DC 20223.

      http://www.moneyfactory.com/document.cfm/18/104

      --
      Loading...
  165. CUTCO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh My God!!! CUTCO!!!!

    How did you escape?

    Did they make you drink the kool-aid?!?!?

  166. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by mattbelcher · · Score: 4, Informative
    How in Greenspan's name did this get modded to +5, Interesting when it contains almost 0 factual information. The Federal Reserve is not a private corporation. It is a Division of the Treasury Dept.. From the site:
    As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the U.S. Congress. It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by the Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Also, the Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as "independent within the government."
    The Federal Reserve is funded by interest collected on U.S. Govt. securities and services to banks, such as check clearing.

    You are correct that our currency is not backed by precious metals, and is only worth whatever someone will give you for it. However, gold is only worth what someone will give you for it as well, but fiat currency has the advantage that the government can control the total supply of money, and thus limit inflation.

    Will someone please mod the parent post back down? Maybe, "-1, Skipped Economics Class?"
    --

    Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  167. Federal Reserve is not a private institution by Rares+Marian · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.federalreserve.gov/faq.htm#frsq3

    Who owns the Federal Reserve?

    The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    1. Re:Federal Reserve is not a private institution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this talk about nutty Alex Jones and the Federal Reserve reminds me of the lyrics to Carl Klang's Federal Reserve song: ~~Oh the Federal Reserve isn't federal at all~~in fact that sum' bitch aint even constitutional~~ or whatever the lyrics are. Sorry, I've been listening to the paranoid conspiracy kooks on Truth Radio a little too much I guess, :-) It's great for laughs though.

    2. Re:Federal Reserve is not a private institution by jriskin · · Score: 1

      Using the federalreserve.gov website to answer the question who owns the federal reserve is like asking a politician if he ever committed an act of indecency. Its certainly a topic up for debate, i've read several books on the topic and seen a few documentaries on it, and I still haven't made complete sense of the situation. Although, I would tend to lean towards reforming the system.

      A few google links on "who owns the federal reserve"
      http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view /whofed.ht ml
      http://www.floodlight.org/theory/flaherty9.htm
      http://weholdthesetruths.org/Dollars%20&%20$en$e /A rticles/testyourfediq.htm

      Why does /. put in spaces in html links?

    3. Re:Federal Reserve is not a private institution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as an 'independent entity within the government'. Not a legal one.
      All branch's of government are SUBJECT TO and LIMITED BY the constitution, and further direct oversight regulations. Any thing that is an 'independent entity within the government' would be considered part of a 'shadow government'.

      So, either it's a government entity, or it's not. Just because it's regulated closely by the federal government does not make it a non-independent entity. (IE From meat packing to baseball. is also closely regulated.)

      Now, back to the primary issue: If the federal reserve is in fact 'part of the government'; if it is not privately owed, then it must have final accounting done by the GOA. There is none. In fact it is the only bank in the US that has NEVER been audited.

      If you are still not convinced I suggest you make a FOIA request to the the federal govt AND the federal reserve bank, as many others have done. Ask for accounting figures. As a citizen you're entitled to financial information, as to what any entity of your government is doing with your money.

      Both will deny your request, as private entities are not required to respond to FOIA!

    4. Re:Federal Reserve is not a private institution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Federal Reserve was created by an act of congress. It could be uncreated by same (whether or not it ever actually would be is another matter...) The "necessary and proper" clause gives the Congress the right to pass Acts (including the delegation of powers to regulatory agencies) pursuent to the enforcement of federal responsibilities.

      The FOIA, BTW, is not part of the Constitution (hint: the "A" stands for "Act") As such, you have no constitutional "right" to any government records, and the FOIA specifically carves out numerous exceptions, one of which is Fed accounting. This says nothing about who "owns" the federal reserve, only that the Fed is a particularly adept and powerful bureaucracy that is very good at keeping people out of its business...

  168. This is most likely a false story by luckyguesser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article at CNN's website was the closest article to the topic introduced here that I could find on CNN, Google News, or Yahoo News. Given the popularity of the RFID issue in the United States technology realm, I would expect it to be in a larger news source such as these. I don't know much about this www.prisonplanet.com place, but I don't have any reason to believe it's highly professional. I get the impressino that it's somewhat of a conspiracy theory website.

    The most apparent points of conjecture about this story, in my mind, are:
    1. Why, if these tags are in $20's all across the nation, are not people setting off alarms for "no reason" all across the nation?
    2. It appears that other /.ers have tried the same microwave experiment, with no ill effect to their bills. Personally, I'm more inclined to believe my fellow /.ers than this story.

    Perhaps these bills were part of a scheme, or an elaborate set of counterfeits with a specific devious purpose in mind. Or perhaps they were never microwaved at all.

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
    1. Re:This is most likely a false story by avendasora · · Score: 1
      I'm more inclined to believe my fellow /.ers than this story.

      You're new here, right?

  169. Destroying currency illegal in the UK not USA by evilandi · · Score: 1
    acoustix: Isn't destroying US currency against the law?

    I don't think so, but it is definitely illegal in the UK. Defacing an image of the monarch. One of those daft treason laws which we still having lying around but no-one enforces anymore.

    (Most banknotes have metal strips in them, so I've no idea why anyone would find it surprising that they catch fire when microwaved.)

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  170. Truckstop or Airport? by PingXao · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know if I kept setting off a store alarm and I knew damn well I hadn't boosted anything I'd keep right on walking. "Would you step over here, sir?" would be met with a quick "Fuck you. Call the cops if you think I stole something. Who the hell do you think you are?

    Retail employees with hand-scanning wands. Give me a break. If there's a living, breathing witness that saw me steal something, that's one thing. But no machine is going to bear false witness against me. I would refuse to cooperate. A truckstop is not an airport where the guards are employees with authority and jurisdiction to prevent "dangerous" items on board aircraft. I refuse to recognize that they have any authority to search or probe my person.

    Those magnetic tag detectors you see in stores have only one valid purpose as far as I can see. To act as a deterrent and scare would-be thieves away. They convey no authority to perform a body scan.

    1. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this up. I wish everyone were like this person, rather than the sheep who obsequiously stop for the rent-a-cop or clerk if the alarm goes off on the way out of the store. Hell, they'd strip search customers on the way out if they thought they could get away with it.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    2. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by Ill_Omen · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Sounds like a great idea. After the guy calls the cops, the police can go chasing after your car in a low-speed highway chase, pull you over, handcuff you, and strip search you and your car to a) look for whatever you stole, and b) as a deterrent to *wasting their fucking time*. And I guarantee you that in just about any court in this country, setting off the "inventory management" alert is probable cause to assume shoplifting is taking place, so don't go talking about violations of your 4th Amendment rights.

    3. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by rnelsonee · · Score: 1
      I'm divided on this issue (mostly with retail stores), and here's why: a business has the right to conduct business on it's own terms. Businesses can (and should) refuse to sell something to any customer for any reason. Likewise, if Best Buy wants to adopt stupid in-store policies like checking me for 'stolen' merchaindise while I shop, that's their deal. If myself or other customers find it that appalling, they'll go elsewhere, and Best Buy will lose out. So I let Best Buy check my bags because, although it's degrading, I'm getting my new so-and-so for $10 cheaper than other places sell it for.

      Other times though, if I'm in a hurry, I'll walk right by the people and tell them to fuck off. Mostly because they check you after you complete the purchase. I'm done my sale, and I'm now trying to leave the property. At that point, you have no right to search me.

    4. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the beeping scanner gives them reasonable belief that you may have stolen something, allowing them to restrain you with a security guard.

    5. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      Can you cite some case law to support your assertion that "setting off the 'inventory management' alert is probable cause"?

    6. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please cite a case in a U.S. court that supports this assertion?

    7. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I guarantee you that in just about any court in this country, setting off the "inventory management" alert is probable cause

      I gaurantee you that in just about any court in this country, you'd be called either an idiot, a fucking liar, or both. You are wrong -- get out, troll.

    8. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > allowing them to restrain you with a security guard.

      Unless that "security guard" is a police officer, you are 100% wrong. I've also seen this crap said three times in a row. You seem to be trying to get us to believe something simply by repeating it.

    9. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      Often the best thing to do is show them your receipt. They will sometimes look at it and glance at your cart to see if you obviously put something else in, but they often will let you go, as often the employees at the checkstands forget to deactiviate the RFID tags in merchandise. It takes a lot less time than it would to get pulled over and searched by the cops.

    10. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by ApewithGun · · Score: 1

      I'm divided on this issue (mostly with retail stores), and here's why: a business has the right to conduct business on it's own terms. Businesses can (and should) refuse to sell something to any customer for any reason.
      __________________________

      ANY reason? Like for being Black, Jewish, or Left-handed?

      I hope you simply spoke before thinking.

    11. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      Ooh, I meant to have "(and should)" to say "(and should) have the right to". So I don't think businesses should have policies like refusing service to, say, left-handers, because it's ignorant (not to mention bad for the company). But I do think they should have the right to. A business owner should be able to sell his wares to whomever he wants. A sale is an agreement between the seller and the buyer. If a seller doesn't want to sell to someone else becaues he's black/jewish/whatever, that's his right. Same reason why a buyer can refuse to buy things from blacks/jews/whatever. Again, it's a stupid philosphy to live by, but's it's not illegal to be racist/judgemental.

    12. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by ApewithGun · · Score: 1

      Again, it's a stupid philosphy to live by, but's it's not illegal to be racist/judgemental.
      ________________________

      In the US (and this is/was a discussion of US currency) it is not illegal to be a racist but it is illegal to refuse to do business with someone due to race, religion, national origion, etc.

      If you really think that: "If a seller doesn't want to sell to someone else becaues he's black/jewish/whatever, that's his right." Then I really feel sorry for you.

    13. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by riffer · · Score: 1
      After the guy calls the cops, the police can go chasing after your car in a low-speed highway chase, pull you over, handcuff you, and strip search you and your car to a) look for whatever you stole, and b) as a deterrent to *wasting their fucking time*. And I guarantee you that in just about any court in this country, setting off the "inventory management" alert is probable cause to assume shoplifting is taking place, so don't go talking about violations of your 4th Amendment rights.

      You are fucking moron. Or a cunting troll.

      a) Cops can not legally just pull you over, handcuff you and perform invasive searches because of an "inventory management" incident. For that matter, no pig is stupid enough to waste that much effort on such an absolutely trivial crime.

      b) Given such an absurd scenario as you postulate, cops would be far more likely to arrest whoever called them to report a non-existant crime.

      c) I'm taking you up on your guarantee. Provide me absolute proof to your claim that any court in this country would consider a mere sensormatic alarm system in a grocery store going off to be probable cause of shoplifting..

      I've personally had these fucking useless hatstands go off on me on so many occasions I can't count. Always because the cashier hadn't demagnetized the merchandise, or there was too long a delay in the line, or the phase of the moon wasn't in the right astronomical house. In EVERY. SINGLE. CASE. I was just waved on. No one ever demanded to see my receipt, verify my purchases, inspect my person or accused me of shoplifting.

      Exactly one time I've seen one of these store alarm systems go off where it was someone actually shoplifting. The other uncountable events were as happened to me... Inept technology uselessly bleating about non-existant situations.

      The plain fact of these "inventory control" alarms is they are to make employees and managers aware of possible loss. They do not impart magical new legal powers or functions to Joe Blow people. No one is ever under any legal requirement to stop just because one of the damned things go off. Even if an actual police officer is there. An actual eye-witness must be available, or you have to exhibit additional behavior such as bolting out the door, screaming "I didn't take nothing!", physically assaulting someone, etc. Just saying "Nope, your machine has no authority or validity over me" and continuing on your way as a lawful citizen is just that... Lawful.

      --
      In the darkness of future past, The magician longs to see. One chants between two worlds, "Fire, walk with me!"
    14. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      it is illegal to refuse to do business with someone due to race, religion, national origion, etc. Sorry, but it's perfectly legal to do so in what we're talking about (like selling electronics at Best Buy -- insurance companies and housing lenders, thankfully, are regulated and are not allowed to discriminate). Haven't you ever seen the sign in stores that say "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"? Why do you feel sorry for me? I like to live in a country where we have rights. Keep in mind the system is kept in check by regulating things like housing, insurance, even hotels and restaurants so minorities aren't getting denied essential services. But if some idiot wants to sell his wares to only certain people, that's his right. What if you have a DVD you want to sell to one of your friends, and some random person comes up to you and offers you money to buy it. Do you have to sell it to him? No. It's your DVD, and you can sell it to whomever you want.

    15. Re:Truckstop or Airport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any security guard worth the badge would punch your fucking teeth out for being such an uptight cunt.

  171. Um... try it by Gaccm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was, to say the least, intrigued, by this story, so, I wanted to experiment. I grabbed a new $20 and stuck it in the microwave. I started with 1 second intervels and slowly increased and increased. And, in the end... nothing happened. I longest interval I tried was 4 seconds on high, but nothing happened in the end. The total amount of 'on' time for the microwave was about 30 seconds.

    I don't know if my bill was defective, or if I didn't put it in long enough, but I seriously doubt this story. The bill never even got toasty, and the right eye was just as warm as all the other parts of the bill. As other people have said, there are tiny amounts of metal in bills normally, so I find it very unlikely that there is any relatively large strip of metal in as well.

    --

    Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    1. Re:Um... try it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Now go get 29 more 20's and make a stack and then see what happens like the nut in the article did.

    2. Re:Um... try it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 minutes on high and nothing for me. well ok the bill was warmish (imagine that).

  172. Re:RFID tags going into Japanese Y10,000 notes fir by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Japan is such a cash based system, that this actually suprises me if it is true. The bank machines used to shut down here at 7:00 PM because the banking computer systems could not keep up with processing over-night transactions. Some are open now, but you cannot make deposits via a bank machine after 3:00 PM. At a bank machine in Tokyo, you can take out up to 1,000,000 yen (around $9000USD) per transaction, and it is common here for people to have $500 to $1000 in their pockets. To actually track all of this cash take a huge amount of processing power.

    If this actually does happen within two years, then it will certainly make life easier for muggers. Carry a small silent scanner with you and you will know who has the cash.

    "Hey you, Show me the money!"

  173. After much thought I have decided. by JVert · · Score: 1

    No.
    Next question.

  174. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Seriously?

    Not flaming, but if that is true, America has gone to hell. It is illegal to have money? I guess I had better quit my job!

    Perhaps it is more like, the police can seize, and use it to buy beer!

  175. Anyone remember their EE or ME classes? by RobiOne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What happens when you stack a bunch of metal strips on top of each other with a fine gap in between? How about rolling them up? ... Congratulations, you just made a capacitor!

    Now place in a magnetic field to have it possibly resonate at the frequency that it resonates at.

    Or like others suggested, a leftover security strip in the wallet.

    People really should learn how to troubleshoot properly. Which reminds me of a story... in short, grad student doing research on fleas, trains his flea to jump when he yells out "Hop!". After much testing and mutilation, one by one, all of the legs get pulled off the flea. He yells out "Hop!", and nothing happens. Hence he begins to write his conclusion:

    "When all of the legs are pulled off the flea, the flea becomes deaf".

    --
    -- Robi
  176. Andrew Jackson's rolling in his grave... by Wolfier · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ouch....
    My...
    Eye...
    !!!

  177. Australian Money by marinebane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Australian Money is much more fun. As it is plastic, it melts in the microwave, and as a definate bonus it also releases toxic fumes!

    1. Re:Australian Money by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Funny
      So do your microwave plates spin clockwise, or counter-clockwise down there mate?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Australian Money by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      more importantly it survives going through the wash

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    3. Re:Australian Money by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      Disparing our microwaves is a bootable offense!

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    4. Re:Australian Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it doesnt spin at all after i tried melting some money in it...

    5. Re:Australian Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine must be from the equatorial region... half the time it spins clock-wise, half the time it spins counter clock-wise.

  178. There are $10,000 bills, too by nikster · · Score: 4, Informative

    As the US Dept. of Treasury informs us here, they no longer produce $5,000 and $10,000 bills. but they do accept them as legal currency.

