Determine the IP's of a DA's office. Anytime that IP accesses your website file a complaint through their office for unauthorized access. Surely someone in the DA office uses the internet.
Ok because you want faster service for your web/mmo traffic some other traffic should never get any bandwidth? More bandwidth isn't the crux of the problem even if it would solve the problem. They can throttle P2P without blocking it. Instead they decided to kill all connections.
In the end they just need to give SLA's with a minimum guaranteed bandwidth and also additional burst capability based on network load. Sure it may be something like 256Kbps guaranteed 12Mbps burst which would really make them look bad but right now if you're unable to use the connection you're effectively at 0bps and thats the same whether the network is under load or not.
Bleach and Ammonia mixed produce toxic gas (I've heard Chlorine). It's a well known thing among janitors since both are in cleaning supplies and I'm pretty sure that bleach has a warning on it saying not to mix with ammonia.
While what you said is true, its not even close to the full story.
IDS are placed on the segment but not actually physically between the two endpoints. Reactive IDS are able to change filtering rules on routers/firewalls. Granted the connection will likely already be formed, but there's nothing stopping them from placing a temporary filter for the offending IP (port as well?). They should also generate an ICMP message to say the traffic was not delivered: ICMP 3 (destination unreachable) Code 13 (Communication administratively prohibited).
Not only is sending forged RST's rude, immoral (possibly illegal?) but its also ineffective. It's possible for clients to ignore RST's and to continue to send traffic despite Comcast's efforts.
If Comcast really wanted to make a fair way to shaping traffic there is a scheme that would allow the network to remain robust. Comcast already uses "Powerboost" if your connection is idle you get some excess bandwidth to download a file quicker. Satellite providers already do something similar as well under Fair Usage Policy. So this is what Comcast needs to do: the more bandwidth you consume causes your bandwidth to go down slowly, it recovers at a certain rate as well. As long as there is bandwidth available though its all used, this is only implemented when the line is loaded.
They need to attack the problem at hand, the amount of bandwidth used, not side effects. If someone is drinking to much and you want to slow them down, you don't just say "No more rum for you" or they'll just drink tequila. You also don't say they can have 100 beers a month, because they can abuse it by drinking them all in one night.
I disagree. The public has a right to the findings. The public may want aggregate data without identifying information. The public just plain doesn't need details on individual incidents.
Or do you think whistle-blower hotlines should be a matter of public record as well?
That is simply concatenating the rar at the end of the jpg. In effect they're just adding a seperate data stream. Steganography usually encodes the data inside the media data stream itself. Whether concatenating is actually steganography is arguable.
So a site that I never heard of gets raided and I learn of a new service (Thanks!). In my anecdotal population of 1, this raid increased exposure to this kind of service.
Then they can send it with their IP, otherwise its impersonation. If I sent Comcast a letter requesting your service be cancelled in your name, that would be fraud. If I sent a letter to Comcast requesting your service be cancelled because of network abuse, thats acceptable (and they can choose whether to ignore it or not).
As long as the content is available for direct linking there's no reason to complain about this. When the market has enough entrants then you'll see google video turn into something that directly searches a bunch of video sites and links you directly to the video you want.
That said is there already some kind of aggregrator site that links directly to videos. The rate that these new video sites open up make it hard to keep track of.
There's a difference between responsible speeding and excessive speeding. You can speed and be courteous if you pass on left, proper lane changes, proper following distances and don't go at speeds so much faster then the flow of traffic that others can't safely react.
Now people like in the article and the Great grandparent... well their cars should be impounded and auctioned off to help pay medical expenses for the victims caused by that kind of behavior.
I find drivers are a good way to access a persons personality (provided they are not a new or inexperienced driver). It shows the consideration that someone pays to strangers. Obviously its a generalization thats not always true. But I'd much rather be in a business relationship with someone that waves a pedestrian to cross ahead of them then someone who cuts off another driver. Cautious drivers afraid to pull out in traffic may have trouble making hard decisions. Plus see someone get cut off and you can see how they react, do they take it in stride, do they go into a fit of roadrage? But you can't get that kind of insight into a person when it matters usually.
The military is like most jobs, it's a matter of where you are and who you're around. Profanity is not appropriate in most situations, but really what that means is its okay as long as no one complains. Remember the military also has ideas of respect (for both superiors and subordinates) and professionalism. I've seen plenty of buildings that had signs "No profanity in area". In headquarters its expected not to use profanity because high ranking people around and it'd be disrespectful and unprofessional to talk that way around them.
