Slashdot Mirror


Apartment Lit Solely by LEDs

(eternal_software) writes "A company called Vos Solutions created what they call 'a blueprint for future living' named The Vos Pad. The Vos Pad is the world's first apartment solely lit by LEDs. There are some images of the place up on their website."

529 comments

  1. Well... by Q-Hack! · · Score: 5, Funny

    I looked at this and said cool... My wife looked at it and said YUCK!!!

    Just goes to show, Not for everybody.

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    1. Re:Well... by Metal_Demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems like a cool concept to me. Problem is they used not so cool colors. One of the best things would be the options in colored lighting, which is not great with conventional lighting. Shouldn't be terribly expensive either.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    2. Re:Well... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was just thinking about how cool it would be to bring a chick home to a place like this. She'd probably be really impressed at first, but then if she became your girlfriend and moved in, she would make you change it.

    3. Re:Well... by l810c · · Score: 5, Funny

      I swear I've seen a porno shot in that apartment.

    4. Re:Well... by foxfyre · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a woman and I like these lights. There is a certain romantic atmosphere to the lighting. It's too bad the ugly sofa pattern destroys it.

      --
      -- Not a /. dude.
    5. Re:Well... by hayds · · Score: 1

      When I looked at it I said cool too.

      But I know that if I had to live in it for more than about 10 seconds I'd go blind or crazy or both :)

    6. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both of my girlfriends looked at it and said: WOW!!! I also think it looks awesome - if the price comes down we'd love to illuminate your place with it.

    7. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I work for the company which did the lighting in there www.acdclighting.co.uk The lighting is a colour changing rgb system so you can have any colour you want at any time of the day

    8. Re:Well... by splurdge · · Score: 5, Informative

      The N.Y. Times article that I read said the installation of the system cost $50,000 (according to the designer's approximation). So much for not too expensive. The article is here.

    9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but,

      You think the three stooges are cool

      she thinks they suck

    10. Re:Well... by QHacksCumGuzzlinWife · · Score: 5, Funny

      My wife has bookmarked my slashdot account and reads this stuff.

      Don't worry about me, honey, I created my own account.

    11. Re:Well... by Deslack · · Score: 3, Funny
      Both of my girlfriends
      I don't think you belong here. This is Slashdot, News for Nerds, Stuff that matters?
      --
      .sigs are useless; it doesn't protect you from imposters.
    12. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably something by Andrew Blake ;)

    13. Re:Well... by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      I'm a woman and I like these lights.

      You can only be half right. Which half? You like the lights.

      --
      P226 .40cal
    14. Re:Well... by PishiGorbeh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Loved the LCD Tv over the stove.. Does anyone there cook? Grease and heat, Yuk.

    15. Re:Well... by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if youre in it for the long haul or you install it on large enough of a scale, with the energy you save over incandescent, it will pay for itself.

    16. Re:Well... by vartvart · · Score: 1

      speaking of cameras... i guess camera manufacturers will eventually have to an an LED setting to the white-balance adjustment.

    17. Re:Well... by canajin56 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I dunno about the large scale bit, it depends on the deal you can get. As for "long haul": If I left every light in my 2 bedroom apartment on 24/7, the portion of my electricity bill corresponding to the cost of the lights would only reach $50,000 by 2138. So if I make it to 150, I could rest easy knowing that I saved myself some money...except that utilities are included in my rent. I imagine if one lived in California, they payoff time would be shorter.

      On the other hand, compact fluorescent bulbs are 35 times cheaper, and 50%+ more efficient than LED bulbs (Even using coloured LEDs. Using white LEDs, fluorescents are 3 times more efficient) Some company has said that by 2005 it will be producing white LEDs that are as efficient as compact fluorescents...

      Until then, however, compact flurescents are the way to go for saving power OR money.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    18. Re:Well... by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      if youre [sic] in it for the long haul or you install it on large enough of a scale, with the energy you save over incandescent, it will pay for itself.
      ...unless, by some chance, you can find someone willing to pay you interest on that %50,000 if you don't squander it on LED lighting. If you made %1 annually on your money, you could buy a lot of light bulbs every year. If you made just a bit more than that, you could buy a lot of electricity to light them.

      On top of that, if you ever went blind, you could still use the $50,000 on something cool, like a Beowulf cluster.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    19. Re:Well... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Both of my girlfriends
      I don't think you belong here. This is Slashdot, News for Nerds, Stuff that matters?


      What is required to keep two girls, but keep them apart and happy is very fast thinking, attention to detail, a great memory and good time management, plus a slight detachment to the world around them.

      That sounds like many nerds to me. :-)

      (Uhh...new innovations on morality too...but that's a different topic.)

    20. Re:Well... by bogado · · Score: 1

      I must agree with your wife, and you also. I think this is cool, since leds are more economical and don't flicker. But the pink toned house almost made me pulk. :-P

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    21. Re:Well... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmmm.... "Female Eye for the Nerd Guy"

      OK, LEDs add a nice atmosphere to this place, but the Spiderman poster and the life-size cardboard Xena cutout have to go. And I don't believe there's such a thing as "load-bearing pizza box", so get shovelling.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    22. Re:Well... by AstroSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      After 20-odd years in front of multiple CRTs, the room is soley lit by me.

    23. Re:Well... by CrashMan79 · · Score: 1

      That was just uncalled for, funny though it is.

    24. Re:Well... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      My entire electric bill is about $100/month, if the LEDs eliminated my electric bill it would take 41.6 years for the $50,000 investment to "pay for itself".

    25. Re:Well... by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      The laws of physics are very much against making white LEDs as efficient as compact fluorescents, so it will never happen.

      LEDs are very much better than anythingelse where you need a monochromatic light, e.g railway signals, traffic lights,...., but NEVER as a source of general illumination, and particularly not where white is required.

    26. Re:Well... by BurritoJ · · Score: 1

      Sure he belongs here. He's 50 and counting both the girl in the 4th grade he had a crush on and Liv Tyler as Arwen...

    27. Re:Well... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Appears to me slashdot linked to the wrong url..... the site is down! haha! it says 'requestedurl not found 404'

  2. what? by awing0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure there are tons of slashdotters whose apartments are already soley lit by LEDs.

    --
    Cthulhu Saves.
    1. Re:what? by iabervon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I doubt there are many slashdotters with apartments that aren't in part lit by either CRTs or halogens (such as LCD backlights).

    2. Re:what? by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, just what we need now is to tell everyone in the neighbourhood -

      Warning! Geek Crossing! Nerd Ahead! LEDs Lit!

      Would do wonders to my social life. No thanks! :-p

    3. Re:what? by Metal_Demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are giving a bad name to geeks everywhere. Most of us aren't ashamed pussies.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    4. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tons of slashdotters means what, three or four people?

    5. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

    6. Re:what? by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there are tons of slashdotters whose apartments are already soley lit by LEDs.
      Their apartements are probably brighter too. I mean, just count all the routers, computers, LED clocks and other cool gadgets.

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    7. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, yes. Although not at the moment. A few years ago I was playing with LEDs a lot while working on data aquisition stuff. I thought it would be cool to use only rehargable LED lamps to light my place. I rather dislike cords. It worked quite well actually, and I intend to fit my next boat out the same way.

      Mind you I didn't use them as a replacment for normal lighting as we know it. I used them more like a high tech oil lamp or candle so most people might have found the system lacking.

      Japanese style lanterns make particularly lovely LED lamps. Quick, cheap and easy to make if you just want a little mood lighting without the fire risk of the real thing. Or try the old punch some holes in a coffee can trick.

      Soon the lure of the light switch called though and I returned to using conventional electric lamps and conventional oil lamps. It was an interesting experiment though. I still keep a couple of LED paper lanterns on poles about the place for fun.

      If I were going to build off the grid (like that boat or the cabin in Montana) I wouldn't have any hesitation about lighting it with a combination of LEDs and oil (never put your eggs all in one basket).

      KFG

    8. Re:what? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder what the next Slashdot fad will be when all this LED business dies down. Apartments entirely heated by a beowulf cluster of Athlons?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, what about electric Athlon blankets...

    10. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You seem to know a lot about this off the grid stuff. I read many of your posts and come off as this geeky woodsman how-stuff-works kind of guy.

      Anyhow, could you suggest a good reference for how a cityfolk like myself would go about moving off the grid? I have been out of work for the last 2 years and am down to my last $20,000. I've started thinking that maybe living in shack in Montana or adobehut New Mexico wouldn't be all that bad if done right.

    11. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:4, Informative)

      Could someone tell me how the parent is 'informative'?

    12. Re:what? by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      damn, you still have $20,000? I've been out of work for 'only' 8 months, and i've got (I think) $11 (as in eleven and no/100).
      we can tell who was the ant and who was the grasshopper with their earnings.
      good luck with the move, if you're seriously considering it. i am myself...

    13. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Most of us are bitter assholes.

    14. Re:what? by sofakingl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure there are tons of slashdotters whose apartments are already soley lit by LEDs.

      You misspelled "parent's basements".

    15. Re:what? by afidel · · Score: 1

      I think you mean heated by 150W next generation P4's =) By comparison the Athlon 64 draws a paltry 70W at 2GHz.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You seem to know a lot about this off the grid stuff. I read many of your posts and come off as this geeky woodsman how-stuff-works kind of guy.

      Thank you. Thank you very much.

      You saved money. Good for you. Most people in your position live a bit above their means and end up with all sorts of payments they can't make when the job goes away. You're ahead of the game already and show evidence of the sort of thinking that might make it off the grid.

      An Adobe hut in Mexico is a lovely way to live. I spent a few months in a couple back in the late 60s. $20,000 should last you about 20 years if you live a bit American. You can live off the interest damn near forever if you aculturate. Yes, it really is that cheap to live there. Adobde is absolutely delightful to live in in the appropriate enviroment (desert}. Hell itself in the wrong one (rainforest). I've tried both. I enjoy it for a time, the desert is lovely, but I'm from the northeast mountains and start longing for trees and meadows after awhile. A bit of ocean doesn't hurt either.

      Books. Lessee. There really aren't too many good ones. Most of them are written by "back to nature" types. There's a difference between back to nature and off the grid. One is a philosophy (generally propounded by city folk), the other is just living. Just living, on the whole, works better as a philosophy of living than a "philosophy of living" does. The trick is to adopt the proper mindset and adapt yourself to the life, rather than trying to force the way of life into some preconcieved notion of "the way things should be."

      On the whole "nature" doesn't give a shit about "the way things should be" and just goes about her business as usual. If you get squashed along the way, well, that's natural.

      The people who actually live like this don't normally write books about it. It's just normal life to them, why write about it?

      But there are some exceptions and a handful of books not overtly intended for off the grid living that can be invaluable.

      First off there's Walden of course, if only for inspiration, but there's a fair amount of very practical advice on living in there. Remember, the whole point was an experiment in living. Throw in Life Without Principle. If you read this and say "Yes! That's what life is all about" you'll probably have a shot at living off the grid. Anybody contemplating any sort of nonconventional living ought to read these. They're both available on the web.

      One of the most valuable books you can possibly own if you're going to build any sort of shelter, from a shed to a mansion on the edge of town is Rex Robert's "Your Engineered House." If you've read my posts much you've heard me mention this one before. It's a must. Written in a conversational style that you can read like a novel and illustrated with his own crude pen drawings this book is a marvel. He covers everything in this book and will leave you wiser about home building than an entire library shelf full of other books.

      ***BUY THIS BOOK***

      Did I make myself clear? :)

      It's out of print. You'll pay at least triple it's original cover price to acquire it used (I'm not the only one who reveres this book. Last time I looked there were copies available on Amazon), maybe double that if you want a really clean copy with dustjacket. Pay whatever you have to. Diamonds aren't cheap.

      Square Foot Gardening. How to grow the most food, the easiest. Forget everything you know about farming. Conventional farming is medieval ideas about how to grow food en mass for the masses. You want modern ideas about how to just grow food for you. This one will get you started. Supplement with any book about container gardening that catches your eye.

      I'm afraid I've never seen a single book beyond the technique of growing food off the grid that was worth a crap though. Honestly, they're all pretty much garbage. You can cherry pick them for bits of info though

    17. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      RE: Your Engineered House by Rex Roberts
      "It's out of print. You'll pay at least triple it's original cover price to acquire it used (I'm not the only one who reveres this book. Last time I looked there were copies available on Amazon), maybe double that if you want a really clean copy with dustjacket. Pay whatever you have to. Diamonds aren't cheap"

      $3 on paperback.. I'll take some of those 3 dollar diamonds plz

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/08 71 311542/qid=1073878285//ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/002 -7800853-4029646?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

    18. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you. I hadn't even noticed the paperbacks. I may have to pick up a couple of copies as gifts.

      I'll keep my hardcover though. I like hardcovers.

      KFG

    19. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the original AC replying. Thanks for taking the time write out such a long response. If you keep writing a little longer you can send it off to a publisher! :] Theres a lot of good info there and if you say there are really no good books about living off the grid then maybe you're the best person to write it and I would be the guy scream BUY THIS BOOK!!!, but for your book. I want to do it, but in the back of my head I keep thinking I'll always be dirty, and bored, and be made the laughing stock of my family. My family is very status oriented. One of your suggestions was simply parking an RV in woods? I suppose that is a good way to squat some land if you cant find who owns it to pay for it. If they come calling with a shotgun you can drive off. its hard to find out who owns what. One idea I had kicking around was having a cheap dome home made by monolithicdome.com. They use the inflated balloon and concrete method so its much cheaper than your everyday timberhouse. The hard part is finding a good piece of land. Thanks again

    20. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually you were incorrect.

      It should be "parents' basement(s)."

      Go about your business.

    21. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've thought of it. It would take a few volumes. :) Just the idea of living off the grid is a full book. Witness Walden.

      Well, lessee again. Dirty never killed anyone you know. Unsanitary will kill you, unpleasantly at that, but it's a modern city myth that dirty and unsanitary are the same thing. In any case, what makes you think you'll suddenly forget how to wash? Going off the grid doesn't mean suddenly forgetting everything you know about living. Get some water. Use it. In one of the adobe huts I lived in, the shabbiest one of the bunch, I had to clamber down a nearly sheer embankment 1/4 mile to a spring for water. I didn't go dirty. I just hauled water.

      I remember reading a piece on the web about some guy who lost his job and decided to live in a tent. He was in your position. He had money. He didn't "have" to, but the idea of living cheaply, "close to nature" and off the grid appealed. So he left his apartment, got a tent, found some woods and moved in. (Come to think of it one of my physics classmates as an undergrad lived on campus in a tent for two years before they made him stop. He prefered it. Us physicists are weird you know). Then he got another job, but continued to live in the tent for awhile. He didn't last. He hated doing things like having to walk too far every morning to jump in an ice cold stream to wash.

      Well, he obviously never bothered to think very much about what he was doing. Why did he suddenly forget you can go to K-Mart and pick up a collapsible 5 gallon water jug with a spigot on it? Did he do something daft like not buy a good camp stove? And if he did, why did he suddenly forget that he could use it to heat bath water? For that mattter why didn't he bother to acquire an army surplus collasible bath? (There's an entire episode of M*A*S*H that revolves around one of these for goodness sake). Or he could have obtained a five gallon paint bucket on trash day, some old hose to go with it and made himself a gravity fed shower, which, in fact, could also double as a complete gravity fed plumbing system (even cities still have gravity fed water tanks. You shouldn't have to be from the woods to think of this). Fresh water is a dear commodity when blue water sailing. You can't waste it on showers. Running out can be fatal. But no one need go dirty. You take an old fashioned tea kettle. Fill it with salt water. Put it up to boil. Fresh steam comes out the spout. You catch it on a sponge and have a nice, toasty warm sponge bath.

      So you're afraid of being dirty. So don't be dirty. Wash. There's a couple dozen perfectly nifty ways to accomplish this if you don't get locked into thinking that "wash" means "upstairs bathroom."

      Bored. Books are cheap. You go to a library sale on the last half day and walk away with shopping bags of books at a couple dollars a bag. A lot of O'Reilly books are showing up at these these days. All the "dime" novels you can choke down. Complete encyclopedias for next to nothing. Even lots of books directly relevant to living off the grid like gardening books. Our ancestors read a lot.

      They played a lot of music too. Get ahold of a fiddle or something.

      But on the whole I've never found being bored to be an issue except when leading a fairly conventional life. Living off the grid is active and interesting as all hell. You have do things, make things, invent things and think about things. The greatest thing about it is there's very little distinction between labor and leisure. The concepts lose most meaning when you don't have a boss. Work is leisure. leisure is your work. There's no "job." It's just living. Living can be fun.

      Ok. Family issues. I'll add a book. J. Krishnamurti; Think on These Things. Chapter 11. Conformity and Revolt. It might give you something to, ummmm, think on. The rest of the book isn't too bad either.

      RV squatting in the woods. Actually, there's a small, very loosely knit community that's doing exactly that right now

    22. Re:what? by GSloop · · Score: 1

      Killer post! Thanks.

      I'm not likely to go off grid myself, but I like the idea of being more self sufficient. (When society really goes south [ararchy, chaos, death - in essence the fabric of society breaks down] the self sufficiency can be a life saver - literally.)

      One point though. Off the grid means self sufficient, or as much as practical. Being in the city makes this more of a struggle. (I understand why you recommend it to the gparent poster though.) This is related to the above. For example, when some massive disaster hits that is sufficient to break down the functioning society, and you're "off the grid" in a city, it's still probably a really bad thing. Lots of un-self-sufficient dope nearby are more than capable of screwing you over in a million different ways.

      So, IMHO, living outside of a larger city (say 100K) would be very useful.

      Mind you, I live in a 1M+ metro area, so I'm not exactly impressed with my ability to handle things when they do go south, but that's my theory at least.

      Thanks for the books - I'm a book nut. There's nuthin' like a well written and informative book with *wisdom*, not just knowledge.

      Thanks again,
      Greg

    23. Re:what? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeesh. Walden isn't "back to nature"?

      That scares me as to what you've run into that *is* "back to nature". I get a vague image of PETA meets the Amish or something.

    24. Re:what? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I built an LED nightlight for my daughter a while back. I used single a "white" LED (slightly blue) I grabbed from a board we were scrapping at work, put it in parallel with a 45 Ohm resistor, and powered it with 4 NiMH AAs (in series). It worked great! A little to good, in fact, it was so bright that just the reflected light off her (white) ceiling kept her awake.

      In fact, I could actually read comfortably by that indirect light. Of course, I grew up off grid with really crappy 12V incandescent lighting, and by crappy I mean that if I wanted to read (wh ch was most of the time) I had to use one of those glass chimneyed kerosene lanterns. This light I built for my daughter beats the hell out of a kerosene lantern, and that's not even considering those nasty kerosene fumes!

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    25. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, off the grid really only means just that. Not dependant on the grid. The grand infrastructure of corporate supplied services. It doesn't necessarily imply self sufficient; and there are whole off the grid communities scattered about.

      Of course in Mexico I lived in villages that were off the grid and yet otherwise perfectly normal villages, largely self sufficient, but only as a village. The buddy system has some real advantages. That's one of the advantages of going off grid in a camper or boat, even if you're solo. When you need a buddy you can find one and they take care of each other.

      But yeah, if you're out in the middle of the Atlantic on a 20' boat you'd damned well better be able to take care of yourself, and if you can that's probably the best place to be if things go all to hell. :)

      I can't say I recommend self dentistry as anything but an emergency measure though.

      Let's say that off the grid means not dependant on services and implies the ability to be self sufficient when and where the need arises. You have a certain security that way.

      Right now I'm obviously not off the grid (Ok, I could be actually. I've powered a compter by pedal generator, but I'm not). In fact I'm city dwelling.

      But when all the lights went out last summer most of mine didn't. People couldn't buy food because all the stores are computerized these days. I had plenty of dried stores on hand and fresh produce in the yard. None of it went bad in the fridge because I don't rely on refrigeration. My toilet didn't flush, but that's because my toilet doesn't flush.

      I passed a powerless night almost exactly as I always do. Entertaining the neighbors for a bit with my guitar, then reading a physics journal and working on my greek for a bit by the warm glow of my oil lamps. (No Slashdot though).

      And if push came to shove I know how to make my own oil to fuel them. Petroleum isn't exactly the only source of hydrocarbons in the world.

      So at the moment I'm quite the little urban urchin. No one should get the idea that I'm Grizzly Adams or anything. Nor am I a Luddite. My shelves aren't lined with anti tech survivalist tomes, unless you consider O'Reilly manuals, Halliday & Resnick, the CRC manual and The Theory of Rotating Stars survivalist tomes. Yes, my light is an oil lamp, but the cabinet it sits on is stuffed with electronic componants and test gear.

      I just play the game by different rules and values and with a skill set appropriate to those rules and values.

      On the other hand, yeah, I'm perfectly capable of wandering off into the state park and flat out disappearing in the woods and remaining there in comfort, by my own standards, for as long as I like, and can get to those woods in a day, with all my gear, without recourse to a motor vehicle. I can get by with little more than a sturdy knife and box of matches (just to make it easy the first few days) if I have to and occasionally do just that. I part it's my technical background that allows me to do it. Physics, astronomy, chemistry, engineering, biology and the history of those are all very valuable things to know out in the woods alone. The average survivalist can survive like that. I can live.

      And oddly enough I'm not sure exactly how I came by those skills, per se. I mean obviously I learned them over time, and I've read a great deal, and "practiced," but I didn't take courses or anything. They don't cover roots and berries in Diffy Calc. It's just the way I've always lived, since I was a child, I like to do things on my own and I picked things up as a went along, even most of my science; and invented three quarters of it simply by paying attention and thinking about things.

      It's just life.