    1. Re:There are $10,000 bills, too by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      They don't even make $500 or $1000 bills anymore either.

      Ben Franklin on the US$100 is as high as you can go in the USA (which is weird given that there's been considerable inflation since they stopped printing the very large denomination bills. I remember growing up in the 1960's when a $20 bill was considered "large", enough to buy most of a weeks groceries for a family.).

      But, they do make Euro 500 notes.

      Some authorities were concerned about this because these higher denomination bills make it easier for cash to be transported around for illegal purposes.

      At one point I had heard that bundles of US$100 bills weighed in around 11 lbs per million dollars and that for quick calculations during drug busts they would simply weigh the money.

      Carrying around bundles of E500 notes would certainly make money movement easier.

      But it looks as if there is opposition to the large beasts.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    2. Re:There are $10,000 bills, too by joggle · · Score: 1

      I think it was harder in the 60s to transfer funds electronically. Nowadays, there really is never a reason to carry around huge amounts of cash for legal purposes. You would simply use a credit card most of the time (to buy a huge TV for instance) or use checks.

    3. Re:There are $10,000 bills, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So simply wanting to base my life on cash instead of trackable plastic isn't a legitimate reason to carry around huge amounts of cash?

      You must be another one of those 'no reason to complain' fuckers that are sending us straight to hell, like people do about otherwise illegal search and seizure ('Oh, but you don't have anything to hide, do you? CRIMINAL!')

      Oh, and fuck you.

    4. Re:There are $10,000 bills, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Looks like I forgot about the tinfoil-hat crowd. So your legitimate reason is that you don't want to be tracked by a government who's software infrastructure is so far behind the times that it is truely laughable/pathetic? You know, the CIA just started using email a couple of years ago and nearly all database access apps are custom, ancient programs running in DOS, right? Then there's the whole IT deparment problem (or lack there of) in the government. Virtually all IT work is contracted and most federal agencies don't even have their own IT department. BTW, currency IS trackable as well, thanks to these new devices called "serial numbers." If it wasn't for the cooperation of private banks, the government would have virtually no hope of tracking anyone via financial transactions (using plastic or currency).

      You did get one thing right--I am one of those crazy fuckers sending you straght to hell. Mwahahaha!!! /me with evil grin, horns and pitchfork in hand :+}

  179. Hey, Slashdot higher-ups... by quintessent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Weren't you looking to hire another news editor?

    1. Re:Hey, Slashdot higher-ups... by FroMan · · Score: 1

      michael's brother?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    2. Re:Hey, Slashdot higher-ups... by sckeener · · Score: 2, Funny

      actually I was thinking the Iraqi Information Minister....

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  180. Replacing the Bills by DaRat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just imagine the scene at the bank when the intrepid couple goes to replace their cash:

    "Umm, I want to replace my 20's because I was dumb enough to burn them in the microwave."

    Actually, I'm not sure if banks will take seriously damaged cash. I know that there is a Dept of Treasury office that will replace damaged bills (as long as there is 51% of the bill left), but would a bank take a stack of them since they'd have to turn around and do the replacement? I imagine that the conspiracy couple would just love having to send their money into the government.

    1. Re:Replacing the Bills by moitz · · Score: 1
      Actually, I'm not sure if banks will take seriously damaged cash.

      Yes, banks will take these bills, as long as there's 3 corners, one complete serial number and at least half the second (I think...it's been years since I was a teller). All that happens is it gets put in the vault in stacks and sent back to the federal reserves to be destroyed. That's actually what you get when you get shredded money. And no, you can't reassemble it into real money again. I've tried.

      -moitz-

      --
      Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
  181. Security alarms.. by BigZaphod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, this news may or may not be a hoax. However, I have personally had problems with a couple stores and their security devices crop up suddenly in the last few months. I tracked it as far as my wallet. Nothing had changed about my wallet's configuration. It had the same credit cards, id, etc. Suddenly I ran into a problem where I was setting off some security gates when going into or out of a couple of stores in the city where my girlfriend goes to school. So, after some trial and error, I eventually tracked it to my wallet (I tried going through each time I visited her and took one item at a time out of my pockets.. cell phone, loose change, gave her my car keys and had her walk in before me, etc. until eventually I got rid of the wallet and the problem went away--which presents a problem when you want to go to the store to buy something...).

    So anyway, there might be something to this although it could be related to the partially conductive ink on newer bills. I haven't bothered to track it any farther (as to specific money arrangements) as I've grown tired of the murderous looks I get from other customers as I walk through and the alarm sounds. (Oddly, the employees never seem to care...)

  182. One of the site's advertisers... by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    ...is yoursmartroom.com, which markets the 21st century version of the Cold War bomb shelter.

    "This versatile structure is designed to protect homeowners and their families from a broad range of security, bio-chemical, natural and industrial disasters," etc.

    It's worth a peek. There's this guy sitting on the bed with his protective arms around his wife and kids as they watch a TV set that is, presumably, declaring the end of the world or another Janet Jackson tit outbreak. Nobody's spazzing. They're in their SmartRoom(tm), illin' on the floral print sofa, kind of daring evildoers to try and penetrate their secure, tastefully decorated sanctum.

    Whether they've burned all their twenties in the microwave for extra-smart safety, it doesn't say.

  183. Send it in to THEM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I...I'm not sure that's a good idea. That's probably just what They want, but, but YOU know that already, don't you? I didn't fall for the "Meds" trick and you think I'm going to fall for this? Hmph

    Now, who took my tin foil umbrella...? It was here just before I used Outlook, at least I know Outlook's secure.

  184. metal doesnt do anything in a microwave by dvdiva · · Score: 1

    putting aluminum or other metals in a microwave doesn't do anything. and if its a pure metal cup with water in it putting it in a microwave won't heat it up. the problem is only when metal and other materials like paper or plastic are present such as a cup with an aluminum liner or foil wrapped paper.

  185. That's 30 dollars! by Kunt · · Score: 1

    This stupid fuck burned 30 dollars. That's FOOD and BEER for Christ's sake!

    1. Re:That's 30 dollars! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > This stupid fuck burned 30 dollars

      How do you destroy $30 worth of $20 bills? ;)

  186. Re:The artical's main point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if I get a bill I suspect is fake, I can nuke it. If it burns, it was real. D'OH! Okay, so Treasury intended for some other testing method, but this one sounds like drowning the suspect to find out if she really was a witch.

  187. Reminds me of an X-Files episode. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This seems to be a feasible possibility.

    SCULLY: How can they do that?

    BYERS: How? I'll show you how. You got a twenty dollar bill?

    SCULLY: Hmmm... I'll check.

    (She digs into her back pocket, looking at Mulder, who smiles back.

    She pulls out a twenty.)

    SCULLY: Um-hmmm.

    (She hands it to Byers and he goes over to the table.

    Mulder waves his hands like "I don't know.")

    LANGLY: (still on phone) Uh-huh... yeah...

    (Byers holds the bill in front of him and rips off its left side.

    Scully crosses over to him. Langly can still be heard unintelligibly

    in the background.)

    SCULLY: Hey!

    (Mulder laughs. Scully looks back at him. Byers pulls out the magnetic

    anti-counterfeiting strip.)

    BYERS: That's just one method. They use this magnetic strip to track

    you. Whenever you go through a metal detector at an airport, they know

    exactly how much you're carrying.

    MULDER: Hey, Byers, it is a federal crime to deface money.

    (Scully crosses back to Mulder, holding the ripped bill. Langly hangs up.)

    SCULLY: This strip is an anti-counterfeiting measure.

    LANGLY: How come it's on the inside? Other countries put that strip on the outside.

  188. anonymity of cash by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The anonymity of pound notes [or dollar bills] is a point in their favour. Imagine if it was possible to trace the history of every note in your wallet?

    Suppose some supermarket chain decided not to accept money obtained by gambling; so, say, you couldn't spend money won fairly and squarely at William Hill's in Asda. Or a brewery decided that pubs selling their beer should not accept money that had been used to purchase, shall we say, products that compete with alcohol? If traders could refuse to accept money that had been won in a lawsuit, suing people would become less attractive {maybe there is an upside to this after all}.

    There would be a brand new market for "clean" notes, which would go for more than their face value. Meanwhile, some establishments -- and I suspect they would be the posher ones -- would not be so fastidious about checking where money had been.

    The end result of knowing the full history of every piece of money would be a situation where money would have different nominal values in different establishments -- and the reason why money was invented in the first place was so that you had something whose nominal value was the same everywhere you went.

    I guess it's already possible to do this sort of thing in theory, since every note already has a unique serial number; but the infrastructure just isn't in place to do it. However, you can bet that the infrastructure would find its way into place right as they were in the process of deploying RFID-ed currency.

    And just who is going to protect you from all this? In the beginning, only criminals will be affected. That is the way all these new control-freak measures are introduced. But then, the effects will be extended to a group of law-abiding but universally disliked citizens; and then, gradually, throughout the whole of the working class. History has shown that the people will tolerate any abuse of liberties, as long as they can be persuaded that it will only affect those they consider as being somehow inferior to themselves.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  189. Forging US Currency by ianturton · · Score: 1
    I've never understood why all US bills are the same size, what stops counterfiters simply washing $1 bills and reprinting them as $20s or $100s. Thus having the right paper, watermark and foil strip and only needing to get the printing right (or even just close).

    This is (I believe) why UK and EURO bills get smaller with smaller denominations. So you could wash a 20 note and make a 5 note but the treasury is less concerned about this (its still ilegal though).

    Ian

    1. Re:Forging US Currency by afidel · · Score: 1

      No, the watermark is per denomination and the security strips have the denomination printed on them and each denomination flouresces a different color under UV light. Different sizes really only helps for blind or near blind people (German marks were nice in this regard, not only were they different sizes they also had raised print in the corners that differed by denomination, making it easy for blind people).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Forging US Currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason that the bills overseas are different sizes - I was always taught in Australia that it was for helping blind people...

    3. Re:Forging US Currency by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      Another reason that the bills overseas are different sizes - I was always taught in Australia that it was for helping blind people...

      That's just what the government told you...

      GF.

  190. My god! by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's amazing! paper burns when you put it in the microwave? quick, call nasa! this could revolutionize the space race! oh wait...

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  191. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ah, but these quotes do not contradict the parent, since they do not outright say that the Federal Reserve is in any way owned by the US Government... which indeed it isn't!

    However words "within the government" quoted from the Fed's site are very misleading, since few people suspect that this alludes to the Fed's status as a privately held corporation which is able to wield governmental authority.

    Yes the Federal Reserve corporation does derive its authority from the US Congress, which is precisely the illegal part. Congress is not constitutionally permitted to delegate this function.

    Why do you think states like Nevada are rebelling against the Federal Reserve, introducing bills to legalize their own state currency?

    Check here for a list of serious grievances knowledgeable folks have with the Federal Reserve system.

    Actually the "Fed" is indeed a private corporation. Its shareholders are known to be major banks, such as Chase Manhattan, Citicorp, etc.

    (And the "federalreserve.gov" should not enjoy a ".gov" top level domain either!)

    For more information, see Test Your FED I.Q.

    The parent post stating the Fed is a private corporation is 100% factual, and its former +5 mod was indeed appropriate, so mods... please restore the post to visibility.

    Lastly, I've taken enough Economics to know that the politically incorrect facts tend not to get any coverage in such classes.

  192. They're tagging ALL of our money! by NeepyNoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I just put all of the change from my pocket into my microwave and...wait a minute...oh.... :(

  193. Setting grapes on fire by pjt33 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Take a grape, cut it almost in half, place it on an old plate with the cut faces flat, and microwave.

    1. Re:Setting grapes on fire by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Place a CD on a paper cup - more exciting than seeing Tron for the first time.

      Place a lightbulb in a half glass of milk.

      All the fun of a Microwave.

  194. Tattoo parlors are in on it too! by curiuz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A counterindication for having a MRI scan done is having a tattoo. Obviously, people with tattoos are more likely to be of a subversive persuasion so it makes good sense for the government to infiltrate tattoo parlors... ...or could it just be that magnetic dye particles are conductive and therefore heat in a rapidly varying magnetic field?

  195. Re:Federal Reserve IS INDEED privately owned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying nobody owns the Fed is exactly like saying nobody owns the Internic!

    Be careful how you read the Fed's own PR site. It tends to mince its words a bit, without spelling out the whole story.

    Note that elsewhere in that same text, it does disclose, almost in passing:
    "...the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks."

    So, who owns the Fed? Its shareholders do. Who are these shareholders? The shareholders are the member banks. Who are the member banks? They are private corporations. Does this mean the Federal Reserve is privately owned? Yes.

  196. Only in America by Underholdning · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article: ... We then walked across the street to a store and purchased aluminum foil. . "It's a conspiracy! They bugged my money! Quick - get some TINFOIL!" I wouldn't be surpriced if he used the rest of that roll to make a tinfoil hat and put in on his head.

  197. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

    And lots of truckers transport fruit from California.

    er... OK.

  198. Most "sensible" conspiry theorists by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Would try just one before doing a $1000 stack of twenties.

    Since microwaving one would reveal the location of the RFID chip, wouldn't something low tech like a pin or punch do the job on the remainder?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  199. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is a lighthearted thread about idiots burning their money, but surely you can't be serious in the above statement? If you are that is the most profoundly sad thing I have heard about america yet. Forget who blew up the WTC on 911, the fact that you can comfortably say your police will just take your money until you can prove a legitimate use is obscene. That's what you expect in some bannana bongo republic not America, or is that what your once proud country has become?

  200. buck stops 'ere by neuraloverload · · Score: 1

    uhmmmm, was everyone else carrying 5s in the places these people were going? it doesn't mention anyone else having these problems.

  201. Alex Jones by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is a fucking nutjob. Anyone in the Austin Area who has TWC and watches his access program for more than 5 minutes can tell you the same.

    Maybe its the tracking device the CIA implanted in his skull, or maybe its bad genetics, I don't know. Either way, its sad (yet humorous) to watch the fucker rant.

    I've never actually seen him foam at the mouth, but he's gotten close.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  202. I'm gonna try this... by trainsnpep · · Score: 1
    I've got a few bucks to burn....

    (sorry, don't have a chance to see if anyone came up with that already, I'm late as it is...)

    --
    --<Mike>--
  203. Alex is my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to know that most of the thing he says, can be proven. Look up "nortwood.pdf" with Google, and realize that your "real world" is very spooky.

    1. Re:Alex is my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alex Jones is the result of someone with too much free time on the Intarweb and no intelligence/educational framework through which to filter it. He sees things he doesn't comprehend and immediately draws a conclusion about them.

    2. Re:Alex is my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nortwood.pdf comes up with ZERO results on google. you're a dumbass

    3. Re:Alex is my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry!
      http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i i.htm

      It's the same as the "northwood.pdf".

    4. Re:Alex is my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want the pdf, it is here.
      http://home.online.no/~rumad/div/northwood. pdf

    5. Re:Alex is my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google displays no results for "nortwood.pdf"

    6. Re:Alex is my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again.
      http://home.online.no/~rumad/div/northwood .pdf

    7. Re:Alex is my hero! by schtum · · Score: 0, Redundant

      exactly.

  204. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Federal Reserve is not a private corporation."

    He he. Do you really believe that?

  205. convenience store fun by btharris · · Score: 5, Informative

    i work at a convenience store/gas station. this provides many opportunities for microwave experimentation. when it rains outside, people tend to pay with soaking wet bills. i regularly dry them by microwaving them for about 10-20 seconds. (we have a higher-wattage industrial microwave.) i have never witnessed any burning like this before, but i usually just microwave smaller bills like 1s and 5s (which, of course, have the older design).

    i have, however, seen paper napkins burn and look like this when left in the microwave for a rather long time---say, several minutes. usually this happens when drunk people heat something and forget to turn off the microwave (when not using the timer). since wood pulp napkins would mostly be cellulose, and U.S. paper currency is made from a special blend of cotton (about 90% cellulose) and linen (about 70% cellulose, i think), then i would expect any bill to burn similarly if microwaved long enough.

    oh---another fun thing to microwave is halogen bulbs. just about one second and they glow brighter than when they're plugged in.

