It's supposed to work that way, but it doesn't. If we want to reverse the course on something as far along as this is we need to
Engage the media - get this to be a big topic in editorials, etc... get it in front of the general public's eyes
Get access to the analysts that are proposing this type of policy in the first place. This is hard and requires people with access to the bureaucracy. People like the ones that the **AA have bought.
I know that the EFF has some kind of presence up here, but we really need a Canadian group that can do the leg work in Ottawa. (As great as the EFF is, anything American based will be ignored.)
In Canada there are only two kinds of elected officials: The Prime Minister and everyone else. Only one of those has any power. It's always been a problem, but it's been ten times worse with this government.
He seems to have more of a clue than you. As far as risk goes, it depends upon which index the index fund is supposed to track. Similarly, a managed fund's risk will depend on the strategy of that particular fund. The only rational equity portfolio is to diversify it as much as possible. Buying a unit of an actively managed fund does not necessarily make your portfolio more diverse, they could be the exact same stocks for a certain period of time, but it does tack on management fees. I know several finance professors and their major holdings are index funds (the lower the fee the better, Vanguard funds are a favourite).
There is real science being practiced under the heading of Psychology. There is also pseudo-science people call psychology. What we really need is for a particular geeky slashdotter to track down her papers and have a look at the analysis.
Even if there's no movie out I think a Star Wars theme will provide a much larger potential market than most other MMOS. I don't think the Galaxies failure will stop anyone that was completely due to Sony and had nothing to do with it being a Star Wars themed MMORPG.
The first link that you would assume is dangerous is in fact completely benign. The reader, now less concerned, is more likely to click on the signature link right below, which logs you out. Not that bad. Still, this fails because it's all transparent to anyone who can mouseover the links. If you want to be successful you'll need to learn to mask your URIs.
From what I've read, it will be charged to every company that has sold legal music online, not the users. I also heard they're not going to bother with any small players, just the big corps (Apple, Puretracks, etc...)
Well yeah, but the point is that she's now a sleazy, corrupt EX-politician, so the situation has changed for the lobbyist.
Sleazy or not, she's wasn't a politician. She was a Director-General, part of the civil service; a bureaucrat. She's not even an appointee, order in council doesn't kick in until ADM.
Your argument has a flaw. I believe that any reasonable person would consider achieving high grades in school as a good thing. They would also consider achieving poor grades as a bad thing.
When looking at your example we have to ask: Will most reasonable people believe that being married is good and unmarried is bad? Probably not, at least not in North America.
This is about using their management authority to promote a social goal at the possible expense of sales. In the article it is a universially held goal, in your's it's that of only a segment of society.
I know that the EFF has some kind of presence up here, but we really need a Canadian group that can do the leg work in Ottawa. (As great as the EFF is, anything American based will be ignored.)
In Canada there are only two kinds of elected officials: The Prime Minister and everyone else. Only one of those has any power. It's always been a problem, but it's been ten times worse with this government.
I assume you're talking about those very important "forward this to 10 other people or you will die in seven days" e-mails. Life and death indeed.
...and give the Taleban a juicy new recruitment stream.
For the record he linked to some kind of diode array, not a flux capacitor. Way to get my hopes up megaditto.
What you really need is a flux capacitor. As an added bonus it will limit any high speed pursuits to a maximum of 88mph!
He seems to have more of a clue than you. As far as risk goes, it depends upon which index the index fund is supposed to track. Similarly, a managed fund's risk will depend on the strategy of that particular fund. The only rational equity portfolio is to diversify it as much as possible. Buying a unit of an actively managed fund does not necessarily make your portfolio more diverse, they could be the exact same stocks for a certain period of time, but it does tack on management fees. I know several finance professors and their major holdings are index funds (the lower the fee the better, Vanguard funds are a favourite).
I don't think they meant cleaning the wound. Rather, they'll do it to the blood after it's out of you.
Or
It could just shoot the **** out of the survivors. Robots are a good solution for some tasks. However, none of those tasks involve firearms.
For the love of God and all that is holy, why does every story have to be about licenses?
There is real science being practiced under the heading of Psychology. There is also pseudo-science people call psychology. What we really need is for a particular geeky slashdotter to track down her papers and have a look at the analysis.
Even if there's no movie out I think a Star Wars theme will provide a much larger potential market than most other MMOS. I don't think the Galaxies failure will stop anyone that was completely due to Sony and had nothing to do with it being a Star Wars themed MMORPG.
Interesting troll.
The first link that you would assume is dangerous is in fact completely benign. The reader, now less concerned, is more likely to click on the signature link right below, which logs you out. Not that bad. Still, this fails because it's all transparent to anyone who can mouseover the links. If you want to be successful you'll need to learn to mask your URIs.
To be fair, Nike was one of the pioneers in the Japan-South Korea-China factory moves. That said, I agree with you.
Fixed it for you. Linux won't win until linux is as useable as a mac.
From what I've read, it will be charged to every company that has sold legal music online, not the users. I also heard they're not going to bother with any small players, just the big corps (Apple, Puretracks, etc...)
Because Joss Whedon has such a great record extending venerable series. Granted, he was a writer in that case.
So will the missing option meme suddenly create a massive influx of amendments onto the Australian Senate floor?
When Hu got to first, everyone was laughing. However, when he tried to round the bases things started to get weird...
Why? Because everyone is born a child-rearing expert? I think society should be encouraging parents to seek advice, not shun them for it.
Sleazy or not, she's wasn't a politician. She was a Director-General, part of the civil service; a bureaucrat. She's not even an appointee, order in council doesn't kick in until ADM.
Don't worry too much. If that problem is the lack of an SO to be waking you up instead; it's a slashdot wide problem.
Your argument has a flaw. I believe that any reasonable person would consider achieving high grades in school as a good thing. They would also consider achieving poor grades as a bad thing.
When looking at your example we have to ask: Will most reasonable people believe that being married is good and unmarried is bad? Probably not, at least not in North America.
This is about using their management authority to promote a social goal at the possible expense of sales. In the article it is a universially held goal, in your's it's that of only a segment of society.