      KFG

    26. Re:what? by jerde · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gosh I hope you don't mean "in parallel" -- you'd want that resistor in series, or all it's doing is wasting power!

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    27. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's not really. While he lived in his cabin in the woods (only a mile out of town mind you) he also kept his commercial schoolroom, lectured, made few of his out of state tourist journies, sold his produce commercially and continued to be an active member of the transcendentalist literary movement.

      It was, as he stated, an experiment in minimalist living, and the form it took was that of a gentleman farmer and scholar reduced to the barest essentials. He also happened to love nature.

      No, I've never met a "back to nature" person who PETA would want to have much to do with. PETA isn't much for slaughtering livingstock and keeping milk cows and hunting. PETA are the very antithesis of the back to nature folk and can only exist in cities. The Amish are religious Luddites, not back to nature people, perfectly civilized and like it that way and very effective capitalists. They tend to think of the back to nature folk as city loons, and they're right.

      The back to nature folk are sort of a cross between hippies, survivalists and new agers.

      They're not only anticapitalist, they're antimoney and often antitrade. They have some vague romantic notions about "being one" with nature and try live totally and completely self sufficiently, by farming mostly, with some hunting and gathering thrown in, and making absolutely everything themselves, eschewing everything they perceive as technology (without any apparent realization that farming itself is a technology, as is a house and a candle and a steel hoe). They can't quite make up their minds about whether they want to be hermits or communists. They virtually all come from cities (country folk think of them as city loons, and they're right) and they virtually all fail.

      You can do mountain man/hermit just fine if you want. A good knife and you're set. A gun is really, really nice to have though, and matches make life easier. Every one I've known also has some product to sell now and again, even if it's only racoon hides. But then a good knife is actually pretty high technology. A gun is even higher. You're not going make your own of either out in the woods or on your little farm thingy. You have to buy them.

      The only back to nature folk I've ever met who "made it" were the ones that eventually realized that the way you make a living from a farm was by being a farmer. You grow crops in excess of your needs. You sell them and then you spend the money on things you need. Things that other people make in excess while you're farming. Things like oil lamps, plough blades, maybe a radio, or a knife, or an electric generator, or, gasp, modern medicine ( 'cause those natural herbs just didn't seem to do the job after all on little Johnny's appendicitis).

      Because farming is a technology of civilization. Go figure.

      Thoreau sold crops and taught school. For money. To buy things with. Things he couldn't make himself. Like flour (remember I said don't grow grain?) paper and ink. His family owned a factory in town that made pencils.

      I only know of one way to go completely back to nature that works. Full blown late stone age living. It can be done. There are certainly at least a few people living like that right now, although fewer every year (The knife and the T-shirt seem to have made it nearly everywhere now). I've tried it as an experiment (just because it's the sort of thing I do sometimes for fun. Really). I can do it. Others less suited for it than I have managed with a little extra to work with. Selkirk, for instance. It isn't what most people would call "fun." Oh yeah, don't get sick.

      City person. In the woods. Naked.

      Riiiiiiiight.

      They don't even know how to make a proper pointy stick.

      KFG

    28. Re:what? by stephenpeters · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the book references.

      I think that learning how to live without the grid will be a vital skill for anyone now living in the industrialised world today. It is clear from recent and past world events that oil supply is going to be a future problem, that governments have yet to address. The uk oil blockade during 2000 brought that home to me very clearly. During that time food was unavailable in supermarkets, travel was limited and the scope of emergency services were limited. I expect to see that type of problem occur again within my lifetime.

      I am employed and can afford to have contractors to work on my house, however I chose to landscape my own garden and fit my own kitchen. During the past year especially I have had practical experience in many forms of building work and spent the cash I saved on the tools I needed. If I ever have to live off the grid I know that I have at least some of the neccesary skills already. I do quite a lot of work for a large London based building contractor, and even there most of the surveyors and estimators have zero hands on experience. They mostly seem surprised that I want to do this kind of work myself.

      I read a lot to gain the skills I have learnt, and while most of the books I read are not really on self suffiency they may be of interest.

      Taunton Press do a whole range of good books on a whole range of building and woodwork related subjects. They can be found at www.tauton.com. They also publish magazines such as Fine Homebulding and Fine woodworking . I have bought quite a few of their books in the past, and they are mostly very good.

      Lindsay books publish a whole load of obsolete engineering books, as well as the classic Gingery series. These are invaluable for those wanting to make tools on a very low budget.

      I also found that the old fashioned Tilley lamp to be an excellent source of heat and light in my garage. They are cheap to buy from ebay, portable and easy to service. Great for your power cut needs. Spares are available from Base Camp in the UK.

      Steve

    29. Re:what? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > Yeesh. Walden isn't "back to nature"?

      Depends on your definition of "back to nature". Sending your laundry back to town to be washed doesn't fit *my* definition of "back to nature", but maybe you have a different perspective.

      Chris Mattern

    30. Re:what? by ReTay · · Score: 1

      Try going to usenet and reading misc.survivalism.
      If you can ignore the white-power types and the rest of the political baggage there is TONs of good info. Not much tree hugging stuff....

    31. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yep, a lot of the Taunton stuff is nice. I try to keep my eye on Fine Woodworking and have a number of their books tucked about the place in odd corners.

      KFG

    32. Re:what? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the great info. I've just printed out all your replies to send to my brother, who lives in a 1960 RV. He doesn't routinely live totally off the grid as he uses an electrical connection, but he maintains the capability to do so when he desires. I think he will enjoy reading your posts.

    33. Re:what? by Fjord · · Score: 1

      ***BUY THIS BOOK***

      Or you can fill out a form and get access to is free online.

      --
      -no broken link
    34. Re:what? by GSloop · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply...

      What I mean about cities, you already understand.

      Communities beyond a pretty small size have stabaility problems both socially and physically, as in food, water etc.

      Not being totally reliant on these "Services" and being able to disentagle yourself in an emergency, quickly, is important if one plans to survive when chaos comes.

      That's in essence what I call self reliance. Get away from the imploding structures, make friends and your own community if required, but be able to "create" that yourself. Don't be reliant on the namelsss, faceless "services" at your own peril.

      (But I can't do what you do, but understand it's importance. I couldn't live completely off the land etc for any signifiant period of time. But I'm not half badly prepared and I'm capable of learning what I don't already know. However, being married and having small children makes it a bit more difficult....)

      Anyway...thanks for the post. I've taken note of the books and will see if I can find them. (Powells books [Portand OR] is great! Esp for used and out of print books.)

      Cheers,
      Greg

    35. Re:what? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And he calls himself "MrResistor".

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    36. Re:what? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for a nice beowulf cluster of Athlons grits heater.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    37. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 1

      I forgot about that one. :)

      KFG

    38. Re:what? by NtroP · · Score: 1
      Awesome!

      I grew up as a kid in the "jungles" of southern Mexico near the Guatemalan border. We lived "off the grid" with a Mayan tribe there. My wife, kids and I now live in North Pole, Alaska after 3 years of living in an Aleut village way out by Dutch Harbor in the Aleutian Islands. Though it may sound like I'm some sort of freak who likes to live in weird, rustic places, each move had a very logical progression leading to it and my chosen career is as a Systems Administrator/Programmer and I love high-tech things.

      Like I said I now live in North Pole, AK, and excluding the occasional -70 F days it's no different than living in any "lower 48" town. We have a 6-bedroom house with a 2-car, heated garage and "all the comforts of home". However, I've always said that (after the kids were grown and gone) I'd love to get back to a simpler life. I know from experience that it isn't and easier life, but when I run down the long list of utility bills, car payments, credit card bills, etc. each month I really start to wonder what it would be like to sell my home for a quarter mil or so, buy an RV or a boat, settle down, write that all-american novel I've started about 6 times and chill.

      I actually miss the times we had in Akutan. No TV. No radio. No phones. My wife and I spent evenings reading novels out loud to each other. Now we have cable TV and BroadBand Internet. I page or IM my kids to come to supper. My wife works nights, so I rarely see her. Yeah, I make a "good living". But am I "living good"?

      Which is a very long way of bringing me to the actual reason I responded to your post: "Why don't you write a book?"

      You are obviously articulate and compelling (I just ordered "Your Engineered House" from Amazon). I like your style of writing and would throughly enjoy reading, if nothing else, of your experiences. Any thoughts along these lines?

      I apologize for have done NO homework on you first (I just stumbled accross your post by accident :-) so if you've already published or have a blog or something forgive me...

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    39. Re:what? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I know, but it didn't work with the resistor in series. Not sure why.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  3. Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    A link to a page full of images on slashdot... This website will die.

    Please use this:
    Google cache for the pictures

    And this:
    Google cache for the website

    1. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by mark-t · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, but the pics themselves weren't cached on google, only the html content so the pics can't load from a site that's so abysmally slashdotted that I'd be suprised if it's still up and running in 2 hours.

    2. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late!

    3. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the google cache still links to the images on their server.

    4. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The HTML, that's always better than nothing...

    5. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't help any. Google doesn't cache the images, just the HTML.

    6. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by MrUnknown · · Score: 0, Redundant

      you DO know that Google don't cache images right? They only cache the HTML. So your cache for the images is completely useless and the site will be slashdotted anyways.

    7. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. They create and cache their own thumbnails.

    8. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      already dead

    9. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for preventing Slashdotting the site.

    10. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They cache thumbnails under images searches. You didn't link one of those did you?

    11. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by aheath · · Score: 1

      This apartment was also covered in a recent New York Times article entitled "Let There Be L.E.D.'s".

    12. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Being Slashdotted they can now have their server room lit solely by LED's as well...

      --
      Martin
    13. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by dozing · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course google doesn't cache images. So how about a different website that displays some images of the same pad: http://www.litelogic.com/client/vos.htm

      --
      Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
    14. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by ShortBeard · · Score: 1

      And so I follow the link and the pics are corrupt. No light show for me. Arrrgh!!

  4. Nightclubbing by BWJones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, its funny but iTunes spun up Nightclubbing by Iggy Pop as soon as I clicked on the link to the sight, because that is exactly what this looks like to me. If I were single and 18-23 again perhaps I might think this was cool, but come on now. I was really hoping that by clicking on the link I was going to see real LED lights (perhaps spectrally tuned to the wavelength of sunlight) that could really light a house. I don't think we are that far away from other applications like automobile headlights and real replacement sources for household lighting, but this is not quite there. This to me is more like mood lighting or decorative lighting rather than household lighting.

    Also, it appears that the apartment is not lit entirely by LEDs as ACDC lighting systems are providing cold cathode lighting as well.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Nightclubbing by BWJones · · Score: 2, Funny

      as soon as I clicked on the link to the sight

      Aaarrgh! For those spelling/grammar nazis out there, I've been writing vision research grants all day, so sight should be site. Forgive me.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Nightclubbing by venicebeach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, apparently in the future, all of our houses will look like the inside of a nightclub with purplish bluish hues.

      I agree with you -- they clearly were more interested in making it look cool than having a functional lighting system. I would have a hard time reading in there. Is this a matter of intent or technological limitations? I mean is it possible to get a room nice and bright and white using only LED lighting?

    3. Re:Nightclubbing by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Is this a matter of intent or technological limitations? I mean is it possible to get a room nice and bright and white using only LED lighting?

      I don't imagine that there could be too many technical considerations other than cost. Right now I have some LED ultra bright white lights for biking back and forth from work and they are amazingly bright. I also have seen a couple of show cars with LED lighting whose output was truly blinding, so I cannot imagine that it would be impossible. Especially if one were to use proper diffuser design and lens systems with ultra-bright LEDs, I am sure one could properly light a living space.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    4. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've been writing vision research grants all day"

      I like it. The old "recently switched from Dvorak" excuse works great too!

    5. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You want "real" LED lights? Try Luxeon Stars....
      I'm just waiting for them to come out with UL-approved, white-light fixtures for the home...

    6. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For those spelling/grammar nazis out there,

      uhm, get a life? move out of your parents' basement? seek professional help? there's a world of options available...

    7. Re:Nightclubbing by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      I'll let it go this time, but don't do it again. "Nazis" should really be capitalized though.

    8. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      itym nazi's.

    9. Re:Nightclubbing by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

      I think you mean spelling/grammar Hitlerists, as George W. Bush, the epitome of bad grammar, would say. I have a sinking feeling the above sentence will cause much emnity from the spelling/grammar Nazis.

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
    10. Re:Nightclubbing by Vexar · · Score: 1
      Some of us don't like the night club look. Why don't these people do something bright and make a low-power replacement on an LED platform that screws into a light bulb form factor? Or am I mistaken, and LEDs suck more juice than a 60-watt, 800 lumen bulb?

      all that room needs is one of those framed art pieces which are augmented with a squiggle of a neon light.

    11. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope your grants get approved -- it sounds like you're working hard on them.

    12. Re:Nightclubbing by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess he did link to the "sight" of the pictures on that website, so technically he could be correct... ;)

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
    13. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is wrong. Yes ACDC do supply cold cathode lighting but not on that job it is lit as it says soley by LED's.

      This site seems a bit behind on things, the flat appeared in T3 and stuff magazines in october

    14. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luxeon star LED's are what is used in the vos pad.

      If anybody wants to buy any ex testing Luxeon Led's cheap ie 1000 of their 50000 hours life used mail me on tom@braynet.net brand new ones may be available too

      For your fittings in white (or any colour you want) try www.acdclighting.net

    15. Re:Nightclubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The LED's used in the vos pad are the luxeon ones

      If anyone wantds to buy any ex testing ones cheap
      ie 1000 hours use of their 50000 hours life then contact me on tom@braynet.net

      For the fittings you require try www.acdclighting.net they are available in white or any colour you wish.

  5. News? by JamesD_UK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Already have one, sorry.

  6. that hurts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like one big flouresecent headache to me

    1. Re:that hurts by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Exactly my thoughts.

      --
      -1 (Troll) is antihammer
  7. Big deal... by odie_q · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I turn off my monitors, my apartment is also lit solely by LEDs.

    --
    ...ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  8. Got a mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some images of the place up on their website.

    I think that should be "there were some images..."

    Anyone got a mirror setup?

    1. Re:Got a mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry darling, you look marvellous!

  9. Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Their server isn't lit by all LEDs, cause this site is slashdotted!

    1. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean: their server room is now also lit solely (or at least mostly) by LEDs.

  10. Site is down by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Must have used up all the power on the LEDs, now their webserver is down.

    1. Re:Site is down by DeadChobi · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This is what happens to any small website when a link gets posted on a larger website with more bandwidth and a readership in the 6 digits. If you run a large-scale website, its the perfect way to get back at your less-powerful competitors. Kind of acts like a DOS attack, except its legal. Someone should've mirrored the images before it crapped out due to lack of bandwidth and posted those instead of the actual website so that those of us reading hours afterwards could get at the pics.

      --
      SRSLY.
    2. Re:Site is down by webcentres · · Score: 1

      Yes this is what happens, and yes it is legal, the only problem being that all us others that are hosted on the same server used by the site in question also suffer. This occurence was just an innoccent one, but before people start doing it to get back at their small enemies (as mentioned earlier by the last poster), please remember the innocent victims as well. Paul

    3. Re:Site is down by DeadChobi · · Score: 0

      I was just questioning the morality of it all. Oh the humanity!! OH THE HUMANITY!!

      --
      SRSLY.
  11. PURPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OH GAWD make it stop..... I would turn insane after living in a place like that, with hardly any direct light, and everything purple or green. Did they do that on purpose? I know even the white LEDs are a little thin in their output spectrum, but damn, they aren't purple!

    Hint to lighting designers: the human body has evolved over millions of years to expect sunlight. Lighting should either look like direct or diffused sunlight.

    1. Re:PURPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another hint: put lights in the celing, not the floor!!!

    2. Re:PURPLE!!! by Ghost_MH · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing that that's a concept house of sorts...Yes, I would imagine they did do that on purpose. I'd say that the colors were chosen in an attempt to make them extra noticable. They aren't trying to sell the room, but the idea of those LEDs lighting up the room. Concidering all the colors they could have chosen to make the LED lighting more apparent and eye catching, at least these purpoe and green lights aren't actually seizure inducing.

    3. Re:PURPLE!!! by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      It's not always PURPLE you can adjust the colours and brightness. It's all computer controlled so you can have any colour your heart desires.

      But...if you want, you can keep that colour scheme, throw in a brass pole and a mirror ball and you'd be all set for the strip club theme party you've been itching to host =)

    4. Re:PURPLE!!! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about, man?

      That light does look like diffused sunlight... by a prism.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:PURPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purple Haze , more like.

      Oh I am showing my age

    6. Re:PURPLE!!! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      ...and everything purple or green...

      Just like Barney, the Dinosaur to decorate his bachelor pad like that. Purple and green are such happy colors! I wonder if he invited Baby Bop over for playtime, too.

      --
      That is all.
  12. Costume by MSBob · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are you required to wear a shiny white uniform when you are in the apartment? It looks like a set for a B rate sci fi flick from the fifties...

    Perhaps it's just that my interior decorating tastes aren't up to date :-)

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    1. Re:Costume by Doubting+Thomas · · Score: 1

      I suspect the entire appt is done up in white on white in order to help the LEDs light things up enough so you don't trip over the coffee table. If you think the all-white decor looks dimly lit, wait until you try the same thing with a black couch and a leather armchair.

      --
      Just because it works, doesn't mean it isn't broken.
  13. /.ed already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After 7 posts?

  14. Any ideas? by ir0b0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any ideas on why led lights for the home are not more widely available? The technology is not new.

    The site reports that that led lights are up to 10,000% longer lasting and can produce up to 10 times more light than incandescent bulbs.

    The site also states that led's use less power and are less expensive.

    --
    I'm laughing at clouds.
    1. Re:Any ideas? by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      Any ideas on why led lights for the home are not more widely available? The technology is not new
      Take a look at the pictures, they will tell you why.

      Now I think it could work, But whats up will all the different colors?
      Besides, I don't think that flatpanel will last long in the kitchen right there. If they ever cook food there it will be all greasy in no time, but then again, it doesn't look like one of those kitchens you actually use.

    2. Re:Any ideas? by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any ideas on why led lights for the home are not more widely available? The technology is not new.

      I believe an LED the size and lummen output of a 100watt bulb for example would be a fair bit costly in contrast to a typical 100watt bulb.

      I have no site to back this up, don't know where to buy a big ass LED, but let's look at radioshack

      http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog%5F na me=CTLG&category%5Fname=CTLG%5F011%5F006%5F002%5F0 00&product%5Fid=276%2D320
      5mm White LED $4.99
      3.6V 20ma

      http://handyman.everything-warehouse.com/PID-3EE z3 ZEY3yaPG/GE-Mazda-100W-Edison-Screw-Lightbulb-Glas s-Pearl-Pastel-Whites-pk-2/
      GE Mazda 100W Edison Screw LightBulb 9004100198514
      1000hours $0.99
      120v .8A

      Now, I don't know how many 5mm white LEDs = the lumen output of one 100watt bulb... but at $5.00 a pop, in the short term the traditional 100W bulb costs less.

      So you can either replace your bulbs at 99cents a pop, or construct a led solution that would likely cost $5.00 per unit, multi units to equal the light level of that one bulb.

      I'm sure the LED would save you money, but people are lazy.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:Any ideas? by radixvir · · Score: 2, Informative

      the reason they arent prevelant yet is because of price. over the next few years it should come down alot though. the best way to get started with led lights would to buy drop in replacement bulbs (edison type sockets). check out this site

    4. Re:Any ideas? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 4, Informative

      Radio Shack gives you the shaft on components. It's really not valid to compare them there.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    5. Re:Any ideas? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      For starters, LED lights use about the same amount of power for a given light output.

      Compact florescents on the other hand are cheap, and use much less power for the same light output. The only think stopping florescents is many do not like the colors, but LEDs have no advantages there. Price the florescent wins, and power the florescent wins. For color they tie.

    6. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the LED would save you money, but people are lazy.

      The LED would last something like 50-100 times longer, so you wouldn't have to replace the bulb for a really really long time.

    7. Re:Any ideas? by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those arent the LEDs you should looking at.
      http://www.lumiled.com/luxeon/products/luxeon III_i ndex.html

      This are the babys for serious room illumination. http://www.lumiled.com/luxeon/products/luxeonIII_i ndex.html
      3.xV, 1000mA. And around 3-5 times the lumen efficency of your traditional bulb. And its only 30$ or so (if i remember correctly). So this is around 15 times more power/money than your example.

      Sure, more expensive in the beginning, but in situations where broken bulb does not only mean 1$ for a new bulb, but working time to replace it, or simply a room being dark that SHOUDNT be dark, the 100.000 hour lifetime should be quite a bonus.

      Especially considering that LEDS dont "break", but fade. If not electrocuted, they become slowly dimmer. The 100.000h usually means the time where they are only at 50% or so output. So even a long time after that, it would still produce light, even if its not a lot.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    8. Re:Any ideas? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Informative

      hah, you DON'T want to price electronic components at Radio Shack. They're so insanely expensive you might as well burn your money for light instead.

    9. Re:Any ideas? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Radio Shack gives you the shaft on components. It's really not valid to compare them there.

      I used Radio Shack as a reference as it indeed is a place where one can go out and buy something, rather then a mailorder website. It's fair to compare with something you can buy NOW.

      But since you objected...

      http://www.lc-led.com/View.jsp?idProduct=141
      10 mm Big Super White (30 Deg.) 3.3V
      30-99 pcs : $1.42 USD
      100-199 pcs : $1.04 USD

      Assuming you can use a rectifier and a set of 36 of these in series, and assuming you bought in the 100 unit class...