  206. Because everything on the internet is true. (NT) by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1

    I am not text.

    --
    Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
  207. They arent new notes... by night_flyer · · Score: 3, Informative

    go look at the picture... some were new, some were older...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:They arent new notes... by daveman_1 · · Score: 1

      Wow! Good eye for detail. I had to zoom in on them to notice the difference in the bills. Further proof this is a completely bogus claim. There is no pattern to which bills burned, except that bills that were on the top of the pile are probably more burned than bills in the middle of the pile.

      --
      Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
  208. question. by judicar · · Score: 0

    Did he remove the tin foil before he nuked the money? This is what happens when bubbas read too much.

  209. Serial numbers? by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    What about the serial numbers on each bill? Wouldn't they end up with each bill having different numbers?

    Also, in the US, its not the banks that redeem destroyed money, its a division of the bureau of engraving and printing. It's interesting stuff. I'd find it hard to beleive you could pull some kind of scheme with them.

    1. Re:Serial numbers? by bugbread · · Score: 1

      I believe (and this is where my memory gets fuzzy), that that's the new system they've adopted. Japanese currency has the serial number in the top left and bottom right of the bill (same as US currency?), which is what they're using now. Actually, I believe their old way of doing it was not through banks, but pachinko parlors. Really, though, relying on my memory on this is bad, as I only remember the barest of details (90% of 9 bills to make 10 bills, and it not being technically illegal at the time)

  210. Funniest Ellen Feiss post, EVER by Talisman · · Score: 0, Informative

    This is way OT, but still hilarious enough to read again:

    http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=45779& ci d=4731395

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    1. Re:Funniest Ellen Feiss post, EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it; what's funny about it? "She smoked marijuana"? Ha ha. Frickin hilarious, man.

    2. Re:Funniest Ellen Feiss post, EVER by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      Yeah, that's what you can expect from slashdot.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
  211. Foil wrap by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 3, Informative

    You'd be better off to leave the foil at home and deal with some temporary embarrassment. Wrapping articles in aluminum foil in an attempt to defeat EAS surveillance is using a tool to help you disable an anti-theft device, and is a felony (Burglary).

    --
    "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
  212. metal chip paint? by bl8n8r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't make enough money to just have a $20 laying around at my disposal (no I don't work for slashdot) but I remember a PBS program about these new bills. They were grinding up metal flakes into the green ink. This would produce the "holographic" type shifting colors in the printed ink when the bill is tilted. Perhaps these dudes were nuking the metal shavings out of their $20s? It would make sense that each bill would burn in the same place if they are all printed the same.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  213. Re: Reliance on crappy systems by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about the security where you are, but where I work those damned alarms never work. There are several other stores in the same complex, and everyone's tags set off the alarms in all the other stores, even if they've been deactivated for the original seller. We don't trust them at all. We watch actual people (you know, with cameras) to see if they're stealing things. And we catch professionals all the time... which could support your argument, I suppose, if they expect our store to act like others do.

    --
    "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
  214. Drug / weapons buyers will be inconvenienced by zootread · · Score: 1

    This is going to be a problem for anyone trying to by a large amount of illegal drugs or weapons with a few thousand of these $20 dollar bills.

    Guess they will just have to use $10's.

    --
    Zoot!
  215. Re:who is going to protect you from all this? by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Well, the law for one thing.

    All the schemes you have outlined would be unlawful if applied to statutory legal tender.

    Oh well, maybe things a different in the US...

  216. Duct Tape Wallet by tekniklr · · Score: 1

    If wrapping the money in tin foil helped, you think carrying it in a duct tape wallet would too? :)

  217. Just use small bills by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    Whenever I get money from an ATM and the bank is still open, I just change it for fives and singles. I do this for two reasons: I patronize a lot of small stores, and giving them smaller denominations makes it easier to make change. The other reason is a corollary of the first: I can leave a store faster if the clerk counts out slowly, or if breaking a twenty results in having to ask a manager or another clerk for change.

    1. Re:Just use small bills by BrK · · Score: 1

      What kind of stores are you shopping at that they can't handle a $20 bill? And how much longer does it take to count change for a $20 vs. a $5? Maybe you need to shop at stores that aren't run out of someones wood shed.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Just use small bills by vudufixit · · Score: 1

      Perfectly normal stores - I just got unlucky a few times in a row with slow clerks who were inherently slow, and also had to fumble to break my twenty.
      I also worked in retail and I was always appreciative of people who tendered small bills or exact change.

  218. Freudian slip of the year? by Snaller · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not terrorably concerned with the goverment tracking the movement of money

    You are not TERRORably concerned with the government? Hm...

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Freudian slip of the year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'terrorably', 'arguement', 'gracery store', 'electonic artical survalance', 'transactoions', 'costomers'

      I was beginning to think this thread was part of a creative spelling competition.

  219. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by dragondm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You are correct that our currency is not backed by precious metals, and is only worth whatever someone will give you for it. However, gold is only worth what someone will give you for it as well, but fiat currency has the advantage that the government can control the total supply of money, and thus limit inflation.
    You mean "... and thus create inflation", right? You do realize that the purchasing power of a US $ basically did not change from the 1790's until 1933, with the bulk of modern inflation happening after 1960 orso, and that as a result, the US$ is now worth roughly 1/20th of it's origional value. And, yes, the gov't does create inflation deliberately. (And no that's not any sort of conspiricy theory, the Fed flat out says this, albeit in jargon-laden gov't econowonk terms. The rationalization is that inflation spurs the economy by making it cheaper to borrow money (because the money you are paying back is worth less than what you borrowed). I think this is a load of old tripe, myself, but that is the gov'ts idea of it. Of course, knowing that the US gov't is one of the biggest borrowers out there also helps to suggest why they think this is good, as well)
    --
    -- -- The Dragon De Monsyne
  220. And now.... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    ... even the photograph of the president has to wear a tin-foil hat.

  221. Money left over by Metryq · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those detectors at Walmart are not anti-theft gates, they're warnings that a customer is leaving the store with money still in his pocket!

  222. And now... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... even photographs of the president have to wear tin-foil hats.

  223. Re:Because everything on the internet is true. (NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This statement is false.

  224. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Never had money seized, but one time I got pulled over (in MI also, btw) on the highway to pick up some computer equipment/parts from a shop in a nearby town. I had about $900 USD, and the trooper saw the wad in my wallet when I hauled it out for the mandatory DL check. He started really checking me and the car out, but, luckily I had the invoice for the order with me, and he quickly apoligised, saying it wasn't so much trying to roust people just for having money, but just a matter of their own safety. A lot of cops have been shot in MI, a lot of them State Troopers, on traffic stops in recent years, and anything out of the ordinary gets their attention, as it could mean them going home tonight..or not.

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  225. Re:who is going to protect you from all this? by ajs318 · · Score: 1
    who is going to protect you from all this?
    Well, the law for one thing. All the schemes you have outlined would be unlawful if applied to statutory legal tender.
    Yes, just like the law protects so many of your other rights. PATRIOT act, DMCA, &c. The law can be changed .....

    All it takes is for some big enough and nasty enough event to happen which -- it can be claimed -- would have been able to have been prevented if the law were different, and popular opinion can be manipulated. Alternatively, a sudden discovery of something that has been going wrong for a long time, with no way of measuring the damage, can have the same effect {such as, if you bypass your electric meter, nobody will ever know just how much juice you have got away without paying for}.

    Is this likely? Well, given the USA's popularity on the international scene, there probably would not even be any need to set up an international incident -- US foreign policy is motivation enough for someone, somewhere, sooner or later, to want to Have a Go. And despite the USA not having especially high taxes {things such as healthcare, education, pensions &c. being considered luxuries and therefore not simply stopped out of wages at source} there are still people who begrudge paying any taxes at all.

    It's likely that RFID-ed cash {or even a transaction history database using the existing serial numbers on banknotes -- whose very existence is the sugar that will help the public swallow this particular pill} would be proposed initially as a tool to fight terrorism or tax evasion; but eventually would be used for surveillance and manipulation of ordinary citizens.
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  226. Most unhelpful helpful post ever. by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I particularly like the emphasis through bolding. It's a subtle and yet clear way of saying, "This is what I mean" in a way that also says, "I speak Swedish and you don't".

    It's truly an inspired effort to be very clear and yet say nothing at all to your largely English speaking audience. Kudos.

    1. Re:Most unhelpful helpful post ever. by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, bork-de-bork-bork on you too. ;-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:Most unhelpful helpful post ever. by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Informative
      OK, I'll translate it for you:
      The Riksbank may refuse to reimburse you for bills or coins who have deliberately been altered or damaged. It says [in the law]: "If a bill or coin has been deliberately altered so its format or appearance differs from the norm, we can refuse to reimburse you for it." This refusal to reimburse is applied as a rule for colored and laminated bills, for deliberately cut bills, for bills missing the security metal thread and such.
      The cited law is mentioned previously in the linked text *oh shit, I just remembered that this part was probably also in the English part of the Riksbank website that I found too late, I need to go home and get some sleep*.

      Besides, I figured no one except Swedes would be interested in the specifics anyway.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    3. Re:Most unhelpful helpful post ever. by Myglaren · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately all the accents were lost in translation rendering the text pretty worthless anyway.

  227. What an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I think the first one or two would have made you stop, but no, you had to do all 50 at once. Idiot.

  228. Just to be skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone think that perhaps they burnt because they may have put the bills into the microwave dry? I mean, if you put any paper into the microwave, it will burn unless you soak it with water first.

    The fact that they burn in the centre could be because they STACKED the bills together and put it most likely in the centre of the microwave. As such, the microwave concentration is highest at the centre and so they burnt first in the centre. I don't know, but this is just a guess. Perhaps you should try spreading the bills out in a radial pattern?

  229. nothing funny going on in the bills by number6x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since at least in the 1970's US bills have used magnetic particles suspended in the black ink to help automate the detection of real bills from phony bills.

    This helps vending machines detect the bill as well.

    Your comment about aluminum foil in the microwave is exactly right.

    The magnetic particles in the bills are going to do the same thing. Especially in a stack of bills. The ink in the eye probably lines up in the stack, and is more concentrated than in other parts of the picture.

    The electromagnetic field generated by the microwave will induce a current in the magnetic particles suspended in the ink.

    Twinkle twinkle little star, power equals I-squared * R.

    The resistance will result in heat, and the bills will burn.

    So take off your tin foil hats folks, or at least don't stick your head in the microwave while wearing it!

  230. New think geek item by nazsco · · Score: 2, Funny

    foil covered wallet.

  231. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Federal Reserve is funded by interest collected on U.S. Govt. securities..."

    That's exactly what your parent post was saying. But you disagreed with it?? Read more carefully next time. That is precisely the form of the interest we pay on the money which is in circulation. It is bond interest.

    New money enters into circulation when the Fed buys interest-bearing Government bonds.

  232. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    Try going to the Fed sometime.

    I went to the Fed bank in New York City. Before taking us down to see all the gold, the tour guide pretty much spelled it out, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation -- a business. It's no secret... just one of those things people choose to ignore, or deny.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  233. The real danger of RFID tags by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    The real danger of RFID tags is twofold: First, if any and all articles and goods, including money, is provided with such a tag, the possibility of privacy-abuse is staggering; the amount of details that could be gathered about a person, without him even knowing, is unheard of. Second, the ease at which this intrusion is possible. While some claim it's only for short-distance detection, and therfor rather limited, this argumentation seems rather foolish. As the history in technology has shown us, it's rather trivial to come up with much more powerfull and sensitive products, even only after a copple of years (or even months) after the original product. It is, therefor, not farfetched to imagine that before long, we will have devices capable of RFID-tagt detection on a distance of, let's say, 20 metres, to be consevative. Can you imagine what power that would give to any government or agency, who happens to be interested in you? And even to common burglars? Someone walking behind you; one push on a button and he knows exactly how much money you have; if you are an interesting prey or not, etc. Or just driving by your house and detecting all things that are of value in your house. It's even possible, using two devices on a known distance of eachother, to exactly pinpoint where you have hidden your stack of cash in the house. The prospects are really frightening. Yet, one must also akcnowledge RFID has potential. The 'cure' is rather simple: allow RFID tags for bulk-transports, but not for money. Als for individual 'consumer' items: if you (a shop) use them, then just make sure you always remove the tag the moment the customer buys it (just as current anti-theft tags are being handled today). With these simp^le rules (who should be put into law), you still have the benefits of RFID-tags, but without the frightening possibility of abuse.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  234. Was it Cut Co? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    My brother did that for a summer. Demostrated the power of the shears by cutting a nickel in two. What a stupid name. Who would by knives from 'CutCo'.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Was it Cut Co? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought Cutco knives a few weeks ago. They're actually really good.

  235. how long he'd cook it for. by dont_stand_so_close_ · · Score: 1

    I doubt it would take 5 min on high just to cook some tags, furthmore i doubt 3 sec on high gets anything hot enough to catch on fire..

    --
    Silence Bossy Meat Creatures!
  236. This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    canadians have more coins than americans.

  237. Why they might put tags in money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you may be right about the circumstances in this particular case. Although, what if these RFID tags are serial #ed. Lets say we have a detector in the doorway of some kind... this detector could quantify the amount of cash you were carrying on you. If it was large enough, maybe they'd pull you aside and search you, just in case you were smuggling something.

  238. Wallet Set it Off by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

    It is well known that wallets themselves set these things off. I was once a victim of this. I don't keep cash in my wallet (dad told me keep it in front pocket), and I began setting off a store alarm. The wallet set it off, once removed, it did not set it off.

    Umm, yeah, stuff burns when you put it in the microwave. I always use the microwave to dry my money after going in the ocean, when left on too long it catches fire. Gee wiz, really?

  239. Am I the only one to think of this? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    EMP.

    Pay some kind of ransom for hostages, then blow EMP charge destroying the ransom?
    Or terrorist attack - launch EMP by a bank, not only their electronics get fried, but there's a large fire in the valut?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  240. This is one guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with money to burn.

    Ha, ha.

  241. Steve Wozniak, $2 bills, and the Secret Service by Samrobb · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Yes, they do. You can even buy uncut sheets of them from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

    Steve Wozniak has an interesting story about how he uses sheets of $2 bills on his site. I got a kick out of reading this a few weeks ago:

    You can purchase $1, $2, and now $5 bills from the Bureau of Printing and Engraving on sheets. The sheets come in sizes of 4, 16, and 32 bills each. I buy such sheets of $2 bills. I carry large sheets, folded in my pocket, and sometimes pull out scissors and cut a few off to pay for something in a store. It's just for comedy, as the $2 bills cost nearly $3 each when purchased on sheets. They cost even more at coin stores.

    I take the sheets of 4 bills and have a printer, located through friends, gum them into pads, like stationery pads. The printer then perforates them between the bills, so that I can tear a bill or two away.

    He ended up raising the suspicions of a casion manager in Las Vegas, who called in the Secret Service because he thought the bills were counterfeit...

    --
    "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    1. Re:Steve Wozniak, $2 bills, and the Secret Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I did this myself when I was a kid. I had been to the Treasury on a recent DC trip and bought a sheet of, like, 5-6 $2 bills. About three years later, I needed some money and decided I'd just use them. So I went down to the store with the sheet and a pair of scissors and cut a couple off in front of the cashier for a laugh. They took the bills, no problem. Of course, I had to explain where I got them from so they wouldn't get too suspicious.

    2. Re:Steve Wozniak, $2 bills, and the Secret Service by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Interesting name missing from his friends list. But even more interesting names on it, Mitnick anyone?

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  242. Re:Wouldn't listen to this poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no 2000 watt microwaves. The most powerful microwaves in consumer use right now top out at 1400 watts. So sorry to see you blatantly misrepresent in a post.