Ultimately it works out to it being acceptable to curse around your work section and I think thats similar with most jobs, you don't curse when management is amongst the peons and you don't curse when you're in another department. That said its a common saying of how can you handle combat if you can't handle swearwords, which helps to reinforces swearing as acceptable despite the ridiculous amount of political correctness.
Of course it already is policy, every IT dept says not to write down passwords but it still happens. The real problem is a lack of security auditing. A flawless policy is useless if its not enforced. Someone needs to go verify that there aren't sticky notes with passwords on the computer, that the drive is encrypted.
Of course "inspectors" are usually associated with bureacracy and corruption. However TSA is already built around useless bureacracy not effectiveness, so how can it hurt.
It all depends on where you are. Most highways 70-75 is usual traffic speed. It's completely reasonable to assume someone won't be travelling 70mph over that as the GP suggested. With the traffic loads on normal highways even at 100 you're not visible at a 2 second window because at that speed you're weaving in and out of traffic (obscured by other cars).
I have no problem with speeding on open highways with common courtesy (Pass on left, merge right so others can pass you if they want to go faster) but then its not possible to go 140 since you have to slow down when the guy going 80 wants to pass the guy going 70.
Yes it may be a goldmine for copyright holders but what about individual copyright holders. If I upload a legitimate video and it gets a million hits, do I have the option to flag it as my video and get a cut of profits?
Do they even notify the poster that someone has claimed copyright? Whats stopping me from claiming copyrights on some other individuals video and asking for a piece of profits. I'm curious what kind of hoops someone has to go through to verify they are the copyright owner? If its to hard they my find themselves opened up to lawsuits from individual copyright holders under the premise of they do content filtering for NBC but they don't do filtering for Joe Blow's video.
3GB an hour is way overboard. You can get decent quality with 500MB an hour on moving scenes. Scenes like a security camera I bet can be encoded to under 50MB an hour (possibly lower if no traffic) just based on having a still background and periods of no movement. It's more an issue of having the correct encoding scheme for what you're doing, and having enough processor power to handle it.
But your premise is still correct, video archiving is out of the reach of most.
I doubt I'm the first person to come up with this, but I've been saying for years that the ballot should be a list of names and a list of offices with blanks by them, in random order. You write in the name you want next to the office you want them for. Thus, without having to invalidate a single ballot you insure that all the votes that "count" come from people who at least have the wherewithal to know who is running for what. yea the one guy that stumbled on big media publicity wins every office even if he was just running for school board.
I suspect government travel will be exempt from this. If you have orders to go somewhere and you're on the no-fly list, I think the unit is really going to ask some questions. If the no-fly list is accurate you'll find yourself out of a job. If it's not, well Uncle Sam has enough pull with TSA I think.
Perhaps there is a genetic advantage to believing in a god. Less likely to be burned at the stake.
This research scares me in one aspect. What if a cultleader adopts this for followers, forcing them all to wear these helmets with a remote control. I suppose since it shows the individual their god, he must have already converted them, but it could really induce some fanaticism.
Also what happens if this effect is induced on an atheist? Do they feel the presence of the flying spaghetti monster? Do they get a feeling of empowerment? Maybe they sense the strings all around them (string theory)?
While that may be true right now, it won't be in future. Any kind of civilization that needs money in space is capable of colonization. Any colony would require constant upkeep of supplies. Any leftover fuel you don't burn can be sold at the first place you stop. Realistically the true currency of space for a long time would be straight up resources that are unavailable off earth.
Most likely forensics labs will begin to require taking multiple samples from multiple areas depending on the DNA evidence found. If you left blood at the scene of the crime, why take DNA from your cheek if there's a chance the criminal is a Chimera or a bone marrow transplantee. The problem isn't false negatives for the reason you said. Suppose stem cells are harvested and the same batch is used on a dozen different people. The blood you find at scene doesn't identify a single person. Forensics will label it as a match with 99.99% confidence, however that model is based on conventional ideas of people not sharing the same DNA.
Though the defense should know enough to bring up this in trial since the defendant should know he's had a marrow transplant.
Which is exactly the point, the govt doesn't spend that on immigrants. The government spends a ton of children and college students. Its a huge money sink for the government until they finally start producing. When an Indian student comes with an undergraduate degree and decides to stay, its a boon. They pay pennies on the dollar to get an educated person.
Yes but is it cheaper to subsidize a foreign student through grad school then to fund a child from K-12, undergrad, grad school and all the children services. If it costs X to provide someone with grad school, and 4x to provide all the child services and undergrad education, it becomes cheaper to train foreign students if only 20% of them decide to stay in US. We spend less to get highly educated person, so why worry bout the ones that go home and help their countries.