      $37.44 per 36 in LEDs alone
      + rectifier, wire, solder, etc..

      vs .99cents for a damn bumb (I pay much less, but hey)

      Assuming you burn 24/7. and it burns out after 720 hours or os... about $12 yearly per bulb...

      I don't know how many LEDs = 1 damn bulb, but assuming we stick to the 36 per bulb... which is reasonable in america... it would take you 3 years to see benifit on your pocketbook. Assuming that you'd need 3 to = one 100watt bulb (again no facts, but according to http://www.theledlight.com/120-VAC-LEDbulbs.html their 36 diode unit provides equal to 30watt bulb). we're talking $108 for the damb bulb. Not likely to see a benifit on your pocketbook for 9 years. If it lasts 30 years... victory!

      [note i'm not taking power consumption into account]

      Excuse me please, i'm going out to buy a traditional lamp and a damn 99cent bulb. I'm lazy!

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    10. Re:Any ideas? by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      Lasting 50-100 times longer still won't break even, at the Radio Shack price. Each LED consumes 3.6v * 20ma = 0.07W. If we are generous and assume that they are 5 times as efficient as incandescent, like a fluorescent is - actually, I don't think they are anywhere near that, certainly not if measured in terms of total lumens - then we would need 20W of them to equal a 100W incandescent, i.e. we would need 285 of them. At the $4.99 Radio Shack price, that would be $1422.15 to get the same light as a $0.99 incandescent bulb.

      I'm sure if you shop around, though, you'll be able to do better than the Radio Shack price, especially if you're going to buy 285 of them for each bulb in your house you're going to replace.

      The real question (assuming money is no object) is whether the Radio Shack LED is really white. All of the so-called "white" LEDs I've purchased, from the Kensington USB light for my laptop to the little flashlight on my keychain, have an annoying purplish/blue tinge that distorts colors and (for reading) gets tiring after a while. I've switched my booklight for reading in bed back to an incandescent one. From the pictures of the LED Apartment, apparently they have the same problem with most of their LEDs, too.

    11. Re:Any ideas? by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Despite popular opinion LED lighting is not significantly more efficient than boring incandescent. Watt for watt full spectrum white LEDs produce the same light as incandescent. Florescent and compact fluorescent beat both by 2 to 3 times. Where LEDs really win is if you want a specific colour (such as red). LED lights can also win if you want directional lighting, but often more efficient lighting with a reflector will work just as well. For household lighting diffused lighting is usually more desirable then directional lighting.

    12. Re:Any ideas? by javaaddikt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Radio Shack's pricing is outrageously high. Their electronics packaging and pricing is structured to provide electronics hobbiests a common part they need at 11pm.

      Because most electronics catalogs have minimum orders, shipping costs, and shipping delays, you'd end up paying probably $15. Therefore, rat shack can rape you with $5 capacitors, or 5 resistors for $2.

      Those LED's would be more like $0.70 in high quantities.

    13. Re:Any ideas? by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      In case you missed it, there's a major trend in interior decorating towards the Moroccan look, which is basically to paint each room a different color, preferably all visible from the entry hall at one time. With these lights, you don't have to go out and buy paint.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    14. Re:Any ideas? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Radio Shack's pricing is outrageously high

      Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't. I quoted radioshack as it was a place you get crap localy, well atleast in north america anyway. I guess that is no longer true, as the last time I wished to order a pair of small speakers from them, they didn't carry them in stock anymore, and they didn't know how to place an order.

      The last time I bought LEDs was at radioshack, but the price wasn't nearly so high.. you could get a pair at .50 a piece.

      The last time I bought a phono cartrage from them, they had a $20 solution, and a $35 solution. They don't carry them anymore, but this needless to say was not overpriced, right on the money in fact. Sad they no longer carry them, as it means a longer drive if I need one.

      Their electronics packaging and pricing is structured to provide electronics hobbiests a common part they need at 11pm.

      I can't argue with that... if it's 11pm, i'm not going to bitch about the thing I need is overpriced at sub $5.00. For me, it's either Radio Shack, or a longer drive to a real electronics shop. Depends on how lazy I am, and how much i'm buying.

      Those LED's would be more like $0.70 in high quantities.

      I since on a seperate thread found a site with bigger LEDs at roughly $1.00 a piece... and likely need 108 to come close to the light output of a 100watt bulb.

      But again... I was just looking for a price quote for a local shop that carried the shinola. Like 'em or not, Radio Shack is local to most north americans.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    15. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Radio shack LED is really bad $5 for a 1.1CD LED

      In Australia we can buy 5+CD LEDS for under $10AUD ~ $US7.5

    16. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off the top of my head, the new Luxeon III parts (green blue and white available) are ~$8 each in quantity 100 or so. The older(sorta dimmer) Luxeon parts(red, orange) are ~$6 in the same quantities.

    17. Re:Any ideas? by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      Look where we find most LEDs too. Size is obviously a consideration as well.

      --
      P226 .40cal
    18. Re:Any ideas? by jldrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those arent the LEDs you should looking at.

      Wait just a second,... is this some sort of Jedi mind trick?

    19. Re:Any ideas? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      hah, you DON'T want to price electronic components at Radio Shack. They're so insanely expensive you might as well burn your money for light instead.

      Hmmmm.... this sounds like a new business idea.

      1. Burn money to produce light
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

      I think I'm on to something here! Quick! Lets IPO!!

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    20. Re:Any ideas? by CNERD · · Score: 1

      The problem is more that LEDs provide directional light, and not so much a glow in every direction.

      But your arguement is very biased. Radioshack has the most overpriced LEDs that I have ever seen. LEDs normally run well under $1. They are really cheap if you buy them in bulk.

      You can already buy replacement bulbs for your car that are LEDs. I honestly don't see home lighting as far behind. The technology is almost there (if it isnt already).

    21. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Led lighting products available at www.acdclighting.co,uk

    22. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Radio shack LED is really bad $5 for a 1.1CD LED In Australia

      Guess they don't have Radio Shack in Aus. Radio Shack was at one point and time a really spiffy place to get parts pre-www. They were a touch costly, but you could usually find them near your home town.

      Pre-1970 is before my birth. I suspect the name implyed to people it's where they could get tubes for their philco's / motorola's, aka those big ass monster radios... back when the radio shack was a ships communication center and was high tech. I even remember they stocked tubes well into the late 70s as I remember atari pong being used on the old B&W tube set that needed new tubes from time to time.

      in the 1970's they sold the realistic brand of audio components which were actually pretty good. I infact own a Realistic LAB-400 turn table that is pretty top notch as far as turn tables go. It was just re-branded other people's stuff, but hey, this was the family store where you could go in for advice and come out with some high tech gear, which in the 1970's was hi-fi equipment.

      In the 1980's their stuff became crappy, just like everyone elses stuff, but they carried electronics parts, where local, and had a nice little club for free batteries. For parts, there actually was at least one person familar with electronics to give you a hand with your hobbist project, and one might think it was worth the extra pricetag to get a helping hand. They even had their own series of computers, one thing in parituclar was a Tandy portable computer. Didn't run anything compatable, it was pretty much nothing more then a PDA with Basic, the size of a notebook, but had a battery life measured in hours. Cool beans to have enough in the way of juice on your trans-ocean flight to actually get some work done. Most cool were those 1001 in 1 kits, basicly educational toys that had all the electronics parts on a nice friendly board and you could construct radios, security systems, musical keyboard, a vast number of things. Lots of good geeks got a foundation in electronics with those radioshack 1001 kits. I think they also still carried tubes at this time, and my local one employed a gent familar with ham radio. Hell, I got a spair TI keyboard there, I got two or tree.

      In the 1990's they were still falling the way side, but it was one of the few places I knew of that you could buy ISA slots for example. Their PCs were sub-standard clones, and they stopped bothering to re-brand their stuff. In the 1980s they sold crap with their name on it, and they needed someone else to blame. Their repair department became non-existant. They ditched their educational toys, they ditched their free battery program, and they stopped carring the really nice recharables that were just a hair better then everyone else. There was an old joke about Radio Shack, "It's over there by the batteries" which no longer applies. There no longer is a big ass kieosk where you could find a battery in just about every imaginable size in the center of the store, in fact I don't know where they keep their batteries anymore.

      In the 21st century... they no longer what they once were. As others have noted their prices for many parts is super inflated. Not only that, but they no longer stock the wide varity of goods they once did. I no longer get x-mas cards from them with a $20 gift certificate. Parts I may need, like a simple 1.5 inch speaker they don't carry, gotta order, and they don't know how to order. Basicly the store staff reccomend the website, which is a joke as if I wanted to order via the web, I wouldn't pick *the shack*. Their stock is pretty limited, they don't carry harneses they once did, and the staff looks at me as if I'm nuts when I say, "look I bought this one from you a year ago, I like it, I want another".

      So when person like my self quotes *the shack* for prices, it's just out of default. I typicaly don't shop for LEDs... and if I did shop for them i'd go for a local electronics shop rather then THE SH

    23. Re:Any ideas? by JediDan · · Score: 1

      Good point. When I built my led lamp it cost me less than $5/per, but I built it a few years back (99 or 00) and bought them in bulk (40 bulbs, two rows of 20 on a circuit board powered by a 1 amp wall-wart) but ~$180 is way more than many people are willing to spend on a lamp that's only good for low-light reading.
      I use it mainly for reading at night because the light is directional enough not to disturb the other people around.

      --
      - Dan
    24. Re:Any ideas? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Couple that with solar power and we can RULE THE WORLD! ...one bill at a time.

  15. Cost? by jimmer63 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What does it cost to have this done? What are the monthly saving each month?

  16. LCD TV above the stove? by phatsharpie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't imagine placing a LCD TV above the stove is a good idea. Not only would heat from the stove damage it, but what about oil splatter from cooking?

    -B

    1. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Anybody who would buy an apartment lit by LEDs wouldn't use a stove.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    2. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by awing0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you insinuating that they would feast off the light emitted from the diodes like some sort of freakish plant monster?

      --
      Cthulhu Saves.
    3. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by sylencer · · Score: 1
      That's exactly what I was thinking - who's gonna clean that mess? Oh, wait, they'll probably just throw it out after half a year and buy a new one... When I look at out kitchen (shared among six students) I know where I would never put such an expensive piece of electronics...

      Just wait for the questions popping up - hey, you've got a stuck red pixel on your display - oh, no, wait, it's just tomato sauce from last week's spaghetti!

      But, admittedly, the thought of using LEDs is intriguing, and it looks cool!

    4. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, that's the problem with "demo" homes like this. They always have neat looking, and completely doofy shit in them.

      You're supposed to go "OOooooooo! Ahhhhhhhh!"

      But mostly you end up saying "Well, That's kinda dumb. What kind of clueless moron thought that up?"

      In the end what really sells a new technology is showing how it can mold into your existing conventional home completely unubtrusively.

      What would really be impressive is a picture of a 1920's farm house kitchen with a caption:

      "This home is completely lit by LEDs -- and you can't even tell!

      KFG

    5. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Well, if it was a 1920's farmhouse, two or three LEDs in a fake candle holder should about do it, right? Most rural farmhouses from that era weren't up with the 'lectrics yet...

    6. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      What about the bath thats in the bedroom that seems to have some sort of a wire dangling in the water (from vos1 movie at http://absurd.ds.pg.gda.pl:8435/ssLL/gallery.html )?

    7. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this was the link to the video
      http://www.litelogic.com/media/vos1.mov

    8. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on where you're from I guess. I've lived in three. They all had original art deco electric lighting fixures in them. One still had the original wiring (shudder).

      Remember that in the 1920s rural farmhouse didn't necessarily mean out in the boonies. More often than not it meant being situated right about where your suburb is now since they hauled fresh produce into the city, often on a daily basis. They didn't fly the stuff in from Argentina and a farm had to be proximate to the city.

      This sort of farmhouse generally got electric lighting about WWI in my neck of the woods (upstate NY, proximate to General Electric).

      KFG

    9. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by mcowger · · Score: 1

      Duh! Thats not a stove silly, its a replicator! No oil splatter!

    10. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by microbob · · Score: 1

      I would think that is a remote shower head with a light under the holder (that is bolted to the wall).

      -mb

    11. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that someone geek enough to do that to their apartment knows about cooking?

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    12. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by mantera · · Score: 1

      actually you're right... i know this 'cos my house is mosly lit by LEDs... well i got into them 'cos i have a neurotic temperament and find the candle-lit soft feel of LEDs comforting and calming, as well as the kosher feeling of using something so low energy-demand and that lasts 11 years of always-on... once you try LEDs as a main lighting source then all other forms of light will drive you crazy... they are also softer for reading 'cos they are diffuse... and the light itself is white in a sorta heavenly way...

      now regarding the stove thing... i can't remember the last time i used a stove.. well, actually i do... it was long ago... i stir-fried some sweet & sour sauce only to remember why i hadn't used the stove for ages before that... and haven't used it since... and i'll tell you how i eat my food... the only method of cooking that i use is steaming and air-grilling... any food i make that requires cooking is steamed... the only exception might be a pasta bake, which then, after i steam it for a little bit, put in a tabletop air-grill... the steamer too is electric and table-top... once you get used to the quality of steamed food, how great the vegetables look, how nice the sauce looks, you never wish to have anything else... oh and did i mention that it's much much easier to prepare and much easier to clean afterwards... as well as healthier and tastier... and all you do is set the digital timer and put your food in pyrexes in those multilevel racks... i love it...

    13. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by mantera · · Score: 1

      here's a link to it... on steam it cooks faster than a stove... it can also do slow cooking... that spagetti sauce that is cooked slowly over 10 hours tastes like nothing you could ever get from a 20 minute job on a stove...

    14. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by mantera · · Score: 2, Informative

      argh i forgot the link... http://www.tefal.co.uk/tefal/products/product/inde x.asp?category%5Fid=200&dept%5Fid=220&sku=U00024&m scssid=C7QHD2W4BPNV9NCS1WRLUPE9G4386TT1

    15. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine placing a LCD TV above the stove is a good idea. Not only would heat from the stove damage it, but what about oil splatter from cooking?
      Frankly, if it gets that hot, or any significant amount of oil, the distance the TV is from the stove, you are doing something badly wrong. Not that it's a benign environment, but it's not that bad either.
    16. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      Remember that this is a geek apartment. We don't actually use our stoves.
      ::Goes to order chinese::

    17. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by sanqui · · Score: 1

      Take a closer look -- if you're talking about the plaster mouldings in the ceiling in Victorian/Edwardian/Art Deco houses, they were originally there to decorate the ventilation holes for gas or fuel fumes, or in hot climates for letting hot air get into the roof.

    18. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      Water mist from whatever dish you're cooking tends to carry particles of oil with it. The condensate lands on a surface, then evaporates, leaving the oil behind. You probably won't get splatter that far up, but you will inevitably get a film of difficult-to-remove oil residue. The "smart" thing (assuming that the LCD is smart at all) is to put it behind a glass panel.

      An LCD could have certain applications: first (and most important), so you can have Emeril going "Bam!" with you as you cook. Next, and most obvious, is having recipes up there. But imagine having interactive recipes right there: One recipe per dish, timers for each dish. Timers for each step! You hit "okay" just after you've added the noodles to the boiling water, and the system turns the stove down for you to a simmer, and counts the twenty minutes to when you need to stir in the flavor packet. Then it shuts the stove off.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    19. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by kfg · · Score: 1

      No, I'm talking about electric lighting fixtures. Some of them big, dangly things made out of metal. Hand made glass insulators at the original incoming to the house. Nifty stuff. A house I lived in in town still had all of its gas fixtures intact though, and functioning. I know what a gas fixture looks like. I've used them. I know what a gas fixture converted to electric looks like too. We've got a lot of those in town as well. That house was built in 1823 though. Pre Victorian, Greek Rivival.

      Sadly the wonderful Italianate Victorian mansion we once bought from an 87 year old woman who was born in the house only had a couple of the original fixtures left. Lots of plaster moldings on the ceilings though and all the iron floor registers.

      When I said proximate to GE I meant very proximate. I'm living back in town at the moment, in a 17th century neighborhood. My house is one of the new ones though. Only about 100 years old. Edwardian. Nice old place, but clearly more "modern" than houses built only a few years before. We liked being modern around here. Turn of the century you know. Time for new style. Still had a coal bin in the basement when we acquired it. With coal in it. I used to love to follow the coal trucks around the neighborhood when I was a kid and pick up stray lumps. If I go up to my attic window and look out I can see where the first tungsten filement lightbulb was made. They had already been making generators there for nearly 40 years at the time.

      We were very proud about being modern here in those days and had a history of being so. We had passenger rail service in 1831. Before that was the Erie Canal. We had already been the major port of embarcation for all points west before that. And now, we were the City that Lights the World. Some family members still have first printings of Maxfield Parish's Edison-Mazda promotional paintings. You can find their cheap reprints in just about any poster shop in the world these days. Ecstasy is my favorite, but I have to make due with a modern poster of that one.

      And virtually every house built here in the 1920s, and for miles around, well out into what was farm country in those days, had electric lighting installed as original equipment. And any number of Edwardians beat them to it; and some Victorians even before that. Do you think Edison wouldn't have electric lights in his house?

      Later on the first commercial television broadcast in the world was made just four blocks from me. Just around the corner from where Lafayette used to stay when he was in town and right next to Washington's prefered lodgings. And then the first color broadcast. The building now houses the science department of a local college.

      Then something went wrong. We became the cockroach capital of the world. Hailed as such on news broadcasts across the country. C'est la vie.

      Anyway, at least in the more populous areas of the northeast a farm house built in the 20's with electric lighting was no particular rarity. Some cities were already installing their second generation power plants by 1920 to keep up with the demand as it spread, not only throughout the city, but out into the surrounding countryside. Some of these towns had installed electric street lamps in the 1880s which meant there were now 50 year olds who had lived with electric lights since they were children and simply took such for granted. Older construction, already fitted for gas, well, sometimes those didn't get electricity until much later. Sometimes much, much later. The house I lived in with gas lighting was in the early 60s. It's all gone now. Someone "restored" the house.

      In the Tennesse Valley and out in the middle of nowhere Iowa, well, perhaps things were different.

      But around here; we used the power of The Man who Made Lighting and the lamp made by the Wizard of Menlo Park.

      And we lit the world.

      KFG

    20. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by DenOfEarth · · Score: 1

      How about a large-scale marijuana grow-op using nothing but LED's for a light source in some persons basement? That would impress me too.

      It's not really a funny thing to ask for either, as I think most of those people that grow large amounts of illegal plants get busted on their power bills....thinking of it now, I wonder if there have been any studies done on the effects of certain frequencies of light on photosynthesis of certain plants too. Just a thought, hehe.

    21. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Water mist from whatever dish you're cooking tends to carry particles of oil with it. The condensate lands on a surface, then evaporates, leaving the oil behind. You probably won't get splatter that far up, but you will inevitably get a film of difficult-to-remove oil residue.
      Well, thats what the fan above the stove is for, to pull such mists up from the stove and condense it in the filter. It's not that hard to remove, if you clean often and don't let is sit so long that dust gets trapped in it. (My big concern would be the slow but steady buildup of gook inside the LCD unit.)
      The "smart" thing (assuming that the LCD is smart at all) is to put it behind a glass panel.
      Yah, with acess from the room/closet behind the kitchen to swap it out when needed.
      An LCD could have certain applications: first (and most important), so you can have Emeril going "Bam!" with you as you cook.
      I'm an Alton Brown man myself.
      Next, and most obvious, is having recipes up there. But imagine having interactive recipes right there: One recipe per dish, timers for each dish. Timers for each step! You hit "okay" just after you've added the noodles to the boiling water, and the system turns the stove down for you to a simmer, and counts the twenty minutes to when you need to stir in the flavor packet. Then it shuts the stove off.
      Well, for that usage, it's really badly positioned because you have to reach across the stove to use it. It really should be to one side of the stove, so you can see and reach it from the stove or prep area. But even without integrated control of the appliances, a digital whiteboard/multitimer would be a hell of an aid. (I've replaced two of my cabinet doors with whiteboards for shopping lists, prep notes, timelines, etc. Used to have corkboards too, but they were impossible to clean.)
    22. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Are you insinuating that they wouldn't?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    23. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plants need UV to grow. AFAIK, LED's don't provide that.

    24. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      I've had stove/ovens with all the controls behind the cooktop with no problem. Electric ranges, of course, including the flattop style in this house. Still, the less leaning, the better: the controls be on the front edge of the range, say a glidepad and clickbutton.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    25. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Certainly, but with controls behind the cooktop you are leaning down and out, your attention focuses on the cooktop. The LCD screen here is *above* the cooktop, meaning you have to lean up and in, focusing away from the cooktop. From a safety/ergonomics standpoint it's a bit questionable.

      Controls on the front are bad (IMO) as kids can get at them, and they can be leaned against. (I've seen housefires from both causes.)

  17. Bah by paul248 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This "electric light" thing will never catch on.
    /lights a candle.

  18. i wonder what wavelengths you get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...compared to incandescant or fluorescant bulbs. i like to use full wavelength bulbs in my house. i wonder if it is possible to get that sort of thing. or if you notice the led flicker...

    1. Re:i wonder what wavelengths you get... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      There is only an "LED flicker" if they are run directly by AC. If they are run by DC there is no flicker, at least for lighting applications (display applications would be another story.)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:i wonder what wavelengths you get... by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 1

      Easy solution:

      [radioshack.com]

      --
      What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
  19. This just in by mrpuffypants · · Score: 3, Funny

    Company just released their second product: First NOC lit by flaming server. Footage at 11...

  20. Ok, That's It I QUIT!!!!! by Elusive_Cure · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Will you guyz refrain just for ONCE slashdotting a server ? ANY MIRRORS PLEASE???