  243. What's more worrisome to me... by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    ...is the way these people, wallet fat with cash, snidely refer to the minimum wage worker as though it were amazing that he had the grey matter to sort out the cause.

    Perhaps they'd have been even more amazed had he lifted up their tinfoil hats and whispered in their ears "The theft alarm works on magnetism... new US currency has a magnetic strip in each bill. You have a stack of magnets in your wallet."

    Now, if you'll all excuse me, I have a grassy knoll to prowl.

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  244. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you look at the list of banks that make up the Federal Reserve, you will discover that they are *all* corporations... it's disingenuous at best to state that the Federal Reserve is *not* private. Rather, it is the best example of corporate control of the Federal government, as it comes from controlling the money that Congress has to spend.

    It's a wonderful scam for the banks, though: Create fiat money from nothing by printing it, loan it to the US Federal Government... and then collect interest on it, making even more money from nothing.

    And then there's the trickle-down effect at the commercial bank level: Fractional reserve laws permit banks to lend more money than they have in reserve, up to 9 times more, IIRC... so for every dollar taken in, they can loan 9, charging interest and again making money from nothing.

    Nice work if you can get it! If a citizen tried it they'd be arrested for counterfeiting.

    The rest of us poor schmucks have to work for our money, and then pay income taxes (and other taxes)on it.

    Other notes about the Federal Reserve: Any audits of it would be conducted by the General Accounting Office. Check the GAO website, you'll not find the results of any Federal Reserve audits because none have ever been conducted.

    The oversight by Congress which you cite is non-existent, any activities that Congress performs with regards to the Federal Reserve are rubber stamps at best - after all, all of Congress knows from where their budget money derives, and it isn't from income taxes, which serve merely to pay down the interest on the debt (and remove money from circulation, thereby helping limit inflation).

    Maybe your post should be moderated "-5, Views World Through Rose-colored Lenses"?

  245. Re:You are, of course, correct... by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But there is an easier way of knowing there are no rfid tags in 20 dollar bills. Basically it is that if there *were* rfid tags in $20 bills, then we would already know about it. I'm sure $20.00 bills have been completely disected with a microscope/metal-detector/mass-spectrometer-to-det ermine-ink-composition/whathaveyou by entrepreneurial money hackers ( aka counterfeiters ), and if they found anything this nasty, we'd know.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  246. Re:Convert your tin foil hat to a wallet? Not yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could there just be a small metal content in the bill designed so that somebody who has $1000 worth of $20 bills (rather than simply 10 $100's) in their wallet is sure to set off an airport security alarm until they show their wallet to make sure they get an extra security questions?

    I used to never have credit cards, so I paid for everything in cash. I have paid for electric guitars in cash ($600), amps (~$550), and once a used car ($3300). Am I suspicious? By this guy's token, yes. But if you read Rich Dad, Poor Dad, I'm pretty smart because I used to never "borrow from the future to pay for the present." Now of course I'm stupid and use credit cards. :(

  247. Officer... by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    But officer, I'm not drunk, it's a medical condition. See, I even have a note from the Federal Reserve.

    In Soviet Russia, the Federal Reserve Bank owns YOU!

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  248. Beowulf cluster by cra · · Score: 4, Funny

    This person isn't very smart. Why didn't he try it on one $20 bill to start with rather than all of them?

    Well, I guess he wanted to try out a Beowulf cluster of them. . . :-)

    --
    This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
  249. Re:Fair Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't counterfeiting, I was protecting my funds from loss or damage.

  250. Patch cables set them off too... by LeonPierre · · Score: 1

    Particularly Panduit Level 7 patch cables. These have a tendency to set off the anti-theft devices at several locations I've been too.

    --
    "If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet"
  251. Re:Intent to defraud. by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Good thing they have that intent to defraud clause in there! I wouldn't want to go to jail for passing $7.00 bills ( a five glued to a one glued to another one ) or my $3.00 bill ( a $2.00 bill glued to a $1.00 bill or a $2.00 bill glued to 4 quarters )

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  252. schmanonymous by option8 · · Score: 1

    strange that you think cash is "anonymous".

    take a look at a dollar bill - or any piece of US paper currency. notice a big fat number (surrounded by letters) anywhere on it? serial number. each note is unique. anti-counterfeiting applications, as well as tracking stolen cash, spring to mind, but then, so does something a little more sinister.

    i had a chat with some friends not long ago about how the lunatic ravings of people like alex jones could possibly be true, based on simple OCR of bank notes' serial numbers. it sounds paranoid, but don't you think someone else may have thought of it?

    any ATM or money changer that doles out money, or any vending machine that accepts paper money could very easily apply OCR to any bill that passes through it. each note already undergoes a battery of tests to be sure it's legal tender - and those tests are updated every time a new note goes out. how difficult would it be to sneak a software OCR into that mix, and some means of recording the serial numbers (correlated with the items purchased with that bill)

    so, here's a $20 that came from this bank at this time, drawn from this person's account. it gets changed to fives, ones and subway tokens at this machine in this subway station. one of the ones is used at this station two stops down to purchase a Cola Beverage...

    so, in the end, the banks will all know what your beverage of choice is. or, slightly more useful, where you spend all your yuppie green stamps (consider that the stores you shop in have to take their money to the bank, too. and it goes through money-counting machines there)

    we all decided it was time to start using sacagawea dollars. but none of the vending machines around here take them...

    paranoid yet?

    1. Re:schmanonymous by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I cited lack of infrastructure as a reason why it isn't already done. Putting the kit in place to track every transaction by means of serial numbers isn't going to be easy or subtle -- if store cashiers have to enter the serial number of each note into a keypad, then it will slow down everyday transactions beyond tolerability. While that d00d is punching in the serial numbers of your bunch of fivers and tenners, you could be thinking about why that's actually necessary, and what it all means; you don't get time for that if it's done instantaneously and automatically, and you might not even know it happened. After all, nobody would put up with security cameras if you had to hold still for a 30-second exposure .....

      Coins are safe, because they are identical and are never going to be RFID-able. Banknotes are safe pro tem but only because nobody is routinely logging serial numbers.

      Just as big a privacy concern, though not RFID-related, is that one day they will be taking DNA samples from every newborn baby {under the guise of some essential medical test} -- if they aren't already, of course.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    2. Re:schmanonymous by option8 · · Score: 1

      feh. if you were really paranoid, you'd know that the post office has developed high-speed OCR machines for routing mail that handle thousands of pieces per minute (and, some say, high-powered light systems that let them read your mail while still in the envelope). while i doubt that anything that reads your cash, no matter how quick or unobtrusive, will ever be installed at the quickee-mart, don't doubt that the banks, ATMs, vending machines or any other automated system that handles money, could already do this.

      and all the ATMs are on networks to do all the necessary bank authentication already. what's to say they're not sending back serial number traces, too?

      and vending machines routinely get software updates and error checks from their suppliers. dump the data from the machine, count the cash, restock the snickers bars... it's all routine. and even if the machine's not set up to do the OCR, each purchase probably gets a timestamp - if nothing else, to tell what peak hours are - and bills get stacked sequentially. correlate, correlate, correlate.

      you'd be surprised how easy it is to get on a roll, once you get into the paranoid mindset.

    3. Re:schmanonymous by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      ATMs certainly could know which serial number note was issued to which account holder, and money being paid into banks could be traced. Of course, they don't know what happened inbetween; but if you were on the opposite end of the chain from someone who was being watched, then you might get leant on for information.

      It would be a good point about the vending machines (though the ones at my last place of work definitely weren't connected to a phone line or anything), but vending machines run on coins - and coins do not have serial numbers, so there's another definite break in the chain. Still, someone might get a photograph of you buying a Kit Kat, I suppose ..... not sure quite what they would do with that information .....

      The EU is talking about RFID-chipped banknotes. That would eventually make it possible to trace every transaction, if stores had banknote readers on their tills. They would be introduced gradually, of course; but, following a high-profile criminal case, the public would be more amenable to privacy invasion under the colour of fighting crime.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  253. In the Name of Science by AskFirefly · · Score: 1

    If anyone would like to help me recreate this experiment, just send me your $20 bills, and I will report back here with the results.... Really, I will.....

    --
    I'm not a human, but I play one on T.V.
  254. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A new breed of muggers has started hitting the
    city. They carry rfid scanning wands and casually
    scan your wallet without ever touching you. If
    you have more than $50 cash, you're the next target!

  255. makes mugging more efficient! by DoomDoom · · Score: 3, Funny

    A mugger can get an RFID scanner, hide in a alley and only step up for business when he gets a strong signal. This eliminates the possibility of mugging people with only petty cash!

    Bet you didn't even think of this !

  256. Check your bill before you post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, I have a twenty dollar bill in my hand right now and the metalic strip is nowhere near the eye Jackson's (not Jefferson's) eye. You might want to look at the bill before you let everyone know you are pulling stuff out of your rear end.

  257. Saved by a second by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Funny

    actually, had you set it for a second or two less, and opened the door- it would have gone off in your face.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Saved by a second by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny
      actually, had you set it for a second or two less, and opened the door- it would have gone off in your face.

      Show of hands: How many of you are going to run off and try this now?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  258. Snopes by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to read the real explantion on Snopes

  259. Which brings us back to the grandparent post.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could've friend any RFID and kept his money if he did the bills one at a time...

  260. not too bright by mlong · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it has dawned on him that he just destroyed $600 of perfectly good money.

    --
    //m
  261. Re:Definitely BS. Those aren't even new 20s. by mkettler · · Score: 1

    Agreed whole-heartedly. That was one of the first things that popped out at me about the article.

    I also pulled a couple twenties out of my wallet. Two of the 1996 series (haloed, off-center Jackson) and one of the new multi-color series.

    Also, regarding the "metal strip" many explain this as:

    None of these bills has a solid object anywhere near Jackson's face. They all have an embedded strip, but the strip is less than 1 inch from the left side of the bill. (it passes through the '0' in the upper left corner of the bill, not Jackson's eye)

    RFID tags, when removed from their packaging, are a small square silicon chip. This chip will NOT transmit light and would be easily visible in the bill if held to light.

    Let's face it, "Dave and Denise" are crackpots. The pattern of burning is typical of what would happen if someone "accidentally" set a stack of bills in front of a propane torch. Note that some bills are burned through and some are barely browned? Looks like heat applied from the bottom to me.

    They also appear to have started off with the heat off to the wrong side and moved it to center it on Jackson's face. Note the double-spot pattern? I suspect they moved it after they realized that when you look at the back of the bill Jackson's face will be offset to the right instead of the left. Brilliant. The crackpots can't even figure out how to measure correctly.

    --
    -Matt
  262. What an idiot... by daveman_1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    RFIDs did not cause his money to burn. Microwaving the money caused the cloth to burn. I'm guessing that the microwave didn't have a carousel in it by the way the microwaves burned through one spot... What a jackass. The author never even mentions if he tried to take the money out of the wallet and walk through the scanner with just the money or just the wallet... There is probably an RFID embedded in the WALLET. I see these things all the time and sometimes they are well hidden, like under a flap. I hope the bank refuses to take back his burned money and then calls the FBI on him for destroying currency.

    --
    Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
    1. Re:What an idiot... by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      The bank will take it back or the "government" will. The Fed has an entire department that's dedicated to identifiying, counting and replacing damaged currency. If you can provide 50.1% of a bill in any state (burned, eaten and digested, water logged, painted, dissolved in acid, etc) they will issue you a new bill of the same denomination.
      The service is free (paid for by your tax dollars).
      Ironically the person who "nuked" their bills may have to do more damage before they qualify for that program.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:What an idiot... by denlin · · Score: 1

      of course, damaging or destroying the money intentionally is a felony.

      --
      Yes, I have RTFA. Yes, I have a girlfriend. Yes, I'm new here. And no, I don't want a free iPod.
    3. Re:What an idiot... by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      That is arguable. Federal laws such as destruction of money and desecration of the flag butt up against the Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech.
      If you destroy money or part of money as a form of protected speech you would probably get away with it.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  263. What is this $20 bill you speak of... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    And how to I obtain one?

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:What is this $20 bill you speak of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting $20 bills is easy. Just go to your local bank and ask for one. Be sure to write your request down and hand them the note, so it's perfectly clear what you are looking for. Also, you might want to prove you can defend your newly obtained $20 by showing them a gun, otherwise they might not believe you care enough about your money to protect it.

  264. I have a microwave with a hot spot too! by cjmnews · · Score: 1

    Put anything in one of my microwaves without changing it's position and you'll burn a hole through it. So I can reproduce the same results with $1's, cookies, bread, a shoe, anything that does not have a lot of moisture!

    What some people report as news! If I'd known this would make Slashdot I would have built a site for my defective microwave a long time ago, and blamed it all on RFID.

    --
    You can lose something that is loose, so tighten the loose item so you don't lose it.
  265. Hoax or not, what's REALLY funny.... by linuxrunner · · Score: 1

    is how many people (after reading all the threads) were willing to burn up and destroy perfectly good money in their microwaves.

    If you've got money to "burn", how about donating it???
    EFF.org is a good place to start.

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  266. Soupy Sales by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Hah! I'm not going to fall for that! Soupy Sales got in trouble during the 50s for asking kids on his TV show to get their mom's purses and dad's wallets and send him all of the pictures of the presidents they can find. He got them, a lot of them! Then he got fired.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  267. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Suidae · · Score: 1

    You are correct. However, it doesn't matter. Quit thinking in terms of governments and corporations. All that matters is that there are a small number of really powerful people that control the money, and they will continue to control it regardless of how it is organized.

    Screwing with these people is the kind of stuff that causes sudden heart attacks and broken kneecaps.

    Plus, I'm not convinced it needs screwing with. It is in the best interest of the people in charge to make the money supply work well at the same time that it keeps them powerful. One of those Nash equilibrium-like things.

  268. Not true by Galileo430 · · Score: 1

    I tried it.. It's not true. The bill wasn't even warm.

  269. What a geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must've been sent in by the college nerds from the Simpsons.

    Actually, isn't a Simpsons reference also nerdy?

  270. Foil Strip? by dukeisgod · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I remember right, US bills have a mylar/foil strip running thru them. You can see it when you hold them up to the light. It also contains a blacklight sensitive dye. If this guy is afraid that strip is being used to track him, he can just throw the gummint off by sending his money to me.

  271. Warning by CCRancor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Take it from someone who's learned it the hard way; DO NOT microwave your Visa card!

    --
    Open source is the art of letting other people write your bad code.
    1. Re:Warning by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      I think most people would be off if they did microwave their credit cards! :-)

      But shears work nicely also.

  272. It's not RFID by laika$chi · · Score: 3, Informative

    The store theft detectors are not RFID scanners - they are highly "tuned" metal detectors. If it was the 20's setting it off, then it was probably the "USA $20" strip which has minute traces of metal.

    Though I would add that this is a good one for Mythbusters!!!

    1. Re:It's not RFID by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the MythBusters would screw this test up just like they screw up so many others. The two are, I'm sure, wonderful special effects tinkerers, but they lack the depth of thought truely test these myths.
      I watched a few episodes and frequently just laugh at their attempts at the scientific method.

      Since I'll get asked what I mean, here's an example:
      The ice bullet test: they didn't even attempt to check different freeze rates. The less time water takes to solidify (turn to ice), the shorter the ice crystals are and the weaker the ice. When the show hosts made their ice by dunking the mold in liquid nitrogen, they made just about the weakest ice they could, not much stronger than packed snow.
      They should have frozen the water at just below freezing point so it took hours to complete the process, then dunked the solid ice bullets in to the nitrogen so they would survive the gun blast. The resulting ice bullet would have been quite strong and probably performed admirably in their firing test.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:It's not RFID by denlin · · Score: 1
      But the MythBusters would screw this test up just like they screw up so many others. The two are, I'm sure, wonderful special effects tinkerers, but they lack the depth of thought truely test these myths.

      they did do one on the microwave, testing the "superheating" of purified water (adding a drink mix to super heated water & have it "explode".) also, they did the light bulb test (causing it to glow). i think they also nuked tinfoil & silverware (to test if they'd explode, of course they didn't). yeah, they botch things up on occasion, but tend to be more reasonable than the subject of the whole post.