Think of it as a means to get educated immigrants, which is a good thing. Worry more about the immigrants that will never be a gain to US, unskilled, uneducated and a drain on social services.
Slashdot Mirror
Determine the IP's of a DA's office. Anytime that IP accesses your website file a complaint through their office for unauthorized access. Surely someone in the DA office uses the internet.
Ok because you want faster service for your web/mmo traffic some other traffic should never get any bandwidth? More bandwidth isn't the crux of the problem even if it would solve the problem. They can throttle P2P without blocking it. Instead they decided to kill all connections.
In the end they just need to give SLA's with a minimum guaranteed bandwidth and also additional burst capability based on network load. Sure it may be something like 256Kbps guaranteed 12Mbps burst which would really make them look bad but right now if you're unable to use the connection you're effectively at 0bps and thats the same whether the network is under load or not.
Bleach and Ammonia mixed produce toxic gas (I've heard Chlorine). It's a well known thing among janitors since both are in cleaning supplies and I'm pretty sure that bleach has a warning on it saying not to mix with ammonia.
While what you said is true, its not even close to the full story.
IDS are placed on the segment but not actually physically between the two endpoints. Reactive IDS are able to change filtering rules on routers/firewalls. Granted the connection will likely already be formed, but there's nothing stopping them from placing a temporary filter for the offending IP (port as well?). They should also generate an ICMP message to say the traffic was not delivered: ICMP 3 (destination unreachable) Code 13 (Communication administratively prohibited).
Not only is sending forged RST's rude, immoral (possibly illegal?) but its also ineffective. It's possible for clients to ignore RST's and to continue to send traffic despite Comcast's efforts.
If Comcast really wanted to make a fair way to shaping traffic there is a scheme that would allow the network to remain robust. Comcast already uses "Powerboost" if your connection is idle you get some excess bandwidth to download a file quicker. Satellite providers already do something similar as well under Fair Usage Policy. So this is what Comcast needs to do: the more bandwidth you consume causes your bandwidth to go down slowly, it recovers at a certain rate as well. As long as there is bandwidth available though its all used, this is only implemented when the line is loaded.
They need to attack the problem at hand, the amount of bandwidth used, not side effects. If someone is drinking to much and you want to slow them down, you don't just say "No more rum for you" or they'll just drink tequila. You also don't say they can have 100 beers a month, because they can abuse it by drinking them all in one night.
I disagree. The public has a right to the findings. The public may want aggregate data without identifying information. The public just plain doesn't need details on individual incidents.
Or do you think whistle-blower hotlines should be a matter of public record as well?
That is simply concatenating the rar at the end of the jpg. In effect they're just adding a seperate data stream. Steganography usually encodes the data inside the media data stream itself. Whether concatenating is actually steganography is arguable.
So a site that I never heard of gets raided and I learn of a new service (Thanks!). In my anecdotal population of 1, this raid increased exposure to this kind of service.
Then they can send it with their IP, otherwise its impersonation. If I sent Comcast a letter requesting your service be cancelled in your name, that would be fraud. If I sent a letter to Comcast requesting your service be cancelled because of network abuse, thats acceptable (and they can choose whether to ignore it or not).
As long as the content is available for direct linking there's no reason to complain about this. When the market has enough entrants then you'll see google video turn into something that directly searches a bunch of video sites and links you directly to the video you want.
That said is there already some kind of aggregrator site that links directly to videos. The rate that these new video sites open up make it hard to keep track of.
There's a difference between responsible speeding and excessive speeding. You can speed and be courteous if you pass on left, proper lane changes, proper following distances and don't go at speeds so much faster then the flow of traffic that others can't safely react.
Now people like in the article and the Great grandparent... well their cars should be impounded and auctioned off to help pay medical expenses for the victims caused by that kind of behavior.
I find drivers are a good way to access a persons personality (provided they are not a new or inexperienced driver). It shows the consideration that someone pays to strangers. Obviously its a generalization thats not always true. But I'd much rather be in a business relationship with someone that waves a pedestrian to cross ahead of them then someone who cuts off another driver. Cautious drivers afraid to pull out in traffic may have trouble making hard decisions. Plus see someone get cut off and you can see how they react, do they take it in stride, do they go into a fit of roadrage? But you can't get that kind of insight into a person when it matters usually.
This could further be abused by frightening the victim to defend themself. Murder by police proxy.
Imagine this being followed by a call to the target: Yo Johnny, I hear you been banging my boys hoe. We're coming to kick your ass.*click*
Or whatever gang speak sounds like now adays.