    --
    Roses are red, violets are blue, most poems rhyme, but this one doesn't... ;^)
  21. too bad it's inefficient by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Compact Flouresent is much higher in efficiency per watt of electricity used.

    plus it's a bitch to find a LED area lamp.

    LED's are ok for small point task lighting, they completely suck at area lighting that is typically used in a home in both electricity used and lumens of light output.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:too bad it's inefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, at the moment. But it's a rapidly evolving technology - ten years ago, nothing like this would be anywhere near practical.

    2. Re:too bad it's inefficient by crazyphilman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently got a full complement of fluroescent bulbs for my apartment; they replaced all of my regular light bulbs with dramatic energy savings: for example, I replaced my 60-Watt bulbs with equivalent fluroescent bulbs that provide just as much light but only use 14 watts each. My only remaining "normal" light bulbs are in the bathroom, where I have some of those fancy globe-type lights over the sink.

      My electric bill dropped under 30 bucks as a result. Not bad, eh? And, that's keeping a couple of lights on at all times.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    3. Re:too bad it's inefficient by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Flourescents, compact or otherwise suck as a human-useful light source. They're the ultimate expression of the concept of making something cheap and barely able to do the task in question. Wonder why a lot of offices are starting to tear them out? The long term effects of looking at a computer monitor that is running at a different refresh rate than the flourescents causes eyestrain and headaches. Definitely not ideal. The only place flourescents are all right are some industrial / woodshop-ish applications, where you're not reading stuff off a monitor, or looking at fine detail all day. And flourescents still burn out a lot more often than LEDs do. One of my kitchen flourescent lights just blew a ballast, so I'll have to go get that replaced as well....
      Besides, it's all relative. If cost efficiency was the defining goal behind everything, we'd all be eating no-name brand macaroni and Ramen for food, riding bikes to the office, and wearing sweats and t-shirts...

    4. Re:too bad it's inefficient by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1
      The long term effects of looking at a computer monitor that is running at a different refresh rate than the flourescents causes eyestrain and headaches.

      Buying a better grade of fluoro will get you a better phosphor coating with better energy retention, and hopefully less output dip in the gap between pulses. I really can't notice the flickering using ( relatively expensive ) compact fluorescent bulbs. I dunno, YMMV.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    5. Re:too bad it's inefficient by mattkime · · Score: 1

      along with your energy savings (by switching to fluroescents) comes ugly green light and occasionally that annoying flicker. i attribute these features to adding to that "sick from being inside" feeling that you get in certain places.

      i'm a photographer so i'm a bit of a light quality snob and prefer halogens. (mmm....white light!) but daylight LEDs sound great.

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    6. Re:too bad it's inefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CF lamps are NOTHING like a regulare flouresent except for the fact that they create UV light and cause a coating to glow.

      I suggest you go out and actually look at modern CF lighting and learn about them. I have almost 100% natural aunlight type light in my home with all CF lighting by buying the correct light color lamps.

      and you talk about ballasts... CF lams do not have a ballast, and I have a CF bulb that lasted longer than a WHITE led of the same vintage.

      Please learn about CF lighting, it's really neat.

    7. Re:too bad it's inefficient by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The long term effects of looking at a computer monitor that is running at a different refresh rate than the flourescents causes eyestrain and headaches. Definitely not ideal.

      Nonsense. Modern flourescent lamps (especially the replacement ones designed for home use) don't flicker at 60/120 Hz anymore; they use electronic ballasts that run at much higher frequencies.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    8. Re:too bad it's inefficient by Reneumann · · Score: 1
      If cost efficiency was the defining goal behind everything, we'd all be eating no-name brand macaroni and Ramen for food, riding bikes to the office, and wearing sweats and t-shirts...

      *blush* so what are you implying?

    9. Re:too bad it's inefficient by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      OK. Tell that to my eyes, then..

      The "modern" light fixtures in our office were driving half our IT staff insane with headaches until we permanently "disabled" them. It's a new building, built in 2001...

    10. Re:too bad it's inefficient by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Besides, it's all relative. If cost efficiency was the defining goal behind everything, we'd all be eating no-name brand macaroni and Ramen for food, riding bikes to the office, and wearing sweats and t-shirts...

      I was just thinking "Now what kind of dumbass would do all that just to save a buck?" as I ate the last bit of my store brand macaroni while sitting here in sweatpants.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    11. Re:too bad it's inefficient by LuxFX · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only place flourescents are all right are some industrial / woodshop-ish applications, where you're not reading stuff off a monitor, or looking at fine detail all day

      (incidental fact)
      In many woodshops, you are definately looking at fine detail, frequently measuring to 1/64 of an inch or so. The reason why woodshops like flourescent lights is because with wide area lights like that, the shadows are reduced. It's much easier to work in three dimensions without strong shadows that might confuse perception.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    12. Re:too bad it's inefficient by paenguin · · Score: 1

      Modern electronic ballasts run above 50khz. I have some here that run at 90khz. There is no flicker problems from these electronic ballasts.

      What you refer to are magnetic ballasts, and they are not all that common these days.

      Have you ever noticed the effect of the strobing of your hand when waved in front of a television? You can see multiple outlines of your hand as you wave it back and forth.

      You can do the same thing with a flourescent light to see if it is a magnetic ballast or an electronic ballast running at a much higher frequency. I think you'll be surprised at how many flourescent lights are running newer electronic ballasts.

      Also, newer electronic ballasts start the bulb so fast that you can use them for a strobe effect. If you can cycle the power of your flourescents quickly and they turn on and off no matter how fast you toggle the power, you can be virtually assured that they are running on a modern electronic ballast at a much higher frequency than 60hz.

      --
      We should start referring to processes which run in the background by their correct technical name... paenguins.
    13. Re:too bad it's inefficient by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Mmm. True. What I meant though was more along the lines of constantly looking at fine detail, such as repairing a watch, etc..

    14. Re:too bad it's inefficient by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well people are replacing their old lamps with fluorescent replacement bulbs(longer age, 'more energy saving' and so on, but it's the longer age that mostly pushes people into doing it). they really do not bother most people and if they seem to be causing headaches, like light placement & etc rather than what type of light it is.

      I live in Finland and for most of the winter it's quite dark, so lighting tends to be on most of the time. and I've yet to meet a person who says that he/she gets headaches from those, though I haven't met a real life person who would tell me that he/she gets headache from the old fluorescents either(and pff, if he/she did, life would be such hell that he/she would definetely tell about it - fluorescents being the main lighting used in buro's, schools & etc).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    15. Re:too bad it's inefficient by hankwang · · Score: 1
      >along with your energy savings (by switching to fluroescents) comes ugly green light and occasionally that annoying flicker.

      There are roughly two types of phosphors in fluorescent lamps: halophosphate and triphosphor.

      Halophosphate emits mainly in a band around yellow, plus a narrow violet line. The result looks white to the eye, but surfaces that mainly reflect green and blue/green wavelengths or deep red wavelengths look strange, since these wavelengths are not present in the light. This is probably what you refer to as "ugly green light". These are mainly used in cheap tube-type fluorescents. In this building, they are used to illuminate the corridors, but not the offices.

      The triphosphor emits mainly five lines: red, yellow, green, blue/green, and violet, evenly distributed over the spectrum of visible light. This type tends to give good color reproduction. All compact fluorescents that I've seen so far use these triphoshpor mixtures, presumably because a compact fluorescent does not need a large amount of phosphor compared to a 120-cm tube. (I played around with looking at diffraction patterns from various light sources through a CD) As other people pointed out, CF lamps are electronically ballasted and do not flicker at frequencies visible to the human eye.

    16. Re:too bad it's inefficient by PonyHome · · Score: 1

      All fluorescents have ballasts. They have to, because a gas discharge tube is a dead short across the mains, so something MUST limit the current. The ballast in a CF is inside that bulky base that keeps them from fitting into many fixtures that are designed for Edison bulbs. It's also what makes them so much more expensive than full-size fluorescent tubes. It's also what usually dies when they are put into closed fixtures that trap heat. I've run calculations on the difference between fluorescents and LEDs, and the LEDs do come out worse in lumens per watt, but it's a lot easier to run them from low voltage, and limiting non-reactive current is much easier. Full-size FL lights are just as good at color rendering (or better) than CF lights, which is why many photographers use them for studio lighting (I'm an artist, and I use 160 Watts of fluorescent for work lighting). I've never seen a comparison (or even a claim) of color rendering for LEDs.

    17. Re:too bad it's inefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you $500.00 you dont have a ballast in your laptop that is lit by a flouresent lamp.

      and the same goes for a CF lamp.

      learn before you speak, you sound like an idiot if you dont.

      They are electronic voltage doublers with other controls.

      I have an icecap power system for my reef tank, no ballast in there.. only electronic circuitry creating the voltages the bulbs want.

    18. Re:too bad it's inefficient by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Actually there are two kinds of compact fluorescent light bulb; the "daylight" type, which gives off a bright blue light, and the "white" type, which gives off a warm, yellowish glow that looks like a 60W normal bulb. I put the white ones in most places in my apartment, and I put blue ones in my water-heater closet and a storage closet, because they're a bit brighter.

      You should go to Home Depot more often. Technology changes with time, you know?

      (Green? Do they even SELL those anymore???)

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  22. FPS by 3lb4rt0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The photos make it look like an FPS game. Do you need a geforce 4 to live there??

  23. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here's a cookie.

  24. Slashdot's new mantra by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    News for the artistic, stuff that doesn't matter to geeks.

    Personally, I'd much rather be hearing more info about Mars and the like. *sigh* Oh well.

  25. One LED I'm sure is up... by b0r0din · · Score: 1

    ...is the traffic light on their router. Slashdot strikes again!

  26. Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by jelle · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else notive the horrible spot for that LCD tv in the kitchen? Or am I the only one who gets the dirt on the wall that high when I cook?

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    1. Re:Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's right between the stove and the ventilation hood. Looks like it would be nicely steamed LCD in no time.

    2. Re:Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by jhobbs · · Score: 1
      Actually not only is the LCD placement not a problem but this apartment looks like many here in South Beach. I don't think they are targeting this design at suburban home owners, as much as trendy urbanites. Out of all my friends here and in New York, no one I know uses thier stove. Its cheaper and easier to eat out, plus its great for social networking. If you notice, this apartment is small enough that every room can be seen from any other room. I would guess the occupant of this apt would spend thier days working, their evenings socializing with other young trendy urbanites under 40 and occasionally have a cocktail party in which the minimal furniture, clean lines, and mood lighting would be perfect.

      In short this demo apt is not for engineering types like most slashdotters, its for your arch nemesis, the marketing guy.

    3. Re:Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by jelle · · Score: 1

      The kitchen of the apartment, while original with its lighting, is just not practical. Not only for people who use their kitchen. If the demo apartment were targeted at people who always eat out, then, especially given its size, why does it have a kitchen at all? In any way, if there is a kitchen that is never used, then why put an LCD monitor in it? If you don't use your kitchen, then why waste money on it? It just doesn't make sense. Got money to burn on it anyway? Then why not convert it into something you will use, such as a bar, or put a supersize hot tub in its place (or both), or something, but don't just let it look cute using up valuable space if you're living small.

      When I lived small and ate out all the time, the 'kitchen' area was smaller than a walk-in closet, just big enough to hold the fridge and sink. Why? Because why waste space with it if you never go there.

      "Its cheaper and easier to eat out, plus its great for social networking."

      While it is impossible to argue against the social networking part, it is not cheaper to eat out unless you regularly just eat a slice of pizza, or something happy at the yellow M or similar low quality 'food' places. Before I figured out that supermarket thing and learned how to buy & combine ingredients for a meal, followed by some pan and plate juggling, I thought that cooking yourself was expensive and hard to do too. But it's like skiing or snowboarding, after you get the hang of it, you'll enjoy it more doing it yourself than going out and watch somebody else do it.

      Cooking yourself however takes some planning because otherwise you end up throwing most of your food in the trashcan. Note that there is no reason that cooking a decent meal for yourself (and a guest...) has to take more than 30 minutes, and you let the dishwasher play waitress with no need for tipping.

      Another thing against eating out too often that most people learn as they are surging into their late twenties, is that eating out is fattening unless you are very careful about where you go and what you order, and never finish your plate. And no, a salad is not a meal, or it's not a healthy salad anymore because of the oh so tasteful but unhealthy addons.

      "In short this demo apt is not for engineering types like most slashdotters, its for your arch nemesis, the marketing guy."

      Having met quite a lot of employed marketing people, none of them have the lifestyle you talk about. Actually, most of them have kids and live in a suburb. More so, the group of people that don't use their kitchen mostly consists of students/recent-grads/early20-ers, artists, and the unemployed rich partiers, or wannabies of any of those groups...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    4. Re:Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by jhobbs · · Score: 1
      The kitchen of the apartment, while original with its lighting, is just not practical. Not only for people who use their kitchen. If the demo apartment were targeted at people who always eat out, then, especially given its size, why does it have a kitchen at all? In any way, if there is a kitchen that is never used, then why put an LCD monitor in it? If you don't use your kitchen, then why waste money on it? It just doesn't make sense. Got money to burn on it anyway? Then why not convert it into something you will use, such as a bar, or put a supersize hot tub in its place (or both), or something, but don't just let it look cute using up valuable space if you're living small. When I lived small and ate out all the time, the 'kitchen' area was smaller than a walk-in closet, just big enough to hold the fridge and sink. Why? Because why waste space with it if you never go there.

      I haven't seen a condo or apartment yet that did not come with a kitchen.

      When calculating the expense of eating out it is important to figure in the when spending an hour or more in the kitchen cooking, you are not making money. Not to mention I'm certain that shushi, food in the raw, low carb, or whatever resturant I'm in the mood for today will do a much better job of creating a well balanced, healthy, and well presented meal than I can.

      "In short this demo apt is not for engineering types like most slashdotters, its for your arch nemesis, the marketing guy." Having met quite a lot of employed marketing people, none of them have the lifestyle you talk about. Actually, most of them have kids and live in a suburb. More so, the group of people that don't use their kitchen mostly consists of students/recent-grads/early20-ers, artists, and the unemployed rich partiers, or wannabies of any of those groups...

      You've got me there, I have no friends or even aquantances with kids. Scratch that, I know one couple with a little boy, but noone invites them anymore because the brat is always tearing something up.

    5. Re:Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by jelle · · Score: 1

      "I haven't seen a condo or apartment yet that did not come with a kitchen."

      Neither have I seen one entirely lit with LEDs. AFAIK, a kitchen is not like car insurance (as in you may get arrested if you get rid of it). My point is that if you go that far to create a home that fits your lifestyle, then why not treat the kitchen too? Either make the kitchen both practical and stylish, or minimize or remove it. Too many people don't really dare touch the kitchen much. For whatever reason, the kitchen is often treated as a protected species, 'dont disturb it too much'. It's not just this apartment where I see that happening, I've seen condo's used mainly for temporary visits (=eating out) with ugly 15+ year old barely used kitchens&applicances. But in those cases often the rest of the condo did not have much or any style in it either, so at least it is consistent.

      "when spending an hour or more in the kitchen cooking, you are not making money."

      If you spend that much time on cooking a single meal, you'd better have a special occasion or other visitors that are very important to you, unless you're still learning to cook that is.

      Anyways, most people in restaurants waiting, chatting, or even 'networking', are not making money right when they are doing that either (I put networking in quotes, because that term is too often abused for naming pure recreational activities with no express or implied business or work ingredients whatsoever). I never let cooking get in the way of earning or earning potential, and I still find time to eat my own cooked food most of the days in the week. Actually, when I cook myself I probably are making money compared to eating out or take-out, because I get so much more energy from my own food than from restaurant food.

      "... or whatever resturant I'm in the mood for today will do a much better job of creating a well balanced, healthy, and well presented meal than I can."

      There is no need for such a low self-esteem. You will be surprised what you can do with a little bit of practice. Note that restaurants optimize for you and your friends to come back for more, not for you to be healthy. And be careful with that low-carb stuff. Carbohydrates are the essential energy for your muscles if you lead an active life. IMHO, low-carb is just another diet that tries to starve the dieter without giving the subject the feeling of hunger.

      ... "because the brat is always tearing something up."

      I don't know them that bad, but some pretty tiring ones: right now I feel that the best kid is somebody else's (meaning they won't stay long, and/or you can leave).

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    6. Re:Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      When calculating the expense of eating out it is important to figure in the when spending an hour or more in the kitchen cooking, you are not making money.

      Eating out takes a long time too. You have to get to the place and back, as well as wait for the food to be prepared and eat it. If you're eating fast food, the preparation time would be low, but you still have to get to and from the place.

      If you eat in, depending on what you cook, it can take very little time. Pasta takes about 5-10 minutes of time, since you can leave the stove unattended for most of the time. Potatoes, rice, string beans, beans, lentils, and many other foods take a similar amount of time. Fruits take 0 time, since they're usually eaten raw.

      Meat would probably take longer (not sure since I never cook and rarely eat meat), but it's not very healthy and it's quite messy to clean up.

      Not to mention I'm certain that shushi, food in the raw, low carb, or whatever resturant I'm in the mood for today will do a much better job of creating a well balanced, healthy, and well presented meal than I can.

      Most restaurant food is not very healthy, particularly fast food.

      As a final note, both your income and restaurant food is taxed (at least in NY). Assuming your marginal tax rate is 30% and the sales tax is 8.75% (NY has a very high sales tax, and restaurants are taxed), a $5 fast food meal would cost you $7.77 in pre-tax income. A dollar saved is worth more than a dollar earned after taking taxes into account.

    7. Re:Horrible spot for the LCD TV. by jhobbs · · Score: 1
      One thing that you diddnt cover is the car/driving. Assuming I want to go to say CostCo, for example. I must call the front desk of my building and tell them I am going to need my car. Usually they have located and delivered it within 20 minutes. Add to that the 45 to 60 minutes to make it to the nearest group of big boxes (CostCo, Winn-Dixie, Publix, Target, etc) add to that an average of 90 to 120 minutes to shop and then (the longest part) wait in line to check out. Another 45 to 60 minutes to get back to South Beach and another 20 minutes waiting for a valet, unloading the car, waiting for one of the valets to bring my groceries up. Your talking about 3.5 to 4.5 hours. Due to the length of the trip I typically devote an entire weekday to one of these and throw in clothes and sundries shopping as well.

      When I'm just hungry I can walk a block and a half to my favorite nieghborhood resturant and have a quick meal in about 30 minutes. I know the chef who is cooking my food, I know the maitre d' well enough she invites me to her christmas party. Like any other resturant in my nieghborhood, it is good food, they will prepare it to meet any dietary needs I have, and I trust the people cooking it. Given that the valet charges $15 every time I pick up my car, plus the $2 tip, plus the cost of gas. The $20 - $30 for a good meal is competitive to driving to a grocery store.

      Most importantly if I were to cook at home that would require going to a local grocery store. There is only one company on the island I live on that sells discount grocieries. (The rest are either organic grocers for the granola bunch or epicureans for the people several tax brackets above mine.) They have three stores, and their food is much more expensive than eating out. Add to that the hassle of the place. . . I personally don't like the stupid Jetson's style people mover that gets you and your cart from floor to floor.

      To top it all off when you figure up my other living expenses like rent, parking, utilities, and such, the $20-$30 a meal dissapears between the cracks, its inconsequential. However! An LCD on the splashboard serves a profound purpose. When you have a cocktail party you can put something like Emeril LIVE on and people that are congregating in that room have and easy subject, whether it be his food, the rumor he's putting a resturant in at 15th and Collins, or those obnoxious toothpaste commercials, it keeps the conversation flowing. And quite frankly I think that looks much better than the iCEBOX that I currently have fulfilling that role.

  27. Oh Yeah! by illuminata · · Score: 0, Redundant

    we can give 'em another led too light there place up... teh activity light on there routr

    kekekekeke

    There, I did the shitty "we Slashdotted their site" joke already, so don't post another! Again!

    God, I hate those posts.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Oh Yeah! by illuminata · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Aww... god dammit. Somebody posted that very same joke just two posts up from mine, only seriously. This really pisses me off...

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  28. Does it really save? by juglugs · · Score: 0

    How many LED's does it take to produce the same output as a 100W lamp?

    Is it really a saving?

    tis very cool tho...

    How many /.'ers does it take to change an LED?

    --
    This sig is in Spanish when you're not looking....
  29. Pretty Dark by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

    It all seems pretty dark to me on the pictures - are LEDs powerful enough to provide more than a romantic-candle-light-dinner light?

    1. Re:Pretty Dark by arevos · · Score: 1

      I thought so too. LEDs, or arrays of them, certainly can be powerful enough to match regular lightbulbs. Not sure about the power behind the LEDs in the pictures; as you say, the illumination in the apartment seems to be stuck on mood lighting.

  30. I just don't see what's so special about this by kaltkalt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When this was posted on Fark yesterday, several people sent me the link... and I couldn't figure out why. I kept reading the page, thinking I was skipping over something that stated something newsworthy or truly interesting about the "Vospad" ... like how this is the inside of George W's Texas ranch or how some new, amazing type of LED is at work here... but nothing was to be found. A house lit by LEDs... looks cheap and tacky to me. So, I asked the people who sent me the link why they sent it to me.... same answer "cuz it's cool." No, sorry, it's really not.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    1. Re:I just don't see what's so special about this by Saeger · · Score: 1
      The only thing that would make this special is if the apartment was located off the electrical grid in the middle of nowhere, because it's in those situations that energy-efficient LED lighting really shines (pun intended).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:I just don't see what's so special about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry you don't see anything. I can't either, because it's Slashdotted. What you missed is this: LED lighting is coming. I'm always excited by the rapid advance of technology. I'm a nerd. Tacky, cheap? I'm a nerd. Why should I care? It's cool because at the rate LED prices are dropping and quality is increasing, in 20 years, incandescent lights will be only for exotic requirements.