      --
      Yes, I have RTFA. Yes, I have a girlfriend. Yes, I'm new here. And no, I don't want a free iPod.
  273. The bills, the bills, the bills are on fire! by Cytlid · · Score: 2, Funny

    We don't need no water let the Andrew Jackson burn
    burn Andrew Jackson, burn.

    --
    FLR
  274. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idiot that wrote the article can't spell "its".

  275. put down the crackpipe by CrudPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting


    the authors need to put down the crackpipe and the copy of 1984 and get real.

    an RFID tag would require a conductor. go see for yourself, scrape layer by layer through the whole area by those eyes and you'll find nothing but paper.

    this is NOT to say that there is not an RFID in the new 20-dollar bill, but I certainly assert that there is nothing near the location described by the author.

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
    1. Re:put down the crackpipe by Enigma+Deadsouls · · Score: 3, Insightful

      an RFID tag would require a conductor. go see for yourself, scrape layer by layer through the whole area by those eyes and you'll find nothing but paper.

      Cheap, Paper RF ID Tags To Replace Barcodes?

      I do however feel that this story needs to be taken with a grain of salt... atleast for now. The authors do seem a bit paranoid, and even bring up the classic wrap it aluminum foil. However I wouldn't put it past our big business controled government to put RFID tags in our money so that whenever Joe Sixpacks walks into his local WalMark they know exactly how much cash he has on him.

    2. Re:put down the crackpipe by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Besides, they may feel funny if they get charged with destruction of government property.

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    3. Re:put down the crackpipe by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Cash is YOUR property until you spend it. If you want to destroy it and lose all cash value, it's your right. Still, the Treasury will replace any damaged bills that have at least half the bill remaining.

    4. Re:put down the crackpipe by llefler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you just didn't recognize the conductor?

      RFID Ink

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    5. Re:put down the crackpipe by ngoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is incorrect. From Bureau of Engraving

      "Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. Under this provision, currency defacement is generally defined as follows: Whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

      Defacement of currency in such a way that it is made unfit for circulation comes under the jurisdiction of the United States Secret Service."

      Destroying it completely may be ok, since you have no evidence it happened.

      --
      --ngoy
    6. Re:put down the crackpipe by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      I don't know the details but I'm pretty certain your statement is false. I believe it is a federal offense to destroy US currency. What you said is certainly more inuitive, so I dunno.

    7. Re:put down the crackpipe by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued

      Prove intent to render unfit.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:put down the crackpipe by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Considering every bill already has a serial number, I fail to see the problem.

      You need to be within about 4" to communicate with most RFID tech anyway. And US Govt certainly does not have extra money to add this technology.

      Likely the burn is from the different concentrations of ink in the face of the bill.

    9. Re:put down the crackpipe by captain_craptacular · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. Under this provision, currency defacement is generally defined as follows: Whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

      Defacement of currency in such a way that it is made unfit for circulation comes under the jurisdiction of the United States Secret Service."


      I would say they didn't intend to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued....

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    10. Re:put down the crackpipe by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      I believe it is a federal offense to destroy US currency.
      This and other posters are wrong, or at least misinterpreting the Federal law they quote. There are several machines at the Boston Museum of Science (and probably elsewhere) which mash a coin flat and put a dinosaur or some such imprint on it. The museum has a plaque next to the machines quoting the portion of the law that makes this legal. IIRC, the critical feature is that you may not alter cash for the purpose of making it appear to be worth some other amount (e.g. pasting "20" on the corners of a 1-dollar bill). Why would the gov't or anyone else care if you destroy your own personal property(cash)?

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    11. Re:put down the crackpipe by thelasttemptation · · Score: 1

      that's funny, I have more money in my bank account that I can access with my credit card then I ever carry around in cash.

    12. Re:put down the crackpipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you were to destroy a large amount (read: tens of millions of dollars) of cash, you would end up inflating the economy as there would be less money in circulation.

    13. Re:put down the crackpipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deflating, you mean.

    14. Re:put down the crackpipe by fpp · · Score: 1

      False. You don't own the money. You own the value of the money.

    15. Re:put down the crackpipe by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the money's in the bank, then the Feds already know how much you have. The IRS gets a 1099 for every interest bearing account. Divide by the likely interest rate and they'll have a ballpark figure for the average balance. For a non-interest bearing account, your records are just a subpoena away, which is a pretty minor obstacle these days, but at least they can't data mine your finances they way they can with 1099's.

    16. Re:put down the crackpipe by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Coin and bill collectors might disagree with you there. So if I own a 1900 Silver Dollar, it's not my property? By your logic the Treasury can reclaim any rare coins by buying it back at face value.

    17. Re:put down the crackpipe by rah1420 · · Score: 1
      You need to be within about 4" to communicate with most RFID tech anyway.


      Huh? What about warehouse management systems? What about EZ-Pass? What about those scanners that they aim at the aluminum-foil-lined hat I wear walking down the street?

      Four inches. Hah!
      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    18. Re:put down the crackpipe by FragHARD · · Score: 0

      >>Destroying it completely may be ok, since you have no evidence it happened>> Not sure but I don't think you can destroy ALL of the evidence -- no matter what you do there is still some sort of matter left wether it be ash or whatever My sig is the longest now: =-> PI + 1

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    19. Re:put down the crackpipe by thelasttemptation · · Score: 1

      but the feds are not wallmart are they?

    20. Re:put down the crackpipe by fpp · · Score: 1

      Technically, yes, they don't own their collections, but why would the treasury knock down their door to collect? The collectors still own the current value of their money.

      Besides, I don't technically own the land that my house sits on, either, because if I did, I could declare myself my own country. That doesn't necessarily mean someone is going to take it from me.

    21. Re:put down the crackpipe by djtripp · · Score: 1

      No but they are more abundant, and generally have less teeth.

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    22. Re:put down the crackpipe by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Good examples, but if you look at the consumer side of each of them, there is something much larger than the trace that's supposedly in the $20 bill.

      In other words, each $20 bill would probably have to be as large as your EZ-Pass in order to be read from the same distance.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    23. Re:put down the crackpipe by nicholaides · · Score: 0

      Good point. RFIDing money would let people know how much money you're carrying. If not how much, then at least that you've got more than $20. That sounds pretty foolish of our government to do (which doesn't mean they wouldn't do it). For now, I'm sceptical.

      --
      http://ablegray.com
    24. Re:put down the crackpipe by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      It helps to cut out the 'excess,' a little bit.

      "Whoever ... disfigures ... any ... note ... with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined ..."

    25. Re:put down the crackpipe by slivovitz · · Score: 1

      Oh my gosh. Please you guys don't go to jail! Send the burnt money to me and get rid of the evidence ASAP.

    26. Re:put down the crackpipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half the bill so long as it contains a serial number that is...

      Reece,

    27. Re:put down the crackpipe by Fred+IV · · Score: 1

      Good thing there are non-interest bearing accounts. Free checking accounts are a good thing, so I'm told.

      FIV
    28. Re:put down the crackpipe by Reziac · · Score: 1
      You don't own that money, son; you've merely licensed it. Didn't you read the EULA??

      ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    29. Re:put down the crackpipe by NateTech · · Score: 1

      What? In God We Trust?

      --
      +++OK ATH
    30. Re:put down the crackpipe by JayClements · · Score: 1

      In college we did a neutron emission spectrograph on a small piece of a dollar bill; had lots of iron it it.

    31. Re:put down the crackpipe by Reziac · · Score: 1

      All others pay cash. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    32. Re:put down the crackpipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course, having magnetic ink and all...

    33. Re:put down the crackpipe by NateTech · · Score: 1

      LOL! Jesus saves, Gretsky rebounds and SCORES! ;-)

      --
      +++OK ATH
  276. Clueless Article Author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What we resent is the fact that the government or a corporation can track our 'cash'. Credit purchases and check purchases have been tracked for years, but cash was not traceble until now. Cash has always beed traceable they have these unique identifying numbers printed directly on the bills.

  277. Impossible! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    While there may be metallic components in the ink and security strip inside a $20; there is NO WAY it could possibly set off an "inventory protection scanner" at a store.

    Also, those anti-shoplift scanners are (except for some very new and expensive trials) NOT RFID scanners. There's no "ID". Either it finds a security tag or it doesn't--it can't ID the exact tag it found.

    Crazy people (i.e., the "UN Black Helicopter" folks and the "9/11 never happened" people) like to think that there are RFID tags in our new money. Nonsense. The government doesn't give a crap about the cash in Joe sixpack's wallet.

  278. Apparently. by autechre · · Score: 1

    I think that I heard this on the Daily Show (which actually does report real facts, it just makes fun of them) that it costs less than the face value of (at least certain units of) currency to make the currency. When they introduce new coins, they have to introduce more than they want in circulation because people like to collect new coins (especially tourists). So this actually counts as a slight profit.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  279. its crap by BobRooney · · Score: 1

    I just microwaved my new 20s...nothing unusual to report. I was hoping for a pop or a fizzle or something but nothing...

    Oh well

  280. Stocks theorem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgot the right spelling, I didn't learn Physics in English, but there's a thearem of Stocks. So, if you put you RFID inside metal box, it won't emit anything.

  281. It happened to me in Venezuela by vegetasaiyajin · · Score: 1

    about 10 years ago. I don't know what I had in my wallet, but there was a bookstore in which I always triggered the alarm and it was my wallet. I never suspected about tags in bills. Maybe I had US bills in my wallet? I doubt venezuelan government put tags on bills, especially 10 years ago.

    --

    My heart is pure, but make no mistake, it's pure evil
  282. RFID Shielded Wallets? by stuffduff · · Score: 1
    I guess I'd better start a company with shielded wallets, and a backroom operation to fake the tags for cheapskates! The guys with real money in their pockets can hide it with a wallet that shields the tags (and fakes out muggers with RFID scanners), and the guys with none can fake out their dates scanners with a wallet that has fake tags embedded in the wallet itself.

    Investment prospectus available on request. Any investment carries risk.

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    1. Re:RFID Shielded Wallets? by Loosewire · · Score: 1

      Ill buy one now , name your price?

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  283. This was in X Files by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was a scene where the conspiracy theorist guys pulled the strip out of a 20 dollar bill and revealed a transmitter in it.

  284. Paper money? Who cares, they have your plastic. by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would they bother with paper money that they can't tie to any specific person? That would be pointless to say the least.. It would make much more sense (and is MUCH easier) to use cell phones and credit cards to track people. Try sticking your credit card in the microwave you clod.

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  285. Blithering idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, dude, we have been off the "gold standard" since 1913

    That's exactly what he said, moron.

  286. This is definitely a HOAX... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    1) Like you said, the magnetic anti-theft systems aren't even the SAME as an RFID system.

    2) RFID chips aren't so thin that you can't feel them on a US bill.

    3) RFID chips require a decent sized antenna to work so they can re-radiate RF. It'd be visible if you shine light through the paper either as a consistent pattern in the ink or as fine wires.

    It's BS, pure and simple.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  287. Are you sure it was the bills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a week or so, I set off every sensor I went through. Turns out there was an active tag in one of the credit card pockets of the wallet I'd just bought.

  288. Re:Who the f*ckity f*ck by AwesomeJT · · Score: 1

    Try getting cross country with big deseal trucks hauling who knows what. The gas and lodging alone could be over $1000. BTW, It is illegal to carry more than $10,000 in to airports without written permission from the government. I guess that rule applies to other places of public transport and other check stations. I think there is even a law against just driving that much money across state lines. I know everyone is going to just assume there is something just terribly wrong with someone like that, but many folks just do it without thinking. For example, why won't you just take enough cash to spend two weeks vacationing in another country? Other countries much prefer large American bills -- you often get a better exchange rate (speaking from experience). Besides, the FBI profiling needs to be updated. Carrying $10K today vs $10K 30 years ago are VERY different.

    --
    SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
  289. Federal Reserve is a FRAUD on the people by fnj · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Oh, you are so trusting. Ask the Federal Reserve's site itself if there if there is anything corrupt and unconstitutional going on here. "Of course not, sir, where did you get that idea?"

    It's like asking the cat what happened to the canary.

    The AC's have already pointed the way to the truth. Somebody mod them up.

    All right, I will give you one more reference, and a good one:

    Federal Reserve Act of 1913 Unconstitutional

    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, ... the banks and corporations ... will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson

  290. Re:Haha . it's conditional. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    F.Y.I. The worst you could do to a microwave by putting metal inside is break the magnatron, and when it breaks, it will just die, not explode or any cool shit like that

    Well, it kinda depends what else is in the microwave too. Years ago I had a girlfriend who put a box of chinese food in her parents brand new microwave - this was around 1983, when they were still relatively expensive - the little metal handle sparked and set the cardboard on fire, and the flame proceeded to melt the top of the inside of the microwave into a black gooey gaping hole! Needless to say, that was the last anyone used it.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  291. Re:Haha . it's conditional. by nelsonal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Our first microwave came with a recipe book for the microwave, one recipe was for bownies that included the tip, put a bit of foil in the corners to keep the brownies from drying out. It was the first time we had ever used a microwave, and you can imagine the shock when lighting began flying around the microwave.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  292. Same NOP result here. by timc · · Score: 1

    I zapped a new $20 bill for 40 seconds. No discernible heat. Oh, wait. This is incredible! I've just replicated Patterson's cold fusion results. Nobel Prize, here I come!

  293. Obligatory Simpsons quote by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    Homer: There's a 10,000$ bill in it for you
    Barney: Oh yeah? Which president is on it?
    Homer: Uhh..all of them. They're having a party.
    Barney: Wow!

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  294. Re:Cops by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1

    She had no manager, she could call to deal with it?

  295. Keep up with conspiracies! by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. That thin strip in each bill actually has a few atoms of an Iridium isotope in it. Not enough to hurt you, barely enough to detect. But, put a bunch of bills in a duffel bag for instance, and the NSA can track you from space. This conspiracy theory is as old as those little strips in the bills. I don't know if it's true, but I never have had a duffel bag of currency either!

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
    1. Re:Keep up with conspiracies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it isn't true. It's stupid fucking slashdot bullshit.

  296. cough bs cough by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    "What we resent is the fact that the government or a corporation can track our 'cash'. Credit purchases and check purchases have been tracked for years, but cash was not traceble until now..."

    Even if it were true, so what? No one knows what $20 bill came from what individual. This so call "story" is just as bad as the one from last week about bud doing inventory tracking on its beer. More proof that a lot of slashdot people are so paranoid that they have exceeded idiot status.

  297. This is useful for criminals and customs agents by saha · · Score: 1
    Whether the charges of RFID in money is true or not.

    This feature would be useful for high-tech criminals who could conjure up their own scanners, then would like to target victims carrying the most money. I can imagine a well organized mafia using it in casinos, race tracks and other events where people carry lots of money.

    The group that would find it useful would be customs agents who want to make sure you declare curreny over $10,000 in and out of the country.

  298. How to replicate this effect. by stephenbooth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get a stack of small sheets of paper (helps if they're slightly absorbant, blotting paper is ideal) and place a small drop of water on one, ensure that is it soaked up by the paper. Put the piece witht he wet spot somewhere near the middle of the stack and leave for a while (let the water soak into the adjacent sheets). With the paper still in the stack put it in a microwave oven and heat on full power for 30 seconds. Depending on the amount of water you put on the initial sheet you might see the paper catch fire in the oven and explode or when you get the stack out you might see a scorch mark on the sheet you put the water on and the sheets either side of it. Very much like the photographs of the $20 bills in the article.

    Metal reflects microwaves, water is heated by microwaves. Seeing a burned spot demonstrates the presence of water, not an RFID chip. Microwaves destroy RFID chips much like static electricity destroys CMOS chips, the electric field generated (several thousand volts but tiny amounts of current over very short amouints of time) destroys the P-N junctions. The heating effect is negligable.

    I've seen similar effects wiping magnetic tapes in a domestic microwave.