The military is like most jobs, it's a matter of where you are and who you're around. Profanity is not appropriate in most situations, but really what that means is its okay as long as no one complains. Remember the military also has ideas of respect (for both superiors and subordinates) and professionalism. I've seen plenty of buildings that had signs "No profanity in area". In headquarters its expected not to use profanity because high ranking people around and it'd be disrespectful and unprofessional to talk that way around them.
Ultimately it works out to it being acceptable to curse around your work section and I think thats similar with most jobs, you don't curse when management is amongst the peons and you don't curse when you're in another department. That said its a common saying of how can you handle combat if you can't handle swearwords, which helps to reinforces swearing as acceptable despite the ridiculous amount of political correctness.
Of course it already is policy, every IT dept says not to write down passwords but it still happens. The real problem is a lack of security auditing. A flawless policy is useless if its not enforced. Someone needs to go verify that there aren't sticky notes with passwords on the computer, that the drive is encrypted.
Of course "inspectors" are usually associated with bureacracy and corruption. However TSA is already built around useless bureacracy not effectiveness, so how can it hurt.
It all depends on where you are. Most highways 70-75 is usual traffic speed. It's completely reasonable to assume someone won't be travelling 70mph over that as the GP suggested. With the traffic loads on normal highways even at 100 you're not visible at a 2 second window because at that speed you're weaving in and out of traffic (obscured by other cars).
I have no problem with speeding on open highways with common courtesy (Pass on left, merge right so others can pass you if they want to go faster) but then its not possible to go 140 since you have to slow down when the guy going 80 wants to pass the guy going 70.
Yes it may be a goldmine for copyright holders but what about individual copyright holders. If I upload a legitimate video and it gets a million hits, do I have the option to flag it as my video and get a cut of profits?
Do they even notify the poster that someone has claimed copyright? Whats stopping me from claiming copyrights on some other individuals video and asking for a piece of profits. I'm curious what kind of hoops someone has to go through to verify they are the copyright owner? If its to hard they my find themselves opened up to lawsuits from individual copyright holders under the premise of they do content filtering for NBC but they don't do filtering for Joe Blow's video.
But these aren't DMCA takedowns. There's no such thing as a DMCA cut-me-in-on-profits.
3GB an hour is way overboard. You can get decent quality with 500MB an hour on moving scenes. Scenes like a security camera I bet can be encoded to under 50MB an hour (possibly lower if no traffic) just based on having a still background and periods of no movement. It's more an issue of having the correct encoding scheme for what you're doing, and having enough processor power to handle it.
But your premise is still correct, video archiving is out of the reach of most.
I suspect government travel will be exempt from this. If you have orders to go somewhere and you're on the no-fly list, I think the unit is really going to ask some questions. If the no-fly list is accurate you'll find yourself out of a job. If it's not, well Uncle Sam has enough pull with TSA I think.
Perhaps there is a genetic advantage to believing in a god. Less likely to be burned at the stake.
This research scares me in one aspect. What if a cultleader adopts this for followers, forcing them all to wear these helmets with a remote control. I suppose since it shows the individual their god, he must have already converted them, but it could really induce some fanaticism.
Also what happens if this effect is induced on an atheist? Do they feel the presence of the flying spaghetti monster? Do they get a feeling of empowerment? Maybe they sense the strings all around them (string theory)?
While that may be true right now, it won't be in future. Any kind of civilization that needs money in space is capable of colonization. Any colony would require constant upkeep of supplies. Any leftover fuel you don't burn can be sold at the first place you stop. Realistically the true currency of space for a long time would be straight up resources that are unavailable off earth.
Though the defense should know enough to bring up this in trial since the defendant should know he's had a marrow transplant.
Rip the song "Don't download this song" (or other song with a message) and fax the hex dump of it. One byte per page.
Which is exactly the point, the govt doesn't spend that on immigrants. The government spends a ton of children and college students. Its a huge money sink for the government until they finally start producing. When an Indian student comes with an undergraduate degree and decides to stay, its a boon. They pay pennies on the dollar to get an educated person.
Yes but is it cheaper to subsidize a foreign student through grad school then to fund a child from K-12, undergrad, grad school and all the children services. If it costs X to provide someone with grad school, and 4x to provide all the child services and undergrad education, it becomes cheaper to train foreign students if only 20% of them decide to stay in US. We spend less to get highly educated person, so why worry bout the ones that go home and help their countries.
Think of it as a means to get educated immigrants, which is a good thing. Worry more about the immigrants that will never be a gain to US, unskilled, uneducated and a drain on social services.