      Ok, my wife cares, I'm not that big of a nerd. :-)

  31. Costs vs Bennies by Fringe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The site is /.'ed so I can't be sure it's the same but there was an article throughout the newsrags (NYTimes, LA Times, etc) this past week on a guy who lit his entire apartment soley by LEDs. The hardware cost him $50K. Too much really. To spend that kind of dough, there's gotta be some additional win. But you'll get a lot farther with a woman, for example, by spending that same amount on a nice car you pick her up in and a few nice dinners than on unfamiliar lighting she finds intimidating.

    Off topic, but I gave a bunch of these really cool LED flashlights for Christmas: http://www.techass.com The Elite is really nice and very bright.

    1. Re:Costs vs Bennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He blew 50 grand on that!?!

      That lucky bastard probably sold his stock before the dotcom bust... or he's a snobby trustfund baby.

    2. Re:Costs vs Bennies by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cost seems too much. Sure that there isnt a 500% designer increase on the price tag?

      For usage like room illumination, only the lumiled luxon star leds would be well suited. They are not cheap, but not too expensive compared with halogens either (especially because they can be switched infinitly and not overdriven they should last for many years). You can get 100W equivalent in luxon stars for arond 100-200$. 10 of these should be enough for a normal sized appartment (60-70 m^2). You have to consider that the smaller granularity of the light sources (one luxon star has around 3-10W equivalent) you can have much more effective illumination, reducing waste in "brightspots" near the light sources.
      So even with installation (comparable effort to 12V halogen) it shoudnt cost more than 5-10 K$ to fullfill even the most fancy demands in led room illumination. 50K seems WAY too much.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Costs vs Bennies by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      You make good points. Because, as we all know, life is all about impressing women.

    4. Re:Costs vs Bennies by thesolo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because, as we all know, life is all about impressing women.

      What, didn't you get that memo?

    5. Re:Costs vs Bennies by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      Because, as we all know, life is all about impressing women.

      Saying something like that makes me think that you didn't know that until it was too late.

      --
      P226 .40cal
    6. Re:Costs vs Bennies by babyrat · · Score: 1

      If you have $50K to spend on lights, you don't need to worry about cars...

  32. Server by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    It appears that the image is of their server room monitoring connect requests.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  33. That hurts my eyes! by puckmaster87 · · Score: 0

    I think LED's are great, but when you have tons of them bunched together, it hurts my eyes. And these pictures definitely hurt my eyes. Anyone else feel this way?

  34. LED lighting is the future....Not now by patdabiker · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a good concept, but LED's don't output enough light to live comfortably. Maybe it'd be cool to flip a switch and have your apartment be purple...but that as the only option? Doesn't work for me. The main benefit I see is that LEDs use a ton less power than conventional lighting. Unfortunately, they don't offer the brightness or color of good ole' conventional light bulbs.

    1. Re:LED lighting is the future....Not now by MrUnknown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Even in the pictures the rooms look too dark to live in. pricing is also a problem... you can go here and buy a 30watt equal for... $180.50! Has 36 LEDs.

      I think LEDs will more than likely gain share in accent lighting to provide the "cool" effects like those in the pictures because there great for that and direct lighting (under cabnets?)

  35. Their server room is certainly lit by LEDs now... by John_Booty · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the lights on their router are surely blinking like mad! Hopefully it won't catch fire, which is certainly a more dangerous (albeit more aesthetically pleasing) method of lighting. :-)

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  36. Re:first post by ari_j · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is that your first gratuitous karma suicide, as well? :)

  37. As there is no way by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny
    that I'll be able to get to the videos - is this static lighting, or is controlled by computer or something?

    I think that having that many lights strobing would have a great effect, when I invite the door to door Mormons in and convince them I gave them LSD.

    Otherwise - I'd like to see a little more white light; I'm not Prince, so I don't need that much purple.

    1. Re:As there is no way by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

      LSD for LDS's? Interesting.

  38. Kenny Roger's Chicken by qedigital · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of the Seinfeld where Jerry has trouble sleeping because of the red glow of the neon sign from the Kenny Roger's Chicken across the street.

    Your colour vision would go all out of whack as you move from room to room with the different colour schemes never mind what will happen when you go outside for some sunlight (that rat fur hat might even look good).

    --

    Rapidly approaching the Zener knee...

    1. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by smart.id · · Score: 1, Informative

      First of all, you Nazi pig, it was going into Kramer's apartment, not Jerry's. Second, he didn't even want the sign taken down, because his friend was working there. Flame on, asshole!

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    2. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Your colour vision would go all out of whack as you move from room to room"

      I have this problem at home with the bathroom and hallway, both of which are lit with GE's "Pure White Light" bulbs. They're not actually white, more of a freakishly bright blue-ish, purple-ish color that hurts my eyes but I'm not the one that makes the household decor decisions. When I go to any other room, the normal incandecsent lighting makes the rooms look all yellow.

    3. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you kike

    4. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i used to log SERIOUS hours with the old green-screen (who's with me?). in the middle of the night after a long session, i'd look out the window and it everything would be red!

    5. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I haven't had that exact problem, but back when I was on a ski trip to Norway (very recommendable) my yellow snow goggles made everything look very, very blue when you took them off.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    6. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      "made everything look very, very blue when you took them off."

      That should have been "when I took them off", since I'm quite sure that the person removing my snow goggles was me, and not an anonymous coward.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    7. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

  39. not even 20 people and IIS already dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it that VOS PAD bought a 10-user license or is it the case that IIS sucks. Or both.

  40. ahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a slashdotting joke!

    too funny!

    1. Re:ahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm lollin' it

  41. During the day? by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why are all the pictures taken during the day? What does it look like at night?

    1. Re:During the day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it looks cool, but dont except to be able to read a book in this kind of light... unless you right on top of a led.

    2. Re:During the day? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      What does it look like at night?

      Dark. Very dark.

  42. Re:NOT the first... by ralf1 · · Score: 1

    You sir are an asshole. We all have better things to do then look at your cheesey scatalogical foolishness.

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  43. Read it all ready by czion3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    NYTimes had an article about this company on thursday here is the
    Google link.

  44. Re:NOT the first... by Izago909 · · Score: 1

    Unless you enjoy goatse and beyond, don't bother clicking on the above link. If I were using IE I would be annoyed, but Firebird puts an end to it rather fast.

  45. Why does the future... by iiioxx · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...look like a 70's porno movie?

  46. Server /.'d ... Followup Story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apartment Lit Solely by Burning Webserver

  47. Sweet by pherris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Low electric use, the ability to change colors on command and lights that last for many years. Get the cost down to say $50 per light fixture and type A / Edison socket incandescent bulbs will go they way of the gas light fixture. Please make it happen soon. I already have plans for these lights. Imagine walking into a room and have a lights slightly change color to notify you of a pressing issue (like bad weather on the way or new porn posted to your favorite USENET group).

    So the question is when will prices really come down? Isn't the big problem making blue LEDs [cheaply]? When will the masses wake up and upgrade?

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:Sweet by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      the ability to change colors on command

      Just like the latest cars. Now if only the couch had breathing seats like the BMWs--or is that too creepy?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Sweet by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      haha. $50 for a multi colored universal 120v socket LED light.

      dont hold your breath.

    3. Re:Sweet by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      So the question is when will prices really come down? Isn't the big problem making blue LEDs [cheaply]? When will the masses wake up and upgrade?

      If the lifespan is 30 years, and the cost is 10 cents per traditional watt lumens.

      Dispite my love for the traditional bulb, I have a few florecents that where $20 and I've not replaced them for 5 years.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  48. Tagline by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Lit by LEDs, inhabited by virgins."

    1. Re:Tagline by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, anyone with sleazy furniture like that surely would have no problem bringing home a working girl...

      That said, although the decoration is terrible, the lighting is actually pretty cool, assuming you could turn the brightness up and maybe have it switch to white light or something.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's PURPLE! Purple is a CHICK colour! 'Nuff said.

    3. Re:Tagline by scrote-ma-hote · · Score: 1

      Is that the new Slashdot tagline?

    4. Re:Tagline by Rib+Feast · · Score: 1

      By working girl I assume you mean prostitute?

      I still can't see the tagline changing.

    5. Re:Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purple is a CHICK colour!

      Tell that to Mace Windu.

  49. Ambient Lighting. by WhodoVoodoo · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anybody else, but that looks pretty nice to me. I mean, if it were any color but purple...

    Anyhow, with this you could create even lighting throughout a room without using track lights, or lamps studding every surface. Though many use lamps for decoration purposes, I dont really have enough space for my equipment as it is. Computers, Fish tanks, Cameras and supplies, Guitar/amp, books, stereo+record/cds... Its all in a fairly small area, cramping my style, as it were.

    In addition, you could probably get a light that is colored to better suit your decor than might be availiable with lightbulbs, not to mention to possible power saving bonus and decrease in heat output over Standard Lightbulbs. I won't even discuss the evils of flourescent lights.

    All in all it seems like an interesting use of LED lighting which might actually be viable. [trekkie]and I can pretend I'm on the Starship Enterprise![/trekkie]

  50. Somebody reverse the polarisation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and it all goes dark.

    Hey! Plug that thing the other way! Yes, the other way! That are frigging DIODES!

  51. Solely by LEDs? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 0, Redundant

    At the moment they happen to be the LEDs on there router!

  52. Thanks to Sony... by mulescent · · Score: 1

    ...and that nice looking plasma screen TV, that aparment would be cool to live in. At least, it would be for the first few days, and then the wierd lighting colors and geometries would send you into a seizure...

  53. Disappointing by Powercntrl · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was expecting something showcasing technology like the 5 watt Luxeon Star LEDs, instead, it just looks like Lucky the Leprechaun shat all over the place.

    Despite the bad example (and color scheme, ugh.) this site shows, LEDs really are coming into their own for uses in lighting and will be a very interesting technology to watch in the coming years. The LED Museum has a great listing and reviews of LED based lighting products, from flashlights to Xmas lights.

    I do believe LEDs can be effectively used for lighting. I was given a 1 watt Luxeon Star-based flashlight this Christmas and after using it in instead of an incandescent flashlight, I have to say I am very impressed. The Luxeon puts out a pure white light (very similar to HID headlights) which makes objects being illuminated appear more clearly and it projects an even beam with no dark shadowy spots. If for nothing else, this article should be a reason to check out what's available in LED lighting - you might be pleasantly surprised.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Disappointing by SubtleNuance · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison

      Well, if you allow the RIAA/MPAA to think of yourself, and your rights of only that of a "CONSUMER" than I guess your bound to lose.
      If, on the otherhand, you asserted yourself as a CITIZEN, who creates copyright law in the bounds of improving your community then you may have better luck.

      Never allow yourself to be called a consumer. Consumers only have the rights they can purchase. Citizens otoh, are very powerfull.... far more powerfull than the RIAA/MPAA could ever be.

  54. Wow, you got me ! by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 1

    Wow, I never thought I'd be taken in by a goatse troll, but you got me.

    This is truly one of the finest trolls I've ever seen.

    *tear*

    1. Re:Wow, you got me ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree! It's about midnight here in the UK, and I'm going to watch a bit more tv before nodding off, because if I fall asleep now...well...god help me if I dream about what I just saw :$

      Best Troll I've seen in a long while!

  55. i get nautious just looking at it by gobblez · · Score: 0

    *naarrrf*

  56. solely lit by LEDs, really? by azzy · · Score: 2, Funny

    > The Vos Pad is the world's first apartment solely lit by LEDs

    No natural lighting at all? Sounds grim. Wanting to get away from Windows is one thing, but this is a bit extreme.

    1. Re:solely lit by LEDs, really? by sofakingl · · Score: 1

      Once again, Sun suffers because of windows.

    2. Re:solely lit by LEDs, really? by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 1

      Look closer at the pictures. There are tons of windows in the apartment, but they have all the blinds puuled closed.

      IMHO, the pics would have been much better, and would have shown the effects of the LCD's more, if the pics were taken at night time.

      --
      No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
  57. slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wonder if my box will survive, but anyway, here's what I captured.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dzie-ku-je-my! ;)

      Fruitbat

    2. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Al-Hala · · Score: 1

      Nice. Thanks for the link.

      Yep. Me thinks this would get old, really fast.

    3. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by va3atc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder if my box will survive, but anyway, here's what I captured.

      I dare you to host those four video files ;)

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    4. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by tornado2258 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link from what everyone was saying I was expecting it to be vile but that is actually quite nice.

    5. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Siergen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bleh. The designer *really* likes up-lighting. I agree it's a nice contrast from standard down-lighting, but a little goes a long way, and almost every room has lots of it...

    6. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, but too sterile :-)

    7. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Nexx · · Score: 1

      I think one of the problems the designers faced is that an LED light, though very intense, is also very directional. You're right, it seemed odd at first, but if you had your traditional down-lighting, you'll be left with a bunch of spotlighted spots and a whole lot of darkness.

      Another method they could've used was a softly glowing ceiling, but perhaps their hardware budget wasn't that high?

    8. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the mirror & greetings from Austria!

    9. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      wow, nice to know that my boxen can survive slashdotting ;-))

      take a look a my traffic graph. It's from last 48 hours. you didn't even manage to get above 250kb/sec :-P

      I cannot get my hands on those four animations now... but I bet I would dare to host them ;)

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
  58. if your not a subscriber... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read metafilter.com, see /. news the day before!

  59. Cool! by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    Critics be damned, I like it. I used to light my apartment with thousands of white christmas lights on the ceiling. Made for some relaxing "soft" lighting, but this really takes the cake.

    Plays hell on CRT monitor screens though :-(

    I used to have to tip my monitors downward to keep the little reflections off.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... except the color scheme they chose is REALLY puke-a-holic

  60. Too Late... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Some blinking LEDs are all that are left of their web server.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  61. Mmmmm seizures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the natural high

  62. /.ed by MrEd · · Score: 1
    " Hey, it worked !
    The SSL/TLS-aware Apache webserver was
    successfully installed on this website."


    The apartment is now also lit by the flames pouring out of the server case...

    --

    Wah!

  63. mirror by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

    mirror

    mirror here

    it'll be up until it's abused my cable connection long enough.

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:mirror by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      crashed

      mod me down boys

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  64. Modem LEDs by Aliencow · · Score: 0, Troll

    Their modem's LEDs are probably lighting up the whole server room now!

  65. Very cool demo but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think living in that apartment would give me eye strain. There really isn't enough light in the right places and one of the effects of low light is that you can't see colors. Check the lack of color on the flowers and the couch. There isn't enough light to read. If you put people in this apartment I suspect they would look grey and zombie-like. "It ain't pretty, it just looks that way."

  66. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the YOU FAIL IT are belong to you.

  67. Now you've killed Google! by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Google is slow now.....

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  68. In the New York Times by DeepRedux · · Score: 3, Informative
    There is a recent article in the NYT about this: Let There Be L.E.D.'s.

    The article noted that the apartment's lighting system cost an estimated $50,000. That probably accounts for the lack of popularity of LEDs for home lighting.

    An alternative to LEDs are Organic LEDs, a much cheaper, plastic-based technology. Unfortunately, they are not yet ready for prime time.

    1. Re:In the New York Times by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      For illumination, OLEDS will probably never see primetime.
      They have other uses, where normal GaIxxx Leds fail, like displays, ect. But these dont require high light densities, and OLEDs are based on organic substances who are quite happy to disintegrate under heat.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  69. Too much purple for my taste... by a1cypher · · Score: 1

    Now heres what I think would be cool. Line all of the walls and ceilings with millions of RGB tricolor LED's Then hook it up to various computer(s) / TV(s). That would kick ass.

    Screw Ambient Lighting, I want a 50ft monitor on all the walls. he he he.

    I can imagine playing some music with the winamp visualization running on all of the walls. That would be "psychadelic" (sp?)

  70. I wonder what the power use is by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    all LED lighting....must bee inexpensive to power those I bet.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  71. Shelves? by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like there's no books in the home of the future.

    That's unfortunate.

    --saint

    1. Re:Shelves? by madpierre · · Score: 1

      no books in the home of the future

      Well in the future the RIAA have obviously won and books are a form
      of illicit file/information sharing and are thus banned. The people
      of the future have also all had their taste genes bypassed why else
      live in a place like this.

      Just a thought, would elves go with Infra Red LEDS?

      --
      siggy played guitar
    2. Re:Shelves? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Looks like there's no books in the home of the future.

      In fact that's the one thing they got right - no-one who liked books would light an apartment like that, or vice versa. Hell, it would be easier to read by candlelight than with those LEDs.

  72. Yuk~! by Whitecloud · · Score: 1

    Are the apartment walls painted in frightening pastels, or are the leds coloured? This demo room shows that you cant beat natural lighting for comfortable and relaxing atmospheres.

    --

    Do you need a website upgrade?

  73. informative ?!? by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Funny

    if you have a link to a halogen lcd backlight, please post...
    (meaning: there arent any)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:informative ?!? by Random832 · · Score: 1

      fluorescent, then. whichever... actually, what _are_ those, anyway?

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    2. Re:informative ?!? by Trejkaz · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:informative ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must...not....insert link...to...goats...picture...

      Whew, it was a close call but I was able to resist. Tempting though, wonder how many would have looked.

    4. Re:informative ?!? by iabervon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was actually distracted by the fact that most of my house is lit with halogen lamps or fixtures at this point, and I don't actually have a recent LCD. But I was going for "funny", not "informative". The moderators are clearly confused today, if you got funny and I got informative.

  74. Ewwww! American Kitsch at its worst by Lorphos · · Score: 1

    As disgusting as it gets.. even with cool tech behind it.

    1. Re:Ewwww! American Kitsch at its worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do notice the site text spelling of "colour" like the British do, right?

  75. Freecache by joshwa · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Freecache by placiBo · · Score: 1

      Freecache is dead too now.

    2. Re:Freecache by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      Nah. its just caching the "sorry our site is dead" page that vospad has put up.

      --
      blog
    3. Re:Freecache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what's the fucking point of freecache?

  76. Stupid color LEDs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they needed were one or two 5 watt white leds per room. 1 watts only cost a few bucks now a days, 5 watts are more but still reasonable.
    And, btw, a completly LED lit apartment *isn't* new.
    Lumileds makes 1W and 5W's.

  77. Big Deal... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    My apartment is lit solely by Electro-Luminescent panels...

    I mean, Palm pilot.

  78. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "A nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there".

    Yes, it looks kewl from a distance, but I'd think it'd be a nightmare to actually live in. All colours will look wrong, and if you pay attention it's all actually fairly dim.

    Old brute force halogen lights are really pretty hard to beat if you want natural lighting. Insanely hot tungsten, almost like the surface of the sun, oooh baby.

  79. The joke's on you! by Hexydes · · Score: 1, Funny

    While the article may say that this is just a simple LED apartment, this is actually the new version of "The House of Tomorrow" at Disneyworld.

  80. Warm Glow of a Slashdotted server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I suppose the room took on a more warm cheery glow as the webserver melted into molten slag from a good slashdotting.

  81. LED lit by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    I looked at this and said cool... My wife looked at it and said YUCK!!!

    Just goes to show, Not for everybody.

    I got one of those little Cateye night riding lights with three high intensity LEDs. It will run 15 hours (they claim) on 3 AAA cells. That's pretty impressive. I expect at some time we will light indoors with LED's and save a lot of cash doing so. The only problem I've seen with LED's off house current is the 60Hz flicker (LED Christmas lights)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:LED lit by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      flickering is normaly no problem because they run on 2-3V DC. and if you are doing more than a ultra cheap solution, you can spend the 0.1$ to include a filtering cab.

      There are already solutions which use the standart halogen sockets (those with the 12V rails) and simple put 4 diodes in series. Simple plug and play installation. And considering that leds cant break while switching (at least not like bulbs), it can even nowadays be money efficient in situations where a light has to be switched a lot.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:LED lit by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A standard fluorescent bulb flickers at 60 Hz.

      With 4 diodes (at a few cents each) you can build a full wave rectifier that will let you connect an LED to AC power without flicker.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    3. Re:LED lit by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      "Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this
      site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take
      the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the
      site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience
      that this may cause." Ha!

      I'm already lighting mainly with screw-in fluorescents, which saves me a bit of cash. Aside from the neat effects, what's the energy use vs. fluorescent? I mean I can light up the place like a Christmas tree for a hundred watts right now. I guess it would save you a bit on wall paint, though. Just change the lights rather than the paint color.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    4. Re:LED lit by shepd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >With 4 diodes (at a few cents each) you can build a full wave rectifier that will let you connect an LED to AC power without flicker.

      It'll still flicker at 120 Hz without a filter capacitor!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:LED lit by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      versus fluorescent they lose. They are around halfway between fluroscent and halogen in efficiency, but have of course size/switchability advantages

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    6. Re:LED lit by enosys · · Score: 1
      A flurescent light flickers at twice the power line frequency, the same frequency as a LED on a full wave rectifier. However a fluorescent light uses phosphor which has some persistance and smooths out this flicker. A LED simply turns off when the current stops flowing so you get a lot more flicker.

      You need a rectifier and a filter capacitor to stop a LED from flickering. A one diode half wave rectifier works too but requires a larger filter capacitor.

    7. Re:LED lit by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wihtout a rectifier it is off 50% of the time.

      With a full wave recrifier, it will be off for tiny amount of time between pulses; almost certainly faster than the LED can turn off, and it will be on fully twice as much. Also, the human eye can't detect a 120Hz flicker, the limit is around 48Hz.

      If it bothers you, spend the 10 cents to add a filter cap :).