    I can only assume that the affected spot on the writer's $20 bills had gotten damp (maybe there's something about the way the bills are made that makes that spot more absorbant).

    Stephen

    --
    "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  299. Check for a security tag in your wallet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had the same problem, I walked into a store once alarms went off. It turned out my new wallet had a security tag tucked under the lining that was never deactivated.

  300. Re: Translation Here... by lhaeh · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the miracle of modern internet translation we have this perfectily readable text....

    Riksbanken able vagra that losa in currency ors coin as intentionally second ors damaged. Dar stout : " have a bank note ors one coin intentionally second said that its size ors look aberration stamp whatever tillkannagivits cowboyenielors able inlosen darav vagras. " That vagran that losa in tillampar Riksbanken as a rule ago infargade and inplastade currency , ago intentionally sonderklippta currency , ago currency dar sakerhetstraden rivit from and such.

  301. What a wallet! Don't forget the Slim Jim's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who carries $1000 in twenties in their wallet? What a fat wad that would be! 50 bills.

    Oh Wait! Maybe it was one of those "biker" / "trucker" wallets?

    http://www.leathercheckbooks.com/large_leather_t ru cker_wallets.html

    I like getting all my information from folks who are up all night driving and listening to late night AM radio talkshows. And stopping at truck stops.

    Be sure to buy a carton of Camels, a copy of Hustler, and handful of beef jerky and "Slim Jim's" before you microwave your money.

  302. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by mattbelcher · · Score: 1

    Actually, I meant control inflation. By expanding the money supply, the Fed can cause inflation. By constricting it, they can curb inflation. Sometimes either policy is necessary. The point is that with gold-backed currency, the total money supply depends on how much gold there is. If someone finds a huge new load of gold, we get instant inflation. For example, Spain had a gold-based currency during the colonial days, and the huge influx of gold from the colonies completely destabilized its economy, causing extreme inflation. With modern economic tools like fiat money, we can limit these problems.

    --

    Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  303. Stew Visits the Airport... by jpellino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in CT there's a famous grocery store whose founder was charged with skimming $17M from the corporate accounts in order to avoid $6M in taxes. He decided one way to get out with some of the money would be to head for the Carribbean with $80,000 in lots of pads of $20s hidden under baggy clothes. What he failed to take into acount were the metallic printed threads on the newer 20s - the aggregate of which managed to set off the metal detector. What they really got him for was not telling anyone he was leaving the country with more than $10,000. Then it got really bad.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  304. Stack of Punch Cards by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That a stack of $20 bills burns in a microwave is not proof of an RFID conspiracy. If you take a stack of ordinary paper and put it in the microwave long enough, it burns from the middle. This is an old hacker prank. Back in the days of punch cards, if you put a stack of punch cards in a microwave, they burned from the middle. The top and bottom cards were fine, but the middle ones were charred. (It was a mean prank to play on the card feeder.) Notice the photograph of the bills. Some are charred a little, some are charred a lot. I would lay freshly baked $20 on the fact that the amound of charring is dependant on the depth in the stack.

    I have one follow-up question for Dave and Denise: do the charred bills set off the scanner? This would not be proof, but it may provide contrary evidence to their claim.

  305. Altoids by Farce+Pest · · Score: 1

    I carry my money and credit cards inside an Altoids tin, minus the Altoids. Now I have a good reason. Thanks!

    --
    This message has been scanned for memes and dangerous content by MindScanner, and is believed to be unclean.
    1. Re:Altoids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better to leave the Altoids in the tin, so you can mint your own money. (I know, it just had to be said)

  306. Your so wrong by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Photoshop doesn't work with the new $20 bills. :)

  307. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by DonDiablo · · Score: 1

    Economics classes are good, but you have to go beyond economics 101 to see the whole picture. The officially accepted economic theory by the US government advisors is Keynesian-Monetarist, but these theories have already proven that they don't work. Keynes believed that during depressions the government could fix the economy by spending on useless projects, monetarists (Milton Friedman et al) believe that by controlling the supply of money with a fiat currency you can steer the economy out of inflation. The practical implementation of these incorrect theories has created a new phenomenon, stagflation, which is stagnation and inflation together. Other equally important theories that are not usually taught in the classroom are the Austrian School(Ludwig von Mises, F. A. Hayek) and the Supply Side School(Arthur Laffer). Several proponents for these theories have received Nobel prizes as well as the monetarists and the keynesians, so they are not exactly fringe wacko theories. They are just unpopular among government regulators, the economists they employ, and the academic programs they give funds to, because their conclusion is usually that the government should leave the economy alone. Both of these theories hold that the government should peg the currency to gold, or to some relatively fixed in supply and hard to manufacture comodity, so that economic agents can make long range plans using an objective measure of value instead of the subjective whims of whoever happens to be dictating economic policy at the time. In my opinion the Austrian school is the most correct of all, but the supply siders also have some interesting to say. You can read Ludwig Von Mises magnus opus, Human Action, online for free at the site dedicated to his memory: http://www.mises.org/humanaction.asp

  308. LOL! Alex Jones! by csoto · · Score: 1

    This is too funny. The funny thing is that it gets \.ed. I mean, the guy is a kook. He's right about a lot of anti-goobermint stuff, but he's still a kook.

    Oh, yeah. There are no RFID tags in money.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  309. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, it is a powerful tool which could potentially be used to regulate inflation.

    However since it can also serve as an inexhaustible spigot of imaginary funding for federal budgets, guess how it inevitably gets used?

    Hint: The national debt has now surpassed 7 trillion.

    "Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the 'hidden' confiscation of wealth," Greenspan stated in The Objectivist some 30 years ago, noting: "Gold stands in the way of this insidious process."

  310. $2 bill usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Clemson Tigers football team is invited to bowl games, Clemson fans obtain large quantities of $2 bills. Many will stamp the requisite orange tiger paw on them all too. Then they pay for everything at the bowl with the $2 bills: hotels, meals, bar tabs, everything.

    At the end of the day, merchants understand very plainly the economic impact of having 50,000 Tiger Fans visiting for a few days.

  311. Poor Andrew Jackson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This gives rise for future generations to have this little poem:

    Poor Andrew Jackson
    Had but one eye
    The other was RFID
    And poked out by and by

    Poor Andrew Jackson
    If only he knew
    He'd turn in his grave
    To see the "Land of the Brave"

  312. Poor misguided fellow by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny


    Wait a minute. This guy is trying to determine whether cash has RADIO FREQUENCY ID's embedded in it... by exposing them to MICROWAVE FREQUENCY radiation?

    Something tells me he slept through his Physics for Crackpots lectures.

    1. Re:Poor misguided fellow by CaptainTux · · Score: 1
      Something tells me he slept through his Physics for Crackpots lectures.

      Perhaps before insulting other people you should actually *read* the article you're replying to. He wasn't trying to determine if the chips had RFID embedded in them. That was his starting assumption. He was trying to destroy the RFID chip by exposing it to microwave radiation.

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  313. So, that's why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I burned my Popcorn!

    RFID tags must have been genetically engineered into the kernels!!!

  314. Why is RFID 'X-files country'? by ph43thon · · Score: 1

    There are RFID chips that can fit into paper. Digital Watermarking is a perfect solution for fighting counterfeiting. See here and here for random crap discussing it. The only question is: If they haven't released RFID chips in paper money yet, when will they? This would also make processing large amounts paper money much easier for banks. Anyhow, the Slashdot community is not ready for Alex Jones. He's like some wild eyed sooth sayer reading the tea leaves. You have to decipher what he's saying by ignoring his editorializing. You can't just process everything literally.

    p

  315. (semi) conductive ink by sflummox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An interesting thought occurred to me- what if the bills don't just *contain* a tag, but *are* the tag. The engraving was redesigned- how difficult would it be to arrange it so that the printing on the bill becomes a viable circuit (antenna, capacitors, whatever else is needed)?

    Not that I mean to fan the flames (puns not intended) of conspiracy theory...it is my opinion that "The Government" already has too much information flowing in and not enough ability for analysis. As mentioned elsewhere, every bill has had a unique identifier (serial number) for quite some time. The printed versions can't be read remotely, but could be tracked whenever the bills changed hands. Whether this data could be rationalized into information is another question.

    A friend of mine had a similar run-in with an airport metal detector and his stack of traveler's checks- each had a foil seal on the face, and collectively these created enough of a signal to set it off. Maybe a simple precaution would be to ensure the bills are oriented randomly (i.e. some with A.J. facing right, others turned 180 degrees and facing left, still others face down in the stack...)

    All true paranoids and patriots unite- pay for everything using old quarters...or better yet- pennies!

  316. Microwave by Two+in+the+Hat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will the microwave oven work on the chips in my head too?

  317. Even more useless by abramul · · Score: 1

    Hey, can I borrow $20?

    --
    There should be a law requiring/prohibiting that (Please circle one)
  318. RFID Proposal for the Euro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rfid in money is pretty pointless, and I'd be supprised to see it implimented in the next fifty years, I'd be less suprised to see the end of cash all together.

    Erm, you do know the E.U. has a proposal on the table to add RFID to the Euro, right...?

  319. Embedded Chips In Grapes by Arkine · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Cut a grape in half and put the two halfs next to each other on a paper plate.

    2. Set microwave to 30.

    3. Profit!!!!!

    Grapes have embedded chips!

    1. Re:Embedded Chips In Grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir you have ruined my microwave! I set it to 30 minutes like you said and when I came back in the house I could breathe from all the smoke and the plate was all charred and the grape was a lump of charcoal and my house now smells like burning tractor tyres even though I didn't burn any tractor tyres and my poor doggie has got a cancerous lump in his right boobie from the chemical smoke and now you sir owe me a new microwave!

    2. Re:Embedded Chips In Grapes by magadass · · Score: 0

      He said 30 not 30:00 even though you were attempting to be funny.

      --
      "If I was smarter I could rule the world!"
    3. Re:Embedded Chips In Grapes by Arkine · · Score: 1

      I might add that I encorage nobody to follow my directions. :-) ...unless you work for SCO

  320. Illegal all over. by ph43thon · · Score: 1

    I believe that, due to the "War" on Drugs.. your cash can be seized if it is above a certain amount. Unfortunately, this is, at best, something I've heard. You have to convince them not to take it. My pop was taking out a lot of cash for a vacation, and the bank teller asked him what it was for. Being a fairly hard core Libertarian, he said, "I'm going to buy a bunch of drugs. What does it matter to you?"

    Either way, I guess one could just ask their local Law Enforcement Agent.

    p

    1. Re:Illegal all over. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Aw, the bank teller was probably just trying to make conversation. They probably get bored standing there taking people's deposits and withdrawls all day. Anyway, it's not like he or she was a government official, although I think they are required to report certain transactions to the IRS, such as large deposits of cash.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  321. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Highly confused and inaccurate. I'll let others explain why the Fed is not a "private" institution, and I'l concentrate on money.

    First - money was never "backed" by gold, anyway - that's what people thought, but it was always based an a misconception of the nature of money. Under the gold standard, the government set at price for gold above it's market value and pledged to pay it to anyone who showed up at the mint with gold bricks, thus accumulating large stocks of a very useful metal and locking them away uselessly in vaults. In 1971, the market price of gold (due to inflationary forces in the larger economy) crept up so that it's price was now greater than the mandated price of $35 an once. Thus the stocks of of gold started to disappear. In response, Nixon announced that the treasury was out of the gold business, and let the price "float". If you examine it closely, you'll see that gold never gave "value" to the currency - it was the currency that gave value to gold. (Think about it - imagine what would happen if the US mint came out with, say, a $10 coin made of 1 once of gold. It would never circulate because people would melt it down for the gold! Money only circulates if its face value is greater than its intrinsic value...)

    I don't really have time to go into a complete monetary theory here, but here's the short version: "money" is credit. Period. All money is, and all it has ever been, is a generally recognized IOU that people use because they have reason to beleive it will be redeemed. Banks issue money by making loans, which other people accept because the bank accepts the money as payment of loans. Governements issue money that is accepted because governments accept it in payment of taxes. You could issue money by granting someone an IOU, that would circulate if if enough other people owed you and thus had need of something to pay you back. The "dollar" or "pound" or "euro" is merely a commonly agreed-on unit - it has no more physical "reality" than a meter or a yard.

    Money is exactly equivilant to tokens for a subway. They have no intrinsic value - they only have value because the subway demands them for you to ride. Money has value if and only if someone, somewhere, will accept it as payment.

    Here's a good overview: http://mosler.org/docs/docs/innes_final.htm

  322. Why not carry smaller denominations? by Blinkslowly · · Score: 0

    The ones without the metal strips.

  323. Walmart and RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...and the blatant bragging of Walmart and many corporations of using 'rfid' electronics on every marketable item by the year 2005.

    I thought Walmart was pushing for all of their distributers to use RFID tags on each pallet or case of products, not every individual product...yet.

    Just trying to point out this guy's exaggerated conspiracy theories and inaccurate information.

  324. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1

    Typically at the Canadian border and at any currency exchange you have to fill out a fair amount of paperwork if you are carrying more than $10K USD of cash - they want to know where you got it from. I beleive it stems from an international treaty on money laundering.

    --
    ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
  325. More Microwave fun by abramul · · Score: 1

    A Popular Science writer decided it would be fun to smelt metal in the microwave. He even made tin fish!

    --
    There should be a law requiring/prohibiting that (Please circle one)
  326. Re:Who the f*ckity f*ck by Creepy · · Score: 1

    The $10K rule for airports was enacted primarily to prevent drug smuggling, because drugs are bought with cash (to reduce tracability).

    One of my old roommates from college, who, btw, was a bit paranoid (he was a recovered heroin/dope addict) believed the metal strips in $20s were put there specifically to set off metal detectors if too many of them were on a person... Sounds like he's driving trucks these days :)

  327. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Fed is a bastard institution, it's true, but it does serve a necessary regulatory role, so I'd keep it - I'd get it out opf the buisness of setting interest rates, though - there's no real evidence that it gyrating short term rates do anything to avoid recessions, and it tends to drive up long term rates. I'd have them set rates at a low rate - or even at 0% - and let the market determine long term rates based on that.

    BTW, the fed (despite its self-serving propaganda to the contrary) does not "control" the money supply in any real sense. It sets overnight rates, but in order to maintain those rates it must provide whatever reserves the banking system needs to maintain liquidity. It has no discretion in this.

    And that story about Nevada is pretty funny. As one wag put it, anybody can issue money - the problem is getting people to accept it. Sure, Nevada can issue a $20 coin, and if it accepts it in payment of taxes, maybe people will use it. But since the niether the feds nor any other state government will accept it, most private institutions won't either, and it will probably trade at a discount everywhere outside of Nevada, and even within Nevada. Once again, monetary cranks misunderstand the basic reality of money - not surprising, since mainstream economists do, too...

  328. It goes deeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apparently, a number of slashdotters have tried putting $20 bills in the microwave. Well, I thought I'd try the same with other currency and the results are nothing short of a fullblown implication of our government! (Yes, you can even try this at home to verify that everything I'm doing is real.) I placed $10 in quarters into the microwave and it lit up like the 4th of July. Clearly, the government is tracking even currency down to the coin level!

  329. now the bastards will use our pants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is just great. Now teerorists can run around with a vircator or other EMP thingy and make our pants explode. Imagine the damage a terrorist could do in a las vegas strip club! Everyone knows that's where all the new twenties go.

  330. Another Wack-o- it is not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is total BS...

    I have an RFID reader and there is no tag in the $20 bill... I get no reads from the 5 new bills I have.

    Just another parinoid wack-o-

  331. Just threw one in the uwave at work.... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...nothing happened even after one minute - save me wasting $0.02 worth of electricity.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  332. Obscure reference - OMG! It's Starchild! by mrmez · · Score: 1

    Those of you who are fans or friends of fans of KISS and/or 70's kitsch will recognize the reference to Phantom of the Paradise, in which Paul Stanley shot some sort of laser beam from his eye. I'm a friend of a fan, so I can't guarantee it was his right eye, but...