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    8. Re:LED lit by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      If the fluorescent tube didn't flicker, then why does it cause a beat freqency with a monitor when the monitor set to 60Hz (in North America)?

      An LED is a diode, so you don't need an additional one to build a half wave rectifier.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    9. Re:LED lit by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >With a full wave recrifier, it will be off for tiny amount of time between pulses; almost certainly faster than the LED can turn off

      Considering LEDs are used in TOSLINK circuits (and heck, gigabit fibre circuit), I really hope that isn't true!

      An LED should shut off nearly instantly. I mean, how can one expect it to stay on but the rectifier diodes to turn off? :-)

      >Also, the human eye can't detect a 120Hz flicker, the limit is around 48Hz

      Directly, yes. Indirectly, the debate is still out there.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:LED lit by VCAGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not quite true. Some fluorescent bulbs do indeed flicker at 60 or 120Hz--these use the old magnetic ballasts. However, most newer fluorescent (and also HID) lamps use electronic ballasts that are very similar to switching power supplies--they "flicker" at 20,000Hz.

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
    11. Re:LED lit by Ioldanach · · Score: 2, Informative
      A standard fluorescent bulb flickers at 60 Hz.

      But an electronic ballasted compact flourescent that screws into a standard lamp base flickers at 25-40kHz. The compact flourescent technology causes no visible flicker, is smaller than the old magnetic ballast (which operated at the frequency of house wiring, 60Hz), and improved efficiency overall, losing less energy to heat in the ballast.

      One reference

      Another reference.

    12. Re:LED lit by Ioldanach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops, the first sentence was copied from a previous poster, but I did the blockquote tag wrong and didn't notice it on preview. Sorry.

      Also, when purchasing a compact flourescent bulb, be sure it is electronically ballasted. It'll last longer, turn on quicker, provide no noticable flicker, and work in colder temperatures.

    13. Re:LED lit by Peale · · Score: 1

      I've got a friend that works in the LED industry. One prototype they worked on was a replacement for incandescents. IIRC, the power was converted from AC to DC.

      It was quite a brilliant thing, really. Using a combination of colors (yellow, red and blue) they made a light that I would have never known was LED until they pointed it out.

      I had an idea to have a houses lighting nearly completely outfitted with similar LED lights, wired to UPS circutry to a central battery source. Power goes off? Lights stay on. Everything else goes off, but at least you can still see. Living in Vermont that happens more than I'd like.

      Idea was shot down though. Aparently LEDs are not anywhere near as energy efficient as Florescent lights. Pity.

    14. Re:LED lit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, and many other people, find 60 hz refresh rates to be HIGHLY flickery, but 85 hertz fully stable and indistinguishable from higher rates. One way flicker manifests itself particularly is in one's peripheral vision. The next time you're at a CRT monitor, set it to 60 hz and look off to the side -- you'll notice a HIGH rate of flicker.

    15. Re:LED lit by shawb · · Score: 2, Informative

      The reason that the light does not flicker is that there is a phosphorescent coating on the inside of the glass, which gives the light a die down time. Sorta like glow in the dark objects, but a much shorter time frame. So in essence, there is a flicker, just less noticeable to the eye (assuming the bulb is in good repair.)

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    16. Re:LED lit by DumbSwede · · Score: 1
      Your reply and the one before it have taken most of my points, but one more to add is that just like high frequency sounds can add to produce a beat tone, so to can high frequency lighting. I usually have no trouble with a monitor at a 60hz refresh rate, but try it with florescent lighting and it becomes almost unwatchable, even higher refresh rates can appear to beat under certain lighting conditions. Incandescent lighting produces less flicker because the filament doesn't have time to cool between cycles (at least not completely).

      I'm sure we'll all be using LED lighting soon as a matter of economics, but there may be situations where various lighting and viewing sources will "beat" you to death.

    17. Re:LED lit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dipshit, an LED is not an incandescent light bulb. An LED turns off extremely quickly, it does not cool down. The only thing that prevents the flicker from being detected is the human eye and brain.

    18. Re:LED lit by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, the human eye can't detect a 120Hz flicker, the limit is around 48Hz.

      I beg to differ. A 60hz flicker is highly irritating to my eyes. If someone's CRT monitor is set to 60hz, my eyes tear up and get red and sore after just a few minutes.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    19. Re:LED lit by enosys · · Score: 1
      I said the phosphor smooths out flicker. I didn't mean that it totally removes it!

      Sure a LED is a diode, but how are you going to provide a filtered DC supply to the LED without yet another diode (besides the capacitor)? I guess maybe you could use a LED and an inductor but the inductor would be more expensive than a diode and capacitor. Besides, some LEDs have very low maximum reverse voltages and can be damaged if this is exceeded.

    20. Re:LED lit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good point about beat! One clear manifestation of this effect is how CRT's look when filmed -- the camera filming it has a certain rate, and this is compounded with the screen refresh rates. (You know what I'm talking about if you've seen a computer screen on TV that wasn't doctored in afterward).

    21. Re:LED lit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, but then why do the LEDs in TFT notebook displays have such horrible lag?

    22. Re:LED lit by shepd · · Score: 4, Informative

      >Good point, but then why do the LEDs in TFT notebook displays have such horrible lag?

      Because they're not LEDs, they're LCDs. ;-)

      LCDs are a totally different technology. They lag because, well, jeez, I explained this once before but it slips my mind (It's early here! Give me credit! Please!). Basically, it has to do with the fact you're asking a material (crystals) to twist and bend when power is applied; then you take the power off them (or reverse it) to try to force them back to their original position. This takes time.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    23. Re:LED lit by holland_g · · Score: 1
      Actually you want the LCDs to flicker, but not at a rate noticeable to your eyes.

      If you turn the LEDs on and off for short periods of time, then you save power.

      The LCD applications that I work with we usually have a microcontroller do Pulse Width Modulation of a gate driving a set of LEDs that are current limited with resistors.

      The current limit resistors set your max brightness level, and the PWM controller allows for software controlled dimming.

      If the LEDs are mulitcolored, then you could also control the ammount of Blue, Green, or Red with software and mix your own colors.

      --
      Holland
    24. Re:LED lit by holland_g · · Score: 1

      Oops. I meant LED wherever LCD was mentioned.

      --
      Holland
    25. Re:LED lit by bkocik · · Score: 1
      A standard fluorescent bulb flickers at 60 Hz.

      But an electronic ballasted compact flourescent that screws into a standard lamp base flickers at 25-40kHz. The compact flourescent technology causes no visible flicker, is smaller than the old magnetic ballast (which operated at the frequency of house wiring, 60Hz), and improved efficiency overall, losing less energy to heat in the ballast.

      I have only one question: Why do you know this?

      =)

    26. Re:LED lit by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      An LED should shut off nearly instantly. I mean, how can one expect it to stay on but the rectifier diodes to turn off? :-)

      My guess is that you know this... but for the non-EE's: A full-wave (i.e. bridge) rectifier does not actually turn on/off anything. Imagine a 60Hz sine wave. The rectifier takes the bottom half (the negative swing) and replaces it with a positive mirror image. For those mathematically inclined, it's like taking the absolute value of the sine. What results is a series of "bumps" that only touch zero at a tiny point.

      That being said, LED light output reacts instantly and would be off at those exact points. Unless they've invented special LED's with a luminosity ramp rate, which is entirely possible.

      --
      bp
    27. Re:LED lit by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      "I have only one question: Why do you know this?"

      HELLO?! this is /. here!
      My Question to you, is why on earth did you think to ask such a thing?

    28. Re:LED lit by Legume · · Score: 1

      The LED would be dark at those points and for the time either side of each point at which the voltage was too low to produce visible output. LEDs on a full-wave rectifier without a smoothing capacitor flicker visibly - not particularly noticable when you fix your eyes on them, but sweep your gaze around the room and you'll see them jump from one place to the next as they strobe across your field of vision.

    29. Re:LED lit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ.

      Nope, fuck you, no differing tonight.

  82. No overhead lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My question is, why isn't there any overhead lighting?

    And who places their bed right smack dead center in their bedroom?

  83. *Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by reignbow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Once again, designers make a laughing stock out of themselves by refusing to use common sense. As a result, their "prototype" has obviously never been lived in for even a few hours. Three glaring points:

    1. LCD TV. Above the stove. So it can catch the oil crackling in the pan, the smell when something gets burned, as has occasionally been known to happen and the condensation when cooking something in boiling water. Yeah, right! No way anyone's going to hang an expensive LCD there.
    2. The bed. In the middle of an open square, so it takes maximum space. This is a bit so-so as they might have thought of a couple. The whole room gives off a rich-bachelor feeling to me, though. Most bachelors I know have the bed pushed up against one wall to conserve space.
    3. The sinks in the bathroom. They're round bowls with no shelf space in sight. Where do you put toothbrush, toothpaste, hair gel, combs, shaver, soap? Well, I'm sure the tooth fairy will be ready to hold them for a while.
    As you can see, I don't think that what is shown in the pictures has anything to do with an apartment, which is made up of connected rooms where and this is important! people need to live, and need to want to live.
    --
    Divide et impera!
    1. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The whole room gives off a rich-bachelor feeling to me, though,

      What gave you that hint, the big rooms, plasma TV, LCD TV or the insane number of odd colored LEDs?

    2. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      The stove top appears impractical for cooking. It appears to me the stove is eather decoration or for cooking stuff inside not on top.

      The bed in the middle of the room. Someone gose remaking his home to light it up with LEDs and hangs the TV over the stove and you think he's practical?
      I sereously doupt he cares about the space as much as how pritty the bed looks in the middle of the room.

      Hair gel? Ok call me bies I have no hair. I shave outside in the back becouse people get fussy about hair in the sink.
      I stop up the drain before brushing my teath becouse else things fall in. You can use inside of the sink to hold stuff once the drain is stopped up.
      Sure it's more practical to have working space on the sink but as I've pointed out the LED consept proves he's not a practical guy.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    3. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I would second all of the points parent made, but also add that I would be totally sick of living in a purple / pink / funky coloured house in about, oooooh a week.

      Looks like a nasty place to live - if I spilled bong water on the couch, THEY'D KILL ME!

      And all those sleek surfaces made of plastic? Looks like a lot of dusting to me...

      But I do like the LED light idea - now if they could get 'em in softwhite with about as many lumens as a 100 wat bulb, that screw into a standard fixture, I'd buy 'em by the dozen.

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    4. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like the ideal place to shoot a porn movie.

      If you ask me the designers got it spot on.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    5. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Nexx · · Score: 1

      But I do like the LED light idea - now if they could get 'em in softwhite with about as many lumens as a 100 wat bulb, that screw into a standard fixture, I'd buy 'em by the dozen.

      Well, they'd also have to be as nondirectional as a standard lightbulb (since most indoor light fixtures assume nondirectionality with their design), and we'll also have to have comparitive TOC's over a given span of time. Other than that, though, I agree. CF's are a bit too huge in some instances, and their murcury vapours aren't exactly friendly to the environment.

    6. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that they make stoves now with the heating elements below a flat, conductive top in order to make cleaning easier, right?

    7. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "LCD TV. Above the stove. So it can catch the oil crackling in the pan, (etc.)"

      Whoever lives in that apartment has a diet that consists of chips and ramen. When they're not ordering delivery. I'm sure he dusts the stove more often than he turns it on.

      "The bed. In the middle of an open square, so it takes maximum space.""

      Don't want it to knock anything over when it starts rotating...

      "The sinks in the bathroom. They're round bowls with no shelf space in sight. Where do you put toothbrush, toothpaste, hair gel, combs, shaver, soap?"

      Huh? What are those?

    8. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by ndogg · · Score: 1

      4. Fucking leopard prints on the couch in the living room! Yes, we'll all be filming porno in our living rooms in the future.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    9. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leopard prints on the couch

      I've actually seen these in a setting where they work. They were meant more as an ironic statement there. But the person who owns that place is an insanely sexy woman, so you're not really caring all that much about whether the seat covering is pink polka dots or leopard print, as long as you get to look at her.

  84. I might get it passed my wife when.... by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

    ... they develop more colors for LED.

    Seriously, LEDs are the future of lighting. Their lifespan is already much better than conventional incandescent. They are also approaching the efficiency of florescent lights. I think we will see wide-scale adoption in the next few years. I bet a popular solution will be LED "bulbs" that screw into regular light bulb sockets. That way the general public won't have to do a complete fork-lift upgrade of all their lamps, etc.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:I might get it passed my wife when.... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      What color do you want?

      LEDs are:

      Red
      Orange
      Yellow
      Green
      Blue
      Purple
      Pink
      White

      Along with invisible infrared and ultraviolet. And three colors can be combined in one package to make an RGB system that can reproduce many colors.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  85. I'm not sure it's American by Cybertect · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check the phone number for their PR contact - it's central London number (England, not anywhere else)

  86. Mistype? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    "There are some images of the place up on their website"

    Shouldn't that be "There were some images of the place up on their website"? :P

  87. I doubt this is the first one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would wager that someone on slashdot would have enough lcds, computer with blikenlights, etc al to have lit their apartment before this.

  88. Slashdotted... by Dieppe · · Score: 1

    From the site:

    Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause.

    That was fast!

    1. Re:Slashdotted... by siphi · · Score: 1

      HAHAHA .... Why cant my site be /.'d???
      Oh yeah spaceports got rid of free hosting and it cant now... no way your goonnaa /. this comp though...

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  89. LOL, my thoughts exactly by Tensor · · Score: 1

    The guy that placed that there never changed the air filter out of a kitchen extractor (? the thing that sucks in air on top of the stove).

    That gets covered with a disgusting, icky oily paste. so i am guessing the lcd tv there is going to be both
    a)airtight and waterproof (vapour)
    b)cleanable with detergent/window cleaner.

  90. Slashdotted! Mirrors collected below! :D by rohan_leader · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause."

    Mirrors that were grabbed from the slashdot thread: Consider using these mirrors.

    mirror 1
    mirror 2
    Karma whoring at its finest :D

  91. Cloud City by danidude · · Score: 3, Funny
    isn't that the interior of the Cloud City? Geez, I wouldn't be surprise if I see Lando in there somewhere :)

    --
    - no sig.
  92. Look past the colors by edo-01 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think it's a very cool idea, but the colors and general decor of this example are pretty terrible. The Vos Pad looks to me to be entirely without human appeal. It works as a technology demo, as an almost abstract rendering of a "futuristic" apartment but it just reeks of designer-wank. I'm sure there's a lot of self congratulatory backslapping going on in coffee shops amongst the design-mavens who lap this stuff up, but the apartment itself looks to be as appealing to live in as a chip manufacturer's clean room. The faux zebra-skin couches, the overwhelming use of purple and the overall sterility of the space are very offputting ofter the initial wow of seeing the images.

    That said however, I've ordered a bunch of of Luxeon LEDs in various colors - mostly the "warm whites" - to play around with. I think if you did this in a decent house or apartment with colors that didn't induce vomiting you could end up with something pretty special.

    1. Re:Look past the colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've ordered a bunch of of Luxeon LEDs in various colors

      Oh, to be as rich as you are. But somebody has to buy them when they're expensive so that later we ordinary mortals can afford them.

    2. Re:Look past the colors by edo-01 · · Score: 1
      Oh, to be as rich as you are. But somebody has to buy them when they're expensive so that later we ordinary mortals can afford them.

      USD$15 for a lightbulb that lasts for years rather than months? I think your definition of rich is somewhat different from mine.

  93. FYI by Uplore · · Score: 0

    This page has been slashdotted to pieces. 12-1-04

    --
    I couldn't think of a sig.
  94. Why the exotic colors? by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Why can't these designers recreate existing rooms with LED lighting? I would like to see new uses for LED lighting that don't look garish.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  95. Why LEDs? by st0rmshadow · · Score: 1

    Why is there so much talk about things being done with LEDs on slashdot? What makes LEDs so special?

  96. I guess the Vos Pad is now lit by,,, by NoData · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the crackling embers of a slashdotted server.

  97. Previous /. discussion by rockwood · · Score: 2, Informative
    We touch on this previously in this article Though previously concerning three other companies

    Kopin Corp
    Color Kinetics
    Luminus Devices

    The biggest issue was the overhead of the LED for the residential aspects, whereas larger corporations may be better equipped financially to handle the current cost.

    To quote this article directly

    "The problem is cost. Like early computer chips, today's LEDs are still too expensive to spark mass adoption. "You could replace a 100-watt light bulb with a 60-watt LED, and get the same brightness," says John Fan, chairman and founder of Kopin Corp., a Taunton company that makes LEDs. "You'd save 40 percent on power, but it would cost about $100. We need to bring that price down.""

    Personally that is far outside of my price range. At that rate I'd be replacing one household bulb each year... hmmm.. I should have my entire house finsihed when I'm about 87 years old. And by that time I'll be blind and won't need lights anyway.

    --
    Never try to beat a professional at his own game!
    1. Re:Previous /. discussion by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Why bother with expensive LEDs? And only a 40 percent savings on power?

      I've changed all the light bulbs in my house to flourescents. The compact fluorescents work great. The ones comparable to a 60 watt incandescent use only 13 watts and the ones comparable to a 100 watt incandescent use only 26 watts.

      Sure, the lifetimes aren't as long as LEDs, but the cost is a LOT less and they're available nearly everywhere now. I got mine from Lowes and WallyWorld and now the power company loves me.

  98. Designed by the decorator from Beetlejuice by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2, Funny
    The place looks like it was designed by Otho, the Interior Decorator from Beetlejuice.

    One thing I noticed was the LCD display over the range. At first I thought it was stupid because why would you want a tv there. Then I though well maybe you could use it as a internet appliance recipe book. But then I realized that having electronics hanging above steaming pots really is a bad idea after all. It should be moved to counter space where you would be doing cutting and mixing. You also need better task lighting in a kitchen unless you want to slice your finger off.

    Having the sconces with their beams of super bright light reflecting off the wall and providing indirect lighting is very cool and is like a fusion of 21st century modern with 19th century retro since it is similar to gas lamps or candleholders. I couldn't help but be reminded of all those dungeons my 24th level Magic-user had traipsed through. However, it appears the sconces are below eye level. It doesn't take an 18 intelligence to know that is a bad idea.

    The LEDs in the floor of the kitchen look like the emergency lighting in the aisles in a passenger jet. It might be useful if your apartment ever crash lands and you need to crawl to the exit through thick smoke. And I won't even go into the colors because so many people have already commented about it that it would just be redundant.

  99. LED Musuem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Check out the LED Museum for info on all sorts of LEDs

    http://ledmuseum.home.att.net/ledleft.htm

  100. ./ed by trolman · · Score: 1

    /. effect in full force tonight:
    "Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause."

  101. and it's corpse turned over to another charnel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    house.

  102. The colour is varaible. by lnjasdpppun · · Score: 1

    I've read a lot of comments complaining about the colour scheme, check out the pictures of the kitchen. In one the light is purple, in another it is a light green colour.

    All lights in that place are colour controllable. I'd guess there is one LED for each colour component. It also says on the site the colours can change and the video's probably show this but I haven't been able to check.

  103. New Mirror by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1

    Lets see how this does...

    --
    Your credit card information wants to be free.
  104. Outside light by zsau · · Score: 1

    Am I looking at the pictures wrong, or is their light coming from outside? That'd surely affect the amount of light the LEDs make, wouldn't it?

    --
    Look out!
  105. -47, Redudantly Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never seen a thread so full of redundant comments. Let's me a few things clear, once and for all:
    1) Yes, the site was ./ed. Ha ha ha. No more lame LED jokes about it.
    2) Yes, the LCD above the stove is stupid. Yes, it would probably be damaged. How many times do we need to point it out?
    3) Yes, the lighting is ugly and no one would want to live in it. Point taken.

    I've seen each of these posted about a dozen times. So, let's all not post them over and over anymore. This thread needs to die.

  106. Efficiency of LEDs by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    An LED is less efficient than an incandescent bulb.
    --
    Insurance for H1-Bs: http://www.H1Bins.com
    Healthcare for the uninsurable: http://www.AFFHC.com
    Medigap insurance information: http://medigap.supremesite.net

    1. Re:Efficiency of LEDs by rco3 · · Score: 1

      >An LED is less efficient than an incandescent bulb.

      Which LED? Which incandescent bulb?

      If you're talking about, say, old SiC blue LED's compared to a 100W incandescent, you're right.

      If you're talking about a modern white LED (phosphor over GaN or InGaN, usually) compared to that same 100W incandescent, you're dead wrong.

      If you're talking about colored incandescents vs. monochromatic GaN /InGaN LED's, you're so far wrong that three lefts won't make you right. In fact, current red/orange LED's are about as efficient as compact fluourescents. That's mighty mighty, as the man said.

      May I suggest Don Klipstein's Lighting Info Site! as a gentle introduction to the current state of affairs in LED lighting?

      I really don't think you know the field well enough to make sweeping statements like that.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  107. Text from site by marshall_j · · Score: 1

    It's been /.'d so here's a copy for everyone:

    Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this
    site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take
    the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the
    site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience
    that this may cause.

  108. heated by PC, already is so by mrycar · · Score: 1

    My home is already heated solely by the electrics active within. Its Winter in Mi, and I have yet to turn on the heat. 72 degree at moment by PowerPC, Athlon, Sparc, Intel power.

    --
    Gator/Claria is Spyware.
  109. Well.. where does he live? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'cause it'll save him all kinds of money on his cooling bill!

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  110. How are you supposed to read? by bobbv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it looks like it would be OK to walk around it, but it's missing some basic things, such as directional lighting for reading. LED's provide narrow directional light, which is fine for washes of light (when diffused with lenses or diffusers) or small pin-spots, but the designers don't appear to have tried to create light at the scale needed for common things like sitting on the couch and reading or cooking.