  333. DAMN MUTIE!!! by mrmez · · Score: 1

    and a more obvious but less appropriate reference for those not so unfortunate as to have suffered through Phantom of the Paradise.

  334. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's an unsustainable illusion of equilibrium since the debt continues to grow. What, then, will happen in a few decades when the payment on this debt can no longer be borne, and the growing financial crisis can no longer be ignored?

    Do we then privatise the nation's water supply and other natural resources? The bankers will be calling all the shots at that point.

    Already, the Fed Chairman is specifying radical changes to Social Security. We will certainly obey him, because:
    "When a government is dependent for money upon bankers, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes....Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency, their sole object is gain." - Napoleon

    We can foresee the ultimate playout of America's predicament as demonstrated many times thoughout history, and already in smaller economies of today. Look at Venezuela, or Brazil... or anyone else on the long list of countries which have leveraged themselves to the point of bankruptcy with the assistance of international finance and central banking. When a foreigner says, "where I come from, the central bank owns you," they are not overstating by much.

    The way I see it, a major battle between central bankers and first-world taxpayers is inevitable. The sooner this confrontation takes place, the less traumatic or (God forbid) militarized it will have to be.

    You're right, that messing with these power-brokers is can be hazardous to one's health. (Just ask Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy about their splitting headaches.) Also notice that you don't see me signing my posts.

    But even in America, this confrontation has happened before. The Federal Reserve corporation is actually the third central bank of the United States.

    For a history lesson, see:
    WHY OUR FOREFATHERS FOUGHT THE FED

  335. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In most jurisidictions, store security DOES have the right to detain customers it suspects of shoplifting. Now, if they don't have proof of it, or were acting unreasonably (I don't remember the standard) then you have a claim for false arrest and imprisonment.

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation?

  336. Correct Answer by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Negative, I am a meat popsicle"

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  337. you need to go out into the country by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of gas stations in the middle of nowhere that only accept cash. I'm talking places where there are no telephones and plumbing.

  338. Re:funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wierd huh?

    Nope, you're one of them.

  339. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are wrong.

    There is nothing mandating that money be credit. That is in fact the most popoular money now, but their is nothing inherent in the definition of money which requires it be credit. In prison, cigarretes are money.

    Its interesting you bring up 'yards' and 'meters'. Where do you think the word "pound" came from (to describe a currency)? Examining how much a pound of silver is worth now (or gold, I'm not sure which metal it used to refer to), will give you a good idea of how much the banker/governemnt cartel his skimmed off the top over the course of history. Hell even 'ounces' of gold are 'troy' ounces, as a relic of some time in the past when the government decided to 'redefine' an ounce, so they could more easily pay back a debt. At least people used to know when they were getting screwed. Its pure and simple fraud. Instead of working to eliminate the fraud, governments ususally recognize how good of a stealth tax inflation is.

    Money (the most popular form of it) used to be gold and/or silver.

    Then it became a claim on gold. If you are saying that at no point in time was money redeemable, on demand, in gold, then you are just factually incorrect. If you are saying the this does not constitute 'money backed by gold', then you are just playing empty word games.

    Then it became a claim on gold that the bank didn't actually have.

    Then a cartel was formed to prevent runs on banks (the Federal Reserve).

    Then they decided they didn't need to honour their claims to redeem in gold anymore.

    Then muddle-headed apoligist like you started spouting nonsense about how money has always been credit.

  340. I tried the experiment, too by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

    But it hurt too much when I close the microwave door, and never could get to see the results.

  341. A Prayer on Every Bill by ddelrio · · Score: 1

    Here's a conspiracy theory for you: All "money" is backed by nothing more than faith. Luckily, that's a resource this country has in abundance.

  342. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is good example on non-cartel, non-fractional-reserve caused inflation.

    So over say the last thousand yaers, how much inflation has been caused this way, and how much has been caused by cranking up the printing pressed? Its not even freakin close.

  343. Static on wallets? by bobdole369 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe there is an issue with certain types of wallets. Eelskin wallets can erase your credit cards. Perhaps this has something to do with it? Don't the RFID scanners scan for magnetism? Wait, this debunks that theory.

    --
    Lousy facepalm.
    1. Re:Static on wallets? by magadass · · Score: 0

      Eelskin wallets do not erase credit cards, that is a myth. The MythBusters have proved this is a myth (its s show on tv where they do research on myths to find truth or myth)!!! They also found out that static will not have an effect, they even held the credit card up to a magnet and kept bumping the power up til it finally got erased, the results are suprising.

      --
      "If I was smarter I could rule the world!"
  344. hole punch or mass paper drill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hole punch or mass paper drill?
    Just like a used deck of cards in Vegas...


    __
    |._.|
    |._.|
    |__|

  345. If he cooked them stacked, this is to be expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A stack of 50 $20 bills is thin enough that they are headted essentially uniformly by microwaves. It may be that there's differential absorption in the inks, but the important thing is that a stack
    of paper is a damn good insulator.

    So apply heat uniformly to a block, but only let it escape (slowly) from the sides. The middle of the block is going to get really hot.

    Do you notice how his disassembled bills have some less-injured ones on top? They had better cooling.

    There's no magic RFID receiver with explosive anti-tampering protection; it's just that if you pump 1000 watts of power into a small space and don't let it escape, you're going to get some really dramatic heating! Lots of energy in a small space is basically the definition of an explosion.

    The guy left the bills in the microwave too long. You put less than an ounce of anything in the microwave for a minute at full power and see if it doesn't get awfully damn hot...

  346. Stupid microwave tricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to tell you my dumbest/funniest stupid microwave trick.

    When I was a kid, I discovered that the Encyclopedia Brittanica had the recipe for gunpowder, and that the drugstore had all the ingredients. I quickly dove into home made rockets.

    After some research and experimentation, I settled on paper mache as a good rocket casing material, with modelling clay for cap and nozzle.

    One day, I was in the process of building my biggest rocket yet, about 4" long and 1" in diameter. After I got the case assembled and dried and packed with powder, I began to doubt whether I had made it thick enough. So I wrapped more paper mache around it and left it to dry.

    Next day, it was still damp, and I was getting impatient. My parents weren't home, so I decided it to dry it in the microwave!

    To keep a long story from getting longer, I saved the microwave, at the expense of a second degree burn on my hand, and several hours scrubbing every inch of the kitchen to remove all the ash and sulfer smell.

    Moral: Don't microwave explosives.

  347. hey, don't! by moondo · · Score: 1

    all right, how many retards borrowed $20 and tried this at home?

    (it didn't work for me... umm, maybe the old $20 bills don't work) ;(

  348. New $20's? Those are the old ones in the pics... by p0rkmaster · · Score: 1

    I mean, geez....he could have at least gotten the new bills that don't have the border around 'ol Andrew.....this guy needs to change his meds.

    --
    ... I like to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out. - Judge Harry Stone, Night Court
  349. Actually, it *is* quite close... by freeBill · · Score: 1

    ...and this example is a part of the reason why.

    The longest period of sustained inflation in world economic history took place over 200 years (from approximately 1500 to 1700). It was almost solely caused by the opening of silver mines in South America and by the influx of Spanish gold.

    Fiat money inflation has probably caused as much inflation, but it has been limited to specific times and places where governments let it get out of hand (countries which achieved hyperinflation by this method include post-embargo Iraq).

    Most people who argue in favor of a gold-backed currency do so in the honest belief that gold is a less arbitrary standard of value. They fail to notice, however that few things are as arbitrary as the value of gold (most of which is an historical accident). Personally, I would rather use a currency that is backed by the productive capacity of a strong nation rather than by a wildly fluctuating specie. But go ahead. If you believe gold is better, buy gold. You have that option.

    Just don't complain to me the next time the bottom falls out of the gold market. I once lived in a gold-mining town. I've probably seen more suffering as a result of those fluctuations than you will be able inflict on yourself by unwise investing decisions.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  350. Dead serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not the original poster, but he's dead serious about police stopping people and simply taking their money.

    For example, police seized $57,000 from three men on the assumption it was drug money. The men claimed it was to buy a shrimp boat, and the police chief was later charged with planting drugs in their car, and convicted of malfeasance - article (Note how in this story police are quoted as refusing to identify the laws that were broken, claiming that to do so would stop people from breaking the laws and limit police's ability to pull people over.)

    Based on examples, it seems like police in the US can seize whatever they feel like, even if they recognize the owner is completely innocent. If someone borrows your car and the police find a joint on him at a traffic stop, they can take your car on the spot, and simply never give it back to you.

    I generally like the police - my favourite uncle is a detective-sergeant - but not all policemen can be trusted to be judicious with power. The law exists to protect the individual, and the law is failing.

  351. Souvenirs made from coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember that in some places such as Alcatraz, they (who are 'they'?) provide a machine that turns pennies into souvenier. Basically, you feed a penny into it and it just rolls it into a thin piece of metal and stamps it with an image of Alcatraz. Alcatraz belongs to the govenment so, this kind of souvenirs are sanctioned. How can that be illegal then? If that is illegal, I could be convicted for destroying a penny. Damn! where is my tin hat.

  352. I don't have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a stack of $20 bills to burn, you insensitive clod.

  353. Your "it" is actually two separate things... by freeBill · · Score: 1

    ...the Federal Reserve's control of the money supply is a different thing from the government's ability to borrow money.

    For the past 25 years the Fed has regulated the money supply almost exclusively for the purpose of controlling inflation. And they have proved remarkably successful at precisely that. During that time, we have seen periods where the deficit was astronomical and we have seen periods where the U.S. Government was running a sizable surplus -- none of which had the slightest effect on the ability of the Federal Reserve to regulate inflation. The monetarists have won that argument: The rate of inflation is governed by the ratio of money in circulation to the available goods. Period. It may be a tricky ratio to maintain, but Greenspan has proven it can be done.

    The currency issued by the Fed is not pure fiat money. The government does not simply print money to pay its debts. The Fed prints money with which it buys securities. Those securities then back the currency, just as gold once did. They choose the most secure of securities, which today means Treasury notes. But, if the deficit was erased, they could still buy notes which could back the currency. Even if surpluses were run long enough to wipe out the entire debt (considered a real possibility just four short years ago), they could still buy Class A rated corporate debt.

    This does not mean that government borrowing and the Fed's issuing of money are not related. But they are tangentially or fractionally related by a fairly complicated set of interactions (note that I am not using the term in the same sense as the morons who call the Fed "the Fractional Reserve Board"). Greenspan was absolutely correct in suggesting in "The Subjectivist" that deficit spending is a subtle form of wealth confiscation. And he was corrrect in saying gold stands in the way of that process. But notice that he said it "stands in the way" not that "prevents" the process.

    The federal government is perfectly capable of engaging in deficit spending (or not engaging in deficit spending) completely independently of the Fed using monetary policy to regulate inflation.

    ...since it can also serve as an inexhaustible spigot of imaginary funding for federal budgets, guess how it inevitably gets used?

    Neither fiat money nor borrowing money are inexhaustible spigots, as governments which have tried them to extreme have inevitably discovered. If such things are inevitable, how can you explain the surpluses of 1999 and 2000?

    I once believed that misusing the power of the Fed was inevitable. Greenspan proved me wrong. I also once believed that misuse of the power to borrow was inevitable. Clinton, Gore and a GOP Congress proved that less than inevitable. But the misuse of that power has made a spectacular resurgence. I hope you will stop spreading obvious untruths and join the people who are really fighting to bring down that debt.

    I would dearly love to be proven wrong again.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
    1. Re:Your "it" is actually two separate things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If such things are inevitable, how can you explain the surpluses of 1999 and 2000?

      What we saw in the late 90's boom was in essence, the brief emergence of another mechanism of currency issuance, which was independent of the Federal Reserve. Clinton, Gore and the GOP Congress had little if anything to do with it.

      Primarily what happened was that due to a previously relaxed Fed policy, the stock markets performed well enough that a critical mass was reached. There came a point at which consumers who were also investors were sufficiently encouraged by the rising values of their investments that they were motivated to spend even more. This spending spree sped up the economy, which in turn caused the stock markets to rise even further. This was a feedback loop - a bubble. Greenspan called this the "wealth effect," and he considered it to be a serious problem.

      But simultaneously, we had investments in technology which enabled dramatic improvements in worker productivity - at least in terms of dollars. So we had this uncontrolled expansion of the money supply because of the wealth effect, yet we did not experience inflation due to the increases in productivity. Money supply and demand remained in a remarkable balance.

      The price of oil was high, which was a strain, but nonetheless our economy kept speeding ahead, fueled both by improvements in effeciency, and by the continued cash infusion of this remarkable stock market bubble.

      The magnitude of this was not expected, by anyone. Most people still don't understand what happened. The economy was processing transactions at a faster rate than ever before, and this caused far more taxes to be collected than anyone thought possible. There were actually budget surpluses at the state and federal levels. Everyone prospered and we even began to pay off a bit of that staggering national debt. There was hope.

      But the Fed had to do something, lest its previous monopoly on the issuance of currency be irreparably harmed by this unprecedented yet remarkable "wealth effect." Ultimately there was overwhelming concern that with economic bubbles such as we were seeing with the stock market, the larger they get, the harder they must pop.

      The Fed, thus, was faced with a serious quandry, to wit: How can one justify raising interest rates in the virtual absence of inflation?

      The Fed saw that it needed to raise the rates as high as necessary to pop this stock market bubble, knowing that the longer this bubble went unchecked, the greater the resulting damage would be. The Fed thus changed its policy from that of reacting to inflation (which had not been occuring) to a policy of raising rates to eliminate the potential for future inflation. Many people were baffled by this apparent inconsistency of philosophy.

      Not only did the Fed raise rates, but it raised them aggressively; again and again and again and again, many times within a very few months until finally, the Fed did regain its control of the economy by successfully bursting the stock market bubble and sending the economy into a deliberate tailspin.

      Today, we no longer have the stock market bubble or the wealth effect to stimulate the economy. But because of the improvements in efficiency from the 90's which are still in place, we are ending this recession with a more productive workforce than ever before. That is why we have been seeing "jobless growth."

      When you say the Fed's ability to expand the money supply is different from the government's ability to borrow, literally you are correct. However the two are inseperably married, and the inevitable offspring of such a union is indeed an uncontrolled debt.

      You are also of course correct in pointing out, that a Gold standard does not completely prevent monetary instability. Yes, even the Gold supply may be subject to expansions, contractions, or occasionally even deliberate manipulation (although the latter is har

  354. Re:illegal? ... must prove intent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued..."

    But first you have to prove "intent".
    I don't believe the microwave-ing was "intended" to render the notes unfit...

  355. Stupid idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he didn't even test just one $20 bill in the microwave before throwing the whole $1000 in. What a stupid idiot. So who cares if they know you have a $20 bill in your pocket. Get real!

  356. clear chips by hackman · · Score: 1

    FYI, It is possible to have chips that are transparent. It depends on the material you make them with. They are not yet common, but likely to be considered for newer display technology. Granted it is unlikely to use something inside a bill to escape detection.

    --
    __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
  357. ad hominem attack by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

    Mightn't the fact that we judge him to sound crazy have quite a bit to do with the total lack of evidence and fact?

    You can certainly believe a person to have unreliable thinking patterns based on a broad range of unreliable claims. Unfortunately, you can't assume that all claims are falacious because most claims are falacious.

    It is a classic falacy to attack the person giving the information, regardless of their reputation. You should always attack the information itself, otherwise you will eventually get stuck in a flame war (or mudslinging if you happen to be in politics).

    This is especially true in this case, when there are plenty of ways to disprove what he has to say. It'd be costly to repeat his experiments with $1000 and a microwave, but a simple investigation with an exacto knife and a magnifying glass can be done to determine if there's an rfid behind Jackson's eye. They're tiny, but they're not invisible.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    1. Re:ad hominem attack by addaon · · Score: 1

      Except there are many more untrue things than true things in the world. If we take it unto ourselves to disprove rigorously everything untrue, we'll never have time for breakfast. Filtering out bozos is a necessary step to making progress in the world.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  358. Voice of Reason by DogBarf · · Score: 1

    I just gotta say this:
    It's kinda scary when the slashdot community is the voice of reason, especially when talking about government monitoring programs.

  359. wow by kendoka · · Score: 1

    This could really give new 20s a black eye... =)

  360. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money typically starts as thrift, then gets abused into becoming credit.

    The first bankers were trusted vaultkeepers who issued deposit receipts for unwieldy metal coinage of the day. When these receipts became tender, the paper money was a system of thrift. But it didn't take long for the slicker vaultkeepers to figure out they could profit at others' expense by handing out more "receipts" than there ever were deposits on hand, and then all the problems that accompany credit began.

    Certainly there are plenty of individuals who can handle large amounts of credit in a responsible manner. There are people who can use heroin without becoming addicted. But we cannot extrapolate this and assume that any large government or population will be collectively able to do the same. Especially in a democracy, whenever possible, people will use their votes to draw more out of the public coffers than they will ever vote to put back in.

    Unlimited public credit may have uses, but like heroin, it is also a highly addictive drug whose risks vastly outweigh its few benefits. It is an unnecesary and recurrent nightmare which has never been improved by repetition.

    But it doesn't have to be that way, nor has it always been that way. Such financial narcotics can be banned. After the first two central banking failures in the United States, central banking was in fact, illegalized for a time; until inevitably memories faded and the powerful banking cartel once again got its way. We don't have to back up our currency with public debt notes to a private corporation, as is literally done today under the Federal Reserve system.

  361. HHhhmmmm.... by krray · · Score: 1

    A buddy of mine, who I can't disclose unfortunately -- happens to work on RF type secret government contracts through a well known military contract type company (also can't name them).

    As he works on typically the space type RF projects I'll refer to him as "Major Tom". Here's what Tom has to say:

    Interesting. Knowing a little something about this :-)

    The RF tag is frequency related. A larger tag can be read with a lower frequency signal - has to do with wavelength. I cannot find any metal in the right eye of Jackson on a twenty. If there was, in order to be read, it would have to be read with a much higher frequency ie, microwave. As lower frequencies travel farther with less power, this higher microwave frequency would have to be rather high in power to "read" it on someone through a body, clothing, and wallet. You would be on the level on a microwave oven, which means all our money would suddenly "burn up" not to mention the sudden outbreak of cancer, pacemaker malfunctions, unexplained feeling of heat, etc.

    Finally, I have walked into many a store with these twenties (so have about 5 billion 999 million 999 thousand, 999 people) and not had the alarms go off.

  362. Heh. See this in Portuguese... by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    In the spirit of this thread, here is an equivalent to such law, but in Portuguese:

    2. Entrava neste tempo o eterno lume No animal Nemeio truculento;
    E o Mundo, que co tempo se consume, Na sexta idade andava, enfermo e lento. Nela ve, como tinha por costume, Cursos do Sol catorze vezes cento, Com mais noventa e sete, em que corria, Quando no mar a armada se Estendia.

    (Actually, this is extracted from "Os Lusiadas", a masterpiece written by the Portuguese writer Luis de Camoes in the 1600's. But, who can really tell it what is, unless one is familiar to any romance language? I could have written a cake recipe and nobody would notice!)
  363. Is he an exterminator, too? by Lemniscatus · · Score: 1

    I think we've found Mike Judge's inspiration for Dale Gribble!

  364. Cheap data protection! by Schmendr1ck · · Score: 1
    AOL free trial CDs are a lot of fun to nuke. Put them in the microwave oven for 1-2 seconds, the foil inside the disc will spark and separate into a pleasing, unique pattern. You will also get a faint whiff of melting plastic when you open the oven. (Disclaimer: This will work with any CD, it's just more fun to do it at the expense of AOL.)

    I believe this is a quick & easy way to almost completely destroy the contents of a CD. IANADRS (I am not a data recovery specialist), but I think it would be nearly impossible to recover any data from a CD destroyed in such a manner.

  365. Bullshit by Jeff_West01 · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit on this story. I nuked a new $20 for several min and nothing happened.

  366. Re:We pay interest on all money in circulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually a troy oz might be more than one ounce. I just went with the assumption of fraud, because its right more often than not. my bad, if I'm wrong.

  367. My $20 bills by shaark78 · · Score: 0

    I don't have 20 bucks you insensitive clod!

    rant from unemployed slashdot dweller.

  368. New RFID Karmawhoring technique by RomulusNR · · Score: 1


    I think I can RFID get free up-mods RFID just by RFID saying the word RFID often enough.

    RFIDNORD!!!

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  369. Most Useful Post by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    Thank you gentlemen. I haven't seen a flurry of useful responses in YEARS.

    What remains is... destroying money as a currency and basing our economy on bandwidth and then suing the Fed for wasting bandwidth explaining how they're not what they are. I would call that a bandwidth audit.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  370. Re:Wouldn't listen to this poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes there are. Commerical ovens usually run about 2.5kw. Obviously, this guy works at 7-11.

  371. Stop the Spread of RFID Bills ! by Wixtech · · Score: 1

    In the interest of stopping the proliferation of RFID tagged currency, I am starting a campaign drive called RID (RFID Investigation and Destruction).

    Just send your ($100+ denominations only please) bills to the address provided below. We will 'scan' your currency for RFID tags and if found, destroy said bills immediately. Of course, if no tags are found, your bills will be returned to you immediately along with a nifty certificate that designates your bills as 'RFID tag free'.

    Please send your bills to the following:

    RID
    P.O. Box 123
    Easy Street
    Anytown, USA

    Act now, before it's too late! :-)

  372. ichimunki is a fag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    indeed anal bastard

  373. you are correct by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i'm sorry for my disdain poisoning my humor

    while we should always have compassion for the mentally ill, i just don't see how or why their mental illness should be on the front page of slashdot

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  374. RFIDs in money == much better mugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is true, I'm sure a mugger would love to have an RFID tracking device, imagine being able to single out potential muggables ranked by cash on hand! Wow.

  375. Right wing freaks are Whacko for WACO Puffs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  376. No Warm Haha: Coagulation by thebiss · · Score: 2, Informative

    INCORRECT -- heating is far from the worst.

    Microwaves are used medically for simultaneous cautery and coagulation during surgery.
    (See http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/171/ 2/449, or google "microwave coagulation")

    Medical microwave scalpels have 50-100W of output power, and are directed at specific tissues. Your 1200W GE Profile version is a bit "hotter" and a lot more random.

    And random coagulation is bad (google thrombosis).

    --
    Beware: I believe all are created equal, and have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
  377. Wallet capacity by Xilo · · Score: 1

    assuming they were all twenties, that's 50 bills.. probably there were a few more than that. Maybe it's not a 'wallet', but more of a 'purse' or 'money-bag'?

    --
    Read; Write; Execute
  378. What the article needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    is not punctuation, but More Cowbell!

  379. Eaten by a cow by gd2shoe · · Score: 1


    I took a tour of the FDIC in San Francisco a while back. The tour guide did mention that damaged money can be returned if they can identify unique bills. One guy apparently had his wallet eaten by a cow. He killed the cow and returned the mostly digested paper to the bank. They were able to refund him about $50 out of his $100. (It's been a while, so I wouldn't trust the details, but it is what she said.)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  380. Oh cmon...make it go bang by whittrash · · Score: 1

    Just take a lightbulb, crack the glass up a bit and set it in the microwave. Fill your microwave full of gasoline/explosives and set a tripwire. Everything I know about explosives I learned on TV! This trick brought to you by Steven Segal in 'Under Siege'!

  381. other bills by Nihynjahs · · Score: 1

    why dont they microwave one dollar bills to see if its the ink that burn cause the face has the most ink doesnt it? so maybe it would burn in othe bills as well and if not mayebe there is somehting weird going on

  382. Gov might own them, might not. by athanatic · · Score: 1

    I know I heard that the Government had kinda acted like they owned certain money a couple times in the past, but searching for it in a cursory way didn't get me authoritative information.

    It seems that twice in US history some money was indeed confiscated by the Federal Government.

    As to your 1900 Silver Dollar, I really wasn't able to find the real data from the Federal government on this either, Apparently the IRS tried to define anything worth at least %15 over its intrinsic (metal) value as "numismatic" so not eligible for confiscation in 1984... http://www.authenticmoney.com/part3.htm. But it was apparently never implemented, so if there were another confiscation, your 1900 Dollar is not safe (doom doom doom...whatever).

    --
    --- I got news, you never gotta go. - Ted Nugent
    1. Re:Gov might own them, might not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was confiscated could be shown to have been fraudulently removed from the Mint. So it was never legal tender - it's the same as buying a stolen TV.

      The other pieces that could be at risk are the 1804 silver dollars (all created at the mint in the 1830s and so never legally issued) and the 1913 nickle.

  383. Give me convenience or give me death by whittrash · · Score: 1

    The real danger is not from a faceless government agencies, it comes from people who are unwilling to stand up for what they believe in and other people who will stop at nothing to get what they want. I am sure the government is doing some secret surveilance. But I doubt they are doing it en masse. Go back and read the declassified Venona files if you are interested on how the government deals with spying. They had Soviet agents within their grasp, but weren't able to convict some of them without violating their rights, so they went free. This was at the height of the McCarthy era.

    There will always be abuses, but as long as people follow the rule of law and honest people are ready and willing to do whatever it takes to keep our government honest, we have nothing to fear. Don't be paranoid. Get involved and make a difference istead of complaining aobut the government.

  384. The real reason the money blew up... metal strip by Kevin143 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Perhaps the metal strip contained in all twenties is the reason the money blew up?

    Holding the twenty up to a light with Jackson facing me, I can clearly see the strip just to the left of the zero on the left side. I checked an older "new" twenty and it's there and a new, new twenty and it's also there.

    I'm not quite sure why this would cause Jackson's right eye to blow up, but it makes more sense than the RFID transmittor in every twenty.

  385. erroneous conclusion by Kallahar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tried microwaving my 20's and nothing happened. My guess is that there was something in the middle of the pack which induced enough heat from the microwave to ignite the papers.

    His attribution of this to RFID tracking makes it a tin-foil hat theory. An interesting one, but false.

  386. He's gonna pop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a breath, man! Do you realize how insane you sound when say "FBI shills kept marking my message to -1 to silence this post"? If the men in black are really out to get you, why haven't they just deleted your posts, and buried you in a drum next to Jimmy Hoffa?

    Your citations are interesting but you come off as a complete and utter loon.

    fnord

  387. the Eyes are Moving! by ElliotLee · · Score: 2, Funny
    Do you know what exploded on American money?? The right eye of Andrew Jackson on the new twenty, every bill was uniform

    Of course they're in his eyes. The government is using them to track or 'watch' us! ;)

  388. has everyone forgotten magnetic ink? by scphantm · · Score: 1

    US Currency is printed with magnetic ink. if you look at the picture, the left eye is one of the highest concentrations of ink on the note. you stack a grand of 20's together and put them in the nuker, i can see a spark arcing across the ink. A stack of bills that big could also duplicate the reaction of those mag tags that they use for the security systems.

    --
    *** I suffer from a colorful array of psychological problems
  389. Re:You are, of course, correct... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell me where the professional association of counterfeiters publish their research findings! Thanks in advance!!!

  390. Please learn how to use links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please learn how to use links.
    <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=45 779&cid=4731395">Funniest Ellen Feiss post, EVER (if it wasn't, would I have capitalized EVER?)</a>
    yields: Funniest Ellen Feiss post, EVER (if it wasn't, would I have capitalized EVER?)

    Oh, and the other AC was right; the linked-to post wasn't really very funny.
  391. Re:Haha . it's conditional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is it my imagination or is the sig great in the context of this post?

    I'm thinking "degauss my microwave?" before I realize the lack of relationship.

  392. Spell check for better respect. by Chmarr · · Score: 1

    I do not argue that it's relatively easy to understand an argument that is otherwise good, but has poor spelling and grammar. However, such bodies of text ARE hard to read, making it easy to 'brush it aside' and concentrate on something else.

    In addition, poor spelling and grammar is a sign of disrespect: "I don't care about you enough to spend time ensuring my text is proofed." Again, it's easy to mentally respond with "Well, if you don't care enough to proof your text, I don't care enough to read it."

    And, that 'I don't care' attitude WILL be picked up by everyone, even if they don't realise it.

    Moral: Spell and grammar check your documents. The more you do this, the easier it is to write good documentation without needing to do the checks.

  393. It is not a RFID... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a camera device!

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  394. The real deal.... by cartermb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else take this seriously. I thought maybe it was really possible, so I did some quick googling. According to the folks at RFID journal and Wired magazine, this (RFID tags in money) is on the table for discussion but not in production yet. Anyone else have a different opinion? www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/523/1/2/ http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,59565,00. html

  395. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by cartermb · · Score: 1

    And they don't use credit cards or ATMs because....? I stay on the road 5 days every week and I hardly ever have more than $200 cash on me. Why anyone would ever carry $1000 cash is beyond me.

  396. Re: Reliance on crappy systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know you're actually catching the professionals and not the amateurs? How can you prove that the professionals are getting by undetected? Huh? Huh? Oh, inventory? Fuck that!

  397. CD's are fine. by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    I have ruined many an AOL CD carelessly left in the lunch room by my fellow employees. It is very simple and safe. Put AOL CD in microwave oven, set timer for three seconds, label side down for the most impressive arcing. Return the AOL CD to the lunch room/owner.

    No more than five seconds or you are going to be breathing burnt plastic fumes!

    Have fun, I sure know I have.

  398. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by jasonditz · · Score: 1

    I'd love to know how taking my money would ever be "for my own protection".

    I wonder if pickpockets would use a similar excuse?

  399. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by jasonditz · · Score: 1

    Guess they didn't believe you about "not flaming" :)

    But yeah, it varies from state to state, but its absolutely true. Money is hard to trace, so anyone using cash for a large transaction is generally assumed to be doing so because they want to hide it from the government.

    Of course stuff like taking your money without any evidence of a crime seems like a pretty good reason to try to keep ones transactions a secret.

  400. Re:Who the fuckity fuck by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Wow,

    I am stunned. I guess no one has ever challenged that in the courts. I would like to believe that if you were to challenge that you would win else it is no longer a matter of innocent until proven guilty. It has come to the point where everyone is guilty. Where the police have the power to say you are guilty and disrupt your life for nothing more than carrying cash.

    That is not the function of the police. That is the function of the courts after a case has been built against a person, and sufficient evdence of a crime has been shown. The police exist to keep the peace, not to disrupt it because they have become paranoid. Certainly crimes exist, but to say, "You have a lot of cash and therefore are a suspect of committing a crime. Prove to us you weren't and we will give you your money back." is, to me, absolute insanity.

    The government is supposed to exist to serve the people. Any government that has set itself and its laws up in such a way that there are so many criminals that they have to assume everyone is guilty has done themselves and their citizens a huge disservice in my opinion.

  401. better put on my tinfoil hat... by xpyr · · Score: 1

    ack! better put in my tinfoil hat now :) Don't want the government spying on the rfid tag in my head. This article proves that they actually work...can you believe it??? :D

  402. Re:RFID tags going into Japanese Y10,000 notes fir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Japan is such a cash based system, that this actually suprises me if it is true. The bank machines used to shut down here at 7:00 PM because the banking computer systems could not keep up with processing over-night transactions.

    Right. I learned that the hard way. ATMs are not open on weekends either. If they're such a cash-intensive society, then why don't they freaking make it easier to get cash? Computers can't keep up my ass. Buy more computers.

  403. Or... by Dictator+For+Life · · Score: 1
    Sorry for the late reply, but...

    By your logic the Treasury can reclaim any rare coins by buying it back at face value.

    Or they can just declare possession of them to be illegal, and confiscate them - just like FDR did with gold coins.

    Fortunately, a lot of people ignored this larcenous decree, or we would not have $20 St. Gaudens coins around!

    --

    DFL

    Never send a human to do a machine's job.