    Btw, I've had my apartment stairway lit with white LED replacement bulbs from LEDTronics for 5 years (continuously! Never turned off because it's too dark to find the switches, which is why I installed the bulbs in the first place.). It's worked great, except that they've now faded to the point they no longer provide enough light to walk up the stairs with, but it's taught me that the technology isn't ready to replace all the bulbs in the house. Here's their full line of replacement bulbs:

    http://www.led.net/datasheets/25mm_medbase_index /2 5mm_med_index.htm

    1. Re:How are you supposed to read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Btw, I've had my apartment stairway lit with white LED replacement bulbs from LEDTronics for 5 years (continuously! Never turned off because it's too dark to find the switches, which is why I installed the bulbs in the first place.). It's worked great, except that they've now faded to the point they no longer provide enough light to walk up the stairs with, but it's taught me that the technology isn't ready to replace all the bulbs in the house. Here's their full line of replacement bulbs:

      I ended up using a CFB instead because for me, it wasn't that the stairway switch is hard to find, it's that it killed off regular bulbs every few months. The CFB, OTOH, lasts for a few years at a time, never gets turned off and makes it easy to find the bath in the middle of the night.

  111. Purple AND green? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
    Better hope the owners aren't Babylon 5 fans, otherwise every five years (Drazi years of course) purple and green lights will duke it out to determine which is the dominant illumination for the next five years...

    ;-)

  112. 100,000 hours by rs79 · · Score: 1

    "Dad left us a bunch of light bulbs in his will??"

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  113. LED Christmas lights by shawn.fox · · Score: 1

    While I don't think lighting up my entire house with LEDs seems very desirable, the ForeverBright LED Christmas Lights look interesting (from the NY Times article concerning the Vos Pad).

  114. Nothing really new. by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    The new part is using LEDs only.
    I use an (I think) HPWT-ML00 amber LED for gentle unobtrusive lighting of my keyboard for at least 3 years already. I used high-power green and amber LEDs as flashlights back when it wasn't mainstream yet, maybe as long as 15 years ago. Gave less light than incandescent flashlights, but it was enough to see what I needed to see (eg, where to step) and it didn't have tendency to blind me with light, leaving my peripheral night vision intact.
    It's very useful thing. If they have sufficient light output, may be good for room lighting as well. Especially because the LEDs have very long life, so they don't tend to die all the time. (And they are easy to rewire for usage of only part of the LED bank with a backup power supply, thus offering a ready way to run emergency lights on very low power in case of a blackout.)

  115. Here's what I get... It's not slashdotted at all. by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this
    site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take
    the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the
    site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience
    that this may cause.

  116. aaah the /. effect by bbowers · · Score: 0

    The slashdot effect strikes again!! MUAHAHA!

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
  117. Halogen great if you enjoy melting screens by lhaeh · · Score: 1

    LCD panels are backlit by CCFLs (Cold Cathode Florocent Lamp) Either 1 or 2 you can tell by looking at the sides of the display and seeing which sides are brighter. CCFLs are those thin ones that are used in scanners. The brightness is kept consistant with a gradual difuser on which the light(s) are mounted.

    Yes I know my spelling needs work, but florocesnt is a big word ;)

    1. Re:Halogen great if you enjoy melting screens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, halogen bulbs are used as the heat source in most laser printers' fuser assemblies. They are surrounded by light abosrbing material for added efficiency so you are unlikely to light a room with them, however.

  118. I like LED illumination. I hate light from FLOOR by haggar · · Score: 1

    The most evil, contrived, perverse idea of interior designers and architects from hell: lighting from the floor! It actually decreases visibility, and it's so annoying it would make a serial killer out of the Dalai Lama.

    --
    Sigged!
  119. I know someone with a LED basement by OYAHHH · · Score: 5, Informative

    I

    Know someone who has an LED basement.

    She has an extreme case of porphyria and she can only tolerate light in the 585+ NM wavelengths.

    BTW, 585 is exactly the wavelength of those ugly yellow street lamps you occasionally see. I think those lamps are some type of sodium vapor lamp and they are ultra efficient also.

    Since incandescants, etc. were literally cooking her from the inside out I built her an LED lamp.

    Her lamp has 50 LEDS connnected in 10 parallel circuits. I also slapped on ten switches with one master on/off switch.

    Thus, she could turn on as little as 5 or as many as 50 bulbs simultaneously.

    It works great for her. She's still very sick, but at least she has some light she can tolerate.

    LED's emit a very narrow wavelength of light. You can get them in small bulk packages at the following address:

    www.TheLEDLight.com

    That store also has a whole bunch of Super Cool LED flashlights etc.

    Also, my friend's porphyria is a really rare and strange disease which means she is akin to a vampire. She has the EP variety. Only approximately 300 more like her in the US.

    She has been stuck in her mom's basement now for two years, at the age of 34. Such a tragedy!

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
    1. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carlos: What, were they psychos, or...?
      Seth: Did they look like psychos? Is that what they looked like? They were vampires. Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are.
      Carlos: Well maybe they just had acute erythropoietic protoporphyria!

    2. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean 585+ nm. That would be nanometers, as opposed to nautical miles.

    3. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't knock the low-pressure sodium lights. Not only are they very efficient (as pointed out), but they also last a long time and don't do nearly as much damage to dark sky conditions as most other types of outdoor lighting. At the current rate of paving/lighting the planet, few people will be able to see but the brightest of stars.

    4. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Also, my friend's porphyria is a really rare and strange disease which means she is akin to a vampire. She has the EP variety. Only approximately 300 more like her in the US.

      Sounds like a wet dream for one of those goth kids.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    5. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by LuxFX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, my friend's porphyria is a really rare and strange disease which means she is akin to a vampire. She has the EP variety. Only approximately 300 more like her in the US.

      Is this different than Xeroderma Pigmentosum? That's the condition I am more familiar with. (The children in The Others are afflicted with Xeroderma Pigmentosum. There was also a very touching story on NPR several years ago about a night-camp for children with Xeroderma Pigmentosum, since they couldn't go to daycamp. That was the only time I have ever heard an NPR reporter actually break down in tears.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    6. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by warez · · Score: 1

      Sodium vapor lights in the basement? Porphyria my ass. Sounds like your friend has a clandestine hydroponic garden in her basement and she's using your LED's for fruiting. You should ask her if its really for her glaucoma. *wink* *wink*

    7. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's a nice example of tolerance and compassion, you fucktard right winger. We're trying to build a world where people aren't put down because they are different, but you jack-booted thugs want to force all the round pegs through your Republican square holes.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  120. This place looks Unreal by ctrl-alt-elite · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think of the original, coloured-lighting intensive, Unreal when they saw this? Not that it's a bad thing or anything, I'm just wondering if this is a case of life imitating art (read: computer games).

  121. Inconsistant Images by GuruHal · · Score: 1

    The demo for the color-changing in the kitchen show two different pianos reflected in the fridge - one is white and one is black. Either they have changed the decor as part of the demo or they have changed the decor to highlight the differences. It doesn't appear to be photo editted since the carpets don't seem to change color...

    Beyond that the place is unlivable. No counter space in the bathroom, an LCD over the stove (I'd hate to clean the grease splatters off that) and although I know its all for demo of the lighting the bed is centered in the bedroom (I'm sure they didn't want one wall to look dark when the bed covered the lighting).

    Interesting as a demo of the ability of these LEDs to light a living area, the practical demonstration is less than perfect. The only room that appears in reasonable color is the bedroom, and only because there is a fair amount of light coming from the blinds. I think the novelty of the various colors would wear off quickly and you'd be left with lighting that would be tacky and unpleasant. The better goal: match a real spectrum of lighting in an LED, or a cluster of LEDs: Aim for more accurate color representation and then the idea will be much more readily accepted - people already dislike the color spectrum of flourescents and this appears worse in the demo photos, even if the color adjustability is slightly cool.

    --
    "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green
  122. A MIRROR (with the images) by blixel · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:A MIRROR (with the images) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey... to cut down on the Slashdot effect, couldn't Slashdot mirror some of these url's before making the article with the url's publicly available on their site?
      Just a thought...

    2. Re:A MIRROR (with the images) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      couldn't Slashdot mirror some of these url's before making the article with the url's publicly available on their site?
      Welcome to Slashdot, you must be new here.
    3. Re:A MIRROR (with the images) by das_cookie · · Score: 1

      Have a look at the /. FAQ.

      --

      You! Yes, YOU! Out of the gene pool!

    4. Re:A MIRROR (with the images) by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Pink (or is it purple?) color scheme??? WTF are they going to do, shoot a Buck Rogers sequel in there?

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    5. Re:A MIRROR (with the images) by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1

      When is somebody going to start a collection of "There be Slashdottin'" error pages?

      --
      3. Profit!
      2. ???
      1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
    6. Re:A MIRROR (with the images) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no shit, sherlock.
      but that doesn't stop someone from personally mirroring the site for the benefit of others on slashdot.

  123. Never known narcissistic jerks with cash? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    Funny, I thought this looked EXACTLY like the apartments of all the egocentric rich phuckwads I've ever known. Form before function, price before practicality. It makes the very strong statement of "I'm a self-involved trust fund baby with no common sense." It's called the VosPAD. I in addition to being slang for apartment, "pad" is an old term for highway robbery.

    It's PERFECT.

  124. another to the list by bicho · · Score: 1

    http://www.thevospad.com/
    Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this
    site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take
    the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the
    site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience
    that this may cause.

    Now, THATS funny!

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  125. Re:Here's what I get... It's not slashdotted at al by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Okay, so it took four hours, and not just two.

  126. Compact Flouresent's die too fast by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    In my experience, the compact flouresents bulbs never match their advertised life span. They ususally die within 6 months. At the premium price, I really wonder how much of a value they are.

    1. Re:Compact Flouresent's die too fast by Spirilis · · Score: 1

      I second this. I do think they are more than worth it, though. My bedroom is lit up using a 38W spiral-shaped fluorescent (in a desk light tilted upwards and clipped to my bookshelf) which puts out the equiv of 150W. The whole room is lit up quite well, and I have no problems with eyestrain. In fact, it's perfect for this room. I will definitely continue to buy these bulbs after this one dies (this is the 2nd one I've bought, first one died after ~6-12mo like you said)

      --
      the real at&t mix
    2. Re:Compact Flouresent's die too fast by Tripster · · Score: 1

      No warranty on those bulbs?

      I bought a Panasonic that cost me like $20CAD, it's still going strong and it has a 5 year warranty.

      Next I installed this other brand in 3-packs around the house, those have 7 year warranties. The warranty is based on 4-6 hours daily average usage.

      Yours may have been early releases?

      I know with these bulbs costing me a fair bit compared to the 6/$2.50 I can get regular bulbs I'd certainly take them up on the warranty if it is offered with the product :)

    3. Re:Compact Flouresent's die too fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have certain switches in the apartment that *kill* regular bulbs (probably dirty contacts in the switch). To the annoyance level of replacing the bulb every few months if I used conventional.

      A CFB, OTOH, will work for years at a time.

      On the life-span side, I use them everywhere and find that they last at least a few years before giving up the ghost. The power-savings is a nice side-bonus. But then, I'm not buying the el-cheapo's from Wal*Mart.

  127. Been doing this for years ... by Sefert · · Score: 1

    Howdy - I belong to a non-profit group that has been doing this for years. We take solar panels, batteries to charge them, and LED lights (especially good cause they last soooo long) and we put them into remote villages in underdeveloped countries. Practical, cheap, and really really effective. We're off to Tanzania this fall! Costs for the last trip to Pakistan Per light-$4.50 Can. 7, 75-watt panels complete with frames and regulators--$6,000 Can. 7.5 amp hour battery (each)---$15 Can. 80 amp hour batteries (each)--$50 Can. Wire- negligible! Total costs---$12,000 Can. Total cost per household with 2 lights----$50 Can. Life Expectancy! Lights----30 years. Batteries-----5 years. Solar Panels---15 years. The trekkers pay for this ourselves - about a grand canadian each... You can check it out at http://www.luxtreks.com/

  128. Excellent... by LoganTeamX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, just to find a way to integrate this into my apartment without the landlord having a seizure (literally!)... hmm. There isn't much heat in our bedroom, but with a decently overclocked Barton and a stock Palomino in custom cases, we don't get cold toes ;) I wonder if the boss will let me convert from fluorescent at work...

    --
    One of the 187.
  129. another site killed by /. by MrLint · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We all know full well that the /. effect can kill all but the most well supported sites. Perhaps something radically different is in order. Perhaps an akamai like p2p fallback system.

    before a small site gets listed on /. and get obliterated into ether the maintainer could allow the site to be mirrored and then sent out to some temporary storage sites for.. oh say a few days, and then when the referrer is /. then the content can be served up by one of the ac hoc distributed mirrors?

    1. Re:another site killed by /. by MagusX · · Score: 1

      Hmm... if there was something like Bit Torrent built into the browser, then it could query a cache-ref server that would point the browser to another browser that has the document in cache. The only problem is you'd need to tell the cache-ref server what is in your cache, which could be a privacy violation.

  130. Flicker by paronomasia5 · · Score: 1

    Is there flicker with LED bulbs? If there is none, switching is very tempting.

  131. Those are NOT feasable! Use flourescent. by Pejorian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those lights are really dim, so you'd still need a lot of them to light a room.

    To give you an idea, the average 60w light bulb gives off 860 lumens. Those LEDs you linked to only give off 80! You'd need 10 of them just to get close to a 60w bulb! If each of those LEDs are $30 as you say (there are no prices on the website), that's $300 per 60w bulb!!!

    Those 15w mini-twister flourescent bulbs give off 900 lumens. They also last for 6000 hours. Seems to be the reasonable way to go for now...

    --
    - Murphy's Corollary: - It is impossible to make things foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
  132. Yes, but... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As least the glasses have lights in them! Everything's so shiny, who needs books!

    Plus, would you really want to read in that dim purple light anyway?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  133. talk about disco inferno baby by mgoodman · · Score: 1

    total 1970s retro chic...

    --
    01100111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00101110
  134. nerd cheap by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

    First off, I never said I didn't see it, I said I didn't see what was so cool, neat, and special about it. I saw it yesterday, like I said... prior to it being slashdotted.

    Being a nerd/geek has never been about being attracted to what is cheap or more cost effective. In fact, I would say quite the opposite. The rate at which the prices of X are dropping has never been a reason why X is cool to geeks.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  135. no more incandescents by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    As my "regular" light burn out, I've slowly replaced all of my incandescents with compact floresent lamps. Not for the enviromental reasons though LOL, I just hate changing light bulbs! They've come down in price that make them more afordable. The energy savings is a sideline benefit though :)

  136. One more try... by davmoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And it will probably fall on deaf ears like it has every other time I've posted a comment like this.

    This story, the resulting Slashdotting of their site, followed closely by the need to take the site down, is yet another indication that the powers that be at Slashdot need to learn the simple courtesy of *ASKING* the people behind websites like that if they want a story about them on Slashdot. Or at least allow them time to prepare for the devestation their servers are about to undergo.

    When stories about spammers and such ilk are posted, we show our feelings by Slashdotting their site, thereby either costing them tons in bandwidth charges or crashing their server.

    When stories about things we like are posted on Slashdot, we show our approval by doing the same damned thing.

    Quite frankly, I'm surprised that in this day and age of litigation-while-you-wait no one has sued Slashdot for getting their server hammered.

    I'll stop now so that the moderators among you can show your ignorance by moderating this post as "off topic" or "flame bait".

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:One more try... by volkris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it IS offtopic and arguably flame bait.

      But in the end these people have already agreed to have lots of people access their site by simply posting a public web site. They've already agreed to play the game; there's no reason to re-ask.

    2. Re:One more try... by davmoo · · Score: 1

      In most any other situation I'd have to agree with you. But I feel Slashdot is different. I know of no other site or news service that can produce the onslaught of visitors that Slashdot will. You'll notice that while we have the term "Slashdot effect", I've never once heard anyone refer to the "CNN effect", "Google effect", or "MSN effect".

      There is a difference between "lots of visitors" and "your server dies" :-)

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    3. Re:One more try... by Amorpheus_MMS · · Score: 1

      There could be a temporary /. mirror for smaller sites. Delete after 3 days or so.

    4. Re:One more try... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      As another poster said, when they went public, they gave their approval.

      Now, 99.99999% of problems are related to webservers being setup by idiots, who don't bother to set a max-user limit, and so they clog their pipes, and exhaust their memory. A minor step, and any pathetic little site, served off of a dial-up connection, could be slashdot-proof. Since these "pros" can't figure it out, they got what they deserved.

      And I bet you're the first one who criticizes websites that are misconfigured, after someone is able to break-in.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:One more try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because CNN and MSN try to keep you from going to other sites, while slashdot encourages you to go to other sites. CNN and MSN are content sites, slashdot is essentially a blog. A really, really big blog.

      Fark has the capability to take down servers too, but because they have more stories they tend to do it less often (though the photoshop contests are image host killers for sure).

      The thing is that as soon as slashdot admits that it is their responsibility to make sure sites don't get slashdotted, they have to implement a policy or they'll get sued over it. As long as they pretend it's not their problem, nobody has grounds to sue them.

    6. Re:One more try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A minor step, and any pathetic little site, served off of a dial-up connection, could be slashdot-proof.

      Let's think about this a little bit and pretend that every "non-idiot" person setting up a web server of any fashion is capable of tuning his server in such a way that it'll begin responding with a 503 when the system or network becomes loaded to the point where it's barely getting responses out. Let's even say that the dial-up connection itself is a 53kbit/s connection (a 56k modem, in the USA, is usually limited to 53k) and you've managed to get your "503 Too Busy" HTTP response down to, say, 250 bytes.

      250 bytes = 2250 bits (ultimately; most modem connections use at least 1 bit for framing), which comes to about 24 responses per second (probably 10-20 for a real-world situation). Any more, and service globally degrades for even those types of responses.

      So what makes a good slashdotting? 20 requests/second? "Slashdot-proof"? I doubt it.

      They don't have to be "idiots". More likely, they are less savvy users that do not want to spend the time learning and applying to prevent an overwhelming amount of traffic from denying traffic to all. If some professor wants to make some course material available, he can do this cheaply and simply by downloading a simple web server and running it off his PC. To say that this person is an "idiot" for approaching things this way says more about your personality than his approach, I think.

      I do agree with you, in part, though: someone putting a public-facing web site on the Internet is implicitly agreeing to accept Internet traffic. An inability to plan for and scale to levels of traffic that end up occurring simply suggests that that person is applying poor web scaling and tuning techniques to his site. His loss.

      But not everyone with a web site needs to be a web server expert. Your elitist attitude isn't really helping things here. Maybe web server software needs to apply some intelligence for novice installations, to start delivering "too busy" responses when the software detects that things really are too busy.

      f

    7. Re:One more try... by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      The FAQ talks about this in some depth, but I don't really buy its objections either. A web server front-end to a caching HTTP proxy would completely solve this problem, but there are misconceptions that nobody seems able to look past:

      1. that it violates copyright of the content owner

      If you're publishing something over HTTP, and create HTTP caching headers that permit caching, you are implicitly authorizing retransmission. A normal caching HTTP proxy certainly wouldn't be the target of copyright infringement suits even if these caching headers were absent; it's simply relaying content the way HTTP was designed. If the content author doesn't like the way that works, he should not publish his content over HTTP.

      2. that it would screw up web page advertisements or hit tracking

      Not if it was done properly. Every HTTP resource can have its own set of HTTP caching headers. Advertisements that are changing dynamically for each request should not express a willingness to be cached. That ad would be re-fetched for every visitor hitting the page. The content itself may not change, so it makes sense for that resource to be cacheable.

      The point is, these HTTP-defined policies are defined on the origin server, where the content originates. If that content carries cache-friendly HTTP headers, why not use them?

      Apache can act as a caching HTTP proxy. It can also rewrite incoming requests (and outbound HTTP headers) to masquerade one URL under its own. These systems can work together to present an HTTP cache under a different, Slashdot-controlled URL.

      If the origin server doesn't want to be cache-friendly, this solution wouldn't work, since every request would have to be made back to the origin server anyway, and they get Slashdotted just as quickly. But that's also kind of dumb of them, and they deserve what they get as a result of that policy decision.

      Or hell, if nothing else, why not post the Google cache? Google seems to deal with this issue somehow. IMO, the powers at Slashdot simply don't want to deal with this issue. Maybe it's laziness, or maybe it's corporate greed (their bandwidth at $0 or ours at $X), I don't know.

      Of course, ISP's could also stand to improve their own HTTP caching policies (transparent proxying, for example, or at least offering proxies for users to voluntarily use). AOL seems to be able to do this without causing problems for users. Why can't other ISP's?

    8. Re:One more try... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      But not everyone with a web site needs to be a web server expert.

      You're absolutely right, they certainly don't. Configuring a maximum number of users is trivial, and if they can't take such a simple, tiny step to make their server respond as it should, then they certainly shouldn't be acting as their own webmasters.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:One more try... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      I'll stop now so that the moderators among you can show your ignorance by moderating this post as "off topic" or "flame bait".

      Do I count as "ignorant" by meta-moderating the "Informative" mod as "Unfair"? :>

      A tough one to M2, really. It's an interesting point, but it's still 100% offtopic. I don't think it should be a -1, but it doesn't really deserve a +5, either. And I'm not willing to wimp out and select the "in between" M2 option.

      Besides... that LED-lit apartment was butt-ugly, anyway.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  137. This might be a little off topic... by nametaken · · Score: 1

    ...but as usual the site is slashdotted. Has anyone discussed the possiblity of slashdot mirroring all offsite links as alts? Or maybe use other OSDN sites in round-robbin, for mirroring? Aside from sites that require registration (usually high-bandwidth sites) it's a process you could pretty easily automate upon approval of an article submission.

  138. LED light is cool but the Vos Pad is silly by kobotronic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    LED lights will eventually replace fluorescents, incandescents and other traditional forms of interior illumination. There's all kinds of reasons :

    The colors are bright and pure when you want them to be, and significant progress has been made towards (simulated) full-spectrum light. The lights are cool and run on low voltage, are much more efficient than fluorescents and have very long lifetimes.

    Cost is coming down (slowly) and eventually LEDs will be reasonable replacements for ordinary lightbulbs, with similar light characteristics except for added features such as optional color control and the like.

    The Vos Pad is silly because like so many posters have pointed out, it's as uninhabitable as the star trek apartment that other guy built. Plus, it looks incredibly gay with those colors. Just an immensely complex concept piece demonstrating how not to use LED light fixtures. The Vos Pad appears dark and spooky, a movie set rather than a home. And the light beams coming from the floor will be incredibly annoying. But all this don't mean the technology itself is invalid.

    LED lit homes can conveivably be every bit as practical as ordinary types. LEDs can be fitted into whole new kinds of fixtures that wouldn't be possible to make with conventional technologies. The LEDs are so versatile they can be built into anything and arranged in any pattern or configuration imaginable. Thin panels or stripes of light could be fitted under shelves or hidden in the ceiling so as to provide advanced discrete lighting without the hassle of bulb replacement.

    As a test project a little while I ago I drew up a fancy model for a dream bathroom in a 3D program, accurately picturing discreet LED illumination with color accents and proper work surface brightness and no nasty point lightsources burning out retinas.

    The render engine used was precise enough using photon maps, global illumination and caustics, that you could get a reasonable estimate of the number of LEDs on any given spec you need to light a room properly. You can pretty much go in with a virtual light meter and measure how much light hits any given simulated surface point and add more lights until you have the desired brightness. (As a photographer I have a nice digital spot lightmeter, and was able to calibrate the model using a handful of Nichia superbright white LEDs for reference.)

    Turns out you need hundreds of LEDs to get an equivalent brightness to just a few 25 watt halogens. But if I had the cash to splash I'd definitely consider it for my new apartment!

    When in Tokyo, visit Roppongi Hills and witness the glorious displays of LED illumination in and around the plaza at the base of the skyscraper complex. There's even LED illumination in the stairways and sometimes in the trees around the plaza too.

    1. Re:LED light is cool but the Vos Pad is silly by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      LED lights will eventually replace fluorescents, incandescents and other traditional forms of interior illumination

      I seriously doubt it. Flourescents are significantly more efficient, and that alone will attract a number of environmentally conscious people. Businesses also like the lower running costs.

      I can certainly see them being used in disrete, detail lights (eg a feature lamp), but they'd never justify full house coverage.

    2. Re:LED light is cool but the Vos Pad is silly by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1

      Can anyone produce some quantitative facts about lighting and which is the most efficient.

  139. Not to mention the extra waste.... by FatSean · · Score: 0

    Replacing the LEDs every year is wastefull when the regular bulb will last many years. On top of that, I'm pretty sure enough LEDs to produce an equivilant 100w incandescant lightsource would take many more resources to produce than a traditional bulb.

    So whiloe you may save money in 3 years...it isn't really ecologically wise.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Not to mention the extra waste.... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Actually it's about 60-100 LED's per 100Watt bulb.

      When I was working for an ECM [Electronics Contract Manufacture] They cost OUR buyers about $.20 a pop...fairly high for electronic parts. But...

      An LED typically has a lifetime of 10's of thousands of hours because it is solid state. [your light bulb will be lucky to get 1000 hours under normal use] Also, Watts per Lumen is about 50-100 to one in favor of the LED! They are that much better.

      Now for our direct wired USA world the initial cost is somewhat more than the over all savings. But if you were wanting to build away from civilization or go ecofriendly, LEDs would allow you to cut the cord and use less over all juice per day. In addition, with all the different types, you could make LEDs in to any shape neccesary ... you can physically see with a lot less light if you can have it where you need it...like halls lit by track lites rather than one bulb...reading lites in back of a chair..under a counter...heat and high voltage electricity aren't an issue with LEDs they can be shaped and sealed.

    2. Re:Not to mention the extra waste.... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Replacing the LEDs every year is wastefull when the regular bulb will last many years. On top of that, I'm pretty sure enough LEDs to produce an equivilant 100w incandescant lightsource would take many more resources to produce than a traditional bulb.

      Well first of all, my numbers were off, turns out it's 99cents per two bulbs, not 99cents a piece. I was going for a net reference that people could verify, it seemed a touch high as I only spend 25cents to 50cents per bulb.

      Assuming 50 cents a piece.... you'd see a cost savings after 18 years with LEDS that are about a buck a piece, assuming you need 3 sets of 36 to equal the same light level.

      It's not about replacing LEDs every year. I don't know the lifespan of your typical LED.... nor do I know it's lifespan as soon as you start stacking them next to eachother. Resulting in a hell of alot more heat.

      As far as resources for a traditional bulb... i'll have to disassemble one and see how much can be reclaimed from one. Ya got your frosted glass, a bit of wire, filiment, base, bit of solder.

      Glass... very recyclable!
      Metal... very recylable!
      Filiment... not sure what they are using these days
      Base... not sure
      Bit o solder... very recylable.

      Uneducated guess... i'd say lightbulbs are not so bad for our enviroment, if we actually recycle them. No one I know of does, but glass is a pretty hip thing to recycle.

      LEDs... big arse chunk of plastic within gallium nitride on a silicon carbide substrate in some cases, and phosphers. Perhaps gallium arsenide is used as well.. not my field really. Their lifespan i'm sure is superior in everyway to the traditional lightbulb, but a big ass chunk of plastic i'm sure would be a pain in the tookus to recycle. Lifespan... 10/20/30 years? I don't know.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:Not to mention the extra waste.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light bulbs are not recyclable... it costs a fortune to seperate out all the components. They go strait into land fills.

      The funny thing is that people talk about the cost of putting together 36 seperate LED's into a single fixture... it would be trivial to create an IC chip with 36 LED's on the top and all the circuitry to control them all in the chip underneath. This would cost maybe a buck.

      Plug this into a standardized fixture to provide standarized power, for maybe another buck... you get a light that will last for 20 years for like $2.00 If either part breaks, then it is trivial to replace that part.

      This will reduce the light bulb load going into landfills to 1/20 the current level, while reducing power to 1/10 the current level.

  140. LED retrofits by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    A while ago I stumbled across LEDtronics...they have a wide variety of LED products, but what makes them really interesting is that they have retrofits for just about every kind of incandescent bulb out there, with ordinary threaded bases that operate on anything from 12VDC to 240VAC, and bulbs for automotive applications. They also have a cross reference that converts incandescent bulb number, bulb type, or bulb base to an LED product.

  141. MOD UP PARENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol that was the funne
    i wonder if she needs like blood transfusions all the time or something

  142. Show us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We would all love to see how your rendered dream bathroom turned out. Do you have it hosted somewhere?

    1. Re:Show us! by kobotronic · · Score: 1

      Sure. But it's 5am here so it'll have to be tomorrow. Anyone interested, drop me an email or something.

  143. Go to the alternate site... the first one says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this
    >site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take
    >the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the
    >site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause.

    Weeee.... gotta love that /. effect

  144. Re: light colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 2 types of CFBs in the apartment here... one style is a nice yellow while the other is a harsher/brighter white.

    So there is some variation in compact fluroescents.

  145. Oh great, I hope this show never goes on the air by Beek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Geek Eye for the Normal Guy

    But really, it's kind of cool. But I think I'd shoot myself if I had to live there.

  146. Future of lighting? by msimm · · Score: 1

    Not there example. The lights shown would only be appropriate as 'mood' lights or at a night club. Bright/direct light is the one important thing I didn't see an example of (although I was viewing a mirror..so..). Dont get me wrong, some of them look beautiful and remind me of Mathmos' lights as seen on thinkgeek.com and I'm glad some designers are taking a new approach to good old lighting.

    Revolution? Paaah!

    --
    Quack, quack.
  147. Apartment? What Apartment? by Viceice · · Score: 1

    "I live in my parents basement, you insensitive clod!"

    Cheers

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  148. Far out, man! by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    Oh! Sorry. Never mind.

    Thought you said slashdotters were lit up by halucinogens.

    Movealongnothingtoseehere.

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  149. All this crap for a page full of 404 errors. by jamehec · · Score: 1

    Could you email me some pix of this apartment?

    --
    This post made with the Dvorak layout.
    "Friends don't let friends use QWERTY"
  150. What did this thing get farked at the same time? by mcknation · · Score: 1

    Even the mirrors are slashdotted. I want pictures!

  151. Not for me by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    $50 for a fucking light bulb? You gotta be shitting me. Thats over a 50 year supply of incandesent lighting. The masses will wake up when light bulbs don't cost $50.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  152. LED Wavelenghts by cosyne · · Score: 1

    real LED lights (perhaps spectrally tuned to the wavelength of sunlight)
    The problem is that LEDs generaly emit particular colors. "White" LEDs involve a combination of select emitters which combine to make something which seems white (like a white pixel), but is really nothing like sunlight (which really does contain all visible wavelengths).
    The fact that LEDs are colored does work out well for brakelights and stoplights, where it's more efficient to generate red or green light in the first place than to use an incandescent bulb to make white light and then put a colored filter over it. (Tangent: yellow lights aren't generally replaced when the red and green lights are, which IIRC is because they are on for such short periods of time that any increased efficiency or lifespan doesn't balance the cost of replacing them).

  153. LEDs aren't all that efficient by Gumber · · Score: 2, Informative

    Contrary to popular understanding, LED's aren't particularly efficient when compaired to incandecent lights.

    A high-efficiency white LED puts out something like 15-20 lumens/watt. A good halogen bulb puts out ~15 lumens/watt.

    LED's seem impressively bright because they throw all their light in a fairly narrow beam.

    I believe that florescent lights are more efficient that LEDs, though that will likely change. Appearantly their will be white LEDs in production with effiencies reaching 60 lumens/watt by 2005.

    1. Re:LEDs aren't all that efficient by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I believe that florescent lights are more efficient that LEDs,

      True, but florscents haven't *really* caught-on for a reason, and that is why LEDs have the potential to really catch-on.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  154. Re:Slashdotted! Mirrors collected below! :D by Draculax · · Score: 1

    This shows how popular slashdot is :-)

  155. LAMENESS WARNING by johnty · · Score: 1

    The company obviously wasn't bright enough to handle /.

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
  156. actually... no costumes needed... by johnty · · Score: 1

    Well according to one of the previous posts, you don't need to wear anything at all?

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
  157. The Lights are Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this
    site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take
    the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the
    site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience
    that this may cause.


    Whew! I thought I didnt have my network cable seated properly for a second.

  158. No, LEDs are NOT efficient. by bani · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They might LOOK efficient, because LEDs output most of their energy in a narrow beam. But overall efficiency is not any better than an incandescent bulb. In fact LEDs are about 4 times LESS efficient than fluorescent lighting in lumens/watt.

    The current efficiency champion is high pressure sodium lighting, roughly twice as efficient as fluorescent.

    It will be a long, long, long time before LEDs replace fluorescent lighting in terms of efficiency.

  159. What was that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Mr. Marbles...?

  160. halogen-lit LCD or stinky plastic goo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, not only are they not common now, I don't predict a technology shift any time soon.

    Halogen needs to burn quite hot. The tubes in LCDs now are fluorescent or some other gas that operate without too much inefficient heat release.

    My brain image of a halogen-lit LCD the size of a CRT made me giggle and I felt really geeky.

  161. It's my contrary nature again... by KC7GR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speaking as someone who suffers from minor Seasonal Affective Disorder, I have to wonder what the value would be, outside of saving power, in lighting an entire room or home with LEDs.

    The material I've read on SAD, and my own direct experience, have shown me that both broad-spectrum (approximating daylight) and high intensity (again, approximating daylight) are important in combating the condition. We live far enough north (Puget Sound region) where the short days and extended periods of cloud cover during the winter do indeed have a noticeable affect on my moods.

    Considering that I grew up in California, which averages 328 sunny days per year, this came as no great surprise.

    What I ended up doing for our home was installing full-spectrum flourescent tubes in the flourescent fixtures, and bright halogens in my work area. Both have done wonders for my mood in the winter months.

    Unless someone has come up with a full-spectrum LED, I don't think this kind of lighting is going to see wide adoption outside of perpetually sun-drenched areas, and then only as a "Gee Whiz" item because of the high cost.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:It's my contrary nature again... by zenyu · · Score: 1

      Unless someone has come up with a full-spectrum LED, I don't think this kind of lighting is going to see wide adoption outside of perpetually sun-drenched areas, and then only as a "Gee Whiz" item because of the high cost.

      They have, sort of. The "White LED" is actually a blue LED with set of phosphors to approximate white light. Basically it's the same as those flourescent fixtures you installed. Flourescents typically emit UV light (slightly higher energy than the blue LED in white LEDs.) and then use phosphors to step it down to a series of different lower energy frequencies. This step down is what makes them a little warm, the energy lost converting ultra-violet to red is lost as heat.

      Of course, "White LED's" aren't super efficient. Stick with the flourescents for now. Also, not all white LED's are created the same, just like flourescent bulbs. There is a potential though for LEDs as full spectrum lighting, they come in many natural frequencies and combining those with a nice diffusor and maybe some phosphors to fill in the blanks could give you a relatively cheap to run "full spectrum light." LED's have advantages over flourescents, like you can change the color mixture simply, you can dim them, they are small and mechanically resilient They do have problems that we wouldn't think of off-hand, I know an architect that wanted to use some in a building and was prevented from doing so because 12 volt lamps can't be UL listed, and none of her suppliers were willing to wire 5 or more of them together and apply for the somewhat expensive UL listing. The NYC building inspector could not be convinced that a battery operated 12 volt light was perfectly safe without a UL listing.

  162. Re:Here's what I get... It's not slashdotted at al by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Text.. slashdotted.. help..

  163. Looks like Miami Vice by serutan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or any number of other tv shows featuring unrealistic and impractical lighting in pastel colors that real people would almost never want in their home/workplace. Bleah.

  164. I've actually seen that sign by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

    For a rather long time, one of the crossings by the Microsoft Campus had the warning sign "Geek Xing".

    Was gone when I looked a year ago, though.

  165. They must draw LOTS of power by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because there wasn't any juice left for their server ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  166. LED headlights by ProKras · · Score: 1

    I don't think we are that far away from other applications like automobile headlights and real replacement sources for household lighting...

    The Hyundai HCD-8, a concept car recently unveiled at the North American International Auto Show, features LED headlights. More information about the HCD-8 can be found in a Hyundai press release.

  167. Your wife is right. by -Maurice66- · · Score: 1

    This is sickly modern

  168. The first? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This company is not the first to do this, infact, a friend of mine works for a company that have done this before in London. mgx.co.uk

  169. Reminds me of a runway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'd keep my curtains closed lest some airplane mistake those cheese ball floor lights for a runway. Or, were those intended to light the path to the exit in case of fire?

  170. full text of the website by nietsch · · Score: 1

    Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause.


    Looks like they didn't like the slashdotting?

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  171. Re:Nightclubbing / They obviously have no kids... by BadElf · · Score: 1

    Very nice lighting effects, but I have to wonder what that would be like in a real home. I step on enough Legos and other painful objects on the way to the bathroom at 3:00am as it is.

  172. Actually by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the College of Education computer lab at my Uni installed exactly but they're new flourescent bulbs. The place went from feeling like a warehouse to feeling like a hospital. No flicker and half the bulbs were required to light up the place. They actually put in all the bulbs to start but it was way too bright.

    Normal flourescent bulbs suck as you describe but quite obviously not sucky versions exist. Flourescent also has the advantage of being more evenly distributed than regular bulbs.

    As for this guy's LED lighting, it'd be great for a club for mood lighting. But for a house it's way over done.

    Ben

  173. Good idea, lousy concept... by teddlesruss · · Score: 3, Insightful
    LEDs are good. The apartment is a step in the right direction, and we should congratulate the company for pioneering that. But. What a. Frightening. Unnatural. Implementation.

    I asked my other half, she wouldn't use the bathroom for all the rice in China. Point-blank no way. "How could I work out my makeup in that light?" was her first question.

    I am thinking about the kitchen. How do I get a meal looking right in those ghastly hues? How can I enjoy a steak when it will look like a Quake gib under that light?

    So while this is a noteworthy effort, it may have set the cause of LED lighting back by years... (kidding, okay? I'm pretty sure other architects and designers will see the advantages and adopt them pretty quickly...)

    Which is sad because the idea of using LEDs to light a living space (or indeed a workspace) is sorely needed in view of the air pollution that our thirst for light and convenience creates.

    I read somewhere that a 100W consumed for a year produces a cupful and a half of pollutants in that year. (I.e. collect all the pollutants and scrunch 'em together, bingo, 1 1/2 cups of waste...)

    That means that for every 100W lightbulb in your place, which stays on for an average of a quarter of a day or so, over a quarter of a cup of crap per year... The average home has seven lightbulbs, that's over two cups of pollution per house per year.

    If you could reduce the amount of power required to produce the same amount of light to around a fifth or less, you'd reduce that contribution to pollution due to light from two cups to a quarter cup.

    That has to be worth going for...

    --
    -- ted russ http://www.arach.net.au/~ted/mydynes/ http://www.arach.net.au/~ted/myblogs/
  174. If you want this yourself by slightly_kooky · · Score: 2, Informative

    The VOS pad was kitted out using the Aurora and Genius fittings from ACDC Lighting.

  175. RE: Your Engineered House by Rex Roberts by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    Apparently Aussies can download it.

  176. Another site down by knigitz · · Score: 1

    Slashdot linking is like packeting on port 80.

  177. replacing them by MadJo · · Score: 1

    Man, I wouldn't like to be the one to replace the broken leds ;)

  178. Site went down like a LED-Zeppelin ;-) by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I had to.

  179. all i need.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it needs is a brass pole, and I'll buy it!

  180. Did YOU?

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  181. OT by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    If you can't handle being Slashdot'ed keep your pussy web server off the Internet.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  182. Re: RE: Your Engineered House by Rex Roberts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have to be Australian? I didn't see anything on that page indicating that the request had to originate from an actual Australian or from a person situated currently in Australia. In fact, the copyright law he quotes to justify making putting out of print books available sounds similar to the Fair Use exception in the U.S. law that exists for libraries and archives here.

    In any case: excellent link. Thanks.

  183. Re:Nightclubbing / They obviously have no kids... by Suidae · · Score: 1

    I used to have this problem with Legos too, then I started picking them up when I'm done playing with them. I find the kids have quit running off with them now too.

  184. Your Engineered House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book in question is indeed available. Though you cannot get diamonds for free, you certainly can get this book. (Free as in beer!)

    The Australian's seem to have an intelligent way of dealing with out of print, and unavailable books that people are interested in. Give them away.
    Just follow this URL:

    http://www.soilandhealth.org/copyform.asp?bookcode =030211

    Fill out the Name and email address for a direct link to the book. (The book itself is in html) I respect their thoughtful approach to copyrights, and so, will not post the direct link myself (as they ask not to). I only ask that others do the same.

    Incidentally, if you are curious, their list of books available in such a way can be found here: http://www.soilandhealth.org/03sov/0302hsted/0302h omested.html

    Instant information. Instant enlightenment. This is the internet, the way it was meant to be.

    the_alabaster_zoroaster

  185. Saving power by flashing by pclminion · · Score: 1
    LEDs have the advantage of extremely fast action. You can pulse them tens of thousands of times per second, which is impossible with incandescent or flourescent lamps.

    LEDs are already much more efficient than other lights, but couldn't we make them even more efficient by taking advantage of the human visual system? Pulse the lights at 1000 hertz with a 50% duty cycle, and I doubt any human eye could ever tell the difference. And, you'd save half the power.

    Some people are able to perceive 60 hertz flicker, but 1000 hertz? Could this work?

  186. stop lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One interesting thing I dont think anyone has mentioned yet. In Boca Raton, FL, and surrounding areas they have begun replacing stop lights with LEDs instead of normal lights. That way they dont burn out so often (cuz you just know its gotta be a bitch to replace a light in the middle of a buisy intersection, and it slows trafic and all that stuff).

  187. ... the world's first apartment solely lit by LEDs by triso · · Score: 1

    All I can say is: "What! No Windows?" [Boom! Boom!]

  188. You should BOTH write the book by CandyMan · · Score: 1

    You should both write the book in the manner of a Socratic dialog. Anonymous Coward provides the questions, and kfg answers. After reading your exchanges in this thread, even I would buy the book for pure entertainment purposes, and I am the staunchest of urbanites (you know, of the kind that thinks the country is that place where chickens run around raw).

    --
    http://barrapunto.com/ - News for nerds, en español
  189. dream come true? by Zapraki · · Score: 0

    Wow... that place is amazing. It's like a cross between everything anyone could ever want in an apartment... ST:TNG's Ten-Forward meets the perfect disco dance party pad with a dash of techno funk. Although it's a bit too much purple, I would prefer more of a, you know, light urple.

  190. L.E.D. Desk Lamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, late, but what the heck. http://www.topdeq.com/merchants/usa/eng/look_handl er.jsp?id=C31,C53,P30186 Lamp name is 'SUI' and only $499!!

  191. 1000 hours?! by FatSean · · Score: 0

    I have light bulbs that are on minimum 8 hours a day and have been in use for at least 2 years. That's way more than 1000. Where did you get that number?

    --
    Blar.